2009-04-003_r1
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/29/2019 2009-04-003_R1
1/7
QUADRATIC DIOPHANTINE EQUATION
x2 (t2 t)y2 (4t 2)x + (4t2 4t)y = 0
ARZU OZKOC & AHMET TEKCAN
Abstract. Let t 2 be an integer. In this work, we consider the number of integersolutions of Diophantine equation D : x2 (t2 t)y2 (4t 2)x + (4t2 4t)y = 0 overZ. We also derive some recurrence relations on the integer solutions (xn, yn) of D. In the
last section, we consider the same problem over finite fields Fp for primes p 5.
AMS Subject Classification 2000: 11E04, 11E16, 11D09, 11D79.
Keywords: Diophantine equation, Pell equation.
Date: 02.04.2009.
1. Introduction.
A Diophantine equation is an indeterminate polynomial equation that allows the variables
to be integers only. In more technical language, they define an algebraic curve, algebraic
surface or more general object, and ask about the lattice points on it. The word Diophan-
tine refers to the Hellenistic mathematician of the 3rd century, Diophantus of Alexandria,
who made a study of such equations and was one of the first mathematicians to introduce
symbolism into algebra. In general, the Diophantine equation is the equation given by
(1.1) ax2 + bxy + cy2 + dx + ey + f = 0.
Also the Diophantine equation
(1.2) x2 dy2 = 1which is a special case of (1.1), known the Pell equation (see [3, 14]) which is named after
the English mathematician John Pell a mathematician who searched for integer solutions to
equations of this type in the seventeenth century. The Pell equation in (1.2) has infinitely
many integer solutions (xn, yn) for n 1. The first positive integer solution (x1, y1) of this
equation is called the fundamental solution, because all other solutions can be (easily) derivedfrom it. In fact if (x1, y1) is the fundamental solution, then the n-th positive solution of it,
say (xn, yn), is defined by the equality xn + yn
d = (x1 + y1
d)n for integer n 2. Thereare several methods for finding the fundamental solution of x2 dy2 = 1. For example, thecyclic method known in India in the 12th century, and the slightly less efficient but more
regular English method 17th century, produce all solutions of x2 dy2 = 1 (see [4]). Butthe most efficient method for finding the fundamental solution is based on the simple finite
continued fraction expansion of
d (see [2, 5, 6, 10, 11]). The Pell equation was first studied by
Brahmagupta (598-670) and Bhaskara (1114-1185) (see [1]). Its complete theory was worked
out by Lagrange (1736-1813), not Pell. It is often said that Euler (1707-1783) mistakenly
attributed Brounckers (1620-1684) work on this equation to Pell. However the equation
appears in a book by Rahn (1622-1676) which was certainly written with Pells help: some
1
-
7/29/2019 2009-04-003_R1
2/7
2 ARZU OZKOC & AHMET TEKCAN
say entirely written by Pell. Perhaps Euler knew what he was doing in naming the equation
(for further details on Pell and Diophantine equations see [7, 8, 9, 12, 13, 15]).
2. The Diophantine Equation x2 (t2 t)y2 (4t 2)x + (4t2 4t)y = 0.
In [16, 17, 18, 19, 20]), we considered some specific Pell (also Diophantine) equations and
their integer solutions. In the present paper, we consider the integer solutions of Diophantine
equation
(2.1) D : x2 (t2 t)y2 (4t 2)x + (4t2 4t)y = 0over Z, where t 2 is an integer. Note that it is very difficult to solve D in its present form,that is, we can not determine have many integer solutions D has and what they are. So we
have to transform D into a appropriate Diophantine equation which can be easily solved. To
get this let
(2.2) T : x = u + hy = v + k
be a translation for some h and k. In this case the pair {h, k} is called the base of T anddenote it by T[h; k] = {h, k}. If we apply T to D, then we get(2.3) T(D) = D : (u + h)2 (t2 t)(v + k)2 (4t 2)(u + h) + (4t2 4t)(v + k) = 0.In (2.3), we obtain u(2h 2 4t) and v(2kt2 2kt + 4t2 + 4t). So we get h = 2t 1 andk = 2. Consequently for x = u + 2t 1 and y = v + 2, we have the Diophantine equation(2.4) D : u2 (t2 t)v2 = 1which is a Pell equation. Now we try to find all integer solutions (un, vn) of
D and then we
can retransfer all results from D to D by using the inverse of T.Theorem 2.1. Let D be the Diophantine equation in (2.4). Then
(1) The continued fraction expansion of
t2 t is
t2 t =
[1;2] if t = 2
[t 1; 2, 2t 2] if t > 2.(2) The fundamental solution of D is (u1, v1) = (2t 1, 2) .(3) Define the sequence {(un, vn)}, where
(2.5)
unvn
=
2t 1 2t2 2t
2 2t
1
n1
0
for n 1. Then (un, vn) is a solution of D.(4) The solutions (un, vn) satisfy un = (2t 1)un1 + (2t2 2t)vn1 and vn = 2un1 +
(2t 1)vn1 for n 2.(5) The solutions (un, vn) satisfy the recurrence relations un = (4t 3)(un1 + un2)
un3 and vn = (4t 3)(vn1 + vn2) vn3 for n 4.(6) The nth solution (un, vn) can be given by
(2.6)unvn
=
t 1; 2, 2t 2, , 2, 2t 2
n1 times
, 2
for n
1.
-
7/29/2019 2009-04-003_R1
3/7
QUADRATIC DIOPHANTINE EQUATION 3
Proof. (1) Let t = 2. Then it is easily seen that
2 = [1; 2]. Now let t > 2. Then
t2 t = t 1 + (
t2 t t + 1) = t 1 + 1
t2t+t1t1
= t 1 + 12 +
t2tt+1
t1= t 1 + 1
2 + 1t2t+t1
= t 1 + 12 + 1
2t2+(t2tt+1)
.
So
t2 t = [t 1; 2, 2t 2].(2) It is easily seen that (u1, v1) = (2t 1, 2) is the fundamental solution of D since
(2t 1)2 (t2 t)22 = 1.(3) We prove it by induction. Let n = 1. Then by (2.5), we get (u1, v1) = (2t 1, 2) which
is the fundamental solution and so is a solution of D. Let us assume that the Diophantineequation in (2.4) is satisfied for n 1, that is,
D : u2n1 (t2 t)v2n1 = 1. We want to show
that this equation is also satisfied for n. Applying (2.5), we find thatunvn
=
2t 1 2t2 2t
2 2t 1n
1
0
=
2t 1 2t2 2t
2 2t 1
2t 1 2t2 2t2 2t 1
n1 1
0
=
2t 1 2t2 2t
2 2t 1
un1vn1
=
(2t 1)un1 + (2t2 2t)vn1
2un1 + (2t 1)vn1
.(2.7)
Hence we conclude that
u2n (t2 t)v2n =
(2t 1)un1 + (2t2 2t)vn12 (t2 t) (2un1 + (2t 1)vn1)2
= u2n1 (t2 t)v2n1= 1.
So (un, vn) is also a solution of D.(4) From (2.7), we find that un = (2t1)un1+(2t22t)vn1 and vn = 2un1+(2t1)vn1
for n 2.(5) We only prove that un satisfy the recurrence relation. For n = 4, we get u1 = 2t 1,
u2 = 8t2
8t + 1, u3 = 32t
3
48t2 + 18t
1 and u4 = 128t
4
256t3 + 160t2
32t + 1. Hence
u4 = (4t 3)(u3 + u2) u1= (4t 3)(32t3 40t2 + 10t) (2t 1)= 128t4 256t3 + 160t2 32t + 1.
So un = (4t 3)(un1 + un2) un3 is satisfied for n = 4. Let us assume that this relationis satisfied for n 1, that is,
(2.8) un1 = (4t 3)(un2 + un3) un4.
Then applying the previous assertion, (2.7) and (2.8), we conclude that un = (4t 3)(un1 +un
2)
un
3 for n
4.
-
7/29/2019 2009-04-003_R1
4/7
4 ARZU OZKOC & AHMET TEKCAN
(6) Note that u1v1
= [t 1;2] = t 1 + 12
= 2t12
which is the fundamental solution. Let us
assume that (un, vn) is a solution of D, that is, u2n (t2 t)v2n = 1. Then by (2.6), we deriveun+1
vn+1 = t 1 +1
2 + 12t2+ 12+ 1
2t2+ 1
+2t2+12
= t 1 +1
2 + 1t1+t1+ 12+ 1
2t2+ 1
+2t2+12
= t 1 + 12 + 1
t1+unvn
=(2t 1)un + (2t2 2t)vn
2un + (2t 1)vn .
So (un+1, vn+1) is also a solution of D since u2n+1(t2t)v2n+1 = (2t 1)un + (2t2 2t)vn2(t2 t) (2un + (2t 1)vn)2 = u2n (t2 t)v2n = 1. This completes the proof. Example 2.1. Lett = 4. Then(u1, v1) = (7, 2) is the fundamental solution of D : u212v2 =1 and some other solutions are
u2v2 = 7 242 7 2
10 = 9728 u3v3
=
7 24
2 7
3 1
0
=
1351
390
u4v4
=
7 24
2 7
4 1
0
=
18817
5432
u5v5
=
7 24
2 7
5 1
0
=
262087
75658
u6v6
=
7 24
2 7
6 1
0
=
3650401
1053780
.
