1. introduction 2. element of a statistical test 3. tests...
TRANSCRIPT
Chapter 10 Hypotheses Testing
1. Introduction
2. Element of a statistical test
3. Tests for single population mean and single
population proportion
4. Tests for the differences between two population
means and between two population proportions
5. The relationship between hypothesis-testing and
confidence intervals
6. Test for single variance, and for comparing two
variances
Statistical Inference – Testing
hypotheses (Ch. 10)
�Are the Math students smarter than the
average people?
�Do the Subway sandwiches have 6
gm fat or less?
How to test these claims?
Statistical Inference –
Testing Hypotheses
A test of significance is a procedure for
evaluating the strength of the evidence
provided by the data against an hypothesis.
Terminology
Key words:
- Null Hypothesis Ho
- Alternative Hypothesis Ha
-Test Statistic and its distribution
- Rejection Region
- Type I error and II errors
- one-sided and two-sided tests
Hypotheses (Ho, Ha):
The null hypothesis, denoted by Ho, is a claim about the
population that is being tested in a statistical test. The
test is designed to assess the strength of the evidence
against the null hypothesis. Usually the null
hypothesis is a statement of “no effect” or “no
difference”.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by Ha, is the
competing claim about the population that we are
trying to find evidence for.
Conclusions of the test, Ho versus Ha, are then
(1) Reject Ho, only if sample evidence strongly suggests
that Ho is not true. Or,
(2) Fail to reject Ho, if the sample does not contain such
evidence.
-Test Statistic
A test statistic is the function of sample data on which a conclusion to reject or fail to reject Ho is based.
- Rejection Region (RR)
RR is the region contains all values of the test statistic for which the null hypothesis is to be rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis. If for a particular sample the computed value of the test statistic falls in RR, we reject Ho; otherwise, we fail to reject Ho.
-Type I error and Type II error
The error of rejecting Ho when Ho is true is called Type I error.
The error of failing to reject Ho when Ho is false is called Type II error.
Testing hypothesis is like a court trial
What are the errors in testing
hypothesis?
- one-sided (one-tailed) and two-sided (two-tailed)tests
If we are interested only in deviations from Ho in one direction, then the Ha is one-sided and the test is called to be one-sided test.
If we are interested in the difference from Ho without specifying the direction of the difference, then Ha is two-sided. The test is called two-sided test.
Main Components
in a Hypothesis Testing Procedure
1. Compose the null and alternative hypothesis:
2. Specify the test statistic
3. Compute the value of test statistic for the particular
sample(s) given
4. Under a confidence level α, determine RR
5. Make conclusion
10.4 Hypothesis test for a population mean
Idea about testing hypothesis about
Is close to ? How do we measure closeness?
What do you conclude if fell in location (1)? or
Location (2)?
To answer this question, assume = some value
(This is our hypothesis). Then examine the z-score
or probability for closeness.
x µ
µ
One-sample z-test for a population mean
Let be the hypothesized value of . Assume
1. is the sample mean from a random sample;
2. the population is approximately normal or n is large.
Ho:
Test statistic:
(a) If Ha: , then we reject Ho if z > z(α);
(b) If Ha: , then we reject Ho if z < -z(α);
(c) If Ha: , then we reject Ho if |z| > z(α/2).
0µ µ
µ
0µµ =
n
xz
/
0
σ
µ−=
0µµ <
0µµ >
0µµ ≠
x
Example 1: Are the Math students
smarter than the average people?
Suppose you are given the following information.
It is known that adults IQs have a bell-shaped
distribution with mean = 100, and SD =16.
Assume that a sample of 16 math students from Brock
University gave the average IQ of 113.
Are the math students smarter than the average
people? Is the claim supported by the above data
at 1% level?
Test for the mean of a normal population
using z-statistic when is known
Make conclusion by compare it with z(α) or z(α/2)
for the chosen significance level α.
σ
Are Math students smarter than average
people?
If large IQ’s are observed for Math students,
then we conclude that Math students are indeed
not the same as the average people, but in fact
are smarter.
If Math students are no better than average
people, then Math students should give the
same IQ.
