2018 sewer collection master plan update - logan, utah collection master plan... · 2020-02-06 ·...
TRANSCRIPT
Prepared By:
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. 1047 South 100 West, Suite 180 Logan, UT 84321
Prepared For:
Logan City Corporation. 255 N Main Street Logan, UT 84321
2018 Sewer Collection Master Plan Update
June 2015
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City P a g e | iii Sewer Collection System Master Plan
CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... viii
1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 2
1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................... 2
1.2 Project Tasks ................................................................................................................................. 4
1.3 Master Plan Purpose ..................................................................................................................... 4
2 DATA COLLECTION ................................................................................................................................ 6
2.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 6
2.2 Existing System Mapping .............................................................................................................. 6
2.2.1 System Connectivity .............................................................................................................. 6
2.2.2 Sewer Cleanouts ................................................................................................................... 7
2.2.3 Lift Station Information ......................................................................................................... 7
2.2.4 Reverse Grade Pipes ............................................................................................................. 7
2.2.5 Flow Routing Adjustments .................................................................................................... 9
2.2.6 Drop manholes .................................................................................................................... 10
2.2.7 Pipe Diameter Adjustments ................................................................................................ 10
2.3 Sanitary Sewer Flows .................................................................................................................. 10
2.4 Total Flows .................................................................................................................................. 10
2.4.1 Infiltration ........................................................................................................................... 11
2.4.2 Inflow .................................................................................................................................. 12
2.5 Summer Flow Data Collection ..................................................................................................... 14
2.5.1 Summer Meter Schedule .................................................................................................... 14
2.5.2 Summer Meter Equipment ................................................................................................. 14
2.5.3 Summer Meter Locations .................................................................................................... 15
2.5.4 Summer Flow Data Evaluation ............................................................................................ 17
3 EXISTING SYSTEM ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................... 18
3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 18
3.2 Collection System Regulatory Requirements .............................................................................. 18
3.3 Development Requirements ....................................................................................................... 18
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City P a g e | iv Sewer Collection System Master Plan
3.4 Model Development and Assumptions ...................................................................................... 19
3.4.1 Collection System Geometry Assumptions ......................................................................... 19
3.4.2 Flow Input Location Assumptions ....................................................................................... 19
3.4.3 Sanitary Flow Assumptions ................................................................................................. 20
3.4.4 Pump Parameter Assumptions ........................................................................................... 20
3.4.5 Diurnal Curves Assumptions ............................................................................................... 20
3.4.6 Infiltration Assumptions ...................................................................................................... 23
3.4.7 Inflow .................................................................................................................................. 24
3.4.8 Flows from Others and Large Water Users ......................................................................... 24
3.5 Cost Estimating Assumptions ...................................................................................................... 25
3.6 Model Calibration ....................................................................................................................... 26
3.7 Existing System Evaluation .......................................................................................................... 27
3.7.1 Depth of Flow over Diameter of Pipe (d/D) ........................................................................ 27
3.7.2 Reserve Capacity ................................................................................................................. 28
3.7.3 Hydraulic Grade Line Profile Evaluation ............................................................................. 29
3.7.4 Condition Analysis ............................................................................................................... 29
3.7.5 Lift Station Analysis ............................................................................................................. 30
3.8 Existing System Improvements ................................................................................................... 30
3.8.1 Capacity Improvements ...................................................................................................... 30
3.8.2 Condition Improvements .................................................................................................... 33
3.8.3 Lift Station Improvements .................................................................................................. 34
3.8.4 Summary of Existing Improvements ................................................................................... 34
4 MASTER PLAN & RELIEF ALTERNATIVES ............................................................................................. 35
4.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 35
4.2 Key Assumptions for Future Models ........................................................................................... 35
4.3 Creation of Future Models .......................................................................................................... 37
4.3.1 Future Lift Station Placement ............................................................................................. 38
4.3.2 Future Flow Generation ...................................................................................................... 38
4.4 2020 Evaluation and Results ....................................................................................................... 38
4.5 2025 Evaluation and Results ....................................................................................................... 40
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City P a g e | v Sewer Collection System Master Plan
4.6 Buildout Evaluation and Results ................................................................................................. 43
5 PRIORITIZED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS (CIP) ...................................................................... 46
6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................................... 49
7 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................................ 53
TABLES
Table 1-1: Logan City Growth Table .............................................................................................................. 2
Table 1-2: Time Frames Analyzed ................................................................................................................. 3
Table 2-1: Reverse Grade Slope Summary Table, S < 0.4 ............................................................................. 8
Table 2-2: Temporary Flow Meters............................................................................................................. 16
Table 3-1: Diurnal Curve Assignments ........................................................................................................ 22
Table 3-2: Infiltration Rates ........................................................................................................................ 24
Table 3-3: Existing System Capacity Improvements ................................................................................... 32
Table 3-4: Existing System Condition Improvements ................................................................................. 33
Table 4-1: Future Time Frames Analyzed ................................................................................................... 35
Table 4-2: Future Pipe Design Parameters ................................................................................................. 37
Table 4-3: 2020 Capacity Improvements .................................................................................................... 40
Table 4-4: 2025 Capacity Improvements .................................................................................................... 42
Table 4-5: Build Out Capacity Improvements ............................................................................................. 44
Table 5-1: Existing System CIP Summary .................................................................................................... 46
Table 5-2: Future System CIP Summary ...................................................................................................... 48
GRAPHS
Graph 2-1: Wintertime Sewer Flows........................................................................................................... 11
Graph 2-2: Summertime Sewer Flows ........................................................................................................ 12
Graph 2-3: Summertime Sewer Flows and Precipitation............................................................................ 13
Graph 3-1: Diurnal Curves ........................................................................................................................... 21
Graph 3-2: Example Calibration Flow Graph .............................................................................................. 26
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City P a g e | vi Sewer Collection System Master Plan
DIAGRAMS
Diagram 3-1: Pipe Flow Less than Half Full ................................................................................................. 27
Diagram 3-2: Negative Reserve Capacity Illustration ................................................................................. 28
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A – REPORT FIGURES (Large maps bound separate from this report)
Figure 1 - Existing Collection System
Figure 2 - Flow Meter Locations
Figure 3 - Diurnal Curve Pattern Assignments
Figure 4 - Infiltration Rates
Figure 5 - Existing Depth over Diameter
Figure 6 - Existing Reserve Capacity
Figure 7 - Existing Peak Velocities
Figure 8 - Existing System Improvements
Figure 9 - Projected Growth
Figure 10 - 2020 Depth over Diameter
Figure 11 - 2020 Reserve Capacity
Figure 12 - 2020 Improvements
Figure 13 - 2025 Depth over Diameter
Figure 14 - 2025 Reserve Capacity
Figure 15 - 2025 Improvements
Figure 16 - Build Out Depth over Diameter
Figure 17 - Build Out Reserve Capacity
Figure 18 - Build Out Improvements
Figure 19 - Build Out System
APPENDIX B – TEMPORARY FLOW METER GRAPHS
Flow versus Time Graphs
Depth and Velocity versus Time Graphs
Velocity versus Level Scatter Plots
APPENDIX C – TEMPORARY FLOW METER SITE NOTES
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City P a g e | vii Sewer Collection System Master Plan
APPENDIX D – GRAPHS OF FLOWS FROM CONTRIBUTING CITIES
APPENDIX E – UNIT PRICE COSTS SUMMARY TABLE
APPENDIX F – MODEL CALIBRATION GRAPHS
APPENDIX G – CALIBRATION NOTES TABLE
APPENDIX H – BUILD OUT LOCATIONS TO MONITOR
APPENDIX I – SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT DIAGRAMS
APPENDIX J – PROJECTED POPULATIONS OF CONTRIBUTING COMMUNITIES
APPENDIX K – COMPUTER MODEL UPDATE PROCEDURE
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City P a g e | viii Sewer Collection System Master Plan
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Background
Logan City hired J-U-B Engineers Inc. (J-U-B) to complete a sewer collection system master plan. The
main purpose of the master plan is to provide a planning document and tools that help Logan City meet
its existing and future sewer collection needs. The primary tool is a computer hydraulic sewer model
that is built based on Geographic Information System (GIS) data provided by the City.
Avoiding the overloading of existing sewer pipes from new development or re-development is of major
importance. Re-development can significantly change peak flows in collection pipes near the re-
developed area. The sewer model created for this plan is detailed enough to allow each proposed
development or re-development to be evaluated to verify its potential impact on the system. Every
mapped pipe (with the exception of some dead end pipes that do not have manholes at the upstream
end) is modeled to allow for capacity checks of the pipes in these types of situations.
Master Plan Goals
• Create a detailed calibrated model that is efficient to operate and update
• Identify existing system capacity and condition deficiencies
• Identify future system deficiencies
• Master plan a conceptual collection system to serve undeveloped areas
• Provide a prioritized list of capital improvement projects needed now and for years 2020, 2025,
and build out
This master plan combined with the Logan City 2015 Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP) complies
with the requirements of the Utah Division of Water Quality’s Utah Sewer Management Program
(USMP) including the System Evaluation and Capacity Assurance Plan (SECAP) requirements. The
program is authorized under State of Utah Administrative Code R317-801.
Conclusions and Recommendations
Existing System Geometry - There are some pipe invert elevations and other system geometry data that
still need to be updated.
Update the City GIS data to include some new manhole inverts that were added as noted in the model.
In the future, the GIS data will always be the parent data and the model will be updated based on the
latest GIS data. Continue to identify and update corrections for the system GIS files and then update the
model.
System Infiltration - The total approximate base flow recorded at the treatment lagoons during winter
months is approximately 3,750 gallons per minute (GPM) based on the flows recorded during the very
early morning hours of winter days. The base flow during the summer is approximately 7,750 GPM. It is
probable that a large portion of the base flow comes from groundwater infiltration with some flow
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City P a g e | ix Sewer Collection System Master Plan
being sanitary flow produced mainly by industrial users that operate during early morning hours. A very
large portion of the infiltration comes from the island area.
Implement more flow monitoring in the island area during the summer months to identify more specific
sources of infiltration. This will lead to more effective efforts to reduce the infiltration.
Implement infiltration reduction methods, such as sealing open pipe joints. An ongoing fund needs to
be included in the budget to implement this maintenance program. This program will result in sewer
treatment savings if I&I is successfully reduced.
System Inflow - Small amounts of inflow were observed as a result of some small rain events recorded
while gathering flow data for this master plan. Infiltration is a much larger flow contributor to the
system then inflow from small rain events.
Collect flow data during large rain events for an accurate evaluation of the impacts of inflow on the
system.
Existing Pipes Near Capacity - Some existing pipes appear to be approaching capacity in the model (See
Figures 5 and 6).
As development occurs, the existing d/D and reserve capacity figures should be referenced to determine
where areas of concern may be. The model should also be updated to reflect new flow conditions as
new routing or new development happens.
Existing Poor Condition Areas - Some pipes in the existing system are known to be problem areas or
pipes that are deteriorated (See Figure 8). These pipes are listed in the report in Table 3-3 with the
estimated replacement costs.
Repair or replace the listed pipes. The condition of the existing pipe located in 400 North from 700 East
to Main Street is of particular concern and should be repaired/replaced as soon as possible.
Existing Over Capacity Areas - Some small isolated pipes in the existing system are over capacity at peak
flow times (See Figure 8).
Design and build the improvements listed in Table 3-4 of the report to add additional capacity as soon as
possible. The improvements are listed in order of priority.
Existing Lift Stations – New pumps will be needed at the existing lift station at the airport in the next
few years. Improvements are currently being made to the Providence lift station by city staff. New
pumps will need to be added to the West Regional Lift Station in the year 2025.
Install two pumps at the Airport lift station. Continue to monitor the existing lift stations and upgrade as
needed. Plan to add two new pumps to the West Regional Lift Station in the year 2025.
