2012 03 19 inquiry in the natural sciences (i)

Upload: muhammad-syed

Post on 06-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/2/2019 2012 03 19 Inquiry in the Natural Sciences (I)

    1/18

    Chapter 12: Inquiry in the Natural Science

    Part I: Basic Concepts

    Haixia Zhong

    2012 03 19

  • 8/2/2019 2012 03 19 Inquiry in the Natural Sciences (I)

    2/18

    Announcement

    Two mid-terms and parts of two final examsfrom former offerings of the course, withanswers at the end, are now posted on

    Avenue (under contents > basic courseinformation > old tests and exams).

    Also, by April 10 there should be posted theframe of our final exam, giving the form of thequestions without the content. (Please checkAvenue regularly.)

  • 8/2/2019 2012 03 19 Inquiry in the Natural Sciences (I)

    3/18

    Whats the difference between scientific

    inquiry and other type of inquiry?

    (reports from Monocle)

    I don't see the difference between inquiry

    into natural science and inquiry into anything

    else , as in all cases claims must be supported

    by factorial evidence and not just opinion.

    Scientific inquiry is always based upon facts,

    that is why it is scientific. If you bring up facts

    in another type of inquiry, does it become

    scientific? Or is it a blend of the two?

  • 8/2/2019 2012 03 19 Inquiry in the Natural Sciences (I)

    4/18

    Nature of Scientific Inquiry

    Issue:

    Scientific inquiry deals with questions offact and theexplanation of facts.

    Method:

    Scientific disciplines ground their claims on systematicand precise observations.

    Scientists establish and test their theories throughargument to the best explanation.

    A scientific theory/hypothesis is testable.

    Scientific claims must face the test of expert peerreview.

  • 8/2/2019 2012 03 19 Inquiry in the Natural Sciences (I)

    5/18

    The movement of Jupiter (planet of

    abundance), Taurus (the sign of money)

    and Mars (planet of action) will cause the

    growth of wealth for Virgos in 2012.

    This causal claim is not scientific because:

    A. It does not make a factual judgment.

    B. It is not based on systematic and precise

    observations.

    C. It is not testable.

    D. Well, I think it is scientific.

  • 8/2/2019 2012 03 19 Inquiry in the Natural Sciences (I)

    6/18

    Scientific Law Causal Explanation

    Generalized descriptions of

    regularities that have been

    found to occur in some area

    of nature.

    An antecedent event

    (events) or thing(s) cause

    something happen.

    a law notes that something

    happens

    an explanation explains why

    and how somethinghappens

    E.g. Newtons second law of

    motion: The acceleration a of a

    body is parallel and directlyproportional to the net force F

    and inversely proportional to the

    mass m, i.e., F= ma.

    E.g. Earthquakes occur in plate

    boundaries because of the

    release of built up stressbetween the rocks constituting

    each plate, as they snap into a

    new position relative to each

    other, or fracture.

  • 8/2/2019 2012 03 19 Inquiry in the Natural Sciences (I)

    7/18

    Explanation, Hypothesis, Theory

    Scientific hypothesis Scientific theory

    an explanation; a model that accounts for the

    observation, explains it, relates it to other

    observations, and makes testable predictions based

    upon it.

    tentative and unproven received, established,

    generally accepted

    E.g. the Gaia hypothesis E.g. the evolution theory

  • 8/2/2019 2012 03 19 Inquiry in the Natural Sciences (I)

    8/18

    The explanation of

    magnetic striping

    of the seafloor

    explains

    argues for argues for argues for

    Wegeners observations and an increasingcollection of surprising anomalies

    (Phenomena to be explained)

    The continents moved over time.(A hypothesis,before its confirmation)

    The seafloor

    becomes older

    with distance

    away from theridge crests.

    A model that

    explains how the

    continents moved

    Improved

    seismic data,

    etc.

    Arguments and Explanations in Natural Science

  • 8/2/2019 2012 03 19 Inquiry in the Natural Sciences (I)

    9/18

    The evolution of a large powerful neck, jaws, and hindlegs was determined to be a favorable adaptation.Smaller, yet powerful, forearms were part of thatadaptation.

    When attacking another animal,

    T-Rex pivoted at the hip, like a lever

    at it's fulcrum. The massive and heavy head was counter-balanced below the hips by the legs and tail. Becausethe head and jaw muscles were so large, there wasselective pressure to reduce the size of the arms in

    order to minimize the animal's weight above the hip.http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Why_do_tyrannosaurus_have_small_arms

    Why do tyrannosaurus have small arms?

    http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Why_do_tyrannosaurus_have_small_armshttp://wiki.answers.com/Q/Why_do_tyrannosaurus_have_small_arms
  • 8/2/2019 2012 03 19 Inquiry in the Natural Sciences (I)

    10/18

    which statement about the following passage

    is true?The evolution of a large powerful neck, jaws, and hind legs was

    determined to be a favorable adaptation. Smaller, yet powerful,forearms were part of that adaptation. When attacking anotheranimal, T-Rex pivoted at the hip, like a lever at it's fulcrum. Themassive and heavy head was counter-balanced below the hips bythe legs and tail. Because the head and jaw muscles were so large,

    there was selective pressure to reduce the size of the arms inorder to minimize the animal's weight above the hip.

    I. It contains an explanation.

    II. It contains an argument.

    A. I only

    B. II only

    C. Both I and II

    D. Neither I nor II

  • 8/2/2019 2012 03 19 Inquiry in the Natural Sciences (I)

    11/18

    Argument to the Best Explanation

    Simplicity(also called Parsimony, Occam'srazor) discouraging the postulation of excessivenumbers of entities

    Scope the apparent application of the theory to

    multiple cases of phenomena

    Fruitfulness the prospect that a theory mayexplain further phenomena in the future

    Conservatism the degree of "fit" with existingrecognized knowledge-systems. (Context of theissue, Burden of proof, etc. More on these in thenext class.)

  • 8/2/2019 2012 03 19 Inquiry in the Natural Sciences (I)

    12/18

    Testability

    Testability requires that a theory or claim mustbe able to identify the kind of observational

    evidence that will support it and the kind of

    that will count against it. (B&B, page 221)

    A scientific prediction suggests a test

    (observation or experiment) for the

    hypothesis. To say that a hypothesis

    "generates predictions" means the same thing

    as saying the hypothesis "is testable".

  • 8/2/2019 2012 03 19 Inquiry in the Natural Sciences (I)

    13/18

    The law of attraction: if you think positive

    thought about what you want, those things will

    come to you. (i.e. if the things you want dont

    come to you, then you are not thinking

    positively enough.)

    The law of attraction is not scientific because:A. It does not make a factual judgment.

    B. It does not make a causal claim.

    C. It is not based on observation.

    D. It is not testable.

    E. Well, I think it is scientific.

  • 8/2/2019 2012 03 19 Inquiry in the Natural Sciences (I)

    14/18

    The rate at which a feather falls and a

    bowling ball falls is the same because

    the acceleration of the two objects is

    the same.

    Is this claim testable?

    A. Yes

    B. No

  • 8/2/2019 2012 03 19 Inquiry in the Natural Sciences (I)

    15/18

    There are other inhabited planets

    in the universe.

    Is this claim testable?

    A. Yes

    B. No

  • 8/2/2019 2012 03 19 Inquiry in the Natural Sciences (I)

    16/18

    Our universe is surrounded by

    another, larger universe, with whichwe can have absolutely no contact.

    Is this claim testable?

    A. Yes

    B. No

  • 8/2/2019 2012 03 19 Inquiry in the Natural Sciences (I)

    17/18

    All human action is motivated by

    unconscious sexual desires. I.e. If these

    desires are not apparent and are notadmitted by people, that is just

    because they are repressed. But they

    are still there. (Freud)

    Is this claim testable?

    A. Yes

    B. No

  • 8/2/2019 2012 03 19 Inquiry in the Natural Sciences (I)

    18/18

    For Wednesday

    Exercises for tutorial 10 (March 23-29):posted on Avenue

    chapter 12 end-of-chapter exercises (pages 233-

    234 print and coursesmart, 253-254 create): 2; 4ii), iii), v), vii)

    Read the rest of chapter 12 (the process ofinquiry into the natural science)

    Answer quiz for Ch. 12 on Avenue

    Enjoy the rest of your day!