©2010 pearson education, inc. publishing as prentice hall marketing of high-technology products and...
TRANSCRIPT
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Chapter 8:
Technology and Product Management
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
What opportunities does digital convergence pose?
How does NIH relate to myopia?
When is it beneficial to customize a product?
What are the advantages of a product platform?
What controversies are associated with patents?
© Mohr, Sengupta, Slater 2009
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
“Digital Revolution”
◦Worldwide transition from analog to digital
technology
◦Companies that lost touch with trends are
facing painful restructuring Kodak
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Digital Convergence
1. Networking previously stand-alone devices
2. Hybrid products (camera phones)
3. Companies are crossing traditional industry
boundaries (Apple)
◦ Fits well with consumers’ lifestyles◦ Global standards
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Help a company anticipate technology trends
Define a stream of new products (breakthrough + incremental) company plans to develop over time
Used for: ◦ Commitment to new product development◦ Allocation of resources
A flexible blueprint that must be updated regularly
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Consider emerging
technology trends
Decide on "What to Sell" Strategy - License vs. full commercialization
3
Decide on Needed Technology Additions - Internal development (Make) - External acquisition (Buy) - Partner to co-develop
2Ongoing Management - Platforms and derivatives - Killing projects - Intellectual property issues
4
Technology Identification1
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Take inventory of firm’s most valuable know-how ◦Products ◦Processes Example: superior manufacturing skills
◦Management practices Example: knowledge management
1. Technology Identification
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
What emerging technology trends will affect business? ◦ Areas of weakness in the firm’s technology
portfolio? Additional technologies necessary to continue to
compete effectively?
◦ “Make vs. buy” decision: development risk Internal development External acquisition Partnering
2. Decide on Technology Additions
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
2. Decide on Technology Additions (cont)
Adding New Technology: Focus on Development Risk Internal Development
◦ Close to existing skills◦ Keep technology
confidential◦ “NIH” (not invented
here): Good technology can be developed only internally
External Acquisition◦ Someone else has
already developed technology
◦ Saves time and effort◦ Let others take risks
first◦ Keep up with
competitors who have new technology
◦ Firm has existing brand name/marketing resources for new product
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Critical issue: marketing risk
Continuum of options
(Explored in detail in later slides)
3. Decide on “What to Sell” Strategy
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Continuum of options◦Additional expenditures customers must incur
to derive the intended benefits of the technology
Know-how only“Proof of concept”Components to OEMFinal products to end-userEnd-to-end solution, service bureau
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
What decision makes sense?
For these conditions Know-How
“Proof of Concept”
Components
Full Product
Complete Solution
Technology doesn’t fit the corporate mission
Sell Sell SellFirm has insufficient financial funds
Diverse range of technologies in a market
Market characterized by demand side increasing returns License
Components incompatible with industry standards
Commer-cialize
Offer Complete Solution
Offering technology to competitors may encourage industry standardization LicenseSkills in only some market segments
and...
See figure 8-2 for more details
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Technology Transfer Considerations
◦ From small companies/inventors larger companies with resources/expertise
◦ Federally funded knowledge private sector
Profit sharing Realistic/accurate value Intellectual property rights
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Actively manage technology asset base◦ Modularity◦ Product derivatives◦ Product platforms◦ Intellectual property management
(Also explored in detail in later slides)
4. Ongoing Management
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Modularity: building a complex product from smaller subsystems that can be designed independently, and function together as a whole
Partition information
◦Visible: design rules, how the subsystems should work together
◦Hidden: how to design each subsystem independently
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Requires architect company to have deep product knowledge for advance specification of subsystems
Reduces uncertainty in product design◦ Results in product standardization◦ Low barriers to entry◦ Incremental (vs. breakthrough) innovations
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Product Platform: common architecture based on a single design
“Next-generation” products: new product platforms◦ Require significant investments◦ Have enhanced performance benefits
Example: Each generation of Intel’s microprocessor chips
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Derivative Products: Include different models, brands, or versions of the platform product
Intended to fill performance gaps between platform products
Example: Slower/faster chip versions, introduced within months of the new chip
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Why use a platform and derivative strategy?
