12o

:

. &

() . , , , . . , . . , , . , .

20 . , []. , - . [] ! (, :43-481).

. , : 1 . (, , ) (. ), .

530

12o

, , (Feiman-Nemser, 2001). , , ,2 (Lampert, 2001) (Corcoran, 1981): , , ., (.., , ). , , [] (. Tschannen-Moran, Hoy, & Hoy, 1998). () . (Tschannen-Moran .., 1998, . 233). (Graham, Harris, Fink, & MacArthur, 2001. Justice, Mashburn, Hamre, & Pianta, 2008) , (Guo, Piasta, Justice, & Kaderavek, 2010. Raudenbush, Rowan, & Cheong, 1992. Ross, 1992) (Anderson, Greene, & Loewen, 1988. Soodak & Podell, 1996). , , (Bandura, 1997. Tschannen-Moran .., 1998), Ghaith & Shaaban, 1999.McKinney, Sexton, & Meyerson, 1999), (Mo, Pazzaglia, & Ronconi, 2010). (Bandura, 1997. Tschannen-Moran ., 1998) , , (. Hoy & Spero, 2005). , 2, (., , Hebert&Worthy, 2001).

531

12o

. , , (Charalambous, Philippou, & Kyriakides, 2008) . , : ; . . . , , . . : (.., Charalambous .., 2008. Knoblauch & Hoy, 2008.Milner & Hoy, 2003. Settlage, Southerland, Smith, & Ceglie, 2009). , . , . , (Mulholland & Wallace, 2001) . , . , , . (Hoy & Spero, 2005) 29 . ,

532

12o

, . , (Chester & Beaudin, 1996) 173 Connecticut 59 . ( ), . Hoy Spero (2005), . , , , , . (ahin & Atay, 2010), 27 . , , , , . , , . , , , , . , . (Patton, 2002, . 234-235) 93 2002 ( Charalambous .., 2008 ). 1, , , , , (. ), .

533

12o

, - ( Charalambous .., 2008). , , . . . , , . , , , , . 1: -1

-

4

-

5.662 2 -, I, I -, , 9.33 -

3 3 -, , -5, ,

-

5.162 3 , II, II -B-E, E,

6.57 3 I, II, II , , . 1 . 2/ .3 , , .4 : (I) , (II) , (III) .5 . . , (Seidman, 2006). (), (), () (). (. Feiman-Nemser, 2001). ,

534

12o

. . . , , () (, ) . , (.. ; ;). 40 70 , . (. Seideman, 2006, . 119-125). , (cross-caseanalysis) . , . . . . . , ( ). , . , , , (:7-8). , . , . , . ,

535

12o

( ), :

, . , . , .(:45-54)

, (:8). - , . :

. . , , , , , . (:202-206)

, . , (: 40-41) , (: 70) , . , , . , , , , , , [] [] , [] , [] (:86-87). , , , [] , [] [] [] (:92-95). (. 1), . , , . , :

, , , -. - , ,

536

12o

. , . -. (:113-120)

, , [] (:572-574). . , , . . , , , [] [] (:98). , . , :

, . , , . , , .(:61-64)

, , , , . : , . (:241-243). , [] (:125), , , [] - , - (:250-251). , . , , , , , . :

537

12o

, . , . , , . (:68-71)

, , :

. . . , . (:219-226).

, , , . , , , [] .. (:164-165). ( , , :151-152) . :

. . , , . , , , .. (:70-76)

, . , 3+2=5. ! ! (:240-241) :

538

12o

2 !(:268-270)

, , , . , :

, . , , , , . , , [] [], . (:577-580).

, 1 30%. ( 70%), , , (80%). , (90-95%), (:558). , , . :

. , , , , , . (:96-99)

, , , . , , . , : , , . , (:504-506).

539

12o

1: . , , , , , , . , , , . , , :

[] . . . .(:14-19)

, . (:5) (:9), :

1.

1. 1.

1.

540

12o

[ ] . . , , , . . . (:16-20)

, , , . , , , , , :

. , [ ] . . . (:126-133)

, , ( ) . , , , : (:93-94). , . , , . :

. , , . [] . , , . (:28-36).

' , , . 7.5 8 1

541

12o

10 (:214), , / . , , . , (, ), , , . , , - (: 48-49), 10 .:

; ; ;(:271-274)

, , [], [], [] [] [] (:54-56). , , (:118-119), , . , (:121-122). , 12 . , , 14 (: 67-68), [] [](: 65). , . , ( ), . , , [] (:83-84) (:143). 1-10, 7.5-8, , 10 10 .