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City P a g e | x Sewer Collection System Master Plan
Future Areas Near Capacity - Some additional pipes appear to be approaching capacity in the model at
the Build Out time frame (See table in Appendix H).
Continue to maintain and update the model in order to manage future capacity issues.
Future Over Capacity Areas - There are some areas in the existing system that will exceed capacity in
the future based on the assumed growth projections.
Begin plans now to build the 2020 improvements as listed in Table 4-3 of the report.
Future Trunk Lines and Lift Station Upgrades - Many new trunk lines and lift stations will be needed to
serve the areas that will develop in the city in the future.
Size pipes and lift stations based on the conceptual future system plan prepared for this report (See
Figure 19).
Computer Model - The computer model is very detailed and can be used to identify impacts from new
developments.
Utilize the existing model to determine impacts from proposed new developments or areas that plan to
re-develop to higher densities. Update the existing model regularly by importing updated system
information from the GIS databases that are maintained by the Logan GIS department.
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 2 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND
The Logan City sanitary sewer system collects sewer flows from Logan City and other surrounding
communities and transports those flows to the Logan wastewater treatment facility located near 600
North 1900 West in Logan, Utah.
There are approximately 895,000 lineal feet of pressure and gravity sewer pipe in the collection system
ranging from 4-inch diameter to 60-inch diameter. The majority of the collection pipes are 8-inch
diameter totaling approximately 589,000 feet in length.
Logan has grown significantly over the last few decades as shown in Table 1-1 (United States Census
Bureau, n.d.) (Utah Governor's Office of Planning and Budget, 2013).
Table 1-1: Logan City Growth Table
Logan City Growth
Year Population Average Annual
Growth Rate
1990
33,022
2.6%
2000 42,713
1.2%
2010 48,174
Logan continues to see growth around its outer edges and growth from re-development in its center as
areas re-develop to higher densities. The collections system serves six surrounding cities that will also
continue to grow. The following cities are connected to the collection system:
• Smithfield
• Hyde Park
• North Logan
• River Heights
• Providence
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 3 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
• Nibley
The trunk lines in the collection system that serve these cities need to be large enough to continue to
convey the flows that will come with the future growth.
The City hired J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. (J-U-B) to evaluate the capacity of the existing collection system,
and propose system improvements to accommodate projected growth. There are four time-frames
analyzed in this plan as listed in Table 1-2 below.
Table 1-2: Time Frames Analyzed
Time Frames Analyzed
Title
Description
2014 Existing flows during summer irrigation months when infiltration is high
2020 Projected 2020 flows during summer irrigation months
2025 Projected 2025 flows during summer irrigation months
Build Out
Projected flows during the summer irrigation months at build out. Build out is defined as the condition when all of the areas in the future boundaries of the City develop to the planned densities as identified in the 2015 Water Master Plan and the contributing cities reach their projected 2060 populations as estimated by the Governor's Office of Planning and Budget (GOPB).
The goals of the master plan are:
• Create a detailed model that is efficient to operate and update
• Identify existing system capacity and condition deficiencies
• Identify future system deficiencies
• Master plan a collection system to serve Logan at build out
• Provide a prioritized list of capital improvement projects needed for 2020, 2025, and build out
• Train City staff to operate and update the model
A master plan is an essential element for any community experiencing growth. With a master plan, a
community has a tool to guide infrastructure improvements. This master plan provides direction to
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 4 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
continue providing adequate sewer collection services as new areas develop and existing developed
areas re-develop.
1.2 PROJECT TASKS
J-U-B performed the following tasks to complete the plan:
• Gathered system information and flow data from Logan City
• Mapped the existing collection system utilizing data provided by Logan City
• Added sanitary flows to the collection system based on winter culinary water meter data as
recorded by City water meters
• Analyzed existing sewer flow meter data provided by the City
• Performed a preliminary model calibration using existing flow data
• Recommended temporary flow data collection sites to measure summer flows during high
infiltration
• Collected flow data from 13 simultaneous temporary meter sites during the summer months to
record the high infiltration flows
• Calibrated the model to match the metered flows
• Met with City staff to identify poor condition locations in the system
• Identified existing system repairs, capacity deficiencies and areas to monitor
• Made future flow projections for 2020, 2025 and build out based on input from City Staff
• Identified system improvement projects needed for 2020, 2025 and build out
• Master planned a conceptual collection system to serve areas that will develop in the future
• Prepared prioritized lists of improvement projects and areas to monitor for each of the future
time frames analyzed
• Listed conclusions and recommendations drawn from the master plan study
• Provided model training for the city staff
A central component of these tasks is the use of computer modeling software to simulate current and
future sanitary sewer system capacity. The software and planning parameters used for this study are
discussed in greater detail in Chapter 3.
1.3 MASTER PLAN PURPOSE
The main purpose of the master plan is to provide a planning document and tools that help Logan City
meet its future sewer collection needs. This report serves as the planning document. The main tool is
the computer hydraulic sewer model. The model is detailed enough to allow each new development or
re-development to be evaluated to verify its potential impact on the collection system. Re-development
can significantly change peak flows in collection pipes near the re-developed area. For example, a multi-
story, multi-family building constructed in the place of a single family home will greatly increase the
peak sewer flows that may enter the collection system. The re-development may be connected to an
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 5 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
existing 8-inch sewer pipe that already is approaching its capacity limits. Every pipe in the system has
been modeled to allow for capacity checks of the pipes in these types of situations.
Conditions may change and ultimately affect the master plan. The analysis and recommendations
contained herein should be updated as necessary. The City should revisit this document and the model
prior to engaging in detailed design of any sanitary sewer facilities to verify that the model and
conclusions are still valid. The model and plan should be updated and verified with any significant
changes to the system.
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 6 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
2 DATA COLLECTION
2.1 INTRODUCTION
A large amount of data was required to build a model of the collection system. Existing system mapping
information, existing water use data and sewer flow data were needed. The software used for the
mapping was ArcGIS software Version 10.2.2.
2.2 EXISTING SYSTEM MAPPING
The existing collection system is shown in Figure 1: Existing Collection System (All of the report figures
are included in Appendix A and bound separate from this report). The information needed to create the
existing system figure was obtained from the City GIS department.
The following items are included in the mapping:
• Aerial image of the City
• Existing gravity sewer lines
• Existing private and City owned lift stations and associated pressure force mains
• Existing Logan City limits
• Points of connection from other cities
• Street labels
J-U-B met multiple times with City staff during the system mapping process to review the sewer
collection data and make adjustments as needed. Through this process, some updates were made to
the existing system for the model as described in the following sub-sections. The City GIS data needs to
be updated to include some new manhole inverts that were integrated and noted in the existing sewer
system model. In the future, the GIS data will always be the parent data and the model will be updated
based on the latest GIS data.
2.2.1 System Connectivity
The system connectivity had to be created to allow the model flows to be conveyed through the
system. All of the manholes in the system needed elevations in order to complete the
connectivity. The following steps were followed to create the system connectivity:
• Identified the manholes that were missing elevations
• Met with the GIS department to review the missing elevations
• Developed a plan with the GIS department to receive the updated data
• Entered the new invert elevations to the model
• Interpolated some elevations that did not come with the updated GIS data
• Added notes on manholes that we interpolated
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 7 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
At the meeting, it was discussed that the GIS department may not be able to identify all the
inverts and that some of the manholes would need to be interpolated. The City gathered or
calculated many more elevations, but there were still a few manholes that needed elevations.
These elevations were interpolated where possible using the manholes with elevations. Notes
were made in the model to track manholes with elevations that were calculated rather than
surveyed.
There were also many pipes in the system that were not connected together. These were
connected in the model in order for the model to run. J-U-B re-drew the un-connected pipes
from the upstream manhole to the downstream manhole and added notes to the pipes that
were adjusted.
2.2.2 Sewer Cleanouts
There are many small dead end pipes in the system that are stubbed out for future services or
line extensions but not connected to any manholes. J-U-B identified these and added manholes
or removed the pipe from the model. J-U-B added notes to all the pipes, manholes and
cleanouts to provide an identifier indicating if they were to be used in the model. J-U-B added a
cleanout or removed the dead end pipe from model at each dead end location
2.2.3 Lift Station Information
The City has multiple lift stations (Figure 1) that are needed to convey some of the flows that
come from within Logan and some of the flows that come from other cities to the treatment
facility. Pump information and wet well geometry information for the lift stations was given to
J-U-B in the form of record drawings and entered into the model.
2.2.4 Reverse Grade Pipes
The collection system GIS file from the City has some reverse grade pipes. The following steps
were taken to determine if the pipes were truly sloping the wrong direction or if the pipe
elevations needed to updated or corrected:
• J-U-B identified pipes in the system with reverse grades
• Logan and J-U-B met and decided that pipes with more than 0.4 feet of reverse
elevation difference between manholes would be verified by the City and that the city
would give updated elevations to J-U-B for the model
• J-U-B input the corrected and interpolated elevations provided by the City
• There are still 39 gravity pipes identified in the model with less than 0.4 feet of reverse
elevation difference. The model cannot calculate flows for gravity pipes with reverse
grades. For the hydraulic calculations, the modeling software assumes that the reverse
grade pipes have a downstream invert elevation that is 0.001 feet lower than the
upstream invert elevation. The elevations that are provided in the model inputs are not
changed by the model software. These pipe segments are listed in Table 2-1.
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 8 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
Table 2-1: Reverse Grade Slope Summary Table, S < 0.4
REVERSE GRADE PIPE SUMMARY
GIS ID UPSTREAM
INVERT DOWNSTREAM
INVERT NEAREST INTERSECTION/DESCRIPTION
SM00826 4492.815 4493.207 100 S/600 W (Runs in 600 W)
SM01007 4527.949 4527.949 400 N/100 E (Runs in 100 E)
SM01373 4516.367 4516.461 Center St./100 W (Runs in 100 W)
SM02087 4472.422 4472.422 1960 S/1100 W (Runs in 1100 W)
SM02179 4464.005 4464.282 Near Country Manor LS
SM02306 4459.495 4459.57 1800 N/600 W (Runs in 1800 N)
SM02331 4462.84 4462.86 Rosewood Circle
SM02493 4487.041 4487.053 800 S/Riverwood Dr. (Runs in 800 S)
SM02510 4472.453 4472.528 880 S/Park Ave. (Runs in 880 S)
SM02522 4788.162 4788.168 Davis Ave./Hillcrest Ave. (Runs parallel to Davis behind homes)
SM02523 4788.168 4788.273 Davis Ave./Hillcrest Ave. (Runs parallel to Davis behind homes)
SM02528 4439.449 4439.525 600 N – Near sewer lagoons
SM02554 4485.386 4485.542 100 W Hwy. 89
SM02603 4457.657 4457.813 1925 S (Connection between Rosehill Develp. and housing to the east)
SM02644 4525.421 4525.423 South of Home Depot (Runs parallel to Main St.)
SM02682 4791.085 4791.235 1220 N 600 E
SM02822 4463.692 4463.692 Between 1780 S and 1750 S
SM02893 4471.104 4471.177 Between 400 W and 600 W north of 1600 N
SM02920 4467.204 4467.26 Between 400 W and 600 W north of 1600 N
SM02956 4537.617 4537.648 100 S/500 E
SM03093 4527.988 4528.124 300 S/400 E (Runs in 400 E)
SM03154 4485.477 4485.596 1200 N/400 W (Runs in 400 W)
SM03177 4434.366 4434.475 1800 S/2000 W (Runs in 200 W)
SM03184 4483.976 4484.042 Riverwalk Pkwy/Golf Course Rd. (Back of townhomes)
SM03203 4441.084 4441.223 600 N – Near sewer lagoons
SM03292 4443.993 4444.262 200 S/1000 W (North of Codale Elec.)
SM03421 4437.396 4437.399 2500 N/900 W (Runs along 900 W)
SM03683 4468.617 4470.88 600 S/Park Ave.
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 9 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
REVERSE GRADE PIPE SUMMARY
GIS ID UPSTREAM
INVERT DOWNSTREAM
INVERT NEAREST INTERSECTION/DESCRIPTION
SM03693 4425.786 4425.85 600 S/2000 W (Runs in 2000 W)
SM03703 4469.789 4470.2 760 S/Park Ave. (Runs in Park Ave.)
SM03713 4445.983 4446.05 200 S/1000 W (Runs in 1000 W)
SM03720 4451.957 4452.223 200 S/1000 W (Runs in 1000 W)
SM03734 4553.551 4553.551 200 N/200 E (Runs in 200 E)
SM03824 4444.85 4444.88 200 N/1000 W (Runs in 1000 W)
SM03833 4443.89 4443.89 600 N/1000 W
SM03837 4446.753 4446.83 1000 N/1000 W (Runs in 1000 N)
SM03839 4449.662 4449.697 1400 N/1000 W (Runs in 1000 W)
SM03917 4467.781 4468.026 200 S/Rosewood Cir. (Runs in Rosewood Cir.)
SM04043 4521.559 4521.634 200 S/200 E
2.2.5 Flow Routing Adjustments
There are many manholes in the system that have two or more pipes that exit. The modeling
software splits the flows at these manholes based on the elevations of the exiting pipes and
based on the flow path of least resistance. The accuracy of the flows in the pipes downstream
of the split manholes is dependent on accurate outgoing pipe elevations, pipe sizes and slopes.
J-U-B worked with the Logan GIS department to field check as many of these locations as
possible and input updated information into the model. The following steps were followed:
• J-U-B queried the model to find the manholes with more than one pipe exiting
• J-U-B met with City staff to develop a strategy to gather more invert and flow routing
data
• City staff checked the manholes in the field:
o If outgoing inverts were different, they collected survey shots on the inverts and added new invert elevations to the system shape files
o If outgoing inverts were the same, they made an estimate of what percent of the incoming flow goes to each of the outgoing pipes
o Other notes such as “All flows go west until pipe is more than half full, then flows are split 50/50” were made
• J-U-B imported the new data and checked the flow routing
Multiple iterations of this process were followed to update the flow routing in the model.
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 10 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
2.2.6 Drop manholes
There are many drop manholes in the existing collection system. Drop manholes are typically
found in steeper areas of the City. They often can be identified in the field by having two inlet
pipes (one a few feet directly above the other) on the upstream side of the manhole with the
upper inlet being mostly dry or completely dry. The dry pipe is representative of the elevation of
the pipe upstream of the manhole as it approaches the manhole. However, at a close distance
from the manhole, the upstream pipe has a vertical tee installed with some vertical elbows that
drop the incoming flow through a lower pipe to an elevation that is close to the bottom
elevation of the manhole it enters.
Logan City staff provided drop manhole information that has been recorded by the GIS
department. There are still some drop manholes in the actual system that need to be input into
the model. Over time the City should continue to identify drop manholes and update the drop
manhole information in the system GIS files.
2.2.7 Pipe Diameter Adjustments
J-U-B identified some pipes in the mapped system data with sizes that did not appear to be
correct. For example, there were a few trunk lines in the data that had pipes that were smaller
than expected based on comparisons with the surrounding pipes. Some of the pipe sizes were
updated in the model after verifying the actual sizes out in the field with Logan public works
staff.
2.3 SANITARY SEWER FLOWS
The sanitary flows are the flows in the system that come directly from homes or businesses. These
flows do not include any extra flows that may enter the collection system along the way to the
treatment facility in the form of infiltration or inflow (I&I).
The sanitary flows were estimated by assuming that the daily sanitary sewer volumes from each sewer
connection are equal to the culinary water usage as recorded by individual water meters during the
winter months. During the winter, most of the culinary water that is used enters the sewer collection
system because no water is being used for outdoor watering. J-U-B obtained water usage data by
gathering water meter records from the City’s water database for the winter season of 2013-14. J-U-B
reviewed this data and selected the highest usage month to use for the model, which was November
2013. J-U-B estimated the daily volume at each meter location by taking the total volume recorded for
November 2013 and dividing by 30 days.
2.4 TOTAL FLOWS
The total flows in the collection system consist of the sanitary flows along with flows that enter the
system in the form I&I. Flow data is critical to quantify the effects of I&I on the flows in the system.
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 11 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
Flow data is most useful for collection system master planning when it represents the highest seasonal
flows that pass through the system. This allows for future pipe sizing that is adequate to convey the
peak seasonal flows. Based on past meter records at the treatment lagoons, the highest flows during a
given year typically occur in the summer time around July and August. The higher flows in the summer
are typically made up in large part by increases in infiltration.
2.4.1 Infiltration
Infiltration consists of groundwater that enters the sewer system through open joint pipes,
cracks in pipes, faulty service connections, leaky manhole joints and poor seals at the
connections between pipes and manholes. Infiltration flows are typically slightly less than the
total flow in a collection system during the very early morning hours when most of the people in
the city are asleep. Graph 2-1 shows the wintertime flows recorded at the sewer treatment
lagoons during the month of November 2013.
Graph 2-1: Wintertime Sewer Flows
The base winter nighttime flows (infiltration) as recorded by the treatment lagoons meter are
approximately 3,750 gallons per minute (GPM).
In Logan, many irrigation canals pass through the city and carry water during the summer
months. With so many canals located close to sewer collection lines, there is potential to have
increased groundwater infiltration when the canals are carrying irrigation water. Graph 2-2
shows the summertime sewer flows at the treatment lagoons as recorded during parts of July
and August 2014.
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 12 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
Graph 2-2: Summertime Sewer Flows
The base summer nighttime flows recorded at the lagoons are approximately 7,750 GPM. The
recorded summer infiltration flows were approximately 4,000 GPM greater (approximately two
times greater) than the winter infiltration flows recoded at the treatment lagoons.
2.4.2 Inflow
Inflow is surface storm water that enters into the sewer system during or after a storm event.
Inflow enters collection systems through manhole covers and direct connections such as roof
drains, foundation drains, and storm sewer connections. One way to estimate the amount of
inflow in a system is by comparing metered flows during rain events with metered flows
recorded at times without rain. Graph 2-3 shows the flows at the treatment plant during the
same summer metering period along with the precipitation data recorded at the Logan-Cache
Airport.
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 13 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
Graph 2-3: Summertime Sewer Flows and Precipitation
The largest storm recorded during the meter period occurred just after midnight on July 30th.
This storm lasted approximately 6 hours with a total of 0.43 inches recorded at the Logan-Cache
Airport. This was a significant rain event but not rare with a return period of less than 1 year. A
1 year 6-hour storm in Logan has a total depth of 0.7 inches.
Collection systems need to be designed to convey daily peak sanitary flows plus the peak
seasonal infiltration and any inflow that may enter the system during a rain event.
Based on the data collected in Logan for this study, infiltration is a much larger flow contributor
to then inflow from rain events. More flow data during rain events needs to be evaluated to gain
a better understanding of the inflow to the system due to rain. More specifically, more data is
needed during large rain events to understand how the system flows change as a result.
A few other observations are made based on the flow data in Graph 2-3. First, the base
nighttime flows in the system increased over a period of three or four days surrounding the
short rain events that occurred. These increases indicate that the collection system has some
delayed inflow or rainfall-induced infiltration around wet periods of time. Delayed Inflow is
defined as the portion of total inflow that is generated from indirect connections to the
collection system or connections that produce inflow after a significant time delay from the
beginning of a storm. Delayed inflow sources include: sump pumps, foundation drains, indirect
sewer/drain cross-connections, etc. Rainfall-induced infiltration cannot be distinguished from
delayed inflow and is therefore included as part of delayed inflow. Delayed inflow sources have
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 14 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
a gradual impact on the collection system and flow decreases gradually upon conclusion of the
rainfall event, and after peak inflow caused by direct connections (EPA, 2014).
Some short duration increases in the recorded flows occurred during or right after some of the
recorded storms. For example, the nighttime flows recorded immediately after the storm that
occurred in the very early morning hours of July 30th were significantly higher than other
recorded nighttime flows. This is likely because of inflow that quickly entered the system
during, or right after the 6-hour storm. Inflow that enters the system quickly through direct
connections is called direct inflow. Direct Inflow is defined as the portion of total inflow which is
from direct connections to the collection system such as catch basins, roof drains, manhole
covers, etc. These inflow sources allow storm water runoff to rapidly impact the collection
system (EPA, 2014).
2.5 SUMMER FLOW DATA COLLECTION
Temporary flow meters were installed during the summer of 2014 in order gather flow data needed to
have a well calibrated sewer model to match the higher seasonal summer flows. These meters were
installed at strategic locations throughout the collection system. The flow data was combined with
other meter data that Logan collected during the same meter period from permanent meters at the
existing lift stations and at the treatment lagoons.
2.5.1 Summer Meter Schedule
Flow data was collected throughout the collection system for a three-week period from July 22,
2014 through August 12, 2014. The start and end dates for the data collection vary slightly for
some of the meter sites
2.5.2 Summer Meter Equipment
J-U-B rented twelve Hach 910 area velocity flow monitors and used one March McBirney Flo-Dar
meter owned by Logan City to collect flow data from 13 temporary sites. These monitors
measured flow depths and velocities to calculate flow and recorded measurements at five-
minute intervals during the metering period. Having multiple meters collecting data throughout
the City at the same time allows for a comparison of flows and helps to isolate areas of interest
or concern.
The Hach 910 meters were equipped with submerged depth velocity sensors that use a pressure
transducer to measure flow depths and measure velocity with sound waves, using the Doppler
principle. The Flo Dar meter consists of a radar-based velocity measurement system and an
ultrasonic-based pulse echo depth measurement system.
Logan City provided additional flow data for the same meter period that was recorded at
permanent meters located at the treatment lagoons and at some of the large lift stations in the
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 15 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
system. Many of the permanent meters measure flows from the surrounding communities that
are connected to the collection system.
2.5.3 Summer Meter Locations
The locations of the temporary summer meters are listed in Table 2-2 and shown in Figure 2:
Flow Meter Locations. Table 2-2 also gives information about the pipe size metered and the
start and end dates of the collected meter data. The meter locations in the table include a
facility identification number which is the numbering system the City uses for all of the
manholes in the collection system.
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 16 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
Table 2-2: Temporary Flow Meters
TEMPORARY FLOW METER SITES
METER FACILITY ID LOCATION DESCRIPTION METER PERIOD
1 SEMH00644 In parking lot along the east side of 1000 West Street at approximately 1075 North and 400 to 500 feet east of 1000 West Street
7-22-14 to
8-11-14
2 SEMH01058 1400 North 875 West 7-22-14
to 8-12-14
3 SEMH00601 1000 North 975 West 7-22-14
to 8-11-14
4 SEMH00403 600 North 990 West 7-22-14
to 8-12-14
5 Man Hole east of
SEMH00408 by 120 feet 325 North 950 West (in parking lot just east of 950 West street)
7-25-14 to
8-11-14
6 SEMH03164 200 South 930 West 7-22-14
to 8-11-14
7 SEMH01611 200 South 950 West 7-22-14
to 8-11-14
8 SEMH01634 835 West 600 South 7-22-14
to 8-11-14
9 SEMH01996 1400 North 750 East 7-23-14
to 8-12-14
10 SEMH01412 1350 East 1405 North 7-30-14
to 8-12-14
11 SEMH01997 800 East 1350 North 7-23-14
to 8-12-14
12 SEMH01025 750 East 700 North 7-23-14
to 8-12-14
13 SEMH00116 700 East 435 South 7-23-14
to 8-12-14
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 17 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
2.5.4 Summer Flow Data Evaluation
J-U-B graphed and evaluated the data collected by the temporary flow meters for the summer
flow meter period. The following graphs are included in Appendix B for each of the temporary
meter sites:
• Flow vs. Time
• Depth and Velocity vs. Time
• Velocity vs. Level Scatter Plot
The Flow vs. Time graphs include the amount of precipitation in inches that was recorded on an
hourly basis at the Logan Cache Airport during the summer meter period. Notes and
conclusions about the flows recorded at each of the temporary sites are included in Appendix C.
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 18 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
3 EXISTING SYSTEM ANALYSIS
3.1 INTRODUCTION
J-U-B created and calibrated a computer model to simulate and analyze the existing flows in the
collection system. The model was created using InfoSWMM 5.1 modeling software which is a product of
Innovyze Incorporated. InfoSWMM functions within ArcGIS software which allows for easy assimilation
of other City mapping that is contained in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) shape files. The
computer model and findings meet Utah Department of Water Quality capacity verification
requirements for large collection systems.
3.2 COLLECTION SYSTEM REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
The Utah Department of Water Quality requires any municipality, or other political subdivision of the
state that owns and operates a sewer collection system to comply with the Utah Sewer Management
Program (USMP) as defined in Rule R317-801 of the Utah Administrative Code. Under the USMP, Logan
City is required to have and implement a written Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP). Logan has a
written plan that was completed in August of 2015 that meets the state requirements.
The SSMP covers:
• General organizational structure for the system
• Operation and maintenance of the system
• Sewer defects
• Sewer design standards
• Sanitary Sewer Overflow (SSO) actions
• Grease, oil, sand and commercial management
• Monitoring and measuring
• System mapping
• Sewer backup flows
Larger collection systems must also complete a System Evaluation and Capacity Assurance Plan (SECAP)
to identify any potential system capacity deficiencies and a capital improvements plan to address
capacity deficiencies. The Logan City collection system falls within the larger system category and is
required to have a SECAP. The work done for this master plan meets the SECAP requirements for Logan
City.
3.3 DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS
All new sewer system improvements within the city need to be constructed to meet current Logan City
and State design requirements. This is true for public systems as well as sewer systems that are
constructed as private utilities including collection piping and lift stations.
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 19 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
The city standards for design and construction shall be used in conjunction with Utah Administrative
Code R317-3. Where a conflict exists between these two standards, the Administrative Code shall
prevail.
3.4 MODEL DEVELOPMENT AND ASSUMPTIONS
The hydraulic model consists of following inputs:
• Collection system geometry
• Flow input locations
• Sanitary flows
• Lift Station parameters
• Daily sanitary flow patterns (Diurnal Curves)
• Infiltration flows
• Flows from others and large water users
The key assumptions used in the existing system model are explained in the following sections.
3.4.1 Collection System Geometry Assumptions
The system geometry (Figure 1) consists of all of the collection system components such as:
• Gravity pipes
• Manholes
• Lift stations
• Force mains
• Diversions
• Other ancillary items such as pumps
Each of the components has attributes assigned such as ground elevations, invert elevations,
sizes etc. The attributes were provided by the Logan City GIS department and include some
updates made during the model building process as errors or discrepancies were found. Notes
have been added in the system attributes table within the model where changes were made to
the system geometry data. Updating and adding data to the system layer in the model will be
an ongoing effort in the future for the City to continue to improve the accuracy of the model.
3.4.2 Flow Input Location Assumptions
J-U-B added flows to the collection system based on the water meter database provided by the
City in a two-step process.
1. Assigned each water meter to the nearest sewer pipe and then to the sewer collection
manhole immediately upstream
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 20 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
2. Reviewed the sewer lateral map data that was provided by Logan city to adjust flow input
locations as needed
3.4.3 Sanitary Flow Assumptions
The daily sanitary flows (no I&I) in the system are equal to the daily culinary water use during
the winter months. These flows were added based on the winter culinary water meter database
that was provided by the City as described in Section 2.3 of this report. A small amount of flow
was added to parks and other open spaces based on the estimated number or fixture units in
restrooms or other plumbed structures. The flows from the open spaces are very minimal.
3.4.4 Pump Parameter Assumptions
The parameters of the pumps in the existing lift stations were added based on data provided by
the City from as-built records.
3.4.5 Diurnal Curves Assumptions
Sewer flows vary throughout the day. The flow patterns during the day are known as diurnal
curves. These diurnal curves allow the modeling software to quantify the flows throughout the
day for the various types of land use. J-U-B initially input 5 different diurnal curves in the model
that have been developed and adjusted by J-U-B over time to match flows that have been
recorded in areas made up of the following flow land use categories:
1. Residential
2. Commercial
3. Industrial
4. Open Space (Parks with restrooms)
5. School
These diurnal curves were adjusted during the calibration process (Section 3.3) to match the
flows recorded by the flow meters. Graph 3-1 below shows the diurnal curves used in the
model. The graph gives the percentage of the total daily volume that is assigned to each hour
during the day for each of the curves. The diurnal curves represent only the sanitary flows and
do not include any inflow or infiltration.
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 21 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
Graph 3-1: Diurnal Curves
J-U-B assigned one of these diurnal curves to each of the sanitary flows added to the model
based on the land uses that were included in the water meter databased provided by the City.
There are many land uses in the City that could generate slightly different diurnal curves, but for
the model, the curves were consolidated into the 5 major types shown in Graph 3-1. The land
uses associated with the water meter database provided by the City are listed below in Table 3-1
along with the diurnal curve that was assigned for each of those land uses.
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
PER
CEN
T O
F D
AIL
Y F
LOW
HOURS
DIURNAL CURVES
RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL
INDUSTRIAL
OPEN SPACE
SCHOOL
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 22 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
Table 3-1: Diurnal Curve Assignments
Diurnal Curve Assignments
City Land Use Diurnal Curve Assigned in Model
CR
Residential
MH
MR-12
MR-20
MU
Not Logan
NR-6
PUB
TC
AP
Commercial
COM
Community Commercial
CS
GW
MU
NC
Not Logan
PUB
REC
TC
IP Industrial
PUB
MU
Open Space PUB
REC
PUB
Schools MU (USU)
PUB (USU)
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 23 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
The diurnal flow pattern assignments for the existing and future service areas are mapped in Figure 3:
Diurnal Curve Pattern Assignments. The undeveloped parcels and some areas that are not connected to
the sewer do not contribute flows in the existing model and were not assigned a flow pattern. Sanitary
flow volumes are based on individual water meter data and not on the diurnal flow pattern.
3.4.6 Infiltration Assumptions
Infiltration is assumed to be a constant base flow that is approximately equal to the average
nighttime base flows. The meter data used to estimate infiltration was recorded by the
temporary flow meters that were installed in July 2014 along with data from permanent meters
for the same time period.
Because of the limitation on the number of temporary meters installed, some assumptions were
made about what localized areas may have more infiltration than other areas. For example, the
island area near the Logan River has high ground water levels and many sections of older pipe
that are not water tight. Because of these and other factors, this area was designated very high
infiltration. On the other hand, some of the areas on the east bench have much lower
infiltration because the pipes are newer, the ground water level is deeper in the ground and the
soils in these areas drains much more freely.
The developed part of the City was divided into regions and categorized into 5 different rates of
infiltration. A proportionate fraction of the total infiltration in a region was assigned to each
manhole within the region. The rates of infiltration per manhole were adjusted in each of the
regions until the base nighttime flows in the model matched the base nighttime flows recorded
by the temporary flow meters. Areas that will develop in the future do not add any infiltration
to the existing model.
The infiltration regions and the rates assigned to each region in the City are shown in Figure 4:
Infiltration Rates. Table 3-2 lists the 5 existing infiltration rates used and the flow added as
infiltration at each manhole for each of the assigned rates.
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 24 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
Table 3-2: Infiltration Rates
Infiltration Rates
Name Infiltration Added per Manhole
(gpm)
Very Low 0.2
Low 0.5
Medium 0.6
High 3.2
Very High 3.8
3.4.7 Inflow
No inflow was added to the model because:
• The infiltration flows measured in the system in the summer are much greater than the
flows that may be added by inflow during a typical summer rain event. The small rain
events that were recorded during the summer meter period did have some varying
effects on the flows in the system depending on the location in the system.
• More sewer flow data needs to be collected and evaluated during large storm events to
quantify the effects from inflow.
3.4.8 Flows from Others and Large Water Users
The following cities near Logan are connected to the collection system (Figure 1):
• Smithfield
• Hyde Park
• North Logan
• River Heights
• Providence
• Nibley
Providence City has two connection points and Smithfield and Hyde Park share a single
connection point. Each connection has a flow meter that records the flows as they enter the
collection system. Flows were added to the model at the connection points to simulate the
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 25 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
flows that enter from each of these outside communities. The flows were shaped into diurnal
flow patterns to match the patterns recorded by the meters. The flow patterns recorded by the
meters from the contributing communities are included in Appendix D.
Utah State University (USU) is another large contributing entity that is connected to the
collection system at multiple locations. Winter-water usage data was used to estimate the
sanitary flows that come from USU in the same fashion as sanitary flows were added throughout
the rest of the City. Summer infiltration from USU was estimated based on flow meter data
from the summer temporary meters as explained in Section 3.2.6. USU has many small pumps
from building basements that turn on and off multiple times during each day for short periods.
These pumps add very little volume to the system with short peaks that attenuate quickly in the
collection system.
Tyco Electronics is a large industrial water user located at 710 North 600 West in Logan that is
connected to the sewer collection system. Hourly water use data from meters at Tyco were
used to create a more accurate diurnal flow pattern.
The flows from other large water users such as Gossner Foods and Schreiber Foods are based on
monthly winter water use. The typical industrial diurnal flow pattern was assigned to these
water users and other industrial water users.
3.5 COST ESTIMATING ASSUMPTIONS
The model development is important because it identifies areas where existing or future system
deficiencies exist in the collection system. Deficiencies are typically addressed by making some kind of
improvement to the system. Funds are required to make most sewer system capacity improvements.
At the master planning stage, many assumptions are required to estimate the costs of future
improvements because there is a fairly high level of uncertainty about challenges or obstacles to
projects that will not be identified until a design process is completed. As a given improvement gets
designed, the uncertainty is reduced. J-U-B has prepared conceptual cost estimates for improvements
that are needed in the collection system now, at year 2020, year 2005 and at build out.
Cost estimates for this plan are based on J-U-B bid tabulation records for sewer collection and lift station
projects and pipe material costs provided by pipe suppliers. For piping projects, it is assumed that the
improvements will be made utilizing conventional open-cut construction in city roadways with manholes
will be placed every 350 feet. The project costs include an additional 40% factor (40% of the estimated
construction cost) to account for engineering services and for uncertainty in items that will be required
for construction. A basic unit price summary table is included in Appendix E.
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 26 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
3.6 MODEL CALIBRATION
J-U-B calibrated the model by adjusting the inputs until the model flows matched the existing system
flows as recorded by the meters. The first step in the calibration process is to choose a day with
relatively high flows to match with the computer model flows. A day with relatively high peak flows is
desired in order to avoid underestimating existing and future flows which may lead to having an
unexpected exceedance of system capacity.
As mentioned earlier in the report, the flows in the system are typically the largest in the summer when
irrigation water is in the irrigation ditches. Upon reviewing the flow data collected in the summer of
2014, Monday July 28, 2014 was selected as the day to match with the model.
In many collection systems, peak flows during a week occur on weekends when people are at home.
However, the peak flows recorded in Logan on the weekdays were higher than during the weekends.
This is probably because a large portion of Logan’s flows come from commercial and industrial entities
that do not operate on the weekends.
Calibration involved an iterative process of superimposing the flow graphs from the temporary flow
meters and from the treatment plant from July 28, 2014 over the model-generated diurnal flow curves.
Then, the flow generating model parameters (diurnal curve shape, infiltration etc.) were adjusted to
match the metered flows. An example calibration flow graph is shown below in Graph 3-2 for the
temporary meter that was installed near the North Logan connection point.
Graph 3-2: Example Calibration Flow Graph
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
28
-Ju
l
29
-Ju
l
FL
OW
(g
pm
)
DATE - July 28, 2014
1 - 1000 W Parking Lot
Meter
Model data
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 27 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
All of the flow calibration graphs are included in Appendix F to show how the model flows compared to
the actual metered flows. A summary of how the flows in the calibrated model compared to the flows
measured by the flow meters is tabulated in Appendix G.
3.7 EXISTING SYSTEM EVALUATION
The existing model simulates the existing flows based on the winter culinary water usage plus summer
infiltration to match the flows recorded in the system on Monday July 28th 2014. Four specific items
were evaluated as part of the existing system evaluation:
1. Depth of Flow over Diameter of Pipe (d/D)
2. Reserve Capacity
3. Hydraulic Grade Line Profiles
4. System Condition
5. Lift Station Analysis
3.7.1 Depth of Flow over Diameter of Pipe (d/D)
A quick way to display how well a collection system accommodates flows is by observing the
depth of flow in a pipe as a ratio of the pipe’s inside diameter. The illustrated pipe shown in
diagram 3-1 below represents a pipe flowing less than half full.
A pipe that is full would have a d/D value of 1.0. While a pipe flowing half full would have a d/D
value of 0.5. Larger pipes are able to handle more flows than are smaller pipes, at equivalent
d/D values. Larger pipes have more reserve capacity per increment of d/D value.
The InfoSWMM modeling software reports d/D values based on the hydraulic grade line
throughout the collection system. If there is a downstream choke point in the collection system
that causes the water to back up and raise the hydraulic grade line to levels above the top of a
pipe, InfoSWMM reports a d/D value of 1.0. The d/D values typically vary along the length of
pipe segments. Some pipe segments have flows that transition between full or partially full.
The d/D values recorded in this report are at the upstream end of each pipe segment in the
model.
Diagram 3-1: Pipe Flow Less than Half Full
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 28 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
The existing depth of flow over diameter of pipe (d/D) for each pipe in the existing collection
system is shown in Figure 5: Existing Depth over Diameter. These are the d/D values for each
pipe segment with existing flow conditions during the peak flow time of the day. Currently
there are a few isolated areas with full pipes (d/D > 0.93). The maximum non-pressurized
capacity of a pipe is achieved at a d/D Value of 0.93 because of increased friction loses created
by the water coming in contact with the tops of the pipes. Most of the full pipes are located in
the island area with a good portion of the full pipes located near 300 South and 200 East.
3.7.2 Reserve Capacity
An equally important measure of system capacity is reported in the InfoSWMM output as
reserve capacity. Reserve capacity is a measure of how much additional flow can be added to
any given pipe segment based strictly on the Manning’s open channel flow equation. The
reserve capacity is calculated for each pipe segment individually without taking into account any
backwater that may be present from a downstream choke point. Reserve capacity can be
reported in various units. For this master plan the reserve capacity is reported in units of gallons
per minute (GPM).
The reserve capacity in each of the existing pipes under 2014 summer flow conditions during the
peak flow time of day is shown in Figure 6: Existing Reserve Capacity. The pipes in the figure are
color coded based on ranges of excess capacity. There are more pipes in Figure 6 that have zero
or negative reserve capacity than pipes that are shown in Figure 5 with a d/D greater than 0.93.
This happens because there are short flat segments of pipe in the system that do not have
enough slope to convey the flows based on the Manning’s equation. However, because the pipe
segments are short and the downstream pipe segments are steeper, the hydraulic grade line
never reaches the top of the pipe. This flow condition is illustrated in Diagram 3-2 below.
Diagram 3-2: Negative Reserve Capacity Illustration
The pipe segment between the two manholes is so flat that the water is beginning to back up.
This is because the capacity of the pipe, based on the Manning’s equation, is less than the peak
flow. If the flat pipe segment were much longer, the hydraulic grade line would rise above the
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 29 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
top of the pipe. In InfoSWMM, the middle pipe segment gets reported as a pipe with negative
reserve capacity even though the water surface never reaches the top of the pipe.
3.7.3 Hydraulic Grade Line Profile Evaluation
Areas that were highlighted in the model as having high d/D values and low reserve capacities
were evaluated further by viewing system profiles in the modeling software. The profiles show
the peak hydraulic grade line through the pipe segments. By evaluating the model profiles, the
pipe segments that are actually causing surcharging (hydraulic grade lines above the tops of
pipes) were identified.
3.7.4 Condition Analysis
Many of the collection system pipes have been in service for a very long time and are
approaching the end of their service lives. As sewer pipes begin falling apart and leaking, more
maintenance is required, more infiltration enters the system and there is some increased risk of
having a road collapse or a large ground sink occur. As such, an ongoing effort to replace or
repair pipes that are in poor condition is important.
The public works staff members that maintain the sewer collection system are aware of areas
that are becoming deteriorated or do not function as needed. J-U-B met with the staff to review
the system and identify the greatest condition problems to address in the capital facilities plan.
J-U-B utilized some tools in the model software to help the City have a better understanding of
which areas are more susceptible to deterioration due to Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S). The velocity
of the flow through a sewer pipe is a significant factor in the amount of potential H2S buildup.
Pipes with slower velocities are more likely to have higher concentrations of H2S. This is due to
the fact that slower velocities allow for more accumulation of solids in the pipes. The
Environmental Protection Agency classified potential sulfide buildup into the following
categories based on flow velocities. (EPA, 1974)
A. Velocity of 2 feet per second - Efficient solids transport. No sulfide buildup in small
flows, up to 2 cfs. Sulfide buildup often observed in larger flows but only at a very slow
rate.
B. Velocity between 1.4 and 2.0 feet per second - Inorganic grit accumulating in the
bottom. More sulfide buildup as the velocity diminishes.
C. Velocity between 1.0 and 1.4 feet per second - Inorganic grit in the bottom, organic
solids slowly moving along the bottom. Strongly enhanced sulfide buildup; severe
problems expected
D. Velocity below 1.0 feet per second - Much organic and inorganic solid matter
accumulating, overlain with slow-moving organic solids. Sulfide problems worse than in
C.
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 30 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
J-U-B classified each gravity pipe segment into one of the four potential sulfide buildup
categories based on the peak velocity from the model output as shown in Figure 7: Existing Peak
Velocities. The force mains are not classified in the figure. Many of the north-south pipes have
slower velocities as they typically have flatter slopes than the east-west pipes. Many of the
pipes that are at the top ends of the system and serve a small number of homes also have slow
peak velocities. In many cases this is due to the fact that the peak flows in these pipes are small
and the flow depths are not large enough to create greater velocities.
During the installation of the temporary flow meters for this master plan, J-U-B recorded high
levels of H2S (above 10 parts per million) near the intersection of 600 North 1000 West.
3.7.5 Lift Station Analysis
The capacity of the existing lift stations was evaluated by running the model with the calibrated
flows. The lift station data was obtained through Logan City and input into the model. No lift
station condition analysis was done at the time of this report.
3.8 EXISTING SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
Some key system improvement projects and actions were identified through the existing system
evaluation process. These projects are categorized as Condition Improvements or Capacity
Improvements.
3.8.1 Capacity Improvements
Some areas in the collection system do not currently have adequate capacity and require
capacity improvements. A capacity improvement may be a modification to an existing manhole
to split flows differently, the addition of a new pipe, or the replacement of an existing pipe with
a larger pipe.
The existing capacity deficient areas that require improvements are listed and identified in the
existing improvements figure (Figure 8). Future capacity deficient areas are identified at each of
the future time frames modeled (2020, 2025, Build Out) and are shown in later figures as
described in Chapter 4. A list of existing capacity improvements is given in Table 3-4 along with
the engineer’s opinion of probable cost for each improvement project.
The lineal foot costs listed for each new pipe project in Table 3-4 include the anticipated bid
items for a typical sewer main installation. Some additional items are listed for projects that are
really short or small to allow for adequate funding. For example, new pipes to be installed that
are less than 350 feet long include an additional item for new manholes at each end of the
project. The lineal foot price for new pipes that are longer than 350 feet includes manholes.
Really small projects include an additional small project cost.
Diagrams of each of the improvements are provided in Appendix I with more detailed
information about how to split flows. For projects that require a weir, the estimated height of
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 31 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
the weir is listed in the improvement diagrams. The weir heights were adjusted in the model
until the flow levels in the downstream pipes were acceptable. The flow levels in the model are
based off of the system data used to build the model such as pipe invert elevations, sizes, slopes
and manhole geometry. It is recommended that the system data for the manholes that need
weirs be verified prior to constructing the weirs.
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 32 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
Table 3-3: Existing System Capacity Improvements
EXISTING SYSTEM CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT DESCRIPTION PIPE SIZE UNIT QUANTITY AMOUNT COST
Install new gravity pipe in 100 N. from 400 E. to Canyon Road to send approximately half of the flows to the west at the intersection of 400 E. and 100 N.
8 LF 112 $ 183 $ 20,482 Manhole EA 2 $ 3,000 $ 6,000
Small Project Cost $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Engineering & Construction Contingency (40%) $ 14,593
PROJECT COST $ 51,074
Connect south pipe to north pipe in 200 S. near 540 E.
8 LF 20 $ 183 $ 3,657 Manhole EA 2 $ 3,000 $ 6,000
Small Project Cost $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Engineering & Construction Contingency (40%) $ 7,863
PROJECT COST $ 27,520
Install weir (dam) at 200 S./300 E. to force more flow from the north to the west.
Weir EA 1 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 Engineering & Construction Contingency (40%) $ 2,000
PROJECT COST $ 7,000
Install weir (dam) in the north pipe in 300 S. near 600 W. to direct more flow north in the east sewer main.
Weir EA 1 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 Engineering & Construction Contingency (40%) $ 2,000
PROJECT COST $ 7,000 Install new 15" gravity pipe in 300 S. from 300 E. to Main Street. Replace existing 8" and 10" pipe from 300 E. to 100 East. Add parallel pipe from 100 E. to Main Street.
18 LF 2,050 $ 226 $ 463,384 Weir EA 2 $ 5,000 $ 10,000
Engineering & Construction Contingency (40%) $ 185,354
PROJECT COST $ 658,738
Upsize pipe or install parallel 8" gravity pipe in 725 N. from 400 W. to Kings Ct.
8 LF 500 $ 183 $ 91,436 Engineering & Construction Contingency (40%) $ 36,574
PROJECT COST $ 128,011
Replace existing 10" pipe from 100 N/500 E to approx. 200 N/550 E with new 12" pipe.
12 LF 1,310 $ 192 $ 251,782 Engineering & Construction Contingency (40%) $ 100,713
PROJECT COST $ 352,495
Install new pumps at the Airport lift station
N/A EA 2 $ 5,000 $ 10,000 Engineering & Construction Contingency (40%) $ 4,000
PROJECT COST $ 14,000
Install new 8" sewer pipe from 900 W to 1000 W at approx. 1230 South (Providence LS)
8 LF 900 $ 183 $ 164,585 Engineering & Construction Contingency (40%) $ 65,834
PROJECT COST $ 230,419 TOTAL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS COST $ 1,476,300
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 33 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
3.8.2 Condition Improvements
Some of the older system pipes are deteriorating, are in poor condition and are in need of repair
or replacement. City staff members met with J-U-B to identify the poor condition areas of the
system that are in the most need of repair.
The highest priority poor condition areas to improve are listed and shown in the existing
improvements figure (Figure 8). A list of existing condition improvements and associated
engineer’s opinion of probable cost is given in Table 3-4.
Table 3-4: Existing System Condition Improvements
EXISTING SYSTEM CONDITION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT DESCRIPTION PIPE SIZE UNIT QUANTITY AMOUNT COST
Replace existing pipe in 400 N (Main Street to 700 E) and 700 E
(400 N to 600 N) as described in the 2006 - 400 North Sewer Feasibility
Study.
