1 short title: new bri1 mutations - plant physiology · 65 last two decades, over 20 different bri1...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Short title: New BRI1 mutations 1
Corresponding author: Jia Li 2
Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Cell Activities and Stress Adaptations, 3
School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China 4
+86 931 8915662 5
Email: [email protected] 6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Plant Physiology Preview. Published on May 1, 2017, as DOI:10.1104/pp.17.00118
Copyright 2017 by the American Society of Plant Biologists
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
2
Scanning for new BRI1 receptor mutations via TILLING analysis 31
Chao Sun1, Kan Yan1, Jian-Ting Han1, Liang Tao1, Ming-Hui Lv1, Tao Shi1, 32
Yong-Xing He1, Michael Wierzba2, Frans E. Tax2, Jia Li1,* 33
34
1Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Cell Activities and Stress Adaptations, 35
School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China 36
37
2Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 38
85721, USA 39
40
*Corresponding author: Jia Li, [email protected] 41
42
Present address of Kan Yan: School of Chemical and Biological Engineering, 43
Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730000, China 44
45
One sentence summary: Nine morphologically altered new BRI1 mutants were identified 46
from 83 independent TILLING mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana. 47
48
List of author contributions: J. L. and F. E. T. conceived the research plans, 49
supervised the experiments and edited the manuscript; C. S. designed the experiments, 50
analyzed the data and prepared the draft of the article; C. S. and K. Y. performed most 51
of the experiments; L. T., M-H. L. and M. W. performed part of the experiments; J-T. 52
H. and Y-X. H. performed the molecular dynamic simulation analysis; T. S. helped 53
with the sequence analysis. 54
55
Funding information: This project is supported by the National Natural Science 56
Foundation of China (31470380 and 31530005 to Jia Li) 57
58
59
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
3
ABSTRACT 60
61
Identification and characterization of a mutational spectrum for a specific protein can 62
help to elucidate its detailed cellular functions. BRI1, a multidomain transmembrane 63
receptor-like kinase, is a major receptor of brassinosteroids in Arabidopsis. Within the 64
last two decades, over 20 different bri1 mutant alleles have been identified, which 65
helped to determine the significance of each domain within BRI1. To further 66
understand molecular mechanisms of BRI1, we tried to identify additional alleles via 67
TILLING. Here we report our identification of 83 new point mutations in BRI1, 68
including 9 mutations that exhibit an allelic series of typical bri1 phenotypes, from 69
subtle to severe morphological alterations. We carried out biochemical analyses to 70
investigate possible mechanisms of these mutations in affecting BR signaling. A 71
number of interesting mutations have been isolated via this study. For example, 72
bri1-702, the only weak allele identified so far with a mutation in the activation loop, 73
showed reduced autophosphorylation activity. bri1-705, a subtle allele with a 74
mutation in the extracellular portion, disrupts the interaction of BRI1 with its ligand 75
brassinolide (BL) and co-receptor BAK1. bri1-706, with a mutation in the 76
extracellular portion, is a subtle defective mutant. Surprisingly, root inhibition 77
analysis indicated that it is largely insensitive to exogenous BL treatment. In this study, 78
we found bri1-301 possess kinase activity in vivo, clarified a previous report arguing 79
that kinase activity may not be necessary for the function of BRI1. These data provide 80
additional insights into our understanding of the early events in the BR signaling 81
pathway. 82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
4
INTRODUCTION 90
91
Brassinosteroids (BRs) are known to play critical roles in regulating many aspects of 92
plant growth and development, including germination, cell elongation, flowering time 93
control, reproduction, photomorphogenesis, and skotomorphogenesis (Clouse and 94
Sasse, 1998; Gudesblat and Russinova, 2011; Wang et al., 2012; Zhu et al., 2013). 95
Recent studies revealed that BRs are also involved in many additional physiological 96
processes, such as root meristem maintenance (Gonzalez-Garcia et al., 2011; Hacham 97
et al., 2011; Vilarrasa-Blasi et al., 2014; Chaiwanon and Wang, 2015; Wei and Li, 98
2016), stomatal development (Gudesblat et al., 2012; Kim et al., 2012), root hair 99
differentiation (Cheng et al., 2014), leaf angle regulation in monocots (Zhang et al., 100
2012), shoot branching control (Wang et al., 2013), and organ boundary determination 101
(Bell et al., 2012; Gendron et al., 2012). 102
In Arabidopsis, BRs are perceived by their major receptor BRASSINOSTEROID 103
INSENSITIVE 1 (BRI1) and co-receptor BRI1-ASSOCIATE RECEPTOR KINASE 1 104
(BAK1), both of which are single-pass transmembrane leucine-rich repeat 105
receptor-like protein kinases (LRR-RLKs) (Li and Chory, 1997; Li et al., 2002; Nam 106
and Li, 2002; Gou et al., 2012). There are 25 total extracellular LRRs in BRI1. 107
Between 21st and 22nd LRR, there is an amino acid sequence containing 68 residues 108
named as an “island”. Genetic and structural analyses indicated that the “island” and 109
the 22nd LRR are directly involved in BR binding. In the absence of BRs, the kinase 110
activity of BRI1 is inhibited by its carboxyl terminus (Wang et al., 2005) and by its 111
associated inhibitory protein named as BRI1 KINASE INHIBITOR 1 (BKI1) (Wang 112
and Chory, 2006). When BRs are present, on the other hand, they can directly interact 113
with the extracellular pocket of BRI1, causing BKI1 to dissociate from the complex 114
(Wang and Chory, 2006; Hothorn et al., 2011; She et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2014). The 115
newly formed BRI1-BL surface can directly interact with the extracellular residues of 116
BAK1 via several hydrogen bonds (Santiago et al., 2013; Sun et al., 2013). The 117
BRI1-BL-BAK1 complex can then initiate early BR signaling events and activate its 118
downstream signaling cascade (Wang et al., 2008). Genetic and structural analyses 119
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
5
demonstrated the essential roles of both BRI1 and BAK1 in controlling BR signal 120
transduction (Clouse et al., 1996; Li and Chory, 1997; Hothorn et al., 2011; She et al., 121
2011; Gou et al., 2012; Santiago et al., 2013; Sun et al., 2013). 122
During the past two decades, over 20 unique bri1 alleles have been isolated 123
(Clouse et al., 1996; Li and Chory, 1997; Noguchi et al., 1999; Friedrichsen et al., 124
2000; Xu et al., 2008; Belkhadir et al., 2010; Shang et al., 2011; Gou et al., 2012). 125
Analyses of these mutants have contributed significantly to our better understanding 126
of BRI1 in regulating plant growth and development (Vert et al., 2005). These alleles 127
share similar phenotypes in various degrees, including dwarfism, dark-green, compact 128
rosette leaves with short petioles, delayed flowering time and senescence, reduced 129
male fertility, and altered both photomorphogenesis and skotomorphogenesis (Clouse, 130
1996; Kwon and Choe, 2005). Most alleles exhibiting the strongest morphological 131
defects contain point mutations in the “island” or kinase domain (Friedrichsen et al., 132
2000). BRI1 was first cloned via a map based strategy (Li and Chory, 1997). Many of 133
the early isolated bri1 alleles are strong alleles with largely reduced male sterility, 134
preventing their use in large scale genetic transformation assays. Fertile weak bri1 135
alleles, such as bri1-5 and bri1-9, on the other hand, are excellent genetic tools used 136
for characterizing the entire BR signaling pathway via extragenic modifier screens 137
(Noguchi et al., 1999). For example, several key components regulating BR signal 138
transduction or BR homeostasis were identified via activation tagging genetic screens 139
using bri1-5 as background, including BRS1 (Li et al., 2001), BAK1 (Li et al., 2002), 140
BSU1 (Mora-Garcia et al., 2004), BRL1 (Zhou et al., 2004), BEN1 (Yuan et al., 2007), 141
and TCP1 (Guo et al., 2010). EBS1 to EBS7, a series of functionally related proteins 142
mediating endoplasmic reticulum (ER) quality control, were isolated via a suppressor 143
screen from ethylmethanesulfonate (EMS) mutagenized bri1-9 (Jin et al., 2007; Jin et 144
al., 2009; Su et al., 2011; Hong et al., 2012; Su et al., 2012; Liu et al., 2015). BES1, a 145
key downstream transcription factor in the BR signaling pathway, was identified via a 146
suppressor screen utilizing an EMS mutagenized bri1-119 library (Yin et al., 2002). 147
Identification of these key regulatory components by using weak bri1 mutants has 148
contributed significantly to our current knowledge of the BR signaling pathway, from 149
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
6
BR perception to downstream responsive gene regulation. 150
In order to deeply understand the molecular mechanisms of BRI1 in regulating 151
the BR signaling pathway, we analyzed all BRI1 point mutations generated from a 152
Targeted Induced Local Lesions IN Genomes (TILLING) project (McCallum et al., 153
2000). Among 83 total BRI1 point mutations isolated, we identified 9 mutants, 154
including 4 subtle, 1 weak, and 4 strong alleles. For example, bri1-702 is a new weak 155
allele with a mutation in the activation loop of the BRI1 kinase domain. Several 156
previously identified bri1 activation loop point mutants are all strong alleles. 157
Therefore, bri1-702 represents the first weak allele bearing a point mutation in the 158
activation loop. bri1-705 is a new subtle allele containing a point mutation in the 159
extracellular portion. Structural analysis suggests that this mutation likely disrupts the 160
formation of hydrogen bonds among BRI1, brassinolide (BL), and BAK1. A third 161
interesting mutant is bri1-706, containing a point mutation in the 8th LRR of the 162
extracellular portion of BRI1. bri1-706 shows a subtle aerial part defective phenotype 163
compared to wild-type (WT) plants, but its root growth is largely insensitive to 164
exogenously applied BL. The new mutants identified from these studies can be used 165
as genetic tools for further dissecting the functions of BRI1, as well as utilizing as 166
references for studying the biological functions of other RLKs in plants. 167
168
RESULTS 169
170
A series of new bri1 alleles were identified via TILLING analyses 171
172
BRI1, the major receptor of brassinosteroids in Arabidopsis, contains multiple 173
functional domains (Li and Chory, 1997; Friedrichsen et al., 2000). Mutational 174
analyses have helped to characterize the biological significance of each of these 175
domains. To further dissect the roles of BRI1 in the BR signaling pathway, we tried to 176
identify all possible BRI1 mutations and identify the mutants with altered phenotypes. 177
TILLING is a reverse genetic method using a high-throughput screening 178
technology to detect point mutations from an EMS mutagenized library (McCallum et 179
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
7
al., 2000). Using this approach, a large number of mutations can be isolated for a 180
