1.3 review: civil- military synergies

D1.3 Review

Imp

Lead bene

Delivery da

Revision: 2

Dissemin

PU: Publi

PP: Restr

RE: Restr

w: Civil- Milit

proving the

eficiary: Nat

ate: M6

2.0

nation Leve

c

ricted to oth

ricted to a g

tary Synergie

e Effective

1.3 Rev

ional Defen

el

her program

group specif

es

PRO

eness of C

view: Ci

nce Universi

mme particip

fied by the c

Public

OJECT TIT

Capabilitie

vil- Mili

ity/ Finnish

pants (includ

consortium

TLE:

es (IEC) in

tary Sy

Defence Fo

ding the Co

(including t

n EU confl

nergies

orces Intern

mmission)

the Commis

Contrac

Start date

Duration

ict preven

s

national Cen

X

ssion)

IECEU

ct no 653371

: 01/05/2015

n: 33 months

ntion

ntre

U

5

s

D1.3 Review Contents

LIST OF TA

LIST OF FIG

EXECUTIVE

ACRONYM

1 INTRODU

1.1 Purpo

1.2 Struct

2 CIVIL- MI

2.1 Devel

2.2 Scope

2.3 Civil-

2.4 Civil-

2.5 Comp

2.6 Concl

3 EU’S CO

..................

3.1 CSDP

3.1.1 K

3.1.2 In

3.2 Civilia

3.3 Lesso

3.4 Plann

3.4.1 E

3.4.2 P

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

ABLES .........

GURES .......

E SUMMARY

S .................

UCTION .......

ose of the de

ture of the de

LITARY REL

lopment of th

e of the inter

Military Coo

Military Coo

prehensive A

lusions .........

MPREHENS

....................

P - The frame

Key policies a

nstitutions an

an and Milita

ons Learned

ning and Con

Early warning

Planning and

tary Synergie

eceived funding from

....................

....................

Y .................

....................

....................

eliverable .....

eliverable ....

LATIONS IN

he theoretica

raction .........

peration (CIM

rdination (CM

Approach (CA

....................

SIVE APPRO

....................

ework of civi

and documen

nd Actors .....

ry capabilitie

Cycle .........

nducting CSD

g and situatio

decision ma

es

the European Union

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

EU CRISIS

al framework

....................

MIC) ............

MCO) ...........

A) to crisis m

....................

OACH TO C

....................

l-military inte

nts relevant t

....................

es .................

....................

DP missions

onal awarene

aking .............

PU

n’s Horizon 2020 rese

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

MANAGEM

for EU crisis

....................

....................

....................

management.

....................

RISIS - INTE

....................

eractions with

to CSDP ......

....................

....................

....................

and operatio

ess ...............

....................

earch and innovation

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

ENT ............

s manageme

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

ERNAL COO

...................

hin the EU ..

...................

...................

...................

...................

ons ..............

...................

...................

n programme under g

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

ent structures

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

OPERATION

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

s ..................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

N AND COO

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

IECEUoject: 653371: 01/05/2015n: 33 months

653371

ii

....... iv

....... iv

....... vi

..... viii

....... 9

..... 12

..... 13

..... 15

..... 16

..... 17

..... 20

..... 21

..... 23

..... 28

RDINATION

..... 29

..... 29

..... 29

..... 34

..... 35

..... 39

..... 45

..... 45

..... 46

U

5 s

i

N

D1.3 Review

3.4.3 C

3.4.4 In

3.4.5 F

3.4.5 T

3.4.6 S

3.5 Civil-

3.5.1 O

3.5.2 In

3.6 Concl

4 LESSONS

4.1 Lesso

4.1.1 A

4.1.2 L

4.2 Limita

4.3 Concl

5 INTER- O

5.1 North

5.2 United

5.3 Regio

5.3.1 O

5.3.2 A

5.4 Concl

6 TOWARD

6.1 Imple

6.2 Civil-

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

Command an

nformation sh

inance and P

Training .........

Staffing .........

military inter

Overview of th

nteraction be

lusion ..........

S FROM IMP

ons learned f

Annual report

essons ident

ations to dev

lusions .........

ORGANIZATI

Atlantic Tre

d Nations (U

onal internati

Organisation

African Union

lusions .........

DS ENHANC

mentation of

Military syne

tary Synergie


d Control (C

haring and re

Procurement

....................

....................

raction in the

he CDSP mi

etween CSDP

....................

PLEMENTAT

from compre

ts .................

tified on CSD

eloping the c

....................

IONAL COO

aty Organisa

UN) – Europe

onal organiz

for Security a

(AU) – Euro

....................

ED COOPER

f comprehen

ergies ..........

es

the European Union

C2) ................

eporting .......

t ...................

....................

....................

eatre .............

ssion and op

P missions a

....................

TION OF CO

ehensive app

....................

DP civil- milit

comprehensi

....................

PERATION .

ation (NATO)

ean Union (E

zations ..........

and Co-oper

opean Union

....................

RATION AN

sive approac

....................

PU


....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

peration dep

and operation

....................

OMPREHENS

proach to CS

....................

tary interface

ive approach

....................

....................

)- European

U) ...............

....................

ration in Euro

(EU) ...........

....................

D COORDIN

ch in CSDP .

....................


...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

loyed paralle

ns in theatre

...................

SIVE APPRO

DP ..............

...................

e ..................

h to crisis ma

...................

...................

Union (EU)

...................

...................

ope (OSCE)

...................

...................

NATION ......

...................

...................

n programme under g

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

el ..................

....................

....................

OACH TO CR

....................

....................

....................

anagement ..

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

- European

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

RISIS ..........

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

Union (EU) .

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................


653371

iii

..... 52

..... 55

..... 56

..... 58

..... 63

..... 66

..... 67

..... 73

..... 78

..... 80

..... 81

..... 81

..... 82

..... 92

..... 96

..... 97

..... 98

... 108

... 116

... 116

... 121

... 125

... 127

... 128

... 132

U

5 s

i

D1.3 Review

6.3 Concl

BIBLIOGR

Key inform

Annex 1.

Annex 2.

LIST OF

Table 1. De

Table 2. Co

Table 3. Ev

Table 4. Civ

Table 5. Mil

Table 6. Wh

Table 7. EU

Table 8. Th

Table 9. Ma

Table 10. In

Table 11. E

Table 12. C

Table 13. C

LIST OF

Figure 1. Im

Figure 2. EU

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

lusions .........

RAPHY .......

mant intervie

Thematic int

Lessons ide

TABLES

efinition of CM

omprehensive

olution of ES

vilian capabil

litary capabil

ho identifies

U level trainin

e Key Lesso

ain barriers to

nstitutional ar

U and UN m

Completed an

Civil- military s

FIGURE

mproving the

U’s Compreh

tary Synergie


....................

....................

ews ..............

terview ........

entified .........

S

MCO ............

e Approach-

SDP/ CSDP .

lities critical .

ities critical .

the CSDP ke

ng providers .

ons from 201

o interoperab

rrangements

missions and

nd ongoing C

synergies tha

S

EU compreh

hensive Appr

es

the European Union

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

relevant doc

....................

....................

....................

ey lessons? .

....................

4 ..................

bility .............

s for EU-UN c

operations d

CSDP operat

at could be f

hensive appr

roach to Cris

PU


....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

cuments and

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

cooperation

deployed par

tions in Africa

further enhan

roach ...........

sis ................


...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

d concepts ...

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

rallel (in Augu

a .................

nced within C

...................

...................

n programme under g

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

........ Error!

....................

ust 2015) ....

....................

CSDP ..........

....................

....................

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

Bookmark n

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................


653371

iv

... 133

... 135

... 150

........ I

...... IV

............... 22

............... 24

............... 31

............... 36

............... 37

............... 43

............... 59

............... 83

not defined.

............. 112

............. 113

............. 123

............. 132

............... 19

............... 27

U

5 s

v

2

4

6

7

3

9

3

2

3

3

2

9

7

D1.3 Review Figure 3. CM

Figure 4. Ci

Figure 5. Fi

Figure 6. Ph

Figure 7. Th

Figure 8. EU

Figure 9. EU

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

MPD decisio

ivilian and M

nancing CSD

hases for Tra

he EU Crisis

U-NATO per

U – Current N

tary Synergie


on making pro

ilitary Comm

DP Missions

aining and R

Platform .....

rmanent liaiso

NATO/EU Co

es

the European Union

ocedure .......

mand and Co

and Operati

ecruitment o

....................

on arrangem

ommon Area

PU


....................

ontrol options

ion ...............

of CSDP Miss

....................

ments ...........

as of Deploy


...................

s ..................

...................

sions and Op

...................

...................

ment ...........

n programme under g

....................

....................

....................

perations .....

....................

....................

....................

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................


653371

v

............... 46

............... 53

............... 56

............... 58

............... 89

............. 101

............. 104

U

5 s

v

6

3

6

8

9

4

D1.3 Review

EXECUT

European

to its intern

to tackle a

enhance t

Foreign Se

EU to tak

internation

Purposeful

and militar

EU’s confli

is not abou

developme

combinatio

and coher

appropriate

greatest de

agency, b

leveraging

This delive

project, wh

capabilities

capabilities

outline the

contributin

instrument

report is t

instrument

To achieve

and panel

issue. As a

military fu

ideological

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

TIVE SUM

Union (EU)

national cou

a complex c

he visibility

ecurity Polic

ke a leadin

al security.

l coordinatio

ry ones, is p

ict manage

ut creating n

ent process

on of the ful

rent manne

e. Promotin

egree poss

ut rather a

, synchroniz

erable “Revi

hich aims

s. This is d

s and ident

e existing p

g to the i

ts that are

that efficien

ts that are o

e the object

discussion

a result, we

nctions is

l facets. A n

tary Synergie


MMARY

) is a unique

unter partne

crisis. Com

y, impact a

cy objective

g role in p

on and coo

perceived to

ment efforts

new structu

ses. It is a

ll range of a

er, thereby

ng this cul

ible, to resi

as tools of

zing, and a

iew: civil- m

to enhance

done by id

tify the pot

ractices of

dentificatio

achieved t

nt conflict

operating, if

tives set fo

n were con

e found out

a comple

number or b

es

the European Union

e actor in co

ers. It has v

mbining the

nd efficienc

es. The Com

peace-keep

operation be

o be of utm

s. The aim

ures nor new

bout ackno

available ca

reinforcing

ture of coo

st seeing th

f the EU’s

pplying them

military syne

e the effec

dentifying h

tential for p

civil- milita

n of poten

through EU

prevention

not integra

r this repor

nducted the

t that coope

x challeng

barriers to in

PU


onflict preve

vast potentia

strengths o

cy of EU’s

mmon Secu

ping operati

etween the

most importa

of the civil-

w mechanis

owledging o

apabilities a

g the desir

ordination

heir capabil

power to

m.

ergies” is a f

ctiveness of

how to incr

pooling and

ry coopera

ntial synerg

U’s compreh

requires p

ated, in a co

rt an extens

ereby gaini

eration and

e with nu

nteroperabi


ention and c

ality in com

of both mili

interventio

urity and De

ions, confli

different EU

ance for the

military coo

sms, nor ab

one anothe

nd resource

red progres

requires th

lities and re

achieve th

first step in

f the Europ

rease the i

d sharing. T

tion and co

gies betwe

hensive app

parallel dep

ooperative a

sive desk re

ng a comp

coordinatio

merous str

lity could be

n programme under g

crisis mana

bining civili

itary and ci

ns, thereby

efence Polic

ct preventio

U actors, na

e coherence

operation/c

bout merging

er’s compet

es and use

ss and cre

e interagen

esources as

he desired

the implem

pean Union

nteroperabi

The aim of

oordination

en CSDP

proach. The

ployment o

and coordina

esearch, ke

prehensive

on between

ructural, po

e identified

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

gement in c

an and mili

ivilian capa

y supportin

cy (CSDP) e

on and str

amely betw

e and effici

coordination

g respectiv

tences, ide

them in a c

eate synerg

ncy memb

s belonging

outcome b

mentation of

n’s conflict

ility of reso

f this delive

within CSD

civilians a

e prerequis

of military a

ative manne

ey informant

understand

n the EU’s

olitical, tec

at politica


653371

vi

comparison

tary means

abilities can

g the EU’s

enables the

rengthening

een civilian

ency of the

n imperative

e capability

ntifying the

coordinated

gies where

ers, to the

to a single

by sharing,

the IECEU

prevention

ources and

erable is to

DP, thereby

and military

site for this

and civilian

er.

t interviews

ding of the

civilian and

chnical and

l- strategic

U

5 s

i

n

s

n

s

e

g

n

e

e

y

e

d

e

e

e

,

U

n

d

o

y

y

s

n

s

e

d

d

c

D1.3 Review level, such

interventio

conducting

operations

operation

sufficient c

actors. In

cooperatio

including

accommod

Common

process an

This delive

relevant to

and coordi

short-term

practises f

the interac

parallel. C

to coopera

Chapter 5

internation

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

h as, a lack

ns, a lack

g and suppo

s, and at o

objectives,

communica

addition, a

on and coo

areas suc

dation, War

pre-deploy

nd Security

erable is div

o civil- milita

ination prac

(operation

from the co

ction betwee

hapter 4 dis

ation and co

reviews the

al actors ou

tary Synergie


k of a unite

of coordina

orting a CS

operational

absence o

tion system

a number o

ordination

ch as, Str

rehouses, T

yment and

provision o

vided into 4

ary relations

ctises within

nal) conflic

onduct of C

en CSDP m

scussed CS

oordination

e intra-instit

utlining the

es

the European Union

d policy lin

ation betwe

SDP mission

l level, su

of common

m that woul

f areas whe

between C

rategic Co

Transportati

“on-theatr

of the CSDP

4 chapters

s in CSDP.

n EU’s crisis

ct preventio

SDP missio

missions an

SDP’s lesso

between c

utional coo

existing pra

PU


e among th

een EU ins

n/ operation

ch as, ins

n training a

ld enable s

ere added

CSDP civilia

ommunicatio

on, Security

re” training

P staff.

(Chapters 2

Chapter 3

s managem

on instrum

ons and op

nd operation

ons learned

civilian and

peration an

actises.


he member

stitutions an

n and the is

ufficient ca

and recruitm

secure infor

value could

an and m

on, Inform

y arrangem

g, Mutual/I

2-5). Chapt

examines t

ment structu

ents, in p

perations. T

ns which ha

d process a

military cris

nd coordinat

n programme under g

states whe

nd with par

ssue of fund

apabilities t

ment standa

rmation sha

d be achiev

ilitary funct

ation shar

ments, Comm

ntegrated

ter 2 discus

the intra- in

res, focusin

articular, a

This chapter

ave been o

nd key less

sis manage

tion betwee

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

en it comes

rtners when

ding the mi

to reach th

ards and a

aring betwe

ved through

tions were

ring/dialogu

mon Medic

civil-military

sses the ke

nstitutional c

ng on the in

analysing t

r includes a

operating in

sons identif

ement capa

en CSDP an


653371

vii

s to military

n planning,

issions and

he mission/

a lack of a

een the EU

h enhanced

identified,

e, Shared

cal facilities,

y Lessons

ey concepts

cooperation

nteraction in

the current

analyses of

the region

fied, related

abilities and

nd the main

U

5 s

i

y

,

d

/

a

U

d

,

d

,

s

s

n

n

t

f

n

d

d

n

D1.3 Review

ACRONY

AU

BiH

C2

CA

CFSP

CiLMA

CivCom

CivOpsCdr

CMC

CMPD

CONOPS

CPCC

CSDP

CSO

DEVCO

ECHO

EDA

EEAS

ELMA

ESS

ESDC

ESDP

EU del

EUMC

EUMS

EUSR

FFM

FSJ

HQ

HR/VP

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

YMS

African U

Bosnia a

Comman

Compreh

Common

Civilian L

Committ

r Civilian O

Crisis M

Crisis M

Concept

Civilian P

Common

Civilian S

Directora

and Dev

Humanit

as the E

Europea

Europea

EUMS L

Europea

Europea

Europea

Europea

Europea

EU Milita

Europea

Fact Fin

Freedom

Headqua

High Re

Policy/V

tary Synergie


Union

and Herzeg

nd and Con

hensive Ap

n Foreign a

Lessons Ma

tee for the C

Operation C

anagement

anagement

t of Operatio

Planning an

n Security a

Strategic O

ate Genera

velopment

tarian Aid a

uropean Co

an Defence

an External

Lessons Ma

an Security

an Security

an Security

an Union De

an Union Mi

ary Staff

an Union Sp

ding Missio

m, Security a

arter

presentativ

ice-Preside

es

the European Union

ovina

ntrol

proach

nd Security

anagement

Civilian Asp

Commander

t Concept

t and Plann

ons

nd Conduct

and Defence

ptions

l for Interna

nd Civil Pro

ommunity H

Agency

Action Serv

nagement A

Strategy

and Defenc

and Defenc

elegation

litary Comm

pecial Repre

on

and Justice

e of the Un

ent of the Eu

PU


y Policy

Application

pects of Cris

r

ing Director

Capability

e Policy

ational Coop

otection (for

Humanitaria

vice

Application

ce College

ce Policy

mittee

esentative

e

ion for Fore

uropean Co


n

sis Managem

rate

peration

rmerly know

an Aid Office

eign Affairs

ommission

n programme under g

ment

wn

e)

and Securit

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

ty


653371

viii

U

5 s

i

D1.3 Review ISB

LI

LL

LMG

MSO

MIP

NATO

NGO

OHQ

OpCdr

OPCEN

OPLAN

OSCE

PFCA

PRT

PSC

PSOR

SIAC

SASE

SitCen

SME

SOR

SSR

TEU

UN

UNSC

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

Intelligen

Lessons

Lessons

Lessons

Military S

Mission

North At

Non-Gov

Operatio

Operatio

Operatio

Operatio

Organisa

Political

Provincia

Political

Provision

Single In

Safe and

Situation

Small an

Stateme

Security

Treaty o

United N

United N

tary Synergie


nce Steerin

s Identified

s Learned

s Manageme

Strategic O

Implementa

tlantic Treat

vernmental

on Headqua

on Comman

ons Centre

ons Plan

ation for Se

Framework

al Reconstr

and Securi

nal Stateme

ntelligence A

d Secure En

n Centre

nd Medium-

ent of Requi

Sector Ref

n European

Nations

Nations Sec

es

the European Union

g Board

ent Board

ptions

ation Plan

ty Organisa

Organizatio

arters

nder

ecurity and C

k for Crisis A

ruction Team

ty Committe

ent Of Requ

Analyses C

nvironment

- sized Entre

rements

form

n Union

curity Counc

PU


ation

on

Co-operatio

Approach

m

ee

uirements

Capacity

eprises

cil


on in Europe

n programme under g

e

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No


653371

ix

U

5 s

x

D1.3 Review

Internation

Given the

terrorism,

protracted

the effects

migratory

security, re

resources

all relevant

stronger t

guaranteed

multilatera

and militar

The need

the improv

recognised

resolution

in solving c

Common

objectives

is to ‘prese

in Ukraine

the preven

comprehen

fragile and

array of ex

1 Cornelius Genshagen, 2 The ongoinground. In adjoint action fr3 The CSDP states discusvisibility and 4 Article 21, 326/01, 26.10

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

1 INTR

nal crisis m

new threat

traditional

conflicts. 1

s of climate

flows, illici

egional con

remain und

t civilian an

than ever.

d by the

lism and a

ry instrumen

for the incr

ved effectiv

d.3 Evolving

of the crise

current issu

Security an

of the EU’s

erve peace,

and strugg

ntative actio

nsive appro

d conflict-af

xternal poli

Adebahr, The2011).

ng fight againsddition, it is evrom various in

was on the assed how to eimpact of the European U

0.2012.

tary Synergie


ODUCTIO

management

ts emanatin

peacekeep

As global c

e change a

it trafficking

nflicts, radic

der pressur

d military in

As evolve

effort of a

networked

nts to be ap

eased inter

veness, vis

g crises are

s in its neig

ues in the gl

nd Defence

s external a

prevent co

gles in fighti

on may not

oach to exte

ffected cont

cies, instru

e Comprehen

st Islamic Statvident that Eurternal and ext

agenda of the enhance defenCSDP. nion. Treaty

es

the European Union

ON

t has unde

ng from frag

ping has f

challenges

and degrad

g, energy

calisation an

e, the case

nstruments

ed crises

a single na

d approach,

plied in a co

roperability

ibility and i

e putting th

ghbourhood

lobal securi

e Policy (C

action as ou

onflicts and

ing transna

t always be

ernal conflic

texts. In or

ments and

nsive Approac

te (ISIS) in therope’s refugeeternal securitymeeting of C

nce capabilitie

on European

PU


ergone a m

gile states,

frequently

continue to

dation of na

security, n

nd terrorism

e for a com

- be they ex

have show

ation or a

, combining

oherent and

of existing

impact of t

he EU’s cap

to a test, a

ity arena by

CSDP) is

utlined in Ar

strengthen

tional terror

e possible

cts and cris

rder to add

tools at its

ch to Crisis

e Middle-Easte crises demay actors. Council of the es, strengthen

n Union (Con


major transit

asymmetri

given way

o rise in num

atural resou

natural disa

m, et cetera

prehensive

xternal or in

wn, security

actor alone

g in the bes

d coordinate

civilian and

the EU’s e

pability to c

and the need

y increasing

now more

rticle 21, of

internationa

rism and ev

or success

ses is critica

dress these

s disposal,

Management

t has brought ands, not only

European Unin the defence

solidated vers

n programme under g

tion over th

c conflicts,

to comple

mber and in

urces, popu

asters, cyb

a, and as e

approach m

nternal polic

y and dev2. Instead,

st possible

ed manner.

d military ca

xternal acti

contribute to

d for the EU

g the efficien

current th

the Treaty

al security’.

volving asyl

ful. Therefo

al for an effe

challenges

ranging fro

in Concerted

forces from scooperation b

ion, Decembeindustry and

sion 2012), D

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

he past two

organised

ex peace

ncrease in

ulation pres

ber security

economic an

making opt

cy instrumen

velopment

it can be

way all av

.

apabilities in

ions has b

o the stabil

U to take a g

ncy and vis

an ever. O

on Europe

As the on-

lum crisis h

ore, advanc

fective EU r

s, the EU h

om diploma

d Weimar Ef

several nationsbetween coun

er 2013, whenimprove the

Document Nu


653371

9

o decades.

crime, and

building in

complexity;

ssures and

y, maritime

nd financial

imal use of

nts - is now

cannot be

enefit from

vailable civil

n CSDP for

been widely

isation and

greater role

ibility of the

One of the

ean Union4,

going crisis

have shown

cing a truly

response in

has a wide

acy and EU

ffort, (Stiftung

s to the samentries, but also

n the heads ofeffectiveness,

umber 2012/C

U

5 s

9

.

d

n

;

d

e

l

f

w

e

m

l

r

y

d

e

e

e

,

s

n

y

n

e

U

g

e o

f ,

C

D1.3 Review external co

including r

measures

and civilian

The exper

War led th

adopt a po

rather a se

CSDP mis

leading ro

internation

broad ran

comprehen

Since 2003

operationa

instrument

comprehen

The term ‘

has emerg

To date, th

different w

and militar

all actors

agencies,

the EU’s c

endeavour

Despite th

current ins

5 “Internationapproach”, Ecrisis-manag6 Roy H. GinsPalgrave Stu7 It was state2004, that “asordination be

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

ooperation

regular polit

(sanctions)

n and milita

rience of wa

e EU to dev

olitical com

et of proced

sions and o

ole in peac

al security.

nge of fore

nsive appro

3 the EU h

al engagem

ts together

nsive appro

‘comprehen

ged from dis

here is no u

ways; varyin

ry actors to

in crisis are

as well as,

comprehens

r to achieve

e political w

stitutional r

nal CooperatiEuropean Comement/links-bsberg & Susan

udies in Europeed by Council os the Union is

etween military

tary Synergie


instruments

tical dialogu

), EU Spec

ry crisis ma

ar and re-e

velop its ca

mmitment to

dures and c

operations a

cekeeping o

The logic

eign policy

oach towar

has launche

ent, the EU

r as its pa

oach to crisi

nsive appro

scussions o

universal de

g from a si

a larger un

eas includi

trade and e

sive approa

e synergies

will to stren

reality, clea

ion and Devemmission, accetween-securn E. Penska, ean Union Poof the Europea

s pursuing a coy and civilian c

es

the European Union

s, to action

ues with thi

cial Represe

anagement

emerged eth

pabilities fo

o prevent v

capabilities

are an impo

operations,

and princip

instrumen

rds crisis m

ed some 32

U has tried

articular st

s managem

ach’ was n

on the integ

efinition and

mple under

nderstanding

ng the dipl

economic in

ach to crisi

between m

ngthen syne

r separatio

elopment- Secessed 5 Seprity-and-develoThe Europeanlitics, 2012), 3an Union in Thomprehensivecomponents w

PU


s under the

ird countrie

entatives, d

missions un

hnic and po

or crisis resp

iolent confl

designed t

ortant instru

conflict pr

ple behind

nts. 6 CSD

managemen

2 peace mis

to present

trength, wh

ment.

not coined i

gration of civ

d the conce

rstanding of

g of the nee

omatic rep

nstruments.

is, particula

ilitary and c

ergies betw

on to civilia

ecurity and dptember 2015opment_en. n Union in Glo31-32. he European

e approach to will be required


e Common

s and inter

disarmamen

nder the CS

olitical conf

ponse withi

icts. CSDP

to improve

ument in CF

revention a

the CSDP

DP is also

nt, drawing

ssions and

its ability to

hich is on

n EU deve

vilian and m

pt is interpr

f a need to

ed for coord

resentation

. From the

arly in the

civilian parts

een civilian

an and mili

evelopment, 5, https://ec.e

obal Security, t

Union Exerciscrisis managed.”

n programme under g

Foreign Se

national org

nt and non-

SDP.5

licts in the

n the frame

P is not a s

and compl

FSP, enablin

and in the

is to expan

an integr

on civilian

operations

o deploy bo

e of the

lopment po

military com

reted depen

promote sy

dination and

, humanitar

outset, a c

context of

s of EU inte

n and milita

tary structu

conflict preveuropa.eu/euro

the politics of

se Concept, 93ement, a stron

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

ecurity Poli

ganisations

-proliferation

aftermath o

ework of CS

stand-alone

ete EU fore

ng the Unio

strengthen

nd the EU

ral part of

n and milita

s. From the

oth civilian a

main featu

olicymaking

mponents in

nding on the

ynergies be

d joint effor

rian and de

central chara

CSDP, has

erventions7.

ary parts in

ures, have

ention and coopeaid/policies

impact, (Grea

329/04 MV/RMng synergy and


653371

10

cy (CFSP),

s, restrictive

n activities,

of the Cold

SDP, and to

e policy but

eign policy.

on to take a

ning of the

toolkit to a

f the EU's

ary assets.

start of its

and military

ures of its

circles but

the CSDP.

e context in

etween civil

rts between

evelopment

acteristic of

s been the

CSDP, the

hinder the

omprehensives/fragility-and-

at Britain:

M 1, 7.5. d co-

U

5 s

0

,

e

,

d

o

t

.

a

e

a

s

.

s

y

s

t

.

n

l

n

t

f

e

e

e

e -

D1.3 Review implement

military fu

Manageme

integration

for a lack

implement

Being able

and politic

coordinatio

increase t

Therefore,

interoperab

the strengt

the efficien

security th

states, for

preventive

To contrib

capabilities

coordinatio

the emergi

to impleme

civil- milita

Comprehe

Comprehe

the need t

8 Panel of Ex9 Directorate-Civil- military10 Fernanda beyond, ESDdifferent contfurther discusis argued thainterests) it isall, commit tcomplex andApproach remobilize in e

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

ation of co

nctions in

ent Plannin

of civil and

k of a com

ation of a c

e to work to

cal question

on between

the efficien

understan

bility of the

ths and we

ncy of the

reats in the

rce the com

and sustai

bute to bu

s in CSDP

on within CS

ing challeng

ent it throug

ary synergie

ensive App

ensive App

to enhance

xperts (EEAS O- General for e

y coordination Faria discuss

DP”, ECDMP text. The apprssed in this reat in the absens difficult for ato its rapid imd fluid situationquires significevery context

tary Synergie


omprehensi

CSDP hav

ng Directo

d military ap

mprehensive

omprehens

ogether in c

n. Accordin

n the civilian

ncy of inte

nding the

EU’s civilia

eaknesses f

EU’s interv

European

mmunity to

nable mann

ild up-to-da

P, this repo

SDP. To pr

ges surroun

gh civil- mi

es, referring

proach to

proach is u

e cooperati

Officials), 16 Jexternal policieand the future

sed in her articBriefing Note

roach used in eport chapter 2nce of a senseall relevant EUmplementationn makes a shcant amounts. It entails a

es

the European Union

ve approac

ve been m

rate (CMP

pproaches,

e planning

sive approac

oherence is

ng to seve

n and milita

ernational

key eleme

n and milita

from a man

ventions. T

soil, and th

look for n

ner.

ate unders

ort outlines

rovide an o

nding the co

litary coope

to it as co

CSDP mis

understood

on and coo

June 2015; Intes, Policy Depe of the EU OHcle “What EU e, No. 71. (20

IECEU, is ba2.5 Comprehee of urgency (eU actors (institn. Even in crishared understas of human re

process of c

PU


ch to crisis

made inter

PD). Despit

this new b

structure,

ch to a crisi

s however n

eral studies

ary actors h

conflict pr

ents enab

ary crisis ma

naging civil-

The issue c

e strained d

ew solution

standing on

s current p

overall unde

omprehensi

eration/coor

operation a

ssions and

d from a “n

ordination

terview with a partment, ConHQ, (BrusselsComprehens

014), the issuased on the Coensive Approae.g. crisis or ctutions and msis situations,anding and pesources, tim

coordination a


s.8 Some e

alia throug

te being a

body has no

which is

is.9

not only an

s and eval

as been re

revention a

ling and o

anagement

- military in

could not b

defence and

ns to maint

n EU’s effo

practises of

erstanding o

ve approac

rdination. T

and coordin

d operation

arrowed pe

between c

EUTM Mali Onsolidating thes, European Paive Approach?

ue of how Coomprehensiveach (CA) to crconflict and a ember states), as for instaolicy approac

me investment and articulatio

n programme under g

efforts to b

gh the fou

an importa

ot been able

perceived

institutiona

uation repo

cognized to

and crisis

on the oth

instrument

terface can

e more cu

d security b

tain securit

orts to exp

f civil- mili

of the topic,

ch to a crisis

The report a

ation, from

ns, and, th

erspective”

civilian and

Officer, 23 Sepe EU’s Crisis Marliament: 201? Challenges mprehensive

e Approach to isis managemclear perceptio) to agree on nce in Syria, h difficult. In aand expertis

n that is eve

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

ridge the c

ndation of

ant step to

e to provide

to be cruc

al, but rathe

orts, coope

o be import

manageme

her hand

ts is crucial.

n significant

rrent, as th

budgets of t

ty in a cos

ploit its civ

itary coope

, this report

s and how t

addresses t

a perspect

hus, in th

”, which em

d military fu

ptember 2015.Management S12) 10. for the EU acApproach is Conflicts and

ment.) Accordinon of threat toa joint strategtoo many int

addition, a Cose that the En more comp


653371

11

civilian and

the Crisis

owards the

e a solution

cial for the

er a cultural

eration and

ant tools to

ent efforts.

preventing

. Identifying

tly increase

he evolving

he Member

st- efficient,

vil- military

eration and

t discussed

the EU tries

the topic of

tive of EU’s

his report,

mphasises

unctions.10

. Structures:

ction plan andinterpreted in Crisis (this isng to which, ito common EUgy and, aboveterests and aomprehensiveU can hardly

plex and time

U

5 s

d

s

e

n

e

l

d

o

.

g

g

e

g

r

,

y

d

d

s

f

s

,

s

d n s t

U e a e y e

D1.3 Review The report

the planni

searched i

to the impo

coherent

interoperab

post- Lisbo

In addition

civil- milita

interventio

relations b

(ECHO) a

scope of t

Therefore,

military fu

Headquart

between m

The IECE

successful

objective o

and coordi

discussion

creating a

consuming ininterests. As focus and effstates’ attent11 In this repEUTM Mali a

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

t aims at en

ng of an o

n the areas

ortance of

and resou

bility, explo

on Treaty se

n, this repor

ary coope

ns to conflic

between CS

nd Develop

this report

this study

nctions in

ters (opera

mission/oper

1.1 Pur

U –project

civilian- m

of the IECEU

ination with

s, we aim

foundation

n the EU contea result of po

forts towards tion and prioritort the followi

and EUCAP SA

tary Synergie


nhancing un

operation a

s where sev

‘using the f

urce efficie

res key less

etting.

rt provides

ration and

cts. Even th

SDP missio

pment (DEV

will be lim

reviews the

the EEAS

ational leve

ration and o

rpose of t

supports E

ilitary syner

U- project b

hin CSDP. T

at ensurin

for the latte

ext, given its iolitical and ‘orga Comprehentization tends ing CSDP misAHEL Mali an

es

the European Union

nderstandin

nd mission

veral missio

full potentia

ent manne

sons of usin

an overview

coordinat

hough the C

ons/ operat

VCO) and

mited to the

e areas of

S structures

l), as well

other interna

the delive

EU by focu

rgies. The s

by outlining

Through ext

ng the topic

er case stud

nstitutional coganizational’ r

nsive Approacto focus on sussions and opd EUNAVFOR

PU


ng on how t

n, as well a

ns and ope

al of the exi

r, the stu

ng civil- mil

w of the ke

tion from

Comprehens

tions and E

more and

e examinati

cooperation

s (political-

as, inter-

ational acto

erable

using on ca

study ‘Civil-

the key iss

tensive des

cality, accu

dies conduc

omplexity and realism, and gh will be hijacuch situations.perations are rR Atalanta, EU


the Compre

as how syn

erations hav

sting capab

udy also id

itary assets

ey concepts

planning t

sive Approa

EU delegat

more inter

on of civil-

n and coord

- strategic

institutiona

ors.

apturing an

military syn

ues related

sk study, ke

uracy and

cted.

diversity of ac

given the EU’scked by crisis . reviewed; EUFUTM Somalia

n programme under g

ehensive ap

nergies with

ve been in th

bilities’ to re

dentifies th

s in a compr

s and proce

o impleme

ach in pract

tions, Com

nal security

-military syn

dination bet

level), Op

al cooperat

nd exploitin

nergies’ con

to solid civ

ey informant

relevance

ctors, policiess capacity conand conflict si

FOR and EUPand EUCAP N

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

pproach is p

hin CSDP

he area par

espond to a

he main

rehensive m

edures relev

entation of

tise also enc

mission Hu

y functions

nergies wit

tween the

peration Ce

tion and c

ng the best

ntributes to

vil- military c

t interviews

of the stud

, instruments,nstraints, it is ituations, bec

PM in Bosnia-Nestor.


653371

12

practised in

have been

rallel.11 Due

a crisis in a

barriers to

manner in a

vant for the

the EU’s

compasses

umanitarian

(FSJ), the

thin CSDP.

civilian and

entres and

coordination

t and most

the overall

cooperation

s and panel

dy, thereby

priorities andlikely that theause member

-Herzegovina,

U

5 s

2

n

n

e

a

o

a

e

s

s

n

e

.

d

d

n

t

l

n

l

y

d e r

,

D1.3 Review The delive

review of o

state- of th

coordinatio

range of ex

as informa

Deliverable

coordinatio

overview f

missions a

between m

as well as

In chapter

aim of outl

of civil- mil

to civil-mi

institutiona

Chapter 3

This chapt

functions i

term (oper

the condu

preventing

strategic a

project bui

the civil- m

12 E-InternatiBlog, A EuroEurope blog,http://www.lehttps://www.fLinkedIn Gro13 The intervi14 Interviews

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

rable is bui

on-going dis

he art literat

on in crisis m

xperts (milit

al conversat

e 1.3. build

on within C

for those s

and operatio

missions and

enablers fo

1.2 Str

2, an overv

lining the im

litary interfa

ilitary inter

alisation of C

discusses

ter outlines

n EU. This

rational) con

uct of CSD

and enab

and operatio

lding on the

military syne

onal Relations

opean Think T June 29, 201

elundin.org/; Cfacebook.comoup, accessed ew template isand news from

tary Synergie


lt on existin

scussion in

ture, as we

manageme

tary and civ

ions in pers

ds on the a

CSDP. The

eeking dee

ons. The de

d operation

or the intero

ucture of

view of the

mplications

ace within th

raction and

CSDP.

the intra- i

the institutio

s chapter fo

nflict preven

DP mission

bling the fo

onal level,

e identificat

ergies in CS

s, E-Internatio

Tank for Globa5, https://isise

Civil- Military c/groups/670468 July, 2015,

s Annex 1 - Tm 2015.

es

the European Union

g knowledg

Media incl

ll as policy

nt missions

vilian) were

son, by pho

above by in

added val

eper unders

eliverable o

s and unde

perability of

the deliv

institutiona

of the ‘Hun

he EU. In a

d how the

institutional

onal and leg

ocuses on t

ntion instrum

and oper

stering of c

the chapte

tion and ana

SDP. The a

onal Relations.al Action (Blog)europe.wordprcooperation’s F65432974396https://www.li

hematic Interv

PU


ge. Before t

luding socia

paper prac

s and opera

consulted t

ne and ema

ntroducing t

ue of this

standing of

outlines the

erlines the m

f civilian an

verable

alisation of C

ntingon’ and

ddition, cha

e interface

cooperatio

gal settings

the civil-mil

ments, in pa

rations. By

civil- militar

r will contri

alysis of the

analysis are

.com, June 29g), June 26, 20ress.com/; LarFacebook gro

6/; Civil- Militarinkedin.com/gview.


he delivera

al media, b

ctise related

ations within

through sem

ail.

the blocks

particular d

f existing14c

existing an

main institut

d military fu

CSDP struc

d ‘Janowitz

apter 2 app

e has em

on and coo

s relevant fo

itary coope

articular, an

outlining

ry coordina

ibute to the

e possibilitie

primarily c

9, 2015, http://015, http://fridrs Lundin, Lelup, accessed ry Interaction agroups/810042

n programme under g

ble was wri

logs and di

d to civil- m

n the EU, wa

mi- structure

of civil- mil

deliverable

civil- militar

nd potential

tional and o

unctions und

ctures is brie

ian’ models

roaches the

erged and

rdination pr

or the coord

eration and

alysing the

some of th

ation within

e latter Wor

es, opportu

conducted th

/www.e-ir.info/e.org/blog/taglundin.com, Ju13 July, 2015

and EU Secur24.

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

tten, a com

scussions p

ilitary coope

as undertak

ed interview

litary coope

is that it p

ry synergie

l areas of c

organisation

der the CSD

efly discuss

s to the und

e key conce

d is appli

ractises wit

dination of c

coordinatio

current pra

he emergin

CSDP at

rking packa

nities and p

hrough inte

/category/blogg/csdp/; ISIS Eune 26, 2015,

5, rity & Defence


653371

13

mprehensive

platforms12,

eration and

ken. A wide

ws13, as well

eration and

provides an

s in CSDP

cooperation

nal barriers,

DP.

sed with an

derstanding

epts related

ed to the

thin CSDP.

civil- military

on in short-

actices from

ng lessons

a political-

ages of the

potential for

erviews and

gs/; The Fride Europe, Isis

e Forum’s

U

5 s

3

e

,

d

e

l

d

n

P

n

,

n

g

d

e

.

y

-

m

s

-

e

r

d

D1.3 Review expert pan

support an

learned fro

chapter 5,

namely the

one of the

interoperab

synergies c

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

nel discussi

nd crisis ma

om coordin

the civil- m

e UN, NATO

priority are

bility betwe

could be de

tary Synergie


ons; utilizin

anagement.

ation/coope

military coop

O, OSCE a

as for enha

een civilian

eveloped.

es

the European Union

ng the expe

Chapter 4

eration betw

peration and

nd AU, is d

anced efficie

and military

PU


rtise of pro

complemen

ween EU’s

d coordinati

discussed, a

ency. Chap

ry actors wi


minent civil

nts chapter

crisis mana

ion between

as working

pter 6 review

ithin CSDP

n programme under g

ian and mil

3 by highlig

agement ac

n the CSDP

with partne

ws the main

, as well as

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

litary exper

ghting the k

ctors within

P and its ke

ers is recog

n findings to

s areas wh


653371

14

rts in peace

key lessons

n CSDP. In

ey partners,

nised to be

o barriers to

here further

U

5 s

4

e

s

n

,

e

o

r

D1.3 Review

There are

armed forc

for the man

proper civ

influenced

Profession

are a sort o

better und

with a brie

discussion

manageme

There are

describe th

in efforts

Cooperatio

two concep

military mi

level, whe

strategic le

Based on

CIMIC, CM

actors in E

where they

chapter als

military coo

efforts.

15 See for e(Routledge: O24/7 Joint ESecurity Stud16 Samuel HMassachuset17 Morris Jan

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

2 CIVIL

vast studie

ces should

nagement o

vilian contr

by two wo

nal Soldier: A

of blueprint

erstanding

ef discussi

on the co

ent.

several co

he relations

to intercon

on (CIMIC),

pts can be

ssion relate

reas the C

evel, also co

the availab

MCO, CA)

EU by outli

y are usual

so shortly o

operation/c

example: RobOxon, 2009); S

Effort for Stabdies”, (Oxford:Huntington, Thtts: Harvard Uowitz, A Socia

tary Synergie


L- MILITAR

es on civil- m

be arrange

of civil-milita

rol. The un

orks: The S

A Social an

t for the inst

on the dev

on on the

oncepts re

ncepts or to

s between th

nnect civil

, and Civil-

made: CIM

ed to coope

CMCO refer

overing the

ble literatur

used to de

ining the m

ly applied w

outlines how

oordination

bert Egnell, CSebastiaan J.

bility, (Hamps: Oxford Univehe Soldier an

University Presal and Politica

es

the European Union

RY RELAT

military inte

ed and man

ary relations

nderstandin

Soldier and

nd Political P

titutionalizat

velopment o

theoretical

lated to ci

ools that ar

he civilian a

and milita

Military Co

IC is a milit

eration betw

rs to the in

implementa

e, this cha

escribe the

main differe

within the E

w the implem

practices s

Complex PeaH. Rietjens anhire: Netherla

ersity Press, 2nd the State: ss, 1957). l Portrait, (Gle

PU


TIONS IN

rfaces.15 Th

naged within

s has been

ng of the

d the State

Portrait (196

tion of the E

of the EU’s

l framework

vil- military

re used by

and military

ary approac

oordination

tary function

ween differe

nternal coor

ation of EU

pter aims a

scope of t

nces betwe

EU. Becaus

mentation o

support the

ace Operationnd Myriame Tands Defence2007).

The Theory

encoe, Ill., Fre


EU CRISI

hese studie

n a society

how to cre

effective o

(1957) fro

60) written

EU’s crisis

s civil- milita

k on civil-

y relations

EU and ot

y sides. Two

ches to cri

(CMCO). A

n, which is p

ent actors

rdination of

actions in c

at the expla

the interact

een the co

se CSDP is

of the comp

EU’s long a

ns and Civil-M.I.B. Bollen ed

e Academy, 2

and Politics

ee Press, 1960

n programme under g

IS MANAG

s have ofte

. The tradit

ate effective

organization

m Samuel

by Morris J

manageme

ary structur

military int

within pea

her internat

o concepts

isis manag

A clear disti

primarily a s

in the field

f EU action

crisis manag

anation of t

ion betwee

ncepts, and

s an instrum

rehensive a

and short-te

Military Relatd., Managing c2008); Alan C

of Civil-Milita

0).

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

GEMENT

en focused

tional point

e military fo

n has bee

Huntington

anowitz17. T

ent structure

res, this cha

terface follo

acekeeping

tional organ

are usually

gement: Civ

inction betw

support fun

at operatio

ns at the p

gement.

the key co

en civilian a

d explainin

ment under

approach th

erm conflict

tions: Winningcivil- military cCollins ed., “C

ary Relations,


653371

15

on how the

of concern

orces under

en strongly

n16 and the

Their works

es. To get a

apter starts

owed by a

and crisis

nizations to

mentioned

vil- Military

ween these

ction to the

onal-tactical

political and

ncepts (i.e.

and military

g how and

CFSP, this

hrough civil-

t prevention

g the Peace,cooperation- AContemporary

(Cambridge,

U

5 s

5

e

n

r

y

e

s

a

s

a

s

o

d

y

e

e

l

d

.

y

d

s

-

n

, A y

,

D1.3 Review

2.1 Deve

structure

The deve

Hungtingto

influenced

and has th

played a c

21st centur

was that i

decreased

Maintaining

states, who

it would ha

military re

manageme

unit to the

The 9/11

internation

states.20 T

since 2003

crisis mana

18 Huntingtonin order to crand physical arranged to scivil- military cause for thechange of rocivilian controofficer corps’establishmencultural barrie19 Per Martin Organisationhttp://eiop.or.20 Katherine

relations in a

Katherine Mo

21 Janowitz, A

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

elopment

es

lopment of

on’s and Jan

how civil-m

hus influenc

central role

ry. A pre-co

t would no

the need

g NATO as

o are also a

ave a stron

elations ha

ent structur

civilian dom

event impa

al security

This new se

3, changed

agement st

n’s model for create effectiveseparation of

separate unitsrelations alre

e military to caole of armed fol and effectiv. This cannot

nt on civil socers between thNorheim-Mar Fit for Pu.at/eiop/texte/2Morton and J

post-9/11 wo

orton, (Canber

A Social and P

tary Synergie


of the

f the EU’s

nowitzian w

military relat

ced on the

in the insti

ondition for

ot weaken

to continu

s the majo

a part of the

ng voice on

ve also b

re, which re

minant instit

acted the d

y, shifting f

ecurity conte

the percept

tructures. Ja

civil- military re armed forcef the military as, with limited eady acknowlearry out the taforces, addedve use of the be achieved t

ciety. Accordinhe military prortinsen, “Manarpose”, Euro2010-010a.htmJacinta O’Hag

orld” in Human

rra: The Austr

Political Portra

es

the European Union

theoretic

s crisis ma

works on civ

tions are ap

developme

tutionalizati

developing

NATO. Ad

ue the dev

r internatio

e allies, as w

n European

been chara

esulted in ad

ution.19

evelopmen

from robus

ext, togethe

tion on the

anowitz21 d

elations, whices it must be uand civilian spvertical intera

edged the obssks in change a new set ofarmed forcesthrough separng to ‘Janowitofession and thaging the Civil-opean Integram (Accessed gan, “Humanit

nitarianism and

ralian National

ait.

PU


cal frame

anagement

vil- military r

pproached a

ent of the N

ion of the E

g the EU’s

dditionally,

velopment

nal military

well as of th

n Security

acterized b

dding a we

nt of the int

st peace-ke

er with less

appropriate

discussed th

ch is still referrunder proper heres.” In pra

action at other stacles that a ed security enf requirement

s can only be ration, due to tz model’ the he rest of soc-Military Interfation online 18 August 201tarianism then

d civil– military

l University, 20


ework fo

t structures

relations.18 E

and organiz

NATO and E

EU’s foreign

own militar

the Berlin

of EU's in

y player wa

he United S

issues. The

y the abs

ell-organized

ternational

eeping tow

sons learned

eness of str

he same iss

red to as the “civilian controctical terms, tthan managestrict separativironment. Ja

ts to the militaachieved by the inevitableideal civil-mil

iety. face in the EUPapers (EIo

15) n and now: E

y relations in a

009), 1-7.

n programme under g

or EU cr

s have be

Especially,

zed in most

EU structure

n security a

ry crisis ma

Plus agree

ndependent

as in the in

States, who

e developm

ence of a

d military st

community

wards the s

d from CSD

rictly separa

sue already

“normal theoryol and there mhis means tha

ement level. Thon of planning

anowitz, argueary professionpolitical integrpolitical and sitary interface

: Creating an oP), Special

Exploring the

a post-9/11 wo

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

risis man

een impact

Huntington

t of democr

es. In fact,

affairs durin

anagement

ement signe

t military c

nterest of E

wanted to

ment of the

a clear civ

tructure as

y’s perceptio

stabilization

DP mission

ate civilian a

y in 1960, a

y,” is based omust be ”a strat the civilian ahe “Janowitziag and comma

ed already in 1n. According tration and edsocial impact e, would be to

Issue Vol.

boundaries o

orld, ed. Jacin


653371

16

nagement

ed by the

’s work has

ratic states,

NATO has

ng the early

capabilities

ed in 2001

capabilities.

EU member

ensure that

EU’s civil-

vilian crisis

a separate

on towards

n of fragile

s deployed

and military

arguing that

n an idea thatrict ideologicaland military isan model” ofand structures1960, that thisto him ‘properucation of theof the militaryo break down

14 (2010):1,

f civil–military

nta O’Hagan &

U

5 s

6

t

e

s

,

s

y

s

.

r

t

-

s

e

s

e

d

y

t

t l

s f s s r e y n

,

y

&

D1.3 Review fostering th

and militar

also be tr

competitive

be used pa

coordinatio

“Hunginton

This idea

need for c

instrument

experience

teams of

challenges

capacity. D

added to o

planning f

capabilities

spectrum o

attempts to

comprehen

Managing

Since 1999

an ability t

approach.

attempting

current ins

between th

civil- milita

2.2 Scop

This increparticularlymilitary int 22 Norheim- M

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

he effective

ry is enhanc

raced in th

e advantage

arallel to m

on’ within th

ns” institutio

has becom

comprehens

ts of power.

e has show

people wit

s, i.e. filling

Due to the

once peace

for an ope

s to condu

on its own

o implemen

nsive appro

the interfa

9, the EU h

to mix civili

Until today

to enhance

stitutional se

he Member

ry structure

e of the i

eased engay for humanteraction wi

Martinsen, “M

tary Synergie


eness of the

ced by brea

e Europea

e is its abilit

ilitary ones

he EU fore

onal settings

me relevant

sive strateg

As Norheim

wn that effe

th various

g immediate

complexity

e is restore

eration. Th

uct out cri

has had an

nt the ‘Jano

oach.

ace

has shown t

an and mil

y, the EU’s

e the EU’s a

et- up for th

States and

es.

nteraction

agement bynitarians. Ththin peace

Managing the C

es

the European Union

e armed forc

aking down

n Security

ty to deploy

. These exp

eign policy

s to tackle a

in the cont

gies, plann

m- Martinse

ective crisis

professiona

e security g

of the con

ed, but nee

e gradual

sis manag

n impact on

owitzian app

the ambitio

itary crisis

ambition ha

ability to im

he civil- milit

d have refle

n

y the milithe key, ove

building co

Civil-Military In

PU


ces require

the cultural

Strategy (

y a large nu

periences h

instruments

a complex c

text of pea

ning and co

en (2010)22

manageme

al backgro

gaps, while

temporary

eds to be in

disintegrat

gement ope

n the EU’s

proach’ to th

n to strengt

manageme

as materiali

plement a t

tary interfac

ected on con

tary in humrarching anoncerns the

nterface in the


that the int

l and structu

(ESS), in w

mber of diff

have led to

s, thereby

crisis.

ce building

ommand ar

concludes

ent require

unds who

e, at the sa

crisis, civili

nvolved alre

tion from

erations alo

policy mak

he civil- mil

then its role

ent instrume

ised as a n

truly compre

ce resulted

nsiderations

manitarian nd widely doe tension b

e EU”

n programme under g

teroperabilit

ural barriers

which it is

ferent civilia

the need to

questioning

and stabili

rrangement

in his analy

s a quick r

can addre

ame time,

an instrume

eady during

NATO and

ong the w

king, which

itary interfa

e as a uniqu

ents as par

umber of in

ehensive ap

from strugg

s rather tha

crises hasocumented etween the

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

ty between

s. This conc

stated tha

an capabiliti

o develop a

g the efficie

ity operatio

ts that inco

ysis, recent

response fr

ess differen

starting to

ents canno

g the early

d EU’s str

whole civilia

nowadays

ace, by dev

ue strategic

rt of a com

nstitutional

pproach. Ho

gles and co

an developin

s been cochallenge f

e neutral an


653371

17

the civilian

ception can

at the EU’s

ies that can

a ‘culture of

ency of the

ons and the

orporate all

operational

rom flexible

nt types of

build local

t simply be

y phases of

rengthening

an- military

is showing

veloping the

c actor with

mprehensive

innovations

owever, the

ompromises

ng effective

ontroversial,facing civil–nd impartial

U

5 s

7

n

n

s

n

f

e

e

l

l

e

f

l

e

f

g

y

g

e

h

e

s

e

s

e

, –l

D1.3 Review provision othe govern

A growing guidelines,activities.24

purposes atimely peawork togeundertake In additionstrategic, oeach otherconflict ma

However, tin differentit has showthe civilianInternationinteraction enriched b‘integrationto civil- mibe connec

23 Eva SvoboHumanitarian24 For exampAdvantages fand Thomas http://futureuATHA, “Humwith armed foaction, (2008(Accessed 7 25 Catherine WEuropean Pehttp://www.epensive%20Ap26 Jean-PhiliJochen Rehr48.

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

of humanitanments that

number of, and best4 Civilian aand maximce buildingther on thehumanitaria

n, the activoperational r. For this reanagement.

the scope ot forms. In tiwn that in tin and militanal organisa between cby differentn’, it is impolitary relatioted to differ

oda, “The inten Policy Groupple: Thierry Tafor the United G. Weiss, (Thn.org/media/aanitarian policorces in comp8), http://www.October 2015Woollard, The

eacebuilding Lplo.org/assetspproach/EPLOppe Scherer, rl and Galia G

tary Synergie


rian assistadirect them

f policymakt practicesnd military

mizing the p interventioe same thean or monit

vities of humand tactica

eason, civil-

of the interfaimes of largimes of ‘extary assets ations have civilian and t terms. Wortant to undons are25. Arent activitie

eraction betwep Vol. 58 (201ardy,”Military-C

Nations?” in Phe Future Unitarchive1/reportcy making for plex political emhpcrresearch.

5) e EU and the CLiaison Office (s/files/2.%20AO_CSDN_Com

“CooperationGlume, (Vienna

es

the European Union

ance and thm. 23

kers and scfor civil-m

specialistspotential forons. This is eatre of optoring activimanitarian al level, and-military co-

ace is contege humanitaternal’ crisisacross a screated vamilitary fun

When using derstand whAs the pictues, such as

een humanitar4): 1-3, http://w

Civilian InteracPeacebuildingted Nations Dets/Peacebuildcivil‐military comergencies”, A.org/sites/defa

Comprehensiv(EPLO)), ctivities/Civil%mprehensiveAn and Coordina: The Federa

PU


e political a

cholars are military relas share ther cooperatiobecause; i

perations. ities during and militar

d even, on s-ordination

ext specificarian disastes, the internpectrum in

arious concenctions. Dis

terms, suhat is mean

ure below djoint planni

rian and milita/www.refworldctions in Multidg Challenges fevelopment SingChallengesoordination (CATHA Themaault/files/public

ve Approach,

%20Society%2Approach_Discnation.” In theal Ministry of D


and strategi

recognizingations in pe goals of aon, in ordeit is frequenFor instancthe first sta

ry operationsome occashas been re

c and it can ers, such asnational com

a coordinaepts to desscourse desuch as ‘intent by these isplays26, dng and reso

ary actors: wh.org/pdfid/53ddimensional Pfor the UN Dev

System, 2015),s_FUNDS201

CIMIC) Establitic Brief Seriescations/ATHA%

European Pea

20Dialogue%2cussionPointse Handbook oDefence and S

n programme under g

c objectives

g the urgenpeace buildavoiding tener to achievnt that militace, a civiliaage of post-ns may affesions, haveecognized a

take place s an earthqmmunity haated or evecribe the scscribing civeroperabilityterms and w

different leveource sharin

here do we god0c2fb4.pdf (Aeace Operatiovelopment Sys, 27 -37. 5.pdf (Accessshing a policys: outlining ba%20Thematic%

acebuilding Li

20Network/Pol.pdf (Accesseon CSDP MisSports of the

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

s of military

nt need for ding and snsions andve more effary and civan organiza-conflict maect each o

e a negativeas a key iss

at differentquake in Haas the abilityen integratecope and dvil- military y’, ‘coordinwhat their iels of relating.

o from here?”Accessed 9 Ocons: What Co

ystem ed. Step

sed 11 Octobey framework foasic tenets of hc%20Brief%20

iaison Office, (

licy%20Meetined 3 Septembssions and OpRepublic of A


653371

18

forces and

standards,stabilization conflictingfective and

vilian actorsation mightanagement.other at thee impact onsue in post-

t levels anditi or Ebola,y to employed manner.depth of therelations isation’, andmplicationsionship can

”, Policy Brief,ctober 2015) mparative

phen Browne

er 2015); or working humanitarian

0CIMIC.pdf ,

(The

ngs/Comprehber 2015) perations, ed.

Austria, 2015),

U

5 s

8

d

, n g d s t .

e n -

d , y .

e s d s n

,

. ,

D1.3 Review

Figure 1. Im

Relations b

Coexisten

Communi

Collaborat

can include

Co-operat

structures

Coordinat

Integration

strategies

Interaction

The aim

interoperab

Interopera

from other

operate eff

Synergy: t

27 Måns, HaOperations, (28 “Interaction

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

mproving th

between civ

nce: existing

cation: sha

tion: workin

e joint plann

tion: differe

and do not

tion: synchr

n: all relev

and then w

n: any actio

of the inte

bility and sy

ability: the

r systems,

fectively tog

the increase

anssen, Civil-M(Stockholm: Sn”, Vocabulary

tary Synergie


e EU compr

vilian and m

g in the sam

aring inform

ng alongsid

ning, poolin

ent actors w

(necessaril

ronizing effo

vant institut

ork jointly to

on between

eraction be

ynergy, whic

ability of sy

units, or fo

gether.

ed effective

Military Intera

Swedish Defeny.COM, acces

es

the European Union

rehensive a

military funct

me time and

ation.

de one anot

g resources

work togethe

ly) share ov

orts for agre

tions are b

owards mee

parties.28

etween civ

ch can be d

ystems, unit

orces and t

eness that re

action in the Ence Researchssed 18 Augus

PU


pproach

tions can be

d space.

her, but not

s and evalu

er as enable

verall object

eed upon sh

brought tog

eting them.

vilian and

described as

ts, or forces

to use the

esults when

European UnAgency, 2010

st 2015, http://


e referred a

t necessaril

uating outco

ers, but are

tives and st

hared purpo

gether to d

military fun

s:

s to provide

services s

n two or mo

ion: Applying0), 12 -14. /www.vocabul

n programme under g

s;27

ly towards s

omes togeth

e not part of

rategies.

oses.

develop com

nctions is

e services t

o exchange

ore functions

a Comprehe

ary.com/dictio

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

shared purp

her.

f the same

mmon obje

often refe

to and acce

ed to enab

s work toge

ensive Approa

onary/interacti


653371

19

poses. That

institutional

ectives and

rred to as

ept services

ble them to

ether.

ach to CSDP

on.

U

5 s

9

t

l

d

s

s

o

P

D1.3 Review It would be

level of in

situation. It

outlined a

coexistenc

as the ex

integration

2.3 Civil-

The definit

Crisis Man

the definitio

between th

population

the military

with local a

CIMIC aim

within the

conditions

crisis mana

29 Hanssen, C30 The develo2002 was oriand military aconference inof the concepof the EU Op10.1080/096631 In AJP-9, Nordination an NATO Command non-gove32 Council of CSDP/PSDCSeptember 2

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

e wrong to s

teraction d

t cannot, fo

above, in p

ce level mig

xperiences

of civilian a

- Military

tion of EU’s

nagement O

on written b

he force and

to contribu

y perspectiv

authorities a

ms to estab

area of op

for the ach

agement op

Civil-Military Inopment of the ented towards

actors in crisisn June 2003 wpt view: Nik Hyperational Hea62839.2011.5NATO Civil-mind co-operatiomander and cernmental orgthe European

C 750, 19.12.22015)

tary Synergie


say that som

epends on

r example,

particular,

ght entail a

from the E

and military

Cooperat

s CIMIC30 w

Operations (

by NATO31.

d civil socie

ute to force

ve that focu

and civilians

blish and m

perations, i

hievement o

perations ai

nteraction in thEU CIMIC ha

s political, stras situations, inwas more orienynek, “EU cris

adquarters”, Eu556622 . ilitary Co-opern, in support oivil actors, inc

ganisations ann Union, ” Euro2014, http://dat

es

the European Union

me of the in

what type

be assume

civilian rel

compromis

Ebola crisis

y actors can

ion (CIMI

was set in

(2002) throu

It is a funct

ety. In a way

protection

uses prima

s to reach th

maintain co-

n order to

of the miss

ming at enh

he European Uas been markeategic and concluding the forntated at the osis managemeuropean Secu

ration (CIMIC)of the missionluding nationad agencies”.opean Union Cta.consilium.e

PU


nteraction le

e of relation

ed that coord

ations with

se of the hu

s have sho

n support bo

C)

Civil-Militar

ugh EU Mil

tion and cap

y, CIMIC is

and peace

rily on forc

hat aim, as

-operation w

create the

sion's purpo

hancing the

Union, 12 ed by two confnceptual levelsrmulation of thoperational anent after the Liurity, Vol. 20 (2

) Doctrine, (NA, between the

al population a

Concept for Eeuropa.eu/doc/


evels are m

ns is possi

dination is a

h military o

umanitarian

own, at tim

oth actors a

ry Coopera

itary Comm

pability that

about “win

e and stabil

e protection

a part of a

with the civ

e best poss

ose. It is an

e effectivene

ferences. The s, and strived he guiding prinnd tactical leveisbon Treaty: c2011): 81- 102

ATO, 2003), th

and local autho

U-led Military /document/ST

n programme under g

ore effectiv

ble or des

always effec

or political

n principles.

mes, the co

chieve their

tion (CIMIC

mittee (EUM

t aims to en

ning the he

ity. Thereby

n, and on t

complex m

vilian autho

sible moral,

n important

ess of those

EU CIMIC Coto delimit the fnciples. The seels. To read mcivil- military c2. Accessed 5

he CIMIC is de

orities, as well

Operations anT-17107-2014-

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

ve than the o

sirable for t

ctive or wor

entities b

.29 On the o

oordination

r objectives

C) Concept

MC) and wa

nhance the r

earts and m

y, CIMIC de

the need to

ilitary opera

orities and p

, material a

feature of

e operations

onference heldfunctions betwecond EU CIM

more about thecoordination a5 August 2015

efined as “The

l as internatio

nd Missions” ,-INIT/en/pdf (A


653371

20

others. The

the specific

rthwhile. As

beyond the

other hand,

and even

.

for EU-led

s based on

relationship

inds” of the

erives from

o cooperate

ation. 32

populations

and tactical

the EU-led

s.

d in June ween civilian MIC developmentnd the future . doi:

e co-

nal, national

17107/14, Accessed 9

U

5 s

0

e

c

s

e

,

n

d

n

p

e

m

e

s

l

d

t

D1.3 Review In practice

cases: t

dependent

resources,

cooperatio

non-govern

Depending

CIMIC-orie

functions.

similar to t

Liaison, Su

the Military

EU concep

published

and implem

and milita

exchange,

between m

concerned

institutiona

CMCO.36

2.4 Civil-

33 Marjan MaUniversity of August 201534 Agata MazSpołeczeństwhttp://www.ac(Accessed 1335 To learn mhttp://www.eunceptcimic_e36 Hynek, “EU

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

e, CIMIC in

the crisis

t on civilian

informatio

on of the mi

nmental org

g on the s

ented meas

Core func

those define

upport to th

y Force. 34

pt for CIMI

in 200835 b

menting CIM

ry capaciti

separation

military and

with coor

al cooperati

- Military

CMCO ‘a

involved

than see

European

alešič, Crisis M

Ljubljana, Fac)

zurkiewicz, ”NAwo Vol. 2 No. cademia.edu/93 September 2

more about theuroparl.europaen.pdf U crisis manag

tary Synergie


nteraction u

manageme

n institution

on and eve

ilitary force

ganizations.

specific co

sures may

ctions of t

ed by NATO

he Civil En

C for EU-le

by Europea

MIC at the p

es. This in

n of manda

civilian ac

rdination in

ion, CIMIC

Coordina

addresses th

in the planni

king to put t

n Union, 7 N

Management inculty of Social

ATO and EU a12 ( 2014): 129638917/NAT2015)

e concept, visita.eu/meetdocs

gement after t

es

the European Union

usually take

ent operati

ns and the

n security

with other

.33

ontext of e

assume v

he Europe

O and inclu

nvironment

ed military

an Union M

political and

ncludes co

ates and lo

ctors in cris

theatre, r

neverthele

tion (CMC

he need for e

ing and subs

too much em

ovember 200

n the EU: Inter Sciences) htt

approach towa25 -140, TO_and_EU_A

t: s/2009_2014/

the Lisbon Tre

PU


es place in

ion is par

e population

or/and the

internation

each opera

various diffe

ean CIMIC

ude Civil-Mi

and Suppo

operations

ilitary Staff

d strategic le

oordinating

ong-term g

sis situation

rather than

ess represe

CO)

effective coo

sequent imp

mphasis on d

03).

rnational Coortp://paperroom

ards civil-milita

Approach_Tow

/documents/se

eaty”


two

rtially

n for

re is

al or

ation,

erent

are

litary

ort to

was

f (EUMS), w

evels, and f

the planni

goals, and

s. Although

an overal

ents an imp

ordination of

lementation

detailed struc

rdination and m.ipsa.org/pap

ary relations in

wards_Civil-M

ede/dv/sede26

“Cithe

opethe

s

m

(C

n programme under g

which is res

for the proce

ing, comm

the transit

h the CIMIC

l strategic

portant oper

f the action o

of the EU’s

ctures or pro

Civil-Military Cpers/paper_26

n military oper

ilitary_Relation

60410euconce

●

vil-Military Ce co-ordinatio

all levels -components

erations and e EU, includin

and authointernation

nongoorganisation

support of the

mission along fu

CIMIC ConcManagemen

●

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

sponsible fo

edural roles

unication,

tion of resp

C concept

concept o

rational com

of all relevan

response to

ocedures’ (C

Cooperation, (6078.pdf (Acce

rations”, Polity

ns_in_Military

eptcimic_/sede

● ●

Co-operation on and co-op- between mis of EU-led m

d civil actors eng the local porities, as we

onal, nationalgovernmentalns and agence achievememilitary

g with all otheunctions.”

cept for EU- lnt operations

● ●


653371

21

or planning

s for civilian

information

ponsibilities

is primarily

of complete

mponent of

nt EU actors

crisis rather

ouncil of the

(Ljubliana: essed 25

yka i

y_Operations

e260410euco

(CIMIC) is peration at ilitary military external to population ell as l and l cies - in ent of the

er military

ed Crisis s, 2008)

U

5 s

g

n

n

s

y

e

f

s

r

e

D1.3 Review

Since adop

military cris

that would

Council. 37

which refe

CSDP, as

CMCO aim

links betw

manageme

EU with

cornerston

comprehen

Whereas C

tactical le

CMCO is

reflected

integrated

Committee

and the

manageme

manageme

Until the e

the Lisbon

most sign

the EU

Comprehe

from the

37 Radek KhoDefence in th38 Civil- civil r39 Svenja PosComprehensThe EU's Co2011), 57 – 640 Bjørn OlavDefence Res

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

ption of the

sis manage

address th7 In 2003 th

rs both to i

well as to c

ms to coord

ween the

ent and the

external a

ne of EU

nsive appro

CIMIC is ma

vel of the

located

in a crisi

at the lev

e (PSC). Th

military int

ent, from

ent, includin

stablishmen

n Treaty, t

ificant conc

ensive Appr

initial discu

ol. “Civil- Militahe Mediterranerefers to coopst, Towards a

sive Crisis Manmprehensive A

65. v Knutsen, Thesearch Establis

tary Synergie


EU CIMIC

ement capa

e need for e

he EU form

nternal EU

civil-civil38 co

dinate the m

e commun

e security-

ctors. CMC

efforts tow

oach.39

ainly located

e crisis ma

at the po

s manage

vel of the

he objective

to the var

strategic

ng training a

nt of CMPD

the CMCO

ceptual coo

oach to a c

ussions of

ary Coordinatiean. Human Seration and coWhole of Eur

nagement, (WApproach to C

e EU and the cshment, 2008

es

the European Union

Concept, E

bilities, and

effective co

mulated its c

processes

oordination

military, polit

nity tools

political rela

CO is the

wards imp

d at the ope

anagement

olitical- stra

ement conc

Political a

e is to integ

rious stage

planning

and exercis

D and the fo

concept p

ordination

crisis. Durin

the conce

on in EU CrisiSecurity, (CIDOoordination berope Approach

Wisbaden: SpriCrisis Manage

challenges of ) 29.

