2005 gwangju asian human rights forum papers
DESCRIPTION
2005 Gwangju Asian Human RIghts Forum PapersTRANSCRIPT
Difference and Human Rights
( Asian Human Rights Charter's Significance and Forecast )
Park Koo Young (Junnam University)
People and organizations which pursue concrete realization of universal human rights
ideology always must always precisely understand the diverse criticisms raised
regardinguniversal ideology of human rights. Only then human rights not lose
sensitivity regarding difference. If human rights are justified by restoring dissimilarity,
differences and divergence to sameness, then human rights could bring about
completely different results compared to its original ideology. In fact, there were cases
when human rights which was abstractly justified on the basis of sameness and not
differences was degraded to an ideology which justified violence and not as a
mechanism which guaranteed human rights. There are largely four types of criticisms
regarding universal human rights ideology.
The first type of criticism can be expressed by the proposition that human rights is a
moral supposition which is impossible to prove or disprove and that it is ultimately an
utopia which cannot be realistically achieved. In order toovercome this criticism, human
rights has to be justified based on a paradigm of mutual subjectivity and has to be
justified not by abstract ideology but by concrete norms. According to the second type
of criticism, justification of human rights itself has no choice but to be dependent on the
context so human rights cannot argue for universal validity. In order to overcome this
criticism, the fact that the universal validity of human rights is not hostile to cultural
distinctiveness but is mutually complementary has to be shown.
Third is the criticism is that since human rights were derived Western society's
heritage from liberalism and possessive individualism, it is hostile to culture which
emphasizes the value of culture of community rather than of individuals. In order to
overcome this criticism, human rights must not be limited to the rights of individuals
and be expanded to the rights of a group. The fourth criticism is that in case human
rights are justified as moral norms which have universal validity rather than as legal
norms, human rights can justify moral imperialism. In this context, warning that the
concept of moral human rights can infringe on sovereignty can be raised. This criticism,
for example can target the US government which is carrying out a war under the reason
of 'Ensuring the human rights of the Iraqi citizens'. In order to overcome this criticism,
human rights have to develop as a basic rights agreement with legal effectiveness and
not a moral charter.
At this point, we must see if the <Asian Human Rights Charter> is overcoming the
aforementioned four criticisms. In my opinion, it seems that <Asian Human Rights
Charter> can overcome at least the aforementioned three criticismsout of the four. First,
the <Asian Human Rights Charter> starts from the large principle that it provides a
human rights agreement as a basis of concrete actions and policy and not from a abstract
concept.
Second, the <Asian Human Rights Charter> is against regarding the universality of
human rights and historic and cultural distinctness as in a hostile relationship. The
<Asian Human Rights Charter> supports the human rights charters or agreements
declared by international organizations whilerespecting the distinctiveness and diversity
of Asian culture. The fact that the <Asian Human Rights Charter> pursues a harmony of
diversity and universality shows the high value of the charter. In particular, a very
remarkable point is the fact that the <Asian Human Rights Charter> clearly criticizes
authoritarian national ideology which is disguised under the name of "Asian value".
Third, the <Asian Human Rights Charter> does not limit human rights as the rights of
individuals but is expanding it to rights of diverse groups. In particular a very
significantachievement is that the human rights of 'women', 'children', 'disabled',
'laborers', 'students', 'prisoners' and 'political prisoners' are clearly stated. Through this,
the <Asian Human Rights Charter> makes it clear that the ideology of human rights
isnot hostile to communal culture. Fourth, <Asia Human Rights Charter> regards
human rights and sovereignty in a mutually limiting relationship. The <Asian Human
Rights Charter> states that countries which do not protect human rights under the name
of sovereignty cannot be justified any more and that infringing on human rights
selectively under the name of human rights also cannot be justified. According to the
<Asian Human Rights Charter>, only countries which guarantee human rights can enjoy
sovereign 쇼 andat the same time, only human rights which guarantee sovereignty is
justifiable.
As mentioned above, the <Asian Human Rights Charter> is convincingly overcoming
the diverse criticisms which are set forth in the modern discourse about human rights.
Furthermore, the critical viewpoint the <Asian Human Rights Charter> takes about
'wrong globalism', that is, a critical view toward 'globalism' and the critical view toward
national or economic ideology and regarding distorted nationalism shows that the
<Asian Human Rights Charter> is an ideology based on differences and not based on
the principle of sameness. The <Asian Human Rights Charter> states that human rights
must not become a logic of the strong but must be the logic of the weak. Of course,
there are several limitations despite these positive results.
The <Asian Human Rights Charter> in 1993 started from criticism by NGOs
regarding the Bangkok Declaration announced by the ASEAN based on the ideology of
"Asian Value'.Accordingly, the human rights charter was carried out purely by NGOs
without the consultation process of Asian governments. This is why the <Asian Human
Rights Charter> contains progressive content which was unheard of in the past.
However this execution process has weak points. Most of all, the <Asian Human Rights
Charter> is not expanding the human rights from a moral concept to a legal concept.
That is why it seems that the <Asian Human Rights Charter> is cannot overcome the
limitation of being a moral declaration of NGOs. Moreover, the <Asian Human Rights
Charter>is not developing into a standard of substantial oppression and limitation
regarding the anti-humanitarian systems and power execution in various Asian countries
This limitation on the onederives from the fact that Asian countries were excluded in
the process drawing up the <Asian Human Rights Charter> but on the other hand it was
because the charter wascompleted and announced in a situation where the public
autonomy of the Asian people was not exercised.Concretely it is because transparent
disclosure and comprehensive sharing process regarding the diverse types of procedures
and regarding the conference was insufficient. This limitation resulted in the content of
the human rights charter limiting awareness of the voting rights (rights about
communication and procedures) whose rights were emphasized in the <European Union
Basic Rights Charter>.
Now the <Asian Human Rights Charter> has to overcome the level of just being a
moral declaration and has to be expanded into a basic rights charter by a
consultativeprocess between related countries, organizations and the whole Asian
people. In this process, we are in need of governance which signifies public rule which
means non-hierarchical and cooperative ruling method between the pluralistic entities of
society including the government and not through a declaration by a government which
means government-centered rule or a declaration centering on a NGO. To this end, we
must first prepare the framework of Asian governance. Taking into account that in the
process of drawing up the basic plan of the <European Union Basic Right Charter>,
indirect participation of NGOs were guaranteed but very limited, the <Asian Human
Rights Charter> will need to come up with a developed human rights charter through a
more upgraded governance process.
Human rights are not a composition of fixed and settled norms but must be aconcept
which is formed in the process of continuous criticism regarding rule and oppression
carried out in a negative reality. Accordingly, human rights must always not be a
language for the ruling system but on the other hand must be the words for the
oppressed and the excluded, the rights for the excluded others or those who are not the
same who either are not assimilated into the system or refuse to be assimilated.
In this context, we must most of all come up with human rights indicators based on
the <Asian Human Rights Charter>. The human rights charter needs to be proposed and
evaluated according to the universality and the distinctiveness of each country. First of
all, it seems that it would be best for the human rights indicators to be proposedfrom the
perspectives of NGOs in each country. It is because through this, the human rights
indicator can be effectively set forth which sufficiently take into consideration the
historical distinctiveness, cultural distinctiveness and the social and economic
distinctiveness of each country.
The concrete human rights investigation, evaluation and declaration of theNGOs
through human rights indicators can limit the activities of the governments and local
autonomies of each country and furthermore provide a cornerstone so that the<Asian
Human Rights Charter> can be established through Asian governance. If the <Asian
Human Rights Charter> needs to be formed newly through Asian governance, it will be
best for the human rights indicators to be drawn up and selected by the NGOs so that
the concrete and special understanding and interests of the Asian people are reflected.
The human rights indicators drawn up mainly by governments or national organizations
have a high possibility of distorting the harmony between human rights, sovereignty,
the universality of human rights and distinctiveness.
The NGOs of Korea also need to come up with a unified human rights indicator. Of
course, before this, there needs to be proposals and executions of diverse forms of
human rights indicators which can limit the local governments according to the special
situation of each region. In this process, there is a need for the Korean human rights to
Be sensitive to the human rights of foreigners or migrant laborers and diverse human①
rights related issues which occur during the process of globalization Need to come②
up with regional human rights indicators, evaluate them and through this, connect
human rights to concrete issues in life and discuss them in the process of checking the
local autonomies. As human rights need to be concrete and practical ideology, the
human rights indicators should not be forced in a fixed framework.
THE POLITICAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS CONDITIONS IN ASIAN
COUNTRIES
I
Introduction
In Asia, as indeed anywhere in the world, the is a strong interdependence and
interrelatedness between political conditions and human rights conditions:
· Good governance brings with it political stability and inclusion, thus creating the
ideal environment for promoting, protecting, respecting and realizing human
rights: all human rights (economic, social, cultural, civil and political) for all
(individuals, communities and groups).
· Respect for human rights in turn fosters good governance.
· Bad governance and exclusion brings with it political instability and very
adverse human rights conditions.
· Disrespect for human rights and their systemic violation encourage bad and
unaccountable governance.
In most countries in Asia, the human rights and political conditions prevailing are like
the proverbial glass of water: half full or half empty depending on ones perspectives.
II
Challenges and opportunities regarding human rights in Asia
At least 5 major and daunting challenges confront human rights activists, governmental
and nongovernmental alike in Asia today:
Co-optation
Asian governments are increasingly adopting a strategy of co-opting the rhetoric of
human rights and making token gestures such as adopting national human rights plans
or creating a national human rights commission with a mandate and resource base so
limited as to make it ineffective. However, Asian human rights activists have responded
by trying to co-opt the co-opted! They have worked with national human rights
commissions and made them effective, often helping to provide human and other
resources, while constantly engaging with them and pressing them to do more.
Similarly, national human rights plans which were intended to be on paper only, have
taken on a life of their own and donors have been quick to respond, to support the
trend..
Confrontation
Certain Asian governments do not hesitate to crack down on human rights activist
whether in Bangkok or in Beijing. However, national refusal to be cowed down and
regional and international support has helped fight back. Urgent action appeals, and hot
lines have been established within Asia itself and an independent media is being
nurtured in several countries.
Conceptualization
Asian human rights intellectuals and activists have worked hard to debunk myths and
misconceptions about human rights spawned by some Western academics, namely that
economic, social and cultural rights are not really rights (unlike civil and political
rights) since they are realized only progressively. Or that human rights are rights only of
individuals and that there can be no such thing as collective rights. But much work lies
ahead in conceptualizing and realizing the rights of minorities, of indigenous peoples or
of migrant workers and the internally displaced. Work is also needed to encourage
justiciability of human rights but to not make justiciability a precondition for the
recognition of human rights. Most importantly, work is needed to hold non-state actors,
corporate, institutional or individual, accountable for the human rights consequences of
their acts and activities.
Capacity
Human rights NGOs and practitioners need to develop their capacities in newly
emerging fields such as applying a human rights-based approach to development, or
utilizing new information technologies for more effective networking.
Co-operation
Human rights NGOs and activists need to improve their ability to co-operate and work
with community-based organizations, peoples organizations, social movements and
other cause oriented action groups such as those working on environmental issues,
consumers issues etc.
But aside from these challenges, at least 5 major opportunities are also visible regarding
human rights in Asia.
Ratification of human rights treaties
There is a distinct trend towards ratifying human rights instruments on the part of some
Asian governments in post-conflict situations, either as part of an international peace
accord as is the case with Afghanistan or on attaining independence as is the case with
East Timor. After ratification, there is also the positive trend of including human rights
in several of the new Constitutions that have been drafted in Asia during the past
decade. The challenge now lies in moving from national incorporation to national
implementation as well;.
National Human Rights Commissions
Perhaps with greater frequency than any other region in the developing world, Asian
governments have been moving to establish National Human Rights Commissions.
Admittedly, the mandate of such Commissions has often been flawed at inception. But
even so, as the experience in Sri Lanka, India and Indonesia clearly indicates, once set
up these Commissions have tended to take on a life of their own and are functioning
with greater autonomy and effectiveness than one could have dared to hope at their
inception. An Asia-Pacific Forum of National Human Rights Institutions has been
established for some time now and is going from strength to strength in networking,
providing technical co-operation and in forging solidarity links.
Emerging human rights jurisprudence
In several Asian countries, under the exceptional leadership of the Supreme Court of
India (and its pioneering work on social action litigation) the apex judiciary has taken
the lead in incorporating human rights into national law and developing human rights
jurisprudence. Thus, for example, the Indian Supreme Court has “read” the right to a
healthy and safe environment into the rights to life and health guaranteed by the
Constitution of India. The Supreme Court and Courts of Appeal in the Phillipines have
been organizing workshops to better understand the role of the courts in realizing
economic, social and cultural rights. Moreover, good judicial practices and precedents
are been shared and adopted within the region.
Changing attitudes to human rights in the large countries in Asia
Although there is a long way to go yet, there has been a distinct change in attitudes
toward human rights in the large countries in Asia, with China and Indonesia beginning
to adopt a more open stance, following the example of India. A large part of the
population of Asia is found in these three countries. In Indonesia, the leadership is
coming from the National Human Rights Commission. In China, the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs has already (in a span of around 5 years) twice hosted the Annual Asia-
Pacific Intergovernmental Workshop on Regional Human Rights Arrangements
organized by the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights under
mandates flowing from annual Resolutions of the UN Human Rights Commission anf
the UN General Assembly.
The least developed countries and human rights.
In Asia there has been a very healthy co-operation between the international donor
community and the governments of the least developed countries of the region. With
generous assistance from the government of Finland, the Lao PDR has embarked upon
an ambitious agenda of ratification of international law treaties, notably the human
rights treaties and is moving from national incorporation to national implementation
over a very short span of less than five years. In Cambodia, the international donor
community has helped bring into existence and strengthen a number of vibrant national
human rights NGOs.
