2011 camp ripley archery hunter survey report
TRANSCRIPT
2011 Camp Ripley
Archery Hunter Survey
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Page 2 of 19
2011 Camp Ripley
Archery Hunter Survey
Prepared by:
Beau Liddell
Area Wildlife Supervisor, Little Falls
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
Section of Wildlife Management
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Page 3 of 19
Acknowledgements
This survey was conducted and supported by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources,
Section of Wildlife Management (DNR). I wish to thank Gen Swenson of the Little Falls Area
Wildlife Office for administrative support. I also thank Ron Kullman and Ray Kappers of the
DNR for their assistance with generating the hunter list from the electronic licensing system
and with preparing, printing and mailing post card notifications. Finally, I thank Betsy Cotone
with the DNR web team for technical assistance in setting up the online survey via
SurveyMonkey.
Suggested Citation
Liddell, B. L. 2012. 2011 Camp Ripley archery hunter survey. Minnesota Department of
Natural Resources, Section of Wildlife Management.
Contact Information
Beau Liddell, Area Wildlife Supervisor
Little Falls Area Wildlife Office
16543 Haven Road
Little Falls, MN 56345
320-616-2468, ext. 222 (phone)
320-616-2473 (fax)
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Page 4 of 19
Introduction
Camp Ripley Military Reservation and Statutory Game Refuge near Little Falls in central
Minnesota has been open to special public archery deer hunts since 1954 primarily for
purposes of managing deer populations below the installations over-winter habitat capacity,
and secondarily to provide public hunting recreation. The Camp Ripley Archery Hunt is the only
archery hunting event of its kind in North America, attracting between 5,500 and 7,500
applicants every year, including 2-3% of applicants from 20-30 different states. Slightly more
than 8% of those who pursue deer by archery in Minnesota apply for the hunt each year, of
which 5,000 are permitted and about 4,500 participate.
The hunt is administered by the Department of Natural Resources, Section of Wildlife (DNR).
An annual special hunt lottery is run by the DNR license bureau, which issues special hunt
permits to successful applicants after the lottery is completed. Planning, on-the-ground
administration of the event and management of the deer population on post is coordinated by
DNR field staff at the Little Falls Area Wildlife Office in collaboration with the Department of
Military Affairs (DMA).
In addition to collecting harvest and population data on Camp Ripley’s deer herd, wildlife
managers periodically conduct hunter surveys to track trends in hunter characteristics,
interference and satisfaction.
Study Purpose and Objectives
This survey was conducted to provide updated information on hunter participation and
satisfaction from the last survey conducted after the 2005 hunt. Most questions were the same
as those asked in previous Camp Ripley hunter surveys. Survey questions addressed:
• Hunter demographics: age, initiation to deer hunting
• Hunting motivations
• Deer observed while hunting
• Likelihood of future participation
• Hunter success, interference and satisfaction
• Hunting methods used
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Page 5 of 19
The questions used to address each of the above objectives are provided in the survey
instrument (Appendix A).
Methods
The population of interest in this survey included all individuals who had applied for the 2011
Camp Ripley Archery Hunt. The sampling frame used to draw the survey sample was the DNR
electronic licensing system (ELS). A random sample of 1,600 individuals who were drawn in the
2011 hunt lottery was selected during December 2011.
Data Collection
Data were collected using an on-line survey prepared by DNR and made available through
www.surveymonkey.com. In early-January of 2012 respondents received a post-card
notification of their selection to participate in the survey and were able to complete the survey
on-line through March 1st
, 2012. No personalization or attempts to make follow-up contacts
were done to increase response rate. Responses were kept anonymous, and no efforts to
assess nonresponse bias were made.
Survey Instrument
The data collection instrument was a 27-question self-administered online survey (Appendix A).
The questionnaire addressed hunter participation, motivations, demographics, hunting
methods, hunting success, hunter interference, deer seen, hunter satisfaction and likelihood of
participation in future events.
Data Entry and Analysis
Data entry was automated through the SurveyMonkey website and data was downloaded to
and analyzed using spreadsheet software. I computed basic descriptive statistics and
frequencies for the responses to questions. Proportions presented in the text are rounded to
nearest whole %. For some questions where multiple responses were possible, readers are
advised that the proportions, if summed, will exceed 100%.