542

12o

(. 1), :

. . . . . (:242-248)

, [] (:298-299). . , , , . , , . , . . , , . : , , (:43-44). , , . , . , . , , ; [ ] , [ ] (:89-92). , , . , , , , ,

543

12o

, . . , , . , , . , :

. [] , . , , . , . . (:53-59)

, . . , , , , , :

. , [ ] . . , . (:201-204)

(. 1), . ,, , . : , , (: 205-206) (:11) : (:206). , . , , , . , , , . :

, .

544

12o

[] ; ; [ ]; ; (:175-178)

, , , . ( 25% , 75% 5% ), , . , , , , . , -: () , () , () , () 2-3 , . , , . . , , (. ), . , . , , , , . , , .

545

12o

, , . , , / (.., ). , , . . , / . , . , , / . . , , , . , . , . , . , , , , . , , , . , , . , , . - . ,

546

12o

, . , (.., , ) (.., , , ) . , . , , . , (.., , ). , (., Chester & Beaudin, 1996. Hoy & Spero, 2005. ahin & Atay, 2010), , . , , , , , (Tschannen-Moran .., 1998). , , . , , . , , . , , , , . , , ; , . , , ; :

547

12o

. , : , ; , , ; . , , , . , , (.., Mulholland & Wallace, 2001), . , . ( ) ( ), , . , , , , , (. Ball, Thames, & Phelps, 2008): . , , . , . - , (lessonstudy) (. Hiebert, Morris, & Glass, 2003). , . , - , - . , , ,

548

12o

, , . , , (.., ). , , . , . ( ;) , , . Anderson, R., Greene, M., & Loewen, P. (1988). Relationships among teachers and students thinking skills, sense of efficacy, and student achievement. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 34(2), 148165. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: what makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59 (5), 389-407. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman. Charalambous, C. Y., Philippou, G. N., & Kyriakides, L. (2008).Tracing the development of preservice teachers efficacy beliefs in teaching mathematics during fieldwork.Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67, 125-142. Chester, M. D., & Beaudin, B. Q. (1996). Efficacy beliefs of newly hired teachers in urban schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33 (1), 233-257. Corcoran, E. (1981). Transition shock: the beginning teachers paradox. Journal of Teacher Education, 32, 1923. Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103 (6), 1013-1055. Ghaith, G., & Shaaban, K. (1999). The relationship between perceptions of teaching concerns, teacher efficacy, and selected teacher characteristics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 487-496. Graham, S., Harris, K., Fink, B., & MacArthur, C. A. (2001). Teacher efficacy in writing: a construct validation with primary grade teachers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5 (2), 177-202.

549

12o

Guo, Y., Piasta, S. B., Justice, L. M., & Kaderavek, J. N. (2010). Relations among preschool teachers self-efficacy, classroom quality, and childrens language and literacy gains.Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1094-1103. Hebert, E., & Worthy, T. (2001). Does the first year of teaching have to be a bad one? A case study of success. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 897-911. Hiebert, J., Morris, A. K., & Glass, B. (2003). Learning to learn to teach: An experiment model for teaching and teacher preparation in mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6, 201-222. Hoy, W.A., & Spero. R. B. (2005). Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching: A comparison of four measures. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 343-356. Justice, L. M., Mashburn, A. J., Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2008). Quality of language and literacy instruction in preschool classrooms serving at-risk pupils. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 51-68. Knoblauch, D., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2008). Maybe I can teach those kids. The influence of contextual factors on student teachers efficacy beliefs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 166-179. Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. McKinney, M., Sexton, T., & Meyerson, M. J. (1999). Validating the efficacy-based change model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 471-485. Milner, H. R., & Hoy, W. A. (2003). A case study of an African American teachers self efficacy, stereotype threat, and persistence. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 263-276. , ., Pazzaglia, F., & Ronconi L. (2010). When being able is not enough. The combined value of positive affect and self-efficacy for job satisfaction and teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1145-1153. Mulholland, J., & Wallace, J. (2001). Teacher induction and elementary science teaching: enhancing self-efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 243-261. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rded.).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Raudenbush, S. W., Rowan, B., & Cheong, Y. F. (1992). Contextual effects on the self-perceived efficacy of high school teachers. Sociology of Education, 65, 150-167.

550

12o

Ross, J. A. (1992). Teacher efficacy and the effect of coaching on student achievement. Canadian Journal of Education, 17, 51-65. ahin, F. E., & Atay, D. (2010). Sense of efficacy from student teaching to the induction year. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2, 337-341. Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research (3rded.). New York: Teachers College Press. Settlage, J., Southerland, S. A., Smith, L. K., & Ceglie, R. (2009). Constructing a doubt-free teaching self: Self- efficacy, teacher identity, and science instruction within diverse settings. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46 (1), 102-125. Soodak, L.C., & Podell, D.M. (1996). Teacher efficacy: Toward the understanding of a multi-faceted construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12 (4), 401-411. Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, W. A., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68 (2), 202-248.

551