1 assessing student understanding david niemi ucla graduate school of education & information...

27
1 Assessing Student Understanding David Niemi UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST) CRESST Conference Los Angeles, CA September 9, 2005

Upload: lewis-norman

Post on 17-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 Assessing Student Understanding David Niemi UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards,

1

Assessing Student Understanding

David Niemi

UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information StudiesNational Center for Research on Evaluation,Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST)

CRESST ConferenceLos Angeles, CASeptember 9, 2005

Page 2: 1 Assessing Student Understanding David Niemi UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards,

2

The mile wide, inch deep curriculum

How wide and deep should it be?

1 inch wide and 1 mile deep?

1/2 mile wide and 2 inches deep?

Page 3: 1 Assessing Student Understanding David Niemi UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards,

3

Example of Instruction

eπi + 1 = 0

Page 4: 1 Assessing Student Understanding David Niemi UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards,

4

Assessment

eπi + 1 =

Page 5: 1 Assessing Student Understanding David Niemi UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards,

5

Answer

eπi + 1 = 0

Page 6: 1 Assessing Student Understanding David Niemi UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards,

6

What would you have to know in order for this to be meaningful

and useful?

eπi + 1 = 0What do the symbols mean? What is this equation about? What can you do with it?What’s important about it?How does it connect to other topics in mathematics?

Page 7: 1 Assessing Student Understanding David Niemi UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards,

7

Our approach

Analyze and map the domain based on previous research and knowledge elicitation

Identify central principles

Used to build schemas

Enable inferences, complex problem solving, and learning

Provide a foundation for advanced learning

Use models to build assessments at right level of cognitive demand

Page 8: 1 Assessing Student Understanding David Niemi UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards,

8

Research on the Structure of Knowledge

--Chi, Glaser, & Rees, 1983

Page 9: 1 Assessing Student Understanding David Niemi UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards,

9

Eliciting the Structure of Knowledge

• Experts (scientists, mathematicians, historians, writers) identify organizing concepts and principles (“big ideas”)

• Determine related ideas and skills: facts, problems, situations, etc.

• Map all ideas and skills

Page 10: 1 Assessing Student Understanding David Niemi UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards,

10

Structure of Algebra I Knowledge:Central Principles

1 Number

2 Expressions, Equations, Inequalities

3 Functions

4 Problem Solving

5 Reasoning

6 Sets

Page 11: 1 Assessing Student Understanding David Niemi UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards,

11

Ideas About Functions

A function is a mapping between inputs and outputs such that each input is mapped to one and only one output.

Many events in the physical world can be modeled as functions.

Many functions can be represented by algebraic equations or graphs.

The equation of a linear function can be written in the form f(x) = mx + b.

The graph of a linear function is a line.

Page 12: 1 Assessing Student Understanding David Niemi UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards,

12

Map of Algebra I Knowledge

Page 13: 1 Assessing Student Understanding David Niemi UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards,

13

Task Components for Assessing Complex Learning

• Text or other representation of information requiring domain knowledge (concepts, principles, and factual knowledge)

• Respond with complex performance • E.g., explanation, problem solving, knowledge map

• Scoring based on expert performance

Page 14: 1 Assessing Student Understanding David Niemi UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards,

14

Examples of Models in Action Assessments of history and math understanding tested with hundreds of students

Scaling up with 300-400,000 students per year in the district’s 2nd largest district

IERI: online tools to build assessments (Assessment Design and Delivery System or ADDS)

New CRESST: assessments of mathematics understanding in grades 6-8, including worked examples

Page 15: 1 Assessing Student Understanding David Niemi UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards,

15

Study of Fifth Grade Students’ Understanding of Fraction

Representations 500 students randomly assigned to instruction on:

• Fractions as parts of wholes

• Fractions as rational numbers

After instruction, students given

Students performed better with the types of representations and meanings they had been taught.

Students who understood the representations performed better on measures of complex problem solving.

Page 16: 1 Assessing Student Understanding David Niemi UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards,

16

Fractions

Page 17: 1 Assessing Student Understanding David Niemi UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards,

17

Fractions

Page 18: 1 Assessing Student Understanding David Niemi UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards,

18

Equivalent Fractions

Page 19: 1 Assessing Student Understanding David Niemi UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards,

19

Equivalent Fractions

Page 20: 1 Assessing Student Understanding David Niemi UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards,

20

Fractions

Page 21: 1 Assessing Student Understanding David Niemi UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards,

21

ADDS Designer:Select Information Source

Page 22: 1 Assessing Student Understanding David Niemi UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards,

22

Screenshot from an Animation

Page 23: 1 Assessing Student Understanding David Niemi UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards,

23

Two Screenshots From an Animation

1 2

Page 24: 1 Assessing Student Understanding David Niemi UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards,

24

Screenshot from a Simulation

Page 25: 1 Assessing Student Understanding David Niemi UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards,

25

Results from Studies of Teachers Using ADDS

Series of experimental studies

In one study, 33 middle school science teachers randomly assigned to ADDS and non-ADDS groups

ADDS teachers were more likely to focus on central ideas and developed more cognitively complex assessments.

In another experimental study with 17 teachers, ADDS enhanced the ability of teachers to develop comparable assessments on the same topic.

Page 26: 1 Assessing Student Understanding David Niemi UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards,

26What have we learned (in the effort to “make

evidence based practice a reality”)?

Complex, research-based assessments:

Can be instructionally sensitive, valid measures of challenging state standards, predictive of performance on state tests

Can provide info to guide and improve instruction,

Can be reliably scored.

Page 27: 1 Assessing Student Understanding David Niemi UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards,

27

What have we learned?

Deep understanding is rare or non-existent, but understanding and use of big ideas can be improved in a relatively short time.

Information on student understanding and complex performance is a powerful tool for change and can be used to help focus and propel capacity building efforts.