1. Unit-one cost The cost of producing the first unit is very high
relative to reproduction
2. “Gaps” in the marketplace Holes in customer migration from old to new
technology(see next slide)
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Family 1
Family 2
Family 3
Per
form
ance
Time
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Per
form
ance
Time
Family 1: Itanium 2
Family 3: Intel Core 2 Duo
Family 2: Pentium D
Family 4: Intel Core 2 Extreme
McKinley 1 GHz
(July ’02) Madison 1.3 GHz
(July ’03) Montecito 1.4 GHz
(July ’06)
820 2.8 GHz
(May ’05) 830
3.0 GHz (May ’05)
840 3.2 GHz
(May ’05)
Allendale 1.6 GHz
(January ’07) Conroe
1.86 GHz (August ’06)
Wolfdale 2.66 GHz January ’08)
Conroe XE 2.93 GHz July ’06) Kentsfield XE
2.67 GHz (November ’06)
Yorkfield XE 3 GHz(Nov ’07)Example:
Intel
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
New Platform Strategy Design for high end of the market
◦ Incorporate as many features as needed for this
segment
◦ Willingness-to-pay helps recover high fixed costs
◦ Subtraction of features is lower incremental cost
than addition
◦ Consistent with both lead user and chasm concepts
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Customizing Complex Products◦ Meets customers needs better
◦ Earns customer loyalty and profits for vendor
In high-tech, vendors assume more control over
customization because customers don’t want to invest in
knowledge that can become obsolete quickly
Vendors assume less control over customization
◦ Products are standardized and modular
◦ Customers have high product knowledge
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Escalation of commitment Product champions/technology
enthusiasts are perennial optimists
◦Personal stake in project
◦Biases in interpreting information Recall info that confirms beliefs Ignore info that disconfirms beliefs Re-interpret neutral info as positive, and
even negative info as positive!
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Foster internal culture that encourages open questioning
Remove project from core of the firm
Managers with no prior beliefs make the decision
Rely on benchmarks established at outset
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Possible Biases Leading to Escalation of Commitment
Bias Manifestation Advice
Confirmation
Managers seek out information that supports their argument, discount information that does not
Replace incumbent with new manager; hold managers accountable
Sunk-cost fallacy
Justify project continuation because there has already been significant investment
Set up contingencies to pull the plug when budgets are exhausted; use zero-based budgeting.
Anchoring and
adjustment
Tendency to adjust estimates insufficiently from an initial value
Use independent evaluators
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Generally unclear scope of responsibilities
Launch window: product managers take over from product development team◦ Help manage trade shows◦ Determine messaging for PR◦ Develop brochures◦ Organize tech support, customer service
In small organizations, job can be daunting:product managers = marketing personnel
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
The “services-dominant logic of marketing”
◦Customer purchases are motivated by the provision of value
◦The product is the vehicle that creates value
◦Emphasizes the importance of know-how and relationships
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Product
“High-Tech”
“Low-Tech”
Service 1 2
3 4
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Augment product with service
Generate service revenue after product purchase
Training, repair, maintenance contract
Does company have sufficient trained service personnel?
Can company balance service proficiency and core competency in product innovation?
Developing Services
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Includes: contract research firms, IT consulting, service providers
How can we leverage customized developments?◦ Create a platform for standardization of services
Is the communication of technical service personnel user-friendly for customers?
Can service reliability of underlying technology be maintained?
Does company make continuous/adequate investments in upgrades and training resources?
Developing Services
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Use technology ◦ Improve customer service
Self-service technologies◦ Make supply chain more efficient◦ To stay abreast of cutting-edge business practice
Examples:1.Self-scanning devices that allow customers to check
out themselves2.Use of the internet to track orders
Developing Services
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Automate labor-intensive operations
Examples:1. Forensic DNA testing2. ATM’s and online banking
Developing Services
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Intangibility: product cannot be touched nor examined prior to purchase decision◦ Marketer’s goal: reduce the perceived risk
(demonstrations, free trials, warranties, guarantees)
Inseparability: production cannot be separated from consumption◦ Production can not occur in advance of demand◦ Potential for quality inconsistencies ◦ Solutions:
flexibility or scalability Pricing incentives in low-demand periods Personnel training
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
1. Protection is vital: know-how forms basis of competitive advantage
2. Strategic alliances: formed with potential competitors- what happens if alliance fails?
3. Globalization: outsourcing trends require underlying trade secrets to be shared
◦ Legal standards/ cultural values vary
4. Employee mobility: doctrine of inevitable disclosure
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Theft: assets can be stored on a disk, shared over the internet
◦ Annually, $11-12 billion in worldwide software industry losses (SIIA)
Double-edged sword: companies must be both open and restrictive in information sharing
Balance: incentive to innovate and society’s right to benefit from innovation
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Original works, “Creations of the mind”
Owner has the right to earn economic return from it
Protection fosters creativity by providing an incentive to investors to undertake the risks of innovation
How to protect it? ◦ Patents◦ Copyrights◦ Trademarks◦ Trade Secrets
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Intellectual Property: Patents
Three criteria invention must meet:
1. Useful: perform some function that benefits humanity
2. Novel: no prior evidence of invention exists
3. Nonobvious: no suggestion of invention exists, even when multiple writings are combined
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Intellectual Property: Patents (cont.)
