12. monitoring and evaluating gender-based violence prevention framework

7/30/2019 12. Monitoring and Evaluating Gender-based Violence Prevention Framework

1/21

Monitoring and Evaluating Gender-Based Violence Prevention

Programs

Partners for Prevention (P4P)


2/21

M&EANSWERS THESE QUESTIONS

Are we fully aware of the problem?

Are we doing the right things?

Are we doing them right?

Are we achieving goal and objectives?


3/21

PROGRAMS HAVEGOALS AND OBJECTIVES

Goal: is a broad statement of a desired, long-termoutcome of a program. Goals represent general bigpicture statements of desired results.

To decrease injury and mortality due to gender-based violence

To reduce incidence of violent sexualperpetration

To reduce prevalence of IPV

Objectives: statements of desired, specific, realisticand measurable program results


4/21

OBJECTIVES NEED TO BESMART

Specific objective is concrete, detailed, focused and welldefined

Measurable objective tells how many or how much and can bemeasured with identified measurement sources

Appropriate logically relates to the overall problem and desiredeffects of the program

Realistic objective is achievable with the available resources

Time-bound objective specifies when it will be achieved


5/21

To increase the % of men and women in the target

population who believe that violence is not an acceptable

way of dealing with conflict from 40% in 2012 to 80% by

2015

To increase the number of domestic violence clients

recommended for counseling who actually utilize counseling

services by 30%

To establish 100% of family health centers that have health

care providers who can provide referral for GBV services to

high risk clients

GOOD OBJECTIVES


6/21

THREE MAIN PHASES OF PROGRAMS AND M&ELINKAGES

PLANNING, IMPLEMENTATION,AND RESULTS


7/21

HOW DO PROGRAMS ACHIEVE?

I think you should be more explicit here in Step Two.

3.2.0a


8/21

NEED TO UNDERSTAND YOUR PROGRAM/PROJECT/INTERVENTION

3.2.2a


9/21

ORGANIZING FRAMEWORK OFPROGRAM

PROGRAM LOGICMODEL

A graphical representation of the logical progression of

program elements and their causal relationships

Includes the program activities, the results expected

and the resources that are needed to carry out these

activities

Based on series of if-then relationships that express

the programs Theory of Change


10/21


11/21

TEMPLATE FOR LOGIC MODEL

Intended Results

(Immediate, mid-term, long-term)

Implementation

Planned Work

What we

invest

What

we do

Who we reach, what behavior changed, how

health has improved

INPUTS/RESOURCES ACTIVITIES OUTPUTS OUTCOMES IMPACTS

Plan

ning


12/21

PROGRAM LOGICALSO INCLUDES:

Assumptions/context: refers to social, political,

and economic factors that exist in area whereprogram is implemented and influence of these

on potential success of program

Problem statement: describes the nature and

extent of problem that needs to be addressed

by program


13/21

TEMPLATE FOR LOGIC MODEL MORE DETAIL

PROBLEM STATEMENT

ASSUMPTIONS


14/21


15/21

4.2.4c

LOGIC MODEL AND COMMON TYPES OF EVALUATION


16/21

M&E METHODS AND PROGRAM LOGIC

4.2.4b


17/21

SOUND MONITORING AND EVALUATION

Monitoring and evaluation uses indicators to trackprogress

Principles of good indicators need to be SMART!

Specific - concrete, detailed, focused and well defined

Measurable - tells how many or how much and can be

measured with identified measurement sources

Agreed upon - stakeholders vested in question should agreethat indicator is relevant

Relevant - indicator generates data that can answer thequestion of interest

Time bound - specifies time frame of what it is measuring


18/21

EXAMPLES OF INDICATORS

Number of districts with active Stepping Stones program input/process

Number of people attending Stepping Stones workshops output

Proportion of people attending Stepping Stones

programme who believe women should obey theirhusband - outcome

Proportion of participants in Stepping Stones programwho have taken some action (speaking out or otherwise)against GBV by the end of the programme - outcome

Decreased prevalence of GBV in target region - impact


19/21


20/21

KEY POINTS TO REMEMBER ABOUTM&E

1. Data should not be collected if it is not intended to be

used.

2. Draw on existing tested indicators, dont reinvent the

wheel

3. Less is more focus on few telling & robust

indicators.

Collectonlythe data that you intend to

use and use allthe data that you collect!


21/21

WHERE TO FIND STANDARDIZED INDICATORS FOR GBV PROGRAMS

Dont reinvent the wheel, use existing field tested indicators

Bloom, Shelah S. Violence Against Women and Girls: A Compendium of

Monitoring and Evaluation Indicators (MS-08-30). Chapel Hill, NC: MEASURE

Evaluation, Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina and ChapelHill; 2008. http://www.cpc.unc.edu/measure/publications

United Nations Division for the Advancement of Women, United Nations

Economic Commission for Europe, United Nations Statistical Division. Indicatorsto Measure Violence against Women. Report of the Expert Group Meeting, 8 to

10 October 2007. Geneva: United Nations Human Rights Council; 2008.

http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/egm/IndicatorsVAW/

IndicatorsVAW_EGM_report.pdf

Report of the special rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and

consequences, by Yakin Ertrk. Indicators on violence against women and state

response. Advance edited version 28 January 2008.

12. monitoring and evaluating gender-based violence prevention framework

Documents