Certain high schools require students to learn a foreign language while others let students to learn subjects of their choice. Which policy do you support? Give specific examples and reasons.

Certain---specific-some-specific

High---secondary

School—institute—centre of learning-academy-college

Require—expect—need-- involve --oblige

Foreign---non native—distant-overseas –external-outside--

Language---communication -speech

Learn-----adopt—practice—study –train –to be skilled at-grasp –master-be proficient in

Subject---course---field—topic—themes –discipline -area

Choice---option—alternative -preference

Policy----rules—paln –quideline—strategy –approach -aatitude

Support—favor—go in with –help-aid

Example—instance—specimen—instance –illustration

Globalization is taking over all fields of life, including education.Therefore, it is important to train the secondary school learners in a non-native language, considering its benefits to the society, altogether.

Mjorly, it helps to secure a bright future for the students.For instance , all the subjects are taught in English at college level in Pakistan.In order to perform well at this level of education one must be proficient in the foreign language ,that is English.Otherwise , poor performance in understanding and achievement in the field of study,due to unfamiliarity with the language, will hinder the opportunities of finding good employment.Thus , a foreign language ,widens the scope of seeking work for a person.

Moreover , this skill ,makes people self dependant.For example,most of the office work in places such as bank, school ,court ,law enforcement agencies in India, is conducted in English language instead of native Hindi language.In case of unfamiliarity with this language, will increase the dependency on the translation services.Therefore , to live an independent life at social level school must oblige children to be skilled at an external language.

However,this approach of teaching may increase the burden on those who are merely interested in developing basic literacy skills.But , it should be noted that every national has responsibility to serve the nation on its way to progress.Theses people can greatly help national economy by familiarising them with an extra language ,which will greatly help to save national spending on translation services.

In conclusion , despite some difficlulties on the way to learn a distant language the benefits are so significant that it is easy to overlook the involved hurdles.Due to this reason the given strategy to teach a foreign language compulsorily is supported.

Students are most likely to perform well in the studies if they are given the option to study a subject of their interest.But , in special cases it is mandatory to impose compulsionin the subject chice.

Majorly , many developing countries culd find it hard to pprogress without the knowledge of a secondary language.For instance , Pakitsnai students must be taught Enlish as a subject because higher education subjects are all taught in English.Therefore the quality of a children education wil be strongly determined by his grasp of Enlish language other than moter tounge urdu.

Moreover, many day to day busineses areconducted in developing nations.For inatnce officials documents arre majrly processes in English .Similarly bbanking applications wrk in English.Without the knowledge of enlish people will fiind them helpless at many stages..Thus, it is important too know a second language to at efficiently in daily life.

However it will lay an extra burden on the student wjho are nt interested to lean a foreign langage.For instan esome popel aerie restin onlu basc ducaio ,an consider this implication as burdenBut ,they can not do without t , and it’s a great sevice to the community becays it wil save great in th trsnation serives .

In conclusion , depiste some diffclut attached to learn a forein language as a consition , it bring moe good than its diffcltuties this, its is good idea to impose restriction of mandatory second language.