II
Challenges and opportunities regarding political conditions in Asia
As with human rights in Asia, there have been at least 5 positive trends and
opportunities regarding political developments in Asia.
People power
Over the past decade and more, there have been heartening manifestations of the
exercise of people power bringing to an end the reign of foreign occupation, autocrats,
dictators and the military in country after country in Asia: the Philippines, Bangladesh,
Pakistan (although lamentably short-lived), Thailand, Indonesia, South Korea, Vietnam,
and most recently East Timor are cases in point. Such exercise of people power has been
peaceful and non-violent. The challenge has been not in the restoration of democracy
but rather in the institutionalization of democracy.
Elections
There has again been a healthy trend in many countries in Asia towards the regular
conduct of largely free and fair elections accompanied by a growing willingness to
allow such elections to be freely monitored by international and national election
monitoring teams. Recognition of the importance of such election monitoring has been
generously made by the international donor community who have also provided willing
and generous support to the establishment of independent and effective National
Election commissions in several Asian countries..
Constitution-making processes
Especially in post-conflict countries in Asia there has been the welcome recognition of
the importance of constitution-making processes to peace-making and to peace-
building. International presence in such processes has been seen in Cambodia and in
Afghanistan. In Nepal, a decade ago, one of the most transparent and participatory
constitution-making processes produce the model, modern, constitution for the region.
Unfortunately, that document lies in tatters due to the usurpation of authority by the
Monarch in Nepal today.
NGOs and Civil Society
In many countries in Asia, there has been a flourishing of NGOs and civil society
organizations. There has also been a welcome trend of co-operation between human
rights NGOs, development NGOs and environmental NGOs exemplified for example,
in the campaign against the Narmada mega-dam project in India. Of course much more
needs to be done to strengthen networking and solidarity both within countries (and here
Iran is a shining example of best-practice) and also between countries (as the decades
long International Campaign for Justice in Bhopal so poignantly demonstrates).
Independence of the media
Given the degree of censorship and control of media that used to typify the Asian
region, there has been a welcome trend towards the development of independent and
responsible media in several countries of the region. Undoubtedly the information and
communications technology revolution has played a positive role here. But so too has a
change in the attitude of several governments in Asia.
Despite the above positive trend noted, one must guard against being too sanguine.
Formidable challenges continue to persist as well.
The failure of political parties
An alarming trend in many Asian countries has been the failure of political parties as an
institution for genuine and effective political participation. Unfortunately, it is a trend
that has not yet attracted the attention it deserves. There has almost been a fatalistic
tendency to accept “low-intensity democracy”. The need of the hour however, is for a
region-wide campaign to reject “low-intensity democracy” as being in fact “no-intensity
democracy”!
Internal armed conflicts
Too many Asian countries are plagued by long-standing (Sri Lanka), persistent (Aceh),
violent (Kashmir).internal armed conflict which is often being inadequately addressed
by the government in power as is the case with the 6 provinces in Southern Thailand
today. We the peoples of Asia need to strive to stop Asia from being the region in the
world with highest incidence and intensity of internal armed conlict.
Protection of minorities
A major cause of internal armed conflict in Asia has been the lack of protection of
minority rights. Asia has a proud heritage of cultural diversity and pluralism which we
once cherished and celebrated. Today, as a result of the ethnicization of politics and
because of the politicization of ethnic identity, many Asian governments look upon
ethnicity and diversity as something to be feared, controlled and suppressed. As ethnic
identities become more and more insecure, intolerance and fundamentalism hold sway.
We need to go back to the practice of appreciating differences and celebrating one
another’s festivals.
Poverty
Despite prosperity for some, poverty for the many remains the rule rather than the
exception in Asia. The growing gap between rich and poor, both within countries and
between countries needs to be addressed with highest degree of political will if peace
and stability are to be attained in our region. Economic globalization is marginalizing
millions in Asia and only a regional approach to the harmful practices of economic
globalization is likely to stem the rising tide of pauperization and human misery.
Prison
Prison conditions in many Asian countries are appalling and should be universally
unacceptable. Yet prison reform remains neglected on the political agenda of most
governments in Asia. This must be redressed instantly. As long as some remain in chains
in Asia there will be no true freedom for anyone in Asia.
In sum therefore, let us not be content to rest on our laurels; but rather let us rage, rage
against the dying of the light.
Clarence J, Dias,
New York.
November 5, 2005.
Paper presented by Gokul Pokhrel, Commissioner,
National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), Nepal, at
The Gwangju Forum on Asian Human Rights
Gwangju City, 7-9 December, 2005
Honorable Chairman,
Distinguished members of human rights community of Asia,
I feel much honored to participate in this august forum organized by our Korean hosts
with the aim of promoting and developing the spirit of democracy, human rights and
peace among various countries of Asia though their respective national human rights
commissions and non-governmental institutions. I would like to avail of this occasion to
extend warm greetings from the Chairman of Nepalese Commission to the 18 Memorial
Foundation, the Korean National Human Rights Commission and Korea Democracy
Foundation for hosting this important meeting at a very critical moment of history when
the lofty principles of human rights are under severe strains in several transitional
democracies, Nepal not being the exception.
While we are assembled here to make fresh appraisal of the human rights situation vis-
à-vis the commitments made by the respective governments to various international
treaties and agreements, our heart and mind bow in reverence to the sacrifices and
memories of the May 18 Gwangju Democratic Uprising, that has stood up as a beacon
providing immense inspiration to many emerging democracies the world over.
It is my honour to attend this meeting representing Nepal, which is now the focus of
attention in various international fora where our friends have expressed their legitimate
concerns over the derailment of democratic institutions in the wake of prolonged
internal conflict and violation of human rights in the absence of a polity based on the
respect for rule of law.
The political situation worsened from 1st February, 2005, when the king imposed a state
of emergency and formed a government under his chairmanship. The imposition of
emergency and direct rule generated wide spread criticism in the country and abroad as
it led to drastic curbs on human rights and media freedom. While the three-month state
of emergency ended on 29 April this year, the situation thereafter has not been
encouraging either. Fundamental rights of the people continue to be violated and abused
with increasing incidents of illegal arrests and re-arrests. The country in effect, is ruled
by ordinances and, in some cases, actions are based on ad-hoc expediencies over respect
for constitutional provisions. The absence of dialogue between the parliamentary
opposition parties and the government at the face of continued threat from the Maoist
insurgency has intensified instability at home and serious concern among international
community who want to see democracy restored in the country at the earliest.
Recent Issues at the Commission
The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) of Nepal had to bear the brunt of the
worsened political environment when it was reconstituted on 27 May, 2005. The
resentment expressed by a section of human rights NGOs of Nepal over the composition
of a new team headed by the former chairman and the concerns expressed by
international fraternity of human rights organizations regarding the independence of the
Commission and its competence were not unfounded in the prevailing environment of
instability and conflict. In this context, the visit by a UN Fact Finding Mission to Nepal
last June and its recommendations thereafter have been very useful in dispelling many
of the apprehensions raised earlier regarding the performance of the national institution.
We are indeed very grateful for the criticism from friends of human rights NGOs in
Nepal and the constructive suggestions of international fraternity which have made us
more vigilant and alert in the dispensation of our onerous responsibilities in the most
critical juncture of our times.
NHRC has already initiated the process of implementing the recommendations made in
the mission report and realigning the activities of the national institution in conformity
with international norms and standards as far as practicable.
During the period of five months, NHRC has made relentless efforts to raise its voice
against cases of illegal detention of political leaders without any charges, the re-arrest of
detainees following their acquittal from courts and restrictions on the exercise of
freedom of expression and opinion.
Defending Human Rights
NHRC expressed grave concern over the unlawful ban imposed on FM radio stations
prohibiting them to air programmes other than of entertainment nature. The protest was
more manifest when the government issued an ordinance on 9 October amending most
of the media laws on print as well as broadcast media that provided for drastic
curtailment of press freedom and freedom of expression. The law permitted broadcast of
information on sectoral developmental issues but restricted airing news and views of
political nature. While the media continued to defy the ban, security forces stormed the
office of the foremost and popular private radio channel Kantipur FM during midnight
on 21 October, 2005 and seized the up-linking equipment.
NHRC denounced the incident as a violation of the fundamental rights of the people and
summoned the Information Minister of the Government for an explanation. The
statement denouncing the government’s unreasonable action was widely reported in the
media. But it also drew sharp reaction from senior government leaders who publicly
repudiated NHRC’s role over the incident.
NHRC on Peace Dialogue
The Maoists declared a three-month cease-fire on 3 September, 2005 on the eve of great
Hindu festivals. NHRC welcomed the move as a ‘positive gesture’ and called upon the
government to reciprocate with similar actions. NHRC regretted that the request did not
meet the response as was expected. The Commission has made relentless efforts
towards building a consensus for a human rights approach for conflict mitigation. In this
context, it once again called on His Majesty’s Government to respond to the ceasefire
positively and on both the parties involved in the conflict to sign on a cease-fire
document and Human Rights Accord drafted by the Commission. In our view, these
measures could be the first step toward confidence building and starting a peace
process.
During this period of unilateral cease-fire, NHRC undertook field monitoring of the
cases of human rights violations by both the State and the Maoists in 35 districts. Other
prominent human rights NGOs also undertook monitoring of human rights violations.
During this period, except sporadic cases of violence including abductions and forcible
extortion of money, the temporary peace gave immense relief to the people.
The period of unilateral cease-fire is due to expire on 3 December after which further
intense political confrontations are expected creating immense suffering to the common
people. There is still the need of promoting the agenda of peace at the mass level to put
enough pressure on the protagonists of power struggle to initiate dialogue and peaceful
settlement of their disagreements.
NHRC on Rule of Law
NHRC has been very forthright in pointing out lapses and shortcomings of the
government on various issues of public concern. It denounced the establishment of the
Royal Commission on Control of Corruption (RCCC) as contravening to the
Constitution of the Kingdom of Nepal, 1990 and human rights instruments to which
Nepal is a party, as well as principles of natural justice and rule of law. In recent times,
the promulgation of Media Ordinances followed by the Code of Conduct meant for
restricting the freedom of NGOs and INGOs operating in Nepal have further aggravated
public concern over the prevalence of rule of law in the country. NHRC has viewed
these developments with serious concern and is in the process of studying the
implications of these latest measures taken by the government. Certainly, it will be to
our advantage to share with members of regional and international community their
experiences and practices in other democratic country situations on these issues of high
priority public concerns. Meanwhile, the cases against the RCCC, media ordinance and
the code of conduct on NGOs are sub judice in the Supreme Court of Nepal. We hope
our apex court will finalize these cases in time.
NHRC on Asian Human Rights Charter
We are delighted to find that the Gwangju Forum on Asian Human Rights has, quite
appropriately, timed the occasion to make fresh appraisal of the contents of Asian
Human Rights Charter. We have noted with high admiration, the labor and efforts put in
by eminent scholars and civil society leaders of Asia for over a decade to bring the
historical document to the present shape. The document is an excellent piece of
synthesis of Asian social and cultural diversities with international human rights
covenants and charters and is applicable to various country situations that profess their
unflinching commitment to democracy, human dignity, freedom and human rights. I am
happy to find that many of our Nepalese friends have also contributed to enriching the
contents of the Draft Declaration during the consultation held in Kathmandu on 9 – 11
April, 1995.
I would like to submit my humble comments and observations on the Charter which are
as followed:
· Rule of Law, social and economic justice and democracy are the pre-conditions
for the dignity of people irrespective of their geography, ethnicity and
cultures. Some of values as codified by international covenants and charters
are universal in application and hence are subject to their implementation as
per the specified international and regional standards and procedures.
· We have noticed that different yard-sticks and criteria are adopted regarding the
composition and functioning of national human rights institutions in various
Asian countries. Such diversities are welcome to the extent that they are
conditioned by national requirements and situations. But in order to promote
their high sanctity and public trust, the Asian Forum is requested to look into
this matter from the view point of ‘best practices’ and flexibility norms
without compromising with international standards and principles.
· It is the responsibility and duty of various national institutions and civil society
organizations to disseminate the principles of the Charter as widely as
possible to educate the masses and generate thereupon a sense of belonging
to the international movement for enhancing human dignity including theirs
also.
· The Charter very rightly enjoins on the governments of States to respect the
various provisions of the Charter, share information with international and
regional bodies on human rights and provide open access to inspection
within the countries.
· NHRC finds merit in organizing a consultative meeting of concerned
organizations in Nepal to discuss the principles and operational modalities as
specified in the Charter for awareness creation among the stakeholders.
· The principles and modalities enumerated in the Charter should be made a part
of national curriculum of human rights and recommended for inclusion as
part of media training curricula and the curricula of various informal
channels of training.
Conclusion
NHRC fully endorses the principle that “Democratic and accountable governments are
the key to the protection of human rights” and looks forward to the restoration of
democratic institutions at the earliest. In this respect, any goodwill or assistance from
regional and international agencies aimed at finding a peaceful settlement of the
conflict, the prevalence of Rule of Law and protection of human rights will be highly
commendable. NHRC as an independent national institution created by a special Act of
law expresses its commitment to ensure that all the regional and international principles
on human rights and other rights associated with it are honored by the State and other
parties concerned. Despite our limitations and constraints under the very complex and
instable political environment we are facing today, we feel nonetheless, encouraged by
the support and understanding shown by human rights institutions and friends of the
Asia Region.
Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) -
Human Rights Activities and Issues
(Presented at Gwang Ju, Korea)
Before I begin, allow me to express my appreciation to the organisers for giving me this
opportunity to address this esteemed conference. The Human Rights Commission of
Malaysia or commonly known as SUHAKAM is deeply honoured by the invitation.
Before I deal with the functions, powers and the work of SUHAKAM, allow me to give
you a brief background of Malaysia to better appreciate the context within which the
Commission works.
