2011 fannie mae and fha guidelines: implications for condos

18
: IMPLICATIONS FOR CONDOMINIUM FANNIE MAE & FHA REGULATIONS OREST TOMASELLI, CEO, NATIONAL CONDO ADVISORS : IMPLICATIONS FOR CONDOMINIUM FANNIE MAE & FHA REGULATIONS OREST TOMASELLI, CEO, NATIONAL CONDO ADVISORS NATIONALCONDOADVISORS.COM

Upload: national-condo-advisors-llc

Post on 20-Jun-2015

3.929 views

Category:

Business


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2011 Fannie Mae and FHA Guidelines:  Implications for Condos

:  I M P L I C AT I O N S   F O R   C O N D OM I N I UM  

FANNIE  MAE  &  FHA  REGULATIONS  

OREST TOMASELLI, CEO, NATIONAL CONDO ADVISORS

:  I M P L I C AT I O N S   F O R   C O N D OM I N I UM  

FANNIE  MAE  &  FHA  REGULATIONS  

OREST TOMASELLI, CEO, NATIONAL CONDO ADVISORS

NATIONALCONDOADVISORS.COM

Page 2: 2011 Fannie Mae and FHA Guidelines:  Implications for Condos

OVERVIEW  

 The  History  of  Condo:  Fannie  Mae,  FHA,  and  Lenders  

 Fannie  Mae  &  FHA  Today  

 PERS   CPM  

 DELRAP/HRAP  

 Top  5  Challenges  for  Condo  Developments   PorHolio  Lenders   Industry  PredicKons  

Page 3: 2011 Fannie Mae and FHA Guidelines:  Implications for Condos

FANNIE  MAE:  A  HISTORY  1990-­‐2000s  

 1990s:    Tighter  guidelines  with  presale  requirements  •  Loans  below  presale  were  originated  through  porHolio  lenders  

 2000-­‐2008:  Agencies  began  to  loosen  condo  standards.  OriginaKng  loans  focused  more  on  the  credit  rather  than  collateral  •  Loosening  condo  standards  started  with  O/O  80%  CLTVs  and  gradually  expanded  

•  At  the  height  95%  CLTV  loans  were  originated  with  liYle  to  no  review  of  the  condominium  elements2000-­‐2008:  Agencies  began  to  loosen  condo  

•  Most  major  lenders  had  waivers  allowing  even  more  flexibility  

Page 4: 2011 Fannie Mae and FHA Guidelines:  Implications for Condos

LENDER  HISTORY  2000-­‐2008  

   No  presale  requirement  

   Commercial  space  allowance  up  to  50%  

   Landleases  rarely  invesKgated  outside  of  the  term  

   CompleKon  of  common  elements  or  addiKonal  buildings  rarely  considered  

   Very  liYle  concern  regarding  conversions  or  current  renters  

   Condos  in  resort  areas  rarely  invesKgated  outside  of  glaring  condotel  elements  

   HOA  budgets  and  financials  rarely  ever  reviewed  

   No  Doc,  Stated  Income,  NIVA,  100%  financing,  credit  scores  down  to  580,  etc…    

 Buyer  credit  docs  valid  for  up  to  one  year  

Page 5: 2011 Fannie Mae and FHA Guidelines:  Implications for Condos

FANNIE  MAE:  START  OF  CHANGE  

   Announcement  7-­‐18  in  November  2007  began  major  changes  for  condo  approval  •     FNMA  reKred  the  1028  process  

•     Removed  the  ability  for  new  condos  to  use  Limited  Review  

•     Put  the  emphasis  of  new  condo  review  on  FNMA  CPM            

•     Provided  20%  commercial  space  requirement  

•     Pushed  responsibility  to  the  lender  •     Major  lenders  sKll  had  their  waivers  in  place  

Page 6: 2011 Fannie Mae and FHA Guidelines:  Implications for Condos

FANNIE  MAE:  START  OF  CHANGE  

   Announcement  8-­‐13  in  December  2008  created  more  thorough  implementaKon  of  stringent  guidelines       Increased  presale  to  70%         FNMA  re-­‐instated  1028  process  now  called  PERS  

     Created  a  stronger  reliance  on  FNMA  systems  (CPM  and  PERS)  

     Marked  the  beginning  of  more  stringency  for  conversions,  commercial  space,  and  budgets  

     Marked  the  end  to  most  major  lender’s  waivers  

     Mandated  all  new  Florida  condos  sent  to  PERS  

     Began  higher  scruKny  of  condos  in  resort  areas  

Page 7: 2011 Fannie Mae and FHA Guidelines:  Implications for Condos

FHA:  A  HISTORY  2009  

   Mortgagee  LeYer  2009  46A&B  •     Created  the  DELRAP/HRAP  process  •     Spot  loans  eliminated  

•     30%  presale  for  new  condos  •     Allowed  right  of  first  refusal  •     10  yr  warranty  not  be  required  with  CO  and  building  

 permits  •     Condo  conversions  will  not  have  to  wait  1  year  for  

 eligibility  •     Provided  25%  commercial  space  requirement  •   10%  line  item  for  reserves  

