16.02.2014| 1 how do agencies follow recommendations from the review team and the review committee?...

11
25.08.22 | 1 How do agencies follow recommendations from the review team and the review committee? The Norwegian Case

Upload: claire-martin

Post on 27-Mar-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 16.02.2014| 1 How do agencies follow recommendations from the review team and the review committee? The Norwegian Case

10.04.23| 1

How do agencies follow recommendations from the review team and the review committee?

The Norwegian Case

Page 2: 16.02.2014| 1 How do agencies follow recommendations from the review team and the review committee? The Norwegian Case

10.04.23| 2

External review of the Norwegian Agency for Quality Assurance in Education (NOKUT)

•March 2007 and commissioned by The Ministry of Education and Research

•The purpose of the evaluation:

To examine whether NOKUT meets the European standards and guidelines for quality assurance in the European higher education area

To evaluate the national role of NOKUT in the Norwegian educational system

•Two evaluation reports submitted February 2008

Page 3: 16.02.2014| 1 How do agencies follow recommendations from the review team and the review committee? The Norwegian Case

10.04.23| 3

NOKUT’s primary tasks

•Evaluation, accreditation (initial) and revision of higher education

•Recognition of post –secondary vocational education

•General recognition of foreign qualifications  

Page 4: 16.02.2014| 1 How do agencies follow recommendations from the review team and the review committee? The Norwegian Case

10.04.23| 4 10.04.23| 4

The organisation structure

Page 5: 16.02.2014| 1 How do agencies follow recommendations from the review team and the review committee? The Norwegian Case

10.04.23| 5

The evaluation team’s conclusions and recommendation for future improvements

• NOKUT fully complies with ENQA’s membership requirements.

Recommendations: • The Ministry should evaluate the current regulations with

the aim of increasing the flexibility and appropriateness of the agency’s operations.

• Discuss of what should be the prioritised evaluation tools and activities for the future. Transformation of evaluation instruments and their functioning.

• NOKUT should find a better balance between control and improvement for the future

• Redefine criteria

Page 6: 16.02.2014| 1 How do agencies follow recommendations from the review team and the review committee? The Norwegian Case

10.04.23| 6

•More efforts to avoid conflicts of interest among external reviewers related to other issues than institutional affiliation

• Improve accountability function and contribute more on the critical issue concerning the quality of Norwegian higher education.

Page 7: 16.02.2014| 1 How do agencies follow recommendations from the review team and the review committee? The Norwegian Case

10.04.23| 7

Follow up

•Amendments of the University and Colleges Act•Amendments of Ministry’s regulation of NOKUT•Amendments of NOKUT’s standards and criteria•Development of the strategy and organisation –

ongoing process 2009-2010

Page 8: 16.02.2014| 1 How do agencies follow recommendations from the review team and the review committee? The Norwegian Case

10.04.23| 8

Follow up process 1Amendments The University and Colleges Act

•Supervision•Development•Recognition of foreign qualification

There has been a hearing and the government submitted a white paper on April 2009.

Waiting for the Parliament decision.

Page 9: 16.02.2014| 1 How do agencies follow recommendations from the review team and the review committee? The Norwegian Case

10.04.23| 9

Follow-up process 2

•Amendments of the Ministry’s regulation of NOKUT•Amendments of NOKUT’s standards and criteria

Page 10: 16.02.2014| 1 How do agencies follow recommendations from the review team and the review committee? The Norwegian Case

10.04.23| 10

NOKUTs strategic plan and process

•A strategic plan for the next three to five years •Dialog with the sector •Management of the activity •Organisation structure

Page 11: 16.02.2014| 1 How do agencies follow recommendations from the review team and the review committee? The Norwegian Case

10.04.23| 11

Strategi- og organisasjonsutviklingsprosessen 2009P

rem

isse

r fr

a e

valu

erin

gen

med

mer

. 2A. Strategi:

Ekstern dialog

1. Strategi:Intern Fase

Gru

nnla

gsno

tat

for

fase

2 (

Str

ateg

iutk

ast)

Gru

nnla

gsno

tat

med

evt

. til

legg

2B. Virksomhetsstyring (VS)

2C. Organisasjonsstruktur:

Idéfase og forhandlinger

Opp

legg

for

VS

2A. Konkretisere strategiplan

+2B.

Konkretiserestruktur for

virksomhetsplan (VP)

Str

ateg

ipla

nS

truk

tur

for

VP

2B. Ut-

arbeide VP

2010-14

Vir

kso

mh

ets

pla

n

201

0-1

4

Nyt

t o

rg.

kart

2C.Pers- pol.

Fase 1 Fase 226.01 06.05 01.09 11.11 17.1201.10

26.01 06.05 01.09 11.11 17.1215.10 april 2010

26.01 26.02 26.03 seminar

06.05 18.06 01.09 13.10 11.11

april2010

17.12

13.02 20.03 01.04seminar

24.04 15.05 05.06 19.0627.0230.01 Som

mer

ferie

11.0921.08 13.1116.10 18.1225.09 30.10 Ca 01.12seminar

Styremøter og -seminarer FFF og internseminarer Kontaktmøter ledelse og tillitsvalgte

16.04 30.04 18.05 04.06 25.06 04.09 17.09 08.10 22.10 10.1219.11

Bak

gru

nnsn

otat

er t

il st

rate

gise

min

ar

1. Strategi:Intern fase

(forts.)

26.03

19.03

26.03

2C. Organisasjonsstruktur:

forberedelser til implement.

01.01

01.01

NY

OR

GA

NIS

AS

JO

N I

MP

LE

ME

NT

ER

ES