10 priorities for fiscal adjustment in emerging economies
TRANSCRIPT
10 Priorities forFiscal Adjustment in LAC
Andrew PowellResearch Department
Inter‐American Development Bank
*Strictly my own views, not those of the IDB nor its Board of Directors.
Where are we? Considerable heterogeneity…
Expected growth rates for 2016 and 2017 (%)
Source: WEO (October 2016)
Dominican RepublicPanamaNicaraguaCosta RicaGuyanaPeruBoliviaHondurasParaguayGuatemalaEl SalvadorColombiaMexicoChileBarbadosJamaicaHaitiThe BahamasUruguayBelize
ArgentinaEcuadorTrinidad and TobagoBrazilSurinameVenezuela
Even among a set of inflation targeters…Source: IDB ( Revela )
Source: IDB (Revela)
2016 Growth Expectations
Many countries continuing counter cyclical fiscal policy this year, some still expanding
Structural Fiscal Balance (% of GDP)
“Output Gap” (% of GDP)
Source: WEO (“Output Gap” is the difference between expected growth for 2016 and that for 2021) Counter Cyclical
Fiscal PolicyPro‐cyclical Expansion
Brazil
Mexico
But financing constraints are likely to bind…
• Heterogeneous debt levels, fiscal deficits imply debt is rising• Some countries with combinations that are a concern…
(Gross) Debt/GDP
Overall Fiscal Balance (% of GDP) Source: WEO Oct 2016
Brazil
Mexico Jamaica
While countries have deficits, surpluses are needed just to stabilize debt levels…
Debt Sustainability Analysis
Required Fiscal Surplus and Adjustment to stabilize the ratio Debt/GDP, in % of GDP.
BaselineShocks
1pp increase in interest rate
1pp decrease in growth rate Combined
Required Surplus 0.85 1.33 1.33 1.81
Required Adjustment 2.29 2.76 2.77 3.24
Average Required Adjustment for 24 countries is 2.3% and this is assuming average potential growth of just over 3%. If potential growth has fallen required adjustments would be larger as they would if real interest rates rise
Source: IDB Staff Estimates
And again there is variation across countries…
(Gross) Debt/GDP
Required fiscal adjustment
Source: WEO, IDB and authors’ calculations
BrazilMexico
Jamaica
How did we get here? Policy in 2009
In the global financial crisis, 69% of the region’s GDP was expanding counter‐cyclically, i.e., countries were running deficits with output below potential
∆ Structural Primary Surplus
∆ Structural Primary Deficit
GDP below potential GDP above potential
% of regional GDP
35% of countries 10% of countries
55% of countries
“Time to Act” IDB 2016
Fiscal policy ‐ 2012
In 2012, expansionary fiscal policy remained despite GDP exceeding potential: 72% of the region’s GDP expanded fiscal spending pro‐cyclically
GDP below potential GDP above potential
% of regional GDP
4% of GDP
72% of GDP
22% of GDP
2% of GDP
25% of countries 20% of countries
40% of countries15% of countries
∆ Structural Primary Surplus
∆ Structural Primary Deficit
Fiscal policy ‐ 2015
By 2015, 64% of the region’s GDP were pro‐cyclically cutting spending and 25% continue to expand fiscal spending pro‐cyclically.
GDP below potential GDP above potential
% of regional GDP
32% of countries 16% of countries
21% of countries 31% of countries
∆ Structural Primary Surplus
∆ Structural Primary Deficit
The response to the crisis and its aftermath…(Summary of various IDB Macro Reports)
• Automatic stabilizers are weak• The crisis response relied on discretionary fiscal policies• But these focused on increasing transfers and salaries• (consumption rather than investment)• Spending increased largely on inflexible items • This was not reversed as output came back to potential• So we had a period of pro‐cyclical expansion• No doubt influenced by the commodity boom in some countries so
not enough was saved – see The Forking Paths of 2012
See www.iadb.org/macroreport
Fiscal Adjustment Programs
• 15 countries in LAC announced an adjustment program• Average length: 4 years, maximum: 10.0 (Brazil), excluding Brazil: average is 3.5, maximum is 5.0
• The average fiscal adjustment is 3.6% of GDP– 2.45% of GDP on average by cutting spending– 1.14% of GDP on average by increasing revenues
• Fiscal expenditures cuts– 1.84% of GDP on average current by spending reductions– 0.61% of GDP on average by capital spending reductions
Source: Internal survey of IDB Country Economists
What is the main constraint to the adoption of an adjustment Program?
• Executive (not keen to adjust): 33%• Congress (executive has a plan but cannot get through congress): 24%
• Fear of impact on growth: 24%• Other: 19%
Source: Internal survey of IDB Country Economists
More LAC countries now announced a program and more emphasis on cutting current spending
But optimistic budgeted GDP growth (2/3rd of countries). GDP growth in the 2016 budget is on average 0.6 p.p. above actual growth estimations
Source: Internal survey of IDB Country Economists
Explicit Growth Programs (in 13 of 21 countries),what are the main pillars?
• Public investment in 11 countries• Subsidies to specific sectors in 3 of countries• Red‐tape reduction in 3 of countries• Other pillars: Labor reform, Private investment, Energy Sector And Education, PPP projects...
Source: Internal survey of IDB Country Economists
11 of 21 countries have an explicitpublic investment program
• On average almost 9% of GDP in total…• And to be applied through following 4 years• Consistency with the adjustment effort?
Source: Internal survey of IDB Country Economists
10 Priorities for Adjustment in LAC
• In 1992 Blanchard and Cottarelli published 10 Commandments for Advanced Economies on iMF Direct
• These priorities draw on but also adapt that list…
Ten Priorities for “Considerate Consolidation”See “How to Adjust” on Ideas Matter
1) If output is below potential then “slow is pro.”, but have a credible medium term plan
2) Make targets explicit for fiscal outcomes and debt, if debt is high the plan should aim to reduce debt, if not stabilization may be enough
3) If taxation is high, don’t tax more, reduce spending, but if spending is low, look for ways to enhance revenues
4) Spending, look for cuts that will not affect growth, efficiency gains, reducing leakages, cutting subsidies that go to the non‐poor, avoid cutting productive capital investment – e.g.: see The Early Years
5) Consider more fundamental tax reforms and improving tax administration : inevitably tax reforms must be country specific, see More than Revenues for a review
Ten thoughts on “Considerate Consolidation”See “How to Adjust” on Ideas Matter
6) Develop a medium term plan to reduce informality, consider reducing labor and other taxes that incentivize informal activity
7) Consider pension reforms – see Savings for Development8) Make Considerate Consolidation consistent with a plan for growth:
structural reforms, investment programs and Rethink Prod. Dev. Pols.9) Strengthen fiscal institutions: when growth > potential again, there
should be fiscal savings, especially for commodity exporters10) Consider mechanisms to make fiscal and monetary policy consistent