PU


EU has decl

d in this resp

oordination o

concept for

with respe

between th

tical and po

for cris

ations of th

e conceptu

lementing

erational an

operation

ategic leve

cept (CMC

and Securi

grate civilian

es of cris

g to cris

es. 40

ormulation o

provided th

reference t

ng the perio

ept and un

is ManagemeOB), 121 - 13

etween differenh: Organizing nger VS, 2005

ement: Premis

f Civil-Military C


Table 1

ared its am

pect, there

of actions o

r Crisis Man

ect to civil-m

he CFSP an

olicy instrum

is

he

al

a

nd

s,

el,

C)

ty

ns

sis

is

of

he

to

od

til

nt”, in 6th Inter1. nt civilian actothe European5), 201; Janina

ses, Ambitions

Coordination a

CMCO

(

n programme under g

1. Definition

bition to de

was a need

of all relevan

nagement C

military coor

nd Commiss

ments of a

rnational Sem

ors; i.e. police Union’s and M

a Johannsen, s, Limits, (Nom

at the strategic

O is referred

a culture o

the proce

Comprehe

practise

the prere

effective

and conce

as implem

ensuring

effective

whole r

instrumen

that the

subject t

and thu

processes

also conc

external a

(Janina Joha

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

n of CMCO

evelop both

d to develop

nt EU actor

Coordinatio

rdination wi

sion compe

CSDP, as

inar on Secur

and human riMember State

mos Publisher,

c level, (Norw

as;

of coordinati

edure to t

ensive App

equisite for

EU respons

erns the plan

mentation pha

within th

co-ordinati

range of

nts, with th

instrument

to different

us decisio

s

cerning coop

actors

ansen 2011,


653371

22

civilian and

p a concept

s under the

n (CMCO),

thin ESDP/

etences.

well as the

ity and

ghts officers.es’

egian

on

ranslate the

proach into

building an

se to a crisis

nning as we

ase

he EU an

on of the

the EU’s

he challenge

ts may be

institutiona

on- making

peration with

57 -65.)

U

5 s

2

d

t

e

,

/

e

e

o

n

s

ll

n

e

s

e

e

al

g

h

D1.3 Review about 2005

made. The

CMCO.41

1) Compre

at hand an

(2) Compr

(3) Manag

theatre.

(4) Method

(5) Manag

make them

These par

Comprehe

concepts h

weak. The

implement

implement

2.5 Comp

Nowadays

challenges

in their pol

especially

efforts of v

Various de

EU membe

than one u

41 Johannse42Christel Vinthe EU, (CopCo-ordinationhttp://www.cl

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

5 when it w

ese attempt

ehensive A

nd how to so

rehensive P

gement of O

dology for

gement of

m inter-oper

rts set the

ensive Appr

have been

ere is still no

ation of Co

ing a Comp

prehensiv

s, most na

s have at lea

licy docume

between m

various acto

efinitions an

er states. T

universal co

en, The EU's Cncentz Rasmupenhagen: Diisn?”, (Studia Dingendael.nl/s

tary Synergie


was adopted

ts led to the

Analysis: A

olve it.

Planning: A

Operations

Measuring

Capabilitie

rational.

roadmap f

roach to cri

fully devel

o single bod

mprehensiv

prehensive A

ve Approa

tional gove

ast a refere

ents. The r

military and c

ors involved

nd practices

Therefore, i

omprehensi

Comprehensivussen, Linking s Report, 2013iplomatica, 20

sites/default/fil

es

the European Union

d, some atte

e identificati

ll actors inv

Aims at colle

s: Aims at f

g Progress

es: Use ava

or the effe

sis manage

oped, and

dy within EU

ve Approac

Approach a

ach (CA) t

ernments a

ence to ‘com

rationale of

civil interven

and increa

s have evo

it is more u

ve approac

ve Approach toinstruments in

3); Margriet Dr011),4 es/20111000_

PU


empts at m

on of five im

volved must

ecting all di

finding conc

: Commonly

ailable (and

ctiveness o

ement inter

the implem

U structures

h to CSDP.

are more un

to crisis m

and interna

mprehensive

f including t

ntions, actin

sing cost-ef

lved in the

useful to sp

ch. In gene

to Crisis Manan developmenrent, The EU’s

_sd_drent_ap


aking the C

mportant pa

t have a coh

ifferent acto

cepts for eff

y conducted

d make ava

of the CMC

rventions. U

mentation o

s that would

. Neverthele

nderdevelop

manageme

ational orga

eness’ in th

his referenc

ng upon roo

ffectiveness

UN system

peak of ‘com

ral, compre

agement, 57 –nt and foreign s Comprehens

pproach.pdf (A

n programme under g

CMCO conc

arts that nee

herent unde

ors in a com

fective civil-

d evaluation

ailable) rele

CO and the

Unfortunatel

of the appro

d be respon

ess, the con

ped than the

ent

anisations

eir crisis ma

ce relates t

ot causes o

s in crisis m

m, NATO, th

mprehensiv

ehensivenes

65. policy- Comprsive Approach

Accessed 19 S

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

cept more s

eded to be

erstanding o

mmon plann

-military int

n on a cont

evant instru

e implemen

ly, to date,

oach has b

nsible for e

nceptual co

e institutiona

dealing wi

anagement

to developin

of conflict, c

managemen

he EU insti

ve approach

ss in securi

rehensive Apph to Security: A

September 201


653371

23

specific was

included in

of the crisis

ing effort.

eraction in-

inual basis.

uments and

ntation of a

not all the

been rather

nsuring the

onditions for

al ones.

th security

t operations

ng synergy,

coordinating

t.42

tutions and

hes’, rather

ity refers to

proaches in A Culture of

15)

U

5 s

3

s

n

s

-

d

a

e

r

e

r

y

s

,

g

d

r

o

Co

Keyway

Corins at leve

Exaandmis

D1.3 Review an unders

spectrum o

in which cr

According

for compre

mindset re

approache

processes

arrangeme

sector wor

The develo

the UN fa

developme

interaction

civil recon

internal co

actors. Ta

referring to

Table 2. Co

omprehens

y doypoints

re conceptstruments strategic - pel

amples of cod instrumenssions level

43 Ibid. 44 Cécile Wenperspectives45 Adopted fr

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

standing tha

of civil and m

risis manag

to Wendlin

ehensive a

ecognizing a

es entail the

for coord

ents and a

rk.

opment of t

mily in sea

ent concern

between it

nstruction; a

oherence w

ble 2.45 pre

o the compr

omprehensiv

sive Approa

UN

octrinal In LBra

s and

political

CapInte

ncepts nts at

InteInteCom

ndling, The co, (France: IRS

rom Mölling, “C

tary Synergie


at peace a

military inst

gement ope

ng (2011), a

pproaches

a holistic ap

e establish

dination, inc

all the app

the concept

arch for bet

ns; by NAT

s military ef

and by the

within the di

esents the

rehensivene

ve Approac

ach (CA) -

N

Larger Freedohimi Report (2

pstone doctrinegrated Missio

egrated Missioegrated Commmmunication s

omprehensive SEM, 2011), 1Comprehensiv

es

the European Union

nd develop

ruments are

rations are

a common

is that the

pproach.44

ment of st

cluding poo

roaches in

t has been

tter linking

TO in searc

fforts and e

e EU need

ifferent inst

key conce

ess in relatio

h- relevant d

relevant d

E

om (2005)2000)

JCTE

ne (2008)ons (2006)

RPCCC

ons with mand and structures

CC

approach to c3. ve Approaches

PU


pment are

e required t

conducted

denominat

ey refer to

Some of th

tructures an

oled fundin

nvolve cros

promoted b

security an

ch for bett

endeavours

to enhanc

truments an

epts and do

on to peace

documents

ocuments

EU

Joint CommComprehensivTreaty ofEU Security S

Revised CrisisProcedures (2CMCO (2003)Crisis ManageCMC (Individu

Cooperation CIMIC

civil–military c

s to Internatio


fundamenta

to address t

.43

or

a

he

nd

ng

ss-

by

nd

er

in

ce

nd

ocuments u

ekeeping m

and concep

and conce

munication ve Approacf Lisbon

Strategy (2003

s Managemen2013) ) ement Concepual missions/ o

with EU D

crisis managem

nal Crisis Man

“The

gen

con

improv

strate

array

coll

delive

polic

re

compr

crisis

(C

Com

n programme under g

ally intertw

the complex

used by the

issions.

pts

epts

on the h (2013)

(2009))

nt

pt operations)

elegations/

ment, a critical

nagement”, 3.

comprehensi

neral working m

crete measure

ve how the EU

egic vision an

y of existing to

lectively can d

er more cohere

cies, working p

esults. (…) Th

rehensive app

and conflict si

sta

Council Conclu

prehensive Ap

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

wined and t

x security e

e UN, EU

NATO

ComprehensiGuidance (20

Updated Approach AcEffects BasOperations E

CIMIC/ PRTs

al analysis and

ive approach i

method and a

res and proces

U, based on a

nd drawing on

ools and instru

develop, embe

ent and more

practices, actio

he need for su

proach is most

situations and

ates”.

usions on the

pproach, 12.0


653371

24

hat a wide

environment

and NATO

ve Po008)

Comprehection Plan (

sed ApproacBAO (2008)

d

is both a

a set of

sses to

common

its wide

uments,

ed and

effective

ons and

ch a

t acute in

in fragile

EU’s

5.2014)

U

5 s

4

e

t

O

olitical

ensive (2011)ch to

D1.3 Review In their po

‘Comprehe

one of its c

civil- milit

developme

the notion

agencies

understand

strategic p

Although,

implement

implement

to contribu

determinat

decision-m

NATO doc

capability

actors and

military org

contributor

supported

The term ‘c

of consen

provides c

not provide

the approa

46 Cedric De 47 Christian M

Vol. 3, No. 42

48 The implemwork. NATO operations; leFor more infohttp://www.na49 NATO formComprehens50 E.g. by sup

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

olicy docum

ensive Appr

core functio

ary coordi

ent, rule of l

of “Integra

in the rec

dings and

artnership b

both NATO

ed in differe

ation of a c

ute in a co

tion, taking

making auto

ctrine on e

to impleme

other inter

ganization,

r for the Co

a civilian m

comprehen

sus on wh

conceptual c

e univocal d

ach, the EU

Coning, The U

Mölling, “Comp

2 (2008), http:

mentation of Nis working to

essons learneormation, see ato.int/cps/en/mally put the Csive Approach pporting EU M

tary Synergie


ments and

roach’, and

ons. The UN

nation to

law, human

ated Missio

construction

common s

between the

O and the

ent ways. N

comprehens

oncerted ef

into accou

onomy. The

enhanced c

ent the app

national org

it does no

omprehensi

mission with

sive approa

hen and fo

coordination

definition. T

High Repre

United Nationsprehensive Ap

://www.css.eth

NATO’s contribmake improve

ed, training, ed “A ‘Compreh

/natolive/topicsComprehensiv

was reaffirmeMission EULEX

es

the European Union

guidelines

the civil- m

N uses a co

a system

n rights and

ons” in 2006

process,

trategic pla

e UN peace

EU use th

NATO ackn

sive approa

ffort, based

nt their resp

reby, the u

civil-military

roach is lim

ganizations.

ot have rele

ve Approac

its military

ach’ is wide

r what the

n reference

To take a st

esentative a

s and the compproaches to I

hz.ch/publicati

bution to a comements in seveducation and eensive Approas_51633.htm.

ve Approach oed and further X convoys and

PU


, both the

military coop

oncept of ‘In

- wide co

humanitari

6, underline

and there

ans among

ekeeping op

he term Co

nowledges i

ach requires

d on a sha

pective stre

understandin

cooperatio

mited and i

.48 This is d

evant civilia

ch.49 There

capabilities

ely used in t

approach

e to the EU

tep forward

and the Com

mprehensive aInternational C

ions/pdfs/CSS

mprehensive aeral key areasexercises; cooach’ to crisis”,

on the agenda developed at

d cooperation


EU and N

peration and

ntegrated A

oordination

an dimensi

es the nee

by the app

g the variou

peration and

omprehens

n its refere

s all relevan

red sense

engths, man

ng of the c

on (CIMIC)

t requires e

ue to the fa

an capabilit

e are variou

s.50

the EU sys

is needed

Comprehe

ds clarifying

mmission fo

pproach, (DIISCrisis Manage

S-Analyses-42

approach is a s of work incluoperation with NATO’ Webs

at the Riga suthe Lisbon Suwith EUPOL A

n programme under g

NATO refer

d coordinati

pproach’, w

across th

ons.46 The

ed to involv

proach is

us UN age

d the UN co

ive Approa

nce docum

nt actors -

of respons

ndates and

oncept goe

. However,

external co

act that as b

ties, and th

us examples

tem, and th

d. Although

ensive Appr

the EU ac

ormulated J

S report, 2008ement”, CSS A

2.pdf (Accesse

permanent feding the plannexternal actor

site, accessed

ummit in 2006ummit in 2010Afghanistan.

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

r to the ap

on is highlig

which goes

he politica

concept, in

ve all the re

mainly abo

encies, in p

ountry team

ach, the co

ments that th

internal and

sibility, ope

roles, as w

es beyond t

, in practic

ooperation w

by definition

herefore it

s in which

here seem t

, the CMC

roach to cri

ctors’ under

Joint Comm

8), 14. Analyses in Se

ed 9 Septembe

eature of the Aning and condrs; and public 18 August 20

6. NATO's com0.


653371

25

pproach as

ghted to be

beyond the

l, security,

troduced in

elevant UN

out shared

particular a

s.47

oncepts are

he effective

d external -

enness and

well as their

the existing

ce, NATO’s

with civilian

n NATO is a

is rather a

NATO has

to be a lack

CO concept

sis, it does

rstanding of

munication

ecurity Policy,

er 2015)

Alliance’s duct of messaging.

015,

mmitment to a

U

5 s

5

s

e

e

,

n

N

d

a

e

e

-

d

r

g

s

n

a

a

s

k

t

s

f

n

,

D1.3 Review document

Comprehe

through ea

early recov

towards su

Despite the

as it is o

Comprehe

The narro

limiting the

Comprehe

NATO focu

crisis mana

in CSDP. 5

The broad

approach

Comprehe

joined effo

policies, in

crises. The

seeks to c

synergies

instrument

51 European JOIN(2013) 32015.) 52 Ibid. 2. 53 Faria outlineApproach. In amember statesinvolves only cdevelopment, osupport, emplo54 Woollard, Th55 Rasmussen,56 Faria, “What57 Petteri TaittoLecture.

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

t. 51 In th

ensive Appr

arly warning

very, stabil

ustainable a

e given def

ften interpr

ensive Appro

ow underst

e approach

ensive Appr

uses on the

agement is54

der unders

towards a

ensive Appr

ort by EU in

nstruments

e integratio

create favo

across inte

ts, which ca

Commission. 30, 11.12.2013

es in her article “addition, in a stus,( Maastricht: Ecivil-military, cooor “system-wideoyment/busineshe EU and the C, Linking instrumt EU Compreheo, “Contributing

tary Synergie


his docum

roach that “

g and prepa

isation and

and long ter

finition, is th

reted as a

oach to EU

tanding to

to crisis m

oach to cris

e cooperatio

firstly inter

standing o

third cou

roach to EU

nstitutions a

and actions

on is not lim

ourable con

er-connecte

an be includ

The EU's com3. http://www.

“What EU Compudy by Volker HaECDPM, 2014) tordination, “mede” that includes s cooperation a

Comprehensive ments in developnsive ApproachEU Comprehen

es

the European Union

ent, the E

“covers all

aredness, c

peace bui

rm developm

here still va

a Comprehe

external ac

Comprehen

managemen

sis manage

on with exte

rnal – conce

f the Comp

ntry or tow

U external a

and membe

s for a mor

mited to CS

nditions for

ed policy ar

ed in the br

mprehensive aeeas.europa.e

prehensive Appauck and Camilthey introduced dium” entailing, diplomacy, secu

and trade. Approach.

pment, 29. h?”, 10. nsive Approach”

PU


European

stages of t

conflict prev

ilding, in or

ment”52

ariance in u

ensive App

ction (broad

nsive Appro

nt. It is simi

ement used

rnal civilian

erned with

prehensive

wards ano

action, refer

er states th

re coherent

SDP, huma

r transitions

reas. 56 Th

road unders

approach to exeu/statements

proach ?”, the twlla Rocca, Gaps three scopes oe.g., diplomacyurity/crisis mana

”, EUCCM-cour


Council a

the cycle of

vention, cris

rder to help

nderstandin

proach to

d).53

oach define

ilar in some

by NATO,

n actors, the

bringing tog

Approach

ther region

rred also as

at seeks to

t and effect

anitarian or

s and cons

e Figure 2

standing of

xternal conflicts/docs/2013/1

wo main interpres between Compof comprehensivy, security/crisis agement, huma

rse (Helsinki, Na

n programme under g

nd HR/EE

f conflict or

sis response

p countries

ng on the s

Crisis Man

es it as a c

e respects

with the di

e EU Compr

gether milit

for the EU

n or group

s a ‘Whole-

o enhance t

tive action u

developme

solidate pro

. 57 below

the Compre

t and crises, J31211_03_en

etations used to prehensive App

ve approach accmanagement, h

anitarian action,

ational Defence

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

EAS comm

r other exte

e and mana

getting bac

cope of the

nagement (

civil-military

to the defin

ifference th

rehensive A

tary and civ

U is an inte

p of countr

-of-EU app

the wide ra

upstream a

ent instrum

ogress by

displays th

ehensive A

oint Communn.pdf, (Accesse

o define EU’s Coproaches of the cording to whichhumanitarian acdevelopment, r

University, 3 M


653371

26

itted to a

ernal crisis;

agement to

ck on track

e approach,

(narrow) or

integration

nitions of a

at whereas

Approach to

vilian actors

egrated EU

ries.55 This

roach’, is a

ange of EU

and beyond

ents, but it

looking for

he range of

pproach.

ication Nr. ed 17 August

omprehensive EU and EU

h “narrow” ction and rule-of-law

May 2015).

U

5 s

6

a

;

o

k

,

r

n

a

s

o

s

U

s

a

U

d

t

r

f

D1.3 Review

Both unde

Comprehe

capacity is

to agree u

There are

of duplicat

the broad u

of its exter

However,

general wo

institutions

The appro

common s

applied, civ

Acknowled

report will

cooperatio

civil- milita

58 Faria,“Wha59 The object· ‘promote pstrengthen in60 Woollard, T

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

Figure 2

erstandings

ensive Appr

ssues, as it

pon a joint

however lot

ion, fragme

understand

rnal action,

as conclud

orking meth

s, instrumen

oach implie

strategy tow

vil-military c

dging the lim

neverthele

on/coordinat

ry synergie

at EU Compretives of the EUpeace, its valunternational seThe EU and th

tary Synergie


. EU’s Comp

s have th

roach- focu

is difficult fo

strategy an

ts of critics

entation and

ing of the a

including th

ded by the

hod, as well

nts and polic

es bringing

wards an e

cooperation

mitations to

ess use tha

tion. This is

s within CS

ehensive ApprU External actiues and the wecurity’ (Art. 21he Comprehen

es

the European Union

prehensive

eir merits

using on cr

or all releva

nd, above a

towards a n

d competitio

approach ar

he preventio

European

l as results

cies to bette

together a

external obj

is one of th

the narrow

at definition

due to the

SDP mission

oach?”, 10. ions set out inwell-being of 1.2(c)). nsive Approac

PU


Approach t

and limit

risis manag

ant EU acto

all, commit t

narrowed in

on that exist

rgue that it b

on of conflic

Council in

or effective

er achieve t

all relevant

ject.60 Wh

he key com

wer understa

n as a poin

objective o

ns and oper

n the Lisbon Trits peoples’ (

ch


o Crisis

ts. Argume

gement- are

ors, includin

to its rapid

nterpretation

t within the

better enab

ct. 58

n 2014, the

eness, to pr

the objectiv

parts of t

ether the n

ponents of

anding of th

nt of referen

of the report

rations.

reaty and inclu(Art. 3.1) and

n programme under g

ents in fa

e mainly b

g institution

implementa

n as it will n

EU. In add

les the EU

e Comprehe

romote cohe

ves of the E

he EU to

narrow or b

the EU’s Ap

he compreh

nce in talki

t, which is to

ude the follow‘preserve pe

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

avour of a

based on p

ns and mem

ation in time

not tackle th

ition, those

to meet the

ensive App

erence amo

EU’s externa

work toget

broad interp

pproach.

hensive app

ing about c

o illustrate t

wing: eace, prevent


653371

27

a narrower

olitical and

mber states,

es of crisis.

e problems

supporting

e objectives

proach is a

ong the EU

al actions.59

ther with a

pretation is

proach, this

civil-military

the existing

conflicts and

U

5 s

7

r

d

,

.

s

g

s

a

U 9

a

s

s

y

g

d

D1.3 Review

2.6 Conc

As discuss

been impa

addition, t

membersh

the develo

the threats

effectively

are no long

about integ

strategic p

of various

missions a

comprehen

impact of t

of the rele

CMCO and

limited reso

existing co

and the m

added valu

should not

61 Rasmusse

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

clusions

sed in this c

acted by the

the domina

hips has cau

opment of a

s emanating

by using th

ger only ab

gration civil

lanning to c

s actors in

and operat

nsive mann

these efforts

vant civilian

d CA, and

ources, the

oordination

military capa

ue and red

be limited d

en, Linking ins

tary Synergie


chapter, the

e traditiona

ant role of

used a reluc

an integrate

g from weak

he traditiona

bout enhanc

ians and th

crisis mana

volved and

ions are a

ner, drawing

s on the gro

n and milita

reforming it

e EU must ‘d

and cooper

ability devel

duce costs,

due to struc

truments in de

es

the European Union

e institutiona

al view on h

f NATO ov

ctance to de

d civil- milit

k states and

al model hav

cing the rela

he military i

gement to a

d increasin

tangible e

g civilian an

ound, the E

ary means t

ts structure

do more wit

ration instru

lopment an

both in sh

ctural and c

evelopment an

PU


alization of

how to effe

ver the Eu

evelop the

tary organiz

d asymmetr

ve been ch

ationship be

nto the var

act upon ro

ng cost-effe

example of

nd military

EU has tried

through the

s. These de

th less’. Thi

uments, and

nd impleme

hort and lo

cultural reas

nd foreign poli


the EU’s c

ectively man

uropean se

EU’s militar

zation in su

ric conflicts,

allenged. C

etween the

rious stages

ot causes o

ectiveness

the EU’s

capabilities

d to find wa

e developm

evelopment

is fosters th

d look for fu

entation pro

ong term st

sons.

icy, 10.

n programme under g

crisis manag

nage a civil

ecurity issu

ry capabilitie

pport of CS

the accura

Civilian- milit

force and c

s of crisis m

of conflict, c

in crisis m

efforts to m

s. To streng

ys to increa

ent of vario

ts have bee

he need to m

urther syner

cesses whe

tabilisation

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

gement stru

l- military in

ues, and o

es, thereby

SDP. Howe

acy to respo

tary relation

civil society

managemen

coordinating

managemen

manage a

gthen the v

ase the inte

ous concep

en welcome

make better

rgies betwe

erever they

efforts. Th


653371

28

uctures has

nterface. In

overlaps in

hampering

ever, due to

ond to crisis

ns in CSDP

y, but rather

nt, from the

g the efforts

nt.61 CSDP

crisis in a

isibility and

eroperability

ts, such as

e, thus with

r use of the

een the civil

y can bring

hese efforts

U

5 s

8

s

n

n

g

o

s

P

r

e

s

P

a

d

y

s

h

e

l

g

s

D1.3 Review

3 EU’S C

AND COO

The EU pr

chapter 2,

prevent an

crisis man

lines of eff

manner ha

crisis man

crisis mana

In this cha

operations

civilian an

focusing o

and militar

approach t

As outlined

preparation

theatre. To

different ph

civil- milita

Mali and H

same regio

EU’s comp

officials, C

discussion

3.1 CSDP

3.1.1 Key

The officia

manageme

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

COMPREH

ORDINATI

ides itself in

the civil- m

nd solve co

nagement a

fort: one in

as led to th

agement ro

agement ins

apter, the E

s are review

d military c

n the effort

ry functions

to crises.

d in chapte

n phase of

o gain a de

hases of CS

ary interacti

Horn of Afric

on, thereby

prehensive

CSDP miss

s.

P - The fra

y policies

al EU policie

ent. There

tary Synergie


HENSIVE

ION

n bringing a

ilitary intera

omplex and

actors- coo

nternal and

he develop

ole has led

stitutions.

EU’s efforts

wed. To pro

capabilities

ts to facilita

s, thereby

er 2, a com

the EU mis

eper under

SDP’s oper

on, utilizing

ca. This is b

y creating a

approach. T

ion and op

amework

and docu

es and doc

are an exte

es

the European Union

APPROA

a comprehe

action has a

multidimen

rdination/co

one extern

pment of th

the EU to

to impleme

vide an ove

in CSDP,

ate internal

creating co

prehensive

ssions, to th

rstanding on

rational cyc

g experienc

because the

a fruitful ba

The assess

peration sta

of civil-m

uments re

umentation

ensive list

PU


ACH TO C

nsive appro

an importan

nsional cris

ooperation

nal. Internal

he compreh

work and

ent a comp

erall unders

this review

coordinatio

onditions fo

approach

he support f

n the imple

cle, assessi

ces from the

ese missions

ase for a ca

sment is ba

aff and othe

military int

elevant to

n lays the fo

of policies


CRISIS -

oach to its c

nt role to pla

es. For the

imperative

lly, the nec

hensive app

develop pa

prehensive a

standing of

w comprise

on and coop

or the impl

should be

functions of

mentation e

ng the exis

e EUs enga

s and opera

ase analysi

sed on liter

er officials,

teractions

o CSDP

oundation to

and docum

n programme under g

INTERNA

crisis manag

ay in CSDP

e EU- as m

has transla

cessity to a

proach. Ext

artnerships

approach in

the interact

es the proc

peration bet

ementation

employed f

civilian and

efforts, this

ting proced

agement in

ations are d

s on their

rature review

as well a

s within th

o the EU’s

ments relate

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

AL COOP

gement. As

and the EU

uch as for

ated into tw

ct in a mor

ternally, its

with a rang

n CSDP mi

tion betwee

cedures and

tween CSD

n of a com

from the pla

d military op

chapter ma

dures in reg

n Bosnia He

deployed pa

implementa

w, interview

s a panel

he EU

comprehen

ed to civil a


653371

29

ERATION

s outlined in

U’s ability to

most other

wo parallel

re strategic

increasing

ge of other

issions and

en the EU’s

d practises

DP’s civilian

mprehensive

anning and

perations in

aps out the

gards to the

erzegovina,

arallel to the

ation of the

ws of EEAS

of experts’

nsive crises

and military

U

5 s

9

n

o

r

l

c

g

r

d

s

s

n

e

d

n

e

e

,

e

e

S

’

s

y

D1.3 Review functions w

CSDP, we

The Europ

The ESS o

developed

strategy w

strategy o

prevention

security is

changes in

context.66 W

a crisis ma

The institu

significanc

formulated

Foreign an

foreign aid

decision’- m

62 European documents” i63 EEAS hassecurity stratthreats are dtoo early’. ‘Nprevention wrespond to su64 The MaastHome Affairs65 European 66 This sets thsector is viewand border pplanning andarmies, privadecision makFederal Minis67 CFSP is inin the Europe68 This procewith the CouEuropean Unactors of CFSterm peacebu

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

within CSDP

have listed

pean Secur

originally bu

within the c

as adopted

outlines thre

, holistic a

s a precond

n a society

With this ac

anagement

utional comp

ce of its ext

d and mana

nd Security

d, trade an

making proc

Union Institutein a Yearbooks announced ttegy titled “EUdynamic’ and None of the nwill require the uch multi–facetricht Treaty cs and CommonUnion, “A Seche conceptua

wed as compriprotection , 2) d financial instate security ckers - The costry of Defencntergovernmenean Council aness involves auncil of Minisnion: Foreign SP and Commuilding.

tary Synergie


P62. To get

d some of th

rity Strateg

uilds the fra

context of g

d in 200363,

ee main pr

pproach an

dition for de

and can no

cknowledge

area.

plexity of th

ternal polic

aged unde

y Policy, wh

nd EU enla

cess.68

e for Security

k of European the need to re

U Global Strate‘spread if theynew threats isapplication of

eted situationsreated a Union Foreign andcure Europe inl framework foising four diffeManagement

titutions,, 3) Jcompanies, guommon securitce and Sports ntal in nature: nd the Councill three of the

sters and the and Security

munity are fur

es

the European Union

a brief over

he key docu

gy (ESS)

mework for

globalisation

ten years a

rinciples on

nd multilate

evelopment

o longer be

ement, the E

he EU often

ies. Since

r one of tw

hich include

argement, w

Studies (EUISSecurity 2013enew the EESegy for foreigny are neglectes purely militaf ‘a mixture ofs’. on with three p Security Polic

n a better worlor EU Securityerent groups: Ct and oversighustice and theuerrillas, Michty and defencof the Republthe 28 membl of Ministers main EU instEuropean Pa

y Policy, (Congrther discusse

PU


rview of the

uments here

r the EU’s ro

n, end of th

after the en

n which all

eralism. 65 I

t, Security

seen in iso

ESS set the

n makes a

its establis

wo separat

es CSDP67

which are s

SSUE), “List o3, (2013), 297 S and High Rn and security ed; therefore ary, nor can f instruments’

pillars of policycy (CFSP). d- European S

y Sector ReforCore security ht bodies, suce rule of law: haela Friberg-ce policy of thic of Austria, 2

ber state goveare the key actitutions: the Earliament are gressional Re

ed in IECEU W


e framework

e.

ole as a glo

e Cold War

try into forc

l EU exter

n addition,

problems o

olation from

e security fr

challenge t

hment, the

e institution

and 2) Ex

shaped and

of civilian CSD- 301.

Representativepolicy” and it conflict preveany be tackl. ‘The Europe

y cooperation

Security Straterm (SSR). Traactors, such ah as the execand Non-stat

-Storey, ” Seche European 2014), 169- 17rnments, actinctors. European Com

involved in tesearch ServiWP 1.1. Revie

n programme under g

k for the civi

obal actor. T

r and enlarg

ce of the Ma

nal action

the strateg

often reflec

its political

ramework in

to understa

EU extern

nal process

xternal polic

d executed

DP-related guid

e Mogherini iswill be publish

ention and threed by purely an Union is p

– the Europea

egy”, Brusselsditionally, the as Armed forccutive and legiutory securitycurity Sector Union, ed. Jo70. ng on the basi

mmission, the the decision-mce, 2013), 2.

ew: from short

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

il-military in

The strateg

gement of th

aastricht Tr

is based.

gy acknowl

ct the wide

l, economic

n which the

nding the c

nal policies

ses: 1) The

cies in area

d under ‘a

delines, conce

s currently drahed in June 2eat preventionmilitary mea

particularly we

an Community

s 12 Decembesecurity

ces, police serislative, releva

y forces, such Reform,” in Hochen Rehrl,

is of unanimo

European Comaking; DereNote: The in

t- term stabiliz


653371

30

nteraction in

y has been

he EU. The

reaty64. The

Those are

ledged that

er structural

c and social

e EU acts in

context and

have been

e Common

as such as

community

epts and other

afting the new016. The newn cannot startns’, thereforell equipped to

y, Justice and

er 2003.

rvice, customsant ministries,as Liberation

Handbook for(Vienna: The

us agreement

ouncil togetherek E.Mix, Thestitutions and

zation to long-

U

5 s

0

n

n

e

e

e

t

l

l

n

d

n

n

s

y

r

w w t

e o

d

s , n r e

t

r e d -

D1.3 Review Common

(CFSP)

Since the

has expre

actor on t

foreign an

of CFSP.69

The object

Treaty, inc

common v

strengthen

the Union a

promotion

democracy

(TEU, title

ESDP, C

established

contribute

manageme

military ins

The Com

(CSDP)

The CSDP

CSDP mis

visible act

security do

security ac

the United

achieve sy

69 Michael Maat the Natiocontent/uploa70 Security thStrategy’.

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

Foreign

establishm

ssed its de

the world

d security 9

tives of the

clude the s

values, its

ning of peac

and on the

of int

y, the rule

V). To ach

CSDP in

d, enablin

on the

ent by de

struments.70

mon Secu

P is the o

ssions and

tivity of the

omain, bein

ctor. CSDP

d Nations C

ystematic ch

atthiessen, “Tnal Universityads/2013/06/2hreats defined

tary Synergie


and Se

ment of the

esire to act

stage and

ambitions w

e CFSP, as

afeguarding

interest an

ce and secu

internationa

ternational

of law an

hieve the se

the Lisbon

ng the E

peacekeep

eploying it0

urity and D

operations

operations

e EU in t

ng the most

operations

Charter 11

hange as a

The EU’s Comy of Singapor20130416_CSd in the Euro

es

the European Union

ecurity Po

EU, the U

t as a coh

has raise

with the fra

s defined b

g of the Un

nd integrity

urity, both w

al stage, an

co-opera

d human r

et objectives

n Treaty,

EU to di

ping and

ts civilian

Defence P

arm of C

s are the

the internat

tangible ex

s and missio

and they t

way to pro

mon Security re”, 16 April 2DP1.pdf

opean Union d

PU


olicy

Union

herent

ed its

aming

by the

nion’s

y, the

within

nd the

ation,

rights

s, the

was

rectly

crisis

and

Policy

CFSP.

most

tional

xamples of

ons are con

take place

mote peace

and Defence2013. Access

document ‘A


Table 3.

the CSDP

nducted in a

in a broad

e through m

Policy (CSDPsed 18 Septe

secure Europ

MaastricChapter CFSP

Amsterd(humanittasks, managem

1999 -agreemegoals), ppolicy- mcrisis ma

2003: ESecure E

2003: Thlaunched

2008: RProviding

2009: TrCSDP

2010: CorganisaExternal

2012: Fiactivated

2013: Represe

2015: Co

2015: 30launched

n programme under g

. Evolution o

‘in action’,

accordance

d security

multiple way

P) and its relevember 2015:

pe in a better

ht Treaty (V of TEU, ES

am Treaty tarian and retasks of cment, includin

2001: Colognent on ESDP (progressive d

making and opanagement

European SecEurope in a Be

he first civiliand under ESDP

Report on impg Security in a

reaty of Lisbo

Council decisation and fun

Action Servic

rst EU Operad

Final Rentative/Head o

ouncil conclus

0 missions ad under ESDP

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

of ESDP/ CS

as well as

e with the p

environmen

ys aiming at

vance in Asiahttp://www.eu

r world- Europ

(1992): CSFSDP became i

(1997): Peteescue tasks, combat forceng peace-maki

ne and Hels(qualitative andevelopment perational stru

curity Strategetter World (20

n and military mP

plementation a Changing W

on and renam

sion on estnctioning of tce

ation Centre (

eport by of the EDA on

sions on CSDP

and operationP/CSDP


653371

31

SDP

of EU as a

principles of

nt trying to

t long- term

, Presentationucentre.sg/wp-

pean Security

FP embodiedntegral part of

ersberg taskspeacekeepinges in crisising)

inki summits-nd quantitativeof permanen

uctures for EU

y (ESS) - A003)

missions were

of the ESS-World

ming ESDP as

ablishing thethe European

(OPCEN) was

the Highn CSDP

P

ns have been

U

5 s

a

f

o

m

n -

y

d f

s g s

- e t

U

A

e

-

s

e n

s

h

n

D1.3 Review and sustai

multidimen

In 1999, th

defence p

exclusively

as rule of

oriented to

post- conf

Since 2003

of police se

strengthen

force of th

17 as of Se

The Treaty

The Treaty

be referred

important n

the creati

the Petersb

for Foreign

Crisis Man

CMPD is a

forms the b

military coo

in a so-cal

other servi

Crisis Man

(PFCA)

71 See the lis72 “Ongoing m http://www.e 73 “About CShttp://eeas.eu

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

nable peac

nsionality an

he EU mem

olicy. Desp

y military in

law or polic

owards such

flict stabiliza

3, the EU h

ervices in U

n the rule o

e Lisbon Tr

eptember 2

y of Lisbon

y of Lisbon

d to as a f

new provisi

ion of a

berg tasks,

n Affairs and

nagement C

a central in

basis of the

operation/ c

lled integrat

ces within a

nagement

st of completedmissions and oeeas.europa.e

DP - The Treauropa.eu/csdp

tary Synergie


e. The EU c

nd its comp

mber states

pite the mil

nature. In

ce training a

h activities,

ation and h

has launche

Ukraine (EU

of law. Elev

reaty on 1

2015, for a to

n

(TEU) rene

fundamenta

ons related

framework

and the cre

d Security P

Concept (C

nstitution fo

e operationa

coordination

ted way, inv

and outside

Procedure

d and ongoingoperations”, Eu/csdp/missio

aty of Lisbon”,p/about-csdp/l

es

the European Union

crisis mana

lexity.

formally ag

itary and d

fact, in prac

and security

as well as

humanitaria

ed 32 missio

AM Ukraine

ven of these

December

otal strengt

ewed the Eu

al documen

to the CSD

k for Perm

eation of the

Policy. 73

CMC)

or forming C

al planning

n, as the st

volving both

e the EEAS.

es (CMP) &

g missions at: European Exteons-and-opera

European Exisbon/index_e

PU


agement co

greed to be

defence ele

ctise, most

y sector ref

peacekeep

an missions

ons and op

e, 2014) an

e operation

2009, whic

th of over 6,

uropean cri

nt for the C

DP, includin

manent St

e EEAS, un

CSDP CMC

and the co

trategic plan

h civilian an

.

& Political F

http://www.eeernal Action Seations/index_e

xternal Action en.htm.


uld be char

egin work o

ements, the

of them co

form. Nowa

ping, conflic

s, rather th

peration. Th

d Mali (EUC

ns have bee

ch brings the

,000 person

isis manage

CSDP actio

ng a mutual

ructured C

nder the aut

C for CSDP

nduct of a m

nning over

nd military

Framework

eas.europa.eu/ervice, accessn.htm

Service, acce

n programme under g

racterised b

on an integr

e activities

onsisted of c

adays, CSD

ct preventio

an military

e most rece

CAP Sahel

en launche

e number o

nnel deploye

ement struc

ns, as it co

assistance

Cooperation

thority of the

P operations

mission. CM

a mission/o

planners an

k for Comp

/csdp/missionsed 12 Septem

essed 12 Septe

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

by its securit

rated EU s

under CSD

civilian acti

DP has beco

n, crisis ma

combat op

ent support

Mali, 2014)

ed since the

of ongoing

ed.72

ctures. The

ontained a

e and solida

n, the exp

e High Rep

s and miss

MC is releva

operation is

nd in consu

prehensive

ns-and-operatimber, 2015,

ember, 2015,


653371

32

ty focus, its

ecurity and

DP are not

vities, such

ome largely

anagement,

perations.71

t the reform

) in order to

e entry into

missions to

Treaty can

number of

arity clause,

pansion of

presentative

sions. CMC

ant for civil-

conducted

ultation with

Approach

ons/

U

5 s

2

s

d

t

h

y

,

m

o

o

o

n

f

,

f

e

C

-

d

h

h

D1.3 Review The most

(CMP), wh

They are

explained,

given.74 A

military C

Framewor

brings toge

discuss an

PFCA have

Standard

EU has St

Crises Man

In spring 2

be applied

developed

promoted.

The guida

military op

facilitate th

the missio

military co

plans, whe

“nice-to-kn

is to be no

the civilia

interoperab

A Joint Co

74 Interview w75 Council of operations”, E7660-2013-R76 Interview w77 Ibid. and P78 Interview w

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

relevant gu

hich deal wit

the “overa

and where

revised CM

SDP proce

rk for Com

ether the CS

nd advise on

e been quit

Operation

tandard Op

nagement M

2015, the ru

d by civilia

manuals a

nce/directio

peration/mis

he reach of

ons’ key do

operation a

ere applicab

now” informa

otified that th

n and mil

bility within

ommunicat

with a EEAS Othe EuropeanEU Council do

REV-2/en/pdf ,with a former EPanel of Experwith a former E

tary Synergie


uidelines, co

th the way

arching” fra

e templates

MP was deliv

esses. The

prehensive

SDP expert

n comprehe

e promising

Procedure

peration Pro

Manual thos

ules for Hum

an and mili

and guideb

on for civil-

ssion manda

f the objecti

ocuments.76

and coordin

ble.77 Howe

ation regard

he existing

litary sides

CSDP. 78

tion on EU

Official, 13 Augn Union, “Suggocuments 766 (Accessed 16

EEAS Official,rts (Ministry ofEEAS Official,

es

the European Union

ommon to e

how to hand

amework g

s of the cr

vered in 201

e revised

e Approach

ts from the

ensive EU a

g.

es (SOP), M

ocedures (S

se including

man Rights

itary sides.

ooks for th

military coo

ates and op

ives, but no

However,

nation has a

ever, guidan

ding the nee

guidelines

s. Howeve

’s Compre

gust 2015. gestions for cr60/2/13 REV 26 September 2 23 Septembe

f Foreign Affai 8 September

PU


each “side”

dle a crisis

guidelines,

risis manag

13. This do

paper also

h (PFCA). T

EEAS, but

actions on c

Manuals, Gu

SOP) for M

g some guid

and Gende

. In additio

heir own us

operation a

peration pla

ot an object

after the la

at least bee

nce/direction

ed to coope

and regulat

r, they ar

hensive Ap

risis managem2, 18 June 2012015) er 2015. rs, EEAS Offi

r 2015.


”, are the C

and how to

where the

gement fram

cument des

o introduce

The signific

also respec

crises at ha

uidance, R

Military CSD

ding policie

er issued b

on, both civ

se and the

and coordin

ans. As civ

tive in itself

aunch of E

en endorse

n are not b

erate more

tions do not

re not pre

pproach

ment procedure3, http://data.

cial and forme

n programme under g

Crisis Mana

o elaborate

crisis man

mework pla

scribes thor

es a new

cance of this

cted Commi

and.75 The f

Rules and D

DP operatio

es for civilia

by EEAS we

vilian and

civil-military

nation is inc

il-military co

f, it is not n

EU OPCEN

ed also in t

inding and

across the

t prevent in

cise enoug

es for CSDP cconsilium.euro

er OPCEN offi

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

agement P

the strategi

nagement

anning docu

roughly the

tool called

s tool is tha

ission orga

first implica

Directions

ons and Mi

n-military c

ere prepare

military en

y cooperati

cluded in m

ooperation

necessarily

, the aspe

the mission

they merely

institutiona

nteroperabili

gh to crea

crisis manageopa.eu/doc/do

icial), 27 Augu


653371

33

Procedures

ic planning.

process is

uments are

civilian and

d Political

at it not only

nisations to

tions of the

ssions and

ooperation.

ed, those to

ntities have

on is often

most of the

is a tool to

included in

cts of civil-

/operations

y represent

l borders. It

ity between

ate a real

ment ocument/ST-

ust 2015.

U

5 s

3

s

.

s

e

d

l

y

o

e

d

.

o

e

n

e

o

n

-

s

t

t

n

l

D1.3 Review By far, on

comprehen

which was

May 2015

capabilities

disposal.79

3.1.2 Inst

The key ac

Decision-

The

for

The

sec

Political c

The

CS

The

on

Operation

A C

stra

A C

A J

An

to t

79 European 80 The functiostabilization t81“The post Service, acce

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

ne of the m

nsive appro

distributed

. The docu

s to handle 9

titutions a

ctors and in

making an

e European

the CSDP.

e High Rep

curity policy

control:

e PSC play

DP operatio

e EUMC, co

military ma

nal planning

Crisis Mana

ategic plann

Civilian Plan

Joint Situatio

EU Military

the High Re

Commission, ons of the insto long- term pof High Repressed 19 Sept

tary Synergie


most signific

oach is ‘A

in Decemb

uments out

complicate

and Actor

stitutions in

nd strategic

n Council a

They provi

resentative

y.81

ys a major

ons.

omposed of

tters.

g and impl

agement P

ning

nning Condu

on Centre (

y Staff (EUM

epresentativ

“The EU's com

stitutions and peacebuildingresentative of tember 2015,

es

the European Union

cant docum

Joint Com

ber 2013, an

tline and d

ed crises by

rs

nvolved in C

c guidance

nd the Cou

de strategic

is charged

role in exe

f the Memb

ementation

lanning Dir

uct Capabil

SitCen) for

MS) tasked

ve.

mprehensive aactors are ex. the Union fo

http://eeas.eu

PU


ments regar

mmunicati

nd supporte

eepen und

y exploiting

CSDP are80:

e:

uncil of Min

c guidance

with coord

ercising po

ber States C

n:

rectorate (C

ity (CPCC)

intelligence

d by the EU

approach” xplained more

or Foreign Affuropa.eu/back


rding the o

on on EU

ed by an Ac

derstanding

the wide ar

:

isters are th

of CSDP.

inating and

olitical contr

Chiefs of De

CMPD): tha

office that r

e analysis a

UMC to prov

in depth in IE

fairs and Seckground/high-r

n programme under g

objectives a

’s Compre

ction Plan w

of the EU

rray of tools

he highest

carrying ou

rol and the

efence, prov

at integrate

runs civilian

and threat a

vide military

ECEU WP 1.1

curity Policy”, epresentative/

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

and implem

ehensive A

which was p

U’s broad a

s that the EU

decision m

ut the EU's

e strategic d

vides input

es civilian a

n missions

ssessment

y expertise

1. Review: fro

European Exe/index_en.htm


653371

34

mentation of

Approach’,

published in

and special

U has at its

aking body

foreign and

direction of

to the PSC

and military

and advice

m short- term

xternal Actionm.

U

5 s

4

f

,

n

l

s

y

d

f

C

y

e

m

n

D1.3 Review In addition

committee

further ex

peacebuild

3.2 Civili

In this repo

effects. It

performanc

discussed

The efforts

substance

nexus’, all

coordinate

is key to t

operations

against the

European

meeting. N

soldiers wa

Agency (E

May 2004.

Based on

developme

activate th

82 Nicoletta PDemocratic C83 DirectorateProcesses, (EU Council dplanning new84, “About Chttp://eeas.eu

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

, there are

s (CIVCOM

xplained in

ding.

an and M

ort, capabili

consists o

ce, interope

in IECEU p

s made ove

to the no

reflect the

ed. For the E

their overa

s requires t

e resources

Union milit

Named as th

as formally

EDA) to dev

Civilian-mi

assessed

ent is to de

he civilian a

Pirozzi, The EUControl of Arme- General foEuropean Pa

document 677w missions. CSDP - Militauropa.eu/csdp

tary Synergie


a number o

M) that are

IECEU W

ilitary ca

ity is unders

of a comple

erability, sus

project deliv

er the last d

otions of ‘i

broad cons

EU, the coo

ll impact.82

the capacit

s available .8

tary capabil

he Helsinki

agreed in

velop the E

litary aspec

risks and

scribe so c

and military

U’s Comprehe

med Forces (Dor external porliament, 2012

77/15 Limited,

ary Headline p/about-csdp/m

es

the European Union

of other inst

relevant fo

WP 1.1. Re

pabilities

stood as th

ex combina

stainability,

verable WP

decade by a

ntegration’,

sensus that

ordination o

The comp

y to contin83

lities began

Head Line

2004. The

EU’s military

cts are heav

d threats in

called scena

y capabilitie

ensive ApproaCAF), 2013).olicies, Policy 2), 101.; Coun3 March 2015

Goals”, Euromilitary_headli

PU


titutions, su

or the CSD

eview: from

e ability to

ation of ma

readiness

1.5. Conce

all crisis ma

‘comprehe

t crisis resp

of the militar

plexity of th

nuously ass

n to develop

Goal, a list

same year

y capabilitie

vily emphas

n the ESS

arios e.g. d

es. So far,

ach to Crisis M

y Department,ncil of the Eu5. Those Less

opean Externine_goals/inde


ch as Europ

DP. These

m short- te

fulfill a spec

anpower, de

and concep

eptual Frame

anagement

ensive app

ponse can

ry and civili

he EU enga

sess the ef

p after the

t of headqu

, the EU es

es. A new H

sized in the

S, the first

escribing th

the EUMS

Management, (

CSDP Missiropean Union

sons should be

nal Action Seex_en.htm

n programme under g

pean Defen

and the ac

erm stabili

cified task o

eployability

pts. The iss

ework.

actors to c

proach’ or

only have a

an compon

agement in

ffectiveness

Helsinki 19

arters and t

stablished t

Head Line

documents

step in t

he situation

S has esta

(Brussels: Gen

ions and Ope, “Annual 201

e taken into ac

ervice, access

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

nce Agency

ctors listed

ization to

or to achiev

y, equipmen

sue of capab

conceptualis

‘security-de

a lasting im

nents of the

n CSDP mi

s of the E

999 Europe

troops of u

the Europea

Goal 2010

s.84

the military

s where the

blished the

neva Centre fo

erations: Less14 CSDP Lesccount system

sed 21 Septe


653371

35

(EDA) and

above are

long- term

ve specified

nt, training,

bility is also

se and give

evelopment

mpact if it is

ir operation

ssions and

U activities

ean Council

p to 60 000

an Defence

was set in

y capability

e EU could

e scenarios

or the

sons Learnedsons Report”,

matically when

ember, 2015,

U

5 s

5

d

e

m

d

,

o

e

t

s

n

d

s

l

0

e

n

y

d

s

d , n

,

D1.3 Review without co

following th

Civilian He

less with t

EU’s civili

manageme

civilian c

emphasize

relief is me

has been

adequate a

priority.87

When a ci

potentially

are training

A vital part

to cost eff

According

developed

limited coo

CMPD is

strengthen

other horiz

85 Interview w86 Council of July 17th, 2087 Council of2011, Chttp://data.co88 Interview w89 Council of 90 “Crisis Mahttp://eeas.eu

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

operation w

he scenario

ead Line G

the same p

ian capabi

ent tasks.86

capabilities

ed and, for

entioned. A

considere

and skilled

ivilian miss

fulfilled by

g, transport

t of a civilian

fectively sto

to the Ann

to serve b

operation wi

paying spe

n ties betwe

zontal aspec

with a former Ethe European15. http://dataf the EuropeaCouncil onsilium.europwith a former Ethe European

anagement anuropa.eu/csdp

tary Synergie


with civilian

o phase is m

Goals 2010

phase, with

lity to res

. In 2011, t

Compreh

instance, s

A work plan

ed to be

personnel

ion requires

military sup

and logistic

n mission’s

ore and de

nual Lesson

better the in

ith military l

ecial attent

een CSDP a

cts of EU cr

EEAS official, n Union, “Civilia.consilium.euan Union, “CoDocument

pa.eu/doc/docuEUFOR Chad n Union, “Annund Planning Dp/structures-in

es

the European Union

side. This

more or less

were deve

h an aim a

pond effec

the Council

hensive A

upport to th

n for civil-m

important.

are highlig

s some spe

pport throug

cs as such

logistics ca

eliver impor

ns Identified

nitial phase

ogistic syst

tion to find

and the are

risis manag

10 Sep 2015.ian Headline Gropa.eu/doc/d

ouncil Conclus8032/11,

ument/ST-803RCA Official,

ual 2014 CSDDirectorate,” Estruments-age

PU


means tha

s divided. 85

eloped mo

at improving

ctively to

Conclusion

Approach

he EU’s dis

military syne

In conclu

ghted as the

ecific capab

gh the who

and person

apability is t

rtant equipm

d and Less

e of the mis

tem could b

d synergies

ea of Freedo

ement.90

. Goal 2010”, Edocument/ST-sions on Civil

21.3.2032-2011-INIT/e

20 Aug 2015P Lessons ReEuropean Extencies/cmpd/i


at the entire

re or

g the

crisis

ns on

were

saster

ergies

usion,

e top

bilities, quit

le operation

nal security

the so called

ment, such

sons Learne

ssions. The

e a key to s

between

om, Securit

U Council Doc14823-2007-INian Capabilitie11, acceen/pdf. . eport” ternal Action ndex_en.htm

n programme under g

e capability

Table 4. Ccritical for

te often the

nal cycle. S

equipment.

d Warehous

as vehicle

ed report, t

ere the deve

success89

civilian and

ty and Justi

cument 14823NIT/en/pdf. es”, Foreign Aessed A

Service, acce

Adequate

personnel

Vast variety

Commission

budgetary, HA

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

developme

ivilian capar CSDP oper

ese gap are

Some typica

. 88

se system.

es, used by

the system

elopment o

d military m

ice, Human

3/07, 19.11.20

Affairs CouncAugust 2

essed 9 Sept

amount of

of MS, Coun

level tools (

A, CSDP, DDR


653371

36

ent process

bilities rations

eas can be

al examples

The idea is

y missions.

should be

of now very

means and

n rights and

007, accessed

cil, 21. March,24 2015,

ember, 2015,

skilled

ncil and

(political,

, SSR)

U

5 s

6

s

e

s

s

.

e

y

d

d

d

, ,

,

D1.3 Review On one

capabilities

commercia

security an

actions, th

specialized

CSDP mis

(COTS) m

capability f

the person

EDA supp

Member S

Union’s de

and progra

dual-use c

that can

following, t

example, t

and ICT re

According

other hand

commissio

dual-use

programme

Commissio

civilian mil

Even if the

projects, t

developing

crucial inte

91 “Dual-use do/activities/a92 Daniel Fiohttp://www.is

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

hand, secu

s. On the

ally designe

nd defence

e civilian re

d equipme

ssions cope

material an

for civilian m

nnel.

orts the Co

States in th

efence capa

ams. EDA’s

capability de

have eithe

thus, the Co

the areas o

epresent cap

to the EU

d, the EU’

on governs

capability

es. EDA ha

on’s Europe

itary coope

e Commissi

the growing

g dual-use

erlocutor for

research”, Euactivities-searott, “The thres.europa.eu/u

tary Synergie


urity and

e other

ed product

domain. Be

ealm doesn

nt as the

e well with

nd equipme

missions is

ouncil of the

heir efforts

abilities thr

s tasking a

evelopment

er a milita

omprehens

of electronic

pabilities fo

treaties, de

’s internal

the Directiv

developme

as, for instan

ean Structu

ration.92

ion’s structu

g importan

technologie

r industry. T

uropean Defenrch/dual-use-reee effects of uploads/media

es

the European Union

defence re

hand, mo

s find thei

ecause of th

n’t have the

military. I

Commercia

ent. Instea

the amoun

e European

to improve

ough coope

lso include

t, which lea

ary or a c

ive Approac

cs, compon

r both entiti

efence-indu

market fal

ves on intra

ent also

nce, been a

ural Funds.

ural budget

ce of thes

es – makes

The Commi

nce Agency, aesearch. dual-use: Firm

a/Brief_21_Du

PU


require spe

re and m

r way into

he nature o

same nee

nstead, civ

al Off-The-S

ad, the cr

nt and quali

n Union and

e the Europ

erative proj

es the so ca

ads to prod

civil applica

ch concept

nents, nano

ies.91

ustrial matte

ls within th

a-EU transfe

seeks fun

able to supp

. There is

t cannot be

se instrume

s the Comm

ission poss

accessed 10 S

ms, capabilitial_use.pdf, (A


Tabfor

ecific

more

o the

of the

d for

vilian

Shelf

ritical

ity of

d the

pean

jects

alled

ducts

ation

. For

otechnologie

ers are trea

he Commis

ers and def

nding from

port seven p

high poten

e used to fu

ents – and

mission, alo

esses an im

September, 20

es, and goveAccessed 10 S

n programme under g

ble 5. MilitaryCSDP opera

es, radars

ted as MS

ssion’s rea

fence procu

the Euro

projects to b

ntial in the

nd purely d

d the supp

ong with the

mportant rol

015, https://ww

ernance,“ EUISeptember 201

Effective tr

command stru

Abilities and

force to dev

Environment (

EU independe

and from the A

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

ry capabilitieations

and senso

responsibi

alm (346 T

urement. Ho

opean Co

be partly fun

future to d

defence init

port they ca

e EDA, an

le of marke

ww.eda.europa

ISS brief Vo15).

raining, plan

uctures and pro

skills to use

velop Safe A

(SASE)

ent Logistic sy

AOR


653371

37

es critical

rs, telecom

lity. On the

TFEU). The

owever, the

ommission’s

nded by the

deepen the

tiatives and

an lead to

even more

et regulator,

a.eu/what-we-

ol. 21 (2014),

nning and

cedures

e necessary

And Secure

ystem to, in

U

5 s

7

m

e

e

e

s

e

e

d

o

e

,

-

,

D1.3 Review as dual-us

respect, th

The Europ

(SMEs) to

This formid

Eurostat c

(R&D) bud

billion wort

projects. C

example is

efforts of F

based surv

Member st

Member S

sending qu

and militar

Thereby, d

and institu

Europe’s d

This is a cl

However,

resource s

between E

operations

and a lack

equipment

limited res

civil- milita

missions. I

93 “Crisis Man94 Fiott, “The 95 Scherer, “C96 Ibid.

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

e technolog

e importanc

pean Comm

utilize the E

dable sum c

calculates th

dgets to def

th of sales

Commercia

s the (civili

Frontex, the

veillance of

tates role is

States’ willi

ualified staff

ry capabiliti

developing

utions. Dece

defence sec

lear examp

at times th

shortages, i

EU actors.

s, ranging f

of coordina

t or C2 stru

sources, the

ry capabiliti

In the EEAS

nagement andthree effects

Cooperation a

tary Synergie


gies are blu

ce of the Co

mission and

EU structura

clearly indic

hat the EU2

fence in 20

in the aero

l R&D and

an) Europe

e European

the EU’s su

s crucial as

ngness to

f, and moni

es are ava

dual- use c

ember 2013

ctor is throu

le of compr

here have

ntermittent 95 Howeve

from resour

ation betwe

uctures, is t

e EU must

ies has an i

S document

d Planning Dirof dual-use”

and Coordinati

es

the European Union

urring the lin

ommission

d the EDA

al funds for

cates the im

28 allocate

12. Additio

onautics sec

d sales are

ean Earth O

n Maritime

urrounding w

the succes

support th

toring and l

ilable is a c

capabilities

3 EU Coun

gh reinforce

ehensive a

been some

political su

er, at times

rce shortag

en EU acto

the key to a

be able to

mportant ro

t "Promotin

rectorate”

on,” 43 – 49.

PU


ne between

is greater th

are lookin

dual-use R

mportance of

d only 5.11

nally, ASD

ctor, only €

e therefore

Observation

Safety Age

waters.94

ss of CSDP

he mission

learning fro

crucial issu

has increas

ncil stated t

ed interactio

pproach in

e real diffic

upport from

s, there ha

ges, intermi

ors.96 Adeq

a mission/o

‘do more w

ole to play t

ng synergies


the comme

han ever fo

ng for smal

R&D worth €

f the proces

1% of their

Europe est

€46 billion w

e essential

n program,

ency and th

P missions

by co-ope

om their wor

ue for the s

sed attentio

that the on

on between

practice.

culties with

Member S

ave been s

ttent politic

uate capab

operation’s

with less’, a

o ‘bridge’ th

s between t

n programme under g

ercial and d

r defence c

ll and med

€325 billion

ss.

total resea

timates tha

was genera

for the De

Copernicus

he EU Sate

depends to

erating and

rk. Ensuring

success of t

on among th

nly way to e

n the civilian

CSDP ope

States, and

ome real d

al support

bilities, whet

ability to fu

and coordin

he heavy ca

the EU civil

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

defence sec

companies.9

dium-sized

between 20

arch and de

at out of the

ated by milit

efence Ind

s, which su

ellite Centre

o a large ex

d sharing i

g that suffic

the CSDP

he EU Mem

ensure the

n and defen

erations, ra

a lack of c

difficulties w

from Mem

ther human

ulfil the man

nating and

apability gap

and militar


653371

38

ctors. In this93

enterprises

014 - 2020.

evelopment

e total €128

tary-related

ustry. One

upports the

e on space-

xtent on the

nformation,

cient civilian

operations.

mber States

viability of

nse sectors.

anging from

coordination

with CSDP

ber States,

resources,

ndate. With

developing

ps in CSDP

ry capability

U

5 s

8

s

s

.

t

8

d

e

e

-

e

,

n

.

s

f

.

m

n

P

,

,

h

g

P

y

D1.3 Review developme

developme

pursued. T

concrete d

ways to fac

taking full a

3.3 Lesso

As display

crisis man

learning le

CSDP mis

Lessons le

This proce

missions/o

resources

knowledge

comprehen

essential p

crisis man

97European E(Common http://www.co%20version%98 Strategic asecurity and systems, shadevelopment99 Council of 100 Europeanoutput, which101 Council of2015.

