2010 geotechnical challenges in urban regeneration

Upload: carlos-manuel-alvarez-nogueira

Post on 07-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Geotechnical Challenges in Urban Regeneration

    1/8

    TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENTS TO DETERMINE THE DIAMETER OF JET-

    GROUTED COLUMNS

    Klaus Meinhard, Porr Technobau und Umwelt AG, Abteilung Grundbau, Vienna, AustriaDietmar Adam, Vienna University of Technology, Institute for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering,Vienna, AustriaRoman Lackner, University of Innsbruck, Institute for Construction and Materials Science, MaterialTechnology Innsbruck, Austria

    In this paper, a back-analysis scheme for the determination of the properties of jet-grouted structures using thermo-chemical couplings is presented. Hereby, thetemperature increase in the center of the jet-grouted column is monitored andcompared with the result of a thermo-chemical analysis of the hydration process inthe column. As regards the latter, a multi-phase hydration model taking thechemical composition of the employed cement (or blended cement) into account isused.

    INTRODUCTION

    Soil improvement by means of jet grouting isperformed without possible visual inspection duringthe entire installation process. Changes within thegeological situation and of grouting parametersinfluence the quality of jet-grouted columns(geometrical properties and mechanical behaviourof jet-grouted soil mass). According to EurocodeEN 12716, grouting of so-called test columns (seeFigure 1) and subsequent excavation are requiredfor determination of grouting parameters. This

    method is time consuming and expensive.Alternatively, methods based on geophysics,mechanical sensoring, measuring the erosion ofpre-installed pipes, and waste-slurry investigationhave been presented to estimate/determine thediameter of jet-grouted columns.

    (a) (b)

    Figure 1: (a) Drilling rig used for jet groutingand (b) test columns after excavation

    In this paper, a thermochemical parameter-identification scheme, considering the exothermal

    nature of hydrating jet-grouted soil mass, ispresented. Hereby, diameter and cement content

    of jet-grouted columns are determined bynumerical back-calculation of temperaturehistories measured on site at the center of jet-grouted columns.

    Departing from the work presented in(Brandsttter, 2002), the thermochemicalparameter-identification scheme of properties of jet-grouted columns is extended as regards thesimulation of the hydration process in early-age

    cement-based materials and the identification ofthermal properties of the in-situ soil and the jet-grouted soil mass. As regards the simulation ofthe hydration process, the properties(mineralogy, blaine value, ...) of the employedbinder are considered within a multiphasehydration model for ordinary Portland cement(OPC), which is extended towards blendedcements (OPC mixed with blast furnace slag,lime stone) and validated by means of differentialcalorimetry tests.The temperature history measured on site,especially after having reached the maximum

    value, is strongly influenced by the thermalproperties of the in-situ soil, i.e., the heatcapacity and thermal conductivity. Whereasvolume averaging is applied for determination ofthe effective heat capacity, determination of theeffective thermal conductivity requiresconsideration of the material microstructure,represented by the number of contacts perparticle, dry density, degree of saturation,mineralogy, particle size, and thermal propertiesof the material phases.

    Finally, a user-friendly software tool for the

    presented thermochemical parameter-identification scheme is developed, allowing theinteractive determination of the column diameter

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Geotechnical Challenges in Urban Regeneration

    2/8

    and cement content. The results obtained fromapplication of this tool at construction sites aregiven at the end of this paper.

    MOTIVATION

    The dependence of the diameter D of jet-groutedcolumns on (i) the work pressure, (ii) the injectiontime, which is determined by the rate at which thedrilling rod is rotated and withdrawn, and (iii) theproperties of the in-situ soil still requires thegrouting of test columns and subsequentexcavation. In addition to grouting of test columns,the estimation/determination of the diameter of jetgrouted columns has been a topic of intenseresearch, having lead to alternative techniquesbased on

    measuring the erosion of pre-installed

    pipes: Hereby, thin pipes are installedparallel to the axis of the jet-groutedcolumn in different distance to the centerof the column (approximately the predicteddiameter). The erosion which occursduring the jetgrouting process providesinformation about the column diameter indifferent depths;

    mechanical sensoring devices, givingaccess to the location of the interfacebetween the rather liquid jet-grouted soilmass and the surrounding soil not affected

    by jet grouting (Weber, 2000) (Raabe,1994);

    geophysical methods, using (i) electrical(Frappin, 2001), (ii) electromagnetic(Tamura, 1996), and (iii) hydrophonemeasurements (Gross, 1997);

    waste-slurry investigation, considering themass balance between the components ofthe inflow during jet grouting and theoutflow (waste slurry) (Lesnik, 2003); and

    mechanical models describing thedeterioration process of soil by the high-pressurejet (Martak, 1999) (Tkatschuk,1997) (Bergschneider, 2002) (Stein, 2002).

