1 k.becker cgsa symposium ‘06 classifying learning objectives in commercial games, proof of...

K.Becker CGSA Symposium ‘06

Classifying Learning Objectives in Commercial Games, Proof of Concept

1

Classifying Learning Classifying Learning Objectives in Commercial Objectives in Commercial Games, Proof of ConceptGames, Proof of Concept

Katrin BeckerUniversity of Calgary

September 2006

This session reports on the results of a proof of concept for a larger similar study.

~or~or~~



2



3

OverviewOverview

1. Why Do This?

8. Next Steps7. What I Learned

6. Game Play Experience

2. How?

3. What is a “good” game?

4. Why these games?

5. The GamesMario / Math

Blaster



4

0. Introduction

Games teach.

People learn from games.

Are Games Educational?

(I don’t care)



5

0b. What are the Questions?

What must be learned to get through this game?

How does this game facilitate that learning?



6

1. Why Do This?

Ultimate goal:Design good instructional games (GIG)Teach people how design GIG

IF good games teach, then we canlearn how by studying the masters.



7

2. How To Do This? (methodology)

Most good games were not designed to be educational…..

at least not on purpose.SO,

their designs are not framed in educational terms.

BUT,to design instructional games, we need that……



8

2. How To Do This? (methodology)

One Answer:PRETEND it was designed that way.

Can re-capture design through reverse engineering.



9

3. What is a “good” game?

Popular:• good sales (really good)• Critical acclaim

That makes it good because:- don’t get awards & sustained sales if the game is frustrating; no fun; too easy; too hard; annoying; too predictable…..



10

4. Why these Games?

All the teachers love Math Blaster– (don’t ask the kids…..)

Mario– Same genre & style– Small console (handicapped graphics

& power)– Good Game



11

5a. The Games: Mario



12

5b. The Games: Math Blaster



13

6a. Playing Mario



14



15



16

1



17

1-1



18

1-1



19

1-1



20

1-1



21

1-2



22

1-3



23

1-3



24

1-toad



25

1-4



26

1-*



27

1-A



28

1-*



29

2-1



30

2-2



31

3-C



32



33

D



34

Field



35

6b. Playing Math Blaster



36



37



38



39



40



41



42



43



44



45



46



47



48



49



50



51



52



53



54



55



56



57

7. What I Learned

Similar learning requirements.Obstacles are arbitrary.Differences in

graphics/sound/animation not central (although play a role).

Learning Mode is trial and error.

Game vs Learning elementslearning elements arbitrary



58

7-1. Supporting Trail and Error

Status Displays

Action FeedbackChoice



59


Status Displays



60


Status Displays



61


Action Feedback



62


Action Feedback



63


Choice



64


Choice



65

8. Next Steps (or, so now what?)



66

Image / sound Credits:Super Mario Bros.

http://www.gamespot.comhttp://www.gamespy.cimhttp://www.ign.com http://mario.nintendo.com/ http://marioevolution.free.frhttp://www.infendo.comhttp://forums.nintendo.com/Sound captures from http://mario.nintendo.com/ by SoundForge 4.5

Math BlasterK. Becker (screen captures by

Screen Shot Deluxe 7.0 http://www.broderbund.com/ )Sound captures by SoundForge 4.5

Nintendo DShttp://www.nintendo.com/http://www.gameinformer.com

Monitor Screen http://www.hp.com

1 k.becker cgsa symposium ‘06 classifying learning objectives in commercial games, proof of...

Documents