2017 pork 101 ippe - meatscience.org

23
1 USSBUNON00593 Pork 101 Presented by Dr. Davey Griffin (Texas A&M University) Dr. Dean Pringle (University of Georgia) USSBUNON00593 Pork 101 Developed by: Dennis Burson (University of Nebraska) Davey Griffin (Texas A&M) Wes Osburn (Michigan State/TAMU) David Meisinger (NPPC & AMSA) USSBUNON00593 Pork 101 First Program: September 1997 University of Nebraska

Upload: others

Post on 19-Mar-2022

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2017 Pork 101 IPPE - meatscience.org

1

USSBUNON00593

Pork 101Presented by 

Dr. Davey Griffin (Texas A&M University)

Dr. Dean Pringle (University of Georgia)

USSBUNON00593

Pork 101Developed by:

Dennis Burson (University of Nebraska)

Davey Griffin (Texas A&M)

Wes Osburn (Michigan State/TAMU)

David Meisinger (NPPC & AMSA)

USSBUNON00593

Pork 101First Program:

September 1997

University of Nebraska

Page 2: 2017 Pork 101 IPPE - meatscience.org

2

USSBUNON00593

Pork 101 Topics

USSBUNON00593

Pork 101 Topics (Day 2 Morning)

USSBUNON00593

Pork 101 Topics (Day 2 Afternoon)

Page 3: 2017 Pork 101 IPPE - meatscience.org

3

USSBUNON00593

Pork 101 Topics (Day 3)

USSBUNON00593

Pork Quality

Prepared By: Dr. Elisabeth Huff Lonergan

Iowa State University

USSBUNON00593

What is Pork Quality?

• Summation of those attributes that make porkdesirable as a human food.

Page 4: 2017 Pork 101 IPPE - meatscience.org

4

Pork Quality Attributes

Color Marbling

Drip Loss

Marbling scores correspond to intramuscular lipid content.

1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0

5.0 6.0 10.0

Marbling Standards

1.0Pale pinkish gray to white

61*

2.0Grayish pink

55*

3.0Reddish pink

49*

4.0Dark reddish pink

43*

5.0Purplish red

37*

6.0Dark purplish red

31*

Color Standards

Minolta L* values use D65 daylight light source & measured on day one.

Page 5: 2017 Pork 101 IPPE - meatscience.org

5

Color & Drip Loss Relationship

PSE RFN DFD

Color & Drip Loss Relationship

pH Decline and Pork Color

5.0

5.5

6.0

6.5

7.0

0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24

pH

Hours Postmortem

DARK

NORMAL

PALE

Genetics Nutrition On-Farm Handling

Transportation

Pre-Slaughter Handling

Carcass Handling

Stunning

Page 6: 2017 Pork 101 IPPE - meatscience.org

6

Pork Quality and Consistency Quiz

USSBUNON00593

Pig HandlingPresented by 

Slides Prepared by 

Drs. Matt Ritter, Phil Rincker, and Scott Carr

Elanco Animal Health

USSBUNON00593

Areas to Discuss

• Overview of pre-harvest stressors in pigs

• Practical importance of pre-harvest handling– Transport losses in market weight pigs– Carcass bruising and trim loss– Pork quality defects– Economic implications

• Review best handling practices to minimize stress

Page 7: 2017 Pork 101 IPPE - meatscience.org

7

USSBUNON00593

“Pig Handling 101”

• During rearing, pigs experience relatively few changes to their environment and may have limited exposure to humans

• Changes in the pig’s environment and / or the presence of an unfamiliar human can cause fear

• Examples of pigs being frightened during loading include:– Moving to the corners of barn pens

– Trying to escape through small openings in gates

– Balking at moving objects, shadows, sunlight, changes in flooring, wind, etc.

Hemsworth, P. 1993. Behavioural principles of pig handling. Pages 197-211 in Livestock Handling and Transport. T. Grandin, ed. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.

National Pork Board. 2004. Trucker Quality Assurance Handbook. C. Stahl, ed. National Pork Board, Des Moines, IA.

USSBUNON00593

“Pig Handling 101”

• Pigs have good memories and can be trained– Examples: show pigs and racing pigs at the fair

• The natural behaviors of pigs are to:– Follow one another during handling– Move from dark to well lit areas

• A thorough understanding of the natural behaviors ofpigs and the flight zone are needed for the optimalhandling and movement of pigs

Hemsworth, P. 1993. Behavioural principles of pig handling. Pages 197-211 in Livestock Handling and Transport. T. Grandin, ed. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.

