102 年度 癌症診療品質認證 醫院 檢討會

Click here to load reader

Upload: michelle-avery

Post on 03-Jan-2016

116 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

102 年度 癌症診療品質認證 醫院 檢討會. 主辦機構:國民健康署 承辦機構: 國家衛生研究院 癌症研究所 TCOG 簡報日期: 102 年 11 月 01 日. 大綱. 認證作業程序檢討 認證基準檢討 綜合討論. 認證作業程序檢討. 申請程序. 102 年 3 月 1 日至 102 年 3 月 31 日 下午五點前,填妥「癌症診療品質認證申請表」一份及 「癌症診療品質認證-醫院自評書」一式三份 (其中二份請勿裝訂) 及電子檔一份 ,寄達健康署所委託之機構,以完成報名之申請。 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

  • 102 TCOG102 11 01

  • *

  • *

  • 10231102331

    https://pfp.bhp.doh.gov.tw48*

  • *

  • *

    3055305(12:30-13:20)3004020

  • 102*

  • 1025101918=94.74%738.89% 844.44% 316.67%*

  • -1

    2

    *

  • *

    N%211.11 1688.89

  • *

    N%00.0018100.00N=171617131191

  • *

    N%1266.67633.33 SOP

  • *

    N%211.111688.89844.44738.89TCOG316.67 1372.22 00.00 527.78 32

  • -2

    ?*

  • *

    N%00.0018100.003N=1771715

  • *

    N%3015.56 1794.44 3001688.89 211.11

  • *

    N%2015.561794.44

    1794.4415.56

  • *

    N%738.891055.5615.56211.111688.89

  • *

  • *

    4 (1 )1 6 1 17 6 6 1 2 1 1 36 10 2

  • *

    Rating A 10Rating A + Rating B 26 Rating D + Rating E0 10 Rating B 5 Rating A Rating A + Rating B > 10 Rating D 3 Rating E0 Rating A + Rating B 10 Rating D 4 Rating E 1

  • ()

    B

    1.22.43.23.3.33.53.6.23.6.33.104.15.1*

  • *

  • *

  • *

    1.1Rating ERating DRating C50

  • *

    1.1Rating BC Rating AB1.275 %

  • *

    1.1

  • *

    1.1

  • 1.1*()

  • *

    1.2 1234

  • *

    1.2 Rating ERating DRating C Rating CRating BC

  • *

    1.2 Rating AB 1 ~ 4

  • *

    1.2

  • 1.2*)

  • *

    1.3 Rating ERating DRating CRating CRating BCPDCARating ABPDCA

  • *

    1.312

  • 1.3*

  • *

    1.4 1AJCC 23 4

  • *

    1.4 1. 1AJCC 23

  • *

    1.4

  • 1.4*

  • *

  • *

    2.1Rating ERating DRating DRating CRating BC

  • *

    2.1Rating AB3000130002

  • *

  • *

    2.1 102 99

  • 2.1 *

  • *

    2.2Rating ERating DRating D95%98%90%95%Rating C98%95%98%Rating B98%98%95%Rating A98

  • *

    2.2( 97 -9999100(1)( A / B ) 100%100A98B98 + 98

  • *

    2.2(2)E+F/ D 100% (100)D98E9898F9898

  • *

    2.2(3)G / H 100%100G98H98

    2.

  • *

    2.3Rating ERating DRating CRating CRating B C Rating A B

  • *

    2.3

  • *

    2.3Rating A 3 123

  • 2.3 *

  • *

    2.4 Rating ERating DRating CRating CRating BCRating AB

  • *

    2.4 1234Class1~25

  • 2.4*

  • *

    2.5Class1~2Rating E Rating DRating C Rating C80

  • *

    2.5Rating BC80 ~ 95%Rating AB 95%

  • *

    2.5Class 1~ 2Stage

  • *

    2.5123 Class 1~245

  • *

    2.5K / L 100 K L 10%Class 1~2

  • *

    962.13Tumor Size96983.4T Clinical T1151172.14Regional Lymph Nodes Examined991003.5N Clinical N1181192.15Regional Lymph Nodes Positive1011023.6M Clinical M1201213.7Clinical Stage Group122124

  • *

    3.10T Pathologic T127129Other Staging System FIGO3.11N Pathologic N130131Other Staging SystemBCLC1013.12M Pathologic M1321333.13Pathologic Stage Group134136Other Staging Systemhistology101

  • 2.52.4*

  • *

    2.6 Class 0 ~ 3Rating ERating DRating CRating BCRating AB

  • *

    2.61Class 0~32Class 1~2 2 5Class 0334:56

  • 2.6

    *

  • *

  • *

    3.1Rating ERating DRating CRating CRating BC

  • *

    3.1Rating AB /

  • *

    3.11 peer review article234

  • *

    3.1Rating A Hodgkin lymphomaBDiffuse large B cell lymphoma Follicular lymphoma

  • 3.1*

  • *

    3.2 Rating ERating DRating CRating C70 %Rating BC50%

  • *

    3.2 Rating ABClass 1~2

  • *

    3.2 Class 1~21 22

    3

    1,000 61,001~2,00092,001 12

  • *

    3.2 123minimum requirement12345comorbidity6regimensdose

  • *

    3.2 C Bsummary note

  • 3.2 regimenRTdose *

  • *

    3.3 3.3.1 Rating E20 %Rating D20 %40 %Rating C40 %60 %Rating B60 %80 %Rating A80 %

