2015 pay-for-performance review executive …...2016/02/03  · february 3, 2016 1 topics 2 •2015...

21
2015 Pay-for-Performance Review Executive Directors Meeting February 3, 2016 1

Upload: others

Post on 16-Aug-2020

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2015 Pay-for-Performance Review Executive …...2016/02/03  · February 3, 2016 1 Topics 2 •2015 Pay-for-Performance (P4P) Activities •2015 Results on 2014-15 services •Comparisons

2015 Pay-for-Performance Review

Executive Directors Meeting

February 3, 2016 1

Page 2: 2015 Pay-for-Performance Review Executive …...2016/02/03  · February 3, 2016 1 Topics 2 •2015 Pay-for-Performance (P4P) Activities •2015 Results on 2014-15 services •Comparisons

Topics

2

• 2015 Pay-for-Performance (P4P) Activities

• 2015 Results on 2014-15 services

• Comparisons to previous years

• Positive Trends

• Ongoing challenges

• Looking ahead for 2016

Page 3: 2015 Pay-for-Performance Review Executive …...2016/02/03  · February 3, 2016 1 Topics 2 •2015 Pay-for-Performance (P4P) Activities •2015 Results on 2014-15 services •Comparisons

2015 P4P Activities

3

Page 4: 2015 Pay-for-Performance Review Executive …...2016/02/03  · February 3, 2016 1 Topics 2 •2015 Pay-for-Performance (P4P) Activities •2015 Results on 2014-15 services •Comparisons

Major Activities in 2015

4

• Spring webinars to review proposed measurements & thresholds

• Fall webinars to review data & new/revised measurements

• Meetings with individual providers at their request

• Conducted a Family Engagement Satisfaction survey of parents/guardians of children receiving STS services

• Incorporated Behavioral Health Screening for Outpatient providers

• Assessed Outpatient providers on Disparities in Early Engagement

• Provided “extra credit” points to Inpatient providers who were early adopters of a Smoke-Free Facility policy.

Page 5: 2015 Pay-for-Performance Review Executive …...2016/02/03  · February 3, 2016 1 Topics 2 •2015 Pay-for-Performance (P4P) Activities •2015 Results on 2014-15 services •Comparisons

Status as of February 2016

5

• Payout of $8.6M to 98 agencies

• Incorporated feedback from providers and applied a

differential percentage to ambulatory vs. institutional based

services

• Threshold set at 70% for maximum Payout

• This year, payout for providers meeting 50 to 70% threshold in

recognition of challenging year (Healthy PA, IT issues, etc.)

• Payout for levels of care not measured through P4P process

Page 6: 2015 Pay-for-Performance Review Executive …...2016/02/03  · February 3, 2016 1 Topics 2 •2015 Pay-for-Performance (P4P) Activities •2015 Results on 2014-15 services •Comparisons

2015 Results

6

Page 7: 2015 Pay-for-Performance Review Executive …...2016/02/03  · February 3, 2016 1 Topics 2 •2015 Pay-for-Performance (P4P) Activities •2015 Results on 2014-15 services •Comparisons

2015 Results

Level of Care

Number of

Providers

Scored in

2015*

Number of

Providers

with a Total

Score

> 70%

Percentage of

Providers with

a Total Score

> 70%

Number of

Providers with

a Total Score

Between

50%-70%

Percentage of

Providers with

a Total Score

Between

50%-70%

Total Funds in

2015

BHRS 76 5 7% 18 24% 1,466,750$

CIRC 11 2 18% 3 27% 592,557$

Host Homes 1 0 0% 0 0% -$

IOP 29 4 14% 6 21% 317,856$

Inpatient 17 1 6% 2 12% 430,529$

Inpatient - EAC 1 1 100% 0 0% 748,680$

Journey of Hope 3 1 33% 0 0% 94,271$

Outpatient D&A 52 14 27% 17 33% 890,787$

Outpatient MH 119 3 3% 16 13% 739,798$

Residential Rehabilitation 41 5 12% 3 7% 279,594$

RTF 11 4 36% 3 27% 664,107$

RTFA 2 0 0% 0 0% 185,281$

TCM 34 0 0% 6 18% 259,683$

Other LOCs N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1,555,398$

Behavioral Health Screening N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 377,841$

Grand Total 394 39 10% 74 18% 8,603,130$

*Excludes providers that did not have a sufficient data to be considered for an award.

7

Page 8: 2015 Pay-for-Performance Review Executive …...2016/02/03  · February 3, 2016 1 Topics 2 •2015 Pay-for-Performance (P4P) Activities •2015 Results on 2014-15 services •Comparisons

To emphasize continuing implementation of population health strategies, participation in screening was included in P4P:

• $15,000 payment for full participation or $7,500 for

partial participation • Plus additional 10% of payout for providers who

received a payout for outpatient

Behavioral Health Screening

8

Page 9: 2015 Pay-for-Performance Review Executive …...2016/02/03  · February 3, 2016 1 Topics 2 •2015 Pay-for-Performance (P4P) Activities •2015 Results on 2014-15 services •Comparisons

• Total amount of awards by Reporting Year: – $8.6 million in 2015

– $6.5 million in 2014

– $9.5 million in 2013

– $16 million in 2012

– $13.4 million in 2011

– $3.2 million in 2010

2015 Award compared to Past Years

9

Page 10: 2015 Pay-for-Performance Review Executive …...2016/02/03  · February 3, 2016 1 Topics 2 •2015 Pay-for-Performance (P4P) Activities •2015 Results on 2014-15 services •Comparisons

Positive Trends

Achieving Quality Through P4P

10

Page 11: 2015 Pay-for-Performance Review Executive …...2016/02/03  · February 3, 2016 1 Topics 2 •2015 Pay-for-Performance (P4P) Activities •2015 Results on 2014-15 services •Comparisons

11

59.50%

64.90%

88.90% 90.5%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015

Percent Children Having TCM Contact Within 2 Days of Inpatient Admission

Page 12: 2015 Pay-for-Performance Review Executive …...2016/02/03  · February 3, 2016 1 Topics 2 •2015 Pay-for-Performance (P4P) Activities •2015 Results on 2014-15 services •Comparisons

12

61% 61%

71%

83%

72%

78% 82%

73%

79%

94%

83% 80%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Adult MAT Adult Non-MAT Child

Percent Discharged from Higher LOCs Having Follow-Up Within 30 Days

2011

2012

2013

2014

Page 13: 2015 Pay-for-Performance Review Executive …...2016/02/03  · February 3, 2016 1 Topics 2 •2015 Pay-for-Performance (P4P) Activities •2015 Results on 2014-15 services •Comparisons

13

73.9% 75.7%

82.4% 82.3%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2011 2012 2013 2014*

MHOP Adult Percent Discharged from Higher LOCs who Receive Timely (30-Day) Follow-Up

*Episode length was shortened from 180 days to 120 days in 2015.

Page 14: 2015 Pay-for-Performance Review Executive …...2016/02/03  · February 3, 2016 1 Topics 2 •2015 Pay-for-Performance (P4P) Activities •2015 Results on 2014-15 services •Comparisons

14

78.6%

87.0% 88.30%

98.50%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015*

BHRS – STS Percent Having 1st LC Claim Within 5 Days of Auth Open Date

*Measure was changed to “percent having 1st claim within 30 days of auth open date,” in 2014-2015 per CBH expectations communicated to STS providers.

Page 15: 2015 Pay-for-Performance Review Executive …...2016/02/03  · February 3, 2016 1 Topics 2 •2015 Pay-for-Performance (P4P) Activities •2015 Results on 2014-15 services •Comparisons

15

47.47%

51.80% 52.74%

57.14%

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

2011 2012 2013 2014

Rehab - Women with Children Providers 14-Day Follow-up Rate

Page 16: 2015 Pay-for-Performance Review Executive …...2016/02/03  · February 3, 2016 1 Topics 2 •2015 Pay-for-Performance (P4P) Activities •2015 Results on 2014-15 services •Comparisons

Ongoing Challenges

16

Page 17: 2015 Pay-for-Performance Review Executive …...2016/02/03  · February 3, 2016 1 Topics 2 •2015 Pay-for-Performance (P4P) Activities •2015 Results on 2014-15 services •Comparisons

• State of performance measures for behavioral health

services

• Timeliness of Data

• Consistency of measures with system values and

priorities

• Redundancy of measures

• Measuring small providers

• Consistently underperforming providers

Ongoing Challenges

17

Page 18: 2015 Pay-for-Performance Review Executive …...2016/02/03  · February 3, 2016 1 Topics 2 •2015 Pay-for-Performance (P4P) Activities •2015 Results on 2014-15 services •Comparisons

2016 and Beyond

18

Looking Ahead…

Page 19: 2015 Pay-for-Performance Review Executive …...2016/02/03  · February 3, 2016 1 Topics 2 •2015 Pay-for-Performance (P4P) Activities •2015 Results on 2014-15 services •Comparisons

Looking Ahead: 2016 and Beyond

19

• Continued emphasis on population health management

• Results will be shared with the public

• Comprehensive provider profiles

• Starting to track provider performance trends over time:

– Trends in individual provider performance

– Trends in providers as a group for certain levels of care and certain measures.

• Outpatient RFP: Using results from P4P to inform RFP, which will in turn inform new measures.

• Care Management Transformation Initiative

Page 20: 2015 Pay-for-Performance Review Executive …...2016/02/03  · February 3, 2016 1 Topics 2 •2015 Pay-for-Performance (P4P) Activities •2015 Results on 2014-15 services •Comparisons

Questions or Comments?

20

Page 21: 2015 Pay-for-Performance Review Executive …...2016/02/03  · February 3, 2016 1 Topics 2 •2015 Pay-for-Performance (P4P) Activities •2015 Results on 2014-15 services •Comparisons

Thank You!

Suet Lim, PhD

Performance Evaluation, Analytics, and Research (PEAR)

Community Behavioral Health

21