1 procedures for describing linguistic competences in „non- language“ school subjects helmut j....
TRANSCRIPT
1
Procedures for describing linguistic competences in „non-
language“ school subjects
Helmut J. Vollmer/Jean-Claude Beacco
Intergovernmental Policy Forum
Geneva, 2-4 November 2010
2
Language in Subjects
• Becoming aware and bringing out the language dimension in all subject learning
• Language competence in subject-specific contexts is often taken for granted, but in fact it is a massive stumbling block for success
• Making the necessary language requirements explicit +teach them improves pupils‘ chances
• It is only through language+discourse that the transmission of knowledge by t. is facilitated
3
Instances of language use
1) Formulate one’s own observations, perceptions, representations, existing knowledge, point of view
2) Retrieve, read, process and interpret (new) information and express it in different modes
3) Present, discuss + negotiate information, answer questions, check findings and arguments critically
4) Expressing (non-)understanding, doubt, degrees of certainty
5) Reflect about own procedures and evaluate them
4
Possible procedure (1)
• Start with analysing existing curricula • Make use of what is already there/traditions• listing the central discourse genres which are
important for a specific subject in question• Look at the necessary tasks and language
activities involved in the management of these• Decide on linguistic means/patterns/conventions
to be learned and mastered in connection with g.
5
Exemples of discourse genres
• Report of an experiment, an observation • Description of the structure of a cell/a
historical event / a picture / a movement• Evaluation of a suggestion/solution/exper.• Argument for and against a decision• Definiton of a word, a concept, a • Classification of an animal, a phenomenon• Monologic/dialogic types of interaction…
6
Typical operators in recent LS curricularead for…(a range of purposes) - select (key points) - identify (key themes/ different passages or genres), comment on (key passages) - use (previous knowledge) - write (different types of text) - plan and structure - communicate (clearly and suitably for the context) - choose (the appropriate vocabulary, grammar, spelling, punctuation)- express (ideas and opinions) (in response to …) – take part in – reflect on – recognise that – show understanding – use (different strategies) – assess (critically)…
Typical operators in subject descriptors (across curric.) describe (125) - explain (67) – compare (44) – present (43) - assess(33) - distinguish (32) – explicate/illustrate (31) – give reasons for (29) – derive (29) – determine (19) – name/label (18) - appraise (17) – record/document (16) – construe(15) – interpret (15) – discuss (12) – evaluate (10)
Typical operators in recent LS curricularead for…(a range of purposes) - select (key points) - identify (key themes/ different passages or genres), comment on (key passages) - use (previous knowledge) - write (different types of text) - plan and structure - communicate (clearly and suitably for the context) - choose (the appropriate vocabulary, grammar, spelling, punctuation)- express (ideas and opinions) (in response to …) – take part in – reflect on – recognise that – show understanding – use (different strategies) – assess (critically)…
Typical operators in subject descriptors (across curric.) describe (125) - explain (67) – compare (44) – present (43) - assess(33) - distinguish (32) – explicate/illustrate (31) – give reasons for (29) – derive (29) – determine (19) – name/label (18) - appraise (17) – record/document (16) – construe(15) – interpret (15) – discuss (12) – evaluate (10)
EMPIRICAL OPERATORS ALREADY IN USE (1)
7
Possible procedure (2)
• Identifying diff. areas of classroom activities
• (If possible: classroom observation, interview with subject teachers (and students))
• Describing specifics of subject teaching, including constant transition from everyday language to academic language use/terminol.
• Verbalising much non-verbal/semiotic inform.
• Translating different forms of representation
8
Area 1: Organising procedures and activities in class negotiating participation and relevance
Area 2:Retrieving information and acquiring knowledge
Area 3:(Re-)Structuring concepts, adapting and extending knowledge
Area 4:Communicating and presenting learning outcome negotiating meaning
Area 5:Reflecting on and evaluating the learning process
Focus on oral teacher-learner as well as learner-learner interaction, mélange of informal and more formal language patterns – also written components (e.g. black-/whiteboard notes)
Focus on reading-, watching-, listening comprehension activities – associated mainly with documents/materials from the public sector
Focus on thinking skills structuring and fine-tuning mental concepts – truncated use of classroom discourse, terminology
Focus on production of oral/written statements/texts/ presentations with supportive non-language material – compliance with convential patterns of classroom language use
Focus on meta-cognitive verbal mostly oral, occasionally written activities – classroom interaction, also self-reflective (e.g. portfolio)
Areas of classroom activities
9
Possible procedure (3)
• Identify the cognitive-linguistic discourse functions underlying subject learning and teaching (frequency, relevance, centrality)
• There a several approaches to do this• Three of them are listed in the paper „Language and
schools subjects“ (pp.20-22)• Identify and link the necc.language resources/means
rules/conventions needed for “appropriate” performance of the discourse functions mentioned.
