20070910-007, ordinance no 20070910-007 ... ordinance shall be kept on file by the city ... recently...
TRANSCRIPT
ORDINANCE NO 20070910-007
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY'S WATER AND WASTEWATERIMPACT FEE PROGRAM BY ADOPTING THE IMPACT FEE LAND USEASSUMPTIONS AND IMPACT FEE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN YEAR2007 UPDATE, BY REVISING THE IMPACT FEE SERVICE AREABOUNDARY, AND BY AMENDING THE WATER AND WASTEWATER FEESTO BE CHARGED BY THE CITY
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN
PART 1 The City Council amends the City's water and wastewater impact fee programby adopting
(A) the Impact Fee Land Use Assumptions and Impact Fee CapitalImprovements Plan Year 2007 Update, attached as Exhibit A andincorporated by reference, and
(B) the Impact Fee Service Area described in Appendix A to the Impact FeeLand Use Assumptions Plan Year 2007 Update, attached as Exhibit A
(C) the amended water and wastewater impact fees as described in the ImpactFee Land Use Assumptions and Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan Year2007 Update, attached as Exhibit A
PART 2 In accordance with City Code Section 25-9-313, the documents adopted by thisordinance shall be kept on file by the City Clerk
PART 3 This ordinance takes effect on October 1, 2007
PASSED AND APPROVED
September 10Will Wym
Mayor
APPROVED V ' V/^-r ( O ATTEST
•
A\i>g...QAllan\Smith / Shirley A pentry
City Attorney City Cld,rkPage 1 of 1
EXHIBIT A
IMPACT FEE REPORTS
IMPACT FEE LAND USE ASSUMPI IONS
AND
IMPACT FEE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
City of Austin TexasAustin Water Utility
Year 2007 Update
Adopted September 10 2007
IMPACT FEF REPORTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
IMPACT FEE LAND USE ASSUMPTIONSPAGE
TABLE OF CONTENTS LUA i
LIST OF MAPS LUA n
LIST OF TABLES LUA n
I INTRODUCTION LUA 1
II SERVICE AREA LUA 1
III GROWTH PROJECTIONS LUA 3
IV SERVICE UNITS LUA 6
APPENDIX A DESCRIPTION OF IMPACT FEE BOUNDARY LUA A 1
IMPACT FEF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
TABLh OF CONTENTS CIP i
LIST OF FIGURES CIP n
LIST OF TABLES CIP n
I INTRODUCTION CIP 1
II FACILITY PLANNING DhHNING THE EXISTING LEVELUSAGE AND RESERVE CAPACITY NEEDS CIP I
HI IMPACT FEE FACILITIES AND FEE CALCULATION METHODOLOGY CIP 16
IV SERVICE UNIT DEMAND AND CAPACITY RELATIONSHIPS CIP 1?
V SERVICE UNIT DEMAND PROJECTIONS CIP 21
VI CAPACITY AND COST A ITRIBUTABLE TO NEW GROWTH CIP 25
VII CALCULATION OF MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE IMPACT FEE CIP 33
VIII IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT CIP 33
IX COLLECTED FEES CIP 33
Appendix A Existing Collected Fees from Fiscal Year 2006/2007 City wide Rate Ordinance CIP A 1
Appendix B Descriptions of the Zones for ihc Fees CIP B 1
Appendix C CIP Projects Targeted lo Meet Existing Needs - Wastewater CIP C 1
Appendix D CIP Projects Targeted to Meet Existing Needs - Water CIP D 1
IMPACT hCE LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS
City of Austin TexisAustin Water Utiht>
Year 2007 Update
Adopted September 10 2007
1MPAC1 1-Eb LAND USE ASSUMPTIONSTABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGCLIST OF MAPS LUA n
LIST OF TABLES LUA. n
I INTRODUCTION LUA 1
II SERVICE AREA LUA 1
III GROWTH PROJECTIONS LUA 3
IV SERVICE UNITS LUA 6
APPENDIX A DESCRIPTION OF IMPACT TEE BOUNDARY LUA A 1
LUA i
US I OF MAPS
TITLE PAGE
Map I Proposed Impact Fee and Service Area Boundary Map (with Planning Areas) LUA 2
LIST OF TABLES
TITLE F AGE
Table! Population Gro\vth LUA-4
Table 2 Employment Growth LU-\ 5
Table 3 Calculation of Service Units LUA 6
Table 4 Estimate of Service Units in Austin Water System (January 2006 ) LUA 7
Table 5 Projection of Service Units (Connected to City of Austin Water System) LUA 8
Table 6 System wide Projections of Growth for Decentralized Cluster Waste\\ater Systems LUA 9
LUA 11
IMPACT FEE LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS
City of Austin TexasAustin Water Uti l i ty
Year 2007 Update
I INTRODUCTION
Texas law specifically Texas Local Government Code Chapter 395 enacted b> the State Legislature in 1987 (SenateBill 336) and amended in 1989 empowers cities to impose and collect impact fees and establishes the guidelineseities must follow to do so The term impact fee includes the capital recovery fees tint the City of Austin chargesfor facility expansion of its water and wastcwater systems
Among the several requirements imposed on cities by Chapter 395 is the development and approval of a report calledland use assumptions Section 395 001 (5) of the Local Go\ernment Code defines the term succinctly Land use
assumptions includes a description of the service area and projections of changes m land USLS densities intensitiesand population therein over at least a 10 >ear period In a defini t ive article \\ntten b> three people who helpeddevelop Chapter 395 entitled Impact Fees The Intent Behind the New Law (St B Tex Envt! L J vol 19 1989pp 68 73) by Ray Farabee et al the term is so described
Land use assumptions are the basic projections of population growth and future land uses on which plans fornew or expanded facilities must be based The land use assumptions may be general and do not requiredetailed projections for specilic parcels of land They should however be thorough enough to permitreasonably accurate long range planning The time period on which these projections are based must be atleast ten years
This report has been prepared for the purpose of complying with the requirements of Chapter 395 of the LocalGovernment Code with respect to land use assumptions It is an amendment to the City s impact fee land useassumptions approved by the City Council on February 13 1997 and subsequently amended and updated twice mostrecently in August 2001 and adopted by City Council November 29 2001 State law requires that the land useassumptions be updated at least every five years
II SERVICE ARFA
The service area for the purposes of these land use assumptions is the entire area wi th in the corporate boundary ofthe City of Austin and its existing extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) that is anticipated to be served within the next tenyears by the existing city water and wastewatcr systems and the facilities listed in the revised Impact Fee CapitalImprovements Plan The boundary encompassing this area is illustrated by Map 1 Appendix A of this land useassumptions report provides the written description of the updated impact fee service area boundary for ordinancepurposes The written description is the official service area description not the map
The Impact Fee service area defines the area to be used to calculate projected service units and the impact fee
The service area for this 2007 update was reduced in size by eliminating land transferred since 2001 from the AustinETJ to other ETJ s The service area was increased in part to include property added to the ETJ since 2001 and wherenecessary to aiclude land adjacent to existing water or \\astewater mams
LUA 1
WILLIAMSONCOUNTY
BASTROPCOUNTY
CALDWELLCOUNTY
2007 IMPACT FEE AND SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY
FT") PLANNING AREAS 2007
,_~ AUSTIN ETJ JAN 2007AUSTIN WATER UTILITY
IMPACT FEE & SERVICE AREA BOUNDARYYEAR 2007 UPDATECOUNTY BOUNDARY
AUSTIN FULL PURPOSE CITY LIMIT
MAP 1LUA2
These land use assumptions anticipate that the impact fees to be calculated will be imposed uniformly over the entireservice area and will be calculated in a manner consistent with that premise This is explicitly provided for by 1989amendments to Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code which added Section 395 0455 This section reads in part
Sybtem Wide Land Use Assumptions
(a) In lieu of adopting land use assumptions for each service area a political subdivision may except forstorm water drainage flood control and roadway facilities adopt system wide land use assumptionswhich cover all of the area subject to the jurisdiction of the political subdivision for the purpose ofimposing impact fees under this chapter
Another paragraph in this section further clarifies the requirements of state law
(c) After adoption of system wide land use assumptions a political subdivision is not required to adoptadditional land use assumptions for a service area for water supply treatment and distribution facilitiesor \vastewater collection and treatment facilities as a prerequisite to the adoption of a capitalimprovements plan or impact fee provided the capital improvements plan and impact fee are consistentwith the system wide land use assumptions
III GROWTH PROJECTIONS
The tables that follow show yowth information for time periods corresponding to years 2005 and 2015 The 2005 and2015 dates correspond to the ten yeir time horizon for the updated land use assumptions required by the Texas LocalGovernment Code The growth data on these tables are aggregated by Planning Areas which are illustrated by Map I
For the 2007 update adjusted 2000 population data adjusted dwelling units and adjusted employment values plus2010 and 2020 data from forecasts by Transportation Planning and Sustamabihty Department were used as a baselineto calculate ten year estimated growth values
All data prepared by the Neighborhood Planning and Zoning Department (NPZD) is provided to us distributed bytraffic serial zone within the City s ETJ and surrounding region The serial zone distribution allows the Austin WaterUtili ty to allocate growth to the selected impact fee service area and to the Planning Areas
The Planning Area and total acreage figures were calculated by computer from digitized serial zone boundary linesLand use acreage by various residential and non residential categones is not required for the update
The following tables of information are attached
Table 1 Population Growth Shows estimated 2005 and projected 2015 population aggregated to Planning Area leveland to total service area As noted above these figures are consistent with NPZD data for 2000 and Utility projectionsfor 2010 and 2020 These population figures correspond to estimates and projections of residents actually receivingCity of Austin water and/or waste\vater service This table includes the calculated average annual growth rate thenumber of estimated dwelling units and the gross population density The yoss densities are calculated by dividingthe estimated or projected population by the total acres in each Planning Area
Table 2 Employment Growth Shows estimated 2005 and projected 2015 employment aggregated to Planning Arealevel and to total service area As noted above these figures are consistent with NPZD data for 2000 and Utilityprojections for 2010 and 2020 This table includes the calculated average annual growth rate and the yossemployment density The gross densities are calculated by dividing the estimated or projected employees by the totalacres in each Planning Area As with population these figures correspond to work sites that will actually receive Cityof Austin water and/or wastewater service
LUA 3
oCO
ooCM
C.c
Coeo
O
O
oco
_0>-O.to
j= w S0 ^ 2
O
£? «in "c § <o -o Q ^_W S S °
o o a > r — o c o o
O
CD O "D
l~!CO
c c o:Ij < £? -e 5a c g
3 O
£ | fl 8o & ctM 5 D
8 s = RS ^D
-^ c -c
»- *- CM
CM CLOa.
o roO 3CM a.
o0.
^ CD ™£ S> E« < i
t M C M C M < N O 4 C M C M C M
COO)CMCO
CO
CMCOCO
£•CDT3
O
nro
ooCM
LUA-4
O
.3?ra_cuo
CD
2
8O
CDEoQ.E
LU
CM
0)
•*- ^ wcj E pLU /R
COT>C3O
CD
I —OoCMC
JZ
i05Eo
° °ELU
'cCD
w Eo >*o oCM -3.
ELU
5
1-1 aw c(ft c
0 LU/(\t_J
•JJ)
eu <a.
(0 Ctft Cg LUO
S?33 *C
CO
LU
OT'xrLOLncDN-cDcocooio)intnr-o>o>
T - L O T - C O r t - x T f O O J
o -* CD en o
ELLI
O OCM -Q.
ELU
>u ,iP E
£ N r O O J f M ( N
C N C M C M C M C N O J C M C M
00inCM
3
.C CO
ro O
CDCO0)
aooCM
2.o
LUA 5
IV SERVICE UNITS
Centralized Water and Wastewater Service Unit AssumptionsCalculation of the impact fee in accordance with Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code requires the use of aservice unit Within the definitions section of Chapter 395 Service unit means a standardized measure of
consumption use generation or discharge attributable to an individual unit of development calculated in accordancewith generally accepted engineering or planning standards for a particular category of capital improvements or facilityexpansions
To use a simplified explanation the number of projected new ser\ ice units are divided into the costs of capital projectsallocated to this new growth in order to calculate the allowable impact fee (per service unit) The journal article by RayFarabee et al mentioned previously states that the Service unit is one of the most important but conceptuallydifficult elements of the (new) law This article also observes that Cities may select their own standards formeasuring service units but any measure chosen must attempt to accurately reflect differences in service consumptionbetween users Austins capital recovery fee ordinances have for years used the fee unit for this purpose and itremains the most appropriate choice for the service unit under the terms of Chapter 395 The term service unit hasreplaced fee unit in the Austin ordinances and codes in recent years The service unit is based on the size of watermeter sold exactly as the fee unit was calculated Table 3 illustrates the relationship between service units and metersizes The service unit calculation depends on the relative differences between the various sizes and types of meters asdetermined by their rated maximum flows and rated continuous flows The same ratios apply in both cases since therated maximum flow for each meter is twice its rated continuous flow
Table 3 CALCULATION OF SERVICE UNITS
The size and type of water meter purchased determines number of service units in accordance with the followingschedule
SIZE5/83/4
11/21/2
223344668
1012
x 2x 2x 2
TYPEpositive displacementpositive displacementpositive displacementpositive displacementturbinepositive displacementturbinecompoundturbinecompoundturbinecompoundturbineturbinetuibineturbinefire servicefire servicefire service
SERVICE UNITS1
I 52558810162425425092160250330
based on domestic demandbat,ed on domestic demandbased on domestic dermnd10
The service unit is determined on the basis of the American Water Works Association (AWWA) standards C700 02C701 02 and C702 01 recommended maximum rate for continuous duty (flow) of the meter purchased at sale of tapThe service unit as described here has for years been in Austins capital recovery fee ordinances it is well acceptedand it is extraordinarily easy to calculate at time of collection In addition it is based on criteria that directly reflect thedifferences in service consumption between different users
The projection of new service units is problematical in that it depends on types and numbers of meters sold while thebasis for the forecasts are population and employment converted to water and wastewatcr flows
LUA 6
This problem is handled by calculating the number of service units in the water system todiy and assuming therelationship between service units and projected usage remains constant in the future Table 4 shows the latest count ofall meters in the system in Januarv, 2006 by size and type From that list is calculated tht number of hypotheticalservice units installed in the system That figure is 316 147 service units as shown on Table 4 The weathernormalized water usaj.,e for FY 2004/2005 (October 2004 September 2005) which is estimated to be 51 321 milliongallons (actual FY 2004/2005 usage wa:> 51 374 million gallons) to obtain a system wide normal weather average useof 445 gallons per day per service unit (or 0 31 gpm)
Table 4 Estimate of Service Units in the Austin Water System
Meter Size5/83/411 1/4I 1/223468101216
MetersJanuary2006*
16848678688324
1835473051I 144
64431213449
10
Service UnitMultiplier **
11 525
558
16952533
56198461242
330
January 2006Service Units
16848611 80220810
90177352440819 391163131750313 1946086
3300
Total 193578 316147
* Meter count January 2006 without individual customers in wholesaleutilities** Service Unit Multiplier based on historical mix of meter types withinsize
Actual FY 2004 2005 usagein million gallons 51 374Weather normalized usagein million gallons 51 121System wide normal weather average usegallons per day per service unit 445
Wastewater Return Flow Rate 62%Wastewater average usegallons per day per service unit 275
All future forecasts derive from projections of population and employment These are then converted to projections ofwater use and wastewater generation These projections are weather normah?ed to isolate the effects of growth Atthat point if WL maintain the assumption that the relationship between water use and service units will remain fairlyconstant then simply dividing the average daily projected use by the 445 gallons per day per service unit figureobtained above will produce a projection of future service units and consequently new service unit growth
The summary of this exercise is presented in Table 5 The population and employment projections of Section IIITables I and 2 were converted to average daily water use and then to forecasts of new serv ice units for the service area
LUA 7
c o c s j i n c o ^ r r —
racomooCM
O
_0>
raV)jyo
ro
tr
o'-'
D 3-to o w
^ ra QT- ,3 /n0 0 ^CN I- S
10 E Q
O & ^CM -Q. 5
ELU
10 S Qi- 0) ffi9 "2 yCM w 5
o>tr
s ^CM^ D
<nin E QO >> rn0 0 ^c>J Q. 5
Eill
O tt) fr,o -g
o:
rag E
C M C N C M C M C N C M C M C M
COOCMCO
minto
SCO
CDcncoO
CO•oDOCO
oo
LUA 8
Decentralized Wastes ater Growth and Service Unit AssumptionsGrowth projections associated with decentralized cluster wastewaler systems are shown below for the entire servicearea The population dwelling units and service units are included in the Planning Area values in Tables 1 2 and 5All forecast growth of this type is anticipated to be residential Since the type of residential units that will use clustersystems tends to be single family suburban houses an assumption is made that the owners will typically purchase 3/4inch water meters which equate to 1 5 semce units Therefore the number of service units is assumed to equal I 5times the number of dwelling units
Table 6 System wide Projections of Growth for Decentralized Cluster Wastewater Systems
Year Population Dwelling Units Service Units2005 0 0 02015 4640 1600 2400
Although no such system is present in the Capital Improvements Plan for the Year 2007 Impact Fee calculation such asystem would be an applicable candidate project for future impact fee assessments
Report Preparation
City of AustinAustin Water UtilityRandall W AlexisTeresa Lutes P E
Citv of AustinNeighborhood Planning and Zoning Department {NPZD}Ten McManus (1996 2010 and 2020 population and employment data)Ryan Robinson City Demographer (2000 census data)
L U A 9
IMPACT FEE I AND USE ASSUMPTIONS - APPENDIX ADescription of Impact Fee Boundary for Year 2007 Update Adopted September 10 2007 (Ord 20070910 007)
All jurisdiction boundaries such as county lines utility compimes ETJs etc used in tins description are thoseboundaries as they exist on the date this boundary is adopted and arc to be recognized as the most accurate location ofthe impact fee boundary if another landmark or distance reference creates an ambiguity
AH street and landmark names reflect one of the names shown in commonly available maps of the Austin area TheCity of Austin GIS street names and MAPSCO Jnc 2005 Austin Street Guide were used for street names in thisdescription Distances have been scaled from commonly available maps and are intended to approximately place theboundary when landmarks are not available or may be ambiguous The referenced landmark is to be taken as theaccurate location
When a road street etc is referenced the boundary is assumed to follow the tenterlme and only one side of the roadstreet etc is \vithm the impact fee service area boundary
Boundaries of any city s extra territorial jurisdiction (tTJ) or city l imits counties and the service area of another utilitycan be found by referring to maps available from those mdiv idual entities The iccuracy of those maps is not warrantedby the City of Austin or the Austin Water Utility
The impact fee service area described below shall not include the certificated sen ice area of another ut i l i ty providingwater and/or wastewater service to its customers under a certificate of convenience and necessity from the Texas WaterCommission or its successor agency and with whom the City has no wholesale contract to provide water and/or sewerservice providing for the payment of impact tees
The impact fee service area described below shall not include land within the extra territorial jurisdiction (ETJ) or citylimits of cities other than Austin provided however that wi th in the extra territorial jurisdiction (ETJ) or city limits ofcities other than Austin land is included within the impact fee service area where it is included in the ser\ ice area ofthose utilities with whom the City has wholesale contracts to provide water and/or sewer service providing for thepayment of impact fees or where that other city has executed an agreement with Austin for the City lo supply retailw atcr and/or wastewater service providing for the payment of impact fees
Where the impact fee service area is described by the Austin ETJ passing through a tract the entire tract which ispartially in the Austin ETJ and not in the ETJ of another city will be considered to be in the service area
In addition to land within the impact fee service area described below the impact fee service area includes land in theservice areas of those utilities with whom the City has wholesale contracts to provide water and/or wastewater serviceproviding for the payment of impact fees to the extent such land has been approved by the City to receive water and/orwastewater service from the City
Any tract of land which is not entirely within the impact fee service area as described below or according to theconditions described above is not considered to be in the impact fee service area
Accordingly the City of Austin Impact Fee Service Area Boundary is descnbed as follows
1 Beginning at the junction of the east frontage road of IH 35 South and the common ETJ boundary of Austin andBuda the boundary proceeds along the common ETJ boundary of Austin and Buda in a generally east and southdirection (to include the Sunfield #2 MUD) for about 2 9 miles until it turns generally NE
2 Then proceeding in a general NE direction along the common tTJ boundary of Austin and Buda for about 0 5 mileto the ETJ boundary west of S Tumersville Rd
3 Then proceeding in a general south direction along the common ETJ boundary of Austin and Buda west of STumen>ville Rd including the electric substation property for about 1 7 miles to Satterwhite Road
4 Then proceeding in a general east and SE direction along Satterwhite Rd for about 2 1 miles to the common ETJboundary of Austin and Niederwald near Williamson Road
5 Then proceeding in a general Nh direction along the common ETJ boundary of Austin and Niederwald for about0 4 mile to the intersection of the common ETJ boundaries of Niederwald Creedmoor and Austin al WilliamsonRoad
LUA A 1
IMPACT FEE LAND USF ASSUMPTIONS - APPENDIX ADescription of Impact Fee Boundary for Year 2007 Update Adopted September 10 2007 {Ord 20070910 007)
6 Then proceeding m a general NE direction alon^, the common FTJ bound iry of Austin and Caedmoor and theCreedmoor city limits for about 5 5 miles including sections along Williamson Road Graef Road Wright RdPalmer Road and near FM 1327 and Carl Road
7 Then proceeding in a general NNE direction along the common ETJ boundary of Austin and Creedmoor near CarlRoad for about 0 9 mile to its intersection with Old Lockliart Hw y
8 Then proceeding in d general SE direction along the common ETJ boundarj of Austin and Creedmoor for about 3 9miles until it intersects with the common ETJ boundary of Creedmoor Austin and Mustang Ridge and turnsgenerally east
9 Then proceeding in a general east direction along the common ETJ boundary of Austin and Mustang Ridge forabout 3 8 mile until it rums generally ESC
10 Then proceeding in a general ESE direction along the ETJ boundary of Austin for about 3 4 miles to the commonTravis/Bastrop county line and turns generally NE
11 Then proceeding in a general NE direction along the common Travis/Bastrop county l ine part of which is also thecommon ETJ boundary of Austin and Bastrop for about 1 2 miles until it turns SE along the common ETJboundary
12 Then proceeding in a general SE direction along the common ETJ boundary of Austin and Bastrop for about 0 1mile to the Austin Water CCN boundary where the Austin CCN boundary turns NE
13 Then proceeding in a general NE direction along the Austin Water CCN boundary for about 1 5 miles to JacksonRd where die CCN boundary turns NW
14 Then proceeding in a general NW direction for about 0 I mile to the common Fravis/Bistrop county line and turnsgenerally NE
15 Then proceeding in a general NE direction along the common I ravis/B istrop county line for about 3 7 miles until itintersects with the common ETJ boundary of Austin and Bastrop
16 Then proceeding in a general NNF direction along the common ETJ boundary of Austin and Bastrop for about 0 7mile until it turns generally north
17 Then proceeding m a general north direction along the ETJ boundary of Austin for about 48 miles to itsintersection with the Colorado River unt i l it turns generally Nb
18 Then proceeding in a general NE direction along the ETJ boundary of Austin for about 1 9 miles until the ETJ turnsgenerally SE
19 Then proceeding in a general SE direction along the ETJ boundary of Austin for about 1 0 mile unt i l it intersectswith the common ETJ boundar> of Austin and Webben ille and turns generally NE
20 Then proceeding in a general NE direction along the common ETJ boundary of Austin and Webberville for about4 1 miles the last portion of which is along Blake Manor Rd and continues generally NE
21 Then proceeding m a general NE and NW direction along the ETJ boundary of Austin following Blakt Manor Rdfor about 1 8 miles and it turns generally north
22 Then proceeding in a general north direction along the ETJ boundary of Austin for about 5 0 miles to itsintersection with Littig Road
23 Then proceeding in a general WNW direction along the Austin ETJ which is also Littig Road for about 2 2 milesuntil it intersects the common ETJ boundary of Austin and Manor and continues along the common ETJ boundary
LUA A 2
IMPACT FEE I AND USE ASSUMPI IONS - APPENDIX ADescription of Impact Fee Boundary for Year 2007 Update Adopted September 10 2007 (Ord 20070910 007)
24 Then proceeding in a clockwise direction WNW bW NW and NE along the common ETJ boundary of Austin andManor for about 5 6 miles until it intersects with Gregg Manor Road
25 Then proceeding in a general NNW direction along Gregg Manor Rd which is the ETJ boundary of Austin forabout 0 4 mile until it intersects Fuchs Grove Road and ihe Austin ETJ
26 I hen proceeding in a general NE direction along the ETJ boundary of Austin near Fuchs Grove Road for about 3 0miles until it intersects with Cameron Road
27 Then proceeding in a general NW direction along tht ETJ boundary of Austin for about 1 9 mile (Cameron Road)until it and the common ETJ boundary of Austin and Pflutervillc turns generally SW
28 Then proceeding m general SW direction along the common ETJ boundary of Austin and Pflugerville (CameronRoad) for about I 2 mile until the common ETJ boundary of Austin and Pflugerville turns generally NW
29 Then proceeding in a general NW direction along the common ETJ boundary of Pflugerville and Austin for about24 miles until the ETJ boundary turns generally SW just east of the intersection of Immanuel Road andKillmgsworth Lane
30 Then proceeding in a general SW direction along the common ETJ boundary of Pflugerville and Austin (east ofImmanuel Road) for about 0 5 mile until the ETJ boundary turns generally NW
31 Then proceeding in a general NW direction along the common ETJ boundary of Pflugerville and Austin (south ofSerenity Drive) for about 0 5 mile until the ETJ boundary turns generally NE
32 Then proceeding in a general NE direction along the common ETJ boundary of Pflugerville and Austin for about0 4 mile until the ETJ boundary turns generally NW