specific target gene. TILLING has been used to generate mutations for a number of 181
important genes including BRI1 in Arabidopsis (Till et al., 2003). All 87 BRI1 182
TILLING mutations were obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center 183
(ABRC) and 83 mutations were confirmed by a dCAPs method (Neff et al., 1998). 184
These mutations are distributed throughout the entire BRI1 sequence, especially in 185
LRR1-10 of its extracellular portion, “island” and kinase domain (Supplemental 186
Figure S1). These mutations were generated in Columbia (Col-0) background 187
containing an er mutation. A high dose of EMS could introduce mutations in other 188
genes that could result in BRI1-unrelated phenotypes. In order to remove those 189
additional mutations, we backcrossed the mutants with Col-0 for at least three 190
generations. Offspring plants containing BRI1 mutations were selected by using the 191
dCAPs approach (Neff et al., 1998). After backcrossing three times, most mutations 192
were found to exhibit no morphological differences from wild-type plants. Only 9 193
mutations consistently exhibit typical bri1-like phenotypes. These mutants were 194
named in the order of their identification, from bri1-702 to bri1-711 (Figure 1, Table 195
1). 196
To further confirm their bri1-related phenotypes, we carried out additional two 197
backcrosses for the 9 new mutants isolated via TILLING. In the F2 generation of the 198
third backcrossing, the phenotypes of bri1-702, bri1-705, bri1-706, bri1-710 and 199
bri1-711 were segregated out as single recessive alleles with a ratio close to 3:1. 200
However, for strong alleles, the ratio is less than 4:1, which might be caused by lower 201
germination rates as observed previously (Steber and McCourt, 2001). Thus, the 202
phenotype appears to be caused by a single locus for all 9 different mutants. bri1-702 203
shows a weak bri1 phenotype similar to bri1-5, bri1-9 and bri1-301 (Figure 2A) 204
(Noguchi et al., 1999; Xu et al., 2008). In comparison, bri1-705, bri1-706, bri1-710 205
and bri1-711 show even weaker phenotypes than bri1-702, which were therefore 206
named as subtle alleles in this study. Whereas bri1-703, bri1-704, bri1-708, and 207
bri1-709 show severe phenotypes similar to a previously reported bri1 null allele, 208
bri1-701 (Figure 2A) (Gou et al., 2012). Interestingly, bri1-707 and bri1-301 both 209
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
8
have mutations in Gly989, but with different amino acid substitutions. As a 210
consequence, bri1-301 shows a weak bri1 phenotype (Xu et al., 2008), whereas 211
bri1-707 does not show any defective phenotypes. Similarly, bri1-708 and 212
bri1-8/108-112 bear different mutations at the same residue. While bri1-8/108-112 are 213
intermediate bri1 mutants (Noguchi et al., 1999), bri1-708 shows a null bri1 214
phenotype (Figure 2A). Statistically, all these 9 new bri1 mutants show significantly 215
reduced growth (Figure 2B). 216
To exclude the possibility that the phenotypes are caused by mutations of other 217
genes closely linked to BRI1, which are not easily segregated out by backcrossing, we 218
crossed these mutants with a number of known bri1 weak alleles. If the phenotype is 219
caused by a mutation in a different gene, the F1 seedlings should show a wild-type 220
phenotype due to functional complementation. All the obtained F1 seedlings show 221
bri1 like phenotypes (Figure 3A). In addition, we transformed the wild-type BRI1 222
sequence driven by its native promoter into these 9 different bri1 mutant alleles. The 223
transgenic plants showed BRI1-overexpressing phenotypes in WT background (Figure 224
3B) (Wang et al., 2001; Nam and Li, 2002). We next transformed the genomic DNA 225
sequences (containing BRI1 promoter and its coding sequences) of bri1-702 and 226
bri1-705 to the null mutant, bri1-701. The resulting transgenic plants resembled the 227
phenotypes of bri1-702 and bri1-705, respectively (Figure 3C). These genetic and 228
transgenic results demonstrated that all 9 new mutants are truly allelic to bri1. 229
230
Characterization of newly identified bri1 mutants 231
232
Root inhibition analysis indicated that bri1-702 and bri1-705 are less sensitive to 233
exogenously applied BL (Figure 4A). It is interesting that the rosette of bri1-706 is 234
significantly bigger than bri1-702 and bri1-705 (Figure 2A), but its root growth is 235
almost completely insensitive to BL treatment, similar to that of null bri1 mutants 236
(Figure 4A and 4D). bri1-707, bri1-710 and bri1-711 show slightly reduced 237
sensitivity to BL compared to Col-0 (Figure 4B). All new bri1 strong mutants, 238
including bri1-703, bri1-704, bri1-708 and bri1-709, are insensitive to BL similar to 239
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
9
bri1-701 (Figure 4C) (Gou et al., 2012). Previous studies indicated that bri1 weak 240
mutant show reduced sensitivity to BL but increased sensitivity to brassinazole (BRZ), 241
a specific BR biosynthetic inhibitor (Asami et al., 2000; Yin et al., 2002). We 242
therefore tested the sensitivity of these new bri1 alleles to BRZ under darkness. As 243
expected, the hypocotyl growth of weak and subtle alleles exhibited hypersensitivity 244
to BRZ, whereas all strong alleles are insensitive to the BRZ treatment (Figure 4E). 245
These data indicated the new bri1 alleles exhibit typical bri1 phenotypes and reduced 246
sensitivity to exogenously applied BL. 247
Previous studies also indicated that, upon application of exogenous BL, the 248
expression of the BR biosynthesis gene CPD is down-regulated and the expression of 249
a BR response gene, SAUR-AC1, is up-regulated (Li et al., 2001; Yin et al., 2005). In 250
addition, the phosphorylation status of BES1 also can be used as an indicator of 251
downstream signaling response to the BL treatment (Yin et al., 2002; Sun et al., 2010; 252
Yu et al., 2011). Quantitative real-time PCR was performed to examine the expression 253
levels of CPD and SAUR-AC1 in WT and newly identified bri1 mutants treated with 254
or without 1 μM BL (Figure 5A and 5B). Similar to previous reports, the expression 255
of SAUR-AC1 was increased dramatically in Col-0 but had no significant change in 256
bri1-701 after the BL treatment. The expression of SAUR-AC1 in the newly identified 257
weak and subtle bri1 alleles exhibited reduced sensitivity to the BL treatment, 258
whereas in newly identified strong bri1 alleles, the expression of SAUR-AC1 is 259
insensitive to the treatment of BL and remained at a lower level of expression with or 260
without the treatment (Figure 5A). Similar to the SAUR-AC1 response, the CPD 261
responses of bri1-702 and bri1-705 showed reduced sensitivity to the BL treatment 262
(Figure 5B). Although the expression levels of CPD in BR-treated bri1-706, bri1-707, 263
bri1-710, and bri1-711 decreased relatively to the same degree compared to Col-0, 264
basal expression levels of CPD without BL treatment were higher than WT, 265
suggesting that the BR signaling is indeed partially altered in these mutants (Figure 266
5B). 267
We next investigated the phosphorylation status of BES1 in WT and in the newly 268
identified bri1 mutants with or without 1 μM BL application (Figure 5C and 5D). In 269
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
10
Col-0, two almost equal intensity bands, representing phosphorylated and 270
unphosphorylated forms of BES1 were detected without the treatment of BL. After 271
the BL treatment, phosphorylated BES1 was greatly reduced and unphosphorylated 272
BES1 was significantly accumulated in Col-0, suggesting that the BR signaling 273
pathway is functional. In bri1-702 and bri1-705, only a small amount of 274
unphosphorylated BES1 was detected after the BL treatment. In the strong bri1 alleles 275
bri1-701, bri1-703, bri1-704, bri1-708, and bri1-709, the accumulation of 276
unphosphorylated BES1 could not be easily observed after the treatment of BL. In 277
subtle alleles, bri1-711, bri1-710, and bri1-706, the accumulation of 278
unphosphorylated BES1 is similar to that in Col-0 upon the treatment of 1μM BL. It is 279
intriguing that bri1-301 and bri1-707 contain different missense mutations at the same 280
residue, but the BES1 response to BL is totally different. bri1-301 remains partial 281
sensitivity while bri1-707 is completely sensitive to the treatment of BL (Figure 5C 282
and 5D). These molecular and biochemical results confirmed that bri1-706, bri1-710, 283
and bri1-711 are subtle alleles of bri1. 284
285
bri1-702, with a point mutation in the activation loop of BRI1, shows reduced 286
autophosphorylation activity 287
288
Autophosphorylation, especially the ‘pocket opening’ of the activation loop, is a 289
common activation mechanism for protein kinases (Oh et al., 2000). In order to 290
understand whether the mutations in the newly identified bri1 mutants affect the 291
kinase activity of BRI1, we used the phospho-amino acid stain Pro-Q Diamond to 292
detect the autophosphorylation activity of E. coli expressed mutant BRI1 cytoplasmic 293
domain (CD) fused with a maltose binding protein (MBP-BRI1-CD) (Figure 6A and 294
6B). After sequential staining with the Pro-Q Diamond and Coomassie blue silver, the 295
E. coli cell lysate which contains the expressed bri1-301-CD, exhibited an 296
undetectable kinase activity in vitro, similar to the results from a previous report (Xu 297
et al., 2008). However, bri1-707-CD, which bears a different substitution at the same 298
residue with bri1-301-CD, showed reduced but detectable autophosphorylation 299
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
11
activity (Figure 6A and 6B). Interestingly, compared to the undetectable kinase 300
activities of other intracellular bri1 mutants, bri1-702, a weak allele with a mutation 301
in the activation loop, still shows autophosphorylation activity, although it is partially 302
reduced compared to WT (Figure 6A and 6B). This result indicated that mutation of 303
bri1-702 leads to reduced kinase activity of BRI1 and therefore attenuated BR signal 304
transduction. 305
To confirm these results in vivo, we generated transgenic plants overexpressing 306
BAK1-GFP in Col-0 and various genotypic backgrounds. A phosphothreonine 307
antibody was used to detect the phosphorylation on threonine residues of 308
immunoprecipitated BAK1-GFP from different backgrounds applied with or without 309
BL (Figure 6C). Similar to a previous report (Wang et al., 2008), the phosphorylation 310
level of BAK1 was strongly enhanced by the BL treatment or by overexpressing BRI1 311
in Col-0. The phosphorylation of BAK1 was reduced to an almost undetectable level 312
and exhibited no response to BL treatment in bri1 null alleles. In bri1-702 and 313
bri1-301, the phosphorylation level of BAK1 was slightly induced by exogenously 314
applied BL. Interestingly, without BL, the phosphorylation level of BAK1 was much 315
higher in these two weak alleles than even in WT (Figure 6C). These results suggested 316
that bri1-702, the only weak allele in activation loop identified so far, exhibited not 317
only a reduced autophosphorylation activity of BRI1 in vitro but also a reduced 318
sensitivity of BAK1 phosphorylation response to exogenously applied BL in vivo. 319
Even though in vitro bri1-301 autophosphorylation could not be detected as 320
previously reported (Xu et al., 2008), BAK1 phosphorylation in bri1-301 background 321
is much higher than that in bri1-701 and is induced by the addition of BL. This result 322
