10553606170logframebib2.pdf

7/23/2019 10553606170logframebib2.pdf

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/10553606170logframebib2pdf 1/5

1

A Bibliography for Program Logic Models/Logframe Analysis

December 18, 2001

Compiled by: Molly den Heyer Evaluation Unit, International Development Research Centre

While there are copious amounts of organizational grey literature or `how-to-manuals` on

program logic models or (logframe analysis), resources that analyze program logic models as a

set of tools are hard to find. For this reason, the resources complied in the following bibliography

focus on the logic model`s various uses; the significance of a variety of forms and structures;

strengths and weakness; and, theoretical implications both in terms of the practice of

international development and monitoring and evaluation field in general. While it is by no

means a comprehensive list, it provides a good starting point to examine how this pervasive tool

is used throughout the international development field.

Resources:

Aune, Jens B. November 2000. “Logical Framework Approach and PRA - Mutually Exclusive or

Complementary Tools for Project Planning?” Development in Practice. Vol. 10, No. 5. Oxford,

England.

Bauer, Malcolm I. and P.N. Johnson-Laird. November 1993. “How Diagrams Can Improve

Reasoning.” Psychological Science. Vol. 4, No. 6. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge,England.

Bell, Simon. 1998. “Managing and Learning with Logical Frameworks: the case of an MIS

project in China.” Human Systems Management. 17, 15-27.

Bell, Simon. February 1999. “Finding Out Rapidly: a soft systems approach to training needs

analysis in Thailand.” Development in Practice. Vol. 9, No. 1, 18-30. Carfax Publishing Ltd.

Oxford, England.

Bell, Simon. February 2000. “Logical Frameworks, Aristotle and Soft Systems: a note on the

origins, values and uses of logical frameworks, in reply to Gasper.” Public Administration andDevelopment. Vol. 20, No. 1, 29-32. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. England.

Cameron, John. Why We Are Doing this B**** Logframe Again? - A History. School of

Development Studies/Overseas Development Group. University of East Anglia, United

Kingdom.

7/23/2019 10553606170logframebib2.pdf


2

Coleman, Gilroy. December 1987. “Logical Framework Approach to the Monitoring and

Evaluation of Agricultural and Rural Development Projects.” Project Appraisal. Vol. 2, No. 4,

251-259. Beech Tree Publishing. Surrey, England.

Cordingley, David. June 1995. “Integrating the Logic Frameworks into the Management of

Technical Co-operation Projects.” Project Appraisal. Vol. 10, No. 2, 587-596. Beech Tree

Publishing. Surrey, England.

Cummings, Harry F. 1997. “Logic Models, Logical Frameworks and Results-Based

Management: Contrasts and Comparisons.” Canadian Journal of Development Studies. Vol.

XVIII, Special Issue, 587-596. University of Ottawa. Ottawa, Canada.

Den Heyer, Molly. 2001. The Development of the Temporal Logic Model. Unpublished Master

Thesis. University of Guelph. Guelph, Canada.

Dunlop, Kathryn, and Jean-Baptiste Sawadogo. 1997. “Managing for Results with a Dynamic

Logical Framework Approach: From Project Design to Impact Measurement.” Canadian Journal

of Development Studies. Vol. XVIII, Special Issue, 597-612. University of Ottawa. Ottawa,

Canada.

Eggers, Hellmut. 1998. “Project Cycle Management Revisited.” The ACP-EU Courier . No. 169.

Framst, Gordon. 1995. “Application of Program Logic Model to Agricultural Technology

Transfer Programs.” The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation. Vol. 10, No. 2, 123-132.

Canadian Evaluation Society, Canada.

Gargani, John. November 7, 2001. The Challenge of Evaluating Theory-Based Evaluation.

Presented to the Annual Meeting of American Evaluation Association. St. Louis, USA.

Gasper, Des. 1997. ‘Logical Frameworks’: A Critical Assessment Managerial Theory, Pluralistic

Practice. Working Paper Series No. 264. Institute of Social Studies. The Hague, The

Netherlands.

Gasper, Des. 1999. The Logical Framework Approach Beyond the Project Enclave: Questions

and Warnings for Monitoring and Evaluation of Humanitarian Assistance in Complex

Emergencies. Unpublished Paper. Institute of Social Studies. The Hague, The Netherlands.

Gasper, Des. February 2000. “Evaluating the ‘Logical Frameworks Approach’ -

Towards Learning-Oriented Development Evaluation.” Public Administration and Development.

17-28. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. England.

7/23/2019 10553606170logframebib2.pdf


3

Gasper, Des. 2000. “Logical Frameworks”: Problems and Potentials. Unpublished Paper.

Institute of Social Studies. The Hague, The Netherlands.

Gentner, Dedre and Albert L.Stevens. 1983. Mental Models. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

Publishers. Hillsdale, New Jersey.

Hacsi, Timothy A. Fall 2000. “Using Program Theory to Replicate Successful Programs.” New

Directions for Evaluation. No. 87. Jossey-Bass. San Francisco, USA.

Imbach, Alejandro C. 2001. Finding the Way: a practical guide to the self-evaluation of

sustainability projects. Monitoring and Evaluation Initiative, The World Conservation Union

(IUCN). Gland, Switzerland.

Jackson, Bill. October 1997. Designing Project and Project Evaluation Using the Logical

Framework Approach. Unpublished Paper. Monitoring and Evaluation Initiative, The World

Conservation Union (IUCN ). Gland, Switzerland.

Julian, David A. 1997. “The Utilization of the Logic Model as a System Level Planning and

Evaluation Device.” Evaluation and Program Planning. Vol. 20, No. 3, 251-257. Elsevier

Science Ltd.

