Pan European Network Services

PENS TransitionPierre HanouneHead of the PENS Management Unit

Pan European Network ServicesPan European Network Services

Transition Scope – Geographical Complexity

Albania Algeria Armenia Austria Belarus Belgium Bosnia &

Herzegovina

Bulgaria Canada Croatia Cyprus The Czech

Republic

Denmark Egypt

Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland

Ireland Israël Italy Latvia Lithuania Luxemburg FYROM

Malta Moldova Morocco The

Netherlands

Norway Poland Portugal

Romania Russia Serbia Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden

Switzerland Turkey Ukraine United

Kingdom

Pan European Network ServicesPan European Network Services

Transition Scope – Technical Complexity

IPv4 HSRPLeased

lines

Cascaded

routers

Shared

Sites

X25 over IPShared

RoutersVoIP IPSEC VPNs Metro Ethernet

64 kbps PSTN Local PTTs MPLS SDH

Star and fully

meshed10 VPNs ISDN IPv6 Switches

BGP 1 Gbps Multicast GRE TunnelsClasses of

Service

Pan European Network ServicesPan European Network Services

PENS Transition Milestones

October 28thContract signed

December 1stTransition Start

October 31stEAD complete

March 31stNM complete

April 2012SESAR complete

TodayANSP Backbone

Pan European Network ServicesPan European Network Services

Site Transition Process

1. Communication

2. Site Survey

3. PENS Proposal

4. Ordering

6. Ready for Service

7. Acceptance

5. Site Readiness

8. Hand-over

PENS Contacts

Site Survey Questionnaire

Transition Requirements

Documentation (Site, Configuration, Technical)

Approved target design

Order delivered

Local

Implementation Plan

Acceptance Criteria

Test Plans

Operations Notification

� Process triggering

� Customer Awareness

� Site documentation

� Local constraints

�Site Proposal (high level target design & prices)

� Customer Approval

� Network & equipment ordered

� Planned Delivery

� NSP Network Ready

� Site Ready

� Site Acceptance Report

� Documentation

� Operations Acknowledgment

KeyInteractionpoints

20 days

Average 80 days to deliver line~

5 M

onth

s20 days

30 days

The Good, the Bad and the Ugly

• The good– Structure

– Commitment to deliver of the NSP

• The Bad– Local delivery coordination (PTT)

• The Ugly– Documentation– Predictability (delays)

Pan European Network ServicesPan European Network Services

What we would do different…

• Reconsider shared routers, not shared sites

• Clarify even further requirements and acceptance criteria

• Consider alternative service models

Pan European Network ServicesPan European Network Services

What we would do the same…

Pan European Network ServicesPan European Network Services