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Page 6 of 19
Survey Response Rate
No instructions were provided via the post-card notification on how to use a web browser, and
thus I assumed that respondents knew how to access the survey website address provided on
the notifications. Of the 1,600 notifications sent out, 189 contacts were received from
respondents indicating they didn’t know how to access the survey on their web browser or that
they were unwilling or unable to complete the survey due to lack of internet access. Of the
remaining 1,411 respondents, 509 fully or partially completed the online survey for a survey
response rate of 36%. Comparisons with data from previous years may be tenuous due to the
low response rate and since non-response bias wasn’t assessed in 2011.
Survey Results
Of the hunters responding, 96% participated in the 2011 hunt, with 49% participating in the
first hunt (Oct. 20-21) and 51% participating in the second hunt (Oct. 29-30). Historically
noticeably more hunters applied for the second compared to the first hunt, but since 2006
similar proportions of applications have been received among the two events. Recent
application success rates have varied between 60 to 66%, with slightly fewer applications and
slightly higher success rates occurring for the first 2-day event (unpublished DNR data).
By far these events are used predominantly by Minnesota residents, with residents comprising
97% of participants (Figure 1). Relatively few youth participate in the Ripley hunts, with 3% of
all participants represented by resident and non-resident youth hunters (Figure 1). Age of
hunters who were drawn for the 2011 events ranged from 14 to 75 years old, with a median
age of 42. Hunters reported having been a deer hunter for nearly 26 years on average (range of
1-60 years), having hunted deer by archery for an average of 19 years (range of 1 to 53 years),
and hunted at Camp Ripley for an average of 9 years (range of 1 to 55 years).
The importance of friends and family in hunting traditions is evident with those who hunt at
Camp Ripley as well, with 40% reporting that relatives introduced them to archery hunting, 34%
indicating that friends had introduced them to the pastime, and 26% stating that they were
self-taught (Figure 2).
Camp Ripley hunters first heard about the event from a variety of sources including friends
(70%) and relatives (39%), followed by newspaper(s) (12%), DNR’s website (7%), magazine
articles (6%), DNR news releases (5%), Internet sources other than DNR’s website (2%), and
nearly 3% of hunters reported finding out about the event through other sources, mainly
through the Minnesota Army National Guard (Figure 3).
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Page 7 of 19
The importance of friends and family to hunters was also evident by the 88% of applicants that
applied for the hunt as part of a group and 91% of participants indicating they hunted in a
group during the event (Tables 1 & 2). In addition, overall 50% of participants said that
socializing with family and friends was an important secondary motivation for hunting at Camp
Ripley.
Due to the high productivity and density of deer at Camp Ripley, DNR began allowing the use of
bonus permits in 2006 to increase harvest on antlerless deer (does and fawns) for purposes of
maintaining the deer population at manageable levels and below the over-winter carrying
capacity of the habitat. This has proven very popular with hunters and has consequently
resulted in sustaining historically high levels of harvest since 2006. In 2011 almost three-
fourths (74%) of participants purchased a bonus permit to use at Camp, 64% of deer taken at
Camp last year were does or fawns (compared to long-term average of 56%), and 92% of those
were taken on bonus permits (unpublished DNR data).
Most (96%) of respondents reported that they participated in the 2011 event. This is higher
than the 86% participation estimated on morning check-in during the 2011 hunt, suggesting
that those who received the post card survey notification but didn’t participate in the event
were less likely to complete the survey online than those who took part in the hunt. Of those
participating in the 2011 event, a 92% majority reported having hunted during both days of
their hunt.
As with most deer hunters, participants at Camp Ripley have many motivations for hunting.
Their primary motivations for hunting at Camp Ripley were dominated by the opportunity to
take any deer (47%), chance to take a trophy buck (38%), followed by helping to manage the
deer herd at Camp Ripley (6%), to socialize with family and friends (5%), introduce someone to
the sport of archery hunting (1%), and various other motivations (2%) (Table 3). In addition to
primary reasons, Ripley hunters listed socializing with family or friends (50%), taking a trophy
buck (46%), opportunity to take any deer (41%), helping to manage the deer herd (31%), and to
introduce someone to archery hunting (9%) as major secondary motivations for participating in
the event (Table 4).