33 Then proceeding in a general NW direction along the common FTJ boundary of Pflugerville and Austin (south ofSt Croix Ln ) for about 0 4 mile until the ETJ boundary turns generally NE
34 Then proceeding in a general NE direction along the common LTJ boundary of Pflugerville and Austin for about0 1 mile until the ETJ boundary turns generally NW
35 Then proceeding in a general NW direction along the common ETJ boundary of Pflugerville and Austin for about0 3 mile until the ETJ boundary turns generally NE
36 Then proceeding in a general NE direction along the common ETJ boundary of Pflugerville and Austin for about0 5 mile unt i l it turns generally NW
37 Then proceeding in a general NW direction along the common ETJ boundary of Pflugerville and Austin {north ofOlympic Drive} for about 0 2 mile until it turns generally SW
38 Then proceeding in a general SW direction along the common ETJ boundary of Pflugerville and Austin for about0 4 mile until it turns generally NW
39 Then proceeding in a general NW direction along the common ETJ boundary of Pflugerville and Austin for about0 4 mile until it turns generally SW
40 Then proceeding in a general SW direction along the common FTJ boundary of Pflugerville and Austin for about0 4 mile until the ETJ boundary turns generally NW at or near proposed Wells Branch Parkway
42 Then proceeding in a general Nh direction along the common ETJ boundary of Pflugerville and Austin for about0 9 mile until it turns generally NW at or near Old Austin Pflugerville Road
LUA A3
IMPACT FEE LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS - APPENDIX ADescription of Impact Fee Boundary for Year 2007 Update Adopted September 10 2007 (Ord 20070910 007)
Then proceeding in a general NW direction along the common ETJ boundary of Pflugerville and Austin (OldAustin Pflugerville Road Pecan St and FM 1825) for about 0 7 mile unt i l the ETJ boundary turns generally Nb
44 Then proceeding in a general NE direction alon^ the common ETJ boundary of Pflugerville and Austin (alsoor near Central Commerce Dr and West Pfluterville Loop) for about 05 mile until the ETJ boundary turns,generally WNW
45 Then proceeding in a general WNW direction along the common ETJ boundary of Pflugerville and Austin forabout 0 2 mile until the ETJ boundary turns generally west at or near White Raver BKd
46 Then proceeding in a general west direction alom., the common ETJ boundary of Pflugerville and Austin (alsoalong or near Grand Avenue Parkway) for about 0 2 mile until the CTJ boundary turns generally NNW
47 Then proceeding in general NNW and NNE directions along the common ETJ boundary of Pflugerville and Austinfor about 0 3 mile until the ETJ boundary turns generally NW at or near Royston Lane
48 Then proceeding in a general WNW direction along the common ETJ boundary of Pflugerville and Austin (alsoalong or near Royston Lane) for about 0 1 mile until the tTJ boundary turns generally NW
49 Then proceeding in a general north direction along the common ETJ boundary of Pflugerville and Austin (alsoalong or near Central Commerce Dr ) for about 0 2 milt un t i l the ETJ boundary turns generally NW
50 Then proceeding in a general WNW direction along the common bTJ boundary of Pflugerville and Austin (alsoalonj, or near Picadilly Dr ) for about 0 7 mile unt i l the ETJ boundary turns generally NW
51 Then proceeding in general NW and west directions along the common ETJ boundary of Round Rock and Austinfor about 0 4 mile until the ETJ boundary turns generally SSW at or near Bratton Lane
52 Then proceeding in a general SSW direction along the common ETJ boundary of Round Rock and Austin for about0 2 mile (along or near Bratton Lane) until the ETJ boundary turns generally WNW
53 Then proceeding in a general WNW direction along the common ETJ boundary of Round Rock and Austin forabout 0 2 mile until it turns generally NNE
54 Then proceeding in a general NNE direction along the common ETJ boundary of Round Rock and Austin for about0 2 mile until it turns generally WNW
55 Then proceeding in a general WNW direction along the common ETJ boundary of Round Rock and Austin forabout 0 7 mile until it turns generally NW at or near FM 1325
56 Then proceeding in a general NW direction along the common ETJ boundary of Round Rock and Austin for about0 2 mile until it turns generally west in the vicinity of SH 45
57 Then proceeding in a general west direction along the common ETJ boundary of Round Rock and Austin for about1 0 mile unt i l tt turns generally SW at or near McNeil Road
58 Then proceeding in a general SW direction along the common bTJ boundary of Round Rock and Austin (and alsoalong or near McNeil Road) for less than 0 1 mile until it turns generally WNW
59 Then proceeding in a general WNW direction along the common ETJ boundary of Round Rock and Austin forabout 0 1 mile until it turns generally NNW
60 Then proceeding in a general NNW direction along the common ETJ boundary of Round Rock and Austin forabout 2 1 miles until it turns generally SW at or near RM 620
61 Then proceeding in a general SW direction along the common ETJ boundary of Round Rock and Austin (and alsoalong or near RM 620) for about 0 8 mile until it turns generally SSE
LUA A-4
IMPACT Ftt LAND USE ASSUMP1 IONS - APPENDIX ADescription of Impact Fee Boundary for Year 2007 Update Adopted September 10 2007 (Ord 20070910 007)
62 Then proceeding in a genenl SSE direction alon^ the common ETJ boundary of Round Rock and Austin (and alsoalong the boundary of the Brushy Creek MUD) for about 0 8 mile until it turns generally WSW
63 Then proceeding in a general WSW direction along the common ETJ boundary of Round Rock and Austin(and also along the boundary of the Brushy Creek MUD) for about 0 6 mile until it turns generally NNW
64 Then proceeding in a general NNW direction along tht, common ETJ boundary of Round Rock and Austin (andalso along the boundary of the Brushy Creek MUD) for about 0 3 mile until it turns generally SW at or near RM620
65 Then proceeding in a general SW direction along the common ETJ boundary of Round Rock and Austin (and alsoalong or near RM 620 and the boundary of Brushy Creek MUD) for about 0 6 mile until it turns generally NNW
66 Then proceeding in a general NNW direction along the common ETJ boundary of Round Rock and Austin (andalso along the boundary of Brushy Creek MUD) for about 0 2 mile unt i l it turns generally WSW
67 Then proceeding in a general WSW direction alon^ the common ETJ boundary of Round Rock and Austin (andalso along the boundary of Brushy Creek MUD) for about 0 2 mile until it turns generally NNW
68 Then proceeding in a general NNW direction along the common ETJ boundary of Round Rock and Austin (andalso along the boundary of Brushy Creek MUD) for about 1 1 mile until it turns generally ENE
69 Then proceeding in a general ENE direction alon^ the common ETJ boundary of Round Rock and Austin (and alsoalong the boundary of Brushy Creek MUD) for about 0 3 mile until it turns generally NNW
70 Then proceeding in a general KNW direction alonj., the common ETJ boundary of Round Rock and Austin (andalso along the boundary of Brush> Creek MUD and Fern Bluff MUD) for about 1 3 mile until it turns generallyWSW at or near Brushy Creek Road
71 Then proceeding in a general WSW direction along the northern ETJ boundary of Austin that also generallymeanders alongside South Brushy Creek for about 5 0 milts until it turns generally SW at or near US 183
72 Then proceeding along US 183 North also called South Bell Blvd which marks the common ETJ boundary ofCedar Park and Austin for about 0 8 mile until it turns generally WSW
73 Then proceeding in a general WSW direction along the common ETJ boundary of Cedar Park and Austin for about0 8 mile until it turns generally SSE
74 Then proceeding in a general SSI direction along the common FTJ boundary of Cedar Park and Austin for about0 8 mile until it intersects FM 620 North
75 Then proceeding m a genera! WSW direction along FM 620 North which marks the common ETJ boundary ofCedar Park and Austin for about 1 1 mile until it intersects with FM 2769
76 Then proceeding in general WNW direction along FM 2769 which marks the common ETJ boundary of CedarPark and Austin for about 0 9 mile unt i l it turns generally SW along FM 2769
77 Then proceeding in a general WSW direction along FM 2769 (part of which marks the common ETJ boundary ofCedar Park and Austin) for about 2 7 miles until it intersects with Bullick Hollow Rd
78 Then proceeding in a general SSE direction along Bull ick Hollow Rd for about 3 0 miles until it intersects with theAustin full purpose city limits as of November 2006 near FM 620
79 Then proceeding in a general SSW and WSW direction along the full purpose city limits (to include lots annexedfor full purpose fronting on FM 620) for about 0 9 mile until the end of the full purpose city limits along FM 620
80 Then proceeding in a general SSW direction along the west boundary of Cortana for about 2 7 miles until it turnsgenerally SE
LUA A 5
IMPACT FEE LAND USE ASSUMP TIONS - APPENDIX ADescription of Impact Fee Boundary for Year 2007 Update Adopted September 1 0 2007 (Ord 200709 1 0 007)
81 Then proceeding in a general SE direction along the west boundary of Cortana for about 03 mile until it turnsgenerally SSW
82 Then proceeding in a general SSW direction alonj, the west boundary of Cortana for about 1 5 mile unt i l itintersects the Colorado River
83 Then proceeding in a general WSW direction upstream alonj, t he Colorado River along the border of CommonsFord Park for about 0 3 mile
84 Then proceeding in a general SW direction upstream along the Colorado River along the border of the BdlfourTract for about 1 0 mile
85 Then proceeding in a general SSb and SSW direction along the common ETJ boundary of Austin and Bee Caves(which is the border of the Balfour Tract) for about 0 9 mile until it turns generally SSE
86 Then proceeding in a general SSE direction along tin, common ETJ boundary of Austin and Bee Caves (which isthe border of the Balfour Tract) foraboutO 7 mile unt i l it intersects PM 2244
87 Then proceeding in a general east direction alont, FM 2244 for about 0 1 mile until it intersects the easternboundary of the Balfour Tract
88 Then proceeding in a general NNE direction alonj., the border of the Balfour Tract for about 1 6 mile unt i l it turnsgenerally SE
89 Then proceeding in a general SE direction along the border of the Balfour Tract and Commons Ford Ranch Parkfor about 0 2 mile to the south corner of Commons Ford Ranch Park
90 Then proceeding in a general NNE direction along the border of Commons Ford Ranch Park for about 03 mileunti l it turns generally north in an arc
91 Then proceeding in an approximate arc following tht, boundary of Commons Ford Ranch Park for about 0 6 mileas it turns from north to NE
92 Then proceeding in a general NNW direction along the border of Commons Ford Ranch Park for about 03 mileuntil it intersects the Colorado River
93 Then proceeding in a general NE direction downstream along the Colorado River for about 1 9 mile
94 Then proceeding in an approximate arc following the course of the river for about 3 1 miles as it turns from east tosouth and then from south to east
95 Then proceeding m a general south direction along the WCID#10 boundary for about I 7 mile unti l it intersects Hvl2244 in the vicinity of Barton Creek Blvd
96 Then proceeding in a general SW direction along the WCID #10 boundary (and along Barton Creek Blvd ) forabout 0 4 mile until the district boundary turns generally SE
97 Then proceeding in a general SE direction along the WCID #10 boundary for about 0 5 mile until it turns generallySSW
98 Then proceeding in a general SSW direction along the WCID #10 boundary for about 04 mile until its junctionwith the boundary of Lost Creek MUD and Country Club it or near Birton Creek
99 Then proceeding in a varying direction from southwest to southeast along the western boundary of Lost CreekCountry Club for about 2 4 mile until it turns generally NE
LUA A 6
IMPACT FEE LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS - APPENDIX ADescription of Impact Fee Boundary for Year 2007 Update Adopted September 10 2007 (Ord 20070910 007)
100 Then proceeding in a general east direction along the boundary of Lost Creek Country Club Lost Creek MUDand Barton Creek for about 1 0 mile until it intersects with the west property line of the Games Ranch
101 Then proceeding m a general SSW direction along the west property lines of the Games Ranch and Chapmantract for about I 5 mile until it turns generally ESE
102 Then proceeding in a general ESE direction along the southwest property line of the Chapman Tract for about0 2 mile until it turns generally SSW
103 Then proceeding in a general SSW direction along Foster Ranch Rd for about 0 3 mile unt i l it turns generallyWNW
104 Then proceeding m a general WNW direction for about 1 7 mile intermittently touching the Austin full purposecity limit as of November 2006 until it turns generally SW
105 Then proceeding m a general SW direction for about 0 2 mile until it intersects the Austin full purpose city limitas of November 2006
106 Then proceeding m a general WNW direction along the Austin full purpose city limit as of November 2006 andrear lot lines of property along Southwest Parkway and Barton Creek Blvd for about 1 0 mile until it turns SSW
107 Then proceeding m a general SSW direction along the back lot lines of lots on Barton Creek Blvd and continuesfor about 0 5 mile until the boundary intersects with the full purpose city limits <is of November 2006 and turnsgenerally west
108 Then proceeding in a general west and SSW direction along the Austin full purpose city limit as of November2006 and along the boundary of the Uplands tract for about 0 6 mile unt i l it intersects with Old Bee Caves Road
109 Then proceeding m a general west direction along Old Bee Caves Road for about 0 4 mile until it intersects withthe boundary of WC1D #14 near the eastern right of way of Hwy 71 and turns generally NE
110 Then proceeding in a general NE direction along the east boundary of WCID #14 for about 0 4 mile and turnsgenerally NW
111 Then proceeding in a general NW direction along the east boundary of WCID #14 for about 0 5 mile until itintersects w ith Hwy 71
112 Then proceeding in a general NW direction along Hwy 71 for about I 5 mile until the boundary intersects withthe common ETJ boundary of the Village of Bee Cave and City of Austin
113 Then proceeding in a general arc from east to west along the common ETJ boundary of the Village of Bee Caveand City of Austin for about 3 5 miles until the ETJ intersects with the boundary of the Wong Tract which is alsothe Bee Cave CCN boundary
114 Then proceeding in a general south direction along various portions of the east boundary of the Wong Tractwhich is also the Bee Cave CCN boundary for about 5 7 miles until it turns generally WNW
115 Then proceeding in a general WNW direction along the southern boundary of the Wonj, Tract which is also theBee Cave CCN boundary for about 0 9 mile until it turns generally NNE
116 Then proceeding in a general NNE direction along the western boundary of the Wonj, Tract which is also theBee Cave CCN boundary for about 0 1 mile until it turns generally east
117 Then proceeding m a general east direction along the western boundary of the Wong Tract which is also the BeeCave CCN boundary for about 0 5 mile until it turns generally north
LUA A 7
IMPACT FEE LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS - APPENDIX ADescription of Impact Fee Boundary for Year 2007 Update Adopted September 10 2007 {Ord 20070910 007)
118 Then proceeding in a general north direction along the western boundary of the Wong Tract which is also theBee Cave CCN boundary for about 0 5 mile until it tumt> generally west
119 Then proceeding in a general east direction along the western boundary of the Wong Tract which is also the BeeCave CCN boundary for about 0 5 mile unt i l it intersects the Shield Ayres City of Austin Conservation propertyand turns generally south
120 Then proceeding in a general south direction about 04 mile along the boundary of the Shield Ayres City ofAustin Conservation Easement property until it turns generally WNW
121 Then proceeding in a general WNW direction about 0 8 mile along the boundary of the Shield Ayres City ofAustin Conservation Easement property until it turns generally SSW
122 Then proceeding m a general SSW and NW direction about 3 4 miles along the southern boundary ot the ShieldAyres Private Conservation Easement property until it intersects the Austin ETJ boundary and turns generallySSE
123 Then proceeding in a general SSE and SSW direction 1 9 miles along the Austin ETJ until it intersects the countyline boundary between Travis and Hays and it turns generally SE
124 Then proceeding in a general SE direction 5 3 miles along the county line boundary between Travis and Hajsuntil it turns generally south at the village limits of Bear Creek
125 Then proceeding in a general south direction along the common city limits of Austin and Bear Creek and thecommon ETJ boundary of Austin and Dnpping Springs for about 5 1 miles unt i l it turns generally east
126 Then proceeding in a general cast direction along the common LTJ boundary of Austin and Dripping Springs forabout 1 0 mile until it intersects with the common Austin ETJ and Hays ETJ
127 Then proceeding in a general east direction along the common ETJ boundary of Austin and Hays for about 1 7mile until it turns generally north
128 Then proceeding in a general north direction along the common ETJ boundary of Austin and Ha>s which followsvarious subdivision boundaries for about 4 I miles unt i l it turns generally east
129 Then proceeding in a general east direction along the common ETJ boundary of Austin and Hays for about 0 9mile until it turns generally south
130 The proceeding m a general south direction along the common ETJ boundary of Austin and Hays for about 1 4mile unt i l it turns generally east
131 Then proceeding in a general east and south direction along the common ETJ boundary of Austin and Hays forabout 1 6 mile until it intersects the common ETJ boundary of Austin and Buda and turns generally SE
132 Then proceeding in a general SE direction along the common ETJ boundary of Austin and Buda for about 1 9mile until it turns generally south
133 Then proceeding in a general south direction along the common LTJ boundary of Austin and Buda for about 1 2mile until it turns generally east
134 Then proceeding in a general east direction along the common ETJ boundary of Austin and Buda for about 1 7miles to the east frontage road of IH 35 South which marks both the end and beginning points of the Impact FeeService Area Boundary
LUA A 8
IMPACT FEE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
City of Austin TexasAustin Water Utility
Year 2007 Update
Adopted September 10 2007
IMPACT FEE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLANTABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
LIST OF FIGURES CIP 11
LIST OF TABLES CIP n
I INTRODUCTION CIP 1
II FACILITY PLANNING DEFINING THE EXISTING LEVELUSAGE AND RESERVE CAPACITY NEEDS CIP 1
III IMPACT FEE FACILITIES AND FEE CALCULATION METHODOLOGY CIP 16
IV SERVICE UNIT DEMAND AND CAPAC11Y RELATIONSHIPS CIP 17
V SERVICE UNIT DEMAND PROJECTIONS CIP 21
VI CAPACITY AND COST ATTRIBUTABLE TO NFW GROW! H CIP 25
VII CALCULATION OF MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE IMPACT FEE CIP 33
VIII IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT CIP 33
IX COLLECTED FEES CIP 33
Appendix A Existing Collected Fees from Fiscal Year 2006/2007 City wide Rate Ordinance CIP Al - A2
Appendix B Descriptions of the Zones for the Fees CIP - BI
Appendix C CIP Projects Targeted to MtU Existing Needs - Wastewater CIP Cl - C7
Appendix D CIP Projects Targeted to Meet Existing Needs-Water CIP D1-D6
CIP i
LIST OF FIGURES
Title
Map 1 Major Water Facilities Impact Fee Capital Impro\ ements Plan
Map 2 Major Wastewater Faulities Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan
LIST OF TABLES
Title
Table 1 Water Impact Fee Projects
Table 2 Wastewater Impact Fee Projects
Table 3 Future Projects in the Capital Improvements Plan
Table 4 Projects Removed From Previous Impact Fee Listing - Water and Wdstcwattr
Table 5 Service Units Associated With Meter Size and Type
Table 6 Estimate of Service Units in the Austin Water System
Table 7 Land Use Service Equivalency Matnx
Table 8 Water Service Unit Comersion Factors and Capacity Sizing Basis
Table 9 Wastewater Service Unit Conversion Factors and Capacity Sizing Basis
Table 10 Projection of Service Units Connected to City of Austin Water System
Table 11 Total Costs of Capital Facilities for Decentralized Cluster Wastewater Systems CIP
Table 12 Impact Fee Calculations Water Impact Fee Projects
Table 13 Impact Fte Calculations Wastewater Impact Fee Projects
Table 14 Existing Impact Fee Structure and Recommended New Impact hcc Structure
Page
CIP 2
CIP 3
CIP 4 8
CIP 9 12
CIP 13
CIP 14
CIP 18
CIP 19
CIP 20
CIP 22
CIP 23
CIP 24
CIP 25
CIP 27 29
CIP 30 32
CIP 35
CIP 11
I INTRODUCTION
The Texas Impact Fee Act (Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code) provides methods and procedures thatAustin must follow to continue to impose its water and wastewater capital recovery fees Tins act requires thedetermination of the costs of capital improvements attributable to new yowth lor a specified period of time Theseto^ts are the principal building blocks on which the calculation of impact fees is based The plan that identifies thecapital improvements or facility expansions for which impact fees may be assessed is termed the capital improvementsplan In 1990 the City of Austin achieved compliance with the Texas Impact Fee Act by approving land useassumptions on April 5 1990 and then approving the impact fee CIP and amendments to the ordinance on June 71990 In subsequent years the City has maintained compliance with periodic updates From 1990 to 2001 the TexasImpact Fee Act stipulated that the City is to update its land use assumptions and impact fee CIP at least every threeyears Beginning September 1 2001 the Texas Impact Fee Act stipulates that these updates are to be done at leastevery five vears The five year period begins on the day the impact fee CIP ts adopted This document represents theupdate to the CIP Both it and the land use assumptions can be adopted at the same time
The law outlines a methodology for calculating the cost of particular facilities attributable to new growth bised on adefined planning period (not to exceed 10 years) The planning period establishes a time frame in which to evaluatecapacity made available for new growth as compared to the demand for that capacity represented by the land useassumptions One of the keys to the methodology is the expression of both demand and capacity for a particularproject in terms of service units By knowing the number of service units associated with the impact fee projects thatarc expected to be used during the planning period the capacity and cost attributable to new growth can readily bedetermined Using this cost and the projected total number of new service units within the utility service boundaryduring the planning period the maximum fee per service unit may be calculated as prescribed by the law Themethodology of the Capital Improvements Plan provides the framework for calculating the maximum allowable impactfee which is simply the upper hunt on the fee pursuant to the law
The methodologies employed in this Impact Fee CIP comply with the provisions of the Texas Impact Fee Act Thisupdate is as comprehensive as previous updates extensively reworking the list of qualified CIP projects It continuesto exclude projects that are predominately dedicated to existing users or that may not be constructed wi th in the tenyear planning period And in cases where other participants contributed funds only the City of Austin s shares of thecosts were included In addition capacity costs and service areas were studied on a project by project basis
The Impact Fee CIP process calculates the maximum allowable fee This calculation conforms to the state requirementfor a credit equ<U to 50 percent of the total projected cost of implementing the capital improvements plan
II FACILITY PLANNING DEFINING THE EXISTING LEVEL Of CAPACITY USAGE AND RFSERVECAPACITY NEEDS
Section 395014 of the impact fee law as codified in the Texas Local Government Code speaks to a capitalimprovements plan that addresses
(1) a description of the existing capital improvements within the service area and the costs to upgrade updateimprove expand or replace the improvements to meet existing needs and usage and stricter safety efficiency orenvironmental or regulatory standards
(2) an analysis of the total capacity the level of current usage and commitments for usage of capacity of theexisting capital improvements
Major utility facilities are shown as Maps 1 and 2 These maps also illustrate the location of the Impact Fee CIPprojects
CIP 1
1 7>7^?^=
WATER TREATMENT PLANT IN 2007 IMPACT FEE CIP
RESERVOIR IN 2007 IMPACT FEE CIP
A PUMP STATION IN 2007 IMPACT FEE CIP
WATER PIPE IN 2007 IMPACT FEE CIP
I I 2007 IMPACT FEE AND SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY
AUSTIN WATER UTILITYIMPACT FEE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
MAJOR WATER FACILITIESYEAR 2007 UPDATE
M A P ICIP 2
B WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT IN 2007 IMPACT FEE CIP
A LIFT STATION IN 2007 IMPACT FEE ClP
f*-- WASTEWATER PIPE IN 2007 IMPACT FEE CIP
| | 2007 IMPACT FEE AMD SERVICE ARgA BOUNDARY
AUSTIN WATER UTILITYIMPACT FEE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
MAJOR WASTEWATER FACILITIESYEAR 2007 UPDATE
MAP 2CIP 3
tt
S o
c
3 2TX 3o to0
CoCO 2Q. (0
E°o0
4>3 QJ
CD |
£
W OO ^41 jflO
iOl ___« «"- o•K oi; o<0 T-
? CE b
~~ 20) g
« OS
01.Qra
O53a
io
03
s"
D)
6 gts3
| 1** 0T> WC £v3 -u. U
*- o O O co*— to coco en CDT- T t
*- o CN to mco o co coCM ^T CD O«- t tn
CO *- T- T- T-
en o o o oT- CN CM CN OJ
O O O O OlO l/i </> tO tfl0> fl> flj m o)
illll? -c -c -e eo o a oZ Z Z Z Z
CO CO CO COco co co co
CN CN CN CN
TJ T! T3 T3Cn CJ> O) O)E E E E
O CO CO CO COCO r- T- T- T-
a.32CT
ofl °fl of)
Z Z Z
°8B -8* < 5 s §UJ 1- 1- to 1-uj co w 55 co0 i & 0-5:z 1| IIo a. a. a. a.^ O O O O
o z z z z•e tr -e a.03 CO CD ^Q. a a. 2
en
o o o oo o o oO> CO CO 03co co co to00 O O Qco m in in
T- co f*— cot- T- CN COO) CN CN *-o r- )•- Q_
CN CN CN CNCM CN CM CN
0 O O rrCO CN CN ffCO O) O) <to co to -J
Q.
§ *? o to^ !n 5
CN incO C D c p C O T - T f
m t m c o t o c o c N O C N T j - c oC O C O O C O C N O f - . C p e p N . ' l -O T — ^ o c n c N r ^ T - ' C N ^ T —CN mco c n c C J t O T - « t i -
O c n o Q O O O c O O J O C Qo o i o p o o o c n c n o c nC N ' - C N C N C N C N C N ' - ' - C N T -
C O C O C O C O C O t O C D C a C D C D C O
<rt (/> VI Ifl If) tO VI U> tf> CO </lp c u t u c u c u c u c u g j c D o a )
o o o o o o o o o o oz z z z z z z z z z z
w
E f
.
w^
CD **^~
z S S< z <
^ O < < O QS w s ^ co to a:- , c o z z z t o £ 2 n^ 5 0 0 o i s>W ^i ^ — — — p— ^- — ^f r t £ O t / j C / J *~~ r ^ C O C O ^ -
O O L 1 J L U U J U J U J U J 2 2 2
^ O ^ z J - i Z j - J — i Q ^ - 5 ^
i i35dd33sl lO = O O O O O O ; | Z Z
•c tr r: -c a.a as. s. 9
C7)
C M ^ ^ - ^ C N C N ,-,-,-,-
8 O O Q O Q O O C D QO O O O o O O O O
t O O C O C O ^ O t O [ ' - - C O C O C O
CM T- .- 1- »- CO CO
m T j - N t i n c o o 0 0 ^ - 3 -CO CN CO CO CO CO CO C7) CD u)
O O O O O ^ - O O O O
C N C N C M C N C N C N C M C N C N C NC N C N C N C N C N C N C N C N C N C N
O O O O O O O O O OC O i n C N ' - ' - C p C N C N T - C Ne o r - c o c o c o c S c o e o c o c oco co co co co co to co co co
<- CN
KSm
O) •«•01 C(l
in
co coo o>CM ^~
— —CD CD
0 CJ
~ =3 ^
ffl CO
CO CQ
0> CD
! 1"S ^O 0Z Z
O)CO ECO CO
A(0O
O
CQ
1
COD:o>cc
« UJp wCD Q;
ifyl ^-
"E Oo cutL Q;
LL U_
in •-o oo oCO CN
S COo
CO CM
to mT mO g;Q. 0
CN CNCN CN
z 2
Q.
m
^
COo
ooCN
—
1
OoO—3
CO
CO
>s=.•eoz
CJ"o
COCOin
en
0)0)cen0)
CO
_L C
RE
EK
P
•COl-UJ5•->
Sco8CM
inCNh-
CNCN
Sr-
S T- o o T- o m CNt*> in co N- toQ) in co ^ o coco in o CD in co
T - c * i o c N i n a > m f MC O G I O C N ' - O C D L Oc o - r - o o i T - t — r-55co in o *•» r-- •* rx.
-
C O O O O O O O l T -o j o o o o o c n oT - c N C N f M C N C N ' - C N
SZ SZ £ JI
s. g.11W CO Ifl tfl
< ro co CQ co jf ff a •CU CD CD CD - ^ ^~
1ft O O O O to ^/> 'w<u ^11 * ^ . * _ Q CU CO* CD CO DD CD 5 5 jS ^ t ^ ^ ^ S f S
Z m c u c 2 c u 2 Z 2S S S 5i: ^ s -CO O S o
.<N ~a -a -D
ro c c c21 ?3 in in infc t CO CO CO• c r ^ e o f t c o c o c o c o
• ^- A WO? °-Q A WJ LL. 3
— en P-. „ Pc c " K os
•C N °r §: g
«iig;^ J S ^ gLU K LU LLI E
§ !S5g*gN S W CO ™ S Pc n « « c o a § H _uj "J u iu 2 o c / i SQ : C L Q ; Q : D y < p
Q . 5 c u D , a c i )UJ<
<^^^i^l« 5 5 3 5 S 5 | ,> Q Q Q Q ' r ' 0 ' §^ c t r c c c c D C S c t c t :£ < < < < L L < C -C > > 2 > 5 - ^> w
Q - S > S - > £> coO O O O O c o O 52 T T T T — T II
.^ ^ ^ ^- ^ L^
t -n -c aas .a§
Ol
v- CO CO -*• CN CN COo o o o o o oo o o o o o oTT ^ ^f ^J CO ^" coo co co co r~ co eg
o 01 in co t m •^~S en p c5 to o TT
r1- (N CM CD en oo o r-- f-» f~- f*- Q.
CN CM CN CN CN CN CMCN CN CN CN CN CN CN
S O O O O O -rO) T- CN CN CD ~ff- eo CM en en tn <
co co *r co co to —ja
m CNen enen -*
U£3
t: r
« s
Q_ <n
T- mo oO) Oco 01en oCM CM
O 0r- cnCO COto co
ClP-4
O h- O CN Oin CN co o 01CO CO CO T- o
to T- CM r-
CO CO CO T— N-to T- r- m INr>- in co r-- *fCO CO •<r CM co o*
r^- ^ co co r*— m CM o co i**- to co in CD ^ CM co co coC D c o o i O C N C D C T > i n r o c o r - . C N i n o i c o ^ r c o c D i -
S 2t! 5O COo
eo co t-- T- coO i- co co TTCN i- Ol T 't
-7 OCM (O•7- o
0>
glQ.
a au> tn a) <f> tn
m mo 6o o o o ^
m S 3 S S3 3 3 3 311111j= ^ j: ^ ^•c -c -c -c -co o o o oz z z z z
s
O CO TI T~CO Ol O OO> CD O OT- i- CN CN
c/> in u> to innj co co to re0) O O 0) OJO O O o yS S CO CO CO
z z z z zz z z z z2 2 2 E Sc S "H c t;<U co <u CD <uO O O O OZ Z Z Z Z
CO CM CO CN CO COCO CD O *- T~ -^CD Ol O O O O•r- T- CN CN CN CM
c c c c c c c c c c c c c c .c .c *: ,c .c ri5 OOo'oOOGo'oooOO 3 = B 3 3, _ . - r r - i - r - t - r - r - c ^ ^ e - i - r O O O O O Oi; i;i=±:i3i= — i;i=i:^i;£;~ (/) W W CO CO W
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
rS
E g
OSSi S
roje
ct D
escriptio
n
0.
OR
TH
TO
WN
TR
AN
S M
AIN
Z
5COZ3
OW
AR
D L
N/N
OR
TH
TO
WN
TF
I
ECD
C/3
Q.^ Z
OR
TH
/EA
ST
AR
EA
WA
TE
R II
E A
US
TIN
PU
MP
ING
ST
AT
IO
Z Z
l_0)01
5)
E A
US
TIN
TR
AN
S M
AIN
Z
S 2
90
EA
ST
RE
SE
RV
OIR
Z)
z<
U)
ECO3<
wCO
LU
PR
ING
DA
LE
RO
AD
48
T
MLL
RIC
H T
O G
RE
EN
TM
t/> O
LJJ
EN
TR
AL A
RE
A W
AT
ER
IMP
O
LLR
ICH
TO
GR
EE
N T
M g
roup
S
H1 3
0 C
ross
ings
w
rj*Q.
ays
Med
ium
Serw
ce T
M
S 1
83 S
outh
/McK
mney
Falls
Q D
o o o c o o c o e o c o c o c o ^ - t o c o- -
co co ts E to coco co in co co •'r
i ± Q.
6
o>^t>cLL
CO
2J3co(J
u
O O O O po o o o 5OJ CO J" CO ^r - to T— co rN- O CO Is- COto CM ti CO
O tf> CN i« Or co T- •q- cor-. f - o h~ r--o o r- o o
r~. fw r- r- N.CM CN CN (N CNCM CN CM CN CN
O O O O OOl Ol O> Ol CDCO CO CO CO COCO CO CO CO CO
oooCMCOco
o
o
r-CNCM
oCO
CO
ooooooooco i*- co to5 01 •«- *-CO CM i- *-
o in in T-m -g- i- oo o r»- r^
r- t- h- t-.CN CN CM CNCN CM CM CN
OOOOco *- r- CDr- co o> r-CO CO CO CO
u
OmtoCO
t—r-
CMCM
o
co
52 «Ol <J>CO CO
co to0 0Q. Q.
^ CM CNCM CM
2 Z350. Q.
0 OO Ot- CM
r- coCO CO
o o
^ CM CMCN CM
O OCO ,-CO COco co
O O O Q Ooooooto CN i- Ol Oh- CO CO CO Olto co co co co
CN CN O CN CM
O O O O O
t- r - 1-- t- [CM CN CN CM CMCN CM CN CN CN
S o o o or- r- o o
co r~- r-- 01 01rt co co co co
ooooO O O O
CM £ Ol COCO CO O O>CO CO CN CN
in o in mto to cp 01oooo
C- [ f~ t-.CM CN CM CMCM CN CN CN
O O O O
r-- 01 O) 01CO CO CO CO
T- T- CMO O Oo o oCD CO f-co t~- coh- co Coto co co
T- in CMCM Ol <r- t» oO O Q.
c-- (-- r-CN CN CMCM CN CM
CO O 5CO Ol <,CO CO -J
CL
tM T- IMO O Oo o oi*- r-- coco co coOl O) COCO CO CO
CO T- T-
§3SCL Q. Q.
f— t-CM CN CNCN CN CN
\\\Q. CL O-
CIP 5
o
r- oco ojin o
CN
1- OJO COin tj>
T-
coCOce
CMrocnID
o co
CM
m oiOJ CM
coOJ
co f-
OJ ^
r-- o*y oCO COoi ro
OJf>cnOJ
cOm
CM
coenoCM
or-cnT-
S00COCO
mCMCOT-
eo Scn oCM rO
T- r-to r--m coO CM
co in
CD CDOJ O
co toCO "»O 1-
m o
cn inco r—
O)
o mo <oCD tJ-
OJ
to
COm
mCMCDCD
CO CD•<- O
CO
CM
CO CO01 T-i- OJ
cn
o m r - o o o o o o oin r- i- i- co coo o oi oj 04 ojCO CD
a.Eoo
C P O O O O O OO O O O O O O01 CM CM CM OJ OJ OJ
O O O O O O T - . - T - , -ooooooooooO J O J C M O J C N C N O J C M O J O J
m too> o3 3
££
O O O O O CJ OUJ lf><v oS 3
o oin co
toCD 015 3
(D 0) 0)O U U
e £ £o> co £ £ S<uCO CO CO CO CO
±3 -C .C
£ £(U O
CO CO
D D
O O
_ _ ^ * - — — .- CO CO *.
>. CD mco 5 3
0} CD CO flJ Q3 3 3 3 3
CD ID3 3
2"a.o ^-^0) IflU. o
is«J T-
n o5 ~
g> E E E^ in m in
CM OJ 01 OJ 0 0 Q
co r- t- i- co ro co
Q. Q. Q. Q. Q.x x x x xCO CO 0) CO CD• D T S - D T S T ) O J T 3 T 3 T 3 T 3O ) O ) O ) O ) c n r ; enenoaiE E E E E r a E E E E^ - i ^ - t ^ r - f — - ^ - o o o o( D t o c o c o t o c o m i n i n i n
co co•g- g-CO CDo co
- * ' j - T i - ^ ^ ^ j - - ^ - t O ' 3 -O J O l O J C M C M C M O J C O O J
CoQ.
uinoQu
s"0.
O)
O
Srf^
•oc3U.
oo3
wcooS1tzo
•i M
C O
ULL
OU
GH
RE
AU
.S
W B
TR
AN
S M
AIN
3E2S
OQ
t S
WB
CA
MP
B
B38
59 0
01
WIN
DM
ILL
RU
N
r- mY"1 f^
o? co0 0
OJ CMOJ CM
0 0in mCO CO
'one P
ump S
tatio
nlE
SE
RV
OIR
SW
C P
ress
ure
24800
005
| part
CIR
CLE
VIL
LE
R
CM mCM mr- r*.
CM CMCM OJ
0 0O OlCN cnr co
: o: i1 UJ 11 CO I
LJJ 1
4800
005
part
CIR
CLE
VIL
LE
R
coT—
£
CM01
OoCM
^
:hbhK
VO
IR
gro
up
:E Z
ON
E T
M P
HA
SE
1:Q
DR P
h 1
r o: 'jj 3 £_i CO to> m S
J U O£ 5 53 co toao
01 OlOJ OJo oo oo oco co
O CDCO CMOJ r--h- r-
OJ OJOJ CM
O OCO OCD CMro -3-
IE Z
ON
E I
MP
PH
2
i Q:
COCOLJJ
o
to
o!oooeo
mCMr-r-
OJOJ
ooCMr
N.
Wa
5335
001
part
ULLR
ICH
WT
P -
«
£
K^
CNCM
O
CM
1 67
MG
D IM
PR
OV
EM
EN
TD
EX
P/1
67
MG
DC
ON
1I6
7 M
GD
IMP
RO
VE
ME
NT
5335 0
01
part
ULLR
ICH
WT
P '
5335
002
part
ULL
RIC
167
MG
5335 0
01
pa
rt U
LLR
ICH
WT
P '
cn i- o
£ £ p:
CM CM CMOl Ol OJ
O O O
O) CM CM
CN
o cOi_ ^
1|D if)Q.
OD)
CM
CMOJ
COO)
11
1
1
6683
002
part
Wate
r Tre
atm
err
6683
002
D
art
Wate
r Tre
atm
en'
T- CO
m m
CM CMOJ CM
° 2CO <
D,
|
- 2
• °- QOJ
oococoCO(O
,_r-
CMCM
°.CO
(A
Q)EV23.jQ
E5Q£
o>Q.20)
Q)
Uo:Q.
ooeoOJr-co
or^I--o
r-OJCM
O00COco
u
<
CMOCOmcoco
OJOloOJ
r—CMCM
oCOcnco
° CO
IIo.3Qcn
oo,-
co
^_CDO!f-
r-CMCM
OOJO)co
QLUJ
00
Ocorocn
to
O01
t-OlOJ
oCMcnto
t£UJ
CO
oCO
COCO
0
CM
1 -CMCN
OCOcnco
\~ UJ
o gQ O
m coro co0 OCO rom inco coto co
0) tDCM OJ0 OCM CM
t- r^CM CMCN OJ
0 OCM COcn cnro ro
£ x-s|o> ^
o.3OD)
CMCMOcoinCOco
CO
oCM
r*-CMCM
QCOcnco
2
1_l H
cls MO 0X cn
Q.3SCD
OT"
OcomcoCO
S. CDo mo oCM f^
r- r-Ol OlCM 01
O OCN CMO3 COCO rO
CM inCO CDO Oco coin inro coCO ro
co r*-OJ V0 0CM CN
S- f-OJ CMOJ CM
O 0CM <OCn cnco ro
OQJ>
&3Ocn
C1P6
ff oC Q i n t O i n O O C O O C O O ' - C O C O C O ' -CM r-- t ^ c Q o > c o ' d - c N w - T t i r - t a
itco
C M C M C O C M * ^ C O c O C M r - - C D c O c OC M h - ^ f t n c M T - c o i n t o o r r r - - S 3:CO
00 CO
CM CM
O O
S 2O CDO
T-«- oN- COrO CM co co
o c o c o o e o r - m i - T -O N - i 1 — c o s n t o i n t o c ot D c n c n c o i n c o c M ' - " -
«> 3 CM CMm uS
co in CQ co in * " h- m r - co ID to to h— h— ID m t t *•* CM o CM co coO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q OO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q O O O O O O O O OC M C M C M C v J C M C M C N C M C M C M C M C M C M C M C M C M C M C M C M C M C N J C M C M C M C M
a cu) op K]
CO CD <
O O O O O
O
C CD
O O O OCO CO CO CO
u oCD CD
o
I I §
« *- .- « _in ifiI '
O
3 33 3 "3 3 O O
O Oco
-S o(D O5
(0
Pro
ject D
esc
CM co o co r- r-S S 8 S S Sco co co co co coin in in in m mCO CO CO CO CO COco co co co co to
oo inCM T-O COm m
oooooCO CO CO CO CO
O O O O OCO CO CO CO CO co co coin in in
CO CO COco co co
O) O Ol Oo> oCO ISo oCM CM
§£
u-
t— b- l1 - T-- I— f- N.
O O O O O O O
co co co co co co co
T- N-CM CMCM CM
r- r-CM CMCM CM
r- f~ r r-_ h,CM CM CM CM CMCM CM CM CM CM
O O O O O
co to c*) co co
O O O O O O O OCM CM CMOJ O) Olco co co
CIP7
CO O5 CO O b-CO CO O *- CMCM T CM CM O
ssO> CM
5
OO
03 OT- CMCO CM
CD i— CD*- o ino in CM
CO CO COco co coCD Ol OT
t1^ l1^ COco co coO3 Ol Ol
om3in
1
Oto
COin
1
OCO
CO
Is1to
CO
toCO
to5oy?
om5
1.coto
<Jm51oto
om5w1o
CO
om30)
-C
oCO
Om2co
£g
<o
w E yra CM c&C CM CO
£ o,,:; £
en
co•<* CD
O)
OCM
8BJ O
o£§£0)5"i
Q
wes
t A
&B
Faci
litie
sS
ite D
evel
opm
ent
CC
#3 M
U
£ <o m
C/3 0)
f t5 to
Q32CO
SO
O
CO
55a.E
D_CQ
(A0)3"3oCO
I_J
S
36
Tra
nsm
issi
on M
ain
CC
#
tnmVSj=
oCO
16
Tra
ns M
ain C
C#3
-MU
D
CQ
O0)3JZ
•so(0
o
Res
erM
or#1
C
C#3
MU
D
CO
Q)§
£
CO
:acih
ties
u_
QZ>^en-*
^
OCM
So
CO
D=3
OCO
0)
OJafl>cro
U)
COQ
M
(PS
dis
char
ge)
SO
MU
D
t-COc
_J
ma
<u
om
s M
UD
South
west
A Z
one
F;
J£CDO
CD
5
DIDSo5>
g03
COQ.E3Q.cuc-1<a3=
Q
0)
UD
South
west
A Z
one F
acili
t
2c
•"-1
2
<
c
D o
qi "
srco
nnec
tor
MR
MU
Das
es 1
1A
2 3
4A
4B
M
R M
l2
Tan
k (S
laug
hter
Lan
e)
MR
•ow
th C
omdo
r M
UD
#1
Res
ervo
irs
NC
AG
C-M
UD
•» Z 01 tn &— Q- 2 S"*- i- -- HJ
•*- O — iCO p^ i™* *-*
t3 *"< < < < g3 S *> 75 oW CO CO £ X
Ocu5"£
iI9>
co r^i - r-CM CMCM CMIS SCO CO
CIP 8
wff -K
13
to co o •>-r^ co co Ooo co -*t o
O CO COo oen en
O •- r» £D-g- to co cod) in CM r- to to en
to to
ssCO CM
,53
Q.E 'oo
CO CD IDCO CO COen o> o
en m m in tn inEO *- *- i- *- i-cn o o o o oT- CM (M CM CM CM
8 2 en f*.S3CM CM
Dra
inag
Basi
n
w v ^ v 333
CO CO C/3 W
c c c c c c c - s - = - sO O O O O O O c r c r t ?ID a) ta ia ia i/i in i i i
SaD
£ £ £ E E E E E E Ec o c o c o r o r a r o r o r o g r a
ill 1111111O O O
CO CO (13 (0
a. a. a. = = = s;
Ham
s B
ra
Ham
s B
ra
E E
ate
r Im
pact
Fee
Pro
jst
s in
100
0s)
S c S1 ro3CM
n
Pro
ject
Desc
riptio
n
oz
w
U>
6
j!
•ocL.
cooBcou
(1
o
! M
GD
WW
TP
o
Gar
field
Tra
c
T*
OoinCMo
coinoa
r-COCM
Or-m
iS iS in in
a.
en
cc
RC
PTR
R E
XS
T to B
OG
GY
CK
INT
ER
CE
PT
OR
INT
ER
CE
PT
OR
above
tt
— z LVJ uj^ = LU LU
O U O O
o o o oz z z zo o o oT— T— T—
S S Sr~- CM r01 en N-T- CM int -*t ^f
•^ ^ c o.nj rp fo xrt rt_ Q. p
0>
m Q oin 5 CMCM in enO 0 O
- r- h-CO CO CON CM CM
O O Oo CM r-co co co
o.
ien
RC
EP
TO
R P
H 4
tunnel
INT
RE
ALLO
tu
nnel
INT
ER
CE
PT
OR
TU
NN
EL
Z LU UJ— UJ UJ^ OL trO O Oz z zo o oz z zo o o,— ,—ssOT h-O> h^CM mV TT
"C C Ciro ro 3Q. d £
01
to inCM CMtn ino o
r- r-CO COCM CM
CM CNCO CO
CM O CO CO to <D CDT}- CO CO CO CO ID CD
u.
CLUJ
Z
fc Q.
RE
EK
IN
T P
H II
F W
MS
ON
CK
IN
TE
RR
EE
K T
UN
NE
L &
GR
AV
n C
reek
Inle
rcepto
rk
Inte
rcepto
rn C
rk I
nter
cept
orn
Cre
ek I
nte
rcepto
r gr
ou
fj O O O OJ O O
"z o: z e A E EO ffl O ro ro roW _j CO = o = -5 ^ 2 ? S > >i I 3 E * *—I ^ _» 0) S 4) O>
ISill33»- »- CM CM CM CM° Q Q o o oO 0 0 O O O•f »t to oo CO CO
T ^1-
r r r t: Q.co ro ro co 3Q. CL CL Q. O
CT
to m -^ CD in mo •*}• " o> to o>co «o *- co co coo o Q. eo O co
i- r- r~. r~- r- c-co co co co co coCM CM CM CM CM CM
8 0 z o o og ^ ^ CD co
co co j in co "* "* 0. ^ ** "*
to CO COco co co
Q.
1Ol
K
T C
RK
IN
TE
RC
EP
TO
RT
CR
EE
K I
NT
T C
RE
EK
IN
TE
RC
EP
TO
I
z z z_ 1 . ] 1
UP
PE
R W
AI
UP
PE
R W
AI
UP
PE
R W
AI
^ T-
S o0
o o1" *-"co eo
•c r o-a t$ ^d 2
Ol
,-G) C)00 COCD CO
h- t~~co coCM CM
O Oco co3 m-J-
CM O O^ CO CD
"CR
EE
KIn
ufB
ulte
rmilk
Inut/B
utte
rmilk
cr ro re
—1 CD CD
£ S §> _j _iLU Q. O.
E O 0
CM CO CO§ CM CM
O Oco to toen CM CMco en o"i
"* *
•c cro roCL CL
O O COS CO CO
in toO CO CO
r- r-- h-co co coCM CM CM
O O 0co r-- coco 10 3
oCD
CL3
eO3
:£
£3CD
3"ro
JB
3Q.
(J
a2Ol
toto
^
o
55CM
6o
D.
O
^__COOtoCMOl
inao
r--COCM
om
CM CM
a.3
nch
Int
erce
ptor
nch
WW
Int
erce
ptor
nch
WW
Inte
rcepto
r gr
o
ro ro roCD CQ CQ
Upp
er H
ams
Upp
er H
ams
Upp
er H
ams
T- T—
O OOl Cftto tor- r-
•C t: CLa ai
o>
r-- toO toQ. 0
h- t--co coOJ CM
z o3 T-
.?
E
sau U
tiliti
es
1P
urc
hase
of
CM
intoCMr«-
O)
CMeo
COCM
OCO
o pn^ ^
o:
CO CD
O CO*- oo o
CIP9
W£ Ws3
m o ooCM 0co tj- t n T j C M t p C M t O t O C M C M •-
CM o in CM CM mT- CM CM
c o i n o i o O T i n o * -eo eo CM in eo o *t«- r- to to t oo inen co o to T- r- T- .- T- -r- Ul
ottl
o o *- i n i n r o c o c M i n o
ao a m o CM mto Q o f•- CM »- T-
O
laQ, flt
OO
COo
CM CM CM T-_. _ O O O OT- — CM CM CM CM
CO CO tO tO tOO O O O O
S3
r - t o i D i o c Q_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ o o o oC M C V J C M C M C M C M C M C M C M C M C M C M C M C M C M C M
M- if CM CM CM
rti & Q Q. o. O- O O. O. O Q 3 Q J < U H > ( U < D a j Q ) ( U O-Q ~v ~o r y a ' Q ' f t ' a ' r r c e c e c K : o o o o u o o o o o-gjO-g; C O C O C O C O C O C O C O C O C O S w S n U J i n S i n i n S J S j
O v fl — = ~ ^ ^ ^ ~ ^r = - ^ • ' ^ a - j ' w - * ' - * ' ^ * ' ^ ^ ^"r; ^ ( P ( p C p C p ( y i P { u E p ( p *< *v M.**.*!.*!.^.^.^.^.& & o o S 6 o o o o t o c o c o w c o c o c o w w c oa ( 5 c 5 o o c 5 o o o o
o o o o o o o o
_ C _ C £ C _ C _ C C ^c o t u r o c o n j c o c o r o5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
E £ E E E EO 1* 1J 03 Q> CJ« W « « in 01>.>. ^ >.>,>.
CO W tO CO CO COQJ fl) O 0) U <U
c "E c c c cUJ UJ LU UJ lil UJ
0.0.0.0.000.0.0.0x x x x x x x x x x
O . Q . O O . O O . O . O .x x x x x x x x
Q. O. Q. O Q. O,x x x x x x
01 01 o1 o) o>
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E Ein iS u> in uS ifi
E T-
Pro
ject
Desc
nptio
n
oz
(/)
po
D)
•oC
c(J
icoo
r"*
•egi
onal
WW
TP
Site
MW
IN
TE
RC
EP
TO
R
PH
2h
Inte
rcep
tor
Ext
No
of 2
91
3m JC/J CO Z- o: co«9 g£g °t jJ 2
z 5 5O O T-o o om 03 o>ID CO CDCM i*- r--.f- T ^
O) CO O)CO CM OT— co ojQ. » Q.
eo co coCM CM CM
o o ot-~ CO t--m g in
Z Z Z ZO O O 0
ER
CE
PT
AN
DD
IVE
RS
IE
RC
EP
TA
ND
DIV
ER
SI
ER
CE
PT
AN
DD
IVE
RS
IE
RC
EP
TA
ND
DIV
ER
SI
NilO O O Oo o o o§ 0 0 0
o o om m m oopi o) o eoCM CM CM tS^r ^- TT i
"C "C "C CS. S. S. S.
in m m to- h^ r . coin m r •$0 O 0 0
co to co coCM CM CM CM
O O O OT- <S ci oco to co «j
O)
O
T A
ND
DIV
ER
S;
Inte
rcep
tor
atio
n
Inte
rcep
tor
uj £ g S
uJ ® = tuZ co ro
•< 1/1 ia in
Q *•****.**.
O Z Z Z
O 0 0o o oto eo eouS uS in
o t; e c§ a S. o.5.
i- CM tOr ^ St~- •% oco o o.
to co toCM CM CM
O 0 ZIs- S ;?in to "*i"^ "* n
Inte
rcep
tor
grou
p
fe
Iro
u
^Z
o.