Malaysia is situated in South East Asia and comprises 11 States in Peninsular Malaysia
and two States, Sabah and Sarawak in the Borneo island. Malaysia’s population of
26.26 million1 is made up of diverse races, ethnic groups, cultures and religions. At the
1 2005 Third Quarter, http://www.statistics.gov.my
time of independence in 1957, Malaysia was known as Malaya and it was not until the
accession of the two States of Sabah and Sarawak in 1963, that the 13 States of the
Federation were collectively known as Malaysia.
Malaysia is a constitutional monarchy and also a representative democracy. What I
mean by this is that although the King is the Head of the State, sovereignty is in the
hands of the people who directly elect the government to govern the country.
Malaysia’s parliamentary democracy is based on the Westminster model, that is, the
legislative and executive powers are in the hands of the majority party. By way of a
general election, held every four years, the ruling government is formed by the party
that wins majority seats in Parliament. The Parliament of Malaysia consists of two
houses – the House of Representatives which comprises representatives elected by the
people during general elections and the Senate, which consists of two members elected
by the local legislature in each State and 40 appointed Senators. Since independence,
Malaysia has been governed by the National Front which consists of 14 component
parties2.
The second fundamental aspect of democracy is that of free and fair elections. The
Federal Constitution and various election laws in Malaysia prescribe the electoral
organisation, the conduct of elections, the constitution of an Election Commission and
the direct vote of electors. Since 1959, Malaysia has held free and fair elections.
The third feature of a democratic nation is an independent Judiciary. The Malaysian
Court system consists of the Magistrates Courts, the lowest Court in the hierarchical
structure, the Sessions Court and the constitutionally constituted High Court, the Court
of Appeal and the apex court of the land, the Federal Court. We have 87 superior Court
Judges and Judicial Commissioners. Whether the number of Superior Court Judges is
sufficient for a population of 26 million is an issue which merits separate consideration.
Suffice to say that the Commission has recommended that more Judges be appointed to
deal with the increasing number of Court cases.
2 The United Malays National Organisation (UMNO), The Malaysian Chinese Association (MCA), The Malaysian Indian Congress (MIC), Parti Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu (PBB), Sarawak United People's Party (SUPP), Gerakan Rakyat Malaysia (GERAKAN), People's Progressive Party (PPP), Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), Sabah Progressive Party (SAPP), Parti Bersatu Rakyat Sabah (PBRS), United Pasokmomogun Kadazandusun Murut Organisation (UPKO) Parti Bersatu Sabah (PBS), Sarawak Progressive Democratic Party (SPDP) and Parti Rakyat Sarawak (PRS).
In Malaysia, the Federal Constitution is the supreme law of the land and contains basic
guarantees of fundamental liberties and freedoms. Of particular importance to human
rights is Part II of the Federal Constitution which provides for the right to liberty 3,
prohibition of slavery and forced labour4, right to the protection against retrospective
criminal laws and repeated trials5, right to equality6, right to freedom of movement7,
right to freedom of speech, assembly and association8, right to freedom of religion9,
right to education10 and the right to property11.
The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia Act 1999, the Act of Parliament that
established the Commission, uses as reference point these nine fundamental liberties as
a framework for the Commission’s activities and work. What is important to note is that
section 4(4) of 1999 Act states that, “regard shall be had to the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights to the extent that it is not inconsistent with the Federal Constitution”.
This provision marks a significant development in the law of human rights in Malaysia
as for the first time, a domestic legislation explicitly cites the application of the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
This brings me to the crux of my address - the establishment, powers, functions and the
work of the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia. The initiative to set up a national
human rights institution in Malaysia was brought about by a permutation of factors.
Firstly, Malaysia’s participation in the United Nations Commission on Human Rights
(UNCHR) from 1993 to1998 and the election of Tan Sri Dato’ Musa Hitam, former
Deputy Prime Minister, as the Chairman of the 52nd session of the UNCHR. In 1994,
Tan Sri Musa Hitam suggested to the Government that the time was right for Malaysia
to establish its own independent national human rights institution.
The increased international recognition of human rights and the important role of
national human rights institutions in the machinery for the protection of human rights
and the 1993 World Conference on Human Rights in Vienna also provided the necessary
impetus for the creation of the Commission. The Vienna Declaration and Programme of
3 Article 5 of the Federal Constitution.4 Article 6 of the Federal Constitution.5 Article 7 of the Federal Constitution.6 Article 8 of the Federal Constitution.7 Article 9 of the Federal Constitution.8 Article 10 of the Federal Constitution.9 Article 11 of the Federal Constitution.10 Article 12 of the Federal Constitution.11 Article 13 of the Federal Constitution.
Action, the main outcome document of the World Conference, which was concurred to
by the Government of Malaysia, called upon all States to promote and protect all human
rights and fundamental freedoms so as to secure full and universal enjoyment of these
rights. In addition, countries within the region such as Indonesia, Philippines, India, Sri
Lanka, Australia, Fiji, Iran and New Zealand had already established their own national
human rights institutions and Thailand was in the midst of setting up its own. To date,
17 countries within the Asia Pacific region12 have established their own national human
rights institutions, including Korea which established its commission in the year 2001.
With the favourable developments at the international and regional level, in July 1999,
the Bill to establish the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia was tabled in
Parliament. On 3 April 2000, the Government announced the appointment of
SUHAKAM's first Chairman, Tan Sri Dato' Musa Hitam, and the 12 other members of
the Commission.
The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia is an independent body and its
establishment is based upon the Principles Relating to the Status of National Institutions
or more commonly referred to as the Paris Principles13. The Paris Principles provide the
international standards that independent human rights commission should possess. The
provisions in the 1999 Act guarantees the independence and pluralism of the
Commission. Commissioners are appointed by His Majesty the King on the
recommendation of the Prime Minister and Commissioners are selected to reflect the
diversity and pluralism of Malaysian society as required by section 5(3) of the 1999 Act.
Furthermore, to ensure a stable mandate for the members of the Commission, without
which there can be no real independence, appointments are for duration of 2 years,
appointments are renewable and a Commissioner can only be removed from office for
cause. The Commission presently has 17 Commissioners, almost with an equal amount
of men and women, from different racial background.
To ensure that the Commission is able to discharge its functions under the 1999 Act,
consonant with the Paris Principles, the Government is required by law to provide
“adequate funds annually”14. Adequate funding is a crucial factor in preserving the
independence of any national human rights institution.
12 Afghanistan, Australia, Fiji, India, Indonesia, Islamic Republic of Iran, Jordan, Malaysia, Maldives, Mongolia, Nepal, New Zealand, Palestine, Philippines, Republic of Korea, Sri Lanka, Thailand.13 Adopted by General Assembly resolution 48/134 of 20 December 1993.14 Section 19(1) of the 1999 Act.
The functions of the Commission as set out in section 4(1) are:
· To promote awareness of and provide education relating to human rights;
· To advise and assist Government in formulating legislation and procedures and
recommend the necessary measures to be taken;
· To recommend to the Government with regard to subscription or accession of
treaties and other international instruments in the field of human
rights; and
· To inquire into complaints regarding infringements of human rights.
The 1999 Act also provides the Commission with powers to enable it to discharge its
functions effectively. Under section 4(2), the Commission is empowered to do the
following:
To undertake research by conducting programs, seminars and workshops and to
disseminate and distribute the results of such research;
To advise the Government and/or relevant authorities of complaints against them and to
recommend appropriate measures to be taken;
To study and verify any infringement of human rights;
To visit places of detention in accordance with procedures as prescribed by laws relating
to the places of detention and to make necessary
recommendations;
To issue public statements on human rights as and when necessary;
To undertake appropriate activities as are necessary.
The Commission’s activities and functions are carried by four working groups, namely,
the Education and Promotion Working Group, the Law Reform and International
Treaties Working Group, the Complaints and Inquiries Working Group and the
Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Working Group. Allow me to briefly elaborate on
one of the principal functions of the Commission - inquiring into complaints. The power
to inquire into complaints is an important aspect of any national human rights institution
as it establishes an avenue for the general public to lodge a complaint on any
infringement of human rights and it provides independent investigation of human rights
abuses. The function of inquiring into complaints is carried out by the Complaints and
Inquires Working Group. The Commission is prohibited from investigating into
complaints which are the subject matter of proceedings pending in a court of law or
which have been finally decided by any court. Where an inquiry discloses the
infringement of human rights, the Commission has the power to refer the matter, where
appropriate to the relevant authority or person with the necessary recommendations. For
inquires that do not disclose infringement of human rights, the Working Group will
record the finding and inform the person making the complaint.
The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia is in its 5th year of operation and based
upon the principle of universality, indivisibility and inalienability of human rights, the
Commission’s activities have ranged from civil and political rights to economic, social
and cultural rights. Amongst the reports published by the Commission are the Report on
Trafficking in Women and Children, Report on the Review of the Internal Security Act
1960, Report on Accessibility to Basic Needs, Report on Freedom of Assembly, Report
on the Rights of Remand Prisoners, Report on the Forums on CEDAW15 and more
recently the Report on the Forum on Right to an Expeditious and Fair Trial (Civil and
Criminal Courts) and the Report on the Millennium Development Goal 1 on eradication
of extreme poverty and hunger.
The Commission has also submitted a Memorandum to the Special Commission to
Enhance the Operations and Management of the Royal Malaysia Police where the
Commission highlighted serious human rights issues such as deaths in police custody
and as a result of police shooting, police brutality, inhuman or degrading treatment of
persons in police custody, abuse of power and police inaction. In addition, the
Commission made a submission to the Parliamentary Select Committee on the Penal
Code (Amendment) Bill 2004 and Criminal Procedure Code (Amendment) Bill 2004.
This provided the Commission with an opportunity to present its views and
recommendations on several issues such as sexual abuse and violence within marriage,
increased powers of the police in criminal surveillance and intelligence, right to privacy
and the definition of terrorism offence.
Under section 12 of the 1999 Act, which empowers the Commission to conduct
inquiries on its own motion or acting on a complaint, the Commission has carried out
three public inquiries. The first public inquiry, the KESAS Highway Public Inquiry was
an investigation into an incident that occurred on the KESAS Highway on 5 November
2000 when the police prevented a rally from taking place. Essentially, the allegations
were that many people were arrested at the incident, some of whom were injured. The
second public inquiry was prompted by the numerous complaints and memorandums
15 Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women.
received by the Commission on allegations that persons detained under the Internal
Security Act 1960 were subjected to ill-treatment while under detention. The third
public inquiry was held in the year 2003. The Commission appointed a panel of three
Commissioners to hold a public inquiry to look into allegations of human rights abuses
by a private company and the police, in the town of Kundasang, Sabah.
The role of national human rights institutions will become progressively important in
the protection and promotion of human rights especially at the domestic level. The
escalating number of security legislation enacted in the name of preventing terrorism
demands greater vigilance on the part of national human rights institutions to ensure that
fundamental liberties are not eschewed in the name of terrorism and national security.
At the regional and international level, cooperation in the Asia Pacific region is greater
than before and for the first time, the United Nations Ad Hoc Committee to consider
proposals for A Comprehensive and Integral International Convention to Promote and
Protect the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, extended an invitation to national human
rights institutions to participate in the drafting and formulation of the said international
convention – a significant recognition by the United Nations of the role of national
human rights institutions in the formulation of international treaties.
I envisage that these developments would have an impact on SUHAKAM in particular,
on all national human rights institutions in general and on civil society at large,
inevitably increasing the responsibilities of national human rights institutions and civil
society to sincerely safeguard the fundamental freedoms of all people. On that note, I
thank you for being a captive audience and if there are any queries, I would be happy to
answer them.
Dato’ K.C. Vohrah
Commissioner
Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM)
Involuntary Disappearances: Sri Lankan Experience
Since 1971 Sri Lanka, once a peaceful country has been under emergency rule up to the
present excepting for some brief intervals. The political turbulence of Sri Lanka began
in 1971 when the radical rebel movement Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) (Peoples
Liberation Front) staged an organized armed insurrection against the government on
socio economic grounds.
The Coalition government led by the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) declared a state
of emergency and curbed the insurrection in a few weeks.
For the first time in the recent history of Sri Lanka torture, involuntary disappearances
and extra-judicial executions were committed to crush the 1971 insurrection. Many
others who were not connected to the insurrection were also arbitrarily arrested and
detained under emergency regulations.
The United National Party government, which came to power in 1977, grew more
repressive. The Executive Presidency created under the new Constitution of 1977 made
the president a virtual dictator. Armed with emergency power promulgated by the
President and the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA) enacted by the Parliament later
began to suppress opposition and the peoples’ will.
The police, security forces, government backed groups of hoodlums. goons and
vigilante groups were used to harass and attack university students, trade unions,
political opponents, intellectuals, journalists and even Supreme Court Judges who
delivered fundamental rights violation judgments against the government. Police
officers found responsible for such violations were rewarded and promoted.
The rights violations dramatically escalated throughout the 1980s creating an
atmosphere of fear among the Sri Lankans, which drew the attention of the International
community. The infamous Referendum held in 1982 to postpone the life of the
Parliament was won by intimidating and harassing millions of people. The Government
started to terrorize Opposition political parties, trade unions and other civil society
organizations that opposed the anti-people economic policies of the Government, which
weakened the people’s capacity to dissent.
During the same time ethnic Tamil youths in the Northern Part of Sri Lanka who
claimed that the majority Sinhala Government in Sri Lanka had discriminated against
them, socially, ethically and economically launched a rebellion against the Government
under the banner of Liberation Tigers of Tamil Elam (LTTE). Their campaign
intensified in the 1980 in the North and spread to the East of the country and the
Government’s reaction was to use increased violence against them. The arrested
members of the LTTE were tortured and executed extra-judicially and were made to
disappear.
In the meantime the JVP also launched a second insurrection in the South almost at the
same time.
Government security forces, paramilitary squads and vigilante groups massacred
thousands of suspected JVP members as well as political opponents of the Government.