Julian, David A., Ann Jones and Diana Deyo. 1995. “Open Systems Evaluation and the Logic

Model: Program Planning and Evaluation Tools.” Evaluation and Program Planning. Vol. 18,

No. 4, 333-341. Elsevier Science Ltd.

Kuchler, Manfred. 1981. “Causal Analysis in Nonexperimental Evaluation Research” Evaluation

Research and Practice: A Comparative of International Perspectives. (Robert A. Levine et. All)Sage Publications. Beverly Hills, USA.

LaComb, Christina A, David L. Shern and William M.K. Trochim. 1995. “The Use of Concept

Mapping for Assessing Fidelity of Model Transfer: An Example From Psychiatric

Rehabilitation.” Evaluation and Program Planning. Vol. 18, No. 2, 143-153. Elsevier Science

Ltd.

Larken, Jill H. and Hebert A. Simon. 1987. “Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten

Thousand Word.” Cognitive Science. 65-99. Ablex Publishing Corporation. Norwood, New

Jersey.

Mathie, Alison. 1996. Evaluation in a Results-Oriented Agency Environment: The Case of

CUSO. Unpublished Paper. Coady International Institute. Antigonish, Nova Scotia.

7/23/2019 10553606170logframebib2.pdf


4

McEwan, Kimberley L., and Douglas A. Bigelow. 1997. “Using A Logical Model To Focus

Health Services On Population Health Goals.” The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation.

Vol. 12, No. 1, 167-174. Canadian Evaluation Society, Canada.

McLaughlin, John A., and Gretchen B. Jordan. 1999. “Logic Models: A Tool for Telling Your

Program Performance Story.” Evaluation and Program Planning. Vol. 22, 65-72. Elsevier Science Ltd.

Millett, Ricardo, and Cythia C. Phillips. (n.d) Logic Model Development Guide: Using Logic

Model to Look at Evaluation. W.K. Kellogg Foundation. Michigan, USA.

Mosse, David, John Farrington and Alan Bew. 1998. Development as Process: Concepts and

Methods for Working with Complexity. Routledge Research / ODI Development Policy Studies.

New York, USA.

Nakabayashi, Saeko. August 2000. The Japanese Version of Product Cycle Management:

Adoption, Adaptation and Application of ZOPP - A Comparison Analysis of Methods andMethodologies Working Paper Series No. 319. Institute of Social Studies. The Hague, The

Netherlands.

Odame, Helen Hambly. May 25, 2000. Engendering the Logical Framework. Unpublished

Report. International Service for National Research (ISNAR). The Netherlands.

Porteous, Nancy, and Barbara Sheldrick. 1997. The Logic Model: A Blueprint for Public Health

Programs. Unpublished Report. Ottawa-Carleton Health Department, Teaching Health Unit.

Ottawa, Canada.

Porteous, Nancy L., Barbara J. Sheldrick and Paula J. Stewart. 1999. “Enhancing Managers’

Evaluation Capacity: A Case Study From Ontario Public Health.” The Canadian Journal of

Program Evaluation. Special Issue, 137-154. Canadian Evaluation Society, Canada.

Rondielli, Dennis A. June, 1993. Strategic and Results-Based Management in CIDA: Reflections

on the Process. Unpublished Report. Strategic Management, Canadian International

Development Agency. Ottawa, Canada.

Rowan, Margo S. “Logic Models in Primary Care Reform: Navigating the Evaluation.” The

Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation. Vol. 15, No. 2, 81-92. Canadian Evaluation Society,

Canada.

Sartorious, R. March 1996. “The Third Generation Logical Framework Approach: Dynamic

Management for Agricultural Rural Projects.” Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension.

Vol. 2, No. 4. Internet Resource: http://www.bib.wau.nl/ejae/v2n4-6.html

7/23/2019 10553606170logframebib2.pdf


5

Toffolon-Weiss, Melissa M., Jane T. Bertrand and Stanely S. Terrell. June 1999. “The Results

Framework – An Innovative Tool for Program Planning and Evaluation.” Evaluation Review.

Vol. 23, No. 3, 336-359. Sage Publications. Newbury Park, USA.

Wiggins, Steve and Dermot Shields. 1995. “Clarifying the `Logical Framework` as a Tool for

Planning and Managing Development Project.” Project Appraisal. Vol 2, No. 1, 2-12. BeechTree Publishing. Guildford, England.

Woodhill, Jim. 2000. Planning, Monitoring and Evaluating Programs and Projects: Introduction

to Key Concepts, Approaches and Terms. Unpublished Report. The World Conservation Union

(IUCN). Gland, Switzerland.

Organization Reports:

The Agricultural Research Impact Indicators Matrix: A User’s Guide. U.S. Agency for

International Development. Washington D.C. August, 1991.

Guide for the Development of Evaluation Framework Accountability. Program

Evaluation and Review. Treasury Board of Canada, Secretariat, Ottawa, Canada. May 2000.

The Logical Framework Approach: Handbook for Objectives-Oriented Planning.

Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (NORAD), Norway. February 1990.

Logic Model Development Guide. W.K. Kellogg Foundation. Battle Creek, USA.

Program Evaluation Methods. Program Evaluation Branch, Treasury Board of Canada, Ottawa,

Canada. January 1991.

Promoting Practical Sustainability. PIA/OPRE. Australian Aid. September 2000.

Results-Based Management in CIDA: An Introductory Guide to the Concepts and Principles

Results-Based Management Division, Canadian International Development Agency, Hull,

Canada. January 1999.

W.K. Kellogg Foundation Evaluation Handbook. W.K. Kellogg Foundation, Battle Creek MI,

USA. January 1998.

ZOPP Objectives-Oriented Project Planning. Deutsche Gesellschaft fur TechnischeZusammenarbeit (GTZ). Eschborn, Germany. 1997.

10553606170logframebib2.pdf

Documents