1-25-12 finance web · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public...

116
FINANCE COMMITTEE 1/25/2012 304 E Grand River, Suite 201, Howell, Michigan 48843 7:30 AM AGENDA 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes Dated: January 11, 2012 4. TABLED ITEMS FROM PREVIOUS MEETINGS 5. APPROVAL OF AGENDA A. Consent Agenda - Res. 10 thru 16 B. Regular Agenda - Res. 17 thru 25 6. REPORTS 7. CALL TO THE PUBLIC 8. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS (Roll Call) A. Consent Agenda - Res. 10 thru 16 9. RESOLUTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION: A. Regular Agenda - Res. 17 thru 25 10 Sheriff RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF A BLANKET PURCHASE ORDER FOR THE PURCHASE OF AMMUNITION – Sheriff's Department/Purchasing 11 Sheriff RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FOR THE PURCHASE OF EXTENDED MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR DIGITAL IN-CAR VIDEO RECORDING EQUIPMENT 12 Central Dispatch RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING BOARD CHAIR TO SIGN USER AGREEMENTS FOR THE PLACEMENT OF SIMULCAST SYSTEM EQUIPMENT – 9-1-1 CENTRAL DISPATCH / EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 13 Central Dispatch RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING BLANKET PURCHASE ORDER NOT TO EXCEED $20,000 FOR 2012 TO FIFER INVESTIGATIONS, LCC FOR CONDUCTING APPLICANT BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS – 9-1-1 CENTRAL DISPATCH / EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT

Upload: others

Post on 05-Jun-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

     

FINANCE COMMITTEE1/25/2012

304 E Grand River, Suite 201, Howell, Michigan 48843

7:30 AM

 

AGENDA

 

1.   CALL MEETING TO ORDER

2.   ROLL CALL

3. 

APPROVAL OF MINUTES          Minutes Dated:  January 11, 2012

4.   TABLED ITEMS FROM PREVIOUS MEETINGS

5. 

APPROVAL OF AGENDA          A.  Consent Agenda - Res. 10 thru 16          B.  Regular Agenda - Res. 17 thru 25

6.   REPORTS

7.   CALL TO THE PUBLIC

8. 

APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS (Roll Call)          A.  Consent Agenda - Res. 10 thru 16

9. 

RESOLUTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION:          A.  Regular Agenda - Res. 17 thru 25

10

 

SheriffRESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF A BLANKET PURCHASE ORDER FOR THE PURCHASE OF AMMUNITION – Sheriff's Department/Purchasing

11

 

SheriffRESOLUTION TO APPROVE A CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FOR THE PURCHASE OF EXTENDED MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR DIGITAL IN-CAR VIDEO RECORDING EQUIPMENT

12

 

Central Dispatch RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING BOARD CHAIR TO SIGN USER AGREEMENTS FOR THE PLACEMENT OF SIMULCAST SYSTEM EQUIPMENT – 9-1-1 CENTRAL DISPATCH / EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT

13

 

Central Dispatch RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING BLANKET PURCHASE ORDER NOT TO EXCEED $20,000 FOR 2012 TO FIFER INVESTIGATIONS, LCC FOR CONDUCTING APPLICANT BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS – 9-1-1 CENTRAL DISPATCH / EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT

Page 2: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

14

 

Central Dispatch RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIVINGSTON COUNTY TO PARTICIPATE IN THE 2010 HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM (HSGP) AND TO SUBMIT FY-2010 HSGP APPLICATIONS PURSUANT TO DECISIONS OF THE LIVINGSTON COUNTY HOMELAND SECURITY PLANNING TEAM –9-1-1 CENTRAL DISPATCH / EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT

15

 

Central Dispatch RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXPANSION OF THE LIVINGSTON COUNTY FIBER OPTIC CABLE NETWORK TO WHITMORE LAKE – 9-1-1 CENTRAL DISPATCH / EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT

16

 

Central Dispatch RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE 9-1-1 DIRECTOR TO SIGN PURCHASE ORDERS FOR PROMOTIONAL MATERIALS – 9-1-1 CENTRAL DISPATCH / EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT

17 

SheriffRESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUPPORT OF THE LIVINGSTON COUNTY SPECIALIZED RESPONSE TEAM -Sheriff Department

18

 

AdministrationRESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION #2009-07-218 TO INCREASE THE FINANCIAL ANALYST POSITION FROM 4 DAYS PER WEEK TO 5 DAYS PER WEEK - Administration

19

 

Emergency Medical Services RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIVINGSTON COUNTY TO ENTER INTO A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) WITH THE MICHIGAN RURAL EMS NETWORK FOR THE PURPOSES OF OBTAINING A CMS INNOVATIONS GRANT/FINANCE/FULL BOARD

20

 

Human Resources RESOLUTION APPROVING THE TENTATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE LIVINGSTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AND THE MICHIGAN ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES REPRESENTING 911 DISPATCHERS

21

 

Human Resources RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN DEFINED BENEFIT RETIREMENT PLAN FOR 911 DISPATCHERS

22

 

Central Dispatch RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE LIVINGSTON COUNTY STREET NAMING AND ADDRESSING POLICY – PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE, FINANCE COMMITTEE, BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND 9-1-1 CENTRAL DISPATCH DEPARTMENTS

Page 3: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

23

 

Central Dispatch RESOLUTION TO ESTABLISH A LIVINGSTON COUNTY ADDRESSING ORDINANCE – PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE, FINANCE COMMITTEE, BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 9-1-1 CENTRAL DISPATCH

24

 

Information Technology RESOLUTION TO APPROVE AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN LIVINSTON COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE LIVINGSTON COUNTY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT AND THE VILLAGE OF PINCKNEY - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

25

 

Information Technology RESOLUTION TO APPROVE AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN LIVINGSTON COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE LIVINGSTON COUNTY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT AND THE CITY OF BRIGHTON AND THE CITY OF HOWELL

26. 

MISCELLANEOUS CLAIMS          Claims and Payables

27.   COMPUTER PRINTOUT (attached)

28.   ADJOURNMENT

 

 

Page 4: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

MEETING MINUTES LIVINGSTON COUNTY

JANUARY 11, 2012 - 7:30 A.M.

ADMINISTRATION BUILDING - FIRST FLOOR

304 E. Grand River Avenue, Howell, MI 48843

FINANCE COMMITTEECOMM. DENNIS DOLAN COMM. DAVID DOMASCOMM. JAY DRICK

COMM. CAROL GRIFFITHCOMM. MAGGIE JONESCOMM. JACK LA BELLE - FINANCE CHAIR

COMM. JIM MANTEYCOMM. RON VAN HOUTENCOMM. STEVE WILLIAMS

OTHERS:

CANDY ATKINS

KEVIN WILKINSON

CINDY MENDOZA

JENNIFER NASH

WM. NEWHOUSE

BELINDA M. PETERS

PAUL MCNAMARA

JEFF BOYD

CHRIS FOLTZ

JAMIE PALMER

JUDGE MICHAEL HATTY

MARK JOHNSON

TIM PERRONE

JENNIFER PALMBOS

MARGARET DUNLEAVY

JORDAN GENSO

DEBBIE WARDEN

1. CALL TO ORDER: Meeting called to order by COMM. JACK LA BELLE at 7:33 AM.

2. ROLL CALL.

3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: MINUTES OF MEETING DATED DECEMBER 14, 2011:

MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES

MOVED BY: MANTEY / SECONDED BY: GRIFFITH

ALL IN FAVOR – MOTION PASSED

4. TABLED ITEMS FROM PREVIOUS MEETINGS. None.

5. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA:

MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA, AS PRESENTED.

MOVED BY: DOLAN / SECONDED BY: MANTEY

ALL IN FAVOR – MOTION PASSED

Page 5: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

MOTION TO APPROVE THE REGULAR AGENDA, AS PRESENTED.

MOVED BY: DRICK / SECONDED BY: DOLAN

ALL IN FAVOR – MOTION PASSED

6. REPORTS: None.

7. CALL TO THE PUBLIC:

Jordan Genso- asked that the committee televise their meetings due to the early morning schedule.

8. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS

9. APPROVAL OF REGULAR AGENDA

10. AIRPORT: RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE LIVINGSTON COUNTY AERONAUTICAL FACILITIES

BOARD TO AUTHORIZE THE ACCEPTANCE OF A COUNTER-OFFER FOR THE PURCHASE OF PROPERTY (PARCEL

E48)

RECOMMEND MOTION TO THE BOARD

MOVED BY: DRICK / SECONDED BY: DOLAN

YEAS: DOLAN DOMAS DRICK GRIFFITH JONES LA BELLE MANTEY WILLIAMS VAN HOUTEN

MOTION PASSED

11. AIRPORT: RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE LIVINGSTON COUNTY AERONAUTICAL

FACILITIES BOARD TO AUTHORIZE THE ACCEPTANCE OF A COUNTER-OFFER FOR

THE PURCHASE OF PROPERTY (PARCEL E50)

RECOMMEND MOTION TO THE BOARD

MOVED BY: DRICK / SECONDED BY: DOLAN

YEAS: DOLAN DRICK GRIFFITH JONES LA BELLE MANTEY VAN HOUTEN

MOTION PASSED

MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA

MOVED BY: DRICK / SECONDED BY: DOLAN

YEAS: DOLAN DRICK GRIFFITH JONES LA BELLE MANTEY VAN HOUTEN

ALL IN FAVOR – MOTION PASSED

MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA

MOVED BY: DRICK / SECONDED BY: DOLAN

YEAS: DOLAN DRICK GRIFFITH JONES LA BELLE MANTEY VAN HOUTEN

ALL IN FAVOR – MOTION PASSED

MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA

MOVED BY: DRICK / SECONDED BY: DOLAN

YEAS: DOLAN DRICK GRIFFITH JONES LA BELLE MANTEY VAN HOUTEN

ALL IN FAVOR – MOTION PASSED

MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA

MOVED BY: DRICK / SECONDED BY: DOLAN

YEAS: DOLAN DRICK GRIFFITH JONES LA BELLE MANTEY VAN HOUTEN

ALL IN FAVOR – MOTION PASSED

MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA

MOVED BY: DRICK / SECONDED BY: DOLAN

YEAS: DOLAN DRICK GRIFFITH JONES LA BELLE MANTEY VAN HOUTEN

ALL IN FAVOR – MOTION PASSED

MOVED BY: GRIFFITH / SECONDEDBY:MANTEY

ALL IN MOTION TO APPROVE THE REGULAR AGENDA

FAVOR – MOTION PASSED

Page 6: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

12. AIRPORT: RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE LIVINGSTON COUNTY AERONAUTICAL

FACILITIES BOARD TO AUTHORIZE THE ACCEPTANCE OF A COUNTER-OFFER FOR

THE PURCHASE OF PROPERTY (PARCEL E51)

RECOMMEND MOTION TO THE BOARD

MOVED BY: DRICK / SECONDED BY: DOLAN

YEAS: DOLAN DRICK GRIFFITH JONES LA BELLE MANTEY VAN HOUTEN

MOTION PASSED

13. AIRPORT: RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE LIVINGSTON COUNTY AERONAUTICAL

FACILITIES BOARD TO AUTHORIZE THE ACCEPTANCE OF A COUNTER-OFFER FOR

THE PURCHASE OF PROPERTY (PARCEL E60)

RECOMMEND MOTION TO THE BOARD

MOVED BY: DRICK / SECONDED BY: DOLAN

YEAS: DOLAN DRICK GRIFFITH JONES LA BELLE MANTEY VAN HOUTEN

MOTION PASSED

14. BUILDING SERVICES: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A CONTRACT FOR JANITORIAL, MAINTENANCE AND

LAWN CARE WITH COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH AUTHORITY

RECOMMEND MOTION TO THE BOARD

MOVED BY: DRICK / SECONDED BY: DOLAN

YEAS: DOLAN DRICK GRIFFITH JONES LA BELLE MANTEY VAN HOUTEN

MOTION PASSED

15. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF A PURCHASE ORDER TO

HARRIS FOR SOFTWARE SUPPORT FOR THE LIVINGSTON COUNTY

TREASURER’S DEPARTMENT FOR THE YEAR 2012

RECOMMEND MOTION TO THE BOARD

MOVED BY: DRICK / SECONDED BY: DOLAN

YEAS: DOLAN DRICK GRIFFITH JONES LA BELLE MANTEY VAN HOUTEN

MOTION PASSED

16. COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS: RESOLUTION APPROVING A BUDGET AMENDMENT AND THE CREATION

OF A PART TIME COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS PRETRIAL INTERVIEWER

POSITION

RECOMMEND MOTION TO THE BOARD

MOVED BY: JONES / SECONDED BY: VANHOUTEN

MOTION PASSED

Page 7: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

17. CIRCUIT COURT: RESOLUTION APPROVING FILLING A VACANT RESEARCH ATTORNEY POSITION INTHE CIRCUIT COURT

RECOMMEND MOTION TO THE BOARD

MOVED BY: MANTEY / SECONDED BY: DRICK

MOTION PASSED

18. EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING OUT-OF-STATE TRAINING FOR TWO EMSMANAGEMENT STAFF

RECOMMEND MOTION TO THE BOARD

MOVED BY: DOLAN / SECONDED BY: MANTEY

MOTION PASSED

19. HUMAN RESOURCES: RESOLUTION TO MODIFY THE VACANCY REVIEW POLICY

RECOMMEND MOTION TO THE BOARD

MOVED BY: GRIFFITH / SECONDED BY: JONES

MOTION PASSED

20. ADMINISTRATION: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING OUT-OF-STATE TRAVEL FOR THE COUNTY FINANCIAL

OFFICER TO ATTEND THE GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICER ASSOCIATION (GFOA)ANNUAL CONFERENCE IN CHICAGO, ILLINOIS

RECOMMEND MOTION TO THE BOARD

MOVED BY: MANTEY / SECONDED BY: DOLAN

MOTION PASSED

21. ADMINISTRATION: RESOLUTION TO SYSTEMATICALLY TRANSFER MONIES BETWEEN FUNDS

RECOMMEND MOTION TO THE BOARD

MOVED BY: GRIFFITH / SECONDED BY: MANTEY

MOTION PASSED

22. MISCELLANEOUS CLAIMS

Page 8: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

MOTION TO APPROVE THE MISCELLANEOUS CLAIMS DATED JANUARY 11, 2012.