Incidents of involuntary disappearances, extra judicial killings and torture increased
dramatically.
The JVP and the LTTE insurrections were also violent. They also massacred hundred of
innocent people. Nevertheless the horrendous onslaught unleashed by the State on its
opponents threatened the basic human right of all Sri Lankans. When the State itself
becomes brutal and lawlessness and anarchy reigns the entire democratic fabric
crumbles. The Sri Lankan government failed to understand the saying of Nietzsche the
German Philosopher that "whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process
he does not become a monster himself’.
According to the UN Working Group on Involuntary and Enforced Disappearances
(UNWGIED) report released in 1992, Sri Lanka with approximately 12,000
documented disappearances had the highest number of recorded involuntary
disappearances in the world. According to Human Rights Organizations, between
40,000 to 60,000 people had disappeared between 1983 and I990. Thousands were
detained in military detention camps. Furthermore, government sponsored death squads
executed many more thousands extra-judicially.
All these were perpetrated in the guise of protecting national security by using the
dreaded emergency regulations which permitted wide powers of arrest and detention
and even provided for the disposal of dead bodies without holding inquests and the
Prevention of Terrorism Act, which was introduced as a temporary measure to cover
only the North and East of the country was made permanent and enforceable all over the
country by a later amendment.
The Peoples’ Alliance (PA) Government came to power in 1994 with a solemn
undertaking inter alia to uphold the Rule of Law and to stop the forces violating
fundamental human rights and to bring before justice all those who were responsible for
the involuntary disappearances. This promise mainly influenced its election victory. But
their actions within the past eleven years show that the present Government’s attitude is
also nothing but apathy and condonation.
This is amply proved by the Report of the 56th Session of the U.N. Working Group
released on 05th April 2000. The report observed among other things “Sri Lanka remains
the country with the second largest number of non-clarified cases of disappearances.
Many of the missing persons allegedly traced by the authorities seem not to correspond
with the disappeared persons submitted by the Working Group”. Although a
considerable number of criminal investigations had been initiated in relation to
disappearances which occurred since 10 years ago only a very few of the suspected
perpetrators have actually been convicted.
After much pressure from various human rights organizations inside the country and
from the International Community the P.A Government set up three Presidential
Commissions of Inquiry into the involuntary removal and disappearances of persons
occurred since 01st June 1988 on territorial basis. All the Commissions submitted
comprehensive reports in September 1997 however without having finished their work.
The investigation of some 10.000 remaining complaints of the old cases was entrusted
to a 04th Commission. About 4.000 suspected individual perpetrators were identified,
about 500 of them have been indicted and a few of them convicted. In the meantime too
high level of disappearances continue to be reported
After the LTTE unilaterally ended peace talks in April 1995 several cases were reported
in Colombo, the Capital and the East of the country. The number increased dramatically
when the Armed Forces regained control over the Jaffna peninsula from the LTEE. In
1995 there were 78 and 623 in 1996, and in 1997 there were 92 cases of reported
involuntary disappearances. In 1998 and 1999 the number has come down to 4 and 2
respectively. This could rise at any time considering the possibility of re- escalation of
the internal armed conflict.
No independent Presidential Commissions have been appointed to probe the
disappearance that occurred during the present regime. Hoverer, a Special Board of
Investigations into the disappearances in the Jaffna Peninsula was appointed which
investigated a total of 2,621 complaints and traced more than 200 disappeared persons
and identified a number of perpetrators.
The three (03) earlier Presidential Commissions into disappearances investigated a total
of 27,742. A further 10,135 alleged complaints were entrusted to be inquired into by the
04th Commission that was functioning, out of which 4,052 cases have been identified as
" proven”.
Apart from only a few found alive all of mere than 20,000 disappeared persons are
presumed to be dead. More than 15,000 death certificates have been already issued in
accordance with the Temporary Legislation (The Registration of Death Amendment
[Temporary Provisions) amendment Act).
The final reports of the four Presidential Commissions were formally published in but
only a limited renumber of copies were printed and are hard to find.
In addition to above cases complained to the Commissions there were many more cases
of involuntary disappearances during the period between 1983 – 1990.
No Presidential Commission of Inquiry has been appointed to go into the
disappearances that occurred after 1994 up to date. The details about such
disappearances have been already dealt with.
Eleven though the Commissions in their report have found that the disappearances is a
result of a well-orchestrated practice carried out by the State the United Nations
Working Group on Disappearances in its report dated 28th December 1998 comments
about the findings of the three Commission as follow.
"The findings of the four Sri Lankan Presidential Commissions states that it has
established a systematic practice of disappearances carried out by the State.
This comprehensive practice includes the initial design of lifting the legal
obstacles that impede disappearances by way of;
1.Carefully drafted emergency regulations
2.Planning and executing abductions (arrest with intention to kill)
3. Establishing detention centers.
4. Training and instructing personnel to, torture kill and dispose bodies
5. The maintenance of mass graves and
6. General instructions to erase all records and to protect the culprits.
What obligations do these well-founded facts established by the Government sources
pose to the international community? The Sri Lankan Presidential Commissions
emphasize the special character of the crimes committed by the State which uses it’s
power to violate the law rather than to uphold it.
In all the Commissions narrated by thousands of humble petitioners of thousands of
abductions and disappearances bore powerful witness to the fact what we are looking at
was an orchestrated phenomenon and not a series isolated instances explicable in terms
of “excesses’” bi individual transgressors.
The 04th Presidential Commission on Disappearances (All-Island) finalized its work a
long time ago but had to wait long to get an appointment with the President of the
country to submit its report. By this alone the International Community can ascertain
the importance the Government attaches to Presidential Commissions on
Disappearances. It is not strange that disappearances are beginning to take place again
in various parts of the country.
The mandates of the four Presidential Commissions expected there to report on inter alia
whether any person or persons were responsible for the removal or disappearance of any
persons and if so what changes in the Laws are needed to prevent such occurrences in
the future and so on.
The Commissions have reported that there is sufficient evidence to prosecute many
persons responsible for disappearances but the Government who rode on the back if
victims, disappeared persons, to power have not taken action against the perpetrators.
The Missing Persons Unit (MPU) in the Attorney-General’s Department which is in –
charge of prosecuting the culprits on the findings of the Commissions have been slow
and negative in their approach in 1997 and proceedings have been instituted only
against about 200 security personnel of the lowest ranks, like Constables and Sergeants
whilst the seniors in the hierarchy like Superintendents, Assistant Superintendents of
Police and Commanders of military units have been exempted. Even the actions filed
are not perused diligently showing the same interest shown in prosecuting ordinary
civilians. It is correct to say that in the majority of such cases taken up for trial in
various high courts in the country, the majority has been acquitted. Though several
leading politicians of the previous Government have been named as persons responsible
for disappearances none has been prosecuted so far. A leading politician of the previous
government against whom there was clear evidence of complicity in the famous
Embilipitiya students disappeared case joined the Peoples Alliance Government and was
made a Minister.
A specific directive by the President issued on the 11" of January 1996 to send on
compulsory leave nearly 200 Police and Army Officers against whom there is evidence
of complicity in disappearances has not been carried out so far. The directive addressed
to the Inspector General of Police and the Service Commander to comply with and
report within one month from the said date has been defied with impunity. The failure of
the president to take action against the violators of her order shows that the officers
concerned know that no follow up action would be taken against them for non-
compliance with the President’s directive.
As a result of the public outcry the Attorney General Department indicted 597 personnel
of the security forces and Police and interdicted in their posts in July 2000, but all of
them were reinstated in their posts in May 2001 by a circular issued by the Deputy
Inspector General (Personnel) on the instruction of the Inspector General of Police.
The Commission’s reports also mention about 15 mass graves in various parts of the
country but no action has been taken to probe them, to exhume the sites or record the
evidence of the witnesses who have mentioned about these sites to the Commissions in
spite of recommendations to that effect. Even at Suriyakanda there are many bodies to
be exhumed. The government was under pressure to take action about the graves at
Chemanai in the North because of the dramatic revelation by a Lance Corporal
convicted in the famous Krishanthy Coomraswamy rape and murder case that many
LTTE suspects were killed extra-judicially and buried in mass graves mentioned above
remained unprobed because the corrupt leaders in the third world countries need Armed
forces to protect themselves against the people.
Torture:
Even though the Sri Lankan government has incorporated the provisions of the UN
Convention on the prevention against Torture by an Act of Parliament, only one person
has been prosecuted so far and that too in the absence of the accused.
Conclusion
The Sri Lanka state must review the current legislation, regulations and orders in
relation to Fundamental Rights to ensure that they comply with its International
obligations.
The procedure under the National Security Laws & Regulations must be either repealed
or amended to be compatible with the International standards in this respect.
All effort must be made by the Sri Lankan authorities with the support of the civil
society to re-establish the hallowed rule of law.
Suggested Resolutions
Resolution 01
“ Where as countries in Africa, the Americas and Europe have adopted their own
regional Human Rights Charters and Monitoring mechanisms & Judicial Tribunals
under those charters for the protection and promotion of Human Rights in their
respective regions this forum resolves that the countries in Asia adopt the Asian Human
Rights Charter of 1998 which will lead to the establishment of an Asian Convention on
Human Rights which will provide for monitoring mechanisms and judicial tribunals for
the protection and promotion of Human Rights in our region.”
Resolution 02
“ Where as the open ended working group appointed by United Nations Commission on
Human Rights has approved a convention against enforced disappearances, this forum
resolves that all states parties of the United Nations in the Asian Region adopt the above
convention without any reservations.”
Resolution 03
“ Where as United Nations’ working group on involuntary and enforced disappearances
(UNWGIED) and Presidential Commissions against enforced & involuntary
disappearances appointed by Her Excellency the President of Sri Lanka have submitted
extensive recommendations to the Government of Sri Lanka in respect of dispensing
transitional justice to the victims and their families, this forum resolves that the
Government of Sri Lanka implement all those recommendations without any further
delay.”
Harischandra Samarasinghe
Member of Board of Directors
Centre for Human Rights and Develo0pment (CHRD) &
Projects Consultant
Organization of Parents and Family Members of the Disappeared (OPFMD)
Written by:
Ahmad Zia Langari
Commissioner
Afghanistan Independent human Rights Commission
15 November 2005, Afghanistan
Afghanistan Women and Human Rights
Afghanistan with its traditionally conservative society still maintains the culture of
medieval history in some parts of the country. Two factors, the tribal traditions and
miss-perception from the Islamic, made most of the communities very conservative.
Except in the capital and in areas of big cities, women have no presence in public as
men. Men and women do not set together to discuss social issues, telling their
suggestion and making joint decision. The female employees of the government
departments are symbolically given chance to participate in dialogues with male
employees for making decision, while in-deed male employees are the main decision
makers. In rural communities, women and men of the village never set together to
discus over the community issues, except in serious cases of family or community
dispute that only old ladies, if men requested, can participate in the community
meetings. In most communities of the rural and semi-rural areas, women are not
allowed to talk face to face with man who is not her family member or relatives.
In Afghanistan gender disparity exercise starts from the first days when a baby born.
Having son is counted a great privilege for a couple while not for the female baby. Very
expensive birthing ceremony is organized by the parents of a male baby while not for
the female baby. This tradition is unfortunately practice even by educated and scholar
families. From the first days when a baby learns playing, parents and family members
treat it differently according the baby gender. The method of education for every aspect
of life is different for boys and girls. Female children of over 12-13 are deprived of
going to school because there is no girl schools in rural areas. Also from the point view
of wrong perception from Islam, girls not allowed to attend the same classroom with
younger boys. Girls have to be separately educated, while this opportunity is only exist
everywhere in the country except in some parts of rural areas where NGOs or
government have constructed the secondary schools for girls. Because of very
conservative thoughts overshadowed the tribal communities, girls were not to go even
to elementary schools, but during recent years, as a result of successful awareness
raising programs done by NGO among rural communities, nowadays girls are allowed
to go to the same elementary school as boys. Unfortunately, 70% of rural areas have no
secondary and high school for girls. In many areas, the elementary schools are located
about 6-10 kilo-meter far from the homes of children which is difficult for girls to walk
every day, while a few number of boys can use bicycle. In many areas of the country,
even in the capital, because of shortage of adequate school premises, tents are used as
classroom, and students have to tolerate cold days of Spring and Autumn and very hot
days of summer which raise up to 35-43oc. However, this is the indicator of people’s
enthusiasm to education.
For easy highlighting the situation of women’s human rights in Afghanistan, I would
like to focus briefly on challenges and progress made in due course:
Marriage and Women
Generally marriage is not taken place on the basis of man and woman’s decision. Due to
the existence of conservative traditions, except at high education institutions and at
workplace, man and woman have rare chance to talk/see each other face to face before
the engagement ceremony takes place. The decision for marriage mostly take by
parents. Most of woman and man is not given enough time to think about the suggestion
made by the parents for marriage or there is less chance for couple to get the necessary
information about the character of each other. Only those couple are lucky who are, by
chance, think the same way as each other and find them good partners, otherwise there
would be continuing family quarrel and disagreement environment for the whole life of
the couple, which negatively affects the future behavior of their children. Because of
tribal attitudes, resorting to divorce to end the whole life dispute, is very restricted, and
the man who divorce his wife gets very bad name among the community members, and
on the other hand, in case of divorce, their children are faced disaster because after
divorce, children are considered as stepchildren by their parents, which is very panic.
However, due to conservative environment, a single women cannot live alone as in
European countries, she has to live with her parents or member of her parent family for
the security reason. In spite of all, generally ninety percent of women loss in case of
divorce in Afghanistan.
One of the problematic forms of marriage in Afghanistan is the inevitable type of
marriage where a poor parents give their young daughter to rich man so as to get
sufficient money, who are mostly much older than the girl. In some cases, such men
might have one or two wife before the third marriage. The parents use this bride price
for investment to maintain their livelihood expenses or to pay their debts.
