2016 statewide results: an excellence with equity...

20
2016 Statewide Results: An Excellence with Equity Report | Prichard Committee For Academic Excellence | Page 1 2016 Statewide Results: An Excellence with Equity Report November 2016 This report shines a light on Kentucky’s progress toward excellence with equity – where students from all backgrounds learn at much higher levels and where students who have had the least opportunity to excel catch up with their peers. The evidence used here comes from Kentucky’s 2016 school report cards, which has been analyzed to reveal areas of progress and areas of concern, including: Good news for Kentucky’s students with identified disabilities, including improvement in mathematics, reading, and college/career ready graduates, along with narrowing gaps on most indicators. Mostly good news for Kentucky’s students eligible for free or reduced-price meals, with growth in mathematics, reading, and college/career ready graduates and with all gaps shrinking between those students and their classmates with higher family incomes. Mixed news for Kentucky’s African American students and students of two or more races, with improvements in mathematics, reading, and college/career ready graduates, but many gaps getting wider compared to their white (non-Hispanic) classmates. Troubling news for Kentucky’s Hispanic students, with mathematics as the only improving subject and most gaps getting wider compared to their white (non-Hispanic) classmates. Troubling news for Kentucky’s English learners, with a pattern of declining scores and widening gaps compared to students who are not English learners. The summary on the next page provides a visual approach to those results. Positive developments are shown with checkmarks and green backgrounds, with double checkmarks and bolder green for improvements of two points or more. A flat line against a red background identifies cases where scores went down or gaps got wider. To be clear, no one assessment can give a complete picture of progress towards meeting Kentucky’s ambitious goals for student learning. Many other kinds of evidence can enrich our understanding of how students’ knowledge and skills are developing. Still, these statewide results provide one important snapshot of Kentucky’s recent progress and the important work still ahead.

Upload: others

Post on 17-May-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2016 Statewide Results: An Excellence with Equity Reportprichardcommittee.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/... · 2016 Statewide Results: An Excellence with Equity Report | Prichard

2016StatewideResults:AnExcellencewithEquityReport|PrichardCommitteeForAcademicExcellence|Page1

2016StatewideResults:AnExcellencewithEquityReport

November2016

ThisreportshinesalightonKentucky’sprogresstowardexcellencewithequity–wherestudentsfromallbackgroundslearnatmuchhigherlevelsandwherestudentswhohavehadtheleastopportunitytoexcelcatchupwiththeirpeers.TheevidenceusedherecomesfromKentucky’s2016schoolreportcards,whichhasbeenanalyzedtorevealareasofprogressandareasofconcern,including:

■ GoodnewsforKentucky’sstudentswithidentifieddisabilities,includingimprovementinmathematics,reading,andcollege/careerreadygraduates,alongwithnarrowinggapsonmostindicators.

■ MostlygoodnewsforKentucky’sstudentseligibleforfreeorreduced-pricemeals,withgrowthinmathematics,reading,andcollege/careerreadygraduatesandwithallgapsshrinkingbetweenthosestudentsandtheirclassmateswithhigherfamilyincomes.

■ MixednewsforKentucky’sAfricanAmericanstudentsandstudentsoftwoormoreraces,withimprovementsinmathematics,reading,andcollege/careerreadygraduates,butmanygapsgettingwidercomparedtotheirwhite(non-Hispanic)classmates.

■ TroublingnewsforKentucky’sHispanicstudents,withmathematicsastheonlyimprovingsubjectandmostgapsgettingwidercomparedtotheirwhite(non-Hispanic)classmates.

■ TroublingnewsforKentucky’sEnglishlearners,withapatternofdecliningscoresandwideninggapscomparedtostudentswhoarenotEnglishlearners.

Thesummaryonthenextpageprovidesavisualapproachtothoseresults.Positivedevelopmentsareshownwithcheckmarksandgreenbackgrounds,withdoublecheckmarksandboldergreenforimprovementsoftwopointsormore.Aflatlineagainstaredbackgroundidentifiescaseswherescoreswentdownorgapsgotwider.Tobeclear,nooneassessmentcangiveacompletepictureofprogresstowardsmeetingKentucky’sambitiousgoalsforstudentlearning.Manyotherkindsofevidencecanenrichourunderstandingofhowstudents’knowledgeandskillsaredeveloping.Still,thesestatewideresultsprovideoneimportantsnapshotofKentucky’srecentprogressandtheimportantworkstillahead.

Page 2: 2016 Statewide Results: An Excellence with Equity Reportprichardcommittee.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/... · 2016 Statewide Results: An Excellence with Equity Report | Prichard

2016StatewideResults:AnExcellencewithEquityReport|PrichardCommitteeForAcademicExcellence|Page2

STUDENTSWITHIDENTIFIEDDISABILITIES

AFRICANAMERICANSTUDENTS

DidScoreImprove?

DidGapImprove?

DidScoreImprove?

DidGapImprove?

Reading ✔ ✔

Reading ✔ ––

Mathematics ✔✔ ––

Mathematics ✔✔ ––

SocialStudies ✔ ✔

SocialStudies ✔ ✔Writing ✔ ✔✔

Writing –– ✔

LanguageMechanics ✔ ✔✔

LanguageMechanics –– ––

Science –– ✔

Science –– ––

ReadyGraduates ✔✔ ✔✔

ReadyGraduates ✔ ––

STUDENTSELIGIBLEFORF/RMEALS

HISPANICSTUDENTS

DidScoreImprove?

DidGapImprove?

DidScoreImprove?

DidGapImprove?

Reading ✔ ✔

Reading –– ––

Mathematics ✔✔ ✔

Mathematics ✔✔ ––SocialStudies ✔ ✔

SocialStudies –– ––

Writing –– ✔

Writing –– ✔LanguageMechanics –– ✔

LanguageMechanics –– ✔

Science –– ✔

Science –– ––

ReadyGraduates ✔✔ ✔ ReadyGraduates –– ––

STUDENTSWHOAREENGLISHLEARNERS

STUDENTSOFTWOORMORERACES

DidScoreImprove?

DidGapImprove?

DidScoreImprove?

DidGapImprove?

Reading –– ––

Reading ✔ ––

Mathematics –– ––

Mathematics ✔✔ ✔SocialStudies –– ––

SocialStudies –– ––

Writing –– ✔

Writing –– ––

LanguageMechanics –– ✔

LanguageMechanics –– ––

Science –– ✔

Science –– ––

ReadyGraduates ✔ ––

ReadyGraduates ✔✔ ✔Note:ResultsforeachtestedsubjectreflectthepercentofstudentswhoreachedtheproficientordistinguishedlevelonKPREPassessments.ReadyGraduatesreflectsthegraduationratemultipliedbythecollegeand/orcareerreadinessrate.

–– 2016resultsthatareworsethan2015✔ 2016resultsthatarebetterthan2015✔✔ 2016resultsthatarebetterthan2015bytwopointsormore

Page 3: 2016 Statewide Results: An Excellence with Equity Reportprichardcommittee.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/... · 2016 Statewide Results: An Excellence with Equity Report | Prichard

2016StatewideResults:AnExcellencewithEquityReport|PrichardCommitteeForAcademicExcellence|Page3

Wherethereisgoodnewshere,itisgoodnewsaboutmakingoneworthwhilestepinalongjourney.Weneedsustainedimprovementatarobustpace,yearafteryear,toequipallofKentucky’sstudentsforsuccessfulfutures.Forexample,someofourmostexcitingnewsthisyeariscomingfrommathematics.Theprogressisworthcelebratingbriefly,andyetthereishugeaddedworktobedone.Threeexamplescanmakethispointveryclearly:■ Forelementarystudentswithidentifieddisabilities,3.4percentgrowthinmathproficiencyisgoodnewsand

stillmeansonly28.2percentofthosechildrenareproficient.