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

ent"97 (Febr

ent and use

The docume

dual use ca

cilitate their

account of c

ons Learn

‘The Co

CSDP

benchm

developi

yed above b

nagement to

essons and

sion was la

earned 100 p

ess is an

operation. A

by eliminat

e as a ben

nsive appro

part of impro

nagement. T

External Actio

Sonsilium.europ%201_EN.pdf and tactical tra force protecaring informatt processes, athe European

n Union Exterh requires furthf the Europea

tary Synergie


uary 2011)

e of civilian

ent states th

pabilities in

r potential a

civilian and

ned Cycle

ouncil also

missions

arking, imp

ing best pra

by Council,

o improve

identifying

aunched.

processes a

important

As described

ting duplica

nefit of the

oach to CS

oving and e

There is a

on Service, ” PSecurity pa.eu/uedocs/(Accessed 16

ansportation, lction, use of tion and intel

and lessons lean Union, “CSDrnal Action deher developmn Union, “EU

es

the European Union

the Counci

n and milita

hat synergie

ncluding thro

availability fo

military spe

e

recognises

and opera

act assessm

actices for e

the EU rec

capacities

best practi

attempt to a

instrumen

d by the EU

ation of effo

sharing pr

DP. The de

extending th

n increasin

Promoting synand

/cmsUpload/16 August 2015logistic suppospace capabligence, trainiarned. P – Council C

efines lessonsent or monitorMilitary Lesso

PU


l identified

ary capabilit

es could be

ough joint r

or CSDP civ

ecificities.

s the need t

ations, incl

ment, identi

effective and

cognizes th

and efficac

ces have b

assess most

nt to impro

UMC 101 ‘the

ort; to benef

rocess,’ the

evelopmen

he EU capa

ng interest

nergies betwe

10223%20fac5). ort, communicabilities, unmaning, exercise

Conclusion”, 17s as “any occring.” ons Learnt at t


a series of

ties can ad

fostered, in

research an

vilian missio

to continuo

luding thro

ifying and im

d efficient C

he need to

cy. The me

been evolvin

t aspects of

ove the pl

e lessons ar

fit from colle

ereby contr

t of lessons

ability to con

from Memb

een the EU ciDefence

ctsheet%20Civ

ation and infonned vehicleses, interconne

7991/11, 1 Deurrence or fin

he Political St

n programme under g

domains98 w

d value an

n particular,

nd technolo

ons and mil

usly improv

ough evalu

mplementin

CSDP action

learn from

ethodologie

ng together

f CSDP mis

anning an

re created t

ective wisdo

ibuting to t

s from CSD

ntribute to c

ber States

ivil and militarP

vil-Military%20

rmation syste, warehousin

ecting the civi

ecember 2011nding that has

trategic Level

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

where syne

d should th

in the deve

ogy efforts,

litary opera

ve the perfo

uation of

ng lessons l

n.’ 99

its own ex

es and tool

r since the f

ssions and

d conduct

to reduce th

dom and to

the develop

DP engage

conflict prev

in the effi

ry capability dPolicy, 0synergies%2

ems (CIS), meng and centrailian and milit

. s an impact o

Concept”, 106


653371

39

ergies in the

herefore be

elopment of

and finding

tions, while

formance of

outcomes,

earned and

perience in

ls used for

first ESDC/

operations.

of CSDP

he waste of

create new

pment of a

ement is an

vention and

ciency and

development,”2011),

0-

edical support,alised supporttary capability

on operational

692/15, 8 July

U

5 s

9

e

e

f

g

e

f

,

d

n

r

/

.

P

f

w

a

n

d

d

” ,

, t y

l

y

D1.3 Review relevancy

achieved w

Identifying

lessons ha

outside ex

modestly in

is less inv

private sec

effect- wou

increased

Process

Various ac

headliners

side, which

overview o

102 Ginsberg

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

of CSDP

with it.

lessons fro

as been con

xperts and N

ncreased th

iting to out

ctor, and ci

uld address

parliamenta

ctors are inv

. The tools

h is reflecte

of the differe

and Penska

tary Synergie


missions,

om operatio

nducted on

Non- Gover

heir consulta

side feedba

ivil society-

s some of

ary role for t

volved in th

and proced

ed in the diff

ent process

, The Europea

es

the European Union

especially

ons is politi

ad hoc bas

rnmental Or

ations with

ack. Regula

which the

the criticism

the annual

he CSDP le

dures have

ferent appro

es is provid

an Union in glo

PU


concerning

ically sensit

sis with little

rganisations

NGO and c

ar consultat

UN and O

m about the

review of C

earning proc

been estab

oaches follo

ded.

obal security,


g how mon

tive. Since

transparen

s (NGO). W

civil society,

tions with N

OSCE have

e democrat

CSDP missio

cesses, EU

blished sepa

owed by the

31.

n programme under g

ney is bein

2003, the i

nce and with

While CSDP

the plannin

NGO’s, inde

a tradition

tic deficit of

ons.102

MS, CPCC

arately for t

e three mai

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

ng used an

identificatio

h infrequen

P field opera

ng process

ependent e

of doing w

of CSPD, as

C and CMPD

the civilian a

in actors. H


653371

40

nd what is

on of CSDP

t input from

ations have

in Brussels

experts, the

with positive

s would an

D being the

and military

Here, a brief

U

5 s

0

s

P

m

e

s

e

e

n

e

y

f

D1.3 Review European

EUMS col

Lessons Id

process, s

lessons fro

LI/LLs are

other instit

grouped th

Planning. D

challenge

The implem

as often t

Therefore,

Conduct of

Civilian Pl

The lesso

operationa

process, s

and verific

best pract

support the

developed

collection,

Lessons a

missions a

Operation

the conduc

103 Current E104 The Milita“EU Military LManagement105 Ibid. 31 - 3106 Ibid. 29 –

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

Union Mili

lects the le

dentified (L

oftware dat

om a variety

e normally c

tutions eng

hematically

Despite the

to the EUM

mentation o

there is no

the mech

f Activities s

lanning an

ns process

al aspects

uch as the

cation/lesso

ices/outputs

e efforts to

for civilian

analysis an

are collecte

are collected

holds mont

ct of the mi

UMS Lessons

ary Lessons PrLessons Learnt Structures, 132. 31; Panel of E

tary Synergie


itary Staff (

essons from

LI) and Les

tabase tool

y of CSDP M

collected fr

aged with

y: Early Wa

e standardiz

MS is to en

of the lesson

o time to c

anism to e

should be s

d Conduct

s for the c

of missions

six-monthly

ns observa

s. It also in

standardiz

n missions

nd developm

ed through

d after the p

thly meetin

ission, best

s Process (ELrocess includint at the Politic11, 29.

Experts (EEAS

es

the European Union

(EUMS)

m CSDP m

ssons Learn

(EUMS Les

Military Ope

rom the EU

the EUMS

arning and

zed process

sure that th

ns at the pla

conduct les

ensure that

strengthened

t Capability

ivilian miss

s, strategic

y lessons r

tions, analy

ncludes the

ze the lesso

(CiLMA), w

ment of indiv

formal an

planning ph

gs with eac

t practices

PRO) was agng the milestocal Strategic L

S Officials) 16

PU


military oper

ned (LL) in

ssons Mana

erations and

UMS, Memb

during ope

Advance

s of collect

he lessons

anning of a

ssons cycle

t Lessons

d.105

y (CPCC)

sions is ma

c reviews,

reports. The

ysis/lessons

e appointm

ons, a proc

which inco

vidual lesso

nd informal

hase, as we

ch mission.

and lesson

reed by the Eones and key aLevel Concept

6 June 2015.


ration. EUM

n practise f

agement Ap

d Exercises

ber States,

erations and

Planning;

ing and dis

identified a

new CSDP

es or cons

are incorpo

anaged by

and suppo

e CPCC les

s identified,

ent of a de

ess databa

rporates al

ons.106

channels.

ell as after th

During the

s are discu

UMC on 26 Nactors is desct.”; Directorate

n programme under g

MS has col

from its bir

pplication –

.104

Operation

d exercises

Situation A

stributing the

are learned

P operation

sult lessons

orated into

CPCC. CP

orting missio

ssons proce

developme

edicated le

se modelle

l the inform

Formally,

he end of a

ese meeting

ussed. Also

ovember 2007cribed in Coune-General, Con

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

llected and

rth.103 Since

– ELMA), ha

ns, Missions

s. Lessons

Assessment

e lessons,

at appropr

has been i

s learned d

CSDP Pla

PCC conce

ons’ lesson

ess include

ent/lessons

essons foca

ed on ELMA

mation rela

lessons fr

a mission. T

gs, issues a

6-month re

7. ncil of the Euronsolidating the


653371

41

registered

e then this

as captured

s and from

have been

t; Strategic

the current

riate levels.

nadequate,

documents.

anning and

entrates on

ns learning

s collection

s learnt and

al point. To

A has been

ating to the

rom civilian

The Head of

arising from

eports from

opean Union, e EU’s Crisis

U

5 s

d

s

d

m

n

c

t

.

,

.

d

n

g

n

d

o

n

e

n

f

m

m

D1.3 Review the Heads

are then p

reports alo

mechanism

personal k

dialogue, m

the discus

documents

Operationa

the additio

A current c

lessons re

improving

higher lev

process of

Crisis Man

CMPD is th

the Annua

support po

reports fro

operations

provides C

The report

disseminat

check lists

planners ta

new and c

identified in

107 Some of internal use Hence, what 108 Directorat109 Panel of E110 Directorat

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

of Mission

passed to C

one do not

ms have an

knowledge

meetings, a

sion of sen

s. In additio

al Comman

nal mechan

challenge w

eports are

missions. T

el of sens

f learning le

nagement

he author o

l Reports a

olitical-strate

om the Hea

s, mission

CMPD with p

ts are then

tion of the

s have been

ake into con

current mis

n previous m

these lessononly is basedCMPD ultima

te-General, CoExperts (EEASte-General, Co

tary Synergie


n include a

CIVCOM for

compel pe

important r

is often sh

and the exch

nsitive issue

on, visits to t

nder, his De

nisms to ide

with the CPC

often censo

This seems

itivity for M

ssons is the

Planning D

of the main

and thematic

egic planni

ads of Miss

HQ, as we

pre-selected

distributed

lessons ide

n used by C

nsideration

ssion staff,

missions an

s identified ar

d on perceivedately receives onsolidating thS Officials) 16 onsolidating th

es

the European Union

section on

r discussion

eople to con

role to com

hared with

hange of ex

es that othe

the mission

eputy and th

entify the are

CC lessons

ored and f

s to be pa

Member Sta

e limit on th

Directorate

lessons lea

c reports. C

ng for CSD

ion or from

ell as from

d informatio

to CivCom

entified are

CMPD to en

the key les

representi

nd develop

re then shared relevance toseem to be hehe EU’s CrisisJune 2015.

he EU’s Crisis

PU


lessons lea

n and appr

nsult the do

plement the

other mem

xperiences

erwise may

ns, contact b

he Head of

eas that mo

s process is

far removed

rticularly th

ates. Addit

he resources

(CMPD)

arned report

CMPD aims

DP. Ideally,

m CPCC, an

internation

on about les

m, PSC and

through th

nsure in the

ssons. Furth

ng an opp

suggestion

ed with CMPDo CMPD, or ieavily edited as Managemen

s Management


arned.107 Th

roval and fi

ocuments i

e sharing of

mbers of C

among offic

be censore

between the

f Missions a

ost need int

the utilizat

d from rea

he case for

ionally, an

s available

ts at the po

s at enhanc

Ideally, CM

nd lessons

nal actors.

ssons ident

d Council. T

e reports, f

e planning p

hermore, C

portunity for

s to training

D. The decisioif it is exclusivand, at times, t Structures, 2

t Structures, 3

n programme under g

he pre-selec

nally sent t

n their wor

f lessons an

CPCC in in

cials. This i

ed out of o

e Head of o

and interna

ervention a

ion of the le

lity to be a

r political le

obstacle t

to CPCC fo

litical and s

ing civil- mi

MPD would

learned do

For the A

ified and lea

The main ch

from 2007/2

phases of a

MPD is invo

r the imple

g requireme

on about whicvely an interncensored.

29 – 31.

31- 33.

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

cted lesson

to PSC. Ho

rk. Therefor

nd best pra

nformal way

nformal sys

official lesso

operations,

al reviews a

and improve

essons iden

able to pla

essons, wh

to a more

or the task.1

strategic lev

ilitary coope

d receive th

ocuments fr

Annual Rep

arned in the

hannels to

2008 onwa

a new miss

olved in the

ementation

ents accordi

ch lessons arenal technical i


653371

42

ns identified

owever, the

re, informal

ctices. This

ys, through

stem allows

ons learned

the Civilian

are some of

ement.108

ntified. The

y a role in

ich carry a

systematic09

vel, such as

eration and

he 6-month

rom military

port, CPCC

e past year.

ensure the

rds, CMPD

ion that the

e training of

of lessons

ingly.110

e deemed forssue learned.

U

5 s

2

d

e

l

s

h

s

d

n

f

e

n

a

c

s

d

h

y

C

.

e

D

e

f

s

r .

D1.3 Review Civilian- m

CMPD, CP

their respe

Working G

lessons, w

and overa

addressed

functioning

Both the

developed

mechanism

outlines th

CSDP key

tendency

process as

foster the

lessons id

the EEAS

Group (LM

high, Depu

results are

Despite the

lessons ha

lessons ne

and policie

revision of

to manage

lessons wi

reporting p

111 Panel of E

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

military less

PCC and EU

ective areas

Groups end

which are a

arching les

in conne

g of the CSD

military an

more sta

ms over the

he current

y lessons.

to standa

s much as

e compreh

entified an

runs a CS

MG). LGM

uty Secreta

e put togethe

e importanc

as drawn m

eeds more

es, they can

f the concep

e, develop a

thin each a

processes h

Experts (EEAS

tary Synergie


sons syner

UMS identif

s and the

orses the f

an importan

sson that

ection with

DP.

nd the civi

andardized

e past few

process of

In gener

ardize and

possible a

ensiveness

d lessons

SDP Lesson

is chaired

ary Genera

er in an Ann

ce of defini

more attentio

effort. Unle

nnot be con

pts underpi

and implem

area and as

has helped

S Officials) 16

es

the European Union

rgies

fies lessons

CSDP Less

five CSDP

nt, cross-cu

needs to

h the prac

lian side h

and cohe

years. Tab

f identifying

ral, there

formalize

at all levels

s of collec

learned (LI

ns Managem

on a relat

al level, pre

nual CSDP

ng the key

on and ther

ess the less

sidered lea

nning CSD

ment lesson

sist in comm

to support

June 2015.

PU


Tas from

sons

key

utting

o be

ctical

have

erent

le 6.

g the

is a

the

s. To

cting

I/LL),

ment

tively

esently by

Lessons R

lessons, ef

re is a com

sons identi

arned. In pa

DP.111 Introd

ns, has incre

mon trend a

combined


able 6. Who

Mr Maciej

Report.

fforts to ens

mmon recog

fied are tra

rticular, les

duction of a

eased the a

analysis. Ad

and integra

• CPCC

reports

• CMPD

and str

• EUMS

and o

experie

• CSDP

of E

discus

key les

• CSDP

by DSG

• MS (PS

n programme under g

identifies th

Popowski

sure the im

gnition that

anslated into

sons need

shared civ

awareness

dditionally, c

ated plannin

identifies le

s and Brusse

D identifies le

rategic review

identifies le

operation re

ence

Lessons W

EEAS, Co

ses the less

ssons every y

Lessons Ma

G Popowski

SC) endorse

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

he CSDP key

. The com

mplementatio

the implem

to changes

to be integ

vilian-militar

and under

combining t

ng for CSD

essons base

els HQ exper

essons base

ws

essons base

eports and

Working Grou

ommission

sons and ag

year.

anagement

endorses th

e the key less


653371

43

y lessons?

mprehensive

on of those

mentation of

in practice

rated in the

ry database

rstanding of

the lessons

P missions

ed on missi

rience

ed on planni

ed on missi

Brussels H

ups (compos

stakeholde

rees up to fi

Group chair

e key lesson

sons

U

5 s

3

e

e

f

e

e

e

f

s

s

on

ng

on

HQ

sed

rs)

ive

red

ns.

D1.3 Review and opera

activities, w

Challenge

Several ch

CSDP;113

Wh

stra

writ

doc

Lac

less

act

sta

Hor

inst

insu

Les

thro

Mo

to

con

The

sho

cap

112 Ibid. 113 Panel of Learned Proc

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

ations and

which can b

es

hallenges ca

hile lessons

ategic level

ting of m

cumentation

ck of coord

sons. Desp

ors conduc

ndards

rizontal lear

titutional cu

ufficient ded

ssons docu

ough the EE

ost of the EU

relevant do

nstrains the

e bridges b

ould be fu

pabilities on

Experts (EEAcesses”, Direc

tary Synergie


contributes

be distribute

an be ident

s are ident

l that invol

ission ma

n.

dination has

pite attempt

cting lesso

rning across

ulture and a

dicated staf

uments tend

EAS structu

U internal d

ocuments

sharing of

between the

rther stren

n the ground

AS Officials) ctorate-Genera

es

the European Union

to learnin

ed widely to

ified that co

tified and le

ves decisio

ndates is

s an impac

ts to homog

ns learned

s missions

a lack of res

ff to the less

d to be filte

ures in Brus

documents

remains lim

information

e operationa

gthened to

d.

16 June 201al, Consolidat

PU


g lessons,

all relevant

ould hampe

earned in

on-making

still unde

ct on the c

genise the

d processes

and institut

sources. A

sons proces

ered and d

ssels depen

and reports

mited to th

n and also tr

al/mission l

o help ens

5; Directorateting the EU’s C


both comm

t EU stakeh

er the capac

various (th

processes,

er-represent

collection, s

methodolo

s apply dif

tions remain

Among all th

ss.

iluted as th

ding on the

s are confid

he few acto

ransparency

evel and th

sure that m

e-General, CSCrisis Manage

n programme under g

mon and in

holders.112

city for instit

hematic) are

concept d

ted in exp

haring and

gies and to

fferent met

ns a challen

he dedicate

hey move ‘u

ir sensitivity

dential and

ors involve

y.

he strategic

mandated

SDP Missionsement Structur

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

ndividual, f

tutional lear

eas, the p

developmen

plicit lesso

d dissemina

ools used, t

thods, defin

nge, as a re

ed institutio

up’ from th

y.

classified, a

ed in CSDP

c/mandate-w

tasks refle

s and Operatires, 101 – 107


653371

44

from CSDP

rning within

olitical and

nt, and the

on learned

ation of the

the various

nitions and

esult of both

ns, there is

he missions

and access

P and this

writing level

ect realistic

ions: Lessons7.

U

5 s

4

P

n

d

e

d

e

s

d

h

s

s

s

s

l

c

s

D1.3 Review

3.4 Plann

3.4.1 Ear

The optima

EU’s CFSP

awareness

conflict em

The EU fo

analyses a

proactive a

EU’s secu

Conflict Pr

the EEAS

The actua

Analyses C

resources,

intelligence

the most im

(SIAC), are

Based on

EU’s instru

114 The confli115 The instpeacebuilding

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

ning and C

rly warnin

al way to pr

P emphasiz

s is of utmo

merges.

follows the

and connect

and preven

urity, some

revention G

Intelligence

l analysis i

Centre and

the metho

e organisat

mportant an

e joint civil-m

this situatio

uments sho

ict cycle and crument is furg.

tary Synergie


Conductin

ng and sit

revent crise

zes the imp

ost importa

security re

ts relevant

tive manne

situations

roup asses

e Steering B

s mostly d

Intelligence

od for both

ions. Organ

nd valuable

military ‘pro

onal awaren

uld be used

conflict prevenrther discusse

es

the European Union

ng CSDP

uational a

s is to turn

portance of

ance, as it

elated situa

actors withi

er. Due to t

are prioritiz

ses the situ

Board (ISB).

one by two

e Directorat

organisatio

nisations ind

e products, s

oducts’.

ness, the EU

d, inter alia,

ntion are discued in IECEU

PU


missions

awarenes

them down

preventive

helps to pl

ation globa

in the EU in

the limited r

zed for mo

uation and d

.

o EEAS org

te of the EU

ons is to re

dependentl

so called S

U and MS

launching a

ussed in IECEU WP 1.1. R


and oper

s

before they

activities.11

an the EU’

ally through

n order to b

resources a

ore detailed

developmen

ganisation,

UMS. Since

equest infor

y deliver th

Single Intelli

representat

a CSDP op

U WP 1.2. Review: from

n programme under g

rations

y escalate t4 In relation

’s intervent

h Early Wa

e able to re

and priority

d assessme

nt of policy

namely the

the EU lac

mation from

heir reports

gence Anal

tives make

eration or m

short- term s

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

to open hos

n to CSDP,

tion before

arning Sys

espond to co

areas in te

ent. In the

option pap

e EU Intell

cks its own

m the Mem

to the ‘cus

lyses Capa

the decisio

mission.

stabilization t


653371

45

stilities. The

, situational

a potential

tem115 that

onflicts in a

erms of the

EEAS, the

ers utilizing

igence and

intelligence

mber States’

tomers’ but

city reports

on on which

to long- term

U

5 s

5

e

l

l

t

a

e

e

g

d

e

’

t

s

h

m

D1.3 Review

3.4.2 Pla

Figure 3. C

The Figure

The Crisis

and form t

the Comm

conduct of

1) Identific

In a case

advance p

participatin

116 AlexandeDefence PoliRepublic of A117 Yves de Kdefence policRepublic of A118 Ibid.

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

nning and

CMPD decisi

e 3.116 outlin

Managem

he framewo

ission and

f a CSDP m

cation of a

of a crisis

planning is p

ng organisa

er Mattelaer, “icy of the EurAustria, 2014),Kermabon, ” Ccy of the EuroAustria, 2014),

tary Synergie


d decision

on making

nes the dec

ent Proced

ork for plan

the EEAS.

mission/oper

crisis and

emerging,

paramount

tions from t

“Decision makropean Union,, 45. Crisis Manageopean Union, , 43 - 47.

es

the European Union

n making

procedure

cision- mak

dures descr

ning CSDP

The Proced

ration.117

developm

the EU w

for EU to b

the EEAS a

king procedure ed. Jochen

ement Proceded. Jochen

PU


ing procedu

ribe the pro

P missions a

dures outlin

ment of an o

will consider

be able to a

and also from

e”, in HandboRehrl, (Vienn

dures” in HandRehrl, (Vienna


ure launchin

ocess of EU

and operatio

ne key phas

overall EU a

r its options

ct proactive

m the Comm

ook for decisioa: The Feder

dbook for deca: The Federa

n programme under g

ng a CSDP

U CSDP en

ons betwee

ses for plan

approach11

s to engage

ely. Plannin

mission.119

on makers - al Ministry of

ision makers- al Ministry of

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

P mission or

ngagement

en the Mem

nning, deplo

18

e in the cr

ng may inclu

The common Defence and

The commonDefence and


653371

46

r operation.

in a crisis,

mber States,

oyment and

risis. CSDP

ude several

Security andSports of the

n security andSports of the

U

5 s

6

.

,

,

d

P

l

d e

d e

D1.3 Review The PSC,

whether a

will be pre

broad rang

best suited

political an

common o

Once the P

starts the p

2) Develo

operation1

Once the

describing

possible m

particular

services. F

At the CM

country co

governmen

In addition

Agreemen

applicable)

In addition

Force Gen

OHQ. The

to the upco

119 Revised Csuch as GeoDemocracy, FRONTEX, Ewith internatiocrisis.” 120 De Kerma121 Silva Laumanagement

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

with the s

CSDP ope

epared onc

ge of option

d in regard

nd operatio

objectives.

PSC has de

planning pro

opment of 120

PSC consi

the EU’s p

mission or op

the CPCC,

For the milita

MC formulat

oncerned to

nt and the E

, Status of

t (in the c

), verifying t

, at this sta

neration at

designated

oming Force

CMP: “CSDP ographic, ConEU Delegatio

EUROJUST), onal organisa

abon, Crisis Muffer and Joht missions, (Be

tary Synergie


support of t

eration is ap

e the secu

ns available

d to the cris

nal elemen

ecided that

ocess.

the Crisis

iders the a

political inte

peration. At

, EUMS an

ary operatio

tion phase,

o assess th

EU Delegati

Forces Agr

case of a

the will of th

age, initial fo

later stage.

d OHQ prep

e Generatio

advance plannflict Preventons, the ComMember Statetions (UN, AU

Management Phannes Hamaerlin: ENTRi, 2

es

the European Union

the respect

ppropriate.

rity situatio

to the EU,

sis at hand

ts – but als

action is a

s Managem

appropriaten

erests, viab

t this phase

nd other re

ons the ATH

normally, C

he situation

ion, and pro

reement (in

civilian mi

he local aut

orce sensin

. Force sen

pares the Pr

on and othe

ning by CMPDion/Peace-bui

mmission (FPes embassies

U, NATO etc),

Procedures, 43acher ed., In 2014), 75 – 76

PU


tive workin

A PFCA, w

on is asses

including w

d, to act. T

so civilian a

ppropriate

ment Conc

ness of pot

ble options

, CMPD co

elevant dire

HENA mech

CMPD will

n on the g

ovide recom

the case o

ssion) are

horities.121

g is launch

nsing often

rovisional S

er capability

D, supported bilding/Mediatio

PI, ECHO, DEs, and NGOs and third state

3 - 47. Control – A

6


g groups (

which sets t

ssed. This a

what EU ins

The adoptio

and military

the EEAS i

cept and

tential CSD

(civilian an

nsults with

ectorates, E

hanism will

send a Fa

ground, ma

mmendation

of a military

negotiated

ed as early

results the

Statement O

requiremen

by CPCC andon, MD CROEVCO, HOMEas required. Wes that may ha

practical guid

n programme under g

CIVCOM a

the political

assessment

struments c

on of a PF

y expertise

s tasked to

establishm

DP action, C

d/or military

all the relev

EU delegati

be activate

act Finding

ke initial c

ns on option

operation)

d with the

y as possible

lead nation

Of Requirem

nts.

EUMS, will eC, EEAS SeE, ELARG), EWhere appropave a role/inte

de for civilian

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

and EUMC)

l context fo

t include id

could be ava

FCA entails

and input

o frame the

ment of th

CMPD draw

y) and obje

vant EEAS

ions and C

d.

Mission (F

contacts wit

ns for EU en

and Status

host coun

e leading to

n and selec

ments (PSO

engage with otecurity, HumaEU Agencies

priate the EEAerest in the res

n experts wor


653371

47

) considers

r the crisis,

dentifying a

ailable, and

combining

– to define

CMC. This

e mission

ws a CMC

ectives of a

services, in

Commission

FFM) to the

th the host

ngagement.

s of Mission

ntry (where

o the actual

ction of the

R) as basis

ther Services,n Rights and (EUROPOL,

AS will consultsolution of the

rking in crisis

U

5 s

7

s

,

a

d

g

e

s

n

C

a

n

n

e

t

.

n

e

l

e

s

,

d , t

e

s

D1.3 Review The CMC

on the CM

the Counc

CPCC to c

3) Operati

Depending

Military or

respectivel

The PSC t

planning a

augmenter

identifies t

recommen

The Counc

operation o

an Operat

Civilian Op

States and

Then, for t

that the C

tasking, th

(CONOPS

subsequen

brief statem

3) Fast tra

In order to

the above

establishm

122 Council of123 Lauffer an124 Ibid. 75-76125 Ibid. 77. 126 De Kerma

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

is presente

C depende

cil for appro

continue wit

on plannin

g on the co

r Civilian S

ly the MSO

tasks the d

and recruitm

rs to CPCC

the future m

ndation of E

cil then ado

objectives a

tion Headqu

peration Co

d invite third

the military

CMC is wel

he Civilian o

) and pres

ntly for the

ment of how

ack process

maintain a

described p

ment of a mi

f the Europeand Hamacher,6.

abon, “Crisis M

tary Synergie


d by the EE

ent on the n

oval. CMC

h the furthe

ng of the CS

omplexity o

Strategic O

s and CMO

director of C

ment of the

C for the c

military Ope

UMC.

opts a Deci

and mandat

uarter (OHQ

mmander (

d states whe

operation t

l translated

or Military O

sented to

Council, fo

w the Opera

s126

level of flex

process can

ssion or op

n Union, “Sug In Control, 74

Management P

es

the European Union

EAS to the P

ature of the

is approve

er operation

SDP missio

of the crisis

Options (M

Os and advic

CPCC and

Head of M

conduct of

erational He

sion establ

te are set ou

Q) for the

CivOpsCdr

en applicab

the EUMS d

d into milita

Operations

the PSC w

or approval

ation Comm

xibility and

n be circum

peration incl

ggestions for c4- 75.

Procedures”, 4

PU


PSC. The P

e proposed

ed by the P

nal planning

on or oper

s the EUMS

MSO/ CSO)

ce PSC acc

Civilian Op

Mission and

the new m

eadquarters

ishing the

ut, Operatio

military ope

r) start the F

le.124

develops on

ary guidanc

Command

who receiv

.125 Then th

mander plan

to enable a

mvented. Th

ludes the ap

crisis managem

47.


PSC asks C

operation.

PSC giving

.122

ration and d

S or the C

). The EU

cordingly.123

perations C

his/her cor

mission. If t

s and future

mission/ope

on Comman

eration is d

Force Gene

n Initiating

ce and dire

der prepare

e advice f

hey prepare

s to fulfill hi

a rapid deplo

he minimum

pproval of t

ment procedur

n programme under g

IVCOM and

The CMC i

basis for t

decision to

CMPD may

UMC and C3

ommander

re team and

the mission

e Operation

eration. At t

nder (OpCd

designated.

eration proc

Military Dire

ction. Base

s a draft C

from EUMC

e their resp

s/her missio

oyment of a

m decision-m

he CMC, de

res”

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

d the EUMS

is finalized

the EUMS

o launch

be asked

CIVCOM w

r to initiate

d to consid

n is military

n Command

this point th

r) becomes

Both the O

cess involvin

ective (MID

ed on CMC

Concept of

C and CIV

pective the

on.

a mission o

making proc

eveloping t


653371

48

S for advice

and sent to

and/or the

to develop

will assess

operational

er possible

y, the PSC

der, on the

he mission/

s active and

OpCdr and

ng Member

D) to ensure

C and PSC

Operations

VCOM, and

OPLAN, a

r operation,

cess for the

he IMD (for

U

5 s

8

e

o

e

p

s

l

e

C

e

/

d

d

r

e

C

s

d

a

,

e

r

D1.3 Review a military o

and the ap

4) Deploym

Under the

strategic d

about the

command

Mission an

operation

Command

5) Strateg

operations

When a g

conducted

mandate, o

the HR pro

PSC agree

refocus th

needed at

6) Transiti

Transition

engageme

and at the

There is n

However, a

a mission,

defining th

127 Ibid. and L128 Ibid. 129 Eva G

http://www.is

130 Council of

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

operation),

pproval of th

ment of the

responsib

direction of

measures

and control

nd the Forc

in the thea

and Contro

gic review

s128

iven CSDP

when the

or when the

oposes to th

es and forw

e EU actio

this stage.

ion and ex

of a CSDP

ent in a cou

beginning o

no universa

according to

included i

he transition

Lauffer and Ha

Gross, “Exit

s.europa.eu/p

f the Europea

tary Synergie


the adoptio

he OPLAN.

e CSDP mi

ility of the

the CSDP

it has take

l of the civil

ce Comma

atre in acc

ol (C2) is dis

of the CS

P action nee

strategic c

e mandate i

he PSC a se

wards the m

on, includin

it strategy

mission/op

ntry, ending

of the activa

l transition

o Gross (20

nto CMC.13

n requires t

amacher, In C

strategies:

publications/de

n Union, “Sug

es

the European Union

on of the C

ssion or op

Council an

P mission/ o

n or envisa

ian mission

ander exerc

ordance w

scussed fur

SDP missi

eds to be r

context of

s nearing th

et of measu

measures to

g possible

peration can

g a single E

ation phase

strategy th

014), transit30 This cou

he setting o

Control, 75 – 7

What’s in

etail/article/exi

ggestions for c

PU


Council deci

peration127

nd of the H

operation. T

ages. The C

n and of the

cise comma

ith establis

rther in this

ion or ope

refocused, a

the mission

he end. In th

ures aimed

o the Coun

terminatio

n be unders

EU mission

e of other ins

hat could b

tion strateg

ld enhance

of achievab

76.

a name?

it-strategies-w

crisis managem


ision that e

HR the PSC

The Comm

CivOpsCdr

e military op

and and co

shed comm

chapter.

eration –

a strategic

n/operation

he light of th

at refocusin

cil. The Co

n, or decid

stood in sev

or the pha

struments. 1

e applied t

y should be

e the efficie

ble objective

?” Brief ISS

whats-in-a-nam

ment procedur

n programme under g

stablishes t

C exercises

mission kee

and the m

eration resp

ontrol of th

and and c

refocusing

review can

changes,

he findings

ng or finishi

ouncil decid

des to laun

veral ways:

se between129

o all CSDP

e provided a

ency of the

es formulat

SUE, No.

me/, . (Accesse

res”

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

the mission

s political c

ps the PSC

ilitary OpC

pectively. T

e mission

control princ

g and/or te

n be trigger

half way t

of the strat

ing the EU

des, as app

nch any fur

as an end

n the end o

P missions/

already whe

mission/op

ting realistic

23, Vol. 1

ed 1 October


653371

49

n/operation,

control and

C informed

dr exercise

The Head of

and of the

ciples. The

ermination

red. This is

hrough the

egic review

action. The

propriate, to

rther action

of the EU’s

of a mission

/operations.

en planning

peration, as

c mandates

18 (2014):1,

2015).

U

5 s

9

,

d

d

e

f

e

e

n

s

e

w

e

o

n

s

n

.

g

s

s

,

D1.3 Review and ensur

take over.

between c

would also

Defining th

for two rea

adjust to c

involved in

ground, e.

will cooper

mission.132

Thereby, a

need to co

security de

developme

Commissio

advance a

and can’t b

Another c

mission/op

ATALANTA

tentatively

takes a gr

create a sa

withdrawal

difficult situ

political re

Security S

Herzegovin

131 Interview 132 Gross, “Ex133 Gross, “Ex

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

ing a degre

In addition

civilian and

o be possibl

he transition

asons: 1) th

changes in

n the plann

g. Commis

rate and the2

a transition

ooperate pa

evelopment

ent instrume

on instrume

and, therefo

be generaliz

hallenge re

peration doe

A has bee

prepared. T

reat deal of

afe and sec

l and hand

uations are

easons. Thi

Sector Refo

na (BiH). A

with a EDA Oxit strategies: xit strategies:

tary Synergie


ee of flexibi

, defining th

military fun

e, if approp

n strategy a

he timeline

its operatio

ing process

ssion instrum

e question i

n benefits f

artly derive

t nexus, the

ents. The c

ents and in

re, the civil

zed or form

elated to th

es not have

n prolonge

This is main

f time for th

cure environ

over of the

e when the

s is espec

orm (SSR)

Also, in the

Official 14 Augu

What’s in a nWhat’s in a n

es

the European Union

ility when it

he transition

nctions, as

priate.131

at the plann

of a missio

onal enviro

s. There ca

ments and

s to what e

from enhan

s from the

ereby unde

cooperation

nternational

- military co

ulized.133

he appropr

e an end sta

ed several

nly because

he missions

nment (SAS

e SASE to

operation c

ially the ca

type of a

2012 closu

ust 2015; Interame?,” 2. ame?”1.

PU


t comes to

n or exit str

transitionin

ning phase

on, in terms

nment, and

an be numb

EU delega

extent they s

nced coope

EU’s CFS

erstanding t

n and coord

l organisati

ooperation/c

riate transit

ate defined

times, but

e crises tend

s and opera

SE). It is diff

other orga

cannot be s

ase when t

activities, su

ure of EUP

rview with a E


planning ti

rategy could

ng from mili

remains a

s of its exp

d 2) the ran

ber of long

ation, with w

should be e

eration betw

P to streng

the interlink

dination bet

ions, is, ho

coordination

tion or exit

. For instan

the exit s

d to be incre

ations to fu

ficult to ass

nizations o

seized beca

the operatio

uch as ope

PM Bosnia,

EEAS Official 2

n programme under g

melines so

d also help

itary to civi

challenge

pected man

nge of EU

- term EU

whom a CS

employed du

ween civilia

gthen susta

k between t

ween the C

owever, ofte

n takes plac

t of a miss

nce, the ma

trategy has

easingly co

lfil their ma

ess when t

r the local

ause of, for

on or miss

eration ALT

the EU’s l

2 October 201

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

o that other

to enhance

lian CSDP

for CSDP,

date and a

actors that

actors alre

SDP missio

uring the pl

an-military a

ainable pea

the EU’s s

CSDP, othe

ten difficult

ce on an ad

sion is tha

ndate of th

s, neverthe

omplex by n

andate, for

he situation

authorities

r example,

ion is inter

THEA in B

longest run

5.


653371

50

actors can

e synergies

operations

particularly

any need to

t should be

ady on the

n/operation

anning of a

actors. The

ace through

ecurity and

er EEAS or

to plan in

d hoc basis

t often the

e operation

eless, been

ature and it

instance to

n allows the

. The most

security or

rlinked with

Bosnia and

ning police

U

5 s

0

n

s

s

y

o

e

e

n

a

e

h

d

r

n

s

e

n

n

t

o

e

t

r

h

d

e

D1.3 Review mission, a

handing ov

A third ele

of resourc

internation

Republic.13

partners th

military op

operations

the EU mi

Other pote

have stron

Conclusio

Although,

mission/op

early stage

this, the

cooperatio

As outline

straightforw

between th

way can b

military int

adequate

often play

sustainabil

‘absorption

exemplified

building m

134 Ibid. 3-4 . 135 Ibid 2. 136 Ibid. 1. 137 Interview 138 Interview

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

after nearly

ver tasks to

ment to tra

ces and e

al actors, 35 Handing

hen eventua

erations, in

s carried ou

ssions in B

ential hando

g presence

on

both civilian

peration, the

es of a pre

next phase

on is conduc

ed above,

ward proce

he Member

ecome the

ervention is

situational

ys a critica

lity of miss

n capacity’

d that the

mission. A r

with a OPCENwith a EEAS O

tary Synergie


a decade

other actor

nsition/exit

conomic p

utilizing on

over often m

ally taking o

cluding Arte

ut by the UN

BiH were ta

over partne

e in the host

n and milita

e examples

vention pha

es are con

cted on an a

despite

ess. Often,

States. Bu

focal point

s used to re

awareness

l role in th

sion object

on the pa

security a

rapidly cha

N Official, 10 SOfficial 2 Octo

es

the European Union

of operatio

rs.134

CSDP miss

pressure en

e another’s

means that

over or abso

emis and E

N. In additio

ken over fr

ers include

t country of

ary function

s have show

ase up to t

nducted in

ad hoc basi

the burea

the delays

ut due to the

of negotiat

espond to a

or conflict

he success

tives also

art of a hos

nd political

anged secu

September 20ober 2015.

PU


on, illustrat

sions is han

ncourages

s competen

the CSDP

orbing CSD

EUFOR RD

on, handov

rom the UN

the African

a mission/o

ns of EEAS

wn that in

he point wh

separate

s.137

ucracy, in

in decision

e large num

tions. In par

a conflict is

t analysis.13

s of a mis

depend on

st state. F

l conditions

rity situatio

015.


ted the intr

nding it ove

the EU to

nces, such

contribution

P activities

Congo, wh

vers have a

N in the firs

n Union (AU

operation.

S are involv

reality, civ-

hen the CM

civil and

principle,

n- making a

mber of acto

rticular, the

s highly poli38 This is

ssion. As G

n the over

or example

s were not

on and the

n programme under g

ricacies of

er to partner

o cooperat

as the ca

n acts in a ‘

. To date, th

hich contribu

lso worked

t instance,

U), or even

ved in the s

-mil cooper

MPD is prep

military sto

CSDP d

are based o

ors involved

decision o

tical and is

a clear lac

Gross argu

rall politica

e, the EUB

t adequate

battle betw

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

ending mi

r organisati

te closely

ase in Cen

‘bridging’ ca

his has hap

uted to pea

d the other

followed b

n member s

strategic pla

ration exists

paring the C

tovepipes a

decision-ma

on political

d, every ste

over whethe

s not always

ck, as confl

ues, the su

l framewor

BAM missio

for civilian

tween the t


653371

51

ssions and

ons. A lack

with other

tral African

apacity with

ppened with

ace-keeping

way round:

y NATO.136

states, who

anning of a

s merely at

CMC. After

and civ-mil

aking is a

constrains

p along the

er civilian or

s based on

ict analysis

uccess and

rk and the

on in Libya

n capacity-

two Libyan

U

5 s

d

k

r

n

h

h

g

: 6

o

a

t

r

l

a

s

e

r

n

s

d

e

a

-

n

D1.3 Review governmen

Planning o

the ground

military an

the ground

with all re

discussed

3.4.3 Com

As outlined

strategic d

the respon

command.

Several m

being pres

proactive

missions p

the implem

have the s

there is no

on the field

139 Interview 140Galia Glumand OperatioRepublic of Afrom the politprocedures aactivities of Hexecution of

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

nts quickly s

of a CSDP m

d. The plann

d civilian, C

d. Joint plan

elevant EU

in chapter 5

mmand an

d above in

direction of

nsibility of th

ilitary opera

sent and ha

e training o

perform exe

mentation of

same C2 str

o clear and

d.

of a Former E

me, “Chain of cons, eds. JochAustria, 2015),tical to the straand feedback. Heads of Misstheir respectiv

tary Synergie


showed tha

mission/ope

ning should

Commission

nning can he

and non-

5.

nd Contro

this chapt

both civilia

he Council

ations have

ving a dete

of local offi

cutive tasks

f missions

ructure. Th

functioning

EUBAM Libya command – cen Rehrl and , 32. The chaiategic, operatiIn particular,

ion/Military Cove mandates.

es

the European Union

at the conflic

eration is als

exploit all t

n instrumen

elp ensure c

EU actors

ol (C2)

er, Membe

n and milita

and of the

e a mandat

errent functio

cers throug

s including

and operat

is is the cas

g C2 structu

Official 11 Seommand and Galia Glume, in of commanional and tacticommand an

ommanders in

PU


ct analyses

so a crucial

the expertis

nts, Specia

consistency

s from the

er States in

ary crisis m

High Repr

te to a saf

on. Some p

gh monitori

riot control

ions vary g

se, despite

ure140 betwe

ptember 2015control for CS(Vienna: The

nd is the strucical levels, andnd control (C2n the direction


were not ca

element fo

se the EU h

l Represen

y with overa

start. The

the PSC e

managemen

resentative.

fe and secu

police and r

ing, mentor

capabilities

greatly, and

the establi

een civilian

5. SDP engagem

Federal Miniscture through wd through whic2) structures dand coordinat

n programme under g

arried out p

r the efficie

as at its dis

tatives and

all EU objec

issue of c

exercise the

nt missions

They are o

ure environ

rule- of law

ring and ad

s. As a resu

the operat

shment of

missions a

ment,” in Handbstry of Defencewhich commach control is edefine the authtion of person

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

properly.139

ency of the a

sposal, inclu

d the EU de

ctives and c

coordination

e political c

and operat

on top of th

nment, throu

missions fo

dvising. So

ult of these d

tion does n

CMPD, as

and military

book on CSDPce and Sports nd instruction

exercised by shority, responsnel/forces and


653371

52

activities on

uding those

elegates on

coordination

n is further

control and

tions under

he chain of

ugh merely

ocus on the

ome civilian

differences,

ot naturally

until today,

operations

P Missions of the s flow down pecified sibilities and d in the

U

5 s

2

n

e

n

n

r

d

r

f

y

e

n

,

y

,

s

D1.3 Review The Figure

CSDP mis

Figure 4. C

Permanen

operationa

ensures th

with the E

civilian mis

Civilian Op

Force Com

the OHQ a

commandi

area due t

Brussels, o

Force Com

However, t

Military op

that can be

141 Ibid. 142 More infor143 Stabilisati(2014), 9. 144 Hanssen,

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

e 4.141 exe

sions and o

Civilian and M

t Operatio

al planning a

he mission

EEAS mana

ssions, and

peration Co

mmander is

and has the

ng power o

to changes

or they are

mmander a

this autonom

perations d

e used to c

rmation abouton Unit, Work

“Civil-Military

tary Synergie


mplifies the

operations.1

Military Com

ns Headqu

and initial o

reporting to

agement (an

d supervise

mmander in

the key ac

e main respo

over a num

security sit

so insignif

and Head

my also dep

o not have

command a

t the different Cking in Europe

Interaction in

es

the European Union

e Civilian a42

mmand and

uarters (OH

operational

o Member S

nd other sta

es the imple

n CPCC wo

tor for the m

onsibility fo

mber of tacti

tuations. Th

ficant that th

of Mission

pends on a

a permane

nd control C

C2 options caan Union Com

the European

PU


and military

Control opt

HQ) is pla

capability. C

States (and

akeholders

ementation

orks closely

military ope

or the day-to

ical decisio

hose decisi

hey do not

usually ge

case-by-ca

ent C2 func

CSDP oper

an be read at Gmmon Security

n Union”, 33- 3


Command

tions

aying a cr

CPCC has

d third cont

as approp

of politica

with the He

eration on th

o-day runnin

ons such as

ons that ca

require to

et consider

ase basis.144

ction, and,

ration (as o

Glume, “Chainy and Defence

36.

n programme under g

d and Contr

rucial role

a key role

ributing Sta

priate) for th

l and opera

ead of Missi

he ground.

ng of the op

s increasing

annot wait a

get OHQ a

rable auton4

therefore, t

utlined in th

n of commande Policy Missio

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

rol Options

for CSDP

in running O

ates) and c

he purpose

ational guid

ion on the g

He/she is in

peration. Th

g number o

approval fro

and Brusse

nomy on th

there are fo

he picture a

,” 32 - 34. ons- Deployee


653371

53

s applied in

P missions

OHQ and it

coordination

s of CSDP

dance. The

ground. 143

n charge of

his includes

of patrols in

om OHQ or

ls involved.

he ground.

our options

above). The

e Guide,

U

5 s

3

n

s

t

n

P

e

f

s

n

r

.

.

s

e

D1.3 Review military OH

identified t

cooperatio

counterpar

planning a

military fun

As explain

the comma

each has a

important

internation

generally n

There may

and a Unio

crucial ele

for CSDP.

would be p

there is a

the case in

and militar

structures

activities s

The level o

relationshi

There hav

mission/

counterpar

145 Panel of EUBAM Liby146Interview w147 Panel of EEUBAM Liby148 Jari MustoManagement1/2008, (200149Interview w150 Interview

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

HQ is chos

to limit milit

on/coordinat

rt for a civ

and inform

nctions.146

ed above, t

and and co

a single and

institutiona

al actors.

not only one

y be other s

on Delegati

ment for civ147 This me

present in t

functional o

n Bosnia for

ry – both ha

often result

uch as info

of cooperat

ps and on

ve been se

Force Co

rt.150 EUSR

Experts (Mini

ya Official 11 Swith a EUMC OExperts (Minisya Official 11 Sonen, “Coordint Instruments 8), 9. with a EEAS Owith a former

tary Synergie


sen by PSC

tary operati

tion, as t

vilian OHQ

mation shar

the EU has

ontrol of CS

d identifiabl

al aspect i

CSDP m

e foreign po

everal oper

on. Thus, C

vil- military

eans that e

the same re

overlap bet

r example, t

aving the fig

t in a lack o

rmation gat

tion betwee

the Head

everal exam

mmander

R, in this res

stry of Foreig

September 20Official 4 Sept

stry of Foreign September 20nation and Coin Bosnia and

Official, 2 OctoEEAS Official

es

the European Union

C decision.

ons’ efficien

the absenc

, exacerba

ring across

developed

SDP missio

e chain of c

s the coo

issions an

olicy instrum

rations, the

C2 has bee

cooperatio

even when

egion, they

tween miss

two CSDP o

ght against

of coordinat

thering, logi

n the CSDP

of Mission/

mples, whe

to coope

spect, act as

gn Affairs, EEA15. tember 2015 aAffairs, EEAS

15. ooperation on Herzegovina

ober 2015. l, 8 Septembe

PU


A lack of a

ncy.145 Add

ce of a

ates inter a

s the civili

several op

ns and ope

command.

ordination w

nd operatio

ment on the

presence o

en identified

on and coor

CSDP op

may occur

sions, the co

operations

t organised

tion of CSD

istical and m

P missions/

/ Force Co

ere there h

rate and

s an import

AS Official an

and Interview S Official and a

Tactical and O”, CMC Finlan

er 2015; Interv


a permane

ditionally, it

military

alia joint

an and

tions for

erations,

Another

with EU

ons are

ground.

of EUSR

to be a

rdination

erations

r simultaneo

oordination

are deploye

crime in th

DP activities

medical sup

/operations

mmander’s

as been re

coordinate

ant coordin

nd a former O

with a EEAS oa former OPC

Operational Lend Civilian Cris

view with a form

n programme under g

nt military C

is a clear b

ously under

is of utmo

ed alongside

heir mandat

in the regio

pports is har

is often de

willingness

eluctance f

e with his

ation agent

OPCEN Officia

official 13 AugCEN Official); I

evels- Studyinsis Manageme

mer EUMC off

●

“There was

competition

military com

commande

resources, t

money and

re

(Interview, F

Somalia 1

●

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

C2 function

barrier to c

r parallel co

ost importan

e one anoth

tes.148 Thes

on, and ove

rd to avoid.

ependable o

s to comm

from Head

s/her Civi

t.

al); Interview

gust 2015. nterview with

ng EU- ESDP Cent Studies Vo

fficial 4 Septem

● ●

s a power stru

n between the

mponents. The

er sits on the m

the civilian sid

the politic pow

real efforts.”

Former Office

10 September

● ●


653371

54

n has been

ivil- military

ommand. If

nce. This is

her – police

se separate

erlapping in

on personal

unicate 149.

of Civilian

lian/Military

with a former

a former

Crisis ol. 1, No.

mber 2015.

uggle or

civil and

e military

materiel

de on the

wer. Not

r, EUTM

r 2015)

U

5 s

4

n

y

f

s

e

e

n

l

.

n

y

r

D1.3 Review To increas

officers an

integrated

examples f

only increa

population

duplication

internation

unifying of

3.4.4 Info

Information

coordinatio

(Learned)

military coo

The report

of the res

predomina

comprehen

An exchan

at all level

(between

the excha

However,

and Comm

civilian mis

also increa

151Interview w152 Interview 153 Email inte

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

se the inter

nd former st

command

from the UN

ase the effi

on why th

ns of action

al actors.15

civilian and

ormation

n sharing a

on. The co

seminars.

operation a

ting seems

spective fu

antly excell

nsive appro

nge of inform

s. There ar

Brussels se

nge of info

currently at

mission sta

ssions, oper

ase civil-mil

with a Former of a Former E

erview of a For

tary Synergie


roperability

taff membe

structures f

N Integrated

iciency, but

he EU is pr

ns and the51 However

d military C2

sharing a

and reportin

ordinative a

Moreover,

and coordin

to have, in

nctionalities

lent, also

oach on CSD

mation is the

re plenty of

ervices) an

ormation on

t the strate

keholders,

ration/missi

itary synerg

UN Official, 1

EEAS Official, rmer EEAS Of

es

the European Union

and efficie

ers of CSDP

for the miss

d missions

t also help

resent in th

sending o

r, especiall

2 structures

and report

ng are tools

activities ar

Force Com

ation in the

many case

s need to

giving a

DP civil-mil

e main stra

f different w

d operation

n the need

gic level, th

as well as

ion comman

gies. 153

3 August 2018 September fficial, 8 Septe

PU


ncy of CSD

P operation

sions and o

have shown

to form the

he region.

of mixed-m

ly due to

s in CSDP is

ting

s to enhan

re usually

mmanders

eir respectiv

es, also ves

be endors

relative ob

itary functio

and of the ci

workshops,

nal (among

d bases be

here are inc

s those of

nders and h

5. 2015.

ember 2015.


DP mission

ns and miss

operations o

n that integ

e clarity am

Integrated

essages to

the politica

s hardly tak

nce EU CS

reported bi

and Head

ve weekly,

sted nationa

sed by EU

bjective situ

onalities.152.

ivil-military s

seminars, e

g operations

etween the

creasingly s

ECHO and

head of dele

n programme under g

s and oper

sions have

occurring in

rated comm

mong the ho

C2 structur

o the local

al and fina

king place in

DP civil-mil

-annually in

of Mission

monthly an

al or other in

UMS. Howe

uation awa

synergies. T

events, plat

s/missions)

stakeholde

such arrang

CSDP me

egations thr

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

rations, sev

welcomed

the same r

mand struct

ost nation a

res can he

population

ancial cons

n the new fu

litary coope

n EU CSD

ns are rep

nd six mont

nterests for

ever, the r

areness of

This should

tforms at th

level, whic

ers and in

gements w

eet with the

rough VTC,


653371

55

veral EEAS

the idea of

region. The

ures do not

and civilian

elp to avoid

and other

traints, the

uture.

eration and

DP Lessons

orting civil-

hly reports.

the benefit

reporting is

f the EU’s

d take place

he strategic

ch facilitate

terlocutors.

here EEAS

e heads of

, in order to

U

5 s

5

S

f

e

t

n

d

r

e

d

s

-

.

t

s

s

e

c

e

.

S

f

o

D1.3 Review

3.4.5 FIN

Figure 5. 1

CSDP civi

operations

Vertical

implies th

States are

participate

operations

all 28 Mem

participate

common

Horizontal

are severa

to finance

nature and

Civilian mi

CFSP bud

personnel

already inc

mission is

willingness

references

establishin

recommen

CSDP mis

CFSP. In

Framework

foresees €

154 Fabien Tfragmented a155 See also: and OperatioRepublic of A156 Thierry Ta

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

ANCE AN

154 display

ilian and m

s are fina

fragmen

hat EU Me

e not oblig

in

s. Historical

mber States

d in

CSDP mi

fragmentat

al mechanis

e an oper

d objectives

issions are

dget, with th

seconded

cluded into

s not subm

s to contr

s are inclu

ng the miss

ndations on

ssions are

the Comm

k 2014 -20

€2.0 billion

Terpan, “Finanand flexible str Uwe Harms a

ons, eds. JochAustria, 2015. ardy, “Funding

tary Synergie


ND PROCU

s how

military

anced.

ntation

ember

ged to

CSDP

ly, not

s have

one

ission.

tion means

sms in plac

ration, base

. 155

generally

he exceptio

by memb

the Union’s

mitted to th

ibute. Usu

ded in the

sion and are

expanding

only one

ission’s Mu

-“Heading

for the CF

ncing Commoructure,” Europand Yannik Se

hen Rehrl and

g peace opera

es

the European Union

UREMENT

that there

ce in order

ed on its

funded by

n of the sa

ber states.

s budget, a

e Member

ally, the f

e Council d

e revised fo

the mission

instrumen

ultiannual F

4: Global

FSP, which

on Security anpean Securityemerle, “FinanGalia Glume,

ations: Better v

PU


Figure 5

T

the EU

laries of

Being

a civilian

States’

financial

decision

following

n.156

nt under

Financial

Europe”

amounts a

nd Defence Py, Vol. 24, Issuncing of CFSP Vienna: Vien

value for EU M


. Financing

“Stronge

through a

between

financial r

regulation

between

relevant p

(

approximate

Policy operatioue 2, (2015). P Engagemen

nna: The Fede

Money”, Brief E

n programme under g

CSDP Miss

● ●

er cooperatio

better alignm

n military and

regulations. A

ns will not allo

CFSP and m

pooling and s

found

Interview of E2 October

● ●

ely 0.2 per

ons: explainin

nts”, In the Haral Ministry of

EUISSUE, Vo

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

sions and Op

●

on can be ach

ment and coh

d civilian mis

As long as fi

ow greater fl

military missi

sharing syner

d. “

EEAS Official r 2015)

●

r cent of th

ng change an

andbook on CSf Defence and

l 38, (2013): 2


653371

56

peration

hieved

herence

ssions’

inancial

lexibility

ions no

rgies be

he total EU

nd inertia in a

SDP Missionsd Sports of the

2.

U

5 s

6

U

a

s e

D1.3 Review budget. In

financial ba

The fundam

is probably

be finance

burden fal

member st

number of

infrastructu

mechanism

Until now,

EUFOR Al

Procurem

After a mis

requires a

security s

internation

military sta

case-by-ca

buildings a

and ask fo

problem a

procureme

private com

complicate

office/com

with limited

the mission

157 EuropeanEuropean Un158 Ibid. 159 EUISS, Y160 Interview

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

2012, €29

asis of the c

mental relu

y partly due

ed from Uni

lling to tho

tates pay th

f common

ure, medica

m. This me

the Athena

thea, EUFO

ent

ssion has be

great deal

ituation in

al personn

aff which no

ase basis b

and equipm

or money in

nd in many

ent standard

mpanies an

ed procurem

pound for t

d resources

n mandate

n Commissionnion, 2013).

Yearbook of Euwith a Former

tary Synergie


90 million w

civilian miss

ctance of th

e to the fun

on budget.

ose countri

he costs of

costs (10

al services

chanism is

a mechanism

OR DRC, E

een launch

of procure

the host c

nel, has be

ormally com

y the respo

ent, mission

n the contex

y missions

ds. The bu

nd local sta

ment proce

he mission

s and a cha

during the f

n, Multiannual

uropean Securr EUBAM Liby

es

the European Union

were alloca

sions is limi

he member

ding metho

Defence co

es participa

f their own

- 15% of

, HQ expe

separate fr

m has only

UFOR Tcha

ed, a great

ement proce

country, co

een a cont

me with thei

onsible EEA

n staff and

xt of a prev

in theatre,

uilding of a

aff and lots

ess.160 For

staff when

allenging se

first months

financial fram

rity 2013, 276 ya Official 11 S

PU


ated to fina

ted.157

r states to b

od. Military

ontributions

ating in th

operationa

the total c

enses, can

rom the EU

been used

ad/RCA & E

challenge

edures. For

ombined w

inuous hind

ir own equi

AS bodies a

the officials

viously agre

it is difficu

dequate fa

s of time a

example,

n the missio

ecurity situa

s.

mework 2014 –

– 277. September 20


nce the civ

become invo

operations

s are paid b

e operation

l contributio

cost of the

be finance

budget and

for five Eu

EUTM Soma

is to establi

r a number

with a lack

drance to

pment, civi

and the Me

s in the CPC

eed upon b

ult to acqui

acilities on

and money

in Libya, t

on began. T

ation preve

– 2020 and E

15.

n programme under g

vilian CSDP

olved in CS

and defenc

by Member

n in quest

on to a CS

e operation

ed via the

d is under th

ropean Uni

alia/Mali.159

ish a missio

r of CSDP

of adequa

effective im

lian staff m

mber States

CC have to

udget. Ove

re resource

the ground

is wasted

here were

The building

nted the m

EU Budget 20

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

P missions.

SDP military

ce implicati

r States, wit

ion. The p

DP operati

n), such as

so called

he authority

on military 9

on on the g

missions, a

ate equipm

mplementat

must be equ

s. For all th

go to the C

erall finance

es following

d require th

due to the

no proper

g of adequa

mission staff

014- The Figur


653371

57

. Thus, the

y operations

ons cannot

th the main

participating

on. Limited

s transport,

‘ATHENA’

y of PSC.158

operations:

round. This

an unstable

ment of the

tion. Unlike

uipped on a

he material,

Commission

es remain a

g European

he hiring of

e slow and

rly secured

ate facilities

f in fulfilling

res, (Belgium:

U

5 s

7

e

s

t

n

g

d

,

’

:

s

e

e

e

a

,

n

a

n

f

d

d

s

g

:

D1.3 Review Procureme

military fun

military mis

shortage o

civilian and

proportion

those mem

political or

vehicles, b

3.4.5 Tra

Training a

missions a

are the sin

become a

importance

personnel.

and operat

Figure 6. P

161 Ibid. 162 For examfrom Ministry163 Jochen RPolicy of the Austria, 2014

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

ents, logisti

nctions in th

ssions/oper

of resources

d military ca

of jointly fu

mber states

r other reas

between civ

ining

and recruitm

and operatio

gle most im

key enable

e, there is s

The Figur

tions.

hases for T

mple Panel of y of Interior) 28Rehrl, “TraininEuropean Un

4), 72.

tary Synergie


cs and eq

heatre could

rations is a

s raises a ne

apabilities, t

unded expe

that are in

sons. They

ilian and mi

ment are p

ons.162 Due

mportant, mi

er in deliveri

still no gene

re 6. 163 dis

raining and

Experts (Offic8 August 2015ng and Recruinion, ed. Joch

es

the European Union

uipping are

d be enhanc

major barr

eed to henc

thus enhanc

enditure for

favour of de

would also

ilitary missio

erceived to

to the task

ission-critica

ing effective

eral framew

splays the p

Recruitmen

cial from Minis5, Interview witment” in Hanen Rehrl, (Vie

PU


e areas wh

ced. A divid

rier to furthe

ce efforts to

cing the im

CSDP milit

eployment,

ease pooli

ons.161

o be crucia

ks of the CS

al capability

e and efficie

work regula

phases for

nt of CSDP

stry of Defencth a Former Undbook for deenna: The Fed


here further

ded funding

er integratio

owards crea

pact on the

tary operati

but cannot

ing equipm

al elements

SDP civilian

y and civilia

ent civilian

ting recruitm

training and

Missions an

ce, Official fromUN Official 13 Aecision makerderal Ministry o

n programme under g

r synergies

mechanism

on of these

ating further

ground. Co

ons would

t become in

ent, namely

s for the ef

n missions,

n crisis man

missions. D

ment or tra

d recruitme

nd Operation

m Ministry of August 2015. rs - The commof Defence an

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

between c

m between

functions. H

r coordinatio

onsequently

be to the b

nvolved them

y accommo

ffectiveness

the human

nagement t

Despite the

aining of CS

ent for CSD

ns

Foreign Affair

mon Security nd Sports of th


653371

58

civilian and

civilian and

However, a

on between

y, a greater

enefit of all

mselves for

odation and

s of CSDP

n resources

training has

recognized

SDP civilian

DP missions

rs and Official

and Defencehe Republic of

U

5 s

8

d

d

a

n

r

l

r

d

P

s

s

d

n

s

l

e f

D1.3 Review Given the

success of

CSDP mis

quality of t

personnel,

training na

training an

approach.1

The most

Training c

operation f

compleme

different tra

are met, a

EU is curre

Currently,

organized

consortium

most rec

organized

Civilian C

European

established

increasingl

strategic-

related ma

developed

of relevant

164 Ibid. 72 - 8165 Council of166 Rehrl, “Tr167“Europeaneeas.europa.168 Schoolmarelevant to thinstitutions ohttp://eeas.eu

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

vital role o

f CSDP ope

ssions is he

the trainings

and some

ational and

nd its effo164

extensive C

concept in

framework,

nt Member

aining prov

and to enha

ently develo

civilian c

by individ

m of differen

cognized t

by Europ

Crisis Mana

Security

d in 2005,

ly importa

level train

atters to M

online- por

t training co

80. f the Europeaaining and Re

n Security and.eu/csdp/strucaster is an onhe European Ur by the EU ituropa.eu/csdp

tary Synergie


of civilian s

erations. Th

eld by the M

s. Some of

e of the me

d internatio

rts to tack

CSDP relat

CSDP acc

training obj

r states’ tr

iders. Howe

ance CSDP

oping CSDP

crisis mana

dual Memb

nt training p

training pr

e’s New T

agement (E

and Defen

operating

ant, espe

ning and e

Member Sta

rtals to stre

ourses, such

n Union, “Drafecruitment,” 80d Defence Colctures-instrumn-line databasUnion's Commtself, all coursp/structures-in

es

the European Union

staff in the

he primary r

Member St

the membe

ember state

nal person

kle the cha

ed training

cepted in 2

jectives and

raining activ

ever, until t

related tra

P training po

agement t

ber states

providers. O

rograms a

Training In

ENTRi). In

nce College

as part of

cially in

education

ates.167 Th

ngthen the

h as School

ft EU Training0. lege (ESDC)”ents-agenciesse containing mon Security aes in Schoolmstruments-age

PU


CSDP mis

responsibili

tates, and t

er states do

es have es

nnel. The E

allenge thro

guidance i

2003/2004.

d requireme

vities and

today, not a

aining, the

olicy.166

training is

and in a

One of the

are those

nitiative for

n addition,

e (ESDC)

f EEAS, is

providing

on CSDP

e EU has

availability

lmaster.168.

g Concept in E

”, European Es/European-se information oand Defence

master are in encies/training


Table 7. E

ssion, spec

ty for trainin

there is inc

o not provid

stablished n

EU highligh

ough policy

is constitute165 Even

ents for ESD

create co

all the objec

ESDP”, 11970/

External Actionecurity-defencon all coursePolicy. Whethprinciple opengs/index_en.h

The E

implem

trainin

or

provid

ESDC

Colleg

CEPO

ENTR

for Civ

EUPS

Servic

EDA s

n programme under g

EU level trai

cialized train

ng personne

coherence a

de any train

national ins

hts the imp

y formulati

ed in EU Tr

though the

DC/CSDP t

oherence a

ctives set ou

/04, 30 Augus

n Service, accce-college/indes delivered thher delivered bn to participantm

EU training

mented by

ng providers

through

ders/project

(European S

ge)

OL (European

i (Europe's N

vilian Crisis M

T (European

ces Training)

supported tra

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

ning provid

ning is inte

el seconde

among the

ning for thei

stitutions de

portance of

on and a

raining Pol

e documen

training, wit

and synerg

ut in these

st 2004.

cessed 5 Septex_en.htm. hroughout theby Member S

nts from all Me

policy in

y Member

s on a natio

EU-level

ts:

Security and

n Police Colle

New Training

Management

n Union Polic

aining activitie


653371

59

ders

egral to the

d to civilian

scope and

r seconded

edicated to

f adequate

networked

icy and EU

nts set the

h an aim to

ies among

documents

tember, 2015,

e EU that areStates' trainingember States.

CSDP is

r States'

onal basis

training

d Defence

ege)

g Initiative

t)

ce

es

U

5 s

9

e

n

d

d

o

e

d

U

e

o

g

s

,

e g .

