1 assessing student success: a discussion of outcomes in year two of a learning community at an...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Assessing Student Success: A Discussion of Outcomes in Year Two of a Learning Community
at an Urban, Commuter University
Laura Woodward, Ph.D. and Jan Collins-Eaglin, Ph.D.
International Assessment and Retention Conference
St. Louis, MO. in the Pershing/Lindell Room. Sunday, June 10 from 8:30 to 9:30 a.m.
Program ID-1853, http://attitudesresearch.org/naspa2007.htm
2
Goals of presentation
To discuss techniques to assess a multi-cultural learning community.
To demonstrate multi-cultural components of self-regulated learning.
To describe how the self-regulated learning paradigm can help staff systematize assessment.
3
Our cohort
High-achieving high school graduates from an urban, predominantly African American school district. Archives indicated performance lower than expected. (Reaves,
Woodward and Collins-Eaglin, 2005) This project documents the success of this group following
intervention.
4
Intervention
A learning community A first year experience
course Weekly instruction
regarding study strategies The textbook, Learning to
Learn, was used.
Taking courses as a cohort
Intrusive advising Peer mentorship Get-togethers
5
Description of the program This learning community provided a social community with a
focus upon academic achievement. Academic, social and academic integration (Tinto,
Goodsell, & Russo, 1993). Achievement and social and emotional well-being.
(Wentzel, 1999) Another important component of the program was its emphasis
upon academic ability as being improvable through effort. (Aronson, 2005; Aronson, Fried, & Good, 2002). )
6
Conceptual foundation
Self-regulated learning A theory that tries to look at
these three aspects holistically: Skill
What skills does a student need to get through academic material?
Will How does the student stay
motivated to get those skills? Self-regulation
How do they regulate motivation and skill building even when it is hard?
7
Self-regulated learners
Self regulated learners are motivated, set goals to strive for in their
learning, have a high sense of self-
efficacy, and set expectations for their
learning.
They are active in monitoring, adapting and controlling their learning.
8
Strategies that students use include:
putting time and effort into planning
keeping track of how much effort, time, and help they need
making choices about whether to increase or decrease their effort
sticking to it regulating how much effort to
put forth using self-talk that emphasizes
the importance of effort using help-seeking to be
successful
9
Motivation and beliefs Motivation to improve abilities is enhanced by student beliefs that
abilities are malleable, and that effort and strategies can improve abilities.
This goes against past descriptions of intelligence as genetic and fixed.
Research shows that greater performance, academic engagement and enjoyment of the academic process is evident in students who are encouraged to think of intelligence as malleable.
(Aronson, Fried and Good, 2002; Hong, 2001; Hong, Chiu, Dweck, Lin & Wan, 1999)
11
Motivation and effort
Uncontrollable Controllable
Internal Ability Effort
ExternalLuck
Help from others
Task difficulty
12
Motivation in self-regulated learning for African American students
Belonging Achievement in college is
related to feelings that one is accepted by a group that values high achievement. (Wentzel, 1999)
Learning is facilitated by teaching one another and helping one another feel a sense of belonging. (Aronson, 2005)
Effort matters Helping students to
understand that intelligence is malleable increases Effort Joy in challenge Risk-taking Pleasure in learning
(Aronson, 2005)
13
Method
A mixed methods approach. Formative measurement Summative measurement
Two cohorts were compared. 2005 (without intervention) 2006 (with intervention)
Both cohorts Were gifted students
from Detroit Public Schools
Received a full tuition scholarship based on their academic achievement in high school
Intervention Learning community
15
Goals for assessment
Goals for our students: A feeling of belonging Gaining strategies of a
self-regulated learner
According to the self-regulated learning literature, improvement in these areas is related to: Improved grades Improved retention
16
Formative assessment
Documented challenges and strengths Social community
23% of the comments related to the peer support.
Self-regulated learning techniques 24% of the comments
related to study skills and time-management
What has your learning community done so far this semester which contributed to your academic success?
Peer support23%
Accountability17%
Study skills18%
General success12%
Nothing12%
How to adapt6%
Mentorship6%
Time-management6%
17
Self-regulation: Study strategies they realized they worked
“I have learned to take big projects one piece at a time. In addition I have used a planner to keep me on task.”
“I have actually studied. That is so major. In High School, I could blow off my classes and still pull off an A. But in College if I am off track for a couple of days, my grade is hurt severely.”