■ Formiddleschoolstudentseligibleforfreeorreduced-pricemeals,a4.4pointstepupinmathematicsisimportantandonlymovesthatgroupto35.6percentproficient.

■ ForhighschoolAfricanAmericanstudents,a4.5pointincreaseisexcitingandnotnearlyenoughwhenonly

27.3percentofthosestudentshavereachedproficiency.Inthelaterpagesofthisreport,eachgroupofstudentsreceivestwopagesoffurtheranalysis,withanarrativeofbrightspotsandreasonsforconcernandafullpageshowingscoresateachlevelforthatgroupandthegroupitwascomparedtoinordertoanalyzeachievementgaps.Theappendixattheendofthereportprovidesadditionalinformationondatasourcesandmethodsusedtodevelopthesereports.Kentucky’sfuturedependsonbigstepsforwardforthesestudentsandforalltheirclassmates.ThePrichardCommitteerecentlyreleasedExcellencewithEquity:It’sEverybody’sBusiness,conveyingthefindingsandrecommendationsoftheAchievementGapStudyGroup.Thereportcarriesaclearcalltoaction:

ItistimeforKentuckianstoembraceandactonanewcommitmenttoexcellencewithequity.Achievingexcellencewithequitywillmean:Excellence.Kentuckystudentsofallbackgroundswilllearnatmuchhigherlevels.Evidenceofthisprogresswillbevisibleonmeaningfulindicatorsofacademicachievementandeducationalattainment.Equity.Studentsinthegroupsthathavehistoricallyhadlessopportunitytoexcel–studentswithlowfamilyincomes,AfricanAmericanstudents,HispanicandLatinostudents,NativeAmericanstudents,studentswithlearningdifferences,andstudentslearningEnglish–willcatchupwiththeirpeers.

Inthe2016datareportedhere,therearesomeimportantexamplesofmovinginthatdirection,withstudentsofallbackgroundsgaininggroundandgroupsthathavenotbeenservedwellinthepastmovingclosertotheirclassmates.Forexample,studentswithidentifieddisabilitieshadhigherscoresandnarrowergapsinreading,socialstudies,writing,andlanguagemechanics,andAfricanAmericanstudentshadhigherscoresandnarrowergapsinsocialstudies.Still,therearenotenoughexamplesofthatkindofprogress.Foreverygroup,scoresdeclinedinatleastonesubject,movingKentuckyawayfromtheexcellencewemustbuild.Foreverygroupexceptstudentseligibleforfreeorereduced-pricemeals,gapswidenedinatleastonesubject,movingusawayfromequityinthatpartofstudentachievement.Andevenwhenbothscoresandgapsmovedintherightdirection,Kentuckystillhasfartogo:TheresultssharedhereshowallgroupsfarfromKentucky’sgoalofgraduatingallstudentswiththeproficiencyandreadinesstheywillneedtosucceedasindividualsandcontributetooursuccessasaCommonwealth.

Page 4: 2016 Statewide Results: An Excellence with Equity Reportprichardcommittee.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/... · 2016 Statewide Results: An Excellence with Equity Report | Prichard

2016StatewideResults:AnExcellencewithEquityReport|PrichardCommitteeForAcademicExcellence|Page4

Changingthesepatternsandbuildingamoreprosperousandinclusivefuturewillrequireintensiveeffortonmultiplefronts.AsidentifiedbytheAchievementGapStudyGroup,themostimportantworkwillfocusonsixoverarchingpriorities:

BoldleadershipatthestateandlocallevelsandineverycommunityAccountabilitytodrivesubstantialimprovementintheperformanceofeachstudentandstudentgroupSchoolclimateandculturethatwelcomeandsupporteachstudentandfamilyInstructionintheclassroomthatengageseachstudentindeep,effectivelearningopportunitiesCommunitiesthatbandtogethertodemandandsupportexcellencewithequitySustainabilityofreforms

ThoseprioritiesmustbecometheBASICSofasharedandmightyefforttodevelopthecapacitiesofeachandeverystudent.ThisreportoffersfurtherconfirmationthatmeetingthischallengewillclearlyrequiredeliberateandsustainedactionfromKentuckiansacrossourCommonwealth,workingtogethertocreateexcellencewithequity.

Page 5: 2016 Statewide Results: An Excellence with Equity Reportprichardcommittee.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/... · 2016 Statewide Results: An Excellence with Equity Report | Prichard

2016StatewideResults:AnExcellencewithEquityReport|PrichardCommitteeForAcademicExcellence|Page5

GOODNEWSFORKENTUCKY’SSTUDENTSWITHIDENTIFIEDDISABILITIES

2016statewideresultsshowimprovementinmath,reading,andreadiness,withmostgapsnarrowingForstudentswithidentifieddisabilities,recentlyreleased2016resultsshowsomeimportantprogress,including:

■ Mathematicsproficiencyincreasedatallthreelevels,growing3.4pointsattheelementarylevel,2.5pointsinmiddleschool,and0.9pointsatthehighschoollevel.

■ Proficiencyalsoincreasedinreading,socialstudies,writing,andlanguagemechanics.

■ Studentsgraduatingreadyforcollegeandcareeralsorose,witha5.7pointincreaseinthefour-yeargraduationrateanda2.7pointincreaseinthepercentofhighschoolgraduateswhohavedemonstratedreadinessforcollegeand/orcareer.

■ Achievementgapsdeclinedbetweenthesestudentsandtheirclassmateswithoutidentifieddisabilitiesalmostacrosstheboard,theexceptionbeinghighschoolmathematics.

Theseresultsforstudentswithidentifieddisabilitiesstillprovidereasonsforconcern,including:

■ Scienceproficiencydeclinedoverall.Thegapnarrowedbecausesciencescoresalsodeclined–anddeclinedfaster--forstudentswithoutidentifieddisabilities.

■ Thegapsbetweenthesestudentsandtheirclassmatesremainedunacceptablylargeineverysubjectandateverylevel,asshowninthedetailedreportingonthenextpage.

■ Proficiencyremainsadistantgoalformostofthesestudents.Forexample,justover28percentofstudentswithidentifieddisabilitieswereproficientoraboveinelementarymathematics,evenafterthisyear’sbigstepupinthoseresults.

Theratingsshownattoprightreflecteachsubject’sKPREPassessmentresults,averagingthepercentofstudentswhoreachedproficiencyoraboveattheelementary,middle,andhighschoollevels;theexceptionisscience,whichusesonlyhighschoolresults.TheReadyGraduatesratecombinesthefour-yeargraduationrateandthecollegeandcareerreadinessrateforgraduates.NooneassessmentcangiveacompletepictureofprogresstowardmeetingKentucky’sambitiousgoalsforstudentlearning.Manyotherkindsofevidencecanenrichourunderstandingofhowstudents’knowledgeandskillsaredeveloping.Still,theseresultssuggestgenerallypositivemovementforKentucky’sstudentswithidentifieddisabilities.Wemustsustainandbuildonthatimprovement,providingthesupports,challenges,andopportunitiesthesestudentsandallstudentsneedtoreachmuchhigherlevelsofachievement.

STUDENTSWITHIDENTIFIEDDISABILITIES

DidScoreImprove?

DidGapImprove?