Hunters used several methods to hunt deer at Camp Ripley, with most hunting from a tree
stand (89%), followed by still-hunting (14%), hunting from a ground blind (12%), and conducting
deer drives (3%) (Figure 4).
While deer densities have been reduced by design over the past decade to drop them to more
manageable levels, densities remain high at Camp Ripley (estimated 2011 spring densities of 21
deer per square mile, and 2011 fall densities of nearly 30 deer per square mile). As with past
years, the overwhelming majority of Camp Ripley hunters (93%) reported seeing deer during
the 2011 hunt (compared to 98% in 2005), with 70% seeing 3 or more deer (compared to 88%
in 2005) (Figure 5). Hunters providing individual estimates of deer seen reported seeing on
average 19 deer during the 2011 hunt compared to 22 deer in 2005.
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Page 8 of 19
Over 9% of respondents reported success in taking a deer at Camp Ripley in 2011, and 37% of
hunters reported passing on at least one deer (range of 1 to 35 deer were passed on) that
presented a clean shot within their comfortable shooting distance. Hunters harvest deer
throughout the day at Camp Ripley. The median time of day hunters reported taking their deer
was 11:00 a.m., with 34% of the harvest occurring between 7:00-9:00 a.m., 21% between 9:00
a.m and noon, 17% between noon and 3:00 p.m., and 25% between 3:00-5:00 p.m.
The level of hunter-reported success is consistent with the nearly 10% success calculated from
raw harvest and hunter data collected on-site at the DNR check station during the 2011 hunt
(Table 8). Current archery hunter success is typical, to slightly better than what’s occurred over
the past three decades at Camp. During the period 1981-2003 success rates varied between 6-
13% (average of just above 8%), compared to a range of just below 10% to just over 12% since
2004 (average of 11.4%). This past year’s success rate is above the 1981-2003 average, and is
slightly above the 1981-2010 long-term average (LTA) success rate of 9% (Table 8).
Hunter satisfaction rates remain high for the public archery hunts at Camp Ripley (78% satisfied
in 2011; 89% in 2005); Table 5, and DNR has received many positive comments in recent years
about the efforts DNR and Department of Military Affairs (DMA) have undertaken to provide a
better organized and safer hunting experience on post.
There has been a slight decline in overall satisfaction from 2005 to 2011 (22% unsatisfied in
2011 vs. 10% in 2005). It’s important to note that the survey instrument was different among
years, and follow-up questions were not asked as to why some hunters express dissatisfaction.
Feedback from some unsatisfied hunters volunteering additional information suggests that the
reasons for their dissatisfaction are quite varied and often unrelated to deer densities or hunter
success.
Hunter interference has increased marginally (86% indicating some level of interference in 2011
compared to 80% in 2005) due to the higher number of permits issued since 2006, and
responses from hunters indicate that interference levels might be a greater factor in 2011
compared to 2005 regarding their decision on whether to apply in the future (Table 6).
However, overall only 7% hunters in 2011 said that interference would probably or definitely
influence their decision to apply in the future (Table 7), compared to 4% of hunters in 2005. In
all, 79% of hunters in 2011 said they would probably or definitely apply for future hunts
(compared to 85% in 2005), and in recent years the number of hunters applying for this event
has reached a 30-year high. However, interference data do support DNR’s decision to not
increase the number of permits issued beyond the current 2,500 per 2-day hunt.
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Page 9 of 19
Figure 1. Proportion of 2011 Camp Ripley Archery Hunt participants by residency.
Figure 2. Introduction of 2011 Camp Ripley Archery Hunt participants to the sport of archery
hunting.
95.1%
2.4%2.2% 0.4%
What type of archery license did you purchase in 2011? (check one)What type of archery license did you purchase in 2011? (check one)What type of archery license did you purchase in 2011? (check one)What type of archery license did you purchase in 2011? (check one)
Resident archery license
Youth archery license
Non-resident archery license
Non-resident youth archerylicense
33.6%
37.8%
26.4%
0.3%
Who introduced you to archery hunting?Who introduced you to archery hunting?Who introduced you to archery hunting?Who introduced you to archery hunting?