D1.3 Review The staff o

Alongside

comprehen

human righ

different c

mission/op

introductio

Although m

on a volun

and deploy

of mission

member st

common

enhance m

that missio

operationa

For CSDP

have recei

for civilian

are usually

officers pa

that are

procedures

more or le

training is

rapidly acc

actors, cro

operations

between c

Training is

actors. Ho

169 Interview a EUAM Offic170 Panel of E171 Panel of Ethe Interior) 2

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

of Civilian C

task spe

nsive crisis

hts, SSR an

civilian and

peration spo

n to the hos

member sta

ntary basis,

y both civilia

n induction

tate commi

foundation

mission effe

on personn

al environme

P military o

ived adequ

missions. T

y profession

articipate in

part of an

s and termi

ess the sam

also import

complish cr

oss- cutting

s. In additio

ivilian and m

s also a too

owever, ba

with a EEAS cial 26 AugustExperts (MinisExperts (Offici28 August 201

tary Synergie


CSDP missi

ecific quali

manageme

nd assistan

d military a

onsors indu

st country a

ates partici

, they are t

an and milit

training va

itments to p

of pre-d

ectiveness a

el have a s

ent.169

operations,

uate training

The person

nal from na

internation

n officer’s

nology acro

me.170 Nev

tant for the

risis manage

g issues an

on, training

military miss

ol to increas

ased on in

Official 2 Octot 2015.

stry of Foreign ial from Minist15.

es

the European Union

ons represe

ities, shou

ent in the E

ce strategie

actors on t

uction traini

and general

pate in tra

the ones th

tary person

aries as wi

pre-deploym

deployment

and coheren

solid under

ensuring

g is less co

nel deploye

ational defen

nal exercise

normal ca

oss the Mem

vertheless,

military to e

ement oper

nd EU stru

is also a

sions, both

se the coop

nterviews o

ober 2015, Int

Affairs, EEAStry of Defence

PU


ents a wide

uld the ex

EU foreign

es, knowled

the ground

ng for new

CSDP mat

aining progr

hat recruit,

nnel. The qu

dely as do

ment trainin

t training

nce by ensu

rstanding of

that perso

omplicated

ed to operat

nce forces.

es and train

areer. Proto

mber states

pre-deploym

ensure the c

rational nee

uctures is a

key effort

at politic- s

peration an

of CSDP m

terview with a

S Official and ae, Official from


e range of e

xperts hav

policy, cros

dge about h

d (EU and

w personnel

tters.

rams

train

uality

o the

ng. A

can

uring

f the

onnel

than

tions

The

nings

ocol,

s are

ment

coherence o

eds. Knowle

also import

to enhanc

trategic and

d coordinat

mission/ope

former UN O

a former OPCm Ministry of F

“In

m

c

de

the

of b

wo

def

fun

(In

n programme under g

experts with

ve sufficie

ss- cutting

ow to appro

non- EU)

, these trai

of multinatio

edge of oth

tant for tho

ce coopera

d operationa

tion betwee

eration pers

fficial 13 Augu

CEN Official) 2oreign Affairs

●

n the compre

ilitary is lack

competence

administratio

fence structu

e strategic ad

by soldiers in

ould, by hear

from own e

finitely a port

close coope

nctions coord

nterview with a

Somalia, 10

●

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

h differing b

nt underst

knowledge

opriately int

). While e

nings only

onal staff to

her civilian a

ose serving

ation and c

al levels.171

en civilian a

sonnel, the

ust 2015 and

27 August 201s & Officials fro

● ●

ehensive app

king the real s

to cope with

on issues wit

ure. In EUTM

dvising was t

nstead of civ

rt, know the

experience. T

rtion that wou

eration/ emb

dinated with t

side.”

a Former Offic

0 September 2

● ●


653371

60

background.

tanding of

of gender,

terface with

ach CSDP

provide an

o be able to

and military

g in CSDP

coordination

and military

ere are no

Interview with

5. om Ministry of

proach the

skills and

the civil

thin the

M Somalia

taken care

vilians who

business

This is

uld require

edded

the civilian

cer, EUTM

2015)

U

5 s

0

.

f

,

h

P

n

o

y

P

n

y

o

h

f

D1.3 Review mandatory

with other

insignifican

considerab

have not re

training in

and in- m

understand

Training an

functions

increase re

lower preju

internal co

seem to be

is not only

planners, m

of the civi

military ca

or 'cultural

One of the

MultiLayer

operationa

among Me

sorts of init

implement

be bolstere

172 Interview 173 Interview 174 Interview Sweden. 175 Interview 176 In Germancooperation bCentre (FINCComprehenscrisis manageFor more info

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

y training o

CSDP mis

nt as the iss

ble lack, es

eceived any

that field th

mission tra

ding of the o

nd exercise

could be s

esources ef

udices betw

ooperation a

e lots of mi

y about 'wh

military ope

lian missio

pabilities ca

awareness

e good cur

r -exercises

al level (Ope

ember state

tiatives are

a genuine

ed and even

with a EDA Owith a EEAS Owith a EUMC

with a EEAS Ony, there is a sbetween milita

CENT) and Crsive Crisis Manement both foormation, visit

tary Synergie


n civil- milit

ssions and

sue is not u

specially for

y training o

hroughout th

ainings also

other EU an

es are perce

searched. J

fficiency, bu

ween the ci

and coordin

sperception

ho does w

rations are

n. As the

an be share

s' needs to b

rrent practic

which are

eration Hea

es, where d

important,

ly compreh

n required.

Officer 14 Augu

Official 13 AugOfficial 4 Sep

Official, 13 Austructure calleary, police andisis Managemnagement whior national cris: http://www.fi

es

the European Union

tary cooper

operations

sually inclu

r the civilia

n liaising w

heir military

o undermin

nd internatio

eived to be a

Joint trainin

ut they also

vilian and m

nation within

ns and preju

what', but a

often seen

quote by a

ed, but in o

be raised am

ce to enha

held every

adquarters)

ifferent civi

as if the EU

hensive app

ust 2015. gust 2015.

ptember 2015;

ugust 2015 anded The Comprd civilian traini

ment Centre (Cch core tasks

sis managemencent.fi//html/e

PU


ration and

s deployed

uded in pre-

an missions

with military.

career.172

nes the o

onal actors

areas wher

ngs and ex

o facilitate m

military acto

n CSDP.174

udices amo

lso 'who ca

as a secur

a former C

order to avo

mong the c

nce civil-m

y two years

).175 In addi

lian and mi

U is to achie

proach to cr

An example o

d Interview wirehensive Natng institutions

CMC) Finland f are the devel

ent capacity buen/120643306


coordinatio

in the sam

-deploymen

s, as many

Military on

A lack of c

pportunity

on the grou

re synergies

xercises pr

mutual learn

ors, thereby4 This is of

ong the acto

an do wha

rity provider

SDP staff

oid wrong ex

civilian plann

ilitary coord

from politic

tion, there

ilitary exper

eve synergy

risis manag

of these joint e

th a former EUional Training

s. In Finland thform together lopment of civuilding and inte68715507526

n programme under g

n. Coopera

me region d

t or in-miss

civilian and

n the other h

oherence a

to system

und. 173

s between t

rior and in

ning, enhan

y creating c

utmost imp

ors. The ne

at and in w

and a supp

member be

xpectations

ners.

dination at

cal level (Hi

are a numb

rts are train

y in civil- mi

gement, the

exercises is V

UMC official 4Partner Platfo

he Finnish Intethe Finnish C

vil-military relaternational cris.html

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

ation and c

does not s

sion training

d humanita

hand, usua

among pre-d

matically en

the civilian a

n-mission d

nce underst

conditions f

portant, bec

eed for mutu

what way'.

port tool for

elow descr

s, a deeper

the missio

igh Repres

ber of good

ned togethe

ilitary coord

e joint traini

VIKING15 Trai

4 September 2orm to facilitaternational Forc

Centre of Expetions and coosis manageme


653371

61

coordination

seem to be

gs. This is a

arian actors

lly receives

deployment

nhance the

and military

o not only

anding and

for stronger

cause there

ual learning

For civilian

r the benefit

ibes, some

knowledge

n level are

entative) to

d examples

er.176 These

dination and

ngs should

ning in

2015. te ces Training

ertise in rdination in ent missions.

U

5 s

n

e

a

s

s

t

e

y

y

d

r

e

g

n

t

e

e

e

o

s

e

d

d

D1.3 Review Training a

Nordic De

activities a

courses, th

efficient an

attempted

Although th

overall agr

understand

culture of

States, an

civilian and

need for e

cooperatio

on ensurin

177 Nordic Dinformation, v

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

nd exercise

efence Coo

among the

he participa

nd coheren

to set-up th

he EU train

reement tha

ding for civ

coordinatio

d in practic

d military st

enhanced M

on among E

g sufficient

Defence Coopvisit: http://ww

tary Synergie


es are also

peration (N

NORDEFC

ating nation

nt manner.

he courses

ing concep

at joint train

vil- military

on Yet the

ce, there is

taff. Even t

Member Sta

ESDC. Cons

, regular an

peration (NOR

ww.nordefco.or

es

the European Union

o where Po

NORDEFCO

O nations.

ns have be

This would

individually

t for CSDP

nings are on

operations

responsibil

no obligatio

hough sign

ates and EU

solidating a

nd systemat

RDEFCO) is rg/The-basics-

PU


ooling and

O) aims to

By dividing

een able to

d not have

.177

only briefly

ne of the m

and may b

ity for the

on for the M

nificant prog

U commitm

a comprehe

tic training.

an example -about-NORD


Sharing alr

coordinate

g the respo

reach an

e been pos

y mentions C

most importa

be a prime

training of

Member Sta

gress has b

ment to expa

nsive appro

of Pooling DEFCO

n programme under g

ready takes

and harm

onsibility for

internationa

ssible if the

CMCO, the

ant means

means to

staff still re

ates to con

een made

and the cap

oach to EU

and Sharing

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

s place. Fo

monize milita

r the differe

al top-level

e nations w

ere seems to

to develop

establish t

ests with th

nduct joint t

in the area

pacity of an

security is

of capabilitie


653371

62

or example,

ary training

ent types of

l in a cost-

would have

o be a wide

a common

the aspired

he Member

rainings for

a, there is a

nd improve

dependent

es. For more

U

5 s

2

,

g

f

-

e

e

n

d

r

r

a

e

t

e

D1.3 Review

3.4.6 Sta

Force gene

generation

EU does n

to rely ess

the headqu

via “calls fo

Shortfalls i

especially

number of

These forc

Battlegrou

context, du

The Head

during the

internation

Vacancies

can put fo

178 Rehrl, “Tr179 Slight imp180 Interview Ministry of Fo181 Interview 182 Rehrl, “Tr

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

ffing

eration for c

n process is

not have its

sentially on

uarters is c

or contribut

in personne

if shortfalls

f personnel

ce generatio

ps, the ma

ue to the lac

of Mission

e operation

al senior o

for individ

orward their

aining and Re

provement is owith a EUAM

oreign Affairs with a former aining and Re

tary Synergie


civilian and

s conducted

own stand

seconded p

alled “force

ions”.178

el have had

s are in key

that can b

on difficultie

in rapid res

ck of politica

n has a cen

al planning

officials an

ual posts a

r candidate

ecruitment,” 72on the sight, as

M Official 26 Aand Official froEUBAM Libya

ecruitment,” 75

es

the European Union

military CS

d well in ad

ing force to

personnel f

e manning”.

d a direct im

positions.

be deployed

es have im

sponse cap

al consensu

Recruitme

the civilian

missions is

the senior

decrease t

Head of M

own perso

and decisi

between H

the mission

ntral role in

g is to rec

d local sta

are circulate

es on a sec

2 - 80. s the EU adopugust 2015 anom Ministry ofa Official 11 S5.

PU


SDP initiative

dvance befo

o be deploy

from Memb

On the civ

mpact on th

In fact, the

d within the

mpacted on

pability, hav

us.180

nt for the c

n mission o

s impacted

leadership

the ability o

Mission/ For

onnel, and

on- makers

Head of Mis

n181.

the recruit

cruit his/he

aff182. They

ed to the m

conded bas

pted the new 'nd Panel of Ef Interior) 28 A

September 201


es is an ong

ore the ope

yed to CSDP

er States. T

vilian side, t

he Missions

success of

e first three

the EU’s ra

ve so far n

civilian miss

on the grou

by the qua

. A mission

of the missio

rce Comma

with host g

s in Brusse

ssion and B

tment proce

r staff mem

y are all re

member sta

sis. Second

Rapid ResponExperts (OfficiaAugust 2015.15.

n programme under g

going challe

eration/ mis

P missions/

The process

he force ge

s’ ability to

f a mission

e to six mo

apid respon

ot been tes

sions is do

und. In the

ality of their

led by inef

on to implem

ander of mis

government

ls. In partic

russels play

ess, and his

mbers, incl

ecruited on

tes (Call fo

ded staff in

nse Concept' ial from Ministr

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

enge. Ideall

ssion is laun

/operations

s of filling t

eneration is

deliver thei

often depe

onths after t

nse capabil

sted in an

one by the

field, the

r personnel

ffectual per

ment its ma

ssions inter

ts, other st

cular, the re

y an import

s most imp

luding the

n an individ

or Contribut

n the missio

in 2015. ry of Defence


653371

63

y, the force

nched. The

and needs

the posts in

s conducted

ir mandate,

ends on the

the launch.

lities.179 EU

operational

CPCC and

success of

, especially

rsonnel can

andate. The

ract with its

takeholders

elationships

tant role for

portant task

contracted

dual basis.

tion), which

ons remain

e, Official from

U

5 s

3

e

e

s

n

d

,

e

.

U

l

d

f

y

n

e

s

s

s

r

k

d

.

h

n

m

D1.3 Review under the

with nation

Operationa

Response

staff are re

Skilled per

On a daily

EEAS staf

technical i

knowledge

An ongoing

several rea

through the

have estab

Additionall

personnel

an interna

considerat

Another c

mainstream

ensure ge

personnel

CSDP mis

nationally

between fe

For the CS

generation

personnel

has been

percent of

183 This mean184 Civilian Rused in seve185 Interview 186 Interview

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

command

nal rules, o

al Control (

Teams (CR

equired at s

rsonnel are

y basis, a m

ff, permane

issues, as

eable and d

g challenge

asons for th

eir national

blished an

y, unlike m

are employ

ational mis

ions might

ontributor o

m UNSCR

ender balan

are female

ssions is p

segregated

emale and m

SDP Military

n are differe

for military

a third the

NATO forc

ns that the Me

Response Tearal cases, the with a Formerwith a EEAS O

tary Synergie


of the natio

or the EU

OPCON) o

RTs) also h

hort notice.

needed in

mission inte

ent and sec

he/she is

riven can he

e for civilian

his difficulty

authorities

institution t

military pers

yed in full-tim

ssion. Ther

play a role

on the hum

1325 to CS

nce among

e and 25% o

partly based

d, such as t

male officer

y Operation

nt from the

y operations

eatre of Eu

ces. Additio

ember States hm (CRT) of mlatest exampl

r EUBAM LibyOfficial, 13 Au

es

the European Union

onal author

institution

of their pers

elp to deplo184

CSDP field

eracts with

conded. Th

the connec

e/she make

n missions i

y. The civilia

s and the pr

hat manage

sonnel, who

me position

refore, reas

in deciding

man resou

SDP missio

g mission

of local staf

d on the c

the police a

rs is even gr

ns, recruitm

civilian one

s because

ropean mili

onally, capa

has the right tmultinational pele from Ukrainya Official 11 Sugust 2015.

PU


rities183 of t

concerned

sonnel, team

oy staff to m

d operation

CPCC. The

he desk ca

ction betwe

e major con

is the difficu

an personn

rocess is of

es the recr

o can be d

ns at home,

sons such

upon joinin

rces is ge

ons and ope

personnel.

ff.186 This im

civilian crisi

and border

reater.

ment is not a

es. In recen

they were

itary deploy

ability gaps

to demand theersonnel able

ne. September 20


he secondi

d or the E

ms and uni

missions in

s and CSD

ere is a “de

an have a

een the mis

tributions o

ulty in recru

nel need to

ften complic

ruitment pro

deployed a

and they c

as secur

ng a mission

ender balan

erations. On

Today, a

mbalance b

is managem

guard. In m

as complica

t years, Me

overstretch

yment, whe

in Membe

eir seconded s to be deploye

15.

n programme under g

ng Membe

EAS. Thos

ts to the H

the early st

DP officials w

esk” for eac

significant

ssion and

n the missio

uiting qualifi

apply for p

cated. Only

ocess for al

abroad with

annot be or

rity concer

n or not.

nce. The E

ne aspect o

pproximate

between ma

ment focus

military oper

ated, and th

mber State

hed in Iraq,

ere EU cou

r States’ na

staff to repatriaed with five da

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

er State in a

se authoriti

ead of Mis

tages, or w

who work i

ch mission,

role for the

EEAS. If t

on’s daily lif

ied experts

positions as

y a few mem

ll the CSDP

h short not

rdered to pa

rns, family

EU has co

of mainstre

ly 21% of

ale and fem

s areas tha

rations, the

he challenge

es have prov

, Afghanista

untries acco

ational defe

ate early. ays- notice. C


653371

64

accordance

es transfer

sion. Crisis

hen certain

n Brussels.

containing

e missions’

he desk is

fe. 185

. There are

individuals

mber states

P missions.

ice, civilian

articipate in

or career

mmitted to

aming is to

f seconded

male staff in

at are also

e imbalance

es in Force

vided fewer

an. Kosovo

ount for 80

ence forces

CRT has been

U

5 s

4

e

r

s

n

.

g

’

s

e

s

s

.

n

n

r

o

o

d

n

o

e

e

r

o

0

s

n

D1.3 Review impact on

simple, sin

Member S

formally ex

colloquial t

Two distin

resources

Military tro

Headquart

Command

ensuring th

objectives.

Similar to

(Transfer o

teams and

Although t

officials an

operationa

For examp

CMPD res

resource s

cooperatio

In interview

impact on

when a mi

other stake

the depth o

187 Rehrl, “Tr188Ibid. 189 Panel of E190European CSDP operatCentral Med(Accessed 5

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

their willing

nce the ope

States will c

xpressed i

terms the ‘s

nct but ins

for CSDP m

oops or fo

ters (C2 ele

d and con

hat the nec

.

civilian mi

of Authority

units to the

the concep

nd missions

al level. In B

ple, in CPC

sponsible fo

situation is

on between

ws and pan

civil- milita

ssion/opera

eholders in

of interactio

aining and Re

Experts (EEASUnion Militarytion to disrupt

diterranean”, September 20

tary Synergie


ness to con

erations are

contribute r

n a docum

shopping lis

eparable e

military oper

rces: to im

ements)

ntrol elem

essary corr

issions, in

y) in accord

e Force Com

pt paper on

, implemen

Brussels, a

CC, there ar

or developin

s a bit bet

the civilian

nel discussio

ary coopera

ation’s politi

theatre190 a

on is still pe

ecruitment,” 77

S Official) 16 Jy Committee (

human smug12 May 201015).

es

the European Union

ntribute to th

e initiated a

esources (i

ment called

t’ for that sp

elements ar

rations: 188

plement the

ents: plan

rective mea

military op

dance with

mmander.

CMCO em

tation of a c

lack of com

re approxim

ng Civilian

tter, but th

and military

ons, the im

tion and co

ical guidanc

and it would

erson relate

7- 78.

June 2015. EUMC), “Militgling network5, http://www

PU


he CSDP o

and subseq

including h

the State

pecific oper

re taken in

e military ob

nning, issui

asures are i

perations, M

national re

mphasizes

comprehen

mprehensive

mately 75 pe

crisis mana

e lack of

y functions

portance of

oordination,

ce (CMC) in

d be further

ed. Almost n

tary Advice onks in the Southw.statewatch.o


perations. H

quently plan

uman reso

ment of Re

ration. 187

nto conside

bjectives de

ing directiv

mplemente

Member Sta

estrictions

the culture

sive approa

e planning i

erson work

agement ca

civilian hu

in CSDP.189

f personal r

both in Br

ncluded a n

translated

no practical

n the "Draft Crhern org/news/2015

n programme under g

However, re

nned on the

urces) to m

equirement

eration whe

etailed in th

ves, monito

d in line wit

ates transfe

and caveat

e of coordin

ach varies b

s partly a h

ing there a

apabilities.

man resou9

relationships

russels and

notion regar

into OPLAN

l guidelines

risis Managem

5/may/eu-milita

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

recruitment

e assumpti

meet the re

ts (SOR), o

en discuss

he operation

oring, evalu

th political a

er operatio

ts, of their

nation amo

both at a st

human reso

nd only one

In EUMS,

urces impa

s emphasiz

d on the gro

rding coord

N in a gene

s are availa

ment Concept

ary-refugee-pl


653371

65

is relatively

on that EU

quirements

or in more

ing human

n plans and

uating and

and military

onal control

personnel,

ong the EU

rategic and

ource issue.

e person is

the human

cts on the

zes a major

ound. Even

ination with

ral manner,

ble and the

for a possible

an-EUMC.pdf

U

5 s

5

y

U

s

e

n

d

d

y

l

,

U

d

.

s

n

e

r

n

h

,

e

e

f

D1.3 Review effectivene

different C

such, and

Thus, the

often depe

3.5 Civil-

When ass

cooperatio

synergies

forgotten.19

instrument

synergies

described

cooperatio

In this sec

barriers to

assessmen

operations

These ope

EU

EU

EU

The most

Southern C

191 Interview 192 Interview a Former OP193 The Lisbothe launch ofEleven of the194 “CSDP”, E195 Council ofMediterraneacontent/EN/T

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

ess of the

CSDP missi

the reportin

level of int

end on the H

- military

sessing the

on and coo

from EU 93 The fir

ts framing

between civ

in the prev

on and coord

ction, an ov

interopera

nt from pas

s exist simul

erations/m

FOR and E

TM Mali an

NAVFOR A

recent EU

Central Me

with a Formerwith a Former

PCEN Official)on Treaty camf the Europeanese operationsEuropean Extef the Europeaan,” Council DTXT/PDF/?uri=

tary Synergie


cooperatio

ions/operat

ng of intera

teraction be

Head of Mis

interactio

e impleme

ordination a

missions a

rst CSDP

the CSDP

vilian and m

vious sectio

dination bet

verview of

bility at the

st and ongo

ltaneously

issions are

EUPM in Bo

nd EUCAP S

Atalanta, EU

’s CSDP m

diterranean

r EEAS officiar EDA official , Interview wite into force inn Union Polices have been laernal Action Sn Union, “ Lau

Decisions (CFS=CELEX:3201

es

the European Union

n relies on

ions.191 CM

action activi

etween the

ssion/Force

on in thea

entation of

at the ope

and operati

mission wa

activities

military funct

on, there ar

tween civilia

the civil- m

operationa

ing CSDP m

e:

snia-Herze

Sahel Mali

UTM Somal

military oper

n (EUNAVF

l, 4 Septembe14 August 201h a EUAM Off December 20

e (EUPM) in Jaunched since

Service, accessunching the EuSP), 2015/ 9725D0972&from

PU


n the perso

MCO is not

ties on the

e EU missio

Commande

atre

a compre

erational lev

ions, CSDP

as launche

have evolv

tions in CS

re several i

an and milit

military coo

al level is p

missions an

govina

ia and EUC

ration – the

FOR MED,

er 2015. 15, Panel of Efficial 26 Augu009 and was aanuary 2003 t

e the entry intosed 18, Augusuropean Union2, http://eur-le

m=EN, (Access


onal qualitie

an objecti

ground is

ons and op

er willingne

ehensive a

vel, as we

P’s relative

ed in 2003

ved. Amon

DP have be

issues at th

tary sides c

peration an

provided. Th

nd operatio

CAP NESTO

e European

launched 2

Experts (Ministst 2015. a cornerstone the EU has ovo force of the Lst 2015, http://n military operx.europa.eu/lesed 26 Augus

n programme under g

es of (main

ve of a mis

not usually

perations an

ss to coope

approach t

ell as searc

ely short h

and since

ng others,

ecome incre

he political-

ould be stre

nd coordina

he review is

ns194, where

OR Horn of

n Union mi

22 June)195

try of Foreign A

in the developver 30 operatioLisbon. /eeas.europa.ration in the soegal-t 2015)

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

nly) the lea

ssion or op

required b

nd other st

erate/coordi

through civ

ching for c

history shou

e then, con

the need

easingly imp

- strategic l

engthened.

ation efforts

s mainly ba

re CSDP m

Africa

litary opera

is not cove

Affairs, EEAS

pment of the Cons as part of

.eu/csdp/indexouthern Centr


653371

66

adership in

peration as

y Brussels.

takeholders

inate.192

vil- military

civil-military

uld not be

ncepts and

to look for

portant. As

evel where

s and main

ased on the

issions and

ation in the

ered in this

S Official and

CSDP. Since CSDP.

x_en.htm ral

U

5 s

6

n

s

.

s

y

y

e

d

r

s

e

n

e

d

e

s

D1.3 Review report due

seems tha

comprehen

Also, the L

into accou

3.5.1 Ove

EU militar

The militar

2004 and

since. The

operation

deploymen

In the fram

compliance

a safe and

and capab

improving

September

Chapter V

(2014).

The main

To

To

To

European

196 Europeanhttp://eeas.euAugust 2015197Jannik Knaand Herzegobih/pdf/factsh198Tobias Fle2002 –

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

e to the lac

at EUNAV

nsive appro

Lessons an

nt during th

erview of

ry operatio

ry operation

has contrib

e launch of

and the a

nt of an EU

mework of O

e with the G

d secure en

bilities, und

security situ

r 2012, but

VII of the U

objectives

provide cap

support BiH

provided su

Union Pol

n Union Externuropa.eu/csdp). auer, “EUFOR

ovina”, EU Dipheet_eufor_altessenkemper

2012,

tary Synergie


ck of prope

VFOR MED

oach196 as

nd Best pra

e planning

the CDSP

n in Bosnia

n ALTHEA

buted to th

Operation

adoption by

force (EUF

Operation AL

General Fra

nvironment.

er the "Be

uation, Ope

t continues

N Charter,

s of Operati

pacity-build

H efforts to

upport to th

ice Missio

nal Action, “Eup/missions-and

R Althea: Appplomacy Papethea_en.pdf, (and Damien

(Co

es

the European Union

r “lessons

D is funda

it is planne

ctices from

process.

P mission

a and Herz

in Bosnia a

e maintena

ALTHEA fo

y the UN S

OR) in BiH

LTHEA, the

amework Ag

Operation

rlin Plus" a

eration ALTH

to act in a

as specifie

ion ALTHE

ing and trai

maintain th

e overall EU

n in Bosnia

uropean Uniond-operations/e

raisal and Futer Vol.7 (2011(Accessed 27 Helly ed., Ten

ondé-sur-Noire

PU


learned” m

amentally b

ed togethe

previous C

and oper

zegovina (O

and Herzeg

ance of the

ollowed the

Security C

.

e EU initially

greement fo

ALTHEA is

arrangemen

HEA has be

accordance

ed in the la

EA are:

ining to the

e safe and

U comprehe

a and Herz

n Naval Force eunavfor-med/

ture Perspect1), http://www.August 2015)n years after:eau: Inst


material and

better prep

r with FRO

CSDP miss

ration dep

Operation E

govina (BiH

e safe and

e decision b

ouncil of r

y deployed

or Peace (G

s carried ou

nts. Manda

een reconfig

with its pe

atest UN S

Armed Forc

secure env

ensive strat

zegovina (E

– Mediterrane/pdf/factsheet_

ives of the EU.eeas.europa.) : lessons fromtitute for

n programme under g

related do

pared in r

ONTEX and

ions/operat

ployed pa

EUFOR ALT

H) was laun

secure env

by NATO to

resolution 1

7000 troops

GFAP) in Bi

ut with reco

te and obje

gured four t

ace enforce

Security Cou

ces of Bosn

vironment in

tegy for BiH

EUPM)198

ean Operation_eunavfor_me

U’s Former Flaeu/csdp/missi

m the EUPM inSecurity

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

ocuments. H

regards to

EUCAP S

tions have

arallel

THEA)197

nched on 2

vironment i

o conclude

1575, auth

s, to ensure

iH and to co

ourse to NA

ectives in

times, most

ement man

uncil Reso

nia and Her

n BiH

H

n Sohia, Octobed_en.pdf, (Ac

agship Operaions-and-oper

in Bosnia andy Studies


653371

67

However, it

the EU’s

ahel Niger.

been taken

December

n BiH ever

e its SFOR-

orising the

e continued

ontribute to

ATO assets

light of the

t recently in

ndate under

lution 2183

rzegovina

ber 2015, ccessed 26

tion in Bosniarations/althea-

d Herzegovinas, 2013),

U

5 s

7

t

s

.

n

r

r

-

e

d

o

s

e

n

r

3

a -

a ,

D1.3 Review Since the s

stabilisatio

Bosnia an

strengthen

Defence P

the invitatio

size until 3

In nearly

Herzegovin

profession

to indepen

reform, and

the fight ag

work on ac

as well as

and operat

The EU Po

To

eng

To

org

To

pol

To

To

EU Trainin

The restor

region and http://www.isService, “EurJune 2012,bih_en.pdf, (A199 European(August 20(Accessed 19

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

signing of th

on of Bosni

d Herzegov

n the rule of

Policy (ESDP

on by the B

30 June 201

a decade

na, EUPM

al multi-eth

dently upho

d keeping a

gainst orga

chieving co

between la

tional capac

olice Missio

strengthen

gaged in the

assist and

ganised crim

assist and

ice-prosecu

strengthen

contribute t

ng Mission

ration of sec

d, in the wid s.europa.eu/uropean Union, http://Accessed 19 A

n External Acti015), http://w9 August 2015

tary Synergie


he Dayton P

a and Herz

vina is part

f law in the

P), was lau

BiH authorit

2.

of its invo

worked dil

hnic police f

old law enfo

a finger on p

anised crime

ordination,

aw enforcem

city.

on’s key ta

the operati

e fight again

d support in

me and corr

promote de

ution coope

police-pen

to ensuring

n in Mali (EU

curity and l

der sense, f

uploads/media Police Missio/www.eeas.euAugust 2015)ion Service, “E

www.eeas.euro5).

es

the European Union

Peace Acco

zegovina (B

t of a broa

country. EU

nched on 1

ties, the EU

lvement in

ligently to c

force, traine

orcement at

police acco

e and corru

communica

ment and ju

asks were:

ional capac

nst organise

n the plann

uption in a s

evelopment

ration;

itentiary sys

a suitable l

UTM Mali) 1

asting peac

for Africa an

a/EUPM_reporon in Bosnia auropa.eu/csdp/. EU Training Mopa.eu/csdp/m

PU


ords (1995),

BiH). The E

der effort u

UPM, the fir

January 2

UPM continu

the streng

create, und

ed, equippe

t the level o

untability, E

uption. This

ation and co

udiciary, and

city and join

ed crime an

ning and co

systematic

t of criminal

stem coope

level of acc

199

ce in Mali is

nd Europe.

rt.pdf, (Accesand Herzegov/missions-and

Mission in Malimissions-and-o


, the EU ha

European U

undertaken

rst mission

003 for an

ued its miss

gthening of

der BiH ow

ed and able

of internation

EUPM’s prim

s effort has

ooperation

d has succe

nt capability

nd corruptio

onduct of in

approach;

l investigativ

eration;

countability.

s a major is

On 18 Feb

ssed 19 Augvina (EUPM)”,d-operations/e

(EUTM Mali)operations/eut

n programme under g

s had a key

Union Polic

by the EU

under the E

initial period

sion with m

f the rule o

wnership, a

to assume

nal standard

mary centre

included, in

among BiH

eeded in cre

of the law

n;

nvestigation

ve capacitie

ssue for the

bruary 2013

gust 2015); E, Common Seupm-bih/pdf/2

,” Common Setm-mali/pdf/fa

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

y supporting

ce Mission

U and other

European S

d of three y

modified ma

of law in B

modern, s

e full respon

ds. Focusin

e of attentio

n particular

H’s 15 police

reating a joi

enforcemen

ns in the fig

es of BiH; T

e stability o

3, at the req European Execurity and De25062012_fac

ecurity and Deactsheet_eutm


653371

68

g role in the

(EUPM) in

r players to

Security and

years. Upon

ndates and

Bosnia and

sustainable,

nsibility and

ng on police

n has been

r, extensive

e agencies,

nt strategic

nt agencies

ght against

To enhance

of the Sahel

quest of the

xternal Actionefence Policy,tsheet_eupm-

efence Policy,m_mali_en.pdf,

U

5 s

8

e

n

o

d

n

d

d

,

d

e

n

e

,

c

s

t

e

l

e

n , -

, ,

D1.3 Review Malian aut

United Nat

mission for

The Europ

Ful

ma

Hel

Neu

The EUCA

The EUCA

governmen

for security

by severa

highlighting

willingness

principles t

Sahel Reg

In addition

armed forc

Niger and

governmen

security a

authorities

In support

internation

advice to

implement 200European (2015), mali/docs/facComprehensApproach to 201 FernandoEuropean Un2014), 124- 1

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

thorities, an

tions Secur

r Malian arm

pean Union

ly restore c

p adopted o

lp the Malia

utralize org

AP Sahel M

AP Sahel Ma

nt is an imp

y and devel

al EU Insti

g the impo

s to suppor

that develo

ion needs a

to the actio

ces and by

d EUBAM

nt with the

nd justice

' commitme

of Mali's a

al partners

the natio

ation of the External Actio

ctsheet_eucapsive ApproachCrisis Manage Moreno, “Sah

nion, ed. Joch125.

tary Synergie


nd in accord

rity Council

med forces,

n's objectiv

constitution

on 29 Janua

an authoritie

anized crim

Mali civilian

ali civilian m

portant elem

opment in t

itutions un

ortance tha

rt developm

opment and

a comprehe

on already t

the Europ

Libya miss

reform of

for Malian

ent to restru

active effort

s, particular

onal police

e security re

on Service, “T

p_sahel_mali_h on the Groement, ( Brusshel,” in Handbhen Rehrl, (Vie

es

the European Union

dance with

Resolution

EUTM Mal

ve in Mali is

al and dem

ary by the N

es to fully ex

me and terro

mission200

mission laun

ment of the r

the Sahel.

der the ne

at the EU

ment and se

security ar

ensive and r

taken in Ma

ean Union

sions, the

its internal

ns. EUCAP

cturing thei

ts to restore

rly MINUSM

e, the nati

eform set ou

The EUCAP Sahttp

_en.pdf, , (Aund: The Casels: Geneva

book for decisienna: The Fed

PU


internationa

n 2085 (201

li

s to suppo

mocratic ord

National Ass

xercise thei

orist threats

0

nched on 15

regional app

The Sahel

ew framew

attaches t

ecurity in t

re interconn

regional app

ali by the EU

Delegation

EUCAP S

security fo

P Sahel Ma

ir defence a

e State aut

MA, EUCA

ional gend

ut by the new

ahel Mali civilp://www.eeas.eAccessed 23

ases of SahelCentre for theion makers - Tderal Ministry


al decisions

2), the Eur

rt Malian e

der through

sembly;

r sovereign

.

5 January 2

proach take

Strategy wa

work establ

to its relati

he Sahel.

nected and

proach, bas

UTM missio

n, and in co

Sahel Mali

orces (ISF)

ali is dedic

and security

thority, and

AP Sahel M

darmerie a

w governm

ian mission,” ”europa.eu/csd3 August 20l and the Hoe Democratic CThe common Sof Defence an

n programme under g

s on the sub

ropean Unio

efforts to:

the implem

ty over the

015 at the i

en in the Eu

as the first t

lished afte

ionship wit

The Strateg

that the co

sed on Afric

n, providing

onnection w

mission is

to enable t

cated to s

y forces in 2

in close c

Mali is prov

nd the na

ent, with a v

”, Common Sedp/missions-an015); Nicoletrn of Africa, Control of ArmSecurity and Dnd Sports of th

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

bject, in pa

on launched

mentation o

whole of th

invitation of

ropean Uni

to be develo

r the Lisb

th the regi

gy was bas

omplex situa

can ownersh

g support to

with the EU

s helping

them to pro

supporting

2015.

coordination

viding assis

ational gua

view to:

ecurity and Dend-operations

etta Pirozzi, The EU’s Co

med Forces (DDefence Policyhe Republic of


653371

69

rticular, the

d a training

of the road-

he country;

f the Malian

on strategy

oped jointly

bon Treaty,

on and its

sed on the

ation in the

hip. 201

o the Malian

CAP Sahel

the Malian

ovide more

the Malian

n with other

stance and

ard in the

efence Policy,/eucap-sahel-Testing the

omprehensiveDCAF), 2013).y of the f Austria,

U

5 s

9

e

g

-

n

y

y

,

s

e

e

n

l

n

e

n

r

d

e

, -e e

D1.3 Review

Imp

Re-

Rei

and

Fac

European

As part of

European

the Europe

Security C

piracy and

Atalanta is

EU NAVFO

and root c

Mission So

“Strategic

the Horn o

(SHADE) i

Under the

mandate i

To

Som

To

To

202 Europeanhttp://www.ee23 August 2Defence Poli203 The Sharcoordinating operations inare co-chaireOCEANS, “B(SHADE)”, 2015).

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

proving thei

-establishin

inforcing the

d supervisio

cilitating the

Union Nav

f the Comp

Union Nava

ean Commo

Council Res

d armed ro

s the Europe

OR is one p

causes of t

omalia (EUT

Framework

of Africa.

nitiative.203

e EU Coun

s to:

protect Wo

malia, and t

deter, prev

protect vuln

n External Aeas.europa.eu2015); Europeicy, eunavfor.ered Awarenes

and de-confn the Gulf of Aed on a rotatioBeyond Pirachttp://oceansb

tary Synergie


r operationa

ng their resp

e role of jud

on of their m

eir redeploy

val Force (E

prehensive

al Force (EU

on Security

solutions (U

bbery off t

ean Union’s

part of the

the problem

TM Somalia

k for the Ho

EU NAVFO

ncil Joint

orld Food P

the African

ent and rep

nerable ship

ction Serviceu/csdp/missionean External Aeu, (Accesseds and Deconfflicting activiti

Aden and the wonal basis by thcy- a project beyondpiracy.

es

the European Union

al efficiency

pective hiera

dicial and ad

missions

ment to the

EU NAVFO

Approach t

U NAVFOR

y and Defen

UNSCR) and

he Horn of

s counter-pi

EU’s “Com

m. Together

a) form a co

orn of Africa

OR is also

Action, w

Programme

Union Miss

press acts o

pping off the

, “CSDP Misns-and-operatAction Servic

d 28 August 20fliction (SHADies between western Indianhe Combinedof the One

org/matrix/sha

PU


y

archical cha

dministrativ

e north of th

OR) Somalia

to Somalia

R) Somalia –

nce Policy (

d Internatio

f Africa and

racy operat

prehensive

r, EU NAV

oherent, int

a”, which gu

an actor in

which is ba

(WFP) ves

sion on Som

of piracy and

e Somali co

ssions and Otions/eu-navfoce, “ Europea015). DE) initiative b

the countriesn Ocean. TheMaritime ForcEarth Future

ared-awarene


ains

ve authoritie

e country

a – Operati

, in Decem

– Operation

(CSDP) and

onal Law in

d in the W

tion off the c

Approach”

FOR, EUC

egrated CS

uides the E

n the Share

ased on U

ssels delive

malia (AMIS

d armed rob

oast on a ca

Operations”, Cor-somalia/pdf/an Union Nav

began in 2008s and coalitio

e meetings areces (CMF), NAe Foundation,ss-and-decon

n programme under g

es with rega

ion Atalant

mber 2008,

n Atalanta w

d in accorda

response

Western Indi

coast of So

, tackling b

AP Nestor

SDP packag

U’s multi-fa

ed Awarene

UN resolut

ering aid to

OM) shippin

bbery at sea

ase by case

Common Sec/factsheet_eunal Force 201

8 as a mechanons involved e held in BahrATO, and EUN Shared Awa

nfliction-shade

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

ard to the m

ta202

the EU lau

within the fra

ance with r

to the risin

ian Ocean,

omalia.

both current

and the E

ge supportin

acetted eng

ess and D

ions, EU

o displaced

ng;

a off the So

e basis.

curity and Denavfor_en.pdf5”, Common

nism of meetin military c

rain at regularNAVFOR. areness and

e, (Accessed


653371

70

anagement

unched the

amework of

elevant UN

ng levels of

, Operation

t symptoms

EU Training

ng the EU’s

agement in

econfliction

NAVFOR’s

persons in

omali coast;

efence Policy,f, (AccessedSecurity and

ings aimed atcounter-piracyr intervals and

Deconfliction17 August

U

5 s

0

t

e

f

N

f

n

s

g

s

n

n

s

n

, d d

t y d

n t

D1.3 Review In addition

Somalia. O

Atalanta un

Regional M

Indian Oce

In July 201

countries d

including c

Mission is

Africa (HoA

staff mem

Somalia. I

Mogadishu

Mandate a

systems in

effectively

objective is

aerostation

EUCAP Ne

the HoA,

humanitari

Member S

In the fight

two CSDP

at sea and

EU progra

MARSIC) a

The Missio

United Nat

204European Western http://www.ee(Accessed 12015”,access

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

, the EU NA

On 21 Nov

ntil Decemb

Maritime S

ean (EUCA

12, the Eur

develop a

counter-pira

Etienne de

A) and Wes

bers carryi

n addition

u, Bosaso, H

and activitie

n HoA/WIO

and to red

s to offer a

n and deten

estor carrie

comprising

an). This is

tates adopt

t against pi

P missions i

d the EU M

mmes fund

and the Eur

on also wo

tions, in par

External ActioIndian O

eas.europa.eu19 August 20sed 23 August

tary Synergie


AVFOR als

vember 201

ber 2016.

Security Ca

AP Nestor)2

ropean Unio

self-sustain

acy and ma

e Poncins fr

stern Indian

ng out act

to Djibouti

Hargeisa, th

es EUCAP

O states, thu

duce the fr

solution tha

ntion of susp

es out its ac

g a broad

s outlined in

ted in Nove

iracy, the M

n the region

ilitary Train

ded under th

ropean Dev

orks closely

rticular UNO

on Service, “R

Ocean (EUu/csdp/mission015); “Europet 2015, https:/

es

the European Union

so contribute

14, the Co

apacity Bui204

on launched

ning capacit

aritime gov

rom France

n Ocean (W

ivities and

i, the Miss

he Seychell

Nestor aim

us enabling

eedom of a

at covers th

pects up to

ctivities with

set of acti

n the "Strat

mber 2011

Mission com

n, the Euro

ning Mission

he Instrume

velopment F

y with key

ODC and UN

Regional MaritiUCAP Nesns-and-operatean Union M//www.eucap-n

PU


es to the m

uncil of the

lding Miss

d EUCAP N

ty for a co

vernance. It

e. The Miss

WIO) region

training ac

ion has pe

les and Tan

ms to supp

g them to f

action for t

he whole pr

the investig

hin the cont

ions (politic

tegic Frame

in order to

mplements a

pean Union

n (EUTM) f

ent for Stab

Fund (Regio

internationa

NDP, the A

ime Security Cstor)”, Cotions/eucap-neMission in thnestor.eu/; Pir


monitoring o

e EU exten

ion in the H

Nestor, a ci

ontinued en

ts Headqua

ion is mand

s, with arou

cross the re

ersonnel str

nzania.

port the de

fight piracy

those involv

ocess “from

gation and p

text of the E

cal, diplom

ework for th

guide the E

a number o

n Naval For

or Somalia

bility (Critica

onal Maritim

al and regi

African Union

Capacity Buildommon Seestor/documene Horn of Arozzi, Testing

n programme under g

f fishing ac

nded the M

Horn of Afr

ivilian missi

hancement

arters is in

dated to wo

und 80 inte

egion with

rategically

velopment

and other

ved in pira

m crime to c

prosecution

EU’s compr

atic, develo

he Horn of

EU’s engage

of other EU

rce Somalia

on land, as

al Maritime

me Security

ional organ

n, IGAD and

ding Mission inecurity annts/factsheet_

Africa and ththe Comprehe

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

ctivities off t

Mandate of

frica and th

ion which a

t of maritim

Djibouti, th

ork across t

ernational a

a particula

positioned

of ‘maritim

maritime c

acy in the r

court”, starti

n of maritime

rehensive a

opment, se

Africa", wh

ement in the

actions, in

a – Operatio

s well as a

Routes Pro

Programme

nizations, s

d IMO.

n the Horn of And Defenc_eucap_nestohe Western Iensive Approa


653371

71

he coast of

f Operation

he Western

assists host

me security,

he Head of

the Horn of

nd 20 local

ar focus on

in Nairobi,

me security’

crime more

region. The

ing with the

e crime.

approach to

ecurity and

hich the EU

e region.

cluding the

on Atalanta

number of

ogramme –

e – MASE).

uch as the

Africa and thece Policy,r_en.pdf; ndian Ocean

ach

U

5 s

f

n

n

t

,

f

f

l

n

,

’

e

e

e

o

d

U

e

a

f

–

.

e

e ,

n

D1.3 Review EU Trainin

On 10 Ap

Somalia) i

the institut

which aims

Since 2010

Somali Na

Junior Offi

and securi

Forces (U

specialist t

commande

On 22 Jan

to March 2

addition of

Somalia o

particular,

States of A

EUFOR RD

EUFOR RD

the Congo

authorising

Mission in

general ele

The missi

205 Europeahttp://www.ee(Accessed 21Union Institu(Accessed 24206 Europeahttp://www.eeJohanssen, peacebuildingMeike Lurweof the Congo

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

ng Mission

ril 2010, th

n order to

ions of Som

s to support

0, EUTM S

ational Army

cers, speci

ity situation

PDF). The

training in th

er and comb

nuary 2013,

2015. This

f strategic

operates in

the United

America.

D Congo206

D Congo wa

. On 25 Apr

g the tempo

n the Demo

ections in th

on was tas

an Union Eeas.europa.eu1 August 2015ute for Secur4 August 2015an External eas.europa.euThe EU´s Cg in the Dem

eg and Fredriko, (Gothenburg

tary Synergie


n in Somalia

he Europea

contribute t

malia. This s

t stabilising

omalia has

y (SNA) wit

alists and t

n in Somali

training fo

he areas of

bat enginee

the Counc

third mand

advisory a

n close co

Nations, t

6

as a short E

ril 2006, the

orary deplo

ocratic Rep

he DR Cong

sked with:

External Actiou/csdp/mission5); Damien Herity Studies, P5)

Action Seru/csdp/missionComprehensive

ocratic Repubk Söderbaum, g, 2011).

es

the European Union

a (EUTM S

n Union la

to strengthe

support is p

the country

contributed

th a focus o

trainers. Init

a, and in c

ocused on

f military po

ering.

il of the Eur

ate contain

and mentor

operation

he African

European U

e United Na

oyment of a

public of C

go, which be

on Service, ns-and-operatelly, “EU EngaPolicy Brief,

vice, “EUFOns-and-operate Approach blic of Congo”‘Building peac

PU


omalia)205

aunched a

ening the T

part of the E

y and to res

d to the tra

on the train

tially trainin

close collab

the comm

olice, civilian

ropean Uni

ned a signif

ing activitie

and coord

Union Miss

Union deploy

ations Secur

a European

Congo (MON

egan on 30

“EUTM Sotions/eutm-somagement in theVol 9 (2012)

OR RD COtions/eufor-rd-to Crisis Ma”, Civil Societce from the ou


military trai

Transitional

EU's compre

spond to the

ining of ove

ning of Non-

ng took plac

boration wit

ander up t

n-military co

on extende

ficant chang

es to comp

ination wit

sion in Som

yment in 20

rity Council

Union forc

NUC) durin

July 2006.

malia”, Commalia/docs/face Sahel: lesso), http://www.

NGO”, Com-congo/index_anagement, 2ty Dialogue Nutside’: The ro

n programme under g

ning missio

Federal Go

ehensive en

e needs of t

er 4,000 So

-Commissio

ce in Ugand

h the Ugan

to company

ooperation,

d the mand

ge in the M

plement the

h other in

malia (AMIS

006 in the D

adopted Re

ce to suppo

ng the peri

mmon Securitctsheet_eutm_ons from Somaiss.europa.eu

mon Securiten.htm, (Acce

238-338; LaNetwork Discusole of the EU i

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

on in Soma

overnment

ngagement

the Somali p

omali soldie

oned Office

da, due to t

nda People

y level, in

intelligence

date of EUT

Mission focu

e training r

nternational

SOM), and

Democratic

esolution 16

ort the Unit

iod encomp

ity and Def_somalia_en.palia and AfPa

u/uploads/med

ty and Defessed 1 Sept

aura Davis, “ssion Paper Nin the Democ


653371

72

alia (EUTM

(TFG) and

in Somalia,

people.

ers from the

ers (NCOs),

the political

e’s Defence

addition to

e, company

TM Somalia

us, with the

role. EUTM

actors; in

the United

Republic of

671 (2006),

ted Nations

passing the

fence Policy,pdf, rk”, European

dia/PB__9.pdf,

fence Policy,ember 2015);The EU andNo. 9, (2014);ratic Republic

U

5 s

2

M

d

,

e

,

l

e

o

y

a

e

M

n

d

f

,

s

e

,

n ,

, ; d ; c

D1.3 Review

To

To

To

Exe

The missio

EU Police

The EUPO

in Africa. L

authorities

mentoring,

provided te

United Kin

been recen

The missio

DRC and t

efforts to h

The EU´s e

3.5.2 Inte

Bosnia an

ESDP, fro

instrument

Herzegovin

doing”. In t

terpretation

207 Europeahttp://www.ee(Accessed 1 208 JohansseDavis, “The E209 Mustonen

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

support and

contribute t

contribute t

ecute evacu

on came to

Mission fo

OL RD Cong

Launched i

to reform

, monitoring

echnical as

gdom) des

ntly extende

on coopera

the United

help ensure

engagemen

eraction b

nd Herzego

m the poin

ts. Cooper

na was - EU

the first pha

ns of the m

an External eas.europa.euSeptember 20

n, The EU´s CEU and peacen, “Coordinatio

tary Synergie


d provide se

to airport pr

to the prote

uation opera

an end on 3

or the DRC

go mission

n July 2007

m the natio

g and advi

sistance to

igned to su

ed until Sep

ates closely

Nations Mis

that all SSR

nt in the DR

between C

ovina (BiH

nt of view o

ration and

UFOR Althe

ase, the diff

ission mand

Action Ser

u/csdp/mission015).

Comprehensivebuilding”; Lurwon and Cooper

es

the European Union

ecurity to M

rotection in

ction of civi

ations in ca

30 Novemb

(EUPOL R

followed on

7, EUPOL

onal police.

ising of the

three Euro

pport the s

ptember 201

y with the E

ssion in the

R efforts de

R Congo has

CSDP miss

H) has some

of planning

coordinati

ea (2004 -) a

ferences be

dates, both

rvice, “EUPOns-and-operat

ve Approach toweg & Söderbration on Tact

PU


MONUC inst

Kinshasa;

ilians under

ase of an em

ber 2006.

RD Congo)2

n from EUP

RD Congo

. Since Oc

e trainers a

opean proje

security of th

14.

EUSEC RD

e Democrati

eployed are

s been stud

sions and

etimes bee

and coord

ion betwee

and EUPM/

etween the

within EUP

OL RD COtions/eupol-rd-

o Crisis Manabaum, ‘Buildintical and Oper


tallations an

r imminent t

mergency.

207

POL Kinsha

supports t

ctober 201

and PNC p

ects (EU De

he 2011 ele

D Congo, th

ic Republic

consistent

died thoroug

d operatio

en referred

inating the

en the CS

/BiH (2004

missions w

PM and EUF

NGO”, Com-congo/pdf/fac

gement, 238-3g peace from rational Levels

n programme under g

nd personne

threat of phy

asa, the EU

the efforts o

3, the mis

police office

elegation in

ections in D

he Europea

of the Con

ghly in seve

ons in the

to as a “te

different E

SDP miss

- 2012) pro

were mainly

FOR209.

mon Securitctsheet_eupol_

338; the outside.’

s”.

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

el;

ysical viole

U's first civil

of national

ssion focus

ers. The m

DRC, Fran

DRC. Its m

n Union de

ngo (MONU

eral publicat

eatre

esting grou

EU crisis m

ions in B

ocessed of “

y related to

ty and Def_rd_congo_en


653371

73

nce;

ian mission

Congolese

ses on the

mission has

nce and the

andate has

elegation in

SCO) in its

tions.208

nd” for the

anagement

Bosnia and

“learning by

differing in-

fence Policy,n.pdf,

U

5 s

3

n

e

e

s

e

s

n

s

e

t

d

y

-

,

D1.3 Review There were

in practice

clear delin

up to the w

were inade

One factor

actors and

under the

conflicting

factors tha

organisatio

As the diffi

became e

lacking, th

EUPM, EU

Increasing

Currently t

For examp

Information

The coope

liaison offic

level mainl

relations b

mutual und

be the lack

more awar

of “stereoty

210 Ibid. The memerged as tcreated a situ211 Magnus Ethe EuropeanMissions in th212 Interview

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

e some rath

e, there wer

eation of ta

will of the ac

equate and

r that was id

d their missi

same EU

personaliti

at have to b

on or missio

culties in th

ever more

he actors th

UFOR and

Co-operati

the benefits

ple, the EU

n and intelli

eration (and

cers and o

ly rests on a

etween ind

derstanding

k of commu

re of what th

ypic expect

mandates werthe critical issuation in which

Ekengren and n Union’s Globhe Balkans, (Bwith a EEAS O

tary Synergie


her general

re neither c

asks betwee

ctors to liais

highly depe

dentified as

on, especia

flag and po

es, languag

be taken int

on.210

he cooperat

apparent, a

hemselves

EUSR ag

on between

s between E

UCAP miss

gence shar

d coordinat

ccasionally

an “on-dem

ividual miss

g and all is

unication be

he military m

tations”, bo

re broad and oue between Eh there was veGreg Simons bal Role, (UK,Brussels, 2007Official, 13 Au

es

the European Union

l directions

clear structu

en the miss

se and coor

endent on p

s having hin

ally at the fi

olicy, never

ge problem

o considera

tion and del

and approp

took the in

reed on th

n EUPM-EU

EUTM Mali

ion benefits

ring is also o

ion) betwee

with HQ s

mand” and “a

sion membe

about good

etween thes

mission doe

th in the mi

overlapping, gEUPM and EUery little or no eds., The Pol 2011); Micha7). ugust 2015.

PU


concerning

ures nor gu

sions. It very

rdinate thei

personalities

ndered coo

eld level int

rtheless cer

ms, different

ation in the

ineation of

priate mec

nitiative to

he documen

UFOR and E

and EUCA

s from EUT

of paramou

en EUTM M

staff officers

ad-hoc” bas

ers. This m

d will and co

se two ope

es on the fie

ilitary and c

giving both orgFOR. In additcoordination o

litics of Securiael Emerson a


g how to co

uidelines fo

y soon bec

r activities,

s and perso

peration wa

terface. Ev

rtain handic

t nationaliti

cooperatio

tasks with r

hanisms fr

improve th

nts “Seven

EUSR”211.

AP Sahel Ma

TM Mali m

nt importan

Mali and E

s. Otherwise

sis and dep

eans that “f

ommon und

erations. Th

eld level an

civilian think

ganisations a rion, some conof operations.ity Sector Refo

and Eva Gross

n programme under g

oordinate th

or coordinat

ame eviden

the coopera

onal contact

as a poor k

ven though

caps, such

es and cul

n, as with a

regard to fig

om the Br

e situation.

Principles

ali rely main

edical facil

nce for both

UCAP is ca

e the coope

ends on wil

fruitful” resu

derstanding

e civilian a

d vice versa

king that a

role in fightingnflicting person

See also: EUorm: Challengs eds. Evaluati

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

e CSDP ac

tion and lia

nt that when

ration and c

ts.

knowledge o

the mission

as nationa

tural backg

any other in

ghting organ

russels end

. In Septem

s” and “Gui

nly on mutu

ities for EU

of these m

arried out m

eration at t

llingness an

ults can be

. Also, ther

ctors shoul

a. There are

mission sho

g the organisednalities within

UISSU, “Ten yeges and Opporting the EU's C


653371

74

ctivities, but

ison, nor a

n left solely

coordination

of the other

ns operated

al agendas,

ground, are

nternational

nised crime

d were still

mber 2005,

idelines for

ual support.

U personal.

missions.212

mainly with

the mission

nd personal

ensured by

re seems to

d be made

e a number

ould get rid

d crime that the missions ears after. rtunities for Crisis

U

5 s

4

t

a

y

n

r

d

,

e

l

e

l

,

r

.

.

h

n

l

y

o

e

r

d

D1.3 Review of. The ma

and on the

Quite ofte

classified

missions/o

documents

Despite th

working w

respective

messaging

within EUT

expertise i

In addition

in the mis

perspective

actors- mo

A very goo

Western In

civilian an

Shared A

Internation

UN Office

individual s

off the coa

between c

213 Interview 214 Interview 215 Interview 216 Kacper RInterview with217 Interview (EEAS) MD Amilitary CSDthe kick of mcivilian and mission/operwas made

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

ain tool in t

eatre. 213

n, the mai

communic

operations, s

s too difficu

e commun

well. The ad

Mission's

g. EUCAP a

TM advisory

n the Missio

, one good

sion person

e. The EU

ostly human

od “global

ndian Ocea

d military s

Awareness

nal Maritime

on Drugs

states, such

ast of Som

iv – mil syn

with a former with a former with a former

Rękawek & Mah a former EUwith a forme

Africa GeograP missions/op

meeting mid-Jumilitary mis

ration CONOPrather clear

tary Synergie


this is comm

n problem

cation sys

some third

lt.214

ication diffi

dded value

advisers

advisers de

y teams wh

on is useful

practice is

nnel and is

TM mission

itarian orga

size” exam

n, where th

stakeholder

and De-c

e Organizat

s and Crim

h as India, C

malia is a un

ergies e.g.

EUTM Mali OEUFOR ChadEUCAP Sahearcin Terlikow

UTM Mali Officer EEAS Officaphical sectorperations. EU uly 2015 it wassions/operati

PS, plans and that writing

es

the European Union

munication

at least fo

stems tha

of countries

culties, the

of each M

is exploited

ealing with

en it comes

to deal with

that in EUT

s in touch w

n HQ has

anisations.21

mple of the

ere are ple

rs. Maritime

confliction

tion (IMO),

me (UNODC

China, Russ

nique multi

capacity bu

Officer 13 Augud RCA Officer el Officer 2 Sewski, “EU CSD

er, 13 August ial, 8 August launched an CSDP Lesso

as emphasizedons. Howeveeventually in rules and

PU


and educa

or effective

at would

s participati

e cooperatio

Mission ben

d to enga

Gendarme

s to engagi

h the intern

TM Mali, a g

with various

a liaison c16

good pract

enty of best

e Security

(SHADE)

United Kin

C), EU, NA

sia etc. Mo

lateral foru

uilding in So

ust 2015. 20 August 20ptember 2015

DP in the Light 2015. 2015; In addinter-service

ons report fromd that there eer, rules/direpractice is nodirections int


tion before

information

facilitate

ing in the o

on between

nefits from

ge the Ma

erie and the

ng the Mini

al security f

gender and

s civilian ac

cell, which

tices is the

practices a

Centre Hor

mechanis

ngdom Mar

ATO, Coali

reover, the

m, which a

omalia.217

015. 5. ht of the Crisis

dition, in July study on exis

m CSDP actioexist lots of beections how ot officially doto official do

n programme under g

and during

n sharing i

the coo

peration ma

n EUTM &

the other.

alian autho

e National

stry of Defe

forces with

human righ

ctors- but m

has regula

counter pi

at the opera

rn of Africa

m brings

ine Trade O

tion of Ma

Contact Gr

also endors

s in Mali,” Bu

2015 Europeasting best pracns 2014 and

est practices into apply becumented. Du

ocuments suc

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

g deployme

is the lack

operation.

ake the rele

EUCAP se

The exper

orities with

Guard are

ence. In Nig

a military s

hts advisor

mostly from

ar contact w

racy opera

ational level

a (MSCHOA

together

Operations

aritime Forc

roup of Cou

ses the bes

ulletin, No. 20/

an External Actices betwee2015 actuatedn use among est practicesuring the kick ch as Coun


653371

75

ent, both off

of reliable

In some

easability of

eems to be

rtise of the

the same

embedded

ger, military

tatus.215

is included

m a training

with civilian

tion on the

among the

A) and the

industries,

(UKMTO),

ces (CMF),

unter Piracy

st practices

/ 475, (2013);

Action Serviceen civilian andd the work. Inand between

into CSDPoff meeting itcil decisions,

U

5 s

5

f

e

e

f

e

e

e

d

y

d

g

n

e

e

e

,

,

,

y

s

;

e d n n P t ,

D1.3 Review “EU NAVF

and root c

Mission So

“Strategic

in the Horn

Perhaps th

and coord

(EU OPCE

mandate, E

stakeholde

Nestor, EU

as EUTM

operationa

Brussels- b

could say

comprehen

“incompreh

Examples

the World

Deconflicto

NAVFOR t

mission/operof applying b218 Council omeeting, 14 (Accessed 28219 EuropeanDefence Pol(Accessed 19220European and Defencentre/index_centre/docs/f221 Interview September 2222 The Sharecoordinating operations inare co-chaireinformation: h223 Interview

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

FOR is one

causes of t

omalia (EUT

Framework

n of Africa.”2

he “best pol

ination with

EN)220 from

EU MSs are

ers and inte

UTM Somal

Mali). Alth

al level, but

between CS

y that it is

nsive “incom

hension” is

of successf

Food Prog

on). Also, E

transported

ration plans etest practices

of the EuropeNovember 2

8 July 2015) n External Actilicy, http://ee9 August 2015External Actio

nce Policy,_en.htm factsheet_eu_with a forme

2015. ed Awarenessand de-conflic

n the Gulf of Aded on a rotatiohttp://oceansbwith a former

tary Synergie


part of the

the problem

TM Somalia

k for the Ho

”219

licies and c

hin the CSD

m summer 2

e currently r

erlocutors o

ia, EU NAV

hough EU

in an upda

SDP stake

s currently

mprehensio

the will of th

ful civil-milit

ramme (WF

EU NAVFOR

EUCAP Ne

tc. is a “politicarules and direan Union, “C2011, http://w

on Service, “Eeas.europa.eu5). on Service, “E, June (

and _opcen_23_06r EEAS Offici

s and Deconflicting activitiesden and the w

onal basis by thbeyondpiracy.oEUVAVFOR A

es

the European Union

EU’s “Com

m. Together

a) form a co

orn of Africa

oncept etc.