10
- presenting (showing, identifying, defining etc)- describing or representing (enumerating, identifying the
constituent elements etc)- characterising (comparing, assessing, assigning a
quality/quantity/property)- situating an action or process in time and space
- representing an action or event in time- doing, acting
- explaining, arguing- summarising
- […]
Agree on loosely structured inventories such as
OR (more systematically):
11
Types of basic school-related Discourse Functions (macro level)
1. EXPLORING/ PROCESSING/DOCUMENTING (INFORMATION)2. NAMING/ DEFINING3. DESCRIBING 4. REPORTING)5. EXPLAINING6. EVALUATING7. ARGUING8. EXCHANGING / NEGOTIATING9. NARRATING10. CREATING11. REFLECTING (e.g. ABOUT LEARNING PATHS + RESULTS)12. ACTING (SYMBOLICALLY OR BY WAY OF SIMULATION)
Each macro function is served by a great number of micro functions (see next slide).
12
Discourse Functions (Macro/Micro)
• 6. EVALUATING (evaluative function), with possible micro functions, e.g.CheckingWeighingComparingConcludingAssessingJudgingGiving reasonsCriticisingMaking decisionsPositioning…
13
Possible Procedure (4)
• Relate procedures 1) to 3) to one another• Integrate them into some sort of a model• Produce a model for more systematic
planning and evalutation and for reference across more than one subject/all subjects
• Conceive of a discourse-based language learning process across the curriculum, including foreign languages and lang.as subject and their functional contributions
14
4. Linking Discourse Functions to Discourse Genres and Linguistic Means
DISCOURSE FUNCTIONS (Macro level), e.g.Naming/Pointing – Narrating- Describing – Explaining – Arguing –
Evaluating – Negotiating …
Meso/Micro level of discourse functions, e.g.name – label – define – point out - specify (details) – summarise –
compare – contrast – relate – judge – appreciate – position …
Text types and genres – factual prose and genres – discontinuous
texts – multi-modal texts / multicoded texts …
Linguistic features / realisations: lexis, morpho-syntax, style,
register, establish coherence and cohesion (BICS/CALP )
15
Theoretical/General
Classification Principles Evaluation
Sample thinking skills:
Sample thinking skills:
Sample thinking skills:
ClassifyingIdentifyingUnderstandingApplying or developing concepts
Establishing hypothesesInterpreting dataDrawing conclusions
EvaluatingRankingJudgingAppreciating
Sample language: Sample language: Sample language:
Verb categories Verbs of possession: havecomparison: more than – taller thanClassification: include, place under
Cause/reason: is due toCondition & contrast: if there isPrediction: probablyGeneralization & explanation: completely
Describing emotions: like, dislike, satisfactoryEvaluation adjectives: good, right/wrongVerbs of volition: prefer, had rather
Model (in this case based on Mohan’s knowledge framework) for Language and content (with sample lang.)
16
5. Suggested Procedure(s) in our own CoE case studies
• Examples for History + Science education
• Literary education will and math might follow
• Combine the procedures mentioned above
• Looks at a subject in a wider and much more fundamental way (incl.social meaning)
• Illustrates how specific areas of knowledge could be constructed and mapped out
• Showshow deeply lang. is embedded in this
17
(1) inventory and description of the educational values targeted by history/science teaching practices;
(2) inventory and description of the social situations of communication and decision-making involving history or science in the learners’ social environment;
(3) inventory and description of basic subject knowledge structures;
(4) inventory and description of the existing in-school communication situations for the acquisition and construction of basic knowledge and procedures in history or in science respectively.
The choices to be made among these possibilities lead to the definition of the purposes + objectives of education in history/science within compulsory schooling.
Steps for Identifying Language Competences in the Learning/Teaching of History or Science
18
Based on steps (1) to (4) it is then possible to create:
(5) inventories and descriptions of the specific linguistic, discursive and semiotic characteristics of relevance for the types of discourse involved in history or science teaching and learning practices in the classroom;
These characteristics should be taught in their own right in each subject area.
The following examples and illustrations are all taken from the two case studies
19
Step 1: Educational values in subject learning and teaching
to be a decisive factor in reconciliation, recognition, understanding and mutual trust between peoples, especially by introducing multiperspectivity into historical research and accounts;
to play a vital role in the promotion of fundamental values such as tolerance, mutual understanding, human rights and democracy;
to encourage recognition and understanding of different interpretations of the same issue and their relative legitimacy, building trust between peoples, by accepting multiperspectivity in scientific research and explanations
to be a fundamental component in the construction of a Europe based on a common cultural heritage, with a humanistic and a scientific orientation, working towards the development of a knowledge society in which conflictual factors are accepted;
to be an instrument for the prevention of crimes against humanity and securing the quality of human existence.
