1 requiring immunizations for health care workers: fair and just? lisa m lee, phd, ms 2014 heal...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Requiring Immunizations for Health Care Workers: Fair and Just?
Lisa M Lee, PhD, MS
2014 HEAL ConferenceApril 11, 2014
3
Action
What we should do
What we are able to
do What we are
permitted to do
Approaching the Question
4
• We should protect the vulnerable • We should implement a comprehensive approach to
ensure vulnerable populations (e.g., ill persons) are protected from seasonal influenza– Hand hygiene– Respiratory hygiene and cough etiquette– Isolation of infected patients and sick days for ill
workers – Full vaccination of staff and patients
• Unless medically contraindicated
Working Thesis
8
• Focus – Provider & patient interaction– Fiduciary duty to patient
• Principles– Respect for autonomy
• Respect choices based on personal values and beliefs
– Nonmaleficence • Obligation not to inflict harm
– Beneficence • Provide benefits to others
– Justice (distributive)• Fair access to or allocation of resources
Clinical Ethics
9
• Fiduciary duty versus HCW autonomy– Stems from Mill’s harm principle – Takes on special significance when one individual is healthy
HCW & other is medically fragile patient• Attempts to resolve: Professional obligation, special
social status• Reciprocal benefits assumption not met with influenza
immunization– Population intervention, not individual intervention– Benefits accrue to individuals only when population is
protected (herd immunity)
Unresolved Tensions: Clinical Ethics Framework
11
• Focus: Community or population as ‘patient’• Duty to community’s health• Principles
– Least restrictive intervention to meet goal– Evidence-based action, precautionary principle– Health equity (reducing disparities) – Community engagement – Reciprocity
• When asked to act in the interest of the greater good, this act is facilitated
Public Health Ethics
12
• Takes us further than clinical ethics framework– Helps us with herd immunity– Addresses reciprocity resistance– Addresses health equity concerns– Allowable under precautionary principle
• Fails to fully address our obligations to contribute to the greater whole
Additional Work and Unresolved Tensions of PH Ethics Frameworks
13
Justice is the first virtue of social institutions, as truth is of systems of thought.
Rawls J. A Theory of Justice, p 3.
Justice
14
• Focus– Plurality, solidarity – Doing together what we cannot do alone
• Principles– Equity (different than health equity)
• How I would like to be treated if I were you
– Obligation to follow the law• Discretion to do only what one prefers nullifies the state’s
ability to protect citizens
– Fairness essential for cooperative schemes• Role for every party, all responsible for their part• Whole is greater than sum of its parts
Justice
18
• Protection for self depends on full participation of all– Benefits of cooperation far exceed individual action
• Exemptions – Challenging to acquire
• Promotes solidarity, fair distribution of burden• Equitable in the just sense
– Medical only• Declared or reassigned to protect vulnerable
Implications of Applying Justice
19
• We should implement a comprehensive approach to ensure vulnerable populations (e.g., ill persons) are protected from seasonal influenza– Hand hygiene– Respiratory hygiene and cough etiquette– Isolation of infected patients and sick days for ill
workers – Full vaccination of staff and patients
• Unless medically contraindicated
• Requiring all components is ethically justified to reach the goal of protecting vulnerable patient populations
Working Thesis
20
Ethics is a social technology, one for which there are no experts. There is only the possibility of conversation, ideally free of factual mistakes and imbued with mutual sympathy.
-- Philip Kitcher, Science in a Democratic Society (2011) p 12.
Ethics and “Should”