2009 03 23 i p semiconductor industry

18
Protection of Intellectual Property in the Semiconductor Industry in The Netherlands Wouter Pors, Partner Bird & Bird The Hague 23 March 2009

Upload: wouter-pors

Post on 13-Jan-2015

405 views

Category:

Business


0 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2009 03 23  I P  Semiconductor  Industry

Protection of Intellectual Property in the Semiconductor Industry in The Netherlands

Wouter Pors, Partner

Bird & Bird The Hague

23 March 2009

Page 2: 2009 03 23  I P  Semiconductor  Industry

2

Netherlands – part of European Union

One economic region

One trade zone

27 countries

500 million people

16.5 million in The Netherlands

1 currency for 16 countries: Euro

Page 3: 2009 03 23  I P  Semiconductor  Industry

3

The Netherlands: gateway to Europe

Trade oriented for centuries

Main shipping port: Rotterdam

Airport hub: Amsterdam

Direct flights to many cities

Excellent logistics to Europe

First language: Dutch

Second language: English

Page 4: 2009 03 23  I P  Semiconductor  Industry

4

The Netherlands: corporate hub

Many IP holdings for Europe, due to relatively favourable taxation on royalties

Many distribution centres for Europe

Relatively large number of European head offices

Companies in The Netherlands are usually engaged in international trade

Good scientific infrastructure through university system

Services and high-tech oriented industry

Page 5: 2009 03 23  I P  Semiconductor  Industry

5

Intellectual property law

European lawEuropean Patent Convention (uniform prosecution)

Community Trademark Regulation

Community Design Right Regulation

National law harmonized at EU levelDutch Semiconductor Topography Act

Dutch Copyright Act

Benelux Convention on Intellectual PropertyTrademarks and Design Rights for The Netherlands, Belgium and Luxemburg

Dutch Database Act

Not harmonizedTort and unfair competition law

Page 6: 2009 03 23  I P  Semiconductor  Industry

6

Patent law – two options

Dutch Patent ActRegistration system, very fast grant of patentsAllows for immediate protection of research resultsEnables early scientific publication

European Patent ConventionThorough examination of applicationsCentralized application and prosecution systemCentralized opposition systemBundle of national patents after grant

Applicant is the ownerInventor mentioned in the application, but no special positionInventors consent not needed for prosecution

Page 7: 2009 03 23  I P  Semiconductor  Industry

7

Patent application strategy

Research and development in The NetherlandsApply for Dutch national patentApply for application under the Patent Cooperation Treaty, invoking the Dutch application as priority document within 12 monthsEnter the regional/national phase within 30 months

European patent applicationApplications in other countries

Decide on registration in countries within Europe after grant of the European patentTest the market before major costs are due

Page 8: 2009 03 23  I P  Semiconductor  Industry

8

The patent litigation hotspots

United Kingdom(London)

Netherlands(The Hague)

Germany(Düsseldorf, Munich,

Mannheim)

Rulings from these courts have authority in other countries

European Patent Office Munich, The Hague

Page 9: 2009 03 23  I P  Semiconductor  Industry

9

Patent enforcement in The Netherlands

One specialized court in The Hague

Experienced judges with feeling for technology

Court appreciates that inventions deserve protection

Court takes developments in other European countries into account

All judgments are published on the internet

ProceedingsAccelerated full proceedings on the merits: 12 – 14 months

Preliminary injunction proceedings: 4 – 8 weeks

Ex parte injunction in very urgent cases: 1 -2 days

Page 10: 2009 03 23  I P  Semiconductor  Industry

10

Further protection of technology

Semiconductor topographyRequires registration

Not much used, since technology progresses fast and good alternatives exist

Copyright lawEnsues from the act of creation

No registration required

No artistic level required

Available for software and for hardware design

Limited exception for technically determined designs

Page 11: 2009 03 23  I P  Semiconductor  Industry

11

Copyright for semiconductor design

Supreme Court 4-1-1991 Van Dale vs RommeList of 230.000 words including in an extensive Dutch dictionary

The selection of words is a decision of the editors with some subjectivity

List is a work which has an individual, original character bearing the stamp of its makers, despite limited room for own views

Supreme Court 30-05-2008 Endstra tapesIf the work is so trivial that no creative efforts of any nature were involved, then no protection

But no requirement of intention of creating a copyright protected work or intentionally creative choices

Limitation still is very low threshold

Page 12: 2009 03 23  I P  Semiconductor  Industry

12

Copyright for semiconductor design

Supreme Court 24-02-2006 TechnipProtection assumed of a “kinetic scheme”, a set of chemical reaction comparisons that formed part of a computer simulation programme for controlling a production process in the chemical industryThe kinetic scheme itself is not a computer programmeThe comparisons themselves are not protected, but the set of comparisons is copyright protectedKinetic scheme is not a pure and simple enumeration of numbers, but was created using subjective criteriaSelection of comparisons is not an automatic mathematical processSubjective element involved, based on the knowledge, insight and experience of the maker

Page 13: 2009 03 23  I P  Semiconductor  Industry

13

Copyright for semiconductor design

Conclusion: semiconductor design which is the result of research and development will be copyright protected in The Netherlands

This part of copyright law is not yet harmonized through European Union Directives, so criteria for assuming a copyright protected work vary throughout Europe

For instance: German law requires a certain level of artistic character, which semiconductors lack

The Netherlands offer a high level of copyright protection and thereby of results of research and development

Page 14: 2009 03 23  I P  Semiconductor  Industry

14

Copyright: some specifics

Copyright is vested in the company that publishes the work without mentioning the author

By making the product available to the public, the manufacturer is assumed to own the copyright

No need to identify the actual designers

Evidence of existenceNo registration required

However, proof of priority desirable

Safe storage of “design freeze” files to prove priorityOnline “i-Depot” with Benelux Office for Intellectual Property

Physical depot on USB-stick with a notary

Page 15: 2009 03 23  I P  Semiconductor  Industry

15

Cooperation in development

No formal legal requirements

Joint venture may be designed as proprietor

Parties may also decide on co-ownershipEach owner free to apply invention and copyrights, but licensing requires cooperation

Cooperation and co-ownership governed by agreement, as parties may desire

Agreement may involve power of attorney to represent co-owner in exploitation and enforcement, including representation in court

Arrangement may be varied for instance per region (i.e. one partner exploits in Europe, other partner in Asia)

Page 16: 2009 03 23  I P  Semiconductor  Industry

16

Professional support

The Netherlands have an international orientation

Legal professionals are used to adopt an international perspective and work in the English language

Several options for using a one-stop-shop for Europe

In general, law firms and patent attorney’s firms are separate, but there is a trend for integrated firms

Page 17: 2009 03 23  I P  Semiconductor  Industry

17

Characteristics of Dutch IP protection

Fast and reliable patent system, both for national and European patents

Supplementary protection availableSemiconductor topography rights

Copyright protection for semiconductor design

Good legal systemEffective protection

Courts appreciate importance of intellectual property

Rulings from Dutch courts are seen as having authority in other European jurisdictions (same applies to judgments from United Kingdom and Germany)

Page 18: 2009 03 23  I P  Semiconductor  Industry

18

Thank you!

Wouter Pors

Bird & Bird The Hague

[email protected]

www.twobirds.com