Summary of Preliminary Study Result for Grant Aid Project

Date: 2008/02/12

１． Title of the Cooperation Project, Relevant Project Report The Project for Construction of Bridges in the Province of Nusa Tenggara Barat (Phase 2)

Project Activity: Reconstruction of 16Brideges and 1 Culvert on the provincial road

２． Categorization and its reason Category B

Reasons

a) The degree of impacts resulting from the project is not significant on the social and

natural environmental areas due to the small scale reconstruction of bridges and culverts

required on the existing provincial road. The Indonesian EIA law prescripts that full

scale EIA is not required for bridges not longer than 500 meters. However, an IEE

level (UKL+UPL) report, and an approval procedure by the provincial environmental

management agency (BAPEDALDA-NTB), are both required before construction

stage.

b) With regard to social matters, permanent and temporary land acquisition must be caused

by reconstruction structures at the BR34 and BR35. Although the Indonesian

government [Ministry of Public Works (PU)] has an appropriate law as well as

procedures for compensation, the Japan’s Government should monitor a negotiation

between land owners and the plan proponent (Ministry of Public Works). Furthermore,

the Indonesian procedure does not include any system of public involvement. Hence

the proponent in cooperation with the JICA Study Team should hold a stakeholder

meeting for consensus building in the basic design from the view of JICA’s

environmental and social consideration guidelines.

c) With regard to natural environment issues, no sensitive or protected areas are located in

the project site.

３． Outline of the Location (Maps, Environmental and Social Condition, Problems and so on) Project site is located in the Sumbawa Island as follows.

Figure-1 Project Location

Figure-2 Detailed Project Location Map

<Summary of project site is as follows> - Project area is located in West Sumbawa and Sumbawa district.

-Total population in the project site is approximately 25,000.(see following table)

Table-1 Population of Project Site Name of District Name of Village Population Household Remarks

Secongkang Bawah 1,369 236 － Sekongkang Atas 2,552 421 － Tongo 1,380 317 － Ari Kangkung 980 280 Including independent transmigrated village Tatar 734 209 Including independent transmigrated village

West Sumbawa/ Sekongkang

Talonanga 1,269 253 Current Transmigrated village: Tongo II SP2 Planned Transmigrated village: Batu Nampar

Lunyuk Rea 1,638 647 － Lunyuk Ode 1,197 292 － Jamu 1,237 315 Including independent transmigrated village Pada Suka 3,697 915 Planned Transmigrated village:Lamar Suaka Maju 3,155 723 Including independent transmigrated village Perung 2,384 740 Including independent transmigrated village

Sumbawa/ Lunyuk

Emang Lestari 3,137 922 Including independent transmigrated village Total 24,729 6,270 －

Source：Lunyuk/Sekongkang government 2006（BPS）

Mountainous Area (except transmigrated Area) Flat Area

0-45km Section 45-60km Sec.

４． Legal Framework of Environmental and Social Considerations (Law, Projects subject to EIA, Procedures, Information Disclosure and Stakeholder Participation)

a) Relevant Law for EIA / Environmental Permission

Name of Law:

-Law No. 23 of 1997 Environmental Management

-Government Regulation No. 27 of 1999 on Environmental Impact Assessment

- Decree of State Ministry for the Environment No. 17 of 2001 on Types of Business and/or

Activity Plans that are required to be completed with the Environmental Impact Assessment

- Decree of State Ministry for the Environment No.11 of 2006 on Types of Business and/or

Activity Plans that are Required to be Completed with the Environmental Impact

Assessment

b) Criteria of the full scale EIA and IEE

Table -2 Criteria for a full scale of EIA/ IEE

Laws Category

Decree of state Ministry of Env. No.11/2006

Decree of state Ministry of Public Works No.17/2003

Requirement of full scale EIA Bridge Length>=500m -

Requirement of IEE level

UKL+UPL

Propose from proponent to authority (NTB-BAPEDALDA)

Major Town (50,000-500,000) :Bridge Length>=60m

Medium Town(20,000-2000,000):Bridge Length>=20m

According to the environmental management agency (NTB-BAPEDALDA), EIA category

issues will be screened generally based on the proposal report from the proponent. However,

the person in charge of the EIA section NTB-BAPEDALDA commented that only an IEE

level report (UKL+UPL) will be required. This is because the degree of impact resulting

from the project must be limited, and it will not be significant for social and natural

environment issues.

An IEE level (UKL+UPL) procedure is shown in the figure below.

Figure-2 Procedures of Environmental Permission (UKL+UPL)

５． Outline of Relevant Agency and Institution which implement Project, EIA and so on Proponent of this project is the Ministry of Public Works (PU).

The organization chart of PU is as follows.

Figure-3 Organization Chart of PU (Ministry of Public Works) *Note) PU has EIA section under the planning section ( )

On the other hand, the environmental organization whose permission for this project is

required is the NTB provincial environmental management agency (NTB-BAPEDALDA).

This is so because the project site is located in more than two districts, West Sumbawa and

Sumbawa.

Figure-4 Section in charge of Environmental Permission

６． Outline of the Project, Analysis of Alternatives (Proposed Project, Comparative Examination of Alternatives, Selected Project on the basis of the Preliminary Study)

a)Outline of the Project

Reconstruction of 16 bridges and 1 culvert (see Table-4: Target Bridges and Culverts)

b)Analysis of Alternatives

Basically, the alternative-1 will be adopted from the view of social and natural

considerations (exception made of BR34 and BR35).

Table-3 Analysis of Alternatives Physical

Alternatives Impact to the Social area Impact to the

Natural area Impact to the Pollution

Remarks

Without Project (Option Zero)

It is impossible to cross rivers in the project site as no structures are available. Most of villagers will not be able to take emergency medical services. Logistics without transportation will be formulated by the self-sufficient community.

No impact resulting from the project

No impact resulting from the project

－

Physical Alternatives

Impact to the Social area Impact to the Natural area

Impact to the Pollution

Remarks

With Project Alternatuve-1 Reconstruction of the BR. and Culvert at the same location

Land acquisition must be avoided

Small impact resulting from the project due to the same alignment of access road.

Turbidity water will be caused by the construction activity (cutting land/drilling) during construction stage

Disadvantage on the cost and time because current sound causeways will not be used as diversion means

With Project Alternative-2 (Reconstruction at the up/down stream)

Permanent / temporary land acquisition will be caused at some points.

A certain level of deforest will be caused by changing alignment of access road.

Turbidity water will be caused by the construction activity (cutting land/drilling) during construction stage

Advantage on the cost and time because current sound causeways will be used as diversion

Table-4 List of Target Bridges and Culverts

St

ruct

ure

Type

Brid

geLe

ngth

(m)

BR

-1A

ir K

eruh

ⅠSe

kong

kang

30G

abio

nB

ridge

30JA

PAN

BR

-2A

ir K

eruh

ⅡSe

kong

kang

30G

abio

nB

ridge

30JA

PAN

BR

-3N

egen

e ⅠSe

kong

kang

25G

abio

n (D

amag

ed)

Brid

ge30

JAPA

ND

etou

r at U

pstre

am R

iver

Bed

BR

-4N

egen

e Ⅱ

Seko

ngka

ng10

Gab

ion

Box

Cul

vert

-IN

DO

NES

IAB

R-5

Tata

r ⅠSe

kong

kang

100

--

0IN

DO

NES

IAA

lignm

ent I

mpr

ovem

ent o

f Cut

Stre

tch

(Ste

ep G

BR

-6Ta

tar Ⅱ

Seko

ngka

ng15

--

0M

issin

gB

R-7

Tata

r ⅢSe

kong

kang

15Ro

ck P

lacing

Box

Cul

vert

-IN

DO

NES

IAB

R-8

Tata

r Lok

aSe

kong

kang

60G

abio

nB

ridge

50JA

PAN

BR

-9Ta

tar B

odo

Seko

ngka

ng25

Gab

ion

Brid

ge25

JAPA

NB

R-1

0La

bihe

ⅠSe

kong

kang

20G

abio

nB

ox C

ulve

rt-

JAPA

NB

R-1

1La

bihe

ⅡSe

kong

kang

20G

abio

n (D

amag

ed)

