1 planning live fire test and evaluation: realism vs. the law of unintended consequences james n....

28
1 anning Live Fire Test and Evaluatio Realism vs. the Law of Unintended Consequences James N. Walbert, Ph.D. Chief Scientist SURVICE Engineering Company June, 2011 UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

Upload: matthew-bradley

Post on 16-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 Planning Live Fire Test and Evaluation: Realism vs. the Law of Unintended Consequences James N. Walbert, Ph.D. Chief Scientist SURVICE Engineering Company

1

Planning Live Fire Test and Evaluation:Realism vs. the

Law of Unintended Consequences

James N. Walbert, Ph.D.Chief Scientist

SURVICE Engineering Company

June, 2011

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Page 2: 1 Planning Live Fire Test and Evaluation: Realism vs. the Law of Unintended Consequences James N. Walbert, Ph.D. Chief Scientist SURVICE Engineering Company

2

TOPICS

What does “Mission-Based” really mean?

The “Building Block Approach” to LFT&E

A Post-Shot Interview with an Anthropomorphic Simulator

Parting Shots (Pun Intended)

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Page 3: 1 Planning Live Fire Test and Evaluation: Realism vs. the Law of Unintended Consequences James N. Walbert, Ph.D. Chief Scientist SURVICE Engineering Company

3

What does “Mission-Based”really mean?

Sub-title:Give me the facts;

all of them.

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Page 4: 1 Planning Live Fire Test and Evaluation: Realism vs. the Law of Unintended Consequences James N. Walbert, Ph.D. Chief Scientist SURVICE Engineering Company

4

InitialConditions

ComponentDamage

RemainingCapability

Mission,Task

1. Interactions,Effects

3. Functions,Capabilities

3. Functions,Capabilities

2. Components,Forces

2. Components,Forces

O1,2O1,2O2,3 O2,3

OWNFOR OPFOR

4. Tasks, Operations 4. Tasks, Operations

O3,4

O4,1O3,4

O4,1

5. Index: Location& Time

6. Context, Environment (Military, Civil, Physical, etc.)

7. OWNFOR Why = Purpose, Mission 7. OPFOR Why = Purpose, Mission

7. Mission 7. Mission

1. Interactions,Effects

3. Functions,Capabilities

3. Functions,Capabilities

2. Components,Forces

2. Components,Forces

O1,2O1,2O2,3 O2,3

OWNFOR OPFOR

4. Tasks, Operations4. Tasks, Operations 4. Tasks, Operations4. Tasks, Operations

O3,4

O4,1O3,4

O4,1

5. Index: Location& Time

6. Context, Environment (Military, Civil, Physical, etc.)

7. OWNFOR Why = Purpose, Mission 7. OPFOR Why = Purpose, Mission

7. Mission7. Mission 7. Mission7. MissionMission-Based Test & Evaluation

Damage?

CapabilityLoss?

MissionDegradation?

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Page 5: 1 Planning Live Fire Test and Evaluation: Realism vs. the Law of Unintended Consequences James N. Walbert, Ph.D. Chief Scientist SURVICE Engineering Company

5

Your child says“My arm hurts, so I’m

not going to school today.”

Your child says“I fell down, so I’m not going to school today.”

InitialConditions

ComponentDamage

RemainingCapability

Mission,Task

InitialConditions

ComponentDamage

RemainingCapability

Mission,Task

Mission Readiness made simple:

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

InitialConditions

ComponentDamage

RemainingCapability

Mission,Task

InitialConditions

ComponentDamage

RemainingCapability

Mission,Task

There are many possible paths (shortcuts)

Page 6: 1 Planning Live Fire Test and Evaluation: Realism vs. the Law of Unintended Consequences James N. Walbert, Ph.D. Chief Scientist SURVICE Engineering Company

6

Your child says“I fell down and hurt my arm.My arm hurts so much that

I won’t be able to concentrate,so I’m not going to school today.”

Your child says“I fell down, so

I won’t be able to concentrate,so I’m not going to school today.”

Mission Readiness made less simple:

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

InitialConditions

ComponentDamage

RemainingCapability

Mission,Task

InitialConditions

ComponentDamage

RemainingCapability

Mission,Task

InitialConditions

ComponentDamage

RemainingCapability

Mission,Task

Mission Readiness done properly:

Page 7: 1 Planning Live Fire Test and Evaluation: Realism vs. the Law of Unintended Consequences James N. Walbert, Ph.D. Chief Scientist SURVICE Engineering Company

7

The“Building Block Approach”

to LFT&E

Sub-Title:

What if I have both Legos and Lincoln Logs?