    For detailed information about the mentionedtechniques for estimating/determining thediameter of jet-grouted columns, the reader isreferred to (Lesnik, 2003).

    Among them, the thermochemical coupling inhydrating cement-based materials (thetemperature influences the hydration kinetics andthe hydration results in a temperature increase)was the basis for the back-calculation of properties

    of jet-grouted columns reported in (Brandsttter,2002). Hereby, the temperature history in thecenter of the column measured on site isreproduced by numerical simulations adaptingthe column diameter and the cement content ofthe improved soil in the numerical model.

    HYDRATION MODEL

    Whereas an overall degree of hydration with onekinetic law was used in (Brandsttter, 2002), amulti-phase hydration model, taking the main(four) clinker phases and the chemicalcompounds of cement into account, wasproposed in (Bernard, 2003).

    Figure 2 shows the evolution of the degree ofhydration of the four main clinker phases C3S,C2S, C3A, and C4AF obtained from application

    of the multi-phase hydration model outlined in(Bernard, 2003) to each clinker phase anddifferent evolution laws considering, e.g., a w/c-ratio of 0.3 and an average particle size ofR=7m.

    Fig. 2 x and dx/dt for the four main clinkerphases (water/cement-ratio=0.3;temperature=30C; average particle sizeR=7m)

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Geotechnical Challenges in Urban Regeneration

    3/8

    In order to reduce costs of ground improvement,blended cements are commonly used during jetgrouting (ordinary portland cement mixed with blastfurnace slag, fly ash, silica fume, and lime stone).

    For this purpose, the hydration model presented in

    (Bernard, 2003) was extended towards blendedcements and validated by means of differential-calorimetry (DC) experiments, see (Meinhard,2008).

    DC tests were performed for blended cementscomposed of ordinary portland cement, with 4,895cm2/g blaine value (Q = 475 J/g), and slag (Q =461 J/g (Schindler (2005)), with a cement/slag-ratioranging from 20/80 to 80/20.

    Figures 3 (a) and (b) show the DC-resultsconducted at 30C and 50C, respectively. The

    dashed lines represent the heat flow and heat-flowrate of the respective cement fraction in theblended cement. It was obtained from multiplyingthe DC-test result for pure cement with therespective amount of cement in the blendedcement. Thus, the difference between the solidand dashed line can be considered as the heatrelease associated with slag hydration.

    Fig. 3(a) DC-test results: heat flow Q and heat-flow rate dQ/dt for different cement/slag-ratios(OPC/slag, Q = 468 J/g for all blended

    cements) at 30C

    Fig. 3(b) DC-test results: heat flow Q andheat-flow rate dQ/dt for different cement/slag-ratios (OPC/slag, Q = 468 J/g for all blendedcements) at 50C

    THERMAL PROPERTIES OF GRANULARMATERIAL

    For the solution of thermal problem, thevolumetric heat capacity C [kJ/(m3K)], and thethermal conductivity k [kJ/(mhK)] of the jet-grouted soil mass and the in-situ soil arerequired. In order to account for the large rangeof these properties in granular, dry to fully-saturated material, determination of C and k fromthe properties of the different material phases,such as particles, water, and air is proposed.Whereas the heat capacity depends on the

    volume fractions of the material phases only,both material composition and arrangement(morphology) influence the thermal conductivity.

    In addition to models given in the literature for dryand saturated state (Lackner, 2005) (Misra,1995) a FEM-based model is employed todetermine the thermal conductivity in the range oflow and high values for the degree of saturation.Hereby, the effect of water bridging in the contactarea of two particles is considered.

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Geotechnical Challenges in Urban Regeneration

    4/8

    DEVELOPMENT OF SOFTWARE TOOL

    THEORETICAL BACKGROUND

    For the description of the exothermal process ofhydrating jet-grouted soil mass, the kinetics of the

    hydration process is assumed to depend only onthe mass of hydrates formed and on the currenttemperature. The underlying field equation for thethermochemical problem is derived from the firstlaw of thermodynamics. In the absence of volumeheat sources, this law is given as

    (1)

    with Ceff [kJ/(m3 K)] as the effective volumetric heat

    capacity, and lx [kJ/m3] as the latent heat of

    hydration per unit volume related to the chemicalreaction of the x-th clinker phase. The heat flow

    vector q is related to the temperature T viaFouriers linear (isotropic) heat conduction law,

    (2)

    with keff [kJ/(mhK)] as the effective thermalconductivity. The kinetics laws controlling the heatrelease were provided within the multiphasehydration model. Alternatively, a single-phasehydration model may be used in case noinformation about the chemical composition of theused cement is available. Hereby, an Arrhenius-type kinetics law for the evolution of the overall

    degree of hydration is employed, reading

    (3)

    where A() [s1] is the chemical affinity, Ea=33.5kJ/mol is the activation energy for T>293 K and33.5+1.47(293-T) for T 1, where L and Ddenotethe length and the diameter of the column,respectively. Hence, the three-dimensionalthermochemical problem can be reduced to aplane model considering only the cross section ofthe column. Hereby, the temperature flow in thelongitudinal direction of the column is set equal tozero. Moreover, the axisymmetry of the cross-section of the jet-grouted column allows to furtherreduce the numerical model to a one-dimensional

    axisymmetric model (see Figure 4). At allboundaries of this model, adiabatic conditions,with qn = q n = 0, are assumed.

    Fig. 4 Sensitivity study: geometricdimensions, material properties, and initialtemperatures T0

    The axisymmetric problem shown in Figure 4 issolved by means of the finite element method(FEM).

    The obtained results show that an increase of theamount of cement seffects the heating period ofthe jet-grouted column at the beginning of thehydration process, whereas a change of the

    column diameter mainly influences the decreaseof the temperature in the cooling period (seeFigures 5 and 6). This clear distinction of the

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Geotechnical Challenges in Urban Regeneration

    5/8

    influence of the unknown parameters Dand s onthe temperature history is illustrated in Figure 7,showing the time instant corresponding to themaximum temperature and the maximumtemperature in the jet-grouted column as a functionof the column radius Rand s.

    Fig. 5 Sensitivity study: Influence of columnradius R on temperature histories obtained atthe center of jet-grouted column (cementcontent s= 500 kg/m3; jet-grouted soil mass:Ceff=2,100 kJ/(m

    3K), keff=6.0 kJ/(mhK); soil:

    Ceff=3,000 kJ/(m3K), keff=2.0 kJ/(mhK); single-

    phase hydration model: a=3.15, b=50.7, c=2300,and d=5.00)

    Fig. 6 Sensitivity study: Influence of cementcontent s on temperature histories obtained atthe center of jet-grouted column (columnradius R= 60 cm; jet-grouted soil mass:Ceff=2,100 kJ/(m

    3K), keff=6.0 kJ/(mhK); soil:

    Ceff=3,000 kJ/(m3K), keff=2.0 kJ/(mhK); single-

    phase hydration model: a=3.15, b=50.7, c=2300,and d=5.00)

    PARAMETER IDENTIFICATION

    For identification of the values of R and s, thetemperature history at the center of the jet-groutedcolumn is computed for 55 (R, s)-pairs. The so-obtained temperature histories are compared withthe temperature history measured on site. The (R,s)-pair giving the lowest deviation between thenumerically-obtained and measured temperaturehistory is used as the center of the new, reducedsearch interval (see Figure 8). The parameteridentification is stopped, when the size of thesearch interval becomes lower than 5 cm for the

    radius R of the jet-grouted column and 10 kg/m3for the cement content s.

    Fig. 7 Sensitivity study: Maximumtemperature in jet-grouted column andrespective time instant as a function ofcolumn radius R and cement content s (jet-grouted soil mass: Ceff=2,100 kJ/(m

    3K),

    keff=6.0 kJ/(mhK); soil: Ceff=3,000 kJ/(m3K),

    keff=2.0 kJ/(mhK); single-phase hydrationmodel: a=3.15, b=50.7, c=2300, and d=5.00)

    Fig. 8Parameter identification: Illustration ofadaption of search interval containing (R, s)-pair characterized by lowest deviationbetween numerically-obtained and measuredtemperature history (: (R, s)-pair givinglowest deviation between numerically-obtained and measured temperature historywithin corresponding search interval)

    USER INTERFACE

    For the application of the developed parameter-identification scheme in engineering practice, auser interface was programmed. Figure 9 showsa screen shot of the user interface containing theresult of the parameter-identification scheme.

    Moreover, result sheets are provided,containing all relevant information, input data,and the result from parameter identification, seeFigure 12.