Reading ✔ ✔Mathematics ✔✔ ––

SocialStudies ✔ ✔Writing ✔ ✔✔

LanguageMechanics ✔ ✔✔Science –– ✔

ReadyGraduates ✔✔ ✔✔

Page 6: 2016 Statewide Results: An Excellence with Equity Reportprichardcommittee.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/... · 2016 Statewide Results: An Excellence with Equity Report | Prichard

2016StatewideResults:AnExcellencewithEquityReport|PrichardCommitteeForAcademicExcellence|Page6

READING 2015 2016 Change 2015 2016 Change 2015 2016 ChangeElementary 32.1 35.4 3.3 A 57.8 59.4 1.6 C -25.7 -24.0 1.7 CMiddle 21.1 23.7 2.6 A 58.1 59.4 1.3 C -37.0 -35.7 1.3 CHigh 16.1 14.4 -1.7 F 61.3 61.1 -0.2 F -45.2 -46.7 -1.5 FAverage 23.1 24.5 1.4 C 59.1 60.0 0.9 C -36.0 -35.5 0.5 C

MATHEMATICSElementary 24.8 28.2 3.4 A 52.7 55.7 3.0 A -27.9 -27.5 0.4 CMiddle 15.5 18.0 2.5 A 46.4 50.8 4.4 A -30.9 -32.8 -1.9 FHigh 13.7 14.6 0.9 C 40.4 44.7 4.3 A -26.7 -30.1 -3.4 FAverage 18.0 20.3 2.3 A 46.5 50.4 3.9 A -28.5 -30.1 -1.6 F

SOCIALSTUDIESElementary 31.9 31.0 -0.9 F 64.9 61.8 -3.1 F -33.0 -30.8 2.2 AMiddle 22.4 23.5 1.1 C 63.1 64.1 1.0 C -40.7 -40.6 0.1 CHigh 22.8 23.7 0.9 C 60.1 62.4 2.3 A -37.3 -38.7 -1.4 FAverage 25.7 26.1 0.4 C 62.7 62.8 0.1 C -37.0 -36.7 0.3 C

WRITINGElementary 17.6 19.1 1.5 C 47.7 44.4 -3.3 F -30.1 -25.3 4.8 AMiddle 12.0 14.4 2.4 A 42.8 48.3 5.5 A -30.8 -33.9 -3.1 FHigh 12.5 10.8 -1.7 F 54.0 47.0 -7.0 F -41.5 -36.2 5.3 AAverage 14.0 14.8 0.8 C 48.2 46.6 -1.6 F -34.2 -31.8 2.4 A

LANGUAGEMECHANICSElementary 25.1 25.8 0.7 C 60.6 56.2 -4.4 F -35.5 -30.4 5.1 AMiddle 13.2 13.8 0.6 C 50.7 45.0 -5.7 F -37.5 -31.2 6.3 AHigh 12.7 13.9 1.2 C 56.0 58.5 2.5 A -43.3 -44.6 -1.3 FAverage 17.0 17.8 0.8 C 55.8 53.2 -2.6 F -38.8 -35.4 3.4 A

SCIENCEHigh 8.5 7.0 -1.5 F 42.5 40.1 -2.4 F -34.0 -33.1 0.9 C

READYGRADUATESGraduationRate 66.0 71.7 5.7 C 89.6 90.0 0.4 C -23.6 -18.3 5.3 CCollege/CareerReadinessRate 25.8 28.5 2.7 A 69.3 70.5 1.2 C -43.5 -42.0 1.5 CReadyGraduates* 17.0 20.4 3.4 C 62.1 63.5 1.4 C -45.1 -43.0 2.1 C

CollegeReady 15.1 16.0 0.9 C 61.1 62.3 1.2 C -46.0 -46.3 -0.3 FCareerReady 8.7 10.5 1.8 C 21.6 22.6 1.0 C -12.9 -12.1 0.8 C

Note:TheReadyGraduatesrateiscalculatedbymultiplyingGraduationbyCollege/CareerReadiness.TheratesshownforotherareasidentifythepercentofstudentswhoreachedtheproficientordistinguishedlevelonstateKPREPassessments.

F 2016resultsthatareworsethan2015

C 2016resultsthatarebetterthan2015

A 2016resultsthatarebetterthan2015bytwopointsormore

STUDENTSWITHIDENTIFIEDDISABILITIES

STUDENTSWITHOUTIDENTIFIEDDISABILITIES

GAPBETWEENTHETWOGROUPS

Page 7: 2016 Statewide Results: An Excellence with Equity Reportprichardcommittee.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/... · 2016 Statewide Results: An Excellence with Equity Report | Prichard

2016StatewideResults:AnExcellencewithEquityReport|PrichardCommitteeForAcademicExcellence|Page7

MOSTLYGOODNEWSFORKENTUCKY’SSTUDENTSELIGIBLEFORFREEORREDUCED-PRICEMEALS

2016statewideresultsshowallgapsnarrowing,ledbymathandreadinessgrowthForstudentswhoareeligibleforfreeorreduced-pricemeals,recentlyreleased2016resultsshowsomeimportantprogress,including:

■ Achievementgapsnarrowedinallsubjectsbetweenthesestudentsandtheirclassmateswithhigherfamilyincomes.

■ Mathematicsproficiencyincreasedatallthreelevels,growing3.5pointsattheelementarylevel,4.4pointsatthemiddleschoollevel,and4.0pointsatthehighschoollevel.

■ Readingandsocialstudiesproficiencyalsoshowedimprovement.

■ Studentsgraduatingreadyforcollegeandcareeralsorose,witha0.7pointincreaseinthefour-yeargraduationrateanda2.3pointincreaseinthepercentofhighschoolgraduateswhohavedemonstratedreadinessforcollegeand/orcareer.

Thisyear’sresultsstillprovidereasonsforconcern,including:

■ Proficiencydeclinedinwriting,languagemechanics,andscience.Inthesesubjects,proficiencydeclinedbothforstudentseligibleforfreeorreduced-pricemealsandfortheirineligibleclassmates,andgapsgotsmallerbecausetheineligiblegroupdeclinedmore.

■ Thegapsbetweenthesestudentsandtheirclassmateswithhigherfamilyincomesremainedunacceptablylargeineverysubjectandateverylevel,asshowninthedetailedreportingonthenextpage.

■ Proficiencyremainsadistantgoalformostofthesestudents.Forexample,justover31percentofstudentseligibleforfreeorreduced-pricemealswereproficientoraboveinhighschoolmathematics,evenafterthisyear’sbigstepupinthoseresults.

Theratingsshownattoprightreflecteachsubject’sKPREPassessmentresults,averagingthepercentofstudentswhoreachedproficiencyoraboveattheelementary,middle,andhighschoollevels;theexceptionisscience,whichusesonlyhighschoolresults.TheReadyGraduatesratecombinesthefour-yeargraduationrateandthecollegeandcareerreadinessrateforgraduates.NooneassessmentcangiveacompletepictureofprogresstowardsmeetingKentucky’sambitiousgoalsforstudentlearning.Manyotherkindsofevidencecanenrichourunderstandingofhowstudents’knowledgeandskillsaredeveloping.Still,theseresultssuggestsomeimportantpositivemovementforKentucky’sstudentswhoareeligibleforfreeorreduced-pricemeals.Wemustsustainandbuildonthatimprovement,providingthesupports,challenges,andopportunitiesthesestudentsandallstudentsneedtoreachmuchhigherlevelsofachievement.

STUDENTSELIGIBLEFORF/RMEALS

DidScoreImprove?

DidGapImprove?