Step 1: Population characteristic of interest is
= true mean of IQ scores of math students.
Step 2: Hypotheses: Ho: =100 (no difference)
vs. Ha: >100 (smarter).
Step 3: Significance level: =0.01.
Step 4: Check assumptions: (1) random sample (2) normality
Step 5: Test statistic:
Step 6: This is a upper tailed test. So, the RR should be: z>z(α).
z(0.01)=2.33.
Step 7: z>2.33. So, we tend to reject Ho and conclude >100,
which means that math students are smarter.
µ
µ
µ
α
µ
Steps in a Hypothesis-Testing:
1. Describe the population characteristic of interest.
2. State the null hypothesis, Ho, and the alternative hypothesis,
Ha.
3. Select the significance level α.
4. Check the assumptions required for the test.
5. Compute the value of the test statistic w, using the given
sample.
6. Determine the RR.
7. State the conclusion (which will be to reject the Ho if w
belongs to RR and not to reject Ho otherwise).
* The conclusion should then be stated in the context of the
problem, and the level of significance should be included.
Two important results from previous chapters
If the population is approximately normal or n is large, then
1.
has approximately a standard normal distribution.
2.
has approximately a t distribution with df=n-1.
n
xz
/σ
µ−=
ns
xt
/
µ−=
Test for the mean of a normal population
using t-statistic when is unknown
The RR is determined by t-values.
Make conclusion by compare t with t(n-1, α or
α/2) for the chosen significance level α.
σ
One-sample t test for population mean
Let be the hypothesized value of . Assume
1. is the sample mean from a random sample;
2. the population is approximately normal or n is large.
Ho:
Test statistic:
(a) If Ha: , then we reject Ho if t > t(n-1,α);
(b) If Ha: , then we reject Ho if t < -t(n-1,α);
(c) If Ha: , then we reject Ho if |t| > t(n-1,α/2).
0µ µ
0µµ =
ns
xt
/
0µ−=
0µµ <0µµ >
0µµ ≠
x
Example 2. Estimating weight gains by lambs:
Inference about using t
The following are the weight gains (lbs) of six young
lambs of the same breed who had been raised on the same
diet: 8, 7, 3, 9, 2, 4
(a) Construct a 90% CI for the true mean weight
gain.
(b) Is the true mean weight gain more than 3.5 lbs?
Test using α= 0.05.
µ
Example 2: Estimating weight gains by
lambs: Inference about using t
(a) The following are the weight gains (lbs) of six young
lambs of the same breed who had been raised on the same
diet: 8, 7, 3, 9, 2, 4 ( = 33, = 223).
Construct a 90% CI for the true mean weight gain of a
population of similar lambs.
Mean = 5.5, SD = s=2.88, SE =1.1758=1.18
Df =n-1= 6-1 = 5, 1- = 0.90, t* = =2.02
90% CI: 5.5 ± (2.02)*(1.18)=5.5 ±2.38 = ( 3.12, 7.88)
µ
∑ x ∑ 2x
ns/=
α 2/αt
(b) Is the true mean weight gain more than 3.5 lbs?
Step 1: Population characteristic of interest is:
= true mean weight gain.
Step 2: Hypotheses: Ho: =3.5 vs. Ha: >3.5
Step 3: Significance level: =0.05.
Step 4: Check assumptions: (1) random sample (2) normality?
Step 5: Test statistic: , df=n-1=5
Step 6: This is a upper tailed test. So, RR is: t>t(n-1,α).
Step 7: Under α =0.05, t(5,0.05)=2.015. t=1.69<2.015. We can not
reject Ho.
So, we conclude that there is no strong evidence to show that the
true mean weight gain is more than 3.5 lbs at significant level
0.05.
µ
µµ
α
69.118.1
5.35.5=
−=t
Summary of one-sample test for mean
1. Terms:
• Null Hypothesis Ho
• Alternative Hypothesis Ha
• Test Statistic and its distribution
• Rejection Region
• Type I error and II errors
• One-sided and two-sided tests
2. Testing for population mean
(1) Using when is known.
(2) using when is unknown.
n
xz
/σ
µ−=
ns
xt
/
µ−=
σ
σ