  • *

    3.3.112T NM AJCC

  • *

    3.3.1

    1272411 [ ( 27 + 14 + 01 ) / ( 212 ) ] 100 %18 / 24 100 %75 %Rating B3.2

  • 3.3.1

    *

  • *

    3.3.2 Rating E20 %Rating D20 %40 %Rating C40 %60 %Rating B60 %80 %Rating A80 %

  • *

    3.3.2123

  • *

    3.3.2

    12833211 [ ( 38 + 23 + 11 ) / ( 312 ) ] 100 %31 / 36 100 %86 %Rating A3.2

  • 3.3.2 *

  • *

    3.3.3 Rating E20 %Rating D20 %40 %Rating C40 %60 %Rating B60 %80 %Rating A80 %

  • *

    3.3.3 123Neoadjuvant

  • *

    3.3.3

    94322 211 [ ( 34 + 22 + 12 + 01 ) / ( 39 ) ] 100 %18 / 27 100 %67 % Rating B 3.2

  • 3.3.3*1.

  • *

    3.3.4Rating E20 %Rating D20 %40 %Rating C40 %60 %Rating B60 %80 %Rating A80 % curative intent

  • *

    3.3.4curative intent123 1 13 C

  • *

    3.3.41.

    92 332311 [ ( 32 + 23 + 13 + 01 ) / ( 39 ) ] 100 %15 / 27 100 %56 % Rating C2. 3.2

  • 3.3.4 *

  • *

    3.4Rating ERating DRating CRating CRating BC70 %

  • *

    3.4Rating AB

  • *

    3.4

  • *

    3.424B1502

  • *

    1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. ()

  • *

    7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12.

  • 3.4

    *

  • *

    3.5 Rating ERating DRating CRating C10%

  • *

    3.5 Rating BC10%5%Rating AB10%20%10%

  • *

    3.5 Class 1~3

  • *

    3.5 12303123

  • *

    3.5 1234

  • *

    3.5 1 conclusion or recommendation 2 process

  • 3.5 10%50%*

  • *

    3.63.6.1Rating ERating DRating CRating C

  • *

    3.6.1Rating BCRating AB

  • *

    3.6.1AdjuvantNeoadjuvantConcurrent Chemoradiotherapy CCRT

  • *

  • 3.6.1*

  • *

    3.6.2 Rating ERating DRating CRating C 3.6.1 prescriptionRating BCprescriptionRating AB

  • *

    3.6.2 1.prescription

  • 3.6.2

    *

  • *

    3.6.3 Rating ERating DRating CRating CRating BCRating AB

  • *

    3.6.3

  • *

    3.6.3 123

  • *

    3.6.3

  • *

    3.6.3 (spill kits)1

    Class II BClass III

  • *

    3.6.3 2

  • 3.6.3

    *

  • *

    3.6.4 Rating ERating DRating CRating CRating BCRating AB

  • *

    3.6.412

  • *

    3.6.4

  • *

    3.6.43.6.3 1

  • 3.6.4 *

  • *

    3.73.7.1Rating ERating DRating CRating C

  • *

    3.7.1Rating BCRating AB

  • *

    3.7.112 permanent section Her-2 /neuCAPTAFISO15189

  • 3.7.1

    *

  • *

    3.7.2Rating ERating DRating CRating CRating BC

  • *

    3.7.2Rating AB

  • 3.7.2

    *

  • *

    3.8 Rating E Rating DRating CRating CRating BC

  • *

    3.8Rating AB

  • *

    3.8 CT MRI

  • 3.8

    *

  • *

    3.9Rating ERating DRating CRating C (curative intent) Rating BCRating C (curative intent)

  • *

    3.9Rating ABRating C curative intent

  • *

    3.9 12CTVPTV

  • *

    3.91peer review article234

  • *

    3.912CC E

  • 3.9(:) *

  • *

    3.10 Rating ERating DRating CRating CRating BRating A

  • *

    3.10 102

  • 3.10 *

  • *

  • *

    4.1 123 / 4Rating E

    Rating DRating C

  • *

    4.1 Rating CRating BCRating AB

  • *

    4.1 /Port-AHickmanPICC /

  • *

    4.1 3.6.4

  • 4.1

    *

  • *

    4.2 Rating E Rating DRating CRating C Rating BC Rating AB

  • *

    4.23.6.4

  • 4.2

    *

  • *

    4.3 Rating ERating DRating CRating CRating BRating A

  • *

    4.3

  • *

    4.3 1.3 3 41 3.6.4

  • 4.3*

  • *

    4.4Rating E Rating DRating CRating C

  • *

    4.4Rating BC20 8020Rating AB 6 50%

  • *

    4.420

  • *

    4.4 6 6 6

  • 4.4850%

    *

  • *

    4.5Rating ERating DRating CRating C50Rating BCClass1~2400

  • *

    4.5Rating AB10299

  • *

    4.511 2 234 C

  • 4.5*

  • *

    4.6 Rating ERating DRating CRating CRating BC

  • *

    4.6Rating AB

  • *

    4.6()

  • *

    4.6 A intake BMI

  • 4.6*

  • *

  • *

    5.1 Rating ERating DRating C Rating CRating B CRating A B

  • *

    5.1 2 PDCA

  • 5.1 2

    *

  • *

    5.2 Rating ERating DRating CRating BCRating AB

  • *

    5.2

  • *

  • *

    6.1 Class1~22,000AIRBClass1~22,0001A

  • *

    6.1 IRB

  • 6.1(:) *

  • *

    *