8 LF 6,300 $ 462 $ 2,912,704.91 Engineering & Construction Contingency (40%) $ 1,165,082
PROJECT COST $ 4,077,787
Replace existing pipe in Country Club Drive, Approx. 1768-1796 (SEMH02440 to SEMH02441)
8 LF 273 $ 183 $ 49,924.14 Engineering & Construction Contingency (40%) $ 19,970
PROJECT COST $ 69,894 Replace existing pipe in 1000 N,
Approx. 950 E-1200 E (SEMH00293 to SEMH00494, Possible liner
project)
8 LF 1,680 $ 183 $ 307,225.49 Engineering & Construction Contingency (40%) $ 122,890
PROJECT COST $ 430,116
Replace existing pipe in 200 S, Approx. Main St.-200 E
(SEMH01765 to SEMH01665, Possible liner project)
8 LF 671 $ 183 $ 122,707.32 15 LF 696 $ 202 $ 140,366.99
Engineering & Construction Contingency (40%) $ 49,083 PROJECT COST $ 312,157
Replace existing pipe in 500 N, Approx. 550 E-600 E (SEMH02059
to SEMH02060, Possible liner project)
8 LF 345 $ 183 $ 63,090.95 Engineering & Construction Contingency (40%) $ 25,236
PROJECT COST $ 88,327
Replace existing pipe in 600 E and 1150 N, Approx. 1150 N - 1200 N &
550 E - 600 E (SEMH01839 to SEMH00021). Rebuild SEMH00085
at 1150 N/500 E to divert more flow west.
8 LF 711 $ 183 $ 130,022.22 Manhole EA 1 $ 3,000 $ 3,000
Engineering & Construction Contingency (40%) $ 52,009
PROJECT COST $ 185,031
TOTAL CONDITION IMPROVEMENT COSTS $ 5,163,300
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 34 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
The condition of the pipe in 400 North/700 East was evaluated in a 2006 feasibility study and
found to be poor. The feasibility study evaluated alternatives to repair or replace the pipe and
provided a recommended repair/replacement plan ( J-U-B Engineers Inc., 2006). The estimated
linear foot cost for trenching (replacement) the new line in the feasibility study was inflated by a
factor of 3% a year and inserted in Table 3-4 above. The 40% contingency was then added to
the construction cost as shown to provide a current estimated project cost.
3.8.3 Lift Station Improvements
The only existing lift station capacity issues were noted at the Airport lift station. There are
currently no pumps in this station, therefore, pumps should be installed as requested by City
staff.
3.8.4 Summary of Existing Improvements
The existing capacity and condition improvements should be completed as soon as possible.
There are no capacity improvements needed for the existing lift stations or their associated
force mains. The estimated opinion of probable cost for all of the existing improvements is
$6,639,000. A prioritized list of these improvements can be found in Section 6.
In addition to the recommended capital improvement projects (CIP) listed above, ongoing
maintenance should be considered as an option that could add capacity and improve pipe
conditions. Reducing I&I is one maintenance item that should be a priority to city staff,
especially in the Island area. I&I maintenance would reduce the flows through the collection
system and at the treatment plant. With the future sewer treatment method switching in the
coming years, this could reduce costs of treatment and save the City money.
One method to reduce I&I is to seal open pipe joints. According to City staff, much of the piping
in the Island area was installed with open joints. These joints can now be sealed and this could
be done by City staff during slow times of the year. Equipment would need to be purchased by
the City or otherwise be contracted out to private companies. Whichever method is used to
reduce I&I, additional funding should be set aside to provide for this improvement. If the
reduction of I&I is significant enough, some CIP’s could be delayed or removed.
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 35 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
4 MASTER PLAN & RELIEF ALTERNATIVES
4.1 INTRODUCTION
The master planning portion of the study involves applying future growth projections in the model to
identify the future collection system improvements needed as the City grows. This master plan
specifically evaluates the future time frames listed in Table 4-1.
Table 4-1: Future Time Frames Analyzed
Future Time Frames Analyzed
Title Description
2020 Projected 2020 flows during summer irrigation months
2025 Projected 2025 flows during summer irrigation months
Build Out Projected flows during the summer irrigation months at build out
Build out is defined as the condition when all of the areas in the future boundaries of the City develop to
the planned densities as identified in the Logan 2015 Water Master Plan Update. Based on a projected
2.5% growth rate provided by Logan and the planned densities, build out in the City will be reached
around year 2048. It is not known when the contributing cities will reach build-out. For the buildout
model, the flows from the contributing cities are based on the projected population for each city in year
2060 as projected by the Governor’s Office of Planning and Budget (GOPB).
The master plan models were utilized as tools for sizing future capacity improvements to the existing
system and sizing future trunk lines (lines that will be serve the undeveloped areas of the city as they
develop) and lift stations. The results of the master plan model identify conceptual alignments and
required pipe and pump sizes to accommodate future build out conditions.
4.2 KEY ASSUMPTIONS FOR FUTURE MODELS
The following is a list of key assumptions used for future projections:
• Logan City Growth Rate (2.5%) - The estimated future annual population growth rate for Logan
City is 2.5% as provided by City staff.
• Logan Growth Areas – J-U-B met with City staff to determine what areas may have more
potential to develop before other areas. The areas projected in the model to grow by years
2020, 2025 and build out are shown in Figure 9: Projected Growth. The build out boundary is
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 36 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
also shown and is based on the future projections used in the Logan 2015 Culinary Water
Master Plan as provided by the water master plan engineer Hansen Allen & Luce Inc.
• Logan Build Out ERU’s - The build out numbers of Equivalent Residential Units (ERU’s) for areas
to develop in Logan in the future are also taken from the projections used for the Logan 2015
Culinary Water Master Plan.
• Logan Build Out Year (2048) - The undeveloped areas in Logan will be built out around year
2048 based on the 2.5% growth rate.
• Growth Rates and Build Out of Contributing Communities - The projected growth rates for the
contributing communities vary decade to decade. Year 2060 populations were used for build
out because these communities may continue to grow after the 2048 Logan build out time
frame. A table that lists the projected populations for the contributing communities is given in
Appendix J (Utah Governor's Office of Planning and Budget, 2013).
• Average Sanitary Flow per Future ERU (0.17 GPM) - Each future ERU will contribute an average
sanitary flow of 0.17 GPM. This flow is based on an average flow from two areas on the east
side of the City. The northeast bench average flow is 0.13 GPM per ERU and the southeast
average flow is 0.2 GPM per ERU. This would equate to 70 gallons per person per day if 3.5
people for each ERU is assumed.
• Future Commercial and Industrial Daily Flow Volumes – All future flow volumes for areas to
develop in the future are based on the projected number of ERU’s used for the 2015 Culinary
Water Master Plan. The diurnal flow pattern used for the future flows correspond to the
planned land use.
• Peaking Factors - The sanitary flows in the model are all assigned to follow one of the five
diurnal flow patterns (Figure 3) based on the planned future land uses. Each diurnal pattern has
a slightly different peaking factor. (Graph 3-1)
• Infiltration Rate for Future Development Areas (0.12 gpm per acre) - Infiltration for areas that
will be developed in the future were added to the model at a rate of 0.12 gpm per acre and
assigned to the nearest existing or future system manhole. The future infiltration rate is
equivalent to the low infiltration rate used in the existing evaluation (Figure 4).
• Future Pipe Design Parameters - The future trunk lines included in the master plan are sized
based on the parameters listed in Table 4-2.
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 37 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
Table 4-2: Future Pipe Design Parameters
Future Pipe Design Parameters
D Diameter (inches)
d/D1 Maximum Allowed Depth / Diameter
d Maximum Allowed Flow Depth
(inches)
s Minimum
Pipe Slope2
8 0.5 4 0.40%
10 0.55 5.5 0.28%
12 0.6 7.2 0.21%
15 0.65 9.75 0.15%
18 0.75 13.5 0.12%
21 0.75 15.75 0.10%
24 0.75 18 0.10%
27 0.75 20.25 0.10%
30 0.75 22.5 0.10%
36 0.8 28.8 0.10%
42 0.85 35.7 0.10%
48 0.85 40.8 0.10%
60 0.85 51 0.10%
72 0.85 61.2 0.10% 1Standard of practice based on ASCE Man. of Reports on Engr. Practice #60 - Gravity Sanitary Sewer Design and Construction 210 State Standards minimum slope for 8" - 21" Pipe, 0.1% for constructability for pipes larger than 18"
• Future Lift Stations - Future lift stations will be built inside above-ground buildings.
• Ground Elevations - The ground elevations used to create the future system layout are based on
existing ground contours at 2 foot intervals provided by the Logan GIS department.
• Minimum Depth of Future Pipes (4 feet) – The minimum depth of the future pipes to serve new
areas is set at 4 feet. Some of the area south of 1700 South along the east side of the
Blacksmith Fork River is too low to allow for 4 foot bury depths without using pumps.
4.3 CREATION OF FUTURE MODELS
The future models were created based on the future assumptions and through an iterative process to
identify the most efficient way to provide sewer service to future development areas. The build out
model was created first to identify all of the pipes and lift stations that will be needed to serve the city
at build out. The build out model provided the sizes for any new pipes that will be installed to serve the
build out growth.
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 38 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
4.3.1 Future Lift Station Placement
A large portion of the undeveloped area is located on the western side of the City. The western
side is lower than other areas and will require some lift stations. The iterative process followed
to develop the build out collection system focused on minimizing the number of lift stations
needed to ultimately serve the City. It will take many years for the City to fully develop, and as
such there will be some smaller intermediate lift stations that will serve for a period of time until
the larger planned regional lift stations can be put into place. For example, the City is currently
phasing out some of its smaller lift stations and connecting the areas served by those lift
stations to the West Regional lift station.
4.3.2 Future Flow Generation
The future flows in the model are based on the assumptions for average flow per ERU listed in
Section 4.2. These flows were added to the model with a slightly different method then in the
existing model. Future flows were added based on the number of projected ERU’s multiplied by
the average sanitary flow per ERU in a given parcel or region. The peaking factors are based on
the diurnal curve assigned that matches the planned land use for each parcel. The flows were
added to the future conceptual manhole upstream of the nearest region served by the pipe.
Infiltration was added based on the service area upstream of each manhole.
4.4 2020 EVALUATION AND RESULTS
A model scenario was created to evaluate the capacity of the existing sewer system at year 2020 and
identify any needed future pipes or lift stations to serve the projected growth. The 2020 scenario was
built assuming that all of the capacity and condition improvements identified and listed in Chapter 3 for
the existing system will have been made. Future growth was added to the areas that were identified as
areas that may develop in the next five years (Figure 9). The 2020 scenario also includes future flows
from other contributing cities.
An overview of the d/D values in the existing system with projected 2020 flows is shown in Figure 10:
2020 Depth over Diameter. The island area continues to have some pipes that have high d/D values
along with a pipe in 1200 South between Legrand Street and Hwy. 89/91 that is full. The reserve
capacity available in each pipe segment for the same scenario is shown in Figure 11: 2020 Reserve
Capacity.
The areas with the capacity improvements that should be focused on between now and 2020 are
identified in Figure 12: 2020 Improvements. The capacity improvements are listed on the figure as well
as future pipes that are needed to serve the areas projected to develop. The future pipes are split into
two categories:
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 39 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
1. Future 8” by Development - These are future 8 inch pipes that will be installed by
developers as needed for new development. The full cost of these pipes will be paid for by
the developers.
2. Future Capacity Up Size - These are future pipes that a developer will be required to install
but are recommended to be larger than the 8 inches. These pipes will serve large areas that
will develop in the future. It is assumed that these will be installed by developers with
Logan paying for the cost differential associated with upsizing to diameters larger than 8
inches. These are listed with a description of “Capacity Up Size”.
The future lift stations and force main pipes needed in year 2020 are identified in Figure 12. The
capacity improvements that are needed between now and year 2020 include upgrades to the existing
system, future lift stations, and future trunk lines. The pipe in 1200 south is approaching full capacity,
Prior to 2020 the section of this pipe from Legrand Street to HWY 91/89 needs additional capacity. A
project to add a parallel 15-inch pipe is proposed to add the needed capacity for buildout.
