1. forum bogota oecd july
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
FORO NACIONAL ESTRATEGIA DE GESTIÓN DEL CAPITAL HUMANO
Quality assurance in the OECD area
Bogota, 28-29 July 2011
Mihaylo MilovanovitchOECD Directorate for EducationProgramme for Co-operation with Non-MemberEconomies
%
1. Excluding ISCED 3C short programmes 2. Year of reference 2004
3. Including some ISCED 3C short programmes 3. Year of reference 2003.
A world of change in the global skill supplyEvolution of school completion
Approximated by % of persons with high school or equivalent qualfications in working age (25-64 years)
Change in the type of skills in demandEconomy-wide measures of routine and non-routine task input (US)
(Levy and Murnane)Mean t
ask
inp
ut
as
perc
enti
les
of
th
e 1
960 t
ask
dis
trib
uti
on
Changes in expenditure: pre-university and university education (2000 – 2007)
Source: OECD
708090
100110120130140150160170180190
1. Public institutions only (for Canada, in tertiary education only; for Italy, except in tertiary education). 2. Public expenditure only.3. Some levels of education are included with others. Refer to "x" code in Table B1.1a for details.Countries are ranked in ascending order of change in expenditure by educational institutions per student.Source: OECD. Table B1.5. See Annex 3 for notes (www.oecd.org/edu/eag2010).
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
190
Index of change (2000 = 100)
205
Tertiary education
Index of change between 2000 and 2007 (2000 = 100, 2007 constant prices )
Changes in expenditure: pre-university and university education (2000 – 2007)
Excellence in education and innovation potential (proxied through research intensity)
Percentage of students at Levels 5 or 6 in the PISA assessment
Impact and challenge
• Accountability pressures
• Awareness that quality (relevance, value for money) matters
• Assurance of quality on all levels and in all segments of the education system
Typology of quality assuranceapproaches in the OECD area
Elements of success?
• Transparency
• Ownership and autonomy
• Institutional and course level assessment
• Combination of accreditation with
assessment/audit
• Consensus on quality standards
• Follow-up mechanisms