Confer owner the rights to exclude others from making, using, or selling product/ process
◦ In US, 20 years from date of filing
“Patent Trolls”: buy and hold patents, and never commercialize
◦ Hope to file lawsuits for “infringement”
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Disadvantages: Patents are public information
◦ Eighteen months from time of filing in the US◦ Competitors may “invent around” patent
Patent owner must enforce rights
Costly!
Intellectual Property: Patents (cont.)
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Two Types of Patent Applications in U.S.1. Provisional:
◦ $160, 1 year time frame to “hold”, do further research
◦ Establishes a “priority date” of invention
2. Utility: ◦ $750 for examiner to render a decision ◦ Granted or denied; applicant can appeal or re-file
(another $750)
Intellectual Property: Patents (cont.)
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Intellectual Property: Patents
U.S. PATENT COSTS FOREIGN PATENT COSTS
Application preparation $8,000-16,000
Searching/patentability $2,000-4,000 PCT filing fee $2,000-3,000
PTO fees for “late” responses
$110-1970 Entry into national countries
$2,000-6,500
Issue fee $1300 Examination in country
$1,500-8,000
TOTAL $12,000-25,000 PER COUNTRY FEE
$3,500-14,500
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Intellectual Property: Copyrights
Protect tangible form or manner in which idea is expressed, not the idea itself.
◦Example: software code
Grants inventor right to reproduce and distribute copyrighted works
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Intellectual Property: Copyrights (cont.)
Term
◦ Life of author + 50 years -or-
◦ Shorter of 75 years from publication or 100 years from creation of work
Easy to obtain ©
◦ Register with US Copyright office in case lawsuit is filed
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Intellectual Property: Trademarks
Names, symbols, devices to distinguish/ identify goods
Protects firm against unscrupulous competitors who try to deceive/mislead customers
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Intellectual Property: Trade Secrets
Any concrete information that:
◦Has commercial value useful to company
◦Secret generally unknown
◦Not easily ascertainable Developed at some expense
◦Provides competitive advantage
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Financial, business, scientific, technical, information including patterns, plans, compilations, formulas, designs, methods, programs,...
To be granted “trade secret” protection, firm must take reasonable steps to protect information
Intellectual Property: Trade Secrets (cont.)
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Intellectual Property: Trade Secrets (cont.)
Premised on the Notion of Confidential Relationships
Nondisclosure Agreements (NDAs)◦ Signer will not disclose information
Noncompete Agreements◦ Signer will not establish/join a competitor’s firm within
a given time frame/territory
Invention assignment clauses◦ Grant firm rights to employees’ inventions
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Patents or Trade Secret Protection?
Patents When:
◦ Product will have long market life
◦ Product can be reverse-engineered
◦ Protection can/will be enforced
◦ Corporate policy
Trade Secrets When:◦ Secret not eligible for
patent protection
◦ Product life cycle is short
◦ Patent would be hard to enforce
◦ Secret is not detectable in the product (via reverse engineering for example)
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Type Protection Requirements Length
Patent Gives owner the right to exclude others from making, using, selling the invention
Apply for it: utility, novelty, nonobviousness
20 years
Copyright
Protects the form or manner in which an idea is expressed, grants exclusive rights to reproduce/distribute.
Originality, tangible form, creative effort
At least 75 years
Trademark
Protects identifying words, names, symbols, or device
Ownership arises when used in trade
Indefinitely
Trade Secret
Concrete information: useful in company’s business, generally unknown, not easily ascertainable, provides a competitive advantage
Precise description, developed at an expense to owner, protected
As long as it is kept secret!
For details, see Tables 8-2 and 8-3
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Business Methods (July 1998) ◦ Patents on E-commerce business models/methods
and medical treatment methods
Natural Occurring Phenomena◦ Patents on “technological breakthroughs”: genes,
prime numbers, lab animals, therapeutic applications
Digital Right Management (DRM)◦ Patents on digital music, books, films, etc.◦ Tension between entertainment and technology
companies.
Intellectual Property: Areas of Contention
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Managing Intellectual Propertyfor High Tech Companies
Competitive advantage stems from intellectual assets (not physical assets)
Management of intellectual property is vital:
Patents can be tapped as revenue source Costs can be reduced- cut maintenance fees on
unneeded patents Patents can be repackaged to be more attractive
to investors
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Managing Intellectual Propertyfor High Tech Companies
Patents can help a firm:◦ Manage its product line
Establish R&D priorities◦ Respond to shifts in the marketplace
Acquisition or partnering opportunities
Intellectual property rights are an asset base that deserves strategic focus
Patent inventions decisions should fit business strategy
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Opening Vignette: Apple iPod
Technology Expert: Memjet; Sun Microsystems
Technology Solution: Godisa SolarAid
End-of-Book Case: TiVo, ESRI, Boeing/Airbus
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic,
mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Printed in the United States of America.