1 hawaii department of education hawaii alternate assessment (haa) spring 2005 results
TRANSCRIPT
1
HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
HAWAII ALTERNATE ASSESSMENT (HAA)SPRING 2005 RESULTS
2
Hawaii Alternate Assessment The Hawaii Alternate Assessment (HAA) is
administered each spring to students who are severely cognitively disabled.
Tasks are uniquely designed to address each students individual needs in language arts and mathematics.
These results are compiled from the Spring 2005 administration of the HAA.
Results are incorporated into the Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) status of our schools in compliance with the NCLB Act of 2001.
Individual school results were distributed to each school by August 1, 2005.
Due to modifications in the HAA test last spring, these results are not directly comparable to previous years.
3
HAA 2005 ADMINISTRATION SUMMARY
Percent Grade
District 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 Total
Central 29% 26% 17% 10% 10% 5% 5% 100%
Hawaii 19% 16% 12% 7% 9% 21% 16% 100%
Honolulu 20% 14% 14% 12% 18% 10% 12% 100%
Kauai 8% 21% 0% 33% 17% 8% 13% 100%
Leeward 16% 21% 10% 13% 6% 13% 21% 100%
Maui 28% 16% 12% 16% 8% 16% 4% 100%
Special Schools 17% 33% 33% 0% 17% 0% 0% 100%
Windward 10% 20% 13% 10% 10% 30% 7% 100%
State 19% 20% 12% 13% 11% 14% 12% 100%
Results are based on 290 students statewide
4
Linking the Assessments
Hawaii State Assessment Performance Levels
Approaches Meets Exceeds
Proficiency Proficiency Proficiency
Indicates a student has little or no knowledge and skills in the content standards for his/her grade level.
Indicates a student has some knowledge and skills in the content standards at his/her grade level, but will need more support and effort to reach the proficient level.
Indicates s student meets the content standards for his/her grade and is ready to work on higher levels.
Indicates that a student’s knowledge and skills exceeds the content standards for his/her grade level.
Alternate Assessment Levels
No Progress Emerging Progressing Achieving Approaches Proficiency Meets Proficiency Exceeds Proficiency
(No Evidence/ Performance)
(Minimal Evidence of Achievement/Limited
Performance)
(Adequate Evidence of Achievement/ Average
Performance)
(Strong Evidence of Achievement/Commendable
Performance)
Indicates a student has made no progress towards his/her IEP goals and objectives that link to the content standards.
Indicates a student has made limited progress towards his/her IEP goals and objectives that link to the content standards.
Indicates a student has made progress towards his/her IEP goals and objectives that link to the content standards, but there is inconsistent performance of the skill or behavior.
Indicates a student has fully met his/her IEP goals and objectives that link to the content standards.
Indicates a student has some knowledge and skills in the content standards at his/her grade level, but will need more support and effort to reach the proficient level. (Same as Above)
Indicates s student meets the content standards for his/her grade and is ready to work on higher levels. (Same as Above)
Indicates that a student’s knowledge and skills exceeds the content standards for his/her grade level. (Same as Above)
Well Below Proficiency
5
HAA 2005 ADMINISTRATION READING RESULTS
Results are based on 269 students statewide
Percent Reading Level
District No Progress Emerging Progressing Achieving Total
Central 2% 10% 51% 37% 100%
Hawaii 0% 5% 43% 51% 100%
Honolulu 0% 14% 50% 36% 100%
Kauai 0% 4% 50% 46% 100%
Leeward 6% 9% 45% 39% 100%
Maui 0% 9% 57% 35% 100%
Special Schools 0% 0% 83% 17% 100%
Windward 4% 4% 61% 32% 100%
State 2% 8% 51% 39% 100%
6
HAA 2005 READING RESULTS
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Achieving
Progressing
Emerging
No Progress
Achieving 37% 51% 36% 46% 39% 35% 17% 32%
Progressing 51% 43% 50% 50% 45% 57% 83% 61%
Emerging 10% 5% 14% 4% 9% 9% 0% 4%
No Progress 2% 0% 0% 0% 6% 0% 0% 4%
Central Hawaii Honolulu Kauai Leeward MauiSpecial Schools
Windward
7
HAA 2005 ADMINISTRATION MATHEMATICS RESULTS
Percent Math Level
District No Progress Emerging Progressing Achieving Total
Central 3% 8% 62% 28% 100%
Hawaii 0% 14% 59% 27% 100%
Honolulu 0% 14% 44% 42% 100%
Kauai 0% 5% 68% 27% 100%
Leeward 2% 19% 56% 23% 100%
Maui 0% 14% 62% 24% 100%
Special Schools 0% 17% 33% 50% 100%
Windward 4% 12% 56% 28% 100%
State 1% 13% 56% 29% 100%
Results are based on 257 students statewide
8
HAA 2005 MATHEMATICS
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Achieving
Progressing
Emerging
No Progress
Achieving 28% 27% 42% 27% 23% 24% 50% 28%
Progressing 62% 59% 44% 68% 56% 62% 33% 56%
Emerging 8% 14% 14% 5% 19% 14% 17% 12%
No Progress 3% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 4%
Central Hawaii Honolulu Kauai Leeward MauiSpecial Schools
Windward
9
HAA 2005 ADMINISTRATION WRITING RESULTS
Results are based on 172 students statewide
Percent Writing Level
District No Progress Emerging Progressing Achieving Total
Central 5% 5% 45% 45% 100%
Hawaii 0% 20% 37% 43% 100%
Honolulu 0% 24% 33% 42% 100%
Kauai 0% 13% 50% 38% 100%
Leeward 2% 20% 42% 36% 100%
Maui 0% 21% 36% 43% 100%
Special Schools 0% 0% 67% 33% 100%
Windward 5% 5% 63% 26% 100%
State 2% 17% 42% 39% 100%
10
HAA 2005 WRITING
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Achieving
Progressing
Emerging
No Progress
Achieving 45% 43% 42% 38% 36% 43% 33% 26%
Progressing 45% 37% 33% 50% 42% 36% 67% 63%
Emerging 5% 20% 24% 13% 20% 21% 0% 5%
No Progress 5% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 5%
Central Hawaii Honolulu Kauai Leeward MauiSpecial Schools
Windward
11
NEXT STEPS
A new version of the HAA is being piloted for live administration in spring 2006. This will be compliant with current NCLB guidelines.
It incorporates grade level performance indicators for each content area.
Eligibility will continue to be restricted to only the most severely cognitively disabled students.
Pursuant to the NCLB Act of 2001, the new version of the HAA will allow eligible students to receive proficiency level scores that will contribute to a school’s AYP results.