MOVED BY: VAN HOUTEN / SECONDED BY: MANTEY

MOTION PASSED

23. COMPUTER PRINTOUT

MOTION TO APPROVE THE COMPUTER PRINTOUT

MOVED BY: MANTEY / SECONDED BY: GRIFFITH

MOTION PASSED

24. CLOSED SESSION: LEGAL OPINION – BILLBOARD ISSUE

MOTION TO RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION AT: 7:45 AM

MOVED BY: DRICK / SECONDED BY: DOLAN

MOTION PASSED

RETURN TO OPEN SESSION AT: 7:54 AM

25. CLOSED SESSION: ATTORNEY LETTER REGARDING INTEREST RATE ON CHARGEBACKS

MOTION TO RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION AT: 7:56 AM

MOVED BY: VAN HOUTEN / SECONDED BY: MANTEY

MOTION PASSED

RETURN TO OPEN SESSION AT: 8:39 AM

26. ADJOURNMENT:

MOTION TO ADJOURN AT 8:40 AM

MOVED BY: JONES / SECONDED BY: DRICK

MOTION PASSED

DEBBIE WARDEN

RECORDING SECRETARY

Page 9: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

RESOLUTION NO:

LIVINGSTON COUNTY DATE:

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF A BLANKET PURCHASE ORDER

FOR THE PURCHASE OF AMMUNITION – SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT / PURCHASING

WHEREAS, the Sheriff’s Department has a need for ammunition for target and service needs;

and

WHEREAS, per the Purchasing Policy, a competitive bid process was performed and the solicitation was posted on the MITN e-procurement site and posted in the local news paper; and

WHEREAS, Purchasing received three bid responses, in which, Michigan Police Equipment of Charlotte was the most responsive responsible bidder on all ammunition; and

WHEREAS, After review of the bids, we recommend a Blanket Purchase Order to Michigan Police Equipment of Charlotte, Michigan in an amount not exceed $44,502.00

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Livingston County Board of Commissioners

hereby authorizes a Blanket Purchase Order for the amount not to exceed

$44,502.00 for 2012 ammunition purchases to Michigan Police Equipment of

Charlotte, Michigan.

# # #

MOVED:SECONDED:CARRIED:

Page 10: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

QTY U/M DESCRIPTION

MFG

PART

NUMBER

UNIT

PRICE

EXTENDED

PRICE

DELIVERY

ARO

70000 Rnds.45 ACP Caliber Pistol, 230 grain FMJ

Remington L45AP4 $0.00 $0.00 /DAYS

7000 Rnds

.45 ACP, +P 230 grain TAP CQ Pistol,

Approved Brand: Hornady +P TAP CQ

#90955--No Substitutions $0.00 $0.00 /DAYS

10000 Rnds.40 S&W Caliber Pistol, 180 grain FMJ

Remington L40SW3 $0.00 $0.00 /DAYS

4000 Rnds

.40 S&W Caliber Pistol, 180 grain TAP CQ,

Approved Brand: Hornady 180 grain TAP

CQ #91365--No Substitutions $0.00 $0.00 /DAYS

2000 Rnds

12 ga. 8 Pellet, 00 buckshot 2 3/4 Approved

Brand: Hornady TAP Light Magnum 00

Buck Hornady #86275--No Substitutions $0.00 $0.00 /DAYS

2000 Rnds

12 ga., 1 oz Rifled slug, 2 3/4 . Approved

Brand: Remington Slugger Rifled Slug

#S12SRS --No Substitutions $0.00 $0.00 /DAYS

15000 Rnds.223 Caliber Rifle, 62 grain FMJ bullet Fiocchi

223C $0.00 $0.00 /DAYS

7000 Rnds.223 Caliber Rifle, Hornady TAP Urban 60

grain #83286--No Substitutions $0.00 $0.00 /DAYS

15000 Rnds.223 Caliber Rifle 75 grain FMJ Hornady

#9760EL--No Substitutions $0.00 $0.00 /DAYS

10000 Rnds

5.56 NATO 75 grain BTHP Approved Brand:

Hornady 5.56 NATO 75 grain BTHP T2 TAP

#8126N-No Substitutions $0.00 $0.00 /DAYS

4000 Rnds.308 168 grain TAP Approved Brand:

Hornady TAP #80965--No Substitutions $0.00 $0.00 /DAYS

2000 Rnds.308 165 grain TAP Approved Brand:

Hornady TAP #80985--No Substitutions $0.00 $0.00 /DAYS

Page 11: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

Liv

ing

sto

n C

ou

nty

Sh

eri

ff's

Dep

art

men

t

2012 A

mm

un

itio

n

Es

tim

ate

d

QT

YU

/MD

ES

CR

IPT

ION

MF

G

PA

RT

U

NIT

PR

ICE

EX

TE

ND

ED

PR

ICE

UN

IT P

RIC

E

EX

TE

ND

ED

PR

ICE

UN

IT P

RIC

E

EX

TE

ND

ED

PR

ICE

70

00

0R

nd

s.4

5 A

CP

Calib

er

Pis

tol, 2

30 g

rain

FM

J

Rem

ing

ton

L45A

P4

$0

.25

4$

17

,78

0.0

0N

o B

id$

0.2

38

$1

6,6

60

.00

70

00

Rn

ds

.45 A

CP

, +

P 230 g

rain

TA

P C

Q P

isto

l,

Ap

pro

ved

Bra

nd

: H

orn

ad

y +

P T

AP

CQ

#9095

5--

No

Su

bsti

tuti

on

s$

0.5

44

$3

,80

8.0

0$

0.5

80

$4

,06

0.0

0$

0.5

50

$3

,85

0.0

0

10

00

0R

nd

s.4

0 S

&W

C

alib

er

Pis

tol, 1

80 g

rain

FM

J

Rem

ing

ton

L40S

W3

$0

.20

0$

2,0

00

.00

No

Bid

$0

.20

7$

2,0

70

.00

40

00

Rn

ds

.40 S

&W

C

alib

er

Pis

tol, 1

80 g

rain

TA

P C

Q,

Ap

pro

ved

Bra

nd

: H

orn

ad

y 1

80 g

rain

TA

P

CQ

#91365- -

No

Su

bsti

tuti

on

s$

0.5

35

$2

,14

0.0

0N

o B

id$

0.3

71

$1

,48

4.0

0

20

00

Rn

ds

12 g

a. 8 P

elle

t, 0

0 b

uckshot 2 3

/4 A

pp

roved

Bra

nd

: H

orn

ad

y T

AP

Lig

ht

Mag

nu

m 0

0

Bu

ck H

orn

ad

y #

86275--

No

Su

bsti

tuti

on

s$

0.5

55

$1

,11

0.0

0$

0.5

84

$1

,16

8.0

0$

0.5

63

$1

,12

6.0

0

20

00

Rn

ds

12 g

a., 1

oz R

ifle

d s

lug, 2 3

/4 .

Ap

pro

ved

Bra

nd

: R

em

ing

ton

Slu

gg

er

Rif

led

Slu

g

#S

12S

RS

--N

o S

ub

sti

tuti

on

s$

0.6

92

$1

,38

4.0

0N

o B

idN

o B

id

15

00

0R

nd

s.2

23 C

alib

er

Rifle

, 62 g

rain

FM

J b

ulle

t F

iocch

i

223C

$0

.29

8$

4,4

70

.00

$0

.00

0$

0.0

0$

0.3

73

$5

,59

5.0

0

70

00

Rn

ds

.223 C

alib

er

Rifle

, H

orn

ad

y T

AP

Urb

an

60

gra

in #

83286--

No

Su

bsti

tuti

on

s$

0.5

24

$3

,66

8.0

0$

0.5

51

$3

,85

7.0

0$

0.5

31

$3

,71

7.0

0

15

00

0R

nd

s.2

23 C

alib

er

Rifle

75 g

rain

FM

J H

orn

ad

y

#9760E

L--

No

Su

bsti

tuti

on

s$

0.2

51

$3

,76

5.0

0$

0.2

66

$3

,99

0.0

0$

0.2

57

$3

,85

5.0

0

10

00

0R

nd

s

5.5

6 N

AT

O 7

5 g

rain

BT

HP

Ap

pro

ved

Bra

nd

:

Ho

rnad

y 5

.56 N

AT

O 7

5 g

rain

BT

HP

T2 T

AP

#8126

N-N

o S

ub

sti

tuti

on

s$

0.5

24

$5

,24

0.0

0$

0.5

51

$5

,51

0.0

0$

0.5

31

$5

,31

0.0

0

40

00

Rn

ds

.308 1

68 g

rain

TA

P

Ap

pro

ved

Bra

nd

:

Ho

rnad

y T

AP

#80965--

No

Su

bsti

tuti

on

s$

0.8

25

$3

,30

0.0

0$

0.8

81

$3

,52

4.0

0$

0.8

38

$3

,35

2.0

0

20

00

Rn

ds

.308 1

65 g

rain

TA

P

Ap

pro

ved

Bra

nd

:

Ho

rnad

y T

AP

#80985--

No

Su

bsti

tuti

on

s$

1.2

70

$2

,54

0.0

0$

1.3

30

$2

,66

0.0

0$

1.2

85

$2

,57

0.0

0

To

tal:

$5

1,2

05

.00

$2

4,7

69

.00

$4

9,5

89

.00

Co

mm

en

ts:

MP

ET

J C

on

ev

era

's,

Inc

.V

an

ce

Ou

tdo

ors

, In

c

Red F

ont =

Substitu

tion; fr

eig

ht

charg

es m

ay a

pply

; N

ote

s in

marg

in o

f pricin

g p

age

C:\D

OC

UM

E~

1\E

AS

YP

D~

1\L

OC

ALS

~1\T

em

p\B

CL T

echnolo

gie

s\e

asyP

DF

4\@

BC

L@

04077

09B

\@B

CL

@04077

09B

.xls

Page 12: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

Terms Fund/Dept Line Item

NET 30

DAYS

101-301; 101-

350; 266-301

747.052; 746.052;

744.050; 747.000

MICHIGAN POLICE EQUIPMENT COMPANY LIVINGSTON COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT

6521 LANSING RD. 150 S. HIGHLANDER WAY

CHARLOTTE, MI 48813 HOWELL, MI. 48843

ATTN: SENA LOSETH For more information contact:

517.322.0443 Sgt. Robert Marshall #257 517.540.7912

Fax 517.322.0491 [email protected]

U/M UNIT PRICE

Rnds $0.254

Rnds $0.544

Rnds $0.200

Rnds $0.535

Rnds $0.555

Rnds $0.692

Rnds $0.298

Rnds $0.524

Rnds $0.251

Rnds $0.524

Rnds $0.825

Rnds $1.270

SHIPPING/FREIGHT

TOTAL

1. PO# must appear on all invoices, packing slips and correspondence.

2. Send invoice to department placing order. Department Authorization Date3.

4. Purchasing Authorization Date

5. Deliver all items to department indicated.

6. Must have purchasing authorization if over $1,000.00.

$44,502.00

This order is exempt from sales & use tax Exemption

No. 38-6005819

4000

2000 $2,540.00

Vendor carries all risk of loss and/or damage to items ordered occurring prior

to their delivery to acceptance by the department indicated.

LIVINGSTON COUNTY PURCHASE ORDERCentral Purchasing

304 E. Grand River, Ste.204, Howell, MI 48843

Phone: (517) 540-8741 Fax: (517) 546-7266

EXTENDED

PRICE

INSTRUCTIONS TO THE VENDOR:

$4,470.00

2000

.308 168 grain TAP Approved Brand: Hornady TAP #80965

15000

By accepting this PO, the seller agrees to the terms and conditions on the

front and reverse sides hereof.

Seller agrees to provide applicable material safety data sheets as required by

law.

.308 165 grain TAP Approved Brand: Hornady TAP #80985

12 ga., 1 oz Rifled slug, 2 3/4 . Approved Brand: Remington

Slugger Rifled Slug #S12SRS --No Substitutions

.223 Caliber Rifle, 62 grain FMJ bullet Fiocchi 223C

5.56 NATO 75 grain BTHP Approved Brand: Hornady 5.56

NATO 75 grain BTHP T2 TAP #8126N-No Substitutions

.223 Caliber Rifle 75 grain FMJ Hornady #9760EL

$3,300.00

$5,240.0010000

.223 Caliber Rifle, Hornady TAP Urban 60 grain #832867000

15000

THEIR TRUCK

ISSUED TO:

QTY

5000

10000

2000

50000

3000

.45 ACP, +P 230 grain TAP CQ Pistol, Approved Brand:

Hornady +P TAP CQ #90955--No Substitutions

.40 S&W Caliber Pistol, 180 grain FMJ Remington L40SW3

Purchase Order Number

Date

$12,700.00

SHIP TO & BILL TO:

10-Jan-2012

.45 ACP Caliber Pistol, 230 grain FMJ Remington L45AP4

Delivery Date

20 DAYS ARO

ITEM NUMBER DESCRIPTION

Ship Via

$2,720.00

$2,000.00

$3,765.00

.40 S&W Caliber Pistol, 180 grain TAP CQ, Approved Brand:

Hornady 180 grain TAP CQ #91365--No Substitutions

12 ga. 8 Pellet, 00 buckshot 2 3/4 Approved Brand: Hornady

TAP Light Magnum 00 Buck Hornady #86275--No

Substitutions

$1,605.00

$1,110.00

$1,384.00

$3,668.00

Page 13: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

40

Memorandum

To: Livingston County Board of Commissioners

From: Sgt. Robert Marshall

Date: January 10, 2012

Re:Resolution authorizing Blanket Purchase Order for Ammunition –Sheriff’s Department/Purchasing

The Sheriff’s Department has a need for ammunition for their target and service needs. Purchasing performed a competitive bid process and posted on the MITN e-procurement site and in posted in the local news paper. Three bids were received and reviewed. The attached tabulation illustrates Michigan Police Equipment was the most responsible responsive bidder that bid on all ammunition.

After review of the three bids, we recommend and request that the attached resolution be approved authorizing that a Blanket Purchase Order to Michigan Police Equipment of Charlotte, Michigan in an amount not exceed $44,502.00 for 2012 ammunition purchases.

Back-up documentation regarding this purchase is available in the Purchasing Office for review. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter, please contact Jana Daroczy at 517.540.8740.

