2009 storms, part 2

55
2009 Storms Part 2 ©2010 Fisher

Upload: mjspieglan

Post on 20-Nov-2014

328 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Presented by Al Fisher

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2009 Storms, Part 2

2009 StormsPart 2

©2010 Fisher

Page 2: 2009 Storms, Part 2

Doppler Weather Radar Concepts

• Radar beam increases in altitude with distance from radar.• Radar beam increases in size with distance from radar.• Radar takes 4-5 minutes to complete full scan when in storm/precip mode.• Reliable doppler wind data limited to about 60-70 nm.• Radar velocity 100% when parallel, 0% when perpendicular to beam direction.

Page 3: 2009 Storms, Part 2

100% 100%

0%

0%

When the wind velocity is parallel to the radial, the full component of the wind is measured

When the radial is perpendicular to the the wind,

the radar displays zero velocity - This “zero zone” is

called the “Zero Isodop”.

What percentage of actual wind

will the radar detect?

00 = 100% - Parallel150 = 97%300 = 87%450 = 71%600 = 50%750 = 26%

900 = 0% - Perpendicular

The Zero Isodop “Problem”

Page 4: 2009 Storms, Part 2

Height of beam above ground vs distance from radar. Green 10nmYellow 15nmRed 20nm

Page 5: 2009 Storms, Part 2

MDW TDWR

20nm10nm

Page 6: 2009 Storms, Part 2

ORD TDWR20nm10nm

Page 7: 2009 Storms, Part 2
Page 8: 2009 Storms, Part 2

PROBLEM(s) OF THE DAY (POTD)

ORGANIZED SEVERE STORMSINGREDIENTS-BASED APPROACH

MOISTURE INSTABILITY

(sources for convective)

LIFT

SHEAR

Page 9: 2009 Storms, Part 2
Page 10: 2009 Storms, Part 2

Tornadic Supercell “Ingredients”

• Instability (varies, usually CAPE > 1000 J/Kg)

• Deep layer shear (0-6km) bulk shear > 35kt

• Low level shear (0-1km) SRH > 150 m2/s2 or pre-existing boundary)

• Relatively high RH values (in BL and aloft)• Sfc Td depressions <12°F

Page 11: 2009 Storms, Part 2

Some Commonly Used SPC Mesoanalysis Indices

• Effective Storm-Relative Helicity (ESRH) • Effective Bulk Shear (EBS)• Supercell Composite Parameter (SCP)• Significant Tornado Parameter (STP)

Page 12: 2009 Storms, Part 2

Summary of STP Assessment

• No strong signal in fixed layer STP in absolute or trending sense• Showed boldly only after event started• Underscores STP as a DIAGNOSTIC parameter

• 0-6 km shear, 0-1 km SRH (400+), and MLLCL all favorable for STP ≥1

• Primary shortcoming resulted from MLCAPE values less than 500 J/kg until 23z

• Suggests need to monitor closely for single “missing” variable when others are in place

Tornado Outbreak over N IL April 20, 2004

Page 13: 2009 Storms, Part 2
Page 14: 2009 Storms, Part 2
Page 15: 2009 Storms, Part 2
Page 16: 2009 Storms, Part 2
Page 17: 2009 Storms, Part 2
Page 18: 2009 Storms, Part 2
Page 19: 2009 Storms, Part 2
Page 20: 2009 Storms, Part 2
Page 21: 2009 Storms, Part 2
Page 22: 2009 Storms, Part 2
Page 23: 2009 Storms, Part 2
Page 24: 2009 Storms, Part 2
Page 25: 2009 Storms, Part 2
Page 26: 2009 Storms, Part 2

Friday June 19, 2009 Naper Days

Page 27: 2009 Storms, Part 2
Page 28: 2009 Storms, Part 2
Page 29: 2009 Storms, Part 2
Page 30: 2009 Storms, Part 2

Pocket of 87 mph winds

Page 31: 2009 Storms, Part 2
Page 32: 2009 Storms, Part 2
Page 33: 2009 Storms, Part 2
Page 34: 2009 Storms, Part 2
Page 35: 2009 Storms, Part 2
Page 36: 2009 Storms, Part 2
Page 37: 2009 Storms, Part 2

July 24, 2009

Page 38: 2009 Storms, Part 2
Page 39: 2009 Storms, Part 2
Page 40: 2009 Storms, Part 2
Page 41: 2009 Storms, Part 2

ILX

Page 42: 2009 Storms, Part 2

ILX

Page 43: 2009 Storms, Part 2

Base Velocity 1700 ft

Page 44: 2009 Storms, Part 2

3500 ft

Page 45: 2009 Storms, Part 2

LOT

Page 46: 2009 Storms, Part 2
Page 47: 2009 Storms, Part 2

Base Velocity

Page 48: 2009 Storms, Part 2
Page 49: 2009 Storms, Part 2

Aug. 9, 2009

Page 50: 2009 Storms, Part 2

DVN

Page 51: 2009 Storms, Part 2
Page 52: 2009 Storms, Part 2

DVN Base Velocity

Page 53: 2009 Storms, Part 2

DVN Storm Relative Velocity

Page 54: 2009 Storms, Part 2

DVN VAD Wind

Page 55: 2009 Storms, Part 2