DP mission

2012, prolo

requesting

of EU CSD

VFOR Atala

OPCEN w

ated manda

holders) an

the best

on” to fulfil

he Member

tary coopera

FP), the co

R and EUC

estor vehicl

al”, not a pracctions than civouncil Conclu

www.consilium

European Unio/csdp/mission

EU Operations2015),http://ee

http://ee6_2015.pdf, (Aal, 8 Septemb

iction (SHADEs between the western Indianhe Combinedorg/matrix/shaAtalanta Office

PU


mprehensive

r, EU NAV

oherent, int

a”218, which

” currently

s/operation

onged sprin

EUOPCEN

DP Operatio

anta) and S

was initially

ate, the fac

nd operation

instrumen

its mandate

r States.221

ation in EU

ooperation w

CAP Nestor

es to Djibou

ctical issue. It vilian head of

usions on the m.europa.eu/ue

on Naval Forcns-and-operati

s Centre Horneas.europa.eueas.europa.eu

Accessed 19 Aber 2015 and

E) initiative begcountries and

n Ocean. The mMaritime Forc

ared-awareneser, 31 July 20


e Approach”

VFOR, EUC

egrated CS

guides the

existing in t

ns is the ma

ng 2015 un

to facilitate

ons/Mission

ahel area (

y created

ilitating take

nal level (be

t to facilit

e. However

NAVFOR A

with the SH

had synerg

uti223.

seems that mmissions, as tHorn of Afric

edocs/cms_da

ce Somalia Opons/eu-navfor

n of Africa & u/csdp/structuu/csdp/structuAugust 2015).d Interview of

gan in 2008 ad coalitions invmeetings are ces (CMF), NAss-and-deconf15.

n programme under g

”, tackling b

CAP Nestor

SDP packag

EU’s multi

the EU rega

andate of E

ntil the end

e the coordi

s in the Ho

EUCAP Sa

to facilitate

es place bo

etween mis

ate the co

r, we shoul

Atalanta we

ADE 222 (Sh

gies in logis

military comma

they are ambaca”, 3124th FOata/docs/press

peration Atalanr-somalia/pdf/f

Sahel (EU OPres-instrumenres-instrumen

a Ministry of

s a mechanismvolved in militaheld in BahraiATO, and EUNfliction-shade

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

both current

r and the E

ge supportin

i-facetted e

arding the c

EU Operati

d of 2016.

ination betw

orn of Afric

ahel and Nig

e coordinat

oth at the s

ssions/opera

oordination

d understa

ere the “join

hared Awa

stics. For ex

anders are moassadors. OREIGN AFFsdata/EN/fora

nta,” Commonfactsheet_eun

PCEN)”, Comnts-agencies/ents-agencies/e

Foreign Affai

m of meetingsary counter-pirin at regular inNAVFOR. Mor


653371

76

t symptoms

EU Training

ng the EU’s

ngagement

cooperation

ons Centre

Within this

ween all EU

ca (EUCAP

ger, as well

tion at the

strategic (in

ations). We

within its

nd that the

t” activity in

reness and

xample, EU

ore responsive

AIRS Councilff/126052.pdf,

n Security andnavfor_en.pdf,

mmon Securityeu-operations-eu-operations-

rs Official, 11

s aimed at racy ntervals and re

U

5 s

6

s

g

s

t

n

e

s

U

P

l

e

n

e

s

e

n

d

U

e

l ,

d ,

y --

D1.3 Review In EUTM S

and is in to

the opportu

knowledge

operationa

As an exa

integrated

civilian mi

Internation

their own

civilian mi

cooperatio

improving

An upcom

reviews of

example o

at the airpo

From time

national in

understand

Europe, w

mid-year. M

was not inf

Sometimes

them to ke

dealing w

operations

missions w

224Interview w225 Interview 226 Panel of E227 Interview 228 Interview 2015. 229 Interview August 2015

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

Somalia, a g

ouch with v

unity to par

e, skill or po

al level.224

ample of im

compound

ission and

nal Airport),

capabilities

ssions. Th

on and coord

civil-military

ing joint str

f the missio

f the compr

ort.226

to time, the

nterests 227

ding throug

here they h

Most of the

formed on w

s civilian m

eep an ade

with Rule o

s/missions a

which also h

with a former Ewith a former

Experts (Miniswith a former with a former

with a former ; Interview wit

tary Synergie


gender (GA

various civi

rticipate in s

otential syn

mplications o

in Mogadis

military C

very close

s. Also, on

he main ch

dination of

y synergies

rategic revie

ons and op

rehensivene

ere has bee7 rather th

h all the m

had their ow

e top level o

what had be

missions are

equate dist

of Law, wh

are to be t

have a polit

EUTM SomaliEEAS Official

stry of Foreign EEAS OfficialEUTM Mali O

EUVAVFOR Ath a former EU

es

the European Union

A) and huma

lian actors,

seminars an

ergies deriv

of civil- mili

shu, current

CSDP miss

to each oth

ly limited m

hallenges a

efforts with

.225

ew of the C

erations, is

ess of the f

en the impr

an the int

missions/ope

wn national

of cooperat

een agreed

e afraid to b

tance to m

hich emph

ransferred

tical agenda

a and EUNAVl, 8 SeptembeAffairs, EEAS

l, 4 SeptembeOfficer, 13 Aug

Atalanta OfficeUTM Somalia O

PU


an rights ad

but mostly

nd meeting

ved from m

itary coope

tly under co

sions are

her. Howev

medical sup

are possible

different ki

CSDP actio

s a good an

final output

ression that

terests of

erations 228)

interests. T

tion was so

at the com

be “branded

ilitary miss

asizes the

many case

a. Civilian m

VFOR Atalantaer 2015. S Official and fer 2015. gust 2015 and

er, 31 July 20Officer, 13 Se


dvisor was i

y from a tra

s, as well a

meetings an

ration in CS

onstruction.

located at

ver, both mi

pport is pro

e force pro

nd of meeti

on in the Ho

nd concrete

is a commo

t certain na

the missio

. They trav

This led to

lely by the

mander of j

d” as part o

ions. Most

e distance

es to a civi

missions are

a Officer 26 Ju

former OPCE

Interview with

15; Interview weptember 2015

n programme under g

ncluded in

aining persp

as to meet d

d seminars

SDP, one c

This is a go

the same

ssions will

ovided from

otection an

ings and pla

orn of Africa

e step forw

on base, wh

tionalities o

n (this is

elled to the

the fact tha

operation c

journeys me

of the milita

of the EU

to the mi

ilian long te

e usually ha

uly 2015.

N Official), 27

h a former EU

with a former 5.

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

the mission

pective. GA

delegations

s were not u

could ment

ood examp

e airport (

utilize almo

m military m

nd C2. Ho

atforms is i

a, instead o

ward. Anoth

hich will be

only pursue

a general

e mission a

at travel fun

commander

eetings.229

ary entity w

U civilian m

ilitary. Milit

erm Rule o

appy to rec

7 August 2015

UTM Mali Offic

EUTM Somal


653371

77

n personnel

A was given

s. However,

used at the

tion the EU

ple of where

(Mogadishu

ost 100% of

missions to

wever, the

ncreasingly

of separate

er practical

e completed

d their own

view and

area, and in

nds ran out

r. The Staff

which drives

issions are

tary CSDP

of Law etc.

eive limited

.

cer, 21 July

ia Officer, 10

U

5 s

7

l

n

,

e

U

e

u

f

o

e

y

e

l

d

n

d

n

t

f

s

e

P

.

d

D1.3 Review logistical (

protection

Command

One of the

level to the

bureaucrat

was functio

3.6 Conc

As outlined

in practice

scope of t

developing

has been

synergies,

been fully e

The numbe

and coordi

efficiency o

practises i

coordinatio

of the civili

closed coo

experience

CSDP eng

way that th

of resource

230 Interview 231 Interview 232 EEAS, “FCivil and Milit

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

medical an

are usually

and Contro

e challenge

e OHQ lev

tic”. Howev

onal in the “

clusion

d in this cha

. The numb

the interact

g instrumen

emphasiz

for examp

exploited.

er of docum

ination betw

of the EU e

in impleme

on on the gr

ian and mili

operation w

es from the

gagement. D

he desired e

es.233

of a former EEwith a former

Factsheet on "tary Capability

tary Synergie


nd air trans

y contracted

ol.230

s in the EU

vel to suppo

ver, the coo

“frame of th

apter, an im

ber of politic

tion betwee

ts and proc

zed through

le, in the p

ments, interv

ween civilia

engagemen

entation of

round show

tary instrum

would bring

past and o

Delivering a

end state ca

EAS Official, 8EUTM Somal

"Promoting syy Developmen

es

the European Union

port) trainin

from privat

U NAVFOR

ort decision

operation b

e mandate”

mplementatio

cal, legal, s

en the civili

cedures for

hout the h

lanning, tra

views and r

n and milita

nt in solving

comprehen

w, there are

ments have

g added va

ngoing miss

activity acro

an be achie

8 September 2ia and EUNAV

ynergies; Counnt – Way ahea

PU


ng support

te enterpris

Atalanta w

n making. S

between EU

”.231

on of the co

structural an

an and mil

effective ci

history of

aining and c

reviews sho

ary function

g and mana

nsive appro

a number o

been enha

alue to the

sions/opera

oss the boar

eved, either

2015. VFOR Atalantncil of the Eurad”, 17285/10,


on ad hoc

ses, which m

was to get t

Sometimes

UCAP NEST

omprehensi

nd ‘cultural’

litary functio

vil-military c

ESDP/CSD

conduct of a

ow that the

ns is a mus

aging crisis.

oach throug

of good pra

nced. There

e EU’s civ

ations provid

rd to reach

r at all or wi

ta Officer, 26 Jropean Union, 6 December

n programme under g

bases. Ev

means that t

he “best pr

the system

TOR and E

ve approac

practises h

ons. Althou

coordination

DP since 1

a mission/o

importance

t for the co

As the exa

gh civil- mil

actises on h

e are also e

ilian and m

de valuable

the commo

thout a sign

July 2015. , “Promoting S2010.

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

ven security

there are no

ractices” fro

m was too “

EU NAVFO

ch to CSDP

have an im

ugh the imp

n in the CS

1999232, th

operation ha

e of closer c

oherence, v

amples of t

litary coope

how the inte

examples o

military act

e lessons fo

on objective

nificant dela

Synergies bet


653371

78

y and force

o issues on

om the field

“formal and

OR Atalanta

is not easy

pact on the

portance of

SDP context

e potential

ave still not

cooperation

visibility and

the existing

eration and

eroperability

f where the

ors. These

or the future

e is the only

ay or waste

tween the EU

U

5 s

8

e

n

d

d

a

y

e

f

t

l

t

n

d

g

d

y

e

e

e

y

e

U

D1.3 Review Additionall

be extende

capacity n

especially

CSDP to o

also ensur

actor, there

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

y, the expe

ed to the ot

eeds to co

when it co

other EU ins

re an adeq

eby ensurin

tary Synergie


eriences hav

ther relevan

me into pla

omes to the

struments. T

quate contin

ng the susta

es

the European Union

ve shown th

nt EU instru

ay during th

e conceptu

This would

nuum of th

ainability an

PU


hat coordina

uments. In

he planning

ualization of

improve no

e stabilizat

d long- term


ation and co

particular,

g and condu

f the desire

ot just miss

tion efforts

m effect on t

n programme under g

ooperation

the EU´s p

uct of missi

ed end-stat

ion design

executed b

the ground.

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

within CSD

political and

ions and o

te and tran

and effectiv

by the EU

.


653371

79

DP needs to

d diplomatic

perations –

nsition from

veness, but

or another

U

5 s

9

o

c

–

m

t

r

D1.3 Review

4 LESSO

CRISIS

As elabora

and militar

operations

countries a

parallel. T

possible, e

CSDP. Ev

comprehen

towards ci

following th

the numbe

not deploy

As discuss

strengths 2

conflict pre

and techni

cooperatio

crisis man

creation o

President

reorganisa

considered

increasing

234European Approach” agencies/eum

235 EEAS, “Fa

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

ONS FRO

“More ci

approac

mechan

mechan

ated above

ry crisis m

s are deplo

and region

These exam

even syner

ven if the

nsive appro

vil-military

he Lisbon T

er of paralle

ed a joint C

sed in the p235. Howeve

evention an

ical reason

on and coor

agement. A

f a "double

of the Eu

ation of rele

d as furthe

civil-militar

Union Milita

EUMS Confmc/documents

actsheet on "P

tary Synergie


OM IMPLE

ivilian-milita

ch: we defin

isms that a

isms.” (EUM

in Chapter

anagement

yed to diffe

s where th

mples offer

gies - as w

missions

oach, still

interactions

Treaty have

el-deployed

CSDP missio

previous cha

er, as disc

nd crisis ma

s. The EU

rdination wit

At the outse

e-hatted" H

uropean Co

evant CSDP

ering the co

ry synergies

ry Staff (EUMerence, Bruss/20140619co

Promoting syn

es

the European Union

EMENTAT

ary synergy

nitely need

allow day-t

MS confere

rs 2 and 3,

t operations

erent count

he EU has

a good op

well as sho

and opera

in many c

s or synerg

e been natu

EU mission

on.

apters, the

cussed in t

anagement

U has come

thin CSDP

et, the entr

High Repres

ommission

P structures

omprehens

s and coord

MS), “Learninssels, 19 J

omprehens__a

nergies”

PU


TION OF

is also an e

d more joint

to-day coor

nce, Brusse

the EU ha

s since 20

tries or reg

deployed

pportunity

ortcomings

ations are

cases, the

ies. Whilst

urally reflec

ns and ope

EU conside

the previou

is challeng

e a long wa

actors mere

ry into force

sentative fo

(HR/VP) w

s (CPCC, C

sive approa

ination, at l

ng by doing: une 2014,ht

approach.pdf,


COMPRE

essential ele

t working m

rdination a

els 19 June

as been en

03. Most o

gions. Howe

a civilian a

to identify

in regards

expected t

operational

the mentio

cted at the l

erations rem

ers a comp

s chapters

ging due to

ay from add

ely as an is

e of the Lis

or Foreign

who is sup

CMPD) und

ach of the

east, at the

Military Lessttp://www.eeas(Accessed 17

n programme under g

EHENSIVE

ement in the

methods, pe

s well as

2014)234

gaged with

of the time

ever, there

and military

lessons an

to civil-mili

to contribu

l level obs

oned chang

level of mis

mains limited

rehensive a

, implemen

o a number

dressing th

ssue betwee

sbon Treaty

Affairs and

pported by

er the EEA

EU to cris

level of Bru

sons Learnt ws.europa.eu/cs7 August 2015

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

E APPRO

e EU's com

ermanent b

more flexib

h implemen

e, these mi

are few ex

y operation

nd best pra

itary interac

ute to an

servations a

ges and dev

ssions and

d, and the E

approach a

nting the a

r of structur

he need for

en civilian a

y and the s

d Security

the EEAS

AS, were au

sis manage

ussels.

within the Cosdp/structures

5).


653371

80

OACH TO

mprehensive

boards and

ble funding

ting civilian

ssions and

xamples of

n in theatre

actices - if

ction within

overall EU

are geared

velopments

operations,

EU still has

s one of its

pproach to

ral, political

r increasing

and military

subsequent

Policy/Vice

S, and the

utomatically

ement, and

omprehensives-instruments-

U

5 s

0

e

d

g

n

d

f

e

f

n

U

d

s

,

s

s

o

l

g

y

t

e

e

y

d

e -

D1.3 Review Although,

comprehen

the effectiv

discusses

literature re

the barriers

As discuss

political- s

establishin

insufficient

play an un

of the key

the crisis m

a political-

could be fu

Treaty, in

lessons id

modalities.

Lessons id

cycle, and

identified b

the lessons

4.1 Lesso

In the next

the comp

reviewed.

4.1.1 Ann

EEAS rele

2015, the E

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

civil-military

nsive appro

veness of

lessons id

eview, key

s and best

sed in chap

structural l

ng permane

t command

narguably si

lessons re

managemen

strategic le

urther enha

regard to c

dentified w

.

dentified an

many of th

by several s

s are often

ons learn

t chapter so

rehensive

nual repo

ase every y

EEAS prese

tary Synergie


y coordinati

oach to crisi

the EU’s c

entified on

informant in

practises to

pter three,

evel comp

ent military

structures

ignificant ro

egarding the

nt structures

evel. Discu

nced. Owin

crisis mana

will only fo

nd lessons

he key less

scholars, in

not exploite

ed from c

ome of the k

approach

rts

year an An

ented the se

es

the European Union

ion only co

s managem

conflict prev

civil- milita

nterviews a

o effective c

many of th

prising i.e.

crisis mana

. Personal

ole for the e

e implemen

s, and there

ssions on h

ng to the sig

agement an

cus on ob

learned pr

ons and be

ndependent

ed when pla

comprehe

key lessons

through c

nual CSDP

econd repo

PU


nstitutes a

ment, when

vention and

ary interact

and a panel

civil- military

e barriers t

the quest

agement st

l relationsh

effective coo

ntation of co

efore this se

how efforts

gnificant stru

nd, in partic

bservations

rocesses a

est practise

researches

anning a ne

ensive app

s and best p

civil- militar

P Lessons

ort on the ke


limited - al

executed p

d resolution

tions within

of expert d

y cooperatio

to create sy

tion of fun

ructures or

ips, adequa

ordination a

omprehens

ection focus

to exploit

uctural chan

cular, civil-m

on post-

re an integ

s highlighte

s, as well a

w CSDP m

proach to

practices re

ry coopera

Report wit

ey lessons id

n programme under g

beit signific

properly, it c

n efforts. T

n CSDP, ba

discussions

on and coor

ynergies wi

nding, reso

a joint pla

ate training

and coordin

ive approac

ses on the l

existing civ

nges broug

military inte

Lisbon pol

gral part of

ed in the ch

as by the EU

ission/opera

CSDP

lated to EU

tion/coordin

h recomme

dentified du

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

cant - part o

can significa

Therefore, th

asing the a

s, focusing o

rdination.

ithin CSDP

ources, relu

anning unit,

g and recru

nation. How

ch are conn

lessons ide

vil- military

ht about by

raction, this

licies, struc

f the CSDP

hapter have

U. Although

ration.

’s efforts to

nation to

endations. O

uring the pre


653371

81

of the EU's

antly impact

his chapter

analysis on

on outlining

P lies in the

uctance of

as well as

itment also

ever, many

nected with

ntified from

capabilities

y the Lisbon

s review of

ctures and

P operation

e also been

h identified,

o implement

CSDP are

On 3 March

evious year

U

5 s

s

t

r

n

g

e

f

s

o

y

h

m

s

n

f

d

n

n

,

t

e

h

r

D1.3 Review in the field

already in

The report

(concrete)

to the pr

coordinatio

outlined in

Those les

However, t

to note tha

military co

process.238

4.1.2 Les

It is said

reform in

automatica

manageme

coordinatio

consultatio

through re

shared situ

but for the

Even if th

understand

236 The 2014 further work iA summary ohttp://eeas.eu237Council of 238 The repreMay 2015 thAspects of Ccomposed ofthe key lesso239 Drent, The240 Nicoletta P

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

d of CSDP.

2013 and li

t included

steps to be

rocesses, b

on and syn

Annex 2. L

ssons would

the recomm

at until the r

oordination 8

ssons ide

that improv

the Lisbon

ally consid

ent. To an

on mechan

on among t

vised Crisis

uational awa

most part,

he idea of

ding of the

report states is needed in pof the Annual 2uropa.eu/csdpthe European

esentatives of ey endorsed

Crisis Managemf both EEAS aons of both 20e EU's ComprPirozzi 2013,

tary Synergie


The repor

sted in the

15 key rec

e taken to i

but there

nergies in C

Lessons id

d most pro

mendations

recommend

and synerg

ntified on

ving cohere

Treaty. 239

ered as f

n extent, t

isms amon

the crisis m

s Managem

areness or

the outcom

a compreh

concept wit

that the imple

particular on ce2013 CSDP lep/documents/an Union, “AnnuEU Member Sits key lessonment, Politicaland European13 and 2014 arehensive App11.

es

the European Union

t also desc

Annual 201

commendat

mplement e

are also s

CSDP miss

dentified. 237

obably enh

are quite g

dations are a

gies in the

n CSDP ci

ence and e9 Through

furthering t

his has be

ng the main

managemen

ment Proced

analysis to

e of this de

hensive ap

thin the EU

mentation of tertain aspectsessons report:annual_2013_ual 2014 CSDStates in the Ens and recomml-Military Grou

n Commission and report bacproach to Secu

PU


cribed the im

13 CSDP le

tions that r

each of the

some reco

sions and 7

hance civil-

general in n

agreed and

field, it m

vil- milita

effectivenes

the institut

the compr

een achiev

n institution

nt actors, m

dures) and

which both

evelopment

pproach is

U. The EEAS

the key lessons of the Comp

_csdp_lessonsDP Lessons ReEU Political anmendations inup and Military

departments ck to Member urity,”12.


mplementat

ssons repo

refer to the

em. The key

ommendatio

operations

- military s

nature and n

d put into pr

ay take qu

ary interfa

ss were am

tional chang

rehensive a

ved throug

ns and the

more consu

improveme

h civilian and

following th

not new, t

S and the E

ns identified inrehensive App

s_report_en.pdeport,” 15-16.nd Security Con line with the y Committee. Tdealing with CStates in the

n programme under g

tion of the

rt236.

e five key

y recomme

ons to enh

in the field

ynergies in

not that con

ractice to en

uite a long

ace

mongst the

ges followin

approach o

h the insti

re is now

ultative plan

nts have be

d military co

he Treaty re

there has

European C

n 2013 made gproach and on

df.

ommittee discadvice of theThe CSDP LeCSDP will monext Annual C

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

key lesson

lessons an

ndations re

hance civi

d. Those le

n the field

ncrete. Als

nhance CS

time due t

guiding pr

ng the Tre

of the EU

titutionalisat

an increas

nning proce

een made i

ounterparts

emains limit

not been

Commission

good progressn pre-deploym

cussed the repe EU Committeessons Managonitor the implCSDP Lesson


653371

82

ns identified

nd describe

elate mainly

lian-military

essons are

of CSDP.

o it is good

DP civilian-

to the long

rinciples for

eaty, it was

U to crisis

tion of the

ed level of

esses (also

n regard to

contribute,

ed.240

a common

n published,

s, although ment training.

port and on 12ee for Civiliangement Groupementation ofs Report.

U

5 s

2

d

e

y

y

e

.

d

-

g

r

s

s

e

f

o

o

,

n

,

2 n p f

D1.3 Review in Decemb

and crisis"

joint under

could work

241 Volker HaTalking Point

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

ber 2013, a

" which, wh

rstanding a

k more com

auck and Andts blog, 20 De

1. The Po

be furth

2. The rev

further a

3. Staff in

training

4. There is

5. Coordin

enhance

tary Synergie


Tabl

a Communic

ilst not rea

among the

prehensive

rew Sherriff, I

ecember (2013

litical Frame

er improved

vised Crisis

analysis to a

Brussels an

.

s insufficient

nation and co

ed.

(Cou

es

the European Union

e 8. The Key

cation on "

lly defining

High Repre

ly.241

mportant prog3).

ework for Cri

.

Manageme

void delays i

nd in EU De

secure comm

ooperation b

ncil of the Eu

PU


y Lessons f

The EU's c

the concep

esentative/E

gress, but rea

isis Approac

nt Procedur

in mission la

legations wo

munication c

between EU

uropean Uni


from 2014

comprehens

pt of a com

EEAS and

al EU compreh

ch (PFCA) sh

res (CMP) p

unch.

ould benefit f

capability.

Delegations

on, 3 March

n programme under g

sive approa

mprehensive

the Commi

hensiveness is

howed its po

proved their

from more s

and CSDP

2015)

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

ach to exter

e approach,

ission on h

s still ahead o

otential but c

worth but

systematic C

missions ca


653371

83

rnal conflict

sets out a

ow the EU

of us, ECDPM

could

need

CSDP

an be

U

5 s

3

t

a

U

M

D1.3 Review The Comm

external po

Whilst the

building),

Communic

the measu

challenges

applicable)

they will be

Shared an

Developing

comprehen

causes be

and asses

sound and

laying out

something

242 European243 Faria, Wh244 Council oCouncil meet

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

munication o

olicy and ac

1. Devel

2. Define

3. Focus

4. Mobili

5. Comm

6. Linkin

7. Make

8. Work

Communic

in essence

cation, welc

ures or prio

s for furthe

) according

e covered a

nalysis

g a shared

nsive appro

hind a (pot

sing the dif

coherent p

the EU in

which is of

n Commission,hat EU Comprof the Europeating Brussels,

tary Synergie


outlined eig

ction in conf

lop a shared

e a common

s on preven

ise the diffe

mit to the lo

ng policies a

better use

in partners

cation emp

e, the Com

comed and

ority areas f

er developi

to those m

accordingly.

analysis ha

oach to crisi

tential) conf

fferent optio

political stra

nterests an

f utmost im

, “The EU's corehensive Appan Union, “Co12 May 2014

es

the European Union

ght measure

flict and cris

d analysis;

n strategic v

ntion;

erent streng

ng term;

and internal

of EU Dele

hip.

hasises con

munication

supported b

for furtherin

ng the EU

easures. U

as been hig

s managem

flict or crisis

ons for actio

tegy for con

d objective

portance w

omprehensive proach?, 8-9. ouncil conclus.

PU


es to "enha

sis situation

vision;

ths and cap

and extern

egations;

nflict preve

is largely

by the Cou

ng the comp

U comprehe

ndoubtedly

ghlighted a

ment. Share

s, identifica

on, by all re

nflict preven

es, as well

when trying

approach to e

sions on the


ance the co

ns"242:

pacities of t

nal action;

ention and l

focused o

ncil of the E

prehensive

ensive app

, other area

s one of th

ed analysis a

ation of rele

elevant acto

ntion and re

as resour

to assess t

external confli

EU's compreh

n programme under g

herence an

he EU;

ong-term c

n crisis ma

EU in its Co

approach,

roach will

as of import

e crucial a

and unders

vant people

ors, is key fo

esponse. Th

rces, in the

the impact o

ct and crises”

hensive appro

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

nd effective

commitment

anagement

onclusions2

the opport

be organis

tance may s

reas for fur

standing of t

e and group

for the form

his should a

e country o

or effective

”

oach,” FOREI


653371

84

ness of the

t (to peace

t.243 As the244, sets out

tunities and

sed (where

surface and

rthering the

the outlying

ps involved

ulation of a

also include

or region -

ness of the

GN AFFAIRS

U

5 s

4

e

e

e

t

d

e

d

e

g

d

a

e

-

e

S

D1.3 Review EU action.

also includ

without a

should be

It has bee

EEAS and

effectively

step towar

when a CS

the range

the suppor

EU delega

instrument

in 2014 to

common E

Regarding

recent exa

conducting

assistance

perspective

Whilst ther

PFCA whic

systematic

the new to

actors. It h

to increas

245 EuropeaComprehensNetwork Mee246 Ari Kerkkäof a CompreManagement247 Konrad AApproach in 248 Europeanmaking/shap249 Council oMinistry of De250 Council of

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

.245 The dev

de a compr

sound unde

applied - an

n noted tha

d the Counc

respond to

rds this dire

SDP action

of options f

rt of relevan

ation. 248 T

ts such as d

address th

EU strategic

improving

amples of g

g conflict

e missions.

es.249

re have bee

ch "the EEA

c250, natural

ool, PFCA s

has been ob

e informati

an Commissiosive Approacheting, Brusselsänen, “From Pehensive Appt, 2015), 42-43

Adenauer StiftExternal Conf

n Commissioning”, 47; Intervof the Europeefence, Officiaf the Europea

tary Synergie


velopment

rehensive k

erstanding

ny response

at the lack o

cil of the EU

crises and

ection has b

is foreseen

for the EU

nt services,

These opti

diplomacy a

he Ukrainia

c vision; sho

shared an

good practi

analysis w

All of thes

en notable

AS will striv

ly it could b

hould be in

bserved tha

ion sharing

on, “The EUh to External s, 30 January Principles to Pproach to Cri3. tung & Care Iflict and Crisis, “The EU's coview with a EU

ean Union, “Aal from Ministrn Union, “Ann

es

the European Union

of a comm

knowledge

of the conf

e, or indeed

of common

U has hamp

conflicts.24

been the cre

, a PFCA th

to respond,

including c

ons do no

and econom

n crisis, wh

owcasing th

nalysis by t

ces in this

workshops

e allow ble

developme

ve to make

be further ut

ncluded into

at further eff

g and impr

U's compreheAction Gathe2013.

Practices - Theisis Managem

International, : from StrategomprehensiveU NAVFOR OAnnual 2014 Cry for Foreign Anual 2014 CSD

PU


mon or shar

and unders

flict contex

d the compr

understan

pered the c47 In regard

eation of th

hat outlines

, will be pre

civilian and

ot include

mic sanction

here it has

e potential

the EEAS

regard, na

and bette

ending in n

ents in the a

it even tim

tilised and

o the training

fforts, and w

rove situati

ensive approering Civil So

e Primacy of Ument, (The Fi

“Summary regy to Practice"e approach to

Officer, 20 AugCSDP lessonAffairs and Of

DP lessons rep


red analysis

standing of

t - and also

rehensive a

ding among

creation of c

to the shar

e PFCA ap

s not just the

epared by t

military rep

only CSDP

ns. The PCF

been repo

of the docu

and the E

amely throu

er coordina

ecessary c

area of sha

melier, to pe

the analysis

g programs

willingness,

onal aware

oach to exteociety Input,”

Understandingnnish Centre

eport on exper, (Brussels, 12external confust 2015. s report”; Pafficial from Minport”

n programme under g

s of the situ

f the root c

o the appro

pproach, w

g the Europ

coherent st

red analysis

pproach. O

e situation o

he EEAS g

presentative

P missions

FA was pre

rted to hav

ment.

uropean C

gh the Ear

ating fact-fi

ivilian and

red analysis

rfect it and

s could be

s, available

is required

eness that

ernal conflict Meeting Repo

g,” in Jari Musof Expertise

rt roundtable: 2 February 20lict and crises

nel of Expertnistry of the In

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

uation at h

causes of t

opriate mea

ill fail.246

pean Comm

trategies fo

s, the most

nce a crisis

or the confli

geographica

es, and the

s and ope

epared for th

ve helped in

Commission

rly Warnin

finding and

military exp

s, mainly o

to make its

improved. T

for all the r

by the diffe

are prereq

and crises”ort, Civil Soc

stonen (ed.) Ge in Compreh

The EU's Co014). s”; De Kermab

ts discussion nterior) 28 Aug


653371

85

and should

the conflict;

asures that

mission, the

r the EU to

noteworthy

s occurs, or

ict, but also

al desk with

e respective

rations but

he first time

n forming a

, there are

ng System,

d technical

pertise and

wing to the

s use more

To promote

relevant EU

erent actors

quisites for

; “The EU'sciety Dialogue

Good Practiceshensive Crisis

omprehensive

bon, “Decision

(Official fromgust 2015.

U

5 s

5

d

;

t

e

o

y

r

o

h

e

t

e

a

e

,

l

d

e

e

e

U

s

r

s e

s s

e

n

m

D1.3 Review formulating

taken by th

Common

As outline

strategic v

and opera

impact, of

broader EU

political pr

regional o

comprehen

should be

Having a "

challenge

framework

Sahel, Gre

Whilst outl

should act

and coope

through be

conducted

mechanism

the effectiv

251 Interview Official from discussion (E252 The CounComprehens253 Faria, Whexternal conf254 Interview w255 Europeanmaking/shap255 Council ofMinistry of De255 Council of255 Interview Official from discussion (E

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

g a shared

he EU.251

strategic v

ed above, s

vision which

ations. In re

CSDP mis

U strategy.2

riorities and

or national

nsive appro

set out in a

global, coh

for the EU2

k, the recen

eat Lakes)

lining a fram

t regionally.

eration on

etter identif

at the fie

ms and long

ve handove

of a EUMS Ministry for F

EEAS Officialsncil of the Eurosive Approach hat EU Compreflict and criseswith a EU NAV

n Commission,ing,” 47; Intervf the Europeaefence, Officiaf the Europeawith a EUMS Ministry for Fo

EEAS Officials

tary Synergie


understan

vision

shared ana

h, in turn, e

egard to cr

ssions and 252 Therefor

d strategies

levels has

oach, also t

Strategy d

erent and r254. Despite

nt regional

have met

mework for

. A stronge

the ground

fication of t

eld level, a

ger term su

r to other E

Official, 8 Se

Foreign Affairss), 27 August 2opean Union, to Crisis Man

ehensive Apps” VFOR Officer , “The EU's coview with a EUn Union, “Annal from Ministrn Union, “AnnOfficial, 8 Sep

oreign Affairs s), 27 August 2

es

the European Union

ding of the

alysis is a

nables a m

risis manag

operations

re, the deve

s of the EU

s been pe

to crisis ma

document.

resilient" str

the import

or national

criticism as

regional ac

er guiding im

d, and the

the most a

as well as

pport activi

U instrume

eptember 201s and , Officia2015; Interview“Council concagement,” 13roach?, 6;Eur

20 August 20omprehensive U NAVFOR Onual 2014 CSDry for Foreign Anual 2014 CSDptember 2015and , Official f2015; Interview

PU


e conflict se

preconditio

more cohere

gement, it

s is enhanc

elopment of

U to addres

erceived as

anagement.253

rategy for a

tance of inc

strategies

s regards t

ction, the s

mplementat

comprehen

ppropriate

better seq

ties; includ

nts.255

5; Panel of eal from Ministw of a EU NAV

clusions on the, 19.

ropean Comm

015. approach to e

Officer, 20 AugDP lessons repAffairs and Of

DP lessons rep; Panel of expfrom Ministry ow with a EU N


etting and

on for the

ent planning

has been

ced when t

f joint policy

ss security

s a valuab

Wherever

country or

cluding CSD

by the EU

their comp

trategies st

tion framew

nsiveness o

instruments

quencing of

ing elabora

experts discustry of the InteVFOR Officere EU's compre

ission, “The E

external confliust 2015. port”; Panel offficial from Minport”

perts discussioof the Interior)

NAVFOR Offic

n programme under g

the approp

developme

g and condu

noted that

they are co

y documents

and develo

ble effort in

possible, th

a region ha

DP actions

(such as o

rehensivene

top short of

work would

of EU actio

s for the va

f short term

ting on CSD

ssion (Official erior) 28 Augu, 20 August 20

ehensive appro

EU's comprehe

ct and crises”

f Experts discunistry of the In

on (Official from) 28 August 20cer, 20 August

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

priate meas

ent of a co

uct of CSD

the effect

onducted a

s that state

opment ch

n increasin

he EU strat

as been ide

in a comm

on the Hor

ess and co

f detailing h

facilitate c

on could be

arious activ

m crisis m

DP exit stra

from Ministryust 2015; Pan015. roach”; Pirozzi

ensive approa

”; De Kermabo

ussion (Officianterior) 28 Aug

m Ministry of 015; Panel of t 2015.


653371

86

sures to be

ommon EU

DP missions

iveness, or

s part of a

the shared

allenges at

ng the EU

tegic vision

entified as a

on strategy

n of Africa,

oordination.

how the EU

coordination

e improved

vities to be

anagement

ategies and

y of Defence,nel of experts'

i, “The EU’s

ach to

on, “Decision

al from gust 2015

Defence, experts'

U

5 s

6

e

U

s

r

a

d

t

U

n

a

y

,

.

U

n

d

e

t

d

, '

D1.3 Review The need t

the EU as

(JFD) has

EU strateg

The guidin

cooperatio

embassies

into accou

instrument

particular w

the commo

Following

case CSD

would pre

Manageme

align civi

procedure

CMC, by t

A recent le

contributed

There is s

and accor

planning p

principle o

common s

utilise has

the best su

There are

multi-annu

255 The CounComprehens256 Council oAction Plan 2257 Faria, “Wh258 ”; De Kerm259 Council of260 Panel of E

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

to define a

s one of the

been emph

gic visions a

ng principle

on between

s on the gro

unt other

ts).256 A les

where CSD

on vision to

the definitio

P was cho

epare its o

ent Procedu

ilian and

es as much

he CMPD,

esson, how

d to a faster

ome criticis

rding to th

process whe

of selecting

strategic vis

been made

uited option

a number

al financial

ncil of the Eurosive Approach of the Europea2015”, Joint Sthat EU Comprmabon, “Decisf the EuropeaExperts (Minis

tary Synergie


common s

e priorities.

hasised as

and establis

es for sett

n the EU a

ound a key r

strategic d

sson, in re

DP missions

strengthen

on of a com

osen as the

options (eith

ures (CMP)

military p

h as possi

includes bo

wever, indica

r launching

sm, despite

e revised

en designin

the most s

sion, many

e, at the pol

s.260

of example

planning o

opean Union, to Crisis Man

an Union, “Tataff Working Drehensive Appsion making/shn Union, “Ann

stry of Foreign

es

the European Union

strategic vi

The devel

an instrume

shing the U

ting out th

and its Me

role. It is als

documents

gard to sh

s are deploy

the "whole

mmon EU s

e best instru

her civilian

. One of the

planning

ble. As exp

oth civilian

ates that wh

of missions

the aspira

CMP, towa

g the CSDP

suitable CS

times the d

itical level,

es of such e

of Commiss

“Council concagement”, 19king forward t

Document, SWproach?”,14. haping”, 47.

nual 2014 CSDAffairs, EEAS

PU


ision has b

opment of

ent to stren

Union's obje

hese guidel

ember State

so emphasi

(regional

haping a co

yed - that t

e-of-EU" com

strategic vi

ument to b

n or militar

e objectives

processes

plained in c

and military

hilst the rev

s and more

tion of actin

ards the a

P interventi

SDP instrum

decision ab

before final

efforts. The

sion externa

clusions on the. ;Faria, “Whathe EU's Com

WD (2015) 85 f

DP lessons repS Official and f


been, as on

guidelines

ngthen joint

ectives and

lines, to d

es, as wel

sed that the

strategies

ommon EU

he Member

mprehensiv

sion toward

be used in

ry) in acco

s of the rev

and har

chapter 3, c

y inputs (CP

vised CMP

efforts are

ng in line w

actual imple

ions. The c

ment accor

bout which

lisation of th

e EEAS, for

al relations

e EU's compreat EU Comprehprehensive Apfinal, 14 April 2

port” former OPCE

n programme under g

e might exp

for Joint F

analysis an

priorities fo

evelop the

l as assig

e Guidelines

, the PFC

strategic v

r States nee

veness.257

ds a conflic

the situatio

ordance wit

ision, in 201

rmonise c

currently, th

PCC and E

has proved

needed in t

with one co

ementation

ritique poin

ding to the

instrument

he analysis

r instance,

funds, and

ehensive approhensive Appropproach to ext2015.

N Official), 27

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

pect, also id

ramework

nd improvin

or a region

e JFD, high

ning deleg

s for JFD n

CA, EU de

vision, has

ed to be co

ct or crisis,

on at hand,

th the rev

13, of the C

civilian an

he developm

EUMS, resp

d functional

this regard.2

mmon strat

of a com

nts out that

e shared an

(civilian or

and the for

now takes

Commissio

roach”; Pirozzioach?”, 6. ternal conflict

7 August 2015


653371

87

dentified by

Documents

ng common

or country.

hlight wide

ations and

eed to take

evelopment

s been - in

ommitted to

and in the

the EEAS

ised Crisis

CMP was to

d military

ment of the

ectively).258

l, it has not259

tegic vision

mprehensive

despite the

nalysis and

military) to

rmulation of

part in the

on services

i, “The EU’s

and crises -

.

U

5 s

7

y

s

n

.

e

d

e

t

n

o

e

S

s

o

y

e 8

t

n

e

e

d

o

f

e

s

D1.3 Review in turn are

by regular

already be

concrete d

ways to fac

taking full a

a security s

Coordinat

As noted a

aspiration

institutiona

methods h

there are m

EU Crisis

Represent

or the Man

and the Cr

meetings,

261 Hauch anPirozzi, The E

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

e actively co

r contacts,

e observed

dual use cap

cilitate their

account of c

sector refor

tion

above, the s

of improve

al "architect

have been im

multiple acto

Response

ative of the

naging Dire

risis Manag

to ensure th

nd Rocca, “GaEU’s Compreh

tary Synergie


ontributing t

information

in many t

pabilities, in

r potential a

civilian and

rm is an exa

structural ch

ed institutio

ture" has b

mproved; e

ors and var

e System

e EU for For

ector for Cri

gement Boa

he coordina

aps between Chensive Appro

es

the European Union

to CSDP m

exchanges

heatres. Sy

ncluding thr

availability f

military spe

ample of su

hanges with

onal coope

been streng

nhancing th

rious coordi

consisting

reign Affairs

sis Respon

ard. The pur

ation of EU a

Comprehensivoach to Crisis

PU


mission/ ope

s and close

ynergies co

rough joint r

for CSDP ci

ecificities. T

uch civil-mili

hin EEAS fo

eration and

gthened, fra

he compreh

ination mec

of the E

s and Secu

nse and Op

rpose of the

actors and

ve AproachesManagement


eration plan

e coordinat

ould be fos

research an

ivilian missi

The creation

tary synerg

ollowing the

d coordinati

ameworks

hensiveness

chanisms th

EU Crisis

urity Policy,

perational P

e EU Crisis

instruments

”, 25; Faria, “Wt, 12.

n programme under g

ning. In the

tion. Tangib

stered in pa

nd technolo

ions and mi

n of a pool o

ies.

e Lisbon Tre

ion. As alr

have been

s of EU exte

hat engage

Platform (c

the Execut

Planning), th

s Response

s across the

What EU Com

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

e field, this

ble results

articular in

ogy efforts,

ilitary opera

of European

reaty brough

ready men

created a

ernal action

in crisis res

chaired by

tive Secreta

he EU Situa

e System is,

e EU system

mprehensive A


653371

88

is matched

of this can

developing

and finding

ations while

n experts in

ht about an

tioned, the

nd working

n. Currently,

sponse: the

y the High

ary General

ation Room

, by regular

m.261

Approach?” 6;

U

5 s

8

d

n

g

g

e

n

n

e

g

,

e

h

l

m

r

;

D1.3 Review

Figure 7. T

As illustra

General S

an ad hoc

Crisis pla

sharing be

standing s

shorter-ter

and militar

improved c

continues.

namely sm

Commissio

Operation

262 “Crisis Pla” http://eeas.e263 Interview 264 Nicole Ko

http://www.in

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

he EU Crisis

ted262, the

ecretariat s

basis, and

atform is a

etween the

tructural ba

rm security

ry structure

coordination

In addition

mooth trans

on measure

n Centre (O

atform,” Europeuropa.eu/criswith a Formeroenig, Resetti

nstitutdelors.eu

tary Synergie


s Platform

Crisis Plat

services, inc

it has been

a good coo

military and

arriers within

policy and

es. Accordi

n at the top

, the ad hoc

sitions betw

es.264

OPCEN)

pen External Asis-response/wr EUBAM Libying EU extern

u/media/euext

es

the European Union

tform cons

cluding the

activated, f

ordination

d civilian fu

n and acros

longer-term

ng to an o

p of the hie

c use of the

ween the a

Action Servicewhat-we-do/crya Official, 11 nal action: po

ternalaction-ko

PU


ists of the

relevant C

for instance

mechanism

unctions. Ho

ss institutio

m developm

official from

erarchy, but

e Crisis Plat

activities in

, accessed 15risis-platform/iSeptember 20

otential and c

oenig-jdib-feb


relevant E

CSDP actors

e, in the eve

m to enhan

owever, it h

ns, those in

ment cooper

m the EU M

t not at the

tform did no

the realm

5 September 2ndex_en.htm.015. onstraints, (B

15.pdf?pdf=ok

n programme under g

EEAS, Com

s. Its meetin

ent of the cr

ce coopera

has not bee

ncluding the

ation, as w

Military Staf

e working le

ot ensure “in

m of the CS

2015,

erlin: Jacques

k, (Accessed 1

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

mmission a

ngs are co

risis in Libya

ation and

en able to b

e intersectio

well as betw

ff, the Cris

evel where

ntelligent se

SDP and l

s Delors Insti

16 July 2015).


653371

89

nd Council

nducted on

a.263

information

bridge long-

on between

een civilian

is Platform

duplication

equencing”,

longer-term

itut, 2015), 5,

.

U

5 s

9

l

n

n

-

n

n

m

n

,

m

,

D1.3 Review Another go

least on a

Operations

military syn

mandate, t

in the ope

CMPD, at

Africa. In a

and operat

structures.

and its geo

The creatio

planning a

to the oppo

therefore t

of the EEA

Overall, th

and opera

some obse

mandate o

some as t

the Horn o

OPCEN is

elevate th

265 EuropeanAnnual Repo– 2012/2138of the EU Op23 March 20266 Council ofon the activathe Horn of A267European Defence Polsignposts forUK (2012), 2015). 268 Interview

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

ood examp

a limited g

s Centre (O

nergies bet

the purpose

erational pla

its request

addition, Op

tions in the 265 At the e

ographical a

on of the O

and conduct

osition by s

he creation

AS, has no c

e creation

ations has b

ervations re

owing to the

he "best in

of Africa and

regarded a

he role of

n Parliament, ort from the Co(INI), 31 Octo

perations Cent12. f the Europea

ation of the EUAfrica”, 1 Dece

External Actiolicy, (June 20r the future”, 3http://www.pu

of a former EU

tary Synergie


le of a stru

geographica

OpCen) whic

tween the t

e of the OpC

anning and

t, in strateg

pCen was to

Horn of Af

end of 2014

and function

PCEN was

t of EU ope

some memb

of a tempo

command re

and functio

been regar

egarding th

e differing v

strument to

d Sahel268.

as a good

OPCEN i

“Report on th

ouncil to the Eober 2012; Cotre for the Com

n Union, “CouU Operations ember 2014. on Service, “E015); Europea31st Report ofblications.par

UCAP Sahel O

es

the European Union

cture that h

al area), as

ch was activ

hree CSDP

Cen was, in

d conduct o

gic planning

o facilitate c

frica, as we

, the manda

nal scope w

based on a

erations and

ber states, t

orary OPCE

esponsibility

oning of the

rded as pos

he unclear

views of the

o facilitate c

In regard to

practice an

nto the ch

he implementaEuropean Paruncil of the Emmon Securit

uncil Decision Centre for the

EU Operationsan Union Comf Session 2010liament.uk/pa/

Officer 2 Septe

PU


has contribu

s outlined

vated in Ma

P missions

nter alia, to

of the then

g for the C

coordination

ll as betwee

ate of the O

was expande

a so called W

d establishm

the foundin

EN was a co

y, and rema

e OPCEN a

sitively con

role of OP

e member s

coordination

o the comm

nd many me

hain of co

ation of the Crliament on the

European Unioty and Defenc

2014/860/CFSe Common S

s Centre Hornmmittee, “Eur0 - 2012, A re/ld201012/ldse

ember 2015


uted to the

by many

arch 2012 to

in the Horn

support the

future civi

CSDP missi

n and syne

en the miss

OPCEN was

ed to cover

Weimar init

ment of a p

g of a perm

ompromise.

ains separa

s a link bet

ntributing to

PCEN, and

states, the

n" between

mand and co

ember state

ommand of

Common Sece Common Fo

on, Council Dece Policy miss

SP amending ecurity and D

n of Africa & Sropean Defeneport ordered belect/ldeucom

n programme under g

EU compre

interlocutor

o coordinate

n of Africa.

e Civilian Op

lian CSDP

on and ope

rgies betwe

sion and op

s extended

the Sahel r

iative that a

permanent o

manent HQ

Structurally

te of the EU

tween Brus

o improved

the challen

OPCEN ha

the differe

ontrol of mis

es have exp

f the miss

urity and Defeoreign and Seecision 2012/1ions and oper

and extendingefence Policy

Sahel Factshece Capabilitieby the House

m/292/29202.ht

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

ehensive ap

rs, has bee

te and stren

According

perations C

mission a

eration in t

een the CSD

perations an

until the en

region. 266

aimed at im

operations

was not po

y, the OPC

UMS.267

ssels and th

coordinatio

nges to im

as been con

ent EU stak

ssions and

pressed wil

sions and

fence Policy (ecurity Policy),173/CFSP on ration in the H

g Decision 20y missions and

eet,” Commones: lessons frof Lords, Partm (Accessed


653371

90

pproach (at

en the EU

ngthen civil-

to its initial

Commander

and support

he Horn of

DP mission

nd Brussels

nd of 2016,

proving the

HQ. Owing

ossible, and

EN, as part

he missions

on. Despite

plement its

nsidered by

eholders in

operations,

llingness to

operations.

based on the, (12562/2011the activationorn of Africa”,

012/173/CFSPd operation in

n Security androm the past,rliament of thed 22 October

U

5 s

0

t

U

-

l

r

t

f

n

s

,

e

g

d

t

s

e

s

y

n

,

o

.

e

n ,

P n

d ,

e r

D1.3 Review Neverthele

its current

2016 beca

In many i

necessary

ensure effi

civilian and

This under

by noting t

multiple cr

very difficu

Rocca is,

settings, "

strategic o

these diffe

With regar

remain bet

between t

military pla

has been a

the planni

concerning

contested

intra-institu

the develo

EUMS. Fo

and coord

planning p

269 Panel of e270 Interview 271 Hauck & R272 Panel of e273 Interview 274 InterviewManagement275 Panel of Ean official of t

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

ess, it looks

form, will n

ause of the o

nstances,

y coordinat

icient coord

d military ca

rstanding ha

that the mu

rises, make

ult270. One s

however,

"there is n

oversight a

rent departm

rd to the in

tween the C

he Brussel

anning proc

an ongoing

ing of civi

g the respe

division or

utional com

opments, lo

or the above

dination bet

rocesses.27

experts (EEASwith a former Rocca, “Gaps experts (EEASof an official f

w of a EU Nt, 3, 11. Experts (Ministhe Ministry of

tary Synergie


s likely that

not be expa

opposition b

it has ther

tion mecha

dination, inc

apabilities a

as, on the o

ultiplicity of

es the coo

shortcoming

that desp

no structur

nd authorit

ments and

nter-institu

CSDP institu

s institution

esses.272 In

g challenge

lian missio

ctive mand

labour or c

mpetition"274.

ong-term (s

e mentione

tween CPC75

S Officials), 27EUFOR Chadbetween Com

S Officials), 27rom the MinistAVFOR Offic

stry of Foreignf the Interior o

es

the European Union

the manda

anded nor e

by some me

refore been

anism shou

cluding betw

at the strate

other hand,

actors, dea

ordination a

g, as observ

ite the var

re that co

ty to take

institutions"

tional rela

utions. Furt

ns that has

n terms of p

between C

ons273. The

ates of CP

coordination

In addition

trategic) m

ed reasons,

CC, CMDP

7 August 2015d RCA 20 Augmprehensive A7 August 2015try of the Intercer, 20 Augu

n Affairs, EEASof Finland, 27 J

PU


ate of OPC

extended b

ember state

n stated th

uld be in pl

ween the e

egic-politica

been chall

aling at time

at the same

ved by Hauc

rious institu

ould provid

decisions a

".271

ations or c

ther work is

s in many

planning of C

CPCC and C

e Lisbon T

PCC and CM

n; sometime

n to the spl

ilitary plann

there is an

and EUM

5. gust 2015. Aproaches”, 255; Faria, What rior of Finland

ust 2015; Piro

S Official and July 2015.


EN, in

beyond

es.269

hat the

ace to

xisting

l level.

lenged

es with

e time

ck and

utional

de the

across

coordinatio

s needed to

instances

CSDP miss

CMPD who

Treaty did

MPD and d

es leading t

it responsib

ning are st

n ongoing n

S in order

5; Faria, “WhaEU Comprehe, 27 July 2015ozzi, The EU

former OPCE

n programme under g

on, some o

address th

still led to

ions and op

o both have

not provid

id not thus

to "persona

bility for civ

ill separate

need to inte

to improve

at EU Compreensive Approa5. U’s Comprehe

EN Official), 27

●

“Coordin

are the k

claimed

need

efficient c

nobo

(InterviewSom

8 Sep

●

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

outstanding

he "silo type

separate c

perations, c

e a role in p

de specific

clarify the

al territorial

vilian planni

ed among C

ensify the c

ve the coor

ehensive Approach? 15.

ensive Approa

7 August 2015

● ● ●

nation and co

key words. It

that there is

for better an

coordination.

ody is willing

coordinated

w of a former malia Officialptember 201

● ● ●


653371

91

issues still

e approach"

civilian and

coordination

particular in

provisions

sometimes

claims and

ng, despite

CMPD and

cooperation

rdination of

oach?”, 8.

ach to Crisis

5; Interview of

ooperation

t is always

an urgent

nd more

. However,

g to be

”.

EUTM l, 5)

U

5 s

l

"

d

n

n

s

s

d

e

d

n

f

s

f

D1.3 Review Further, as

civilian an

comprehen

The Comm

engaging m

from non-s

humanitari

been the

desire to k

Brussels s

It has been

"change o

of coordina

greater dia

institutions

interventio

Everyone d

for more co

4.2 Limit

Whilst man

comprehen

the compre

As discuss

integration

command

276 Hauch an277 Interview 278 Intreview 279 Faria, “Wh280 Thierry Ta281 Article 41 budget, while% of commonreform of the

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

s regards co

nd military

nsive appro

munication

more effect

state actors

an and dev

different ap

keep civilia

tructures ar

n pointed o

of mind-se

ation, in the

alogue betw

s.279 The inc

ns will req

dealing with

ooperation

ations to

ny areas of

nsive appro

ehensivene

sed in chap

and syner

d aspects282

d Rocca, “Gaof a former EUof a OPCEN Ohat EU Comprardy, “CSDP inof the Treaty

e military missn expenditure existing cost

tary Synergie


oordinatio

actors or

oach to ext

did not ad

ively throug

s owing to th

velopment

pproaches

n and milita

re still not id

ut that asid

t" is neede

e spirit of th

ween the v

creasingly c

quire an en

h CSDP mis

and coordin

developi

f developm

oach to cris

ess of CSDP

pter 3, the m

rgies in the2 of CSDP m

ps between CUMC Official, Officer 10 Seprehensive Appn Action – Whon European

sions abide to s) funded throdistribution m

es

the European Union

n between

civil-milita

ernal confli

ddress the

gh joint actio

he fear that

component

by the Me

ary crisis m

deally suited

e from furth

d to facilita

he Commun

various act

complex cha

nhanced in

ssions, eith

nation.

ng the co

ment and im

sis managem

P.

major obsta

e field lie in

missions. 28

Comprehensive4 September

ptember 2015.proach? 2014,hat ContributioUnion (TEU). the principle o

ough the ATHEechanism for

PU


the CSDP

ary coordin

ict and crisi

longstandin

on; someth

t military an

ts of their w

mber State

managemen

d for close c

her clarifyin

ate a compr

nication, am

tors require

allenges tha

ntegration b

her at the st

omprehen

mprovement

ment, there

acles for the

n the decis3

e Aproaches”,2015. . , 15.

on to Internatio Civilian missi

of “costs lie whENA mechanioperations is


instrumen

ation, the

is" provided

ng issue of

ing which h

nd political c

work. Anoth

es to civil-m

nt separated

cooperation

g the relatio

rehensive a

mong the CS

es support

at the EU is

between m

trategic, ope

sive appr

ts have bee

e still seem

e implemen

sion- makin

, 29.

onal Security?ions are directhere they fall,”sm. In the ligha pressing iss

n programme under g

nts, and in p

Communic

d limited at

f the civilia

has provoke

consideratio

her contribu

military ope

d, it has be

n.277

onship betw

pproach, an

SDP actors

at higher

s called to f

military and

erational or

roach to c

en identified

to exist so

ntation of ef

ng process

” Chaillot Paptly financed th” with only a smht of the differesue, particular

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

particular b

cation on

ttention to t

an and mili

ed criticism

ons would o

uting factor

erations.276

een observ

ween the ins

nd the impl

s.278 Further

political lev

face throug

civilian co

r tactical lev

crisis man

d in further

ome areas,

ffective civi

s280, financ

pers, No.134 (2hrough the collmall proportioent sources ofrly for the


653371

92

between the

"The EU's

this aspect.

itary actors

particularly

overrun the

to this has

Due to the

ed that the

stitutions; a

ementation

r, achieving

vels in the

h its CSDP

omponents.

vel is voting

nagement

ring the EU

which limit

lian-military

cial 281 and

2015) lective CFSP

on (about 10 f funds, a

U

5 s

2

e

s

.

s

y

e

s

e

e

a

n

g

e

P

.

g

U

t

y

d

D1.3 Review The limited

strategic

human and

missions a

needed285.

to those d

among the287

Also EU´s

the pipe ex

own purpo

the deploy

and condu

creation of

In fact the

been com

comprehen

available f

been obse

response,

deployment omilitary and cAthena decis282 Wolfgang Operations, eAustria 2015 283 See for in275-276. 284 It remainscivilian and mrespond in Ethe strategic the CSDP. 285Interview w286 “Unity of This preventscan achieve command exoperations. Inthrough a un287 People widifferent wayinclusive), an288 Tardy, “CS

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

d cooperatio

level are o

d financial),

and operat

In addition

documents

e EU institut

strategic p

xported, wh

oses and in

yment of op

uct structure

f Joint milit

e different

mmonly rec

nsive appro

for CSDP m

erved in p

where the

of larger civiliacivilian operatision, but also i

Wosolsobe, “eds. Jochen R); Glume, “Ch

stance; Europ

s to be seen homilitary capabiEAS, which inlevel (except

with a Ministryeffort” is the ss organizationunity of effort

xcept it usuallyn this case, unified commandith different pr

ys of solving prnd different waSDP in Action

tary Synergie


on and coo

often based

structural a

ions and t

n, different r

limit the h

tion, preven

planning, va

here necess

different tu

perations th

es, together

tary-civilian

t financing

cognised a

oach to cris

missions an

particular in

financing w

an and militaryions have been the context “The Challeng

Rehrl and Galiahain of comma

pean Union Ins

ow the EEAS lities. Creation

nclude all majoEUMS and EU

y of the Interiostate of harmons from workinthrough share

y relates to coonity of effort isder (Wikipediarofessional bacroblems (intuitays of communn”

es

the European Union

ordination a

on lack of

and politica

he planning

reporting sta

orizontal in

nt also the in

arious plann

sary in the

ubes. Altho

hat could co

r with the re

n operation

g mechanis

as one of

sis manage

nd operatio

n those ca

would come

y contingents. en ongoing oveof the ‘Train a

ges of CSDP Ca Glume, (Vieand”.

stitute for Sec

review, whichn of a Crisis reor CSDP civiliaU OPCEN), sh

r Official, 27 Jnizing efforts g at cross pur

ed common obordinating org often achievea). ckgrounds aretive vs. analytnicating (acce

PU


across CSD

f shared vis

al constrains

g procedur

andards, le

nstitutional

nteroperabi

ning pipes a

EEAS in B

ough the Tr

ombine mili

elevant fina

ns. 288

sms of civi

the main

ement. This

ons, and hi

ases that w

both throu

Discussions er the last twoand Equip’ proCommand Conenna: The Fed

curity Studies (

h was completesponse unit uan and militaryhould be a ma

July 2015. among multiprposes and it rbjectives. In mganizations noed through cam

e used to diffetical), differentepting orders v


DP’s civilian

sion, time p

s. 284 Also th

re itself is

ssons learn

learning. O

lity between

and a lack

russels, eac

eaty on Eu

tary and ci

ancial regula

ilian missio

n limitations

s has result

ndered ope

would requ

gh the Athe

on new sourc

o years, notabogramme. ntrol”, in the Heral Ministry o

(EUISS), Year

ted this summunder the Depy mission/ope

ajor improveme

ple organizatioreduces duplic

military operatiot in the same mpaign plans

erent organisatt views on goovs. encouragin

n programme under g

n and militar

pressure, lim

he planning

still an are

ned process

Overall, lack

n civilian an

of mechan

ch operatio

ropean Uni

vilian eleme

ations, have

ons and mil

s to the

ted in lack

erational ef

uire a com

ena mecha

ces or mechanly on the occa

Handbook on Cof Defence and

rbook of Europ

er, is improvinuty Secretary rations’ stakehent on civil-mi

ns working towcation of effortons, unity of ecommand, suor coordinatin

tional structureod leadership (ng discussion)

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

ry functions

mited resou

and condu

ea where p

ses and lim

k of unity o

nd military c

isms for the

on is design

ion does no

ents, the E

e so far pre

litary opera

implementa

of resourc

ffectiveness

mbined civi

nism and th

nisms of fundinasion of the re

CSDP Missiond Sports of th

pean Security

ng interoperaby of CSDP andholders and inilitary interope

wards a similat. Multiple org

effort is similaruch as in interang committees

es (hierarchy (authoritarian )


653371

93

s in politic-

urces (both

ct of CSDP

progress is

ited access

of efforts286

components

e design of

ned for their

ot preclude

EU planning

evented the

ations have

ation of a

es that are

s. This has

lian-military

he member

ng for both view of the

ns and e Republic of

y 2013, 2013,

bility between d Crisis nterlocutors aterability within

ar objective. anizations r to unity of agency s instead of

vs. network), vs.

U

5 s

3

-

h

P

s

s 6

s

f

r

e

g

e

e

a

e

s

y

r

t

D1.3 Review states.289 F

premises a

use of exi

financing m

has been c

the differen

Absence

parallel ha

approach

activities o

the worst c

mixed mes

EU actors,

The creatio

Constitutio

operations

reluctant to

closely inv

civilian fiel

satisfy the

Ministries

the engage

crisis mana

At the mis

actors’ will

discussion

cooperate/

289 Fabian TeSecurity and 290 Panel of e28 August 22015. 291 Interview 292 Pirozzi , T293 Tardy, “CSSee also: Alefor decision mFederal Minis

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

Financing h

and medica

sting resou

mechanisms

concluded b

nt positions

of Joint c

s also been

in the field.

on the groun

case, loss o

ssages. The

but perceiv

on of a truly

ons of som

s led by a m

o be deplo

volved in th

ld, where th

different in

of Justice,

ement of, a

agement.293

ssion/field le

lingness to

s, the abs

/coordinate

erpan, “FinancDefence, (21

experts (Finnis015; Panel of

with a former The EU’s ComSDP in Actionexander Mattemakers - The stry of Defenc

tary Synergie


has been a

al services

urces in the

s has been

by some int

by the mem

command

n identified

. With sepa

nd are diffic

of creditabili

e people of

ve carrying

y integrated

e Member

military com

oyed under

he planning

he delegate

nterests of t

etc. Lookin

and strength3

evel, the sc

liaise and

sence of

between C

cing CSDP opJanuary 2015

sh Ministry forf Experts (Min

MINUSMA Ofmprehensive Apn”; Pirozzi , Thelaer, “Who is common Secu

ce and Sports

es

the European Union

a limitation

which could

e spirit of c

widely ack

terlocutors t

mber states

and Contr

to be an im

arate comm

cult to avoid

ty among th

the host na

an EU flag

d chain of c

States292 d

mander, mo

a civilian h

g phase of

es from nat

the nationa

ng for a way

hen ties betw

cope of civi

coordinate

sufficient r

CSDP civilia

perations and 5). r the Interior, Mnistry of Fore

fficer 17 Augupproach to Cre EU’s Comprin Charge? N

urity and Defeof the Republ

PU


to, for exa

d otherwise

comprehens

knowledged

that a reform

s.290

rol structu

mportant bar

mand structu

d. This unfo

he host nati

ation do not

as the sam

command

do not allo

ost of the m

head. More

EU missio

tional Minis

al authorities

y out of this

tween, the n

il- military i

their activi

resources,

an mission

missions,” Pr

Ministry of Deign Affairs, E

ust 2015; Interrisis Managemrehensive App

Natural Frictionence Policy of ic of Austria, 2


ample, bett

e be areas

siveness. W

d, and recen

m will not ta

ures betwe

rrier to imple

ures, duplic

ortunately re

ion, if the ac

t necessaril

me.291

encounters

ow the dep

military cons

eover, while

ns, the situ

stries of Fo

s concerne

s stalemate

national min

nteraction

ities. Accor

tools and

and militar

resentation to

efence and MinEAS Official a

view with a Foment proach to Crisn in the CSDPthe European

2014)

n programme under g

er utilisatio

that would

Whilst the n

ntly discuss

ake place a

en the CS

ementation

cations, gap

esults as wa

ctivities are

ly see the d

s a number

ployment of

stituencies

e national m

uation is m

reign Affair

d, including

e, the CMP

nistries invo

is (too ofte

rding to the

mandate

ry missions/

the European

nistry for Foreand former O

ormer EEAS O

sis ManagemeP Decision-Man Union, ed. J

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

on of share

contribute

need to ref

sed at vario

any time soo

SDP activiti

of the com

ps and inco

aste of reso

e carried out

difference b

of obstacle

f civilian pe

in Member

military auth

uch less li

rs are often

g Ministries

D is trying

olved in the

n) dependa

e interviews

based dir

/operations

n Parliament C

eign Affairs repOPCEN Officia

Official 23 Sep

ent aking ProcessJochen Rehrl,


653371

94

ed logistics,

to a better

form CSDP

us levels, it

on owing to

es existing

mprehensive

oherence of

ources, and

t in sending

between the

s: while the

ersonnel in

r States are

horities are

near in the

n unable to

of Interior,

to promote

EU civilian

able on the

s and panel

rections to

in theatre,

Committee on

presentatives,al), 27 August

ptember 2015.

s”in Handbook (Vienna: The

U

5 s

4

,

r

P

t

o

g

e

f

d

g

e

e

n

e

e

e

o

,

e

n

e

l

o

,

n

, t

.

k e

D1.3 Review hinder the

EEAS and

be achieve

with EUSR

comprehen

In addition

cultural ba

addition, th

of synergie

manageme

overcome

294 Interview 295 Interview

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

Civil-

‘need’ to do

the missio

ed. This is

R and the

nsive appro

n, the nation

ackgrounds

he capacity

es. Adequa

ent includin

the prejudic

with a former with a Former

tary Synergie


Tab

Lack of s

Lac

- military coo

Cooperat

o so. Thus

n staff, as w

unfortunate

EU delega

oach on the

nal agendas

are the f

y to underst

ate training

ng (EU dele

ces and dev

OPCEN Offic

r EDA Officer

es

the European Union

ble 9. Main b

Po

EEAS

secure comm

ck of joint Co

Ina

operation/coo

tion is often d

Ru

Use of e

(I

the scope o

well as the w

e, as espec

ation, can h

ground. 294

s, personal

factors whic

tand one an

for all the

egations, E

velop comp

cer 15 Septem14 August 20

PU


barriers to in

olitical const

Funding

S institutional

munication a

ommand and

adequate tra

ordination is

dependable o

ules of Repo

equipment v

Interviews 20

of the intera

willingness

cially the He

have a sign4

relationshi

ch hamper

nother’s com

relevant EU

EUSR, EEA

prehensive c

mber 2015. 15; Interview w


nteroperabi

rains

l settings

nd informatio

control struc

aining

not integral

on personal

orting

vary widely

015)

action is hea

and capac

ead of Miss

nificant imp

ps, languag

r the fruitfu

mpetences

U actors in

AS, ECHO a

capabilities.

with a EUMC

n programme under g

lity

on systems

ctures

part of the m

connections

avily based

ity to see w

sion/Force

pact on the

ge barriers,

ul civil-milita

also seems

volved in c

and DEVCO

.

Official 4 Sep

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

mandate

on individu

where added

Commande

e implemen

different n

ary cooper

s to hinder

conflict prev

O) could co

ptember 2015.


653371

95

uals, both in

d value can

er, together

ntation of a

ational and

ration.295 In

the search

vention and

ontribute to

U

5 s

5

n

n

r

a

d

n

h

d

o

D1.3 Review

4.3 Conc

This chapt

cooperatio

taken imp

contempor

disposal. It

applied if c

aspect in s

constraints

Further eff

made thro

most recen

new oppor

pursuing.