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Page 8: 1 Planning Live Fire Test and Evaluation: Realism vs. the Law of Unintended Consequences James N. Walbert, Ph.D. Chief Scientist SURVICE Engineering Company

8

InitialConditions

ComponentDamage

RemainingCapability

Mission,Task

The DamageCorrelation Process

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Page 9: 1 Planning Live Fire Test and Evaluation: Realism vs. the Law of Unintended Consequences James N. Walbert, Ph.D. Chief Scientist SURVICE Engineering Company

9

Medical

Personnel Vulnerability

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Insult

Injury

Casualty

Incapacitation

InitialConditions

ComponentDamage

RemainingCapability

Mission,Task

Operational

Medical

Page 10: 1 Planning Live Fire Test and Evaluation: Realism vs. the Law of Unintended Consequences James N. Walbert, Ph.D. Chief Scientist SURVICE Engineering Company

10

Personnel Vulnerability

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Insult

Injury

Casualty

Incapacitation

Dos

eResponse

No Effect TemporaryDiscomfort

Injury SevereInjury

Death

Page 11: 1 Planning Live Fire Test and Evaluation: Realism vs. the Law of Unintended Consequences James N. Walbert, Ph.D. Chief Scientist SURVICE Engineering Company

11

Personnel Vulnerability

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Insult

Injury

Casualty

Incapacitation

1 MINOR2 MODERATE3 SERIOUS4 SEVERE5 CRITICAL6 VIRTUALLY UNSURVIVABLE9 UNKNOWN

AIS Severity Scale

Page 12: 1 Planning Live Fire Test and Evaluation: Realism vs. the Law of Unintended Consequences James N. Walbert, Ph.D. Chief Scientist SURVICE Engineering Company

12

Anthropomorphic Simulator Damage Correlation

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Insult

Injury

Casualty

Incapacitation

Page 13: 1 Planning Live Fire Test and Evaluation: Realism vs. the Law of Unintended Consequences James N. Walbert, Ph.D. Chief Scientist SURVICE Engineering Company

13

If you thought those were big leaps of faith…

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Insult

Incapacitation

InitialConditions

ComponentDamage

RemainingCapability

Mission,Task

Injury

Casualty

PersonnelComponent

Non-PersonnelComponent

Page 14: 1 Planning Live Fire Test and Evaluation: Realism vs. the Law of Unintended Consequences James N. Walbert, Ph.D. Chief Scientist SURVICE Engineering Company

14

Does “Correlation” mean the samething as “Cause and Effect?”

What Constitutes a “Full-Up” System?

Is a Hybrid III a suitable substitutefor the real component in a

full-up live-fire test?

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Page 15: 1 Planning Live Fire Test and Evaluation: Realism vs. the Law of Unintended Consequences James N. Walbert, Ph.D. Chief Scientist SURVICE Engineering Company

15UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Would DOT&E, Congress, and the media tolerate othercomponent substitutions?

How about a fuel tank that has “about the same shapeand weight,” but with different materials and differentresponses to ballistic loading than the original?

How about if that surrogate fuel tank were filled with waterinstead of diesel fuel?

How about if we had correlation curves to compensatefor the different materials and responses?

Page 16: 1 Planning Live Fire Test and Evaluation: Realism vs. the Law of Unintended Consequences James N. Walbert, Ph.D. Chief Scientist SURVICE Engineering Company

16

A Post-Shot Interview with anAnthropomorphic Simulator

Sub-Title:

Do we have the “right person” for the job?

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Page 17: 1 Planning Live Fire Test and Evaluation: Realism vs. the Law of Unintended Consequences James N. Walbert, Ph.D. Chief Scientist SURVICE Engineering Company

17

Reporter: When the IED went off, did you have the proper sitting posture? Was your seat belt/harness tightened properly?

Anthro: I don’t know – I have no memory.

Reporter: What are your injuries? Where does it hurt?Anthro: What do you mean by “injuries” and “hurt?”

Reporter: Well, can you still do your assigned tasks?Anthro: I have no “assigned tasks.” I couldn’t do anything before the shot,

and I can’t do anything now.

Reporter: It has been suggested that this event was worse than last week’s event. Is that true?

Anthro: I just record events, I don’t judge them.

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Page 18: 1 Planning Live Fire Test and Evaluation: Realism vs. the Law of Unintended Consequences James N. Walbert, Ph.D. Chief Scientist SURVICE Engineering Company

18

Reporter: Do you think a human counterpart would have been injured had he or she gone through what you went through?

Anthro: I have no idea.

Reporter: You haven’t really answered many of my questions. Are you being evasive?

Anthro: I was made for a different line of work. You’re holdingme to a different set of standards.

Reporter: Are you saying your data isn’t worth much?Anthro: Hey, look, you’re asking questions I wasn’t designed

to answer. What do you expect?

Reporter: So, your data really isn’t worth much!Anthro: I want to speak to my lawyer.

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Page 19: 1 Planning Live Fire Test and Evaluation: Realism vs. the Law of Unintended Consequences James N. Walbert, Ph.D. Chief Scientist SURVICE Engineering Company

19

The SAE data processing techniques for the Hybrid III arenot satisfactory for analysis of ballistic impact data.

Impulsive loads are those having a total duration lessthan the system response time.

In order for a blast load to be considered impulsive,the product of the positive duration of the blast (td) andthe fundamental vibration frequency of the system (F)

must be less than or equal to 0.25*

td x F < 0.25

* Army TM 5-855-1 UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Page 20: 1 Planning Live Fire Test and Evaluation: Realism vs. the Law of Unintended Consequences James N. Walbert, Ph.D. Chief Scientist SURVICE Engineering Company

20

For 20lbs TNT @ 2 ft and a typical combat system,

td < 0.4 ms and F < 100, so td x F < 0.25.