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Geotechnical Challenges in Urban Regeneration

    6/8

    Fig. 9 User interface: Screen shot showingresult from parameter identification

    APPLICATION

    The developed tool for identification of thediameter D [m] of jet-grouted columns and thecement content s [kg/m3] of jet-grouted soil masswas applied to more than 100 jet-grouted columnsat construction sites in Europe. The groutingmethod used at the these construction sites weredifferent. For every cement employed DCexperiments were conducted.

    INSTALLATION OF TEMPERATURE SENSORSON SITE

    Figures 10 and 11 illustrate the installation of atemperature sensor in jet-grouted columns. Figure10 shows the temperature sensor which, afterinstallation, will be connected to a monitoringdevice. Right after termination of the jet-groutingworks, the drilling rod is moved into the jet-groutedcolumn until the future position of the temperaturesensor is reached. Thereafter, the sensor isinstalled through the high-pressure channel of thedrilling rod (see Figure 11). Finally, the drilling rodis withdrawn, while the temperature sensorremains at its position.

    CONSTRUCTION SITE, VIENNA, AUSTRIA

    On this site, jet grouting was performed in June2005 in areas of future shafts and as underpinningfor a collector and a telephone pole. Four testcolumns were produced in order to determine theeffect of different jet-grouting parameters. Thewater/cement-ratio of the used cement grout was1.0.

    Since information about the mineralogical

    composition of the employed cement is available,the multiphase hydration model for blendedcements was employed in numerical simulations.

    Fig. 10 Temperature sensor ready forinstallation

    Fig. 11 Installation of temperature sensorthrough high-pressure channel of drilling rod

    The thermal properties of the in-situ soil and thejet-grouted soil mass were determined.

    After excavation of the jet-grouted columns,diameters in the range of 110 to 240 cm weremeasured.

    Figure 12 for example contains the result sheetobtained from the application of the developedparameter-identification tool, providing thegeneral information of the construction site, thegeometrical properties of the column, theemployed thermal properties of the in-situ soil,the grout, and the jet-grouted soil mass. At thebottom of each sheet, the measured temperaturehistory and the numerically-determinedtemperature history corresponding to theidentified values for the column diameter and thecement content are given.

    For each column, the deviation between thepredicted and the measured diameter was lessthan 10%.

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Geotechnical Challenges in Urban Regeneration

    7/8

    Fig. 12 Construction site, Vienna: Result sheetfor jet-grouted column

    CONCLUSIONS

    In this paper, the thermochemical identification ofproperties of jet-grouted columns presented in(Brandsttter, 2002) was extended as regards theproper description of the hydration process of theemployed (blended) cement by means of amultiphase hydration model and themicrostructure-related identification of the thermal

    properties of in-situ soil and jet-grouted soil mass.The so-obtained parameter-identification tool wasemployed on several jet-grouting sites within thelast five years, characterized by different in-situ soilconditions and grouting parameters. Hereby, thepredicted column diameters agreed very well withthe column diameters measured after excavationof the test columns. In addition to the columndiameter, the developed parameter identificationprovided access to the cement content,determining the mechanical properties of the jet-grouted soil mass.

    Based on the experience gained during the on-siteapplication of the developed parameter

    identification tool, the following remarks for futurepractical applications are given:

    In case the mineralogy of the employedcement is not available, the developedmultiphase hydration model for (blended)

    cement may be replaced by the single-phase hydration model. Hereby,however, the chemical affinity of thecement needs to be determined byrespective calorimeter experiments.

    The deviation between the measuredand numerically-obtained temperaturehistory especially after the maximumtemperature has been reached is anindicator for the proper determination ofthe thermal conductivity of the in-situ soil,thus, serving as validation for thedeveloped microstructure-related model.

    The presented mode of parameter identificationcan be further improved by considering the effectof moving groundwater and hydrating neighbourcolumns on the temperature history of theinstalled column. These are topics of ongoingand future research.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    The authors thank Lafarge CTEC (Mannersdorf,

    Austria) for supplying the cement and blast-furnace slag used in the experimental program.Financial support by PORR (Vienna, Austria) andthe Austrian Research Promotion Agency Ltd.(FFG) is gratefully acknowledged.

    REFERENCES

    BERNARD, O., ULM, F.-J., LEMARCHAND, E.(2003), A multiscale micromechanics-hydrationmodel for the early-age elastic properties ofcement-based materials., Cement and Concreteresearch, 33, pp. 1293-1309.