Also un = 7un1 + 24vn1 and vn = 2un1 + 7vn1 for n 2; un = 9(un1 + un2) un3and vn = 9(vn1 + vn2) vn3 for n 4. Further
u2v2
= [3; 2, 6, 2] =97
28u3v3
= [3; 2, 6, 2, 6, 2] =1351
390u4v4
= [3; 2, 6, 2, 6, 2, 6, 2] =18817
5432u5v5
= [3; 2, 6, 2, 6, 2, 6, 2, 6, 2] =262087
75658u6
v6= [3; 2, 6, 2, 6, 2, 6, 2, 6, 2, 6, 2] =
3650401
1053780.
From above theorem we can give the following result.
Corollary 2.2. The base of the transformation T in (2.2) is the fundamental solution of D,that is T[h; k] = {h, k} = {u1, v1}.
Proof. We proved that (u1, v1) = (2t1, 2) is the fundamental solution of D. Also we showedthat h = 2t1 and k = 2. So the base of T is T[h; k] = {h, k} = {2t1, 2} as we claimed.
We saw as above that the Diophantine equation D could be transformed into the Dio-
phantine equation D via the transformation T. Also we showed that x = u + 2t 1 and
-
7/29/2019 2009-04-003_R1
5/7
QUADRATIC DIOPHANTINE EQUATION 5
y = v + 2. So we can retransfer all results from D to D by using the inverse of T. Thus wecan give the following main theorem.
Theorem 2.3. Let D be the Diophantine equation in (2.1). Then
(1) The fundamental (minimal) solution of D is (x1, y1) = (4t 2, 4).(2) Define the sequence {(xn, yn)}n1 = {(un + 2t 1, vn + 2)}, where {(un, vn)} defined
in (2.5). Then (xn, yn) is a solution of D. So it has infinitely many many integer
solutions (xn, yn) Z Z.(3) The solutions (xn, yn) satisfy
xn = (2t 1)xn1 + (2t2 2t)yn1 8t2 + 10t 2yn = 2xn1 + (2t 1)yn1 8t + 6
for n 2.(4) The solutions (xn, yn) satisfy the recurrence relations
xn = (4t 3)(xn1 + xn2) xn3 16t2 + 24t 8yn = (4t 3)(yn1 + yn2) yn3 16t + 16
for n 4.
3. The Diophantine Equation x2 (t2 t)y2 (4t 2)x + (4t2 4t)y = 0 over FiniteFields.
In this section, we will consider the integer solutions of D over finite fields Fp for primes
p 5. Let t Fp and let t2 t d(mod p). Then D becomes(3.1)
Ddp : u
2
dv2
1(mod p).
Let Ddp(Fp) = {(u, v) Fp Fp : u2 dv2 1(mod p)}. Then we can give the followingtheorem.
Theorem 3.1. Let Ddp be the Diophantine equation in (3.1). Then# Ddp(Fp) =
p 1 for d Qpp + 1 for d / Qp,
where Qp denote the set of quadratic residues.
Proof. Let d Qp and let p 1, 5(mod8). If v = 0, then u2 1(mod p) u 1(mod p).So
Ddp has two integer solutions (1, 0) and (p 1, 0). If u = 0, then dv2 1(mod p)
has two solutions v1, v2. So Ddp has two integer solutions (0, v1) and (0, v2). Now let Sp =Fp {1, p 1}. Then there are p52 points u in Sp such that u
21d
is a square. Set u21d
= c2
for some c = 0. Then v2 c2(modp) v c(modp). So Ddp has two solutions (u, c) and(u, c), that is, for each u in Sp, Ddp has two solutions. So it has 2(p52 ) = p5 solutions. Wesee as above that it has also four solutions (1, 0), (p 1, 0), (0, v1) and (0, v2). Therefore Ddphas p 5 + 4 = p 1 integer solutions. Now let p 3, 7(mod 8). Ifv = 0, then u2 1(mod p)and hence u = 1 and u = p 1. So Ddp has two integer solutions (1, 0) and (p 1, 0). Ifu = 0, then dv2 1(mod p) has no solution. So Ddp has no integer solution (0, v). LetHp = F
p {1, p 1}. Then there are p32 points u in Hp such that u
21d
is a square. Setu21d
= j2 for some j = 0. Then v2 j2(modp) v j(modp). So
Ddp has two solutions
(u, j) and (u,
j), that is, for each u in Hp, D
dp has two solutions. So it has 2(
p32 ) = p
3
-
7/29/2019 2009-04-003_R1
6/7
6 ARZU OZKOC & AHMET TEKCAN
solutions. It has also two solutions (1, 0) and (p 1, 0). Therefore Ddp has p 3 + 2 = p 1integer solutions.
Similarly it can be shown that if d /
Qp, then D
dp has p + 1 integer solutions.
Example 3.1. Let t = 4. Then 12 Q23 and 12 / Q31. So
D1223(F23) =
(1, 0), (2, 11), (2, 12), (3, 4), (3, 19), (5, 5), (5, 18), (6, 1), (6, 22), (7, 2),
(7, 21), (16, 2), (16, 21), (17, 1), (17, 22), (18, 5), (18, 18), (20, 4),
(20, 19), (21, 11), (21, 12), (22, 0)
D1231(F31) =
(0, 7), (0, 24), (1, 0), (2, 15), (2, 16), (4, 3), (4, 28), (5, 8), (5, 23), (7, 2),
(7, 29), (10, 4), (10, 27), (11, 14), (11, 17), (13, 13), (13, 18), (18, 13),
(18, 18), (20, 14), (20, 17), (21, 4), (21, 27), (24, 2), (24, 29), (26, 8),
(26, 23), (27, 3), (27, 28), (29, 15), (29, 16), (30, 0)
.
For the Diophantine equation D, we set
D(Fp) = {(x, y) Fp Fp : x2 (t2 t)y2 (4t 2)x + (4t2 4t)y = 0(mod p)}.Then we can give the following theorem.
Theorem 3.2. Let D be the Diophantine equation in (2.1). Then
#D(Fp) =
p 1 for t2 t Qpp + 1 for t2 t / Qp.
References
[1] S.P. Arya. On the Brahmagupta-Bhaskara Equation. Math. Ed. 8(1)(1991), 2327.
[2] C. Baltus. Continued Fractions and the Pell Equations: The work of Euler and Lagrange. Comm. Anal.
Theory Contin. Fractions 3(1994), 431.
[3] E. Barbeau. Pells Equation. Springer Verlag, 2003.
[4] H.P. Edward. Fermats Last Theorem. A Genetic Introduction to Algebraic Number Theory. Corrected
reprint of the 1977 original. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 50. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1996.
[5] D. Hensley. Continued Fractions. World Scientific Publishing, Hackensack, NJ, 2006.
[6] P. Kaplan, K.S. Williams. Pells Equations x2 my2 = 1,4 and Continued Fractions. Journal ofNumber Theory 23(1986), 169182.
[7] H.W. Lenstra. Solving The Pell Equation. Notices of the AMS 49(2)(2002), 182192.
[8] K. Matthews. The Diophantine Equation x2Dy2 = N, D > 0. Expositiones Math. 18(2000), 323331.[9] R.A. Mollin, A.J. Poorten, H.C. Williams. Halfway to a Solution of x2 Dy2 = 3. Journal de
Theorie des Nombres Bordeaux 6(1994), 421457.
[10] R.A. Mollin. Simple Continued Fraction Solutions for Diophantine Equations. Expositiones Math. 19
(1)(2001), 5573.
[11] R.A. Mollin. The Diophantine Equation ax2
by2
= c and Simple Continued Fractions. Int. Math. J.2 (1)(2002), 16.
[12] R.A. Mollin. A Note on the Diophantine Equation D1x2 + D2 = akn. Acta Math. Acad. Paed. Nyireg.
21(2005), 2124.
[13] R.A. Mollin. Quadratic Diophantine Equations x2 Dy2 = cn. Irish Math. Soc. Bulletin 58(2006),5568.
[14] I. Niven, H.S. Zuckerman, H.L. Montgomery. An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers. Fifth
Edition, John Wiley&Sons, Inc., New York, 1991.
[15] P. Stevenhagen. A Density Conjecture for the Negative Pell Equation. Computational Algebra and
Number Theory, Math. Appl. 325(1992), 187200.
[16] A. Tekcan. Pell Equation x2Dy2 = 2, II. Bulletin of the Irish Mathematical Society 54(2004), 7389.[17] A. Tekcan, O. Bizim, M. Bayraktar. Solving the Pell Equation Using the Fundamental Element of
the FieldQ(
). South East Asian Bull. of Maths. 30(2006), 355366.
[18] A. Tekcan. The Pell Equation x2
Dy2 =
4. Applied Mathematical Sciences 1(8)(2007), 363369.
-
7/29/2019 2009-04-003_R1
7/7
QUADRATIC DIOPHANTINE EQUATION 7
[19] A. Tekcan, B. Gezer, O. Bizim. On the Integer Solutions of the Pell Equation x2dy2 = 2t. Int. Jour.of Comp. and Math. Sci. 1(3)(2007), 204208.
[20] A. Tekcan. The Diophantine Equation 4y24yx1 = 0, Curves and Conics over Finite Fields. Acceptedfor publication to Mathematical Reports.
Uludag University, Faculty of Science, Department of Mathematics, Gorukle, 16059, Bursa-
TURKIYE
E-mail address : [email protected], [email protected]
URL: http://matematik.uludag.edu.tr/AhmetTekcan.htm