Reading ✔ ✔Mathematics ✔✔ ✔SocialStudies ✔ ✔

Writing –– ✔LanguageMechanics –– ✔

Science –– ✔ReadyGraduates ✔✔ ✔

Page 8: 2016 Statewide Results: An Excellence with Equity Reportprichardcommittee.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/... · 2016 Statewide Results: An Excellence with Equity Report | Prichard

2016StatewideResults:AnExcellencewithEquityReport|PrichardCommitteeForAcademicExcellence|Page8

READING 2015 2016 Change 2015 2016 Change 2015 2016 ChangeElementary 44.1 46.5 2.4 A 71.1 72.8 1.7 C -27.0 -26.3 0.7 CMiddle 42.9 44.6 1.7 C 70.1 71.4 1.3 C -27.2 -26.8 0.4 CHigh 44.3 44.7 0.4 C 72.0 71.0 -1.0 F -27.7 -26.3 1.4 CAverage 43.8 45.3 1.5 C 71.1 71.7 0.6 C -27.3 -26.4 0.9 C

MATHEMATICSElementary 38.6 42.1 3.5 A 65.9 69.0 3.1 A -27.3 -26.9 0.4 CMiddle 31.2 35.6 4.4 A 60.2 64.4 4.2 A -29.0 -28.8 0.2 CHigh 27.4 31.4 4.0 A 49.8 54.2 4.4 A -22.4 -22.8 -0.4 FAverage 32.4 36.4 4.0 A 58.6 62.5 3.9 A -26.2 -26.1 0.1 C

SOCIALSTUDIESElementary 50.3 47.7 -2.6 F 76.8 74.4 -2.4 F -26.5 -26.7 -0.2 FMiddle 47.2 48.6 1.4 C 74.9 76.1 1.2 C -27.7 -27.5 0.2 CHigh 44.9 47.9 3.0 A 69.9 71.5 1.6 C -25.0 -23.6 1.4 CAverage 47.5 48.1 0.6 C 73.9 74.0 0.1 C -26.4 -25.9 0.5 C

WRITINGElementary 34.7 32.3 -2.4 F 58.1 55.5 -2.6 F -23.4 -23.2 0.2 CMiddle 29.6 35.0 5.4 A 53.5 58.7 5.2 A -23.9 -23.7 0.2 CHigh 38.1 32.5 -5.6 F 63.7 56.6 -7.1 F -25.6 -24.1 1.5 CAverage 34.1 33.3 -0.8 F 58.4 56.9 -1.5 F -24.3 -23.6 0.7 C

LANGUAGEMECHANICSElementary 45.3 42.6 -2.7 F 72.8 68.3 -4.5 F -27.5 -25.7 1.8 CMiddle 35.0 30.9 -4.1 F 63.3 57.3 -6.0 F -28.3 -26.4 1.9 CHigh 39.3 41.4 2.1 A 67.0 69.0 2.0 A -27.7 -27.6 0.1 CAverage 39.9 38.3 -1.6 F 67.7 64.9 -2.8 F -27.8 -26.6 1.2 C

SCIENCEHigh 27.3 25.6 -1.7 F 54.2 51.2 -3.0 F -26.9 -25.6 1.3 C

READYGRADUATESGraduationRate 84.8 85.5 0.7 C 91.4 91.8 0.4 C -6.6 -6.3 0.3 CCollege/CareerReadinessRate 55.4 57.7 2.3 A 78.2 79.4 1.2 C -22.8 -21.7 1.1 CReadyGraduates* 47.0 49.3 2.3 A 71.5 72.9 1.4 C -24.5 -23.6 0.9 C

CollegeReady 45.0 47.5 2.5 A 72.0 72.8 0.8 C -27.0 -25.3 1.6 CCareerReady 21.6 22.1 0.6 C 20.1 21.9 1.8 C 1.5 0.2 -1.3 F

Note:TheReadyGraduatesrateiscalculatedbymultiplyingGraduationbyCollege/CareerReadiness.TheratesshownforotherareasidentifythepercentofstudentswhoreachedtheproficientordistinguishedlevelonstateKPREPassessments.

F 2016resultsthatareworsethan2015

C 2016resultsthatarebetterthan2015

A 2016resultsthatarebetterthan2015bytwopointsormore

STUDENTSELIGIBLEFORF/RMEALS

STUDENTSINELIGIBLEFORF/RMEALS

GAPBETWEENTHETWOGROUPS

Page 9: 2016 Statewide Results: An Excellence with Equity Reportprichardcommittee.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/... · 2016 Statewide Results: An Excellence with Equity Report | Prichard

2016StatewideResults:AnExcellencewithEquityReport|PrichardCommitteeForAcademicExcellence|Page9

MIXEDNEWSFORKENTUCKY’SAFRICANAMERICANSTUDENTS

2016stateresultsshowimprovementsinmath,reading,andreadiness,butgapshavewidenedForAfricanAmericanstudents,recentlyreleased2016resultsshowsomeimportantprogress,including:

■ Mathematicsproficiencyincreasedatalllevels,growing1.0pointattheelementarylevel,2.9pointsatthemiddleschoollevel,and4.5pointsatthehighschoollevel.

■ Readingandsocialstudiesproficiencyalsoincreased.

■ Studentsgraduatingreadyforcollegeandcareeralsorose,witha0.2increaseinthefour-yeargraduationrateanda0.6pointincreaseinthepercentofgraduateswhohavedemonstratedreadinessforcollegeand/orcareer.

TheseresultsforAfricanAmericanstudentsstillprovidereasonsforconcern,including:

■ Proficiencydeclinedinwriting,languagemechanics,andscience.

■ Gapsgotworseinmostsubjects,leavingAfricanAmericanstudentsfurtherbehindtheirwhiteclassmatesin2016thantheywerein2015.

■ Thegapsbetweenthesestudentsandtheirclassmatesremainedunacceptablylargeineverysubjectandateverylevel,asshowninthedetailedreportingonthenextpage.

■ Proficiencyremainsadistantgoalformostofthesestudents.Forexample,only23.9percentofAfricanAmericanstudentswereproficientoraboveinmiddleschoolmathematics,evenafterthisyear’sbigstepupinmathematicsresults.

Theratingsshownattoprightreflecteachsubject’sKPREPassessmentresults,averagingthepercentofstudentswhoreachedproficiencyoraboveattheelementary,middle,andhighschoollevels;theexceptionisscience,whichusesonlyhighschoolresults.TheReadyGraduatesratecombinesthefour-yeargraduationrateandthecollegeandcareerreadinessrateforgraduates.NooneassessmentcangiveacompletepictureofprogresstowardsmeetingKentucky’sambitiousgoalsforstudentlearning.Manyotherkindsofevidencecanenrichourunderstandingofhowstudents’knowledgeandskillsaredeveloping.Still,thisone-timesnapshotshowsusmixedandinsufficientresults.WeclearlymustaccelerateourworktodevelopthetalentsofKentucky’sAfricanAmericanstudents,providingthesupports,challenges,andopportunitiesthesestudentsandallstudentsneedtoreachmuchhigherlevelsofachievement.

AFRICANAMERICANSTUDENTS

DidScoreImprove?

DidGapImprove?

Reading ✔ ––Mathematics ✔✔ ––

SocialStudies ✔ ✔Writing –– ✔

LanguageMechanics –– ––

Science –– ––

ReadyGraduates ✔ ––

Page 10: 2016 Statewide Results: An Excellence with Equity Reportprichardcommittee.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/... · 2016 Statewide Results: An Excellence with Equity Report | Prichard

2016StatewideResults:AnExcellencewithEquityReport|PrichardCommitteeForAcademicExcellence|Page10

READING 2015 2016 Change 2015 2016 Change 2015 2016 ChangeElementary 32.7 33.7 1.0 C 57.8 60.0 2.2 A -25.1 -26.3 -1.2 FMiddle 31.4 31.7 0.3 C 57.4 59.2 1.8 C -26.0 -27.5 -1.5 FHigh 34.2 33.3 -0.9 F 60.4 60.4 0.0 F -26.2 -27.1 -0.9 FAverage 32.8 32.9 0.1 C 58.5 59.9 1.4 C -25.7 -27.0 -1.3 F

MATHEMATICSElementary 30.5 31.5 1.0 C 51.7 55.2 3.5 A -21.2 -23.7 -2.5 FMiddle 21.0 23.9 2.9 A 46.1 50.7 4.6 A -25.1 -26.8 -1.7 FHigh 22.8 27.3 4.5 A 40.2 44.1 3.9 A -17.4 -16.8 0.6 CAverage 24.8 27.6 2.8 A 46.0 50.0 4.0 A -21.2 -22.4 -1.2 F

