2013 trappe solioccasus_withcover.pdf

9
OFFICIAL BIMONTHLY PUBLICATION of the MYCOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA MYCOLOGIA Vol. 105 No. 4 2013 July August

Upload: trandang

Post on 21-Dec-2016

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

C E L L B I O L O G Y / U L T R A S T R U C T U R E

795–801 Colletotrichum lindemuthianum exhibits different patterns of nuclear division at different stages in its vegetative life cycle • Francine H. isHikawa, elaine a. souza, nick D. reaD & M. Gabriela roca

802–813 Functional and phylogenetic implications of septal pore ultrastructure in the ascoma of Neolecta vitellina • rosanne a. Healy, T.k. arun kuMar, DaviD a. HewiTT & DaviD J. MclauGHlin

E C O L O G Y

814–826 Within-population genetic structure differs between two sympatric sister-species of ectomycorrhizal fungi, Rhizopogon vinicolor and R. vesiculosus • susie M. DunHaM, aliJa baJro MuJic, JosepH w. spaTaFora & anneTTe M. kreTzer

827–836 Fungal communities of young and mature hypersaline microbial mats • sHaron a. canTrell, rok Tkavc, nina GunDe-ciMerMan, polona zalar, Manuel aceveDo & claribel báez-Félix

837–843 Assessment of the fungal diversity and succession of ligninolytic endophytes in Camellia japonica leaves using clone library analysis • Dai Hirose, sHunsuke MaTsuoka & TakasHi osono

P L A N T P A T H O G E N S

844–860 Circumscription of the anthracnose pathogens Colletotrichum lindemuthianum and C. nigrum • FanG liu, lei cai, peDro w. crous & ulrike DaMM

861–872 Ophiodiaporthe cyatheae gen. et sp. nov., a diaporthalean pathogen causing a devastating wilt disease of Cyathea lepifera in Taiwan • cHuen-Hsu Fu, Huei-Mei HsieH, cHi-yu cHen, Tun-TscHu cHanG, yao-Moan HuanG & yu-MinG Ju

S Y S T E M A T I C S

873–887 Fomitiporia castilloi sp. nov. and multiple clades around F. apiahyna and F. texana in Meso- and South America evidenced by multiloci phylogenetic inferences • Mario aMalFi & cony Decock

888–895 Australasian sequestrate fungi 18: Solioccasus polychromus gen. & sp. nov., a richly colored, tropical to subtropical, hypogeous fungus • JaMes M. Trappe, MicHael a. casTellano, roy e. HallinG, ToDD w. osMunDson, ManFreD binDer, niGel FecHner & nicHolas MalaJczuk

896–911 A systematic, morphological and ecological overview of the Clavariaceae (Agaricales) • JosHua M. birkebak, JorDan r. Mayor, k. MarTin ryberG & p. branDon MaTHeny

912–937 Taxonomic revision of Eurotium and transfer of species to Aspergillus • viT Hubka, Miroslav kolar ík, alena kubáTová & sTepHen w. peTerson

938–944 Perichaena megaspora, a new nivicolous species of myxomycetes from the Andes • anna ronikier, carlos laDo & Diana wriGley De basanTa

945–958 Morphological and molecular identification of four new resupinate species of Perenniporia (Polyporales) from southern China • cHanGlin zHao & baokai cui

959–976 Freshwater Ascomycetes: Minutisphaera (Dothideomycetes) revisited, including one new species from Japan • HuzeFa a. raJa, nicHolas H. oberlies, Mario FiGueroa, kazuaki Tanaka, kazuyuki HirayaMa, akira HasHiMoTo, anDrew n. Miller, sTeven e. zelski & carol a. sHearer

977–993 The species of Cortinarius, section Bovini, associated with conifers in northern Europe • Tuula niskanen, ilkka kyTövuori, kare liiMaTainen & Håkan linDsTröM

994–1018 A radical shift in the taxonomy of Lepraria s.l.: Molecular and morphological studies shed new light on the evolution of asexuality and lichen growth form diversification • JaMes c. lenDeMer & brenDan p. HoDkinson

1019–1029 Magnaporthiopsis, a new genus in Magnaporthaceae (Ascomycota) • JinG luo & ninG zHanG

1030–1042 Typification and phylogenetic study of Phyllosticta ampelicida and P. vaccinii • ke zHanG, ninG zHanG & lei cai

1043–1058 Morphological and molecular data for Australian Hebeloma species do not support the generic status of Anamika • beTTye J. rees, DaviD J. MiDGley, aDaM MarcHanT, anDrew perkins & DaviD a. orlovicH

105/ 4 M Y C O L O G I A July / August 2013

I S S N 0 0 2 7 - 5 5 1 4M Y C O A E 1 0 5 ( 4 ) : 7 9 5 – 1 0 8 6 ( 2 0 1 3 )

I S S U E D 2 5 J U L Y 2 0 1 3

T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S ( C O N T I N U E D O N C O V E R 3 )

J

UL

Y

AU

GU

ST

2

01

3

MY

CO

LO

GI

A

VO

L.

