11- copyright 2007 prentice hall 1 organizational theory, design, and change fifth edition gareth r....
Post on 19-Dec-2015
215 views
TRANSCRIPT
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall 111-
Organizational Theory, Design, and Change
Fifth EditionGareth R. Jones
Chapter 11
Organizational Transformations:
Birth, Growth, Decline,
and Death
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall 211-
Learning Objectives
1. Appreciate the problems involved in surviving the perils of organizational birth and what founders can do to help their new organizations to survive
2. Describe the typical problems that arise as an organization grows and matures, and how an organization must change if it is to survive and prosper
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall 311-
Learning Objectives (cont.)
3. Discuss why organizational decline occurs, identify the stages of decline, and how managers can change their organizations to prevent failure and eventual death or dissolution
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall 411-
The Organizational Life Cycle
Organizational life cycle: a predictable sequence of stages of growth and change
The four principal stages of the organizational life cycle:
Birth Growth Decline Death
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall 511-
Figure 11-1: Model of the Organizational Life Cycle
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall 611-
Organizational Birth Organizational birth: the founding
of an organization Occurs when entrepreneurs take
advantage of opportunities to use their skills and competences to create value
A dangerous life cycle stage associated with the greatest chance of failure
Liability of newness: the dangers associated with being the first in a new environment
New organization is fragile because it lacks a formal structure
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall 711-
Organizational Birth (cont.)
Developing a plan for a new business
Begins when an entrepreneur notices an opportunity to develop a new or improved product or service
Tests the feasibility of the new product idea
SWOT analysis Examine the strengths and
weaknesses of the idea Decide whether the new product
idea is feasible
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall 811-
Organizational Birth (cont.) Developing a plan for a new
business (cont.) Plan should include:
Statement of the organization’s mission, goals, and financial objectives
Statement of the organization’s strategic objectives
List of all the functional and organizational resources required to implement the idea
Timeline that contains specific milestones used to measure the progress of the venture
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall 911-
Table 11-1: Developing a Business Plan
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall 1011-
A Population Ecology Model of Organizational Birth
Population ecology theory: a theory that seeks to explain the factors that affect the rate at which new organizations are born (and die) in a population of existing organizations
Population of organizations: the organizations that are competing for the same set of resources in the environment
Environmental niches: particular sets of resources or skills
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall 1111-
Population Ecology Model (cont.)
Number of births determined by the availability of resources
Population density: the number of organizations that can compete for the same resources in a particular environment
Factors that produce a rapid birth rate
Availability of knowledge and skills to generate similar new organizations
New organizations that survive provide role models
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall 1211-
Population Ecology Model (cont.) As environment is populated with a
number of successful organizations, birth rate tapers off because:
Fewer resources are available for newcomers
First-mover advantages: benefits derived from being an early entrant into a new environment
Difficulty of competing with existing companies
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall 1311-
Figure 11-2: Organizational Birth Rates Over Time
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall 1411-
Population Ecology Model (cont.) Survival strategies
Strategies that organizations can use to gain access to resources and enhance their chances of survival in the environment
r-strategy versus K-strategy r-strategy: a strategy of entering a
new environment early K-strategy: a strategy of entering an
environment late, after other organizations have tested the environment
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall 1511-
Population Ecology Model (cont.) Survival strategies (cont.)
Specialists: organizations that concentrate their skills to pursue a narrow range of resources in a single niche
Generalists: organizations that spread their skills thin to compete for a broad range of resources in many niches
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall 1611-
Population Ecology Model (cont.)Process of natural selection
Two sets of strategies result in: r-Specialist, r-Generalist, K-Specialist, K-Generalist
Early in an environment, new organizations are likely to become r-Specialists
Move quickly to focus on serving the needs of a particular group
As r-Specialists grow, they often become generalists and compete in new niches
K-Generalists often move into the market and threaten the weaker r-Specialists
Eventually, the market is dominated by the strongest r-Specialists, r-Generalists, and K-Generalists
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall 1711-
Figure 11-3: Strategies for Competing in the Resource Environment
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall 1811-
Population Ecology Model (cont.) Natural selection: the process
that ensures the survival of organizations that have the skills and abilities that best fit with the environment
Over time, weaker organizations die because they cannot adapt their procedures to fit changes in the environment
Natural selection is a competitive process
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall 1911-
The Institutional Theory of Organizational Growth
Organizational growth: the life-cycle stage in which organizations develop value-creation skills and competences that allow them to acquire additional resources
Organizations can develop competitive advantages by increasing division of labor
Creates surplus resources that foster greater growth
Growth should not be an end-in-itself
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall 2011-
The Institutional Theory of Organizational Growth (cont.) Institutional theory: a theory that
studies how organizations can increase their ability to grow and survive in a competitive environment by becoming legitimate in the eyes of their stakeholders
Institutional environment: values and norms in an environment that govern the behavior of a population of organizations
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall 2111-
The Institutional Theory of Organizational Growth (cont.) Organizational isomorphism:
the similarity among organizations in a population
Three processes that explain why organizations become similar are:
Coercive isomorphism Mimetic isomorphism Normative isomorphism
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall 2211-
The Institutional Theory of Organizational Growth (cont.)