suggests that bri1-301 is indeed partially functional towards its substrate in vivo, 323
clarifying a previous argument regarding whether the kinase activity of BRI1 is even 324
critical to the BR signaling transduction (Xu et al., 2008). 325
326
327
328
329
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
12
Overexpression of mBAK1 failed to generate a dominant negative phenotype in 330
bri1-705 331
332
Structural analysis suggested the extracellular portions of BRI1 and BAK1 can form a 333
BL-induced complex (Santiago et al., 2013; Sun et al., 2013). Several crucial surfaces 334
for the interaction of BRI1 and BAK1 were also identified, among which were two 335
residues of BRI1 (Thr726 and Met727) directly associated with BAK1 via 336
hydrophobic interactions (Santiago et al., 2013; Sun et al., 2013). Coincidentally, 337
bri1-705, a new subtle allele with a typical BR-deficient phenotype, contained a 338
nearby mutation at Pro719 to Leu which may affect interaction between BRI1 and 339
BAK1. In order to test this hypothesis, a series of transgenic analyses were carried out. 340
Based on previous studies, overexpression of BAK1 can suppress the phenotype of 341
bri1-5, while overexpression of a kinase-inactive version of BAK1 (mBAK1), in 342
which a point mutation is introduced on a conserved lysine residue within the ATP 343
binding site, results in a dominant negative phenotype (Li et al., 2002; Gou et al., 344
2012). Both genetic suppression and dominant negative phenotypes rely on 345
interactions between the extracellular portion of BRI1 and BAK1. If a mutation in 346
BRI1 disrupts the interaction with BAK1 or mBAK1, overexpression of mBAK1 may 347
not dramatically alter the phenotype of the bri1 mutant. BAK1-GFP and mBAK1-GFP 348
were transformed to a series of weak bri1 alleles. Consistent with previous reports (Li 349
et al., 2002), the defective phenotype of bri1-5 was partially rescued by 350
overexpressing BAK1 but greatly enhanced by overexpressing mBAK1 (Supplemental 351
Figure S2). Overexpression of BAK1 or mBAK1 in bri1-301 and bri1-702 resulted in 352
phenotypes similar to those in bri1-5 (Figure 7) (Li et al., 2002). However, 353
overexpression of BAK1 or mBAK1 failed to dramatically alter the phenotype of 354
bri1-705 (Figure 7), suggesting the mutation in bri1-705 may interfere with the 355
interaction between bri1-705 and BAK1 or mBAK1. These genetic data demonstrated 356
that the BL-dependent extracellular heterodimerization of BRI1 and BAK1 is an 357
important step in the initiation of BR signaling. 358
359
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
13
To further confirm this notion, we performed a molecular dynamic simulation 360
(MD) analysis of the BRI1-BL-BAK1 structure. The fluctuation of 120 ns MD 361
trajectories obtained from two simulation systems (the wild-type complex and 362
BRI1-Pro719Leu complex) were monitored by using the root mean square deviation 363
(RMSD) of the backbone atoms of BRI1, BAK1 and BL (Supplemental Figure S3). It 364
can be clearly seen that the RMSD values of both BRI1-Pro719Leu and wild-type 365
BRI1 oscillate at ~ 4 Å after 20 ns whereas the structural fluctuations of BAK1 and 366
BL are significantly higher in the BRI1-Pro719Leu complex compared to the 367
wild-type complex, implying that the Pro719Leu mutation of BRI1 may destabilize 368
the interactions of BRI1-BL and BRI1-BAK1. The simulation analysis also showed 369
that the mutation leads to significant conformation alterations of Arg717, which 370
precedes Pro719 and has the propensity to change from a random coil to a β-turn in 371
the mutant complex. Meanwhile, the β-turn structure formed by Asn705 and Ile706 in 372
the wild-type complex seems to be destabilized and prone to show a random coil 373
conformation in the mutant complex (Figure 8A). Analysis of the interaction 374
interfaces revealed the hydrogen bonding of the residue Asn705, which bridges the 375
side-chain of His61 from BAK1 and the hydroxyl group of BL, was continuously 376
interrupted in the BRI1-Pro719Leu complex during the last 20 ns simulation (Figure 377
8B). Additionally, the hydrogen bond between the main-chain oxygen atom of His61 378
from BAK1 and the hydroxyl group of BL also breaks up more frequently in the 379
BRI1-Pro719Leu complex compared to the wild-type complex (Figure 8B). Taken 380
together, these results suggest the mutation in bri1-705 results in significant local 381
conformational changes involving the residue Asn705 that interacts with both BAK1 382
and BL, thus destabilizing the pairwise interactions among BRI1, BAK1 and BL 383
(Figure 8C). 384
385
bri1 point mutants exhibiting defective phenotypes all bear point mutations 386
within conserved residues among BRI1s and BRLs 387
388
Eighty-three missense mutations of BRI1 were isolated in this study, among which 9 389
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
14
point mutations resulted in typical bri1 phenotypes including one mutation that 390
generated a premature stop codon, and 74 point mutations did not show any 391
significant phenotypes in normal laboratory growing conditions. There were 16 392
different bri1 point mutants identified in previous reports (premature stop mutants are 393
not included). Altogether, 98 point mutations of BRI1 have been found so far. We 394
were curious whether these 24 bri1 point mutants (16 previously identified plus 8 395
newly identified) with mutant phenotypes all contain point mutations in conserved 396
residues. We thus carried out a sequence alignment among 70 BRI1s or BRLs from 18 397
sequenced flowering plant species (Figure 9A). As expected, all of these mutants are 398
mutated at conserved residues, but their phenotypes are not positively related to the 399
degree of conservation. Surprisingly, not all mutations of conserved residues exhibit 400
defective phenotypes (Figure 9A). As BRI1 is a typical LRR-RLK with multiple 401
functional domains, we also performed sequence analysis among all LRR-RLKs from 402
Arabidopsis thaliana (Figure 9B). These results indicated that not all mutation 403
residues of 24 bri1mutants are conserved among all LRR-RLKs. These residues may 404
be particularly important for specific BRI1 functions which have been evolutionarily 405
selected. We also found that not all mutations of conserved residues among all 406
LRR-RLKs exhibit defective phenotypes (Figure 9B). 407
408
DISCUSSION 409
410
The activation loop is a crucial region for protein kinase activity (Oh et al., 2000). 411
Sequence analysis indicated most residues in the activation loop are extremely 412
conserved in 70 BRI1s/BRLs obtained from 18 sequenced flowering plant species 413
(Supplemental Figure S4A). Besides, there are several residues in the activation loop 414
of BRI1 that are also conserved in all Arabidopsis LRR-RLKs (Supplemental Figure 415
S4B). Two new bri1 strong alleles, bri1-703 and bri1-704, contain mutations in the 416
last and first residues of the BRI1 activation loop respectively, and both of which are 417
extremely conserved not only in BRI1s or BRLs but also in all other Arabidopsis 418
LRR-RLKs. Two previously reported alleles, bri1-103/104 and bri1-115, with 419
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
15
mutations on extremely conserved residues among BRI1s or BRLs but less conserved 420
among all other LRR-RLKs, also show strong bri1 phenotypes (Supplemental Figure 421
S4) (Li and Chory, 1997; Friedrichsen et al., 2000). We found that bri1-702, the only 422
weak allele in the activation loop of BRI1, contains a mutation in Pro1050 which is 423
extremely conserved in BRI1s or BRLs but not conserved in all other LRR-RLKs 424
(Supplemental Figure S4). However, there is also a mutation found via TILLING in 425
Arg1032Lys which has the same degree of conservation with bri1-103/104 among 426
BRI1s or BRLs but showed no defective phenotypes, possibly because it is mutated to 427
lysine, which shows similar degree of conservation with arginine in other LRR-RLKs 428
(Supplemental Figure S4). Among all Arabidopsis LRR-RLKs, several residues 429
mutated in bri1 alleles are not even conserved. We suggest that these mutation 430
residues may be related to the specificity of the BRI1-mediated signaling pathway 431
(Figure 9B). 432
In previous studies, the importance of the BRI1 kinase activity was questioned 433
because bri1-301-KD showed no kinase activity in vitro, either via an 434
autophosphorylation assay or an analysis for its phosphorylation activity towards 435
BAK1, but exhibits a weak bri1 phenotype (Xu et al., 2008). In our studies, 436
bri1-301-CD fusion protein extracted from E. coli also could not be stained by 437
phosphoprotein diamond Pro-Q (Figure 6A and 6B). However, we noticed that unlike 438
a bri1 null allele, the BAK1 phosphorylation level in bri1-301 is even higher than that 439
of wild-type as detected by immunoblotting using a phosphothreonine antibody 440
(Figure 6C). This is possibly caused by higher endogenous levels of BL in bri1-301 as 441
was found in other bri1 mutants (Noguchi et al., 1999). The phosphorylation level of 442
BAK1 in bri1-301 can be significantly induced by BL in vivo (Figure 6C). This result 443
indicated bri1-301-CD possesses kinase activity for its substrate BAK1 in vivo. The 444
undetectable autophosphorylation of bri1-301-CD in vitro may be caused by protein 445
misfolding when expressed in E. coli. 446
In this study, we also have some interesting findings from analyzing new bri1 447
mutant alleles. For example, bri1-707 (Gly989Glu, Col-0 accession) contains the 448
same mutation as bri1-301 (Gly989Ile, Col-0 accession) but with a different amino 449
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
16
acid substitution. As a result, bri1-707 shows a WT-like phenotype (Figure 2). 450
Actually, the change of Gly to Glu is predicted to substitute a larger side chain than 451
Gly to Ile because of an additional carboxyl group in Glu. Similarly, the new strong 452
allele bri1-708 (Arg983Gly, Col-0 accession) also bears a point mutation at the same 453
residue as bri1-8 (Arg983Gln, WS2 accession) and bri1-108-112 (Arg983Gln, Col-0 454
accession). However, the Arg to Gly substitution causes a greater phenotypical 455
alteration than the Arg to Gln substitution. These results indicated that the 456
mechanisms of point mutation are complicated and may involve in structural changes. 457
We identified an extracellular subtle mutant bri1-705, which has an amino acid 458
substitution close to the BRI1-BAK1 interaction surface. Unlike other weak alleles, 459
such as bri1-5, bri1-702 and bri1-301, overexpression of mBAK1 in bri1-705 failed to 460
generate a dominant negative phenotype (Figure 7). This result suggested that the 461
mutation in bri1-705 may affect the interaction between the extracellular portions of 462
BRI1 and BAK1. This is further supported by the MD simulation results, indicating 463
that the mutation in bri1-705 results in significant local conformational changes, 464
causing the disruption of three pairs of hydrogen bonds formed between 465
BRI1-Asn705 and BAK1-His61, BRI1-Asn705 and BL, and BAK1-His61 and BL. 466
Alterations of this hydrogen bonding network could potentially destabilize the 467
pairwise interactions among BRI1, BAK1 and BL and lead to decreased binding 468
affinity of the BRI1-BAK1 extracellular portions. Our data therefore provide 469
additional genetic and structural evidence for the crucial role of BL-dependent 470
BRI1-BAK1 heterodimerization in the early events of BR signaling. 471
During our study, we identified another surprising bri1 mutant, bri1-706. 472
bri1-706 only shows a subtle morphological phenotype compared to other weak 473
alleles isolated so far (Figure 2). However, root inhibition and hypocotyl promotion 474
assays showed that bri1-706 is greatly insensitive to the treatment of BL (Figure 4A, 475
Supplemental Figure S5A). When pBRI1::BRI1 was introduced in bri1-706, both the 476
phenotype and insensitivity to BL were completely restored (Figure 3B, Supplemental 477
Figure S5B). Endo H analyses indicated that bri1-706 proteins are partially retained in 478
ER in 10-day-old seedlings, in which roots and shoots of the seedlings showed no 479
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
17
significant differences (Supplementation Figure S5C-D and S6). But CPD 480
down-regulation and unphosphorylated BES1 accumulation in response to exogenous 481
BL in bri1-706 are similar to those of wild-type seedlings (Supplemental Figure 482
S5E-G). This is the first bri1 mutant showing that phenotypic severity is not 483
positively correlated to the degree of insensitivity to exogenous BL application. These 484
data suggest that the specific mutation found in bri1-706 may have destructed the 485
interaction of bri1-706 with an unknown protein which may regulate a branch of the 486
BR signaling pathway. Detailed molecular mechanisms regarding how bri1-706 487
affects root growth sensitivity to BL need to be further investigated in the near future. 488
We identified a strong allele, bri1-709, in which a point mutation results in a 489
premature stop codon within the juxtamembrane region (Supplemental Figure S7A). 490
Interestingly, a specific band which is smaller than that in Col-0 can be detected by an 491
immunoblotting assay using total proteins from bri1-709 plants with an anti-BRI1 492
antibody (Supplemental Figure S7B). This result suggests that the early stop codon of 493
bri1-709 did not disrupt the protein transport of BRI1, and that a partial BRI1 protein 494
without the kinase domain and the carboxyl terminus is expressed in bri1-709. This 495
mutant can be used for future genetic and biochemical analyses. 496
In previous studies, two extracellular weak alleles, bri1-5 and bri1-9, were found 497
to be retained in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), because the mutational BRI1 498
proteins interact with ER chaperones and fail to pass the ER quality control system 499
(Jin et al., 2007; Hong et al., 2008; Jin et al., 2009). In order to test whether BRI1 is 500
retained in the ER for our newly identified extracellular mutation alleles, we 501
performed an Endo H analysis (Supplemental Figure S6). The results indicated that 502
BRI1 is not retained on ER in bri1-710 and bri1-711, and partially retained on ER in 503
bri1-705 and bri1-706. In bri1-705 and bri1-706, there is still a considerable amount 504
of BRI1 which is resistant to Endo H cleavage, suggesting partially retained bri1-705 505
or bri1-706 on ER may not be the main reason causing their defective phenotypes. 506
507
508
509
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
18
CONCLUSIONS 510
511
In this study, we analyzed 83 BRI1 point mutations generated by TILLING, among 512
which 9 mutants showed typical bri1 mutant phenotypes. bri1-702 is a weak allele. 513
bri1-705, bri1-706, bri1-710, and bri1-711, are subtle alleles. bri1-703, bri1-704, 514
bri1-708, and bri1-709 are strong alleles, similar to bri1-701 (Figure 1, Table 1). 515
bri1-702, the first weak allele in the activation loop of BRI1 identified so far, 516
exhibited not only reduced autophosphorylation activity of BRI1 in vitro but also 517
reduced sensitivity of BAK1 phosphorylation response to exogenously applied BL in 518
vivo (Figure 6). bri1-705, a new subtle allele in the extracellular portion, contains a 519
BRI1 mutation that may disrupts the formation of hydrogen bonds among BRI1, BL, 520
and BAK1 (Figure 8). Surprisingly, bri1-706, a subtle morphological mutant with a 521
mutation in the extracellular portion of BRI1, showed insensitive root growth 522
inhibition to exogenously applied BL which is similar to the null bri1 mutants (Figure 523
2A and 4A). Identification of unexpected characteristics of bri1-706 suggests there are 524
still many unknown aspects in the early events of the BR signaling pathway waiting to 525
be elucidated in the future. 526
527
MATERIALS AND METHODS 528
529
Plant materials, growth conditions and mutants detection 530
531
Original bri1 TILLING seeds obtained from ABRC are all in Col-0 accession which 532
contains an er mutation. After er and additional mutations were segregated out via 533
backcrossing for at least three generations, each homozygous bri1 was isolated and 534
used for phenotypic determination and detailed analyses. Other known bri1 mutants 535
used in this study include bri1-5 (WS2 background), bri1-9 (Col-0 background), 536
bri1-301 (Col-0 background) and bri1-701 (SALK_116202). All plants were grown in 537
a greenhouse under a long-day lighting condition (16 h light and 8 h dark) or under 538
darkness at 22˚C. Seedlings were grown in 1/2 MS agar plates or liquid media 539
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
19
supplemented with 1% (w/v) sucrose. 540
dCAPs approach was used for confirming the point mutations (Neff et al., 1998). 541
dCAPS Finder 2.0 (http://helix.wustl.edu/dcaps/dcaps.html) was used for designing 542
mismatched PCR primers to generate or disrupt a restriction enzyme recognition site 543
relative to the mutation (Neff et al., 2002). All primers and enzymes used in this study 544
for genotyping bri1 TILLING mutations are listed in Supplemental Table S1. 545
546
Root inhibition and hypocotyl growth assays 547
548
Seeds were surface sterilized with 75% (w/v) ethanol for 30 seconds, followed by 1% 549
NaClO for additional 7 min, and washed with desterilized water for 5 times. The 550
seeds were then placed on 1/2 MS plates with 0.8% (w/v) agar, 1% (w/v) sucrose, and 551
different concentrations of 24-epiBL (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) or brassinazole (Santa 552
Cruz Biotechnology). The seeds were vernalized at 4˚C for 3 days and transferred to 553
different growth conditions as indicated in the figure legends. Before placed in the 554
dark, plates were exposed to white light for 6 hours to induce germination. All 555
measurements were carried out using ImageJ (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/). 556
557
Vector construction and transgenic plants generation 558
559
Gateway technology (Invitrogen, Life Technologies) was used in cloning all genes 560
into expression vectors in this study. The full-length CDS fragments of BRI1, 561
BRI1-CD and BAK1 were amplified and cloned into a pDONR/Zeo entry clone vector. 562
Site-directed mutagenesis was carried out for generating mutated entry clones of BRI1, 563
BRI1-CD and BAK1 based on the method described previously (Gou et al., 2010). All 564
the cloned genes were sequence verified. Genes in the entry clone vectors were then 565
cloned into various destination vectors for different purposes such as 566
pBRI1-GWR-Flag, pBIB-BASTA-35s-GWR-Flag and pBIB-HYG-35s-GWR-GFP. All 567
expression constructs were transferred into appropriate plant materials by a floral dip 568
method (Clough and Bent, 1998). 569
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
20
RNA extraction and quantitative Real-time PCR 570
571
Seven-day-old seedlings of Col-0 and bri1 mutants grown on 1/2 MS plates were 572
collected and then grown with or without 1 μM 24-epiBL in liquid media for 4 hours. 573
Total RNAs were extracted using an RNA simple total RNA kit (Tiangen, China) and 574
reverse transcribed to total cDNAs utilizing M-MLV a reverse transcriptase 575
(Invitrogen, Life Technologies). The quantitative Real-time PCR was performed by a 576
StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) utilizing SYBR Green 577
reagent (Takara, Japan). Detailed experimental procedures were the same as 578
previously reported (Zhao et al., 2016). 579
580
Membrane protein isolation, immunoprecipitation, Western blotting and 581
phosphoprotein staining 582
583
Ten-day-old seedlings of 35S::BAK1-GFP 35S::BRI1-FLAG, Col-0 35S::BAK1-GFP, 584
bri1-702 35S::BAK1-GFP, bri1-301 35S::BAK1-GFP, or bri1-701 35S::BAK1-GFP 585
were treated with or without 100 nM 24-epiBL for 1.5 hours and then grounded to 586
fine powder in liquid N2. The membrane protein isolation procedure was the same as 587
previously reported (Li et al., 2002). The soluble protein samples were 588
immunoprecipitated utilizing an anti-GFP antibody (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) 589
combined with Protein A/G Plus-Sefinose Resin (BBI, Canada). The 590
immunoprecipitated proteins were separated on 10% SDS-PAGE and tested by 591
Western analyses with anti-GFP and anti-phosphothreonine antibodies. 592
The same plant materials used for quantitative Real-time PCR were also used in 593
detection of BES1 phosphorylation status. Total proteins were separated on 12% 594
SDS-PAGE and detected via a specific anti-BES1 antibody (made by Jia Li’s lab). 595
The transgenetic plants in Figure 7 were identified by detecting their GFP tag utilizing 596
an anti-GFP antibody (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The Endo H analyses shown in 597
Supplemental Figure S5 and S6 were performed as previously described (Hong et al., 598
2008). The total proteins of WT and mutants in Supplemental Figure S7 were 599
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
21
separated on 8% SDS-PAGE and detected via a specific anti-BRI1 antibody (Agrisera, 600
A177246, Sweden). Horseradish peroxidase-linked anti-rabbit or anti-mouse antibody 601
was used as a secondary antibody, and the signal was detected by Western Lightning 602
Chemiluminescence Reagent Plus (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA) in all Western blot 603
experiments. 604
For the phosphoprotein staining assay, the cytoplasmic domain sequences of WT 605
BRI1 and mutated BRI1 (residues 815–1196) were cloned into the expression vector 606
pMAL-cRI-MBP-GWR. The recombinant proteins were expressed in E. coli and 607
induced by 0.1mM IPTG for 6 hours at 18˚C. The cell lysates were boiled and 608
centrifuged. The supernatant was separated on 10% SDS-PAGE and sequentially 609
stained with Pro-Q Diamond (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and Coomassie blue silver as 610
previously described (Taylor et al., 2013). 611
612
Molecular dynamics simulation analysis 613
614
The initial complex coordinates of BRI1-BAK1-BL were retrieved from the PDB 615
database (http://www.rcsb.org) under the accession code 4M7E (Sun et al., 2013). MD 616
simulations were carried out using the AMBER 10 software package (Case et al., 617
2005) to check the stability of the BRI1 and BAK1 in complex with BL. We used the 618
AMBER ff12SB (Hornak et al., 2006) force field for the protein and water and the 619
general AMBER force field (GAFF) (Wang et al., 2004) for the BL molecule. Atom 620
types and AM1-BCC atomic charges were generated for BL using the Antechamber 621
module. The LEaP module of the AMBER10 software package was used to prepare 622
the protein-ligand complex. The complex was solvated using the explicit TIP3P 623
