1 behavior risk factors among hispanics in idaho (brfss aggregate data 1998-2000 and yrbs 2001) and...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Behavior Risk Factors Among Hispanics in Idaho(BRFSS Aggregate Data 1998-2000 and YRBS 2001)
and Results from the Migrant and Seasonal Farm Worker Study (2003)
Dr. Galen LouisBureau of Community and Environmental HealthTobacco Prevention and Control
2
Purpose of Presentation Comparison of health behaviors between Idaho
Hispanics and Non-Hispanics in Idaho
Comparison of smoking behaviors of Idaho’s Migrant and Seasonal Farm Worker population to Idaho Hispanics and general Idaho population
Point out the gaps in state data and come up with ideas to address these issues.
3
Disparities Pilot Project Idaho is one of 14 states selected to look
at a process of identifying and elimination of disparities among populations in regard to tobacco use.
Improve Data Collection Strengthen Community Infrastructure Policy Advocacy Assure Cultural Competency Increase Funding and other Resources
4
Identified Priority Populations in IdahoWhere Data or Literature Supports Disparate Status
Communities(Identified through Idaho
Data)
Strata(Identified through Idaho
Data)
Currently Unidentified Through Idaho Data
(Inferred through Literature and National
Data)
Native American Communities
Age Group 18-24 GLBT
WIC Women Low SES Migrant and Seasonal Farm Workers
Medicaid Population Low Educational Attainment
Bosnian (Refugee)
Pregnant Women African-American
Note: While these communities may also be considered “strata,” they are unique in that they have more defined routes of intervention, either geographically or programmatically.
Note: “Strata” can and in many cases do include ethnic groups. These are different than “communities” in that distribution of population may not be geographically or programmatically bound.
Note: These populations exist in Idaho, however little is known about specific Idaho prevalence or behavior. Literature and other national studies indicate that they may be at high risk and exhibit high prevalence of use.
5
Demographics: Age (Adults)
Hispanic
18-2424.1% 25-3429.9% 35-4421.4% 45-5411.9% 55-64 6.1% 65+ 6.6%
Non-Hispanic
18-2412.4% 25-3417.3% 35-4420.4% 45-5419.1% 55-6412.7% 65+ 18.1%
6
Hispanic and Non Hispanic Population Pyramid2000
2.9
10.4
12.4
10.3
10.5
10.3
9.4
8.2
7.2
5.7
4.2
3.0
2.0
1.3
1.0
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.2
1.4
5.7
7.4
7.9
8.4
7.0
6.3
6.4
7.3
7.7
7.4
6.3
4.9
3.9
3.3
2.9
2.5
1.8
1.5
15 10 5 0 5 10 15
< 1 year
1-4
5-9
10-14
15-19
20-24
25-29
30-34
35-39
40-44
45-49
50-54
55-59
60-64
65-69
70-74
75-79
80-84
85+
Percent of Population
Non-Hispanic or Latino
Hispanic or Latino
Population Distribution by Age of Hispanic and Non-Hispanics in Idaho
7
Demographics: Income Hispanic
<$15 K 11.1% $15-25 36.0% $25-35 20.9% $35-50 18.2% $55 K+ 13.9%
Non-Hispanic
<$15 K 11.2% $15-25 20.3% $25-35 18.6% $35-50 22.5% $55 K+ 27.4%
8
Comparing Household Incomes In Idaho Between Hispanics and Non-Hispanics
0
5
10
15
20
25
<$10k
10-14.9
15-19.9
20-24.9
25-34.9
35-49.9
50-74.9 >7
5
HispanicNon-Hispanic
9
Demographics: Employment and Education Hispanic
Employed70.7%
Unemployed 7.7% Other 21.6%
K-11th 27.7% 12th/GED
32.7% Some College 29.9% College Grad 9.7%
*Includes homemakers, students, retired or unable to work
Non-Hispanic
Employed64.8%
Unemployed 3.3% Other 31.9%
K-11th 9.0% 12th/GED
31.6% Some College 33.4% College Grad 26.0%
10
Health Outcomes: Leading Causes of Death in Idaho (1999-2001)
Hispanic