Coercive isomorphism: exists when an organization adopts certain norms because of pressures exerted by other organizations and by society in general
Increasing dependence of one organization on another leads to greater similarity
Mimetic isomorphism: exists when organizations intentionally imitate one another to increase their legitimacy
Environmental uncertainty increases the likelihood of imitation
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall 2311-
The Institutional Theory of Organizational Growth (cont.)
Normative isomorphism: exists when organizations indirectly adopt the norms and values of other organizations in the environment
Organizations acquire norms and values when:
Employees move from one organization to another and bring with them the norms and values of their former employer
They participate in the activities of industry, trade, and professional associations
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall 2411-
The Institutional Theory of Organizational Growth (cont.) Disadvantages of isomorphism
Organizations may learn ways to behave that have become outdated and no longer lead to organizational effectiveness
Pressure to imitate may reduce the level of innovation in the environment
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall 2511-
Greiner’s Model of Organizational Growth
Greiner proposes five growth stages Each stage results in a crisis Advancement to the next stage
requires successfully resolving the crisis in the previous stage
Stage 1: Growth through creativity Entrepreneurs develop the skills to
create and introduce new products Organizational learning occurs Crisis of leadership – entrepreneurs
may lack management skills
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall 2611-
Greiner’s Model of Organizational Growth (cont.) Stage 2: Growth through direction
Crisis of leadership results in recruitment of top-level managers who take responsibility for the organization’s strategy
Often turns around an organization’s fortunes
Crisis of autonomy Creative people lose control over new
product development Professional managers run the show
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall 2711-
Greiner’s Model of Organizational Growth (cont.)Stage 3: Growth through
delegation To solve the crisis of autonomy,
managers must delegate Strike a balance between the need for
professional management and the opportunity for entrepreneurship
Movement toward product team structure
Crisis of control as power struggles over resources emerge between top-level and lower-level managers
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall 2811-
Greiner’s Model of Organizational Growth (cont.)Stage 4: Growth through
coordination To resolve crisis of control, managers
must find right balance of centralized and decentralized control
Top management takes on role of coordinating different divisions
Attempt to inculcate a companywide perspective
Crisis of red tape Increasing reliance on rules and standard
procedures Organization becomes overly bureaucratic
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall 2911-
Greiner’s Model of Organizational Growth (cont.)Stage 5: Growth through
collaboration Emphasizes greater spontaneity in
management action Greater use of product team and
matrix structures Changing from a mechanistic to an
organic structure as an organization grows is a difficult task
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall 3011-
Figure 11-4: Greiner’s Model of Organizational Growth
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall 3111-
Organizational Decline and DeathOrganizational decline: the life-
cycle stage that an organization enters when it fails to anticipate, recognize, avoid, neutralize, or adapt to external or internal pressures that threaten its long-term survival May occur because organizations
grow too much
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall 3211-
Organizational Decline and Death (cont.)Effectiveness and profitability
Assessing an organization’s effectiveness involves comparing its profitability relative to others
Profitability: measures how well a company is making use of its resources by investing them in ways to create goods and services that generate profit when sold Short term profits say little about how
well managers are using resources to generate future profits
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall 3311-
Figure 11.5: Relationship Between Organizational Size and Organizational Effectiveness
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall 3411-
Figure 11.6: Differences in Profitability
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall 3511-
Organizational Decline and Death (cont.)
Organizational inertia: the forces inside an organization that make it resistant to change
Risk aversion: managers become unwilling to bear the uncertainty of change as organizations grow
The desire to maximize rewards: managers may increase the size of the company to maximize their own rewards even when this growth reduces organizational effectiveness
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall 3611-
Organizational Decline and Death (cont.) Organizational inertia (cont.)
Overly bureaucratic culture: in large organizations, property rights can become so strong that managers spend all their time protecting their specific property rights instead of working to advance the organization
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall 3711-
Organizational Decline and Death (cont.) Uncertain and changing
environment Affect an organization’s ability to
obtain scarce resources, thereby leading to decline
Makes it difficult for top management to anticipate the need for change and to manage the way organizations change and adapt to the environment
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall 3811-
Weitzel and Jonsson’s Model of Organizational DeclineFive stages of decline
Stage 1: Blinded: organizations are unable to recognize the internal or external problems that threaten their long-term survival
Stage 2: Inaction: despite clear signs of deteriorating performance, top management takes little actions to correct problems
Gap between acceptable performance and actual performance increases
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall 3911-
Weitzel and Jonsson’s Model (cont.)
Five stages of decline (cont.) Stage 3: Faulty action: managers
may have made the wrong decisions because of conflict in the top-management team, or they may have changed too little too late fearing more harm than good from reorganization
Stage 4: Crisis: by the time this stage has arrived, only radical changes in strategy and structure can stop the decline
Stage 5: Dissolution: decline is irreversible and the organization cannot recover
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall 4011-
Figure 11-6: Weitzel and Jonsson’s Model of Organizational Decline