For an automobile crash at 50mph,

td ~ 60-100 ms and F ~ 8-12, so td x F > .25.

The automobile crash is NOT an impulsive load.

The IED event happens more than 100 times faster andwith thousands of times more force than the automobilecrash.

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Page 21: 1 Planning Live Fire Test and Evaluation: Realism vs. the Law of Unintended Consequences James N. Walbert, Ph.D. Chief Scientist SURVICE Engineering Company

21UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Original Data

-0.08

-0.06

-0.04

-0.02

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

4 6 8 10 12 14 16

Time, msec

Acc

eler

atio

n,

gs;

Vel

oci

ty,

g-m

s

Data from ballistic events has higher frequency contentthan data from automobile crashes…

Page 22: 1 Planning Live Fire Test and Evaluation: Realism vs. the Law of Unintended Consequences James N. Walbert, Ph.D. Chief Scientist SURVICE Engineering Company

22UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Original, Butterworth, Chebyshev

-0.08

-0.06

-0.04

-0.02

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

4 6 8 10 12 14 16

Time, msec

Acc

eler

atio

n,

gs

SAE (Butterworth) filters lack the narrow transition bandsand flat pass bands necessary to analyze ballistic data.

Page 23: 1 Planning Live Fire Test and Evaluation: Realism vs. the Law of Unintended Consequences James N. Walbert, Ph.D. Chief Scientist SURVICE Engineering Company

23UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Original, Butterworth, Chebyshev

-0.015

-0.01

-0.005

0

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

0.025

4 6 8 10 12 14 16

Time, msec

Vel

oci

ty,

g-m

sec

Equi-ripple Chebyshev filters are more appropriate foranalysis of ballistic data.

Page 24: 1 Planning Live Fire Test and Evaluation: Realism vs. the Law of Unintended Consequences James N. Walbert, Ph.D. Chief Scientist SURVICE Engineering Company

24UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

NHTSA DoD

Rating Chance of Injury (%)

5 Stars <10 4 Stars 11-20 3 Stars 21-35 2 Stars 36-45 1 Star >46

Crew Position

Acceleration Incapacitation and Injury

Probability of Incapacitation

Trauma Severity Profile

Affected Body Region

Assistant Driver

(Crew 2)1.0 000020.2 Spine, Left Tibia

Left Rear Passenger (Crew 8)

1.0 011260.5

Head, Neck, Chest, Spine,Left and Right Femur, Left and Right Tibia,

Left and Right Foot/Ankle

Right Rear Passenger (Crew 9)

1.0 020060.5Head, Neck, Chest, Spine

Left and Right Tibia, Left and Right Foot/Ankle

Crew Position

Acceleration Incapacitation and Injury

Probability of Incapacitation

Trauma Severity Profile

Affected Body Region

Assistant Driver

(Crew 2)1.0 000020.2 Spine, Left Tibia

Left Rear Passenger (Crew 8)

1.0 011260.5

Head, Neck, Chest, Spine,Left and Right Femur, Left and Right Tibia,

Left and Right Foot/Ankle

Right Rear Passenger (Crew 9)

1.0 020060.5Head, Neck, Chest, Spine

Left and Right Tibia, Left and Right Foot/Ankle

Lack of anthro suitability for ballistic events has not stoppedDoD from making higher demands on the data than dothe automotive and insurance industries.

Page 25: 1 Planning Live Fire Test and Evaluation: Realism vs. the Law of Unintended Consequences James N. Walbert, Ph.D. Chief Scientist SURVICE Engineering Company

25

Parting Shots(Pun Intended)

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Page 26: 1 Planning Live Fire Test and Evaluation: Realism vs. the Law of Unintended Consequences James N. Walbert, Ph.D. Chief Scientist SURVICE Engineering Company

26

Note to BETA (Ballisticians for the Ethical Treatment of Anthros)No anthropomorphic simulators have ever been injuredor killed in the conduct of a live fire test.

Anthros are the only components for which we have no damageor capability information (nor can we get that information).

Use analytical methods appropriate for ballistic events whenanalyzing anthro data.

Either develop an anthro suitable for DoD use, or try a ratingsystem like that of NHTSA for “event survivability” based onprobability of injury, not specific injury types.

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Page 27: 1 Planning Live Fire Test and Evaluation: Realism vs. the Law of Unintended Consequences James N. Walbert, Ph.D. Chief Scientist SURVICE Engineering Company

27

If we’re going to conductMission-Based Test and Evaluation,

let’s do it properly!

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Page 28: 1 Planning Live Fire Test and Evaluation: Realism vs. the Law of Unintended Consequences James N. Walbert, Ph.D. Chief Scientist SURVICE Engineering Company

28

James N. Walbert, Ph.D.Chief Scientist

SURVICE Engineering Company3700 Fettler Park Drive, Suite 401

Dumfries, VA 22025

[email protected]

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED