1 september 2011 to 31 august 2012 programme...for the period 1 september 2011 to 31 august 2012...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 Programme...For the period 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 information on waiting times was available for 15,115 of the 16,590 new attendances](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052019/6032f4692300865c7008c62f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
ISBN number: 978-1-907487-14-9
QA - CS/PR/PM-17 Rev 1
The National Cancer Screening Service is part of the Health Service Executive. It encompasses BreastCheck – The National Breast Screening Programme, CervicalCheck – The National Cervical Screening Programme, BowelScreen – The National Bowel Screening Programme and Diabetic RetinaScreen – The National Diabetic Retinal Screening Programme
CervicalC
heck Pro
gram
me R
epo
rt1 Sep
temb
er 2011 to 31 A
ug
ust 2012
Programme Report
1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012
![Page 2: 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 Programme...For the period 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 information on waiting times was available for 15,115 of the 16,590 new attendances](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052019/6032f4692300865c7008c62f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
CervicalCheck Charter
Screening commitment:
• CervicalCheck–TheNationalCervicalScreeningProgrammeoffersafreecompletequalityassuredprogrammeofcare
• YouchooseyoursmeartakerfromawiderangeofeligibleserviceprovidersregisteredwiththeProgramme
• YoumaychangeyourpreferredproviderforsubsequentProgrammescreening
•AllProgrammestaffwillrespectyourprivacy,dignity,religion,raceandculturalbeliefs
• Yourscreeningrecordswillbetreatedinthestrictestconfidence
• Youwillalwayshavetheopportunitytomakeyourviewsknownandtohavethemtakenintoaccount
•OnceyoubecomeknowntotheProgrammeyouwillbeinvitedeverythreeyearsforscreeningwhileyouareaged25to44andeveryfiveyearswhileyouareaged45to60
• Yoursmeartestwillbescreenedinanaccreditedqualityassuredlaboratory
• YourresultandanytreatmentrecommendationwillbeprovidedtoyouandyournominatedsmeartakerbytheProgrammewithinfourweeks.
We aim:
• Toensurepleasantandcomfortablesurroundingsduringscreening.
If you require further treatment, we aim:
• Toensurethatyouwillbeofferedanappointmentataqualityassuredcolposcopyclinic(withinfourweeksforhighgradecellchangesandwithineightweeksforlowgradecellchanges).
Tell us what you think:
• Yourviewsareimportanttousinmonitoringtheeffectivenessofourservicesandinidentifyingareaswherewecanimprove
• Youhavearighttomakeyouropinionknownaboutthecareyoureceived
• IfyoufeelwehavenotmetthestandardsofthisCharter,letusknowbytellingthepeopleprovidingyourcareorinwritingtotheProgramme
•Wewouldalsoliketohearfromyouifyoufeelyouhavereceivedagoodservice.Ithelpsustoknowthatweareprovidingtherightkindofservice–onethatsatisfiesyou.
• Finally,ifyouhaveanysuggestionsonhowourservicecanbeimproved,wewouldbepleasedtoseewhetherwecanadoptthemtofurtherimprovethewaywecareforyou.
Ways you can help us:
• PleasemakeyourappointmentwitharegisteredsmeartakeronreceiptofyourinvitationletterfromtheProgramme
• PleasebringyourPPSnumberwithyoutoyourappointment
• Pleasereadanyinformationwesendyou
• Pleasetrytobewellinformedaboutyourhealth.
Let us know:
• Ifyouchangeyouraddress
•Whatyouthink–yourviewsareimportant.
Freephone 1800 45 45 55
www.cervicalcheck.ie
![Page 3: 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 Programme...For the period 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 information on waiting times was available for 15,115 of the 16,590 new attendances](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052019/6032f4692300865c7008c62f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
CervicalCheck Charter 1
Outline of The National Screening Service 3
Overview and introduction to CervicalCheck programme report 4
Updates 5
Completion of the first five years of CervicalCheck 6
Primary care 6
Smeartaker supports and training 7
Promoting regular smear test as a routine health behaviour 8
Cytology services 9
Colposcopy services 10
Histology services 12
Programme statistics 14
Glossary 35
Contents
![Page 4: 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 Programme...For the period 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 information on waiting times was available for 15,115 of the 16,590 new attendances](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052019/6032f4692300865c7008c62f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
The National Screening Service (NSS) was part of the Health Service Executive National Cancer Control Programme during the fourth year of the CervicalCheck programme 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012. The National Screening Service has responsibility for four population-based screening programmes in Ireland:
• BreastCheck–TheNationalBreastScreeningProgrammewhichofferswomenaged50-64(over360,000women)afreemammogrameverytwoyearsandcommencedscreeningfromFebruary2000.www.breastcheck.ie
• CervicalCheck–TheNationalCervicalScreeningProgrammewhichoffersfreesmearteststowomenaged25to60(over1.1millionwomen).Regularsmeartestsatrecommendedintervalscanpreventcervicalcancer.SinceCervicalChecklaunchedinSeptember2008,almost1.65millionsmeartestshavebeenprocessedformorethan875,000women.www.cervicalcheck.ie
• BowelScreen–TheNationalBowelScreeningProgramme,fortheearlydetectionofbowelcancerinmenandwomenaged55to74(overonemillionpeople).Theprogrammeisinitiallyaimedatpeopleaged60to69years(500,000)andthefirstroundbeganinlate2012andmaytakeuptothreeyearstocomplete,afterwhicheachroundshouldbecompletedintwoyears.www.bowelscreen.ie
• DiabeticRetinaScreen–TheNationalDiabeticRetinalScreeningProgramme,fortheearlydetectionofdiabeticretinopathyisaimedatallpeoplewithType1orType2diabetesaged12andover(approximately190,000people).Theprogramme,whichcommenceditsfirstroundinearly2013,signalledtheexpansionforNSSintonon-cancerrelatedconditionsandisapopulation-basedcall,re-callscreeningprogramme.
Whenallfourpopulation-basedscreeningprogrammesarefullyoperational,overtwomillionpeopleinIrelandwillbeeligibletoparticipateinoneormoreoftheprogrammes.
TheNationalScreeningServicehasacommitmenttoimplementspecialmeasurestopromoteparticipationinitsprogrammesbyharder-to-reachindividualsandcommunitieswithinthepopulation.
TheNationalScreeningServiceisdedicatedtocontinueddeliveryofscreeningprogrammes,sharingexpertiseandlearningacrossnationalscreeningprogrammesanddrivingeffectivenessthroughstrengtheningthesinglegovernancemodelinplaceforscreening.
BackgroundNSS,formerlytheNationalCancerScreeningService(NCSS),wasestablishedinJanuary2007followingthelaunchof‘AStrategyforCancerControlinIreland2006’bytheCancerControlForumandtheDepartmentofHealth,whichadvocatedacomprehensivecancercontrolpolicyprogrammeinIreland.Thestrategysetoutrecommendationsregardingtheprevention,screening,detection,treatmentandmanagementofcancerinIreland.ItrecommendedtheestablishmentoftheNationalCancerScreeningServiceBoard,whichwaslaterdissolvedwhentheNCSSjoinedtheHealthServiceExecutiveNationalCancerControlProgramme(NCCP)in2010.
The National Screening Service
THENATIONALSCREENINGSERVICE3
![Page 5: 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 Programme...For the period 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 information on waiting times was available for 15,115 of the 16,590 new attendances](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052019/6032f4692300865c7008c62f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
THENATIONALSCREENINGSERVICE
This report contains screening statistics for the fourth year of operation (1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012) and an overview of activity and developments within CervicalCheck up to the time of publication.
CervicalCheckiscentraltocervicalcancerpreventioninIreland,workingtoreduceincidenceandmortalityfromthediseasebydetectingchangesinthecellsofthecervixbeforetheybecomecancerous.TheannualaverageincidenceofcervicalcancerinIrelandduring2008-2010was308caseswith88deathsduetothediseasein2010.1
Withaneligiblepopulationofover1.1millionwomenaged25to60,CervicalCheckhasthepotentialtoreducemortalityfromcervicalcancerbyasmuchas80percentinthescreenedpopulation.
Womenhaveachoiceofover4,700smeartakersinalmost1,450locations.Resultsareavailablequickly,withreducedwaitingtimesforcolposcopy.
Noscreeningtestis100percentaccurate.Thevalueofapopulation-basedscreeningprogramme,suchasCervicalCheck,isintherepeatnatureofscreening.
HealthprofessionalsincludingregisteredGPs,practicenursesandmedicalpractitionersworkinginprimarycareandincolposcopyservicesplayavitalroleinprovidinganeffective,qualityassuredenvironmentandexperienceinallstagesofthescreeningpathway.
ItisimportanttoalsoacknowledgetherolethateverymemberofstaffandmanagementinvolvedinrunningtheprogrammehasplayedduringthefirstfiveyearsofCervicalCheck.
Throughthecombinedeffortofthoseworkingonbehalfoftheprogramme,eligiblewomenandthewidercommunity,cervicalscreeningatrecommendedintervalsisbecomingroutinehealthbehaviour.
Majella ByrneHead, National Screening Service
Dr Gráinne FlannellyClinical Director, CervicalCheck
Overview and introduction to CervicalCheck programme report
1 CancerinIreland2013:AnnualReportoftheNationalCancerRegistry;NationalCancerRegistryIreland
2 CIN2+andadenocarcinomainsituincluded
4
![Page 6: 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 Programme...For the period 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 information on waiting times was available for 15,115 of the 16,590 new attendances](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052019/6032f4692300865c7008c62f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
In the first five years of CervicalCheck, more than 1.65 million smear tests provided
![Page 7: 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 Programme...For the period 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 information on waiting times was available for 15,115 of the 16,590 new attendances](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052019/6032f4692300865c7008c62f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Completion of the first five years of CervicalCheck CervicalCheck completed its first five-year screening round on 31 August 2013, with over 74 per cent of women age 25-60 having at least one smear test. Over 1.65 million smear tests were provided during the first five years with more than 875,000 eligible women aged 25 to 60 having at least one CervicalCheck smear test.
CervicalCheckhastransformedtheexperienceofcervicalscreeningforeligiblewomen,strivingtomaketheprogrammeaccessibleandaseasyaspossibleforawomantoincorporatearegularsmeartestintoherroutinehealthbehaviour.
CervicalCheckusesamulti-layeredapproach,communicatingdirectlywithhealthprofessionalsandcommunitygroups,usingmediaandothercommunicationchannelstopromoteunderstandingofthevalueofregularsmeartestsamongitstargetpopulation.
Theprogrammeitselfiscomplex,involvingallaspectsofdeliveryfromregistermanagement,administration,smeartakinginprimarycare,cytology,colposcopy(diagnosisandtreatment)andhistologyservices.Everyaspectoftheprogrammeisgovernedbyqualityassurancestandards,basedonbestinternationalevidenceandreviewedbyapanelofinternationalexpertsbeforepublication.Thesecondeditionoftheseguidelines,publishedinearly2014,buildsonthelearningofthepastfiveyearsoftheprogrammeandcompletionofthefirstroundofscreening.
CervicalCheckcontinuestoinnovate,withrecentinitiativesincluding:
• Facilitatedreferralstocolposcopy
• Amoreaccessibleanduser-friendlywebsite
• Abilitytoanalyseandevaluateadditionalperformancemeasures
• IntroductionofHPVtestingpostcolposcopy
• Tailoredmanagementplansatcolposcopy
Theprogrammeisadaptingwithinachanginghealthenvironment,embracingdevelopmentswithinHPVtechnology,andmakingpreparationsfortheinclusionofHPVvaccinatedwomeninthecomingyears.Thisdiscussionissimilarlyreflectedacrossothercountrieswithavaccinationprogramme.
Primary careWomenhaveagreatdegreeofflexibilityandabroadchoiceoflocationsfortheirsmeartest.Thevastmajorityofwomenchosetohavetheirsmeartestcarriedoutinaprimarycaresetting.PrimarycaresettingsincludeGPpractices,Women’sHealth,FamilyPlanningandWellWomenClinics.
TheremainderofwomenhadtheirCervicalChecksmeartestinacolposcopyclinic,publicgynaecologyserviceorSTI/GUM(sexuallytransmittedinfection/genito-urinarymedicine)clinic.
Updates
During the fourth year of the CervicalCheck programme (1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012) over 90 per cent of women had their smear tests in a primary care setting, which is unsurprising with over 4,700 smeartakers registered with CervicalCheck across approximately 1,450 primary care settings.
UPDATES 6
![Page 8: 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 Programme...For the period 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 information on waiting times was available for 15,115 of the 16,590 new attendances](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052019/6032f4692300865c7008c62f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Smeartaker supports and trainingAdedicatedScreeningTrainingUnitco-ordinatessmeartakereducationandtraininginitiativesforthosestartingoutinpractice,andclinicalupdatesforexperiencedsmeartakers.Theunitprovidescomprehensivetrainingandresources,developedincollaborationwithsmeartakers,toensureprovisioninaflexibleandmeaningfulway.
CervicalCheckwonBestEducationProject(GeneralPractice/Pharmacysection)attheIrishHealthCareAwards2012.CervicalCheckalsohostedasuccessfulnationalstudydayfeaturingnationalandinternationalspeakersinAutumn2012.Thestudydayprovidedaforumfordiscussingtheachievementsoftheprogrammeaswellasthefutureofcervicalscreening.
AccreditedsmeartakertrainingmodulesareprovidedthroughsuccessfulpartnershipswiththeIrishCollegeofGeneralPractitioners(ICGP),RoyalCollegeofSurgeonsinIreland(RCSI)andtheNationalUniversityofIreland,Galway(NUIG).
TherehasbeenhighlevelofengagementwithGPTrainingSchemesandatailoredtrainingprogrammewasdeliveredto316GPtraineesduring2013.AccreditedclinicalupdatesessionshavebeendeliveredtoIrishPracticeNurseAssociation(IPNA)practicenursesatregionalbranchlevel.Continuingmedicaleducation(CME)sessionswereprovidedtoclinicallyresponsibledoctors.
Over98percentofsmeartestswerereportedassatisfactoryduringtheperiodofthisreport,reflectingtheskillandprofessionalismofsmeartakersregisteredwiththeprogramme.
AneLearningportalprovidesavirtuallearningenvironment,facilitatingbusyhealthprofessionalstoadvancetheirknowledgeandskillsinanaccessible,flexibleformat.
TheeLearningportalincludesCPDaccredited‘eUpdates’,acerviximagelibrary,resourcesforGPtrainees,andeducationalmodulesonotherNCSSprogrammes(availableatwww.cervicalcheck.ie–healthprofessionalssection).
Additionaleducationalresourcesincludetherecentlyrevised‘DesktopGuideforSmeartakers’.
CervicalCheck national study day Best Education Project (General Practice/Pharmacy Section) at the Irish Health Care Awards 2012
UPDATES7
![Page 9: 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 Programme...For the period 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 information on waiting times was available for 15,115 of the 16,590 new attendances](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052019/6032f4692300865c7008c62f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Promoting regular smear test as a routine health behaviourAcentralprincipleoftheprogrammeistheneedforeffectivecommunicationwitheligiblewomen,particularlyaroundraisingawarenessanddrivingunderstandingoftheimportanceofregularsmeartestsforcervicalhealth.Theprogrammeaimstoinform,educateandencourageeligiblewomentoparticipateintheCervicalCheckprogramme.
Maintaininghighlevelsofscreeningovertimeisakeychallengeinternationallyforpopulationscreeningprogrammes.Asthetargetaudiencechanges,withnewwomenenteringtheprogrammeandawarenessoftheprogrammegrowingacrossthewiderpopulation,CervicalCheckworkstoensureeligiblewomenareawareoftheimportanceofregularsmeartestsasaroutinehealthbehaviour,understandingthevaluefortheirhealthacrosstheirlifetime.
Somewomeninmorevulnerablesituationscanfaceanumberofbarrierstoparticipationandareidentifiedasharder-to-reach.Cuttingthroughtheimpedimentstodeliveracomplexmessageabouttheimportanceofregularsmeartestsisbestachievedusingacomprehensive,sensitivescreeningpromotionapproach.
Amulti-layeredapproachisdevisedinpartnershipbytheScreeningPromotionandCommunicationsteam,whichusestraditionalmediumssuchasadvertisingandpublicrelationsalongsidespecificinitiativestoencourageeligiblewomen,particularlythosewhoareharder-to-reach.
TheSmeartakerTrainingUnitlikewisehasakeyroleinreinforcingsimilarmessagingamongsttheserviceproviders.Inaddition,CervicalCheckprovides:
• Ascreeningpromotionteamwhoworkonanationalbasistoincreaseawarenessandunderstanding.
• AFreephoneinformationandsupportline.
• LeafletsdesignedinlinewiththeNationalAdultLiteracyAgency(NALA)PlainEnglishmark.
• Anaccessofferwhoworkstoprovideequalaccesstoscreeningforallwomen,includingthosewithdisabilities.
• Resourcesdesignedtomeetparticularneeds,suchasBraille,audioanddifferentlanguages.
UPDATES 8
*Image removed due to copyrights
![Page 10: 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 Programme...For the period 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 information on waiting times was available for 15,115 of the 16,590 new attendances](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052019/6032f4692300865c7008c62f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
During2013atargetedcampaignaddressedtwokeyissues:
• Encouragingwomenaged50-60toparticipate.TheinternationaltrendforlowerparticipationbywomentowardstheupperendoftheagerangeisreflectedinIrelandandaconcertedeffortwasmadetoraiseawarenessoftheimportanceofparticipationacrosstheagerange.
• Targetingpopulationswithalowuptaketoencouragewomenacrosstheagerangelivinginthoseareastoparticipate.
Cytology servicesCytologyservicesareprovidedforCervicalCheckbyQuestDiagnosticsIncandMedLabPathologyLtd,twolaboratoriescontractedbytheNationalScreeningService(NSS)followingapublicprocurementprocess.
ANationalCytopathologyTrainingCentrelocatedattheCoombeCytologyDeptbeganprocessingCervicalChecksamplesfromearly2013.
Performanceisauditedagainststandardssetforcytologyaspartoftheprogrammetobestensureturn-aroundtimesandotherperformanceindicators.
TheNationalScreeningServiceiscurrentlyengagedonaprojectwithHealthlinkandthecytologylaboratoriestoprovideGPsregisteredwithHealthlinkaccesstoelectroniccytologyresults.Theprojectisaimingforcompletionin2014.
Inordertoavoidunnecessarysmeartestsforwomen,follow-upofwomenwithlowgradeabnormalitieswasmodifiedinApril2012.
During the fourth year of the CervicalCheck programme (1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012)
•Over87percentofsatisfactorysmeartestswere found to be negative or normal.
•11percentshowedlowgradeabnormalities.
•Highgradeabnormalitiesweredetectedin1.6 per cent of smear tests.
Dr Gráinne Flannelly promoting the pearl of wisdom, emblem of European Cervical Cancer Prevention Week, January 2014
UPDATES9
![Page 11: 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 Programme...For the period 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 information on waiting times was available for 15,115 of the 16,590 new attendances](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052019/6032f4692300865c7008c62f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Colposcopy services provided at
Coombe Women and InfantsUniversity Hospital, Dublin
St Finbarr’s Hospital, Cork
The Adelaide and Meath Hospital, incorporating the National Children’s Hospital, Tallaght
Louth County Hospital, Dundalk Mayo General Hospital, Castlebar
University College Hospital, Galway
Limerick Regional Maternity Hospital
Kerry General Hospital, Tralee
South Tipperary General Hospital, Clonmel
Wexford General Hospital
Waterford Regional Hospital
Sligo General Hospital
Rotunda Hospital, Dublin
National Maternity Hospital, Dublin
Letterkenny General Hospital
UPDATES 10
![Page 12: 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 Programme...For the period 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 information on waiting times was available for 15,115 of the 16,590 new attendances](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052019/6032f4692300865c7008c62f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Colposcopy services
Colposcopyservicesprovidedacrossfifteenlocationsarevitaltoensuringaccuratediagnosisandeffectivetreatmentofwomenwhohavehadabnormalitiesdetectedintheirsmeartest.
CervicalCheckhasgreatlyimprovedcolposcopyservicesinIreland,increasingcapacityandensuringservicesreceiveadequateinvestmentandsupport.
InSeptember2013aColposcopyforumwashostedbytheNSSwherecolleaguesfromcolposcopyservicesnationallyattendedtodiscusstheprogramme’sachievements,newdevelopmentsandqualityassuranceatcolposcopyservices.
CervicalCheckcontinuallyworkstobetteridentifythosewomenwhoneedtreatmentandfurthersurveillance.ProgresshasbeenmadeinthisareawithrevisedNSS‘GuidelinesforQualityAssuranceinCervicalScreening’issuedrecentlybytheQualityAssurancecommittee.Aclinicalguidance
documentdescribestheuseofHPVtestingforthefollow-upoftreatedwomen.Italsoupdatesclinicaladviceonmanagementandsurveillancefollowingcolposcopy.WhereappropriateacombinedsmearandHPVtestwillbeprovidedayearfollowingtreatment.
Updatedclinicalguidanceonthemanagementoflowgradeabnormalitieswasintroducedinearly2014.Thistailoredapproachwillidentifyatanearlierstagethosewomenwhoneedtreatment.AnumberofITchangesandinformationsourceswereintroducedinordertofacilitatethis.WomenwhoattendaninitialcolposcopywherenoCINisidentifiedwillbeplacedundersurveillanceandreceiveacombinedsmearandHPVtestinayear’stime.
Performanceismonitoredagainststandardssetforcolposcopyaspartoftheprogrammeandinformationgatheredcentrallyisanalysedtoproducetheresultsinthisreport.ColposcopyservicesareprovidedbyclinicianscertifiedbytheBritishSocietyforColposcopyandCervicalPathology(BSCCP).
CervicalCheckcommitstoofferingcolposcopyappointments:
• Urgentreferralswithintwoweeksofsmeartestresults
• Highgradecellchangeswithinfourweeksofsmeartestresults
• Lowgradecellchangeswithineightweeksofsmeartestresults.
Participants at recent colposcopy forum hosted at King’s Inns House
UPDATES11
*Image removed due to copyrights
![Page 13: 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 Programme...For the period 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 information on waiting times was available for 15,115 of the 16,590 new attendances](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052019/6032f4692300865c7008c62f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Theprogrammecontinuestoworktowardsachievingandsurpassingstandardstoavoidanxietyandmaximiseefficiencyindiagnosisandtreatmentforthewoman.
Facilitated referral process for colposcopy services
Thefacilitatedreferralprocess,recommendingaspecificcolposcopyserviceforawomanrequiringreferral,hasbeenofbenefitbothintermsofcapacitymanagementandensuringappointmentsaregivenwithinprogrammetargets.Thisensuresthatwomenarereferredtocolposcopyserviceswithavailablecapacitywithinagreedtargetsforofferinganappointment.
Thefacilitatedreferralprocesshasalsoseenparticularbenefitintemporarilydivertingreferralsfromacolposcopyservicethatbecomesunavailableduetounforeseencircumstances.DuringfloodingatLetterkennyGeneralHospitalinAugust2013,referralswerequicklydivertedtoSligoGeneralHospitaluntilthehospitalreinstateditsserviceareas.Thisminimiseddisturbancetowomenandensuredreferralsoccurredinatimelyfashion.
Histopathology services
Biopsysamplestakenatcolposcopyareanalysedinhistopathologylaboratoriestodeterminethedegreeofabnormalityfound.Treatmentdecisionsarebasedonhistopathologyoutcomes.
In2013NSSextendedthescopeofitsagreementswithhospitalsprovidingcolposcopytoincludehistopathology.
Positive predictive value for CervicalCheck programme smear tests
Oneofthemostimportantqualitymeasuresforascreeningprogrammeisthepositivepredictivevalue(PPV)asitreflectstheprobabilitythatapositivetesthasdetectedtheunderlyingconditionbeingtested.
Thepositivepredictivevalueisameasureofthelikelihoodthatawomanwithapositivesmeartestactuallyhasapre-cancerouscervicalabnormalityoracancerdiagnosis.
Cervicalscreeningprogrammesaimforearlydetectionofhighgradeabnormalitieswhileminimisingunnecessaryinvestigations,anxietyandpossibleovertreatment.Thevalueofcytologyasatesttakesintoaccountboththesensitivity(abilitytodetectaproblemandavoidanceoffalsenegatives)andspecificity(avoidanceoffalsepositives).
During the fourth year of the CervicalCheck programme (1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012) the programme exceeded the standard set at 90 per cent for urgent and low grade referrals, with over 93 per cent of women being offered an appointment within eight weeks of the date the letter was received in the clinic.
During the fourth year of the CervicalCheck programme (1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012) the positive predictive value of Colposcopic impression was 75.3 per cent, above the programme standard of 65 per cent.
UPDATES 12
![Page 14: 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 Programme...For the period 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 information on waiting times was available for 15,115 of the 16,590 new attendances](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052019/6032f4692300865c7008c62f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
women screened from September 2011 - August 2012
328,000+
![Page 15: 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 Programme...For the period 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 information on waiting times was available for 15,115 of the 16,590 new attendances](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052019/6032f4692300865c7008c62f/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Introduction to the statistics 2011/2012CervicalCheck became a national screening programme on 1 September 2008. The figures reported in this section relate to the fourth year of operation (1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012). During this period the programme operated both an invitation entry system whereby eligible women received an invitation letter to screening and ‘direct entry’ whereby a woman could be screened by a smeartaker who could check her eligibility using an on-line facility.
Theresponsetotheprogrammehasbeenverypositivewith328,161womenattendingforscreeningduringthereportingperiod.QualityassuranceunderpinseveryaspectoftheCervicalCheckprogramme.Theprogramme’sperformanceismeasuredagainstKeyPerformanceIndicators(KPIs)asoutlinedinGuidelinesforQualityAssuranceinCervicalScreeningFirstEdition2009.
Table1showsthenumberofwomenscreenedbyagegroup.Womenbetweentheagesof25and60areinvitedtoscreening,butasmallnumberofwomenunder25mayattendunderspecificcriteria.Thosewomenaged61orovermayhavepresentedforthefirsttimeatthisageandsowereeligibleforafirstsmeartest,mayhavereceivedtheirinvitationtoscreeningatage60butdelayedsometimebeforepresentingforscreening,ormayreflectwomenhavingfollow-upsmeartestsperformed.
Programme statistics
Table 1: Number of women screened by age group
Age group Number of women screened %
<25* 1,812 0.6
25-29 55,083 16.8
30-34 60,128 18.3
35-39 54,378 16.6
40-44 47,254 14.4
45-49 38,936 11.9
50-54 30,840 9.4
55-59 23,599 7.2
60 3,659 1.1
≥61 12,472 3.8
Total: 328,161 100
* Basedonevidencetodate,thereisnoadditionalpublichealthbenefitinstartingpopulationscreeningbelowtheageof25.Screeninginwomenundertheageof25mayleadtomanywomenreceivingunnecessarytreatmentforlesionsthatwouldneverhavedevelopedintoinvasivecancer.Certainexemptionsapplywheresomewomenovertheageof60andundertheageof25areconsideredeligible.Suchexemptionsmayincludewomenofanyagewhoarepostcolposcopy,womenovertheageof60whohaveneverhadasmeartestandwomenaged20andoverwhoareonrenaldialysis,haveHIVinfection,arepostorgantransplantorwhohavehadapreviousabnormalsmeartestresultandarewithintherecommendedfollow-upperiod.
PROGRAMMESTATISTICS 14
![Page 16: 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 Programme...For the period 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 information on waiting times was available for 15,115 of the 16,590 new attendances](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052019/6032f4692300865c7008c62f/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Figure 1: Percentage of eligible women screened based on county of residence* from 1 September 2008 to 31 August 2012
* PopulationbasedonCSO2011Censusextrapolatedto2012
100%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Carlo
w
Kildare
Meath
Don
egal
Limerick
Sligo
Clare
Laois
Offa
ly
Galway
Louth
Waterford
Wexford
Cavan
Kilken
ny
Mon
agha
n
Dub
lin
Long
ford
Tipp
erary
Cork
Leitrim
Roscom
mon
Kerry
Mayo
Westm
eath
Wicklow
PROGRAMMESTATISTICS
Programme coverageCoverageisdefinedastheproportionofuniquewomenwhohavehadatleastonesatisfactorysmeartesttakenwithinthedefinedperiod,expressedasapercentageofthetotalnumberofeligiblewomeninthepopulation.Itisameasureofhowwelltheprogrammeisreachingthetargetpopulation.
Theoverallpercentageoftheeligiblepopulationscreenedinthefirstfouryearsofthenationalprogrammewas67.9percentnationwide.ThisdemonstratesthatCervicalCheckcontinuestoimprovecoverage,followingsuccessfulachievementofitstargetcoverageduringthefirstscreeninground(inyearsonetothreeofthenationalprogrammecoveragewas60.9percent).
ThegeographicalspreadofscreeningcoveragebasedontheeligiblepopulationofeachcountyisshowninFigures1and2.
15
![Page 17: 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 Programme...For the period 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 information on waiting times was available for 15,115 of the 16,590 new attendances](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052019/6032f4692300865c7008c62f/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
PROGRAMMESTATISTICS
70km40mls
>=70%
65%-69%
<65%
Coverage
Figure 2: Map showing percentage of eligible women screened by county of residence* from 1 September 2008 to 31 August 2012
* DataanalysedusingHealthAtlasIreland.
PopulationbasedonCSO2011Censusextrapolatedto2012
Eligible Women ScreenedSeptember 2008 – August 2012
16
![Page 18: 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 Programme...For the period 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 information on waiting times was available for 15,115 of the 16,590 new attendances](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052019/6032f4692300865c7008c62f/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
100%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%25-29 30-34 35-39
Agegroup
%cov
erag
e
40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60
Figure 3: Coverage of women by age group
Mostwomen(90.8percent)hadtheirsmeartestscarriedoutinaprimarycaresetting;93.2percentoftheseattendedaGPpractice.Fortheremainderofwomen,thefirstCervicalChecksmeartestoccurredinacolposcopyclinic,publicgynaecologyserviceorSTI/GUMclinic.
CoverageoftheprogrammebyagerangeforthefirstfouryearsisshowninFigure3.ThesefiguresrepresentthenumberofwomenscreenedcomparedtoeligiblewomenasoutlinedinCensus2011extrapolatedto2012.
Aconsistentpatternhasbeenevidentsincetheinceptionoftheprogramme,withthehighestcoverageseeninyoungeragegroupsandcoveragegraduallydecreasingwithincreasingage.
PROGRAMMESTATISTICS17
![Page 19: 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 Programme...For the period 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 information on waiting times was available for 15,115 of the 16,590 new attendances](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052019/6032f4692300865c7008c62f/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Table 3: Percentage of women sent results letter within four weeks of smear test date
Time from smear test to results letter printed date 2011/12 Target
Within4weeks 74.8% >90%
Table 2: Laboratory turnaround time - time from receipt of sample at laboratory to results returned to the programme
Performance parameter 2011/12 Target
%resultsreturnedwithintwoweeksof 88.2% >90%receiptofsampleatlaboratory.
Laboratory turnaround time Oneofthecriteriafortheselectionoflaboratoriesfortheprovisionofcytologyserviceswasthecapacityandabilitytoprocesssmeartestswithin10daystofacilitatetheprovisionofresultstowomenwithinfourweeksfromthedateofthesmeartest.Table2showshowthelaboratoriesperformedoverthefourthyearoftheprogramme.Overallforthereportingperiod88.2percentoftestresultswerereceivedbytheprogrammewithintwoweeks,slightlybelowthetargetset.
Thelaboratories’performancemetricsareauditedandmonitoredonanongoingbasistoensureadherencetotheguidelinesforqualityassuranceincervicalscreening.
CervicalCheck women’s charterTheCervicalCheckwomen’scharterincludesthecommitmentthat“yourresultandanytreatmentrecommendationwillbeprovidedtoyouandyournominatedsmeartakerbytheprogrammewithinfourweeks”.Laboratoriestypicallyprovidewrittenresultstodoctorswithinthreeweeksofreceiptofsamples.Theprogrammeisnotifiedthattheresultisavailable,andwomenareissuedaletterfromtheprogrammeoutliningthenextstepandanyrecommendationfollowingtheirsmeartest.
BytheendofAugust2012almost75percentofwomenreceivedaresultsletterfromtheprogrammewithinfourweeks(over91percentwithinfiveweeks)oftheirsmeartestdate(Table3&Figure4).Overthefirstfouryearsofthenationalprogrammetherehasbeensustainedimprovement.Thenumberofwomensentresultsletterswithinfourweeksincreasedfrom40.5percentin2008-2009to74.8percentin2011-2012.Ongoingmonitoringandactionsaretakentoprogressivelyimprovethisresponsetime,workingwithsmeartakersonsamplesubmissionaswellasprocessimprovements.
PROGRAMMESTATISTICS 18
![Page 20: 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 Programme...For the period 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 information on waiting times was available for 15,115 of the 16,590 new attendances](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052019/6032f4692300865c7008c62f/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Upto4weeks
4-5weeks
5-6weeks
Over6weeks
Figure 4: Time in weeks for results letter sent to women (%)
Table 4: Cytology findings for smear test results
Smear tests Cytology findings
Total number of smear Unsatisfactory/ Satisfactory/ tests processed inadequate smear test adequate smear test
N N % N %
364,213 4,554 1.3 359,659 98.7
CytologyCytologyfindingsreportedinTables4and5arebasedonsmeartestresultsreceivedbytheprogrammeintheperiod1September2011to31August2012,ratherthanthesmeartestdate.Ofthe364,213smearteststaken,asmallnumberwereunsatisfactory(Table4).Theoutcomesoftheremaining359,659satisfactorysmearsarereportedinTable5.
17.1%
3.6%4.4%
74.9%
PROGRAMMESTATISTICS19
![Page 21: 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 Programme...For the period 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 information on waiting times was available for 15,115 of the 16,590 new attendances](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052019/6032f4692300865c7008c62f/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Table 5: Cytology results excluding unsatisfactory smear tests
Cytology results N %
NAD(noabnormalitydetected) 314,476 87.4
Low Grade
ASCUS 25,497 7.1
AGC(AtypicalGlandularCells) 1,211 0.3
LSIL 12,860 3.6
High Grade
ASC-H 2,026 0.6
HSIL(Moderate) 1,683 0.5
HSIL(Severe) 1,870 0.5
QuerySquamousCellCarcinoma 10 0.0
QueryGlandularNeoplasiaorAIS 26 0.0
Total 359,659 100
Ofsmeartestsperformedoutsideofcolposcopyclinics14,194(4.2%)resultedinareferraltocolposcopy.
Over87percentofsatisfactorysmeartestresultsintheperiodwerefoundtobenegativeornormal.Oftheremainder,11percentshowedlowgradeabnormalitiesand1.6percentshowedhighgradeabnormalities(HSIL(moderateorsevere),ASC-H,queryinvasivesquamouscarcinomaorqueryglandularneoplasia).
Thehighrateoflowgradeabnormalitiesremainedaninterestingfeatureoftheprogrammeduringthisyear.Thisisbecausesomewererepeatsmearsthatwererecommendedfollowingapreviouslowgradesmeartestresult.
PROGRAMMESTATISTICS 20
![Page 22: 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 Programme...For the period 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 information on waiting times was available for 15,115 of the 16,590 new attendances](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052019/6032f4692300865c7008c62f/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Table 6: Outcome of appointments at colposcopy clinics
First visits Follow-ups Total
N % N % N %
Attended 16,621 72.6 43,202 53.7 59,823 57.9
Cancelled 5,056 22.1 28,609 35.6 33,665 32.6
Didnotattend(DNA) 1,172 5.1 8,531 10.6 9,703 9.4
Notrecorded 54 0.2 60 0.1 114 0.2
Total 22,903 100 80,402 100 103,305 100
50,00035,00020,000 45,00030,00015,0005,000 40,00025,00010,0000
Numberoffirstvisits Numberoffollow-upvisits
Sep2011–Aug2012
Sep2010–Aug2011
Sep2009–Aug2010
Sep2008–Aug2009
Figure 5: Attendance at colposcopy services from 1 September 2008 – 31 August 2012
Diagnosis and treatmentTheprovisionofhighqualitycolposcopyserviceswithtimelydiagnosisandtreatmentisacrucialcomponentofsuccessfulcervicalscreeningprogrammesandremainsakeypriorityfortheCervicalCheckprogramme.FifteencolposcopyservicesnationwideworkwiththeProgramme,eachwithagreedindividualisedserviceplansdeliveredbydedicatedmultidisciplinaryteams.Informationiscollectedelectronicallyandacentraldataextractionperformed.Thesedataformthebasisforthissectionofthereport.
Duringtheyear16,621womenattendedcolposcopyforthefirsttime.Thisrepresentsaslightdroponthepreviousyear.Thesustainedincreaseinreferralsseeninpreviousyearsisreflectedinadoublingofthenumbersofwomenattendingforfollowupappointments(43,202in2012comparedto20,769in2011).
Itisimportanttonotethenumberofwomenreferredandthenumberofnewreferralsattendedwillnotbethesameinanygiventimeperiod.Thisisbecauseoftheleadtimebetweenthecolposcopyreferralandthedateofthefirstcolposcopyvisitaswellasadditionalreferralsforclinicalreasons.
PROGRAMMESTATISTICS21
![Page 23: 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 Programme...For the period 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 information on waiting times was available for 15,115 of the 16,590 new attendances](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052019/6032f4692300865c7008c62f/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Women who default from attendance at colposcopy services according to CervicalCheck standards
Performance parameter 2011/12 Target
Thepercentageofwomenwhodonotattendand 9.4% <15%whodonotnotifytheclinicshouldbemaintained atalowleveltomaximisetheefficiencyoftheclinic andtoavoidthelossofwomentofollow-up.
Table 7: DNA rates for appointments offered to women by age group
Age in years at Number of First Number of Follow-up first offered first visit DNA follow-up visit DNA appointments appointments rate (%) appointments rate (%)
<25 946 12.6 5,798 15.5
25–29 6,224 5.5 23,412 12.0
30–34 5,011 5.5 17,952 11.2
35–39 3,420 5.1 11,470 9.7
40–44 2,596 4.0 8,381 8.5
45–49 1,927 2.9 5,897 7.5
50–54 1,310 2.7 3,592 6.7
55–59 684 3.1 1,893 6.1
60 77 2.6 248 3.6
≥61 355 1.7 654 5.2
Notrecorded 353 9.3 1,105 12.8
Ofthe16,621newattendancesatcolposcopy,informationontheageofthewomanwasavailablefor16,488(99.2%).Themeanageatreferralwas36years.Themajorityofwomenwereagedbetween25-45yearswith3.8percentagedunder25yearsand11.3percentover50years.
AccordingtothestandardsforcolposcopyfortheCervicalCheckprogrammetherateofdefaultedappointmentswherenopriornoticewasgiven(DNA)shouldbekepttoaminimumandmaintainedbelow15percent.
TherateofDNAappointmentsispresentedaccordingtothetypeofvisitandtheageofthewoman(Table7).TheDNArateishigherforreturnvisitsthanforfirstvisits.Asreflectedinlastyear’sreport,youngerwomenweremorelikelytodefaultthanolderwomen.Thismayreflecthigherlevelsofmobilitywithinthispopulationofwomen.
PROGRAMMESTATISTICS 22
![Page 24: 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 Programme...For the period 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 information on waiting times was available for 15,115 of the 16,590 new attendances](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052019/6032f4692300865c7008c62f/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Table 8: Reason for referral to colposcopy
New referrals for whom consent is available
Reason for referral to colposcopy N %
Abnormalsmeartestresult 13,728 82.8
Clinicalindication–nonurgent 1,531 9.2
Clinicalindication–urgent 1,316 7.9
Total* 16,575 100
* 15womenhadnoreasonentered
Figure 6: Reason for referral for women attending colposcopy services from 1 September 2008 – 31 August 2012
6,000
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
Sep2008–Feb2009
Lowgrade Highgrade Clinicalindication–nonurgent Clinicalindication–urgent
Mar2009–Aug2009
Sep2009–Feb2010
Mar2010–Aug2010
Sep2010–Feb2011
Sep2011–Feb2012
Mar2011–Aug2011
Mar2012–Aug2012
Num
ber
Reasons for referralOfthe16,621newreferralswhoattendedcolposcopyservices,consentinformationwasavailablefortheCervicalCheckprogrammefor16,590women(99percent).Fortheremainingonepercenttheconsentinformationwasnotrecorded.Thereasonsforreferraltocolposcopyforthesewomenwere:
• 83percentwerereferredonthebasisofanabnormalsmear
• 17percentforclinicalreasons
Anumberofwomenwerereferredtocolposcopyfromoutsideoftheprogrammeforclinicalreasonssuchasanabnormalsmeartestresultorforclinicalreasonssuchassymptomsofabnormalvaginalbleedingorasuspicionofananatomicalabnormalityofthecervix(Table8).
Therelativeincreaseinclinicalreferralsisfacilitatedbyanincreaseincapacityforthesereferralsatcolposcopywhichpreviouslywouldhavebeenseeninoutpatientgynaecologyservices(Figure6).
PROGRAMMESTATISTICS23
![Page 25: 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 Programme...For the period 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 information on waiting times was available for 15,115 of the 16,590 new attendances](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052019/6032f4692300865c7008c62f/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Ofthe13,728womenwhopresentedwithanabnormalsmear,4,092(30%)werereferredfollowingdetectionofahigh-gradeabnormality(Table9).Thedetectionofalow-gradesmeartestresult(LSILorASCUS)wasthereasonforreferralin8,690(63%)womenandasmeartestshowingAGC(borderlineglandularcells)wasthereasonforreferralin883cases(6.4%).Thenumbersofwomenreferredwithpersistentlyunsatisfactoryorinadequateresults(63;0.5%)remainedconsistentlylow.
Table 9: Reason for referral to colposcopy as a result of an abnormal smear test result
New referrals for whom consent is available
Referral smear abnormality N %
Unsatisfactory/inadequate 63 0.5
Low Grade
ASCUS 4,334 31.6
AGC(borderlineglandular) 883 6.4
LSIL 4,356 31.7
High Grade
ASC-H 1,410 10.3
HSIL(moderate) 1,272 9.3
HSIL(severe) 1,377 10.0
Queryinvasivesquamouscarcinoma 11 0.01
QueryglandularneoplasiaAIS/adenocarcinoma 22 0.2
Total 13,728 100
PROGRAMMESTATISTICS 24
![Page 26: 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 Programme...For the period 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 information on waiting times was available for 15,115 of the 16,590 new attendances](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052019/6032f4692300865c7008c62f/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Figure 7: Waiting time for colposcopy services over first four years of the programme – measured against CervicalCheck standards over time
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Sep2008–Aug2009
Sep2009–Aug2010
Sep2010–Aug2011
Sep2011–Aug2012
Allwomenreferredtocolposcopyshouldbeofferedanappointmentwithineightweeksofthedatetheletterwasreceivedintheclinic
Allwomenreferredtocolposcopywithasuspicionofinvasivecanceronasmearshouldbeofferedanappointmentwithintwoweeksofthedatetheletterwasreceivedintheclinic
AllwomenreferredtocolposcopywithasmearsuggestiveofCIN2orCIN3shouldbeofferedanappointmentwithinfourweeksofthedatetheletterwasreceivedintheclinic
Allwomenreferredtocolposcopywithasmearsuggestiveofglandularneoplasiashouldbeofferedanappointmentwithinfourweeksofthedatetheletterwasreceivedintheclinic
Waiting timesOneofthekeychallengesfacedbytheCervicalCheckprogrammeinthefirstfouryearswastheprovisionofaccesstocolposcopyinatimelyfashionforwomen.Sincethestartoftheprogramme,serviceshavebeenactivelyengagedinaprocesstoincreasecapacityandthishasresultedinsustainedimprovementsyearonyear.