The future lift stations and trunk lines will need to be installed in areas that currently have no collection
system as those areas develop. All of the future lift stations are needed to serve future growth only. It
is anticipated that they will be paid for by developers through impact fees. Future trunk lines that are
installed should be large enough to serve all of the future development in the City as outlined in this
master plan.
The conceptual opinion of probable costs for the 2020 capacity improvements to the existing system,
the future lift stations and the costs to upsize the future trunk lines needed for year 2020 are tabulated
in Table 4-3. The exact sizes for the pumps and force mains will be determined during design of the lift
stations. The exact time frame for the construction of these projects is not known and will be driven by
development.
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 40 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
Table 4-3: 2020 Capacity Improvements
YEAR 2020 SYSTEM CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS
PRIORITY NO. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PIPE SIZE UNIT QUANT.
UNIT AMOUNT COST
16 Add a parallel 15" main line in 1200 South from HWY 89/91 to Legrand Street.
15 LF 800 $ 202 $ 161,341
Weir EA 1 $ 5,000 $ 5,000
Eng. & Const. Contingency (40%) $ 66,537
PROJECT COST $ 232,878
Sub Total $ 232,900
YEAR 2020 LIFT STATIONS AS NEEDED FOR GROWTH
ID DESCRIPTION ITEM SIZE GPM HEAD QUANT. UNIT
AMOUNT COST
Future 1
New lift station at
3000 North/2300
West
Pumps 450 56 2 $ 300,000 $ 600,000
Force Main 6 1,700 $ 30 $ 51,000
Building & Land
$ 200,000 $ 200,000
Engineering & Construction Contingency (40%) $ 340,400
PROJECT COST $ 1,191,400
Future 2
New lift station at
2200 North/2300
West
Pumps 1700 150 2 $ 350,000 $ 700,000
Force Main 12 12,500 $ 45 $ 562,500
Building & Land
$ 200,000 $ 200,000
Engineering & Construction Contingency (40%) $ 585,000
PROJECT COST $ 2,047,500
Future 4
New lift station at
1900 South/2000
West
Pumps 350 20 2 $ 250,000 $ 500,000
Force Main 6 900 $ 30 $ 27,000
Building & Land
$ 200,000 $ 200,000
Engineering & Construction Contingency (40%) $ 290,800
PROJECT COST $ 1,017,800
Sub Total $ 4,256,700
YEAR 2020 FUTURE MAIN LINE UPSIZE COST TO BE PAID BY CITY AS NEEDED FOR GROWTH
MODEL ID APPROX. LOCATION DESCRIPTION SIZE QUANT.
UNIT AMOUNT COST
FUTP57 East of TP Wetlands
Capacity Up Size
12 1,980 $ 15 $ 29,700
FUTP59 East of TP Wetlands
Capacity Up Size
12 780 $ 15 $ 11,700
FUTP63 East of TP Wetlands
Capacity Up Size
18 830 $ 40 $ 33,200
FUTP65 East of TP Wetlands
Capacity Up Size
18 350 $ 40 $ 14,000
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 41 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
FUTP67 East of TP Wetlands
Capacity Up Size
18 1,770 $ 40 $ 70,800
FUTP145 East of TP Wetlands
Capacity Up Size
12 1,170 $ 15 $ 17,550
FUTP147 East of TP Wetlands
Capacity Up Size
12 80 $ 15 $ 1,200
FUTP155 East of TP Wetlands
Capacity Up Size
18 200 $ 40 $ 8,000
FUTP173 1400 W (Between 400 S &
600 S) Capacity Up
Size 10 1,020 $ 10 $ 10,200
FUTP177 600 S (Between 1400 W &
2000 W) Capacity Up
Size 10 3,720 $ 10 $ 37,200
Sub Total $ 233,600
Total $ 4,723,200
4.5 2025 EVALUATION AND RESULTS
A 2025 model scenario was created to evaluate the capacity of the existing sewer system and identify
any needed new pipes or lift stations to serve the projected growth. This scenario was built assuming
that all of the improvements identified for the previous time frames will have been made. Future
growth was added (Figure 9) and includes future flows from other contributing cities.
An overview of the d/D values in the existing system with projected 2025 flows is shown in Figure 13:
2025 Depth over Diameter. The two existing trunk lines that connect to the West Regional lift station
have many pipe segments with d/D values greater than 1.0. This is because the existing pumps in the lift
station do not have adequate capacity to keep up with the projected flows coming to the lift station.
The pipes themselves have capacity to convey the flows to the lift station as indicated by the 2025
reserve capacity evaluation results. The reserve capacity available in each pipe segment for the same
scenario is shown in Figure 14: 2025 Reserve Capacity.
The trunk line in 1200 South from Providence between Legrand Street and the Providence flow meter
will need additional capacity. A project to add a parallel 15-inch pipe is proposed to add the needed
capacity for buildout.
The areas that will require additional capacity along with the identified pumping capacity improvement
to the West Regional Lift Station are listed in Figure 15: 2025 Improvements. The conceptual opinion of
probable cost for the West Regional Lift Station upgrades and for the new pipe in 1200 South are given
in Table 4-4.
The future pipes that need to be installed to serve areas that are projected to develop between year
2020 and 2025 are all 8 inch pipes. Because of this fact, Table 4-4 does not list any costs for these pipes
because it is assumed that they will be paid for and installed by developers. The future 8” pipes are
shown in Figure 15.
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 42 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
Table 4-4: 2025 Capacity Improvements
YEAR 2025 SYSTEM CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS
PRIORITY NO.
MODEL ID PROJECT
DESCRIPTION GPM HEAD QUANT.
UNIT AMOUNT
*COST
17 W_REGIONAL_ PUMP1
Add 2 new pumps in pump slots #3 and #4. Install 1 pump that the City has on the shelf in slot #3, purchase and install one pump in slot #4 and purchase 2 additional pumps as backups.
730 30 3 $ 18,500 $ 55,500
Eng. & Const. Contingency (40%) $ 22,200
PROJECT COST $ 77,700
PRIORITY NO.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION PIPE SIZE
UNIT QUANT. UNIT
AMOUNT COST
18
Add a parallel 15" main line in 1200 South from Legrand St. to
Providence meter that is located east of Hwy. 165.
15 LF 1,850 $ 202 $ 373,102
Casing LS 1 $ 76,000 $ 76,000
Eng. & Const. Contingency (40%) $ 179,641
PROJECT COST $ 628,743
19 Replace existing 8" pipe with new
10" pipe crossing 2500 N to Airport
10 LF 116 $ 187 $ 21,735
Eng. & Const. Contingency (40%) $ 8,694
PROJECT COST $ 30,428
Total $ 736,900 * - The costs for the upgrades to the West Regional Lift Station are based on the assumption that the station is already plumbed
and wired for the addition of two more pumps and that the pump control equipment is already in place, and one of those
pumps is in the City inventory. If pump controls are not currently in place for the 2 additional pumps, the estimated total cost
of the improvements to the lift station should be assumed to be $90,000. The exact time frame for the improvements will be
driven by development.
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 43 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
4.6 BUILDOUT EVALUATION AND RESULTS
A model scenario was created to evaluate the capacity of the existing sewer system and identify any
needed new pipes or lift stations to serve the City under build out conditions as defined in Section 4.1.
This scenario was created assuming that all of the improvements identified for the previous time frames
will have already been made.
An overview of the d/D values in the existing system with the projected build out flows is shown in
Figure 16: Build Out Depth over Diameter. The island area continues to have pipes that are near or
exceeding capacity. The trunk lines that serve North Logan and Smithfield/Hyde Park are approaching
their capacity limits and a short pipe that crosses Highway 91 near 1100 South. The reserve capacity
available in each pipe segment is shown in Figure 17: Build Out Reserve Capacity.
Many pipe segments along the existing trunk line that comes from North Logan is over capacity at the
build out time frame in the model. Future alternatives to add capacity to this trunk line were evaluated
in the Northwest Regional Wastewater Study (Sunrise Engineering, Inc., 2012). The alternative selected
as a result of the study requires a new trunk line to be shared by Logan and North Logan. The new trunk
line will include some 36-inch, 42-inch and 48-inch diameter piping as described in the study. Based on
the study, Logan’s cost share is 14% for the 36” pipe, 27% for the 42” pipe and 53% for the 48” pipe.
The trunk line that comes from Smithfield/Hyde Park is at capacity at build out in the model. This trunk
line may or may not reach its capacity limits depending on development densities and I&I flow in the
future. This line should be monitored in future years (Appendix H).
The capacity improvements that are needed between year 2025 and build out include two upgrades to
the existing system, two future lift stations and future trunk lines. The areas that will need to be
monitored and the capacity improvements for build out are shown in Figure 18: Build Out
Improvements. The new pipe for Project #9 will divert some flows from the pipe that crosses Highway
91 at 100 West to Legrand Street to the south. Two future lift stations and multiple trunk lines will need
to be installed in areas that currently have no collection system as those areas develop.
The conceptual opinion of probable costs for the buildout capacity improvements to the existing system,
the two future lift stations and the cost to upsize the additional future trunk lines are listed in Table 4-5.
The exact sizes for the pumps and force mains will be determined during design of the lift stations. The
exact time frame for the construction of these projects will be driven by development.
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 44 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
Table 4-5: Build Out Capacity Improvements
BUILD OUT SYSTEM CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS
PRIORITY NO.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION PIPE SIZE
UNIT QUANT. UNIT
AMOUNT COST
20 New 8" Main Line in 100 West from
US 89-91 to Legrand Street
8 LF 650 $ 183 $ 118,867
Eng. & Const. Contingency (40%) $ 47,547
PROJECT COST $ 166,414
21 New trunk line
from North Logan
LOGAN SHARE
14% 36 LF 2,700 $ 393 $ 148,674
27% 42 LF 4,750 $ 380 $ 487,350
53% 48 LF 4,700 $ 400 $ 996,400
Eng. & Const. Contingency (40%) $ 652,969
PROJECT COST (Logan's Share) $ 2,285,393
Sub Total $ 2,451,800
BUILD OUT LIFT STATIONS AS NEEDED FOR GROWTH
ID DESCRIPTION ITEM SIZE GPM HEAD QUANT. UNIT
AMOUNT COST
Future 3
New lift station at 250
South/1900 West
Pumps 80 30 2 $ 300,000 $ 600,000
Force Main 6 6,230 $ 30 $ 186,900
Building & Land
$ 200,000 $ 200,000
Eng. & Const. Contingency (40%) $ 394,760
PROJECT COST $ 1,381,660
Future 5
New lift station at 600
North/1900 West
Pumps 200 25 2 $ 350,000 $ 700,000
Force Main 6 320 $ 30 $ 9,600
Building & Land
$ 200,000 $ 200,000
Eng. & Const. Contingency (40%) $ 363,840
PROJECT COST $ 1,273,440
Sub Total $ 2,655,000
BUILD OUT FUTURE MAIN LINE UP SIZE COST TO BE PAID BY CITY AS NEEDED FOR GROWTH
MODEL ID APPROX. LOCATION DESCRIPTION SIZE QUANT. UNIT
AMOUNT COST
FUTP151 East of TP Wetlands Capacity Up
Size 18 2,370 $ 45 $ 106,650
FUTP181 East of 2000 W/South of 600 S Capacity Up
Size 10 1,470 $ 8 $ 11,760
FUTP100 East of 2000 W/South of 600 S Capacity Up
Size 10 2,320 $ 8 $ 18,560
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 45 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
FUTP03868 Btwn 1000 & 1200 W, North
of 1800 N Capacity Up
Size 24 1,380 $ 100 $ 138,000
FUTP03927 Btwn 1000 & 1200 W, North
of 1800 N Capacity Up
Size 24 1,090 $ 100 $ 109,000
FUTP03959 Btwn 1000 & 1200 W, North
of 1800 N Capacity Up
Size 24
1,090 $ 100 $ 109,000
FUTP04068 Btwn 1000 & 1200 W, North
of 1800 N Capacity Up
Size 24 1,360 $ 100 $ 136,000
Sub Total $ 629,000
Total $ 5,736,000
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 46 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
5 PRIORITIZED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS (CIP)
Table 5-1 below lists the needed CIP’s identified within the existing collection system in order of priority.