Sra
mi*- co en"" 10O Dm Q
to oLU -" a>
U7 r-
Q- 1
Q« U
is|^ ^ ^ ^co co (/} a)
S o o oo o o
to to co toco co eo coS CO CO to
co co co
-c -c -c cQ. Q. Q. CL
. - c o ^ t m
a> co co eo
to to to coCM Cv( CM CM
o o o o
? ^ $ $
orth
tnca
l S
ubst
atio
nou
thor
th
IIII*£, *f. ^to to to <n
sillco co co toco co co coco co co toco co co to
n -c -e -co. o o o
tor^ -CM
CO CO CO Oj
co co eo coCM CM CM CM
o o o o
5 § $ £
j*^to
ico
8CO
r
ta
toCM
z
rt
0)
D to
75
MG
D E
XP
AN
SIO
N >
iS
•to
o.2CT
N £1 *" 0o ^ £ S,
WW
TP
75
MG
D H
YD
60
tf5
Mgd
In H
ouse
75 M
gd U
pgra
d P
h1W
wtp
Ext
& I
mp
EK
WW
TP
PH
AS
E I
II 60
UW
WT
P 6
0 t
o 7
5 M
GD
EK W
WT
P E
>P &
IM
P 6
0E
K W
WT
P60
TO
75
MG
D
^ ^ . ^ . ^ L l J ^ L U L i Jc r i g - t B - S a r c E i r a :O f f i S S O O U O
5 $ H ^ 5 S SZ 3 3 3 Z Z Z Z
^ ^P ,ir ^~ ^r ^S O -^5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3
r- T- ^- T- 0 OO O O O O Oto co co co 01 to CMCM CM CM Ol r- CM _.o o o o m o £3to co to co ^ co £J
oo- e t r t r t t r r S-aaa.s.as.a.1
Cl
S T- CM «- h- m ooa> to to CM CM in
*- O> T- r- Ol h- T-co o eo eo o o oo
co to co to co to toCM CM CM CM CM CM CM
O O Q O O O O
f ^r to Si r-~ coco co m co ^ 'j
51 «
ND
IN
LET
SC
RE
EN
SS
ides
trea
m T
rmt
Pla
nt R
etS
AR
Dig
este
r H
ouse
Reb
u2
Add! G
BT
sA
dditi
onal
Inl
et S
cree
nsS
ludg
e P
roce
ssin
g I
ncre
as
UJ -o T3 -g -g T3m e c £ £ c
aj o) ai a) <D> CD CD CD CD CD/A >fc >* >^ >^ >^^ n n n j^ n•^ m w w w in
O o o o o oX X I X X X
T- CO CO CM CMO 0 0 O O
5 iS CD iS toto to to to co
tr c t e t aa CO tn TO 01 3
d. Q. a. Q. oOl
S o t-- t~- »^ ^ co co*- •- o o o
CO CO Q, Q. O.
co to to co coCM CM CM CM CM
O O Z O O
*" 3 5 ^ *"
o
CIP 10
S o5 u
O O O CO CO tor-- r-- inCM (O <J>*- T- CM
o o o o O r- cor- «- coCD co to
W I3*
CO CO O! O tN CM C3 tO Tt-o m o r- roco <o CM m co
o coO h-in cn
O coO O)CM CO
o oco in
co oi in3 r-- CM
in o>
<t Qa. ra
oO
o in to toS BBS
CO CT) O Oen cn o o01 U> O OT- i- CM CM i- CM CM CN CN
to to too o oo o oCN CN CN
OD) C
c »i nra (Oa
01 CU 0) CD
_to _ra _co _rato to to to
O O O O O O
co ca ra n> co ca
O O O<D CD 0)
JC Ji jtfro cn fa
Wal
ler
Cr
Wal
ler
Cr
Walle
r C
r c c c co o o oE? E C Cfl) <0 fQ TOO O O 0
o CP cu cu-* je jc jco o o oCD 5 CJ QQ D Q Q
u_ ix.CM CN CO CO
E E
CM CM CM CV
cn & cn o>E E E Em in m m
CO CO.j -JS E E5. Q. a.cn cn cn
\fi o inco in co
UJ g
n
Pro
ject
Desc
riptn
oz!h
»
CDITO
>*o
•ac••
Sc01E
b.3
EV
Cfm
%0^
O
Q
. O
CU
LLE
N/S
OU
TH
LAN
D S
ER
VIC
E E
XT
CU
LLE
N/S
OU
TH
LAN
D S
VC
EX
TE
NT
l'A
KIN
hi
gh s
choo
l
,- ^ caS O i-
o oi- i- CO
CO CO COco co co
O CO O")CN h- Oo co gCO CO CO
i-- r«- N-CO CO COCN CN CM
o o o
3 3 5
IIcin
CO
Dev
elop
er R
eim
burs
emen
ls S
laug
hter
&I
Vi v* T «c? E t Szj CO O O]« to Q; E — co cara 0 ... . 3>
JOU
RD
AN
CR
OS
SIN
G W
W L
LIN
E (
SJO
UR
DA
N C
RO
SS
ING
SV
C E
XT
EN
T!
DE
LL 1
8
WA
ST
EW
AT
ER
LIN
ED
ES
TIN
AT
ION
PA
RK
/TN
D C
OLL
LIN
EB
alco
nes
Un
Sta
tion
Rel
ief (
ST
AN
ZE
LD
evel
oper
Rei
mbu
rsem
ents
Wal
nut
Cr
r~- h- v co r--o o 5 o 5CO CO CO CO COin m in in mto co co co roCO CO CO CO CO
Q.
QO)
•- O h- T- CN(N f- O CN CNO cn g CT CMCO CO co CO CO
r^ t>. r- r- r-CO CO CO CO COCM CM CM CN CM
O O O O O
TT -ft TT m m
DA
VIS
SP
RIN
GS
SE
RV
ICE
EX
TLa
ke C
reek
LS
Cap
acity
Inc
reas
e
T—Oo1-
gM uj
*- >to >cn QJeo 2
f- r-CO COCM CM
0 OCD C*-
5!?
<nCO
CO^L
Dev
elop
er R
eim
burs
emen
ts L
ake
Cre
e
Q.
ecn
Z)
BE
RD
OLL
FA
RM
S L
S
& F
M R
EIM
B
^scomCOCO
coO)coCO
r«-cOCN
om
TR
IAN
GLE
SQ
UA
RE
Rob
erts
on H
ill D
evel
opm
ent W
W
CN cnS3<f> co^ inCO COm co
t-. a>•r- COO O
r- r~CO COCN <N
0 O
m mTt -<J-
II
*Pjf\
Dev
elop
er R
eim
burs
emen
ts W
alle
r Cre
a1cn
ME
TR
O C
EN
TE
R S
ER
VIC
E E
XT
ME
TRO
CE
NT
ER
SE
RV
ICE
EX
TM
ET
RO
CE
NT
ER
SE
RV
ICE
EX
T
to to coo o oCO fO COin in mCO fO COco to to
CM «t tO
CO cO CO
r-- r-- r~-CO cO COCM CN CN
O CD OCO O3 CO
3 3 ?
COCO
01cu
Dev
elop
er R
eim
burs
emen
ts C
arso
n C
r
Q.
1ra
TR
AV
IS C
OU
NT
RY
toooeomCOto
rooj
O
r-fO(M
OCO
C)•D
•=: C C
WIL
D H
OR
SE
75
mgd
pac
kage
pla
rW
ild H
orse
Ran
ch W
W
Rei
mbu
rsem
eW
ild H
orse
Ran
ch W
W
Rei
mbu
rsem
e
to to coO CN Tt0. co CL
c- i . h-co to coCN CN CN
o o zN- f- rfin in iTt ^ J
II
tup
Dev
elop
er R
eim
burs
emen
ts D
ecke
r C
r
agO)
CNIIX
Mar
bndg
e F
arm
s W
WR
anch
o A
ltoD
evel
oper
Rei
mbu
rsem
ents
Bea
r C
ree
S T-
1"-
0 0
S rtin
CO COCO CO
a.
Qcn
to cn*- 30 OCO CO
r- i--CO COCN CN
0 0c- r-in m
CIP 11
V ffl
5
CN •*• co in CDro co 3 ID coCO (N CO CO CM
oitoaiiOco coT- <o
cooigit--CM 01
in o-r- ino coco to
<oin
CO CM
T- o> CO.
(O r-- CD CO f-- o>
S S S S 8 S S01 Q d co eg oio> o> h- Is- in in•"" c S c n c O co coco co coco coco
G^ cQ C 7 > O c 7 ) O> O O") Q) O) O) Gi 0)
« 35— «n 03Q
-5 -D o: =
p W
UJ 7^
en o) O) 01 en3 3 3 3 3m _ra ^2 CD to
tn «
co co ' r e r a nj co5 5
& SE *-tl c
»
nS(M
5An
u. u.
V) w
E EQ, Q.O) cn
8S
C
CoQ.
£&o0o°ol
o"Z.
^di
<S>
S1
O
>,D)<
C3
a01Eg;3
E
1_a5"Sril
o cdz S SQ a •- w
^is i? w« 233 UJ UJ t?
c " g S w 0
^ E ^ l S? < o c Es p^i-B^" S B ^ ^ I"6 2 S cu S. -Sl^sfls l f ^ s iS^^ IS ieo o cv r- co CMm (O to to i o0 0 O O O 0
S CO CO CO CO COm m in m CM
to to co co ro o<o co co co co in
co co in r- o to
co co co co co co
t~~ r- r- i— r- f-to co to co co coCM CM CM CM CM CM
o o o o o oin in in in m m•* •"*- •* •* -t T
E0>
tt>,V)
S
onal
Was
te w
a
m
W*
^ul
CD0)
6
13
mc
c0)
0>>
£
5Q.n
w
CD
P=55o^2OJ
E>.03o.to _co co>• E*l
£lii
CD ^= D #
4 S
laug
hter
Cre
ek F
acili
ty
DSOQ)
«s0)o1
EL
•oc£0)3c>A
K
rt
ioco
CM
O
S
O
i
Sou
th B
ranc
h In
terc
epto
r an
d E
xten
sD
#3
Sla
ught
er C
reek
Fac
ilitie
s
D2Oegy6
rv.m<M
36-in
chJD
48-
54-m
cl
^
pS o2 a»s^O "3
CO <N«a _
Nor
th B
ank
Upp
er S
laug
hter
Cr
Int
AS
laug
hter
Cre
ek I
nter
cept
or P
hase
s 1
to to
co coCM CMEN) SiCO CO
f- r-co coCM CM
1
aZ)S
o
aks
MU
D S
laug
hter
Cre
ek F
acilit
ies
Sla
ught
er C
reek
Int
erce
ptor
1 &
2
S
O•gc co(0 T-
£ to? CMO ?J
<f> CO
f*.COCM
^1CO lf>
DZ)SOtn
Sla
ught
er N
orth
Bra
nch
Inte
rcep
tor
!S
laug
hter
Tun
nel
SO
MU
D
^ i—^ pL,
c^ Soo oo
N- r--CO COCM CM
aks
MU
D O
nion
Cre
ek F
acili
ty
O•aCO.c
W
o
i B
oggy
) S
O-M
UD
Oni
on C
reek
Int
Pha
se 3
(S
laug
ht
Tces
tem
Oak
s M
UD
5-_(Q
1
>
r*.coCM
u
CM lA
ents
VW
O M
UD
d2
V
WO
-MU
D
Nor
th W
illiam
son
Cre
ek I
nt &
Eas
emS
outh
Will
iam
son
Trun
k P
hase
s 1
an
r- r--to co<N CM
30-in
ch
ity ir M
R M
UD
t A
ustin
MU
D W
illia
mso
n C
reek
Fac
ilW
illia
mso
n C
reek
30
WW
Inte
rcep
tc
CD
3
U-.CJ
to
r-COCM
iUD
72-in
chO
60
inch
w S IJS 0 s•=008c12u. O <^ 2 0« O *S °0 0 m S3 < c u, m
il A
ustin
Gro
wth
Com
dor
MU
D #
1 W
aiLo
wer
Wal
nut
Cre
ek W
W I
mp
Pha
se:
Upp
er W
alnu
t Cce
ek In
t P
hase
s 3A
3
Gc<x> inO 9j= co
r- r .co coCM CM
O
CO
OO
5is•= CMOra <<U. £3 *~
- ? (rt
GC
MU
D #
1 W
ells
Bra
nch
Upp
er W
aW
ells
Bra
nch
WW
Tru
nk L
ine
Pha
se:
E7>
_c
o
COCM
•* toCM V
=> S2 oo aO co<£ <J
5 2™ _jco *-"U) >s
<9 c£ 2
Upp
er W
alnu
t C
reek
WW
Tru
nk L
ine
MU
D#1
Lake
Cre
ek C
olle
ctio
n an
d In
terc
epto
i
cat
.ct:o
r--. r-.CO COCN CM
s
CIP 12
TaWe 3 Future Projects in the OP(Costs in IOOOs)
Timing uncertain or beyond 2015 or not serving ne\v users in 10-year planning horizon
Fund/Agy/OrgWater
Ser No Orgo Name
3960 227 P0233960 227 P0373960 227 P0383960 227 72293960 227 P0433960 227 P0323960 227 P0333960 227 P0363960 227 P0393960 227 P0403920 227 P054Plan 227 P047
Fund^Agv/Org
4570 237 P0884570 237 P0044570 237 PI 374570 237 P0374570 237 P0494480 237 P054NEW 237 NEWNEW 237 NEWNEW 237 NEWNEW 237 NEW
44802378172
5038003 Anderson Mill Elevated Reservoir6936 002 Martin Hill Elevated Reservoir6936 003 Martin Hill Pump Station6683004 Anderson Mill NWBTM6935 006 Spicewood Springs 24-inch TM Upgrade6935002 FM 1626TM ManchacatoS 1st6935003 BoyceLaneTM6936001 Shoreline Drive TM6936004 Grand Avenue Pkwy TM6936005 Vista Business Park TM6939001 Harm Ridge Blvd Loop Connection6683006 Jollyville/NWA TM
WastewaterSer No Orgn Name
3333021 SARExpansionto 100MGD ff
3023014 Walnut Creek Expansion7265004 Wildhorse WWTP Expansion to 3 5 MOD3164023 Homsby Bend 2 Added GET s3168037 Pearce Lane Lift Station Upgrade7025 002 Pearce Lane Area Interceptor Dry Creek
NEW Elm Creek Area InterceptorNEW Onion Interceptor Upgrade Slaughter to TunneNEW Onion Interceptor Segment 1 Bear to SlaughterNEW Onion Interceptor Segment 2 ETJ to Bear
3333002 SAR WWTP Land Purchase (1999)
Cost
320025003500
291001010293533064000
133978385
0
Cost
596258465057501450
200
828020000280001680040004191
CIP 13
£ g. £c c cCO A3 (QE £ Eat g> c tu>. >-. ,= >.•= = U •=o o n ure re . nja. a. So.ro re cL c0
re re£ Ec cE E
SS
S Ess
Ol D> OlE £ cc c cre re reS E E
o o oco 03 raQ. Q. Q.
<TJ TO rtE E Ec c EE E E
co ro ry
rem
aire
mai
rem
ai
i E Ec E cE E ES CM CJ1
Ift fM
5f
<
lort
hwes
t
re
E
orth
Cen
t
§CN
C
3w
s
uS
^£
CJ1Ol
U
s(/)
O)o>
CJ2
3to
0)
yS<
§CN
43iti
re S
yst
iN
01
in>,
O>
e
§CM
E.£7S>,«0)
c8n<B
OL
O 2** ^K tnou
co? CB
a. «e Q0o
Dra
inage
Basin
re caE E0) »
_>. ^,0 U tla a «ra re g
"re "S —E E gE c 5E £ -S
CO CO OCO <PCO A*— fO
^
<o coO) co reOl CJl C
Fra^
s C
ount
y C
rW
alnu
t se
rvic
eW
alnu
t C
reek
(DE££.uTOCLreu
"reEcE8CM,_
CT)COOl
Lake
Cre
ek
oS
ing
cos
crec
1C
5
&_
CM
CON-Ol
Cro
ssto
wn
Impact
Fee L
istin
gP
revi
ous
Tab
le 4
P
roje
cts
Re
mo
ved f
rom
1 S
Rem
oved
Wat
er I
mpact
Fe
e P
roje
(All
cost
s in
100
0s o
f do
llars
)
o<r>
Pro
ject
Desc
riptio
n
»"S•atn
u
(0 CO*-* 1-
Q
liO
5£ Zy ^C O
Nor
th A
ustin
GC
MU
D #
1 W
ells
Bra
iN
orth
Aust
in T
M P
h 4
(B
umet
/Mop
aiN
OR
TH
WE
ST
A T
RA
NS
MA
IN
itJr--(N
T CO
LU
BU
RA
TTI
PE
CO
RA
II R
EIM
BU
RS
EM
AK
IN H
igh
Sch
ool
CO ID
f 5Is83
u o
e£ TO co to-* c -t tr
m
? 9 2 Q. wo =! 5 a ai.«) 5 T P -
^|ol&>m
Villag
e a
t W
este
rn O
aks
MU
D S
outh
part
Bro
die
TM P
hase
s 1
2 an
d 3
part
Tra
nsm
issi
on M
ain
Eas
emen
tB
rodi
e T
M P
hase
s 1
2 an
d 3
VW
O-
Map
le R
un a
t A
ustin
MU
D S
outh
Zon
Bro
die
TM
Pha
ses
1 an
d 2
MR
MU
D
? 1 ?CM E CMCM D) CM
CO CO
QJ IU <U
Ol O) O)S E Eo o o
§ SsS- 0o ~~
ULR
ICH
WT
P 1
00 M
GD
AD
Dm
ON
7\
ULLR
ICH
WT
P 1
00 M
GD
IM
P
70 to
ULLR
ICH
WT
P I
MP
RO
VE
ME
NT
S 7
0
CD in oCM CM CMCM CM CM
h- 01 01
%Og1
Q.
Rem
oved
Wa
ste
wa
ter
Impact
Fee
(All
cost
s in
100
0s o
f do
llars
)
V
V)
Pro
ject
Desc
riptio
nU]
^ TO CM
^
lit(_}o:0 ou- (5T, a^ CM
TR
AV
IS C
OU
NT
RY
LIF
T S
TA
TIO
N &
WA
LN
UT
CR
EE
K W
WT
P 1
8 M
GD
4.
IBM
TIV
OLI
O) -r- tjt9 °? Sco coCM CM CO55 p] 10CO CO %
ca.en
i~-
Nor
th A
ustin
MU
D #
1 C
ontr
act B
ond
Lake
Cre
ek
Lift
Sta
tion
part
.
CR
OS
ST
OW
N T
UN
NE
L
i 5
CIP 14
Us 1% the methodology described later in this document major facilities targeted to benefit new growth were identifiedand the portions of capacity serving existing and future users estimated To provide an overall comparison of thecapacity and costs associated with new growth projects versus those associated with existing needs the recent CapitalImprovements Program (CIP) projects of the Austin Water Utility have been divided into the three groups AppendicesC and D include those projects from the FY 2006/2007 CIP built in prior years or scheduled to be built in the next fewyears that are targeted to benefit existing users and to meet stricter safety efficiency environmental or regulatorystandards Tables 1 and 2 list those water and wastewater impact fee projects that have been built or plan to be built mthe future and that will largely benefit new Utility customers during the next ten jears Table 3 is composed of projectsthat are anticipated to be built late in the ten year planning period or beyond and thus are not included in the group ofprojects on which impact fee calculations are based
A comparison of the dollar value of projects in the Appendices and Tables, 1 2 and 3 gives an indication of the relativeinvestment in capacity to serve existing and future needs {as defined by the law) as a function of the CapitalImprovements Programs (CIPs) of 1980s Some of the projects in Appendices C and D will certainly benefit futureusers however in order to take a conservative approach to ensuring full compliance with the law they will not beconsidered impact fee projects when they are made necessary by environmental and regulatory requirements Otherprojects in Appendices C and D will also benefit future users as well as existing users (annexation areas highwayutility relocations and certain trunk lines internal to the system) but when their benefit to existing users outweighs thebenefit to future users they are not included in with the impact fee projects in Tablet. 1 and 2
Analysis of the level of existing usage of capacity in the case of water and wastewater treatment plants is astraightforward examination of flow data Flow data for pipes in the water distribution system and wastewatercollection system is generally not available so hydraulic models are used to help estimate utilization levels ot pipesunder selected demand conditions (existing or future) The summary tables at the end of this document Tables 12 and13 include an estimate of the existing users and the total capacity of impact fee projects expressed in service units forwater pressure zones and wastewater collection areas Inspection of these figures gives an indication of the level ofexisting capacity usage and the reserve capacity associated with the facilities
In the January 1999 addendum the City extended the scope of the impact fees to cover decentralized cluster wastewatertreatment and disposal systems for which some funding is provided by the City No such systems exist m 2006therefore existing capacity use and commitments of such systems equals zero All new facilities of this type wi l l beused to serve new development
In sizing and timing new facilities both population projections (the Land Use Assumptions) and trending fromhistorical flow data regression are used in predicting demands (flows) associated with future growth These demandsare then input into the computer models Model simulations yield the necessary pipe capacity to meet pressure andflow performance objectives The Utility s CIP planning employs cost effectiveness analysis to identify the bestinfrastructure timing and sizing investment alternatives The principle factors weighed m this analysis are
* bramstorming of alternatives* capital costs* operation and maintenance costs* time value of money* economy of stale* environmental and other key non pecuniary impacts
Note that occasionally development policy or political considerations run eounter to the facility alternative derivedfrom cost effectiveness analysis In typical utility engineering practice the above factors result in a cost beneficialrange of reserve capacity of ten to thirty years depending on the type of facility The Utilitys CIP especially thegroup of impact fee projects is the set of facilities that will satisfy needs for additional capacity in the next ten years asindicated by the Land Use Assumptions
The Utility seeks to maintain a healthy cost effective amount of reserve capacity m the water and wastewater systemin order to carry out its mission of providing safe reliable service In this way the commitments that the City makes toits customers in the form of tap sales service extension requests developer reimbursement contracts and MUD andother district contracts can be fulfilled in a manner that allows all parties in the development process to planefficiently The impact fee methodology prescribed by state statute serves the function of quantifying the cost of thereserve capacity that constitutes the Utility s plan for serving new customers for a ten year planning horizon
CIP 15
Ill IMPACT FEE FACILITIES AND FEE CALCULATION METHODOLOGY
The facilities that provide the bulk of wafer and wasfewater capacity for new growth '« Austin s service area are listedin Table 1 and Table 2 (and again in Tables 12 and 13 in Section VI) They were selected from the complete list ofplanned projects including the major facilities built with contract bonds and developer contract reimbursementsaccording to the following criteria
(1) Has the predominant function of serving new growth rather than existing growth(2) Does not provide repair operation or maintenance of existing facilities(3) Does not upgrade expand or replace existing facilities serving existing development in order to meet
stricter safety environmental or regulatory standards
These impact fee projects represent the individual projects that provide capacity necessitated by new developmentprojected to occur within the next ten years As shown m Table I and Table 1 most are already built as part of theCity s CIP program with only a portion not yet constructed Major impact fee facilities are shown graphically in Map1 and Map 2 Projects removed from the project listing adopted in the 2001 Impact Fee CIP are shown on fable 4
To determine the costs of projects attributable to new growth the Texas Impact Fee Act outlines a conceptually simple4 step process based on quantifying the demand versus capacity relationship for projects in service areas The processcan be stated as follows
(1) Determine capacity of project in service units and cost per service unit(2) Determine future demand (capacity used up) for project in service units for the ten year planning
period(3) Determine the project cost attributable to new growth which is the cost per service unit (step 1)
multiplied by the planning penod demand (step 2)
To complete the impact fee calculation the law calls for the calculation stated in step 4
(4) The construction cost per service unit may not exceed the amount determined by dividing thesummation of the costs of the capital improvements (step 3) by the total number of projected serviceunits for the ten year planning period from the Land Use Assumptions
The difficult part of this methodology is step 2 determining the capacity that will be depleted in an individual projectduring the planning period One might be tempted to simply add up the cost per service unit of each project to come upwith a fee This would be invalid because each new user does not use a service unit of capacity in every new projectand would result in double counting Instead the spatial allocation of new users from the Land Use Assumptions mustbe used to estimate the actual usage of a given project To carry out this approach in a manageable manner the waterand wastewater service areas were divided up into subareas pressure zones for water and drainage areas forwastewater Sets of projects are assigned to each subarea and the capacity addition to the subarea system is thendefined The assumption is made that each new user m a subarea uses a service unit of the available capacityassociated with the selected set of impact fee projects in that subarea The structure of Tables 12 and 13 illustrates thissubarea methodology
The resulting calculation for each subarea may be considered as a weighted average cost of impact fee facilities basedon project dollar values for improv ements al the locations called upon for service to new growth
Calculation of the impact fee is not sensitive to the length of the planning period or the number of new growth users aslong as all projects have more than enough capacity for growth (in excess of capacity serving existing users) in theplanning penod as is the case with the ^reat majority of Austin s impact fee improvements because the number of newservice units occurs in both the numerator and the denominator of the fee calculation The calculation is more sensitiveto the location ot new users If a large proportion of new users arc projected to locate in areas with high cost perservice unit for impact fee facilities the calculated impact fee is correspondingly higher If instead more are projectedto locate in areas with few or inexpensive impact fee facilities the calculated fee will be lower
CIP 16
IV SERVICE UNIT DEMAND AND CAPACITY RELATIONSHIPS
Calculation of the impact fee in accordance with Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code requires the use of asen ice unit Within the definitions section of Chapter 395 Service unit means a standardized measure of
consumption use generation or discharge attributable to an individual unit of development calculated in accordancewith generally accepted engineering or planning standards for a particular category of capital improvements or facilityexpansions
To use a simplified explanation the number of projected new service units will be divided into the costs of capita!projects allocated to this new growth in order to calculate the allowable impact fee (per service unit) A journal articleby Ray Farabee e ta l states that the Service unit is one of the most important but conceptually difficult elements ofthe (new) law This article also observes that Cities may select their own standards for measuring service units butany measure chosen must attempt to accuratel> reflect differences in service consumption between users
Austins capital recovery fee ordinances ha\e for years used the service unit for this purpose and it remains the mostappropriate choice for the service un i t under the terms of Chapter 395 The service unit is based on the size of watermeter sold Table 5 on the following page illustrates the relationship between service units and meter sizes Theservice unit calculation depends on the relative differences between the various sizes and types of meters as determinedby their rated maximum flows and rated continuous flows The same ratios apply in both cases since the ratedmaximum flow for each meter is twice its rated continuous flow
The number of service units is determined by the si?e ind type of the water meter purchased for the property and inaccordance with the schedule in Table 5
1 Farabee Ray Lisa K Anderson and Sara Swanson Impact Fees The Intent Behind the New Law St B TexEnvtl L J Vol 19 1989 pp 68 73
CIP 17
Table 5 SERVICE UNITS ASSOCIATED WITH METER SIZE AND TYPE
The size and type of water mcler purchased determines number of sen ice uni ts in accordance with the followingschedule
METER
68
10
SIZE5/83/4
1I 1/21 1/2
22334466
1012
x 2x 2x 2
TYPEpositive displacementpositive displacementpositive displacementpositive displacementturbinepositive displacementturbinecompoundturbinecompoundturbinecompoundturbineturbineturbineturbinefire servicefire servicefire service
S E R V I C f c U N I I S1
1 52 55
10162425425092160250330
based on domestic demandbased on domestic demandbased on domestic demand
The service unit is determined on the basis of the American Water Works Association (AWWA) standards C700 02C70I 02 and C702 01 recommended maximum rate for continuous duty (flow) of the meter purchased at sale of tapThe service unit as described here has long been in Austins existing capital recovery fee ordinance it is wellaccepted and it is extraordinarily easy to calculate at time of fee collection (at sale of taps or during the building permitprocess) In addition it is based on criteria that directly reflect the differences in service consumption and capacityrequirements between different users One of the best benefits of using meter type and size for determining number ofsen ice units is that (he owner makes the decision based on his or her real needs The decision is not made for theowner on the basis of prior guesses of impact as would be the case with LUEs land use etc
The projection of new service units is problematical m that it depends on types and numbers of meters sold while thebasis for the forecasts are population and employment converted to water and v. astewater flows
This problem js handled by calculating the number of service units in the water system today and assuming therelationship between service units and projected usage remains constant m the tuture In other words an updated countwas made of all meters in the system in January 2006 by size From that list the number of hypothetical service unitsinstalled in the system was calculated That figure is 316 147 service units as shown on Table 6 Then the serviceunits were divided into the weather normalized pumpage for FY 2004 2005 which is estimated to bi, 51 321 milliongallons (actual FY 2004 2005 pumpage was 51 374 million gallons) to obtain a system wide normal weather averageuse of 445 gallons per day per service unit (or 0 31 gpm)
CIP 18
Table 6 Estimate of Service Units m the Austin Water System
Meter Size5/83/4fI 1/41 1/223468101216
MetersJanuary2006*
16848678688324
18354730511 144
64431213449
10
Service UnitMultiplier **
11 525
558
16952533
56 19846(242
330
January 2006Service Units
1684861180220810
90177352440819391163131750313 1946086
3300
Total 193,578 316 147
* Meter count January 2006 without individual customers in wholesaleutilities** Service Unit Multiplier based on historical mix of meter types withinsi/e
Actual F\ 2004 2005 usagein million gallons 51 374Weather normalized usagein million gallons 51,321
System wide normal weather a\erage usegallons per day per service unit 445
Wastewater Return Flow Rate 62%Wastewater average usegallons per day per service unit 275
All future forecasts are derived from projections of population and employment These are then converted toprojections of water use and wastewater generation These projections are always weather normalized to isolate theeffects of growth At that point if the assumption is maintained that the relationship between water use and serviceunits will remain iairly constant then simply dividing the average daily projected use by the 445 gallons per day perservice unit figure obtained above will produce a projection of future service units and consequently new service unitgrowth
CIP 19
Waler Service Unit EquivalencyThe average flow per service unit can be used to establish land use equivalency factors For residential use 445gallons per day per service unit divided by an average flo\v per capita of 112 gallons per capita per day (residential usedivided by population for the ten year period) yields 3 97 residents per service unit The number of residentialcustomers per average service unit in Austin appears to be very high because this calculation is skewed by the largeptrcenta^e of customers living in multi family housing and by municipal utility districts with master meters Thesetypes of customers typically have large master meters with more efficient ratios between number of users andmaximum capacity (on which the number of service units is determined) than do small icsidciitial meters Forcommercial/industrial use 445 gallons per day per service uni t divided by an average flow per employee of 97 gallonsper employee per day (projected non residential use divided by projected employees) yields 4 58 employees per serviceuni t
The only measurements of land use that are used in the calculation of capacity service units and impact fee are (1)residential population and (2) commercial/industrial employment See Table 7 below
Table? LAND USE SERVICE UNI T EQUIVALENCY MATRIX FOR THEWATER SYSTEM CONVERSIONS FOR A TEN YEAR PERIOD
Average Numberof Commercial Average Number
Average Number /Industrial of Gallons/DayService Units of Residents Fmplo>ees Water Use
1 397 458 445
Meter size selection usually involves a count of water using fixtures and an analysis of the number of fixtures that maybe used at one time calculated by a builder engineer or architect The result is d determination of the flowcharacteristics of a structure or other facility relating the land use to continuous and maximum flow requirements\\hich m turn are compared against meter flow ratings to select a meter size Thus a given meter size reflects a userdefined level of use or consumption in terms of flow The average dail) flow of one service unit defined above waschosen as the basis of consumption in this analysis so that every customer charged an impact fee will be placed on auniform flow based footing This says that on an average each meter purchaser would be expected to use about 445gal/day per service unit of meter capacity purchased The corresponding maximum dav and peak hour consumption(needed to determine the required capacity m facilities) are readily determined from the known relationships betweenthese flows derived from flow measurements in the water pressure zones
Wastewater Service Unit EquivalencyAverage daily pumpage and the average meter capacity based service unit of 445 gpd/su defines a water service unitThe wastcwater service unit is determined by using the flow relationship between average daily water pumpage andaverage daily flow to wastewater treatment plants This is one expression of return flow
Three years of data indicate the resulting return flow ratio the average daily wastewater flow to average daily waterpumpage to be 62% When applied to the water service unit this ratio yields a wastewaler service unit value of 275kpd/su
vvastewater service unit (su) = 445 gpd/su x 62 = 275 gpd/su (see Table 9 text does not reflect rounding)
As stated in the Land Use Assumptions one dwelling unit using decentralized cluster wastewater treatment anddisposal systems is assumed to equal 1 5 service units The 1 600 projected dwelling units usmfc, these particulardecentralized systems would yield 2 400 service units
CIP 20
Service Uim Conversion FactorsThe foregoing basic service unit definitions arc specific to particular terms for relating magnitude and duration of flowaverage daily pumpage in the case of water service units and average daily flo\v tor wastewater Utility facilities aresized using varied design flow criteria To calculate the capacity of a given facility in service units the basic serviceunit value must be converted to the necessary design flow basis for that type of facility using the appropriate peakingfactor relationship These relationships are shown on Tables 8 and 9 along with the capacity sizing basis for each typeof facility Note for example that for wastewater li t t stations and force mams a peaking factor of 4 is used to convertthe basic wastewater service unit (275 gpd/su) to a wet weather peak basis so that an infiltration and inflow flowcomponent is factored into the calculation of service unit capacity
V SERVICE UNIT DEMAND PROJECTIONS
The Land Use Assumptions provide the foundation for estimating the cost of capital improvements attributable to newgrowth by making it possible to quantify the demand for service from those improvements The source data obtainedfrom the Department Transportation Planning and Sustamability gives population and employment data distributed bytraffic serial zone within the City s extraterritorial jurisdiction The serial zone distribution not only allows the Utilityto allocate growth to the selected impact fee service area but it also can be translated into demands at specific points inthe water and wastewater pipe networks using the computer
The translation of population and employment demand data to flow based service units was described in the previoussection Land use data expressed in service units by Planning Area was included in Table 5 of the Land UseAssumptions reproduced here as Table 10 Using what are termed demand computer models the tiaffic senal zonedemand information was allocated to water piessure zones and wastewater drainage areas to quantify demand bysubarea Model demand sets for 2000 2010 and 2020 were interpolated to produce demand sets at the beginning andend of the ten year planning period
Demand projections describing the impact fee project subareas are presented in Tables 12 and 13 All water pressurezones include impact projects and since they do not overlap the ten year growth summed by zones equals the systemwide growth total Accounting for the growth service units in wastewater project drainage areas is more complexsince the drainage area of one interceptor project may be a subset of a downstream interceptor project drainage areaFor example the Slaughter Creek project drainage area is a subset of the Onion Creek project drainage area Serviceunit totals by wastewater treatment plant drainage areas are also presented to indicate a system wide total
CIP21
to fa
1 1s= =<u CDO) O)2 2S ¥co ru"ra 13? sc cc eCQ TO
ZD ^CO CO
& O-O) D>in it
II iiD DCO COaac cg o
c cqj nja (3| |
£E LL
E £
u oS 2 £S Q) 0)£ to coo 5 £(n *-* *-
Q* CO CO
u 5 5* 93 "™ g g£ (M CM
50u. D,- to
1 &CM <U _
IS<D(O
OUCQ
S f
CDVQ.
1LL -
§5 fcfsi a> -n
O ^
trt
oo
i- LLO rT,
(M £nQ.
01U)CO
CQQ.
c=N
(O
OCOa.
(3
^COLL
CDS*/
II
S
^
1
O
T.
II
5
RT-
raE
^
s? ^Q) GQ toC Q.JS ™ic °S ej0 S^- «LT) Co> to
K<a
nj-aXTO
^a
CJ
?1£TOS
m m in in
X X Xen <D CNCM <M CD
3 3 3
S o i a > i - - < D n i p ( M c pT ^ i - p - - r - . ( M C M < D e o
• * ' - ' ~ c o r ^ o i - - C M ^C M I N I C M . - 1 - - - C M C N C M
1 1 II II I II
X X X X X X X X
{ M C M t o i n t o e o c o c M C Mt M C M ' - O C O O J ' - C ' J C M
C N f y C N C M * - » - t N C M t MX X X X X
C M C M r - O C O O ) T - ( N C M
C M C M C M C M i - T - C M C M C M
* S
a) S
c » g c n c ^ u > c o a > ' - ' -| S S c ^ g S i S f f i c o
II tl n II n ii 11 II IIr ^ i n u i c o m i n c ^ c D i nS a s o — 5 f C M C M r - - > -
m e o o o r -m ' -• < J - t ^ ( M C - 7 ^ M n C O - J -x x x x . R x x x xinininmi'mininm5 5 5 ^ 3 ^ 3 5 5
§ CQ O LO h»» (O LT1
o § o S in ^ ( ^ c ^ c o o j f O r o c o ^ *
e o c o g i n ' t M i n ' S g J g
ii n |( u ii ii n |, nc N C M - c o o r - m , — . ,-r - . f - . f - C M i o . - c o e o e o
f O f o ^ r o c M r o ^ r ^ ^
33|lsiiS|
^ ^ r - S S ^ S ^ c o
3(Or-•«•
coCO
n5. =3TO COo ^"> raS O )
togsf- IIXCO
aCOo«S1
CM
(0
DWaio
cS(OCM
a
to (/]o ~;co caOl OiCO 0
S COm
"- I.xraQ.CO
^J15S8
CO
on
(£
tt
5m
CM<D£
15
V"o•z.
TooD)
Oc
(3•afa
5in_>.
ruoei)c3OuuCDO
"cO)
ca
1
£ < CQ ug5 5 5co <o to 10
O CQ <
o *Z •-
CIP 22
>,ff"oraQ.nO£«
"ora
LL.
•£tn-
§ra
LL
OOSQ)
COoED0>u£0)CO
o»Ara
(A0)
OnLL
4>(fl
*1a
in<nco.aSo
B= CO
(U 10en TOra -Q
¥ 1ro ,gro o>3 raSi 2ro ¥-, roCO roT1 3
^ cQ. S°> roE Dc* CO
" ^« rat«* «Xm u'"- m- CD
M 3I <x>
2*CO "
S -jCOVJ
^ rl0 °*= &
Def
initi
on a
t 61
73%
ret
urn
Def
initi
on a
t 65
/ re
turn
Ben
3 30 0d Hc cP D0) 0}0 0E vcQ> 01w to
ewat
erew
ater
</> toCD ra
^ > >
S T-0
O 0rj ?5
3oLI D- CO
CD e i-0 ^ CD0 -* Qcsi e
0 ^e ^t?
tuto
OoCO
<p U.S ,-,.o 21
CM =j»;rooQ.
1E D— to
§3 i(M (D
U X£ raQ)
CO
oQ
coT- U_
CM EraQ)
CL
en</>romen
NCO>,tjroa.roO
>,
oraLL
toc
IL
cac
C*J
5O)CO
XCO
co
01ro*"
1^•C 0
s* aTO roc °
11E 2S 'c3 rox CL
re ii
S _3 re£ Q.w —ro E5 cES raS £CN t-
m njc c
S row
CM CMr-. N.CM CM
II II•* •*X Xco coCO CO
^ ^
*»_
peak
hou
r flo
w=
75
/ of
p\p
e 1
uH c
apac
ity
peak
hou
r flo
w=
rat
ed fi
rm c
apac
ity
s 1§• roy to£ cC ~1— ^5 5o oCM CM
tf\u J1*-CMII
^^Xmr~CM
T-
<U
Oc^~"o
^
ro
roc
annu
al a
vera
ge fl
ow=
plan
t ra
ted
capa
city
& —a S3 —OJ Q.W T±™ S§ C=*• t
S TO8 sCM 1-
~ Q. S
"S
pe
to
S 5o
CIP23
T 3; CM o oCM O U- CM M-
w Ol CO 1 — h- ^t"i_ c -q- T- coJo S -c
-s is i a
w
Tf in to co inT~ OJ f"— O 1~"
co to CM en in
3 T~^ ^D h - W}
m o i»5 2 E™£ =»
eo r- r- m oen m ^r co to
« 'g Q *~T" •*,* ff\o o yCM 1— 2
CO CM i— f-- ^Jf- CO OO CM CO CO<V CM i- r~ O i-
m E D -_ HI >» f1!£*S -2 ^co ^ B. 5E E5 UJo
CO in in to co to
8 --. o co en m o— r*-" en co CM in
S£ s §C 0 XJ U.5 N £ 5•e <i>? *
£ o i- ^r co m*1J Qj (\J CO OO F1—C cO CO lO LO ^D_O CO C? Ol fQ CM"/n 0} CO ^™ ""
O o | E^ CM Q> -1
s w
5_oCQ . jjj . rt (
j>
.c ^ jH Q -^5 S § o^ CM K= 5
ra00: _ CO O CM tO (O
r to in O 10 cOf— ^E J) v- -r- r- 0 r-W g E Q "-
< M a 2* E« UJc
co 01 CM r*- ^0) rg T- O CM CO O" i to en en CM Tc m c Q$ S "6 O_ CM w 5o 3)c Q^ot) — CM cn T m
0* -n ^^ f"
£ t^j *oC Qi P
o c 5 ET- « <C C
o E 5JD
CD — ^ o o o o t p c o c n o c D ' - o i c M h - o o i r ^ c M c oo oo oo cn CM CD T— cS o co m co in ^^ ^ T— CM o ^ — o tf>CM CM T— T- tD CM i- *- CM *— CM c n C M L O C O T r r - - 1 ^ ^ -
CM O tO O} CO ID CO CJ} CD T CM O CO i — CO CO *f CO T— (O ^ — C^~ co to co co co co co to ^~ cj r*1- CM cn co co to ^~ co co coO J O ^ - C M — c M i n c o ' C - i n i n c M i - o — i n r ^ c o o ^ r c Sco CM to I**** co co in CD co co CM 0) f*** ^^ *^~ co r**- co r CD cj>
O l O N - Q O ^ ^ c O O O l T — O K* h^ ^ in CO O CM ^ — CO Ccn co r^- to cn ^ — o) cn QI co cO in ^~ CM cj) r*** o^ r^ cM CM ^~ c
o^ 10 ^™ r*1^ co co to ^" m to m co co to ^" co r*- ^r co *^ f cT- T-
a - ^ - t o c n T - i n c n o i n o i n c o o o r o c o c M t o o c o m oc o o c o ' i - c n c n o i r — o ) i n t D ^ r T - v - T T ^ r ^ j - c o a ) r ~ . o
^ f T - C O c n ^ C M C M O O O T — CV^" C M ' ~ " ~ C O C M C O T — O O
c O ' ~ r v j c j ) O t D O O * T i ~ i n o i ( — ^ • c M C M c o c n T r m c o oc o o r - - e N a > i - i o v c M ' - o c o r - - T - i n e o T r c M ^ r c M t Q o^T *^ co ^ m in ^ co m in ^ m ^^ ^ co CM ^r CM CM CM cn c
cn cj) CM in f*^ m ^™ CM co co 10 o^ ^~ co CM co co ^~ co CM f o3 pc.
cnco o} ^" m CD 10 ^r oo *~ co ^^ to co co oo cn CD to to m m
CM
co co in co m CM ^ r**- CM ' cn CM ^ CM t - co in co in CM ov tocn *~ o^ T~ in oo ^~ oo ^— co cj 10 01 co oo *T CM CD co ^? cn CDCO ^r CD P*- r ** tD CO rO lO ^J" " h*- CM " cn ^^ "cf CM CO CM CM CD
HT".
C p c O i O ^ - T - O O O i - C M ^ J ' i n C M T - c O O > C O ^ F ' - * J - l O C M Oi n c o t O ' - T C M O h - i n t o c M C M t n t o o c o c 3 c D r * - * - C N O• ^ • O C M C O C M C M C M O O C O — C M ' - i - T - O C S l T - ' - — O O
S ' ^ t D O O C O O c n c D C O C N r - C J J ' ^ t D t ^ O^ ^ CO CM tO CO CO r- f . to CM CM CO CM T~ CO
r o c o c o c n i n ^ - ^ r c n T r ^ r c o i O T - c n c M O C M ' - ' - ' - c M O
c o r - - o o c n o — c M c o T r i n c D r - - o o c n c o j - c M c O ' t > n c o t - .
00
CO
1 —
mincn-3-CT)CO
COcoinf—
cncn<oto
cnO)
COo
r-•fl-
tocn
,_too•*
toCO
oin
mr-01CO
C £,
- ro> ~°
"3
CO 0
£ m
^
CM
0)TStuo:_^
?2
C5ro
o
VI CAPACITY AND COST ATTRIBUTABLE TO NEW GROWTH
Decentralized Wastewaler CostsEstimates of the capital costs for the construction of decentralized cluster system treatment lacihties and disposal fieldsrange from $15 per gallon for daily flow to $40/£,al/day depending on the complexity of the treatment facilities thetelemetry equipment and the nature of terrain and topography These estimates assume the use of low pressure dosing(LPD) fields for disposal For the purposes of this projection the mid ran^e figure of S25/gai/day was selectedBorrowing from State and local On Site Sewage Facility rules the daily flow of 360 gallons per dwelling unit isselected which corresponds to large single family houses Therefore the estimated typical cost of these facilities is$9 000 per dwelling unit ($25 x 360) Since each of these houses, is assumed to equal 1 5 service units the cost perservice unit \\ould equal $6 000 ($9000/1 5) The costs stated below represent the entire service area and are notreflective of a specific development
Table 11 Total Costs of Capital Facilities for Decentralized Cluster Wastewater Systems C1P
Cost per Service Unit Ten year Projection Total Project CostsOf Service Units
$6000 2400 $14400000
Interest costs are not added to the total project costs because the decentralized cluster wastewater systems CIP projectis not anticipated to be financed with bonds The total project costs shown in the previous table would overstate thetotal impact to the City of Austin since the City is unlikely to fund or reimburse the full costs of the cluster treatmentand disposal facilities Although no such system is present in the Capital Impro\ements Plan for the Year 2007 ImpactFee calculation such a system \vould be an applicable candid-ite project for future impact fee assessments
Central Water and Wastewater Capacity and.CostsTables 12 and 13 present the capacity and cost attributable to new growth according to the impact fee methodolog)outlined in Section III The cost used in the impact fee calculation is simply the cost per service unit multiplied by theten year growth in service units derived from the land use assumptions for the subarea served by each set of facilities
The following outline illustrates the methodology used to calculate the maximum impact fee allowed by law Theletters of each item correspond to the lettered columns in Tables 12 and 13
A The reference table to the Impact Fee project listing tables
B Project description Columns A and B are used to identify the Impact CIP projects
C Unused (part of project descnption)
D Project size This is the design size of the facility
E Pressure zone or drainage area
F Completion date
G Cost to build The cost to build a given facility includes the cost to the City for land acquisition engineering andconstruction along with related cost components The cost is listed in thousands of dollars and excludes interest
H Interest cost The law allows interest cost to be added into the cost of a project if the impact fee will be used torepay both principal and interest The amount of debt service assigned to each project was calculated by the Utilityusing the following assumptions all bonds for the selected impact fee capital improvements projects were sold atthe same time an interest rate of 6 O/o was assumed and (he term of the bonds \vas thirty years The amount ofinterest cost is indicated in thousands of dollars
I Total cost to build (G plus H) Tables 12 and 13 provide price figures with and without interest to provide a costcomparison
CIP 25
J Design capacity of impact fee new facility or expansion Capacity of the impact fee projects are expressed inservice units for the subarea as a whole All of the projects in a subarea are evaluated as a group to determine thebest estimate of capacity added to the subarea by the facilities acting together Typically one project size bestrepresents the capacity addition for the subarea as a w hole See Tables 8 and 9 for capacity equations
K Cost to build per service unit without interest (G divided by J)
L Cost to build per service unit with interest (1 divided by J)
M Year 2005 land use assumptions Tht population and land use level m a particular pressure zone or drainage area mthe year 2005 expressed in service units
N Year 2015 land use assumptions The population and land use level in a particular pressure zone or drainage area inthe year 2015 expressed in service units
O Growth users (N minus M) The number of semce units of new growth entering a particular pressure zone ordrainage area in the ten years between 2005 and 2015 Each service unit of new growth uses a service unit ofcapacity m the set of facjhlies making up the subarea
P Impact costs without interest (K times O) The cost per service unit of the facilities multiplied by the number ofgrowth users in the specific pressure zone or drainage area excluding interest
0 Impact costs with interest (L times 0) The cost per service unit of the facilities multiplied by the number of growthusers m the specific pressure zone or drainage area including interest
R Existing users The number of existing users (expressed in service units) whose service is enhanced by the additionof the facilities in the subarea therefore capacity attributable to existing needs
S Excess service units in the subarea (J minus R minus 0) The number ot service units remaining unused m thesubarea impact fee facilities ifler the 10 year planning period
Steps A through S define the costs of the impact fte projects attributable to new growth The procedure for summingthese costs to calculate the maximum allowable impact fee is presented in the next section
CIP26
I-3 e
•5u. «
a *-
s s
E £
"Iflll
?gjv O S " U I
3 S J3 W.g1"3
°lsts!
°- Mli°£° S I *
*f £3 =°5 I|S j
., 2 = B.D
S "2 s f3 .
_* 5 B E <n
jiifr- 2 in -,
,ij|a2 2 r
~l|" «
|.
^
° 8 *
|u. |a
u |ln.
o(0
o
B
1
Pro
ject
Desc
nptio
nit
Org
n N
ame
•* 3S 1-
S £ £
r» Jp c
- " -
S ^ £2 S
D U O
111S
IS CO q
f- (M
CA
NY
ON
CR
EE
K X
WV
C P
UM
P S
TATV
ON i
TM
gro
upD
e\d
opef
Rei
mbu
rsem
ent
Nor
thw
est C
'
r-l
0.
1_
S
£™
§
S"
n—CN
3o
S
5S
1 s^s l
s a s s sr-. «)
IIII
Vi fi w ifo u u o
1111
Iiiit/> IL
i a* !fi
5 "^
F 1
ly S
a
Tha
t D
el
rrn n
es C
apac
ty A
dd
FOU
H P
OIN
TS
RE
SE
RV
OIR
S (N
WB
&C
)W
ES
T8
UU
CR
EE
K P
S en
g.ne
enng
Four
Pol
ts
/NW
B T
MD
enet
oper
Rei
mbu
rsem
1
h4or
thw
est
B8.
C
2a.
§^
1
S°
sR
i/l
n3
O
O
1$"
3 5 S S S 5 g ; s
uj <s o i i o r j - T ^
Ilillill
dojmainKanim
.? s i s fe la^ l ^
1 t-
Fac
1 ty
S
That
Det
erm
ines
Cap
acity
A
dd
RO
UTE
620
TR
AN
SM
ISS
ION
M
AIN
MIL
LWO
OD
NW
B T
RA
NS
MIS
SIO
N M
AW
1 JO
LLY
VIL
E T
M g
roup
1 JO
LLY
VU
-E P
UM
P S
TA
TIO
N1
AN
DE
RS
ON
MIL
L T
RA
NS
MIS
SIO
N M
N 2
4A
ND
ER
SO
N M
ILL
TR
AN
SM
ISS
ION
MA
IN I
AN
DE
RS
ON
MIL
L R
ES
ER
VO
IRD
e-»l
ope
Rei
mbu
rsem
ent
Nor
thw
est
8
4
8a
£PI
I
r*-
ffl
i
N
8
?.
3
3^
I
isx- 5
u if
Tf h-
i
1-"S
5
i
S 8
1 I
1 R
Fac
1 ty
Siz
e T
hat
Det
enu
nes
Cap
ac ty
Add
i H
OW
AR
D L
AN
E P
UM
P S
TA
TIO
N &
TM
gn>
"I
«"3
r^
t
-
!Ǥp.*u1
o
183
j- 3 O m o f;
£ g s s s gt * f •- !>-
lllii
D Z Z Z 2 Z
:
.Jl 0,
FJ 4 Ep (D -4 CO•s rt •- ft r* ^
! 3
Fac
1 ty
SttC
Tha
t D
et
rmm
es C
apac
ity A
dd
i N
OR
TH
WE
ST A
PR
ES
ZO
NE
RE
S M
art
Ii
161
FM
182
5 In
terc
onne
cti
HO
WA
RD
LA
NE
EA
ST
TM
I D
evel
oper
R
imbu
rsem
enfs
Nor
thw
est
A
4I
For
est
Rid
ge/N
WA
TM
S
™
S
I
STT
ID
35
T
O
5
§1
S £
5 Sa K
j
S
1
1
2yt
S 3
i!
1 =?5 -S
i (1j i5 f
1-j)-s
s
T
ito
so
1:
1
S S s s sm *-
8 ^ £i p ;?m ^ o *
<E * rt
• <- OJ »-
£ £^ §
_
E ^. cr o*N t
5 £ «- PS S
—i 2
Fac
1 t
y S
tz
Tha
t D
elei
m n
es C
apa
ty
A
A*
DE
SS
AU
RD
TR
AN
SM
ISS
ION
MA
INI
DE
CK
ER
LA
KE
TM
/JO
HN
NY
MO
RR
ISi
De-
fllop
er R
eim
burs
emen
t N
orth
T
1 H
owan
J La
ne R
eSer
*»re
N
CA
GC
-MU
D
5
""
o
o
§s
ssto
fD•*.
ft
"
1
tS
s § a § ° §
R S I S S B5 " *" *~ "*
Hill
t £ £ £ £a a i a
o o o o c3 3 33 3
2 2 2 2 2_
5 "5r fe. ,1§
S c.
Fa
cilt
yS
iz
Thai
Det
erm
nes
Cap
ac ty
Add
1 N
OR
TH
TO
WN
TR
AN
S M
AIN
1 H
OW
AR
D L
N/N
OR
TH
TO
WN
TR
AN
S M
AIN
1 N
OR
TH
/EA
ST
AR
EA
WA
TE
R I
MP
S
m
w
i1
NE
AU
SflN
PU
MP
MG
ST
AT
ON
1 N
E A
US
TIN
TR
AN
S M
AIN
"
?
f"g
§
12U)
S
«
?
10
1
;c-
3
§S
§ S ? 2 g
J? v •- rv •--J ^ f*J C^
iiii
e e 1 2
0 0 O C
L
5-
? r2 S 5 ^
5
Fac
1 ty
S
Tha
i D
eten
n n
es C
apac
ty
Ada
1 D
ads
Med
m
Ser
vice
TM
1 S
H13
0 C
ross
ngs
1 D
CM
etop
ef R
m
b rs
m
ent
Nor
th C
entra
)1
US
290
EA
ST
RE
SE
RV
OIR
SS
§ID
S
t<H
•ss
_
V
a
so
1*
3 Ss§
111
o y c£ £ £5 3 3
z z z
Usg
!J> -j r-
5
Fac
&ty
S
That
Det
rm
nes
Cap
acity
A
dd
1 E
lA
ust
TR
AN
S M
AIN
1 S
PR
ING
DA
LE R
OA
D A
ST T
M1
ULL
RIC
H T
O G
RE
EN
TM
gro
up
C1P27
« - i 3 s 5
5 W
«
-3B t to
c s5 2
I ^ =* 8 ° Sm
ll sI * lo
5 ICD O
o
^ ^ A A A A p A5S8
w l iO O
i D i V t yu u O
S »fN
£i2
ti 1?
: O a> Hi> B t
, CO = ^
K g £
3 f"
K S0> C*
3 =ID
°S
S3
gg
-- *
ID .-
"
Sc1
r-
$
0
01 CD
3 3
i iIIm m3 3
i i11
CO IE3 3
1 IIS
CO3
|
1Ul Ifl tO tO tO 01 Ul
s s
opoi R
aim
bura
m
ert
S
outh
*™ i A
I
wre
st A
SI
Deve
lopm
ent C
OIJ
W J
O
II
5 8
Lane T
M
ps <
* hafg
e)
SO
MU
D
Lane P
um
p S
tatio
n V
WC
H1U
D
5<5
4^nch
48-in
ch
48"
lnte
rconnecl
o<
M
R-M
UD
TM
Phase
s 1
5A
2 3
«A
4B
M
R-M
UO
o>
a3
££
5£
SJC
1-
sin to u>
n01
o
1O
4
5
R
2
!
g
*
«
"
>.
i3
|
5
io)
iS1
m
j
o
in
«
U«CD
I
1
W0.
"8
-u
m
E
1
*&
o
2
!s
o
I-.
10
s
o
Pio
D
r>M
m
o
Lft
f-3
g"o
«
t
3
n
g"
i-g
S
3 R™ -
83
Si
2gCN
h- ^
gg
u>.
^
5
c
uI
j
i
i
t
|
to
b
CD
Sto
IK
1
|
1
i|I i||i iII
[/> tO tO CO tO Ol
to
CA
MP
BE
N M
C C
ULLO
UG
H R
EA
LL
1
s
JWLL R
UN
SW
B T
RA
NS
MA
IN
LJ
fcS
ll
§
c f>
£?5
west
B P
um
p S
I t on C
C*3
MU
D
wesl
B 3
6
Tta
n m
«io
n M
ai
CC
*3-M
•rw
eS
lB 1
6"T
»n
M
aj
CC
B3-
MU
D
M*s
t B
ReS
KM
or tl
CC
*3-M
UD
IIII
C1P 28
£ § s
*• MlF O E
*1
o £= ^
a°e E
I ~«o B "3
SB
ri T 3 S> S S
8 8 8 8
w in w in a>
b
Zon
e P
ES
ER
SW
CC
IRC
.S
WC
PR
ES
SU
RE
ZO
NE
TM
PH
AS
WC
Pro
s re
Zon
e P
h S
ty IC
^ m8 S i-
n »s e•e gUJ 111
0 *
ft !ss
l! 1
1 1E 2
CIP 29
Ill-
c >, S m 5 "_ o u °-u x>
>• it ,? a i wrt ** u. i-J r\
i ° — S s!s SS31
rtpt
ie
•* OICft N
3 « §0 <i Im S « " A
a
C1P 30
R ^el
E P A
ND i er
t£) 0*^ ifi
g S S g£ E | | |
5 £ I i
E u, c o: i- eO 5 E B 5
fj tN « IM PJ
" "1 i"^lo-
in "~
in C ffK s " I "
UJ
°iSli
"1^1o l lBa
£ u 3
« .§C 3 'B. DZ 5 3 ? |«
*§
= l|t3i> _• ^ u
• J 3 » a£ " - o ^ S& *» :»• ~ 1 w ! g
^59 S >•
S | -||a«c e0 -a 3— ~ 5 t5 3S £ 2$m
5?"- ui •_*
£ i 5 ?TS S<* Sa. *•i — -a
;| ° J-|3- sa5 u. -5 Sn C D
a*
8, c
a-
Q dW
O
B
Pro
ject
Oes
cnpt
on
Org
n N
ame
< "S3OL £
*- c& IT)•» 1
n --« '
o *~S 5- IN
c cS Q.K K
cn v
O ^
(H IDw $
aIa
GO
VA
LLE
IN
TE
RC
EP
T A
ND
DIV
ER
SIO
NN
Au
stin
Was
lew
alef
Int
erc
ptw
gr
oup
04 <M
1S
to
^s
s3
«S
s
E>
brten
E
«
£
S
£o
-
y
S2
§ °0)
n u
S
Q£CM
O
o I; o
cj
•i1 tN
^
Dev
*tope
r R
wm
burs
emen
l C
arso
n C
ree>
rj
a*0
IDIN
Ul
in
•T
0>
0
ooIN
moo
moo
^UJ
s
0 5
T O
"<D5s
1
-a
J=;3
i03
(M •—
04
1O
"a
E
JD
a
* ta
!N
8
_o(N
n
"
to
S
inSfV
,_3«
S
T
O
3CN
0CN
f IN
A «<n o
"
Oj
R
! 1r i
i-
•inT-
&IP
RM
MA
Red
ve
lopm
ent
Cat
ell
sS
ER
d v
eim
burs
enie
nl
™
I
o
01PJ
Sx
1
^S"~
o
D
S••
"
•iID
^ grl 01
1 c
§ c-n O)
flSK
1
! !
i IL. •
j
<fi
^
£. sO
i
IwQ.
I <
ty
IT
-T
toS
jr
,
S
sHFg
•9
2s
3
oo
3
;
rj
1 IgS g § S g
8 gSS g K S S01 in rj as - -
fM r to ^ h^ 1/1 10g g g g a g gS K H - - - -
" * § « i c i = it 2 - a a 3 5
•a E3 uj
UJ
g. c £ 12 c c S
in •» S 5 oj £ co tC*>F*J" l i - ^ - 55 ^" M
91
8 -» O IN01 fc rf wi < ®tt ., S 0) S •- "
UP
PE
R W
ALN
UT
CR
EE
K
INTE
RC
EP
TOD
e^o
pef
Ren
nbw
sem
enl
Wal
nul
C e
etA
sl
m B
l S
ky I
n I
nc S
ER
227
1 de
velo
pei
mbu
rsem
e t
Low
er W
ain
1 C
reek
Ww
Im
p P
has
s A
NC
AG
C-M
UD
Upp
er W
ain
1 C
reek
hit
Pha
s 3A
3B
-wN
CA
GC
-MU
DW
efls
Bra
nch
WW
Tru
nk L
e
Pha
ses
12S
3 N
CA
GC
-MU
DU
pper
Wal
nul
Cre
ek W
w T
ru k
Une
Pha
NC
AG
C-M
UD
M W (N CM (S CM «
12
nin
a10
10
o
s*•
n
g
n%
S
0o
>-o
3n
MM^
at oi c
£ « 0n --
0 S ?
s «s
D tj
S i"~ ^
3 :•§ "i3 ?
_i -j
r fecr =«
LITT
LE W
ALN
UT
CR
EE
KA
CW
P U
ltle
Wai
n t/B
ttem
ilk
grou
p
CM rj
C1P 31
•> 0 22 u 5 ™ 9</) S 8 < >.(£
* iu 3 ° -*UJ </} --
ift ge^K p " *o (/)
UJ
T3 _ ,- a „_ u W 6 O
lsir j
. S » a e o"• £8 * - *
CO £ £o>i -32 U 3
« S, ¥ 3 I-Dz o TJ B in
01 S 3
~* <
« sg 3 a 3
2 a a E mrj C3<
V O „ 3 S5 - 2 V) £ -,
» "s^-3 *
"™ «. T 43*~ * 5 » 3 ! =(0 _ K — Oo =r « m SB° .0 O "••-.
p
0 S S ° m 3W Si ^ v & Q. Iri£ & £ s s0 Su -e - 22 — ie 5 ^31" S O ffl3 £ >- (3
51
-5 * Hs S sa*E c STI« 53* s ,s ffl• S oc =tti S
5 L. s aV
S
H
f =
£ (O
0 rif
O
B
Pro
ject
Des
pt
on
Org
ntia
me
< 5 3o: ^
r*> idS
O r-N- ^J
»- o
p Oi
JJ ^
i i3 3
Is
I5*T n T
«si
De\e
lope
R
em
burs
em
ent
Lak
Cre
k
'.
Lake
Cre
ek C
olle
ctio
n a
nd I
nt re
plo
r on
l)t
paci
ly)
PJ C1
r^
SsOl
s
CJ
5?
S(V
"-[O
2»
r>o
^
o
?i
S
S71O>
7> S *f *- f
J ^ -r " 5
S ul O O p C~ * m ?j ?
in in ri n — •*
r <p 01 r iv•^ O O Q o8 a s a a^ fv rj ry
^ r- J= C W
P E U U
I* ml1
£„ IE E E
2 fi 5 2 ^
IDs~
5 s.^ 3 i,?g g-E ^^SC fl«™g.2K'c3
•« fa ' " l acnu. (MC) iM
tS 9- ? »
Fac
1 ty
Siz
e T
hat
Detn
es C
apac
ty A
ddH
li
Upp
er H
ams
B a
nch W
W luerc
eplo
f gnx
Pur
ha
of
Des
Ultle
s
HA
RR
IS B
RA
NC
H I
NTE
RC
EP
TO
R s
egm
eH
m
B
ranc
h P
kg W
WT
P
pa
on
t
0
Ponee
C
ross
ng A
mended
PU
D M
(N « (M C-J IM
IBi£r*
1
Sr-
1OJ
sr^10
CO
o<
s
aiD
So
co m o A Q< tN O GS
A S 3^
^3 o o o en0 Q t^ r-4 tQ
<0 ifs o n ^
t- t JP ^S S S p
^ ^p <3 S
_ 5 M s o- a I •* I« 3 S o S
& £
t tin <"— 0 T3
f 3 v £?
i - S b i
„
i f\
FacU
y S
Tha
t D
efin
es C
apac
ly
fc*ll*
Nonhea t
S bre
gio
nal
WW
TP S
IW
ILD
HO
RS
E N
W W
TE
RC
EP
TD
RP
H2
W Idh
ora
Notlh
Inte
rcepto
r E
t
No
of
291
Dei«
loper
Rei
mbu
rsem
ents
Deck
er
Cre
ek
M CM rj w
ffi
o
in^2
"i(N
8c^
o
^fD
3
U
^J
fj
O
"-
3
S
•*
s a3 2
? ul5
E S>»
a-
§ 1i «I t"- ro
P- E™ -- Q.
I1 ? f
S5 io
S 1 2S
Fac
1 ly
Sl2
e T
hai
Def
ines
Cap
ac t
y A
ddrti
Capita
l hr«
s1nie
t
n B
rush
y C
reek
Reg
ie3m
gd p
lant
allo
catio
n
ncre
a
(fro
m 3
Bru
shy
10-y
ea
pa
ymer
US
on
WW
TP
nd
Cap
it t
Imps
Iro
m p
rofe
rm
«
S §
Q O
1 1h-
a £* u
3 XT^ JT
Tj U
fy 1-T*
1 1I~^~
S 8Ol Pi
s sm .-
>> So <nS
? "!(*j ft2 K}rO £
no
K r^a so f-
%
§
01
•ICE«tW
a. Q
L ^r Ej«\ m" ?J
a
S 1
Facil ty
SI
Tha
t D
efin
es C
apa ty
Add
u
SA
R W
WT
P 5
0 t
o 7
5 M
GD
E>P
AN
SIO
N
«
Of
S
o
81-
g
^a£
f-.aOJo
sQ
U*
nu
3CJ
a*"
mS
X
aopf
b,r^(O
aiif
*£
«|s
Q
B,E
Q
D)
1
WA
LN
UT
CR
EE
K W
WT
P60
TO
75 M
GD
M
ft
o
1
3r^*
£f^
r^-
s»t
3
o
so
r^
^"
ffl^*
^
S•n
&
*"
^
8
§2.
E¥iu
a
1
S%
Hom
sby B
end S
ludg
e P
roc
ng (
In r
ea(O
70
dry
ton/d
ay)
gro
up
M
V 1^ *•- tf»•- in o 9
»^ f> n M
§ I^ C
«9 V --*•
8 5 f l
S s I ^= IE 1S C
E K3 x *2 1 R* R S— c "1^ i
3 £ •* <Ml2 6 p.— «> y «
S c £ *.S y 2
^ B * tt
1 E« „.
« 5= B
S -S EE co e —£ 5 <>^ a
c/>
? 1™ 35 |?1 s
C1P32
VII CALCULATION OF MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE IMPACT FEE
The total system wide impact costs for all pressure zone and all drainage areas are determined by simply summing theimpact costs of th<_ individual subareas (Note that these summations can be found in columns P and Q in Tables 12and 13)
The maximum allowable impact fee as provided in Section 395015 of the Texas Local Government Code iscalculated by taking the system wide impact costs per service unit and applying the 50% credit required by State Lawbeginning September I 2001 then dividing the result by the service units The resulting maximum allowable impactfees are stated below
Water $3 307Wastewatcr $1 852
V I I I IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT
The Texas Impact Fee Act (Section 395 016 of the Texas Local Government Code) provides that the impact fees mustbe assessed on a)] property no later than the time of subdivision with certain exceptions where development occurswithout the need for subdivision The City staff can with existing improved computer databases find the date when asubdivision plat is recorded The scanned image of the recorded pht is available to personnel in the subdivision reviewand tap sales offices allowing them to inform customers in a timely fashion what the assessed fee is for a specific lot
Since 1990 the Impact Fee update reports and ordinances have included an assessed fee separate from the maximumallowable and collected fees The assessed fees have remained constant since 1990 at $1 700 for water per serviceuni t and $1 300 for wastewater per service unit With the new recommended fee structure the separate assessed feeis being dropped and from now on the assessment will be the maximum allowable amount
IX COLLECTED FEES
The fees actually collected at the time of tap sale may be set by ordinance at any amount equal to or lower than themaximum allowable fees On August 5 1999 the City Council adopted an updated fee schedule for capital recoveryfees to be collected per service unit The fees as adopted m 1999 vary according to location as described below Insubsequent years the adopted annual budget has included the 1999 fee structure The existing collected fee schedulefrom the Fiscal Year 2006/2007 City v. ide Rate Ordinance is attached as Appendix A
Descriptions of tht zones for the fees are found m the Land Development Code Chapter 25 1 21(26} and (30) Chapter25 8 2(D) Chapter 25 2 311 and Ordinance 990805 31 excerpted in Appendix B
The fees adopted as part of the Fiscal Year 2006/2007 City wide Ratt, Ordinance are assessed in accordance with theTexas Impact FL,L Act (Section 395 016 of the Texas Local Government Code) to all lots in subdivision plats recordedprior to the effective date of the following recommended fee structure
The fee for lots recorded after the effective date of the recommended fee structure will be assessed according to thisrecommended fee schedule Under the current state statute if this recommended fee structure were to remain in placefor five years for example lots in plats recorded during those five years will pay this recommended fee Subsequentfee structures will not increase or decrease the fee for lots platted during the five >ear period
In order to provide more structure to the collected impact fees this update of the Impact Fee Capital Improvement Planrecommends establishing a policy relationship between each of the fee zones and the maximum allowable fee Since1990 the collected impact fee has been established at a rate lower than the maximum calculated fee Since the currentfee zones were established in 1999 the fee for each zone has not had a formalized policy relationship to the maximumallowable fee This update proposes establishing the following relationships for each fee zone to the maximumallowable fee for- both water and wastewater fees based on the historic relationships of the water fee zones rounded tothe nearest $100 as shown in Table 14
CIP 33
Table 14 Existing Impact Fee Structure and Recommended New Impact Fee Structure
WATERMAXIMUM ALLOWABLE AMOUNT
DWPZ OUTSIDE ETJ FEEDWPZ ETJ FEEDWPZ INSIDE CITY FEEDDZ ETJ FEEDDZ INSIDE CITY FEEDDZ URBAN WATERSHEDS FECDDZ CURE FEE
WASTEWATERMAXIMUM ALLOWABLE AMOUNT
DWPZ OUTSIDE ETJ FEEDWPZ ETJ FEEDWPZ INSIDE CITY FEEDDZ ETJ FEEDDZ INSIDE CITY FEEDDZ URBAN WATERSHEDS FEEDDZ CURE FEE
CURRENT IMPACT
FEE STRUCTURE$PER
SERVICEUNIT
$2280
$1 700$1 700$1 500$1 300
$700$600$500
$PER
SERVICEUNIT
$2228
$1 300$1 300$1 200
$800$400$400$300
%OFMAXIMUM
ALLOWABLE100%
75%75%66 /57%31/o26%22 y
%OF
MAXIMUMALLOWABLE
100%
58%58/o54°/36 /18/o18/o13°/
RECOMMENDED NEWFEE STRUCTURE
$PERSERVICE
UNfT$3307
$2500$2500$2200$1 800$1 000
$800$700
$PERSERVICE
UNIT$1 852
$1400$1400$1 200$1 000
$600$500$400
%OF
MAXIMUMALLOWABLE
100%
75%75/o65%55°/30°/25/o20%
% OF
MAXIMUM
ALLOWABLE1000/
75%75%65°/55 /o30°/25%20%
VARIANCE FROM
CURRENT FEES
$INCREASE
(DECREASE)$1 027
$800$800$700$500$300$200$200
FEEINCREASE
(DECREASE)($376)
$100$100
$0$200$200$100$100
/o
CHANGE45
47%47%47%38°/43%33 /40°/
/o
INCREASE(DECREASE)
17/o
8%8%O0/
25 /50%25°/33%
Due to the many uncertainties and estimates used to calculate the system \vide impact costs per service unit thisstructure recommends that the greatest fee be 75% of the maximum allowable amount The other percentages reflectthe mcenti\ es the City provides to develop in certain areas over others The City has provided these incentives eversince the existing zones were established in 1999 Establishing this policy relationship between the maximumallowable fee and each of the fee zones w ill make the fees charged rebponsive to changes m the costs ot providinginfrastructure for growth—costs which have doubled since 1990 This policy change also preserves current incentivesfor development consistent with the City s policy goals
Existing Collected Fees, from FY 2006/2007 City wide Rate Ordinance are attached to this document as Appendix A
CIP 34
Updated Report Preparation
Citv of AustinAustin Water Utility
Tom Ellison P ERandall AlexisBob ButlerTom AlbmTeresa Lutes P E
City of AustinNeighborhood Planning and Zoning Department (NPZD)Ten McManus (1996 201 Hand 2020 population and employment data)Ryan Robinson City Demographer (2000 census data)
CIP35
ago o ort 04 (DO Ol f)4A ** CO
oo dj
•o0).co
CO0)0)
oo01
er
Uti
Req
uE
xte
view
rvi
pe
•5 £
0 S
ocy ~Z — -; ) e
'ant
Initiatio
n F
eest
per
initi
atio
n
•s oJoG>
IX
•ant
Inst
alla
tion
Fee
•a>.I0)s
Ll-
St p
er in
stal
latio
nip
liance
Rem
oval
Fe
o S°<3
coz
st p
er re
mov
ald
Equ
ipm
ent
Dep
osit
oo
c(0
aj
i
Met
er a
nd e
quip
men
t
-
Met
er a
nd e
quip
men
t
m
apita
l R
ecov
ery
Fee
Wat
er P
rote
ctio
n Z
ortd
e C
ity F
ees
Wat
er
" ? =S^.. ci*- c•50nfl.E
Was
tew
ater
tsid
e C
ity F
ees
Wat
er
O
Was
tew
ater
147
CIP A 1
£ $1 &a o> CD"5 "5 TiiQ Q Q
M 9ss
O(0o0)u_
ooCM
ssP
l
Q)
IC
ry F
ee)
(con
tinue
d)on
e
<U N
Cap
ital R
eco
Dev
elop
men
«1V !7.11 *"U- m
tJQaaE
ui
stde
City
Fee
Wat
er
-
5
Was
taw
a 9.
utsi
de C
ity F
eW
ater
O
5
Was
tew
aon
e U
rban
Wat
ers
M £
Dev
elop
men
Wat
erW
aste
wa
S
one
Cen
tral
Urb
ai
_
Dev
elop
men
S0>o
Lake
La
mar
Bou
!e\
e
unde
d b
y T
ovW
ater
ora
(5
emto
nal J
url&
dicl
ior
(u m
Was
tew
aO
f Aus
tin E
xt
13O
U-
Wat
erW
aste
wa
ct f
ee i
n ac
cord
ant
naE<a£
1
_
O
•stio
n or
dis
char
ge
0>c<n
<uin3
1o.E3inC
S
3O
C
S in *
i!£M0 1^ wc v
1?
"c "c c c53 fl> QJ flj
E £ E £8 8 S Sn> TO {Q <tt
W 10 Wl Ifl
Q Q Q Q
> > > |H « S wo o o o0. Q. 0. a.