1. Unintentional Injury 2. Cancer 3. Heart Disease 4. Diabetes 5. Perinatal 6. Stroke 6. Congenital 8. Homicide 9. Respiratory 9. Suicide
Non-Hispanic
1. Heart Disease 2. Cancer 3. Stroke 4. Respiratory 5. Unintentional Injury 6. Diabetes 7. Influenza/pneumonia 8. Alzheimer 9. Suicide 10. Liver and Cirrhosis
11
Percent Total Deaths by Age Cumulative
0
20
40
60
80
100
<1 1014
20-29
40-49
60-69
80-84
Hispanic Non-Hispanic
12
Health Outcomes: Access to Healthcare
Hispanic
Insured76.9%*
None in last 1210.5%
Non-Hispanic
Insured85.7%
None in last 12 6.6%
13
Health Behavior: Women Who Have Had a Mammography/CBE in Past Two Years
Hispanic
Mammography (70% HP 2010)
All Women 28.6%* Women over 40 50.6% Women over 50 68.1%
Clinical Breast Exam All Women 68.7%* Women over 40 58.2% Women over 50 73.7%
Non-Hispanic
Mammography All Women 42.1% Women over 40 50.6% Women over 50 70.7%
Clinical Breast Exam All Women 75.4% Women over 40 56.1% Women over 50 73.2%
14
Health Behavior: Diabetes and Body Mass Index and Exercise
Hispanic
Adults over 18 Diabetic Diagnosis 6.1% Overweight 63.5% Obese 25.3%* Exercise 67.3%*
9th – 12th Grade Overweight 8.8% Exercise 3 of 7 59.7%* Exercise 5 of 7 22.7%* TV 3 hrs day 35.7%*
Non-Hispanic
Adults over 18 Diabetic Diagnosis 5.0% Overweight 56.4% Obese 19.5% Exercise 79.3%
9th – 12th Grade Overweight 7.0% Exercise 3 of 7 68.1% Exercise 5 of 7 29.9% TV 3 hrs day 22.1%
15
Overweight and Obesity Trends Between Hispanic and Non-Hispanic Adults
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
HispanicOverweight
Non-HispanicOverweight
Hispanic Obesity
Non-HispanicObesity
16
Health Behavior: Drug Use and Abuse
Hispanic
Adults over 18 Ever Illicit Drug 27.8% Ever marijuana19.6% Binge last 301 33.7% 9th – 12th Grade Drank last 30 40.0% Binge last 30 24.2% Marijuana last 30 22.6% Cocaine last 30 5.1%
1from 2001 BRFSS
Non-Hispanic
Adults over 18 Ever Illicit Drug
26.7% Ever marijuana19.3% Binge last 301 25.9%
9th – 12th Grade Drank last 30 40.3% Binge last 30 27.2% Marijuana last 30
16.4% Cocaine last 30
2.7%
17
Health Behavior: Violence/Intentional Injury
Hispanic
9th – 12th Grade Weapon/school 12.6% Physical Fight 36.3% Hit by S.O. 13.3% Forcible Sex 8.4% Suicide Ideation 19.2% Suicide Attempt 11.2% Suicide/Doctor 3.1%
Non-Hispanic
9th – 12th Grade Weapon/school 9.7% Physical Fight 27.3% Hit by S.O. 9.1% Forcible Sex 7.5% Suicide Ideation 16.0% Suicide Attempt 7.3% Suicide/Doctor 1.9%
18
Health Behavior: Sexual Behavior
Hispanic
9th – 12th Grade Ever Had Sex 35.9% Sex Before 13 4.7% Taught about AIDS
72.6%
Non-Hispanic
9th – 12th Grade Ever Had Sex 35.9% Sex Before 13 4.5% Taught about AIDS
86.8%
19
Health Behavior: Tobacco Use
Hispanic
Adults over 18 Current Smoker 21.0%
9th – 12th Grade Ever Tried 71.2% Smoked Before 13 23.5% Current Smoker 18.0% Chew Tobacco 4.3% Live with Smoker 37.8% Smoke next year? 24.0% Smoke 5 years? 13.7%
Non-Hispanic
Adults over 18 Current Smoker 21.2%
9th – 12th Grade Ever Tried 52.0% Smoked Before 13 18.4% Current Smoker 18.7% Chew Tobacco 8.8% Live with Smoker 28.5% Smoke next year? 21.8% Smoke 5 years? 7.9%
20
MSFW Survey: Smoking Rates for Total Survey Population
Total Population of Survey
29
71
0 20 40 60 80
Non-Smokers
Smokers
Smoker ?
%
21
MSFW Survey: Smoking Rates for Total Survey Population
Total Population of Survey
29
71
0 20 40 60 80
Non-Smokers
Smokers
Smoker ?
%
22
MSFW Survey: Smoking Rates by Gender
Current Smokers by Gender
42
5.6
0 10 20 30 40 50
Women
Men
Gender
% of Current smokers
23
MSFW Survey: Smoking Rates for Total Survey Population
Total Population of Survey
29
71
0 20 40 60 80
Non-Smokers
Smokers
Smoker ?