20
Political agendas where scientific knowledge or assumptions are used for persuasive purposes to define e.g. ‘progress’ or ‘security’ and justify actions to be taken e.g. dealing with atomic power or pandemic threats, reduction of CO2 emissions etc.;
Exchanges between citizens which pre-suppose “general knowledge” of a scientific nature;
Family and neighbourhood contexts where personal knowledge and evaluations are passed on or mixed with “expert” knowledge and opinions;
Accounts in the media of technological breakthroughs, celebrations of “great scientists”, expansion of knowledge about the universe, etc. or of actual or potential misuses of scientific discoveries
Reading both general and specialist science press and didactic publications etc.);
Watching different kinds of entertainment both fictional and documentary – films, television programmes, theatre - with a scientific content e.g. re-enactment of scientific discoveries
Using sources of reference such as websites ;
Visiting museums, exhibitions, similar sites of natural science and technology;
Step 2: Social situations of knowledge use
21
Step 3: inventory and description of basic subject knowledge structures and
methodologies, e.g. history
general categories and general knowledge:Chronology, event, structures, concepts, elements, principles
specific or local categories and knowledge, proximate in space and time: relationships, structures, systems and functions ??
specific or local categories and knowledge, remote in space and time: developments??
22
formulate relevant questions about the available documents/data source;
examine potential sources of information and distinguish between primary and secondary sources;
assess such sources in terms of validity, possible bias, accuracy and reliability;
use the sources available to identify relevant information to answer certain questions;
analyse and structure this information on a particular topic/issue and relate it to existing/prior knowledge;
contextualise the information by relating it to information already available about the period, the actor, the transmitter of knowledge;
scrutinise the available source materials for rational justification and rank them in terms of their significance;
Acknowledge that scientific inquiry and findings are not value-free;
recognise one’s own perspective, bias and prejudice and take account of them when interpreting the available evidence;
acquaint oneself with the history of science as a particular form of the construction of knowledge;
Components of methodological/procedural competences
23
Step 4: Existing in-school communication situations for the acquisition and construction of
basic knowledge and procedures
24
identify types of sources used/academic sources
identify reasoning, based on data/clues
notice the strategies/devices applied to give popular appeal: e.g. dramatisation, “experts” versus laymen, activating elements/substances etc.
identify and distinguish already known and new knowledge
place the presentation into a broader context (larger issues, concepts, structures)
Evaluate representational forms chosen specific to the media in question
identify simplifications, generalisations, lack of data, allusion to academic controversies, unbalanced solutions etc.
understand whether a particular bias is being conveyed
…
Science-related cognitive skills include the ability to
25
Step 5: Discourse genres in the subject(s)
Types of discourse involved in history or science teaching and learning practices in the classroom
26
From classroom situations to discursive forms History-related cognitive skills
Read and summarise relevant documentation;
Locate the different sources of information;
Adapt an existing historical discourse;
Interpret primary data;
Interpret quantitative data;
Report the opinion of professional historians;
Give and support one’s own point of view, explaining its source and nature;
Highlight the gains and the problems;
State a plan, a scheme of narration;
“Give clear, systematically developed descriptions and presentations, with appropriate highlighting of significant points” (Descriptor B2 in the CEFR p. 58);
Emphasise the stages of the presentation as it unfolds;
Present and organise the linguistic commentary of tabulated data, a diagram, etc.;
Make the presentation attractive: manage voice and intonation;
React with restraint to objections or criticism from class or teacher;
Answer questions afterwards;
Assess one’s own performance;
Linguistic and semiotic skills
27
Overview of necessary competences in science education
• Strategic, discursive, formal competences
• Involving pragmatic + cognitive categories
• discourse functions in science education
• manipulating examples of discourse genres (reception, speaking and writing)
• linguistic means/conventions/categories for the realisation of discourse types
• Issue: thresholds + stages of development
28
No Framework, but Procedures
• The right to quality education drives/pushes us• The largely hidden curriculum has to become
unveiled, rights and requirements made CLEAR• The needs of ‘vulnerable learners’ are just a
catalyst for becoming clearer and more explicit• Implications for curricula, for language support
systems and teacher education are enormous• Each member state should procede under their
own conditions + operate language-specifically
29
6. Who should act?
• Curriculum planners in each member state • Subject teachers in cooperation with linguists, with
language or discourse specialists: Sensitizing• The goal is to take every learner along in each
subject+help them to make full use of the curriculum• Quality education in a subject requires mastering the
relevant discourse functions and genres, to become discourse competent and an active citizen
• Our youth needs best of knowledge-building possible
30
Summary/Conclusion
The importance of language in subject learning and teaching has to be (fully) acknowledged
Language competences have to be explicitly stated/ formulated in each curriculum and also explicitly taught as part of the knowledge-building/the subject
Focussing on subj.-specific terminology is not enough!Different procedures for describing classroom acitivi-
ties, discourse genres, cognitive/linguistic functions and linguistic repertoires in subject learning exist
Transversality between subjects should be strived for.