Brid

ge20

JAPA

ND

etou

r at U

pstre

am R

iver

Bed

BR

-12

Labi

he Ⅲ

Seko

ngka

ng20

Gab

ion

Brid

ge25

JAPA

NB

R-1

3M

one Ⅰ

Seko

ngka

ng20

--

0M

issin

gB

R-1

4M

one Ⅱ

Seko

ngka

ng15

--

0M

issin

gB

R-1

5M

one Ⅲ

Seko

ngka

ng10

--

0M

issin

gB

R-1

6Te

lona

ng Ⅰ

Seko

ngka

ng30

-B

ridge

30JA

PAN

Cro

ssin

g at

Sha

llow

Wat

er S

tream

BR

-17

Telo

nang

ⅡSe

kong

kang

15W

oode

n B

ridge

(Dam

aged

)B

ridge

10IN

DO

NES

IAB

ridge

Nam

e : B

atu

Nam

par,

Rem

aini

ng o

f Bot

BR

-18

Telo

nang

ⅢSe

kong

kang

10W

oode

n B

ridge

(Dam

aged

)B

ridge

10IN

DO

NES

IAD

ecay

of W

oode

n Pa

rts, D

etou

r at D

owns

tream

BR

-19

Sepa

ngLu

nyuk

40C

oncr

ete

Cau

se W

ayB

ridge

35JA

PAN

Exist

ing

Stru

ctur

e C

ompl

etio

n in

200

7 B

R-2

0Bo

nton

gLu

nyuk

20W

oode

n B

ridge

(Dam

aged

)B

ridge

20JA

PAN

Col

laps

e of

Old

Brid

ge, D

etou

r at U

pstre

am R

ivB

R-2

1Bo

n Ja

tiLu

nyuk

10W

oode

n B

ridge

(Dam

aged

)B

ridge

10IN

DO

NES

IAC

olla

pse

of O

ld B

ridge

, Det

our a

t Ups

tream

Riv

BR

-22

Blen

gkon

Luny

uk20

--

0M

issin

gB

R-2

3Te

bil

Luny

uk20

-B

ridge

20JA

PAN

Cro

ssin

g at

Sha

llow

Wat

er S

tream

BR

-24

Mom

il ⅠLu

nyuk

10-

Box

Cul

vert

-IN

DO

NES

IAB

ridge

Nam

e : G

rant

aB

R-2

5M

omil Ⅱ

Luny

uk30

RC

Brid

ge (N

ew)

--

L=10

m, W

=7.5

m, S

uper

stru

ctur

e: 6

- I B

eam

s ,

BR

-26

Krik

itLu

nyuk

15U

nder

Con

stru

ctio

n-

-IN

DO

NES

IAL=

10m

. Com

plet

ion

of A

butm

ents

, BR

-25

loca

tB

R-2

7La

mar

Luny

uk40

Con

cret

e C

ause

Way

Brid

ge40

JAPA

NEx

istin

g St

ruct

ure

Com

plet

ion

in 2

007

BR

-28

Aik

mad

Luny

uk15

-B

ox C

ulve

rt-

IND

ON

ESIA

BR

-29

Lian

g Ba

gikLu

nyuk

20C

oncr

ete

Cau

se W

ayB

ridge

20JA

PAN

Exist

ing

Stru

ctur

e C

ompl

etio

n in

200

7 B

R-3

0Pe

tain

ILu

nyuk

15C

oncr

ete

Cau

se W

ayB

ridge

20JA

PAN

Exist

ing

Stru

ctur

e C

ompl

etio

n in

200

7 B

R-3

1Pe

tain

IILu

nyuk

15C

oncr

ete

Cau

se W

ayB

ridge

15IN

DO

NES

IAEx

istin

g St

ruct

ure

Com

plet

ion

in 2

007

BR

-32

Peta

in III

Luny

uk20

--

0M

issin

gB

R-3

3M

olon

gLu

nyuk

15-

-0

Miss

ing

BR

-34

Eman

gLu

nyuk

30C

oncr

ete

Cau

se W

ayB

ridge

30JA

PAN

Exist

ing

Stru

ctur

e C

ompl

etio

n in

200

7 B

R-3

5K

albir

Luny

uk20

Con

cret

e C

ause

Way

Brid

ge20

JAPA

NEx

istin

g St

ruct

ure

Com

plet

ion

in 2

007

Nos

. of B

ridge

: 35

T

otal

Brid

ge L

engt

h : 8

25m

Nos

. of B

ridge

: 20

T

otal

Brid

ge L

engt

h : 4

90m

Nos

. of B

ridge

(≧20

m) :

