2015 pay-for-performance review executive …...2016/02/03 · february 3, 2016 1 topics 2 •2015...
TRANSCRIPT
2015 Pay-for-Performance Review
Executive Directors Meeting
February 3, 2016 1
Topics
2
• 2015 Pay-for-Performance (P4P) Activities
• 2015 Results on 2014-15 services
• Comparisons to previous years
• Positive Trends
• Ongoing challenges
• Looking ahead for 2016
2015 P4P Activities
3
Major Activities in 2015
4
• Spring webinars to review proposed measurements & thresholds
• Fall webinars to review data & new/revised measurements
• Meetings with individual providers at their request
• Conducted a Family Engagement Satisfaction survey of parents/guardians of children receiving STS services
• Incorporated Behavioral Health Screening for Outpatient providers
• Assessed Outpatient providers on Disparities in Early Engagement
• Provided “extra credit” points to Inpatient providers who were early adopters of a Smoke-Free Facility policy.
Status as of February 2016
5
• Payout of $8.6M to 98 agencies
• Incorporated feedback from providers and applied a
differential percentage to ambulatory vs. institutional based
services
• Threshold set at 70% for maximum Payout
• This year, payout for providers meeting 50 to 70% threshold in
recognition of challenging year (Healthy PA, IT issues, etc.)
• Payout for levels of care not measured through P4P process
2015 Results
6
2015 Results
Level of Care
Number of
Providers
Scored in
2015*
Number of
Providers
with a Total
Score
> 70%
Percentage of
Providers with
a Total Score
> 70%
Number of
Providers with
a Total Score
Between
50%-70%
Percentage of
Providers with
a Total Score
Between
50%-70%
Total Funds in
2015
BHRS 76 5 7% 18 24% 1,466,750$
CIRC 11 2 18% 3 27% 592,557$
Host Homes 1 0 0% 0 0% -$
IOP 29 4 14% 6 21% 317,856$
Inpatient 17 1 6% 2 12% 430,529$
Inpatient - EAC 1 1 100% 0 0% 748,680$
Journey of Hope 3 1 33% 0 0% 94,271$
Outpatient D&A 52 14 27% 17 33% 890,787$
Outpatient MH 119 3 3% 16 13% 739,798$
Residential Rehabilitation 41 5 12% 3 7% 279,594$
RTF 11 4 36% 3 27% 664,107$
RTFA 2 0 0% 0 0% 185,281$
TCM 34 0 0% 6 18% 259,683$
Other LOCs N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1,555,398$
Behavioral Health Screening N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 377,841$
Grand Total 394 39 10% 74 18% 8,603,130$
*Excludes providers that did not have a sufficient data to be considered for an award.
7
To emphasize continuing implementation of population health strategies, participation in screening was included in P4P:
• $15,000 payment for full participation or $7,500 for
partial participation • Plus additional 10% of payout for providers who
received a payout for outpatient
Behavioral Health Screening
8
• Total amount of awards by Reporting Year: – $8.6 million in 2015
– $6.5 million in 2014
– $9.5 million in 2013
– $16 million in 2012
– $13.4 million in 2011
– $3.2 million in 2010
2015 Award compared to Past Years
9
Positive Trends
Achieving Quality Through P4P
10
11
59.50%
64.90%
88.90% 90.5%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015
Percent Children Having TCM Contact Within 2 Days of Inpatient Admission
12
61% 61%
71%
83%
72%
78% 82%
73%
79%
94%
83% 80%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Adult MAT Adult Non-MAT Child
Percent Discharged from Higher LOCs Having Follow-Up Within 30 Days
2011
2012
2013
2014
13
73.9% 75.7%
82.4% 82.3%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
2011 2012 2013 2014*
MHOP Adult Percent Discharged from Higher LOCs who Receive Timely (30-Day) Follow-Up
*Episode length was shortened from 180 days to 120 days in 2015.
14
78.6%
87.0% 88.30%
98.50%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015*
BHRS – STS Percent Having 1st LC Claim Within 5 Days of Auth Open Date
*Measure was changed to “percent having 1st claim within 30 days of auth open date,” in 2014-2015 per CBH expectations communicated to STS providers.
15
47.47%
51.80% 52.74%
57.14%
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
2011 2012 2013 2014
Rehab - Women with Children Providers 14-Day Follow-up Rate
Ongoing Challenges
16
• State of performance measures for behavioral health
services
• Timeliness of Data
• Consistency of measures with system values and
priorities
• Redundancy of measures
• Measuring small providers
• Consistently underperforming providers
Ongoing Challenges
17
2016 and Beyond
18
Looking Ahead…
Looking Ahead: 2016 and Beyond
19
• Continued emphasis on population health management
• Results will be shared with the public
• Comprehensive provider profiles
• Starting to track provider performance trends over time:
– Trends in individual provider performance
– Trends in providers as a group for certain levels of care and certain measures.
• Outpatient RFP: Using results from P4P to inform RFP, which will in turn inform new measures.
• Care Management Transformation Initiative
Questions or Comments?
20
Thank You!
Suet Lim, PhD
Performance Evaluation, Analytics, and Research (PEAR)
Community Behavioral Health
21