National Pork Board. 2004. Trucker Quality Assurance Handbook. C. Stahl, ed. National Pork Board, Des Moines, IA.

USSBUNON00593

Flight Zone and Point of Balance

(Photo courtesy of the National Pork Board’s TQA Handbook, 2004)

National Pork Board. 2004. Trucker Quality Assurance Handbook. C. Stahl, ed. National Pork Board, Des Moines, IA.

Page 8: 2017 Pork 101 IPPE - meatscience.org

8

USSBUNON00593

Common Pig Handling Tools

At the Farm At the Plant

(Photos courtesy of www.qcsupply.com and www.grandin.com)

Sorting Board

Livestock Paddle

Electric Prod

Flag

Livestock Paddle

Witch’s Cape

USSBUNON00593

Overview of Pre-harvest Stressors

Photos provided by: Dr. Mike Ellis, National Pork Board, and Pork Magazine

USSBUNON00593

Economic Impact of Transport Losses

• Ritter et al., 2009– Transport losses cost the U.S. swine industry ~$46 million in 2006

– This translates to approximately $0.44 per pig marketed

Ritter, M. J., M. Ellis, N. L. Berry, S. E. Curtis, L. Anil, M. Benjamin, D. Butler, C. Dewey, B. Driessen, P. DuBois, J. Hill, J. Marchant-Forde, P. Matzat, J. McGlone, P. Mormede, T. Moyer, K. Pfalzgraf, J. Salak-Johnson, J. Sterle, C. Stull, T. Whiting, B. Wolter, S. R. Niekamp, and A. K. Johnson. 2009. Transport losses in market weight pigs: I. A review of definitions, incidence and economic impact. Professional Animal Scientist. 25:404-414.

Page 9: 2017 Pork 101 IPPE - meatscience.org

9

USSBUNON00593

• Carcass bruising can be caused by:– Rough handling– Poorly maintained facilities– Overcrowding pigs during transport– Fighting

Carcass Bruising and Trim Loss

Lonergan, S., E. Huff-Lonergan, and A. Johnson. 2006. Pork Quality. Proceedings of the Animal Care and Handling Conference, Overland Park, KS.

Faucitano, L. 2001. Causes of skin damage to pig carcasses. Can. J. Anm. Sci. 81:39-45.

Barton Gade, P. 1997. The effect of pre-slaughter handling on meat quality in pigs. Pages 100-123 in Manipulating Pig Production. P. D. Cranwell, ed. Australasian Pig Science Association, Victoria, Australia.

(Photos courtesy of Lonergan et al., 2006)

USSBUNON00593

Live Market Hog Evaluationand Grading

Developed by:B. A. Reiling, Ph.D.

University of Nebraska‐Lincoln

USSBUNON00593

How Do Animals Get Fat?

• Top to Bottom

• Front to Rear

• Gender Effects– Gilts leaner than barrows

Page 10: 2017 Pork 101 IPPE - meatscience.org

10

Practice 1

Dress %Hot Carcass WtLRBF10th Rib FatLEAMuscle ScoreUSDA Grade% Lean

77.6%

187 lbs

0.60 in

0.50 in

8.0 in2

2

Live Weight = 241 lbs

USSBUNON00593

Let’s Look at Some Live Pigs!

Page 11: 2017 Pork 101 IPPE - meatscience.org

11

USSBUNON00593

Pork Carcass Lean Value Pricing

Prepared by:Dr. Davey Griffin

Texas A & M University

USSBUNON00593

Conversion of “Pig to Pork”

Lean Quality

Page 12: 2017 Pork 101 IPPE - meatscience.org

12

Lean Quantity

Pork Carcass Measurements

Backfat Measurements:

Last Lumbar Vert.

Last Rib

1st Rib

Carcass Length:

Anterior Edge of First Rib to

Anterior Edge of Aitch Bone

Pounds of

Fat Free Lean =8.5876–(21.8957 x 10th rib fat, in)

+(3.0047 X LEA, in.2)

+(.4650 x HCWT, lbs.)

Percentage

Fat Free lean =(Pounds of Fat Free Lean/

Hot Carc. Wt.)x100

Fat Free Lean Equation

Page 13: 2017 Pork 101 IPPE - meatscience.org

13

Carcass Weight Pricing

“Dress-Off Items”

Head, Viscera, Pluck, Hair, Blood, etc.

65 lbs.

250 lbs.

185 lbs.

74%

26%

Producer Paid on a Carcass Weight Basis

Dressing Percentage Is The Most Important Factor!