21

Tot

al B

ridge

Len

gth

: 640

mN

os. o

f Brid

ge (≧

20m

) : 1

7 T

otal

Brid

ge L

engt

h : 4

45m

xt

JAPA

N/

IND

ON

ESIA

m

Res

ult o

f Rec

onna

issan

ce b

y JI

CA

Pre

limin

ary

Stud

y Te

amB

ridge

List

Req

uest

ed b

y In

done

sia

Rec

omm

enda

tion

Brid

geN

o.B

ridge

Loc

atio

n(S

ub-D

istr

ict)

Estim

ated

Leng

th o

fB

ridge

(m)

radi

ent o

f Cut

ting

Slop

e)

h A

butm

ents

, Det

our a

t Dow

nstre

am R

iver

Bed

er B

eder

Bed

Abu

tmen

t: R

Ced

nea

r Lun

yuk

than

BR

-26

arks

Re

ure

Stru

cist

ing

EB

ridge

Nam

e

７． Adverse Environmental and Social Impacts (Results of Scoping and Environmental and Social Considerations Studies)

Scoping matrix for the project is as follows.

Significant adverse impacts are not predicted on the social, natural and pollution areas.

Although some items will have certain degree of affection, they will be of small scale and

can be minimized by some appropriate mitigation measures.

Table-5 Scoping Matrix The Project for Construction of Bridges in the Province of

Nusa Tenggara Barat (Phase 2)

Planning Phase

Construction Phase

Post Construction

Likely Impacts

Com

preh

ensi

ve R

atin

g

Ove

rall

Rat

ing

Land

acq

uisi

tion

Cha

nge

of L

and

use

plan

, Con

trol o

f va

rious

act

iviti

es b

y re

gula

tions

for t

he

cons

truct

ion

Rec

lam

atio

n of

Wet

land

, etc

.

Def

ores

tatio

n A

ltera

tion

to g

roun

d by

cut

land

, fill

ing,

dr

illin

g, tu

nnel

, etc

. O

pera

tion

of C

onst

ruct

ion

Equ

ipm

ent

and

Vehi

cles

Con

stru

ctio

n of

Roa

ds, t

ollg

ates

, pa

rkin

g lo

ts, A

cces

s ro

ads

for b

ridge

s an

d ot

her r

elat

ed fa

cilit

ies

Traf

fic R

estri

ctio

n in

con

stru

ctio

n ar

ea

Influ

x of

con

stru

ctio

n w

orke

rs,

cons

truct

ion

of b

ase

cam

p

Incr

ease

of T

hrou

gh T

raffi

c

App

eara

nce/

Occ

upan

cy o

f Roa

ds a

nd

rela

ted

build

ing

stru

ctur

es

Incr

easi

ng in

flux

of s

ettle

rs

1 Resettlement B B

2 Local economy such as employment and livelihood, etc.

3 Land use and utilization of local resources B B B B B B B

4 Social institutions such as social infrastructure and local decision-making institutions

5 Existing social infrastructures and services

6 The poor, indigenous and ethnic people

7 Misdistribution of benefit and damage

8 Cultural heritage

9 Local conflict of interests C C

10 Water Usage or Water Rights and Rights of Common B B

11 Sanitation B

12 Hazards (Risk) Infectious diseases such as HIV/AIDS B B B B

Soc

ial E

nviro

nmen

t

13 Accidents B B B B 14 Topography and Geographical features

15 Soil Erosion

16 Groundwater

17 Hydrological Situation

18 Coastal Zone

19 Flora, Fauna and Biodiversity B B B

20 Meteorology Nat

ural

Env

ironm

ent

21 Landscape

No.