Standardsfortheprogrammestatethat90percentofwomenwithhighgradecytologicalabnormalitiesshouldwaitlessthanfourweeksand90percentofallwomenshouldwaitlessthaneightweeksforanappointment.
Fortheperiod1September2011to31August2012informationonwaitingtimeswasavailablefor15,115ofthe16,590newattendances(Table10,Figure7).
ForwomenreferredtocolposcopywithasmeartestsuggestiveofCIN2/CIN3,81.6percentwereseenwithinfourweeks.
Overallhowever,onlysevenpercentofwomenexperiencedwaitingtimesoflongerthaneightweeksandinonlyonepercentofcasesthewaitwaslongerthan12weeks.Thisrepresentsaconsiderableimprovementinthefourthyearoftheprogramme(duringthepreviousyearthewaitwaslongerthan12weeksin15.8percentofcases).
PROGRAMMESTATISTICS25
![Page 27: 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 Programme...For the period 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 information on waiting times was available for 15,115 of the 16,590 new attendances](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052019/6032f4692300865c7008c62f/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Waiting times for colposcopy measured against colposcopy standards
Performance parameter 2011/12 Target
Allwomenreferredtocolposcopyshouldbeoffered 93.4% > 90%anappointmentwithineightweeksofdatetheletterwasreceivedintheclinic.
Allwomenreferredtocolposcopywithasmear 81.6% > 90%suggestiveofCIN2orCIN3shouldbeofferedanappointmentwithinfourweeksofdatetheletterwasreceivedintheclinic.
Allwomenreferredtocolposcopywithasuspicion 100% > 90%ofinvasivecanceronasmearshouldbeofferedanappointmentwithintwoweeksofdatetheletterwasreceivedintheclinic.
Allwomenreferredtocolposcopywithasmear 95.5% > 90%suggestiveofglandularneoplasiashouldbeofferedanappointmentwithinfourweeksofthedatetheletterwasreceivedintheclinic
Table 10: Waiting times for women referred to colposcopy grouped by grade of referral smear test
High grade Low grade Total
N % N % N %
Lessthan2weeks 1,411 35.1 1,639 17.4 3,050 22.7
Between2and4weeks 1,848 45.9 2,274 24.1 4,122 30.6
Between4and8weeks 689 17.1 4,695 49.7 5,384 40.0
Between8and12weeks 42 1.0 703 7.4 745 5.5
Greaterthan12weeks 12 0.3 129 1.4 141 1.0
PROGRAMMESTATISTICS 26
![Page 28: 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 Programme...For the period 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 information on waiting times was available for 15,115 of the 16,590 new attendances](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052019/6032f4692300865c7008c62f/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Figure 8: Number of women undergoing biopsy at colposcopy services
12,000
10,000
8,000
6,000
4,000
2,000
0
Num
ber
Sep2008–Feb2009
Mar2009–Aug2009
Sep2009–Feb2010
Mar2010–Aug2010
Sep2010–Feb2011
Sep2011–Feb2012
Mar2011–Aug2011
Mar2012–Aug2012
Allappointments Firstappointments
Biopsy rates measured against colposcopy standards
Performance parameter 2011/12 Target
Abiopsyshouldbeperformedinthepresenceofan 88.0% >95%atypicalTransformationZoneandasmeartestwhichsuggestsunderlyingCIN.
Ifthereisasuspicionofinvasivediseaseabiopsy 93.9% >90%mustbeperformedimmediately.
Theroleofcolposcopyistofacilitatediagnosisandtreatmentofwomenwithabnormalsmeartestresults.Whereanabnormalityissuspectedatcolposcopyitisgoodpracticetoperformabiopsytoconfirmthediagnosis.Therearetwomaintypesofbiopsyperformed–adiagnosticbiopsy,whichinvolvessamplingaportionoftheabnormalareaonly,andanexcisionalbiopsywhichremovestheabnormalareainitsentirety.
Duringthereportingperiod13,373diagnosticbiopsies,7,375excisionalbiopsiesand40otherbiopsieswereperformed.TheinitialcolposcopyvisitdeterminesthepresenceorabsenceofanatypicalTransformationZone.Abiopsywasperformedin88percentofcaseswherethetransformationzonewasdocumentedasatypicalandover93percentofcaseswhereaninvasivecancerwassuspected.
PROGRAMMESTATISTICS27
![Page 29: 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 Programme...For the period 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 information on waiting times was available for 15,115 of the 16,590 new attendances](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052019/6032f4692300865c7008c62f/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Table 11: Biopsies performed during the first visit to colposcopy according to referral smear grade
Biopsy performed
Excisional Diagnostic No biopsy Total biopsy biopsy taken
Grade of cytology result of referral smear N % N % N % N %
AGC(borderlineglandular) 145 16.4 468 53.0 270 30.6 883 100
HighGrade 1,193 29.2 2,283 55.8 616 15.1 4,092 100
LowGrade 360 4.1 4,821 55.5 3,509 40.4 8,690 100
Unsatisfactory/inadequate 2 3.2 19 30.2 42 66.7 63 100
Total 1,700 12.4 7,591 55.3 4,437 32.3 13,728 100
ThebiopsyratesaccordingtothegradeofthereferralsmeartestandreasonsforreferralarepresentedinTable11.Eightyfivepercentofwomenpresentingwithahighgradecytologicalabnormalityhadabiopsyperformedatthefirstvisitcomparedwith60percentofwomenpresentingwithalowgradecytologicalabnormality.Over69percentofwomenpresentingwithAGC(borderlineglandularcells)hadabiopsyatthefirstvisitwhichincludedanexcisionalbiopsyin16.4percent.Thisreflectsthecontinueddifficultyofmanagingthisrelativelynewgroupofwomenparticularlyifthecolposcopicappearanceisnormalorunsatisfactory.
PROGRAMMESTATISTICS 28
![Page 30: 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 Programme...For the period 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 information on waiting times was available for 15,115 of the 16,590 new attendances](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052019/6032f4692300865c7008c62f/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
The outcome of use of local anaesthetic measured against colposcopy standards
Performance parameter 2011/12 Target
Themajorityofwomenshouldhavetreatment 94.0 >80%performedasanoutpatientunderlocalanaesthetic.
Treatment at colposcopyEffectivetreatmentofhighgradeCINandadenocarcinomainsituwithsubsequentreductionoftheriskofinvasivecancerisvitaltothesuccessofanycervicalscreeningprogramme.Thistreatmentshouldbeeffective,safeandacceptable.ItshouldaimtoeradicateallCINfromthecervixandshouldbetailoredtothecircumstancesoftheindividualwoman.
ThestandardsfortheCervicalCheckprogrammestatethattreatmentsbeperformedasanoutpatientprocedureunderlocalanaestheticmorethan80percentofthetime.Duringthefourthyearoftheprogrammetreatmentwasperformedasanoutpatientusinglocalanaesthetic94percentofthetime,surpassingthistarget.
Duringthereportingperiod,8,109treatmentswererecordedatcolposcopy.LargeloopexcisionoftheTransformationZone(LLETZ)wasperformedin7,236(89.2%)andablativetreatmentwasusedin758(9.3%)cases.Fortyconebiopsies(0.5%),74hysterectomies(0.9%)andonetrachalectomy(0.01%)wereperformed(Figures9and10).Ofthetotaltreatments,7,545wereperformedfollowinganabnormalsmeartest.
Ablation
ConeBiopsy
LLETZ
Hysterectomy
Trachalectomy
Figure 9: Treatment at colposcopy
89.2%
9.3%
0.5%
0.01%0.9%
PROGRAMMESTATISTICS29
![Page 31: 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 Programme...For the period 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 information on waiting times was available for 15,115 of the 16,590 new attendances](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052019/6032f4692300865c7008c62f/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Table 12: Treatment at first visit to colposcopy
Reason for referral No treatment Treatment on Total number of to colposcopy on first visit first visit women attended
N % N % N %
Clinicalindication 1,472 96.1 59 3.9 1,531 100– nonurgent
Clinicalindication 1,282 97.4 34 2.6 1,316 100– urgent
AGC 737 83.5 146 16.5 883 100(borderlineglandular)
Highgrade 2,901 70.9 1,191 29.1 4,092 100
Lowgrade 8,330 95.9 360 4.1 8,690 100
Unsatisfactory 61 96.8 2 3.2 63 100/inadequate
Total 14,783 89.2 1,792 10.8 16,575 100
4,500
4,000
3,500
3,000
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0
Num
ber
Allappointments Firstappointments
Sep2008–Feb2009
Mar2009–Aug2009
Sep2009–Feb2010
Mar2010–Aug2010
Sep2010–Feb2011
Sep2011–Feb2012
Mar2011–Aug2011
Mar2012–Aug2012
Figure 10: Number of women undergoing treatment at colposcopy
PROGRAMMESTATISTICS 30
![Page 32: 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 Programme...For the period 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 information on waiting times was available for 15,115 of the 16,590 new attendances](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052019/6032f4692300865c7008c62f/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
The performance of colposcopy treatment parameters measured against colposcopy standards
Performance parameter 2011/12 Target
Treatmentatfirstvisitshouldnotbeperformed 4.1% <10%onwomenwhopresentwithlowgradecytologicalchangeevenifthereisaColposcopicsuspicionofhighgradedisease(exceptinspecialcircumstances).