Time-management40%
Stay motivated20%
Be organized10%
Career10%
I can do well10%
Study10%
18
Self-regulation: Study strategies they realized they needed
Study skills• “To improve my academic
success I could have studied more for my tests in Chemistry. I could have performed better on my quizzes and took more time out of my schedule to focus more on my courses.”
Time-management• “I waited to the very last minute to
do many assignments. If I could go back, I would do things earlier so I wouldn't have to work and cram the night before on an assignment.”
Attending class • “I could have not missed any
classes which would have helped me not to be so behind.”
Study skills31%
Time-management25%
Attend class19%
Workload13%
Scheduling6%
Use resources6%
19
Self-regulation:Noticing what works and making changes to increase learning
I had another quiz in Algebra and the rehearsal technique was a very effective way for me to study.
It’s hard to sit in a lecture for two hours. But I just remind myself that I have to pay attention if I want a good grade and that I cannot get into medical school without good grades.
I have been studying at the library but I noticed that when the weather turns cold, it gets kind of noisy up there. I may start looking for a different place to study.
When I feel myself becoming frustrated, I take a break. I usually feel better after a break.
Now before I do a reading assignment, I briefly skim the chapter first.
I learned this week that I am most productive at night. I am a very social person and so when others are having fun, I want to have fun with them. But at night, it is only me, my computer and my thoughts. I focus better at this time of day.
I have noticed that I tend to drift off in government class when the professor lectures. I will try to refocus my energy and listen by making myself look into the professor’s eyes so that I can get an idea of how the professor feels about what he is saying.
To keep myself paying attention, I pinch myself so that I will stop falling asleep. The other way I stay awake is by taking notes and finding interesting things about the subject.
Comments from students’ journals and the portfolios.
20
Summative assessment
LC88%
No LC81%
76%
78%
80%
82%
84%
86%
88%
90%
Retention: Percent retainedfor the first year
No LC2.26
LC2.9
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
Academic Achievement:GPA first semester
N no learning community =16 N learning community =25
21
Compilation
Our approach worked: Formative analysis indicated that friendships and study
skills helped students stay on track academically. Summative analysis indicated higher grades and increased
enrollment.
22
Conclusions
How the self-regulated learning paradigm can help staff systematize assessment: Study strategies Friendships Meta-cognition
Multi-cultural components of self-regulated learning. Sense of belonging Importance of effort
Techniques to assess a multi-cultural learning community. Formative Summative
23
ReferencesAronson, J., (2005) Stereotypes and the Fragility of Human Intelligence. A presentation at the American
Psychological Association Convention. Retrieved online at http://www.apa.org/ed/topss/05topss_speaker.html on 6/4/2007.
Aronson, J., Fried, C., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 113– 125.
Chiu, Chi-yue, Ed.; Salili, Farideh, Ed.; Hong, Ying-yi, Eds. Multiple Competencies and Self-Regulated Learning: Implications for Multicultural Education. Research in Multicultural Education and International Perspectives. Information Age Publishing: Greenwich, CT.
Hong, Y. (2001). Chinese students’ and teachers’ inferences of effort and ability. In F. Salili, C. Chiu, & Y. Hong (Eds.), Student Motivation: The Culture and Context of Learning. New York: Kluwer/Plenum, 105-120.
Hong, Y.-y., Chiu, C.-y., Dweck, C. S., Lin, D. M. S., & Wan, W. (1999). Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 588-599.
McInerney, D. M., & Van Etten, S. (Eds.). (2001). Research on Sociocultural Influences on Motivation And Learning, 1. Greenwich, CT: IAP.
Pintrich, P. R., Zusho, A., Schiefele, U., & Pekrun, R. (2001). Goal orientation and self-regulated learning in the college classroom: A cross-cultural comparison. In F. Salili, C-Y. Chiu, & Y-Y. Hong (Eds.), Student Motivation: The Culture and Context of Learning. New York: Plenum. 149-169
Purdie, N., & Hattie, J. (1996). Cultural differences in the use of strategies for self-regulated learning. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 845 – 871.
Reaves, R. Woodward, L. and Collins-Eaglin, and J. (2005). Retaining the Academically Talented Student. Presented at the Twelfth National Conference on Students in Transition, held November 6-8, 2005, Costa Mesa, California.
Tinto, V. (1997). Colleges as communities: Exploring the educational character of student persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 68(6).
Tinto, V., Goodsell, A., & Russo, P. (1993). Gaining a voice: The impact of collaborative learning on student experience in the first year of college. Unpublished manuscript. Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York.
Wentzel, K. R. (1999). Social-motivational processes and interpersonal relationships: implications for understanding motivation at school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 76}97.
Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag.