120
DESCRIPTION
36. 34. 32. 30. Temperature (°C). 28. 26. 24. 22. 20. 0. 120. 240. 360. 480. 600. 720. 840. 960. 1080. Time (s). Supplementary Figure 1. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
Time (s)
Te
mp
era
ture
(°C
)Supplementary Figure 1
Graph of temperatures measured over time in seven different temperature zones during a test run. The power supply was switched off after approximately 1000 s. The set values were 22, 25, 28, 31, 34, 37, and 40 °C.
Supplementary Figure 2Melting curve analysis using the MTAW. TC-p26-W and TC-p26-M capture sequences were spotted on agarose-coated slides as eight subarrays, each fitting into one chamber in the MTAW. The entire array was hybridized with saturating amounts of Cy3-labeled target (W54-T-W, and theslide was mounted in the MTAW device and the subarrays were subjected to washing in different zones with temperatures ranging from 25 to 60 °C at increments of 5 °C. The slide was subsequently washed at low stringency, dried, and scanned.
TC-p26-W: TTTTTTTTTTCCCCCCCCCCGCCACGCTCATCGACAAGCTTGTC
TC-p26-M: TTTTTTTTTTCCCCCCCCC············T············
W54-T-W :
5’-Cy3-GATGACTTCGCAGAGACAAGCTTGTCGATGAGCGTGGCAGCATCTTCAACTGTCGCAATT -3’
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60Temperature, °C
Nor
mal
ized
flor
esce
nce TC-p26-W-
TC-p26-M
Tm=39°C
Tm=37°C
No
rmal
ized
Rat
io
Sig
nal
in
ten
sity
(a.
u.)
Supplementary Figure 3
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
22 25 28 31 34 37 400
0.25
0.5
0.75
1
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
22 25 28 31 34 37 400
0.25
0.5
0.75
1
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
22 25 28 31 34 37 400
0.25
0.5
0.75
1
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
22 25 28 31 34 37 400
0.25
0.5
0.75
1
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
22 25 28 31 34 37 400
0.25
0.5
0.75
1
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
22 25 28 31 34 37 400
0.25
0.5
0.75
1
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
22 25 28 31 34 37 400
0.25
0.5
0.75
1
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
22 25 28 31 34 37 400
0.25
0.5
0.75
1
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
22 25 28 31 34 37 400
0.25
0.5
0.75
1
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
22 25 28 31 34 37 400
0.25
0.5
0.75
1
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
22 25 28 31 34 37 400
0.25
0.5
0.75
1
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
22 25 28 31 34 37 400
0.25
0.5
0.75
1
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
22 25 28 31 34 37 400
0.25
0.5
0.75
1
Temperature (ºC)
Temperature (ºC)
MT signalWT signal Ratio
CD5
CD8/9
CD17
CD27/28
IVS I+6
IVS I+5
CD24
CD15
CD8
CD27/28 (12/12)
CD27/28 (13/13)
CD27/28 (12/13)
CD24 (13/13)
Melting curves of the wild-type (square) and the mutant (diamond) probe in each probe pair tested.The graphs are based on quantified signal intensity (in arbitrary units, a.u.) of the results shown in the scanning images in Figure 2 (A and B) for the corresponding temperatures. The secondary Y-axes (triangles) show the normalized ratios (see Materials and Methods) calculated from the signals of the wild-type and mutant probes at the indicated temperatures.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
CD
24
CD
27/2
8
CD
27/2
8
CD
5
CD
8
CD
8/9
CD
15
CD
17
CD
24
CD
27/2
8
IVS
I +
5
IVS
I +
6
13nt
13nt
12nt
Tm set
Te
mp
era
ture
(d
eg
ree
C)
Calculated Tm
Tc
Observed Tm
Supplementary Figure 4
Summary of melting temperature (Tm) versus temperature for best classification (Tc).Tc values from data presented in Figures 3 and 4, and summarized in Figure 5. Calculated Tm values for the wild-type probe in each probe pair are from Table 1. Observed Tm is the temperature at which a half maximum signal was observed (Supplementary Figure 3).