1 empowering esp practitioners: rethinking the paths to ‘specialized knowledge’ through the lens...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Empowering ESP practitioners: Rethinking the paths to ‘specialized knowledge’ through the lens of genre analysis
An ChengDepartment of EnglishOklahoma State [email protected]
2
3
Understanding learner needs
Analyzing specialized discoursesDeveloping curriculum
Experimenting with methodologies
(Dudley-Evans & St John, 1998; Hutchinson & Waters, 1987; Kennedy & Bolitho, 1984; Mackay & Mountford, 1978; Robinson, 1980; Selinker, Tarone, & Hanzeli, 1981; Schleppegrell & Bowman, 1986; Swales, 1985).
4
Understanding learner needs
Analyzing specialized discourses
Developing curriculum
Experimenting with methodologies
(Mackay & Mountford, 1978; see also Holden, 1977; Kennedy & Bolitho, 1984; Robinson, 1980; Selinker, Tarone, & Hanzeli, 1981; Schleppegrell & Bowman, 1986; Swales, 1985; Basturkmen, 2006, 2010; Belcher, 2009; Belcher, Johns, & Paltridge, 2011; Paltridge & Starfield, 2013).
Corpus linguistics
Multi-methodological genre analysis
Learner identities
Critical ethnography
ESP program evaluation
5
What kinds of needs?
How specifi
c?
Collaborate, corporate, team-teaching, or not at all?
Wide-angled or
narrow-angled?
Product-oriented or process-oriented?
Laurence Anthony
Image from http://lukenixblog.blogspot.jp/
“ESP has frequently been a hotbed of conflict—the Wild West of ELT” (Hutchinson & Waters, 1987, p. 158).
6
Content knowledge, should we? How much?
• “The most frequently asked questions and the core of many debates in the field” (Tsou & Kao, 2014, p. 5)
• “A feeling of inadequacy” (Tsou & Chen, 2014)
• Turning away from specialized ESP teaching (Anthony, 2011; Cai, 2004)
• A part of teacher empowerment (Tsou, 2013)
7
How much content knowledge?
• Process-oriented skills (Anthony, 2011)
• Specialist knowledge vs. specialized knowledge (Fergusson, 2014)
8
Specialist knowledge
Specialized knowledge
Knowledge of content in the student’s content area
Knowledge of disciplinary culture <- sociological and anthropological
Knowledge of epistemological basis of disciplines <- philosophical
Knowledge of genre and discourse <- linguistic (Tsou, 2013; Wu & Badger, 2009)
Too much to learn
Outdated easily
Not easy to determine what a discipline is
9
The third knowledge of genre Linguistic
Understanding the language of the discipline/profession
Genres as structured communicative events engaged in by specific discourse communities whose members share broad communicative purposes (Swales 1990)
Structured: moves/steps as function units/indicators of communication functions
Lexical grammatical features
10
OPENING SALUTATION
SUBJECT
ACTIONS TAKEN
DISCUSSION OF ISSUES(with [optional] clear distinct issue headings)
SOLICIT ACTION
EXPRESS AVAIL ABILITY
CLOSING SALUTATION
The recurrent schematic structure of Tax Computation Letters (Flowerdew & Wan, 2006, p. 141).
The typical rhetorical organization of the introduction section of technical instructions Describing the goal of the instructions, Defining the intended readers of the
technical instructions Motivating the readers to read the technical
instructions Explaining the usage and conventions used
in the technical instruction, including safety information
Providing a list of tools and equipment necessary for completing the tasks described in the instruction
11
12
SOLICIT ACTION [politeness strategies and the avoidance of modal auxiliary]
• Please note that the filing date of the above return is on. . . .
• We look forward to receiving your agreement to the holdover application before.. .being the first payment due date of the provisional tax liability.
(Flowerdew & Wan, 2006, p. 147).
13
Element of ‘specialized knowledge’
The paths to gaining the knowledge
Knowledge of disciplinary cultures and values
??? <- ethnographic observation?
Knowledge of epistemological basis
A course about science/in science; a course about law/in law
Knowledge of genre and discourse <- Linguistic
Learning to • Recognize genre as ‘structured’
communicative events • Analyze function units
(moves/steps)• Categorize the conventionalized
linguistic features that perform the moves and steps
Defeating purpose?
14
Element of ‘specialized knowledge’
The paths to gaining the knowledge
Knowledge of disciplinary cultures and values
??? <- ethnographic observation?
Knowledge of epistemological basis
A course about science/in science; a course about law/in law
Knowledge of genre and discourse <- Linguistic
Learning to • Recognize genre as ‘structured’
communicative events • Analyze function units
(moves/steps)• Categorize the conventionalized
linguistic features that perform the moves and steps
Defeating purpose?
15
Genres as structured communicative events engaged in by specific discourse communities whose members share broad communicative purposes (Swales 1990)
Context• Culture of discourse
community• Communicative
purposes valued by discourse community
Text• Schematic
structures (Moves and steps)
• Lexico-grammatical features
Trajectory of inquiry in genre analysis (Bawarshi & Reiff, 2010; see also Basturkmen, 2010; implied in Fergusson, 1997) )
16
Genres as structured communicative events engaged in by specific discourse communities whose members share broad communicative purposes (Swales 1990)
Context• Culture of discourse
community• Communicative
purposes valued by discourse community
Text• Schematic
structures (Moves and steps)
• Lexico-grammatical features
Trajectory of inquiry in genre analysis (Bawarshi & Reiff, 2010; see also Basturkmen, 2010; implied in Fergusson, 1997) )
17
Additional ways to turn genre into a window into context Genre system Meta genre
18
19
Element of ‘specialized knowledge’
The paths to gaining the knowledge
Knowledge of disciplinary cultures and values
??? <- ethnographic observation?
Knowledge of epistemological basis
A course about science/in science; a course about law/in law
Knowledge of genre and discourse <- Linguistic
Learning to • Recognize genre as ‘structured’
communicative events • Analyze function units
(moves/steps)• Categorize the conventionalized
linguistic features that perform the moves and steps
Defeating purpose?
20
Element of ‘specialized knowledge’
The paths to gaining the knowledge
Knowledge of disciplinary cultures and values
??? <- ethnographic observation?
Knowledge of epistemological basis
A course about science/in science; a course about law/in law
Knowledge of genre and discourse <- Linguistic
Learning to • Recognize genre as ‘structured’
communicative events • Analyze function units
(moves/steps)• Categorize the conventionalized
linguistic features that perform the moves and steps
• Use the genre features to read the disciplinary cultures and values as well as the epistemological basis
21
Genres as structured communicative events engaged in by specific discourse communities whose members share broad communicative purposes (Swales 1990)
Context• Culture of discourse
community• Communicative
purposes valued by discourse community
Text• Schematic
structures (Moves and steps)
• Lexico-grammatical features
Trajectory of inquiry in genre analysis
22
Take-home messages/Implications for ESP?
• The need for and quantity of specialist knowledge will continue to be an elusive question
• The power of genre analysis enables us to ask the right questions• Not constrained by issues of
specificity • Enable a particular stance of
working with content experts
23
Thank you!