%
24
MSFW Survey: Smoking Rates by Gender
Current Smokers by Gender
42
5.6
0 10 20 30 40 50
Women
Men
Gender
% of Current smokers
25
MSFW Survey: Age
4147
3843
9
0
10
20
30
40
50
% of Current Smokers within
Age Group
18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55+
Age
Male Smokers as % of Age Group
26
MSFW Survey: Education
33
44 4146
0
10
20
30
40
50
% of current smokers
None Elementary Middle High
Last year of School completed
Male Smokers as % of Education level
27
MSFW Survey: Income of All Survey Respondents
Income Distribution of Total Survey Population
32
21
34
9 305
10152025303540
Less than$10,000
$10,000-14,999
$15,000-24,999
$25,000-34,999
$35,000+
Annual Household Income
% d
istr
ibutio
n
28
MSFW Survey: Income of Male Smokers
29
17
42
93
05
1015202530354045
Current Smokers
Less than$10,000
$10,000-14,999
$15,000-24,999
$25,000-34,999
$35,000+
Annual Household Income
Income of Male Smokers
29
MSFW: Citizenship or Legal Status
23
77
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Current Smokers
US citizen or PermanentResident
Other
Type of Legal Status
Males Smokers as % of "Legal Status"
30
Social Capital Defined
Social Capital - Interconnections between people Obligations and Expectations Information flow (Communication) Norms and sanctions (Reciprocity) Bonding and Bridging Trust
31
Social Capital Definitions Continued
“Features of social organization such as networks, norms and trust that facilitate coordination and cooperation for mutual benefit.” Robert Putnam
“Capability that arises from the prevalence of trust in a society.” Fukuyama
“Generalized and Particularized trust” Uslaner and Conley
32
Social Capital Community Bench Mark Survey
Ethnicity/Race
54
2723
40
65 68
6 8 9
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Whites Blacks Hispanics
Racial/Ethnic Group
% o
f T
rus
t
Most People canbe trusted
You can't be toocareful
Depends
33
Social Capital Community Bench Mark Survey
36
56
8
48 46
6
63
31
6
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
% of Trust
<=High School Some College College Degree +
Education Completed
Trust by Level of Education
Most people can be trusted
You Can’t be too careful
Depends
34
Hypotheses
H1: MSFW will exhibit lower levels of trust than Latinos nationally.
H2: MSFW will exhibit lower levels of trust towards whites (Americanos) than they will towards Mexican Americans.
35
Findings: MSFW: Trust other People
5
55
37
4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
%
Most Peoplecan be trusted
You can't be toocareful
Depends Don't Know
Level of Trust
MSFW survey: General levels of trust
36
MSFW Survey: Trust of Whites or “Americanos”
3
23
41
23
9
05
1015202530354045
%
Trust thema lot
Trust themsome
Trust thema little
Trust themNot at all
Don'tKnow
Level of Trust
MSFW Survey: Trust of Whites or "Americanos"
37
MSFW Survey: Trust of Mexican Americans
523
46
18 7
0102030
4050
%
Trustthem a lot
Trustthemsome
Trustthem a
little
Trustthem Not
at all
Don'tKnow
Type of Trust
MSFW Survey: Trust of Mexican Americans
38
Quote from Marsing Focus Group
“El que es mecanico sabe de el trabajo que hace el campesino. Y el Chicano que es de cobarta no sabe de lo que sufrimos.”
“The guy that is a mechanic understands the
kind of work that farmworkers do. And the Chicano (Mexican-American) that wears a tie doesn’t know of our suffering.”
39
Main Findings:
(1) Variation in characteristics associated with smoking:
Gender Income Education
(2) Extremely low levels of trust Low levels of trust of people (including government
officials, health care workers, employers) Surprisingly, equally low levels of trust in Mexican
Americans and Whites
40
Initial Policy Implications
1. Gender specific outreach campaigns2. Education materials should be provided in
Spanish and at “less than High School” reading levels
3. Public policy efforts should be directed towards adults because the average age of initiation is 15 but average age of entry to US is 21.
41
Initial Policy Implications, cont.
1. Health campaigns need to assure individuals that they will not face threats due to legal status
2. Low levels of trust suggest that MSFWs will likely be suspicious of government officials and, perhaps, health care workers.
3. The MSFW population surveyed has few ties to the broader white or Mexican American communities. Finding the appropriate outreach organizations is vital.
42
Cultural Sophistication Framework
Dimensions
CognitiveAffective
SkillsOverall
CulturallyIncompetent
ObliviousApatheticUnskilled
Destructive
Culturally Sensitive
AwareSympatheticLacking Skill
Neutral
Culturally Competent
KnowledgeableCommitted to Change
Highly SkilledConstructive
Butterfoss and Francisco