Womentreatedbyexcisionaltreatmentsatfirst 91.8% >90%visitshouldhaveCINonhistology.
Womentreatedbyexcisionaltreatmentsatany 91.0% >80%visitshouldhaveCINonhistology.
The positive predictive value of colposcopy measured against colposcopy standards
Performance parameter 2011/12 Target
CompliancebetweenColposcopicimpressionof 75.3% >65%highgradediseaseandhistologicallyprovenhighgradeCIN.
Oneofthekeychallengesofscreeningistheavoidanceofovertreatment.Thisisofparticularrelevancetocervicalscreeningbecausetreatmenthasthepotentialtohaveanadverseeffectonfuturefertility.Inthisregardtreatmentatthefirstvisitforwomenwhopresentwithlowgradeabnormalitiesshouldbeavoidedandkeptbelow10percent.Duringthefourthyearoftheprogrammethisfigurewaswithinthetargetat4.1percent.
ItisgenerallyacceptedthatmostofthewomenwhoundergoexcisionalproceduresshouldhaveCINonhistologyontheexcisedspecimen.Thisisparticularlytrueiftheprocedureisperformedatthefirstvisittocolposcopy.DuringthefourthyearoftheCervicalCheckprogrammethistargetwasreachedwithnearly92percentofwomentreatedatthefirstvisithavingCINonhistology.
Colposcopyplaysanimportantroleintheevaluationofwomenwithsuspectedcervicalabnormalities.Itallowstheidentificationofthesiteoftheabnormalityaswellasanestimationofthegradeofabnormalityincludingthepresenceorabsenceoffeaturessuggestiveofinvasivecancer.Thecorrelationbetweenthecolposcopicimpressionandhistologicaldiagnosisisausefulmarkerofthequalityofcolposcopy.Duringtheyearthepositivepredictivevalueofacolposcopicimpressionofhighgradediseasewas75percentwhichexceedstheCervicalCheckstandard(>65%).
PROGRAMMESTATISTICS31
![Page 33: 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 Programme...For the period 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 information on waiting times was available for 15,115 of the 16,590 new attendances](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052019/6032f4692300865c7008c62f/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
7,000
6,000
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
Num
ber
Figure 11: Detection of CIN and cancer
Sep2008-Aug2009
NoCIN LowgradeCIN HighgradeCIN Cancer
Sep2009-Aug2010 Sep2010-Aug2011 Sep2011-Aug2012
Performance parameter 2011/12 Target
Biopsyspecimensshouldbesuitablefor 98.7% >95%histologicaldiagnosis
HistologyTheobjectiveofacervicalscreeningprogrammeisthedetectionandtreatmentofhighgradeCINandtheyieldoftheseabnormalitiesisoneofthehallmarksofasuccessfulprogramme.ThehistologyispresentedbyyearinFigure11.TheyieldofhighgradeabnormalitiesremainedconsistentlyhighandillustratestheprogrammeisachievingitsobjectiveofdetectionandtreatmentofhighgradeCIN.Thisreflectsthesustainedhighlevelsofactivityinthecolposcopyservices.
PROGRAMMESTATISTICS 32
![Page 34: 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 Programme...For the period 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 information on waiting times was available for 15,115 of the 16,590 new attendances](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052019/6032f4692300865c7008c62f/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Tabl
e 13
: H
isto
logy
resu
lts fo
r wom
en w
ho h
ad a
sat
isfa
ctor
y bi
opsy
in c
olpo
scop
y fr
om 1
Sep
tem
ber 2
011
to 3
1 A
ugus
t 201
2
N
o CI
N/N
o H
PV
HPV
/ Ce
rvit
is
CIN
1
CIN
2
CIN
3
Ade
noca
rcin
oma
Canc
er
(n
orm
al)
only
in s
itu
/ CG
IN
(incl
udin
g
m
icro
inva
sive
)
Gra
de o
f cyt
olog
y
resu
lt o
f ref
erra
l sm
ear
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
ASC
US
723
20.9
448
12.9
1,43
141
.3
517
14.9
331
9.6
10
0.3
40.1
AGC
249
29.2
85
10.0
244
28.6
88
10.3
124
14.5
52
6.1
12
1.4
(borde
rline
gland
ular)
LSIL
654
15.0
435
10.0
1,73
239
.7
925
21.2
603
13.8
14
0.3
10.02
ASC
-H
144
9.7
103
7.0
324
21.9
272
18.4
610
41.2
12
0.8
16
1.1
HSIL
211
6.0
147
4.2
501
14.2
560
15.9
2,00
756
.9
29
0.8
71
2.0
(mod
erateorsevere)
Que
ryinvasive
110
.0
00.0
00.0
00.0
110
.0
110
.0
770
.0
squa
mou
scarcinom
a
Que
rygland
ular
620
.7
13.4
310
.3
13.4
931
.0
517
.2
413
.8
neop
lasiaAIS/
ad
enocarcino
ma
Unsatisfactory/
11
40.7
518
.5
829
.6
00.0
311
.1
00.0
00.0
Inad
equa
te
Total
1,99
914
.5
1,22
48.9
4,24
330
.8
2,36
317
.2
3,68
826
.8
123
0.9
115
0.8
PROGRAMMESTATISTICS33
![Page 35: 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 Programme...For the period 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 information on waiting times was available for 15,115 of the 16,590 new attendances](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052019/6032f4692300865c7008c62f/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Measures of the performance of cytology
PPV 75.6%
APV 28.7%
TPV 45.8%
RV 2.18
Performance measures for CervicalCheck programme smear testsCervicalscreeningprogrammeshavetobalancetheearlydetectionofhighgradeabnormalitieswithavoidingunnecessaryinvestigationsandpossibleovertreatment.Performancemeasureshavebeendevelopedwhichlookathowvalidthescreeningtestsarewithinorganisedprogrammes.Theseincludethepositivepredictivevalue(PPV),abnormalpredictivevalue(APV),totalpredictivevalue(TPV)andreferralvalue(RV).
Thepositivepredictivevalue(PPV)isreportedasthepercentageofwomenreferredwithhigh-gradecytologicalabnormalitywhohaveahistologicaldiagnosisofCIN2orhigher.DuringthecurrentreportingyearthePPVwas75.6percent.
Theabnormalpredictivevalue(APV)calculatesthepercentageofsamplesreportedasborderlineorlow-gradethatledtoreferraltocolposcopyandsubsequenthistologicaldiagnosisofCIN2orhigher.DuringthecurrentreportingyeartheAPVwas28.7percent.
Thetotalpredictivevalue(TPV)examinesthepercentageofallwomenreferredtocolposcopyonthebasisofanabnormalsmearwhohaveahistologicaloutcomeofCIN2orworse.Duringthereportingyear45.8percentofwomenreferredtocolposcopyhadCIN2orhigherdemonstratedonhistology.
Thereferralvalue(RV)looksatthisinanotherwayandexaminesthenumberofwomenreferredtocolposcopyforthedetectionofonecaseofCIN2orworse.Duringthecurrentreportingyear,forevery2.18womenreferredtocolposcopyonehadCIN2orhigherdetected(forevery218womenreferredtocolposcopy100hadCIN2orhigherdetected).
PROGRAMMESTATISTICS 34
![Page 36: 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 Programme...For the period 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 information on waiting times was available for 15,115 of the 16,590 new attendances](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052019/6032f4692300865c7008c62f/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
AblationTreatmentwhichinvolvesthedestructionofthecervicalabnormalitiesusingavarietyoftechniques.Itdoesnotallowforhistologicalexaminationofthewholeabnormalareaandstrictcriteriamustbefollowedthereforetominimisetheriskofinadvertenttreatmentofhiddenmicroinvasivecancer.
Abnormal/not normal smear test Asmeartestwhichshowscellswhicharenottypicallynormalorwherepre-cancerousorcancerouscellsareidentified.