Exchanging marriage is another form of marriage that a number of couples are not
happy, but they have to tolerate it because the marriage cost is too high which is out of
their efforts. In such type of marriage, parents of girl agree to give their daughter to the
son of the second parents for marriage, and in compensation, second parents also have
to agree to give their daughter to the son of the firs parents so as to cut down the
marriage expenses. This is done mostly regardless of the girls and boys agreement.
The worst type of marriage is that a powerful or a rich man forces parents to give their
daughter to marry with him, regardless the age of the man, his education status, without
considering the agreement of the girl. Attractive girls are mostly targeted by rich men or
powerful commanders. In some cases, parents are in difficult situation even their life is
threatened. In case of disagreement by parents, the girl might be kidnapped.
However, all of these types of marriage, by this way or another, are forced marriage,
which denies the rights to free choice for marriage.
The Islamic principle for marriage is strictly conditional upon the agreement of man and
woman to orally agree by their voice in front of more than two adult persons, but
unfortunately in most cases, getting this agreement is forcibly done by their parents.
Access to Education
About 86% of women are illiterate in Afghanistan. The conservative culture in deed,
don’t consider the necessity of education for women. According to this perception, good
cooking, washing, cleaning the house, rearing children, looking after livestock, are the
indicators for an ideal housewife.
Although the first efforts for educating women began in the first decade of nineteen
century that, for the first time, about twenty young Afghan girls sent to Turkey for
higher education, but this effort was frustrated by the conservative clergies, even it
became one of the pretexts made by clergies to overthrown the reformist King
Amanullah in 1928. Removal of veil from women was also announced by the King
Amanullah. His wife, for the first time, came into public without veil, but this was also
frustrated till 1933. The first high schools for girls opened in thirties, first in the capital
and later on in main cities. Afterward girls were given opportunity to study in higher
education institutions. In the years of Sixties, Afghan women got the ministerial post
and a few of them elected as parliament members. During the ruling time of communist
regime, 1978-1992, women were given senior position and a big number of them
studied university and employed by government departments.
During the Mujahiddin’s ruling time, the environment for women’s participation in
different aspects of economic, social, cultural and political life, were limited which
challenged women’s fundamental rights and freedoms. The government separated the
male and female employees at workplace. Even in the same office space, women and
men were separated by developing partition. Recruitment of women in the
governmental offices was stopped. Most of the female students of the universities were
disappointed and left the universities. Putting large scarf was forced on women.
In the harsh atmosphere of Taliban regime (1994- November 2001) women were
seriously suppressed. No woman allowed to work at any office except in female wards
of the hospitals and governmental health clinics. Working outside home and women’s
education, even primary education for female children, totally banned by the regime.
The fundamental rights and freedoms of women were seriously abused. The worst form
of forced marriage was exercised by the Taliban commanders. Using overall veil by
women was forced and violators were lashed publicly. Women not allowed to be seen in
cities for shopping without family male supporter. Women were not allowed to talk with
a man of non-family member. Launching television programmes were forbidden and no
voice of women heard from radio. It was a killing period for Afghan women in the
history of Afghanistan.
Fortunately, after the establishment of the Interim Administration of Afghanistan in
January 2002, Afghan women now enjoy of their fundamental rights and freedoms at
least at low percentage in the capital and in main cities. Now they allowed to maintain
their studies at universities, going abroad for higher education, travel outside the
country, take the senior positions in the government, UN and NGO offices. More than
eighty NGOs are being managed by women, who had very good initiatives in the area of
economic, social and culture, and raised the capabilities of women through
empowerment programmes. Several publications and media organizations also run by
women. Three ministerial and one governor posts allocated in the new cabinet. Very
significant development took place in the area of women’s rights during recent years is
that the new Afghan constitution adapted the rights of women equal as men, The new
election law stipulated a positive discrimination for women to be elected as parliament
members, at the rate of minimum two women per province which is raised up according
to the size of the population of the province. Women candidates were elected for the
upcoming parliament. The President, in accordance with the law, have to appoint 15
women as the parliament member for the Upper House of the Parliament These are the
great achievements made since the onset of the Interim Administration. Off course, the
advocacy support of the international community has been very effective in this
achievement. Despite these, the Afghan society is still far away of protecting and
promoting women’s rights.
Access to Health Facilities
Most of the Afghan women have inadequate access to health services. Every half an
hour a woman dies of pregnancy-related problems. 1,600 out of 100,000 die during
childbirth, which 60 times higher than the rate in industrialized countries.
Due to Conservative attitude, women are not intending to go to those health clinics
which are run by men. According to UNFPA, over 80 percent of maternal deaths are
considered preventable. Women’s knowledge about reproductive health is very low.
Delivery clinics are limited only in big cities, while in rural areas only traditional birth
attendants, who are illiterate ladies, manage the delivery process at poor hygienic
condition. Few people are aware about HIV/AIDS. About forty HIV/AIDS positive
cases have been officially reported in the country, while may be there are more positive
cases that has not been so far diagnosed because HIV/AIDS diagnose is not possible in
private clinics in the country, or infected persons, themselves, have not been noticed
yet.
Employment
Women are doing varieties of works in rural communities. They are responsible for
cooking, child rearing, washing, house cleaning, livestock keeping, kitchen gardening,
looking after the orchards, fruit collecting and processing, and almost many of the post
harvest duties. In forest area, women are graze animals and collect wood from the
forest. Afghan women are very skillful in handicraft making in the northern part of the
country. They also perform some of the community work, but unfortunately not valued.
In main cities, educated women are working in the government offices, UN and NGO
offices and few of them are working in the private trade an industrial offices. Unless
there is no legal barriers curtailing women employment, but practically, because of
cultural barriers, women are given less chance to exercise their ability in management.
Women and Media
Afghan women nowadays are very active in media. They present well in TV and radio
programmes. They had good initiatives in designing those programmes, advocate the
status of women’s rights in different Afghan communities. Women also run more than
ten publications as monthly or quarterly magazines, and weekly news as well as other
non-periodical publications, which have effective role in raising the awareness of people
about human rights.
Afghan women and politics
Afghan women now got involved in politics. In the very near future the female
members of the parliament of Afghanistan will participate in every debate in the
parliament house. Women are participating in TV and radio roundtable interviews,
analyzing the political situation of the country, particularly women’s political rights, and
give comments. Several of Afghan women who are prominent ladies in the areas of
politics and human rights, have gained international price and honorary awards during
the last three years.
Women and Justice
Although a considerable number of Afghan women have academic law background but
they are not appointed as senior judge. They work as judicial staff in the courts and
attorney general offices, while a few of them are judges in the juvenile and family
courts.
Women’s vice heard rarely in the judicial offices for their case proceeding. Therefore,
they are not able to defend them in the court, and on the other hand, hiring advocating
attorney is impossible for destitute women. Due to traditions, registering a property by
the name of a lady in court offices is not so common, although there is no barrier in the
civil and Sharia codes in Afghanistan in this regard. Therefore, a lady registers her
properties mostly by the name of her husband of her brother.
Women and Violence
Afghan women are seriously victimized by different types of violence. Family violence
is of serious one among different violence challenging women rights and dignity. The
criminal justice system is simply unwilling or unable to address the issues of violence
against women. No sentence has stipulated so far in the law pertaining to violence
against women. The magnitude of family violence is so intensive that some of women
killed them due to serious depression and many of them have been disabled as a result
of attempt to suicide attempts. Self-immolation has been of the serious type of suicide
that more than 200 disappointed women have ended their lives in the last two years. The
main reason of suicide by women is the different types of deprivation, economic, social,
cultural, and civil, and generally being deprived of their fundamental rights and
freedoms.
Challenges
· Miss-perception from Islam by conservative clergies
· Overshadowing the tribal codes that challenge women’s rights and dignity as the
worst example are giving a women to a man as crime compensation and honor
killing
· Lack or poor security of women outside home
· Poor social knowledge of husbands about women’s rights and understanding their
special gender needs
· The existence of the culture of disturbing women outside home
· Existence of wrong perceptions within the society about the inequality of man and
woman
· Wrong perceptions considering that women are not naturally competent and capable
to perform social duties
· Ignoring special gender needs of women
· Inadequate legislation to address women’s rights and provide them opportunities for
development initiatives
· Not giving priority to women recruitment
· Kidnapping young girls for sexual exploitation
The Afghanistan Independent Human rights Commission and women’s rights
The Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission, from the first days of its
establishment in June 2002, paid its keen attention to the situation of Afghan women
and taken necessary steps to protect and promote the rights of women all over the
country. To achieve well, the Commission established its units of women’s rights
promotion and promotion in the headquarters and other 10 regional and provincial
offices throughout the country. The Commission receives complaints on women’s rights
violation and investigate them. The staff then refer them to the relevant government
departments to solve women’s problems. In cases of serious violation committed by the
government staff, it is directly reported to the President, the Head of the Supreme Court,
and Attorney General. To promote women’s rights, the commission raises public
awareness about the women’s rights through organizing meetings with different walks
of the society, organizing awareness workshops and also celebrating the International
Women’s Day, 8th March, and the International Day of elimination of Violence Against
Women, 25th November of each year. The commission, to address adequately the rights
of women through advocacy efforts, developed its relation with the Ministry of
Women’s Affairs, other government departments, UN and diplomatic representative
offices, and NGOs. The national and private media also very cooperative now to the
Human Rights Commission for airing awareness programmes of the Commission.
THE ACTIVITIES AND CONCERNS OF THE NATIONAL COMMISSION ON
HUMAN RIGHTS OF INDONESIA
BY SAMSUDIN
1. INTRODUCTION
Komnas HAM was formed based on the limited authority given through Presidential
Decree No. 50/1993 for the monitoring and investigation of Human Rights issues and
the proposal of recommendations to government.
Law No. 39/1999 gives Komnas HAM the authority for the power of subpoena to carry
out Pro Justisia inquiry and monitoring.
Komnas HAM is the only organisation which has been given the authority to hold Pro
Justisia investigations which can be referred to the public prosecutor. This authority
particularly pertains to the investigations surrounding the gross violations of human
rights and crimes against humanity. This authority is offered to Komnas HAM for
issues pertaining to basic Human Rights under Law No. 26/2000.
2. INFLUENTIAL CONDITIONS
A significant contributing factor to human rights in Indonesia relates to the pluralistic
and extremely heterogeneous nature of Indonesia, giving rise to issues relating to
religious, economic and ethnic minorities. Indonesia is still characterised by the
practice of diverse cultural and traditional values.
Such conditions contain a substantial potential for violations of basic human rights due
to differentiation within society. Also, human rights in some areas of Indonesia are still
hindered by conflict and security issues. Conflict affected areas may begin to experience
hardships which are environmental, social or which have resulted from problems
relating to refugees.
Given the pluralistic and heterogenous nature of Indonesian society, Indonesia must
establish human rights which stem from society and which are based on objective
conditions and which are not contradictory to the values of basic universal human
rights.
3. SOME OF THE ACTIVITIES OF KOMNAS HAM
Komnas HAM has exercised its authority for the Pro Justisia investigation of cases of
the gross violation of human rights in the following investigations. The first
investigation relates to events in Timor Leste in 1999; the second to Tanjung Priok in
1984; and the third to Abepura in 2002.
In this third case, Komnas HAM determined that a gross violation of human rights had
occurred in the shape of a crime against humanity. The outcome of this investigation
was accepted by the public prosecutor in the form of an investigation.
The first two cases were heard by an Ad Hoc court, whereas the third case was heard in
a human rights court under the provisions in Law No. 26/2000. In their report, Komnas
HAM made recommendations relating to the civil, military and political authorities who
were found responsible in the Komnas HAM investigation. It is extremely regrettable
that the decision and outcome of the court released the charges against all accused.
The United Nations Security Council had sufficient grounds for suspicion of the
Indonesian government with regard to the case in Timor Leste to send experts to Timor
Leste and Indonesia to investigate.
In the case of Aceh, between 1988 and 1990 Komnas HAM and security organisations
uncovered mass graves indicating that crimes against humanity had been committed. A
Komnas HAM recommendation for the investigation of such crimes had been made to
the government. Prior to this, suspected cases of crimes against humanity committed
during the Military Emergency in Aceh had been restricted to the level of data collection
and monitoring.
Another case which is currently in the process of being investigated is the case of
crimes against humanity committed in Wasior and Wamena in Papua. The Pro Justisia
investigation, which began in 2004, has already been presented to the public prosecutor,
although it has yet to come to court.
A further case, which began in 1998, relates to disappeared persons. This is currently
under the process of Pro Justisia investigation.
In addition to the vertical conflicts discussed above, Komnas HAM, together with
government and nongovernmental organisations, has assisted in attempts to resolve
horizontal conflict such as ethnic conflict in Kalimantan, religious conflict in Maluku,
North Maluku and Central Sulawesi.
A third conflict area also addressed by Komnas HAM relates to the problems
surrounding the thousands of refugees in Indonesia.
Komnas HAM has also attempted to work with government to implement the Human
Development Index.
Another issue which has been addressed by Komnas HAM is that of the trafficking of
women, particularly those trafficked for the purposes of domestic and international
prostitution.
Research has begun in the areas from which the majority of women are recruited into
prostitution, and in the areas through which they transit and in which they will work.
The problem of the trafficking of women has the potential to become an international
issue.
These issues arising in circumstances of armed, civil conflict have led to the exodus of
local populations. It is estimated that up to 10 000 people have become categorised as
Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) as a result of conflict.
Together with NGOs, Komnas HAM has already visited locations affected by IDPs and
urged the government to fulfil their basic rights such as food, shelter, education and
health.