The joint C

step towa

communica

functions,

developme

countries o

The Coun

simultaneo

crisis. In t

including t

element in

Despite the

the strateg

now need

approach

comprehen

institutions

contribute

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

clusions

ter discuss

on/coordinat

portant step

rary issues

t has been

coordinated

support of

s, Europe a

forts to sup

ugh a num

nt, Joint Co

rtunities in

Communica

ards clarify

ation does

but rather a

ent coopera

of conflict si

cil stresses

ously or in s

he context

hrough its c

the EU’.

e strong ide

gy has not b

s to make

as a guid

nsive appro

s, as well

to more coh

tary Synergie


ses lessons

tion betwee

ps towards

preventing

notified by

such that p

looking for

lso needs to

pport the im

mber of Poli

mmunicatio

this regard

ation by the

ying EU a

not separa

a coherence

ation and as

ituations wh

s that the s

sequence- i

of crisis m

civilian and

eological su

been a succ

e further im

ding princip

oach is a joi

as for Me

herent and

es

the European Union

s identified

en civilian an

more coh

the EU in f

the EU, th

potential sy

synergy ar

o do better

mplementatio

cy papers i

on Action Pl

that both t

e EU High

actors und

ately call for

e and coop

ssistance, a

here the EU

strategically

is necessar

managemen

military ex

upport for a

cess story. A

mprovement

ple to the

nt undertak

mber State

more effect

PU


related to

nd military a

herent exte

fully exploit

hat all the to

ynergies and

re the limite

with less.

on of the a

i.e. ESS, L

lan. Howeve

the Europe

Representa

derstanding

r closer coo

peration betw

and other re

U deploys m

y coherent

ry to effectiv

nt, the Cou

xpertise and

comprehen

As the lesso

ts and, mo

EU exter

king and its

es, whose

tive EU resp


existing pr

actors. Alth

ernal action

ing the civil

ools that the

d mutual su

ed financial

approach at

isbon Trea

er, it was th

ean Commis

ative and th

of the

operation b

ween its CS

elevant dom

multiple acto

use of the

vely addres

ncil reiterat

d civilian- m

nsive approa

ons identifie

ore consist

rnal policy

success is

policies, a

ponses.

n programme under g

ractises an

ough, the E

ns, there a

lian and mi

e EU has a

upport can b

resources.

t an institut

ty, Joint Co

he Lisbon Tr

ssion and t

he Commis

comprehen

etween EU

SDP missio

mains of EU

rs, instrume

e EU’s instr

ss the root c

tes the imp

military syne

ach to crisis

ed showed

ently, apply

and actio

a shared re

actions and

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

nd barriers

EU has in re

are still a

litary capab

at its dispos

be generate

. In a time

tional level

ommunicati

reaty that tr

the EEAS a

sion was a

nsive appro

U’s civilian a

ons and ope

action, in p

ents and int

ruments an

causes of a

portant role

ergies, as a

s, operation

in this chap

y the com

on at all l

esponsibility

d support s


653371

96

to efficient

ecent years

number of

bilities at its

sal are best

ed. Another

of financial

have been

on and the

ruly opened

are actively

a significant

oach. The

and military

erations, its

particular in

terventions.

nd policies-

a conflict or

e of CSDP,

an essential

nalisation of

pter, the EU

mprehensive

evels. The

y for the EU

significantly

U

5 s

6

t

s

f

s

t

r

l

n

e

d

y

t

e

y

s

n

.

-

r

,

l

f

U

e

e

U

y

D1.3 Review

5 INTER-

As presen

primarily a

i.e. the ne

parties. Eff

of the Euro

the UN, NA

due respe

principle o

divided into

EU

with

Inte

to h

Oth

and

Reg

and

Non

and

the

rule

As the list

the deploy

overall coo

This is no

peacekeep

cooperatio

build syne

296 E.g. Norw297 Ginsberg 298 Council ofin support ofboard”, Issue

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

- ORGANIZ

ted in this

about EU in

cessity for

fective mult

opean Unio

ATO, OSCE

ct to the in

of inclusiven

o five categ

member

hout whom

ernational s

help to prev

her internati

d coordinate

gional inter

d coordinate

n-member s

d Turkey.) o

e EU counte

e of law mis

above pres

yment of the

ordination a

ot least for

ping opera

on could he

rgies betwe

way, China, U.S

and Penska, f the Europeaf security ande Vol 6 (2014)

tary Synergie


ZATIONA

reports’ intr

nternal coor

the EU to

tilateralism

on has emp

E, AU and A

nstitutional

ness. Curre

gories;297

states who

there would

security org

vent and end

ional organ

es to enhan

rnational or

es to enhan

states who

or whose na

er-piracy op

ssion in Kos

sents, there

e first CSD

mong the m

the reason

tions cond

lp to avoid

een the org

S, Canada, TuThe European

an Union, “Join development, 1.

es

the European Union

L COOPE

roductory c

rdination an

reach out t

is one of th

phasized th

ASEAN, as

framework

ently, the E

o deploy pe

d be no CS

anisations

d conflict an

isations (su

nce human s

ganisations

nce security

participate

ational secu

peration, Ru

sovo.).

are severa

DP mission

many actors

n that mos

ducted by

unnecessa

anisations.2

urkey and Newn Union in globnt Communicat”, 8504/15, B

PU


RATION

chapter, wh

nd cooperat

to other cri

he principle

he importan

well as stra

and decis

EU’s impac

ersonnel, c

DP;

(UN NATO

nd engage

uch as UNC

security and

s (ASEAN,

y in specific

in CSDP o

urity interest

ussia by EU

al non- EU a

in 2003, th

s involved in

st of the E

NATO, UN

ary overlaps298 In additi

w Zeland. bal security - tation to the EuBrussels, 28.4


ile a compr

tion, it also

sis manage

es of the EU

ce of worki

ategic partn

sion- makin

ct on the o

capabilities

) with whom

in post- con

CHR, UNOH

d welfare;

OSCE, AU

region;

perations (i

ts are affect

U monitors i

actors that h

he Member

n peace- an

U member

N and OS

s, inter- ins

on, whatev

the politics of uropean parlia4.2015; Tardy,

n programme under g

rehensive a

contains a

ement acto

U’s foreign p

ing with its

ners and pa

g autonomy

ther securit

and asset

m the EU c

nflict stabiliz

HA) with who

U) with who

i.e. Canada

ted by such

in Georgia

have implica

States hav

nd crisis ma

r states are

SCE. Efficie

titutional co

er the reso

impact, 140. ament and the Thierry, “CS

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

approach to

an external

rs, as well

policy and t

partners, i

artner count

y of the E

ty provider

ts and fina

cooperate/ c

zation;

om the EU

om the EU

a, Norway, S

h operations

and Serbia

ations to CS

ve desired t

anagement

e also don

ent coordin

ompetition a

urces made

e Council- CapSDP: getting th


653371

97

o a crisis is

dimension,

as to local

the Council

n particular

ries296, with

U, and the

rs could be

ance them-

coordinates

cooperates

cooperates

Switzerland

s (Kenya by

a by the EU

SDP. Since

to enhance

operations.

ors for the

nation and

and help to

e available,

pacity buildinghird states on

U

5 s

7

s

,

l

l

r

h

e

e

-

s

s

s

d

y

U

e

e

.

e

d

o

,

g n

D1.3 Review however, i

crisis mana

good coop

effective m

In this cha

partners, n

aim of this

and opport

and impac

organisatio

5.1 North

"Berlin Plu

The "Euro

and the "

partnership

These arr

CONCORD

299 European300 “Cooperatcontent/EN/T301 “CONCORhttp://eeas.euNATO’s Depever EU-led mEU-OperationMons, BelgiuAFSOUTH in

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

n most thea

agement ac

peration and

multilateralis

apter, the co

namely NAT

chapter is

tunities for

ct of the N

ons is discu

h Atlantic

"The EU

and stra

capabilit

security.

us" arrang

pean Union

"Berlin Plu

p.300

rangements

DIA301 took

n Commission,tion with NATO

TXT/?uri=URISRDIA/FYROMuropa.eu/csdputy Supreme Amilitary peacen Headquarte

um, to assist thn Naples, Italy

tary Synergie


atres, CSDP

ctors. Aside

d coordinati

sm.

ooperation

TO, UN, OS

to provide a

the cooper

NATO and

ssed more

Treaty O

U and NAT

ategic inter

ty developm

.”299

ements

n-NATO De

s" arrange

s were firs

over the re

, “Statement/1O”, accessed SERV:l33243.

M”, European Ep/missions-andAllied Comma

ekeeping missrs (OHQ) washe Operation C(which is the

es

the European Union

P can only s

e from clear

on with the

and coordi

SCE and AU

an overview

ration betwe

UN on th

in detail.

rganisatio

TO are uniq

rests. We w

ment and po

eclaration o

ements are

st impleme

esponsibiliti

5/5206”, Brus7 September External Actiod-operations/cander Europe ion. NATO su

s set-up at NATCommander. NATO Joint F

PU


succeed if i

r benefits a

ese actors is

ination effo

U, in the fie

w of the lega

een the org

he EU’s fo

on (NATO

que and ess

work side

olitical cons

on the Euro

e the basic

ented in s

es of the N

ssels, (16 June2015, http://e

on Service, accconcordia/inde(DSACEUR) wpported the E

ATO’s SupremeIn addition, an

Force comman


t works in c

at the politic

s also a key

rts between

eld of crisis

al framewor

ganisations.

oreign issu

O)- Europe

sential part

by side in

sultations to

pean Secu

c documen

spring 2003

NATO-led m

e 2015). ur-lex.europa.

cessed 6 Sepex_en.htm (In was appointedU on strategice Headquarten ‘EU Command for Balkan o

n programme under g

close partne

cal, operatio

y dimension

n CSDP an

manageme

rk, as well a

Due to the

es, the co

ean Union

tners who s

crisis man

o support in

rity and De

nts for the

3 when th

mission Ope

.eu/legal-

tember 2015, line with the "

d as Operationc, operational rs Allied Powend Element’ (Eoperations).

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

ership with o

onal and ta

n of the EU

nd EU’s ma

ent are disc

as the main

e strategic

ooperation

n (EU)

share comm

nagement

nternational

efence Polic

e EU-NATO

he EU-led

eration Allie

"Berlin-Plus" an Commanderand tactical pers Europe (SEUCE) was es


653371

98

other major

ctical level,

U support to

in strategic

ussed. The

challenges

importance

with these

mon values

operations,

peace and

cy (ESDP)"

O strategic

Operation

d Harmony

arrangements,r of this first lanning. An HAPE) in stablished at

U

5 s

8

r

,

o

c

e

s

e

e

s

d

"

c

n

y

D1.3 Review in the form

operation E

The Berlin

2003 betw

capabilities

The formal

A N

rec

Ass

Ava

Pro

Ter

Eur

EU

NA

Arr

the

ma

The EU C

NATO in t

exercise g

through C

develop in

between th

of each.”

302 Turkey rec303 “ALTHEA/http://eeas.eu304 “About CShttp://eeas.euSee also: “EUhttp://www.co305 “About CS306 “EU CounNations- New

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

mer Yugosla

EUFOR Alth

Plus agree

ween the E

s for EU-led

l elements o

NATO-EU S

ciprocal sec

sured acces

ailability of N

ocedures fo

rms of refe

rope) for co

-NATO con

ATO assets

rangements

e incorporati

y be require

Council high

the conclus

greater resp

SDP togeth

full comple

he EU and N

cognises the R/BiH”, Europeuropa.eu/csdpSDP- The Beruropa.eu/csdpU- NATO: Theonsilium.europSDP- The Berncil conclusionw York, access

tary Synergie


av Republic

hea303 in Bo

ement refer

EU and the

d crisis man

of the Berlin

Security Ag

urity protec

ss to NATO

NATO asse

r the releas

erence for

ommanding

nsultation ar

and capabi

s for cohere

ion within N

ed for EU-le

hlighted in

sion 306 on

ponsibility …

her with ke

ementarity

NATO and

Republic of Man External A

p/missions-andlin Plus Agree

p/about-csdp/be framework fopa.eu/uedocs/lin Plus Agree

ns on Commonsed 5 Septem

es

the European Union

of Macedo

osnia and H

rs to a com

e NATO tha

nagement op

n Plus agree

reement tha

tion rules;

O planning c

ets and capa

se, monitorin

using NAT

EU-led ope

rrangement

lities;

ent and mu

NATO's defe

ed military o

December

CSDP stat

….if they w

ey partners

with NATO

in complian

acedonia withAction Service,d-operations/aement”, Europeberlin/index_eor permanent /cmsUpload/03ement” n Security andber 2015, http

PU


onia (FYRO

Herzegovina

mprehensive

at allows th

perations304

ement (deta

at covers th

capabilities f

abilities for

ng, return a

TO’s DSAC

erations;

ts in the co

utually reinf

ence planni

operations.

2013 the

ting inter a

want to con

such as t

O, in the ag

nce with the

h its constitutio accessed 6 S

althea-bih/indeean External An.htm (Not purelations and 3-11-11%20B

d Defence Polp://eu-un.euro


OM)302 and i

a.

e package o

he EU to m4.

ails of which

he exchang

for EU-led o

EU-led civi

and recall of

EUR (Depu

ntext of an

forcing capa

ng of the m

strategic p

alia: “The E

ntribute to

he UN and

reed frame

e decision-m

onal name. September 20ex_en.htm. Action Service

ublished in theBerlin Plus”, a

Berlin%20Plus

icy”, Europeanpa.eu/articles/

n programme under g

n Decembe

of arrangem

make use

h are classif

ge of classif

operations;

l-military op

f NATO ass

uty Suprem

EU-led ope

ability requ

military need

partnership

EU and its

maintaining

d NATO…C

work of the

making auto

15,

e, accessed 6 Official Journ

accessed 6 Se%20press%20

n Union Deleg/en/article_144

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

er 2004 for

ments finaliz

of NATO a

fied) includ

fied informa

perations;

sets and cap

me Allied C

erations ma

irements, in

ds and capa

between th

Member S

g peace an

CSDP will c

e strategic

onomy and

September 2nal) eptember 2010note%20BL.

gation to the U417_en.htm


653371

99

the current

zed in early

assets and

e305;

ation under

pabilities;

Commander

aking use of

n particular

abilities that

he EU and

States must

nd security

continue to

partnership

procedures

01,5

5, pdf

United

U

5 s

9

t

y

d

r

r

f

r

t

d

t

y

o

p

s

D1.3 Review Areas of E

Meetings

NATO and

place at

representa

NATO’s In

European

European

The highe

Council (N

varying fre

NATO's hig

(EUMC) ha

of EU Mem

as well as

Between E

which main

DGIMS ha

improve c

branches m

the agend

“unofficial”

on “person

Liaison

307 “NATO- Ehttp://www.na308 “NATO- ENATO IMS DVTCs, month309 Since 200meetings betcalled Transa310 Interview

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

EU-NATO c

d the EU m

different le

atives and d

ternational

External A

Parliament)

st point of

NAC) and th

equency (rou

ghest milita

ave strong

mber States

EU Counci

EUMS and

nly deals w

ave regular

cooperation

meet at leas

a. The rela

. The level

nal relations

EU: a strategicato.int/cps/en/EU: a strategicDirector Generhly with a spec03, because otween the twoatlantic eventswith a former

tary Synergie


cooperation

meet on a re

evels, inclu

defence ad

Staff and In

Action Serv

).308

institutiona

he EU's Po

ughly every

ary body, th

personal lin

s sit on both

l and NATO

NATO SHA

ith informat

r annual m

between

st monthly,

ationship b

of informat

ships” and “o

c partnership”, /natohq/topicsc partnership” rals' Conferencial focus on oof the “participo organisationss are held bianEUMS Officia

es

the European Union

n307

egular basis

uding at th

visors. The

nternational

vice, the E

l contact is

olitical and

y six weeks)

he Military C

nks, since th

h. Furthermo

O Military Co

APE or IMS

ion sharing

eetings 3-4

respective

either on V

etween the

tion exchan

organizatio

NATO, access_49217.htm.

(E.g EU HR -ce, twice a ye

operations; EUpation problems at ministeriannually in Newal, 8 Septembe

PU


s to discuss

he level of

ere are reg

l Military Sta

European D

s currently

Security Co

) at ambass

Committee a

he Chiefs o

ore, the EU

ommittee m

S, there are

g and Situat

4 times pe

organizatio

VTC or work

e aforemen

ge varies fr

nal ambition

ssed 7 Septem

- NATO SG, mear; EUMS INUMS - SHAPEm” (so-called “al level. To ovw York or in Euer 2015.


s issues of

f foreign m

ular staff-to

aff, and the

Defence Ag

in the mee

ommittee (P

sador level.3

and the Eu

of Defence a

UMC Chair a

meetings.

e weekly un

ional Aware

r annum, p

ons. EUMS

kshops with

tioned orga

rom time to

ns”. No offic

mber 2015,

monthly; EUMT DIR - SHAP Induction Tra“Turkish-Cyprercome this duropean capita

n programme under g

common in

ministers, a

o-staff talks

ir respective

ency, the

tings betwe

PSC). This 309

ropean Uni

and their M

attends join

nofficial mee

eness (SA).

producing c

S Directors

common o

anizations i

time and is

cial agenda

MC - NATO MCPE J2 regular aining) iot dispute”), teadlock high-als.

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

nterest. Me

ambassado

s at all leve

e EU interlo

Commissio

een the No

formation

ion Military

ilitary Repre

nt NAC-PSC

etings and

. DGEUMS

common ob

and their

objectives a

is “not form

s also very

as are produ

C every 2 momeetings; EU

there have be-level informal


653371

100

eetings take

rs, military

els between

ocutors (the

on and the

orth Atlantic

meets with

Committee

esentatives

C meetings,

workshops

and NATO

bjectives to

respective

nd topics in

mal” and is

dependent

uced.310

onths; EUMS -UMS - SHAPE

een no formal meetings, so

U

5 s

0

e

y

n

e

e

c

h

e

s

,

s

O

o

e

n

s

t

- E

l o

D1.3 Review The Figure

established

been opera

(NATO’s s

Figure 8. E

Cooperati

For military

one option

case, the

Command

Althea (see

Balkans

On 31 Mar

led mission

311 Defence Management312 “NATO- E313 “NATO- E314 Glume, ”C315 “CONCOR

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

e 8. 311 be

d to facilitat

ating at the

trategic com

U-NATO pe

on in the f

y operation

n is to use

preferred o

Operations

e below).314

rch 2003, th

n, Operatio

Command Fit, 5 May 2015

EU: a strategicEU: a strategicChain of commRDIA/FYROM

tary Synergie


elow display

te cooperat

EU Military

mmand for o

rmanent lia

ield313

ns, in the ab

NATO ass

option is to

s (ACO) at S4

he EU-led O

on Allied Ha

inland, “EU –.

c partnership” c partnership” mand” M”

es

the European Union

ys “Perman

ion at the o

y Staff since

operations i

ison arrang

bsence of a

sets and ca

o establish

SHAPE (Mo

Operation C

armony, in t

– NATO Perm

PU


nent militar

operational l

e Novembe

in Mons, Be

ements

a permanen

apabilities u

an EU O

ons, Belgiu

Concordia315

the former Y

manent Struct


ry liaison a

level. A NAT

r 2005 and

elgium) in M

nt Operatio

under the B

perations H

m). This is,

5 took over

Yugoslav R

ures,” Semina

n programme under g

rrangement

TO Perman

an EU Cell

March 2006.

ns HQ (OH

Berlin-Plus

Headquarte

for instanc

the respon

Republic of

ar on EU- NA

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

ts,” which

nent Liaison

was set up

.312

HQ, at strat

arrangeme

er in the NA

ce, the case

nsibilities of

Macedonia

ATO Coopera


653371

101

have been

n Team has

p at SHAPE

tegic level),

ents. In this

ATO Allied

e of EUFOR

the NATO-

a (FYROM).

ation in Crisis

U

5 s

n

s

E

,

s

d

R

-

.

s

D1.3 Review This missio

assets wer

In July 200

Jointly dra

determinat

Building on

Force (SF

Operation

The Opera

planning e

Allied Com

Headquart

as a whole

core, liaisin

Centre, all

maintained

accordanc

NATO has

Law Missio

ever launc

framework

protection

ground in o

316 NATO, “http://www.na317 Interview 318 “OperatioUnion Commnecessary cocovered undecontrol and s319 “Operation320Interview wAgreements Joint OperatiOperations, Jbetween the between ESD

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

on, which e

re made ava

03, the EU

afted, it out

tion both org

n the resul

OR) in Bos

EUFOR Alt

ation EUFO

expertise an

mmander Eu

ters (OHQ)

e provides

ng with all S

lowing a to

d by the E

e with CSD

s been lead

on in Kosov

ched under

k. The EU's

of its civilia

order to fac

“EU and NAato.int/docu/prwith a former

on ALTHEA,” mand Elemenoordination foer the "Berlin

strategic directn ALTHEA” with a Ministryare: ing ProcedureJOA for Coop ESDP MissiDP Mission an

tary Synergie


ended in De

ailable to th

and NATO

tlined core

ganizations

ts of Conc

snia and H

thea on 2 D

OR Althea o

nd on othe

urope is the

located at

the Operat

SHAPE's Di

otal interfac

EUSG, with

DP. 318

ding a peac

vo (EULEX)

the CSDP

exclusively

an personn

ilitate coope

ATO agree cor/2003/p03-08SHAPE OfficeNATO, accest (EUCE), wh

or ensuring a Plus" arrange

tion of the ope

y of Interior Off

es (JOA) for Cperation betweion and KFORnd KFOR in In

es

the European Union

ecember 20

he European

O published

areas of c

s share to b

ordia and f

erzegovina

December 20

operates un

er Alliance

e Command

SHAPE. S

ion Headqu

irectorate's

e in all are

h recourse

ekeeping fo

), which dep

P. In Kosov

y civilian m

nel. In Koso

eration.

oncerted app89e.htm (Acceer, 7 Septembssed 6 Septemhich is locate

Balkans regements. The Eeration, under

ficial, 26 July

Cooperation been the ESDPR to Responsformation Exc

PU


003, was the

n Union.

d a ″Conce

cooperation

ring stability

following th

, the Europ

004.

nder the “Be

assets and

der of Oper

Supreme He

uarters (OH

Branches,

eas.317 A cl

to all SH

orce in Kos

ployed in De

vo, NATO a

mission is re

ovo, four te

proach for theessed 7 Septeber 2015. mber 2015, h

ed at NATO Jional approacEU's Political the responsib

2015.

between the EP Mission andse in Case ochange, Includ


e first “Berli

rted Approa

n and emph

y to the reg

he conclusio

pean Union

erlin-Plus” a

d capabilitie

ration Althea

eadquarters

HQ), and th

particularly

ose relation

HAPE's ass

sovo (KFOR

ecember 20

and EU ope

eliant on NA

echnical ag

e Western Bmber 2015).

http://www.acooint Force Co

ch and regardand Security

bility of the Co

ESDP Mission d KFOR in Bof Civil Disturb

ding The Field

n programme under g

n Plus” ope

ach for the

hasises the

ion.

on of the N

n deployed

arrangemen

es. The NA

a. There is

s Allied Pow

e EU Staff

through the

nship with

sets as OH

R319) since 1

008, is the l

erate in par

ATO's milita

greements32

Balkans” Pres

o.nato.int/pageommand (JFCding the use Committee (Puncil of the EU

and KFOR inorder Managembance Situatiod Of Intelligenc

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

eration in w

e Western B

e common

NATO-led S

a new mis

nts, drawing

ATO Deputy

also an EU

wers Europ

Group (EU

e Strategic

EEAS and

HQ when

1999. The

largest civil

rallel witho

ary compon20 were sig

ss release 29

e39511625.asC) at Naples,

of reserve, wPSC) exerciseU.

n Military Supment, JOA forons, JOA force


653371

102

which NATO

Balkans″316.

vision and

Stabilisation

ssion called

g on NATO

y Supreme

U Operation

pe (SHAPE)

USG) is the

Operations

d EUMS is

needed, in

EU Rule of

ian mission

ut a formal

nent for the

ned on the

9 July 2003,

px. Europeanprovides the

which are notes the political

pport to Policer Cooperationr Cooperation

U

5 s

2

O

.

d

n

d

O

e

n

)

e

s

s

n

f

n

l

e

e

,

n e t l

e n n

D1.3 Review Other regi

The NATO

training, a

Afghanista

The Figure

and Afgha

partly relia

to negotia

protection

frustrating

In Darfur b

in particula

Since Sep

deployed w

which have

are superv

side. In

communica

Particularly

functioning

de-conflict

tactical lev

and individ

321“Afghanist322 “EUPOLoperations/eu323 Defence Cooperation 324 S.J. Smith325 “EU suppoperations/eu326“MARCOMhttp://www.m327“EU NAVoperations/eu328 Interview 329 The Sharcoordinating operations inare co-chaire

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

ions

O-led Resolu

dvice and

an CSDP Ru

e 9. 323 on t

nistan, NAT

nt on NATO

ate 14 sepa

and transp

to both civi

both NATO a

ar with rega

ptember 20

with other a

e the same

vised from N

theatre, co

ations and

y concernin

g cooperatio

ion. SHADE

vel, not only

dual nations

an Resolute SL Afghanistaupol-afghanistCommand Fin Crisis Mana

h, The EU NAport to AMIS (u-support-ami

M FACTSHmc.nato.int/aboVFOR Somau-navfor-somawith a former

red Awarenesand de-conf

n the Gulf of Aed on a rotatio

tary Synergie


ute Support

assistance

ule of Law M

the next pa

TO and the

O's military

arate agree

port of its pe

lian and mi

and the EU

rd to airlift r

008, NATO

actors, off

mission (fig

Northwood,

ommanders

regular cros

ng naval o

on and coo

E329 is mayb

y between th

s. It remain

Support”, NATan”, EEAS, tan/index_en.h

Finland, “EU- agement, 5 MTO cooperatio(Darfur)”, EEAs-darfur/index

HEET- Opeout/Pages/Opelia”, EEAS, alia/index_en.EUMS Officias and Deconfflicting activiti

Aden and the wonal basis by th

es

the European Union

t321 (RS) mi

for the Afg

Mission (EU

age shows t

EU operat

component

ements wit

ersonnel. T

litary perso

325 supporte

rotations.

O Operation

the coast o

ght against

England, v

s coordina

ss-deck me

perations i

ordination m

be one of th

he EU and

s to be see

O, accessed 7accessed

htm Current NAT

ay 2015. on the case foAS, accessed x_en.htm ration Oceeration%20Oc

accessed 7htm

al, 8 Septembefliction (SHADies between western Indianhe Combined

PU


ssion (form

ghan secur

UPOL322) in

the areas w

te in paralle

t for the pro

th different

The search

nnel, being

ed the Afric

n Ocean S

of Somalia

t piracy) and

via EU and

ate their a

eetings.328

n this regi

mechanisms

he “most ad

NATO, but

en whether

7 September 26 Septembe

TO/EU Comm

or institutional 7 September

ean Shield”cean%20Shiel7 September

er 2015. DE) initiative b

the countriesn Ocean. TheMaritime Forc


mer ISAF 20

rity forces

June 2007

where NATO

el without a

otection of it

EU and i

for case-by

time-consu

can Union’s

Shield326 an

for anti-pir

d operate in

NATO com

actions on

on (Gulf o

s to improv

dvanced” me

also other

the same k

2015, http://wer 2015, h

mon Areas of

fatigue?, (July2015, http://w

, NATO, d.aspx r 2015, h

began in 2008s and coalitio

e meetings areces (CMF), NA

n programme under g

02-2014) in

and institut

.

O and EU c

formal fram

ts civilian p

ndividual n

y-case solut

uming and i

mission (AM

d EU NAV

acy mission

n the same

mmand cen

a daily

f Aden) th

e the Situa

echanisms

maritime an

kind of arra

www.rs.nato.inhttp://eeas.eur

Deployment,

y 2011). www.eeas.eur

accessed

http://eeas.eur

8 as a mechanons involved e held in BahrATO, and EUN

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

n Afghanista

tions. EU la

coexist. As

mework. EU

personnel. T

nations to

tions on the

nefficient.32

MIS) in Dar

VFOR Atal

ns. These

region (Gu

ntres operat

basis via

here are se

ational awar

at the oper

nd naval org

angements w

nt/ ropa.eu/csdp/m

,” Seminar o

ropa.eu/csdp/m

6 Septem

ropa.eu/csdp/m

nism of meetin military c

rain at regularNAVFOR.


653371

103

an provides

aunched in

s in Kosovo

UPOL is still

The EU had

ensure the

e ground is24

rfur, Sudan,

anta327 are

operations,

lf of Aden),

ting side by

electronic

everal well-

reness and

rational and

ganizations

will also be

missions-and-

n EU- NATO

missions-and-

mber 2015,

missions-and-

ings aimed atcounter-piracyr intervals and

U

5 s

3

s

n

o

l

d

e

s

,

e

,

,

y

c

-

d

d

s

e

-

O

-

,

-

t y d

D1.3 Review established

and NATO

Figure 9. E

Political c

The range

past two y

Since the c

decisions,

each other

Middle Eas

Capabilitie

330 EU NAVF331 “FRONTE332 “Ophttp://www.na333 “Joint statClaude http://www.na

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

d in the Me

O (Operation

U – Current

consultatio

of subjects

ears, partic

crisis in Uk

especially w

r. Consultat

st. 333

es

FOR Somalia” EX”, accessedperation ato.int/cps/en/tement by NA

Juncker,” ato.int/cps/en/

tary Synergie


editerranean

n Active End

t NATO/EU C

n

s discussed

cularly on se

raine, both

with regard

tions have a

7 SeptemberActive

/natolive/topicsTO Secretary

NATO, /natohq/opinio

es

the European Union

n Sea betwe

deavor332).

Common Ar

d between N

ecurity issu

organisatio

to Russia,

also covere

r 2015, http://frEndeavour”, s_7932.htm; IGeneral Jens

June ons_120675.ht

PU


een the EU

reas of Depl

NATO and t

ues within th

ons have re

to ensure t

ed developm

rontex.europaNATO,

nterview with s Stoltenberg

2015, tm


(EUNAVFO

loyment

the EU has

he Europea

egularly exc

that their me

ments in the

a.eu/ accesse

a former EUMand the Presi

accessed

n programme under g

OR Med330

s expanded

n space or

hanged vie

essages an

e Western B

ed 8 MS Official, 8 Sdent of the Eu

d 7

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

and FRON

considerab

r its immedi

ews on their

nd actions c

Balkans, Lib

SeptembeSeptember 20uropean Com

Septembe


653371

104

TEX331 Op)

bly over the

ate vicinity.

r respective

complement

bya and the

er 2015,015. mission Jean-r 2015,

U

5 s

4

)

e

.

e

t

e

,

-,

D1.3 Review Together w

where ther

2003 to en

efforts. Fol

work with

cooperatio

Among oth

such as co

an importa

Defence”33

Terrorism

Both NATO

weapons o

field of pr

(CBRN) at

exchanging

New areas

Since the a

which iden

areas of co

defence. In

the specific

The practi

within the

autonomy

coordinatio

interaction

“intertwinin

334 “Smart de335 “Poolingpriorities/poo336 ”NATOhttp://www.na

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

with operat

re is potenti

nsure the co

llowing the

in the Eu

on, acquisitio

her issues,

ountering im

ant role in e34 and the E

and WMD

O and the E

of mass de

rotection of

ttacks. The

g inventorie

s of cooper

adoption of

ntifies the n

ooperation

n this conte

c areas in w

cal coopera

agreed fra

of each o

on (e.g. in

of maritim

ng summits

efence”, NATOg and Sharoling-and-sharO’s New atolibguides.in

tary Synergie


ions, capab

ial for furthe

oherence a

creation, in

ropean Un

on and rese

the Capab

mprovised e

ensuring tra

EU’s “Poolin

proliferati

European U

struction (W

f civilian po

two organi

es of measu

ration

f NATO’s ne

need for the

with the EU

ext, NATO a

which the tw

ation betwe

amework of

organisation

Kosovo, H

me security,

” – from De

O, accessed 9 ring”, EDA, ing. Strategic C

nfo/nsc/docum

es

the European Union

bility develo

er growth. T

nd mutual r

n July 2004,

nion on th

earch, EDA

bility Group

explosive de

nsparency

ng and Shar

on

Union are co

WMD). They

opulations a

sations als

ures taken i

ew Strategi

e Alliance t

U are takin

and EU sta

wo organisa

een the EU

f their strat

. Apart fro

Horn of Afr

defence a

ecember 20

September 20accessed 8

Concept: Ofments.

PU


opment is a

The NATO-E

reinforceme

, of the Eur

e developm

experts co

has addre

evices and

and comple

ring”335 initia

ommitted to

y have exc

against che

o cooperate

n this area.

ic Concept3

to address

g place- in

affs have be

tions could

U and NAT

tegic partn

om the alre

rica, Afghan

and security

013 (Europ

015, http://ww8 Septembe

fficial Texts


an area wh

EU Capabil

ent of NATO

ropean Defe

ment of d

ntribute to t

essed comm

medical su

ementarity

ative.

o combating

changed info

emical, bio

e in the fiel

336 at the Lis

emerging s

particular e

een holding

enhance th

TO has exp

ership and

eady on-go

nistan), the

y capacity b

pean Counc

ww.nato.int/cpsr 2015, htt

s”, NATO,

n programme under g

ere cooper

ity Group w

O and EU c

ence Agenc

efence ca

the work of

mon capabi

upport. The

between NA

g terrorism a

ormation on

logical, rad

d of civil em

sbon Summ

security cha

energy secu

consultatio

heir coopera

panded ove

respecting

ing operati

ere is poten

building an

cil discussio

s/en/natohq/top://www.eda.e

accessed

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

ration is es

was establis

capability de

cy (EDA) to

pabilities,

the Capabi

ility shortfa

Group is a

ATO’s work

and the pro

n their activ

diological a

mergency p

mit in Novem

allenges, s

urity issues

ons in orde

ation in thes

er the past

g the decis

onal coope

ntial for st

nd cyber se

on on CSD

opics_84268.heuropa.eu/wha

8 Septem


653371

105

sential and

shed in May

evelopment

coordinate

armaments

lity Group.

lls in areas

also playing

k on “Smart

oliferation of

vities in the

and nuclear

planning by

mber 2010,

everal new

s and cyber

r to identify

se fields.

few years,

sion-making

eration and

rengthened

ecurity. The

P), through

htm. at-we-do/eda-

mber 2015,

U

5 s

5

d

y

t

e

s

s

g

t

f

e

r

y

,

w

r

y

,

g

d

d

e

h

-

,

D1.3 Review the NATO

Summit in

reinforcing

the assess

security re

Ukrainian

invaluable.

Challenge

In assessin

suspicion",

diplomatic

relationshi

- whose m

economic c

The “Berlin

military op

2003. In p

Berlin Plus

making pro

to the exte

The real “f

three thea

Afghanista

Althea in

NATO has

However,

337 Helena Boand Galia Glu338 See for exworking to fillhttp://www.na339 Also commhave increaslevels of coopSecurity Rev340 Panel of E341 Tardy, “CS342 “EU NAVF

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

Summit in

Warsaw –

actions, fo

sment that t

eality for Eu

crisis, the

.337

es

ng EU-NAT

, "institutio

language s

p has yet to

membership

crisis.338

n Plus” fram

perations an

rinciple, for

s framework

ocess in EU

ent possible

field level” c

atres where

an, and the

Bosnia and

s been abs

in the NAT

ogusławska, “ume, (Vienna:xample: Oxforl gaps in defenato.int/cps/en/mentators noted to compenperation leave

view, no. 48, (2Experts (MinisSDP in ActionFOR Somalia”

tary Synergie


n Wales in

– bring add

or example,

he crisis in

urope and

good coop

TO cooperat

nal fatigue

stresses the

o fulfil its po

ps largely o

mework tha

nd overall c

rmal commu

k. This facto

UMS. In pra340

cooperation

EU-NATO

Gulf of Ad

d Herzegov

sent from A

TO and EU

CSDP and Pa: The Federal rd Analytica, “Ence capabilitie/natolive/newse that since th

nsate to some es more flexibi2010). stry of Foreign n” ”

es

the European Union

2014, the

ditional dyn

on military

the Eastern

the broade

eration and

tion, the sa

e" and lack

e progress

otential. Cal

overlap - h

at defines t

coordination

unication339

or sometime

actice thoug

n between t

cooperatio

den.341 Curr

vina benefit

Africa wher

U (NAVFO

artners” in the Ministry of DeEurope: NATOes,” NATO, acs_89487.htm. he 2004 EU enextent for the ility at lower le

Affairs, EEAS

PU


June 2015

namics, fos

capability d

n and South

er transatlan

d coordinat

me comme

k of "mea

already ma

lls for better

ave becom

the nature

n has not b9 between E

es hampers

gh, inter-ins

the EU and

on has bee

rently, out o

ts from the

re currently

R Atalanta

Handbook onefence and SpO-EU cooperaccessed 13 Au nlargement, in political block

evels. See: Pa

S Official and f


5 European

tering furth

developmen

hern neighb

ntic commu

ion with NA

entators use

ningful sub

ade, while a

r cooperatio

me more ins

and conditi

been update

EU and NA

s the dialog

titutional re

NATO has

en tested in

of 17 EU m

e "Berlin-plu

y the bulk

)342 anti-pir

n CSDP Missioports of the Reation remain diugust 2015,

nformal contackage. Focusinaul Sturm, “NA

former OPCE

n programme under g

n Council u

her complem

nt. Both the

bourhoods s

unity. Since

ATO and th

e negative te

bstance". F

acknowledg

on between

sistent in t

ions of NAT

ed since it

TO is not p

gue, cooper

lations have

s been relat

n the last fiv

missions/ope

us" arrange

of CSDP a

racy missio

ons and Operaepublic of Austifficult”, (June

cts between stg the political

ATO and EU: C

N Official)

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

up to the 2

mentary an

e EU and N

significantly

e the begin

he OSCE h

erms, such

From the o

ing that the

n the two org

times of au

TO support

was finalis

possible out

ration and th

e developed

tively small

ve years a

erations, on

ements. Fu

activities ta

on there ex

ations, eds. Jotria, 2014). 2012); “NATO

taff of both org"red lines" at

Cooperation?”


653371

106

2016 NATO

nd mutually

NATO share

altered the

ning of the

has proved

as "mutual

other side,

e EU-NATO

ganisations

usterity and

t to EU-led

sed in early

tside of the

he decision

d informally

-scale. The

are Kosovo,

nly EUFOR

urthermore,

akes place.

xist several

ochen Rehrl

O-EU:

ganisations the highest ”, European

U

5 s

6

O

y

e

e

e

d

l

,

O

s

d

d

y

e

n

y

e

,

R

,

.

l

D1.3 Review cooperatio

in that regi

The Turki

developme

consistentl

NATO mem

in formal c

Cyprus, fro

Agency (E

for EU se

problem", h

343 Interview 344 Marta Lat345 Matteo RiAffairs, EEAS

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

on and coord

on343.

sh-Cypriot

ent of EU-N

ly opposed

mbers must

ooperation

om its side

DA) and Tu

cret docum

has drastica

with a former ek, EU-NATOcci, The CSDP

S Official and

tary Synergie


dination me

dispute344

NATO coop

Cypriot par

t first conclu

with NATO

e, has block

urkey, as we

ments to be

ally reduced

EUMS Officia

O partnership inP and NATO: former OPCE

es

the European Union

echanisms t

is frequen

peration. Si

rticipation in

ude security

at minister

ked adminis

ell as the si

e transmitte

d the scope

al, 8 Septemben stagnation, Lfriends, compN Official).

PU


to improve

ntly presen

ince Cypru

n formal EU

y agreemen

rial level if a

strative arra

ignature of

ed to NATO

e of effective

er 2015. Library Briefin

petitors or both


the Situatio

nted as a

s joined th

U-NATO me

nts with NAT

all its Memb

angements

a security a

O. This iss

e cooperatio

ng, Library of th?, ( 2014); Pa

n programme under g

onal awaren

major stu

e EU in M

etings unde

TO. The EU

er States ar

between th

agreement w

sue, known

on between

he European anel of Expert

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

ness and de

umbling blo

May 2004, T

er the prete

U refuses to

re not prese

he Europea

with Turkey

n as the "p

n the EU and

Parliament, (2ts (Ministry of


653371

107

e-confliction

ock in the

Turkey has

xt that non-

o participate

ent.

an Defence

y necessary

participation

d NATO.345

2012). Foreign

U

5 s

7

n

e

s

-

e

e

y

n

D1.3 Review

5.2 Unite

Backgrou

According

ESS also o

the mainte

Nations is

The coope

following th

military cr

challenging

EU. In turn

now offer

that the U

activities.34

The Europ

basis for c

European

crises ava

respond m

UN…". The

well as mo

the United

certain prin

Despite th

EU-UN coo

346 European

347 Thierry TCrisis ManagJournal of InmanagementOccasional P348 PresidencEuropean Co349 Tardy, "U

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

ed Nations

nd and fra

to the ESS

outlines tha

enance of i

a European

eration betw

he creation

risis manag

g peacekee

n, the EU th

not just fin

UN lacked. 47

pean Counc

cooperation

crisis-mana

ailable to th

more effectiv

e Presiden

odalities for

Nations.348

nciples for t

e institution

operation g

n Union, “A Se

Tardy, "UN-EUgement: the Cnternational Rt: the experie

Paper n:o 72, (cy Report on ouncil MeetingN-EU relations

tary Synergie


s (UN) – E

mework fo

S, effective

at "the Unite

internationa

n priority.346

ween the EU

of ESDP. T

gement wa

eping opera

hat was in

ancial supp

The UN a

cil in Nice in

n between

agement ca

he internati

vely and mo

cy Conclus

potential co8 Building o

the relations

nal develop

gained more

ecure Europe i

U relations in Challenge of Inelations, Vol.

ence of EUFO(September 2the Europea

g 7, 8 and 9 Des in military cr

es

the European Union

European

or the UN-E

multilatera

ed Nations

al peace an6

U and the U

The primary

as based

ations, need

the course

port to UN

also provide

n 2000, in a

the EU an

apabilities i

ional comm

ore coheren

sions of Nic

ooperation i

on this spirit

ship were e

ments whic

e substance

n a Better Wo

military crisisnter-organisatLXII, n:o 3 (2

OR RD Cong008), 9-10. n Security anecember 2000risis managem

PU


Union (E

EU coopera

alism is one

(UN) Secur

nd security

UN in the fi

y reason fo

on mutual

ded the su

of develop

peacekeep

ed legality

addition to fu

d the UN,

increases t

munity" whi

ntly to requ

ce Council

in crisis ma

t, dialogue

stablished.3

ch primarily

e once the E

orld. European

s managementionalism, ed. 2009), 43-45;

go in 2006,”

nd Defence P0.

ment: institutio


U)

ation

e of the stra

rity Council

y" and that

ield of crisis

or increasing

interest:

pport of reg

ping its crisi

ping operati

and legitim

urther deve

stating inte

the range o

ch "will en

uests from le

Meeting als

nagement b

between th349

y facilitated

EU gained

n Security Stra

nt: institutionaJoachim A. KClaudia MajoThe Europea

olicy, Annex

nalization and

n programme under g

ategic obje

has the pri

the strengt

s managem

g EU-UN co

the UN, fa

gional orga

s managem

ions but als

macy for E

eloping ESD

er alia that

of instrume

nable Europ

eading orga

so called fo

between the

e organisat

the exchan

operational

ategy”

lization and kKoops, Studia or, “EU-UN coan Union Inst

VI of the Pre

d key constrain

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

ectives of th

imary respo

thening of

ment began

ooperation

faced by i

anisations s

ment capab

so military

U crisis m

DP, set the

t "the deve

ents for res

peans in p

anisations s

or identifyin

e European

tions was in

nge of infor

l responsibi

key constraintDiplomatica:

ooperation in titute for Sec

esidency Conc

nts", 46.


653371

108

he EU. The

onsibility for

the United

to develop

primarily in

ncreasingly

such as the

ilities could

capabilities

anagement

institutional

elopment of

sponding to

particular to

such as the

g areas as

n Union and

nitiated and

mation, the

ility in crisis

ts", in MilitaryThe Brusselsmilitary crisis

curity Studies:

clusions, Nice

U

5 s

8

e

r

d

p

n

y

e

d

s

t

l

f

o

o

e

s

d

d

e

s

y s s :

e

D1.3 Review manageme

EU Police

Task Forc

deploymen

Republic o

first autono

Following t

EU Co-op

of the Unit

the Europe

steering co

areas of

commitme

identified tw

1. Provisio

decision to

2. An EU o

control and

for a speci

Whilst iden

reiterated t

The

the

The

cas

350 See, for in351 Johannse352 Annex II Management353 Annex II o

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

ent. In Janu

Mission in

ce.350 In su

nt of a well

of Congo (M

omous EU m

the first EU

eration in

ed Nations

ean Union a

ommittee) a

planning, t

nts set thro

wo main op

on by mem

o provide m

operation in

d strategic g

fic compone

ntifying opti

the followin

e EU will re

e Political an

ere would b

se basis;

nstance,; Flesen, The EU's C

of the ESDt, 24 Septembof the ESDP P

tary Synergie


uary 2003,

n Bosnia an

mmer 2003

l-equipped

MONUC) in

military ope

deploymen

Crisis Man

in crisis ma

also agreed

at the worki

training, co

ough the J

ptions353:

mber states

ilitary capab

n support of

guidance of

ent within th

ons for stre

g basic prin

tain the pol

nd Security

be no auto

senkemper an

ComprehensivP Presidency

ber 2003. Presidency Re

es

the European Union

the EU lau

nd Herzego

3, following

multination

the Ituri re

ration, Arte

nts, in 2003

nagement,

anagement

d to establis

ing level to

ommunicatio

oint Declar

s of nationa

bilities to a

f the UN; wh

f the EU, e

he UN oper

engthening

nciples for E

itical contro

Committee

matic involv

nd Helly, “Tenve Approach toy Report 15 J

port 15 June 2

PU


unched its f

ovina, taking

g a request

al force to

egion in the

emis, was de

3, the EU an

in which th

. Through t

sh "a joint co

enhance m

on and be

ration, in te

al capabilit

UN operatio

here the EU

ither as a s

ration.

cooperation

EU-UN coop

ol and strate

e (PSC);

vement but

n years after”.o Crisis ManagJune 2004; "

2004.


first civilian

g over from

t by the U

support th

e Democrat

eployed in t

nd UN signe

he EU reiter

he Joint De

onsultative

mutual co-o

est practice

erms of mili

ies, in whi

on, and

U can cond

stand-alone

n with the U

peration:

egic directio

t cooperatio

gement, 255-2"Joint Declara

n programme under g

crisis man

m the UN-le

N Secretar

e UN Miss

ic Republic

the DRC.351

ed the Join

rated its sup

eclaration, th

mechanism

ordination a

es.352 In im

itary crisis

ch regard

uct operatio

operation o

UN, at the s

on of any of

on will take

257. ation on UN-E

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

nagement m

ed Internati

ry-General

sion in the

c of Congo 1

nt Declarati

pport to the

he United N

m" (also call

nd compati

mplementat

manageme

it remains

ons, under t

or taking re

same time t

f its operatio

e place on

EU Co-opera


653371

109

mission, the

onal Police

for a rapid

Democratic

(DRC), the

ion on UN-

e objectives

Nations and

ed the joint

ibility in the

tion of the

ent, the EU

a national

the political

esponsibility

he EU also

ons through

a case-by-

ation in Crisis

U

5 s

9

e

e

d

c

e

-

s

d

t

e

e

U

l

l

y

o

h

-

s

D1.3 Review

The

mis

arra

The 2007

determinat

exchanges

cooperatio

systematic

Again, the

interaction

EU deploy

MONUC d

deployed a

Central Afr

to the prot

military co

European

was deploy

In addition

EUPOL Ki

MONUC (s

Afghanista

the EU tak

UN-EU coo

Whilst the

the develo

of the prop

the Steerin

354 AlexandraProspects”, experience o355 Joint Statmilitary crisis356 Johannse357 United Na358 Johannse

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

e EU does

ssions or o

angements

Joint sta

tion of the t

s of views

on and coo

c lessons lea

e developin

s or cooper

yed a milita

during the

a "military b

rican Repub

tection of ci

omponent o

Union Nava

yed parallel

to coopera

nshasa RD

since 2010

an in 2007 w

king over fro

operation a

above men

pment of cl

posed coord

ng Committ

a Novosseloff,GGI Analysis

of EUFOR RD tement on UNs managementen, The EU's Cations Securityen, The EU's C

tary Synergie


not constitu

operations,

.354

atement on

two organis

and coord

ordination

arned.355

ng of coope

ration at the

ary operatio

election pr

bridging" op

blic and Cha

vilian and f

of MINURCA

al Force AT

l with UN Po

ation in the

D Congo, E

onwards M

which led int

om the UN

lso outside

ntioned agre

ose interac

dination me

tee - were

, “United Natios Paper No. Congo in 200

N-EU cooperatt: the experien

Comprehensivy Council ResoComprehensiv

es

the European Union

ute a pool o

and there

n UN-EU

ations to co

dination bet

in specific

eration at t

e operation

on EUFOR

rocess in t

peration EU

ad (MINUR

facilitate the

AT in Marc

TALANTA (E

olitical Offic

military field

UPOL RD C

ONUSCO).

to coexisten

in Kosovo,

military cris

eements, as

ction betwee

chanisms -

actually imp

ons - Europea4 (2012),10;

06, 11. tion in Crisis Mnce of EUFORve Approach toolutions 1778

ve Approach to

PU


of forces bu

e would b

cooperatio

ontinue coo

tween the

areas suc

the strateg

nal level. In

RD Congo

the DRC356

UFOR Tcha

RCAT). EUF

e delivery o

ch 2009.357

EU NAVFO

ce for Soma

d, EU civilia

Congo and

.358 Further

nce with the

through EU

sis manage

s well as pr

en the EU a

primarily fo

plemented

an Union Coop Major, EU-

Management, R RD Congo ino Crisis Manag(2007) and 18

o Crisis Manag


ut can only

be no earm

on in Cris

operation an

organisatio

ch as sen

ic or policy

2006, follow

o to suppor6. Two yea

ad/RCA in s

FOR Tchad/

of humanitar7 In Decem

R) which, w

alia.

an crisis ma

EUSEC R

, the deploy

e UN Assist

ULEX Kosov

ment.

ractical coo

and the UN

ormal conta

or are still

peration in the-UN cooperat

Brussels, 7 Jn 2006, 11. gement. Prem861 (2009). gement,

n programme under g

intervene b

marked forc

is Manage

nd reiterated

ons, whilst

nior level p

y level was

wing an inv

rt the UN p

ars later, in

support of t

RCA was m

rian aid unt

mber 2008,

whilst having

anagement

RD Congo -

yment of the

tance Missio

vo mission

peration on

in peaceke

cts and the

being appl

e Field of Peaction in military

June 2007; Ma

mises, Ambition

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

by conduct

rces to an

ement reaf

d the variou

calling for

political dia

s inherently

vitation by t

peacekeepi

n early 200

the UN Mis

mandated to

til the deplo

the EU lau

g a regiona

missions in

(have) coe

e EU Police

on in Afgha

in 2008 inte

n the ground

eeping effort

e bi-annual m

ied. From t

cekeeping: Chry crisis man

ajor, EU-UN c

ns, Limits, 279


653371

110

ing specific

y stand-by

ffirmed the

us levels of

increasing

alogue and

y linked to

the UN, the

ng mission

08, the EU

ssion in the

o contribute

oyment of a

unched the

l approach,

n the DRC -

existed with

e Mission in

anistan, and

ensified the

d facilitated

ts, only few

meetings of

the point of

hallenges andagement: the

cooperation in

9-280.

U

5 s

0

c

y

e

f

g

d

o

e

n

U

e

e

a

e

,

-

h

n

d

e

d

w

f

f

d e

n

D1.3 Review view of the

foreign an

operation f

crisis man

need to f

developing

for its sche

Following t

between th

adopted “A

Action to

implement

partnership

EU-UN coo

framework

Plan of Ac

function as

the UN; so

Member S

intermedia

componen

considered

359 Tobias Pi(October 20Challenges a360 Council oJune 2012; P361 Tobias Pie362 Britta MadApproach?,”

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

e EU, the p

nd security

for three ye

agement ca

facilitate pr

g the coope

eduled mee

this period

he organisa

Actions to

Enhance E

ing modalit

p with the U

operation w

k for shaping

ction are w

s an interme

omething w

States have

ary361. The

t as part o

d legally unv

etz, “The Eur13), 2-3; Nov

and Prospectsof the EuropeaPietz, The Euretz and Thierrdsen and TobZIF Policy Bri

tary Synergie


process aro

policy inst

ears, until 2

apabilities,

ractical coo

eration with

tings during

of limited p

ations has i

o Enhance

EU CSDP S

ties of the s

UN as a cen

with impleme

g the future

worth mentio

ediary for b

hich was fo

chosen to

so called M

f the comm

viable and y

ropean Union vosseloff, Un

s, 15-16. an Union, “Plaropean Union ary Tardy, “Thebias Pietz,”EUiefing, (Novem

es

the European Union

ound the Lis

titutions res

2012. The a

coupled wi

operation in

the UN. As

g 2010/2011

progress, a

ntensified c

EU CSDP

Support to

said actions

ntral task fo

entation tim

e cooperatio

oning. Unde

ilateral Mem

oreseen to b

directly inte

Modular Ap

mand struct

yet remains

and UN Peacnited Nations

an of Action toand UN Peace

e EU and the UU-UN Cooperamber 2014), 1-

PU


sbon Treaty

sulted in t

approach o

th the abse

n the field

s an examp

1.359

nd after the

considerabl

P Support

UN Peacek

s.360 The P

r the CSDP

meline from 6

on with the

er the Clea

mber State

be impleme

eract with t

pproach (Fie

ures of an

s to be appli

cekeeping: Ha- European

to enhance EUekeeping: HalUN: together foation on Justic-4.


y and the r

he EU not

of the EU to

ence of new

d, shifted t

ple, the Stee

e creation o

y. In Novem

to UN Pe

keeping”, p

Plan of Actio

P and outline

6 to 24 mon

UN. In par

aring House

contribution

ented by the

the UN inst

eld B) envi

UN operat

ied.362

alf-time for theUnion Coop

U CSDP supplf-time for the or peace,” EUce and Secur

n programme under g

related rest

t launching

o focus on

w missions

he attentio

ering Comm

of EEAS an

mber 2011

eacekeepin

published in

on, in whic

es six fields

nths, provid

rticular the f

e model (Fi

ns (civilian,

e end of 20

tead of refe

sioned the

ion - some

e EU’s Actioneration in the

port to UN peEU’s Action P

UISS Alert, (Deity in Crisis M

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

tructuring o

g a single

strengthen

and subse

on away fr

mittee did n

nd CSDP, c

the Europe

ng", and th

n June 2012

h the EU e

s of various

ded the EU w

first two mo

ield A), the

police and

013. Until n

erring to the

e integration

ething which

n Plan,” ZIF Phe Field of P

eacekeeping”, Plan, 3. ecember 2014Missions: A Co


653371

111

f European

mission or

ing its own

quently the

rom further

ot convene

cooperation

ean Council

e “Plan of

2, laid down

emphasises

models for

with a clear

odels of the

e EU would

military) to

ow, the EU

e EU as an

n of an EU

h has been

Policy Briefing,Peacekeeping:

11216/12, 14

4), 2. omprehensive

U

5 s

n

r

n

e

r

e

n

l

f

n

s

r

r

e

d

o

U

n

U

n

, :

4

e

D1.3 Review Table 10. In

YEAR M

2003 J

C

2004 E

M

I

D

2007 J

C

2012 E

t

363 Major, EUthe EuropeanUnion and UN

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

nstitutional

Modality

Joint declara

Crisis Manag

EU-UN coo

Management

mplementati

Declaration

Joint statem

Crisis Manag

EU Plan of A

o UN Peace

U-UN cooperatn Union, “PlaN Peacekeepi

tary Synergie


arrangemen

ation on UN

gement

operation

t Operatio

ion of th

ment on UN

gement

Action to Enh

keeping

tion in militaryn of Action toing: Half-time

es

the European Union

nts for EU-U

N-EU cooper

in Military

ns. Eleme

he EU-UN

-EU cooper

hance CSDP

y crisis manago enhance EUfor the EU’s A

PU


UN cooperat

C

ration in T

th

E

w

a

b

Crisis

ents of

N Joint

E

fo

E

a

o

E

o

E

ration in R

m

C

in

d

Support E

S

E

o

E

U

E

o

S

a

C

gement: the exU CSDP suppoAction Plan, 3.


tion 363

Content / pr

The EU reiter

he UN in cris

Establishes jo

working leve

reas of plan

est practices

EU Member

or UN operat

EU operation

s a stand-a

peration

EU retains po

ver its opera

EU involveme

Reaffirmed d

management

Calls for incre

n specific ar

ialogue and

EU provides

States contrib

EU can pro

peration (Mo

EU autonomo

UN

EU autonomo

f UN

Strengthen as

nd sub-regio

Cross-cutting

xperience of Eort to UN pea.

n programme under g

ractical effe

rates its supp

sis managem

oint consulta

l to enhanc

nning, trainin

s.

States provi

tions

in support

alone opera

olitical contro

ations

ent to be dec

etermination

easing coope

reas such a

systematic le

a Clearing

butions.

vide a EU

odular approa

ous civilian d

ous military

ssistance to

onal organisa

areas

UFOR RD Coacekeeping”, 2

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

fects

port to the o

ment.

ative mechan

ce coordina

ng, commun

ide national

of UN oper

ation or with

ol and strateg

cided case by

n to coopera

eration and c

as senior lev

essons learn

g House fo

component

ach)

deployment in

deployment

AU and oth

ations

ongo in 2006, 2012; Pietz, T


653371

112

objectives of

nisms at the

tion in the

ication and

capabilities

ration either

hin the UN

gic direction

y case

ate in crisis

coordination

vel political

ned

or Member

t to a UN

n support of

t in support

her regional

12; Council ofThe European

U

5 s

2

f n

D1.3 Review Finally, in

Coordinat

civilian m

"Coordina

civilian m

an ambitio

of principle

missions a

Libya, EUC

operation

Republic in

of 2014364,

African Re

Table 11. E

Afghanista

Central Afr

Democratic

Israel/Pale

Kosovo

Libya

Mali

Somalia

State of pl

After more

parallel mi

cooperatio

developing

364 Madsen, P365 Council of

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

terms of pr

tion betwe

missions an

ation betwe

missions an

ous plan for

es and mod

and operatio

CAP Sahel

EUTM Mal

n the transit

, and most

epublic (EUM

EU and UN m

an

rican Repub

c Republic

estinian Terr

lay of UN-E

e than ten

ssions and

on, the two

g their partn

Pietz, EU-UN f the Europea

tary Synergie


rinciples an

een the UN

nd military

een the UN

nd military

r joint asses

dalities for c

ons in the f

Niger, EUA

i. The abov

tion from an

recently, in

MAM RCA)

missions and

blic

of Congo

ritories

EU coopera

years of c

operations

organisatio

nership. The

Cooperation, n Union, “Cou

es

the European Union

nd framewo

N and the

y operation

N and the

operations

ssment, pla

cooperation

field - throu

AVSEC in S

vementione

n EU militar

n the buildin

.365

d operation

EUPOL Af

EUMAM R

EUSEC R

EUBAM R

EUPOL CO

EULEX Ko

EUBAM Li

EUTM Ma

EUCAP Sa

EUNAVSE

EUTM Som

ation: lesso

cooperation

s in the field

ons have de

e years of c

3. uncil conclusio

PU


rk for coop

EU during

ns" in April

e EU durin

s" in June

anning and

n has been

ugh the dep

South Sudan

ed modalitie

ry operation

ng up of an

s deployed

fghanistan

RCA

D Congo

Rafah

OPPS

osovo

ibya

ali

ahel Mali

EC Somalia

malia

ons identif

n, with man

d, and with

emonstrated

cooperation

ons on the Cen


eration, the

g the plan

2014 and

g the plan

2014 comp

after action

linked to pr

ployment of

n and EUCA

es were pu

n (EUFOR

EU Military

parallel (in

a

fied and wa

ny experien

establishe

d their aspi

, notwithsta

ntral African R

n programme under g

e adoption o

nning of U

the agreem

nning of U

plemented t

n review. Ag

ractical exp

f civilian CS

AP Sahel M

t into test

RCA) to a U

y Advisory

August 201

UNAMA

MINUSCA

MONUSC

UNSCO

UNTSO

UNMIK

UNSMIL

MINUSMA

UNSOM

ay forward

nces throug

d principles

rations for f

anding the g

Republic”, 9 Fe

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

of "UN gui

UN mission

ment on mo

UN mission

the framew

gain, the de

periences fr

SDP missio

Mali, as wel

in the Cen

UN mission

Mission in

5)

A

CO

A

gh the dep

s and mech

further incr

gradual dev

ebruary 2015.


653371

113

delines on

ns and EU

odalities for

ns and EU

ork, setting

evelopment

rom parallel

ns EUBAM

l as military

tral African

n at the end

the Central

ployment of

hanisms for

reasing and

velopments,

U

5 s

3

n

U

r

U

g

t

l

M

y

n

d

l

f

r

d

,

D1.3 Review have revea

Initiative",

cooperatio

capabilities

Mandates

The differi

discovered

aspirations

something

the UN ma

EU manda

missions a

African Re

Despite the

and UN Gu

missions.36

organisatio

Training

Both orga

provide qu

between th

are deploy

with the m

organisatio

certain EU

standards

modules o

366 Wanda HOperations,” 367 Major, EU368 Hummel a369 Pietz and

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

aled that th

implemente

on on pea

s and justice

and plann

ng political

d already a

s translate

that can u

andates are

ates tend to

are deployed

epublic and

e improved

uidelines), i68 In gene

ons' differen

nisations s

ualified per

he two orga

ying to the s

modalities e

on ranges f

U courses,

developed

on gender a

ummel and ToZIF Policy Bri

U-UN cooperatand Pietz, ParTardy, The E

tary Synergie


here still are

ed by Germ

ce operati

e and secu

ning proces

agendas a

at the early

into mand

ndermine th

e more gen

focus on s

d to same c

Mali are t

coordinatio

it has been

ral, it can

nt cultures,

share the s

sonnel for

anisations o

same opera

established

from the int

curricula

by the EU

and human

obias Pietz, “Piefing, (Februation in militaryrtnering for Pe

EU and the UN

es

the European Union

e constrain

many and I

ons: coher

rity sector r

sses

and objectiv

y stages to

dates, the

he coheren

eral, leadin

specific task

countries w

the most re

on and insti

noted that

be said th

planning ru

same challe

the missio

on training,

ation area,

by the EU

tegration an

and guide

U based in

rights). Co

Partnering for ary 2015), 1. y crisis manageeace, 2. N, 1.

PU


nts or challe

Italy in 201

rence in m

reform.366

ves of the o

o hinder the

EU and U

ce of their

ng to a grea

ks and are

with similar t

ecent exam

tutional arra

the cooper

hat coordin

les and stru

enge in the

ons. For thi

for instance

has so far

Plan of Ac

nd use of U

elines (such

UN experi

ourses withi

Peace: Lesso

ement: the ex


enges rema

14, identifie

mandates

organisation

e EU-UN r

UN mission

cooperation

ater autono

less flexible

asks in the

mples), lead

angement (

ration is larg

nated plann

uctures.369

eir missions

is purpose,

e in the cas

been rathe

ction, traini

UN training

h as Secu

iences and

n the EU f

ons and Next

xperience of E

n programme under g

aining. The

d four prim

and plann

ns, or their

relationship

s often dif

n. It has be

my for the

e. In some i

ir mandates

ing to a ne

(in line with

gely depend

ning is still

s and oper

training is

ses that bot

r unstructur

ng coopera

standards

urity Sector

practices

ramework h

Steps for EU-

UFOR RD Co

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

"EU-UN P

mary areas

ing, trainin

member s

p.367 As the

ffer from e

een acknow

missions w

instances, U

s (of which

ecessity to

the EU Pla

ded on the

l underpinn

rations: bei

s crucial. C

th of the org

red and lim

ation betwe

in the deve

r Reform)

(for examp

have been

-UN Cooperat

ongo in 2006, 7


653371

114

Partnerships

for EU-UN

ng, military

tates, were

ese political

each other;

ledged that

whereas the

UN and EU

the Central

cooperate.

an of Action

staff of the

ned by the

ing able to

Cooperation

ganisations

mited. Along

een the two

elopment of

to sharing

ple, training

opened for

tion on Peace

7.