AdenocarcinomaAcanceraffectingthecervix,butinvolvingthecolumnar(endocervical)cellsratherthanthesquamouscells.Thecolumnarcellsareinvolvedinglandularactivity.
Adenocarcinoma in situApre-canceraffectingthecervix,butinvolvingthecolumnar(endocervical)cellsratherthanthesquamouscells.
Adequate smear test resultAsmeartestwhichisdeemedsatisfactoryforevaluationbythelaboratory.
AGCAtypicalglandularcells.
AGUSAtypicalglandularcellsofundeterminedsignificance.
ASC-HAtypicalsquamouscellsforwhichahigh-gradelesioncannotbeexcluded.
ASC-USAtypicalsquamouscellsofundeterminedsignificance.
Atypical Transformation ZoneThetermusedwhenchangesaredetectedbycolposcopyintheTransformationZone.Thesechangescanincludeavarietyofpatternsincluding:leukoplakia,acetowhiteepitheliumandabnormalvascularpatterns.
BiopsyTheremovalofasampleoftissuefromthebodyforexaminationusingamicroscope.
Cervical cancerCancerofthecervix.Cancercellshavespreadbeyondthenaturalbasementmembraneboundaryofthecervicalskin.Cervicalcancercanbeofsquamousorigin(approximately85%)orglandularorigin(approximately15%).
Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)CINisnotcancerbutisthehistologicaltermreferringtotheabnormalgrowthofpre-cancerouscellsinthesurfacelayersofthecervix.Itdescribesvaryingdegreesofabnormalityofthecellswithinandconfinedtotheepithelium.TherearethreegradesofCIN:CIN1,CIN2orCIN3.
Cervical screeningAprocesswhichinvolvestheapplicationofascreeningtestatregularintervalstoadefinedpopulationofwomentodetectpre-cancerouschanges.
Cervical cytologyAmicroscopicexaminationofasinglelayerofcellsscrapedfromthesurfaceofthecervix.
ColposcopyAnexaminationofthecervixusingaspecialisedopticinstrument(colposcope)thatprovidesmagnificationtoallowdirectobservationandstudyofvaginalandcervicalepithelium.Itidentifieslesionsonthecervixwhichcanbebiopsiedandtreated.
Cone biopsy Asurgicalremovalofacone-shapedsectionofthecervixtoremoveabnormalcells.
CoverageTheproportionofwomenaged25-60yearswhohavehadascreeningresultrecordedonthescreeningregisteroveracompletescreeninground.
DiagnosisAprocessaimedattheclarificationofcervicalabnormalitiestoinformdecision-makingregardingtreatment.
DyskaryosisTermusedincytologytodescribenuclearabnormalitiesincervicalcells.
Glossary
GLOSSARY35
![Page 37: 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 Programme...For the period 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 information on waiting times was available for 15,115 of the 16,590 new attendances](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052019/6032f4692300865c7008c62f/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Eligible for screeningWomanaged25to60wholiveinIrelandareeligibletohaveafreesmeartest.
Excisional treatmentTreatmentwhichinvolvestheremovaloftheabnormalityinitsentiretytherebyallowinghistologicalexaminationoftheentireTransformationZone.
HSILHighgradesquamousintraepithelial(moderateandsevere)lesionencompassingmoderate(CIN2)andseveredysplasia(CIN3/CIS).
HistologyThemicroscopicstudyofthestructureandcompositionofbodytissue.
Human papillomavirus (HPV)Agroupofwartvirusesofwhichahighproportionaresexuallytransmitted.Over100differenttypesofHPVhavebeenidentifiedandeachisknownbynumber.Types6and11areassociatedwithgenitalwartsandtypes16and18areassociatedwithhighgradelesions.
HysterectomyThesurgicalremovaloftheuterus(womb)–calledtotalifitincludesthecervixorsubtotal/partialifthecervixisnotentirelyremoved.
IncidenceThenumberofnewcasesofadiseaseorhappeningthatoccursinagivenperiodinaspecifiedpopulation
Informed consentThegivingofallthenecessaryinformationbythesmeartakertothewomaninorderthatshefullyunderstandsthesmeartestprocedureandpossibleresultssothatshecanmakeaneducateddecisiontoparticipateintheprogramme.FortheCervicalCheckinformedconsentprocess,thenecessaryinformationcoversparticipationintheprogramme,thetransferofdatatothirdparties,limitationsofscreening,results,associatedtestsandtreatment.
Invasive cancerAbnormalcells,notlimitedtotheouterlayeroftheepithelialbutwhichbreachthebasementmembranetoinvadetheunderlyingstroma(layeroftissue).
Key performance indicators (KPIs)Ametricusedtohelpanorganisationdefineandmeasureprogresstowardorganisationalgoalsorstandards.
Large loop excision of the Transformation Zone (LLETZ)LargeloopexcisionoftheTransformationZoneisadiagnosticand/ortreatmentmethodtoremovethecervicalareasofabnormality.TheprocedureinvolvesremovaloftheentireTransformationZoneusingathinwireelectrodechargedwithelectriccurrenttoprovideasampleforexaminationbythepathologist.
LesionsAzoneoftissuewithimpairedfunctionasaresultofdamagebydiseaseorwounding.
Liquid based cytology (LBC)Theplacementofharvestedcellsintoaspecialtransportsolutionforsendingtothelaboratory,wheretheslideismadereadyforexamination.
LSILLowgradesquamousintraepitheliallesionencompassingHPVinfectionormilddysplasia(CIN1).
Microinvasive cancerThisrepresentsearlystagecervicalcancerwheretheabnormalcellsbreachthebasementmembraneandinvadetonotgreaterthan5mmindepthandnotmorethan7mminwidth.
MortalityThenumberofdeathsfromaspecifieddiseaseduringadefinedperiodoftimeinagivenpopulation.
NADNoabnormalitydetected(normal).
Positive predictive value (PPV)Theproportionoftest-positivewomenwhoaretrulypositive.Itcanbeconsideredameasureofthelikelihoodthatawomanwithapositivetesttrulyhasapre-cancerouscervicalabnormality.
GLOSSARY 36
![Page 38: 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 Programme...For the period 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 information on waiting times was available for 15,115 of the 16,590 new attendances](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052019/6032f4692300865c7008c62f/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Primary care settingFirstcontactcarethatisnothospitalorspecialistcare-generalpractice,WellWomanandFamilyPlanningClinics.
Quality assuranceAprogrammeforthesystematicmonitoringandevaluationofthevariousaspectsoftheNationalCervicalScreeningProgrammetoensurethatstandardsofqualityarebeingmet.
Screening programmeAnorganisedapproachtoscreeningadefinedpopulationtodeterminethelikelihoodofaspecificdiseasewithinthepopulationwiththeaimofreducingtheriskofthediseaseandimprovingthequalityoflifethroughearlydiagnosis.
Select and treatAprocesswherebywomenwithsuspectedhighgradediseaseareselectivelytreatedatthefirstvisittocolposcopy.
Smear testAscreeningtestwherecellsfromthesurfaceofthecervixaresampled,preservedimmediatelyandsenttothelaboratoryforcytologicalanalysis.
SmeartakersAdoctorornursewhotakessmeartests.
SpecimenAsampleoftissueremovedfromthebodyformicroscopicexamination.
Squamous Atypeofmulti-layerscells,whichlinethevaginaandouterlayerofthecervix.
Squamous cell carcinoma/cancer Themostcommonformofcervicalcancerinvolvingthesquamouscells.
StandardAminimumrequirementagainstwhichperformancecanbemeasured.
Transformation Zone (TZ)Theregionofthecervixwherethecolumnarcellsoftheinnercervixhaveorarechangingtooutersquamouscells.Theprocessofchangeiscalledmetaplasia.Itistheareamostatriskofabnormalchange.
TreatmentAprocessaimedattheeradicationofcervicalabnormalitiesthusrestoringnormalcytologyandreducingthechanceofsubsequentcancerby90percent.
Unsatisfactory colposcopyAtermusedtodescribetheinabilitytovisualisethewholeoftheTransformationZonecolposcopically.
Unsatisfactory/inadequate smear test resultAn‘inadequate’or‘unsatisfactory’smeartestthatcannotbeassessedbythecytologylaboratory.
GLOSSARY37
![Page 39: 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 Programme...For the period 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 information on waiting times was available for 15,115 of the 16,590 new attendances](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052019/6032f4692300865c7008c62f/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
ISBN number: 978-1-907487-14-9
QA - CS/PR/PM-17 Rev 1
The National Cancer Screening Service is part of the Health Service Executive. It encompasses BreastCheck – The National Breast Screening Programme, CervicalCheck – The National Cervical Screening Programme, BowelScreen – The National Bowel Screening Programme and Diabetic RetinaScreen – The National Diabetic Retinal Screening Programme
CervicalC
heck Pro
gram
me R
epo
rt1 Sep
temb
er 2011 to 31 A
ug
ust 2012
Programme Report
1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012