1-d velocity model for use by the sansn in earthquake location · 1-d velocity model for use by the...

1
1-D Velocity Model for use by the SANSN in Earthquake Location V. Midzi, I. Saunders, M. B. C. Brandt & T. Molea Email: [email protected] Objective To determine a 1-D velocity model for South Africa by inverting travel times of well recorded and located events in Southern Africa. INPUT DATA & TRAVEL TIME CURVES TRAVEL TIME INVERSION VELOCITY MODEL EFFECT OF NEW VELOCITY MODEL (VM1) South Africa Zimbabwe Mozambique Botswana Namibia Lesotho Swaziland SANSN seismic stations Earthquakes 0.00 400.00 800.00 1200.00 1600.00 Epicentral Distance (km) 0.00 40.00 80.00 120.00 160.00 200.00 Travel Time (s) 0.00 100.00 200.00 300.00 400.00 Epicentral Distance (km) 0.00 40.00 80.00 120.00 Travel time (s) x c Regional seismicity systematically selected for travel time inversion. Selection criteria: rms 1.0 sec, P phase readings 5 & 10<GAP<180 Velocity model obtained through linear regression of travel time data. Horizontal projection of approximate ray paths for selected seismicity. V p (km/s) h (km) 6.36 26.44 8.06 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 Vp (km/s) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Depth (km) (a) VM1 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 Vp (km/s) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Depth (km) (b) VM2 Comparison of rms values obtained after relocation of 247 well recorded ( >10 stns) events using final models VM1 (Brandt model) and VM2 (Gane). The length of the bars represents the difference between the rms values for the VM2 model and the VM1 model. Also VM1 upper 28 km has an average velocity of 6.3 km/s comparable to travel time curve model. Thus VM1 model was selected as best model for SA (a ) (b) New model is observed to shift locations as in zoomed clusters New locations show increased clustering within mines (West Rand (a) & Witbank (b)) Improvement in locations was also seen in the smaller errors. 0 100 200 300 Event Number -2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Location Residual (VM1-CGS) (km) P - Wave station corrections Station Corrections show strong heterogeneity across the region. Positive values in mobile belts due to thicker crust Thus it would be beneficial to determine at least 3 models for the 3 structurally different areas shown, for even better locations. KC ZC LB NNMB CFB SLR sec New velocity model resulted in improved location of earthquakes.

Upload: others

Post on 16-Apr-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

1-D Velocity Model for use by the SANSN in Earthquake Location

V. Midzi, I. Saunders, M. B. C. Brandt & T. Molea Email: [email protected]

Objective

To determine a 1-D velocity model for South Africa by inverting travel times of well recorded and located events in Southern Africa.

INPUT DATA & TRAVEL TIME CURVES

TRAVEL TIME INVERSION VELOCITY MODEL EFFECT OF NEW VELOCITY MODEL (VM1)

South Africa

Zimbabwe

Mozambique

Botswana

Namibia

Lesotho

Swaziland

SANSN seismic stations Earthquakes

0.00 400.00 800.00 1200.00 1600.00Epicentral Distance (km)

0.00

40.00

80.00

120.00

160.00

200.00

Trav

el T

ime

(s)

0.00 100.00 200.00 300.00 400.00Epicentral Distance (km)

0.00

40.00

80.00

120.00

Trav

el ti

me

(s)

xc

Regional seismicity systematically selected for travel time inversion. Selection criteria: rms ≤ 1.0 sec, P phase readings ≥ 5 & 10<GAP<180

Velocity model obtained through linear regression of travel time data.

Horizontal projection of approximate ray paths for selected seismicity.

Vp (km/s)

h (km)

6.36 26.44 8.06

5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5Vp (km/s)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60D

epth

(km

)

(a) VM1

5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5Vp (km/s)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Dep

th (k

m)

(b) VM2

Comparison of rms values obtained after relocation of 247 well recorded ( >10 stns) events using final models VM1 (Brandt model) and VM2 (Gane). The length of the bars represents the difference between the rms values for the VM2 model and the VM1 model. Also VM1 upper 28 km has an average velocity of 6.3 km/s comparable to travel time curve model. Thus VM1 model was selected as best model for SA

(a)

(b)

New model is observed to shift locations as in zoomed clusters

New locations show increased clustering within mines (West Rand (a) & Witbank (b))

Improvement in locations was also seen in the smaller errors.

0 100 200 300Event Number

-2.0

-1.5

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

Loca

tion

Res

idua

l (VM

1-C

GS)

(km

)

P - Wave station corrections

Station Corrections show strong heterogeneity across the region. Positive values in mobile belts due to thicker crust

Thus it would be beneficial to determine at least 3 models for the 3 structurally different areas shown, for even better locations.

KC

ZC

LB

NNMB

CFB

SLR

sec

New velocity model resulted in improved location of earthquakes.