(Jorgensen et al., 1983) water model, which extended a minimum 10 Å distance from 624
the box surface to any atom of the solute. Two consecutive steps of minimization were 625
carried out. All bond lengths were constrained using the SHAKE algorithm (Ryckaert 626
et al., 1977), and the equations of motion were integrated with 2 fs time step using the 627
Verlet leapfrog algorithm. To eliminate possible bumps between the solute and the 628
solvent, the entire system was minimized in two steps. First, the complex was 629
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
22
restrained with a harmonic potential with a force constant k=50 kcal mol-1Å-2. The 630
water molecules and counter ions were optimized using the steepest descent method 631
of 1,000 steps, followed by the conjugate gradient method for 2,000 steps. Second, the 632
entire system was optimized using the first step method without any constraints. 633
Subsequently, the entire system was heated gradually in the NVT ensemble from 0 to 634
300k over 400ps, with a weak restraint (k=5 kcal mol-1Å-2) for the complex (Wu et al., 635
2016). The final coordinates obtained after the temperature equilibration simulation 636
were used for a 120 ns MD simulation during which the temperature was kept by the 637
Langevin thermostat with a collision frequency of 2 ps-1. A constant pressure periodic 638
boundary was used to maintain the pressure of the system using an isotropic position 639
scaling algorithm with a relaxation time of 2 ps. After MD simulation, distances 640
between two atoms were calculated using the cpptraj program, and the dictionary of 641
secondary structure of protein (DSSP) program developed by Kabsch and Sander was 642
used to assign the secondary structures of the BRI1-BAK1-BL complex (Kabsch and 643
Sander, 1983). All the structure figures were prepared using PyMol (www.pymol.org). 644
645
Sequence analysis 646
647
For sequence analysis, the sequences of 70 BRI1s or BRLs from 18 flowering plants, 648
and 223 LRR-RLK sequences from Arabidopsis were downloaded and analyzed in 649
software Mega (http://www.megasoftware.net/), the final alignment data was 650
generated to a logo (Figure 9 and Supplemental Figure S4) on a website 651
(http://weblogo.berkeley.edu/logo.cgi). 652
653
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS 654
655
Supplemental Table S1. List of primers and enzymes used in this study for 656
genotyping bri1 TILLING mutations. 657
Supplemental Figure S1. Eighty-three total mutations of BRI1 identified in this study 658
and 22 previously reported bri1 mutants. 659
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
23
Supplemental Figure S2. Overexpression of mBAK1 in bri1-5 resulted in a dominant 660
negative phenotype. 661
Supplemental Figure S3. Monitoring of the equilibration of the MD trajectories of 662
the wild-type complex (colored in black) and BRI1-Pro719Leu complex (colored in 663
red). 664
Supplemental Figure S4. Sequence analyses of the BRI1 activation loop. 665
Supplemental Figure S5. Endo H cleavage of BRI1, responses of BES1 666
phosphorylation and CPD expression to BL treatment showed no significant 667
differences between shoots and roots of bri1-706 seedlings. 668
Supplemental Figure S6. Endo H analysis indicated that BRI1 is not retained in the 669
endoplasmic reticulum (ER) in bri1-710 and bri1-711, and partially retained in the ER 670
in bri1-705 and bri1-706. 671
Supplemental Figure S7. In bri1-709, the mutation results in a premature stop 672
codon. 673
674
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 675
676
We thank Jia Li lab member, Yao Xiao, for generating the BES1 antibody. We also 677
thank Steven Henikoff and his team for their hard work on the 678
Arabidopsis TILLING Project. All the seeds were purchased from ABRC. 679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
24
Table 1. bri1 alleles (For references, please see Figure 1)
Allele Base pair change
AccessionAllelic strength
Possible mechanism
bri1-1 G2725A Col-0 Strong unknown
bri1-3 4-bp deletion after 2745
WS2 Strong Premature stop
bri1-4 10-bp deletion after 459
WS2 Strong Premature stop
bri1-5 G206A WS2 Weak ER retention
bri1-5R1 G260A bri1-5 Weak Partially restore ER retention of bri1-5
bri1-6/119 G1931A En-2 Weak unknown
bri1-7 G1838A WS2 Weak unknown
bri1-8/108 -112
G2948A WS2/ Col-0
Inter- mediate
Autophosphorylation cannot be detected in vitro
bri1-9 C1985T WS2 Weak ER retention
bri1-101 G3232A Col-0 Strong Autophosphorylation cannot be detected in vitro
bri1-102 C2249T Col-0 Strong unknown
bri1-103/ 104
G3091A Col-0 Strong unknown
bri1-105- 107
C3175T Col-0 Strong unknown
bri1-113 G1832A Col-0 Strong unknown
bri1-114/ 116
C1747T Col-0 Strong unknown
bri1-115 G3143A Col-0 Strong unknown
bri1-117/ 118
G3415A Col-0 Strong unknown
bri1-120 T1196C Ler Weak unknown
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
25
bri1-201 G1831A WS2 Strong unknown
bri1-202 C2854T WS2 Strong unknown
bri1-301 GG2965/6AT Col-0 Weak
Autophosphorylation of bri1-301 cannot be detected in vitro but transphosphorylation of BAK1 can be detected in vivo
bri1-701 T-DNA insertion
Col-0 Strong Knock-out of BRI1
bri1-702 C3148T Col-0 Weak Reduced autophosphorylation in vitro
bri1-703 G3166A Col-0 Strong Autophosphorylation cannot be detected in vitro
bri1-704 G3079A Col-0 Strong Autophosphorylation cannot be detected in vitro
bri1-705 C2156T Col-0 Subtle Disrupt the formation of hydrogen bonds among BRI1, BL, and BAK1
bri1-706 C758T Col-0 Subtle unknown
bri1-708 C2947G Col-0 Strong Autophosphorylation cannot be detected in vitro
bri1-709 G2543A Col-0 Strong Premature stop
bri1-710 G1858A Col-0 Subtle unknown
bri1-711 G2236A Col-0 Subtle unknown
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
26
FIGURE LEGENDS 698
699
Figure 1. Diagram showing all bri1 mutants identified thus far, including 9 new 700
alleles identified by this study. New mutants are labeled in red and known mutants 701
are labeled in black. Known bri1 mutants include bri1-1 (Clouse et al., 1996; 702
Friedrichsen et al., 2000), bri1-3, bri1-4, bri1-5, bri1-6, bri1-7, bri1-8, bri1-9 703
(Noguchi et al., 1999), bri1-5R1 (Belkhadir et al., 2010), bri1-101, bri1-102 704
bri1-103/104, bri1-105-107, bri1-108-112, bri1-113, bri1-114/116, bri1-115, 705
bri1-117/118, bri1-119 (Li and Chory, 1997; Friedrichsen et al., 2000), bri1-120 706
(Shang et al., 2011), bri1-201, bri1-202 (Domagalska et al., 2007), bri1-301 (Xu et al., 707
2008), and bri1-701 (Gou et al., 2012). 708
709
Figure 2. New bri1 mutants identified in this study and their phenotypes. (A) 710
Phenotypes of mutants and wild-type seedlings. The picture was taken 3 weeks after 711
germination. (B) Rosette width and height of the mutants and wild-type seedlings. 712
Rosette width was measured 3 weeks after germination. Height was measured when 713
growth was completely finished. T-tests were carried out to show the significance 714
between each allele and Col-0. Each data shown is the average and SD (n≥20). ***, 715
P<0.001. ns, not significant. 716
717
Figure 3. Complementation analyses confirm that all mutants are alleles of bri1. 718
(A) The phenotypes of new bri1 weak or subtle alleles cannot be complemented by 719
other bri1 weak alleles. (B) BRI1 driven by its native promoter can completely rescue 720
the phenotypes of new bri1 weak or subtle alleles. (C) The phenotypes of bri1-702 721
and bri1-705 can be recapitulated by expressing their corresponding genomic DNA in 722
a null BRI1 mutant allele, bri1-701. Pictures were taken 4 weeks after germination. 723
724
Figure 4. All mutants show either insensitive or reduced sensitivity to 725
exogenously applied BL. (A to C) Response of root growth to the treatment of BL. 726
Seven-day-old seedlings grown on 1/2 MS media supplemented with different 727
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
27
concentrations of BL. (D) bri1-706 is almost completely insensitive to BL. 728
Seven-day-old seedlings grown on 1/2 MS media supplemented with or without 1μM 729
BL. The seedlings were grown under long-day light conditions in a 22˚C growth 730
chamber for A to D. (E) Response of hypocotyl growth to the treatment of BRZ. 731
Four-day-old seedlings were grown on 1/2 MS media with or without BRZ 732
application under darkness in a 22˚C growth chamber. T-tests were performed to show 733
significance between each allele and Col-0. Each data represents average and SD 734
(n≥20). ***, P<0.001. 735
736
Figure 5. Responses of downstream BR signaling components of the new mutants 737
to BL. (A and B) Transcriptional responses of SAUR-AC1 and CPD to the treatment 738
of BL. ACTIN2 was used as a reference gene. Error bars represent SD (n= 3). (C) 739
Response of BES1 phosphorylation status to the treatment of BL. Total protein was 740
extracted and immuno-blotted with an anti-BES1 antibody. (D) Coomassie blue 741
staining showing equal loading between each pair of samples in C. Seven-day-old 742
long-day grown seedlings treated with or without 1 μM BL for 4 h were used in A-D. 743
-, without BL treatment; +, with BL treatment; *, non-specific band. BES1-P, 744
phosphorylated BES1; BES1, unphosphorylated BES1. 745
746
Figure 6. In vitro and in vivo phosphorylation analyses of the BRI1, bri1, and 747
BAK1. (A) Pro-Q diamond analyses of BRI1 and various bri1 cytoplasmic domains. 748
The recombinant proteins were expressed in E. coli and total protein extracts were 749
separated on 10% SDS-PAGE. The gel was stained by Pro-Q diamond. (B) Coomassie 750
blue silver staining to show equal loading of the samples. mBRI1 contains a mutation 751
within the ATP binding site (Lys911Glu). (C) In vivo phosphorylation analyses of 752
BAK1-GFP from various bri1 mutants in response to the treatment of BL. Membrane 753
proteins were extracted from 10-day-old long-day grown seedlings treated with or 754
without 100 nM BL for 1.5h. BAK1-GFP proteins from different bri1 alleles were 755
immunoprecipitated with an anti-GFP antibody. The phosphorylation levels of BAK1 756
were detected with a phosphothreonine antibody. The immunoprecipitated 757
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
28
BAK1-GFP was immuno-blotted with an anti-GFP antibody to show equal loading. -, 758
without BL treatment; +, with BL treatment. 759
760
Figure 7. Overexpression of mBAK1 in bri1-301 and bri1-702 but not in bri1-705 761
resulted in dominant negative phenotypes. (A) Phenotypes of the transgenic plants 762
and their backgrounds. The pictures were taken 3 weeks after germination. (B) 763
Western blotting analyses showing the expressed BAK1-GFP and mBAK1-GFP 764
fusion proteins in transgenic plants. Total proteins from rosette leaves were extracted 765
and immuno-blotted with an anti-GFP antibody. mBAK1 contains a mutation within 766
the ATP binding site (Lys317Glu). 767
768
Figure 8. Conformational changes monitored during the last 20 ns MD 769
simulation. (A) Time evolution of the secondary structures of residue 703-721 of 770
BRI1 in the wild-type complex (left) and mutant complex (right). Compared with the 771
wild-type complex, the residue Arg717 preceding Pro719 has the propensity to change 772
from a random coil to a β-turn while Asn705 and Ile706 seem to be destabilized and 773
prone to adopt a random coil conformation in the mutant complex. (B) Monitoring 774
time evolution of the distances between the atom OD1 of BRI1-Asn 705 and ND1 of 775
BAK1-His61 (upper left panel), atom OD1 of BRI1-Asn 705 and O02 from C2 of BL 776
(upper right panel) and atom ND1 of BAK1-His61 and O03 from C3 of BL (lower 777
panel) , respectively. The distances in the wild-type complex and mutant complex are 778
colored in black and red, respectively. (C) The interaction modes of BRI1-Asn705 779
(cyan), BAK1-His61 (purple) and BL (yellow). At 110 ns, as shown in upper right 780
inset, Asn705, His61 and BL form pairwise hydrogen bonds, indicated by the close 781
distances of 2.91, 2.81 and 3.03 Å between Asn705, His61 and BL, respectively. 782
However, in the bri1-705 mutant complex shown in the lower right inset, these 783
hydrogen bonds are disrupted as evidenced by the much larger pairwise distances 784
between Asn705, His61 and BL. 785
786
787
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
29
Figure 9. Sequence analyses of all 98 BRI1 point mutations. (A) Sequence 788
analyses among 70 BRI1s or BRLs from 18 sequenced flowering plant species. 789
Mutants showing defective phenotypes all result from mutations of conserved 790
residues. But not all mutations in the conserved residues show defective phenotypes. 791
(B) Sequence analyses among all 223 LRR-RLKs of Arabidopsis thaliana. Not all 792
mutation sites from mutants with defective phenotypes are conserved, and vice versa. 793
Only the amino acid sites with mutations are shown. New mutants from this study are 794
labeled in red. Previously known mutants are labeled in black. New mutations without 795
significant phenotypes are labeled in grey. The size of the logo is positively correlated 796
to the degree of conservation. 797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
30
REFERENCES 818
819
Asami T, Min YK, Nagata N, Yamagishi K, Takatsuto S, Fujioka S, Murofushi N, 820
Yamaguchi I, Yoshida S (2000) Characterization of brassinazole, a 821
triazole-type brassinosteroid biosynthesis inhibitor. Plant Physiol 123: 93-99 822
Belkhadir Y, Durbak A, Wierzba M, Schmitz RJ, Aguirre A, Michel R, Rowe S, 823
Fujioka S, Tax FE (2010) Intragenic Suppression of a Trafficking-Defective 824
Brassinosteroid Receptor Mutant in Arabidopsis. Genetics 185: 1283-1296 825
Bell EM, Lin WC, Husbands AY, Yu L, Jaganatha V, Jablonska B, Mangeon A, 826
Neff MM, Girke T, Springer PS (2012) Arabidopsis LATERAL ORGAN 827
BOUNDARIES negatively regulates brassinosteroid accumulation to limit 828
growth in organ boundaries. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 21146-21151 829
Case DA, Cheatham TE, Darden TA, Gohlke H, Luo R, Merz KM, Onufriev AV, 830
Simmerling C, Wang B, Woods RJ (2005) The Amber biomolecular 831
simulation programs. J Comput Chem 26: 1668-1688 832
Chaiwanon J, Wang ZY (2015) Spatiotemporal brassinosteroid signaling and 833
antagonism with auxin pattern stem cell dynamics in Arabidopsis roots. Curr 834
Biol 25: 1031-1042 835
Cheng Y, Zhu W, Chen Y, Ito S, Asami T, Wang X (2014) Brassinosteroids control 836
root epidermal cell fate via direct regulation of a MYB-bHLH-WD40 complex 837
by GSK3-like kinases. Elife 02525 838
Clough SJ, Bent AF (1998) Floral dip: a simplified method for 839
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 16: 840
735-743 841
Clouse SD (1996) Molecular genetic studies confirm the role of brassinosteroids in 842
plant growth and development. Plant J 10: 1-8 843
Clouse SD, Langford M, McMorris TC (1996) A brassinosteroid-insensitive mutant 844
in Arabidopsis thaliana exhibits multiple defects in growth and development. 845
Plant Physiol 111: 671-678 846
Clouse SD, Sasse JM (1998) Brassinosteroids: Essential regulators of plant growth 847
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
31
and development. Annu Rev of Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 49: 427-451 848
Domagalska MA, Schomburg FM, Amasino RM, Vierstra RD, Nagy F, Davis SJ 849
(2007) Attenuation of brassinosteroid signaling enhances FLC expression and 850
delays flowering. Development 134: 2841-2850 851
Friedrichsen DM, Joazeiro CA, Li J, Hunter T, Chory J (2000) 852
Brassinosteroid-insensitive-1 is a ubiquitously expressed leucine-rich repeat 853
receptor serine/threonine kinase. Plant Physiol 123: 1247-1256 854
Gendron JM, Liu JS, Fan M, Bai MY, Wenkel S, Springer PS, Barton MK, Wang 855
ZY (2012) Brassinosteroids regulate organ boundary formation in the shoot 856
apical meristem of Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 21152-21157 857
Gonzalez-Garcia M-P, Vilarrasa-Blasi J, Zhiponova M, Divol F, Mora-Garcia S, 858
Russinova E, Cano-Delgado AI (2011) Brassinosteroids control meristem 859
size by promoting cell cycle progression in Arabidopsis roots. Development 860
138: 849-859 861
Gou X, Yin H, He K, Du J, Yi J, Xu S, Lin H, Clouse SD, Li J (2012) Genetic 862
evidence for an indispensable role of somatic embryogenesis receptor kinases 863
in brassinosteroid signaling. PLoS genet 8: e1002452 864
Gudesblat GE, Russinova E (2011) Plants grow on brassinosteroids. Curr Opin in 865
Plant Biol 14: 530-537 866
Gudesblat GE, Schneider-Pizon J, Betti C, Mayerhofer J, Vanhoutte I, van 867
Dongen W, Boeren S, Zhiponova M, de Vries S, Jonak C, Russinova E 868
(2012) SPEECHLESS integrates brassinosteroid and stomata signalling 869
pathways. Nat Cell Biol 14: 548-554 870
Guo Z, Fujioka S, Blancaflor EB, Miao S, Gou X, Li J (2010) TCP1 Modulates 871
Brassinosteroid Biosynthesis by Regulating the Expression of the Key 872
Biosynthetic Gene DWARF4 in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 22: 873
1161-1173 874
Hacham Y, Holland N, Butterfield C, Ubeda-Tomas S, Bennett MJ, Chory J, 875
Savaldi-Goldstein S (2011) Brassinosteroid perception in the epidermis 876
controls root meristem size. Development 138: 839-848 877
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
32
Hong Z, Jin H, Tzfira T, Li J (2008) Multiple Mechanism-Mediated Retention of a 878
Defective Brassinosteroid Receptor in the Endoplasmic Reticulum of 879
Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 20: 3418-3429 880
Hong Z, Kajiura H, Su W, Jin H, Kimura A, Fujiyama K, Li J (2012) 881
Evolutionarily conserved glycan signal to degrade aberrant brassinosteroid 882
receptors in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 11437-11442 883
Hornak V, Abel R, Okur A, Strockbine B, Roitberg AE, Simmerling C (2006) 884
Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved 885
protein backbone parameters. Proteins 65: 712-725 886
Hothorn M, Belkhadir Y, Dreux M, Dabi T, Noel JP, Wilson IA, Chory J (2011) 887
Structural basis of steroid hormone perception by the receptor kinase BRI1. 888
Nature 474: 467-471 889
Jin H, Hong Z, Su W, Li J (2009) A plant-specific calreticulin is a key retention 890
factor for a defective brassinosteroid receptor in the endoplasmic reticulum. 891
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 13612-13617 892
Jin H, Yan Z, Nam KH, Li J (2007) Allele-Specific Suppression of a Defective 893
Brassinosteroid Receptor Reveals a Physiological Role of UGGT in ER 894
Quality Control. Mol Cell 26: 821-830 895
Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey R, Klein ML (1983) 896
Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem 897
Phys 79: 926-935 898
Kabsch W, Sander C (1983) Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern 899
recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22: 900
2577-2637 901
Kim TW, Michniewicz M, Bergmann DC, Wang ZY (2012) Brassinosteroid 902
regulates stomatal development by GSK3-mediated inhibition of a MAPK 903
pathway. Nature 482: 419-422 904
Kwon M, Choe S (2005) Brassinosteroid biosynthesis and dwarf mutants. J Plant 905
Biol 48: 1-15 906
Li J, Chory J (1997) A Putative Leucine-Rich Repeat Receptor Kinase Involved in 907
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
33
Brassinosteroid Signal Transduction. Cell 90: 929-938 908
Li J, Lease KA, Tax FE, Walker JC (2001) BRS1, a serine carboxypeptidase, 909
regulates BRI1 signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 910
5916-5921 911
Li J, Wen J, Lease KA, Doke JT, Tax FE, Walker JC (2002) BAK1, an Arabidopsis 912
LRR Receptor-like Protein Kinase, Interacts with BRI1 and Modulates 913
Brassinosteroid Signaling. Cell 110: 213-222 914
Li JM, Nam KH, Vafeados D, Chory J (2001) BIN2, a new 915
brassinosteroid-insensitive locus in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 127: 14-22 916
Liu Y, Zhang C, Wang D, Su W, Liu L, Wang M, Li J (2015) EBS7 is a 917
plant-specific component of a highly conserved endoplasmic 918
reticulum-associated degradation system in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U 919
S A 112: 12205-12210 920
McCallum CM, Comai L, Greene EA, Henikoff S (2000) Targeting induced local 921
lesions IN genomes (TILLING) for plant functional genomics. Plant Physiol 922
123: 439-442 923
Mora-Garcia S, Vert G, Yin YH, Cano-Delgado A, Cheong H, Chory J (2004) 924
Nuclear protein phosphatases with Kelch-repeat domains modulate the 925
response to brassinosteroids in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev 18: 448-460 926
Nam KH, Li J (2002) BRI1/BAK1, a Receptor Kinase Pair Mediating 927
Brassinosteroid Signaling. Cell 110: 203-212 928
Neff MM, Neff JD, Chory J, Pepper AE (1998) dCAPS, a simple technique for the 929
genetic analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms: experimental 930
applications in Arabidopsis thaliana genetics. Plant J 14: 387-392 931
Neff MM, Turk E, Kalishman M (2002) Web-based primer design for single 932
nucleotide polymorphism analysis. Trends Genet 18: 613-615 933
Noguchi T, Fujioka S, Choe S, Takatsuto S, Yoshida S, Yuan H, Feldmann KA, 934
Tax FE (1999) Brassinosteroid-insensitive dwarf mutants of Arabidopsis 935
accumulate brassinosteroids. Plant Physiol 121: 743-752 936
Oh MH, Ray WK, Huber SC, Asara JM, Gage DA, Clouse SD (2000) 937
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
34
Recombinant brassinosteroid insensitive 1 receptor-like kinase 938
autophosphorylates on serine and threonine residues and phosphorylates a 939
conserved peptide motif in vitro. Plant Physiol 124: 751-765 940
Ryckaert J, Ciccotti G, Berendsen HJC (1977) Numerical integration of the 941
cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular 942
dynamics of n-alkanes. J Comput Phys 23: 327-341 943
Santiago J, Henzler C, Hothorn M (2013) Molecular mechanism for plant steroid 944
receptor activation by somatic embryogenesis co-receptor kinases. Science 945
341: 889-892 946
Shang Y, Lee MM, Li J, Nam KH (2011) Characterization of cp3 reveals a new bri1 947
allele, bri1-120, and the importance of the LRR domain of BRI1 mediating BR 948
signaling. BMC Plant Biol 11: 8 949
She J, Han Z, Kim TW, Wang J, Cheng W, Chang J, Shi S, Wang J, Yang M, 950
Wang ZY, Chai J (2011) Structural insight into brassinosteroid perception by 951
BRI1. Nature 474: 472-476 952
Steber CM, McCourt P (2001) A role for brassinosteroids in germination in 953
Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 125: 763-769 954
Su W, Liu Y, Xia Y, Hong Z, Li J (2011) Conserved endoplasmic 955
reticulum-associated degradation system to eliminate mutated receptor-like 956
kinases in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 870-875 957
Su W, Liu Y, Xia Y, Hong Z, Li J (2012) The Arabidopsis homolog of the 958
mammalian OS-9 protein plays a key role in the endoplasmic 959
reticulum-associated degradation of misfolded receptor-like kinases. Mol Plant 960
5: 929-940 961
Sun Y, Fan X-Y, Cao D-M, Tang W, He K, Zhu J-Y, He J-X, Bai M-Y, Zhu S, Oh 962