4. CONCLUSION
a. In an extremely pluralist and heterogenous society such as Indonesia, the potential for
the violation of basic human rights is significant. In order to prevent the breach of
human rights Indonesia must strive for consensus between different social and value
groups and different cultures. This consensus is necessary to bring about a sense of
tolerance between those groups of society at conflict. In order for consensus and
tolerance to be possible, they must be underpinned by a sense of security. This sense of
security must be created by the government and House of Representatives and founded
in legislation in which the attainment of a sense of security is a centralised goal.
b. The nature of national development (political, economic, social, cultural and legal)
should have the purpose of promoting the fulfilment of human rights. This approach to
development sees that an integration of basic human rights into development must
become a mould for every country (Human Rights-based Development).
c. Development which is based on an awareness of basic human rights allows the
strengthening of democracy. In such a democracy, the value of human safety, security
and the enforcement of law are very highly respected in themselves. A strong
democratic system will emerge if an awareness of basic human rights is integrated into a
transparent legal system. In a system of democracy, freedom is a necessity, as freedom
can cultivate new and diverse thinking. This thinking can benefit the resolution of
problems concerning human rights, as it will result in alternatives views being
contributed to the decision making process.
EXTRA JUDICIAL KILLING
(By : Samsudin)
1. INTRODUCTION
Extra Judicial Killing (EJK) is something form of crime against humanity and
cursed by international community. EJK is a cruel action, and degrading human
dignity ; against the right to live, the right of freedom and the right of equal. Those the
three rights known as the highest aspirations of human rights.
Generally, EJK presiding, at the least one among this actions such as arrest
without cause, torture and unvoluntary disappearance before killed. Thus, EJK break
several international laws as :
· Chapter 5 of Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
· Chapter 6 and chapter 7 of ICER.
· Convention Against Torture.
· Chapter 1 paragraph (2) and chapter 4 paragraph (1) of Protection for All From
Unvoluntary Disappearance, issued by UN General Assembly number 47/133
December 18 1992.
Notes : Convention Against Torture and Covenant on ICCPR and
ECOSOC has been ratified by The Government of the
Republic of Indonesia.
2. STATE IN INDONESIA
A significant contributing factor of human rights in Indonesia relates to the
pluralistic and extremely heterogeneous of Indonesia. We also faced the problem in
minority as minority in ethnic group, economic and religion. There are 1075 ethnics
group live in 17000 islands. Indonesia is still characterized by the practice of diverse
cultural and traditional values.
Such conditions mention above contain a substantial potential for violation of
human right and then to physically conflict among the communities. Up to now, conflict
is still proceed in several places. Especially, arm conflict gave significant contribution to
EJK. In 1985 - 2003, three big scale of conflicts among the communities occurred.
Firstly, conflict in Maluku, North Maluku and Poso. Those conflicts caused by
religious background. In this conflict, highly cruel EJK proceeded. All the massacre
unacceptable by civilized communities. Among the perpetrators killed in trance, as if
they got inspiration from their ancestors to kill. The victim were little children, young
and old men and women.
Secondly, physically conflict in Kalimantan between two ethnics group. This
conflict cause by differences of values and cultural. In this conflict the way to killed
equal to what explained above.
The third, EJK occurred in arm conflict areas and carried out by booth sides to
each other and to the civilian.
In the three shapes of conflict mention above caused in thousands were killed
besides thousand more seriously wounded or physically handicap for life. The other
result of the conflict were in thousands of internally displaced persons (IDPs), widows
and orphans. What is more, conflict in Kalimantan caused eviction of stranger ethnic to
their birthplace out of Kalimantan. They left all their personal belonging, houses, land
other properties. Since 2001 up to now local people never permit them to come back.
EJK had seriously effect to Indonesia. This incident almost created
disintegration of the nation. As far as human rights is concern, our report was very
disappointed. Beside, social problems caused by IDPs created unemployment,
education, health and hate among the communities. It is extremely regrettable, non of
EJK had been completed. The past arm conflict would be completed by truth
commission being prepared.
Except the big scale conflict, minor crime occurred widely spread in Indonesia.
Perpetrators just like minor crime killed by cruel and sadistic. They were stoned or
burned. As regard, behavior change of communities occurred toward destructively.
Probably it was an iceberg syndrome which hidden a serious problem. Thus, the
judgment by groups of people was gratify annoyance caused press burden of life.
Attached to this paper, enclosed a result of EJK investigation in Ambon, and I
was appointed as investigation team leader.
Human Rights Issues in Korea and
the Human Rights Commission of Korea
Kim, Man Heum
Commissioner, National Human Rights Commission of Korea
1. Democratization, Globalization and Human Rights in Korea
Along with democratization, the human rights conditions in Korea have been
improved considerably. There’s greater public sensitivity to human rights. This
receptiveness is reflected in the public debate and attention over the
recommendations, policy suggestions and activities of the Human Rights
Commission of Korea. Still, however, Korea faces difficult challenges and tasks to
make further improvements. There continues to be disagreement and controversy
over human rights issues such as the National Security Law, North Korean human
rights, and conscientious objectors. New and emerging controversial issues include
privacy and human rights, migrant workers, and irregular workers.
Human rights was not a concept that was referred to often before Korea became a
democratic country. During the military dictatorships, democracy was a concept that
included human rights, and democratization was, in effect, a practical expression of
human rights. Violations of human rights committed by the state that included
torture and the fabrication of pro-communist activities were issues that we had to
resolve. The Kwangju Uprising of May 18 of 1980, in which Kwangju citizens’
rights were violated through the brute violence of the military dictatorship, enabled
Korea to address human rights issues throughout the democratization process. That
is why we intend to make Kwangju, which is hosting this conference, a city of
democracy, human rights, and peace.
During the democratization process, the human rights challenges that Korea faced
were mainly struggles for civil and political rights. Two factors behind the
challenges were the dictatorship and the division of the Korean Peninsula.
Democracy drove the dictatorship out, but the inter-Korea problem has continued to
be a particular factor dominating the human rights situation, but when President
Kim, Dae-Jung came into office, the environment began to change. An increasing
number of peaceful exchanges between North and South Korea have affected the
condition, but most of all, the nature of leadership has changed. Along with the
leadership of President Kim, forces that pursued a strategy of embracing North
Korea have led the government.
Broader understanding of human rights is an achievement of democratization. Not
only did the democratization improve human rights, but it also made human rights
issues more concrete and broad in the context of democracy. In particular, the Kim,
Dae-Jung administration added human rights as one of the values that Korean
politics must pursue along with peace. It’s been commonly said, ‘democracy and
human rights’. During his leadership, efforts by human rights NGOs and the
response of the government allowed the National Human Rights Commission of
Korea to set sail.
The National Human Rights Commission has recently celebrated its 4 th anniversary
since its inception in November of 2001. Complying with the Paris Principles, the
Commission was established as an independent body. The Commission mainly
performs two functions: receiving and addressing complaints of human rights
violations and making recommendations to the government on national policy
related to human rights.
I’d like to now introduce some human rights issues in Korea that are at the center of
the activities of the Commission. I’d then like to briefly introduce the National
Action Plan for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights (NAP).
2. Activities of NHRC (November 2001~October 2005)
Since 2001, the National Human Rights Commission has dealt with a total number
of 17, 529 complaints. Human rights violation cases accounted for 80% of them. In
particular, complaints against detention facilities including prison, and police
accounted for the greatest amount of the percentage. Of the total number of
complaints, 10.6% were discrimination cases which are increasing. Discrimination
cases were filed mostly on the basis of gender, disability, age, and type of
employment.
NHRC has made 322 recommendations on human rights violations committed by
national agencies and bodies, most of which were accepted by them (98.4%). Also
NHRC addressed 115 cases of discrimination that led to public debate and
controversy because the recommendations suggested changing existing practices in
society. Despite such controversy, 85.1% of the measures advised by NHRC were
accepted.
In addition, NHRC issued a total number of 100 statements in regards to legislative
bills or government policies. Among these statements, one included a
recommendation to investigate human rights violations committed by former
authorities and to establish an act on compensation. It also advised revision or
repeal of bills or acts that could possibly violate human rights. In 2003, it expressed
its opinion opposing the dispatch of Korean soldiers to Iraq, in conflict with the
government.
► Conflicts surrounding human rights (National Security Law, North Korean
human rights)
Regarding policy recommendations on bills and acts, NHRC’s recommendation to
repeal the National Security Law, a law that has violated human rights throughout
past dictatorships, was a point of controversy. NHRC concluded that the National
Security Law is nothing but an anachronism and violates human rights limiting
freedom of ideology and conscience. NHRC presented its opinion that threats to the
nation's security based on the Law should be regulated by other general laws
including criminal law. The National Assembly has yet to decide whether to revise
or repeal the Law. Civic groups also clash over opposing opinions on this issue.
Progressive civic groups are campaigning to abolish the Law while conservative
groups denounce them. They base their arguments on positions on North Korea,
freedom of ideology and consciousness, national security, and more. Amid this, a
majority of people are arguing that the Law should exist but be revised to reduce
elements that could lead to human rights violations.
Such conflict is apparent on the matter of North Korean human rights. NHRC has
collected information and researched the North Korean human rights issue for more
than one year. However, NHRC is mandated to review only cases that occur to
Korean citizens and persons living in Korea. Therefore, whether NHRC has the
authority to present its opinion on the North Korean human rights issue and to
whom it should do so is still controversial, and the Commission has not made a
final decision. Conservative groups insist that NHRC should criticize North Korea.
Where progressive groups are actively engaging in overall human rights issues,
North Korean human rights is almost the only agenda that conservative groups
would like to actively comment on.
Korea has adopted the conscription system, which does not acknowledge refusal of
military service based on conscience or offer alternatives to military service. For the
last 5 years, there have been a total number of 2,911, or 600 per year, who refused
to serve in the military. 16 persons rejected the service based on personal faith
including personal commitments to anti-war and peace. The rest of them refused to
serve in the military based on their religion. Of them, 2,393 were sentenced to more
than one year of prison. NHRC has reviewed whether conscientious objection to
military service can be acknowledged and whether alternatives to military service
can be adopted. NHRC expects to present its final opinion on this in the near future.
► Globalization and influx of foreign workforce - migrant workers' rights
The topic of migrant workers' human rights has grown into one of the controversial
human rights issues in Korean society in the process of globalization. Korea, who
used to be one of the major labor exporting countries, has become a labor importing
country as its economy grew and became highly industrialized. It could be assumed
that migrant workers' working conditions would be inferior to those of domestic
workers. Migrant workers' human rights are becoming an important and
controversial issue in Korea, an isolated society with little experience in
multicultural
ism. In addition, the number of illegal foreign workers, which brings out several
social problems amounts to 50%. It was once estimated that 78% of migrant
workers were illegal (undocumented) workers. According to statistics from the
ministry of justice as of August 2005, the number of illegal foreign workers is
189,000, which accounts for the 50% of the total migrant workers.
The National Human Rights Commission of Korea has so far received 392
complaints related to migrant workers or foreigners. Both domestic and
international organizations and activists have demonstrated dedicated support for
the promotion of migrant workers' rights. Among those complaints, mutual
agreements were reached or relief measures were taken to resolve 22 cases, and 44
cases are still under investigation. The laws and legislation related to migrant
workers were amended according to NHRC's recommendation, and immigration
offices have actively reflected human rights views after having participated in
human rights education. Nevertheless there is still room for improvements, and the
commission has included migrant workers' problems in the proposed NAP.
► Abolition of social polarization and discrimination against informal employees
It was a recent event that the problem of discrimination against irregular employees
has become an controversial labor rights issue in Korean society. Korean society
discriminates between the working conditions of formal employees and those of
irregular or informal employees to a great extent. Even though Korea has achieved
miraculous economic growth to the extent that it is now included in the list of
OECD countries, the polarization within society is serious. The most severe
polarization is the discrimination between regular labor and irregular labor. Even
according to the statistics from the ministry of labor, which presents the lowest ratio
among others, 37% of the employed are engaged in part-time or informal positions.
Given the seriousness of the problem, it is a critical issue for the whole society to do
away with the discrimination against the informal employees.
The National Human Rights Commission has made a policy recommendation last
year that irregular workers should be protected from misuse, and be treated on the
basis of [equal payment for equal work]. However, the controversy over the new
bill continues with the objection from management.
3. The main human rights subject in the future: eradication of social discrimination
and the promotion of human rights in the field of Economic, Social and Cultural
Rights.
The issue of human rights that used to be focused on the prevention of human rights
violations by the state power is gradually expanding to the field of Economic,
Social and Cultural Rights. Besides the discrimination based on gender and the
disability, matters that had been customary and culturally accepted are now
considered as discriminatory acts, and reviewed. Especially, it used to be commonly
accepted that people get treated differently based on their age and/or academic
background , and on this account, the recommendation on correction of
discrimination has brought about social disputes. The recommendation by the
commission on the abolition of 'hojuje' or the patriarchal family registry system was
also exceptional. Through such events, the government and society began to have a
new perspective on human rights. Issues that were controversial when the
commission first made recommendations to rectify or address discrimination are
now gaining widespread acceptance among government organs and civil society.
The matters that were once handled by other government ministries, such as women
and labor have been gradually merged into the NHRC's work. In response to this
trend, the commission is now conducting basic operations for introducing anti-
discrimination legislation. Although the current National Human Rights
Commission Act includes provisions about the prohibition of discrimination,
independent anti-discrimination legislation is now being promoted to specify the
restrictions and to expand its scope, reinforcing the actual effects of the prohibition
on discrimination law.
On the commemoration day of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, NHRC
plans to submit recommendations on the National Action Plan (NAP) to the
government. The NAP could be a blueprint for a nation's human rights policy. Since
the Vienna Conference on the Universal Human Rights had recommended each
nation to establish human rights NAPs as well as the national human rights
institutions in 1993, this is the first time Korea has prepared an NAP. The draft
proposal is now in the final stage of completion after more than 2 years' work.