U

5 s

4

s

N

y

e

l

;

t

e

U

l

.

n

e

e

o

n

s

g

o

f

g

g

r

e

D1.3 Review UN staff pa

has been m

In order to

personnel

cooperatio

by the dev

as by the e

Europe's N

challenges

field perso

architectur

their coop

processes

Military ca

EU, or rat

cooperatio

UN peace

relatively lo

envisioned

has been t

Departmen

which the

Battlegrou

however, p

Justice an

Activities r

the restora

decade. T

security se

370 Annalisa peace operat371 Hummel a372 Hummel a373 Hummel a

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

articipation

made availa

respond to

and bridgin

on between

velopment o

establishme

New Trainin

s and also m

onnel. The

res has cre

eration on

or mutual e

apabilities

ther Europe

on since the

keeping op

ow for the

d in the EU

through its o

nt of Peace

preferred E

ps, logistica

preferred to

nd security

related and

ation of rule

he organisa

ector reform

Creta, “Trainitions?” ZIF Poand Pietz, Parand Pietz, Parand Pietz, Par

tary Synergie


and the on

able for the

o common c

ng the gap b

the organis

of common

ent of trainin

ng Initiative

made EU p

fact that b

eated a uniq

training. U

efforts for se

ean, suppo

e beginning.

perations, t

past decad

Plan of Acti

own missio

ekeeping O

EU support

al assets o

maintain b

y sector ref

assistance

e of law, ha

ations are c

m in almos

ing architectuolicy Briefing, (rtnering for Pertnering for Pertnering for Pe

es

the European Union

line-databa

UN as rega

challenges r

between pr

sations sho

or harmonis

ng recogniti

e for Civilia

pre-deploym

both the EU

que possib

Until now, h

eizing this o

ort to UN p

Whilst the

he amount

des. Also, a

ion, yet rem

ns and ope

Operations

t is outlined

or high-tech

ilateral coo

form

to justice a

ve been at

currently de

st ten coun

re(s) under re(October 2014

eace, 4; Creta,eace, 2; Creta,eace, 3; Pietz a

PU


ase Goalkee

ards the ava

related to tr

reliminary tr

ould be wide

sed training

ion system

an Crisis M

ment and ce

U and UN

bility for the

however, th

opportunity.

peacekeepin

EU membe

t of Europe

an example

mains to be

erations. In r

(DPKO) ha

d as provis

h equipmen

peration wit

and security

the core of

eploying pa

ntries or reg

eview: An ave4), 3-4. , Training arch, Training archand Tardy, Th


eper (or, rat

ailable cour

raining (for

raining and

ened. This w

g standards

and standa

Managemen

ertification c

are review

organisatio

here appea372

ng efforts h

er states ha

ean troops

e of EU com

seen as the

regard to th

as submitte

sion of "stra

nt. The EU

th the UN in

y sector ref

f both EU a

arallel missi

gions. Yet

enue for bolst

hitecture(s) unhitecture(s) unhe EU and the

n programme under g

ther its Sch

ses.370

example, m

actual depl

would be fa

among the

ards.371 With

nt (ENTRi)

courses ava

wing and re

ons to inten

r to be onl

has been i

ave provided

at UN ope

mponent wi

e EU has op

he EU milita

ed the EU

ategic enab

member s

n this regard

form (SSR),

and UN mis

ons that ha

the organis

ering EU-UN

nder review, 4.nder review, 2.

UN, 2.

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

hoolmaster a

managemen

loyment of

acilitated, fo

e organisati

hin the EU

has addres

ailable to U

eforming th

nsify and s

ly limited c

n the core

d significan

erations has

ithin UN op

pted to supp

ary capabilit

a "capabili

blers" such

states have

d.373

, as well as

ssions for m

ave tasks i

sations hav

Partnership o

.

.


653371

115

application)

nt of trained

personnel),

or example,

ons as well

framework,

ssed these

UN (civilian)

heir training

synchronise

consultation

of EU-UN

t funding to

s remained

peration, as

port the UN

ties, the UN

ities list" in

as the EU

e until now,

s support to

more than a

n justice or

ve different

on training for

U

5 s

5

)

d

,

,

l

,

e

)

g

e

n

N

o

d

s

N

N

n

U

,

o

a

r

t

r

D1.3 Review interpretati

implement

short-term

With the E

In particula

law or just

SSR capa

recently d

cooperatio

DPKO in t

coordinatio

5.3 Regio

Conflict p

organizatio

cooperatio

depending

operations

and AU. C

EUs credi

cooperatio

5.3.1 Org

Union (E

The OSCE

decision-

participatin

374 Madsen, P375Emma J. Prevention aRoutledge, 2states such acoordination of the EU in r

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

ion of wha

ation of su

CSDP eng

U Plan of A

ar, the "Mod

ice compon

abilities. Aw

eployed E

on and divis

he planning

on structure

onal inter

revention a

ons, particu

on between

on the sc

s are open t

ooperation

tability as

on on pressi

ganisation

U)

E is an inte

making pr

ng states. It

Pietz, EU-UN Stewart, Eur

and Crisis Ma2011), 32-33.; as Turkey, Chwith them has

regards to the

tary Synergie


at the rule

uch activitie

agement an

Action, mod

dular appro

nent to a UN

waiting the

UCAP Sah

ion of labou

g of the EU

es and the e

rnational o

and crisis

ularly after

organizatio

cope and

o contributi

in conflict p

a security

ng security

n for Sec

ergovernme

rocedure, a

differs from

Cooperation,

ropean Unionanagement- RAlongside AUina, Canada as an impact o

e third states c

es

the European Union

of law an

es in the fie

nd long-term

alities for d

oach", in line

N operation

materialisa

hel Mali m

ur between

mission to

exchange of

organizat

managem

the failure

ons has de

nature of t

ons from th

prevention w

provider,

challenges

curity and

ental organ

aiming prim

m the EU in

1-4; Hummel n conflict prevRoles, institutiU and OSCE hand Norway haon the efficiencan be read at

PU


nd SSR m

eld. In part

m developm

eveloping E

e of which t

n would be

ation of suc

ission offe

the EU and

o compleme

f liaison offi

tions

ent emerg

to preven

eveloped in

the crisis.

hird countrie

within the E

as well as

s.375

d Co-oper

nization with

marily to p

that it pract

and Pietz, Pavention and ions and polihas EU longstaave importantcy of the EU’s: Ibid. 221 -22


mean, which

ticular, the

ment suppor

EU-UN coop

the EU wou

a good pilo

ch an appr

rs some g

d UN; includ

ent the UN

cers betwe

ed as a

t war in th

ncrementally

Alongside

es and regio

U and AU a

s improved

ration in

h a consen

prevent dis

tices its fore

artnering for Pthe Europeanicies, ed. Evaanding relatiocontribution t

s interventions29.

n programme under g

h also cha

EU interna

rt remains a

peration in t

uld provide,

ot in the cas

roach, the

good practic

ding the clo

activities in

en the miss

shared pri

he Balkans.

y, and as a

NATO and

onal organis

and OSCE h

the prosp

Europe (O

nsus- based

sputes betw

eign and se

eace, 3. n security arca Gross and nship with ASo CSDP operas. More inform

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

allenges the

al coherenc

a challenge

this field alr

, in this cas

se of a rule

example o

ces in reg

ose interacti

n Mali, as w

sions.374

iority amon

. Since the

a case-by-c

d UN, vari

sations suc

have streng

pects for in

OSCE) - E

d, non-lega

tween and

ecurity polic

chitecture”, inAna E. Junc

SEAN. Also therations and comation regardi


653371

116

e coherent

ce between

.

ready exist.

se, a rule of

of law and

of the quite

gard to the

on with UN

well as fixed

ng security

en, security

case basis,

ous CSDP

h as OSCE

gthened the

nternational

European

ally binding

within its

y not within

n EU Conflictros, (London:e nonmemberoperation andng the impact

U

5 s

6

t

n

.

f

d

e

e

N

d

y

y

,

P

E

e

l

g

s

n

t : r d t

D1.3 Review but beyond

OSCE field

Democratic

The EU st

Security a

European

border mo

has gone f

operating i

a result of

cooperatio

Framewor

The activit

the concep

the signific

regarding

participatin

from outsid

The coope

EU and O

broadened

manageme

manageme

21st. Effici

Yugoslav R

establishm

engageme

376 ”OSCEhttp://eeas.eu377 Lauffer an378 Ibid.42. 379 Ibid. 60. 380ConferencCommunity’sEC’s gradualthe post-Helsefforts. See Relationship”

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

d its borde

d operation

c Institution

ates have p

nd Cooper

foreign pol

nitor, police

from contrib

independen

f the devel

on within OS

rk for coop

ties of the O

pt of compr

cance of de

the overa

ng states. T

de Europe,

eration betw

OSCE coop

d and deepe

ent operatio

ent has bee

ent coopera

Republic of

ment of a

ent of the

E & EUuropa.eu/delend Hamacher,

ce on Securitys integration byl emergence asinki process c

more: Alyso”, OSCE Year

tary Synergie


rs. OSCE h

ns are the c

ns and Hum

played a ke

ation in Eu

licy. Since

e missions a

buting to OS

ntly as a co

lopment of

SCE.378

peration

Organizatio

rehensive s

emocracy a

ll picture

There are 5

such as the

ween EU me

erate on a

ened, follow

ons under C

en develop

ation amon

Macedonia

joint opera

EU in OS

”, Europeagations/vienna In Control, 60

y and Co-opery creating stabas a security created the firon J.K. Bailerbook 2008, (B

es

the European Union

has conduc

conflict prev

an Rights (

ey role in th

urope (CSC

its origins,

and promot

SCE missio

mpeting ac

EU civilian

n for Secur

ecurity, wh

and human

of security

57 participa

e United Sta

ember state

range of

wing develop

CSDP. In pa

ped through

g the intern

a, included c

ation room

SCE partici

an Externaa/eu_osce/ind0- 65.

ation in Europbility to the areactor, becausst serious opes, Jean-Yves

Baden-Baden:

PU


cted 17 ope

vention cen

ODIHR).377

he origins o

CE)). It was

OSCE has

ion of huma

on discussio

ctor in the p

n competen

rity and Co

ich, in addi

rights, as w

y. Its goal

ating states

ates and Ca

es and OSC

issues, and

pment of th

articular, int

h the exper

national inst

constant inf

ms. These

ipating Sta

al Action dex_en.htm.

pe, CSCE, anea. The CSC

se the negotiaening for EC ms Haine & Z Nomos, Verla


erations in

ntre (CPC)

of OSCE (fo

s one of th

s dealt with

an rights. O

ons to opera

an Europe

nces and b

o-operation

ition to polit

well as eco

is to imp

in the OSC

anada..379

CE has bee

d the scope

e CFSP, an

eraction be

riences from

titutions in a

formation sh

experience

ates, result

Service,

d NATO wereE also gave a

ations leading members to apZdzislaw Lachag, 2008), 65.

n programme under g

total. 376 T

located in

ormerly kno

e first platf

h conflict pr

Over their co

ating under

an area. Th

because of

in Europe (

tico-military

onomic and

prove coop

CE, which a

n developed

e of their c

nd the launc

tween the O

m the Balka

a respondin

haring, regu

es, togethe

ed in sign

accessed

e important co more specificup to the Hels

pply their diplohowski, “Refle

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

The main st

Vienna and

own as Con

forms for c

revention a

ommon hist

r OSCE ma

his has take

f a decline

(OSCE) are

y security, e

environme

peration be

also includ

d since 197

co-operatio

ch of the fir

OSCE and

an region i

ng crisis in

ular meeting

er with an

ning a fram

10 Septem

ontributors for c boost to the sinki Final Ac

omatic co-ordinections on th


653371

117

tructures of

d Office for

nference for

coordinating

ctivities i.e.

ory, the EU

ndates and

en place as

in political

e based on

emphasises

ental issues

etween the

e countries

70s.380 The

n has both

st EU crisis

EU in crisis

n the early

the Former

gs and joint

increased

mework for

mber 2015,

the European

ct of 1975 andnation he OSCE-EU

U

5 s

7

f

r

r

g

.

U

d

s

l

n

s

s

e

s

e

h

s

s

y

r

t

d

r

,

n

d

U

D1.3 Review partnership

area for th

have been

information

Today, EU

Jud

Dem

Me

Sm

Bor

Ele

Modalities

The EUs d

with the E

closely wit

has involv

practical c

monitors.38

cooperatio

A mechanpolitical athrough;384

Con

EU

Cro

Con

For

on

381 Council oConflict Prev382 Ginsberg 383 Stewart. “384 Ulfstein, jgreater cohe

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

p between

he OSCE-

n establishe

n sharing w

U- OSCE co

dicial and po

mocratizatio

edia develop

mall and med

rder manag

ections.

s of cooper

developmen

EU in elect

h OSCE pr

ed regular

cooperation82 The int

on between

nism to facnd field le

4

nsultations

at both the

oss represe

ntacts betw

reign Affairs

topical issu

of the Europeavention, Crisis

and Penska, “EU conflict prjuris Geir, “Thrence”, Strasb

tary Synergie


EU and OS

EU coopera

d in the OS

ith the OSC

ooperation

olice reform

on, institutio

pment;

dium-sized

gement and

ration

nt of civilian

ion monito

eviously in

consultatio

, such as

ernational

the organis

cilitate the cevel have

between th

e ministerial

entation at re

ween the S

s and Secu

ues that are

an Union, “CoManagement The European

revention and he council of bourg: Counci

es

the European Union

SCE in 200

ation. And

SCE area. A

CE on the gr

comprises

m, public adm

on-building

enterprise d

combating

n crisis man

ring, borde

Macedonia

ons and info

in Macedo

attention t

sations.383

cooperationbeen deve

he OSCE T

and ambas

elevant mee

Secretary G

rity Policy a

on each or

onclusions of and Post- Co

n Union in globthe EuropeanEurope and

l of Europe, D

PU


03.381 Today

of 32 CSD

All of them h

round

s;

ministration

and human

developme

human traf

nagement c

er managem

a and Kosov

ormation sh

onia where

to these c

n and cooreloped. Cu

Troika, inclu

ssadorial/P

etings;

General and

and other h

rganization's

the Council oonflict Rehabilibal security - t

n security archthe OSCE: E

Directorate of P


y crisis man

DP missions

have develo

n, anti-corru

n rights;

nt;

fficking;

capabilities

ment and p

vo and curre

haring betw

e EU troop

countries h

rdination beurrently, th

uding the O

olitical Secu

d the High

igh-level EU

s agenda;

of the Europeaisation” the politics of itecture,” 44.

Enhancing co-Policy Plannin

n programme under g

nagement h

s and opera

oped a degr

ption meas

has led to i

police miss

ently in Ukr

ween the in

s provided

has encou

etween the e relations

SCE Secre

urity Comm

Representa

U officials. A

an Union on E

impact, 194.

-operation andg, (2012), 3.

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

has evolved

ations, man

ree of coop

ures;

increased c

ions. EU h

raine. The c

nstitutions,

d protection

raged the

EU and Oships are

etary Gener

mittee levels

ative of the

Annual staff

EU- OSCE Co

d complemen


653371

118

d into a key

ny of these

eration and

cooperation

has worked

cooperation

as well as,

n to OSCE

enhanced

OSCE at amaintained

ral, and the

;

e Union for

f-level talks

o-operation in

ntarity through

U

5 s

8

y

e

d

n

d

n

,

E

d

a d

e

r

s

n

h

D1.3 Review

Sta

com

These mod

headquarte

coordinatio

oriented.

In theatre,

place in sta

co-ordinate

ground ar

cooperatio

EU represe

should be

practice an

Challenge

Due to the

participatin

the organis

the coope

EU’s civilia

overlappin

perceived

visible or r

has been

undertake

in recent y

cooperatio

enhancing

allies has c

385”OSCE & E386 Interview 387 Bailes, Ha388 Ibid.

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

aff to staff

mmission, a

dalities of c

ers level be

on should a

cooperatio

ates where

e with relev

re frequent

on often take

entatives o

fostered o

nd not perso

es

e long hist

ng in the St

sations is s

ration. One

an crisis ma

g mandates

to rival the

isky assign

the relucta

new missio

years has be

on has been

cooperatio

contributed

EU” of a EUAM Of

aine and Lach

tary Synergie


f contacts

and the OSC

ooperation

etween sen

also receiv

on and dialo

parallel pre

vant EU rep

tly invited

es place in

n the groun

n the groun

on dependa

ory, as we

ates of the

solid. There

e challenge

anagement

s and in the

e OSCE ste

ments.387 A

ance of som

ons without

een to minim

n limited. EU

on in the se

to preventi

fficial, 26 Augowski, “Reflec

es

the European Union

between t

CE secretar

are concen

nior officials

ve attention

ogues betw

esence exis

presentative

to addres

ad- hoc, de

nd. Accordin

nd, so that

able.386

ell as the fa

OSCE, it w

are severa

for enhan

capabilities

e same reg

ealing the t

Another cons

me OSCE

t a consens

mize such m

U- NATO co

ecurity fram

ng the deve

ust 2015. ctions on the O

PU


the Genera

riat and inst

ntrated on th

s in Brussel

n, as the n

ween OSCE

st. Often, th

es in the h

ss the OS

epending of

ng to an EU

dialogue b

act that all

would be ea

al political a

ced cooper

s, both instit

gions. The

tasks from

siderable d

member s

sus decision

missions. U

ooperation h

mework and

elopment of

OSCE-EU Re


al secretar

titutions.

he political l

ls and Vien

nature of O

E mission o

he Heads of

host country

SCE Perma

ften on the

U official, a

between the

EU memb

asy to assu

and structur

ration is th

tutions are

EU, who is

OSCE and

ominator fo

tates. As m

n, including

ntil the mos

has also im

d withdrawa

f EU- OSCE

lationship”, 65

n programme under g

iat of Cou

level prioriti

nna. Howev

OSCE activi

offices and

f OSCE field

y and EU r

anent Coun

individual d

pragmatic

e organisati

ber states a

me that the

ral aspects,

at since the

undertaking

s a newer p

d exploits i

or the develo

mentioned

Russia, w

st recent op

pacted on t

al of Russia

E partnershi

5 - 77.

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

uncil of th

izing of dial

ver, ensurin

ities are la

EU delega

d operation

representati

ncil.385 How

diplomats, o

culture of c

ions becam

are at the

e cooperatio

, which hav

e developm

g similar mi

player in th

t to go on

opment of c

above, OS

whose clear

peration in U

the Russian

an Federat

ip.388


653371

119

e EU, EU

ogue at the

ng that field

argely field-

ations takes

s liaise and

ives on the

wever, the

officials and

cooperation

me common

same time

on between

ve hindered

ment of the

ssions with

e field, has

doing less

cooperation

SCE cannot

preference

Ukraine, the

n interest in

tion and its

U

5 s

9

U

e

d

-

s

d

e

e

d

n

n

e

n

d

e

h

s

s

n

t

e

e

n

s

D1.3 Review Opportuni

Although E

still needs

long before

and experi

proliferatio

of approac

ammunitio

own mem

coordinatio

terrorism, o

harmoniza

be substa

occupying

Finally, an

some more

to be too p

EU for com

has shown

organizatio

role.390 Alt

proved its

Ukraine, th

things. The

the crisis.39

Finally, OS

strengthen

and resou

mediation.

389 Ibid. 390 Natalia MPaper No. 8, http://eplo.orgN_Discussion391 Ministry foAffairs of Finl

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

ities

EU and OSC

the OSCE.

e the first C

ienced staff

on, as the E

ches for b

n stocks, a

bers, but t

on of outrea

or drugs or

ation of inter

ntially redu

Europe’s e

important p

e remote an

partial. The

mprehensive

n, the EU

on like OSC

hough Rus

worth in

he organisa

e organisati91

SCE is an i

ning the sec

urceful acto

irimanova, “Pe(2014),

g/assets/files/n_Paper_Peaor Foreign Affaland Vol. 3 (20

tary Synergie


CE can be p

. It is a strat

CSDP opera

f. Additiona

U has not m

better contr

nd so on. T

the OSCE

ach to cove

human traf

rnal laws an

uced by ev

eastern and

point of coo

nd sensitive

OSCE may

e and forma

is not view

CE, which is

ssia has vio

conjunction

ation has ca

on has also

mportant p

curity in Eur

or in civilia

eacebuilding i

2.%20Activitieacebuilding%2airs of Finland015), 29 – 31.

es

the European Union

perceived a

tegic partne

ation was la

lly, the OSC

much expert

rol of WMD

The EU may

can devel

r twice as m

fficking, the

nd practises

ven looser

south-easte

operation is

e parts of th

y offer a mo

al solutions

wed as a

s not either p

olated the O

n with the

arried out sp

o played an

artner for th

ope and its

an crisis m

n Ukraine: Wh

es/Civil%20So0in%20Ukrain

d, “Review on

PU


as competito

er that has

aunched an

CE has exp

rtise on that

D-related c

y be able to

op codes

many count

e EU has be

s, but the st

forms of

ern approac

that OSCE

he non-integ

ore politically

to the vario

neutral thir

pro- Europe

OSCE’s ce

Ukraine c

pecial moni

important p

he EU, sha

neighbourh

manageme

hat Role for th

ociety%20Dialne_What%20rFinland’s Sec


ors in the ar

developed

nd, thus, the

pertise in the

area, while

capacities,

o formulate

of conduct

tries. Simila

etter chance

trategic vuln

co-operatio

ches.389

E organs and

grated territ

y acceptabl

ous frozen c

rd party in

ean or pro-

ntral princip

risis; throu

itoring and

part in the e

aring the sa

hood. At its

nt, conflict

he EU?”, Civil

ogue%20Netwrole_for_the_Ecurity Coopera

n programme under g

rea of crisis

its security

e EU can b

e fields i.e.

e both institu

small arms

e tighter reg

, best prac

arly, when ta

es than the

nerability of

on with the

d represent

tories, wher

le (“neutral”

conflicts. Li

peace talk

Russian is

ples in the

gh its inter

election mo

efforts to fin

me values,

best, the O

prevention

Society Dialog

work/DiscussioEU.pdf, (Accestion”, Publicat

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

s managem

and govern

benefit from

arms contr

utions supp

s, landmine

gulatory reg

ctice excha

tackling the

e OSCE of a

f the EU ter

e other OS

tatives are a

re the EU is

”) interventi

ke the Ukra

ks and, the

better suite

crisis, the

rnational p

onitoring, am

d a politica

goals, and

OSCE can b

n, early-wa

gue Network,

on%20Papersssed 8 Octobetions of Minist


653371

120

ent, the EU

nance tools

m the skilled

ol and non-

port a range

es, excess

imes for its

anges, and

menace of

achieving a

rritory could

SCE States

accepted in

s perceived

on than the

ainian crisis

erefore, an

ed to such a

OSCE has

presence in

mong other

l solution to

d interest in

be a flexible

arning and

, Discussion

s/EPLO_CSDer 2015). try for Foreign

U

5 s

0

U

s

d

-

e

s

s

d

f

a

d

s

n

d

e

s

n

a

s

n

r

o

n

e

d

D1.3 Review

5.3.2 Afr

African Un

Addis Aba

partner of

framework

cooperatio

strategy fo

efforts with

develop its

policy, the

addition, th

Framewor

Cotonou A

and Pacif

developing

first set the

Africa-EU

Africa-EU

interests o

building AU

coherent w

The joint s

Summit. T

2014 – 201

Pea

Dem

Hum

392Ginsberg a393Ginsberg &394 EU- Africa

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

ican Unio

nion (AU) is

ba, Ethiopia

f the region

k agreemen

on has beco

or Africa is

h CSDP ac

s own capac

EU is the

he EU is the

rk for coop

Agreement,

fic (ACP)

g countries

e framewor

Strategy a

relations. T

n strategic

U peaceke

whole.393

strategy is

he last Sum

17. Five are

ace and sec

mocracy, go

man develo

and Penska, “& Penska, “Tha Summit, “Fo

tary Synergie


on (AU) –

s an organ

a. AU is an

n for many

nt with all c

ome an im

s to bring t

tions, in ord

city for pea

world large

e largest co

peration

adopted in

countries

and the EU

rk of Africa-

adopted in

The strategy

subjects, in

eping capa

implemente

mmit was he

eas for joint

curity;

ood govern

opment;

“The Europeanhe European Uourth EU- Afric

es

the European Union

European

nization con

important

y years. It

countries co

portant ele

together its

der to be a

cekeeping.

est contribu

ntributor to

2000 to rep

is the mo

U, covering

- EU relatio

2005, whic

y set the obj

ncluding con

acities, while

ed through

eld in 2014,

action are;

ance and h

n Union in globUnion in globaca summit,” Br

PU


n Union (E

nsisting of

regional pa

is commit

oncerned a

ment in EU

s significan

a more strat

Due to the

utor of hum

building AU

place the 19

ost compre

g the EU's

ons. Howeve

ch provides

bjectives and

nflict preven

e linking al

jointly ide

, adopting a394

human rights

bal security - al security - therussels, 2 – 4 A


EU)

54 African

artner for the

tted to sup

nd to foste

U foreign p

t diplomatic

tegic actor

e strategic im

manitarian a

U capacities

975 Lomé C

ehensive p

relations w

er, the mos

s the overa

d mechanis

ntion and re

l EU opera

ntified prior

a roadmap

s;

the politics of e politics of imAril 2014.

n programme under g

states with

e EU. The

pport the im

r regional c

olicy and C

c, commerc

in the regio

mportance o

nd develop

s in crisis m

Convention

partnership

ith 79 coun

st relevant f

arching lon

sm for the tw

esolution, cr

ations and p

rities, which

to frame EU

impact”, 212- mpact”, 2012, 2

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

h secretaria

EU has bee

mplementa

cooperation

CSDP actio

cial and de

on and to h

of Africa to

pment aid i

management

for African,

agreemen

ntries. This

framework

ng-term fram

wo to pursu

risis manag

programs i

h are ident

U- African r

215. 213.


653371

121

at based in

en a strong

tion of the

n. AU- EU

on. The EU

evelopment

help the AU

EU foreign

n Africa. In

t. 392

Caribbean

nt between

agreement

is the Joint

mework for

ue common

gement and

nto a more

tified in the

relations for

U

5 s

n

g

e

U

U

t

U

n

n

n

n

t

t

r

n

d

e

e

r

D1.3 Review

Sus

Glo

In EU, one

capacity b

Security A

The action

Standby Fo

well as sup

The overa

autonomou

issues, pro

through w

componen

Areas of c

Currently,

or capacity

AMISOM39

(EDF), the

prevent an

officers, w

major don

strengthen

and, if nec

the AU inc

Africa throu

Under the

advisors a

395 “AU PeacAnnual JointOctober 201to-hold-their- 396 EuropeanCouncil- CapBrussels, 28.397 Kenneth Human Secu

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

stainable an

obal and em

e key polic

building for

rchitecture

ns to imple

orce (ASF)

pport to bui

all goal of

usly. The E

oviding sup

which the

ts of APSA

cooperation

the EU’s co

y building i96, mainly t

e APF prov

nd, if neces

hile military

ator for the

n the capac

cessary, ma

clude devel

ugh these i

CSDP, the

re based in

ce and Securt Consultative5, http://www.first-joint-retre

n Commission,pacity building.4.2015. Mpyisi, How E

urity Enhancem

tary Synergie


nd inclusive

merging issu

cy of the St

conflict pr

(APSA) de

ement the

, a Continen

ld on the C

is to make

EU continue

pport throug

EU is sup

. 395

n

ooperation w

initiatives. T

through su

vides suppo

ssary, mana

y equipmen

e implemen

city and effe

anage and r

opment an

nstruments

e EU provi

n the EU de

rity Council ane Meeting on .peaceau.org/eat-and-8th-an

, “Joint commug in support o

EU support oment in Africa,

es

the European Union

e developme

ues.

trategy for

revention, m

fines the in

strategy in

ntal Early W

SDP Action

e the AU

es is one o

gh several

pporting th

with AU in c

The EU su

bstantial E

ort to the A

age crises.

t, weapons

tation of A

ective functi

resolve con

d humanita

.397

ides capac

elegation to

nd EU Politica15 - 16 Octo

/en/article/au-pnnual-joint-con

unication to thf security and

of the African , (Addis Ababa

PU


ent and gro

Africa is to

managemen

nstruments a

clude area

Warning Sys

n Plan for A

able to pla

of the main

instruments

e operatio

crisis mana

pport Africa

EU funding.

African Uni

Most of th

s or ammun

APSA. The

ioning of A

nflicts in Afr

arian aid an

city- building

o Ethiopia a

al and Securitober 2015, inpeace-and-sensultative-mee

he European Pd developmen

peace and Sa: Institute for


owth and co

o provide U

nt and res

and activitie

as such as

stem, suppo

Africa includ

an and con

strategic p

s, notably,

nalization

agement is

an-led Pea

. Within th

ion and reg

he funding c

nitions are e

EU financia

PSA and to

rica. Furthe

nd the EU i

g support f

and under t

ty Committee n Debre Zeit, curity-council-

eting-on-15-16

Parliament andnt - Enabling p

ecurity ArchiteSecurity Stud

n programme under g

ntinental int

Union suppo

olution. Th

es for AU’s

the develo

ort for Secu

ing military

nduct peac

partners of t

the Africa

and imple

materialized

ce Support

e Europea

gional econ

covers allow

excluded. In

al support t

o improve c

rmore, othe

s currently

for the AU

the remit of

to hold their Ethiopia”, Af

-and-eu-politic6-october-2015

d the partners to pre

ecture Impactdies, 2009).

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

tegration;

ort for Afric

he African

peacekeep

opment of

urity Sector

and civilian

ce support

the AU on

Peace Fac

mentation

d through f

t Operation

n Develop

nomic com

wances for

n addition, t

to the APS

cooperation

er elements

the bigges

in Addis.

f the EU de

First Joint Rfrican Union, cal-and-securi5-in-debre-zei

event and ma

ts Democracy


653371

122

can Union’s

Peace and

ping efforts.

an African

Reform, as

n elements.

operations

a range of

cility (APF),

of various

inancial aid

ns, such as

ment Fund

munities to

troops and

the EU is a

A seeks to

n to prevent

s to support

st donor for

EU military

elegation to

etreat and 8th

accessed 16ty-committee-it-ethiopia

anage crises”,

y Building and

U

5 s

2

s

d

.

n

s

.

s

f

,

s

d

s

d

o

d

a

o

t

t

r

y

o

h 6 -

,

d

D1.3 Review AU. In add

Peace and

In addition

requested

been in res

Table 12. C

The impac

associated

EU and ot

involved a

reinforcem

AU. As th

humanitari

crisis in A

strengthen

Challenge

The EU an

coordinate

scope of E

398 EuropeanSeptember 2399 “Ongoing 400 Ginsberg

CSDP MISSMILITARY

CIVILIAN

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

dition, in 20

d Security C

, the EU ha

by AU. As

sponse to A

Completed a

ct on the A

d with the U

ther securit

nd needs a

ment to aid a

e current a

an crisis ha

Africa and

n its efforts t

es

nd the AU h

ed operation

European A

n External Act2015: http://eea

missions and

& Penska, “Th

SIONS AND OCOMPLETED

2003: ARTEM

2006: EUFOR

2008‐ 2009:

2014‐ 2015:

COMPLETED

2005 ‐ 2007:

2007 ‐ 2014:

2008‐ 2010:

2012 ‐ 2014:

tary Synergie


009 an earl

Council on p

as had a sig

outlined in

African secu

and ongoing

U is closely

UN Chapter

ty providers

assistance o

a humanitar

asylum crisis

as a direct

their impac

to build long

have comple

ns. Howeve

Aid, the AU

tion Services,as.europa.eu/ operations,”

he European

OPERATIOND

MIS, DRC

R RD Congo,DRC

EUFOR TCHAD,

EUFOR RCA, CA

D

EUPOL KINSHA

EUPOL RD CON

EU SSR, Guinea

EUAVSEC, Sou

es

the European Union

y- warning

potential con

gnificant im

the Table

urity and hu

g CSDP oper

y linked on

r VII of the

s to render

or is otherw

rian crisis in

s have clea

impact on

ct on the E

g- term stab

ementary o

er, despite

is an awkw

“Factsheet: E/cfsp/conflict_p

Union in globa

NS IN AFRICA

C

CHAD/CAR

AR

ASA, DRC

NGO, DRC

a‐ Bissau

th Sudan

PU


initiative w

nflicts and t

pact on AU

13. 399 belo

manitarian

rations in A

n the UN, s

UN Charter

r security a

wise affected

n Chad or S

arly proved,

the EU me

EU’s secur

bility to the r

bjectives in

the promis

ward partne

EU Conflict Eprevention/do

al security - th

AONGOIN

2008: So

2010: EU

2012: EU

2013: EU

2015: EU

ONGOIN

2012: EU

2012: EU

2013: EU

2014: EU


was launche

hreats to pe

U, given its c

ow, 17 of C

issues.

Africa

ince AU is

r. For this re

ssistance i

d. Therefo

Sudan, the

the conseq

ember state

rity environ

region.400

n the region

se of EU- A

r for CSDP

Early Warning cs/201409_fa

he politics of im

NG

omalia Naval Fo

UTM Somalia, S

UCAP Nestor, H

UTM Mali, Mali

UMAM RCA, CA

NG

UCAP Sahel, Nig

UCAP NESTOR, K

UBAM, Libya

UCAP Sahel, Ma

n programme under g

ed to AU, d

eace and se

contribution

SDP opera

a regional

eason, the

n Africa, w

re, when th

impact is fe

quences of

es. With the

ment, the

manifested

AU security

operations

System”, Sepctsheet_confli

mpact”, 212 – 2

orce‐ Operation

omalia

orn of Africa

R

ger

Kenya, Somalia

ali

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

designed to

ecurity in Af

ns to CSDP

ations since

security ar

UN has req

where the A

he UN asks

elt on both t

instability,

e path dep

EU has a

d in both se

y cooperatio

s. Since the

ptember 2014ict_earth_war

215.

n ATALANTA

a, Seychelles an


653371

123

advise the

frica.398

operations

2003 have

rrangement

quested the

AU is either

the EU for

the UN and

terrors and

endency of

priority to

eparate and

on, and the

e AU, as an

4, accessed 9ning_en.pdf

nd Tanzania

U

5 s

3

e

s

e

t

e

r

r

d

d

f

o

d

e

n

9

D1.3 Review internation

are limits to

Another ch

operationa

That depen

internal po

region, wh

There is s

increase th

forms part

commitme

cooperatio

insufficient

enhanced

Difficulties

Some pow

wide chara

to an exte

strengthen

implement

be more in

Opportuni

Building up

continues t

instate co

peacekeep

many purp

and objec

manageme

401 Ibid. 402 Ibid. 403 Ibid.; GorPaper preparBoston, (5 –

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

al security

o the scope

hallenge is

al capacity.

ndency hind

olitical chall

ich impact o

still a lack

he efficiency

t of a com

nt to conf

on hinders t

t equipmen

intra – insti

in attempti

werful EU m

acter of the

ent, undercu

n a repress

ing the APF

nvolved in th

ities

p AU peace

to be functi

nflict and

ping capaci

poses from

ctives, while

ent to Africa

rm Rye Olsenred for the EU7 March 2015

tary Synergie


provider, is

e for the EU

that curre

Therefore,

ders buildin

lenges and

on the AU’s

of coopera

y, the EU n

mprehensive

flict preven

he EU to h

nt, lack of r

tutional and

ng to form a

members se

APF. Thus

ut the good

sive regime

F is that oth

he region an

ekeeping ca

on of how A

humanitaria

ty so that it

a European

e at the s

an lower- le

, “Providing SUSA Fourteent5).

es

the European Union

not as inte

U impact on

ntly, the A

it is depend

ng an equal

d scope of

s ability to d

ation and c

eeds to dev

e approach

tion and r

ave an exp

resources a

d inter- orga

a coherent

eem to purs

s, as a resu

d intentions

e rather th

her major w

nd they mig

apacities is

AU itself evo

an disaster

t would tak

n Perspecti

ame time,

evel units of

Security in a libth Biennial Co

PU


egrated as t

the AU.401

AU lacks the

dable on th

partnership

the violent

develop its o

coordination

velop a stra

h drawing o

resolution a

pected impa

and securit

anizational c

and consis

sue their o

lt, the comp

s of the EU

han enhan

world player

ght be less w

an EU prior

olves as a r

rs. The eff

e the leadin

ive. Europe

developing

f governme

berial world oonference: The


he EU and

e capacity

e EU’s and

p between t

t conflicts a

own ability t

n among th

ategic ration

on the long

and econo

act on the g

ty threats a

cooperation

stent EU pol

wn African

peting agen

U. In some

ce democr

rs such as

willing to co

rity. The sco

regional sec

forts to su

ng role in c

e can comb

g the imple

nt, i.e. the a

rder: The onlye Panel on ‘Ch

n programme under g

is much lar

and resou

d UN’s supp

the organis

are current

o manage a

he EU instr

nale for its A

g- term obj

mic develo

ground. The

are difficult

n.

licy, is affec

foreign po

ndas of EU

instances,

ratization. A

China also

ooperate in C

ope for the

curity actor

upport the

conflict man

ine a strong

ementation

armed force

y tool left for Ehanging agend

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

rger and div

rces to exp

port for yea

ations. In a

trends in

a crisis.402

ruments in

African ope

bjectives an

opment. Th

e challenges

to overco

cted by poli

olicies desp

member st

EU assist

Another ch

have a ma

CSDP.403

EU impact

in a contine

AU to bui

nagement w

g influence

of operat

es. But, of c

European Unidas in EU- Afr


653371

124

verse, there

ploit its full

rs to come.

addition, the

the African

Africa. To

rations that

nd financial

his lack of

s related to

me without

tical rivalry.

ite the EU-

tates might,

ance helps

hallenge to

ajor interest

on the AU,

ent rife with

ild its own

would serve

over goals

ional crisis

course, this

ion in Africa?”frica relations’,

U

5 s

4

e

l

.

e

n

o

t

l

f

o

t

.

-

,

s

o

t

,

h

n

e

s

s

s

” ,

D1.3 Review also has m

assistance

Another im

implement

centres. F

headquarte

necessary

challenges

African sec

preparedne

5.4 Conc

As discuss

significantl

have evolv

partner in t

EU’s princ

efficiency o

long stand

geostrateg

capabilities

with numb

ongoing cr

Africa and

and coope

actors is a

is best ach

to ensure

security an

Cooperatio

missions/o

nations or

troops of p

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

many potent

e.

mportant ar

ation of th

For each A

ers and on

transforma

s. At the sa

curity enviro

ess capabil

clusions

sed in this

y in nature

ved within t

the field of c

ciples since

of the EU’s

ding and

gic environm

s of the Eur

er of diplom

risis in Eur

Syria, com

eration from

lso an impo

hieved throu

stability an

nd capacity

on with o

operations. T

other inter

police from-

tary Synergie


tial consequ

rea of coo

e road ma

African sub

ne standby

ation of nat

ame time, t

onment, the

ities.

s chapter,

, structure a

the time. To

conflict prev

its creation

crisis mana

emerging

ment, while t

ropean coun

matic, civilia

ropean neig

mbined with

the whole

ortant form

ugh ensurin

d the prote

to manage

other secu

This is due

rnational or

or to fill in t

es

the European Union

uences, suc

peration is

ps for stre

regional o

force. It is

tional secur

the EU rec

ereby suppo

internationa

and organis

oday, the E

vention and

n and worki

agement ef

security ch

the financia

ntries. The

an and hum

ghbourhood

the asylum

internationa

of cooperat

ng the stabi

ection of cit

a crisis out

urity provid

to the fact t

ganisations

temporarily

PU


ch as strong

s the situat

engthening

organization

s seen as

rity and def

ceives valua

orting the fo

al organisa

sational cult

EU is seen

d crisis man

ing with par

fforts. In the

hallenges,

al crisis is po

military cap

manitarian as

d. The sco

m crisis and

al communi

tion. In the

ility of its ne

tizens is an

tside its bor

ders is a

that half of

s. Several C

for. NATO


g African de

tion centre.

the AU sit

n, the obje

institutiona

fence think

able up-to-d

orming of it

ations invol

ture. They a

as a credi

agement. M

rtners in co

e current se

within a

osing challe

pabilities of

ssets, have

pe and com

d the situati

ty. Building

e end, the s

eighbour. T

n important

rders.

an importa

the operatio

CSDP oper

(Macedoni

n programme under g

ependence

. CSDP ha

uation room

ctive is on

ally better e

king needed

date inform

ts own situa

ved in cris

are all living

ble security

Multiliteralism

oherence is

ecurity envir

rapidly cha

enges to the

the NATO a

e been nece

mplexity of

ion in Ukra

the capacit

security of th

hus improv

tool to stre

nt elemen

ons have be

rations were

a and BiH)

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

on EU res

as participa

m and join

ne permane

equipped to

d for the pa

mation on th

ational awa

sis manage

g organisat

y actor and

m has been

a precondi

ronment, th

anging an

e security a

and the UN

essary to de

the ongoin

ine, require

ty of the oth

he EU Mem

ving its part

engthen the

nt for ma

een reques

e deployed

and the UN


653371

125

ources and

ated in the

t operation

ent brigade

o push the

aradigmatic

he evolving

reness and

ement vary

ions, which

d a relevant

n one of the

ition for the

e EU faces

d complex

nd defence

N, combined

eal with the

ng crisis in

e resources

her security

mber States

ner's ability

e EU’s own

any CSDP

sted by host

to replace

N (i.e. DRC,

U

5 s

5

d

e

n

e

e

c

g

d

y

h

t

e

e

s

x

e

d

e

n

s

y

s

y

n

P

t

e

,

D1.3 Review BiH) In sev

primarily N

(Indonesia

where CSD

actors and

crisis. I.e.

not suppo

missed the

Despite the

is still a

coordinatio

The existin

thereby av

where the

and extens

404 Ginsbergexperience w405 Ibid, 65. 406 Tardy, “CS

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

veral opera

NATO (BiH

a) and OSCE

DP operatio

d between E

in the case

rted the co

e opportunit

e good expe

number of

on between

ng concept

voiding the

objectives

sive informa

and Penska

with comprehe

SDP in action

tary Synergie


ations, the E

H and Koso

E (Kosovo,

ons deploy.

EU and oth

e of Georgia

ontinuation

ty for conflic

eriences fro

f political,

n the EU an

ts could be

unnecessa

and values

ation sharin

, The Europe

ensive civil and

,” 29 -31.

es

the European Union

EU coopera

ovo) and U

Georgia an

Thus, there

her security

a, an EU m

of the OS

ct preventio

om working

structural

nd its strate

e exploited

ary overlap

s are the sa

g, regular c

ean Union in d military appr

PU


ates or coo

UN (DRC,

nd Ukraine)

re is a stron

y providers

ission woul

CE mission

n between

with partne

and cultur

egic partner

further to

ps, compet

ame. This c

consultation

global securiroaches in inte


ordinates wi

Chad, Som

.404 In addit

ng necessity

with vested

d not have

ns. 405 On

Russia and

ers, there is

ral issues

rs, both at a

deepen the

ition and c

can be part

ns and effici

ity - the politernational ope

n programme under g

th other int

malia), the

ion, context

y for policy

d interests

been agree

multiple oc

d Georgia.40

still room f

hindering

a strategic

e cooperati

conflicting a

tially achiev

ent coordin

ics of impact,erations, DIIS R

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

ternational

AU (Sudan

t matters, e

coherence

in the outc

ed upon if

ccasions, th06

for improvem

the coope

and operat

ion in relev

activities in

ved through

ation mech

t, 31.; Julian Report (2009)


653371

126

institutions,

n), ASEAN

especially to

among EU

come of the

Russia had

he EU had

ment.There

eration and

tional level.

vant areas,

the areas

h enhanced

anisms.

Brett, Recent),17.

U

5 s

6

,

N

o

U

e

d

d

e

d

.

,

s

d

t

D1.3 Review

6 TOWAR

As discuss

potential to

partners a

one instru

Despite its

visible effo

Due to its

stabilisatio

to build str

The issue

Evolved m

internal se

to Europe.

European

countries.

reaching It

EU naval o

Med). This

approach t

emergency

The idea o

of the guid

and militar

by definitio

to provide

maximum

compared

though pra

longer. Thi

407 EuropeanMediterraneanaval-operati

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

RDS ENHA

sed in this

o access c

nd third act

ment amon

s scope in te

orts on how

flexibility, t

on in diverse

ronger capa

of using th

migration cri

curity. Failin

Conseque

soil, as tho

In addition,

taly. The tra

operation to

s military o

to migration

y situations

of comprehe

ding princip

ry capabiliti

on relatively

a short-te

of two yea

to the need

actice has

is is also th

n Council, “Can”, Press Rion/, (Accesse

tary Synergie


ANCED CO

report, the

capabilities

tors. CSDP

ng the EU’

erms of reso

the EU is p

he CSDP h

e theatres.

abilities to ac

he capabilit

ises are an

ng to tackle

nces of uns

ousands of

over 2,000

agedy requ

o disrupt hu

operation is

n, which ai

, tackle the

ensiveness,

les of the d

es. It is how

y short-term

rm solution

ars at a tim

ds of conflic

proved tha

he case in s

Council launc

Release, 22.06ed 8 October 2

es

the European Union

OOPERAT

e EU has t

of all its 2

P, which is t

s other co

ources, CSD

participating

has proven

The CSDP

ct rapidly an

ies in a com

n example o

e the crises

solved confl

migrants h

0 migrants h

ired a rapid

uman smugg

s claimed to

ms to resp

root causes

despite so

developmen

wever impo

m interventio

n to a conf

me, very of

ct preventio

at often the

some of the

hes EU nava6.2015, http:/2015.)

PU


TION AND

to tackle c

28 membe

the focus o

onflict preve

DP mission

g in the burd

to be a us

P allows EU

nd effective

mprehensiv

on how ext

in Libya, Sy

licts in a ne

have left the

have drown

d response,

glers and tr

o be one e

ond to the

s of irregula

o far lacking

nt of EU`s c

ortant to no

ons: crisis m

flict or crisi

ften their o

on or conflic

e missions

e case study

al operation //www.consiliu


D COORDI

risis in a c

r states an

of IECEU pr

ention and

ns and opera

den sharing

seful instrum

Member S

ely in times

ve and effic

ternal crise

yria and Ira

eighbourhoo

eir homes a

ned in the M

and in Jun

raffickers in

element of

immediate

ar migration

an overarc

crisis manag

tify that CS

managemen

s and as t

objectives a

ct transform

and opera

y areas of t

to disrupt huum.europa.eu/

n programme under g

NATION

comprehens

nd support

roject and th

crisis man

ations are im

g of global d

ment that ca

States to po

of crisis.

cient manne

es can impa

aq have bee

od have bec

applying for

Mediterranea

ne 2015, the

the Medite

the broade

need to sa

n and fight tr

ching interpr

gement, bo

SDP mission

nt instrumen

heir manda

are in a qu

mation. This

tions rema

he IECEU p

uman smuggl/en/press/pres

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

sive manne

its main in

hus this rep

agement in

mportant, ta

disasters an

an be used

ool their res

er is arguab

act on a Co

en drivers fo

come very c

r asylum fr

an this yea

e Council la

erranean (E

er EU com

ave lives a

raffickers. 4

retation, ha

oth in regard

ns and ope

nts are only

ates are ag

uite short t

s is still the

ain in the re

project. Mis

lers and traffss-releases/20


653371

127

er. It has a

nternational

port, is only

nstruments.

angible and

nd conflicts.

d to support

ources and

bly current.

ommunity’s

or migration

concrete on

rom the EU

r, aiming at

aunches an

EUNAVFOR

mprehensive

nd address07’

s been one

d to civilian

erations are

y supposed

greed for a

time frame,

case, even

egion a lot

ssions such

fickers in the015/06/22-fac-

U

5 s

7

a

l

y

.

d

.

t

d

.

s

n

n

U

t

n

R

e

s

e

n

e

d

a

,

n

t

h

e -

D1.3 Review as EUFOR

and a clea

The visibil

more CSD

and resou

mission ac

matters ar

operationa

This very n

be only on

of other ins

6.1 Imple

As discus

capabilities

EU interve

achieving

competenc

combined,

the actions

comprehen

crises.

In reality,

difficult. On

Defence is

with Memb

States’ cap

economic

there is al

CSDP mis

as a challe

408 European

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

R Althea, E

r exist strat

ity and imp

DP generate

rces to CS

chievement

re a very sm

al aims and

nature of th

e part of a

struments.

ementatio

sed in this

s should be

entions wo

a commo

ces and ca

so that the

s, thereby

nsive appro

implementi

ne polarized

s still at the

ber States. C

pabilities be

crisis has e

lso need to

ssions are o

enge, due n

n Union Institut

tary Synergie


UBAM Rafa

egy is still n

pact of the

e public sup

DP operatio

s is also c

mall part of

capacities,

e missions

wider confli

on of comp

s report, to

e developed

uld be pla

n objective

apabilities o

ere would b

increasing

oach to crisi

ing the com

d issue rela

e heart of n

Cuts in mem

ecame app

exacerbated

o strengthe

of a civilian

notably to th

te for Security

es

the European Union

ah and EUS

not in sight.

CSDP eng

pport, the m

ons and m

rucial. CSD

f the EU’s

but also a

and operat

ict preventio

prehensiv

o fully exp

d and used

nned and

e towards

of the EU’s

be no short

the efficien

s through C

mprehensiv

ated to CSD

national sov

mber states

arent during

d existing s

n and gene

nature. Ge

he shortage

y Studies (EUI

PU


SEC RD Co

gagement h

more memb

issions. Th

DP missions

External ac

n understan

tions is esse

on and reco

ve approa

ploit the po

in a coord

applied in

an extern

s institution

tfalls in civi

ncy of the a

CSDP can h

ve approac

DP has rela

vereignty a

s national de

g the CSDP

structural pr

erating civi

enerating ci

es of perso

ISSUE), Yearb


ongo have

has also im

ber states w

us, managi

s and oper

ctions. Miss

nding of wh

ential to ack

onstruction

ach in CSD

otential of

inated and

a compreh

al country,

s, Member

lian or milit

activities. W

have an imp

h in crisis

ated to avai

nd decision

efence budg

P operation

roblems. Al

lian capabi

vilian capa

nnel in spe

book of Europ

n programme under g

been ongo

plications o

will incline to

ing the exp

ations are

sion manda

hat is possib

knowledge,

process, ap

DP

CSDP, the

coherent m

hensive ma

, region o

r States an

tary capabil

When implem

portant cont

manageme

lability of th

ns on milita

gets and th

ns in Libya

ongside, th

ilities for C

bilities rema

cialised pro

pean Security

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

oing for ove

on public op

o contribute

pectations t

visible, but

ates should

ble in a giv

, as therefo

pplied with t

e military a

manner. Ide

anner with

r actor.408

nd partners

lities or ove

mented ad

tribution on

ent has pro

he military c

ary capabilit

e shortfalls

and Mali a

he military c

CSDP. The

ains a prior

ofiles. There

YES 2014, (20


653371

128

er 10 years,

pinion. The

e personnel

owards the

t budgetary

reflect EU

ven context.

re they can

the support

and civilian

eally, all the

an aim of

Thus, the

, would be

erlapping in

equately, a

solving the

oven to be

capabilities.

ties remain

in Member

and that the

capabilities,

majority of

rity, as well

eby, lack of

014).

U

5 s

8

,

e

l

e

y

U

.

n

t

n

e

f

e

e

n

a

e

e

.

n

r

e

,

f

l

f

D1.3 Review sufficient

comprehen

As outlined

to appropr

in efficient

civil-militar

the adapta

cooperatio

manageme

Comprehe

has been a

EU crisis m

As discuss

step towar

civilian an

cross-secto

commandi

and institut

of CSDP m

manageme

Commonly

Political- s

CS

ope

409 The CSDPand for operaStrategy hasaspects, andrapidly evolvless than a d410 The effect411The object186. 412 This is the

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

military a

nsive appro

d in this rep

iate structu

t and timely

ry cooperati

ation of ESS

on within E

ent function

ensive Appro

at the core

managemen

sed in chapt

rds the furth

d military f

orial comp

ng the CSD

tional archit

missions an

ent.411

y the follow

strategic

DP has h

erations or

P , formerly Eations abroads laid out the d strengthens ving EU policeecade. The Ctiveness of CStives were list

e summary of

tary Synergie


and civilian

oach in CSD

ports, anoth

res and pro

y manner, t

ion and coo

S important

EU. Establis

ns to a form

oach to cris

of the CSD

nt and huma

ters 3 and 5

her integrat

functions p

petences a

DP mission

tecture, the

nd operation

wing issue

had difficult

missions is

SDP, provide. The policy wstrategy undethe political a

es, the CSDP CSDP will evolvSDP missions ted in the Trea

the desk stud

es

the European Union

n capabilit

DP.

her importan

ocesses. In

the EU has

ordination in

steps have

shment of

m of the CM

sis. Since th

DP409 and is

anitarian op

5, although

tion of civili

lanning and

and capab

s and opera

ere have bee

ns and thei

s are raise

ties to act

s often cum

s the policy frawas incorporaterlying the CSand budgetaryhas acquired

ve further, as should be jud

aty of Maastric

y, key informa

PU


ties has

nt element

order to ha

s gradually

nto their cor

e been take

EEAS and

MPD have

he entry int

s in charge o

perations an

the founda

ian and mil

d conduct

ilities from

rations. Alon

en importan

ir ability to

ed412

t rapidly. T

mbersome

amework for ated into the EUSDP, while thy role of the Ed a major straspecified in th

dged on the excht in 1992.; E

ant interviews


complicated

regarding th

ave the capa

stressed t

re documen

en towards i

d merging

been impor

o force of t

of the integ

nd missions

ation of CMP

itary approa

structures

m being fu

ngside the

nt points of

contribute t

This is bec

and long, C

a number of pU Treaties in 1he Lisbon TreEuropean Partegic orientati

he Lisbon Treaxtent to which EUISSUE, Ye

and panel of

n programme under g

d the imp

he effective

ability to pre

he importa

nts and polic

institutional

EU’s milita

rtant milest

he Lisbon T

rated civilia

.

PD was wel

aches to cr

remain sep

ully exploit

shortfalls in

criticism tow

to conflict p

cause deci

CSDP face

ermanent poli1999. Since 2aty provides lrliament. As oon — and an

aty. they achieve

earbook of Eur

experts discus

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

plementatio

eness of CS

event and s

nce of mai

cies. In add

isation of c

ary and civ

tones for fa

Treaty in 20

an-military p

lcome as a

risis manag

parate, prev

ted in pla

n sufficient

wards the e

prevention a

ision-makin

es capability

itical and milit2003 the Eurolegal clarity o

one of the mon operational c

their objectiveropean Secur

ssions.


653371

129

on of the

SDP relates

solve crises

nstreaming

dition, since

ivil- military

vilian crisis

acilitation of

009, CMPD

planning for

n important

gement, the

venting the

nning and

capabilities

efficiency410

and conflict

ng on new

y shortfalls,

tary structurespean Security

on institutionalost visible andcapacity — in

es. rity YES 2014,

U

5 s

9

e

s

s

g

e

y

s

f

D

r

t

e

e

d

s 0

t

w

,

s y l

d n

,

D1.3 Review

eith

var

The

bud

bas

exp

A l

inte

A la

and

No

CS

con

suff

in t

A la

or r

Operation

A la

Ins

Slo

No

No

A la

A la

bet

Com

413 EUISSUEcommit resouplace Membe414 The commMember state415 ‘OperatingForeign and from opera- totherwise’. A416 This is the

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

her due to a

rious legal a

e question o

dget,414 whe

sis meaning

penditures;4

lack of a

erventions;

ack of coord

d supporting

clear end-

DP mission

ncrete opera

fficient reso

he region o

ack of a sha

region wher

nal416

ack in the in

ufficient cap

ow response

permanent

common tr

ack of coord

ack of a su

tween the E

mplexity of

E, Yearbook ources to CSDer States’ natiomon costs of ce’s responsibig expenditure Security Polictions having m

Article 41, Parae summary of

tary Synergie


a lack of co

and financia

of funding i

ereas milita

g that the M415

united poli

dination bet

g a CSDP m

state scena

ns and ope

ation, its ob

urces to the

or country of

ared strateg

re a CSDP

nteroperabil

pabilities- b

e from mem

t command

raining and

dination and

ufficient com

EU actors;

the chain o

of European SDP, at least to

onal security acivilian missionlity. to which the i

cy] gives rise smilitary or defeagraph 2 TEUthe desk stud

es

the European Union

mmitment o

al constraint

is crucial - c

ary operatio

Member sta

cy line am

tween EU in

mission/ ope

ario or exit s

erations are

bjectives, th

e expertise

f deploymen

gic vision a

mission or o

lity of civilia

oth civilian

mber states

and contro

recruitment

d cooperatio

mmunication

of command

Security YES 2up to a certa

at risk. ns are funded

mplementatioshall also be cnce implicatio. y, key informa

PU


or because

ts; 413

civilian mis

ons are ma

ates are re

mong the m

nstitutions a

eration;

strategy wh

e often depl

he resource

and knowl

nt;

mong EU a

operation h

an and milita

and military

to provide p

l structures

t standards

on between

n system th

d and its sep

2014, Naturalain level of ca

by CSDP bud

on of this Chapcharged to the ons and cases

ant interviews


the capabi

sions are d

ainly funded

sponsible f

member sta

and with pa

en launchin

loyed in an

es and equi

edge preva

actors and m

has been de

ary capabilit

y- to reach t

personnel a

for the mili

;

n the other E

hat would e

paration for

ly, it is essenapabilities whe

dget, but the s

pter [Chapter 2Union budget where the Co

and panel of

n programme under g

lities are no

directly fund

d on a ‘cos

for their ow

ates when

rtners when

ng a CSDP

ad-hoc ma

pment need

ailing among

member sta

eployed.

ties;

the mission

and forces;

tary operati

EU actors o

nable secu

the civilian

tially a politicaereon the lack

econded pers

2, Specific Prot, except for suouncil acting u

experts discus

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

ot available

ded by the E

sts lie wher

wn personne

it comes

n planning,

mission or

anner. Dec

ded, are tak

g other EU

ates toward

n/ operation

ions;

on the groun

re informat

n and militar

al choice whek of those res

sonnel costs a

ovisions on theuch expenditu

unanimously d

ssions.


653371

130

, as well as

EU’s CFSP

re they fall’

el and item

to military

conducting

operation.

isions on a

ken without

institutions

s a country

objectives;

nd;

ion sharing

ry side.

ether or not tosources would

are at sending

e Common ure arising ecides

U

5 s

0

s

P

’

m

y

g

a

t

s

y

g

o d

D1.3 Review All in all, co

challenge w

interventio

military fun

the EU’s a

is also pla

permanent

example, a

support a c

used in co

A lack of c

exploitation

Overcomin

and civilian

CSDP mis

potential c

strategy.

417 In additioninstituted.

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

ooperation

with numer

ns seem to

nctions. The

ability to tac

anned and

t structures

an example

civilian miss

mprehensiv

coherence a

n of the p

ng the instit

n actors to

sions and o

could be ex

n, Battlegroup

tary Synergie


and coordin

rous structu

o be planned

e segregatio

ckle the cris

implemente

s and conc

e from Libya

sion, even i

ve manner.

among the

potential of

tutional and

better wor

operations h

xploited furt

ps have not be

es

the European Union

nation betw

ral, politica

d in an ad h

on between

sis effective

ed in a som

cepts that

a has show

f the securi

institutions

f EU's con

d cultural b

rk towards

have proved

ther throug

een deployed

PU


ween the EU

l, technical

hoc manne

n military an

ly. Recent

mewhat ad

would ens

wn that the E

ity situation

and memb

flict preven

barriers to i

achieving a

d to be a us

gh stronger

, and the perm


U’s civilian a

and ideolog

r, overruled

nd civilian i

examples

d hoc mann

ure cohere

EU’s Military

would requ

ber states is

ntion and

nteroperab

a common

seful instrum

integration

manent headq

n programme under g

nd military f

gical facets

d by the riva

ntervention

have show

ner, and th

ence betwe

y capabilitie

uire so.417 T

s unfortunat

crisis mana

ility would

objective.

ment in the

n into the U

quarters for E

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

functions is

s. As a resu

al between

indubitably

wn that the c

ere are sti

een the act

es are not a

The capabili

te, since th

agement in

help the E

Despite th

EEAS toolb

Union’s wid

EU operations


653371

131

s a complex

ult, the EU’s

civilian and

y impact on

cooperation

ll a lack of

tivities. For

activated to

ties are not

hey limit the

nstruments.

U's military

he criticism,

box, and its

der security

has yet to be

U

5 s

x

s

d

n

n

f

r

o

t

e

.

y

,

s

y

e

D1.3 Review

1) Stra

2) Info

CSD

3) Sec

4) Sha

5) Milit

fund

6) Inte

7) Cyb

8) Cou

9) Med

10) Log

11) Rea

arra

12) Mut

13) Com

14) Sec

Table 13

6.2 Civil-

The need

with partne

questions

CSDP fund

are already

set of civili

financial im

led missio

however, n

418 The issueactivities of E419 Such as A

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

ategic Comm

ormation sha

DP Missions

cure commun

ared accomm

tary airlift ca

ding/refundin

elligence Sur

ber defense c

unter IED ca

dical facilities

gistic support

al Life suppo

angements e

tual/Integrate

mmon pre-de

curity provisio

3. Civil- mili

- Military

for a deve

ers in the

to be decid

ding, coope

y numbers

ian tools th

mplications.

ons, by pro

needs to be

e of pooling aEU. Air-to-Air refue

tary Synergie


munication (S

ring/dialogue

s)

nication

modation

pability to de

ng due differe

rveillance and

capabilities

pability

s (Field hosp

t (Airport of d

ort (Use of co

etc.)

ed civil-milita

eployment an

on of the CS

itary synerg

synergies

lopment of

area of CS

ded in the n

eration with

of example

at can be u

On the oth

viding supp

e an unders

and sharing is

eling, Satellite

es

the European Union

STRATCOM)

e bad “comm

eploy civilian

ent budgetin

d Reconnais

pitals, Air ME

disembarkatio

ontractors, Ca

ary Lessons p

nd “on-theatr

DP staff

gies that cou

s

both civilia

SDP seem

near future s

other actor

es of succe

used to sup

her hand, th

port to sec

standing on

further discus

Communicati

PU


)

mon” situation

missions eq

g between c

ssance (ISR)

EDEVAC)

on, Seaport

amps, Ware

process

re” training

uld be furthe

an and milit

to be the

seem to be

rs and the E

ess when it

pport military

he military c

curity, logist

how to bet

ssed in IECE

ons, Cyber De


nal awarenes

quipment (ne

civilian and m

capabilities

of disembark

houses, Tran

er enhanced

tary capabi

key issues

e capability

EU Battlegr

comes to E

y led challe

capabilities

tics, transp

tter use the

U WP 1.2. Re

efence, and R

n programme under g

ss (EEAS-EU

eds addition

military)

kation, wareh

nsportation, S

d within CSD

lities and e

s for the fu

planning, p

roups (BG).

EU coopera

enges, often

can bring a

portation an

se existing

eport: Analysi

Remotely Pilote

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

U Delegation

nal

houses)

Security

DP

enhancing c

uture. Henc

pooling and

On capabi

ation.419 The

n without co

added value

nd intelligen

tools, how

is of the curre

ed Aircraft Sys


653371

132

ns-

cooperation

ce, burning

sharing,418

ilities, there

e EU has a

onsiderable

e to civilian

nce. There,

to improve

ent preventive

stems.

U

5 s

2

n

g 8

e

a

e

n

,

e

e

D1.3 Review their intero

missions a

To increas

engageme

making an

needs whe

current asy

which part

for an effe

the onset o

have show

civilian pre

coordinatio

governanc

operations

excellent f

work. They

6.3 Conc

As discuss

at its dispo

peace and

as develop

reflected in

civil-militar

only CSD

backgroun

all releva

420 Although across agenccatalyst for instruments c

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

operability, a

and operatio

se the effici

ent and tran

n effective c

en acquiring

ylum crisis

ticularly ben

ective and s

of operation

wn, the trad

esence to re

on of action

ce has to e

s. The Lisbo

framework

y just need

clusions

sed in this r

osal, it is in

security. In

pment and

n the under

ry cooperati

P-cooperat

d, developi

ant instituti

border securitcies and institinstability, th

could play a g

tary Synergie


as well as,

ons.

iency with l

nsition of th

contribution

g new civil

has shown

nefits from e

synchronize

ns (ideally i

itional sequ

econstructio

s are the ke

evolve in a

on Treaty a

for compre

to be utilize

report, cons

n a unique

n addition to

humanitar

rstanding of

ion and is n

tion, but a

ing the EU

ions has

ty is mainly cotutions could

his can be preater role.

es

the European Union

political will

limited reso

he activities

to crisis re

ian or milita

n, improving

enhancing e

ed planning

in the plann

uence of m

on, is no lo

ey words fo

coordinate

and the Eur

ehensive an

ed to the full

sidering the

position to

o CSDP, the

rian tools, d

f the EU co

now increas

lso the wh

comprehen

received

onsidered a cbring significa

platform wher

PU


l to implem

ources, the

s between

esponse. C

ary capabil

g border se

effort in this

g and deplo

ning phase)

ilitary interv

onger valid.

or success.

ed manner

ropean Exte

nd effective

l.

wide array

o become a

e 'EU toolbo

diplomacy

mprehensiv

singly used

hole of the

nsive appro

increasing

ivilian related ant achievemere enhanced


ent the com

re is a nee

different ac

Considering

ities can he

ecurity, for e

s way. 420 C

oyment of m

). As the cr

vention in c

The availa

Security, de

to achieve

ernal Action

e crisis pre

y of the diffe

an even stro

ox' can be c

and econo

ve approach

in a broade

e EU`s fo

oach that in

attention,

task, increasients. With poo

cooperation

n programme under g

mprehensive

ed for coher

ctors- both

one anothe

elp to bring

example, m

Current and

military and

rises in Afric

crisis manag

ability of req

evelopment

e success

n Service p

evention an

erent instrum

onger contr

considered

omic means

h that has b

er understan

reign polic

n its broad

and not

ing military coor border manbetween CS

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

e approach

rence in th

EU and pa

er’s compe

g added va

may be one

d future ope

civilian cap

ca and Med

gement, fol

quired capa

t, rule of law

in crisis m

rovide the

nd crisis m

ments that

ributor to in

to include a

s. This not

been widen

nding that in

cy tools. A

interpretatio

twithstandin

ooperation andnagement ofteSDP’s civilian


653371

133

into CSDP

e planning,

artners- for

tences and

lue. As the

such area,

erations call

pabilities at

diterranean

lowed by a

abilities and

w and good

anagement

EU with an

anagement

the EU has

nternational

assets such

tion is also

ing beyond

ncludes not

Against this

on includes

ng notable

d coordinationen acting as a

and military

U

5 s

3

P

,

r

d

e

,

l

t

n

a

d

d

t

n

t

s

l

h

o

d

t

s

s

e

n a y

D1.3 Review improveme

‘preserve p

The EU's

comprehen

term enga

recognizes

missions a

of the und

capabilities

and militar

coordinatio

context of

effectivene

(where app

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

ents, furthe

peace, prev

comprehen

nsive appro

agement, th

s conflict pr

and operatio

derlying ass

s to better c

ry crisis ma

on or synerg

the IECEU

ess of CSD

plicable) wh

tary Synergie


r developm

vent conflict

nsive appro

oach, in par

herefore in

evention as

ons do cont

sumptions w

contribute t

anagement,

gies - dese

project, pot

DP interven

hen assessi

es

the European Union

ments are re

s and stren

oach to cris

rticular in re

many insta

s being part

tribute to the

within the IE

to conflict p

the 'traditio

rves contin

tential civil-

ntions and,

ng the diffe

PU


equired for

ngthen intern

ses only c

elation to co

ances reac

t of crisis m

e overall EU

ECEU proje

prevention.

onal' view t

uous attent

-military syn

therefore,

erent missio


the EU to

national sec

onstitutes a

onflict preve

ching beyon

managemen

U conflict p

ect, that is,

Since CSD

to a compre

tion in orde

nergies can

they need

ons and ope

n programme under g

be able to

curity’.

a limited p

ention that

nd CSDP.

t, and in tur

revention. T

to gauge t

DP has two

ehensive a

r to further

also contrib

to be give

erations.