E, Patil S, Kim T-W, Ji H, Wong WH, Rhee SY, Wang Z-Y (2010) 963
Integration of Brassinosteroid Signal Transduction with the Transcription 964
Network for Plant Growth Regulation in Arabidopsis. Developmental Cell 19: 965
765-777 966
Sun Y, Han Z, Tang J, Hu Z, Chai C, Zhou B, Chai J (2013) Structure reveals that 967
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
35
BAK1 as a co-receptor recognizes the BRI1-bound brassinolide. Cell Res 23: 968
1326-1329 969
Taylor I, Seitz K, Bennewitz S, Walker JC (2013) A simple in vitro method to 970
measure autophosphorylation of protein kinases. Plant Methods 9: 22 971
Till BJ, Reynolds SH, Greene EA, Codomo CA, Enns LC, Johnson JE, Burtner 972
C, Odden AR, Young K, Taylor NE, Henikoff JG, Comai L, Henikoff S 973
(2003) Large-scale discovery of induced point mutations with high-throughput 974
TILLING. Genome Res 13: 524-530 975
Vert G, Nemhauser JL, Geldner N, Hong F, Chory J (2005) Molecular 976
mechanisms of steroid hormone signaling in plants. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 977
21: 177-201 978
Vilarrasa-Blasi J, Gonzalez-Garcia MP, Frigola D, Fabregas N, Alexiou KG, 979
Lopez-Bigas N, Rivas S, Jauneau A, Lohmann JU, Benfey PN, Ibanes M, 980
Cano-Delgado AI (2014) Regulation of plant stem cell quiescence by a 981
brassinosteroid signaling module. Dev Cell 30: 36-47 982
Wang J, Jiang J, Wang J, Chen L, Fan SL, Wu JW, Wang X, Wang ZX (2014) 983
Structural insights into the negative regulation of BRI1 signaling by 984
BRI1-interacting protein BKI1. Cell Res 24: 1328-1341 985
Wang J, Wolf RM, Caldwell JW, Kollman PA, Case DA (2004) Development and 986
testing of a general amber force field. J Comput Chem 25: 1157-1174 987
Wang X, Chory J (2006) Brassinosteroids regulate dissociation of BKI1, a negative 988
regulator of BRI1 signaling, from the plasma membrane. Science 313: 989
1118-1122 990
Wang X, Kota U, He K, Blackburn K, Li J, Goshe MB, Huber SC, Clouse SD 991
(2008) Sequential Transphosphorylation of the BRI1/BAK1 Receptor Kinase 992
Complex Impacts Early Events in Brassinosteroid Signaling. Dev Cell 15: 993
220-235 994
Wang X, Li X, Meisenhelder J, Hunter T, Yoshida S, Asami T, Chory J (2005) 995
Autoregulation and homodimerization are involved in the activation of the 996
plant steroid receptor BRI1. Dev Cell 8: 855-865 997
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
36
Wang Y, Sun S, Zhu W, Jia K, Yang H, Wang X (2013) 998
Strigolactone/MAX2-induced degradation of brassinosteroid transcriptional 999
effector BES1 regulates shoot branching. Dev Cell 27: 681-688 1000
Wang ZY, Bai MY, Oh E, Zhu JY (2012) Brassinosteroid signaling network and 1001
regulation of photomorphogenesis. Annu Rev Genet 46: 701-724 1002
Wang ZY, Seto H, Fujioka S, Yoshida S, Chory J (2001) BRI1 is a critical 1003
component of a plasma-membrane receptor for plant steroids. Nature 410: 1004
380-383 1005
Wei Z, Li J (2016) Brassinosteroids Regulate Root Growth, Development, and 1006
Symbiosis. Mol Plant 9: 86-100 1007
Wu D, Tao X, Chen Z, Han J, Jia W, Zhu N, Li X, Wang Z, He Y (2016) The 1008
environmental endocrine disruptor p -nitrophenol interacts with FKBP51, a 1009
positive regulator of androgen receptor and inhibits androgen receptor 1010
signaling in human cells. J Hazard Mater 307: 193-201 1011
Xu W, Huang J, Li B, Li J, Wang Y (2008) Is kinase activity essential for biological 1012
functions of BRI1? Cell Res 18: 472-478 1013
Yin Y, Vafeados D, Tao Y, Yoshida S, Asami T, Chory J (2005) A new class of 1014
transcription factors mediates brassinosteroid-regulated gene expression in 1015
arabidopsis. Cell 120: 249-259 1016
Yin Y, Wang Z-Y, Mora-Garcia S, Li J, Yoshida S, Asami T, Chory J (2002) BES1 1017
Accumulates in the Nucleus in Response to Brassinosteroids to Regulate Gene 1018
Expression and Promote Stem Elongation. Cell 109: 181-191 1019
Yu X, Li L, Zola J, Aluru M, Ye H, Foudree A, Guo H, Anderson S, Aluru S, Liu 1020
P, Rodermel S, Yin Y (2011) A brassinosteroid transcriptional network 1021
revealed by genome-wide identification of BESI target genes in Arabidopsis 1022
thaliana. Plant J 65: 634-646 1023
Yuan T, Fujioka S, Takatsuto S, Matsumoto S, Gou X, He K, Russell SD, Li J 1024
(2007) BEN1, a gene encoding a dihydroflavonol 4-reductase (DFR)-like 1025
protein, regulates the levels of brassinosteroids in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 1026
51: 220-233 1027
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
37
Zhang C, Xu Y, Guo S, Zhu J, Huan Q, Liu H, Wang L, Luo G, Wang X, Chong 1028
K (2012) Dynamics of brassinosteroid response modulated by negative 1029
regulator LIC in rice. PLoS Genet 8: e1002686 1030
Zhao B, Lv M, Feng Z, Campbell T, Liscum E, Li J (2016) TWISTED DWARF 1 1031
Associates with BRASSINOSTEROID-INSENSITIVE 1 to Regulate Early 1032
Events of the Brassinosteroid Signaling Pathway. Mol Plant 9: 582-592 1033
Zhou A, Wang HC, Walker JC, Li J (2004) BRL1, a leucine-rich repeat 1034
receptor-like protein kinase, is functionally redundant with BRI1 in regulating 1035
Arabidopsis brassinosteroid signaling. Plant J 40: 399-409 1036
Zhu JY, Sae-Seaw J, Wang ZY (2013) Brassinosteroid signalling. Development 140: 1037
1615-1620 1038
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Parsed CitationsAsami T, Min YK, Nagata N, Yamagishi K, Takatsuto S, Fujioka S, Murofushi N, Yamaguchi I, Yoshida S (2000) Characterization ofbrassinazole, a triazole-type brassinosteroid biosynthesis inhibitor. Plant Physiol 123: 93-99
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Belkhadir Y, Durbak A, Wierzba M, Schmitz RJ, Aguirre A, Michel R, Rowe S, Fujioka S, Tax FE (2010) Intragenic Suppression of aTrafficking-Defective Brassinosteroid Receptor Mutant in Arabidopsis. Genetics 185: 1283-1296
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Bell EM, Lin WC, Husbands AY, Yu L, Jaganatha V, Jablonska B, Mangeon A, Neff MM, Girke T, Springer PS (2012) ArabidopsisLATERAL ORGAN BOUNDARIES negatively regulates brassinosteroid accumulation to limit growth in organ boundaries. Proc NatlAcad Sci U S A 109: 21146-21151
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Case DA, Cheatham TE, Darden TA, Gohlke H, Luo R, Merz KM, Onufriev AV, Simmerling C, Wang B, Woods RJ (2005) The Amberbiomolecular simulation programs. J Comput Chem 26: 1668-1688
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Chaiwanon J, Wang ZY (2015) Spatiotemporal brassinosteroid signaling and antagonism with auxin pattern stem cell dynamics inArabidopsis roots. Curr Biol 25: 1031-1042
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cheng Y, Zhu W, Chen Y, Ito S, Asami T, Wang X (2014) Brassinosteroids control root epidermal cell fate via direct regulation of aMYB-bHLH-WD40 complex by GSK3-like kinases. Elife 02525
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Clough SJ, Bent AF (1998) Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. PlantJ 16: 735-743
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Clouse SD (1996) Molecular genetic studies confirm the role of brassinosteroids in plant growth and development. Plant J 10: 1-8Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Clouse SD, Langford M, McMorris TC (1996) A brassinosteroid-insensitive mutant in Arabidopsis thaliana exhibits multiple defectsin growth and development. Plant Physiol 111: 671-678
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Clouse SD, Sasse JM (1998) Brassinosteroids: Essential regulators of plant growth and development. Annu Rev of Plant PhysiolPlant Mol Biol 49: 427-451
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Domagalska MA, Schomburg FM, Amasino RM, Vierstra RD, Nagy F, Davis SJ (2007) Attenuation of brassinosteroid signalingenhances FLC expression and delays flowering. Development 134: 2841-2850
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Friedrichsen DM, Joazeiro CA, Li J, Hunter T, Chory J (2000) Brassinosteroid-insensitive-1 is a ubiquitously expressed leucine-rich repeat receptor serine/threonine kinase. Plant Physiol 123: 1247-1256
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gendron JM, Liu JS, Fan M, Bai MY, Wenkel S, Springer PS, Barton MK, Wang ZY (2012) Brassinosteroids regulate organboundary formation in the shoot apical meristem of Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 21152-21157
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Gonzalez-Garcia M-P, Vilarrasa-Blasi J, Zhiponova M, Divol F, Mora-Garcia S, Russinova E, Cano-Delgado AI (2011)Brassinosteroids control meristem size by promoting cell cycle progression in Arabidopsis roots. Development 138: 849-859
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gou X, Yin H, He K, Du J, Yi J, Xu S, Lin H, Clouse SD, Li J (2012) Genetic evidence for an indispensable role of somaticembryogenesis receptor kinases in brassinosteroid signaling. PLoS genet 8: e1002452
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gudesblat GE, Russinova E (2011) Plants grow on brassinosteroids. Curr Opin in Plant Biol 14: 530-537Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gudesblat GE, Schneider-Pizon J, Betti C, Mayerhofer J, Vanhoutte I, van Dongen W, Boeren S, Zhiponova M, de Vries S, Jonak C,Russinova E (2012) SPEECHLESS integrates brassinosteroid and stomata signalling pathways. Nat Cell Biol 14: 548-554
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Guo Z, Fujioka S, Blancaflor EB, Miao S, Gou X, Li J (2010) TCP1 Modulates Brassinosteroid Biosynthesis by Regulating theExpression of the Key Biosynthetic Gene DWARF4 in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 22: 1161-1173
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hacham Y, Holland N, Butterfield C, Ubeda-Tomas S, Bennett MJ, Chory J, Savaldi-Goldstein S (2011) Brassinosteroid perceptionin the epidermis controls root meristem size. Development 138: 839-848
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hong Z, Jin H, Tzfira T, Li J (2008) Multiple Mechanism-Mediated Retention of a Defective Brassinosteroid Receptor in theEndoplasmic Reticulum of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 20: 3418-3429
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hong Z, Kajiura H, Su W, Jin H, Kimura A, Fujiyama K, Li J (2012) Evolutionarily conserved glycan signal to degrade aberrantbrassinosteroid receptors in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 11437-11442
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hornak V, Abel R, Okur A, Strockbine B, Roitberg AE, Simmerling C (2006) Comparison of multiple Amber force fields anddevelopment of improved protein backbone parameters. Proteins 65: 712-725
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hothorn M, Belkhadir Y, Dreux M, Dabi T, Noel JP, Wilson IA, Chory J (2011) Structural basis of steroid hormone perception by thereceptor kinase BRI1. Nature 474: 467-471
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jin H, Hong Z, Su W, Li J (2009) A plant-specific calreticulin is a key retention factor for a defective brassinosteroid receptor in theendoplasmic reticulum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 13612-13617
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jin H, Yan Z, Nam KH, Li J (2007) Allele-Specific Suppression of a Defective Brassinosteroid Receptor Reveals a PhysiologicalRole of UGGT in ER Quality Control. Mol Cell 26: 821-830
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey R, Klein ML (1983) Comparison of simple potential functions for simulatingliquid water. J Chem Phys 79: 926-935