For the promotion of economic, social and cultural rights as well as the civil and
political rights, the commission has presented legal and institutional tasks in its
recommendations to the government. Reflecting the changing society, certain rights
such as the rights to information and the rights to life are now getting attention as a
new aspect of civil and political rights. Economic, Social and Cultural rights
include the Social Security Act(S.S.A), the right to work, the right to health, the
right to housing, the right to education, the right to environment, and cultural rights.
Other main tasks of the commission are strengthening the human rights education
and building networks through international and domestic cooperation.
Besides the legal and institutional tasks for the promotion of human rights, the
commission has also focused the NAP on the rights of the vulnerable and minorities
of society. People with disabilities, informal employees, migrant workers, refugees,
women, children and youth, the elderly, sexual minorities, military men, North
Korean defectors (Satoemin), and people living in residential social service
facilities are included in this category. It also includes measures to protect the
human rights of soldiers and the police living in group environments particularly
under the conscription system of Korean society. The commission intends to submit
those recommendations to the government. After the government draws up the draft
plan, the commission plans to monitor implementation and how the proposed
recommendations are carried out.
The National Action Plan contains directions and strategies for the protection and
promotion of human rights in Korea as I mentioned before. Human rights norms are
universal. However, a national approach or prioritization is needed to develop an
actual action plan. The National Action Plan, therefore, will be the initiative to
review human rights ideology to principles of Korean society. Korea has professed
democracy and a market economy from its foundation. However, Koreans haven't
really realized the importance of living together within their communities owing to
its history of strong nationalism. Now it is time to focus on specific challenges that
have been raised as human rights arguments. For example, the ways that we tackle
the issue of irregular workers will decide the future of Korea, and migrant workers'
rights will set our position within international communities. The way we approach
the North Korean human rights issue is overlapped with systems of integration
among the two Koreas.
The National Action Plan has been prepared by the National Human Rights
Commission of Korea under the banner of mainstreaming human rights in Korea.
Respect of human dignity and solidarity among people are the structural elements of
a community based on this mainstreaming, which is a goal of a nation and at the
same time a universal goal of the world. As it had the honor and opportunity to host
the Seventh International Conference of National Human Rights Institutions in
Korea, the National Human Rights Commission of Korea sincerely hopes to
continue to take part of the efforts to protect and promote human rights in the world
by building cooperative relationships internationally. We are looking forward to
future relationships and exchanges. Thank you.
Human Rights in Cambodia
Presented by Mr. SOK Sam Oeun, Esq.,
Executive Director of the Cambodian Defenders Project and Law Lecturer of University
in Phnom Penh
During the Gwangju Forum on Asian Human Rights in South Korea
Today is the human rights day which the people around the world are celebrating. Some
people in Cambodia is joking that we have only one day enjoying our human rights, but
on the others the government forgot and ignored. The poor people complained that they
have not enjoyed their rights yet but the government officials said that the human rights
in Cambodia has been improved a lot if we compare with the time before 1993 or with
Pol Pot time. The rich people said that they were enjoying their rights enough.
The Human Right Day is not a festival. But it is the day that we should remind and
review the past last year whether our human rights have been protected or not. If there
were not, it is better for us to think how we can promote and protect human rights, in
particular for the vulnerable and disadvantaged people. It is not the day that we should
review about ourselves but we should review also the people in the other countries, in
particular the transitional countries which are under or have just been freed from
dictatorship, military or genocidal regimes or from the war.
In fact, the situation of human rights in Cambodia is further improved than we were
before 1993 or in Pol Pot time. But, we could not compare with those bad times. We
need to compare with other people in world, or other countries in the region. The little
improvement from the bad situation is not enough. We need:
· To ensure that the human rights shall be protected and respected in accordance
with the international norms;
· To ensure that the situation of human rights respect and protection shall be
stable;
· To have a functional mechanism to protect human rights, so that the protection
of human rights is systematic; and
· To make the promoting and protecting human rights to become a culture in
Cambodia.
THE IMPORTANCE OF HUMAN RIGHTS
Some people said that human rights is a concept created in Western world, it cannot be
used in Asia. It is wrong perception. Every body, rich and poor, Westerners, African or
Asian, black, yellow or white people are equal. Everybody needs to live with dignity.
Human beings cannot live like parrots living in the cage without freedom to travel
anywhere, freedom to speak what they want, or freedom to express opinions what they
are thinking. Human beings cannot live like cattle that are used any time, without rest
and without care of their health.
Cambodian people experienced a lot of human rights abuses in Pol Pot time. We
understand clearly how important of freedom and human rights. At that time, Khmer
Rouge regime robbed all of our properties and our land and forced us to go to live in
country side or forest where we did not want to. We were forced to work hard, did not
provide us enough food. The children were not allowed to education. We had no rights
to choose jobs. Everybody was forced to farm and work what we did not like to work.
We were forced to live far from our parents. During any meeting, Khmer Rouge leaders
always said that everybody has right to express opinion, but many people were killed
because they expressed opinion against Khmer Rouge policies, etc…
No one understands about the importance of human rights more than the people who
had experienced their rights abused. The people who crossed their lives in Pol Pot
regime understand clearly that the human rights and freedom are very important for
them.
Because Cambodian people did not want those bad historical experience would be
happened again in Cambodia and we did not want our rights abused like in Pol Pot time,
a new Constitution was adopted in 1993. This new Constitution guaranteed many
Citizens' rights in accordance with international standard. Additionally, the Article 31 of
this Constitution recognized all human rights instruments of the United Nations. It
means that Cambodian people shall enjoy their rights like other people in the world. It is
only in the Constitution. What happens in real life?
No Independence of Judiciary, no Human Rights
In 1995, two press editors were convicted on defamation because they criticized the
prime minister. Their lawyers16 argued that they should not be charged on a criminal
16 Lawyers of the Cambodian Defenders Project.
offense because they were journalists and must be under the press law. If they are
charged on press law, they would not receive any imprisonment. If there is not criminal
charge on journalist, the journalists will not be scared to express opinion and release
information to the public. Therefore, at that time everybody wanted the Supreme Court
to make clear that the government could not use criminal offense to charge journalists.
But, unfortunately, the Supreme Court did not dare to decide that the criminal offenses
could not be used against journalists. Instead, the Supreme Court announced that it had
not power to interpret the law. Only the Constitutional Council could interpret the law.
In Kbal Spean case, five people were shot to death and many others were injured
because of the crash between the people and police and military force used by the
winner to evict the people from the land they lost in the court. Some military men were
arrested but were found not guilty because the court could not find any evidence against
them.
Based on the lessons learnt from this case, the human rights cannot be respect and
protected if the judiciary is not strong and independent enough.
Human Rights Cases and Citizen's rights Violation
Many people perceives that the fact of a government official abuses a person's rights is a
human rights abuse. So, in order not to show that there are any human rights abuses, the
official-in-charge must hide this information. For example, if a prison guardian beat a
prisoner, the Chief of Prison will hide this information.
Is the fact that a prison guardian beat a prisoner the human right abuse? It may be but it
also may be not. If the prison chief investigates the incident and punishes who did
wrong, it is not human rights abuse because the prisoner's right has been protected by
the government. And if the prison chief understands this meaning, he or she will not
hide for his or her staff and instead he or she will protect the victim's rights.
Therefore, it is very important to understand what human right abuse is. If the meaning
of human right abuse is misunderstood, the word human right will increase human
rights abuses.
How to abuse Human Rights
There are many types of abusing human rights.
1. Human Rights violation by lack of protection: A right is abused by a person and
the government does not try to protect the victim's rights. For this case, we need
to improve judicial system and law enforcement system.
2. Human Rights violation by lack of assistance: The people cannot or is not able
to enjoy his or her rights, and the government does not try to assist him or her to
enjoy that rights. For this case, we need to have mass movement and train the
people to advocate for their need.
3. Human Rights violation by Law: The people need a right to do or not to do
something, but the law prohibits or forces the people to do that act. For this case,
we need to have law reform and push the government to recognize and ratify
international laws.
Human Rights Mechanism
At present, there are three human rights commissions in Cambodia, of the National
Assembly, the Senate and of the Government. But all of them are not independent from
the three branches and not strong enough. There is no procedure to solve the human
rights abuse, if the act is not a crime. In India, the victim of human rights abuse can
complain to the Supreme Court and in Europe they can complain to the Human Rights
Court in Strasbourg. But, in Cambodia the people found no place to complain if they
feel abused by powerful people. There are many strikes in front of the National
Assembly but they were cracked down by riot police.
During the negotiation between elected parties, both of ruling parties, CPP17 and
Funcinpec18, agreed to establish a National Independent Human Right Commission. The
civil society also is discussing a draft of law on this commission in order to recommend
to the government. However, Cambodia still needs to reform the jurisdiction of
Supreme Court so that this court can hear human rights case or establish a Special Court
on Human Rights.
Police Reform
Police is the ones who have duties to protect the people's life and properties. When
police receives information about robberies or any events can impact to the people's life
17 Cambodian People's Party, former Heng Sam Rin Regime.18 From French abbreviation: National United Front of Cambodia for Independence, Peace and Cooperation.
or properties, they must go to the scene immediately to save and protect the people and
their properties. However, they should use some powers to do their works. Their
powers, such as power of arrest, search, entry and seizure, all are impact to the people's
rights. So if they do not follow the legal process carefully or the law itself not fair
enough, they will be viewed as the first ones who violate human rights. However, if the
police are well trained, they will be the first ones who protect human rights.
Therefore, the police reform must be prioritized. Their training must be human rights
based approach. Their concepts and organizational structure must be changed. They
must be non-partisan. In Cambodia, most police officers are members of ruling parties
and top positions of police forces are shared by quota between both ruling parties. These
practices must be stopped.
In order to reform police forces, a police code and ethics must be made. Clear and
transparent police policies including recruitment, disciplinary action and promotion
must be in writing and implemented strictly.
Police should be changed from:
· Police forces to police service
· Military police to civilian police
· Political Police to Community Police
· Watch dogs to Legal Advisors for the people
· Political Party Police to National Police
· Human Rights Abuser to First Human Rights Protector, etc…
However, at present the Ministry of Interior establishes a Royal Police Training School
and five Regional Police Training Schools. The Ministry of Interior opens for
cooperation with NGOs19 to establish a new police training curriculum20. The Ministry
also asked Mr. Sok Sam Oeun to draft a Police Code for the Ministry. However it still
needs time and political wills.
Human Rights Commission must be independent
There are many debates on how to establish an independent institution. Political parties
19 It cooperates with the Cambodian Defenders Project and the Asian Human Rights Institute to establish a new police training curriculum.20 They finished the training course for Police Trainers (ten from Royal Police Training School and ten from the Training Department of Ministry of Interior.
said there were no independent people, so the members of independent institution shall
be mixed among all political parties having seat in national assembly. Civil society had
different views. They believe that they can find independent people but they should be
recruited by a recruitment committee consisting of political party representatives and
civil society. The recruitment committee will recruit candidates for members of human
rights commission for the National Assembly or the Senate to vote for.
However there are many other factors to make an institution independent. It shall have
autonomous budget and has power enough to operate its function freely. It is better to
make this commission as a constitutional one. So, it is better to amend the Constitution
and put the human rights commission and how to recruit its members in the
Constitution.
Human Rights Commission must not be misused
At present, we remark that the Human Rights Commission of the Government tried to
report against the report of human right violation made by the Civil Society or by the
Officer of Human Rights of the United Nations. The Commission also has responsibility
to report about the human rights situation to the Human Rights Commission of the
United Nations. So it means that the commission has two conflicting roles, preventing
and fighting against human rights violation and protecting the government against bad
reputation of human rights abuse. These two functions can make the Commission to
change its mission and it will become the one that tried to hide the wrongdoing of the
government not to find and prosecuting human rights abusers.
It is okay that the government has its human rights office to correct the wrong doing or
promote human rights but it is better to have another human rights commission which is
independent from the government. I recommend strongly that the Independent Human
Rights Commission must not have function to represent the government to report on
human rights situation in the country.
Constitution must be protected
The Constitution is the top law of a county. There are two types of Constitution, rigid
and flexible ones. Flexible Constitution is the one that is easy to change or has been
changed or amended many times. If the Constitution is flexible, we can say that it is a
weak Constitution or we can say that the executive or powerful person is above the
Constitution. If the Constitution is not protected or is ignored or violated without
protection measures or mechanism, the human rights will be easily abused the same.
In 1993, Cambodia passed a new Constitution. This Constitution recognizes all
International Human Rights instruments and guarantees many rights of the people. But,
it also recognizes existing laws before the Constitution until the new ones would replace
them. Before 1993, Cambodia was socialist regime so those laws do not care about the
people's rights but they cared only the interests of the State. For example, at present the
government uses law on demonstration to prohibit the demonstration. So, if this law is
still in force, the freedom of expression and freedom of assembly guaranteed in the
Constitution means nothing. Now twelve years has been passed but the government is
still using law existed since socialist time.
The Government passed a law on press regime in 1995. In that law, there is no
imprisonment used against journalists. But the government still uses penal code to put
journalist in jail. In recently, Mr. Mam Sonando, the Director of Behive Radio has been
arrested on defamation because he interviewed a person who criticized the Prime
Minister.
In 1994, because of the deadlock of forming the new government, both ruling parties
make an Additional Constitution. Many legal analysts said that Cambodia has two
Constitutions. It is another type of amending the Constitution. If it is an additional one,
it means Cambodia has two Constitutions. It also means that the Constitution of 1993 is
not the Top Law of Cambodia.
So we can see that the Constitution of the Kingdom of Cambodia is very flexible, or we
can say that it is very weak.
Regional Human Rights Mechanism
Europe has its European Human Rights Commission and one Human Rights Court.
Even though Europe and Asia may have different values on human rights, it is better for
Asia to have similar human rights mechanism so that Asian States can help each other to
raise the level of human rights in our continents. In case we may not be able to start for
whole Asia, but we may start from Regional level.