Friend
Relative
Self-taught
Other (please specify)
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Page 10 of 19
Figure 3. How 2011 Camp Ripley Archery Hunt participants heard about the event.
Figure 4. Hunting techniques used by participants of the 2011 Camp Ripley Archery Hunt.
70.3%
39.3%
2.2%7.5%
4.7% 6.1%11.6%
5.7%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
Fri
en
d
Re
lative
Inte
rne
t (o
the
rth
an
DN
Rw
eb
site
)
DN
R w
eb
site
DN
R n
ew
sre
lea
se
Ma
ga
zin
e
Ne
wsp
ap
er
Oth
er
(ple
ase
sp
ecify)
How did you hear about the Camp Ripley Archery Hunt? (check all that How did you hear about the Camp Ripley Archery Hunt? (check all that How did you hear about the Camp Ripley Archery Hunt? (check all that How did you hear about the Camp Ripley Archery Hunt? (check all that apply)apply)apply)apply)
13.9%
2.8%
88.8%
12.4%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
Stalking/Still-hunting Deer drives Hunted from a treestand
Hunted from aground blind
What hunting technique did you use during the hunt? (check all that apply)What hunting technique did you use during the hunt? (check all that apply)What hunting technique did you use during the hunt? (check all that apply)What hunting technique did you use during the hunt? (check all that apply)
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Page 11 of 19
Figure 5. Relative number of deer seen by participants during the 2011 Camp Ripley Archery
Hunts.
7.0%
23.2%
33.2%
25.2%
11.5%
How many deer did you see while hunting at Camp Ripley?How many deer did you see while hunting at Camp Ripley?How many deer did you see while hunting at Camp Ripley?How many deer did you see while hunting at Camp Ripley?
None
1 or 2
3 to 5
6 to 10
More than 10 (please give anestimate)
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Page 12 of 19
Table 1. Proportion of 2011 Camp Ripley Archery Hunt participants that
applied for the event as group or individual.
Did you apply as a group or individual?Did you apply as a group or individual?Did you apply as a group or individual?Did you apply as a group or individual?
Answer OptionsAnswer OptionsAnswer OptionsAnswer Options Response Response Response Response
PercentPercentPercentPercent Response Response Response Response
CountCountCountCount
Group 87.8% 446
Individual 12.2% 62
answered questionanswered questionanswered questionanswered question 508508508508
skipped questionskipped questionskipped questionskipped question 2222
Table 2. Proportion of 2011 Camp Riley Archery Hunt participants that hunted in a group
during the event.
Did you hunt with a group during the Camp Ripley hunt?Did you hunt with a group during the Camp Ripley hunt?Did you hunt with a group during the Camp Ripley hunt?Did you hunt with a group during the Camp Ripley hunt?
Answer OptionsAnswer OptionsAnswer OptionsAnswer Options Response Response Response Response
PercentPercentPercentPercent Response Response Response Response
CountCountCountCount
Yes 91.2% 444
No 8.8% 43
answered questionanswered questionanswered questionanswered question 487487487487
skipped questionskipped questionskipped questionskipped question 23232323
Table 3. Primary motivations for hunters participating in the 2011 Camp Ripley Archery Hunt.
What was your primary motivation for hunting at Camp Ripley? (check only one)What was your primary motivation for hunting at Camp Ripley? (check only one)What was your primary motivation for hunting at Camp Ripley? (check only one)What was your primary motivation for hunting at Camp Ripley? (check only one)
Answer OptionsAnswer OptionsAnswer OptionsAnswer Options Response Response Response Response
PercentPercentPercentPercent Response Response Response Response
CountCountCountCount
To take a trophy buck 38.8% 184
To have the opportunity to kill any deer (buck or doe) 47.2% 228
To help manage the deer herd at Camp Ripley 5.8% 28
To socialize with friends and family 5.4% 26
To introduce/recruit someone to archery hunting 1.2% 6
Other (please specify) 2.3% 11
answered answered answered answered questionquestionquestionquestion 483483483483
skipped questionskipped questionskipped questionskipped question 27272727
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Page 13 of 19
Table 4. Secondary motivations for hunters participating in the 2011 Camp Ripley Archery
Hunt.