These should be completed in the order they are listed and as funding becomes available.
Table 5-1: Existing System CIP Summary
EXISTING SYSTEM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS SUMMARY
PRIORITY NO.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT
TYPE RECOMMENDED
TIMEFRAME PROJECT COST1
1
Install new 15" gravity pipe in 300 S. from 300 E. to Main Street. Replace existing 8" and 10" pipe from 300 E. to 100 East. Add parallel pipe from 100 E. to Main Street.
Capacity Existing $ 658,700
2
Replace existing pipe in 400 N (Main Street to 700 E) and 700 E (400 N to 600 N) as described in the 2006 - 400 North Sewer Feasibility Study.
Condition Existing $ 4,077,800
3 Replace existing pipe in Country Club Drive, Approx. 1768-1796 (SEMH02440 to SEMH02441)
Condition Existing $ 69,900
4 Replace existing pipe in 1000 N, Approx. 950 E-1200 E (SEMH00293 to SEMH00494, Possible liner project)
Condition Existing $ 430,100
5
Install new gravity pipe in 100 N. from 400 E. to Canyon Road to send approximately half of the flows to the west at the intersection of 400 E. and 100 N.
Capacity Existing $ 51,100
6 Install new 8" sewer pipe from 900 W to 1000 W at approx. 1230 South (Providence LS)
Capacity Existing $ 230,400
7 Connect south pipe to north pipe in 200 S. near 540 E.
Capacity Existing $ 27,500
8 Install new pumps at the Airport lift station Capacity Existing $ 14,000
9
Replace existing pipe in 600 E and 1150 N, Approx. 1150 N - 1200 N & 550 E - 600 E (SEMH01839 to SEMH00021). Rebuild SEMH00085 at 1150 N/500 E to divert more flow west.
Condition Existing $ 185,000
10 Replace existing pipe in 200 S, Approx. Main St.-200 E (SEMH01765 to SEMH01665, Possible liner project)
Condition Existing $ 312,200
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 47 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
PRIORITY NO.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT
TYPE RECOMMENDED
TIMEFRAME PROJECT COST1
11 Replace existing pipe in 500 N, Approx. 550 E-600 E (SEMH02059 to SEMH02060, Possible liner project)
Condition Existing $ 88,300
12 Install weir (dam) at 200 S./300 E. to force more flow from north to west.
Capacity Existing $ 7,000
13 Install weir (dam) in the north pipe in 300 S. near 600 W. to direct more flow north in the east sewer main.
Capacity Existing $ 7,000
14 Replace existing 10" pipe from 100 N/500 E to approx. 200 N/550 E with new 12" pipe.
Capacity Existing $ 352,500
15 Upsize pipe or install parallel 8" gravity pipe in 725 N. from 400 W. to Kings Ct.
Capacity Existing $ 128,000
Existing Timeframe Subtotal $ 6,639,500
16 Add a parallel 15" main line in 1200 South from HWY 89/91 to Legrand Street.
Capacity 2020 $ 232,900
2020 Timeframe Subtotal $ 232,900
17
Add 2 new pumps in pump slots #3 and #4. Install 1 pump that the City has on the shelf in slot #3, purchase and install one pump in slot #4 and purchase 2 additional pumps as backups.
Capacity 2025 $ 77,700
18 Add a parallel 15" main line in 1200 South from Legrand St. to Providence meter that is located east of Hwy. 165.
Capacity 2025 $ 628,700
19 Replace existing 8" pipe with new 10" pipe crossing 2500 N to Airport
Capacity 2025 $ 30,400
2025 Timeframe Subtotal $ 736,800
20 New 8" Main Line in 100 West from US 89-91 to Legrand Street
Capacity Build Out $ 166,400
21 New trunk line from North Logan Capacity Build Out $ 2,285,400
Buildout Timeframe Subtotal $ 2,451,800
Total $ 10,061,000
1 – This project cost includes 40% engineering and construction contingency
Table 5-2 below lists the needed CIP to serve areas that are currently undeveloped. These should be
completed as growth dictates.
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 48 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
Table 5-2: Future System CIP Summary
FUTURE SYSTEM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS SUMMARY
ID PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT
TYPE PROJECTED TIMEFRAME
PROJECT COST1
Future 1 New lift station at 3000 North/2300 West
Growth 2020 $ 1,191,400
Future 2 New lift station at 2200 North/2300 West
Growth 2020 $ 2,047,500
Future 4 New lift station at 1900 South/2000 West
Growth 2020 $ 1,017,800
FUTP57 Capacity Up Size Growth 2020 $ 29,700
FUTP59 Capacity Up Size Growth 2020 $ 11,700
FUTP63 Capacity Up Size Growth 2020 $ 33,200
FUTP65 Capacity Up Size Growth 2020 $ 14,000
FUTP67 Capacity Up Size Growth 2020 $ 70,800
FUTP145 Capacity Up Size Growth 2020 $ 17,600
FUTP147 Capacity Up Size Growth 2020 $ 1,200
FUTP155 Capacity Up Size Growth 2020 $ 8,000
FUTP173 Capacity Up Size Growth 2020 $ 10,200
FUTP177 Capacity Up Size Growth 2020 $ 37,200
Future 3 New lift station at 250 South/1900 West Growth Build Out $ 1,381,700
Future 5 New lift station at 600 North/1900 West Growth Build Out $ 1,273,400
FUTP151 Capacity Up Size Growth Build Out $ 106,700
FUTP181 Capacity Up Size Growth Build Out $ 11,800
FUTP100 Capacity Up Size Growth Build Out $ 18,600
FUTP03868 Capacity Up Size Growth Build Out $ 138,000
FUTP03927 Capacity Up Size Growth Build Out $ 109,000
FUTP03959 Capacity Up Size Growth Build Out $ 109,000
FUTP04068 Capacity Up Size Growth Build Out $ 136,000
Total $ 7,774,500 1 – This project cost includes 40% engineering and construction contingency
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 49 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The following conclusions and recommendations are given based on the foregoing evaluation.
Existing System Geometry - There are some pipe invert elevations and other system geometry data that
still need to be updated.
• Update the City GIS data to include some new manhole inverts that were added as noted in the
model.
• In the future, the GIS data will always be the parent data and the model will be updated based
on the latest GIS data.
• Continue to identify and update corrections for the existing system GIS files and then update the
model.
System Infiltration - The total approximate base flow recorded at the treatment lagoons during winter
months is approximately 3,750 gallons per minute (GPM) based on the flows recorded during the very
early morning hours of winter days. The base flow during the summer is approximately 7,750 GPM. It is
probable that a large portion of the base flow comes from groundwater infiltration with some flow
being sanitary flow produced mainly by industrial users that operate during early morning hours. A very
large portion of the infiltration comes from the island area. With the construction of a new treatment
plant and the change in treatment methods, the costs of treatment of sewer flows per gallon is
increased. Any reduction in infiltration will result in treatment savings
• Implement more flow monitoring in the island area during the summer months to identify more
specific sources of infiltration. This will lead to more effective efforts to reduce the infiltration.
• Implement infiltration reduction methods, such as sealing open pipe joints. An ongoing
infiltration reduction fund should be created in the budget as a way to implement this
maintenance program. This program will result in sewer treatment savings if I&I is successfully
reduced.
• Focus infiltration reduction efforts first in the Island area which has been identified as the area
with the highest infiltration rates in the City. Many of the pipes in this area were installed with
open joints that can be sealed off.
• Monitor ground water levels to understand how and if the ground water changes as a result of
the pipe joint sealing efforts.
City staff could seal pipe joints during winter months when the crews are not as busy if some sealing
equipment is purchased. This work could alternatively be contracted out.System Inflow - Small
amounts of inflow were observed as a result of some small rain events recorded while gathering flow
data for this master plan. Infiltration is a much larger flow contributor to the system then inflow from
small rain events.
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 50 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
• Collect flow data during large rain events for an accurate evaluation of the impacts of inflow on
the system.
Existing Pipes Near Capacity - Some existing pipes appear to be approaching capacity in the model (See
Figures 5 and 6).
• As development occurs, the existing d/D and reserve capacity figures should be referenced to
determine where areas of concern may be. The model should also be updated to reflect new
flow conditions as new routing or new development happens.
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 51 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
Existing Poor Condition Areas - Some pipes in the existing system are known to be problem areas or
pipes that are deteriorated (See Figure 8). These pipes are listed in the report in Table 3-4 with the
estimated replacement costs.
• The condition of the existing pipe located in 400 North from 700 East to Main Street is of
particular concern and should be repaired/replaced as soon as possible.
Existing Over Capacity Areas – Some small isolated pipes in the existing system are over capacity at
peak flow times (See Figure 8).
• Design and build the improvements listed in Table 3-3 of the report to add additional capacity as
soon as is feasible.
Existing Lift Stations – New pumps will be needed at the existing lift station at the airport in the next
few years. Improvements are currently being made to the Providence lift station by city staff. New
pumps will need to be added to the West Regional Lift Station in the year 2025.
• Install two pumps at the Airport lift station. Continue to monitor the existing lift stations and
upgrade as needed. Plan to add two new pumps to the West Regional Lift Station in the year
2025.
Future Over Capacity Areas - There are some areas in the existing system that will exceed capacity in
the future based on the assumed growth projections.
• Begin plans to build the 2020 improvements as listed in Table 4-3 of the report.
Future Trunk Lines and Lift Station Upgrades - Many new trunk lines and lift stations will be needed to
serve the areas that will develop in the city in the future.
• Require stringent requirements for new developments and enforce installation of tight sewer
systems to minimize new sources of I&I.
• Size future pipes and lift stations based on the conceptual future system plan prepared for this
report (See Figure 19).
• Plan for future regional lift stations in the approximate locations indicated. This will require
extra coordination with developers during planning and development, but will greatly reduce
future operation and maintenance costs. By having fewer regional lift stations instead of many
smaller lift stations the City will have much less equipment to operate and maintain.
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 52 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
Future Areas Near Capacity – Some additional pipes appear to be approaching capacity in the model at
the Build Out time frame (See table in Appendix H).
• Continue to maintain and update the model in order to manage future capacity issues.
Computer Model - The computer model is very detailed and can be used to identify impacts from new
developments.
• Utilize the existing model to determine impacts from proposed new developments or areas that
plan to re-develop to higher densities.
• Update the existing model regularly by importing updated system information from the GIS
databases that are maintained by the Logan GIS department as defined in Appendix K.
• Require an update to the existing sewer model to verify that there is adequate capacity prior to
permitting new developments.
• Update the overall master plan projections every 5 to 10 years.
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Logan City Page 53 Sewer Collection System Master Plan
7 REFERENCES
J-U-B Engineers Inc. (2006). 400 North Sewer Feasibility Report. Logan.
Environmental Protection Agency. (1991). Sewer System Infrastructure Analysis and Rehabilitation.
Cincinnati, OH: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and
Developement.
EPA. (1974). Process Design Manual for Sulfide Control in Sanitary Sewerage Systems.
EPA. (2014). Guide For Estimating Infiltration and Inflow. Water Infrastructure Outreach. Retrieved from
EPA.
Sunrise Engineering, Inc. (2012). Northwest Regional Wastewater Study.
United States Census Bureau. (n.d.). Population Estimates. Retrieved from
https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=Logan+City+population+1990
Utah Governor's Office of Planning and Budget. (2013). Governors Office of Management and Budget.
Retrieved from http://gomb.utah.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2013/08/Subcounty-Pop-
Projections-2013.xlsx