25 5 care pathways for common 5 infectious...

2
Care pathways for common infectious diseases H Grant Stiver MD FRCPC 1 , Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia and Vancouver Hospital and Health Sciences Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia John M Conly MD FRCPC 1 , University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario C are pathways and maps are attractive strategies for deal- ing with various medical conditions because they can be formulated by experts, are algorithmic in nature, are easy to use by busy physicians, and facilitate the practice of an opti- mal standard of care (1-3). Although infectious diseases rank as one of the most common types of illnesses encountered, few detailed care pathways have been produced or published. In this supplement, care pathways for several relatively common infections are presented. In many conditions, parenteral anti- biotic regimens may be required, and these regimens can be administered on an outpatient basis in many cases. Outpa- tient intravenous antibiotic therapy, administered through a local hospital emergency room, at a daycare facility or in the patient’s residence, has long been shown to be as safe and ef- ficacious as parenteral therapy administered in hospital, is considerably less expensive per se and allows greater efficiency in the use of hospital beds, making beds available for other pa- tients (4). It has become a common treatment modality for pa- tients with certain acute and chronic infectious diseases (5). In other cases, oral antibiotics may be equally efficacious, available at less cost and more convenient for the patient. Oral agents are often used as a stepdown therapy after acute symp- toms have been controlled with parenteral therapy (6). A deci- sion to use oral therapy depends on the pharmacological characteristics of the antibiotic, ie, it must have sufficient bioavailability and dose tolerability to support adequately high serum and tissue concentrations, and the patient must be com- pliant in taking the oral medications. Theoretically, if these conditions are met and careful follow-up is assured, even though the infections may manifest acute symptoms, oral ther- apy constitutes an efficacious regimen, and from a purely bac- teriological point of view, there is no absolute requirement for intravenous antibiotic administration. In most ‘real life’ clinical settings, however, the severity of the patient’s illness determines whether intravenous or oral therapy is begun. Acute streptococ- cal cellulitis is a good example of this. In this situation, one may have an uncomplicated focal limb infection with a very susceptible organism that is pharmacologically amenable to serum levels that can be obtained with oral antibiotics such as cephalexin or clindamycin. However, intravenous therapy is often started initially because the patient’s host response makes him or her appear very sick. In patients with endocardi- tis, there are dose limitations for most oral regimens and very little clinical data on their efficacy; in these cases, the intrave- nous route is preferred for a different reason. Most care path- ways presented in this issue provide an intravenous-to-oral switch strategy when the infection is well under control and alternate recommendations for beta-lactam allergic patients. Management strategies for infectious diseases do undergo changes with the advent of newer antimicrobial agents and with the need to keep pace with the fundamental changes in medical care delivery that are occurring across the country. The following articles present care pathways, including rec- ommendations for antimicrobial therapy for bacterial endocar- ditis (pages 4D-10D), acute cellulitis (pages 11D-14D), diabetic foot infection (pages 15D-21D), community-acquired pneumo- nia (pages 22D-26D), febrile neutropenia (pages 27D-33D), and septic arthritis and osteomyelitis (pages 34D-40D). These pathways should be viewed as guidelines to assist individuals in developing policies and standards of care for the populations that they serve within their own regions and jurisdictions. REFERENCES 1. Ellis BW, Johnson S. The care pathway: a tool to enhance clinical governance. Clin Perform Qual Health Care 1999;7:134-44. 2. Kelly CS, Andersen CL, Pestian JP, et al. Improved outcomes for hospitalized asthmatic children using a clinical pathway. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2000;84:509-16. 3. Marie TJ, Lau CY, Wheeler SL, et al. A controlled trial of a critical pathway for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. JAMA 2000;283:749-55. 4. Stiver HG, Telford GO, Mossey JM, et al. Intravenous antibiotic therapy at home. Ann Intern Med 1978;89:690-3. 5. Tice AD. Handbook of Outpatient Parenteral Therapy. New York: Scientific American Inc, 1997:122. 6. Lew DP, Waldvogel FA. Osteomelitis. N Engl J Med 1997;336:999-1007. Can J Infect Dis Vol 11 Suppl D November/December 2000 3D EDITORIAL 1

Upload: dinhtuyen

Post on 26-Sep-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Care pathways for commoninfectious diseases

H Grant Stiver MD FRCPC1, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia

and Vancouver Hospital and Health Sciences Centre, Vancouver, British ColumbiaJohn M Conly MD FRCPC

1, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario

Care pathways and maps are attractive strategies for deal-

ing with various medical conditions because they can be

formulated by experts, are algorithmic in nature, are easy to

use by busy physicians, and facilitate the practice of an opti-

mal standard of care (1-3). Although infectious diseases rank

as one of the most common types of illnesses encountered, few

detailed care pathways have been produced or published. In

this supplement, care pathways for several relatively common

infections are presented. In many conditions, parenteral anti-

biotic regimens may be required, and these regimens can be

administered on an outpatient basis in many cases. Outpa-

tient intravenous antibiotic therapy, administered through a

local hospital emergency room, at a daycare facility or in the

patient’s residence, has long been shown to be as safe and ef-

ficacious as parenteral therapy administered in hospital, is

considerably less expensive per se and allows greater efficiency

in the use of hospital beds, making beds available for other pa-

tients (4). It has become a common treatment modality for pa-

tients with certain acute and chronic infectious diseases (5).

In other cases, oral antibiotics may be equally efficacious,

available at less cost and more convenient for the patient. Oral

agents are often used as a stepdown therapy after acute symp-

toms have been controlled with parenteral therapy (6). A deci-

sion to use oral therapy depends on the pharmacological

characteristics of the antibiotic, ie, it must have sufficient

bioavailability and dose tolerability to support adequately high

serum and tissue concentrations, and the patient must be com-

pliant in taking the oral medications. Theoretically, if these

conditions are met and careful follow-up is assured, even

though the infections may manifest acute symptoms, oral ther-

apy constitutes an efficacious regimen, and from a purely bac-

teriological point of view, there is no absolute requirement for

intravenous antibiotic administration. In most ‘real life’ clinical

settings, however, the severity of the patient’s illness determines

whether intravenous or oral therapy is begun. Acute streptococ-

cal cellulitis is a good example of this. In this situation, one

may have an uncomplicated focal limb infection with a very

susceptible organism that is pharmacologically amenable to

serum levels that can be obtained with oral antibiotics such as

cephalexin or clindamycin. However, intravenous therapy is

often started initially because the patient’s host response

makes him or her appear very sick. In patients with endocardi-

tis, there are dose limitations for most oral regimens and very

little clinical data on their efficacy; in these cases, the intrave-

nous route is preferred for a different reason. Most care path-

ways presented in this issue provide an intravenous-to-oral

switch strategy when the infection is well under control and

alternate recommendations for beta-lactam allergic patients.

Management strategies for infectious diseases do undergo

changes with the advent of newer antimicrobial agents and

with the need to keep pace with the fundamental changes in

medical care delivery that are occurring across the country.

The following articles present care pathways, including rec-

ommendations for antimicrobial therapy for bacterial endocar-

ditis (pages 4D-10D), acute cellulitis (pages 11D-14D), diabetic

foot infection (pages 15D-21D), community-acquired pneumo-

nia (pages 22D-26D), febrile neutropenia (pages 27D-33D),

and septic arthritis and osteomyelitis (pages 34D-40D). These

pathways should be viewed as guidelines to assist individuals

in developing policies and standards of care for the populations

that they serve within their own regions and jurisdictions.

REFERENCES

1. Ellis BW, Johnson S. The care pathway: a tool to enhance clinicalgovernance. Clin Perform Qual Health Care 1999;7:134-44.

2. Kelly CS, Andersen CL, Pestian JP, et al. Improved outcomes forhospitalized asthmatic children using a clinical pathway.Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2000;84:509-16.

3. Marie TJ, Lau CY, Wheeler SL, et al. A controlled trial of a criticalpathway for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.JAMA 2000;283:749-55.

4. Stiver HG, Telford GO, Mossey JM, et al. Intravenous antibiotictherapy at home. Ann Intern Med 1978;89:690-3.

5. Tice AD. Handbook of Outpatient Parenteral Therapy. New York:Scientific American Inc, 1997:122.

6. Lew DP, Waldvogel FA. Osteomelitis. N Engl J Med1997;336:999-1007.

Can J Infect Dis Vol 11 Suppl D November/December 2000 3D

EDITORIAL

1

G:...stivered.vpMon Dec 18 15:46:43 2000

Color profile: DisabledComposite Default screen

0

5

25

75

95

100

0

5

25

75

95

100

0

5

25

75

95

100

0

5

25

75

95

100

Submit your manuscripts athttp://www.hindawi.com

Stem CellsInternational

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

MEDIATORSINFLAMMATION

of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Behavioural Neurology

EndocrinologyInternational Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Disease Markers

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

BioMed Research International

OncologyJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

PPAR Research

The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Immunology ResearchHindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Journal of

ObesityJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine

OphthalmologyJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Diabetes ResearchJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Research and TreatmentAIDS

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Gastroenterology Research and Practice

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Parkinson’s Disease

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Volume 2014Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com