LIVINGSTON COUNTY, MICHIGANDEPARTMENT OF SHERIFF

150 S Highlander WayHowell, Michigan 48843

Page 14: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

RESOLUTION NO:

LIVINGSTON COUNTY DATE: January 10, 2012

RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FOR THE PURCHASE OF EXTENDED MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR DIGITAL IN-CAR VIDEO RECORDING

EQUIPMENT - Sheriff’s Department / Public Safety Committee / Finance Committee

WHEREAS, the Sheriff’s Department has determined a need to continue the warranties on the thirty (30) digital in-car video recording systems, data storage server, attached PC, and wireless equipment that was purchased in three phases (board resolutions #2007-10-273; #2008-06-173; 2009-05-171); and

WHEREAS, The EMA for the server, RAID Storage, and software will cost $3,479.20 to cover from 4-25-2012 to 2-24-2013; The software will be prorated and cost $360.34 once the backend hardware (server and RAID) falls out of coverage from 2-25-2013 to 4-24-2013; The initial ten (10) cameras will cost $4,750.00 and cover the warranty period 4-25-2012 to 4-24-2013 and then they will fall out of coverage; The seven (7) cameras purchased in phase two of the project will cost $2,625.00 and cover the warranty period 5-27-2012 to 5-26-2013; And the last thirteen (13) cameras will cost $6,175.00 and cover the warranty on the equipment from 9-11-2012 to 9-10-2013; and

WHEREAS, the Sheriff’s Department will be purchasing the one year Extended Maintenance Agreement (EMA) from L-3 Communications Mobile-Vision for all of the equipment for a sum not to exceed $17,389.54; and

WHEREAS, the purchase of the EMA will be an annual expense to maintain the equipment for as long as L-3 Communications agrees to cover the equipment; and

WHEREAS, there are sufficient funds within Fund 266- Federal Equitable Sharing (DEA) special revenue fund balance for the purchase and

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Livingston County Board of Commissioners hereby

approves the purchase of a one year Extended Maintenance Agreement from L-3

Communications for a sum not to exceed $17,389.54 which will be paid for out of the

Federal Equitable Sharing (DEA) special revenue fund.

# # #

Page 15: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

Memorandum

To: Livingston County Board of Commissioners

From: Sgt. Robert Marshall

Date: 1/24/2012

Re: Resolution authorizing purchase of Extended Maintenance Agreement from L-3

Communications

RE: Resolution authorizing purchase of Extended Maintenance Agreement from L-3 Communications to continue warranties on Thirty (30) In-Car Digital Video Recording systems and data storage server from the 266 Fund- Federal Equitable Sharing (DEA) special revenue fund.

The Sheriff's Department would like to purchase an Extended Maintenance Agreement from L-3 Communications Mobile Vision to extend the warranties of the Thirty (30) in-car video recorders, data storage server, software, and wireless equipment that was purchased in three phases (See board resolutions #2007-10-273; #2008-06-173; 2009-05-171). Since the equipment was purchased in three phases, the maintenance agreements expire on three separate dates this year. We would like to make one payment to cover the cost of the EMA for all of the equipment. This will be an annual cost for as long as L-3 Communications agrees to cover the equipment.

The breakdown of the total cost of the EMA is as follows: The server and RAID storage unit would cost $3,479.20 to cover from 4-25-2012 to 2-24-2013; The software would cost $360.34 once the hardware falls out of coverage prorated from 2-25-2013 to 4-24-2013; The initial ten (10) cameras would cost $4,750.00 to cover from 4-25-2012 to 4-24-2013 and then they will fall out of coverage; The seven (7) phase two cameras would cost $2,625.00 to cover from 5-27-2012 to 5-26-2013; And the last thirteen (13) cameras would cost $6,175.00 to cover from 9-11-2012 to 9-10-2013.

We will purchase the L-3 Communications Mobile Vision EMA for a total $17,389.54 which will extend all of the warranties into 2013. The total amount will be covered using funding from the Federal Equitable Sharing (DEA) special revenue fund. The statute governing this special revenue fund authorizes a purchase in this capacity. This purchase has been reviewed by the Purchasing staff and is in compliance with the Purchasing Policy.

Therefore, I am requesting that the attached resolution be approved. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me.

LIVINGSTON COUNTY, MICHIGANDEPARTMENT OF SHERIFF DEPARTMENT

150 S. Highlander WayPhone 540-7912 Fax

Web Site: co.livingston.mi.us

Page 16: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

RESOLUTION NO:

LIVINGSTON COUNTY DATE:

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING BOARD CHAIR TO SIGN USER AGREEMENTS FOR THE

PLACEMENT OF SIMULCAST SYSTEM EQUIPMENT– PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE, FINANCE

COMMITTEE, BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, 9-1-1 CENTRAL DISPATCH / EMERGENCY

MANAGEMENT

WHEREAS, August 1, 2011, the Board of Commissioners authorized funding for the construction of an eight-site VHF simulcast radio system for dispatching the fire service and EMS in Resolution No. 3220; and,

WHEREAS, current system design has it making use of towers owned by the village of Fowlerville, Livingston Community Water Authority (LCWA) and Deerfield Township; and,

WHEREAS, a template has been developed by county civil counsel so agreements may be perfected and entered into with other entities for placement of county-owned equipment on towers and/or property owned by those entities; and,

WHEREAS, Motorola, the general contractor, is eager to begin construction; and,

WHEREAS, each agreement must also be approved by the entity’s governing body; and,

WHEREAS, county civil counsel suggests passage of a resolution authorizing the Chair to sign agreements as they are perfected and approved by civil counsel as an expeditious means of conducting these transactions.

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the Livingston County Board of Commissioners authorizes the Chair to

sign user agreements necessary for completion and operation of the simulcast system upon review and approval

by County Civil Counsel.

# # #

MOVED:SECONDED:CARRIED:

Page 17: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

Memorandum

To: Public Safety CommitteeFinance CommitteeBoard of Commissioners

From: Donald T. Arbic, Director

Date: January 9, 2012

Re: Authorization for Chair to Sign Use Agreements

August 1, 2011, the Board of Commissioners approved Resolution 3220 (2011-08-219) authorizing funding to construct an eight-site VHF simulcast radio system for dispatching the county’s eight fire departments and the EMS department.

System design has not been finalized at this writing. Currently, the system is slated to use towers owned by the village of Fowlerville, Livingston Community Water Authority (LCWA) and Deerfield Township. This department and county legal counsel developed a user agreement template, copy attached, allowing the county to place communications equipment, shelters, etc., on towers and property owned by other entities. It may also be necessary to enter into a user agreement with a private property owner to place a shelter and generator proximate to the LCWA tower in Green Oak Township. The template can be modified to meet the unique elements of these separate agreements.

Motorola, the project’s general contractor, is eager to begin construction. County legal counsel suggests the passage of a Board of Commissioners resolution authorizing the Chair to sign the agreements as they are perfected and approved by legal counsel as an expeditious means to transact this business.

Each separate agreement must also be approved by the governing bodies of the aforementioned agencies.

Attachment (1)

LIVINGSTON COUNTY, MICHIGAN911 CENTRAL DISPATCH/

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT

300 S. Highlander Way, Howell, Michigan 48843Phone 517.546.4620 Fax 517.546.5008

Web Site: co.livingston.mi.us

Page 18: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

1

FACILITY USELICENSE AGREEMENT

THIS LICENSE AGREEMENT, made and entered into this _____ day of __________, 2011, by and between the COUNTY OF LIVINGSTON, a political subdivision of the State of Michigan (hereinafter referred to as the “County”), ) and the_________________________________ , a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Michigan (hereinafter referred to as the "Owner”).

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, the County provides emergency communications for Livingston County, including providing communications for police, fire, and emergency medical services; and

WHEREAS, the County has requested permission to install, at no rental cost, certain equipment on the Owner's ________________________ to assist in implementing these emergency services communications; and

WHEREAS, the Owner has authorized the County’s use of the Owner’s________________________ for such purposes.

NOW, THEREFORE, FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual covenants hereinafter contained, IT IS HEREBY AGREED, as follows:

1. Use. The Owner hereby grants a non-exclusive license to the County toinstall on the Owner’s _____________ located at ______________________________

911 communications equipment, including __________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________ ,

and the necessary electrical and coaxial cables required to operate such equipment, subject to the conditions in this License Agreement .

2. Damage and Clean up to Owner Property and/or Premises. County shall be responsible for any damage to any Owner property or premises that is caused by County or County’s employees, contractor’s, or volunteers. If damage occurs, County shall make necessary repairs and/or replacements to the damaged property to the satisfaction of the Owner. If the damage cannot be completed to the Owner's satisfaction, County shall reimburse the Owner the actual cost for repairing or replacing the damaged property. County shall be responsible for assuring that all Owner sites are restored to their original condition after work performed under this License Agreement is complete.

Page 19: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

2

3. Permits and Licenses. County shall be responsible for obtaining and maintaining throughout the term of this License Agreement all licenses, permits, certificates, and governmental authorizations necessary to perform all of its activities under this License Agreement.

4. Independent Contractor. Nothing in this License Agreement is intended to establish an employer employee relationship between the Owner and any County employee, contractor, or volunteer. All County employees, contractors, and volunteers assigned to perform work under this License Agreement by County shall, in all cases, be deemed employees, contractors, or volunteers of County, and not employees, agents, subcontractors, or volunteers of the Owner.

5. Insurance. The County shall procure, pay the premium on, keep and maintain during the term of this License Agreement adequate personal injury and property damage insurance, covering injuries, death and property damage arising out of its activities pursuant to this License Agreement. Any insurance policies obtained for the program shall name the Owner as an additional insured. In the event the insurance coverage obtained by the County is for any reason reduced or terminated during the term of this License Agreement, the County shall immediately notify the Owner of that fact in writing.

6. Contractor Coverage. County's contractors and subcontractors working on the Owner’s ________________ will carry in full force and effect all insurance coverages required by this License Agreement. In the alternative, County, at its expense, may provide such coverage for any or all its contractors and subcontractors by adding them to County's policies.

7. Insurance Primary. County’s insurance coverage shall be primary and non-contributory over any other valid insurance or self-insurance carried by the Owner.

8. Liability/Risk Management System. .

A. All liability to third parties, loss, or damage as a result of claims, demands, costs, or judgments arising out of activities, such as the provision of policy and procedural direction, to be carried out by the County in the performance of this License Agreement shall be the responsibility of the County and not the responsibility of the Owner if the liability, loss, or damage is caused by, or arises out of, the action or failure to act on the part of any County employee or agent, provided that nothing herein shall be construed as a waiver of any governmental immunity by the County or its employees as provided by statute or court decisions.

B. All liability to third parties, loss or damage as a result of claims, demands, costs, or judgments arising out of activities, such as direct service delivery,

Page 20: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

3

to be carried out by the Owner in the performance of this License Agreement shall be the responsibility of the Owner, and not the responsibility of the

County, if the liability, loss, or damage is caused by, or arises out of, the actions or failure to act on the part of the Owner, any subcontractor, anyone directly or indirectly employed by the Owner, provided that nothing herein shall be construed as a waiver of any governmental immunity that has been provided to the Owner or its employees by statutes or court decisions.

C. In the event that liability to third parties, loss, or damage arises as a result of activities conducted jointly by the County and the Owner in fulfillment of their responsibilities under this License Agreement , such liability, loss, or damage shall be borne by the County and the Owner in relation to each party’s responsibilities under these joint activities provided that nothing herein shall be construed as a waiver of any governmental immunity by the County, the Owner or their employees, respectively, as provided by statute or court decisions.

D. Each of the parties to this License Agreement agrees to cooperate with the other party in the constitution and operation of their respective risk management systems. Each party agrees that if an incident occurs and is reported as a part of its respective risk management system, and if the incident report involves the public entity or its respective staff or agent, a copy of said incident report will be immediately delivered to the designated representative of the other party. It is agreed and understood that said incident reports will be held in the strictest of confidence and that each party agrees to cooperate fully with the other in the investigation and resolution of the incident or liability exposure revealed as a result of its respective risk management system.

9. No Third Party Beneficiaries. This License Agreement does not and is not intended to create any obligation, duty, promise, contractual right or benefit, right to be indemnified, right to be subrogated to the parties' rights in this License Agreement, and/or any other right, in favor of any other person or entity.

10. Discrimination. In carrying out the terms to this License Agreement, the parties hereto shall adhere to all Federal, State and local laws and regulations prohibiting discrimination. The parties hereto, as required by law, shall not discriminate against persons to receive services under this License Agreement or against an employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, sexual preference, handicap, height, weight, marital status, political affiliation or beliefs, or citizenship. Breach of this covenant shall be regarded as a material breach of this License Agreement.

Page 21: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

4

11. Compliance with Laws. The parties to this License Agreement shall perform all their respective duties and obligations hereunder in complete compliance with all applicable Federal, State and local statutes, laws, ordinances, rules and regulations.

12. Reservation of Rights. This License Agreement does not, and is not intended to impair, divest, delegate, or contravene any constitutional, statutory, and/or other legal right, privilege, power, obligation, duty, or immunity of the Owner and the County.

13. Delegation /Subcontract/ Assignment. County shall not delegate, assign, or subcontract any obligations or rights under this License Agreement or this entire License Agreement without the prior written consent of the Owner.

14. Amendments. All modifications, amendments or waivers of any provision of this Agreement shall be made by the written mutual consent of the parties hereto.

15. Contract Period/Termination. This License Agreement shall be effective from the date of execution by both parties and shall remain in effect until terminated by either party. Either party may terminate this License Agreement upon one-hundred-twenty(120) days written notification to the other party.

16. Certification of Authority to Sign License Agreement . The persons signing this License Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto certify by their signatures that they are duly authorized to sign on behalf of said parties and that this License Agreement has been authorized by said parties.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this License Agreement has been fully signed by the authorized representatives of the parties hereto on the day and year first above written.

WITNESSED BY: COUNTY OF LIVINGSTON.

BY Date

BY Date

______________________________(OWNER)

BY Date

Page 22: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

C:\DOCUME~1\EASYPD~1\LOCALS~1\TEMP\BCL TECHNOLOGIES\EASYPDF 4\@BCL@1C07E6BE\@[email protected]

BY Date

Page 23: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

RESOLUTION NO:

LIVINGSTON COUNTY DATE:

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING BLANKET PURCHASE ORDER NOT TO EXCEED $20,000 FOR 2012

TO FIFER INVESTIGATIONS, LCC FOR CONDUCTING APPLICANT BACKGROUND

INVESTIGATIONS – 9-1-1 CENTRAL DISPATCH / EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT /

PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE / FINANCE COMMITTEE / BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS

WHEREAS, the 9-1-1 Central Dispatch Department will fill six to eight vacancies during 2012; and

WHEREAS, all applicant finalists are subjected to a thorough background investigation; and

WHEREAS, the number of vacancies coupled with failures during the training process will necessitate multiple background investigations before all vacant positions are filled; and

WHEREAS, the 9-1-1 Central Dispatch Department outsources this work to Fifer Investigations, LCC for their unique expertise and experience conducting employee background investigations for public safety agencies; and

WHEREAS, a full background investigations costs $900; and

WHEREAS, the funds have been budgeted and approved in the department’s budget for 2012; and,

WHEREAS, the 9-1-1 department requests the competitive bid process per the Purchasing Policy be waived.

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the competitive bid process per the Purchasing Policy is waived and the

Livingston County Board of Commissioners hereby authorizes a blanket purchase order to Fifer Investigations,

LLC for the conduct of employment applicant background investigations during 2012 in an amount not to

exceed $20,000.