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

o deliver on

part of the

often requi

Nevertheles

rn, crisis m

This recogn

the potentia

key eleme

pproach - c

develop CS

bute to the

en sufficien


653371

134

its goal to

overall EU

ires a long-

ss, the EU

anagement

nition is one

al of CSDP

nts, civilian

civil-military

SDP. In the

operational

nt attention

U

5 s

4

o

U

-

U

t

e

P

n

y

e

l

n

D1.3 Review

BIBLIOG

Adebahr CEffort, Stift EU- Africa ATHA, “HuframeworkSeries: http://www.pdf. (Accessed Bailes AlyRelationsh Brett Juliaoperations “Civil- Milithttps://www “Civil- Militmodified 8 Collins Ala Creta AnnPartnershi Davis LauDialogue N De Coning Defence CEU- NATO Defence CCooperatio De Kermacommon sFederal Mi DirectorateManagemeEuropean DirectorateLessons Le

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

GRAPHY

Cornelius, Ttung Gensh

Summit, “F

umanitariank for working

outliningw.hpcrresear

d 7 October

yson J.K., hip”, OSCE

n, Recent es, DIIS Repo

ary cooperaw.facebook

ary Interact July, 2015

an ed., “Con

nalisa. “Trap on trainin

ra. “The ENetwork Dis

g Cedric. Th

Command FO Cooperatio

Command Fon in Crisis

abon Yves. security andinistry of De

e- General ent StructuParliament,

e- General earned Pro

tary Synergie


The Compragen, 2011

Fourth EU- A

n policy mag with arme

g basicrch.org/sites

r 2015).

Haine JeaYearbook 2

experience ort (2009).

ation Faceb.com/group

tion and EU. https://ww

ntemporary

aining archg for peace

EU and peascussion Pa

he United Na

inland, “EUon in Crisis

inland, “EUManageme

” Crisis Md defence efence and

for externures: Civil- , 2012.

for externacesses, Eu

es

the European Union

rehensive A.

Africa summ

aking for cied forces inc tenes/default/file

an-Yves & 2008, Baden

with compr

book group.ps/67046543

U Security &ww.linkedin.c

Security St

hitecture(s)e operations

acebuilding aper No. 9, (

ations and t

- Current NManageme

– NATO Pent, 5 May 2

anagementpolicy of thSports of th

nal policiesmilitary co

al policies, ropean Par

PU


Approach to

mit,” Brusse

ivil‐military n complex pets of es/publicati

Lachowskin-Baden: N

rehensive c

” Facebook32974396/.

& Defence Fcom/groups

tudies”, Oxf

) under res?” ZIF Polic

in the Dem(2014).

the compre

NATO/EU Cent, 5 May 2

ermanent S2015.

t Procedurehe Europeahe Republic

s, Policy Dordination

Policy Deprliament, 20


o Crisis Ma

els, 2 – 4 Ar

coordinatiopolitical eme

humanons/ATHA%

Zdzislaw. omos, Verl

civil and mi

k.com. Last

Forum Linkes/8100424.

ord: Oxford

eview: An cy Briefing,

mocratic R

ehensive ap

ommon Are2015.

Structures,”

es” in Handan Union, ec of Austria,

Department.and the fu

partment, C012.

n programme under g

anagement

ril 2014.

on (CIMIC) ergencies,” nitarian %20Themat

“Reflectionag, 2008.

ilitary appro

modified 13

edIn group.”

University

avenue fo(October 2

epublic of

proach, DII

eas of Deplo

Seminar on

dbook for ded. Joche2014, 43 -

Consolidauture of the

CSDP Miss

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

in Concert

Establishin ATHA The

action, tic%20Brief

ns on the

oaches in in

3 July, 2015

” LinkedIn.c

Press, 200

or bolsterin2014).

Congo”, C

S report, 20

oyment,” Se

n EU- NATO

decision men Rehrl, V

47.

ating the Ee EU OHQ

sions and O


653371

135

ted Weimar

ng a policyematic Brief

(2008),f%20CIMIC

OSCE-EU

nternational

5.

com. Last

7.

ng EU-UN

Civil Society

008.

eminar on

O

akers- TheVienna: The

EU’s CrisisQ, Brussels:

Operations:

U

5 s

5

r

y f ,

U

l

N

y

e e

s :

:

D1.3 Review Drent MargStudia Diphttp://wwwSeptember Egnell RoRoutledge E-Internati(accessed Ekengren Opportunit Emerson Brussels, 2 European Figures, Be European traffickers http://www(Accessed European Defence somalia/pd European Defence Pmali/docs/f European http://www1 Septemb European Common instrumenthttp://eeascentre/doc European Sohia, http://eeasmed/pdf/fa European Defence P

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

griet. The Elomatica, 20

w.clingendaer 2015).

obert. Comp: Oxon, 200

onal RelatioJune 29, 2

Magnus anties for the E

Michael an2007.

Commissioelgium: Eur

Council, “in

w.consilium.e 8 October

External APolicy,

df/factsheet_

External AcPolicy, (20factsheet_e

External Acw.eeas.europber 2015).

External AcSecurity

ts-agenciess.europa.eu/cs/factsheet_

External ACommon

s.europa.eu/actsheet_eu

External APolicy, eunav

tary Synergie


EU’s Compre011. el.nl/sites/de

plex Peace09.

ons. E-Inter015).

nd Simons GEuropean U

nd Gross E

on. Multiannropean Unio

“Council lauthe

europa.eu/e2015.)

Action Serv htt

_eunavfor_

ction Servic015), http:/eucap_sahe

ction Servicpa.eu/csdp/

ction Servicand Defen/eu-operatio/csdp/structt_eu_opcen

Action Serv Secu/csdp/missi

unavfor_med

Action Servivfor.eu, (Ac

es

the European Union

rehensive Ap

efault/files/2

e Operation

rnational Re

Greg eds., TUnion’s Glob

Eva eds. E

nual financion, 2013.

unches EUMediterr

en/press/pre

vice, “CSDPtp://www.ee

_en.pdf, (Ac

ce. “The EU//www.eeasel_mali_en.p

ce. “EUFOR/missions-a

ce. “EU Opnce Policyons-centre/tures-instru_23_06_20

vice. “Europrity anons-and-opd_en.pdf, (A

ce. “Europeccessed 28

PU


pproach to

20111000_s

ns and Ci

elations.com

The Politicsbal Role, U

Evaluating

ial framewo

U naval opranean”, ess-release

P Missionseas.europa.ccessed 23 A

CAP Sahels.europa.eupdf, , (Acce

R RD CONGand-operatio

erations Cey, June (/index_en.hments-agen

015.pdf, (Ac

pean Unionnd Defperations/euAccessed 2

ean Union August 201


Security: A

sd_drent_a

ivil-Military

m. http://ww

s of SecurityK, 2011.

the EU's

ork 2014 –

peration to Press

es/2015/06/

s and Ope.eu/csdp/miAugust 201

Mali civilia/csdp/mississed 23 Au

GO”, Commons/eufor-rd

entre Horn 2015),http:/tmncies/eu-opccessed 19

n Naval Fofence Punavfor-26 August 2

Naval Forc15).

n programme under g

Culture of

pproach.pd

Relations:

ww.e-ir.info/c

y Sector Re

Crisis Miss

2020 and E

disrupt huRelea

/22-fac-nava

rations”, Cssions-and5).

n mission,”ons-and-op

ugust 2015)

mon Securityd-congo/inde

of Africa & //eeas.euro

perations-August 201

orce – MedPolicy,

015).

ce 2015”, C

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

Co-ordinati

df (Accessed

Winning t

category/blo

eform: Chal

sions in th

EU Budget

uman smugase, 2al-operation

Common Se-operations

Common Sperations/eu.

ty and Defeex_en.htm,

Sahel (EUpa.eu/csdp

15).

diterranean(October

Common S


653371

136

ion?”

d 19

the Peace,

ogs/

llenges and

e Balkans,

2014- The

gglers and22.06.2015,n/,

ecurity ands/eu-navfor-

Security anducap-sahel-

ence Policy, (Accessed

U OPCEN)”,/structures-

and

Operation2015),

ecurity and

U

5 s

6

,

d

,

e

d ,

d -

d -

, d

, -d

n ,

d

D1.3 Review European Common navfor-som European (EUPM)”, http://wwwbih/pdf/250 European http://wwwcongo/pdf/ European and Deoperations European http://wwwsomalia/do European 2014. http://eeaspdf European capability http://wwwMilitary%2 European Horn of AfPolicy, nestor/doc European (based onForeign an European the future”Parliamenthttp://wwwOctober 20 European 2014, (201 European 2013.

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

External ASecurity an

malia/pdf/fac

External AComm

w.eeas.europ062012_fac

External Acw.eeas.europ/factsheet_e

External Acfence Po

s/eutm-mali/

External Aw.eeas.europocs/factshee

External A

s.europa.eu/

External Adevelop

w.consilium.e0synergies

External Africa and th

cuments/fac

Parliamentn the Annund Security

Union Com”, 31st Ret

w.publication015).

Union Inst4).

Union Insti

tary Synergie


Action Servind Defencctsheet_eun

Action Servimon Sepa.eu/csdp/

ctsheet_eup

ction Servicpa.eu/csdp/eupol_rd_co

ction Servicolicy, (A/pdf/factshe

Action Servpa.eu/csdp/et_eutm_so

Action ServiAccessed

/cfsp/conflic

Action Servment, europa.eu/u%20-%20ve

Action Serviche Western

ctsheet_euc

, “Report onal Report fPolicy), (12

mmittee, “Eueport of Se

of ns.parliame

itute for Se

itute for Se

es

the European Union

ice. “Europe Policy, hnavfor_en.p

ce, “Europeecurity /missions-a

pm-bih_en.p

ce, “EUPOL/missions-aongo_en.pd

ce, “EU Traugust 20

eet_eutm_m

vice, “EUTM/missions-a

omalia_en.p

ces. “Facts

ct_preventio

vice. ” ProCommon

uedocs/cmsersion%201

ce, “RegionIndian Ocehttp://www

cap_nestor_

n the implemfrom the C

2562/2011 –

uropean Deession 2010

nt.uk/pa/ld2

ecurity Stud

curity Stud

PU


ean Union http://eeas.epdf, (Access

ean Union and D

and-operatiopdf, (Access

L RD CONGand-operatiodf, (Accesse

aining Missi015), htt

mali_en.pdf,

M Somaliaand-operatiopdf, (Access

sheet: EU C9

on/docs/201

moting synn SecurisUpload/1101_EN.pdf (A

nal Maritimeean (EUCAw.eeas.euro_en.pdf; (Ac

mentation oCouncil to t– 2012/2138

efence Capa0 - 2012,

the 201012/ldse

dies (EUISS

ies (EUISS


Naval Foreuropa.eu/csed 19 Aug

Police MisDefence ons/eupm-sed 19 Aug

GO”, Commons/eupol-rded 1 Septem

ion in Mali p://www.ee(Accessed

”, Commonons/eutm-sed 21 Augu

Conflict Ear

1409_factsh

nergies betity and 0223%20faAccessed 16

e Security AP Nestor)”,opa.eu/csdpccessed 19

of the Commthe Europe8(INI), 31 O

abilities: lesA report o

elect/ldeuco

SUE), Year

SUE), Yearb

n programme under g

ce Somaliacsdp/missioust 2015).

sion in BosPolicy,

ust 2015).

mon Securityd-mber 2015).

(EUTM Maas.europa.e19 August

n Security

ust 2015).

rly WarningSeptember

heet_conflic

tween the Defence

ctsheet%206 August 20

Capacity B, Common p/missions-aAugust 201

mon Securiean ParliamOctober 2012

sons from tordered by

UK om/292/2920

rbook of Eu

book of Eur

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

a Operationons-and-ope

snia and H(June

ty and Defe

.

ali),” Commoeu/csdp/mis2015).

and Defen

g System”, r ct_earth_wa

EU civil ae Policy,0Civil-015).

Building MisSecurity anand-operati15).

ity and Defement on the2.

the past, sithe House

02.htm (Ac

uropean Se

ropean Sec


653371

137

n Atalanta,”erations/eu-

Herzegovina2012),

ence Policy,

on Securityssions-and-

nce Policy,

September2015,

arning_en.

and military (2011),

ssion in thend Defenceons/eucap-

ence Policye Common

gnposts fore of Lords,

(2012),ccessed 22

ecurity YES

curity 2013,

U

5 s

7

” -

a ,

,

y -

,

r ,

y ,

e e -

y n

r , ,

2

S

,

D1.3 Review European concepts a European Concept foCentral Mrefugee-pla European Comprehe2014,http:/agencies/e Faria Fernbeyond, ES Fiott Danie21 (2014September Flessenkeand Herz2013,http:/ Friberg-Stocommon sFederal Mi The Fride June 26, 2 Ginsberg Rimpact, Gr Glume GalCSDP Misof Defence Gorm Rye in Africa?” agendas in Gross Evahttp://wwwOctober 20 Hanssen Approach t Harms UwMissions aMinistry of

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

Union Institand other do

Union Militor a possibleMediterraneaan-EUMC.p

Union Militensive //www.eeaseumc/docum

nanda. “WhSDP”, ECD

el. “The thre4), http://wr 2015).

mper Tobiazegovina //www.iss.e

orey Michasecurity andinistry of De

Blog. A Eur2015).

Roy H. andreat Britain:

lia. “Chain osions and O

e and Sports

Olsen. “ProPaper prep

n EU- Africa

a. “Exit stw.iss.europa015).

Måns. Civito CSDP O

we and Semand OperatDefence an

tary Synergie


tute for Secocuments” i

tary Comme CSDP opan, 12 M

pdf (Access

tary Staff (Approach”

s.europa.euments/2014

hat EU ComDMP Briefing

ee effects owww.iss.eu

as and Helly2002 – uropa.eu/up

aela. ”Secud defence efence and

ropean Thin

d Penska SPalgrave S

of commandOperations, s of the Rep

oviding Secpared for tha relations’,

trategies: Wa.eu/publica

il-Military Inperations, S

merle Yanniktions, eds. nd Sports o

es

the European Union

curity Studiein Yearbook

mittee (EUMeration to d

May 2015, ed 5 Septe

(EUMS), “LEUM

/csdp/struct0619compr

mprehensivg Note, No.

of dual-use: uropa.eu/up

y Damien e2012, Co

ploads/med

urity Sectorpolicy of thSports of th

nk Tank for

Susan E. TStudies in Eu

d – commaneds. Joche

public of Au

curity in a libe EUSA FoBoston, (5

What’s in tions/detail/

nteraction Stockholm:

k. “FinancinJochen Re

of the Repub

PU


es (EUISSUk of Europe

MC). Militarydisrupt huma

http://wwwmber 2015)

Learning byS Contures-instrurehens__ap

ve Approac71. (2014)

Firms, caploads/media

ed., Ten yeondé-sur-Ndia/EUPM_r

r Reform,” he Europeahe Republic

Global Acti

The Europeuropean Un

nd and conen Rehrl andustria, 2015

berial worldourteenth Bi– 7 March

a name?”/article/exit-

in the EurSwedish D

ng of CFSPehrl and Gblic of Austr


UE), “List of ean Security

y Advice oan smugglinw.statewatc).

y doing: Minference,

uments-pproach.pdf

h? Challen: 1- 18.

pabilities, ana/Brief_21_

ars after: leoireau: Inreport.pdf, (

in Handboan Union, ec of Austria,

on. http://fri

ean Union inion Politics

trol for CSDd Galia Glu.

d order: Theiennial Con2015).

” Brief ISS-strategies-w

ropean Uniefence Res

P EngagemeGalia Glumeria, 2015.

n programme under g

civilian CSy 2013, 201

n the "Drafng networksh.org/news/

litary LessoBrusse

f, (Accessed

ges for the

nd governan_Dual_use.p

essons fromnstitute forAccessed 1

ook for deed. Joche2014.

ide.org/blog

in Global Ss, 2012.

DP engagemme, Vienna

e only tool leference: Th

SUE, No.

whats-in-a-n

on: Applyinsearch Agen

ents”, In thee, Vienna:

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

DP-related 3.

ft Crisis Ms in the Sou/2015/may/

ons Learntels, 19

d 17 Augus

e EU action

nce“ EUISSpdf, (Acce

m the EUPMr Security19 August 2

ecision maken Rehrl, V

g/tag/csdp/

Security, the

ment,” in Haa: The Fede

eft for Europhe Panel on

23, Vol. name/, (A

ng a Comncy, 2010.

e HandbookVienna: T


653371

138

guidelines,

anagementuthern /eu-military-

t within the9 June

t 2015).

n plan and

S brief Vol.essed 10

M in Bosniay Studies,2015).

kers - TheVienna: The

(accessed

e politics of

andbook oneral Ministry

pean Unionn ‘Changing

18 (2014),ccessed 1

mprehensive

k on CSDPhe Federal

U

5 s

8

,

t

-

e e

d

. 0

a ,

e e

f

n y

n g

,

e

P l

D1.3 Review Hauck Volmember st Hauck Volahead of u Helena Boeds. JocheRepublic o Helly DamInstitute http://www Hummel WCooperatio HuntingtonCambridge Hynek Nikfuture of t10.1080/09 ISIS Europ Janowitz M

Johannsen

Ambitions,

University

Joint Decla

Juris Geir

compleme

Planning, (

Kenneth M

Democracy

Security St

Kerkkänen(ed.) GoodExpertise i Khol RadeSecurity an

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

ker and Rotates”, ECD

lker and Shus,” ECDPM

ogusławskaen Rehrl anof Austria, 2

ien. “EU Enfor

w.iss.europa

Wanda andon on Peace

n Samuel. Te, Massach

k. “EU crisithe EU Op9662839.20

pe. Isis Euro

Morris. A So

n, Janina.

Limits. A

of Hamburg

aration on U

r Ulfstein.

ntarity throu

(2012).

Mpyisi, Ho

y Building

tudies, 2009

n Ari. “Fromd Practices n Compreh

ek. “Civil- Mnd Defence

tary Synergie


occa CamillaDPM Scopin

herriff AndrM, Talking P

. “CSDP annd Galia Gl014.

ngagement Security

a.eu/uploads

Pietz Tobe Operation

The Soldier usetts: Harv

s managemerational H

011.556622

ope blog. h

ocial and Po

The EU's

Publication

g: Volume 2

UN-EU Co-o

“The coun

ugh greater

w EU sup

and Huma

9.

m Principlesof a Compr

hensive Cris

ilitary Coorde in the Med

es

the European Union

a. “Gaps beng Study, (2

rew, “ImporPoints blog,

nd Partnersume, Vienn

in the SaheStudie

s/media/PB

ias. “Partnens,” ZIF Poli

r and the Stvard Univer

ment after Headquarter

.

https://isiseu

olitical Portr

Comprehe

n of the Ins

204, 2011.

operation in

ncil of Eu

r coherence

pport of th

an Security

s to Practicerehensive Asis Managem

dination in Editerranean.

PU


etween Com014).

rtant progre20 Decemb

s” in the Hana: The Fed

el: lessons s, Pol

B__9.pdf, (A

ering for Plicy Briefing

tate: The Thrsity Press,

the Lisbon rs”, Europe

urope.wordp

rait, Glencoe

ensive App

stitute for P

n Crisis Man

rope and

e”, Strasbou

e African

y Enhancem

es - The PApproach toment, 2015

EU Crisis M Human Se


mprehensiv

ess, but reaber (2013).

ndbook on deral Minis

from Somaicy Br

Accessed 24

eace: Less, (February

Theory and P1957.

Treaty: civean Security

press.com/

e, Ill., Free

proach to

Peace Rese

nagement, 2

the OSCE

urg: Counci

peace and

ment in Af

rimacy of Uo Crisis Man.

Managemenecurity, CIDO

n programme under g

ve Approach

al EU comp

CSDP Misstry of Defen

alia and AfPrief, Vo4 August 20

sons and N2015).

Politics of C

vil- military y, Vol. 20

(accessed

Press, 1960

Crisis Man

earch and S

24 Septemb

E: Enhanci

il of Europe

d Security

frica, Addis

Understandinagement,

nt”, in 6th IntOB.

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

hes of the E

prehensiven

ssions and Once and Sp

Park”, Europol 9

015).

Next Steps

Civil-Military

coordinatio(2011): 81

June 29, 20

0.

nagement.

Security Po

ber 2003.

ing co-ope

e, Directora

Architectur

s Ababa: I

ing,” in JarThe Finnis

ternational S


653371

139

EU and EU

ness is still

Operations,ports of the

pean Union(2012),

for EU-UN

y Relations,

on and the- 102. doi:

015).

Premises,

olicy at the

eration and

te of Policy

re Impacts

nstitute for

i Mustonenh Centre of

Seminar on

U

5 s

9

U

l

, e

n ,

N

e :

e

d

y

s

r

n f

n

D1.3 Review Knauer JaOperation http://wwwbih/pdf/fac Knutsen BjNorwegian Koenig NicInstitut, 2(Accessed Konrad AdCompreheFebruary 2 Latek MarParliament Lauffer Silworking in Lundin, La Lurweg MeDemocratic Madsen BrComprehe Major ClauCongo in (Septembe Malešič MCooperatiohttp://pape Mattelaer common SFederal Mi Mattelaer Ain HandboUnion, ed.Austria, 20 Matthiessein Asia, http://wwwSeptember

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

annik. “EUFin Bos

w.eeas.europtsheet_eufo

jørn Olav. Tn Defence R

cole. Rese2015. http: 16 July 20

denauer Stifensive Appro2014).

rta. EU-NAt, 2012.

lva and Hacrisis mana

ars. Lelundin

eike and Söc Republic

ritta and Pieensive Appro

udia. “EU-U2006,” Th

er 2008).

Marjan. Crison, Ljublerroom.ipsa

Alexander.Security aninistry of De

Alexander. ook for deci Jochen R

014

en Michael. Presentat

w.eucentre.sr 2015).

tary Synergie


OR Althea:snia andpa.eu/csdp/or_althea_e

The EU andResearch Es

tting EU ex://www.insti15).

ftung & Caoach in Ext

ATO partne

amacher Joagement mi

n.com. http:

öderbaum Fof the Cong

etz Tobias.”oach?,” ZIF

UN cooperae European

sis Manageiana: Un.org/papers

“Decision d Defence efence and

“Who is in ision make

Rehrl, Vienn

“The EU’s tion at t

sg/wp-conte

es

the European Union

: Appraisal Herzego

/missions-aen.pdf, (Acc

d the challestablishmen

xternal actitutdelors.eu

re Internatioternal Confl

ership in s

ohannes edissions, Ber

://www.lelun

Fredrik. ‘Buigo, Gothenb

”EU-UN CoF Policy Brie

tion in militn Union Ins

ement in tniversity s/paper_260

making pPolicy of tSports of th

Charge? Nrs - The co

na: The Fed

Common Sthe Nation

ent/uploads/

PU


and Futureovina”, E

and-operatiocessed 27 A

enges of Civnt, 2008.

ion: potentiu/media/eue

onal, “Sumlict and Cris

tagnation,

d., In Contrlin: ENTRi,

ndin.org/ (a

ilding peaceburg, 2011.

ooperation oefing, (Nove

tary crisis mstitute for S

the EU: Inof Ljublj

078.pdf (Ac

procedure”, the Europehe Republic

Natural Frictommon Sederal Minist

Security annal Unive/2013/06/20


e PerspectivEU Diplomons/althea-August 2015

vil-Military C

ial and conexternalacti

mary reporsis: from St

Library Bri

trol – A pra 2014.

accessed Ju

e from the o

on Justice aember 2014

managemenSecurity Stu

nternationalana, Faccessed 25 A

in Handboean Union, c of Austria,

tion in the Ccurity and ry of Defen

nd Defence ersity of 0130416_C

n programme under g

ves of the macy Pap

5)

Coordination

nstraints, Bion-koenig-j

t on expert rategy to P

iefing, Libr

actical guid

une 26, 201

outside’: Th

and Security).

nt: the expeudies: Occa

l Coordinatculty of August 201

ook for deed. Joche2014.

CSDP DecisDefence Poce and Spo

Policy (CSSingapore

SDP1.pdf,

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

EU’s Formeper Vol.7

n at the stra

Berlin: Jacqjdib-feb15.p

roundtablePractice", (B

rary of the

de for civili

15).

he role of th

y in Crisis M

erience of Easional Pap

tion and CSocial

5).

ecision maken Rehrl, V

sion-MakingPolicy of theorts of the

SDP) and itse”, 16 A

(Acces


653371

140

er Flagship7 (2011),

ategic level,

ues Delorspdf?pdf=ok,

e: The EU'sBrussels, 12

European

ian experts

e EU in the

Missions: A

EUFOR RDper n:o 72,

Civil-MilitarySciences,

kers - TheVienna: The

g Process”,e EuropeanRepublic of

s relevancepril 2013,

ssed 18

U

5 s

0

p ,

,

s ,

s 2

n

s

e

A

D ,

y ,

e e

, n f

e ,

8

D1.3 Review Matthiessein Asia, http://wwwSeptember Mazurkiewoperationshttp://wwwMilitary_Re Ministry foMinistry for MirimanovNetwork, http://eplo.20Papers/he_EU.pdf Mix Derek 2013. Moreno FePolicy of tSports of t Morton Ka

of civil–mil

post-9/11 w

University,

Mustonen

ESDP Cris

Manageme

Mölling C

Analyses i

Analyses-4

Norheim-MOrganisatio(2010) http

Novosselo

Peacekeep

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

en Michael. Presentat

w.eucentre.sr 2015).

wicz Agatas”, Politykw.academia.elations_in_

r Foreign Ar Foreign A

a Natalia. ,

org/assets/EPLO_CSDf, (Accessed

E. The Eur

ernando. “Sthe Europeahe Republic

therine and

litary relatio

world, ed. J

2009.

Jari. “Coor

sis Manage

ent Studies

Christian. “C

in Security

42.pdf (Acce

Martinsen Peon Fit for P

p://eiop.or.a

off Alexand

ping: Challe

tary Synergie


“The EU’s tion at t

sg/wp-conte

. ”NATO ka i Spedu/96389

_Military_Op

Affairs of Finffairs of Fin

“PeacebuildDis

/files/2.%20DN_Discussd 8 October

ropean Unio

Sahel,” in Haan Union, ec of Austria

d O’Hagan J

ons in a pos

Jacinta O’H

rdination an

ement Instru

Vol. 1, No.

Comprehen

Policy, Vol

essed 9 Se

er Martin. “MPurpose”, Eat/eiop/texte

dra. “Unite

enges and P

es

the European Union

Common Sthe Nation

ent/uploads/

and EU połeczeństw17/NATO_aperations (A

nland, “Revnland Vol. 3

ding in Ukrscussion Activities/C

sion_Paper_r 2015).

on: Foreign

andbook fored. Jochen, 2014.

Jacinta, “Hu

st-9/11 wor

Hagan & Ka

nd Coopera

uments in B

1/2008, (20

nsive Appro

. 3, No. 42

eptember 20

Managing thEuropean Ine/2010-010a

d Nations

Prospects”,

PU


Security annal Unive/2013/06/20

approach wo Vol. and_EU_ApAccessed 1

view on Finl(2015), 29

raine: WhatPap

Civil%20Soc_Peacebuil

n and Secur

r decision mn Rehrl, Vie

umanitarian

rld” in Huma

therine Mor

tion on Tac

Bosnia and

008).

oaches to

2 (2008), ht

015).

he Civil-Milntegration oa.htm (Acce

- Europe

GGI Analys


nd Defence ersity of 0130416_C

towards c2 No.

pproach_To3 Septemb

and’s Secu– 31.

t Role for ter

ciety%20Diading%20in%

rity Policy, C

makers - Thenna: The

ism then an

anitarianism

rton, 1-7, C

ctical and O

d Herzegovi

Internatio

ttp://www.cs

itary Interfaonline Papeessed 18 Au

ean Union

sis Paper N

n programme under g

Policy (CSSingapore

SDP1.pdf,

civil-military12 (

owards_Civier 2015).

urity Cooper

the EU?”, CNo.

alogue%20N%20Ukraine

Congressio

he common Federal Mi

nd now: Exp

m and civil–

Canberra: Th

Operational

ina”, CMC

nal Crisis

ss.ethz.ch/p

ce in the EUers (EIoP), ugust 2015)

Cooperat

No. 4 (2012)

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

SDP) and itse”, 16 A

(Acces

y relations 2014): 1il-

ration”, Pub

Civil Societ8,

Network/Dise_What%20

onal Resear

Security annistry of De

ploring the

– military re

he Australia

Levels- St

Finland Civ

Managem

publications

U: CreatingSpecial Iss

).

tion in the

)


653371

141

s relevancepril 2013,

ssed 18

in military25 -140,

blications of

ty Dialogue(2014),

scussion%0role_for_t

rch Service,

nd Defenceefence and

boundaries

elations in a

an National

udying EU-

vilian Crisis

ment”, CSS

s/pdfs/CSS-

g an sue Vol. 14

e Field of

U

5 s

e ,

8

y ,

f

e ,

,

e d

s

a

l

-

s

S

-

4

f

D1.3 Review OCEANS. Deconflictideconflictio

Oxford Ana

.Pietz, TobPolicy Brie Pietz Tobia2014 Pirozzi NicCentre for Pirozzi Nicthe Horn oCentre for Post SvenMember S PresidencyConclusion RasmusseComprehe Rehrl JochSecurity anMinistry of Rękawek K20/ 475, (2

Ricci Matte

Rietjens S24/7 Joint

Scherer Je

Operations

Sports of t

Smith S.J.

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

“Beyond Pon (Son-shade, (

alytica, “Eu

bias. The Euefing, Octob

as and Tard

coletta. The the Democ

coletta. Tesof Africa, Ththe Democ

nja. Towardtates’ Comp

y Report ons, Nice Eu

en Christel Vensive Appro

hen. “Decisind DefenceDefence an

Kacper and2013).

eo. The CSD

Sebastiaan Effort for St

ean-Philippe

s, ed. Joch

he Republic

The EU NA

tary Synergie


Piracy- a proSHADE).” Accessed 1

rope: NATO

uropean Unber 2013.

dy Thierry, “

EU’s Compcratic Contro

sting the Cohe EU’s Cocratic Contro

ds a Wholprehensive

n the Euroropean Cou

Vincentz. Lioaches in th

on making e Policy of thnd Sports o

Terlikowsk

DP and NA

J.H. and Btability, Ham

e. “Coopera

hen Rehrl a

c of Austria

ATO cooper

es

the European Union

oject of the http://o

17 August 2

O-EU coope

nion and UN

“The EU an

prehensive ol of Armed

omprehensiomprehensivol of Armed

e of EuropCrisis Man

pean Secuuncil Meetin

inking instruhe EU, Cop

procedure”he Europeaof the Repub

ki Marcin. “E

TO: friends

Bollen Myriampshire: Ne

ation and C

and Galia G

, 2015.

ration the ca

PU


One Earth oceansbeyo2015).

eration rema

N Peacekee

nd the UN: t

Approach t Forces (DC

ive Approacve Approac Forces (DC

pe Approacagement, W

urity and Deng 7, 8 and

uments in dpenhagen: D

, in Handboan Union, edblic of Austr

EU CSDP in

s, competito

ame T.I.B. etherlands D

Coordination

Glume, Vie

ase for inst


Future Fouondpiracy.o

ain difficult”

eping: Half-t

ogether for

to Crisis MaCAF), 2013

ch on the Gch to Crisis CAF), 2013

ch: OrganizWisbaden: S

efence Pol9 Decembe

developmenDiis Report,

ook for decisd. Jochen Rria, 2014.

n the Light o

ors or both?

ed., ManagDefence Ac

n.” In the H

enna: The F

titutional fati

n programme under g

undation, Srg/matrix/sh

, (June 201

time for the

peace,” EU

anagement, .

Ground: TheManageme

.

zing the ESpringer VS

icy, Annex er 2000.

t and foreig2013.

sion makersRehrl, Vienn

of the Crisis

, 2014.

ging civil- mademy, 200

Handbook on

Federal Min

igue? July 2

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

hared Awahared-awar

2).

EU’s Action

UISS Alert, (

Brussels: G

e Cases ofent, Brusse

European US, 2005.

VI of the

gn policy-

rs - The comna: The Fed

s in Mali,” B

military coop08.

n CSDP Mi

nistry of De

2011.


653371

142

reness andreness-and-

n Plan. ZIF

(December

Geneva

f Sahel andels: Geneva

Union’s and

Presidency

mmon deral

ulletin, No.

peration- A

issions and

efence and

U

5 s

2

d -

d a

d

y

A

d

d

D1.3 Review Stabilisatio

Deployee G

Stewart Em

EU Conflic

Ana E. Jun

Sturm Pau Svoboda

here?”

http://www

Taitto PettDefence U Terpan Faand inertia Tardy ThieNo.134 (20 Tardy ThComparativDevelopmeNations http://future11 Octobe Thierry Tar Tardy Thie(2013). Tardy ThiconstraintsA. Koops, (2009). Terpan FaParliament Wendling

analysis an

Woollard C

Office,

http://www

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

on Unit, Wo

Guide, 2014

mma J. Eu

ct Preventio

ncros, Lond

ul. “NATO a

Eva. “The

Policy B

w.refworld.or

teri, “ContriUniversity, 3

abien. “Finaa in a fragme

erry, “CSDP015)

ierry. ”Milive Advantaent System

eun.org/mer 2015).

rdy. “CSDP

erry. “Fundi

erry. "UN-s", in Militar

Studia Dip

abian. “Fint Committee

Cécile. Th

nd perspect

Catherine. T

The

w.eplo.org/as

tary Synergie


orking in E

4.

uropean Un

n and Crisis

on: Routled

nd EU: Coo

interaction

Brief, Hu

rg/pdfid/53d

ibuting EU May 2015)

ancing Comented and f

P in Action

tary-Civilianages for t

m ed. StephDev

edia/archive

P: getting thi

ing peace o

EU relatiory Crisis Maplomatica: T

nancing CSe on Securi

he compreh

tives, Franc

The EU and

Europea

ssets/files/2

es

the European Union

European Un

ion conflict

s Managem

dge, 2011.

operation?”,

between h

umanitarian

d0c2fb4.pdf

Comprehe).

mmon Securflexible struc

– What C

n Interactiohe United hen Brownevelopment 1/reports/P

ird states on

operations:

ns in militanagement:The Brusse

SDP operatty and Defe

hensive app

ce: IRSEM,

d the Comp

an Pe

2.%20Activi

PU


Union Comm

t prevention

ment- Roles,

, European

umanitarian

n Policy

f (Accessed

nsive Appr

rity and Decture,” Euro

Contribution

ons in MNations?”

e and Thom

eacebuildin

n board”, Is

Better valu

tary crisis : the Challeels Journal

tions and ence, (21 Ja

proach to

2011.

prehensive

eacebuildin

ties/Civil%2


mon Securit

n and the E

, institutions

Security Re

n and milita

Group

d 9 October

roach”, EUC

efence Policopean Secu

to Internat

ultidimensioin Peaceb

mas G. WeSy

ngChallenge

ssue Vol 6 (2

ue for EU M

managemeenge of Inteof Internat

missions,” anuary 2015

civil–militar

Approach,

ng Lia

20Society%

n programme under g

ty and Defe

uropean se

s and policie

eview, no. 4

ary actors: w

Vol.

2015).

CCM- cours

cy operationurity, Vol. 24

ional Secu

onal Peacbuilding Cheiss, 27 -3ystem, es_FUNDS2

2014).

Money”, Br

ent: instituter-organisational Relati

Presentati5).

ry crisis m

European

aison

%20Dialogue

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

fence Policy

ecurity arch

ies, ed. Eva

48, (2010).

where do w

58 (201

se, (Helsink

ns: explain4, Issue 2, (

rity?” Chail

ce Operatiohallenges f37, The Fut

2015.pdf

rief EUISSU

tionalizationtionalism, etions, Vol. L

ion to the

management

Peacebuild

Office

e%20Netwo


653371

143

y Missions-

itecture”, in

a Gross and

we go from

14): 1-3,

ki, National

ing change2015).

llot Papers,

ons: Whatfor the UNture United

2015.(Accessed

UE, Vol 38,

n and keyed. JoachimLXII, n:o 3,

European

t, a critical

ding Liaison

(EPLO),

ork/Policy%

U

5 s

3

-

n

d

m

,

l

e

,

t N d .

d

,

y m

,

n

l

n

,

D1.3 Review 20Meeting

nts.pdf (Ac

Wosolsobe

Missions a

Defence a

WEB SOU

“About CSSeptember “About CS2015, http: “About CSSeptemberOfficial Jou “Afghanista “ALTHEA/Bhttp://eeas “AU PeaceRetreat anEthiopia”, Aand-securiannual-join “A ‘Comphttp://www “Cooperaticontent/EN “Crisis MaSeptemberagencies/c “Crisis Plat http://eea “CONCORhttp://eeas “CSDP.” http://eeas

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

s/Compreh

ccessed 3 S

e Wolfgang

and Operati

nd Sports o

URCES

SDP - Milir, 2015, http

DP - The T://eeas.euro

SDP- The r 201,5 httpurnal).

an Resolute

BiH.” Eurs.europa.eu/

e and Secund 8th AnnAfrican Unity-council-a

nt-consultat

prehensive w.nato.int/cp

on with NAN/TXT/?uri=

anagement r, cmpd/index_

tform.” Euroas.europa.e

RDIA/FYROs.europa.eu/

Europeans.europa.eu/

tary Synergie


ensive%20

September

. “The Cha

ions, eds. J

of the Repub

itary Headp://eeas.eur

Treaty of Lisopa.eu/csdp

Berlin Plusp://eeas.eur

e Support.”

ropean Ex/csdp/missi

rity Counciual Joint Cion, accessand-eu-polittive-meeting

Approachps/en/natoliv

ATO”, acces=URISERV:

and Plann2015,

_en.htm.

opean Exteu/crisis-resp

OM.” Europ/csdp/missi

n Extern/csdp/index

es

the European Union

Approach/E

2015).

allenges of

Jochen Reh

blic of Austr

line Goalsropa.eu/csd

sbon.” Europp/about-csd

s Agreemeropa.eu/csd

NATO. Acc

xternal Aons-and-op

l and EU PConsultativeed 16 Octotical-and-seg-on-15-16-

h’ to crisisve/topics_51

sed 7 Septel33243.

ing Directo,

rnal Action ponse/what

pean Exterons-and-op

nal Actiox_en.htm

PU


EPLO_CSD

CSDP Com

hrl and Gal

ria 2015).

.” Europeadp/about-cs

pean Externp/lisbon/ind

ent.” Europdp/about-csd

cessed 7 Se

Action Serperations/alt

Political ande Meeting ober 2015, ecurity-comm-october-20

s.” NATO’1633.htm.

ember 2015

orate,” Eurohttp://e

Service. Act-we-do/cris

rnal Actionperations/co

on Servic


DN_Compre

mmand Con

lia Glume,

an Externadp/military_

nal Action Sdex_en.htm

ean Externdp/berlin/ind

eptember 20

rvice. Accthea-bih/ind

Security Con 15 - 16http://www.mittee-to-ho15-in-debre

’ Website.

5, http://eur-

opean Extereeas.europa

ccessed 15 sis-platform/

Service. oncordia/ind

ce. Acce

n programme under g

ehensiveApp

ntrol”, in the

(Vienna: Th

l Action S_headline_g

Service. Acc.

nal Action dex_en.htm

015, http://

cessed 6 dex_en.htm

Committee t6 October peaceau.or

old-their-firse-zeit-ethiop

Accessed

-lex.europa

rnal Action a.eu/csdp/s

September/index_en.h

Accessed dex_en.htm

essed 1

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

proach_Dis

e Handbook

he Federal

Service. Acgoals/index_

cessed 12 S

Service. Am (Not publi

/www.rs.nat

Septemb.

to hold their2015, in D

rg/en/articlest-joint-retrepia

d 18 Aug

a.eu/legal-

Service. Astructures-in

r 2015, htm.

6 Septem.

8 Augus


653371

144

scussionPoi

k on CSDP

Ministry of

ccessed 21_en.htm

September,

Accessed 6shed in the

to.int/

ber 2015,

r First JointDebre Zeit,e/au-peace-eat-and-8th-

gust 2015,

Accessed 9nstruments-

mber 2015,

st 2015,

U

5 s

4

P

f

,

6 e

,

t , --

,

9 -

,

,

D1.3 Review “Dual-use https://www “EuropeanSeptemberdefence-co “EU Councthe Unitun.europa. “EU NAVhttp://eeas “EUPOL Ahttp://eeas “EuropeanAugust 201 “EU- NATO2015, http://www11%20Ber “EU suppohttp://www “FRONTEX “Interactionhttp://www “Internatiocomprehenhttps://ec.eand-develo “Joint stateCommissiohttp://www “MARCOMhttp://www “NATO- http://www “NATO-EUhttp://www

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

researchw.eda.europ

Security ar, 2015, ollege/index

cil conclusioted Natio.eu/articles/

VFOR Soms.europa.eu/

Afghanistans.europa.eu/

Union Mis15, https://w

O: The fram

w.consilium.erlin%20Plus

ort to AMISw.eeas.europ

X.” Accesse

n.”Vocabulaw.vocabulary

onal Coopensive appeuropa.eu/eopment_en.

ement by Non Jean-C

w.nato.int/cp

M FACTSHw.mc.nato.in

EU: a w.nato.int/cp

U: working w.nato.int/cp

tary Synergie


”, Europepa.eu/what-

nd Defenceeeas.eu

x_en.htm.

ons on Comons- New/en/article_1

alia.” Euro/csdp/missi

n.” Europe/csdp/missi

sion in the www.eucap-

mework for p

europa.eu/us%20press%

(Darfur).” pa.eu/csdp/

ed 7 Septem

ary.COM. y.com/dictio

ration and proach.” europeaid/p.

NATO SecreClaude Junps/en/natohq

HEET- Opet/about/Pag

strategic ps/en/natohq

to fill gapps/en/natoliv

es

the European Union

ean Defen-we-do/activ

e College (Europa.eu/cs

mmon Securw York. 14417_en.h

opean Exteons-and-op

ean Externons-and-op

Horn of Afr-nestor.eu/.

permanent r

uedocs/cms%20note%2

European E/missions-a

mber 2015,

Aconary/intera

DevelopmeEuropean olicies/fragi

etary Generncker.” NAq/opinions_

eration Oceges/Operati

partnershq/topics_49

ps in defenve/news_89

PU


nce Agenvities/activit

ESDC)”, Eusdp/structur

rity and DefAccesse

htm.

ernal Actionperations/eu

nal Action perations/eu

rica and the.

relations an

sUpload/03-20BL.pdf

External Acand-operatio

http://fronte

ccessed ction.

ent- SecuritCommiss

ility-and-cris

ral Jens StoATO, June_120675.htm

ean Shieldon%20Oce

hip.” NAT9217.htm.

nce capabi9487.htm.


ncy. Acceties-search/

ropean Extres-instrume

fence Policyed 5

n Service. u-navfor-som

Service. Aupol-afghan

e Western I

nd Berlin Plu

-11-

ction Servicons/eu-supp

ex.europa.e

18

ty and devesion. Accesis-manage

oltenberg ane 2015. Am

.” NATO. ean%20Shie

TO. Acce

lities,” NAT

n programme under g

ssed 10 /dual-use-re

ernal Actionents-agenci

y.” EuropeaSeptember

Accessed malia/index_

Accessed istan/index_

ndian Ocea

us.” Access

ce. Accesseport-amis-da

eu/.

A

elopment, cessed 5

ement/links-

nd the PresAccessed

Accessed eld.aspx.

essed 7

TO, access

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

Septembesearch.

n Service. Aies/Europea

an Union Der 2015,

7 Septemx_en.htm.

6 Septem_en.htm.

an 2015.”Ac

sed 6 Septe

ed 7 Septemarfur/index_

August

conflict prevSeptemb

-between-se

sident of the7 Septem

6 Septem

Septemb

sed 13 Au


653371

145

ber, 2015,

Accessed 5an-security-

elegation tohttp://eu-

mber 2015,

mber 2015,

ccessed 23

mber

mber 2015,_en.htm

2015,

vention andber 2015,ecurity-

e Europeanmber 2015,

mber 2015,

ber 2015,

gust 2015,

U

5 s

5

,

5 -

o -

,

,

3

,

,

d ,

n ,

,

,

,

D1.3 Review ”NATO’s http://www “Ongoing m2015, http://www “Operationhttp://www “Operationhttp://www ”OSCE &http://eeas “Pooling ado/eda-prio “The post External Arepresenta “Smart http://www

OFFICIAL Council of

EU Counci

Council of Central Mehttp://eurle&from=EN

Council of May 2015. Council of

Capacity b

28.4.2015.

Council of

conflict and

2015.

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

New Stratw.natolibguid

missions an

w.eeas.euro

n ALTw.aco.nato.in

n Activew.nato.int/cp

& EU.” Es.europa.eu/

and Sharingorities/pooli

of High ReAction Servative/index_

defencw.nato.int/cp

DOCUMEN

the Europe

il document

the Europeediterraneanex.europa.e (Accessed

the Europe

the Europe

building in

.

f the Europ

d crises - A

tary Synergie


tegic Concdes.info/nsc

nd operatio

opa.eu/csdp

THEA.” nt/page395

e Endeaps/en/natoliv

European /delegations

g.” EDA. Ang-and-sha

epresentativvice, access_en.htm.

ce.” Nps/en/natohq

NTS

ean Union. E

ts 10692/15

ean Union. n, Council Du/legal,cont

d 26 August

ean Union,

ean Union. J

support o

pean Union

Action Plan 2

es

the European Union

cept: Officc/documents

ons”, Europe

p/missions-a

NATO. 11625.aspx

avour.” ve/topics_79

External As/vienna/eu

Accessed 8 aring.

ve of the Unsed 19 Sep

NATO. q/topics_84

EU Military

5, 8 July 201

Launching Decisions (Ctent/EN/TXT2015)

Council co

Joint Comm

of security

. Taking fo

2015, Joint

PU


ial Texts.”s.

ean Extern

and-operati

Accex

NATO. 932.htm.

Action Seu_osce/inde

Septembe

nion for Forptember 20

Accesse4268.htm.

Lessons Le

15.

the EuropeCFSP), 201T/PDF/?uri=

nclusions o

munication t

and devel

orward the

Staff Worki


NATO. A

al Action S

ons/index_e

ssed

Accessed

ervice. Accex_en.htm.

er 2015, htt

reign Affairs015, http://e

ed 9

earnt at the

ean Union 5/ 972, =CELEX:32

on CSDP, E

to the Europ

opment, E

EU's Comp

ing Docume

n programme under g

Accessed

Service, acc

en.htm.

6 Se

d 8

cessed 10

tp://www.ed

s and Secueeas.europa

9 Se

Political Str

military ope

2015D0972&

EU Council d

pean parlia

U Council

prehensive

ent, SWD (2

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

8 Septem

cessed 12 S

eptember

Septembe

0 Septem

da.europa.e

urity Policy”a.eu/backg

eptember

rategic Leve

eration in th

&qid=14358

document 8

ment and th

document

Approach

2015) 85 fin


653371

146

mber 2015,

September,

2015,

r 2015,

ber 2015,

eu/what-we-

, Europeanround/high-

2015,

el Concept,

he southern

825940768

8971/15, 18

he Council-

s 8504/15,

to external

nal, 14 April

U

5 s

6

,

,

,

,

,

-

n -

,

,

n

8

-

,

l

l

D1.3 Review Council of

6777/15 Li

Council of

2015.

Council of

Missions,

http://data.

2015)

Council ofDecision 2and Defen Council ofFOREIGN Council of

manageme

http://data.

September

Council of EU Counci Council ofOperationsHorn of Afr Council of

December

Council ofAFFAIRS http://www28 July 20 Council of

Council, 2

http://data.

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

f the Europ

mited, 3 Ma

the Europe

f the Europ

EU C

.consilium.e

f the Euro2012/173/CFce Policy m

f the EuroAFFAIRS C

f the Europ

ent operat

.consilium.e

r 2015).

the Europeil document

f the Europs Centre forica”, 23 Ma

the Europe

r 2011.

f the EuropC

w.consilium.e15).

f the Europ

21. March,

.consilium.e

tary Synergie


pean Union

arch 2015.

ean Union.

pean Union

ouncil D

europa.eu/d

opean UnioFSP on the

missions and

pean UnioCouncil mee

ean Union.

tions, EU

europa.eu/d

ean Union. Pt 11216/12,

pean Unionor the Comarch 2012.

ean Union.

pean UnionCouncil europa.eu/u

pean Union

2011, Cou

europa.eu/d

es

the European Union

n, “Annual

Council co

n. Europea

ocument

doc/docume

on, Council e activation d operation

n. Council eting Bruss

Suggestio

Council

doc/docume

Plan of Acti14 June 20

, Council Dmon Secur

CSDP – C

. Council Cmeet

uedocs/cms

n. Council

uncil Docum

doc/docume

PU


2014 CSD

onclusions o

n Union C

17107/14,

ent/ST-1710

Decision of the EU Oin the Horn

conclusionsels, 12 May

ons for crisi

documents

ent/ST-7660

ion to enha012.

Decision 20rity and De

ouncil Conc

Conclusionsting, s_data/docs

Conclusion

ment 8032/

ent/ST-8032


P Lessons

on the Cen

oncept for

, CSDP/

07-2014-INI

2014/860/COperations n of Africa”,

ns on the y 2014.

s managem

s 7660/2/1

0-2013-REV

nce EU CS

012/173/CFfence Polic

clusion, EU

s on the H14

s/pressdata

ns on Civil

/11, 21.3.20

2-2011-INIT

n programme under g

Report”, E

tral African

EU-led Mi

PSDC 75

T/en/pdf (A

CFSP ameCentre for 1 Decembe

EU's comp

ment proced

13 REV

V-2/en/pdf

DP support

FSP on thecy missions

U Council do

orn of AfricNove

/EN/foraff/1

ian Capab

011. Acces

T/en/pdf

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

EU Council

Republic,

ilitary Oper

50, 19.1

Accessed 9

ending andthe Commo

er 2014.

prehensive

dures for C

2, 18 Ju

, (Acce

t to UN pea

e activation s and opera

ocuments 1

ca., 3124th ember 126052.pdf,

ilities, Fore

ssed July 2


653371

147

l document

9 February

rations and

2. 2014,

September

extendingon Security

approach,

CSDP crisis

une 2013,

essed 16

acekeeping,

of the EUation in the

17991/11, 1

FOREIGN2011,

(Accessed

eign Affairs

24th, 2015.

U

5 s

7

t

y

d

,

r

g y

,

s

,

6

,

U e

N ,

d

s

.

D1.3 Review Council of Developme Council of

19.11.2007

17 July 20

Council of11970/04, Council of 9329/04 M Council of OSCE Co-EU Counci European EuropeanCouncil- Cprevent an European

Communic

http://www

European 2012/C 32 European 12.12.2003 Joint State

North AtlaNATO Doc United Nat

United Nat

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

the Europeent – Way a

f the Europ

7.. http://da

15).

f the Europ30 August

f the EuropMV/RM 1, 7.5

the Europe-operation iil document

n Commiss

n CommissCapacity bnd manage

Commissio

cation

w.eeas.europ

Union. Tre6/01, 26.10

Union. A 3.

ement on UN

ntic Treaty cuments, 20

tions Secur

tions Secur

tary Synergie


ean Union. ahead, EU C

pean Union

ata.consilium

pean Union2004.

ean Union.5.2004.

ean Union, in Conflict Pts 14527/1/0

sion, “State

sion, “Joint building in e crises”, B

on. The EU

nr.

pa.eu/state

eaty on Eu0.2012.

Secure Eu

N-EU coope

Organisatio003.

ity Council

ity Council

es

the European Union

Promoting Council doc

. Civilian H

m.europa.eu

n. Draft EU

. The Euro

Draft ConcPrevention,03, 10 Nove

ement/15/5

communicsupport of

Brussels, 2

U's compreh

ments/docs

uropean Un

urope in a

eration in C

on. In AJP-

Resolution

Resolution

PU


Synergies cument 172

Headline Go

u/doc/docum

U Training

pean Union

clusions of Crisis Manember 2003

5206”, Brus

cation to thf security 28.4.2015.

hensive app

JOIN(201

s/2013/1312

nion (Conso

better wo

Crisis Manag

-9, NATO C

1861 (2009

1778 (2007


between th285/10, 6 De

oal 2010, E

ment/ST-14

Concept in

n Exercise

the Councnagement a3.

ssels, (16 J

he Europeaand develo

proach to e

3)

211_03_en.

olidated ve

orld- Europe

gement, Bru

Civil-military

9).

7).

n programme under g

e EU Civil aecember 20

EU Council

4823-2007-I

n ESDP, E

Concept, E

il of the Euand Post- C

June 2015

an Parliamopment - E

external con

30,

.pdf (Access

rsion 2012

ean Securi

ussels, 7 Ju

y Co-operat

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

and Military010.

Document

INIT/en/pdf

EU Council

EU Council

uropean UnConflict Reh

5).

ment and thEnabling p

nflict and c

1

sed 17 Aug

2), Docume

ity Strategy

une 2007.

tion (CIMIC


653371

148

y Capability

t 14823/07,

(Accessed

document

Document

ion on EU-habilisation,

e partners to

crises, Joint

11.12.2013.

gust 2015).

ent Number

y, Brussels

C) Doctrine,

U

5 s

8

y

,

d

t

t

- ,

o

t

.

r

s

,

D1.3 Review

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

tary Synergie


es

the European Union

PU

n’s Horizon 2020 reseearch and innovationn programme under g

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No


653371

149

U

5 s

9

D1.3 Review

KEY INF

Interview of

Interview of

Atalanta Off

Interview of

Interview of

Interview of

Interview of

Interview of

Interview of

Interview of

Interview of

Interview of

Interview of

Interview of

Interview of

Interview of

Interview of

Interview of

Interview of

Interview of

Interview of

Interview of

Interview of

Interview of

Interview of

Panel of Ex

Panel of EOfficial and

Panel of EOfficial from

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

FORMANT

f a former EU

f a former EU

ficer

f a Ministry o

f a former EU

f a former EU

f a EEAS Off

f a former UN

f a former ED

f a former MI

f a former EU

f a NAVFOR

f a EUAM Of

f a former EE

f a EUTM Ma

f a former EE

f a EUMC Of

f a EUTM So

f a OPCEN O

f a NATO Sh

f a former EU

f a former OP

f a Former E

f a former EU

f a EEAS Off

xperts (EEAS

xperts (Miniformer OPC

Experts (Officm Ministry of

tary Synergie


T INTERV

UTM Mali Off

UTM Somali

of Interior Off

UVAVFOR A

UTM Somalia

ficial

N Official

DA Officer

NUSMA offic

UFOR Chad

Atalanta Off

fficial

EAS Official

ali officer

EAS Official

fficial

omalia officer

Officer

ape officer

UBAM Libya

PCEN officia

EAS Official

UCAP Sahel

ficial

S Officials)

istry of ForeCEN Official)

cial from MiForeign Affa

es

the European Union

VIEWS

ficer

a and EUNA

icial

talanta

a Officer

cer

RCA Officer

ficer

r

Official

l

23

officer

eign Affairs,

inistry of Deairs & Officia

PU


21

AVFOR 26

27

31

10

13

13

14

17

20

20

26

8 S

1 S

4 S

4 S

10

10

11

11

15

23

2 S

2 O

16

EEAS 27

efence, als from

28


July 2015

July 2015

July 2015

July 2015

August 2015

August 2015

August 2015

August 2015

August 2015

August 2015

August 2015

August 2015

September 2

September 2

September 2

September 2

September 2

September 2

September 2

September

September 2

September 2

September 2

October 2015

June 2015

August 2015

August 2015

n programme under g

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

015

015

015

015

2015

2015

2015

2015

2015

015

5

5

5

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

notes

notes

notes

notes

notes

notes

notes

notes

email in

notes

notes

notes

notes

email in

email in

email in

email in

email in

email in

email in

notes

email in

email in

email in

notes

notes

notes


653371

150

nterview

nterview

nterview

nterview

nterview

nterview

nterview

nterview

nterview

nterview

nterview

U

5 s

0

D1.3 Review Ministry of t

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

the Interior

tary Synergie


es

the European Union

PU

n’s Horizon 2020 reseearch and innovationn programme under g

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No


653371

151

U

5 s

D1.3 Review

ANNEX 1

Theme 1:

CSDP

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

Theme 2

cooperatio

1.

2.

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

1. THEMA

Guidelines

What are t

of civilian a

Do the ex

capabilities

How well d

coordinatio

elements a

Are/ were

mission/ o

benefits? H

How the

commande

How facili

resourced?

that sufficie

Do/Did the

between c

How imple

between c

and sufficie

: Experien

on in crisis

Based on

cooperatio

In your pe

activities?

tary Synergie


ATIC INT

s, policies

the most re

and military

xisting guid

s? If yes, in

do the exist

on between

are effective

the aspect

peration ma

How effectiv

e coopera

ed/directed?

itation of c

? In terms

ent?

e personnel

ivilian and m

ementation

civilian and

ent?

nces, pra

s managem

your own e

on there are

rspective, d

es

the European Union

ERVIEW

and conce

elevant guid

capabilities

elines, poli

what way?

ing guidelin

n civilian an

e?

ts of civil- m

andate and

ve they are/

ation betw

? Was it eff

cooperation

of personn

receive tra

military func

of the le

military func

ctices and

ment missio

experience,

/ were in CS

did those sy

PU


epts for inte

delines, poli

s within CS

icies and c

?

nes, policies

nd military

military coo

d/or in other

/were?

ween civi

fficient?

n between

el, funding,

aining on ho

ctions? Is/W

evel of inte

ctions is/wa

d barriers

ons and op

what kind

SDP?

ynergies inc


eroperabili

icies and co

DP?

concepts pr

s and conce

functions?

operation an

r official do

lian and

the civilia

, trainings t

ow to enhan

Was the train

eroperability

as reported

s to impl

perations

of civil- mil

crease/ dec

n programme under g

ity of civil-

oncepts to e

revent the

epts facilitat

Are they e

nd coordina

cuments? W

military

n and mili

to facilitate

nce the coo

ning efficien

y, cooperat

and where

ementation

itary synerg

crease the (

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

military fu

ensure inte

interoperab

te the coop

effective? I

ation includ

What are th

capabilitie

itary capab

the cooper

ordination/ c

nt and suffic

tion and c

e? Is/Was th

n of civi

gies and p

(cost) effici


653371

I

unctions in

eroperability

bility of the

eration and

f not, what

ed into the

he potential

es is/was

bilities was

ration. Was

cooperation

cient?

coordination

hat efficient

l- military

practices of

ency of the

U

5 s

I

n

y

e

d

t

e

l

s

s

s

n

n

t

y

f

e

D1.3 Review

3.

4.

5.

6.

Theme 3:

1. Sho

leve

2. How

imp

3. In w

imp

4. Are

5. How

Theme 4:

1. Cou

cap

Additiona

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

How the co

realized in

Pol

Op

Bet

What are

military cap

Based on

civil- milita

Can you

cooperatio

How intero

ould there b

els and betw

w coopera

proved?

Polit

Ope

Betw

what way t

proved to en

e there pote

w the EU’s

Pooling an

uld you give

pabilities? H

Politica

Operat

Betwee

l questions

tary Synergie


ooperation

practice?

litical- Strate

erational- F

tween EU a

the opera

pabilities in

your exper

ry cooperat

provide p

on in CSDP?

operability

be more co

ween? Whi

ation and

tical- Strateg

rational- Fie

ween EU an

the instituti

nhance the

ential negati

crisis mana

nd sharing

e some pra

How they co

al- Strategic

tional- Field

en EU and O

s:

es

the European Union

and coordin

egic level

Field level

and OSCE,

tional barri

CSDP?

rience, can

tion/ coordin

ractical ex

?

of civil- m

ooperation b

ch actors? W

coordinatio

gic level

eld level

nd OSCE, U

onal coope

efficiency o

ve implicati

agement ca

of civil- m

actical exam

ould be utiliz

c level

d level

OSCE, UN,

PU


nation betw

UN, NATO

iers to effe

you provid

nation in CS

xamples fro

ilitary capa

between civ

What could

on between

UN, NATO, A

eration with

of the capab

ions of such

apabilities sh

ilitary capa

mples from p

zed in CSD

, NATO, AU


ween the civ

, AU

ective inter

e examples

SDP missio

om negativ

abilities co

vilian and m

d be exampl

n EU’s civ

AU

hin EU and

bilities?

h enhancem

hould be de

abilities

pooling and

P missions

U

n programme under g

vilian and m

operability

s of best pr

ns and ope

ve implicati

uld be imp

military funct

les of such

vil- military

between o

ments with t

eveloped in

sharing of

and operat

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

military funct

between c

ractices of

erations?

ions of civ

proved?

ctions? If ye

cooperation

y functions

other actor

the third act

the future?

f civilian and

tions?


653371

II

tions was/is

civilian and

operational

vil- military

es, at which

n?

could be

rs could be

tors?

d/or military

U

5 s

I

s

d

l

y

h

e

e

y

D1.3 Review

1. Is t

syn

2. In w

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

there somet

nergies in C

what way th

tary Synergie


thing else, w

CSDP missio

he civil- milit

es

the European Union

what would

ons and ope

tary synergi

PU


be relevan

eration?

ies in CSDP


nt when stud

P contribute

n programme under g

dying and a

e to long- te

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

analyzing C

erm CFSP o


653371

III

ivil- Military

objectives?

U

5 s

I

y

D1.3 Review

ANNEX 2

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

2. LESSO

(2014.1.

synergie

(2014.2.

Crisis M

process

(2014.3.

better ex

aspects,

(ESDC).

(DEVCO

(2014.3.

compreh

the EU

available

Comman

(2014.3.

Delegati

and rele

(2014.4.

commun

operatio

(2014.5.

between

relocatio

tary Synergie


ONS IDEN

.5) EEAS s

es between

.2) Member

Managemen

.

.1) EEAS,

xplore and

, in particul

. This also

O) on fragilit

.2) For the

hensive wor

OHQ augm

e to senio

nder/Head

.5) The E

ions and th

evant Brusse

.1) The E

nication and

ons/ mission

.1) The EEA

n EU Dele

on, SOMA a

es

the European Union

NTIFIED

should ens

EU actions

r States an

nt Procedur

CSDP miss

make use

ar those of

includes the

ty, security

military, th

rking practic

mentation l

or personn

of Mission r

EAS shou

eir activities

els staff.

EAS shou

d how it m

ns and withi

AS should c

egations an

and underst

PU


sure that P

s. PFCA ana

nd EEAS sh

res agreed

sions, othe

of existing

ffered by th

e courses d

and develo

he EEAS sh

ce not only

lists. Speci

nel who h

roles.

ld include

s in the pre

uld determi

may be pro

n Brussels.

consider wa

nd CSDP

tanding of C


PFCAs help

alysis shoul

hould reach

in 2013,

er EU servi

training op

he Europea

developed j

pment.

hould offer

y to EUMS s

alised train

ave the p

a standa

-deploymen

ne what i

ovided in t

ays to impro

missions,

CSDP.

n programme under g

p avoid dup

ld inform mi

h a shared

notably reg

ces and M

pportunities

an Security

ointly by ES

training in

staff but als

ning should

potential to

rdised train

nt training fo

is required

he field, b

ove coordin

inter alia i

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

plication an

ission plann

understan

garding the

Member Sta

on all relev

and Defen

SDC-and C

core instit

so those no

d also be m

o be cons

ning modu

for CSDP m

d to impro

between Br

nation and c

in regard


653371

IV

nd promote

ning.

ding of the

e fast track

ates should

vant CSDP

nce College

Commission

utional and

minated on

made more

sidered for

ule on EU

mission staff

ove secure

ussels and

cooperation

to mission

U

5 s

V

e

e

k

d

P

e

n

d

n

e

r

U

f

e

d

n

n