2015-09-09 1 five year follow-up study of female substance abusers in drug free residential...
TRANSCRIPT
23-04-191
Five year follow-up study of female substance abusers in drug free residential compulsory
treatment institution in SwedenRimini, October 2009
Mats Fridell, Johan Billsten, Iréne Jansson
Department of Psychology, Lund Universitet
23-04-192
PUBLICATIONSPUBLICATIONS
Jansson, I., Fridell, M., & Hesse, M. (2008). Personality Disorder features as predictors of Symptoms five-year post treatment. The American Journal on Addictions 17:172-175.
Jansson, I., Hesse, M., & Fridell, M. (2007). Validity of self-reported criminal justice involvement in substance abusing women at five-year follow-up. BMC Psychiatry 8:(2).
Jansson, I., Hesse, M., & Fridell, M. (2007). Influence of personality disorder features on Social Functioning in Substance-abusing Women five years after Compulsive Residential Treatment., European Addiction Research 15: 25-31.
Fridell, M., Billsten, J., Jansson, & Amylon, R., (2009). Femårsupp- följning av kvinnor vårdade vid Lundens LVM- och LVU-hem. Stockholm, Statens Institutionsstyrelse, SiS utvecklar och följer upp 2009:1. – GENERAL REPORT
23-04-193
LUNDEN, RESIDENTIAL LUNDEN, RESIDENTIAL DRUG FREE COMPULSORY CARE DRUG FREE COMPULSORY CARE
A 21 bed inpatient residential treatment care unit, Lund 12 beds for adults and 9 for youth. Milieu therapeutic
organisation and psychosocial support and motivationenhancement
Law on Compulsory Care for Substance Abusers (LVM, act 1988:870),
The Care of Young Persons Act (LVU, act 1990:5r2)
LVU and LVM acts are unrelated to penal code and laws of psychiatric care.
According to the LVU, “a care order is to be issued, if the According to the LVU, “a care order is to be issued, if the young person exposes his health or development to a young person exposes his health or development to a palpable risk of injury through the abuse of addictive palpable risk of injury through the abuse of addictive substances, criminal activities, or some other socially substances, criminal activities, or some other socially degrading behavior” (LVU, act 1990:52, section 3).degrading behavior” (LVU, act 1990:52, section 3).
Youths can also be taken into care under the LVU due to Youths can also be taken into care under the LVU due to neglect or chaotic circumstances in neglect or chaotic circumstances in the home.the home.
Under Section 4 of the LVM, a court can order Under Section 4 of the LVM, a court can order compulsory care for a person whose health is deemed to compulsory care for a person whose health is deemed to be at risk, or who may be placing others at risk, and who be at risk, or who may be placing others at risk, and who is considered to need assistance in order to discontinue is considered to need assistance in order to discontinue
substance use. The LVM and substance use. The LVM and 172 172 Downloaded By: [DNL] Downloaded By: [DNL] At: 13:04 23 May 2008. At: 13:04 23 May 2008.
23-04-195
Sampling and MethodologySampling and Methodology
Sampling procedure: Consecutively admitted to compul-sory treatment 1997-01-01 - 2000-12-31 at Lundens LVM-/LVU-center for women in LUND
Cohort: N = 230 (138 LVM and 92 LVU) Sample: 132 persons who were diagnosed and evaluated by a
number of psychological, neuropsychological and psychiatric assessment procedures (60%)
All patients hade previously agreed to participate. Study was approved by the ethics committe of the medical faculty of Lund University Lund University Written consent was in addition to previous consent requested
for each participant at the time of the interview.
23-04-196
Women at index admissionWomen at index admission
Cohort design 1997 – 2000Cohort design 1997 – 2000
At which point in their carreers dothe women enter LVM-/LVU-treatment ?
23-04-197
Abstinence treatment four years before andAbstinence treatment four years before andfour years after index admission, (register data n= 131)four years after index admission, (register data n= 131)
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
Year before and after admission to Lunden
-0,1
0,0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
Aver
age
num
ber o
f adm
issi
ons
per y
ear
23-04-198
Inpatient treatment in Psychiatry four years before and Inpatient treatment in Psychiatry four years before and four years after index admission (register data, n=131)four years after index admission (register data, n=131)
Mean Mean and
95% confidence interval
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
Years before and after index admission
0,0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1,0
1,2
1,4
Aver
age
num
ber o
f adm
issi
ons
per y
ear
to p
sych
iatri
c tre
atm
ent
23-04-199
Inpatient treatment in somatic hospital four years before Inpatient treatment in somatic hospital four years before and four years after index admission, and four years after index admission,
(register data, n= 131)(register data, n= 131)
Mean Mean and
95% confidence interval
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
Year before and after index admission
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
Aver
age
num
ber o
f adm
issi
ons
to s
omat
icho
spita
l per
yea
r
23-04-1910
BACKGROUND – baseline data (n=132)BACKGROUND – baseline data (n=132)
LVM LVU
Psychiatric problems in family 40% 29%of origin
Drug/alcohol abuse in family of 58% 46%origin
At least one Suicidal attempt 48% 42%
Homeless at index admission 35% 54%
Prostitution as a source of income 41% 23%
23-04-1911
DATA COLLECTED AT INDEX ADMISSIONDATA COLLECTED AT INDEX ADMISSION
Background data: DOK=ASI-equivalent docu-mentation
Test and rating scales: Personality inventories (BCT, CMPS), Psychiatric symptom scales (SCL-90) Global function (GAF), SCID I och SCID II, DSM-IV-diagnoses.PCL-R – PsychopathyNeuropsychological assessment Intelligence level (WAIS)
23-04-1912
Personality disorders at index (N=132) Personality disorders at index (N=132)
AXIS II diagnosis LVM (80) LVU (52)
Borderline 26% 17%
Anti-social PD 23% 0%
Conduct Disorder 1% 44%
ANY Person diagnosis 62% 69%
23-04-1913
PSYCHIATRIC DISORDERS (AXIS I) IN THE COHORT PSYCHIATRIC DISORDERS (AXIS I) IN THE COHORT (N=132) (N=132)
DIAGNOSISDIAGNOSIS LVM (80)LVM (80) LVU (52) LVU (52) AXIS IAXIS I PsychopathyPsychopathy 3% 3% 6% 6% Toxic psychosisToxic psychosis 17% 17% 15% 15% SchizophreniaSchizophrenia 0% 0% 5% 5%SociophobiaSociophobia 1% 1% 2% 2%Major Depression Major Depression 13% 13% 13% 13%Depressive disorders 13% Depressive disorders 13% 13% 13%DysthymiaDysthymia 3% 3% 0% 0%Anxiety, anyAnxiety, any 25% 25% 20% 20%
TOTALTOTAL 60% 60% 61% 61%
23-04-1914
TREATMENT LAST YEAR
LVM LVU
- Treatment in psychiatry 61% 50% - Gynaecology 26% 17%
- Dental treatment 59% 48%
- Hepatitis B and/or C 57% 43%
23-04-1915
Patients followed-up at five-yearsPatients followed-up at five-years
23-04-1916
TRIANGULATION APPROACHTRIANGULATION APPROACH
Half structured face-to-face interview: Background data, actual situation, diagnostics etc.
Standardized Psychological tests and rating scales
Register data from 1970-ties up to the present date: a) Compulsory care, b) Criminal records (BRÅ), c) Hospital admissions all kinds (Epidemiological Center), d) Causes of Death register (EPC), Death certificates completed by forensic ortopsy reports.