USSBUNON00593

Lean Value Pricing

• Grid carcass weight and leannessadjustments may be applied:– Fixed premiums (known dollar amount)

– Relative premiums (percent adjustment)

• Carcasses are not typically USDA (thirdparty) graded– Packer employee measures

• Objective measures– Fat-O-Meater, ruler, ultra-sound, etc.

EVALUATIONS OF CUTABILITY

Expected Yields of the Four Lean Cuts, by Grade, Based on Chilled Carcass Weight1

1These yields will be approximately 1 percent lower if based on hot carcass weight.

Grade Yield

U.S. No. 1 60.4% and greater

U.S. No. 2 57.4% to 60.3%

U.S. No. 3 54.4% to 57.3%

U.S. No. 4 Less than 54.4%

U.S. No. 1 U.S. No. 2 U.S. No. 3 U.S. No. 4

Page 14: 2017 Pork 101 IPPE - meatscience.org

14

Carcass Evaluation

#1 Evaluation Barrow

#5 Evaluation Barrow

Page 15: 2017 Pork 101 IPPE - meatscience.org

15

USSBUNON00593

Factors in the Slaughter Process Affecting Pork Quality

South Dakota State UniversityJennifer BokDuane Wulf

The Ohio State UniversityDustin Boler

National Pork BoardDavid Meisinger

Oklahoma State UniversityJacob Nelson

Factors that can Impact Pork Quality

• Pre-stun handling• Stunning• Stun-to-stick interval• Carcass position during sticking• Bleeding time• Scalding/skinning• Buffer rails• Evisceration• Rail-outs• Total stun-to-chill time

Harvest

Page 16: 2017 Pork 101 IPPE - meatscience.org

16

Loin

Belly

HamShoulder(Boston butt)

PicnicShoulder

Cutting Styles

Page 17: 2017 Pork 101 IPPE - meatscience.org

17

Pork 101 Fabrication

Pork 101 Fabrication

Page 18: 2017 Pork 101 IPPE - meatscience.org

18

USSBUNON00593

Fresh Sausage Manufacture

Steps in Making Fresh Sausage

• Initial Grinding– Coarse grind-3/4" -1"

plate• Lean/fat meats ground

separately

• Frozen and/or fresh

• Uniform particle size

Page 19: 2017 Pork 101 IPPE - meatscience.org

19

USSBUNON00593

Enhanced Pork Technology

USSBUNON00593

Enhanced Pork Technology

• Enhanced/unseasoned pork– Lower injection levels – 7-15%

– Additional water and phosphate improves juiciness,and resistance to cooking abuse

• Enhanced/seasoned pork– Higher injection levels with tumbling to guarantee

tenderness

– Seasoning applied to the surface of the product

– Convenience/Variety

Page 20: 2017 Pork 101 IPPE - meatscience.org

20

USSBUNON00593

Cured Pork Technology

Raw Materials

Trimming Stuff/Net

Brine Injection

Thermal Processing

Slicing

Packaging

• lean to fat• weight• color• bone/skin removal

• SQ fat• seam fat

• % pump

• yield• color

• shape

• whole• half• thickness

• weight

Tumbling•dispersion/bind

Chilling

Boneless Ham Production

Page 21: 2017 Pork 101 IPPE - meatscience.org

21

USSBUNON00593

Pork 101 Topics (Day 3)

+Current “Hot” Topics

&Host University Specialties

USSBUNON00593

Pork Product Evaluation

USSBUNON00593

Objectives

• Develop a basic understanding of thefactors used to evaluate the quality anddetermine the value of processed meatproducts– Bacon

– Bone-in or boneless hams

– Fresh pork sausages

– Enhanced [marinated] pork products

Page 22: 2017 Pork 101 IPPE - meatscience.org

22

Normal DFD

PSE “High” Marbling

Page 23: 2017 Pork 101 IPPE - meatscience.org

23

USSBUNON00593

Pork 101 Participant Comments

• What did you think was most valuable about Pork 101?

– “I was most interested in learning the different cuts so the hands‐on experience of learning the different cuts was great!”

– “I learned a lot about further processing and making products that I did not know.”

– “Grading hogs‐understanding of pH and its application to quality.”

• “Instructors, students were very knowledgeable and passionate about the subjects! Really enjoyed the course!”

USSBUNON00593

Pork 101 – 2017 Classes

May 23 - 25, 2017 – Texas A&M UniversityCollege Station, TX USA

October 23 - 25, 2017 – Iowa State UniversityAmes, IA USA

For more details, please visit:www.pork101.org