1st year design at the u of c
DESCRIPTION
First Year Design and Communication at the University of CalgaryTRANSCRIPT
Engineer of the Future 2.0Olin College, 1 April 2009
First Year Design & Communicationat the University of Calgary
Dr. Bob BrennanAssociate Dean (Academic & Planning)
Schulich School of Engineering
Dr. Ayo JejeAssociate Dean (Teaching & Learning)
Schulich School of Engineering
Engineer of the Future 2.0Olin College, 1 April 2009
Outline
• Engineering Design
• Fourth-year “Capstone Design”
• First-year Design and Communication
• Challenges
Engineer of the Future 2.0Olin College, 1 April 2009
Engineering Design
• Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board (CEAB)
– Engineering design integrates mathematics, basic science, engineering sciences and complementary studies in developing elements, systems and processes to meet specific needs. It is a creative, iterative and often open-ended process subject to constraints which may be governed by standards or legislation to varying degrees depending upon the discipline. These constraints may relate to economic, health, safety, environmental, social or other pertinent interdisciplinary factors.
Engineer of the Future 2.0Olin College, 1 April 2009
Engineering Design
• CEAB Definition– Engineering design integrates mathematics, basic
science, engineering sciences and complementary studies in developing elements, systems and processes to meet specific needs. It is a creative, iterative and often open-ended process subject to constraints which may be governed by standards or legislation to varying degrees depending upon the discipline. These constraints may relate to economic, health, safety, environmental, social or other pertinent interdisciplinary factors.
“Inquiry-based Learning”
Engineer of the Future 2.0Olin College, 1 April 2009
“Capstone Design”
• CEAB became more prescriptive in terms of how and where this content is taught in 1996:
– The engineering curriculum must culminate in a significant design experience which is based on the knowledge and skills acquired in earlier course work and which preferably gives students an exposure to the concepts of team work and project management.
Engineer of the Future 2.0Olin College, 1 April 2009
The Typical Capstone Design Model
• Two half-courses– Design methodology and application
• Inquiry-based learning– Problem or question driven design projects– Small groups / self-directed teams of 4-5 students– Critical discourse design reviews– Interdisciplinary / research projects tend to require
interdisciplinary knowledge and/or research
F W F W
1st 2nd
F W
3rd
F W
4th
Capstone
Engineer of the Future 2.0Olin College, 1 April 2009
An Excellent Platform for Inquiry-based Learning …
Engineer of the Future 2.0Olin College, 1 April 2009
Only in 4th Year?
• Common Core Curriculum Redesign (Spring 2000)– Canadian Academy of Engineering, CEAB, U of C Curriculum
Redesign Initiative– Experiential learning
• Result: 1st Year Design & Problem Solving Stream– ENGG 251/253 “Design and Communications”– 2 x H(1-4.5) in first year– Experiential learning design labs (ICT Building)
F W F W
1st 2nd
F W
3rd
F W
4th
CapstoneInquiry-based Learning ??
Engineer of the Future 2.0Olin College, 1 April 2009
2001/2002 2002/2003
First Year First Year
1AMAT 217Calculus
AMAT 217Calculus
2AMAT 219
Multivariable Calculus AMAT 219
Multivariable Calculus
3CHEM 209
General Chemistry CHEM 209
General Chemistry
4ENGG 201
Liquids, Gases, Solids ENGG 201
Liquids, Gases, Solids
5ENGG 203
StaticsENGG 205
Mechanics I
6ENGG 215
Design, Practice & CommsENGG 251
Design & Comms I
7ENGG 233
Computing IENGG 233
Computing I
8ENGG 249Dynamics
ENGG 253Design & Comms II
9MATH 221
Linear AlgebraMATH 221
Linear Algebra
10PHYS 259
Electricity & MagnetismPHYS 259
Electricity & Magnetism
11PHYS 269
Acoustics, Optics, Radiation Complementary Studies
Second Year Second Year
1AMAT 307
Differential EquationsAMAT 307
Differential Equations
2ENGG 313*
Drawing & Comp GraphicsENGG 349*
Mechanics II
3ENGG 319
Probability & StatisticsENGG 319
Probability & Statistics
4PHYS 369**
Acoustics, Optics, Radiation
* except ENCM, ENEL, ENSF** excpet ENCH, ENOG
* except ENCM, ENEL, ENSF** except ENCH, ENOG
* except computer, electrical and software engineering** except chemical and oil & gas engineering
Engineer of the Future 2.0Olin College, 1 April 2009
Operational Effect of Change
• 1st Year Design & Communication– 600 students in 2002/2003– expanded to 720 students in 2006/2007
• Doubling of Instruction Hours – ENGG 215/313: 953 hours– ENGG 251/253: 1880 hours (2819 hrs post-expansion)
• Increase in Teaching Resources– Number of instructors increased by a factor of 4.5– Number of teaching assistants increased by a factor of
3
Engineer of the Future 2.0Olin College, 1 April 2009
First Year Design Labs
“Coaches”
Instructors
DesignStudio
DesignStudio
DesignStudio
Shop
Bro
ad
cast
Engineer of the Future 2.0Olin College, 1 April 2009
Experiential Learning Spaces
Engineer of the Future 2.0Olin College, 1 April 2009
Tools of the Trade …
Engineer of the Future 2.0Olin College, 1 April 2009
Ready …
Set …
Go!
Design/Build Experiences
Engineer of the Future 2.0Olin College, 1 April 2009
Challenges - Large Classes
• “Hand-on” Design– providing a significant “hands-on” design experience to
720 students
• Course Co-ordination– getting the message out (communication)– managing a large teaching team– managing multiple student projects
• Course Objectives– appropriate student projects– appropriate intended learning outcomes
• Space– specialized teaching labs
Engineer of the Future 2.0Olin College, 1 April 2009
Challenges - Assessment
• Subjective– “good design” vs. “good design process”– Competency-based
• Broad range of assessment tools– Performance assessment of processes or products– Oral communication– Portfolios
• Reliability– Consistency across judges– Consistency across forms of assessment
• Grading– Aggregating varied assessments into an overall letter
grade
Engineer of the Future 2.0Olin College, 1 April 2009
Challenges - Instruction
• Teaching Workloads– Teaching workload is approximately double that of other
engineering science courses– Given that the model involves a fall term course and a winter
term course, this requires higher than normal annual workloads
• Teaching Skill Sets– These courses also require instructors with special skill sets
that are not common in typical engineering departments: i.e., visual, oral and written communication.
• Teaching Assistants– These courses rely heavily on a large team of teaching
assistants– Like the instructors, the teaching assistants’ load is higher (60
hrs/term vs. 40 hrs/term) and they must have engineering design, visual, oral and written communication skills