1 don ratliff executive director - scl regents and ups professor of logistics [email protected]...

13
1 Don Ratliff Executive Director - SCL Regents and UPS Professor of Logistics [email protected] Observations from Analyzing GM New Car Delivery Network - 2005 Data Supply Chain & Logistics Institute Supply Chain & Logistics Institute

Post on 20-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

1

Don RatliffExecutive Director - SCL

Regents and UPS Professor of [email protected]

Observations from Analyzing GM New Car Delivery Network - 2005 Data

Supply Chain & Logistics InstituteSupply Chain & Logistics Institute

2

GM New Car Delivery“Network Map”

Plant

RailRamp(VDC)

SwitchYard

Dealer

GM controls what gets

loaded on rail

TTX controls rail car

allocation

Hauler controls• truck allocation• truck schedule• what gets loaded

Railroad controls train

schedule

RailTruck

3

GM New Car Delivery“Geographic Map”

Border Points

Demand Areas

Plants

Ports

Rail Ramps

4

Average days in each process

Assemble Car

Car Available

Wait at Plant

Dispatch

Transport by Truck

Transport by Rail

Arrive at Dealer

DispatchArrive at

VDCWait at VDC

Dispatch

Transport by Truck

Arrive at Dealer

Wait at Plant

D

D

D

D

5.98 days

1.36 days

3.10 days

8.76 days

4.15 days

.44 days

Total = 7.3 Total = 16.4

5

GM New Car DeliverySingle Plant

UU Plant-Demand Lanes

UU Plant-Rail Lanes

UU Rail-Demand Lanes

• Inventory cost is ignored in mode selection• Trips < 1000 miles:

• truck = $0.50/mile/car • rail = $0.32/mile/car

• Why was new car inventory of little concern?

6

Summary 2005 Plant Rail Wait Times

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

40.00

45.00

50.00

3B 3M 3W DC EA FF HL JX LR MM NV RA RO SD SO UU VO XX

Day

s

Average Days

85% Waiting

90% Waiting

95% Waiting

99% Waiting

7

Inventory of cars at plant

8

Moraine-(Days 300-400)

Lag in Shipments When Plant Restarts

9

Plant “rail” Inventory

• Same symptoms at each plant• What causes big inventories at plants

– GM’s failure to anticipate production

– TTX’s model for minimizing empty movements

– Lack of oversight technology

– GM attributes problem to rail car shortage

– GM had no interest in trying to change the system

10

Summary 2005 VDC Truck Wait Times

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

VT

WL

RS

VG

VU

VM

MQ IB VI

GA

FR

SU

DY

VH

VR

VW

VC IG LV

VE

TB

RL

JC

MR

OD

KT

SZ

RQ

Da

ys

Average Days

85% Waiting

90% Waiting

95% Waiting

99% Waiting

0.005.00

10.0015.00

20.0025.0030.0035.00

WE

OX LS NA

BC NZ

GU DZ

UL

RR

GZ

QT

DR

PB

BE TU DO

HW JA CE

WX

NM D

I

RV 4J MN NJ

PH

LM

Day

s

Average Days

85% Waiting

90% Waiting

95% Waiting

99% Waiting

11

Truck Synchronization

• Load building is primarily manual– One day delay to manually plan truck deliveries

• Carriers build their own loads– Fees based on origin, destination and car class– Carriers have a conflict of interest since they can reduce their own

costs by accumulating inventory which increases delivery time – Load builders hold cars until they get “good” loads

• Load building is complex– Carriers lack technology to automate and optimize load building

• GM had no interest in trying to change the system

GM Supply Chain Characteristics

• Competence– Little supply chain knowledge

– Little analytic capability

– Heavy reliance on “experience”

– Many really dumb policies/strategies

– No interest in changing systems

• Complexity– Very complex systems have evolved

– No appreciation for the implications of complexity

– If it is complicated, outsource it (e.g., Vector SCM – Menlo)

• Technology– Little modern supply chain technology

– Little interest in changing anything

• Variability – up to 2 months after car is built– Huge impact on dealer inventory and sales

12

13

CommentsComments

QuestionsQuestions