SOCIALSTUDIESElementary 37.6 36.8 -0.8 F 64.1 61.3 -2.8 F -26.5 -24.5 2.0 AMiddle 35.6 34.8 -0.8 F 62.1 63.8 1.7 C -26.5 -29.0 -2.5 FHigh 37.0 41.6 4.6 A 59.7 61.6 1.9 C -22.7 -20.0 2.7 AAverage 36.7 37.7 1.0 C 62.0 62.2 0.2 C -25.3 -24.5 0.8 C

WRITINGElementary 28.6 25.7 -2.9 F 46.1 43.5 -2.6 F -17.5 -17.8 -0.3 FMiddle 21.3 25.7 4.4 A 41.7 47.2 5.5 A -20.4 -21.5 -1.1 FHigh 31.9 27.1 -4.8 F 52.7 46.0 -6.7 F -20.8 -18.9 1.9 CAverage 27.3 26.2 -1.1 F 46.8 45.6 -1.2 F -19.5 -19.4 0.1 C

LANGUAGEMECHANICSElementary 36.5 32.2 -4.3 F 58.8 55.2 -3.6 F -22.3 -23.0 -0.7 FMiddle 26.7 20.9 -5.8 F 49.1 44.6 -4.5 F -22.4 -23.7 -1.3 FHigh 27.3 31.5 4.2 A 55.8 57.9 2.1 A -28.5 -26.4 2.1 AAverage 30.2 28.2 -2.0 F 54.6 52.6 -2.0 F -24.4 -24.4 0.0 F

SCIENCEHigh 19.4 15.4 -4.0 F 42.5 40.4 -2.1 F -23.1 -25.0 -1.9 F

READYGRADUATESGraduationRate 80.3 80.9 0.6 C 89.3 90.0 0.7 C -9.0 -9.1 -0.1 FCollege/CareerReadinessRate 43.0 43.2 0.2 C 70.4 72.4 2.0 A -27.4 -29.2 -1.8 FReadyGraduates* 34.5 34.9 0.4 C 62.9 65.2 2.3 A -28.4 -30.3 -1.9 F

CollegeReady 37.9 37.9 0.0 F 61.5 63.3 1.8 C -23.6 -25.4 -1.8 FCareerReady 8.8 9.2 0.4 C 23.0 24.5 1.5 C -14.2 -15.3 -1.1 F

Note:TheReadyGraduatesrateiscalculatedbymultiplyingGraduationbyCollege/CareerReadiness.TheratesshownforotherareasidentifythepercentofstudentswhoreachedtheproficientordistinguishedlevelonstateKPREPassessments.

F 2016resultsthatareworsethan2015

C 2016resultsthatarebetterthan2015

A 2016resultsthatarebetterthan2015bytwopointsormore

AFRICANAMERICANSTUDENTS

WHITE(NON-HISPANIC)STUDENTS

GAPBETWEENTHETWOGROUPS

Page 11: 2016 Statewide Results: An Excellence with Equity Reportprichardcommittee.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/... · 2016 Statewide Results: An Excellence with Equity Report | Prichard

2016StatewideResults:AnExcellencewithEquityReport|PrichardCommitteeForAcademicExcellence|Page11

MIXEDNEWSFORKENTUCKY’SSTUDENTSOFTWOORMORERACES

2016statewideresultsshowimprovementsinmath,reading,andreadiness,butwideninggapsForstudentsoftwoormoreraces,recentlyreleased2016resultsshowprogressinafewimportantareas:

■ Mathematicsproficiencyincreasedateverylevel,growing1.4pointsattheelementarylevel,5.0pointsatthemiddleschoollevel,and8.4pointsatthehighschoollevel.

■ Readingproficiencyalsoimproved.

■ Studentsgraduatingreadyforcollegeandcareeralsorose,witha2.2pointincreaseinthefour-yeargraduationrateanda2.0pointincreaseinthepercentofgraduateswhohavedemonstratedreadinessforcollegeand/orcareer.

However,resultsforstudentsoftwoormoreracesprovidemanyreasonsforconcern,including:

■ Socialstudies,writing,languagemechanics,andscienceproficiencydeclined.

■ Gapsincreasedinmostsubjects,leavingstudentsoftwoormoreracesfurtherbehindtheirwhiteclassmatesin2016thantheywerein2015.

■ Thegapsbetweenthesestudentsandtheirclassmatesremainedunacceptablylargeineverysubjectandateverylevel,asshowninthedetailedreportingonthenextpage.

■ Proficiencyremainsadistantgoalformostofthesestudents.Forexample,only38.5percentofstudentsoftwoormoreraceswereproficientoraboveinhighschoolmathematics,evenafterthisyear’sbigstepupinthoseresults.

Theratingsshownattoprightreflecteachsubject’sKPREPresults,averagingthepercentofstudentswhoreachedproficiencyoraboveattheelementary,middle,andhighschoollevels;theexceptionisscience,whichusesonlyhighschooltestresults.TheReadyGraduatesratecombinesthefour-yeargraduationrateandthecollegeandcareerreadinessrateforgraduates.NooneassessmentcangiveacompletepictureofprogresstowardsmeetingKentucky’sambitiousgoalsforstudentlearning.Manyotherkindsofevidencecanenrichourunderstandingofhowstudents’knowledgeandskillsaredeveloping.Still,thisone-timesnapshotshowsusmixedandinsufficientresults.WeclearlymustaccelerateourworktodevelopthetalentsofKentuckystudentsoftwoormoreraces,providingthesupports,challenges,andopportunitiesthesestudentsandallstudentsneedtoreachmuchhigherlevelsofachievement.

STUDENTSOFTWOORMORERACES

DidScoreImprove?

DidGapImprove?

Reading ✔ ––Mathematics ✔✔ ✔SocialStudies –– ––

Writing –– ––

LanguageMechanics –– ––

Science –– ––

ReadyGraduates ✔✔ ✔

Page 12: 2016 Statewide Results: An Excellence with Equity Reportprichardcommittee.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/... · 2016 Statewide Results: An Excellence with Equity Report | Prichard

2016StatewideResults:AnExcellencewithEquityReport|PrichardCommitteeForAcademicExcellence|Page12

READING 2015 2016 Change 2015 2016 Change 2015 2016 ChangeElementary 50.5 50.8 0.3 C 57.8 60.0 2.2 A -7.3 -9.2 -1.9 FMiddle 48.2 49.1 0.9 C 57.4 59.2 1.8 C -9.2 -10.1 -0.9 FHigh 54.1 53.6 -0.5 F 60.4 60.4 0.0 F -6.3 -6.8 -0.5 FAverage 50.9 51.2 0.3 C 58.5 59.9 1.4 C -7.6 -8.7 -1.1 F

MATHEMATICSElementary 44.4 45.8 1.4 C 51.7 55.2 3.5 A -7.3 -9.4 -2.1 FMiddle 35.2 40.2 5.0 A 46.1 50.7 4.6 A -10.9 -10.5 0.4 CHigh 30.1 38.5 8.4 A 40.2 44.1 3.9 A -10.1 -5.6 4.5 AAverage 36.6 41.5 4.9 A 46.0 50.0 4.0 A -9.4 -8.5 0.9 C

SOCIALSTUDIESElementary 57.8 52.1 -5.7 F 64.1 61.3 -2.8 F -6.3 -9.2 -2.9 FMiddle 52.8 50.5 -2.3 F 62.1 63.8 1.7 C -9.3 -13.3 -4.0 FHigh 51.7 55.7 4.0 A 59.7 61.6 1.9 C -8.0 -5.9 2.1 AAverage 54.1 52.8 -1.3 F 62.0 62.2 0.2 C -7.9 -9.4 -1.5 F