What were your other motivations, if any, for hunting at Camp Ripley? (check all that What were your other motivations, if any, for hunting at Camp Ripley? (check all that What were your other motivations, if any, for hunting at Camp Ripley? (check all that What were your other motivations, if any, for hunting at Camp Ripley? (check all that apply)apply)apply)apply)
Answer OptionsAnswer OptionsAnswer OptionsAnswer Options Response Response Response Response
PercentPercentPercentPercent Response Response Response Response
CountCountCountCount
None 3.1% 16
To take a trophy buck 46.4% 236
To have the opportunity to kill any deer (buck or doe) 41.1% 209
To help manage the deer herd at Camp Ripley 30.6% 156
To socialize with friends and family 49.9% 254
To introduce/recruit someone to archery hunting 9.4% 48
Other (please specify) 4.5% 23
answered questionanswered questionanswered questionanswered question 483483483483
skipped questionskipped questionskipped questionskipped question 27272727
Table 5. Categories of satisfaction of participants in the 2011 Camp Ripley Archery Hunt.
How do you rate your overall How do you rate your overall How do you rate your overall How do you rate your overall experience at this year’s Camp Ripley Archery Hunt?experience at this year’s Camp Ripley Archery Hunt?experience at this year’s Camp Ripley Archery Hunt?experience at this year’s Camp Ripley Archery Hunt?
Answer OptionsAnswer OptionsAnswer OptionsAnswer Options Response Response Response Response
PercentPercentPercentPercent Response Response Response Response
CountCountCountCount
Very satisfied 18.0% 87
Satisfied 39.5% 191
Neither satisfied or dissatisfied 20.1% 97
Unsatisfied 13.7% 66
Very unsatisfied 8.7% 42
Don’t Know 0.0% 0
answered questionanswered questionanswered questionanswered question 483483483483
skipped questionskipped questionskipped questionskipped question 27272727
Table 6. Level of interference experienced by participants in the 2011 Camp Ripley Archery
Hunt.
What level of interference from other hunters did you experience at Camp Ripley?What level of interference from other hunters did you experience at Camp Ripley?What level of interference from other hunters did you experience at Camp Ripley?What level of interference from other hunters did you experience at Camp Ripley?
Answer OptionsAnswer OptionsAnswer OptionsAnswer Options Response Response Response Response
PercentPercentPercentPercent Response Response Response Response
CountCountCountCount
None 13.7% 66
Interfered by 5+ hunters 19.3% 93
Interfered by 1-2 hunters 38.3% 185
Interfered by 3-4 hunters 25.7% 124
Other (please specify) 3.1% 15
answered questionanswered questionanswered questionanswered question 483483483483
skipped questionskipped questionskipped questionskipped question 27272727
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Page 14 of 19
Table 7. Influence of interference on likelihood of 2011 Camp Ripley archery hunters to apply
for future hunts.
Will the hunter interference that you experienced this year influence your decision to Will the hunter interference that you experienced this year influence your decision to Will the hunter interference that you experienced this year influence your decision to Will the hunter interference that you experienced this year influence your decision to apply for the hunt in the future?apply for the hunt in the future?apply for the hunt in the future?apply for the hunt in the future?
Answer OptionsAnswer OptionsAnswer OptionsAnswer Options Response Response Response Response
PercentPercentPercentPercent Response Response Response Response
CountCountCountCount
I definitely will not apply again 1.4% 7
I probably won’t apply again 5.6% 27
Maybe 12.4% 60
I probably will apply again 19.0% 92
I definitely will apply again 60.0% 290
Don’t Know 1.4% 7
answered questionanswered questionanswered questionanswered question 483483483483
skipped questionskipped questionskipped questionskipped question 27272727
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Page 15 of 19
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Page 16 of 19
Appendix A. 2011 Camp Ripley archery hunter on-line survey questions.
1) How old are you? ______ years old
2) How many years have you hunted deer? ______ years
3) How many years have you hunted deer by archery? ______ years
4) How many years have you hunted deer at Camp Ripley? ______ years
5) Who introduced you to archery hunting?