c18
0) m
3 fi^ m
>
1Q,
s ar
eC
alc
5 c
148
CIP A 2
Appendix BDescriptions of the Zones for the Fees
Descriptions of the zones for the fees are found in the Land Development Code Chapter 25 1 21(26) and (30) Chapter25 8 2(D) Chapter 25 2 311 and Ordinance 990805 31 excerpted below
Land Development Code Chapter 25 1 21 (30) DRINKING WATER PROTECTION ZONE means the areas withinthe Barton Springs Zone the Barton Creek Watershed all Water Supply Rural Watersheds and all Water SupplySuburban Watersheds that are in the City s planning jurisdiction
LDC 25 8 2(D) BARTON SPRINGS ZONE means all watersheds that contribute recharge to Barton Springsincluding those portions of the Barton Williamson Slaughter Onion Bear and Little Bear Creek watershed located inthe Edwards Aquifer recharge or contributing zones
BARTON CREEK WATERSHED means the land area that drams*to Barton Creek
EDWARDS AQUIFER CONTRIBUTING ZONE means all land generally to the west and upstream of the EdwardsAquifer recharge zone that provides drainage into the Edwards Aquifer recharge zone
EDWARDS AQUIFER RECHARGE ZONE means all land over the Edwards Aquifer that recharges the aquifer asdetermined by the surface exposure of the geologic units comprising the Edwards Aquifer including the areas overlainwith quaternary terrace deposits
WATER SUPPLY RURAL WATERSHEDS include the Lake Travis watershed and Lake Austin watershed excludingthe Bull Creek watershed and the, area to the south of Bull Creek and the east of Lake AustinWATER SUPPLY SUBURBAN WATERSHEDS includeBull Eanes North Drv Taylor Slough and West Bull creek watershedsTown Lake watershed on the south side of Town Lake from Barton Creek to Tom Miller DamTown Lake watershed on the north side of Town Lake from Jolmson Creek to Tom MiHer Dam andTown Lake watershed on the east side of Lake Austin from Tom Miller Dam to Bull Creek
Land Development Code Chapter 25 1 21 (26) DESIRED DEVELOPMENT~ZONE means the area not within theDrinking Water Protection Zone
LDC 25 8 2(D) SUBURBAN WATERSHEDS include all watersheds not otherwise classified as urban water supplysuburban or water supply rural watersheds and includeBrushy Carson Cedar Cottonmouth Country Club Decker East Dry Elm Gilleland Hams Branch Lake MahaMarble North Fork Rattan Rmard South Boggy South Dry Walnut and Wilbarger creek watersheds ColoradoRiver watershed downstream of U S 183 andthose portions of the Onion Bear Little Bear Slaughter and Williamsoncreek watersheds not located in (he Edwards Aquifer recharge or contributing zones
LDC 25 8 2(D) URBAN WA TERSHEDS includeBlunn Buttermilk East Boggy East Bouldin Fort Harper Branch Johnson Little Walnut Shoal Tannehill Wallerand West Bouldin creek watersheds the north side of the Colorado River watershed from Johnson Creek to U S 183and the south side of the Colorado River watershed from Barton Creek to U S 183
LDC 25 2 311(A) CURE means central urban redevelopment (CURE) combining district which is property located inthe central urban area shown on the map adopted by Ordinance No 001130 110 which is on file with theNeighborhood Planning and Zoning Department This definition is used in the impact fee ordinance 990805 31 withan addition phrase expanding the fee zone to include the area bounded by Town Lake Lamar Boulevard 15lh Streetand IH 35 (For the Impact Fee Ordinance 9908 05 31 added and area bounded by Town Lake Larnar Blvd I5lh
Street and IH 3 5 )
CIPB 1
Appendix CCIP Projects Targeted to Meet Existing Needs-Wastewater
Current ITD
FAO
45702378851
45702378919
FLAN 237 Pi 29
PLAN 237 P010
PLAN 237 PI 25
FLAN 237 P009
FLAN 237 P191
FLAN 237 P117
4570 237 8359
4480 237 8672
45702378712
4570 237 8579
4570 237 8550
45702378561
4570 237 8560
4480 237 8098
PLAN 237 Pf 62
4570 237 4573
4570 237 4574
PLAN 237 PI 9245702374593
4570 237 4591
4480 237 8097
4570 237 4590
4570 237 8776
4480 237 8096
45702374583
4480 237 86834570 237 4586
4570 237 4581
4570 237 4552
457023745534570 237 4557
45702374560
4570 237 4559
4570 237 4558
4570 237 4565
4570 237 4564
4570 237 4562
4570 237 4563
4570 237 8756
4570 237 4567
4570 237 4569
4570 237 4571
4570 237 4568
4570 237 4570
SubprojectID Orgn Name
4775 004 1997 ANNEXATION PROJECT MGMT
6076 001 2000 ANNEXATION FRGRAM MGT WW
2231 102 2006 Drainage Bond WW Rehab
3212 078 2006 Drainage Bond WW Relocation
2231 102 2006 Street Bond WW Rehab
3212 078 2006 Street Bond WW Relocation
2231 111 24th and Vista SSO portion of ACWO 4926 109
3212 094 2nd & Nueces Extension
6055 015 2ND ST PH 2 COLORADO 2 TRlNfTY
5402 001 45TH- Dft/JSION TO AIRPORT
5402 001 45TH ST RECONS/WW/LAMAR AIRPOR
4926027 ACWP LWB QUA L CREEK
4926003 ACWP OVERFLOW ABATEMENT
4926010 ACWP PMC
4926012 ACWP WESTRIVERSDE/KNNEY
4926 081 ACWP- BARTON CRK LS TUNN SEC 1
4926 090 ACWP Govalle 1 Phase If So 2nd Sf
4926 120 ACWP GOVALLE 4 CHCON ST WW
4926121 ACWP GOVALLE 4 FEDERNALESWW
4926 108 ACWP Govalle SSO
4926 118 ACWPGOVALLE&CROSSTOWNBASNS
4926 116 ACWP LTTLEWALNUT/GEORGIANDR WW
4926 107 ACWP- SKUNK HOLLOW WW IMFROVS
4926 115 ACWPTREEREFLCEMNTSRVCEAGMT
4926 078 ACWP UPPER SHOAL SPtCEWD BRNCH
4926 106 ACWP- WEST BANK LS REHAB
4926 109 ACWP24THST& VISTA LNAREA
4926 080 ACWP-BARTON HEIGHTS W&WW HVFRV
4926 081 ACWP-BARTONCRK LS RELEFTUNNEL4926 104 ACWP-CROSSTOWN BASN SSO IMFRV
4926 085 ACWP-EAST LAMAR AREA WW IMPRS
4926 086 ACWP-EAST MONROE AREA WW IMPS
4926 088 ACWP-GOVALLE1 BASIN WW M=S
4926091 ACWP-GOVALLE 1 NEWTON STWWIM
4926090 ACWP-GOVALLE 1 S 2DSTWWM3
4926 089 ACWP-GOVALLE 1 W LAMAR AREA WW
4926 111 ACWP-GCVAUE2 BLUNN CREEK
4926 100 ACWP-GOVALLE 2 HARPERS BRANCH
4926 092 ACWP-GOVALLE 2 OLTORF ST WW !M
4926 099 ACWP-GOVALLE 2 TRVIS HTS WW M
4926 068 ACWP GOVALLE 3 TOWN LAKE/RVRSD
4926 093 ACWP-GOVALLE4 E 7TH ST WW IMP
4926 095 ACWP-GOVALLE4 MANOR ROSEWD WW
4926 098 ACWPGOVALLE4 UT40 STWW IMP
4926 094 ACWP-GOVALLE4 WEBBRVL SAN BRN
4926 097 ACWP-GOVALLE4 WLR FONLS WW IM
Appropriation Expenditures
(in 1000s of dollars)
7 740 90
24500000
000
000
000
000000
1000060000
1 035 007477411 259 92
29 200 88181500
69900000
3000024000
00048000345004050030000
2 586 0046800
1 372 0092000
4 500 00412600
636008370043000
1 562 001 754314 15000
49000957009300
310005 078 50
70004 764 00
2600034400371 00
66941217641
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
00060002
2 897 093417
2171247
35503000
000000
000
000000000
000
000
84468000
14807
7695000
18988
5937989829008
437167669558542
00052475596
14403
308835685
88870170192980428055
CIP C 1
Appendix CCIP Projects Targeted to Meet Existing Needs-Wastewater
Current ITD
Appropriation Expenditures
FAO SubprojectlD Orgn Name {In 1000 s of dollars)
4570 237 8595 4926 048 ACWP-GOVALLE5 BASIN/W 29TH-BO
4570 237 8691 4926 052 ACWP-GOVALLE 5 BASIN-PRJ 1 TAY
4570 237 8692 4926 053 ACWP-GOVALLE 5 BASN-FRJ 4 W&H
4570 237 8693 4926 054 ACWP-GOVALLE 5 BASN-PRJ5 JOHN
45702374582 4926108 ACWP-GOVALLE BASNSSO PROJECT
4570 237 8770 4926 072 ACWP-GOVALLE3 CARSON CRK@MNTPL
4570 237 8759 4926 071 ACWP-GOVALLE3 MONTOPOLIS DRIVE
4570 237 8757 4926 069 ACWP-GOVALLE3 PARKR LWMETCALF
4570 237 8758 4926 070 ACWP-GOVALLE3 WCKSHRE LN/BURL
4570 237 4584 4926 110 ACWP-HAROLD CRT EMERG WW REPLC
4570 237 8585 4926 039 ACWP-LNING SERVICEAGREEMENT
4570 237 4556 4926 101 ACWP-LrTTLE WALNT BRDGPRT&FRFD
4570 237 8580 4926 028 ACWP-LrTTLE WALNUT/BUTTERMILK
4570 237 4589 4926 114 ACWP-LfTTLE WALNUT7EMLY WAY
45702374587 4926 112 ACWP LITTLE WALNUT/MDWOODDR
45702374588 4926113 ACWP-LrTTLEWALNUT/ROCKHRSTLN
4570 237 4555 4926 096 ACWP-LTL WALNT&UPPER FT BR SSO
FLAN 237 PI 64 4926 035 ACWP-Ltl Walnut/Btrrrtk Crk Phase 2
4570 237 8573 4926 021 ACWP-LWB AT 290 AND 183
45702378574 4926022 ACWP LWB AT BUTTBWILK CREB<
4570 237 8575 4926 023 ACWP-LWB AT CENTER CREEK
4570 237 8576 4926 024 ACWP LWB AT COLONY CREEK NORTH
45702378582 4926035 ACWP LWB CREB< AREA WW REHABIL
4570 237 8578 4926 026 ACWP LWB NORTHCAFTTAL DR EASE
4570 237 8772 4926 074 ACWP-M.K/3D ST/WHfTE HORSETRL
4570 237 8581 4926 029 ACWP-MOSS RNDTREE.PANNEL/E AUS
4570 237 4585 4926 105 ACWP ONION CRK BASM SSO ABTMT
4570 237 8598 4926 056 ACWP-ONION CRK BASN-LWR SO BO
4570 237 8599 4926 055 ACWP ONION CRK BASN-WLLWMSN
4570 237 8773 4926 075 ACWP-ONION CRK BSN-CHAPRRL TRL
44802378680 4926003 ACWP-OVERFLOW ABATEMENT
4570 237 8774 4926 076 ACWP-REPEAT SPILL WW SVC ABTMT
4570 237 8583 4926 036 ACWP-SHOAL CREEK 25TH TO 29TH
45702378584 4926037 ACWP-SHOAL CREEK 29TH TO 34TH
4570 237 8698 4926 060 ACWP-SHOAL CREEK STREAM STAB1
4570 237 8771 4926 073 ACWP-SHOAL CRK BASN-GASTON LN
4570 237 8596 4926 049 ACWP-SMALL REPAIRS SERVCE-AGR
4570 237 8697 4926 059 ACWP THREE SIPHONS
45702378569 4926032 ACWP-UPPER SHOAL UFPB3HANCOC
PLAN 237 P145 4926 103 ACWP-Upper Tannehill hterceptor
4570 237 8566 4926 020 ACWP UPPER TANNEHELL BROADMOOR
4570 237 4551 4926 084 ACWP UPPER WALLER SSO ABTMT PR
4570 237 8775 4926 077 ACWP-UPPR SHOAL SPICEWD SPR RD
45702378755 4926067 ACWP-UPFRTANN&CL LWR FTBR
4570 237 4554 4926 087 ACWP-WALNUT CRK BSN ODOR CNTRL
4570 237 8586 4926 040 ACWP WATERSHED PROTECTION PERM
CIP C2
4 609 00
3 182 20
91504
1 050 42
1 381 00
92596
1 392 00
2 632 00
1 375 00
48000
16 089 33
75600
1210000
52840
48900
48800
35000
000
253444
3 738 94
4421 18
224612
1 34427
841302
4 459 60
3 835 04
1 071 00
86621
319790
82200
000
35000
2 670 22
1284000
169600
3 074 49
9 552 39
1 039 30
8 050 65
000
7 389 21
48580
92500
1 950 55
25000
87388
27890
32390
36221
16837
19142
21241
24364
30262
38733
20034
2 188 56
000
8 963 51
090
093
1 10
31847
000
44761
801 16
279069
1 335 39
76892
1 389 89
51633
171864
3857
64371
22964
18412
000
5239
1 25467
719612
14452
33814
000
10437
144201
000
3 628 90
23257
52414
131664
14531
57349
CIP Projects Targeted to Meet Existing Needs-WastewaterCurrent ITD
Appropriation Expenditures
FAO SubproJectlD Orgn Name (in 1000 s of dollars)
4570 237 4580 4926 102 ACWP WEST KM WW MPROVEMENT
4570 237 4594 4926 723 ACWP-WHTTEHORSETRU DOWNTOWNWW
4570 237 8753 4926 064 ACWP-WW MANHOLE REHAB SVC AGMT
PLAN 237 P032 4857 010 Anderson Mil Estates STAA WW
FLAN 237 P131 4857 016 Anderson Mill MUD
4570 237 3047 3353 067 AUSTIN BLUE SKY N NC SER2271
FLAN 237 P178 3159 019 AWU Ftione Switch Replacement COATN
PLAN 237 P179 3159 018 AWU Time and Attendance system
45702378941 4857011 BARCLAY STAA WASTEWATER
44802378688 4926081 BARTN CRK LIFT STN RELIEF TUNL
4530 237 8403 4926 081 BARTON CREEK L S FORCE MAN
45702378357 3212070 BGA {10°/ OF$2WYR)
PLAN 237 P031 3168 033 Bluffington #1 Force Mam Replacement
45302378406 4954007 BLUFFINGTON L S UPGRAGES
FLAN 237 P126 3168043 Boggy Creek LS Upgrade
4570 237 3021 3353 026 BROCK COMMERCIAL REIMBURSEMENT
45702378719 3212071 CA P METRO (10% OF $5M 2006 07)
46802378004 3185002 CAPITAL EQUIP-VEHICLES
44802378324 5873002 CRCLE S RD CULV RT REPL STR #2
44802378065 3159010 CMMS HANSEN
4430 237 8462 6967 001 CMTA BGA STREET REHABUTATION
PLAN237P171 6961001 Cotorado/Srd to 11th
45702373033 3353053 COLTON BLUFF SUBDIVSON WW
44802378067 3159013 DATA MGMT/INTEGRATTON TOOL
45702378076 3159011 DATASTREAM(MP5) CMMS SOFTWARE
45702378884 4857006 DAVENPORT WEST STAA
4570 237 8876 4890 006 DAVENPORT/LOOP 360 WW ffvP
PLAN 237 P093 3212 091 David Ln frnLeo St to Huebiger Dr
PLAN 237 P096 3212 091 Davis Ln from Brodie Ln to Coastal Dr4570 237 8883 5205 005 Da VALL6AREA 3
4480 237 8106 7265 001 DESSAU WWTP REHAB
4570 237 8921 3353 043 DESTNATION PARK/TND COLL LINE
FLAN 237 P142 757 008 Emergency Gen Tie h/UPS hstall
FLAN 237 PI 80 757 010 ESC HVAC System Replacerrent
FLAN 237 F077 757 010 ESC Ice Machine
44802379172 757010 ESC SECURITY MPROVEMENTS
FLAN 237 P069 3212 086 FM 969 fm FM3177 to FM973/973 to SH130
PLAN 237 P039 3212081 FM 973 at Bm Creek
PLAN 237 P026 3212 081 FM973 from969 to Green Grove
44802378322 3212051 FM973/SH71 TO PEARCELANE
4570 237 8433 3212 075 FM2222 @ LAKEWOOD (BULL CREEK)
FLAN 237 P045 3212 081 FM973 from Green Grove to N of 71
PLAN 237 P106 757 009 GBSC Auto CalOst (ACD) Repl/Digital On hold
FLAN 237 F064 757009 GBSC Carpet Replacement
FLAN 237 P114 757 009 GBSC Rre Alarm Panel Replacerrent
PLAN 237 P071 757 009 GBSC Generator Replacerrent With Transfer
78400
1 73400
387273
000
000
79573
000
000
16400
19760
9 735 86
10000
000
1 000 00
000
12000
50000
1074371
270068001125000
781 25
180001500096000
4 430 00000
000247361
5000
1 19915000
000
000
3800000
000
000
3551 006348000
000
000
000
000
5337000
35326000
000
000
000
000
1911
000
281730000
000
50595000
000
000
6 930 63
000
000
001
000
000
000
000
8069577749
000
0001 826 94
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
CIPC 3
Appendix CCIP Projects Targeted to Meet Existing Needs-Wastewater
Current ITD
FAO
FLAN 237 PI43
PLAN 237 P065
44802379153
PLAN 237 P113
44802379152
4570 237 8325
4480 237 8066
RAN 237 PI 87
PLAN 237 PI63
4570 237 8932
PLAN 237 P058
4570 237 8880
FLAN 237 PI 57
4410 237 0695
PLAN 237 PI 36
FLAN 237 F028
FLAN 237 F083
PLAN 237 F003
4480 237 8129
44802378148
4480 237 8149
PLAN 237 P043
FLAN 237 F044
PLAN 237 P046
4570 237 8144
FLAN 237 P047
FLAN 237 PI 58
FLAN 237 P115
FLAN 237 P116
PLAN 237 P062
FLAN 237 P048
FLAN 237 F050
FLAN 237 P051
FLAN 237 F060
FLAN 237 F059
45702378917
4480 237 8055
4480 237 8069
PLAN 237 PI 21
4480 237 8993
FLAN 237 PI 50
4570 237 3011
45702378210
PLAN 237 PI 52
PLAN 237 P151
4480 237 8673
Subproject ID Orgn Name
757 009 GBSC HVAC Control Sys WW
757 009 GBSC Replace/Modify Entrance Gate Remote Park
757 009 GBSCSECURTTY IMPROVEMENTS
757 009 GBSC Titt Wall Seams Caulked
757 009 GBSC UPS REPLACEMENT
3212 005 GENERAL UTLFTY RELOCATIONS
3159012 GS
2231 107 Govalle 2 Blunn Creek SSO Portion of ACWP
4926 071 Govalle 3 Montopolis Dr Ftiase II
4927 003 GOVALLE TUNNa CORROSION REPAI
3007 001 Govalle WWTP Improvemenls/Decommssion
4769 009 HARRIS BRANCH ANNEX RBIVB
6943 001 Harris Branch Filter replacement
4769 010 HARRIS BRANCH INTERCEPTOR
7265 003 Harris Branch Pkg WWTP exp lo 6 MGD
3164 021 HB Biosolids Storage Facility
3164 038 HB Digester Domes Repair
3164 020 HB Gravity Belt Improvements
3164 036 HB HAZARDOUS GAS DETECTA/ENTIL
3164008 HB BMP CONTROL SYSTBd REPLACE
3164034 HB SIDESTREAMTRKNT PLANT REBU
3164 029 Hornsby Bend Compost Pad
3164 030 Hornsby Bend Drying Bed Modifications
3164 032 Hornsby Bend Hot Water Piping Replacement
3164016 HORNSBY BEND INLET SCREENS
3164 033 Hornsby Bend SAR Digester House Rebuild
3164 042 Hornsby Sludge Drying Facility
3212 093 Howard Ln from Harris Branch to SH 130 WW
3212 093 Howard Ln through Pioneer Crossing
3212 082 IH35 from Grand Ave to Wells Branch
3212 082 1H35 from S of Yager to Braker Ln
3212 082 H35 from US 183 Direct N to N (Rundberg)
3212 082 H35 S of How ard Ln to Farmer
3212 082 IH35 Wells Branch to S of Wells Branch
3212 082 IH35N of Farmer to S
3322 003 IN-Smj REHAB & REFLACEJvB^T
3159007 fl MASTER FLAN
3159017 FT NETWORK IMPROVBwENTS
3159016 FT Platform
3159 003 LABORATORY INFO MGMT SYSTEM
3168 046 Lake Creek LS Capacity Increase
3353 020 LAMAR CARWASH REIMBURSEMENT
3168 014 LIFT STATION & FORCE MA IN REHA
3168 048 Lift Station Abandonment
3168 047 Lrft Station Relief Study
2231095 LmGATON ASSET ONION CRKT
CIPC4
Appropriation Expenditures
(in 1000s of dollars)
000
000
1500000
15002491 75
7500000
000
5 000 00000
1 52700000
5 797 61000
000
000
000
2000050005000000
000
000
681 00000
000000
000
000000
000
000
000
000
1491800000
5000000
35200000
250079716
000
000
15000
000
000000
000
00044392
000
000
000
000
000
(933)000
57389000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
712
000
000000
000
000000
000
000000
000
1346519000
000
000
7639000
000
270
000
000
000
PLAN 237 PI22
4570 237 8349
45702378923
PLAN 237 P130
45702373055
45702373016
45702378958
4570 237 8939
4570 237 871 1
45402378050
45702378944
45402378051
PLAN 237 P128
PLAN 237 P134
PLAN 237 F006
45302378962
PLAN237 P139
4570 237 8350
PLAN 237 P075
PLAN 237 P094
4380 237 8933
PLAN237P184
PLAN 237 P053
44802378280
45702373043
PLAN 237 P138
PLAN 237 P161
RAN 237 P1 1 8
4480 237 8279
FLAN 237 P186
45702373049
45702378358
FLAN 237 PI 20
4480 237 8660
FLAN 237 P181
4480 237 8828
4570 237 8355
4570 237 3046
4570 237 3039
4480 237 8108
FLAN 237 P063
FLAN 237 P018
FLAN 237 P088
44802378181
4540 237 8177
FLAN 237 F022
Appendix CCIP Projects Targeted to Meet Existing Needs Wastewater
Current ITD
Appropriation Expenditures
SubprojectID Orgn Name (in 1000 s of dollars)
3212 097 Loop 1 Section 1 & 2 WW
6599 007 LOOP 1/SH 45 UTLrTY RELOCATO
4890007 LOOP 360 HDD STAA #9B
4857015 Lost Creek
3353075 MARBRDGE ESTATES
3353054 MARBRIDGE FARMS WW
2183004 MCKALLA PLACE IMPS
4857 009 MEADOWHEATH LIFT STATION RELIE
5481 001 N AUSTIN WASTEWATER INTERCEPT
4769001 N E AREA REGDNAL SVC FLAN
4857013 NAGLE ANNEXATION AREA
4769002 NE AREA INTERIM WWTP
3168 045 Nixon Lane WW Force Mam
4857017 North Acres
5481 001 North Austin Outfall
2183005 NORTH SERVICE CTREXPOSION INV
7265006 Northeast Subregional WWTP Site
5404 001 NUECES/MLK TO GUADALUPE
3212 089 Old Manor Rd
2231 092 Onion Creek Tunnel Corrosion Protection Inst
2231 059 ONION CREEK TUNNEL LINER
2231 105 Onion Crk Basin ChaprrlTr SSOACWP
7025 001 Pearce Lane WWTP Fre Engineering
3168042 PICKFAIRDECOMMISSDNNG
3353060 PIONEER CROSSING AMENDED FUDN
7265005 Pkg WWTPRehab
5645001 Rant 0 & MMgrrt Systems
321 2 095 Pleasant Valley St Brno to Nuckols
7265 002 PURCHASEOF DESSAU UTILmES
3376 038 Purchase of Sitverado{Dessau Mobile Home)
3353071 RANCHO ALTO VENTURES
5873012 REDBUDTRL FEASIBLfTY OFREL
3212 096 Redbud Trail
2231 004 REPLACE DETERIORATED FACILmE
757 007 Replace WCC Make up Air Handier
5403 001 RHD GRAND-MLK TO 29TH
5374 002 RTVERSIDE DR CONGRESS 2 S 1 ST
5028 002 RMMA REDEV CATELLUS SER#2263
3353 049 ROBERTSON HILL DEVELOPMENT WW
7264 001 ROOFING PARENT A CCT( ASSESSMENT
3212083 RR 2222 from 620 to 360
3333 009 SAR Electrical Improvements
3333021 SAR Expansion to 100 MGQ
3333023 SA R EXPANSION- TRAIN C
3333 008 SAR NEW ELECTRCAL SUBSTATION
3333012 SAR Purrp Systems
CIP C 5
000
42006441 00
000
78770345507500045000
22 775 00181500
452508 987 00
000
000
000
351828000
1800000
000
4 981 00000
000
500004 068 00
000
000000
2 400 00000
577172800000
49923000
173004421
3 206 00400002500000
000
000
300020 200 00
000
000
474
65663000
000
000
270596841551
1 698 9811229
7 725 80000000
000
276284000
000
000
000
581318000
000
000
000
000
000000
000
000000
000
000000
000
000000
29472000
000
000
000000
000
10 226 87000
Appendix CCIP Projects Targeted to Meet Existing Needs-Wastewater
Current ITO
Appropriation Expenditures
FAO Subproject ID Orgn Name (in 1000 s of dollars)
FLAN 237 P085 3333 019 SAR Raise Access Shafts on Interconnect Tunne
RAN 237 P081 3333 017 SAR Replace Drives on A & 8 Oarifiers & Trie
RAN 237 F082 3333 018 SAR Replace Grit Classifiers on Rani A & B
FLAN 237 P087 3333 020 SAR Replace Influent Valve Filter 1
FLAN 237 P033 3333 013 SAR Roof Replacement
FLAN 237 P034 3333014 SAR Scum Facilities
FLAN 237 P160 3333026 SAR Security Ftiase II
PLAN 237 P080 3333 016 SAR Thickened Sludge & Scum FUmp Replacement
FLAN 237 F035 3333 015 SARThickner/Filter Improvements
4540 237 8176 3333 007 SAR TRAIN C NORTH
45902378842 3333007 SA RTRA IN C NORTH
FLAN237F146 3333007 SAR Train C North
4540 237 8175 3333 006 SAR TRAIN C SOOTH
FLAN 237 PI 54 3333 024 SAR Upgrade controls for Bevator LS2
PLAN237F119 3159014 SCADA
4570 237 3057 3353 077 SCOTS GLEN
45702373044 3353004 SERREhBURSENB-JTS-CP
4480 237 8918 757 009 SERVICE CENTER BVFROVEMENT WW
PLAN237P123 3212098 SH 45 Section 8 WW
FLAN237P124 3212098 SH 45 Section 9 WW
FLAN 237 P165 3212 079 SH71 from FM973 to Bastrop Co line
FLAN 237 P023 3212 079 SH71 from US183 to 973
45702378360 6967001 STREET REHAB FOR MIDDLE FtSKVL
45702378361 6968001 STREET REHAB FOR NORTHCREST
4480 237 8068 3159 015 TE2MOTOR GENERATOR AT GBSOWC
FLAN 237 P076 3212090 Todd Ln from Ben White to St Brno
44302370738 3212003 TSM (MISCELLANEOUS)
FLAN 237 P017 4769 011 Upper Harris Branch Interceptor
FLAN237F073 3212088 US 183 at H 35 (S to S Connection)
44802378829 3212072 US 183 BOLMTOPATTON
FLAN237P066 3212084 US 183 fromSH71 to SH 130
4570 237 8428 3212 060 US 183/BOLM RDTO THOMPSON LN
4570 237 8341 3212 049 US 183/GOVALLETUNNEL SHAFT RE
4480 237 8827 3212 055 US183-H2O RELOC-SFRNGDALE28OGG
4570 237 8356 3212 056 US290 JOE TANNER TO SCENIC BRK