23-04-1917
TEST AND RATING SCALESTEST AND RATING SCALES
Background data: DOK (LVM) & ADAD (LVU)
Time-Line-Follow-back over five years – DOC-variables
Test and rating scales:AUDIT – level of problems related to Alcohol Personality Inventory (BCT), Psychiatric Rating Scales (SCL-90) Global functioning (GAF),Sense of Coherence (SOC)Individual Schedule of Social Integration (ISSI)SCID II - DSM-IV-diagnoses.
23-04-1918
INTERVIEWSINTERVIEWS
Face-to-face interview 106 in 32 different communities
Telephone interview 3
Deceased 8
Outcome known (inkl deceased) 117 (88%) (83% itt)
Additional register data 130 (98%)
Independent Social workers 69 (84%)rating 2003 *
*Stable abstinence (29%), definitely improved (23%), active drug use (25%), diseased (7%), unknown (13%), Prison or compulsory care LVM (3%)
23-04-1919
Abstinence at five-year follow-upAbstinence at five-year follow-up
23-04-1920
DD
Outcome at five year follow-up (ITT)
23-04-1921
73,0%
55,0%
47,0%
28,0%
17% 18%
36,0%
42,0%
49,0%
62,0%
0,0%
10,0%
20,0%
30,0%
40,0%
50,0%
60,0%
70,0%
80,0%
Drogfrisenaste 30
dgr
Drogfrisenastehalvåret
Drogfrisenaste året.
Drogfrisenaste tvååren eller
längre.
Drogfri sedanutskrivning
Längd på drogfrihet
Pro
cent
dro
gfri
a
LVM
LVU
23-04-1922
Cluster Analysis of continous trends for theCluster Analysis of continous trends for the
first three years after discharge from Lundenfirst three years after discharge from Lunden
23-04-1923
Time-line-diagrams demonstrating level of drug use Time-line-diagrams demonstrating level of drug use and abstinence until three years post treatmentand abstinence until three years post treatment
Days of active drug use –Days of active drug use – 0 dgr0 dgr five categories five categories 1-2 dgr1-2 dgr
3-5 dgr3-5 dgr6-15 dgr6-15 dgr
16-30 dgr 16-30 dgr
23-04-1924
Diagram 2. Drug use trends over three years after discharge from Lunden definiedby drug use the last 6 months before interview. Cluster analysis (Ward´s metod).No of women = 101, Time-Line-Follow-Back-model (TLFB)
654321
Six months intervals
4,00
3,00
2,00
1,00
Est
ima
ted
Mar
gin
al M
ean
s 2,001,00,00
mbgrupp2
--- --- not abstinentnot abstinent
--- --- Sporadic drug useSporadic drug use
__ Continous abstinence
23-04-1925
CONCLUSIONS
Three different courses are discerned from discharge and over the following three years: those who continues using drugs regularily, those who improves but have relapses and those who are abstinent almost from discharge and onwards.
Control for days in treatment three years past index, reveal Control for days in treatment three years past index, reveal few differences even if number of days in treatment show afew differences even if number of days in treatment show atendency to decrease over time F(1;99)=7,167); p < .009). tendency to decrease over time F(1;99)=7,167); p < .009).
More women in active substance use have many treatmentMore women in active substance use have many treatmentoccasions F=4,431; p < .0,04) compared to those abstinent. occasions F=4,431; p < .0,04) compared to those abstinent.
23-04-1926
Diagram 3. Trends in criminal activity over three years pasttreatment in two clusters past discharge (n=101). TLFB-model.
654321
Mätpunkt
0,80
0,60
0,40
0,20
0,00
Kri
m
Missbrukar
Missbrukar inte
Two levels of drug useover three years pasttreatment
___ ___ not abstinentnot abstinent
_____ abstinent_____ abstinent
23-04-1927
CONCLUSIONSCONCLUSIONS
Already in the first year, those who still use drugs, Already in the first year, those who still use drugs, (group 2 and 3) continue to have a higher number (group 2 and 3) continue to have a higher number of offences brought to justice in the Criminal of offences brought to justice in the Criminal Justice data-base (BRÅ) F(1,99)=9.062; p<0.003. Justice data-base (BRÅ) F(1,99)=9.062; p<0.003.
