2006 infrastructure conference
TRANSCRIPT
CONTEXT SENSITIVE
SOLUTIONS
NM Infrastructure & Finance Conference 2006
Right Sizing A Project for our Home Towns
Joe J. Sanchez, PE.
NMDOT CSS Division Manager
NMDOT CSS Status
• Context Sensitive Solutions
– Transportation Solutions +
Community
• Integrated Transportation Services
– Pavement Design Solutions
– Professional Services Contracting
– Environmental and Urban Design
Who are our Clients?
• You are our Clients- the citizens who use our transportation facilities
• Why do we care- we need to provide multimodal transportation Facilities that equally address safety, mobility, the environment, historic and local values and the respect the cultural uniqueness of our State.
Environmental & Urban
Design Unit
• New Initiative at NMDOT
• CSS Guidance Document for Planning, Development, Design, Construction, & Maintenance-ATRI
• Visual and Architectural Design Guide-UNM
• Artists on Call for Aesthetic Guidance-
• Engineering and Architectural Perspective for “Balanced design”
– Engineer, and two Landscape Architects, plus collaboration with design teams for CSS Management Plans for development & design
Why is this important to me?
• FHWA CSS CRITERIA Level 4
– Level 4: Meets CSS/CSD Criteria
– (from the 2/27/2003 CSS/CSD Game Plan)
Criteria A - there is a written commitment or policy.
Criteria B - technical staff is trained in CSS approach, both in field and central offices and across disciplines (planning, environment, design, right-of-way, operations, maintenance).
Criteria C - most projects are being implemented using CSS approach, tools, and methodologies.
Criteria D - there is early, continuing, and iterative public involvement throughout the project development process.
Criteria E - interdisciplinary teams are involved in the process from the beginning to the end.
Measurement Framework for CSS
Multi-disciplinary teams Community engagement Agreement on project problems & needs Alternatives analysis Construction
Training Manuals Policies Motivation
Timeframe and Budget Stakeholder satisfaction
Achievement of Project Vision & Goals Stakeholder satisfaction Quality Assurance Review
From small towns to
urban centers Arterials ( Rural/Urban)
higher mobility
low degree of access
Collectors (Rural/Urban)
balance between mobility and access
Locals (Rural/Urban)
lower mobility
high degree of access
What’s that Chart got to do
with Me?
• Characterize the Roadway and
Land Use
– Cars
– Cars & Trucks
– Cars/Trucks/People
– Cars/Trucks/People/Farms &
Ranches/Industry/Zoning
– Cars/Trucks/People/City
Life/Industry/Zoning
Designing for the Facility
• Identify Design Controls – Functional Classification
– Terrain
– Location ( Rural/Urban-mixed)
– Traffic Volume
– LOS
– Design Driver and Vehicle
• Speed
• Project Type – New Construction
– Reconstruction of Existing
– 3R ( Resurfacing, Restoration, & Rehabilitation
Are we to smart for our own good?
• The Engineers Trap.
– We really want to help!
– We think we can solve everything!
– We think we can design a solution right away!
• Do our stakeholders really what us to help that
much?
– Stakeholders want to be heard!
– Stakeholders want to understand why we design the
way we do!
– This doesn’t mean giving up responsible engineering
charge!
Role of the Design Professional
• Develop safe, effective, creative
alternatives
• Communicate Stakeholder concerns &
issues for Decision Makers
• Participate in the Project Decision
Process
• Incorporate Public Input w/Env. Doc’s
• Document Project Decision’s
• Assure Community Issues are addressed
through the construction phase
Applying CSS in Terms of
Design And Flexibility
• Sustainability
– Adapt to Facility
– Resources ( Public/Agency)
– Community Traditions and
Roles
Context Sensitive Solutions
• Planning,
• Development
• Design
• Construction
• Maintenance
• And integrating NEPA along the way
for Safe, multimodal, designs that
integrate, enhance and preserve
our unique environmental heritage