# # #

MOVED:SECONDED:CARRIED:

Page 24: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

Memorandum

To: Public Safety CommitteeFinance CommitteeBoard of Commissioners

From: Donald T. Arbic, Director

Date: December 16, 2011

Re: Blanket Purchase Order for Applicant Background Investigations – Fifer Investigations

The 9-1-1 Central Dispatch Department at this writing has six vacant dispatcher positions. Two current dispatchers are experiencing health issues that may eventually force them from the department’s workforce.

Half of the applicants commencing on-the-job dispatcher training do not successfully complete the training program. The failure rate will necessitate as many as three background investigations each to fill the last one or two vacancies. The unusually high number of background investigations anticipated in the coming year requires the issuance of a blanket purchase order in an amount not to exceed $20,000.

The department hires Fifer Investigations, LLC to conduct thorough background investigations of persons successful in the initial stages of the application process. The firm’s president and lead investigator is Tim Fifer. Mr. Fifer is a retired state police detective whose specialty was background investigations on casino employees. He parlayed those skills into his current forte of conducting background investigations for public safety agencies; see Fifer Investigations, LLC client list attached. A full background investigation costs $900.

At this writing, Fifer Investigations has completed 16 applicant background investigations for the central dispatch department since 2009.

Whenever Mr. Fifer has made potential employment disqualifying discoveries about an applicant, he stops his investigation, reports his finding, and then awaits a decision by the employer if he should proceed or cease the investigation at that point. Stopping an investigation upon discovery of a disqualifying fact results in savings to the department each time it occurs.

The thoroughness of Mr. Fifer’s background investigations saves the employer time, money and energy. For example, one of his recent investigations revealed an

LIVINGSTON COUNTY, MICHIGAN911 CENTRAL DISPATCH/

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT

300 S. Highlander Way, Howell, Michigan 48843Phone 517.546.4620 Fax 517.546.5008

Web Site: co.livingston.mi.us

Page 25: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

applicant was reported chronically tardy by a former employer. Tardiness is intolerable for this department; the applicant failed to make this disclosure and was disqualified.

This writer concedes the subjectivity, but will assert the unique skill set, experience, subject matter expertise and information provided by Fifer Investigations allows the department’s administrators to make better hiring decisions than when background investigations were conducted in-house.

Attachments (1)

Page 26: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology
Page 27: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

RESOLUTION NO:

LIVINGSTON COUNTY DATE:

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIVINGSTON COUNTY TO PARTICIPATE IN THE 2010 HOMELAND

SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM (HSGP) AND TO SUBMIT FY-2010 HSGP APPLICATIONS PURSUANT TO

DECISIONS OF THE LIVINGSTON COUNTY HOMELAND SECURITY PLANNING TEAM – 9-1-1 CENTRAL

DISPATCH / EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT / PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE/ FINANCE COMMITTEE

WHEREAS, the FY-2010 HSGP is a primary funding mechanism operated by the United States Department of Homeland Security for building and sustaining national preparedness capabilities providing pass-through funds to states, regions and counties for preventing, deterring, responding to and recovering from incidents of national significance; and

WHEREAS, Livingston County’s FY-2010 HSGP allocation by the Region One Homeland Security Planning Board’s Executive Committee is $241,842.05; and

WHEREAS, the state of Michigan administers the HSGP on behalf of the United States Department of Homeland Security; and

WHEREAS, the city of Lansing is the Region One Homeland Security Planning Board’s fiduciary for FY-2010 HSGP funds; and

WHEREAS, both the state of Michigan and the city of Lansing require various officials of participating counties to sign annual grant agreements and supporting documents; and

WHEREAS, Livingston County maintains a Homeland Security Local Planning Team representing all public safety disciplines to determine the most worthwhile use of HSGP funding; and

WHEREAS, capture of FY-2010 HSGP funds necessitates submission of written applications to the Region One Homeland Security Planning Board and state of Michigan on forms prescribed by the state of Michigan.

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED after review by civil counsel to their form and substance, the Chair of the Livingston

County Board of Commissioners, the County Administrator, the County Emergency Management Coordinator, the County

Emergency Program Manager, and other Livingston County officials as may be necessary are authorized to sign the State of

Michigan 2010 Homeland Security Grant Program Agreement, the 2010 HSGP Region One Board

Equipment/Exercising/Planning Agreement and other supporting documents necessary to participate in the FY-2010

Homeland Security Grant Program.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the Livingston County Board of Commissioners hereby authorizes the submission of FY-

2010 HSGP application(s) and other required documents to support the application pursuant to the determination of the

Livingston County Homeland Security Local Planning Team.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the Livingston County Board of Commissioners hereby designates the9-1-1 Central Dispatch/Emergency Management Department Director as the primary applicant agent and the County EMS Director as the secondary agent.

# # #

MOVED:

SECONDED:

CARRIED:

Page 28: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

Memorandum

To: Public Safety CommitteeFinance CommitteeBoard of Commissioners

From: Donald T. Arbic, Director

Date: December 02, 2011

Re: Resolution Authorizing Livingston County’s Participation in theFY-2010 Homeland Security Grand Program (HSGP) and County Officials to Sign and Submit Required Documents

The United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) annually issues a non-competitive, pass-through grant to states, regions, urban areas and counties to build and sustain preparedness, as well as recover from incidents of national significance called the Homeland Security Grant Program (HSGP). The Michigan Department of State Police Emergency Management and Homeland Security Division (EMHSD) administer the HSGP on behalf of the DHS. Livingston County is in EMHSD’s Region One. The Region One ’10 HSGP is $2,996,195.00. Based on population, the Region One Executive Committee allocated $241,842.05 of that sum to Livingston County for local projects at the discretion of the Local Planning Team (LPT).

Annual HSGP participation requires various officials of Livingston County to sign and submit grant agreements, project justification forms, actual cost justification forms, reimbursement forms, environmental & historic preservation forms and other documents to receive HSGP funds and participate in Region One projects supported by and paid for out of Region One’s allocation.

LIVINGSTON COUNTY, MICHIGAN911 CENTRAL DISPATCH/

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT

300 S. Highlander Way, Howell, Michigan 48855Phone 517.546.4620 Fax 517.546.5008

Web Site: co.livingston.mi.us

Page 29: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

RESOLUTION NO:

LIVINGSTON COUNTY DATE:

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXPANSION OF THE LIVINGSTON COUNTY FIBER OPTIC CABLE

NETWORK TO WHITMORE LAKE – PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE – FINANCE COMMITTEE – BOARD

OF COMMISSIONERS -1-1 CENTRAL DISPATCH / EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT

WHEREAS, Livingston County is a participant in the Mid-Michigan 9-1-1 Consortium with Ingham, Eaton and Clinton Counties; and,

WHEREAS, consortium participants agree to share use and costs of a next generation 9-1-1 call system featuring mirrored servers installed at the Lansing and Howell 9-1-1 centers; and,

WHEREAS, protecting the system from a single point of failure necessitates redundant geo-diverse high-speed network paths between Howell and Lansing; and,

WHEREAS, it has been determined by the Information Technology Departments of Ingham and Livingston Counties the most desirable paths are along the Grand River corridor (currently under construction) and from Green Oak Township to Whitmore Lake; and,

WHEREAS, construction costs have previously been competitively bid by the Livingston Educational Service Agency (LESA); and,

WHEREAS, this is a 9-1-1 surcharge eligible expenditure and the 9-1-1 department has sufficient funds in fund balance to pay for this project; and

WHEREAS, the proposed budget amendment ensures compliance with the Uniform Budgeting and Accounting Act, as amended.

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the Livingston County Board of Commissioners authorizes expansion of the county fiber optic cable network to Whitmore Lake via LESA to include construction, splicing and provisioning the network for a sum not exceed $105,000.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Livingston County Board of Commissioners approves the following budget amendment:

2012 2012 ProposedAmended Proposed Amended

Fund Budget Amendment Budget

Central Dispatch $5,875,584 $105,000 $5,980,584

The budgetary status reports showing the line-item changes for this budget amendment will be attached as part of the

resolution

# # #

MOVED:SECONDED:CARRIED:

Page 30: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology
Page 31: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology
Page 32: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology
Page 33: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology
Page 34: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology
Page 35: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology
Page 36: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

Memorandum

To: Public Safety CommitteeFinance CommitteePublic Safety Committee

From: Donald T. Arbic, Director

Date: January 06, 2012

Re: Resolution Authorizing Extension of County Fiber Network

Livingston County participates in the Mid-Michigan 9-1-1 Consortium to share use and cost of a next generation 9-1-1 call system with Eaton, Clinton and Ingham Counties. The system’s heart is a redundant switching architecture with mirrored servers in the Livingston and Ingham County 9-1-1 centers. It is necessary to connect the two servers by primary and back-up geo-diverse high-speed network pathways to protect the system from a single point of failure.

The primary pathway will be a fiber optic cable connection currently under construction between Howell and Lansing via the Grand River corridor. It has been determined the most desirable back-up pathway is to connect the Livingston County fiber network to the Washtenaw County fiber network at Whitmore Lake, and then create a token ring to Lansing through Washtenaw, Jackson and Ingham Counties, which are already connected. This will ultimately connect the 9-1-1 centers of Howell and Lansing by two separate and distinct network paths.

The Livingston Educational Service Agency (LESA) previously bid expansion of the Livingston County fiber network to Ingham County via Webberville as a base bid with 17 optional legs, see attachment. One of the previously bid options was the connection between Livingston and Washtenaw Counties via Whitmore Lake at approximately $85,000. The electronics, slicing and network configuration will add an estimated $20,000 to the overall cost to complete the connection.

LIVINGSTON COUNTY, MICHIGAN911 CENTRAL DISPATCH/

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT

300 S. Highlander Way, Howell, Michigan 48843Phone 517.546.4620 Fax 517.546.5008

Web Site: co.livingston.mi.us

Page 37: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

RESOLUTION NO:

LIVINGSTON COUNTY DATE:

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE 9-1-1 DIRECTOR TO SIGN PURCHASE ORDERS FOR

PROMOTIONAL MATERIALS – PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE, FINANCE COMMITTEE,

BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, 9-1-1 CENTRAL DISPATCH / EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT

WHEREAS, departmental staff members are regularly invited to make instructional presentations to groups of elementary and middle school students; and,

WHEREAS, said instructional presentations have historically been supported by distribution ofpromotional materials to members of the target audience; and

WHEREAS, said promotional materials consist of bookmarks, pencils, erasers, zipper tabs, stickers, removable tattoos and edible suckers bearing generic 9-1-1 logos; and

WHEREAS, the Citizen Emergency Response Team (CERT) will train a new group of general public volunteers during 2012; and,

WHEREAS, volunteers completing CERT training have heretofore been awarded a CERT lapel pin; and,

WHEREAS, 9-1-1 department has sufficient funds budgeted for 2012 on line 347-956-000 to pay for this project.

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the Board of Commissioners hereby authorized the 9-1-1 Central

Dispatch/Emergency Management Department Director to sign purchase orders for the purchase of the

aforementioned promotional materials in an amount not to exceed $1,500 during the 2012 calendar year.

# # #

MOVED:SECONDED:CARRIED:

Page 38: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

Memorandum

To: Public Safety CommitteeFinance CommitteeBoard of Commissioners

From: Donald T. Arbic, Director

Date: January 10, 2012

Re: Authorization to Purchase Promotional Materials

This department’s staff is regularly invited to make presentations to groups of elementary and middle school students. The presentations are instructive in nature, developed to inform students how to call 9-1-1, what services are available and to reduce hoax calls.

Additionally, the departments Citizen Emergency Response Team (CERT) volunteers1 are awarded a pin upon completion of CERT training. A new group of CERT volunteers is scheduled to undergo training this year.

I request a resolution authorizing me to sign purchase orders during the forthcoming calendar year for the purchase of bookmarks, pencils, erasers, zipper tabs, stickers, bags, removable tattoos, edible suckers and lapel pins bearing generic 911 or CERT logos to support the aforementioned activities for a total amount not to exceed $1,500 throughout the year.

1 Volunteer members of the general public, not employees.

LIVINGSTON COUNTY, MICHIGAN911 CENTRAL DISPATCH/

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT

300 S. Highlander Way, Howell, Michigan 48843Phone 517.546.4620 Fax 517.546.5008

Web Site: co.livingston.mi.us

Page 39: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

RESOLUTION NO:

LIVINGSTON COUNTY DATE:

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUPPORT OF THE LIVINGSTON COUNTY

SPECIALIZED RESPONSE TEAM -Sheriff Department

WHEREAS, In 2010, the Local Emergency Planning Committee (LEPC) expanded the County-wide Specialized Response Team (SRT) to include Underwater Search and Recovery Units; and

WHEREAS, the LEPC has invited the Sheriff Department to participate in the Specialized Response Team (SRT) involving underwater search and rescue incidents occurring in and around Livingston County; and

WHEREAS, the Sheriff Department currently maintains an underwater search and rescue team that shares the same capabilities and responsibilities of the participating SRT organizations; and

WHEREAS, the Sheriff intends to abide by the Livingston County SRT Participating Agreement dated June 17, 2010 to allow each participating organization to share resources, financial and otherwise, when responding to technical rescue incidents; and

WHEREAS, the SRT Participating Agreement requires each Member Organization to pay an annual fee of $3,500.00 that is used in accordance with the guidelines set forth by the SRT Participating Agreement; and

WHEREAS, the funding to maintain the Sheriff Department underwater search and recovery team, including the annual fee, is currently included in the 2011 and 2012 Sheriff Department annual budget; and

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Livingston County Board of Commissioners hereby

approves and authorizes the Sheriff to join the Livingston County Specialized Response Team and

abide by the contents of the Participating Agreement.

# # #

MOVED:SECONDED:CARRIED:

Page 40: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology
Page 41: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology
Page 42: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology
Page 43: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology
Page 44: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology
Page 45: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology
Page 46: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology
Page 47: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology
Page 48: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology
Page 49: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology
Page 50: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology
Page 51: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology
Page 52: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

Memorandum

To: Livingston County Board of Commissioners

From: Lt. Don Jakrzewski

Date: 12-1-2011

Re: Livingston County Specialized Response Team

In 2010, the Livingston County Specialized Response Team (SRT) expanded their incident response capabilities that originally only included hazardous material incidents, to include underwater search and recovery incidents. The Sheriff Department, having a technical underwater search and recovery unit, was invited to join 6 other emergency response organizations that maintain underwater search and recovery units. The advantage of sharing resources is obvious when dealing with these types of incidents.

The Sheriff Department has worked very close with all local Fire Departments when responding to underwater search and recovery incidents occurring within our jurisdiction. At times, we have been called on to assist in neighboring jurisdictions for assistance.

The Livingston County Specialized Response Team Participating Agreement dated June 17, 2010, details member obligations. As a member of the SRT, it is required to pay an annual fee of $3,500.00. As outlined in the agreement, these funds are used primarily for “uncollectable” costs associated with response to hazardous material and underwater search and recovery incidents. Some of those costs are equipment maintenance and repair, supplies, training, and equipment purchase.

The Sheriff Department has suffered a decrease in funding for the maintenance of the Sheriffs’ Dive Team. The SRT does not only allow emergency response personnel to work collectively in responding to these types of incidents, but also allows for sharing expenses incurred while doing so. I have attached the Sheriff Department Dive Team expenses incurred by year from 2003 to present.

If you have any questions regarding this matter please contact me.Lt. Don Jakrzewski

LIVINGSTON COUNTY, MICHIGANSHERIFF DEPARTMENT

150 S. Highlander WayHowell, MI 48843

Phone 517-540-7983 Fax 517-552-2542

Page 53: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology
Page 54: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology
Page 55: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology
Page 56: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology
Page 57: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology
Page 58: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology
Page 59: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology
Page 60: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology
Page 61: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

RESOLUTION NO:

LIVINGSTON COUNTY DATE:

RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION #2009-07-218 TO INCREASE THE

FINANCIAL ANALYST POSITION FROM 4 DAYS PER WEEK TO 5 DAYS PER

WEEK - ADMINISTRATION / GENERAL GOVERNMENT - 1.9.12 / FINANCE - 1.11.12 / FULL BOARD - 1.17.12

WHEREAS, Resolution #2009-07-218 increased the Financial Analyst position from Two (2) days per week to Four (4) days per week due to the increased demand for costing services in the Information Technology Department for its unprecedented growth both within the County departments and from outside customers; and

WHEREAS, the Equalization Department no longer has a need for the Financial Analyst position One (1) day per week because of the redistribution of duties and responsibilities within the department; consistent with Resolution #2011-11-312; and

WHEREAS, funding for this position is budgeted in the IT Fund - 636, L.E.T.S. Fund - 588, and General Fund Administration Department - 101-172 and departmental personnel line items; and, overall, this would create a decrease in General Fund expenditures.

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Livingston County Board of Commissioners hereby

authorizes the increase in the current financial analyst position from Four (4) days

per week to Five (5) days per week as follows utilizing funds in the respective

2012 budgets:

DEPARTMENT DAYS PER WEEK HOURS PER WEEK

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Three (3) 24

L.E.T.S. One (1) 8

ADMINISTRATION One (1) 8

TOTAL: Five (5) 40

THEREFORE BE IT ALSO RESOLVED that the Livingston County Board of Commissioners

hereby authorizes the current Financial Analyst pay at Grade M, Step 6.

# # #

MOVED:

SECONDED:

CARRIED:

Page 62: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

LIVINGSTON COUNTY, MICHIGANLIVINGSTON COUNTY ADMINISTRATION

304 E. Grand River Avenue - Suite 202 Howell MI 48843

TEL: (517) 546-8710 BELINDA M. PETERS

FAX: (517) 546-7266 County Administrator

MAIL: [email protected]

MEMORANDUM

TO: GENERAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE

FROM: BELINDA M. PETERS - COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR

RE: AUTHORIZE DARREN SPEER AT FINANCIAL ANALYST POSITION

DATE: JANUARY 5, 2011

The purpose of this memorandum is to request an amendment to Resolution # 2009-07-218 to increase the Financial Analyst position currently held by, Darren Speer, from Four (4) days per week to Five (5) days per week. Funding for this position is contained in the 2012 Budgets for IT, LETS and Administration. This modification in his schedule should have been executed simultaneously with the reorganization of the Equalization Department (reference attached Resolution #2011-11-312). The net change to the General Fund for the redistribution of duties/responsibilities in the Equalization Department and modifying the Financial Analyst position is a savings of $4,138.00.

BACKGROUND

Since July 2008, Darren Speer has been splitting his daily job duties / responsibilities between a Senior Appraiser position in the Equalization Department and Financial Analyst position in IT, LETS & Administration. Initially, and for approximately One (1) year, the split was Three (3) days in Equalization as a Senior Appraiser and Two (2) days as a Financial Analyst (1 day each in IT and LETS). However, as the Financial Analyst workload increased, in July, 2009, the Board of Commissioners approved the split to Four (4) days as Financial Analyst and One (1) day as Senior Appraiser (reference attached Resolution #2009-07-218).

In November 2011, the Board of Commissioners authorized the reorganization of the Equalization Department to redistribute the workload within the department; bring the Industrial Study back in-house; and, eliminating the One (1) day per week Senior Appraiser position. The reorganization reduced the overall cost of operations in the Equalization Department, approximately $19,000 and the net savings to the General Fund is $4,138.

Thank you for your consideration of this matter, if you have any questions please feel free to contact me.

\\Livcohq\board-admin\WP\Belinda - Misc\Financial Analyst Position.doc

Page 63: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

RESOLUTION NO:

LIVINGSTON COUNTY DATE:

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIVINGSTON COUNTY TO ENTER INTO A MEMORANDUM OF

UNDERSTANDING (MOU) WITH THE MICHIGAN RURAL EMS NETWORK FOR THE PURPOSES

OF OBTAINING A CMS INNOVATIONS GRANT/FINANCE/FULLBOARD

WHEREAS, Livingston County EMS has identified an opportunity to participate with the Michigan Rural EMS Network to obtain a CMS Innovations Grant;

WHEREAS, A memorandum of understanding signed by an authorized agent of Livingston County or the department designee is required to continue pursuit of the grant;

WHEREAS, The grant opportunity would fully fund a community paramedic for Livingston County for a minimum of three years;

WHEREAS, The memorandum of understanding allows for Livingston County EMS to be part of the grant process and if the grant is received enter into an agreement to receive grant funds;

WHEREAS, Livingston County EMS is requesting to expend funds not to exceed $3,000.00 in expenses related to obtaining the CMS Innovations Grant.

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, following favorable review by civil counsel and recommendation of an

appropriate County official, the Livingston County Board of Commissioners hereby authorizes

said County official to sign and enter Livingston County EMS into the aforementioned MOU

with the Michigan Rural EMS Network.

# # #

MOVED:SECONDED:CARRIED:

Page 64: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

Memorandum

To: Livingston County Board of Commissioners

From: Jeffrey R Boyd

Date: January 23, 2012

Re: CMS Innovations Grant

Livingston County EMS has been closely following sudden opportunity for a Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Innovations Grant Opportunity that is over 11 million dollars and being applied for by the Michigan Rural EMS network. The grant would bring almost 2.5 million dollars over the course of 3 years to Livingston County. The opportunity funds a community paramedic that would provide preventative health services to Livingston County Residents and has provisions for sustainability beyond the three year grant cycle.

The goal of the community paramedic would be to prevent CMS patients from being admitted for preventable disease processes and to prevent CMS patients from being readmitted to the hospital for patients recently discharged. This reduces the cost to CMS by preventing costly hospital visits and readmissions.

The money would be used to fund existing initiatives already in place by Livingston County EMS and grant preference is placed on organizations that already have processes in place to jump start this initiative.

If you have any questions regarding this matter please contact me.

LIVINGSTON COUNTY, MICHIGANDEPARTMENT OF EMS

3950 W Grand River Howell MI 48855Phone 517-546-6220 Fax 517-546-6788

Web Site: co.livingston.mi.us

Page 65: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

Memorandum of UnderstandingInnovations for Michigan EMS

Section I: Purpose and Organizational Intent

This memorandum affirms the commitment of the organizations listed in Section II to work collaboratively to implement the Innovations for Michigan EMS project (herein referred to as project). The project will be focused on three levels of EMS provider training and deployment:Community Health Advocate, Community Paramedic, and Advanced Practice Paramedic. These three levels of care will require certificate training to be provided by grant funds. The organizations listed in Section II agree to work with other EMS services and the project management organization, Michigan Rural EMS Network (MiREMS), to implement grant activities. This agreement is contingent upon receipt of grant funds and will be for the original project period (March 30, 2012-March 29, 2015).

Participating organizations through signing this agreement are committed to be an member of the Michigan Rural EMS Network in good standing and carryout project activities as indicated in their Partner Profiles. They are committed to the vision, goals, objectives and strategies that have been developed for this project. Anticipated outcomes of the project include 1) Better Care,2) Better Health Outcomes, and 3) Decreased Costs

Section II: Participating Organizations

The following organizations have agreed to participate in the Michigan Community EMS Project and will carry-out the responsibilities as outlined in Section III & IV. Compensation and benefits to partners are also included in Section III & IV.

1. Michigan Rural EMS Network (MiREMS)2. American Society for the Advancement of Paramedicine (ASAP)3. Livingston County EMS (LCEMS)4. Mobile Medical Response (MMR)5. Tri-Hospital EMS (TriEMS)6. In response to Year 1 data, additional partners will be recruited to participate in Year 2

with the intent of covering the entire state of Michigan with the project through the state EMS response regions. Agreement addendums will be created to include those partners.

Section III: Common Responsibilities & Agreements

! Appoint a representative to attend Consortium meetings ! Authorize that representative to make decisions that pertain to the daily operation of project! Maintain a MiREMS membership in good standing! Read minutes, reports and newsletters to keep abreast of Network decisions/activities! Provide name of a contact person for project operation, authorizing documents, and

handling financial matters. ! Complete all reports and participate in data collection as required for compensation.! Agree to participating in negotiating a formal contract upon receipt of grant funds.! Agree to inclusion of additional partners in years 2 and 3 in order to regionalize the project

and impact the entire state of Michigan.

Page 66: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

Section IV: Specific Organization Profiles and Responsibilities

A. Michigan Rural EMS Network

1. Partner Information

Legal Name of OrganizationMichigan Rural EMS Network

Physical Location- City/StateCaro, Michigan

Mailing Address:P.O. Box 265Caro, MI 48723

Contact Person:Leslie Hall, Director

Phone:989-284-5345

E-Mail:[email protected]

2. Organization Description: MiREMS is a Michigan not-for-profit corporation which exists to support EMS agencies and EMS professionals that provide care in rural areas of Michigan. MiREMS began as the Huron-Sanilac EMS Network, which represents EMS services and providers that deliver prehospital care to rural Huron and Sanilac Counties. Based on successes achieved in Huron and Sanilac Counties, Network received a 3 year, Network Development grant through the US Department of Health and Human Services Office of Rural Health Policy. The goals of MiREMS are to 1) Improve the healthcare environment and level of support for rural EMS professionals and the companies for which they work; and 2) Provide opportunities, events, resources and technical assistance that expand and enhance the effectiveness of rural EMS professionals and the companies for which they work

3. Responsibilities:

! Handle all grants management activities including reporting, attending required/voluntary meetings and trainings, submission of documents, workplan submissions, and any other grantor required activities.

! Contract with individuals and organizations as needed to meet obligations of the CMS Cooperative Agreement (includes project director, financial management services, training partner, EMS Deployment Partners, and evaluators.)

! Provide contract oversight and serve as project fiduciary

! Coordinate and facilitate Innovations for Michigan EMS Meetings

! Serve as the point of contact for CMS Cooperative Agreements

! Provide leadership and serve as contact person with Michigan Department of Community Health EMS Division, Michigan Association of Ambulance Services, and other state organizations.

! Provide background information, support, and leadership to conversations with payors regarding the cost benefit of providing reimbursement for services provided through the EMS Innovations project.

4. Anticipated Compensation: Compensation includes reimbursement for material costs and actual time spent by staff on the Innovations for Michigan EMS project as provided in the grant budget in the amount of $2,442,464.00

5. Authorization

Authorizing Official (Please Type or Print):________________________________________

Signature _______________________________________________Date________________

Page 67: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

B. American Society for the Advancement of Paramedicine

1. Partner Information

Legal Name of OrganizationAmerican Society for the Advancement of Paramedicine

Physical Location- City/StateGrand Rapids, Michigan

Mailing Address:ASAP-51P.O. Box 1110Grand Rapids, MI 49501

Contact Person:Doug Smith, President

Phone:616-439-0331

E-Mail:[email protected]

2. Organization Description: The American Society for the Advancement of Paramedicine, envisions creating and sustaining new advancements within the field of Paramedicine. Longterm, ASAP would plans to be instrumental in the development and implementation of a national standard for the creation of a Paramedic Practitioner program and its proper utilization within the healthcare system. ASAP goals include: 1) Establishing a well-equipped Educational Curriculum, 2) Promoting positive change within Emergency Care Services, 3) Advocating the appropriate use of the Healthcare System, 4) Providing a well-trained Practitioner for the extraordinary patient, 5) Providing appropriate care in a timely and cost efficient manner, 6) and Creating an EMS Clinical Career path that provides for practicing medicine with autonomy and accountability.

3. Responsibilities:

! Develop and oversee the training program for the three levels of EMS care included in the project: Community Health Advocate (CHA), Community Paramedic (CP), and Advanced Practice Paramedic (APP).

! Establish/maintain Michigan certification standards/requirements for CHA, CP, and APP.

! Provide leadership to the educational process and any required infrastructure development to support sustaining training and certification of EMS providers in the roles of CHA, CP, or APP.

! Contract with individuals and organizations as needed to carryout responsibilities above OR delegate this responsibility to MIREMS.

! If establishing contractual relationships, provide contract oversight.

! Fulfill the common responsibilities and agreements outlined in Section III. 4. Anticipated Targets & Compensation Schedule for Deliverables:

! Development of Community Health Advocate (24 hour) Curriculum………...$7,500

! Development of Community Paramedic (4 hour) Modules ($1200/module)….$4,800

! Development of Advanced Practice Paramedic (102 hour) Curriculum….......$30,000

! Development of Instructor (16 hour) Curriculum……………………………..$4,800

! Provision of two Instructor Courses (16 hours)……………………………….$3,200

! Provision of two Train the Trainer (8 hour) Certification Courses…...….……$1,600

! Estimated Certification Fees for project……………………………………….$3,795(CHA-54@$15; CP-108@$20; APP-18@$25; IC-10@$25; Trainers-5@$25)

Total $55,695

5. Authorization: We recognize that a formal contract with Michigan Rural EMS Network, the fiduciary, reflecting the information in this memorandum of understanding will be created upon notification of a grant award.

Authorizing Official (Please Type or Print):________________________________________

Signature _______________________________________________Date________________

Page 68: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

C. Livingston County EMS

1. Partner Information

Legal Name of OrganizationLivingston County EMS

Physical Location-City/StateHowell, Michigan

Mailing Address:3950 W. Grand River AveHowell, MI 48855

Contact Person:Kevin Wilkinson, Admin Manager

Phone:(517) 546-6220

E-Mail:[email protected]

2. Organization Description: Livingston County EMS was established in 1970 by the Board of Commissioners with one ambulance in the Brighton area. Since then it has grown into a modern, efficient member of the emergency response community as we know it today. In 1971 the County Board opted to provide county wide service with units stationed in Howell and Brighton. In January 1982, Advanced Life Support (ALS) or Paramedic Service was initiated. Livingston County EMS is the only ambulance service in Livingston County. We cover an area of 584 square miles. Call volume now exceeds 10,000 calls per year with 60% of those being emergency calls.

3. Responsibilities:

! Provide a minimum of 6 EMS professionals for project related training to include at least one of the following levels of training: Community Health Advocate (CHA), Community Paramedic (CP), and Advanced Practice Paramedic (APP).

! Employ or contract with individuals and organizations as needed to carryout service targets.

! Provide all medical, management, and administrative oversight for individuals providing services under Livingston County EMS.

! Restrict CHA, CP, and APP services to those already included in Michigan Protocols. Livingston County EMS is required to fulfill study or other requirements for any services outside of current state protocols. Grant funds may be provided for such services upon meeting state requirements and executing a contract amendment to include such services.

! Fulfill the common responsibilities and agreements outlined in Section III.

! Submit invoices as outlined in project contract upon award.

4. Anticipated Targets & Compensation Schedule for Deliverables: See Attachment A

5. Authorization: We recognize that a formal contract with Michigan Rural EMS Network, the fiduciary, reflecting the information in this memorandum of understanding will be created upon notification of a grant award.

Authorizing Official (Please Print):______________________________________________

Signature _______________________________________________Date________________

Page 69: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

D. Mobile Medical Response

1. Partner Information

Legal Name of OrganizationMobile Medical Response, Inc.

Physical Location-City/StateSaginaw, Michigan

Mailing Address:834 S. Washington AvenueSaginaw, MI 48601

Contact Person:Phil Petzold, Operations Manager

Phone:989-551-8247

E-Mail:[email protected]

2. Organization Description: Mobile Medical Response, Inc. is a non-profit ambulance company providing service to 10 counties in mid-Michigan. We are a full service medical transportation company providing basic, advanced and mobile intensive care. We also provide medical dispatching services for eight counties, dispatching services for two air medical programs and flight following services. MMR's Education Department provides first aid, CPR and AED instruction as well as MFR, EMT and Paramedic training.

3. Responsibilities:

! Provide a minimum of 6 EMS professionals for project related training to include at least one of the following levels of training: Community Health Advocate (CHA), Community Paramedic (CP), and Advanced Practice Paramedic (APP).

! Employ or contract with individuals and organizations as needed to carryout service targets.

! Provide all medical, management, and administrative oversight for individuals providing services under Mobile Medical Response, Inc.

! Restrict CHA, CP, and APP services to those already included in Michigan Protocols. Mobile Medical Response, Inc. is required to fulfill study or other requirements for any services outside of current state protocols. Grant funds may be provided for such services upon meeting state requirements and executing a contract amendment to include such services.

! Fulfill the common responsibilities and agreements outlined in Section III.

! Submit invoices as outlined in project contract upon award.

4. Anticipated Targets & Compensation Schedule for Deliverables: See Attachment A

5. Authorization: We recognize that a formal contract with Michigan Rural EMS Network, the fiduciary, reflecting the information in this memorandum of understanding will be created upon notification of a grant award.

Authorizing Official (Please Print):______________________________________________

Signature _______________________________________________Date________________

Page 70: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

E. Tri-Hospital EMS

1. Partner Information

Legal Name of OrganizationTri-Hospital EMS

Physical Location-City/StatePort Huron, Michigan

Mailing Address:309 Grand River AvenuePort Huron, MI 48060

Contact Person:Ken Cummings, CEO

Phone:810-985-7115

E-Mail: [email protected]

2. Organization Description: Tri-Hospital EMS was established in 1983 to provide ambulance service to portions of St. Clair and Sanilac Counties. Twenty-five years later, Tri-Hospital EMS is the largest ambulance provider in St. Clair County, providing service to over 140,000 individuals in a 650 square miles radius, and responding to more than 12,000 runs annually. Tri-Hospital EMS has a state-of-the-art communication center that provides our Certified Emergency Medical Dispatchers immediate access medical providers. Tri-Hospital EMS’ fleet of 13 ambulances are all ALS licensed and staffed with two person crews, one always being a paramedic. Our staff of over 70 dedicated professionals work together to provide Advanced Life Support in an efficient and reliable manner. Tri-Hospital EMS has continued to grow over the years and has expanded its services to include assisted transportation, educational services to our staff and public and our most recent addition – a Health Care Answering Service call Med-Connection.

3. Responsibilities:

! Provide a minimum of 6 EMS professionals for project related training to include at least one of the following levels of training: Community Health Advocate (CHA), Community Paramedic (CP), and Advanced Practice Paramedic (APP).

! Employ or contract with individuals and organizations as needed to carryout service targets.

! Provide all medical, management, and administrative oversight for individuals providing services under Tri-Hospital EMS.

! Restrict CHA, CP, and APP services to those already included in Michigan Protocols. Tri-Hospital EMS is required to fulfill study or other requirements for any services outside of current state protocols. Grant funds may be provided for such services upon meeting state requirements and executing a contract amendment to include such services.

! Fulfill the common responsibilities and agreements outlined in Section III.

! Submit invoices as outlined in project contract upon award.

4. Anticipated Targets & Compensation Schedule for Deliverables: See Attachment A

5. Authorization: We recognize that a formal contract with Michigan Rural EMS Network, the fiduciary, reflecting the information in this memorandum of understanding will be created upon notification of a grant award.

Authorizing Official (Please Print):______________________________________________

Signature _______________________________________________Date________________

Page 71: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

EM

S A

ge

ncy

Ass

um

pti

on

s

36

ho

urs

of

serv

ice

pe

r w

ee

k p

er

EM

S p

rofe

ssio

na

l

2 h

ou

rs p

er

visi

t (i

ncl

ud

es

tra

vel,

re

po

rtin

g,

follo

w u

p,

coo

rdin

ati

on

, a

nd

tim

e w

ith

clie

nt)

Co

mp

en

sati

on

ove

r n

orm

al s

ala

ry-

CH

A $

1,

CP

$2

, A

PP

$4

Co

st p

er

visi

t- C

om

mu

nit

y H

eal

th A

dvo

cate

(w

ag

e, f

rin

ge

, ve

hic

le o

p/m

ain

ten

an

ce,

sup

plie

s, e

tc)

Ag

en

cy

ho

url

y

rate

ba

se $

# o

f u

nit

sT

ota

l

wa

ge

& f

rin

ge

37

$3

82

$7

6

mile

ag

e (

incl

ud

es

fue

l, o

p,

ma

in)

$1

30

$3

0

sup

pli

es

$5

1$

5

me

dic

al a

nd

man

ag

em

en

t o

vers

igh

t$

38

20

%$

7.6

0

To

tal p

er

visi

t$

11

9

Co

st p

er

visi

t- C

om

mu

nit

y P

ara

me

dic

(w

age

, fr

ing

e,

veh

icle

op

/ma

inte

na

nce

, su

pp

lie

s, e

tc)

Ag

en

cy

ho

url

y

rate

ba

se $

# o

f u

nit

sT

ota

l

wa

ge

& f

rin

ge

37

$3

92

$7

8

mile

ag

e (

incl

ud

es

fue

l, o

p,

ma

in)

$1

30

$3

0

sup

pli

es

$1

01

$1

0

me

dic

al a

nd

man

ag

em

en

t o

vers

igh

t$

39

25

%$

9.7

5

To

tal p

er

visi

t$

12

8

Co

st p

er

visi

t- A

dva

nce

d P

ract

ice

Par

am

ed

ic (

wag

e,

frin

ge

, ve

hic

le o

p/m

ain

ten

an

ce,

sup

pli

es,

etc

)

Ag

en

cy

ho

url

y

rate

ba

se $

# o

f u

nit

sT

ota

l

wa

ge

& f

rin

ge

37

$4

12

$8

2

mile

ag

e (

incl

ud

es

fue

l, o

p,

ma

in)

$1

30

$3

0

sup

pli

es

$1

51

$1

5

me

dic

al a

nd

man

ag

em

en

t o

vers

igh

t$

41

30

%$

12

.30

To

tal p

er

visi

t$

13

9

Co

mp

en

sati

on

Sch

ed

ule

# o

f

pro

vid

ers

#/w

ee

kw

ee

ksra

te$

# o

f

pro

vid

ers

#/w

ee

kw

ee

ksra

te$

# o

f

pro

vid

ers

#/w

ee

kw

ee

ksra

te$

Co

mm

un

ity

He

alth

Ad

voca

te T

rain

ing

& S

tart

Up

Sala

ry C

ost

Ba

se (

ho

urs

)6

12

2$

38

$5

,47

22

12

2$

38

$1

,82

42

12

2$

38

$1

,82

4

Co

mm

un

ity

He

alth

Ad

voca

te B

ase

Vis

its

21

84

4$

11

9$

18

7,8

62

29

52

$1

19

$1

11

,01

02

55

2$

11

9$

61

,67

2

Co

mm

un

ity

He

alth

Ad

voca

te V

isit

s O

ver

Bas

e2

10

44

11

9$

10

4,3

68

21

95

2$

11

9$

23

4,3

54

22

35

21

19

$2

83

,69

1

Co

mm

un

ity

Par

am

ed

ic T

rain

ing

& S

tart

Up

Sal

ary

Co

st B

ase

(h

ou

rs)

24

5$

39

$1

,56

02

45

$3

9$

1,5

60

24

5$

39

$1

,56

0

Co

mm

un

ity

Par

am

ed

ic B

ase

21

54

0$

12

8$

15

3,3

00

28

52

$1

28

$1

06

,28

82

55

2$

12

8$

66

,43

0

Co

mm

un

ity

Par

am

ed

ic V

isit

s O

ver

Ba

se2

10

40

$1

28

$1

02

,20

02

18

52

$1

28

$2

39

,14

82

25

52

$1

28

$3

32

,15

0

Ad

van

ced

Pra

ctic

e P

ara

me

dic

Tra

inin

g &

Sta

rt U

p

Sala

ry C

ost

Ba

se (

ho

urs

)$

0$

02

26

10

$4

1$

21

,32

0

Ad

van

ced

Pra

ctic

e P

ara

me

dic

Ba

se$

0$

02

10

26

$1

39

$7

2,4

36

Ad

van

ced

Pra

ctic

e P

ara

me

dic

Vis

it$

0$

02

10

26

$1

39

$7

2,4

36

Ve

hic

le (

rad

io,

ligh

tba

r, e

tc)

10

00

00

Eq

uip

me

nt-

Sta

rt U

p5

00

00

10

00

00

$7

04

,76

2$

69

4,1

83

$1

,01

3,5

19

Ye

ar

1Y

ea

r 2

Ye

ar

3

Page 72: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

RESOLUTION NO:

LIVINGSTON COUNTY DATE:

RESOLUTION APPROVING THE TENTATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE

LIVINGSTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AND THE MICHIGAN

ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES REPRESENTING 911 DISPATCHERS –

HUMAN RESOURCES

WHEREAS, negotiations have resulted in a tentative agreement between the Livingston County Board of Commissioners and the Michigan Association of Public Employees (hereinafter referred to as “MAPE”), for the period of 1/1/11 through 12/31/13; and

WHEREAS, the 911 Dispatchers have ratified the tentative agreement; and

WHEREAS, the modifications to the agreement are consistent with Board policy concerning wages and benefits; and

WHEREAS, the approval of the tentative agreement by the Board of Commissioners is the final action needed to execute this agreement.

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Livingston County Board of Commissioners

hereby approves the agreement reached with the MAPE and the Livingston

County Board of Commissioners for the period of 1/1/11 through 12/31/13.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chair of the Board of Commissioners be authorized to

sign all agreements necessary to effectuate this agreement.

# # #

MOVED:

SECONDED:

CARRIED:

Page 73: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

LIVINGSTON COUNTY, MICHIGAN

LIVINGSTON COUNTY ADMINISTRATION

304 E. Grand River Avenue - Suite 205

Howell MI 48843

TEL: (517) 546-8790 JENNIFER J. PALMBOS

FAX: (517) 546-6657 HUMAN RESOURCES/LABOR RELATIONS DIRECTOR

E-MAIL: [email protected]

MEMORANDUM

TO: BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS

FROM: JENNIFER PALMBOS – Human Resources/Labor Relations Director

RE: TENTATIVE AGREEMENT REACHED REGARDING 911 DISPATCHERS

DATE: FEBRUARY 6, 2012

I am pleased to announce that a tentative agreement has been reached between the County and the Michigan Association of Public Employees, the union representing 911 Dispatchers (hereinafter referred to as “911 Dispatchers”). The 911 Dispatchers voted to approve this agreement. If approved by the Board of Commissioners, the agreement will be effective January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2013. The agreement largely mirrors with non-union employee wage and benefit package.

Highlights of the agreement are as follows:

1. Beginning the first pay in March, 2012, all employees who are in the MERS defined benefit pension contribute 5% of MERS eligible payroll on a pre-tax basis for their MERS benefit.

2. Beginning March 1, 2012, or as soon as is practical thereafter, all employees go to the PPO 4 benefit equivalent to the non-union employees and begin contributing 10% toward the cost of these benefits. Employees pay a $10 per pay spousal surcharge for covered spouses.

3. Employees hired after ratification contribute 20% of the cost of their selected health and dental benefit (plus buy-up costs), with the base benefit being PPO 4.

Page 74: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

4. 0% increase to pay scales – 2011Me to for any across the board increase for non-union employees – 2012Me to for any across the board increase for non-union employees – 2013

1.5% wage reductions for employees hired after ratification.For new hires hired after ratification, training completion bonus - $1,500 one-time payment upon successful completion of 1st year of employment. An additional $1,500 one-time payment at the end of year two (2).

Training pay $.75 per hour if training new employee for four (4) consecutive hours.

5. Two (2) holidays converted from no premium to premium pay holidays.

6. All bargaining unit goes to direct deposit/debit card (paperless) for payroll.

7. $800 signing bonus.

8. Signing of a Letter of Understanding, notwithstanding the County’s Antinepotism and Antifraternization policy, to allow Shift Leader Joni Stidham and Dispatcher II Jami O’Bryant to select their shifts by seniority so long as no other interpersonal conflicts exist.

9. Includes all prior initialed and dated TA’s.

10.Contract through 12/31/2013.

County Administration is pleased with this agreement as it secures necessary concessions in wages, health care, and pension. Therefore, we strongly recommend Board approval of this agreement. Should you have any questions,please feel free to contact me.