There is a significantly decreasing trend among There is a significantly decreasing trend among those abstinent, which does not exsist in the group those abstinent, which does not exsist in the group still using drugs.still using drugs.
23-04-1928
Aggregated measures of social adjustment over Aggregated measures of social adjustment over the three years past discharge (n=101)the three years past discharge (n=101)
Halvår efter utskrivning
654321
Sjä
lvra
pport
erade so
cial fö
rhållande
2,00
1,75
1,50
1,25
1,00
0,75
Inte drogfriDrogfri
Två missbruksgrupper baserade på 6 mån innan
uppföljning
23-04-1929
CONCLUSIONSCONCLUSIONS
In the abstinent group (Group 1) there is an increase In the abstinent group (Group 1) there is an increase in legal income, number of non drug friends, social in legal income, number of non drug friends, social relations to family, more stable living etc. F(1,99( = relations to family, more stable living etc. F(1,99( =
4.30, p < .04).4.30, p < .04).
There is a simliar trend for the first year after There is a simliar trend for the first year after discharge for the drug abusing group, but it does not discharge for the drug abusing group, but it does not continue and the interaction between the two groups continue and the interaction between the two groups
is significant, F (1;99) = 6,37, p < .013), F (1;99) = is significant, F (1;99) = 6,37, p < .013), F (1;99) = 11,168), p < .001).11,168), p < .001).
23-04-1930
Mortality and causes of deathMortality and causes of death8 diseased in the sample8 diseased in the sample
11 in the comparison group11 in the comparison group
All but one women had a drug related death,All but one women had a drug related death,two suicides. 3 died from somatic illnesses. two suicides. 3 died from somatic illnesses.
12 Overdoses and 3 fatal poisonings12 Overdoses and 3 fatal poisonings
Substance problems were a contributing Substance problems were a contributing factor in all. SMR=9,07factor in all. SMR=9,07
23-04-1931
PSYCHIATRIC SYMPTOMS
23-04-1932
Diagram 6. The course of psychiatric symptoms like depression, anxiety and aggressive behavour is more negative among the persons still having a substance abuse compared to abstinent persons.(F(2,99)=4,445: p < .038.) (n=101)
654321
factor1
1,40
1,20
1,00
0,80
0,60
Es
tim
ate
d M
arg
ina
l M
ea
ns
2,00
Missbrukar inte
Två missbruksgrupperbaserade på 6 mån
innan uppföljning
Estimated Marginal Means of MEASURE_1
Två missbruksgrupper baserade på 6 mån innan uppföljning
___ Fortsatt missbruk
______ DrogfriaDrogfria
23-04-1933
CONCLUSIONSCONCLUSIONS
Symptoms higher on all scales in groups with Symptoms higher on all scales in groups with non-abstinent women F(2, 99)= 4,445; p < .038).non-abstinent women F(2, 99)= 4,445; p < .038).
The main difference is in the early phases of the The main difference is in the early phases of the three year period.three year period.
23-04-1934
23-04-1935
Patients becoming abstinent have significantly:Patients becoming abstinent have significantly:
- A Higher SOC (KASAM) than others- A Higher SOC (KASAM) than others- Have lower scores of symptoms (SCL-90)- Have lower scores of symptoms (SCL-90)- A higher level of social integration (ISSI)- A higher level of social integration (ISSI)- Show personality changes (BCT) - Show personality changes (BCT) - Have lower levels of criminal activity- Have lower levels of criminal activity
Anti-social Personality disorder and ConductAnti-social Personality disorder and Conductdisorder have a significantly negative impact ondisorder have a significantly negative impact on
drug abuse, criminal behaviour, social adaptationdrug abuse, criminal behaviour, social adaptation
No other personality disorder reveal this !!!No other personality disorder reveal this !!!