1

05

P

P.

7

95

–1

08

6

O F F I C I A L B I M O N T H L Y P U B L I C A T I O N o f t h e M Y C O L O G I C A L S O C I E T Y O F A M E R I C A

MYCOLOGIA Vol. 105 No. 4

2013July August

Australasian sequestrate fungi 18: Solioccasus polychromus gen. &sp. nov., a richly colored, tropical to subtropical, hypogeous fungus

James M. Trappe1

Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society, OregonState University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331-5752

Michael A. CastellanoUSDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 3200Jefferson Way, Corvallis, Oregon 97331

Roy E. HallingNew York Botanical Garden, 2900 SouthernBoulevard, Bronx, New York 10458-5126

Todd W. OsmundsonForest Pathology and Mycology Laboratory, Departmentof Environmental Science, Policy and Management,University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-3114

Manfred BinderCBS Fungal Biodiversity Centre, EvolutionaryPhytopathology, Institute of the Royal NetherlandsAcademy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW), Uppsalalaan 8,3584 CT, Utrecht, the Netherlands

Nigel FechnerQueensland Herbarium, Mount Coot-tha Road,Toowong, Brisbane, Queensland 4066, Australia

Nicholas MalajczukTreetec Consulting Pty Ltd., P.O Box 1046, Bunbury,Western Australia 6231, Australia

Abstract: Solioccasus polychromus gen. & sp. nov., themost brightly colored hypogeous fungus known, isdescribed from Papua New Guinea and tropicalnorthern Australia south into subtropical forestsalong the Queensland coast and coastal mountainsto near Brisbane. Phylogenetic analysis of moleculardata places it as a sister genus to Bothia in theBoletineae, a clade of predominantly ectomycorrhizalboletes. Ectomycorrhizal trees, such as members ofthe Myrtaceae (Eucalyptus, Corymbia, Lophostemon,Melaleuca spp.) and Allocasuarina littoralis, werepresent usually in mixture or in some cases dominant,so we infer some or all of them to be among theectomycorrhizal hosts of S. polychromus.

Key words: Basidiomycota, Boletales, Boletineae,Bothia, DNA, ectomycorrhizae, EF1-a, ITS, LSU,rhizomorphs, tef1

INTRODUCTION

In 1992, three of us (Trappe, Castellano, Malajczuk)along with colleagues and volunteers mounted afungus-collecting expedition to Papua New Guineasponsored by the Australian Centre for InternationalAgriculture Research. The two major goals were to (i)collect and identify sporocarps of ectomycorrhizalfungi adapted to tropical habitats and (ii) obtainmycelial isolates that could be tested for inoculatingeucalypt seedlings for use in habitat restorationprograms in the tropics.

At that time epigeous fungi of the island of NewGuinea had received some attention, but hypogeousfungi largely had been ignored. Australian mycologistDr Jack Simpson had collected Elaphomyces andDescomyces specimens in Papua New Guinea and sentthem to Trappe, but their identity could not bedetermined with confidence at that time. According-ly, we anticipated finding some novel hypogeousfungi, and in Solioccasus polychromus our hopes werewell rewarded. In subsequent years we found thespecies in subtropical and tropical Australia as well, inQueensland from near Brisbane north to Cape Yorkand in Northern Territory’s Arnhem Land.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Habitats were sampled for hypogeous sporocarps by rakingsmall patches in the forest floor near ectomycorrhizal hostsand processing collections as described by Castellano et al.(1989). At the end of each collecting day, specimens weresliced vertically in half or, if more than 2 cm broad, intoseveral slabs. After characters of fresh specimens wererecorded, the Papua New Guinea collections were placed ontrays of a food dehydrator powered by a portable gasoline-powered generator; later collections from Australia werepreserved in silica gel. When thoroughly dried, specimenswere placed in plastic zipper-sealed bags to prevent themfrom rehydrating in the 95-plus percent humidity prevalentin that season. Dried specimens were checked daily formold; if any developed they were further dried andrebagged. Colors were matched to swatches in Kelly andJudd (1989); their color terminology is used and the swatchnumbers given in parentheses as ‘‘ISCC-NBS #.’’ Herbariaare designated by Index Herbariorum abbreviations(http://sweetgum.nybg.org/ih/).

Microscopic structures were examined with a compoundmicroscope from hand-cut sections mounted respectively in5% KOH and Melzer’s reagent. Measurements of structuraldimensions are given as length 3 width. Spores also wereexamined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

Submitted 7 Jan 2012; accepted for publication 28 Jan 2013.1 Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]

Mycologia, 105(4), 2013, pp. 888–895. DOI: 10.3852/12-046# 2013 by The Mycological Society of America, Lawrence, KS 66044-8897

888

For molecular analysis, silica gel-preserved basidiomespecimens were pulverized with a FastPrep tissue lyser(Qbiogene Inc.) and genomic DNA was extracted by theprotocol of Alexander et al. (2007) with minor modifica-tions. Partial sequences were obtained from three nuclearloci: the ribosomal large (25S) subunit (nucLSU), the rDNAinternal transcribed spacer (ITS) region and translationelongation factor 1a (tef1 or EF1-a). PCR amplificationswere performed in 25 mL volumes consisting of 2.5 mL 103

PCR buffer, 2.5 mL dNTP mix (0.2 mM), 2.5 mL 103 bovineserum albumin, 1 mL of each primer (10 mmol concentra-tion) 0.2 mL Taq polymerase, 1 mL template DNA and ddH20to reach 25 mL total volume. PCR primers were LR0R andLR7 (Vilgalys and Hester 1990) for nucLSU, ITS1 and ITS4(White et al. 1990) for ITS and 526F + 1567R and 983F +2218R (Rehner and Buckley 2005) for tef1. Amplificationconditions for nucLSU and ITS were (i) initial denaturationat 95 C for 5 min, (ii) 40 cycles of denaturation at 94 C for60 s, annealing at 56 C for 60 s and extension at 72 C for60 s, (iii) final extension at 72 C for 5 min. Amplification oftef1 was conducted with a touchup PCR procedure: (i) 95 Cfor 5 min; (ii) 94 C for 60 s, 56 C for 60 s, increasing 1 C percycle for the following nine cycles, then 72 C for 60 s; (iii) 30additional cycles of 94 C for 60 s, 65 C for 60 s and 72 C for60 s; (iv) final extension at 72 C for 5 min. PCR productswere purified with ExoSAP-IT (Affymetrix Inc.), cyclesequenced with the Big Dye terminator sequencing kit 3.1(Applied Biosystems) and sequenced with an ABI 3700capillary sequencer at the High Throughput GenomicsFacility, University of Washington. Sequencing primers wereidentical to the PCR primers. Sequences were obtained fortwo Solioccasus polychromus specimens and submitted toGenBank under these accession numbers: J. Trappe 15399,Nhulunbuy, Northern Territory, Australia (nucLSU: Gen-Bank JQ287643; ITS: GenBank JX888459); and R.E. Halling9417, Frasier Island, Queensland, Australia (nucLSU:GenBank JQ287642 and tef1: GenBank JQ287644).

We initially assessed phylogenetic affinity by submittingsimilarity searches to GenBank with BLASTn. BecausenucLSU, ITS and tef1 sequences showed high sequencesimilarity to members of the order Boletales, suborderBoletineae, phylogenetic analyses were conducted as de-scribed below by adding the Solioccasus polychromusnucLSU sequences into the Boletales datasets of Binderand Hibbett (2006) and Desjardin et al. (2009). Becausetaxon coverage within the Boletales is poor for tef1 and ITSexhibits too much variability to allow alignment across theorder, the analysis was conducted only by use of nucLSUsequence data. Sequences were aligned with MAFFT 6(Katoh et al. 2002, 2005; Katoh and Toh 2007); thealignment was edited with Geneious Pro 4.9.3 (www.geneious.com). The sequence alignment was submitted toTreeBASE under accession number S12026. Nucleotidepositions that could not be unambiguously aligned wereremoved before analysis.

Phylogenetic analyses were conducted under a maximumlikelihood (ML) optimality criterion with RAxML 7.2.8(Stamatakis 2006) implemented on the CIPRES Portal V.2.2 (http://www.phylo.org/sub_sections/portal/) at theSan Diego Supercomputer Center. Two preliminary analy-

ses were conducted, adding the Solioccasus nucLSUsequences into the Boletales datasets of Binder and Hibbett(2006; Analysis 1) and Desjardin et al. (2009; Analysis 2).Outgroup taxa for Analysis 1 included four members of thePaxillineae (Gyrodon monticola, G. lividus, Paxillus involu-tus, P. vernalis, P. filamentosus). The outgroup taxon forAnalysis 2 was Hydnomerulius pinastri. The analyses includ-ed 50 inferences on the original alignment with distinctrandomized starting trees and 1000 bootstrap replicatesusing a GTR+GAMMA model for both bootstrapping and finalML optimization and allowing RAxML to optimize thenumber of rate categories and initial rearrangement setting.Most branches in both analyses received poor (,50%)bootstrap support. The resulting trees (SUPPLEMENTARY

FIGS. 1, 2), in addition to the BLASTn query results, wereused to guide assembly of a final dataset in which taxa werelimited in the interest of generating a tree in which thesister group affinity and broad-scale phylogenetic member-ship of Solioccasus could be shown more clearly. Because noclades having well supported, conflicting arrangementswere observed in the two phylograms, the dataset fromAnalysis 1 therefore was trimmed to produce the reduceddataset by retaining representatives from major Boletineaelineages (SUPPLEMENTARY FIG. 1). To better illustrate thesubordinal phylogenetic membership of Solioccasus, exem-plars of seven additional suborders or major lineages ofBoletales (Sclerodermatineae, Suillineae, Hygrophoropsi-daceae, Serpulaceae, Tapinellineae, Coniophorineae, Athe-lioid clade) were added. A RAxML analysis was conducted aspreviously described, with two members of the Athelioidclade (sensu Binder and Hibbett 2006), Athelia decipiensand Athelopsis subinconspicua (GenBank accession num-bers, FIG. 1) selected as outgroups based on the results ofBinder and Hibbett (2006).

RESULTS

Sequence similarity searches in GenBank for LSU,ITS and tef1 sequences support placement ofSolioccasus within Boletales, suborder Boletineae,family Boletaceae. The nucLSU sequences exhibitedhighest similarity to Bothia castanella (100% querycoverage, 95% maximum identity) for JT 15399 andto Tylopilus felleus (100% query coverage, 95%

maximum identity) for REH 9417. The latter matchis likely a function of the longer length of both thequery and top hit sequences, which are longer thanmany Boletales nucLSU sequences in GenBank; aclose relationship between Solioccasus polychromusand Tylopilus felleus is not supported by phylogeneticanalyses, and trimming the REH 9417 sequence to thelength of the JT 15399 sequence reveals 100%

similarity between the two sequences and yields abest BLAST match to B. castanella. The search withthe JT 15399 ITS sequence also returned Bothia andTylopilus spp. as best hits. A BLAST query by the tef1sequence for REH 9417 resulted in a best match toBoletellus projectellus (100% query coverage, 86%

TRAPPE ET AL.: AUSTRALIAN SEQUESTRATE FUNGI 889

FIG. 1. Single-locus phylogram of representatives of Boletales based on maximum likelihood analysis of nuclear ribosomallarge subunit DNA sequences by RAxML-HPC 7.2.8. Final GAMMA-based score of best tree 5 26046.87. Bootstrap percentagevalues (based on 1000 bootstrap replicates) greater than 50 appear above branches. Solioccasus is strongly supported(bootstrap 5 97%) as monophyletic with Bothia castanella. Athelia decipiens and Athelopsis subinconspicua were used asoutgroup taxa.

890 MYCOLOGIA

maximum identity); the weaker similarity exhibited bythe tef1 sequence (compared to nucLSU) is likely afunction of the lack of tef1 sequences from Boletineaein GenBank.

The sequence alignment for the reduced dataset(with ambiguously aligned nucleotide positions re-moved) consisted of 53 taxa and 801 alignmentpositions (TreeBASE S12026). The RAxML analysisyielded a best tree with a final GAMMA-basedlikelihood score of 26046.87 (FIG. 1). Solioccasus isplaced within the Boletineae, strongly supported(bootstrap 5 97%) as monophyletic with Bothiacastanella. The Solioccasus/Bothia clade appears asparaphyletic with Tylopilus in this analysis; however,due to poor bootstrap support for the backbonenodes of the tree, this phylogenetic position as well asthe sister groups of this clade cannot be accuratelyidentified from these results.

TAXONOMY

Solioccasus Trappe, Osmundson, Manfr. Binder,Castellano & Halling, gen. nov.

MycoBank MB800824Basidiomata hypogeous to partly emergent, up to

45 mm broad, subglobose to deeply lobed andfurrowed, with robust yellow to orange rhizomorphsemergent from the base and adpressed against thesides. Peridium entire to split open or mostly absentto reveal the gleba locules, ivory in youth but soondeveloping yellow, pink-orange or reddish orangecolors, with or without a suprapellis of a tangledtrichodermium. Gleba similarly colored as the perid-ium, loculate, with a prominent to inconspicuous,dendroid, cartilaginous columella. Spores smooth bylight microscopy, minutely roughened by SEM,ellipsoid or rarely subangular to allantoid.

Type species: Solioccasus polychromus Trappe, Os-mundson, Binder, Castellano, & Halling.

Etymology: Latin Soli- (sun) and –occasus (setting ofheavenly bodies), hence ‘‘sunset’’, in reference to thebrilliant yellows, pinks, oranges and reddish oranges of thebasidiomata, mimicking the rich colors of Australiansunsets.

Solioccasus polychromus Trappe, Osmundson,Manfr. Binder, Castellano & Halling, sp. nov.

FIGS. 2, 3MycoBank MB800825

Macrocharacters: Basidiomata gregarious, 8–32 3

10–45 mm, subglobose to turbinate or irregularlylobed and furrowed, on larger specimens the basedeeply indented; base with appressed to emergent,yellow to orange rhizomorphs up to 1.7 mm broad.Peridium continuous and pallid-pubescent in youth,

dry, with age the pubescence remaining only indepressions and the peridium split in places orreduced to remnant patches to expose the gleba,where present #0.5 mm thick and sordid yellowishwhite to olive but orange in cross section, soonbecoming moderate yellow (ISCC-NBS 87) to strongpink (ISCC-NBS 2), then deep pink (ISCC-NBS 3)mottled and streaked with light orange-yellow (ISCC-NBS 70) to moderate orange-yellow (ISCC-NBS 71)and at full maturity variously vivid orange (ISCC-NBS48), vivid orange-yellow (ISCC-NBS 66) and vividreddish orange (ISCC-NBS 70). Rhizomorphs up to0.8 mm thick, scattered to abundant, concolorouswith the peridium, emergent from the base andappressed on bottom and sides of basidiomata. Glebarubbery-cartilaginous, with globose to elongate loc-ules 0.1–1.5 mm broad, ivory to pale yellow in youth,soon developing the same range of colors as theperidium, with an inconspicuous to robust gray-translucent to yellow or red, dendroid, cartilaginouscolumella up to 1 mm broad at the base, somebranches percurrent and becoming pink to orangewhere emerging at the basidiome surface. Sporeslining the locules moderate greenish yellow (ISCC-NBS 102) in mass, becoming cinnamon to brown inpatches in fully mature specimens. Odor pleasant topungent or fungoid. Flavor not distinctive.

Microcharacters: Spores ellipsoid to broadly ellip-soid or occasionally subangular to subfusoid orallantoid in some specimens, with a sterigma attach-ment 1 3 1–2 mm; (8–)10–14(–17) 3 (5–)6–8(–9) mm(Q 5 1.4–2.6), the lower Qs predominant in somespecimens, the higher Qs in others, the walls up to0.8(–1) mm thick at maturity, appearing smooth bylight microscopy or faintly roughened by Nomarskiimaging but distinctly minutely roughened by SEM;light yellow in KOH and Melzer’s reagent, deep bluein cotton blue. Basidia clavate, 32–40 3 7–10 mm, with2(–4) sterigmata 6 4–6 3 1 mm. Peridium 200–300 mmthick, with a suprapellis, pellis and subpellis; supra-pellis a tangled trichodermium of hyaline, obtusehyphal tips 3–5 mm broad; pellis tightly constructed ofpericlinal, hyaline, highly gelatinized hyphae 2–5 mmbroad; subpellis of similar but tightly interwovenhyphae. Gleba trama 100–250 mm thick, of sinuous-subparallel, hyaline, highly gelatinized hyphae 2–4 mmbroad. Subhymenium of interwoven hyphae other-wise similar to those of the trama. Clamp connectionslacking.

Etymology: Greek, poly- (many) and -chromus (colored),‘‘many colored’’.

Distribution, habitat and season: Australia (NorthernTerritory and Queensland) and Papua New Guinea, inlowland tropical and subtropical forests with variousmixtures of ectomycorrhizal Allocasuarina littoralis,

TRAPPE ET AL.: AUSTRALIAN SEQUESTRATE FUNGI 891

Corymbia dichromophloia, C. erythrophloia, C. polycarpa,Eucalyptus pellita, E. pilularis, E. racemosa, E. tetro-donta, Leptospermum spp., Lophostemon sp. and Mela-leuca spp., often in sandy soil. February, March.

Holotype: PAPUA NEW GUINEA. Kirrawa-MeruTrack near Morehead River Crossing under Melaleucaand Lophostemon spp., J. Trappe, G. Tubeg, N.Malajczuk, R. Young H5569, 19 Feb 1992 (BRI;isotypes LAE, MEL, NY, OSC 130764, PERTH).

Paratypes: AUSTRALIA: NORTHERN TERRITORY:Nhulunbuy, V. Gordon, Trappe 15398, 16 Mar 1995(DNA); Nhulunbuy, Nambra Arts and Crafts Center,

J. Trappe, M. Castellano & V. Gordon, Trappe 15399,16 Mar 1995 (BRI, OSC 130891); Nhulunbuy, Yirrkalasite, V. Gordon, Trappe 15384, 16 Mar 1995 (DNA,OSC 130889); Nhulunbuy, 0.3 km up Rainbow CliffRoad, J. Trappe, M. Castellano, V. Gordon, Trappe15391, 16 Mar 1995 (BRI, DNA, OSC 130774); 30 kmS of Nhulunbuy, J. Trappe 15377, 15 Mar 1995 (DNA,OSC 130896). QUEENSLAND: Cape York, 6 km W ofScherges RAAF Base, J. Trappe 15348, 11 Mar 1995(BRI, PERTH); Cape York, 15 km from Weipa onWeipa-Archer River Road, J. Trappe & P. Reddell,Trappe 15320, 10 Mar 1995 (MEL, OSC 130769) and

FIG. 2. Solioccasus polychromus basidiomata. a. Cross section showing gleba and prominent columella (co). b. Surface withappressed concolorous rhizomorphs (ar) and exposed glebal locules (gl). Bars 5 10 mm.

892 MYCOLOGIA

P. Reddell, Trappe 15359, 12 Mar 1995 (BRI, OSC130768); Cooloola, Wide Bay District, FreshwaterRoad, N. Fechner & R. Halling, AQ795158, 21 Feb2011 (BRI); Moreton District, pedestrian track paral-lel to Old Logan Road, Camira, N. Fechner & K.Querengasser, AQ795159, 15 Apr 2009 (BRI); FraserIsland, Great Sandy National Park, Northern Road10.5 km from Central Station toward KingfisherResort, M. Castellano, Trappe 34636, 24 May 2010

(MEL, OSC 130892); Fraser Island, Pile Valley-Kingfisher Bay Rd, 25u24930.50S, 153u3925.50E, 62 m,R. Halling, REH9290, 28 Mar 2010 (BRI, NY) and26u27926.30S, 153u4932.70E, 34 m, N. Fechner & R.Halling, REH9417, 16 Feb 2011 (BRI, NY); FraserIsland, Wide Bay District, Pile Valley-Kingfisher BayRoad, N. Fechner & R.E. Halling, AQ795156, 16 Feb2011 (BRI); Fraser Island, Wide Bay District, PileValley-Lake McKenzie Road, N. Fechner & R.E.

FIG. 3. Solioccasus polychromus photomicrographs. a. Sinuous-interwoven trama hyphae; bar 5 20 mm. b. Peridiumsuprapellis (su) and pellis (pe); bar 5 20 mm. c. Single basidium (ba) with four spores attached to sterigmata (st); bar 5 5 mm.d. Basidiospores in cross section; bar 5 10 mm. e. Scanning electron micrograph of basidiospores showing the faintlyroughened surface; bar 5 5 mm. f. Scanning electron micrograph of basidiospores showing point of sterigmal attachment; bar5 5 mm.

TRAPPE ET AL.: AUSTRALIAN SEQUESTRATE FUNGI 893

Halling, AQ795157, 16 Feb 2011 (BRI); PalumaRange National Park, Hidden Valley Rd. 6.2 km Wof Talvare Road, M. Castellano, Trappe 13415, 3 Mar1994 (BRI, OSC 130893). PAPUA NEW GUINEA:WESTERN PROVINCE: Near Kiriwo on track toMeru, N. Bougher & R. Young H5554, 16 Feb 1992(OSC 130766, PERTH, PNG); Kiriwo, 3 km on trackto Meru, J. Trappe, G. Tubeg, N. Malajczuk, K. Bisam,R. Young H5551, 16 Feb 1992 (BRI, LAE, OSC130767, PERTH) & H5552, 16 Feb 1992 (CANB,MEL, NY, OSC 130765, PERTH, PNG); near Meru ontrack from Kiriwo, R. Young H5553, 16 Feb 1992(LAE, MEL, OSC 130886, PERTH) and Katawe BakuH5557, 16 Feb. 1992 (LAE, OSC 130887, PERTH).

DISCUSSION

Sequestrate fungi have evolved in many forms andlineages of the Boletales (Grubisha et al. 2001; Binderand Bresinsky 2002; Binder and Hibbett 2006; Desjar-din et al. 2008, 2009; Lebel et al. 2012). Both DNAsequence similarity and phylogenetic analyses stronglysupport the placement of Solioccasus within orderBoletales, suborder Boletineae, Boletaceae. Solioccasusis strongly supported as monophyletic with Bothiacastanella, the sole described species in Bothia and aspecies with a combination of features that createsuncertainty in determining its taxonomic placementon morphological grounds (Halling et al. 2007). Lowbootstrap support for backbone branches in bothHalling et al. (2007) and the present study precludeidentifying the closest relatives of the Solioccasus/Bothia clade; at present it is possible to conclude withreasonable confidence only that placement of Solioc-casus within Boletineae and a close relationship toBothia are likely. It is clear that systematic studies ofboletes will benefit greatly from availability of sequenc-es for additional loci and additional taxa.

We often spotted colonies of Solioccasus because oneor more specimens were partly emergent, so theirbright colors might attract insect or bird mycophagists.However, most basidiomata were covered by litter, sandor soil; mammals likely detect them by odor. PapuaNew Guinea has diverse populations of native rodentsand other potential mycophagists (Rowe et al. 2008),and Australian mycophagists include numerous marsu-pials as well as native rodents (Claridge and May 1994).An estimated nine or more rodent dispersal events haveoccurred between New Guinea and Australia over thepast 5 000 000 or more years, and sea-level fluctuationsduring the Pleistocene have created a series of landbridges between the two land masses (Rowe et al. 2008).Dispersal of Solioccasus across the presently shallowTorres Straight can be reasonably attributed mostly tomammals and possibly birds.

The fresh appearance of Solioccasus polychromus,with its many rhizomorphs, split peridium withexposed locules, and cartilaginous gleba with aprominent dendroid trama/columella, led us tosuppose it was a brightly colored Gautieria sp. in thefield, and our notes designated it as the ‘‘manycolored Gautieria.’’ When we later had access to amicroscope and saw what we interpreted as boletoidspores, we supposed it to be a new genus and speciesin the Boletaceae. The molecular data support thathypothesis.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the Australian Centre for International Agricul-tural Research for financially supporting projects 8736 and9116 for N. Malajczuk and Australian Biological ResourcesStudy for its grant to T. Lebel, J. Trappe and R. Halling(Revision of Australian truffle-like genera in the orderBoletales, Basidiomycota). U.S. National Science Foundationsupported travel by Trappe and Castellano through GrantDEB 9007186. The U.S. Forest Service, Pacific NorthwestResearch Station, contributed laboratory and office facilitiesin support of Trappe’s participation in the research. RoyHalling acknowledges support from National Science Foun-dation grant DEB 1020421 and National Geographic SocietyCommittee for Research and Exploration grant 8457-08. TheQueensland Parks and Wildlife Service provided accommo-dation and orientation on Fraser Island. Sushma Mandavaand Matthew Sewell engineered the extraction and amplifi-cation of DNA from the Fraser Island specimen in thelaboratory of the Lewis B. and Dorothy Cullman Program forMolecular Systematics at the New York Botanical Garden. Weappreciate the excellent service by the staffs of herbaria inproviding access to and accessioning of these collections: theQueensland Herbarium, Brisbane (BRI), Papua New GuineaForest Research Institute Herbarium, Lae (LAE), NationalHerbarium of Victoria, South Yarra (MEL), New YorkBotanical Garden, Bronx (NY), Oregon State UniversityHerbarium, Corvallis (OSC), Western Australian Herbarium,Perth (PERTH) and Papua New Guinea Division of PrimaryIndustry Herbarium (PNG). Sam Malish of the Papua NewGuinea Forest Research Institute and Brian Gunn of theAustralian Commonwealth Institute for Scientific andIndustrial Research Division of Forestry and Forest Productsefficiently organized and guided the collecting trips in PapuaNew Guinea, as did Paul Reddell of CSIRO Forestry andForest Products for tropical Australia. Roy Young, KataweBaku, M. Bisam, Neale Bougher, Victoria Gordon, K.Querengasser and G. Tubeg, additional participants in thefield work, merit our deeply felt thanks for putting up withtropical temperatures and humidity and often living andworking in primitive conditions.

