1 elasticity and surplus chapter 3. 2 you are here
Post on 22-Dec-2015
219 views
TRANSCRIPT
1Elasticity and Surplus
Chapter 3
2
You Are Here
3
Elasticity
• One of the most important concepts in economics is elasticity• The elasticity of demand and elasticity of supply are
basically the slope of the supply and demand curve• They are very important for determining the
magnitudes of interventions• Formally
Elasticity=
4
• One kind of annoying thing about this is the P and the Q
• If it were just: it would just be the slope of the curve
• For all intensive purposes this is what it is• Ignoring (or conditioning on Q and P) the larger is
the slope the larger is the elasticity.• Lets focus on the elasticity of demand.• I am going to use straight lines because it is the
easiest to think about• With a linear demand curve elasticity is technically
greater at higher prices but lets not worry about that
5
Elasticity Labels
• Elastic : the condition of demand when the percentage change in quantity is larger than the percentage change in price• Inelastic: the condition of demand when the percentage change in quantity is smaller than the percentage change in price• Unitary Elastic: the condition of demand when the percentage change in quantity is equal to the percentage change in price
6
P
Q
Medium (Unitary) Elasticity of Demand
High Elasticity
Perfectly Elastic
Inelastic
Perfectly Inelastic
7
Why Do we Care
• Economic behavior depends a lot on the elasticity of the demand curve (and of the supply curve)
• As an example lets think about what happens when the supply curve shifts
8
Medium Elasticity
0 10 20 30 40 50
P
Q/t
$2.50
$2.00
$1.50
$1.00
$0.50
0Demand
Supply
Old Equilibrium
New Equilibrium
New Supply
Pricerises
Quantityfalls
9
Perfectly elastic Demand
0 10 20 30 40 50
P
Q/t
$2.50
$2.00
$1.50
$1.00
$0.50
0Demand
Supply
Old Equilibrium
New Equilibrium
New Supply
Price doesn’tchange
Quantitydecreases a lot
10
Perfectly Inelastic Demand
0 10 20 30 40 50
P
Q/t
$2.50
$2.00
$1.50
$1.00
$0.50
0Demand
Supply
Old Equilibrium
New Equilibrium
New Supply
Price changesa lot
Quantitydoesn’t change
11
Comparing Elasticities
0 10 20 30 40 50
P
Q/t
$2.50
$2.00
$1.50
$1.00
$0.50
0Large Elasticity
Low Elasticity
When Demand is more elastic price change is smaller and quantity change is larger
12
Alternative Ways to Understand Elasticity
• A good for which there are no good substitutes is likely to be one for which you must pay whatever price is charged. It is also likely to be one for which a lower price will not induce substantially greater consumption. Thus, as price changes there is very little change in consumption, i.e. demand is inelastic and the demand curve is steep.• Inexpensive goods that take up little of your
income can change in price and your consumption will not change dramatically. Thus, at low prices, demand is inelastic.
13
Seeing Elasticity Through Total Expenditures
•Total Expenditure Rule: if the price and the amount you spend both go in the same direction then demand is inelastic while if they go in opposite directions demand is elastic.
14
Determinants of Elasticity
• Number of and Closeness of Substitutes• The more alternatives you have the less likely you
are to pay high prices for a good and the more likely you are to settle for something that will do.
• Time• The longer you have to come up with alternatives
to paying high prices the more likely it is you will shift to those alternatives.
• Portion of the Budget• The greater the portion of the budget an item
takes up, the greater the elasticity is likely to be.
15
Elasticity ExamplesInelastic Goods Price Elasticity
Eggs 0.06
Food 0.21
Health Care Services 0.18
Gasoline (short-run) 0.08
Gasoline (long-run) 0.24
Highway and Bridge Tolls 0.10
Unit Elastic Good (or close to it)
Shellfish 0.89
Cars 1.14
Elastic Goods
Luxury Car 3.70
Foreign Air Travel 1.77
Restaurant Meals 2.27
16
Price Elasticity Supply
• Identical in concept to elasticity of demand.• Formula is the Same• It is also related to the slope of the supply curve but
is not simply the slope of the supply curve.• Terminology is the same
17
P
Q
Medium (Unitary) Elasticity of Supply
High Elasticity
Perfectly Elastic
Inelastic
Perfectly Inelastic
18
Perfectly elastic Supply
0 10 20 30 40 50
P
Q/t
$2.50
$2.00
$1.50
$1.00
$0.50
0
Old Equilibrium
New Equilibrium
Price doesn’tchange
QuantityIncreasesa lot
19
Perfectly Inelastic Supply
0 10 20 30 40 50
P
Q/t
$2.50
$2.00
$1.50
$1.00
$0.50
0
Old Equilibrium
New Equilibrium
Price Increasesa lot
Quantitydoesn’tchange
20
Comparing Elasticities
0 10 20 30 40 50
P
Q/t
$2.50
$2.00
$1.50
$1.00
$0.50
0
Low Elasticity
High Elasticity
When supply is more elastic price change is smaller and quantity change is larger
21
Consumer Surplus
I think this is easiest to see in our extensive margin example that we started with
Name Willingness to Pay
Jim $200
Jackie $400
Bill $600
Sally $800
Lisa $1000
So for Bill the value of the Ipad is $600.
If he could get an Ipad for free this would be worth $600
This gave the demand curve
22
In this case Bill, Sally and Lisa all get their Ipads, Jackie and Jim do not
Lisa
Sally
Bill
Jackie
Jim
The Value to Lisa is $1000.