Page 8: 2011 Fannie Mae and FHA Guidelines:  Implications for Condos

FHA:  A  HISTORY  2011  

   11-­‐22  Mortgagee  LeYer  Guide  •  Time  limits  on  30%  presale  

•  All  conversions  less  than  2  years  old  to  be  approved  via  HRAP  and    requires  a  reserve  study  with  50%  presale  requirement  

• More  flexibility  for  sponsor  ownership  during  conversion  

• More  stringent  review  for  projects  involved  with  aucKon,  BK,  deed-­‐in-­‐  lieu,  asset  sale,  and  receivership  

• More  stringent  review  of  HOA  budget  and  financials    

Page 9: 2011 Fannie Mae and FHA Guidelines:  Implications for Condos

CONDO  APPROVAL  OPTIONS  TODAY  

.  

 CPM:  Lender  Delegated  Automated  UW.  Capability  to  reach  51%  presale.  

 Lender  Full  Review  

 PERS  Submission:  UKlized  many  Kmes  for  excepKons    (rent  regulaKon,  excessive  commercial  space,  etc..)  or  markeKng  purposes.  Mandatory  for  Florida  project.  Cost  for  submission  

 FHA/VA  Review:    DELRAP  or  HRAP  

 PorHolio  Lenders  

New  Condominiums  

Page 10: 2011 Fannie Mae and FHA Guidelines:  Implications for Condos

CONDO  APPROVAL  OPTIONS  TODAY  

.  

• Limited  Review  (FNMA)  

• Any  opKons  listed  for  new  condominiums    

Established  Condominiums  

Page 11: 2011 Fannie Mae and FHA Guidelines:  Implications for Condos

TOP  5  CHALLENGES  FOR  CONDOS  

1.    Fannie  Mae  Legal  Requirements  

  By-­‐law  revisions    

  Unit  owner  vote  requirements  

Page 12: 2011 Fannie Mae and FHA Guidelines:  Implications for Condos

TOP  5  CHALLENGES  FOR  CONDOS  

2.  Non  Gut  Rehab  Conversions  

  Established  vs.  Non  Established  

  Mandatory  reserve  studies  for  newly  converted  

  5  years  of  repair  cost  in  reserve  fund  

Page 13: 2011 Fannie Mae and FHA Guidelines:  Implications for Condos

TOP  5  CHALLENGES  FOR  CONDOS  

3.  Reserve  Requirements  

  Departure  from  the  Special  Assessment  

  10%  Line  item  within  the  budget  

  Ongoing  contribuKon  

Page 14: 2011 Fannie Mae and FHA Guidelines:  Implications for Condos

TOP  5  CHALLENGES  FOR  CONDOS  

4.  Commercial  Space  

  Fannie  Mae:  above  20%  -­‐trigger  

  FHA:    above  25%  -­‐  cannot  be  approved  

  Condo  hotel:    prevalence  

Page 15: 2011 Fannie Mae and FHA Guidelines:  Implications for Condos

TOP  5  CHALLENGES  FOR  CONDOS  

5.  LiVgaVon  

  Trigger  for  Fannie  Mae  PERS  and  FHA  HRAP  submission  

  ConstrucKon  deficiency    

  Slip  and  fall  

Page 16: 2011 Fannie Mae and FHA Guidelines:  Implications for Condos

PORTFOLIO  LENDERS  

 Terms  olen  not  as  compeKKve:  •  Higher  down  payment  requirements,  interest  rates,  credit  score  

requirements  

 PotenKal  downsides:  •  Usually  not  designed  for  LMI  buyers  •  Not  always  reliable  for  long  term.  

•  PotenKal  probability  to  be  “adversely  selected”  •  Buyers  not  always  comfortable  with  unknown  sources  for  funding  •  Media  has  convinced  many  people  to  look  for  FNMA  approval  and  

adequate  presale  requirements    

Page 17: 2011 Fannie Mae and FHA Guidelines:  Implications for Condos

INDUSTRY  PREDICTIONS  

 Lenders  will  conKnue  to  become  more  knowledgeable  through  necessity    

 More  buy-­‐backs  

 Desire  to  lend  to  certain  clientele  

 Some  lenders  to  selecKvely  choose  to  porHolio   Presale  being  primary  driving  factor  

 Elements  that  would  cause  FNMA  to  never  approve  are  less  likely  

 Credit  profile  to  be  significant  component  

 Less  flexibility  through  FNMA  and  HUD   Financial  review  to  become  a  key  component  for  reviews  

Page 18: 2011 Fannie Mae and FHA Guidelines:  Implications for Condos

QUESTIONS/COMMENTS?  

 *NaKonal  Condo  Advisors,  LLC  is  not  a  law  firm.    None  of  the  guidance  or  advice  contained  within  should  be  considered  or  construed  as  legal  advice  from  either  NCA  or  any  of  its  employees.    We  recommend  you  consult  with  your  aYorney  regarding  the  informaKon  provided  within.