LITERATURE CITED

Alexander PJ, Govindarajalu R, Bacon CD, Bailey CD. 2007.Recovery of plant DNA using a reciprocating saw and

894 MYCOLOGIA

silica-based columns. Mol Ecol Notes 7: 5– 9,doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2006.01549.x

Binder M, Bresinsky A. 2002. Derivation of a polymorphiclineage of gasteromycetes from boletoid ancestors.Mycologia 94:85–98, doi:10.2307/3761848

———, Hibbett DS. 2006. Molecular systematics andbiological diversification of Boletales. Mycologia 98:971–981, doi:10.3852/mycologia.98.6.971

Castellano MA, Trappe JM, Maser Z, Maser C. 1989. Keysto spores of the genera of hypogeous fungi of northtemperate forests with special reference to animalmycophagy. Eureka, California: Mad River Press.186 p.

Claridge AW, May TW. 1994. Mycophagy among Australianmammals. Aust J Ecol 19:251–275, doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.1994.tb00489.x

Desjardin DE, Binder M, Roekring S, Flegel T. 2009.Spongiforma, a new genus of gasteroid boletes fromThailand. Fungal Divers 37:1–8.

———, Wilson AW, Binder M. 2008. Durianella, a newgasteroid genus of boletes from Malaysia. Mycologia100:956–961, doi:10.3852/08-062

Grubisha LC, Trappe JM, Molina R, Spatafora JW. 2001. Biologyof the ectomycorrhizal genus Rhizopogon V. Phylogeneticrelationships in the Boletales inferred from LSU rDNAdata. Mycologia 93:82–89, doi:10.2307/3761607

Halling RE, Baroni TJ, Binder M. 2007. A new genus ofBoletaceae from eastern North America. Mycologia 99:310–316, doi:10.3852/mycologia.99.2.310

Katoh K, Kuma K, Toh H, Miyata T. 2005. MAFFT 5:improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment.Nucleic Acids Res 33:511–518, doi:10.1093/nar/gki198

———, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T. 2002. MAFFT: a novelmethod for rapid multiple sequence alignment basedon fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res 30:3059–3066, doi:10.1093/nar/gkf436

———, Toh H. 2007. PartTree: an algorithm to build anapproximate tree from a large number of unalignedsequences. Bioinformatics 23:372–374, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl592

Kelly KL, Judd DB. 1955. The ISCC-NBS method ofdesignating colors and a dictionary of color names.US Department of Commerce, National Bureau ofStandards Circular 553. 158 p.

Lebel T, Orihara T, Maekawa N. 2012. The sequestrate genusRosbeeva T. Lebel & Orihara gen. nov. (Boletaceae) fromAustralasia and Japan: new species and new combinations.Fungal Divers 52:49–71, doi:10.1007/s13225-011-0109-x

Rehner SA, Buckley E. 2005. A Beauveria phylogenyinferred from nuclear ITS and EF1-a sequences:evidence for cryptic diversification and links toCordyceps teleomorphs. Mycologia 97: 84– 98,doi:10.3852/mycologia.97.1.84

Rowe KC, Reno ML, Richmond DM, Adkins RM, Steppan S.2008. Pliocene colonization and adaptive radiation inAustralia and New Guinea (Sahul): multilocus system-atics of the old endemic rodents (Muroidea: Murinae).Mol Phylogen Evol 47:84–101, doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2008.01.001

Stamatakis A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxaand mixed models. Bioinform 22:2688, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446

Vilgalys R, Hester M. 1990. Rapid genetic identification andmapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA fromseveral Cryptococcus species. J Bacteriol 172:4238–4246.

White TJ, Bruns TD, Lee S, Taylor J. 1990. Amplificationand direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genesfor phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, SninskyJJ, White TJ, eds. PCR protocols: a guide to methodsand applications. San Diego, California: AcademicPress. p 315–322.

TRAPPE ET AL.: AUSTRALIAN SEQUESTRATE FUNGI 895