101.22.firstimp · 2019-11-07 · judges to get 1 score per teacher course evaluations •...

4
11/7/19 1 Social Psychology Focuses on behavior and mental processes of the individual in context of other people Outline for next four classes: First impressions Attribution errors; attitudes and behavior Obedience to authority The Stanford Prison Experiment Illustrate the power of the situation Forming impressions Impressions We form impressions of other people How quickly? Are they predictive? Other people form impressions of us Do others see us how we think they see us? Are impressions predictive? Does Alice’s impression of Chris predict Bob’s impression of Chris? A test of whether impressions are reliable Do first impressions predict later impressions? Later impressions may differ if they’re based on more information Correlation Two variables correlate if they change together Correlations can be useful for predicting one variable from another Correlations may (but need not) reveal causal relationships A correlation: Lead and crime

Upload: others

Post on 15-Apr-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 101.22.firstimp · 2019-11-07 · judges to get 1 score per teacher Course evaluations • Administered at the end of term • Each student rated two aspects: – The quality of the

11/7/19

1

SocialPsychology

•  Focusesonbehaviorandmentalprocessesoftheindividualincontextofotherpeople

•  Outlinefornextfourclasses:– Firstimpressions– Attributionerrors;attitudesandbehavior– Obediencetoauthority– TheStanfordPrisonExperiment

Illustratethepowerofthesituation

Formingimpressions

Impressions

•  Weformimpressionsofotherpeople– Howquickly?– Aretheypredictive?

•  Otherpeopleformimpressionsofus– Doothersseeushowwethinktheyseeus?

Areimpressionspredictive?

•  DoesAlice’simpressionofChrispredictBob’simpressionofChris?– Atestofwhetherimpressionsarereliable

•  Dofirstimpressionspredictlaterimpressions?– Laterimpressionsmaydifferifthey’rebasedonmoreinformation

Correlation

•  Twovariablescorrelateiftheychangetogether– Correlationscanbeusefulforpredictingonevariablefromanother

– Correlationsmay(butneednot)revealcausalrelationships

Acorrelation:Leadandcrime

Page 2: 101.22.firstimp · 2019-11-07 · judges to get 1 score per teacher Course evaluations • Administered at the end of term • Each student rated two aspects: – The quality of the

11/7/19

2

Quantifyingcorrelation

•  Onecommonmeasure:Pearson’sr– Nocorrelation:r=0– Perfectdirectcorrelation:r=1– Perfectinversecorrelation:r=-1

Hypotheticalcorrelations

Onetwin’sIQ

Fraternaltwin’sIQ

Iden

ticaltw

in’sIQ

Onetwin’sIQ

r=.6 r=.8

Firstimpressions(Ambady&Rosenthal,1993)

•  13teacherswerevideotaped– Teachersweregraduatestudentsintraining– Pickedtohaveawiderangeofcourseevaluations•  Toavoidrestrictionofrange

Judges’ratings

•  Judgeswere9undergraduates– Notfromthoseteachers’classes

•  Eachshown310-secclipsfromeachvideo– Soundturnedoff

•  Eachrated15teachercharacteristics,including:– Competence,confidence,enthusiasm,likeability,supportiveness,warmth

– Ratingswereaveragedovercharacteristicsandjudgestoget1scoreperteacher

Courseevaluations

•  Administeredattheendofterm•  Eachstudentratedtwoaspects:– Thequalityofthesectionoverall– Theinstructor’sperformanceoverall

•  Ratingswereaveragedoveraspectsandstudentstoget1scoreforeachteacher

Results

•  Correlationbetweenjudges’ratingsandcourseevaluations:

r=.76

•  With2-secclipsinsteadof10-secclips:r=.71

Page 3: 101.22.firstimp · 2019-11-07 · judges to get 1 score per teacher Course evaluations • Administered at the end of term • Each student rated two aspects: – The quality of the

11/7/19

3

Examplecorrelationof.76

Judgesratings

Courseevaluations Eachpoint

correspondstoahypotheticalteacher

Implications

•  Alice’simpressionofChrispredictsBob’simpressionofChris– Thoughimperfectly;correlationislessthan1

•  Impressionsformrapidly–  Inafewseconds– “Thinslicesofbehavior”

Implications

•  Alice’sfirstimpressionofChrispredictsBob’simpressionofChrisafterBobhasgottentoknowChris

•  Possibleexplanations:– Alotofinformationiscommunicatedrapidlywhenwefirstseeormeetsomeone

– Onceweformanimpression,westicktoit•  Confirmationbiasmayplayarole

Meta-impressions

•  Ourimpressionsofotherpeople’simpressionsofus– Doothersseeusthewaywethinktheydo?

Thespotlighteffect(Gilovich,Medvec,&Savitsky,2000)

•  Participantputonatshirt,knockedonadoor,andwalkedintotheroom– Sixotherparticipantswereinside,workingonsomethingbutfacingthedoorway

– TshirthadalargeimageofBarryManilow

Thespotlighteffect(Gilovich,Medvec,&Savitsky,2000)

•  Experimenterthen“changedtheirmind”– Pulledtshirtweareroutoftheroomasheorshewasabouttosit

•  Conditions:– Predicted,actual,control

Page 4: 101.22.firstimp · 2019-11-07 · judges to get 1 score per teacher Course evaluations • Administered at the end of term • Each student rated two aspects: – The quality of the

11/7/19

4

Conditions

•  Predicted:– Tshirtwearerwasaskedtopredicthowmanypeopleintheroomnoticedthetshirt

•  Actual:– Peopleintheroomwereaskedwhethertheynoticedthetshirt

Controlcondition

•  Participantswatchedavideoreenactment•  Thenwereaskedtopredicthowmanypeopleintheroomwouldnoticethetshirt– Thesamepredictiontaskasthetshirtwearer,butnotmadewhileinthespotlight

– Measurespeople’sgeneralabilitytopredictwhatotherpeopleactuallynotice

Thespotlighteffect Thespotlighteffect

•  Otherparticipantsdonnedabettert-shirt– Chosefrom:MartinLutherKing,Jr.BobMarleyJerrySeinfeld