We hope that in short future, ASEAN may lead to establish its ASEAN Human Rights
Commission and ASEAN Human Right Court in Asia.
Roles of NGOs in Cambodia
There are many types of NGOs in Cambodia. We can categorize them into four types:
1. Human Rights NGOs,
2. Democracy NGOs,
3. Development NGOs and
4. Legal Aid NGOs.
However, they have four types activities:
Development assistance such as providing or donating wells, school building,
computers, etc… to the poor people.
Awareness programs:
Health Awareness: HIV, sanitation, health, medical care etc…
Legal Awareness: legal skill training, workshop on legal issues, etc…
Advocacy:
Local advocacy: with local authorities, cadastry committees, etc…
Political advocacy: lobby with donors, foreign embassies or high rank
officials relating to political tension, for example arrest of radio director,
or arrest of civil society leaders, etc…
Legal advocacy: giving comments to the draft laws, etc…
Legal Aid: There are two largest legal aid NGOs, the Cambodian Defenders Project
(CDP) and Legal Aid for Cambodia (LAC). These two organizations provide
legal services to the poor and vulnerable people free of charge. Since 1994, the
CDP represented more than eleven thousands poor and vulnerable people.
In Cambodia, NGOs are stronger than the government. Many good staffs work with
NGOs21. However, after 2003 more good people left NGOs and joined the Government.
Recently, the Government arrested and issues warrant for arresting many NGO leaders
who criticized the Government. All top leaders of NGOs are in the black list of
government. It is a backward step of democracy in Cambodia.
Therefore, if an NGO is independent it becomes a watch dog to monitor the
government. It will become a fourth power. However, each NGO has different
21 It may be working with government, the salary is very low.
strategies. Some NGOs use confrontation approach, some use coaching approach, etc…
In order to have synergy, NGOs establish many coalitions, so that they will work as a
group.
More Independent Bodies, Stronger Democracy.
Civil Society is a bridge between the people and the Government
Since 1993, the New Constitution adopts many good principles and guarantees many
rights of the people. When we read it, we feel that we have all those rights. But it is not
true. If you do not try to demand those rights you do not know whether you have any
rights or not. For example, in the Constitution provides the freedom of demonstration,
but at present the government do not allow the people to have any demonstration or any
event in the public places. You can organize it only in any building. So, do we enjoy this
right? We must demand.
So the civil society or NGOs have very important roles in telling the people what rights
they have and help the people to demand those rights to be sure that we have really
those rights or not. It is a normal life of Democracy.
CONCLUSION
Human Rights Day is not a Human Rights Festival. We do not come only for fun and
chatting with old friend. But, we must use this day to review whether the people have
their human rights or not. It is the day that reminds us that we must try to strengthen
human rights mechanism in our own country, help neighbor countries, and build
regional and continental human rights mechanism.
The government is only a group of the people working for the people. We vote for them
not to kill us but to serve us. If you are elected as a leader or head of state, you are
parent of the people. You must care the children, love them, tolerate them and work for
them.
The Legal Problems of China's Environment Rights
_Under the Background of Asian Human Rights Charter of 1998
ZhouWei 22
一、The Legislations on Environment Rights of China
After the People's Republic of China was founded in 1949, the legal protection of
Environment Rights in Mainland can be divided into three stages: the first stage was in
the “initial period after founding ”. During the initial period after the People's Republic
of China's founding from 1949 to the end of 1950s, some rules and normative
documents were formulated to explore, make use of , protect and improve the
environment and natural resources reasonably, such as the Interim Regulation on
Mining of the People's Republic of China (April, 1951),the Government
Administration Council's Designation on Mobilizing the People to Plant Forests,
Cultivate Forests, and Protect Forests(July, 1953), the Management Ways of
Hunting(October,1956) and so on . In this period, corresponding with the economic
development, environmental pollution was not a problem yet. The second stage was in
“starting period” from 1960s to 1970s. The first national environmental protection
meeting of China was held on August in 1973, in which Several Regulations on the
Protection and Improvement of Environment was formulated that was the first
comprehensive administrative regulation on environmental protection of China and had
important meaning to the development of China's environmental legislations. On
January 1974, the central government made out the Interim Regulation on Prevention
and Cure of the Coastal Waters' Pollution,which was the first normal administrative
regulation of prevention and cure of environmental pollution. The third stage was in
opening-up period. It was the time the modern environmental legislations of China
developed quickly and comprehensively from 1978 till now. The first climax of
environmental legislations emerged in the metaphase and anaphase of 20c, started from
the enactment of Environmental Protection Law (trying out). In 1978, the Constitution
was amended and in the new Constitution it was said that “ the country protect
environment and natural resources, prevent and cure pollution and other social effects of
22 professor of Law school of Sichuan university and Shanghai Jiaotong
universit
e-mail: [email protected]
address: No.99,ZHIHUI-ROAD,610016 CHENDU CITY, CHINA
pollution.” It was the first time China prescribed environmental protection in the
Constitution, considered environmental protection as a national basic duty, and
identified natural protection and prevention and cure of pollution as two fields of
environmental protection and environmental legislations, which directly established the
basic framework and main content of environment legislations system in China. On
September 1979, China passed Environmental Protection Law (trying out), and in
1989, China passed Environmental Protection Law,after that, China finished the
environmental legislations system preliminarily. With the economic development,
environmental protection is becoming a popular social problem gradually. On March
1994, the central government ratified China's agenda in 21c, and proposed the total
strategy, fundamental countermeasures, and plans of action to achieve sustainable
development. On March 1993, with the set up of environment and resources protection
committee, the legislations and supervisions on the environmental protection of the
organ of supreme power was strengthened. Since 1994, China has revised and
formulated one batch of laws、regulations and administrative rules about pollution
preventing and controlling .Such as Rules for Implementation of the Law on Prevention
and Control of Atmospheric pollution(Formulated on 8/1995) Rules for Implementation
of the Law on the Prevention and Control of Solid waste pollution(Formulated on
10/1995,Amended on 2004) Rules for Implementation of the Law on the Prevention and
Control of Water Pollution(Formulated on 5/1996)etc. Successively has revised and
formulated some resources energy management, disaster preventing and controlling
and the natural conservation aspect law, the laws and regulations and the rules and
regulations, like " nature protection area rule " (in October, 1994), " coal law " (in
August, 1996), " flood prevention law " (in August, 1997) and so on. In solid waste
pollution environment preventing and controlling law which recently newly revised,
increasing the promotion of circulation economy development, implementing the
system on producer extend responsibility ,initiating the production method and the life
style that are advantageous to the environmental protection .strengthening the
stipulation in the village environmental protection, the mine environmental protection as
well as aggravating the punishment , manifesting the important principle of
comprehensive realizing pollution responsibility and the thought of encouraging solid
waste circulation use .and entrusting the environmental protection department with a
governing power by a set time .
二、Chinese environment law execution present situation
The Chinese law educational world mostly favors the environment power for the
human right organic constituent. In recent years, the Chinese scholar started to favor
the environment power for the human right constituent. Seem by the Chinese scholar,
the human right core factor is the right to live and the development power. The
environment power not only is the right to live, also development ,and is the humanity
survival and the development essential premise, the reality safeguard of Human
civilization inheritance and race multiplication. In order to protect the environment,
Chinese government strengthens the environmental protection work from the
organization mechanism. The important measure of carrying out science development
view and the correct achievements in one's official career view .is to implement the
leading cadre environmental protection achievements in one's official career inspection
Some places bring into line with the environmental protection inspection inspect inside
the place all levels of officials' standard, promoting environmental protection work
developing. For example, Heilongjiang Province first includes the environmental
protection target among it, Chongqing inspects the environmental protection actual
accomplishments and inspection object various areas county party politics one handle
expands to the municipal government department concerned one handle. Hebei,
Guangdong, Shandong, Tianjin, Sichuan, Zhejiang, Jilin (city) the scope carrying out
environmental protection actual accomplishments inspection work with the party
politics leading cadre in entire province.
At the same time, the national environmental protection law enforcement
department increased the law enforcement dynamics to reduce the environmental
pollution. In 2004, China altogether has the environmental pollution and destruction
accidents 1,,441, creates the direct economy loses 36,365.70 thousand Yuan. Whole
year altogether implements environment administration punishment case 80,079. In
2004, the Chinese environmental pollution government investment is 1,908.6 hundred
million Yuan, occupying same year GDP 1.4%, achieving the historical most high level.
The Chinese country environmental protection bureau proposed the concrete
environmental protection goal in "Country Environmental protection" 15 "Plan".The
nation altogether sets out 1310 thousand law enforcement personnel inspecting 600
thousand enterprises , soluting 3365 prominent environment questions with the license
to supervise, investigating 270000 environment illegal questions of which 15000 has
settled a lawsuit , banning 6462 closure illegally dumps pollutants enterprises, ordering
3861 enterprises to have a suspension ,and 6755 enterprises by a set time punishing 155
related responsibility people of whom government and department concerned 81 people
(environmental protection department 66 people). Through investigating the illegal
activity, solving some prominent environmental pollution harm problems. Some 18
provinces initiatively cleaned up and corrected more than 200 “ local policies” which
violate Environmental protection law and regulations, and promoting local authority
environment concept of law.
三、The problem and outlook of the Chinese environment law performance
The fundamental realities of China is “the population is many, the resources are
few, the pollution is heavy, the economy grows quickly and the development form is
extensive ”, this indicates that environmental pollution and resources consumption have
been “a bottleneck” to achieve the goal of ensuring our people a relative comfortable
life. Therefore, the country proposes the policy of “transforming economy development
way, developing circulation economy and taking a new road to industrialization” and so
on, And this substituted for the value orientation of developing economy firstly while
neglecting the environmental protection in the past. However, China is locating the
period of economical development fast, the environment and the development
contradiction is more and more prominent. According to the State Environmental
Protection Administration, these questions mainly display in the following aspects:
Firstly, in the process of industrialization, the pollution profession of papermaking, the
electric power, chemical, the building materials, the metallurgy equipollent and so on
will continue to develop, the control pollution and the ecology will destroy the
difficulty will enlarge; Secondly, in the process of urbanization, the city’s environment
infrastructure construction will lag, the massive trash and the sewage cannot handle
safely, and the surface vegetation receives badly destruction; Thirdly, in the process of
agriculture modernization, the use of chemical fertilizer and insecticides and the
development of aquaculture will pollute the cultivated land, and the controlling and
preventing task of the durable organic pollutant will be more arduous, this threats
agricultural product’s security; Fourthly, in the transformation of society
consummation , every kind of new pollution such as the waste of electronic electric
appliance, the vehicle exhaust, the harmful building material and inappropriate interior
decoration and so on will take on a rapidly rise tendency; Fifthly, take the coal as the
focus energy structure long-term existence, and the task to deal with the sulfur dioxide,
the compound of nitrogen oxide, the smoke and dust will be more arduous; Sixthly, the
new technology and the new product such as transgenic product, the new chemical
substance and so on will brings more latent risks to the environment and the health. In
brief, along with the rapid development of economy, the economical scale expands
unceasingly; the type and the quantity of output of pollutant will increase rapidly , the
rivers, the lake, the wet land, the ground water, and the multiply biology will have the
possibility of being polluted and destructed.
Along with Chinese government to take sustainable development and
environmental protection seriously, the ideas and the policy which the development
economy and the protection environment, and the environment is one part of the
economical sustainable development are becoming a execution policy of local
government. In the recent years, Chinese government has proposed the scientific
concept of development which the concept of people-oriented, comprehensive,
coordinated and sustainable development, which indicates that the Chinese government
has put economical construction to a new height with which economy and society,
person and nature comprehensive development, and this brings the rare opportunity for
the development of environmental protection enterprise. The Chinese government have
already realized the permanent cure to the environment question at the present stage is
to transform the economical growth way, develop circulation economy and construct the
resource conservation and the friendly environment society.
Appendix : The Song hua river environmental contamination accident caused by ji lin
chemical corporation of China oil and gas group
In November 13 of 2005 , double benzolism chemical plant of ji lin chemical
corporation exploded abruptly. Because of the unexpected explosion accident, some
poisonous substance flowed into Song hua river causing great water pollution through
the process of saving. Zhang li jun (the vice president of national environmental
protection department) said “ This accident belongs to a major environmental pollution
accident.The major poisonous substance include benzolism, aniline, nitrobenzene and
other organic matters. And it is sured that the responsibility is taken by double
benzolism chemical plant of ji lin chemical corporation.” in the press conference of
November 24, 2005. According to the expertises′ estimation, about 100 tons poisonous
substance have flowed into Song hua river. By far, the citizens don′t have any physical
problems for drinking the water of Song hua river . Because of this major pollution,
Harbin municipal government announced that there will be no water supply from
November 22 to 26 and also will check the city propers′ water supply network
installaion comprehensively.
(Attachment: the details of Harbin municipal government Announcement).
The announcement of cutting off the city propers′ water supply by Harbin municipal
government
【2005】26 unit
In November 13 of 2005 , double benzolism chemical plant of ji lin chemical
corporation exploded abruptly. According to the environmental supervision department
survey, up to now, unusual things are not discovered in the city′s section of song hua
river, however,forests that the upper section′s pollution will come in short run. To ensure
the safety of water supply, the municipal government will cut off the water supply
temporarily .And the details of the announcement are as followed:
· There will be no water supply in Harbin city from 8pm November 22 . This
water shortage event will be extended for about 4 days( the timeline for
recovering water supply wil be proclaimed afer several days). Hope that every
public bodies ,enterprises, individual producers and citizens are seriously
prepared to store water for future various use meeting their own needs.
· From now on, any bathe units and car body washing units must stop using water
immediately in the Harbin city propers.
· The industry and commerce supervision department , market pricing department
and public security must execute their own work well in the fields of
strengthening market supervision ,safety guards,protecting market and social
sequence.
November 21, 2005