WRITINGElementary 42.8 35.4 -7.4 F 46.1 43.5 -2.6 F -3.3 -8.1 -4.8 FMiddle 36.3 40.0 3.7 A 41.7 47.2 5.5 A -5.4 -7.2 -1.8 FHigh 45.7 40.1 -5.6 F 52.7 46.0 -6.7 F -7.0 -5.9 1.1 CAverage 41.6 38.5 -3.1 F 46.8 45.6 -1.2 F -5.2 -7.1 -1.9 F

LANGUAGEMECHANICSElementary 51.4 49.3 -2.1 F 58.8 55.2 -3.6 F -7.4 -5.9 1.5 CMiddle 42.6 35.4 -7.2 F 49.1 44.6 -4.5 F -6.5 -9.2 -2.7 FHigh 49.8 50.9 1.1 C 55.8 57.9 2.1 A -6.0 -7.0 -1.0 FAverage 47.9 45.2 -2.7 F 54.6 52.6 -2.0 F -6.7 -7.4 -0.7 F

SCIENCEHigh 34.6 32.3 -2.3 F 42.5 40.4 -2.1 F -7.9 -8.1 -0.2 F

READYGRADUATESGraduationRate 84.4 86.4 2.0 A 89.3 90.0 0.7 C -4.9 -3.6 1.3 CCollege/CareerReadinessRate 59.7 61.9 2.2 A 70.4 72.4 2.0 A -10.7 -10.5 0.2 CReadyGraduates* 50.4 53.5 3.1 A 62.9 65.2 2.3 A -12.5 -11.7 0.8 C

CollegeReady 54.8 56.4 1.6 C 61.5 63.3 1.8 C -6.7 -6.9 -0.2 FCareerReady 13.1 14.3 1.3 C 23.0 24.5 1.5 C -9.9 -10.2 -0.3 F

Note:TheReadyGraduatesrateiscalculatedbymultiplyingGraduationbyCollege/CareerReadiness.TheratesshownforotherareasidentifythepercentofstudentswhoreachedtheproficientordistinguishedlevelonstateKPREPassessments.

F 2016resultsthatareworsethan2015

C 2016resultsthatarebetterthan2015

A 2016resultsthatarebetterthan2015bytwopointsormore

STUDENTSOFTWOORMORERACES

WHITE(NON-HISPANIC)STUDENTS

GAPBETWEENTHETWOGROUPS

Page 13: 2016 Statewide Results: An Excellence with Equity Reportprichardcommittee.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/... · 2016 Statewide Results: An Excellence with Equity Report | Prichard

2016StatewideResults:AnExcellencewithEquityReport|PrichardCommitteeForAcademicExcellence|Page13

TROUBLINGNEWSFORKENTUCKY’SHISPANICSTUDENTS

2016statewideresultsshowmathasonlyimprovingsubject,andmostgapshavegottenwiderForHispanicstudents,recentlyreleased2016resultsshowonebrightspotoftrulygoodnews:

■ Mathematicsproficiencyincreasedatalllevels,growing2.9pointsforelementarystudents,2.2pointsformiddleschooland2.2pointsforhighschoolstudents.

Thisyear’sresultsalsoshowprogressonachievementgapsinwritingandlanguagemechanicscomparedtowhitestudents.Thatisgoodnewsinonesensebuttroublinginanother,becausetheimprovementreflectslossesforbothgroups,withwhitestudentsshowingdeeperaveragedeclines.Morebroadly,resultsforHispanicstudentsshowdisturbingtrends,including:

■ Proficiencydeclinedinallsubjectsotherthanmathematics.Thedetailednumbersonthenextpageshowisolatedimprovementsinelementaryreading,middleschoolsocialstudiesandwriting,andhighschoollanguagemechanics,butthosechangeswerenotstrongenoughtoaltertheaveragesacrossthegrades.

■ Studentsgraduatingreadyforcollegeandcareeralsodeclined,witha1.2pointdeclineinthefour-yeargraduationrateanda0.4pointdecreaseinthepercentofgraduateswhohavedemonstratedreadinessforcollegeand/orcareer.

■ Gapsexpandedinmostsubjects,leavingHispanicstudentsfurtherbehindtheirwhite(non-Hispanic)classmatesin2016thantheywerein2015.

■ Thegapsbetweenthesestudentsandtheirclassmatesremainedunacceptablylargeineverysubjectandateverylevel,asshowninthedetailedreportingonthenextpage.

■ Proficiencyremainsadistantgoalformostofthesestudents.Forexample,justover35percentofHispanicstudentswereproficientoraboveinhighschoolmathematics,evenafterthisyear’sstepupinthoseresults.

Theratingsshownattoprightreflecteachsubject’sKPREPassessmentresults,averagingthepercentofstudentswhoreachedproficiencyoraboveattheelementary,middle,andhighschoollevels;theexceptionisscience,whichusesonlyhighschoolresults.TheReadyGraduatesratecombinesthefour-yeargraduationrateandthecollegeandcareerreadinessrateforgraduates.NooneassessmentcangiveacompletepictureofprogresstowardsmeetingKentucky’sambitiousgoalsforstudentlearning.Manyotherkindsofevidencecanenrichourunderstandingofhowstudents’knowledgeandskillsaredeveloping.Still,thisone-timesnapshotshowsustroublingresults.WeclearlymustaccelerateourworktodevelopthetalentsofKentucky’sHispanicstudents,providingthesupports,challenges,andopportunitiesthesestudentsandallstudentsneedtoreachmuchhigherlevelsofachievement.

HISPANICSTUDENTS

DidScoreImprove?

DidGapImprove?

Reading –– ––Mathematics ✔✔ ––

SocialStudies –– ––

Writing –– ✔LanguageMechanics –– ✔

Science –– ––

ReadyGraduates –– ––

Page 14: 2016 Statewide Results: An Excellence with Equity Reportprichardcommittee.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/... · 2016 Statewide Results: An Excellence with Equity Report | Prichard

2016StatewideResults:AnExcellencewithEquityReport|PrichardCommitteeForAcademicExcellence|Page14

READING 2015 2016 Change 2015 2016 Change 2015 2016 ChangeElementary 41.2 43.3 2.1 A 57.8 60.0 2.2 A -16.6 -16.7 -0.1 FMiddle 43.6 42.9 -0.7 F 57.4 59.2 1.8 C -13.8 -16.3 -2.5 FHigh 43.9 40.6 -3.3 F 60.4 60.4 0.0 F -16.5 -19.8 -3.3 FAverage 42.9 42.3 -0.6 F 58.5 59.9 1.4 C -15.6 -17.6 -2.0 F

MATHEMATICSElementary 37.8 40.7 2.9 A 51.7 55.2 3.5 A -13.9 -14.5 -0.6 FMiddle 33.0 35.2 2.2 A 46.1 50.7 4.6 A -13.1 -15.5 -2.4 FHigh 32.9 35.1 2.2 A 40.2 44.1 3.9 A -7.3 -9.0 -1.7 FAverage 34.6 37.0 2.4 A 46.0 50.0 4.0 A -11.4 -13.0 -1.6 F

SOCIALSTUDIESElementary 50.4 45.0 -5.4 F 64.1 61.3 -2.8 F -13.7 -16.3 -2.6 FMiddle 48.9 49.3 0.4 C 62.1 63.8 1.7 C -13.2 -14.5 -1.3 FHigh 50.6 50.5 -0.1 F 59.7 61.6 1.9 C -9.1 -11.1 -2.0 FAverage 50.0 48.3 -1.7 F 62.0 62.2 0.2 C -12.0 -13.9 -1.9 F