23-04-1936
23-04-1937
SUMMARYSUMMARY1. It is a surprisingly positive outcome for many1. It is a surprisingly positive outcome for many2. The immediate consequences on short sight 2. The immediate consequences on short sight
following discharge are very important also following discharge are very important also for long-term outcome.for long-term outcome.
3. When substance problems decreases, so do 3. When substance problems decreases, so do problems in social functioning, criminality etc, problems in social functioning, criminality etc, 4. Improvement in drug patterns give important 4. Improvement in drug patterns give important
gains .gains .5. The assessment of quality show that most 5. The assessment of quality show that most
patients are satisfied with the interventionpatients are satisfied with the intervention7. 7. NOTE that 15% leave Lunden with no or minor NOTE that 15% leave Lunden with no or minor
relapses.relapses.
23-04-1938
METHODMETHOD
SettingSettingThe setting was a 21-bed inpatient compulsory care residential care unit, Lunden, in Lund, Sweden. The institutionThe setting was a 21-bed inpatient compulsory care residential care unit, Lunden, in Lund, Sweden. The institutionhas 12 beds for adults and 9 for youths. The unit staff includes psychologists, psychiatrist, nurses, social workers, has 12 beds for adults and 9 for youths. The unit staff includes psychologists, psychiatrist, nurses, social workers, treatment attendants, and administration. Women are treated under the Law on Compulsory Care for Substance treatment attendants, and administration. Women are treated under the Law on Compulsory Care for Substance Abusers (LVM, act 1988:870) or The Care of Young Persons Act (LVU, act Abusers (LVM, act 1988:870) or The Care of Young Persons Act (LVU, act 1990:52).1990:52).
According to the LVU, “a care order is to be issued, if the young person exposes his health or development to a According to the LVU, “a care order is to be issued, if the young person exposes his health or development to a palpable risk of injury through the abuse of addictive substances, criminal activities, or some other socially degrading palpable risk of injury through the abuse of addictive substances, criminal activities, or some other socially degrading behavior” (LVU, act 1990:52, section 3). Youths can also be taken into care under the LVU due to neglect or chaotic behavior” (LVU, act 1990:52, section 3). Youths can also be taken into care under the LVU due to neglect or chaotic circumstances in circumstances in the home.the home.
Under Section 4 of the LVM, a court can order compulsory care for a person whose health is deemed to be at risk, or Under Section 4 of the LVM, a court can order compulsory care for a person whose health is deemed to be at risk, or who may be placing others at risk, and who is considered to need assistance in order to discontinue substance use. who may be placing others at risk, and who is considered to need assistance in order to discontinue substance use. The LVM and The LVM and 172 172 Downloaded By: [DNL] At: 13:04 23 May 2008. LVU acts are unrelated to penal code and laws of Downloaded By: [DNL] At: 13:04 23 May 2008. LVU acts are unrelated to penal code and laws of psychiatric psychiatric care.care.
Patients are usually reported to courts by social welfare, or, more rarely, police, their family members, or generalPatients are usually reported to courts by social welfare, or, more rarely, police, their family members, or generalpractitioner. Within eight days after report, an assessment of need for treatment must be completed, and court practitioner. Within eight days after report, an assessment of need for treatment must be completed, and court hearings can hearings can then proceed.then proceed.
Care orders are implemented in specially certified LVM and LVU homes, under the authority of the National Board forCare orders are implemented in specially certified LVM and LVU homes, under the authority of the National Board forInstitutional Care. Institutional Care. The number of adults undergoing compulsory care was 1,029 persons in 2003, of which 301 were The number of adults undergoing compulsory care was 1,029 persons in 2003, of which 301 were women, and the number of youths was 1073, of which 373 were girlswomen, and the number of youths was 1073, of which 373 were girls
23-04-1939