2011 local twn match program
DESCRIPTION
Kent County Road Commission Partnering with 21 Townships serving over 235,000 residents and 1312 miles of Local Roads. 2011 Local TWN Match Program. Townships contributed over 2.5 millions dollars. Upgrading gravel roads to asphalt .80 miles Re-Surfacing Asphalt Roads 24 miles - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: 2011 Local TWN Match Program](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062407/56812cf9550346895d91c842/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Kent County Road Commission Partnering with 21 Townships serving over 235,000 residents and 1312 miles of Local Roads
![Page 2: 2011 Local TWN Match Program](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062407/56812cf9550346895d91c842/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
MDOT8%
Primary/ Major 27%
Local/ Minor65%
Centerline MilesPrimary/ Ma-
jor34%
Local/ Minor12%
MDOT54%
Distribution of Revenues
![Page 3: 2011 Local TWN Match Program](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062407/56812cf9550346895d91c842/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
2011 Local TWN Match Program
• Townships contributed over 2.5 millions dollars.• Upgrading gravel roads to asphalt .80 miles• Re-Surfacing Asphalt Roads 24 miles• Appling new gravel to existing gravel roads 53,000
tons• Improving drainage• Applying dustlayer
![Page 4: 2011 Local TWN Match Program](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062407/56812cf9550346895d91c842/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Construction vs. Preservation
![Page 5: 2011 Local TWN Match Program](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062407/56812cf9550346895d91c842/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
KENT COUNTY ROAD SYSTEM MILEAGE CERTIFICATION
MARCH 2012 SHEET 1
TOWNSHIP
DISTRICT
PRIMARY ROADS
LOCAL ROADS
TOTAL LOCAL
TOTAL PRIMARY AND LOCAL
PAVED
GRAVEL
ADA
3
22.39
8.04
11.62
19.66
42.05
4
12.55
32.90
3.74
36.64
49.19
34.94
40.94
15.36
56.30
91.24
ALGOMA
2
36.64
51.42
8.19
59.61
96.25
ALPINE
3
26.01
66.87
0.60
67.47
93.48
BOWNE
4
31.65
20.69
16.83
37.52
69.17
BYRON
5
41.60
93.23
2.39
95.62
137.22
CALEDONIA
4
40.12
32.66
10.02
42.68
82.80
CANNON
2
13.36
57.33
3.02
60.35
73.71
3
7.96
7.01
4.64
11.65
19.61
4
0
0.09
1.93
2.02
2.02
21.32
64.43
9.59
74.02
95.34
CASCADE
4
40.92
73.44
5.43
78.87
119.79
COURTLAND
2
23.95
52.67
6.77
59.44
83.39
GAINES
4
32.12
27.81
0
27.81
59.93
5
16.85
36.27
0
36.27
53.12
48.97
64.08
0
64.08
113.05
![Page 6: 2011 Local TWN Match Program](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062407/56812cf9550346895d91c842/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
![Page 7: 2011 Local TWN Match Program](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062407/56812cf9550346895d91c842/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
PASER Good Pavements (10 – 8)
Little or no distress observed Requires little to no maintenance
Fair Pavements (7 – 5) Non-structural distresses observed Requires surface treatment or
overlay to preserve base & sub-base Poor Pavements (4 – 1)
Distress indicates structural failures Requires heavy rehab or
reconstruction
![Page 8: 2011 Local TWN Match Program](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062407/56812cf9550346895d91c842/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Practical Selection Considerations
Right Fix, Right Road, Right Time Pavement Management Philosophy Preserve base & sub-base
Address Specific Safety Issue Wet pavement & rut filling Wedge paving & crown correction