WRITINGElementary 34.5 32.8 -1.7 F 46.1 43.5 -2.6 F -11.6 -10.7 0.9 CMiddle 31.5 36.3 4.8 A 41.7 47.2 5.5 A -10.2 -10.9 -0.7 FHigh 41.6 35.7 -5.9 F 52.7 46.0 -6.7 F -11.1 -10.3 0.8 CAverage 35.9 34.9 -1.0 F 46.8 45.6 -1.2 F -10.9 -10.7 0.2 C

LANGUAGEMECHANICSElementary 44.0 40.5 -3.5 F 58.8 55.2 -3.6 F -14.8 -14.7 0.1 CMiddle 36.1 28.9 -7.2 F 49.1 44.6 -4.5 F -13.0 -15.7 -2.7 FHigh 33.0 42.2 9.2 A 55.8 57.9 2.1 A -22.8 -15.7 7.1 CAverage 37.7 37.2 -0.5 F 54.6 52.6 -2.0 F -16.9 -15.4 1.5 C

SCIENCEHigh 29.5 27.2 -2.3 F 42.5 40.4 -2.1 F -13.0 -13.2 -0.2 F

READYGRADUATESGraduationRate 83.3 82.1 -1.2 F 89.3 90.0 0.7 C -6.0 -7.9 -1.9 FCollege/CareerReadinessRate 56.3 55.9 -0.4 F 70.4 72.4 2.0 A -14.1 -16.5 -2.4 FReadyGraduates* 46.9 45.9 -1.0 F 62.9 65.2 2.3 A -16.0 -19.3 -3.3 F

CollegeReady 49.4 49.8 0.4 C 61.5 63.3 1.8 C -12.1 -13.5 -1.4 FCareerReady 14.5 13.8 -0.7 F 23.0 24.5 1.5 C -8.5 -10.7 -2.2 F

Note:TheReadyGraduatesrateiscalculatedbymultiplyingGraduationbyCollege/CareerReadiness.TheratesshownforotherareasidentifythepercentofstudentswhoreachedtheproficientordistinguishedlevelonstateKPREPassessments.

F 2016resultsthatareworsethan2015

C 2016resultsthatarebetterthan2015

A 2016resultsthatarebetterthan2015bytwopointsormore

HISPANICSTUDENTS

WHITE(NON-HISPANIC)STUDENTS

GAPBETWEENTHETWOGROUPS

Page 15: 2016 Statewide Results: An Excellence with Equity Reportprichardcommittee.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/... · 2016 Statewide Results: An Excellence with Equity Report | Prichard

2016StatewideResults:AnExcellencewithEquityReport|PrichardCommitteeForAcademicExcellence|Page15

TROUBLINGNEWSFORKENTUCKY’SENGLISHLEARNERS

2016statewideresultsshowapatternofdecliningscores,wideningmostgapsForstudentswhoareEnglishlearners,recentlyreleased2016resultsshowonlyalittlegoodnews,including:

■ Studentsgraduatingreadyforcollegeandcareerrose,witha1.2pointincreaseinthefour-yeargraduationrateanda2.2pointincreaseinthepercentofhighschoolgraduateswhohavedemonstratedreadinessforcollegeand/orcareer.

■ Achievementgapsimprovedinwriting,languagemechanics,andscience,withthemajorcaveatthatthegapsshrankbecauseproficiencydeclinedforEnglishlearnersbutdeclinedfasterfortheirclassmates.

Morebroadly,resultsforEnglishlearnersshowdisturbingtrends,including:

■ Proficiencydeclinedinallsubjectsexceptmathematics.Thedetailednumbersonthenextpageshowisolatedimprovementsinelementaryreadingandhighschoolwritingandlanguagemechanics,butthosechangeswerenotstrongenoughtoaltertheaveragesacrossthegrades.

■ Mathematicsproficiencydidnotimproveoverall,withhighschoollossesbigenoughtooffsetelementaryandmiddleschoolgains.

■ Gapsexpandedinmostsubjects,leavingEnglishlearnersfurtherbehindtheirclassmatesin2016thantheywerein2015.

■ Thegapsbetweenthesestudentsandtheirclassmatesremainedunacceptablylargeineverysubjectandateverylevel,asshowninthedetailedreportingonthenextpage.

■ Proficiencyremainsadistantgoalformostofthesestudents.Forexample,thebestimprovementforEnglishlearnerswasa3.3pointincreaseinmiddleschoolwriting,butthatgrowthonlymovesthesestudentsupto13.3percentreachingproficientorabove.

Theratingsshownattoprightreflecteachsubject’sKPREPassessmentresults,averagingthepercentofstudentswhoreachedproficiencyoraboveattheelementary,middle,andhighschoollevels;theexceptionisscience,whichusesonlyhighschoolresults.TheReadyGraduatesratecombinesthefour-yeargraduationrateandthecollegeandcareerreadinessrateforgraduates.NooneassessmentcangiveacompletepictureofprogresstowardsmeetingKentucky’sambitiousgoalsforstudentlearning.Manyotherkindsofevidencecanenrichourunderstandingofhowstudents’knowledgeandskillsaredeveloping.Still,thisone-timesnapshotshowsustroublingresults.WeclearlymustaccelerateourworktodevelopthetalentsofKentucky’sstudentswhoareEnglishlearners,providingthesupports,challenges,andopportunitiestheyneedtoreachmuchhigherlevelsofachievement.

STUDENTSWHOAREENGLISHLEARNERS

DidScoreImprove?

DidGapImprove?

Reading –– ––Mathematics –– ––

SocialStudies –– ––

Writing –– ✔LanguageMechanics –– ✔

Science –– ✔ReadyGraduates ✔ ––

Page 16: 2016 Statewide Results: An Excellence with Equity Reportprichardcommittee.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/... · 2016 Statewide Results: An Excellence with Equity Report | Prichard

2016StatewideResults:AnExcellencewithEquityReport|PrichardCommitteeForAcademicExcellence|Page16

READING 2015 2016 Change 2015 2016 Change 2015 2016 ChangeElementary 23.3 24.5 1.2 C 55.2 57.2 2.0 A -31.9 -32.7 -0.8 FMiddle 11.4 10.3 -1.1 F 54.6 56.0 1.4 C -43.2 -45.7 -2.5 FHigh 5.6 4.1 -1.5 F 57.5 57.3 -0.2 F -51.9 -53.2 -1.3 FAverage 13.4 13.0 -0.4 F 55.8 56.8 1.0 C -42.4 -43.8 -1.4 F

MATHEMATICSElementary 24.2 25.6 1.4 C 49.6 52.8 3.2 A -25.4 -27.2 -1.8 FMiddle 12.2 13.0 0.8 C 43.4 47.6 4.2 A -31.2 -34.6 -3.4 FHigh 19.8 17.6 -2.2 F 38.4 42.6 4.2 A -18.6 -25.0 -6.4 FAverage 18.7 18.7 0.0 F 43.8 47.7 3.9 A -25.1 -29.0 -3.9 F

SOCIALSTUDIESElementary 24.2 15.1 -9.1 F 61.4 58.7 -2.7 F -37.2 -43.6 -6.4 FMiddle 14.3 13.7 -0.6 F 59.5 60.6 1.1 C -45.2 -46.9 -1.7 FHigh 14.0 10.3 -3.7 F 57.4 59.7 2.3 A -43.4 -49.4 -6.0 FAverage 17.5 13.0 -4.5 F 59.4 59.7 0.3 C -41.9 -46.7 -4.8 F

WRITINGElementary 16.5 13.3 -3.2 F 44.4 41.6 -2.8 F -27.9 -28.3 -0.4 FMiddle 10.0 13.3 3.3 A 39.7 45.0 5.3 A -29.7 -31.7 -2.0 FHigh 8.7 6.2 -2.5 F 50.5 44.1 -6.4 F -41.8 -37.9 3.9 AAverage 11.7 10.9 -0.8 F 44.9 43.6 -1.3 F -33.2 -32.7 0.5 C