_____(1) Friend
_____(2) Relative
_____(3) Self-taught
_____(4) Other (please specify): ______________________________
6) How did you hear about the Camp Ripley Archery Hunt? (select all that apply)
_____(1) Friend
_____(2) Relative
_____(3) Internet (other than DNR website)
_____(4) DNR website
_____(5) DNR news release
_____(6) Magazine
_____(7) Newspaper
_____(8) Other (please specify): ______________________________
7) Did you apply as a group or individual?
_____(1) Group
_____(2) Individual
8) Which hunt did you apply for?
_____(1) Hunt A (Oct. 20-21, 2011, Th-Fri)
_____(2) Hunt B (Oct. 29-30, 2011, Sat-Sun)
9) What type of archery license did you purchase in 2011? (select one)
______(1) Resident archery license
______(2) Youth archery license
______(3) Non-resident archery license
______(4) Non-resident youth archery license
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Page 17 of 19
10) Did you purchase a bonus permit to use during the Camp Ripley hunt? _____(1) Yes
_____(2) No
11) Did you participate in this year’s hunt?
_____(1) Yes. Go to question 12.
_____(2) No. You are finished with the survey; thank you for your time and participation.
12) How much time did you spend hunting at Camp Ripley? Days _____ Hrs ______
13) How many deer did you see while hunting at Camp Ripley?
______(1) None ______(4) 6 to 10
______(2) 1 or 2 ______(5) More than 10 (please provide estimate _____)
______(3) 3 to 5
14) How many deer did you pass on during the hunt that presented a clean shot within your
comfortable shooting distance?
_____ Deer
15) How many deer did you shoot and recover at Camp Ripley? Include deer you recovered
and tagged with someone else’s license or bonus permit.
______(1) Antlerless deer (does, fawns & non-legal bucks)
______(2) Legal buck(s)
16) If you harvested a deer, approximately what time of day was it killed?
_________ (please note AM or PM)
17) How many times did you shoot your deer?
______ times at 1st
deer
______ times at 2nd
deer (if applicable)
18) Did other hunters shoot your deer also? _____(1) Yes _____(2) No
19) If so, how many? _____ Hunters on 1st
deer
_____ Hunters on 2nd
deer (if applicable)
20) Did you hunt with a group during the Camp Ripley hunt? _____(1) Yes _____(2) No
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Page 18 of 19
21) Did you wound & not recover a deer? _____(1) Yes _____(2) No
If yes, how many? _____ Deer
22) What hunting technique did you use during the hunt? (select all that apply)
______(1) Stalking/Still-hunting
______(2) Deer drives
______(3) Hunted from a tree stand
______(4) Hunted from a ground blind
23) What level of interference from other hunters did you experience at Camp Ripley?
______(1) None ______(4) Interfered by 5+ hunters
______(2) Interfered by 1-2 hunters ______(5) Other (specify): ___________________
______(3) Interfered by 3-4 hunters
24) Will the hunter interference that you experienced this year influence your decision to apply
for the hunt in the future?
______(1) I definitely will not apply again ______(4) I probably will apply again
______(2) I probably won’t apply again ______(5) I definitely will apply again
______(3) Maybe ______(6) Don’t Know
25) What was your primary motivation for hunting at Camp Ripley? (select only one)
______(1) To take a trophy buck
______(2) To have the opportunity to kill any deer (buck or doe)
______(3) To help manage the deer herd at Camp Ripley
______(4) To socialize with friends and family
______(5) To introduce/recruit someone to archery hunting
______(6) Other (please specify): ________________________________________
26) What were your other motivations, if any, for hunting at Camp Ripley? (select all that
apply)
______(1) None
______(2) To take a trophy buck
______(3) To have the opportunity to kill any deer (buck or doe)
______(4) To help manage the deer herd at Camp Ripley
______(5) To socialize with friends and family
______(6) To introduce/recruit someone to archery hunting
______(7) Other (please specify): ________________________________________
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Page 19 of 19
27) How do you rate your overall experience at this year’s Camp Ripley Archery Hunt?
______(1) Very satisfied
______(2) Satisfied
______(3) Neither satisfied or dissatisfied
______(4) Unsatisfied
______(5) Very unsatisfied
______(6) Don’t Know