4480 237 8927 757 007 WALLER CREEK CENTER IMPS
4570 237 8937 6932 001 WALNUT CREEK PROJECT MGMT
FLAN 237 F027 3023 019 Walnut Creek WWTP Headw orks Improvements
FLAN 237 F002 3023018 Walnut Creek WWTP Msc Imp
FLAN 237 F036 3023 021 Walnut Creek WWTP Plant Control System Upgrad
FLAN 237 POOS 3023015 Walnut WWTP Master Flan
45702373050 3353073 WATERSEDGEFUDMAKAR
FLAN 237 F099 757 007 WCC Building Envelope Inspection/Re Cauffang
FLAN 237 P108 757 007 WCC Crossw alk Roof Replacement
FLAN 237 P095 757 007 WCC Equipment Generator Tie In
44802379117 757007 WCC FIRE PANEL REPLACEMENT
CIP C6
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
25 030 009 290 00
000
3010000
000
000
1 204 009 467 24
3802
000
000
000
000
3730
3981
7500
000
13500
000
000
73000
000
4 681 00
31370053700
311 0010212
1513257
000
000
000
000
2 690 00000
000
000
10000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
22 954 432613
000
1932495
000
000
000
000
3775
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
7044
000
000
000
000
8790
28495
000
000
101901 93144
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
Appendix CCIP Projects Targeted to Meet Existing Needs-Wastewater
Current ITD
Appropriation Expenditures
FAO Subproject ID Orgn Name (in 1000 s of dollars)
WCC Fire Pump Replacement
WCC SECURfTY IMPROVEMENTS
WCC Telephone System Upgrade Succession 3 0
WCC Won Door Motor Replacement
WCWWTP Beet Dst Impr Fti II
WESTBOULDW CREEK INTERCEPTOR
West Waller Interceptor Improvements
Westgate from Cameron Lp to Cohaba
WILD HORSE RANCH WW REMBURSEM
WILDHORSE ADDITION
Wildhorse North Interceptor Bet No of 290
WLDHORSE NW INTERCEPTOR FH 2
Wildhorse Ranch
Wildhorse WWTP Expand to 1 5 MGD
WILLIAM WALLACE WAY LIFTSTATI
WRJ CENTRAL PHASE IB
WSC Bird Netting
WSCFire Alarm System
WSC PBX Phone System
WSC SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS
WSC Window Replacement
WW HOUSE CONNECTIONS
WW PLANT RECTRICAL DIST IMP
WWSUBDENG&INSP
YAGER LN AT IH35 WW RELOCATION
ZACHRY SCOTT TRACT WW SER#2260
FLAN 237 PI 35
44802379118
FLAN 237 PI 04
FLAN 237 P074
FLAN 237 PI 49
4570 237 8892
FLAN 237 PI 72
FLAN 237 P1 10
4570 237 3023
4570 237 3056
FLAN 237 F090
4480 237 8826
FLAN 237 PI 48
FLAN 237 PI 37
45702378213
4570 237 8705
FLAN 237 P098
PLAN 237 PI 40
FLAN 237 P072
44802379133
FLAN 237 P078
45102375011
45302378101
45102375010
4570 237 8447
4570 237 3045
Agency Total 237
757 007
757 007
757 007
757 007
3023 006
5014 002
6943 002
3212092
3353 028
3353 076
4769015
4769 008
3353 028
7265 004
4769 003
5267 006
757 008
757 008
757008
757 008
757 008
3163 001
3023 006
2981 001
3212 068
3353 062
000
2000
000
000
000
599400
000
000
1 1 000 00
98844
000
3 000 00
000
000
4 000 00
3 400 00
000
000
000
6000
000
3394 13
19611 54
6 799 09
11500
1 333 74
54715394
000
000
000
000
000
372384
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
76465
000
000
000
000
000
251288
2 745 92
615003
3080
000
199 344 63
Total - Austin Water Utility Water and Wastewater 1 049 737 68 376 508 00
CIPC 7
3960 227 7869
3960 227 7523
PLAN 227 P164
PUN 227 P052
PUN 227 P161
PLAN 227 F025
PLAN 227 P085
PLAN 227 F086
3960 227 7469
FLAN 227 P147
3920 227 7483
3920 227 7471
3960 227 7464
3960 227 7382
3920 227 7838
3960 227 6015
39602272054
PLAN 227 P081
3960 227 2018
PLAN 227 P048
PLAN 227 P169
PLAN 227 P020
3920 227 2010
3920 227 2013
3960 227 2040
PLAN 227 P186
PLAN 227 P185
39202277712
3920 227 7697
PLAN 227 P051
PLAN 227 P122
39602277498
PLAN227P189
3960 227 7493
3960 227 7749
3960 227 7059
39602272015
39602272022
41802278004
3960 227 7748
39602277494
396Q2277491
39602272049
39202277066
3920 227 7530
3960 227 7468
Appendix DCIP Projects Targeted to Meet Existing Needs-Water
Current ITD
Appropriation Expenditures
Subproject ID Orgn Name (m 1000 s of dollars)
4775 004 1 997 ANNEXATION FM
4796 007 2004 VALVE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM
2231 102 2006 Drainage Bond Water Rehab
3212 078 2006 Drainage Bond Water Relocation
2231 102 2006 Street Bond Water Rehab
3212 078 2006 Street Bond Water Relocation
4798 009 2008 Valve Replacement Program
4798 010 2010 Valve Replacement Program
6964 001 22ND- SAN GABRIEL TO NUECES
3212 094 2nd & Nueces Extension
6055 015 2ND ST PH 2 COLORADO 2 TRINFTY
6589 001 31ST STREET SPEEDWY TO WALLING
5408 002 34TH ST WEST AVE TO SHOAL CRK
5402 001 45TH STREET DIVISION TO LAMAR
5267 014 ABANDON 24 LINE
5267 012 ABIA EXTENSION
3353074 ALEXAN ONON CREEK
6621 006 All WTP Security Improvements
3353 022 AMAX SaF STG REIMBURSEMENT
4857 010 Anderson Mil Estates STAA
4857 016 Anderson Mil MUD
5038 002 Anderson MII/RR620 TM
3353 015 AUSTIN MARKETPLACESERVICEEXT
3353 018 AVERY RANCH BLVD WESTTM
3353 018 AVERY RANCH SERVICE EXTENSION
3159 019 AWU Phone Sw itch replacement GAATN
3159018 AWU Time & Attendance System
4810001 BARTON BLUFF 16 WATER LINE
2231 083 BARTON HEIGHTS WWW INPROVEMNTS
4800 026 Benedict/A Us ton/Dunning
4953 010 Boundary Fencing (Ed Crossing Tabor and Andr
6960001 BRAZOS CESAR CHAVEZ TO 11TH
2231103 Brazos 3rd to 11th
3212 070 BUILD GREATER AUSTIN-WATER REL
2231 094 BUILD GREATR AUSTIN-WATER REHA
4953 017 BUILDING TO HOUSESTAFF
3353021 BURATTI PECORA II RE1MBURSEMEN
3353027 CANYON CREEK SUBDIVISION PfJMB
3185002 CARTAL EQUIP-VEHICLES
2231 093 CAFTTAL METRO- WATER REHAS
3212071 CAFTTAL METRO-WATER RELOCATION
6965001 CASWELL 49THTO51ST
3353068 CIRCLE CCCR 103 WATER LINE
3159010 CMMS HANSEN
4800 024 CNTRL NRTH&NRTH ZONE BNDRY PRJ
6961 001 COLORADO- CESARCHAVEZ TO 11TH
599102 032 85
000
000
000
000000
000
31400000
18100
2358035900
6 697 466000
1 4500076000
000
29000
000
000000
22600213820
2 31 1 30
000
000
11000
5000000
000
12000000
20000100002000028000
1 100004 834 37
2500050000
2000090000
68001 700 00
22000
500594042000
000
000
000000
000
000000
000
726
000
391612000000
000
00013705
000
000
000000
76224
2 31 1 22
000
000
3280603
000
000
000
000000
000000
000
27500438433
000
000
000094
000
000
000
CIP D I
Appendix DCIP Projects Targeted to Meet Existing Needs Water
Current ITD
Appropriation Expenditures
FAO Subproject ID Orgn Name (in 1000s of dollars)
PLAN 227 P195 6961 001 Colorado/3rd to 11th 0 00 0 00
39602272033 3353053 COLTON BLUFF SUBDIVISION-WATER 68750 000
3920 227 7067 3159 013 DATA MGMT/INTB3RATION TOOL 180 00 0 00
39602277076 3159011 DATA STREAM( 1 5) CNWS SOFTWARE 15000 000
PLAN 227 P141 3212 091 Davd Ln fm Leo St to Huebiger Dr 0 00 0 00
PLAN 227 P010 2015004 David WTP Filter hp Phase II 000 000
PLAN 227 F059 2015 015 Davis Basin Hand RaB Replacements 0 00 0 00
PLAN 227 P061 2015 016 Davis Bldg Roof Replacements 0 00 0 00
PLAN 227 P197 2015 004 Davis FKer Process CP 0 00 0 00
PLAN 227 P142 3212091 Davis Ln frnBrodie Ln to Coastal Dr 000 000
PLAN 227 P062 2015 017 Davis LSPS htake Wetwell Hydraulics Rehab 0 00 0 00
PLAN 227 P073 2015018 Davis Rant & Equip Rehab & Upgrade Ph II 000 000
PLAN 227 P019 2015 013 Davis Rant & Equip Rehab 7 Upgrade Ph III 0 00 0 00
PLAN227P074 2015019 Davis SCADA System 000 000
3960 227 7143 2015 013 DAVIS WTPEQUPREHAB & AUTOMT 12 200 00 74 74
3960 227 7140 2015 004 DAVIS WTP FILTER PROC MPROV 9 320 00 188 95
39602277141 2015011 DAVIS WTP aOCCULATORIMPROVMT 407500 712
PLAN 227 P016 2015 021 Davis WTP Master Plan 0 00 0 00
42002277135 2015010 DAVIS WTP PHASE II 1231000 16002
PLAN 227 P001 2015 012 Davis WTPPhase III Improvements 0 00 0 00
PLAN227P022 2015006 Dave WTP Rant Power Distribution Upgrade 000 000
3960 227 7883 5205 005 Da VALLEAREA 3 3 881 39 2 823 85
39602277921 3353043 DESTINATION PARK/TNDTM 135247 094
39602277935 6935007 EHWY183TM 45000 000
3900 227 0945 2097 001 ELROY TRANSMISSION MAIN 5 356 63 1 744 31
PLAN 227 PI 79 757 008 Emergency Gen Tie in/UPS Install 0 00 0 00
PLAN 227 P064 757 010 ESC Ice Machine 0 00 0 00
39202276172 757010 ESC SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS 3800 000
PLAN 227 P184 757010 ESC-HVAC System Replacement 000 000
PLAN 227 Pf 91 3376 039 Stales of Shady Hollow 0 00 0 00
PLAN 227 PI 77 757 008 Rre Alarm System WSC 0 00 0 00
PLAN227P134 3212087 FM812 fromUS 183 to SH130 000 000
PLAN 227 PI 30 3212 086 FM 969 from Perez to Tannehill 0 00 0 00
PLAN227P077 3212081 FM973 fromFM812 to US 183 000 000
PLAN 227 P065 3212 081 FM 973 FromPearce Ln to FM812 0 00 0 00
3960 227 7433 3212 075 FM2222 @ LAKEWOOD (BULL CREEK) 172 93 0 00
PLAN227P129 3212086 FM969 frn FM 3177 to FM973/973 to SH130 000 000
PLAN 227 P083 3212 081 FM973 from Green Grove to N of 71 0 00 0 00
PLAN 227 P082 3212 081 FM973 N of Broy to S of Broy 0 00 0 00
FLAN 227 P160 2127 003 Forest Rdge and Pilot Knob Access Rds 0 00 0 00
PLAN 227 P044 6683003 Forest Ridge/NWA TM 000 000
PLAN 227 P046 6683 005 Four Foints/NWB TM 0 00 0 00
PLAN 227 P112 757 009 GBSC Auto Call Ds (ACD) Repl/Digrtal On hold 0 00 0 00
PLAN 227 P055 757 009 GBSC Carpet Replacement 0 00 0 00
PLAN 227 P119 757 009 GBSC Fire Alarm Panel Replacement 0 00 0 00
PLAN 227 P017 757 009 GBSC Generator Replacement With Transer Sw i 0 00 0 00
CIP D 2
Appendix DCIP Projects Targeted to Meet Existing Needs-Water
Current ITD
Appropriation Expenditures
FAO Subproject ID Orgn Name (in 1000 s of dollars)
FLAN 227 P071 757 009 GBSC Replace/Modify Entrance Gate Remote Park
3920 227 6153 757 009 GBSC SECURTTY IMPROVEMENTS -
PLAN 227 P118 757 009 GBSC Tilt Wall Seams Caulked
3920 227 6152 757 009 GBSC UPS REPLACEMENT
PLAN 227 P006 757 009 GBSC UPS Replacement
PLAN 227 P183 757 009 GBSC-HVAC Control System
39602277325 3212005 GENERAL UTILrTY RELOCA71NS
3920 227 7065 3159 012 CIS 2006
3960 227 2052 3353 072 GOODNIGHT RANCH
39602277123 2009010 GREEN WTP DECOMMISSIONING
39202277118 2009008 GREEN WTP RB LACGMENT STUDY
3920 227 7472 6028 001 GRNGR DR BUCKS RUN TO BLUD MDW
3960 227 7374 6055 002 GUADALUPE BEAUTIFICATION RELOC
PLAN 227 POM 6939 001 Harris Ridge Btvd Loop Connection
PLAN 227 F027 6934 003 Harris Ridge Conversion
PLAN 227 P124 4953 012 Hays County Ranch Boundary Fencing Section 1
PLAN 227 P125 4953 013 Hays County Ranch Boundary Fencing Section 2
PLAN 227 P155 2127 004 Highland Park Overflow Project
PLAN 227 P145 3212 093 Howard Ln from Harris Branch to SH 130
PLAN 227 P146 3212 093 How ard Ln through Pioneer Crossing
PLAN 227 P149 4800 029 HWY 290 /183 Low Pressure Project
PLAN 227 P150 4800 030 IH 35 / Oltorf Low Pressure Project
PLAN 227 P042 6937 002 IH 35 South Reservoir
PLAN 227 P156 4800031 IH35N
PLAN 227 PI 32 3212 082 IH35 from Grand Ave to Wells Branch
PLAN 227 F092 3212 082 1H35 from S of Yager to Braker Ln
PLAN227 P093 3212 082 IH35 from US 183 Direct N to N Rundberg
PLAN227P095 3212082 IH35 N of Parrrer to S
PLAN 227 P094 3212082 IH35 S of Howard Ln to Parmer
PLAN 227 P098 3212 082 IH35 Wells Branch to S of Wells Branch
39202277055 3159007 rTMASTERPLAN
39202277069 3159017 FT NETWORK IMPROVEMENTS
PLAN 227 P135 3159 016 fT Platform
3960 227 2046 3353 063 JOHNSON RIDGE TRCT WTR SER2257
3920 227 7970 3353 007 JOURDAWS CROSSING SERV EXTEN
3920 227 7993 3159 003 LABORATORY INFO MGMTSYSTEM
3920 227 7262 2127 013 LACROSSE RESERVOIR RECOAT&SAFE
3920 227 7473 6587 001 LINNET DRV WESTGTE TO LONGVEW
PLAN 227 P153 3212097 Loop 1 Section 1 & 2 Water
3960 227 7441 6599 007 LOOP 1 /SH 45 UTILfTY RELOCATE
3960 227 7907 4890 007 LOOP 360 HDD STAA #9B
3920 227 7226 5071 001 LOOP360 IMPROVEMENTS
PLAN 227 F056 6939 003 Loop 360 Westlake to Waymaker
FLAN 227 PI 68 4857015 Lost Creek
3960 227 7357 363 004 LOYOLA 183 TO CRYSTALBROOK
3920 227 7474 6586 001 LTTLE HLL CR CRAK3WD TO CRAGWD
000
1500
000
1500
000
000
9 280 43
7500
3 796 50
10000
35000
15458
38374
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
5000
000
531690
221 54
35200
47500
22568
000
10000
16500
88820
000
000
70000
50916
000
000
000
000
000
000
47506
000
000
000
10231
172
4603
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
8854
7639
000
321
000
11 32
6431
38889
000
000
27355
2213
CIP D3
Appendix DCIP Projects Targeted to Meet Existing Needs-Water
Current ITD
Appropriation Expenditures
FAO Subproject ID Orgn Name (m 1000 s of dollars)
PLAN 227 P038 6936003 Martin hill Puirp Station
3830 227 0447 2028 001 MARTIN HILL TRANSMSSION MAIN
PLAN 227 P024 4800 023 McAllen Pass PRV
3830 227 0700 2030 001 MCNBL RD TRANSMISSION MAIN
4200 227 7719 4800 007 MESA/GREY STONE PVUP STATION
3920 227 7475 6588 001 MONROE ST EASTSIDE TO CONGRESS
3920 227 7818 6934 001 MOTOROLA/OAKHLL CONVERSION
3920 227 7820 6939 002 MT LARSN RD/LAGUNA VSTA/LAKESH
3960 227 2036 3353 055 NALLE WOODS SUBDWISON
PLAN227 P163 5038 001 NMCFumps Slatons
FLAN 227 PI 70 4857 017 North Acres
FLAN227 P159 2127 012 North Austin Reservoir Replacement
4200 227 7959 2183 005 NORTH SERVICE CENTER
3920 227 7531 4800 025 NORTHWEST A&B ZONE BNDRY PRJ
39602277362 5404001 NUECES ST RECOrJSTRUCDON
39202277218 5038001 NWC PUMP STATION & TM
FLAN227P137 3212089 Old Manor Rd
39602277467 6959001 OLTORF CONGRESS TO IH35
3960 227 7435 6959 002 OLTORF STREET RECONSTRUCTION
3960 227 2025 3353 030 PKXARDTRACT
FLAN 227 POOS 3368 001 Pilot Knob Purnp Station
39602272043 3353060 PIONEER CROSSING AMENDED FUDN
3960 227 2031 3353 033 PIONEER CROSSING PH2 SER1825
PLAN 227 P148 3212 095 Reasnt Valley St Brro to Nuckols
39202277620 5309001 POLYBUTYLENE SERVICE REPLACE
PLAN 227 P187 4953 003 Property Improvements for New Bond Lands
3920 227 7220 2006 001 PUMP STATION IMPROVEKB^TS
PLAN227F162 2006001 Punp Station Irrprovemsnts
FLAN 227 P190 3376 038 Purchase of Silveradof Dessau Mobile Home)
4200 227 7721 4800 009 RABB/BBONNET AREA PRESSURE IMP
3960 227 7482 5873 012 RED BUD TRL FEASIBLfTY OF REL
PLAN 227 P151 3212096 Redbud Trail
3920 227 7070 4953 017 REICHER RANCH RENOVTN-OFFICES
3920 227 7660 2231 004 REPLC DETERIORATED FACILmES
3920 227 6810 2127 001 RESERVOIR IMPROVEMENTS
39202277105 2127010 RESERVOIR SECURITY IMFROVEMNTS
39602272048 3353066 RDDELL/ADAMS EXTRCTTRCTS WTR
39602277465 5403002 RJO GRANDE/12THTO M.K
39602277496 3212073 RM 2244 DRAINAGE REDESIGN
39602277791 5028002 RMMA RBMBUSEMENT (CATELLUS)
3960 227 2039 3353 049 ROBERTSON HILL DEVROPMENT W
3960 227 7746 4800 009 ROBRT E.LEBRABB/BLUEBNT LN PI
3960 227 7024 7264 001 ROOFING PARENT A CCT( ASSESSMENT
PLAN 227 P099 3212083 RR 2222 from 620 to 360
FLAN 227 P121 4953 009 Rutherford Boundary Fencing
FLAN 227 F126 4953 014 Rutherford Fencing (road easement)
000
458400
000
3 500 00
1 452 00
51833
30000
43700
46400
000
000
000
316328
1 400 00
58000
60000
000
58500
59400
97800
000
1 17000
72500
000
671 38
000
1 000 00
000
00085000
2800
000
13660
1 938 59
1 351 97
42500
420461
60000
800
9 821 48
35000
3 694 00
2500
000
000
000
000
271 10
000
14943
8376
946
000
000
000
000
000
000
1 953 42000
1230
17259
000
000
5300
294
000
000
40253
000
2088
000
000
000
00032323
000
000
000
5010
15548
000
188
000
000
86047
000
000
000
000
000
000
CIP D4
PLAN 227 P120
PLAN 227 P133
3960 227 204?
3920 227 7102
39602272044
3920 227 791 8
4200 227 7739
39602277747
PLAN 227 P154
PLAN 227 P156
PLAN227F063
39602277121
39202276751
3920 227 762S
39602277466
PLAN 227 P043
3960 227 2026
42002277725
42002277722
4200 227 7726
3960 227 7230
4200 227 7715
PLAN 227 P123
3920 227 7068
FLAN227P139
3960 227 2020
3960 227 2042
39602277389
3960 227 7497
4240 227 7161
PLAN 227 P192
PLAN 227 P144
42102277158
4240 227 7160
39202277163
39602277169
3960 227 2050
FLAN 227 P196
PLAN227P136
3960 227 7495
PLAN 227 PIOQ
39602277492
PLAN 227 P131
PLAN 227 P1 15
3960 227 7438
3920 227 7927
Appendix DCIP Projects Targeted to Meet Existing Needs-Water
Current ITD
Appropriation Expenditures
Subproject ID Orgn Name (m 1000 s of dollars)
4953 008 Rutherford Watergaps Replacement
3159 014 SCADA
3353 065 SCHULTZ 45AC TRCT WTR SERS2289
6621 001 SECURITY ENHANCEMENTS WATER
3353004 SERREWBURSEMENTS CP
757 009 SERVICE CENTER IMPROVEMENT WTR
4800 032 SETON-SHOAL CREEK WATERLINE
6935010 SH 130 CROSSINGS
3212098 SH 45 Section 8 Water
3212 098 SH 45 Section 9 Water
3212079 SH71 fromUS 183to973
2009006 SKAW LNLIMESLDG PTTNO2 DEV
2231091 SMALL DIAMETER MAIN REPLACE
5309005 SO CENTRAL AREA PB SERVICE REP
6052001 SPEEDWAY 25THT046TH
6935 006 Spicew ood Springs 24 inch TM Upgrade
3353 038 STONE HEDGE SUBDIVISION
4800021 SWC PRESSURE ZONE IMP FH2
4800010 SWC PRESSURE ZONE IMPS
4800 022 SWC PRESSURE ZONE TM PH1
4800 022 SWC PRESSURE ZONE TM PHASE 1
4800 004 SYSTEM IMP TO MEET MN STANDAR
4953011 Tabor Dam Repair
31 59 01 5 TIE 2 MOTOR GENERATORS AT GBSC
3212090 Todd Ln f rom Ben w hite to St Brro
3353 025 TRAVIS COUNTRY WEST REIMBURSEM
3353 061 TRJNfTY PUBLICATION
3212051 TXDOTFM973 S OFSH71 PEARCEL
3212 074 TXDOT FY06 $35M ($5M NON IH35)
5335 002 ULLRC 160MGD EXP/160MGD CON 1
5335 005 Ullrich DACS Obsolescence
2006 004 Ullrich Pump Station to Serve West Rim
5335001 ULLRICH WTP 160 MDG IMPS
5335001 ULLPJCHWTP160 MGDIMFROVEMEN
5335004 ULLRJCH WTP LfTlGATlON
5335001 ULLRICH WTP160 MGD IMPROVEMENT
3353 069 UNIVERSTY NGHBRHD OVERLAY DSTR
6935011 US 183 24 TM
3212088 US 183 at IH 35 {S to S connection)
3212 072 US 183 BOLMTOPATTON
3212084 US 183 fromSH71 toSH130
3212055 US 183 SFRINGDALE TO BOGGY
3212 085 US290Efrom E of FM 374 to E of 973
3212 085 US290Eof Arterial to E of FM734
3212 056 W US 290 71 JOETANNER SCENIC
757 007 WALLER CREEK CENTER IMPRS
000
000
21600
4 958 73
1 090 51
4014
22716
60000
000
000
000
7000011300
1 550 00
9700
000
1200000
3 500 005 932 00
2 855 00555000
75965
000
7500
000
1 725 00
4500
53300
50000310000
000
000
34 900 00
35 884 00
4700
43 952 50
1 93480
000
000
11 15900
000
3 090 00
000
000
43000
7255
000
000
000
2 874 39
000
3987
000
000
000
000
000
392
000
418
000
000
45760
201 21
2 943 53
48912
000
3885
000
000
000
1 108 25
000
10974
0002 072 42
000
000
28 694 561968430
000
3261350
094
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
21859
7255
CIP D 5
Appendix DCIP Projects Targeted to Meet Existing Needs-Water
Current ITD
Appropriation Expenditures
FAO Subproject ID Orgn Name (in 1000 s of dollars)
WALNUT CREEK PROJECT MANAGEMEN
WALNUT CRK SVC TO ANNXD PRJT A
WATER RESOURCE PLANNING STUDY
WATER SERVCES & METERS
WATER SUBO ENG & MSP
Water Treatment Plant 4
WATERSEDGE PUD
WCC Building Envelope hspectton/Re Caulking
WCC Carpet Replacement
WCC Crossw alk Roof Replacement
WCC Equipment Generator Tie ft
WCC Rre Panel Replacement
WCC Fire Pump Replacement
WCC SECURfTY IMPROVEMENTS
WCC Telephone System Upgrade Succession 3 0
WCC Won Door Motor Replacement
WCC-Replace Make up Air Handler
WDCS/SCADA
WEST BULL CREEK PS UPGRADES
West Campus System brprovements
Westgate fm Cameron Lp to Cohaba
Westlake/West Rim Water System Improvements
WILD HORSE RANCH WATER R8MBUR
WRI CENTRAL PH I-B RMW\ RES EN
WRICNTRL PH 1C-aEV&HYDRO TNK
WR1-SPH1A SLEEVE UNDER SH
WR1-CENTRAL PH 1D-51STTM
WRI-CENTRAL PH3A RH5 RV TO UT
WSC Bird Netting
WSC PBX Phone System
WSC Security Improvements
WSC Window Replacement
WSC Window ReplacementWTP #4 WATER TREATMENT PLANT
WTR QUALTY PROTECTION LAND IMP
WTR SYS IMPS TO MEET MN STDS
YAGER LN AT IH35 WATER RELOCTN
2ACHRY SCOTT TRCT WTR S£R#2259
3960 227 7937
3960 227 7939
39202277119
39402275011
39402275010
FLAN 227 P053
3900 227 2055
PLAN 227 P105
PLAN 227 P072
PLAN 227 P116
PLAN 227 PI 04
PLAN 227 P002
PLAN 227 PI 78
39202277916
PLAN 227 P1 10
PLAN 227 P050
PLAN 227 PI 80
39602277199
37502277215
PLAN 227 P089
PLAN 227 P143
PLAN 227 PI 65
3960 227 2023
4220 227 7832
39602276010
3920 227 7836
3960 227 6014
39602276013
PLAN 227 P045
PLAN 227 F068
PLAN 227 P009
FLAN 227 P066
FLAN 227 P069
3840 227 0951
3920 227 7058
3920 227 6705
3960 227 7447
3960 227 2045
Agency Total 227
6932 001
6932 002
3156003
2982 001
2981 001
6683 002
3353 073
757 007
757 007
757 007
757007
757007
757007
757 007
757 007
757 007
757 007
2056 002
2006 003
4800 028
3212092
4800 001
3353 028
5267 006
6940 004
6942 001
6940 005
6940 001
757 008
757 008
757 008
757 008
757 007
6683 002
4953 003
4800 004
3212 068
3353 062
93940
97000
58000
578000
6 800 02000
3 899 00
000
000
000
000
000
000
2000000
000
000
5 000 0012830
000
000
000
14 500 0087535
415000
45000
85000
25000
000
000
000
000
000
12779985
8340
10844
34500
3 428 00502 583 73
21218000
1215
496406
6 352 70000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
1 131 5910820
000
000
000
000
70478
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
48311 062442
5485
20896
094
17716337
CIP D6