22 Global Warming B B B B

23 Air Pollution

24 Water Pollution B B B B

25 Soil Contamination

26 Waste B B B B B B

27 Noise and Vibration B B B B

28 Ground Subsidence

29 Offensive Odor

Pol

lutio

n

30 Bottom sediment

Rating: A: Serious impact is expected. B: Some impact is expected. C: Extent of impact is unknown (Examination is needed. Impacts may become clear as study progresses.) No Mark: Few impacts are expected. IEE/EIA is not necessary.

８． Mitigation and Monitoring for Key Impacts Mitigation measures and methodology of monitoring for key items are as follows.

Table-6 Mitigation Measures and Monitoring Methodology

No Target Items Selected from

JICA’s Guidelines Items to be inspected in the site

(BD and DD stage) Mitigation Measures

1 Involuntary Resettlement - Land owners for land acquisition/lease land

-Implementation of public consultation in the Basic Design -Participation of UKL+UPL evaluation committee (representative of the Regency)

2 Land use and utilization of local resources

- Land owners for land acquisition / lease land (farming land)

- Law based procedure should be taken

3 Existing social infrastructures and services -

- Adoption of alternative alignment in case of displacement

4 Local conflict of interests -

-Implementation of public consultation in the Basic Design -Participation of UKL+UPL evaluation committee(representative of the Regency)

5 Water Usage or Water Rights and Rights of Common

- Approach water using places near bridge

- Well points, spring water near bridge

- Adoption of easy-approach design of protection embankment to the river

- Adoption of alternative alignment in case of displacement

6 Hazards (Risk) Infectious diseases such as HIV/AIDS

- - Education for village people and construction workers

Social

7 Accidents - - Traffic safety campaign

Natural

8 Flora, Fauna and Biodiversity -

- Minimization of felling trees in the construction site -Implementation of law based procedures for cutting trees

9 Water Pollution - Measurement or observation of water quality

-Selection of construction methodology to avoid pollution - Monitoring of complaint procedures

10 Waste - Proper disposal of waste (oil from construction equipment and waste from base camp)

Pollution

11 Noise and Vibration - -Fixed construction time/date (in respect of residential area, religion considerations, praying time)

９． Consultation (state who has been contacted about the Project, means of contacting them, date when they were contacted and so on) No public consultation, or stakeholder meeting, has been held in this project based on

JICA’s guidelines and Indonesian laws at the moment. Furthermore, the Indonesian EIA

law prescripts that a public involvement process and information disclosure is applied in

case of full scale EIA (AMDAL), not IEE level (UKL+UPL).

Therefore, the JICA Preparatory Study Team recommended the holding of a stakeholder

meeting in the basic design; and the Indonesian Government agreed with this

recommendation basically. (See Figure-2 Procedures of Environmental Permission (UKL+UPL))

The JICA B/D study team should observe the above stakeholder meeting and report it in the

basic design stage.

１０． Social Acceptability in case of involving Involuntary Resettlement and Land Acquisition According to a rough planning for reconstruction structures, temporary land acquisition at

BR35, and permanent land acquisition, must be caused without resettlement.

The proponent (PU) will contact owners after preparation of the draft basic design, and law

-based process will be carried out for negotiation and compensation.

A family member of land owners commented: “We will agree to construct all structures and

follow government instructions, if they will be taking appropriate process and compensate

reasonable costs for land acquisition and displaced some properties.”

Table-7 Location of Land Acquisition and Compensation

BR Num. BR. Name

Area of Land Acquisition

Current Land-use Public Compensation Fee

BR-34 Emang Less than 1ha (approximately 2,000m2)

Compound of private house

14,000Rps./㎡×2,000= 28 million Rps.

BR-35 Kalbir Less than 1ha Paddy field Negotiation-based between landowner and proponent

Photo-1 Location of Permanent Land Acquisition at BR34

Figure-5 Topographical Map at BR34

Photo-2 Location of Temporary Land Acquisition at BR35