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kabsch W, Sander C (1983) Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometricalfeatures. Biopolymers 22: 2577-2637
Pubmed: Author and Title www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from
Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
CrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim TW, Michniewicz M, Bergmann DC, Wang ZY (2012) Brassinosteroid regulates stomatal development by GSK3-mediatedinhibition of a MAPK pathway. Nature 482: 419-422
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kwon M, Choe S (2005) Brassinosteroid biosynthesis and dwarf mutants. J Plant Biol 48: 1-15Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J, Chory J (1997) A Putative Leucine-Rich Repeat Receptor Kinase Involved in Brassinosteroid Signal Transduction. Cell 90:929-938
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J, Lease KA, Tax FE, Walker JC (2001) BRS1, a serine carboxypeptidase, regulates BRI1 signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana. ProcNatl Acad Sci U S A 98: 5916-5921
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J, Wen J, Lease KA, Doke JT, Tax FE, Walker JC (2002) BAK1, an Arabidopsis LRR Receptor-like Protein Kinase, Interacts withBRI1 and Modulates Brassinosteroid Signaling. Cell 110: 213-222
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li JM, Nam KH, Vafeados D, Chory J (2001) BIN2, a new brassinosteroid-insensitive locus in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 127: 14-22Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liu Y, Zhang C, Wang D, Su W, Liu L, Wang M, Li J (2015) EBS7 is a plant-specific component of a highly conserved endoplasmicreticulum-associated degradation system in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112: 12205-12210
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
McCallum CM, Comai L, Greene EA, Henikoff S (2000) Targeting induced local lesions IN genomes (TILLING) for plant functionalgenomics. Plant Physiol 123: 439-442
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mora-Garcia S, Vert G, Yin YH, Cano-Delgado A, Cheong H, Chory J (2004) Nuclear protein phosphatases with Kelch-repeatdomains modulate the response to brassinosteroids in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev 18: 448-460
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Nam KH, Li J (2002) BRI1/BAK1, a Receptor Kinase Pair Mediating Brassinosteroid Signaling. Cell 110: 203-212Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Neff MM, Neff JD, Chory J, Pepper AE (1998) dCAPS, a simple technique for the genetic analysis of single nucleotidepolymorphisms: experimental applications in Arabidopsis thaliana genetics. Plant J 14: 387-392
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Neff MM, Turk E, Kalishman M (2002) Web-based primer design for single nucleotide polymorphism analysis. Trends Genet 18:613-615
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Noguchi T, Fujioka S, Choe S, Takatsuto S, Yoshida S, Yuan H, Feldmann KA, Tax FE (1999) Brassinosteroid-insensitive dwarfmutants of Arabidopsis accumulate brassinosteroids. Plant Physiol 121: 743-752
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Oh MH, Ray WK, Huber SC, Asara JM, Gage DA, Clouse SD (2000) Recombinant brassinosteroid insensitive 1 receptor-like kinaseautophosphorylates on serine and threonine residues and phosphorylates a conserved peptide motif in vitro. Plant Physiol 124:751-765 www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from
Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ryckaert J, Ciccotti G, Berendsen HJC (1977) Numerical integration of the cartesian equations of motion of a system withconstraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J Comput Phys 23: 327-341
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Santiago J, Henzler C, Hothorn M (2013) Molecular mechanism for plant steroid receptor activation by somatic embryogenesis co-receptor kinases. Science 341: 889-892
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shang Y, Lee MM, Li J, Nam KH (2011) Characterization of cp3 reveals a new bri1 allele, bri1-120, and the importance of the LRRdomain of BRI1 mediating BR signaling. BMC Plant Biol 11: 8
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
She J, Han Z, Kim TW, Wang J, Cheng W, Chang J, Shi S, Wang J, Yang M, Wang ZY, Chai J (2011) Structural insight intobrassinosteroid perception by BRI1. Nature 474: 472-476
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Steber CM, McCourt P (2001) A role for brassinosteroids in germination in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 125: 763-769Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Su W, Liu Y, Xia Y, Hong Z, Li J (2011) Conserved endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation system to eliminate mutatedreceptor-like kinases in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 870-875
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Su W, Liu Y, Xia Y, Hong Z, Li J (2012) The Arabidopsis homolog of the mammalian OS-9 protein plays a key role in the endoplasmicreticulum-associated degradation of misfolded receptor-like kinases. Mol Plant 5: 929-940
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sun Y, Fan X-Y, Cao D-M, Tang W, He K, Zhu J-Y, He J-X, Bai M-Y, Zhu S, Oh E, Patil S, Kim T-W, Ji H, Wong WH, Rhee SY, Wang Z-Y (2010) Integration of Brassinosteroid Signal Transduction with the Transcription Network for Plant Growth Regulation inArabidopsis. Developmental Cell 19: 765-777
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sun Y, Han Z, Tang J, Hu Z, Chai C, Zhou B, Chai J (2013) Structure reveals that BAK1 as a co-receptor recognizes the BRI1-boundbrassinolide. Cell Res 23: 1326-1329
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Taylor I, Seitz K, Bennewitz S, Walker JC (2013) A simple in vitro method to measure autophosphorylation of protein kinases. PlantMethods 9: 22
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Till BJ, Reynolds SH, Greene EA, Codomo CA, Enns LC, Johnson JE, Burtner C, Odden AR, Young K, Taylor NE, Henikoff JG,Comai L, Henikoff S (2003) Large-scale discovery of induced point mutations with high-throughput TILLING. Genome Res 13: 524-530
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Vert G, Nemhauser JL, Geldner N, Hong F, Chory J (2005) Molecular mechanisms of steroid hormone signaling in plants. Annu RevCell Dev Biol 21: 177-201
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Vilarrasa-Blasi J, Gonzalez-Garcia MP, Frigola D, Fabregas N, Alexiou KG, Lopez-Bigas N, Rivas S, Jauneau A, Lohmann JU,Benfey PN, Ibanes M, Cano-Delgado AI (2014) Regulation of plant stem cell quiescence by a brassinosteroid signaling module. DevCell 30: 36-47
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang J, Jiang J, Wang J, Chen L, Fan SL, Wu JW, Wang X, Wang ZX (2014) Structural insights into the negative regulation of BRI1signaling by BRI1-interacting protein BKI1. Cell Res 24: 1328-1341
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang J, Wolf RM, Caldwell JW, Kollman PA, Case DA (2004) Development and testing of a general amber force field. J ComputChem 25: 1157-1174
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang X, Chory J (2006) Brassinosteroids regulate dissociation of BKI1, a negative regulator of BRI1 signaling, from the plasmamembrane. Science 313: 1118-1122
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang X, Kota U, He K, Blackburn K, Li J, Goshe MB, Huber SC, Clouse SD (2008) Sequential Transphosphorylation of theBRI1/BAK1 Receptor Kinase Complex Impacts Early Events in Brassinosteroid Signaling. Dev Cell 15: 220-235
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang X, Li X, Meisenhelder J, Hunter T, Yoshida S, Asami T, Chory J (2005) Autoregulation and homodimerization are involved inthe activation of the plant steroid receptor BRI1. Dev Cell 8: 855-865
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y, Sun S, Zhu W, Jia K, Yang H, Wang X (2013) Strigolactone/MAX2-induced degradation of brassinosteroid transcriptionaleffector BES1 regulates shoot branching. Dev Cell 27: 681-688
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang ZY, Bai MY, Oh E, Zhu JY (2012) Brassinosteroid signaling network and regulation of photomorphogenesis. Annu Rev Genet46: 701-724
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang ZY, Seto H, Fujioka S, Yoshida S, Chory J (2001) BRI1 is a critical component of a plasma-membrane receptor for plantsteroids. Nature 410: 380-383
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wei Z, Li J (2016) Brassinosteroids Regulate Root Growth, Development, and Symbiosis. Mol Plant 9: 86-100Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu D, Tao X, Chen Z, Han J, Jia W, Zhu N, Li X, Wang Z, He Y (2016) The environmental endocrine disruptor p -nitrophenolinteracts with FKBP51, a positive regulator of androgen receptor and inhibits androgen receptor signaling in human cells. JHazard Mater 307: 193-201
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Xu W, Huang J, Li B, Li J, Wang Y (2008) Is kinase activity essential for biological functions of BRI1? Cell Res 18: 472-478Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yin Y, Vafeados D, Tao Y, Yoshida S, Asami T, Chory J (2005) A new class of transcription factors mediates brassinosteroid-regulated gene expression in arabidopsis. Cell 120: 249-259
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yin Y, Wang Z-Y, Mora-Garcia S, Li J, Yoshida S, Asami T, Chory J (2002) BES1 Accumulates in the Nucleus in Response toBrassinosteroids to Regulate Gene Expression and Promote Stem Elongation. Cell 109: 181-191
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Yu X, Li L, Zola J, Aluru M, Ye H, Foudree A, Guo H, Anderson S, Aluru S, Liu P, Rodermel S, Yin Y (2011) A brassinosteroidtranscriptional network revealed by genome-wide identification of BESI target genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 65: 634-646
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yuan T, Fujioka S, Takatsuto S, Matsumoto S, Gou X, He K, Russell SD, Li J (2007) BEN1, a gene encoding a dihydroflavonol 4-reductase (DFR)-like protein, regulates the levels of brassinosteroids in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 51: 220-233
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang C, Xu Y, Guo S, Zhu J, Huan Q, Liu H, Wang L, Luo G, Wang X, Chong K (2012) Dynamics of brassinosteroid responsemodulated by negative regulator LIC in rice. PLoS Genet 8: e1002686
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhao B, Lv M, Feng Z, Campbell T, Liscum E, Li J (2016) TWISTED DWARF 1 Associates with BRASSINOSTEROID-INSENSITIVE 1to Regulate Early Events of the Brassinosteroid Signaling Pathway. Mol Plant 9: 582-592
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou A, Wang HC, Walker JC, Li J (2004) BRL1, a leucine-rich repeat receptor-like protein kinase, is functionally redundant withBRI1 in regulating Arabidopsis brassinosteroid signaling. Plant J 40: 399-409
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhu JY, Sae-Seaw J, Wang ZY (2013) Brassinosteroid signalling. Development 140: 1615-1620Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
www.plantphysiol.orgon March 19, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.