    BRANDSTAETTER, Ch., LACKNER, R., MANG,H.A. (2002), Bestimmung vonMaterialeigenschaften zementgebundenerWerkstoffe mittels Temperaturmessungen:Anwendung im Rahmen desDsenstrahlverfahrens [Evaluation of propertiesof cementitious materials by means oftemperature measurements: Application to jet

    grouting]. Bauingenieur, 77(2), pp. 51-57, inGerman.

  • 8/3/2019 2010 Geotechnical Challenges in Urban Regeneration

    8/8

    WEBER, K., KOGLER, K., (2000),Neuentwicklungen zur Qualittskontrolle vontiefen Hochdruckinjektionssohlen. GruppeGeotechnik Graz, Beitrge zum 15. ChristianVeder Kolloquium, volume 7, pages 131142,Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria, in

    German.

    RAABE, E. W., KALTHOFF, D., STEWERING, T.(1994), Herstellung von Dichtwnden und -sohlen mit dem Soilcreteverfahren. Mitteilung desInstituts fr Grundbau und Bodenmechanik,Braunschweig Technical University, Braunschweig,Germany, 23:89109, in German.

    P. FRAPPIN, P., MOREY, J. (2001), Jet groutingcolumn diameter measurement using the electriccylinder method. Travaux: Sols et fondations,(775):5560.

    TAMURA, M., FUTAKI, M., ABE, A. (1996), Use ofnon-destructive method for the evaluation ofreclaimed soil column. In Proceedings 2ndInternational Conference of Ground ImprovementGeosystems, volume 1, pages 659664, Tokio,Japan.

    GROSS, H.-W. (1997), Jet grouting in situdiameter control with hydrophone measurements.In Proceedings British Institute of Non-destructiveTesting, pages 449456, Liverpool, U.K.

    LESNIK, M. (2003), Ermittlung der Reichweitebeim Dsenstrahlverfahren unter Bercksichtigungder Herstellparameter und derBodeneigenschaften mittels Rcklaufanalyse,volume 17, Gruppe Geotechnik Graz, Institute forGeotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics,Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria, inGerman.

    MATRAK, L. (1999), Jet-Grouting, dieProblemlsung im Tiefbau? Entwurfsgrenzen undVerfahrensrisiken. In Vortrge der 2.sterreichischen Geotechniktagung, pages 283305, Vienna, Austria, IAV, in German.

    TKATSCHUK, S., (1997), TheoretischeUntersuchung des Eindringprozesses desHochdruckstrahls in Lockergesteine beimDsenstrahlinjektions-Verfahren. In AachenerBeitrge zur Rohstofftechnik und -wirtschaft,volume 12, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany, inGerman.

    BERGSCHNEIDER, B. (2002), Zur Reichweiten-ermittlung beim Dsenstrahlverfahren im Sand. InBerichte aus Bodenmechanik und Grundbau derBergischen Universitt Wuppertal, volume 24.

    Bergische Universitt Wuppertal, Wuppertal,Germany, in German.

    STEIN, J. (2002), Untersuchungen zumDsenstrahlverfahren in einem Halbzylinder. InVortrge der Baugrundtagung 2002,

    Spezialsitzung Forum junger Geotechnik-Ingenieure, Deutsche Gesellschaft frGeotechnik, volume 23, Essen, Germany, inGerman.

    MEINHARD, K., LACKNER, R. (2008), Multi-phase hydration model for prediction ofhydration-heat release of blended cements,Cement and Concrete research, 38, pp. 794-802.

    SCHINDLER, A.K., FOLLIARD, K.J. (2005),Heat of hydration models for cementitiousmaterials, ACI Materials Journal, 102(1):2433.

    LACKNER, R., AMON, A., LAGGER, H. (2005)Artificial ground freezing of fully-saturated soil:Thermal problem. Journal of EngineeringMechanics (ASCE), 131(2):211220.

    MISRA, A., BECKER, B.R., FRICKE, B.A.(1995), A theoretical model of the thermalconductivity of idealized soil, Journal of Heating,Ventilation, Air-Conditioning and RefrigeratingResearch, 1(1):121.

    FREIESLEBEN HANSEN, P., PEDERSEN, E.J.

    (1977), Mleinstrument til kontrol af betonshardening [Measurement device for controllinghardening of concrete]. Nordisk Betong, 1:2125,in Norwegian.

    CARLSLAW, H.S., JAEGER, J.C. (1959),Conduction of Heat in Solids. Clarendon Press,Oxford, 2nd edition.