LANGUAGEMECHANICSElementary 19.8 18.7 -1.1 F 56.7 53.0 -3.7 F -36.9 -34.3 2.6 AMiddle 9.9 6.6 -3.3 F 46.7 41.8 -4.9 F -36.8 -35.2 1.6 CHigh 2.9 6.5 3.6 A 52.2 55.0 2.8 A -49.3 -48.5 0.8 CAverage 10.9 10.6 -0.3 F 51.9 49.9 -2.0 F -41.0 -39.3 1.7 C

SCIENCEHigh 5.3 4.8 -0.5 F 40.1 37.8 -2.3 F -34.8 -33.0 1.8 C

READYGRADUATESGraduationRate 67.2 68.4 1.2 C 88.2 88.8 0.6 C -21.0 n/a n/a FCollege/CareerReadinessRate 5.7 7.9 2.2 A 67.4 69.1 1.7 C -61.7 -61.2 0.5 C

ReadyGraduates 3.8 5.4 1.6 C 59.4 61.4 2.0 A -55.6 n/a n/a F

CollegeReady 3.8 6.3 2.5 A 59.1 60.6 1.5 C -55.3 -54.3 0.9 CCareerReady 1.9 2.3 0.4 C 21.0 22.3 1.3 C -19.1 -20.0 -0.9 F

Note:TheReadyGraduatesrateiscalculatedbymultiplyingGraduationbyCollege/CareerReadiness.TheratesshownforotherareasidentifythepercentofstudentswhoreachedtheproficientordistinguishedlevelonstateKPREPassessments.

F 2016resultsthatareworsethan2015

C 2016resultsthatarebetterthan2015

A 2016resultsthatarebetterthan2015bytwopointsormore

STUDENTSWHOAREENGLISHLEARNERS

STUDENTSWHOARENOTENGLISHLEARNERS

GAPBETWEENTHETWOGROUPS

Page 17: 2016 Statewide Results: An Excellence with Equity Reportprichardcommittee.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/... · 2016 Statewide Results: An Excellence with Equity Report | Prichard

2016StatewideResults:AnExcellencewithEquityReport|PrichardCommitteeForAcademicExcellence|Page17

AppendixonSourcesAndMethodsWhatdatasourcewasusedforthesereports?AllstartingdatafilesweredownloadedonOctober5,2016,fromtheKentuckyDepartmentofEducation’sschoolreportcardportal,http://applications.education.ky.gov/SRC/DataSets.aspx.Forreading,mathematics,socialstudies,writing,andlanguagearts,howwereresultscombined?Thosefivehadaccountabilityresultsattheelementary,middleandhighschoollevel.Thepercentproficientordistinguishedforthethreelevelswereaveragedtodeterminetheoverallpaceofimprovementordecline.Howwassciencehandled?Inscience,Kentuckyisdevelopingnewassessmentstomatchnewandmoreambitioussciencestandards.Duringthattransition,highschoolstudentshavecontinuedtotakeanend-of-coursebiologyassessment,butelementaryandmiddleschoolstudentshavenottakenscienceassessmentsforaccountabilityuse.Thisreportusedonlythehighschoolresults.Whatisthereadygraduateindicatorusedinthereport?Formanypeopletheimportantfinalquestionaboutpubliceducationishowmanystudentswhostartninthgrademovethroughtograduatefromhighschoolreadyforcollegeand/orcareersuccess.Thereadygraduatesrateanswersthatquestionbymultiplyingthefour-yeargraduationratebythepercentofgraduateswhohavebeenidentifiedascollegeand/orcareerreadybasedonstatewidecriteria.Howweretheimprovementratingsdecided?Whatresultsgotflatlines,checkmarks,ordoublecheckmarks,alongwithred,lightgreen,andboldgreencolor-coding?Flatlinesandredcodingwereusedfordeclinesandunchangedresultsineachsubject(usingtheaverageofallavailablelevelsasdescribedabove)andinthereadygraduatesrate.Acheckmarkandalightgreenbackgroundwereusedforincreaseoflessthan2points,andtwocheckmarksandastrongershadeofgreenforgainsoftwopointsofmore.Thatcodingwasappliedbothtochangesinresultsandtochangesingaps.Whyweretwo-pointchangesidentifiedasadividinglinefordifferentratings?Itprovidedasimplewaytodistinguishsmallgainsfrombiggerandmoreimportantones.HowwereresultscalculatedforstudentswhoarenotEnglishlearners?Schoolreportcardfilesprovideenoughdatatofigureoutthoseresults.Giventhetotalnumberofstudentstestedandthepercentwhoreachedproficiencyordistinguished,multiplicationcanproducethenumberwhoscoredatthoselevels.SimilararithmeticcanbedonefortheEnglishlearnerresults.Afterthat,subtractioncanproduceboththenumberofnon-Englishlearnerstestedandthenumberofnon-Englishlearnerswhoreachedproficientordistinguished.Finally,divisioncanconvertthosetwonumberstoapercentproficientordistinguishedforstudentswhoarenotEnglishlearners.Theresultsshownherereflectthatsetofspreadsheetcalculationsforeachindicatorused.

Page 18: 2016 Statewide Results: An Excellence with Equity Reportprichardcommittee.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/... · 2016 Statewide Results: An Excellence with Equity Report | Prichard

2016StatewideResults:AnExcellencewithEquityReport|PrichardCommitteeForAcademicExcellence|Page18

Howwereresultscalculatedforstudentswithoutidentifieddisabilitiesandstudentswhoarenoteligibleforfreeorreduced-pricemeals?ThosecalculationsusedthesameapproachasthecalculationsforstudentswhoarenotEnglishlearners.

Howstrongwasstudentparticipationintheseassessments?InitsFederalDatafile,theKentuckyDepartmentofEducationreportsthefollowingverystrongparticipationlevelsforKentuckyassessments:

EnrolledinTestedGrades

ParticipatinginAssessments

AssessmentParticipationRate

AllStudents 382,745 381,875 99.8StudentsEligibleforF/RMeals 232,389 231,774 99.7

StudentswithIdentifiedDisabilities 42,874 42,779 99.8AfricanAmericanStudents 40,260 40,082 99.6

HispanicStudents 22,286 22,226 99.7StudentswhoareEnglishLearners 10,217 10,170 99.5

Initsfederalreportingfile,theDepartmentdoesnotreportparticipationratesforstudentsoftwoormoreraces.

Page 19: 2016 Statewide Results: An Excellence with Equity Reportprichardcommittee.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/... · 2016 Statewide Results: An Excellence with Equity Report | Prichard

2016StatewideResults:AnExcellencewithEquityReport|PrichardCommitteeForAcademicExcellence|Page19

Thispageisintentionallyblank

Page 20: 2016 Statewide Results: An Excellence with Equity Reportprichardcommittee.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/... · 2016 Statewide Results: An Excellence with Equity Report | Prichard

2016StatewideResults:AnExcellencewithEquityReport|PrichardCommitteeForAcademicExcellence|Page20

2016StatewideResults:AnExcellencewithEquityReport

November2016

Wewelcomeyourthoughtsonthiswork!Atwww.prichardcommittee.org,youcancontactusorlearnmoreaboutthePrichardCommittee,anindependentcitizens’advocacyorganization;ourworktobuildexcellencewithequity;andourcommitmenttomakeKentuckyoneofthetop20statesinthenationineducationperformance.WorkonthisreporthasbeensupportedbyagenerousgrantfromtheJamesGrahamBrownFoundation.Withattribution,thisworkisfreelyavailableforuseoradaptationfornon-commercialpurposesunderCreativeCommonsLicensing:CC-BYNC4.0PrichardCommitteeforAcademicExcellence2016.