She pays $600, so her surplus is $400
Sally’s Value is $800 so her surplus is $200
Bill’s value is $600 so he gets no surplus
Total Consumer Surplus: $600
23
Now lets think about this in a more more standard (and general) context
0 10 20 30 40 50
P
Q/t
$2.50
$2.00
$1.50
$1.00
$0.50
0Demand
Total Consumer Value
Consumer Surplus
Total that consumers pay
24
Now the firm
0 10 20 30 40 50
P
Q/t
$2.50
$2.00
$1.50
$1.00
$0.50
0Demand
Total firms receive in revenue
Variable costs to producer
Producer Surplus
25
0 10 20 30 40 50
P
Q/t
$2.50
$2.00
$1.50
$1.00
$0.50
0Demand
Total Combined Surplus
26
Market Efficiency
One can see from this why people think markets are efficient
Suppose rather than having the market choose Q we decided to do it ourselves.
Could we do any better in terms of total surplus.
27
Now lets think about this in a more more standard (and general) context
0 10 20 30 40 50
P
Q/t
$2.50
$2.00
$1.50
$1.00
$0.50
0
What if we chose a lower Q?
Surplus Now
Total surplus is lower
DeadweightLoss
I did not say anything about how surplus isdistributed-could be moreequitable
28
0 10 20 30 40 50
P
Q/t
$2.50
$2.00
$1.50
$1.00
$0.50
0
What if we chose a higher Q?
Thus Total surplus is lower
This bit is actually negative,Costs are higher than users valuation
29
Do Markets Always Work Well?
• No, for many reasons markets may fail• Market Failure: the circumstance where the market
outcome is not the economically efficient outcome• Possible Sources:• Consumption or production can harm an innocent
third party.• A good may not be one for which a company can
profit from selling it though society profits from its existence. • The buyer may not be able to make a well-
informed choice. • A buyer or seller may have too much power over
the price.
30
Categorizing Goods:Exclusivity and Rivalry
• Exclusivity: the degree to which the consumption of the good can be restricted by a seller to only those who pay for it • Rivalry: the degree to which one person’s consumption reduces the value of the good for the next consumer
31
Private and Public Goods
• Purely private good: a good with the characteristics of both exclusivity and rivalry• Purely public good: a good with the neither of the characteristics exclusivity and rivalry• Excludable public good: a good with the characteristic of exclusivity but not of rivalry• Congestible public good: a good with the characteristic of rivalry but not of exclusivity
32
Taxes
• I am mostly following Guell quite closely• However here I will not, I think this is a good time in the
course to talk about taxes• The book talks about specific aspects in many places in
the book• I want to make some general points• Think about a $1.00 tax on the good (like gas tax)• Very similar to standard sales tax (just a percentage
rather than a level)
33
0 10 20 30 40 50
P
Q/t
$2.50
$2.00
$1.50
$1.00
$0.50
0
Tax Example
Before I would have bought 25 units ifprice was $1.25. Now if price is $0.25 it costs me $1.50 so I buy 25 units
Price firmgets
Effective priceconsumer pays
Consumersurplus
Producersurplus
Governmentrevenue
Deadweightloss
Actual Demand
Demand from consumers perspective
34
Incidence
It doesn’t matter here at all whether the tax was imposed on the producer or consumer
You get exactly the same result either way
35
0 10 20 30 40 50
P
Q/t
$2.50
$2.00
$1.50
$1.00
$0.50
0
Producer pays taxNew supply curvefirms act like price is P-$1.00
Before I would have sold 20 units ifprice was $1.50. Now if price is $2.50, I get $1.50 so I sell 20 units
Effective price firmgets
Price consumer paysConsumersurplus
Producersurplus
Governmentrevenue
Dead Weightloss
It is exactly the same as before
36
Taxes and elasticity
• A really really important issue here is that the deadweight loss depends upon the elasticity• Suppose elasticity of supply or demand were zero
• There are a bunch of different ways to do this, but suppose elasticity of demand is zero and tax is on producer• Then consider the case in which elasticity of supply is
zero and tax is on consumer
37
0 10 20 30 40 50
P
Q/t
$2.50
$2.00
$1.50
$1.00
$0.50
0
Perfectly Inelastic DemandNew supply curvefirms act like price is P-$1.00
Price consumer pays
Governmentrevenue
I would sell 20 units whether there are taxes or not
This means there is no deadweight lossEffective price
that firm gets
38
0 10 20 30 40 50
P
Q/t
$2.50
$2.00
$1.50
$1.00
$0.50
0
Perfectly Elastic Supply
New demand curveWorkers act like price is P+$1.00
Price firmgets
Effective priceconsumer pays
Producersurplus
Governmentrevenue
No deadweightloss
3939
•More generally the size of the deadweight loss depends on the elasticity
•The larger the elasticity the larger the deadweight loss
•For similar reason the larger the elasticity the smaller the government revenue
•For that reason Governments should tax things with low elasticity
40
0 10 20 30 40 50
P
Q/t
$2.50
$2.00
$1.50
$1.00
$0.50
0
New demand curveWorkers act like price is P+$1.00
Think about what happens as elasticity increases?Deadweight Loss Rises and Government Revenue Falls
Both are bad so we don’t want to tax things that are high elasticity
4141
Stop Coddling the Super-RichWarren Buffett, New York Times, Aug. 11 2011
“According to a theory I sometimes hear, I should have thrown a fit and refused to invest because of the elevated tax rates on capital gains and dividends.
I didn’t refuse, nor did others. I have worked with investors for 60 years and I have yet to see anyone — not even when capital gains rates were 39.9 percent in 1976-77 — shy away from a sensible investment because of the tax rate on the potential gain.”