Page 75: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

Letter of Understanding

This Letter of Understanding is made this ____ day of ___________, ________, by and between Livingston County and the Michigan Association of Public Employees/MAPE.

WHEREAS, the Livingston County Board of Commissioners approved Resolution No. 2006-10-336 October 16, 2006, adopting a human resources anti-nepotism and anti-fraternization employment policy; and,

WHEREAS, the anti-nepotism and anti-fraternization employment policy was incorporated into the Livingston County Personnel Manual effective December 05, 2011; and,

WHEREAS, the anti-nepotism policy and the Personnel Manual proscribe siblings of differing ranks working within the same sphere of influence; and,

WHEREAS, central dispatch employed siblings Joni Stidham and Jami O’Bryant as dispatchers; and,

WHEREAS, Joni Stidham was promoted April 1, 2008; and,

WHEREAS, actions to keep the aforementioned siblings separated by altering the work schedule in disregard of seniority rights granted within the collective bargaining agreement creates greater workplace hardships than the policy was intended to prevent.

THEREFORE, the Livingston County Board of Commissioners and the Michigan Association of Public Employees/MAPE agree to allow Shift Leader Joni Stidham and Dispatcher II Jami O’Bryant to select their shifts by seniority so long as no other interpersonal conflicts exist.

This Letter of Understanding shall be non-precedent setting and shall not otherwise alter or amend the collective bargain agreement between the parties.

It is expressly understood and agreed any modifications to this Letter of Understanding must be in writing and signed by the parties.

The above provisions have been agreed upon by the representatives of the below-signed parties.

Livingston County: Michigan Association of Public

Employees/MAPE:

_______________________ __________________________

Maggie E. Jones, Chair Jim Steffes, Labor Relations Specialist

Dated: _________________ Dated: ____________________

DTA:da

Page 76: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

RESOLUTION NO:

LIVINGSTON COUNTY DATE:

RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM

OF MICHIGAN DEFINED BENEFIT RETIREMENT PLAN FOR 911 DISPATCHERS

WHEREAS, Livingston County currently provides certain 911 Dispatchers hired before May 1, 2003 with a defined benefit pension plan through the Municipal Employees’ Retirement System of Michigan (MERS) at the B-2 (2.0% multiplier) with a 0% employee contribution; and

WHEREAS, the collective bargaining agreement ratified by all parties on February 6, 2012 provides that 911 Dispatchers who are in the MERS defined benefit plan shall contribute 5% of MERS eligible wages toward the cost of that benefit;

WHEREAS, MERS as administrator of the defined benefit pension plan requires the County Board of Commissioners to adopt the attached resolution to administrator the program.

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Employer hereby adopts the Municipal

Employees’ Retirement System of Michigan resolution such that 911 Dispatchers

in the defined benefit plan shall contribute 5% of MERS eligible wages to the

defined benefit plan.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chair of the Livingston County Board of

Commissioners is authorized to sign all necessary documents to effectuate this

change consistent with the collective bargaining agreement affecting 911

Dispatchers.

# # #

MOVED:

SECONDED:

CARRIED:

Page 77: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology
Page 78: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

RESOLUTION NO:

LIVINGSTON COUNTY DATE:

RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE LIVINGSTON COUNTY STREET NAMING AND

ADDRESSING POLICY – PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE, FINANCE COMMITTEE,

BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND 9-1-1

CENTRAL DISPATCH DEPARTMENTS

WHEREAS, on April 9, 2002, the Livingston County Board of Commissioners approved the Livingston County Street Naming and Addressing Policy; and,

WHEREAS, the Livingston County Street Naming and Addressing Policy was last amended in 2005; and,

WHEREAS, the Information Technology Department, Central Dispatch and Address Policy Committee recognize the need to review and update the County-wide addressing and street naming standards; and,

WHEREAS, the Address Policy Committee with representatives from IT/GIS, 911 Emergency Management, the Road Commission and local units that assign their own addresses have proposed amendments to the current Policy; and,

WHEREAS, the attached policy was developed with the advice and consent of County Civil Counsel and will continue to standardize County-wide addressing and street naming procedures and eliminate addressing confusion amongst all communities within Livingston County.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Livingston County Board of

Commissioners hereby adopts the attached Addressing and Street Naming Policy Amendments.

# # #

MOVED:SECONDED:CARRIED:

Page 79: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

1

LIVINGSTON COUNTY

STREET NAMING AND ADDRESSING POLICY

SECTION 1

GENERAL PROVISIONS

A. OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this County-Wide Street Naming and Addressing Policy is to establish standards for naming roadways, posting street signs and assigning numbers to all dwellings, principal buildings, businesses and industries; and to assist emergency management, first responders, the United States Postal Service and the public in the timely and efficient provision of services to residents and businesses of Livingston County.

This policy is written and adopted to eliminate addressing confusion and to create a standard system by which addresses may be assigned and maintained from this time forward. It is not the objective of this policy to correct all erroneously addressed structures. All addresses and road names within the municipalities identified in Sec. 1,B., ADDRESSING RESPONSIBILITY (below) as addressed by the Livingston County Information Technology Department are subject to correction notwithstanding the length of time such address or road name has existed. Corrections of addresses and road names will be made when non-conformity interferes with the accurate dispatch of emergency vehicles or postal delivery as outlined in Section 5 of this policy.

No policy can anticipate every condition or question related to individual circumstances. Livingston County reserves the sole right to revise or rescind this policy or any portion thereof as it deems appropriate. Amendments to this policy will be communicated to the community through official notices.

B. ADDRESSING RESPONSIBILITY

The Livingston County Information Technology Department/Geographic Information Systems Division (GIS) is responsible for addressing the following entities:

Cohoctah Township Iosco Township

Conway Township Marion Township

Deerfield Township Oceola Township

Genoa Township Putnam Township

Green Oak Township Tyrone Township

Handy Township Village of Fowlerville

Hartland Township Village of Pinckney

Unadilla Township (DTE Energy Customers Only)

Page 80: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

2

The following entities are responsible for addressing the area within their boundaries:

Brighton Township City of Brighton

Hamburg Township City of Howell

Howell Township

Unadilla Township (Consumers Energy Customers Only)

C. EFFECTIVE DATE

This policy is effective upon initial adoption and adoption of subsequent amendment or amendments by Resolution of the Livingston County Board of Commissioners. The policy shall be reviewed on an annual basis, or more often as deemed necessary, by GIS in conjunction with representatives of 911/Central Dispatch, the U.S. Postal Service, and the local governmental units responsible for addressing areas within Livingston County. This policy may be amended from time to time by Resolution of the Livingston County Board of Commissioners and shall be revised as necessary to be non-conflicting with locally approved addressing policies and ordinances.

Page 81: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

3

SECTION 2

ADDRESS REQUESTS

A. REQUIREMENTS

The following must be submitted at the time of application for an individual address:

1. Completed application form.2. Proof of ownership/copy of deed.3. Land use permit issued by the local governmental unit where the address is to

be assigned.4. Site plan/survey showing location of principal dwellings and drive.5. Current tax parcel identification number. 6. Copy of driveway permit or waiver7. Closest existing address on left, right and across the street from property to be

addressed.8. A fee for each address requested. Livingston County address issuance fees

are established by the Board of Commissioners.

B. ADDRESS REQUEST FOR NEW DEVELOPMENTS

The application for addressing subdivisions, condominiums, and mobile or manufactured home developments requires a final site plan showing all road names and location of roads be presented to the addressing official. Additional access roads in the development shall be required to have street names on the final site plan. The street names shown on the site plan must be approved by the Livingston County Road Commission prior to address assignment. The site plan shall also show the site/unit/lot number for each site along with the location of each meter that requires an address.

The developer will be responsible for the addressing fee for all lots, units, or meters included in the development at the time of application.

Official addresses shall be issued for each individual site/unit/lot by the addressing office at the time a building permit is applied for. The owner will be required to submit a copy of a land use permit and a site plan to obtain the address.

Page 82: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

4

SECTION 3

NUMERIC ASSIGNMENT

A. FRONTAGE INTERVAL/ADDRESS STYLE

The addressing system within the townships is based on a baseline meridian structure. The county is divided into four quadrants based on the following roads: Oak Grove Road/Pinckney Road/Toma Road as the meridian; and Mason Road/Golf Club Road/Commerce Road as the baseline. See Appendix A.

Livingston County uses a formula developed by Detroit Edison. Addresses are generally based on 1000 address numbers per mile. When divided by 5280 feet per mile, this calculates to one address number for each five (5) foot (+/-) interval. Addresses are assigned based on the location of the driveway entrance, not the front of the structure.

For townships previously addressed by Consumers Energy now under the addressing jurisdiction of Livingston County GIS, the Consumers Energy formula of one address number for each ten (10) foot (+/-) interval will be followed. Townships under this formula include: Cohoctah, Deerfield, and Tyrone.

The villages of Pinckney and Fowlerville use a city block address range style with approximately 50 addresses per block. The meridian for the Village of Pinckney is Howell St; the baseline is Main St/M-36. The meridian for the Village of Fowlerville is Grand Ave/Fowlerville Rd; the baseline is Grand River Ave. See Appendix A.

B. ODD/EVEN NUMBER LOCATION

The location of odd and even address numbers applies to townships and villages.

North of the baseline, even numbers shall be on the easterly side of the roads;Odd numbers shall be on the westerly side of the roads.

South of the baseline, even numbers shall be on the westerly side of the roads;Odd numbers shall be on the easterly side of the roads.

East of the meridian, even numbers shall be on the southerly side of the roads;Odd numbers shall be on the northerly side of the roads.

West of the meridian, even numbers shall be on the northerly side of the roads;Odd numbers shall be on the southerly side of the roads.See appendix A.

Page 83: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

5

C. FRACTIONAL, ALPHANUMERIC, HYPHENATED ADDRESSES

There shall be no use of fractional addresses, alphanumeric address numbers or hyphenated address numbers. This also applies to apartment numbers and suite numbers.

D. COMPONENT ORDER

Components of a street address shall always be in the following order: address number, directional prefix (if any), street name, street type/suffix, post-directional (if any), designation of apartment or suite, and apartment/suite number.

E. DIAGONAL STREETS

Diagonal streets shall be treated as either north-south or east-west streets. Once orientation is established, it shall be used the entire length of the road. The orientation will not change even if the road changes direction.

Within developments it is advisable to consider the direction of the beginning of the road.For example, if it originates off a north/south road and begins by going east before meandering in any other direction, it is generally considered an east/west road.

F. CIRCULAR STREETS

A circular street/road is one that returns to the same origin point or to the same originating road. Circular streets shall be numbered beginning at the low numbered intersection and continuing to the other end of the road. The outside of the circle is numbered first and the inside is then numbered to match and mix with the outside. This will result, in most cases, with fewer numbers on the inside of the circle and with larger spaces between the inside numbers.

G. CUL-DE-SACS

Cul-de-sacs shall be addressed using the system based on the baseline/meridian structure,odd/even numbers on the appropriate sides of the street and meeting at the mid-point or the back of the cul-de-sac.

H. CORNER LOTS

Corner lots shall be addressed to the road the driveway accesses. The assigned addresswill be determined by the site plan presented at the time a building permit is requested. Display of address numbers on the structure shall face the road to which the home is addressed.

Page 84: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

6

I. EASEMENTS/STACKED ADDRESSES

Houses sharing a common drive/easement shall be addressed to the main road from which the easement is accessed and using the numbering system applied to the main road. Local zoning and private road ordinances governing the requirement to name private drives/easements vary. The addressing official will consult the local government prior to assigning a new address sharing a common drive/easement.

J. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES

A single-family residence shall receive its own individual address determined by the basic rules for distance and direction.

K. DUPLEX RESIDENCES

A duplex shall be addressed with each unit receiving its own individual address determined by the basic rules for distance and direction.

L. APARTMENT BUILDINGS

Apartment buildings, where one entrance provides access to a number of apartments, shall be numbered with the main building receiving one address and each individual apartment being assigned apartment numbers as secondary location indicators. The apartment number assigned should indicate the floor location (e.g. Apt 204 is the fourth apartment on the second floor). Alphanumerical numbers are not to be used.

Apartment buildings with multiple entrances, where each entrance provides access to a limited number of apartments, shall require an address for each individual entrance. Each individual apartment shall be assigned an apartment number indicating the floor location. Alphanumerical numbers are not to be used.

Apartments that are accessed by a separate door for each unit shall be addressed with each unit receiving its own individual address determined by the basic rules for distance and direction.

M. MANUFACTURED HOME COMMUNITIES

Each individual manufactured home shall be assigned its own individual address following the basic rules for distance and direction. This generally results in leaving four(4) to eight (8) numbers between adjacent sites.

Page 85: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

7

N. TOWNHOUSES

Townhouses that are individually owned and not part of an apartment complex shall be assigned an individual address for each unit as determined by the street allowing main access to the building and following the basic rules for distance and direction.

Townhouses where one entrance provides access to multiple units shall fall under the apartment category and shall be addressed as apartments, with the main building receiving one address and each individual townhouse being assigned apartment numbers as secondary locators. Alphanumerical numbers are not to be used.

O. CONDOMINIUMS

Condominiums shall be assigned an individual address for each unit as determined by the street allowing main access to the building and following the basic rules for distance and direction.

An apartment building or townhouse complex converted to a condominium shall be required to be addressed with an individual address for each unit.

P. INDIVIDUAL COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS

Individual commercial buildings shall be given one address to the road/street on which the driveway access is located as determined by the basic rules for distance and direction. When a business faces a main road, but is accessed from a secondary road, an address will be allowed to the main road if the primary entrance faces the main road.

It is preferable for an individual building housing more than one business to be issued a separate address for each unit. However, an individual building housing more than one business has the option of using suite numbers when the interior units do not have external access doors to the street. If an individual building housing more than one business includes an external access door for each unit, then each unit shall be assigned an individual address as determined by the street allowing main access to the unit.

A large retail complex/superstore that houses one main retail business with additional smaller retail spaces within (i.e. grocery store with cleaners, bank, hair salon etc.) shall be assigned one address for the use of all businesses located within the main structure. This address shall be posted on the outside of the main building in a manner legible to the public as well as emergency responders.

Q. STRIP COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS

Strip commercial buildings shall require an address to be reserved for each individual entry door. Careful planning shall be taken to reserve enough numbers for future divisions of businesses. Each business shall receive its own individual address. If a

Page 86: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

8

business is large enough to use space accessed by two or more doors, the business shall be assigned the number that corresponds to its primary entrance.

Addresses shall be determined by the street/road from which the business is accessed. On corner lots, when a business faces a main road but is accessed from a secondary road, an address will be allowed to the main road if the primary entrance for the units faces the main road. When each unit has an individual entrance, the building will be addressed to the road on which the majority of the entrances are located.

R. MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES

Outbuildings and/or utility meters required to have an address shall be given their own individual address, generally four (4) to six (6) numbers from the main residence. Outbuildings having their own access drive shall be assigned an address following thebasic rules for distance and direction.

S. WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS TOWERS

A wireless communications tower shall be assigned one address determined by the basic rules for distance and direction. Each additional carrier shall obtain a suite number.

Page 87: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

9

SECTION 4

DISPLAY OF ADDRESSES

All principal buildings shall be required to display an address number in the manner prescribed in this policy.

A. RESPONSIBILITY FOR DISPLAY OF ADDRESS NUMBERS

It shall be the responsibility of each and every property owner, trustee, lessee, agent and occupant of each residence, apartment building, business or industry to post and maintain, at all times, address numbers as required under this policy. All addresses shall be displayed in such a way they are unobstructed and legible from the traveled roadway.

B. PLACEMENT OF ADDRESS NUMBERS

When a cluster box is used for mail delivery, it will only be required for the address to be displayed on the structure.

1. Manufactured homes located within a development shall display the address number in numerals of at least three (3) inches in height and on the side of the home facing the access road.

2. Structures located within a subdivision, condominium or within a city or village within 50 feet from the edge of the road right-of-way shall:

a. Display the assigned address number in numerals no less than three (3) inches in height on the structure in such a manner it is visible from the road.

b. The address numbers not less than two (2) inches in height shall also be displayed on both sides of the mailbox.

c. The numbers shall be reflective numbers on a contrasting background.

d. The address shall not be obstructed in any way by any form oflandscaping, other mailboxes or newspaper delivery boxes.

1. When the mailbox is obstructed, it will be required that anaddress sign be displayed at the road, following the standardslisted for structures located more than 50 feet from the road.

3. Structures located more than 50 feet from the edge of the road right-of-way shall comply with the previous requirements listed for structures within 50 feet of the edge of the right of way (Section 4 B.2) and in addition shall:

Page 88: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

10

a. Display the assigned address number on a post, fence or wall or other permanent structure no farther than ten (10) feet back from the edge of the traveled roadway.

b. The address shall be composed of numbers not less than three (3) inches in height.

c. The sign shall be composed of reflective numbers on a contrasting background.

d. The numbers shall be not less than four (4) feet and not more thanseven (7) feet above the ground.

Failure to display the address for new construction following the county standards, as posted within this policy, will be grounds for withholding issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy by the Building Department in accordance with the governing Building Code and Ordinance provisions.

Page 89: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

11

SECTION 5

ADDRESS CORRECTIONS

Whenever an error in a numeric address or street name comes to the attention of the Information Technology Department, that department shall initiate proceedings to correct the error.

Address corrections become effective within 60 days of receipt of Notice of Address Correction. The Addressing Official serves notice of address correction on the property owner via United States Postal Service. The address correction notice shall be signed by the Addressing Official and contain the name, business address and business telephone number of a county official the property owner may contact to request information, have questions answered or call special circumstances to the attention of the Addressing Official. Address corrections require two-party policy compliance verification.

A resident who does not put a correction of address in with the United States Postal Service and/or who does not display the new correct address thereafter will be in violation of this policy and subject to penalty as provided by ordinance.

A. NUMERIC CORRECTION

Addresses shall be corrected if one or more of the following conditions are met:

1. The existing address number is not in sequence and/or does not run consecutively in the same direction as the county address system.

2. The existing address number has the incorrect parity (odd/even) as determined by the county address system.

3. The existing number is such that the assignment of address numbers for new buildings is not practical and in keeping with the requirements of this policy. Addresses out of range by more than 35 (+/-) numbers shall be corrected to the proper range as needed and to accommodate new growth.

4. When an easement becomes a named private street, the structures mustreflect the new road name using correct numerical range for the new street.

5. An existing address is duplicated or otherwise violates this policy.

In the case of a numeric address correction, the following procedure shall be followed:

1. The reason for the numeric change shall be documented with date and reporting party.

Page 90: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

12

2. A new numeric address shall be determined using the county address assignment standards.

3. The property owner or owners shall be contacted in written form using the governing assessor’s information to identify ownership.

4. Notification shall also be sent to the following:

a. Township/village assessor

b. United States Postal Service

c. Utility companies

5. The resident shall be responsible for supplying their individual phone, financial, and other service providers with a copy of the official change of address form.

B. STREET NAME CORRECTIONS

Street names shall be corrected if one or more the following criteria exist:

1. Street name is a duplicate of another street within a designated postal area or within Livingston County and interferes with the accurate dispatch of emergency vehicles or postal delivery.

2. One road has two commonly used names or where portions of what appears to be the same road have two or more names.

3. A shared driveway or an easement servicing multiple buildings shall be named to comply with the local zoning or private road ordinance. The shared driveway/easement shall also meet the private road standards set by the Livingston County Road Commission.

4. All property owners along a street request a new street name in order to resolve interference with accurate dispatch of emergency vehicles or postal delivery and the street meets local zoning or private road ordinance and Livingston County Road Commission standards.

5. The street name and approach have been previously approved by the Livingston County Road Commission but the new street name was never used in the issuance of addresses.

Page 91: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

13

In the case of a private street name change, where the street is not part of a platted subdivision or condominium development, the following procedure shall be followed:

1. The reason for street name change shall be documented with date and reporting party.

2. The property owner or owners will be contacted in written form using the governing assessor’s information to identify ownership.

3. Within 60 days of notification, the owners of land accessed by the street to be re-named shall submit to the Livingston County Road Commission, thefollowing items:

a. A central person of contact for the owner group.

b. A proposal of three different name choices complying with the street naming requirements, and have been agreed upon by all of the affected property owners.

c. A list of all residents comprising the owner group with their currentaddresses and phone numbers.

4. The new street names will be researched and one will be assigned according to the primary preference of the owner group. If submitted street names do not comply with the street naming standards, the Livingston County Road Commission will work with the central contact of the owner group to discuss alternatives.

5. Within 60 days of the original notification, if a new approved street name has not been accepted by all of the owners, a street name will be assigned by the Livingston County Road Commission.

6. Upon approval of the new street name by the Livingston County Road Commission, a new address will be assigned to each property. The address change notification form will be mailed to each property owner affected by the change.

7. Notification of any new addresses, including street names, will be sent to:a. United States Postal Serviceb. Village or township officesc. Affected school districtd. Livingston County Clerke. Utility companies

Page 92: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

14

In the case of a street name change located within a subdivision or condominium the following procedure shall be followed:

1. The reason for street name change shall be documented with date and reporting party.

2. The property owner or owners will be contacted in written form using the governing assessor’s information to identify ownership.

3. Within 60 days of notification the owners of land accessed by the street to be re-named shall submit to the Livingston County Road Commission the following items:

a. A central person of contact for the owner group.

b. A proposal of three different name choices complying with the street naming requirements, and have been agreed upon by all of the affected property owners.

c. A list of all residents comprising the owner group with their currentaddresses and phone numbers.

4. The new street names will be researched and one will be assigned according to the primary preference of the owner group. If submitted street names do not comply with the street naming standards, the Livingston County Road Commission will work with the central contact of the owner group to discuss alternatives.

5. Within 60 days of the original notification, if a new approved street name has not been accepted by all of the owners, a street name will be assigned by the Livingston County Road Commission.

6. Upon approval of the new street name by the Livingston County Road Commission, the governing municipality shall pass a resolution approving the new street name as required by MCL Section 560.226 (Land Division Act, PA 288 of 1967, as amended).

a. If the street is in a subdivision, the approved resolution shall be recorded at the Livingston County Register of Deeds office and shall be mailed to the State of Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs – Office of Land Survey & Remonumentation.

b. If the street is in a condominium development, an amendment to the Master Plan shall be recorded at the Livingston County Register of Deeds office.

Page 93: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

15

7. A copy of the approved resolution shall also be sent to the Livingston County Information Technology Department. Upon receipt of the approved resolution, a new address will be assigned to each property. The address change notification form will be mailed to each property owner affected by the change.

8. Notification of any new addresses, including street names, will be sent to:a. United States Postal Serviceb. Village or township officesc. Affected school districtd. Livingston County Clerke. Utility companies

In the case of a public street name change, the following procedure shall be followed:

1. A public safety agency shall contact the Road Commission with a request for a street name change. The reason for the street name change shall be documented with date and reporting party.

2. The property owner or owners will be contacted in written form using the governing assessor’s information to identify ownership.

3. Within 60 days of notification the owners of land accessed by the street to be re-named shall submit to the Livingston County Road Commission the following items:

a. A central person of contact for the owner group.

b. A proposal of three different name choices complying with the street naming requirements, and have been agreed upon by all of the affected property owners.

c. A list of all residents comprising the owner group with their currentaddresses and phone numbers.

4. The new street names will be researched and one will be assigned according to the primary preference of the owner group. If submitted street names do not comply with the street naming standards, the Livingston County Road Commission will work with the central contact of the owner group to discuss alternatives.

5. Within 60 days of the original notification, if a new approved street name has not been accepted by all of the owners, a street name will be assigned by the Livingston County Road Commission.

Page 94: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

16

6. Livingston County Board of Road Commissioners shall review the request and pass a resolution approving a new street name.

7. A copy of the approved resolution shall be sent to the Livingston County Information Technology Department. Upon receipt of the approved resolution, a new address will be assigned to each property. The address change notification form will be mailed to each property owner affected by the change.

8. Notification of any new addresses, including street names, will be sent to:a. United States Postal Serviceb. Village or township officesc. Affected school districtd. Livingston County Clerke. Utility companies

C. SUSPENSION OF PROCESS

For good cause, the Addressing Official may suspend the address correction process at any point for up to 90 days. Suspension of process longer than 90 days or in addition to the original 90 days requires the advice and consent of the 9-1-1 Central Dispatch/Emergency Management Director.

Page 95: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

17

SECTION 6

STREET NAME REQUIREMENTS

A. STREET/ROAD DESIGNATION

Every existing, proposed, or constructed roadway that provides, or will provide, access to multiple buildable lots shall be identified as a street/road in accordance with the local zoning or private road ordinance and the standards set by the Livingston County Road Commission.

B. STREET NAMING RESPONSIBILITY

Application for new street names, or to reserve street names for a development, is to be made through the Livingston County Road Commission.

The applicant must submit to the Livingston County Road Commission:

1. A proposal of three different street name choices.

2. New developments require a list of all street names being requested and a site plan showing the layout of the streets.

A final site plan showing the layout of the approved street names shall also be submitted to the appropriate addressing agency for approval.

C. NAMING NEW ROADS

When application is made for a new road name, the name will be compared to the Livingston County Road Commission database to check for duplication. Street names may be reserved for one (1) year. All street names will conform to the standards set in this policy.

D. RESERVING STREET NAMES FOR NEW DEVELOPMENTS

A written request to reserve new street names must be presented to the Livingston County Road Commission for each new development. These street names will be reviewed and reserved in the road name inventory, if approved.

In a development in which any given street constitutes a loop and in which a portion of that loop crosses over another street creating an intersection, each segment of the loop divided by that street shall be designated by a separate name.

Page 96: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

18

Additional street names shall be selected for access roads within commercial developments even if addresses are not issued to these streets. The street names selected shall follow the standards listed in this policy and shall be shown on the final site plan.Street names become final upon the issuance of a road approach construction permit, final plat approval, or the recording of the final site condominium documents.

Street names may be reserved for one (1) year. If one of the requirements to finalize the street name is not satisfied within the one (1) year, a written request for a one (1) year extension of the street name reservation may be submitted to the Livingston County Road Commission. If such a request is not received, the names will no longer be reserved.

E. STREET NAME SELECTION

The following standards will be used:

1. Street names will be easy to pronounce and easily recognizable in emergency situations.

2. No street name may duplicate, in sound or pronunciation, any other roadway already in use, previously approved, or slated for use in the preliminary stages of a project application anywhere within Livingston County.

3. Streets that are an extension of an already existing street shall maintain that street name.

4. No special characters in road names such as hyphens, apostrophes, or dashes will be allowed.

5. Use of frivolous or complicated words, or unconventional spellings will not be allowed.

6. Names that may be offensive (slang, double meanings, etc.) will not be allowed.

7. Names with the same theme (i.e., flowers, birds, trees) are suggested for naming streets in an entire subdivision or condominium development, asmeans of general identification.

8. Vanity street names that do not conform to the County address style will not be allowed.

9. No street name shall contain the words North, South, East, West, or any combination thereof. Directional compass points are used only as a prefix.

10. Streets shall not be named after any business that accesses the street.

Page 97: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

19

F. PREFIXES

Directional prefixes will be used only when necessary, such as for distinguishing regions of a continuous road traversing several municipalities from either a baseline or meridian. Secondary streets that cross a main road shall not use a directional. A street/road may have no more than one directional prefix. Acceptable prefixes are North, East, South, West.

G. SUFFIXES

Each approved street name shall require a street suffix. Only one street suffix will be allowed per street name. The street name shall not be allowed to use North, East, Southor West as a suffix. All street suffixes will be abbreviated in compliance with the United States Postal Service (USPS) Standards. If the last word of a street name is an acceptable suffix according to USPS Standards, then it will be used as a street suffix and abbreviated accordingly.

There are numerous suffixes to choose from, including but not limited to:

Avenue LandingBend LaneBoulevard MeadowsCove MountainDrive RidgeEstates ShoreGlens TrailHills ValleyLake View

The street suffixes listed below will carry the following designations:

Circle A thoroughfare that returns to the same origin point or to the same originating road.

Court A permanently closed road such as a cul-de-sac.

When there is an extension of a cul-de-sac it shall be required the extension continue with the existing name.

New developments should avoid using the suffix Court for any cul-de-sac that has the future option to be extended.

Loop A thoroughfare that returns to the same originating road (the suffixCircle may also be used in this situation).

Road A secondary thoroughfare that is accessible from both its origin and terminus. The suffix road is predominantly used for public county and state roads.

Page 98: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

20

Street A major thoroughfare accessible from both its origin and terminus. The suffix street is predominantly used within city/village limits.

H. POST-DIRECTIONALS

A directional shall only be used as a prefix. The street name shall not be allowed to useNorth, East, South or West at the end of the street name or as a suffix.

Page 99: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

21

SECTION 7

STREET NAME SIGNS

Guidelines for signs shall be dictated by the Michigan Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MMUTCD) prepared by the Michigan Department of Transportation in conjunction with the Michigan Department of State Police.

A. LOCATION OF SIGNS

All public and private roads in Livingston County shall be identified by a Street Name sign and shall display the proper street name. Street Name signs shall be installed at all intersections.

B. DESCRIPTION OF STREET NAME SIGNS

1. SIGN COLOR

The Street Name sign shall be retro-reflective or illuminated to show the same shape and similar color both day and night. The legend and background shall be of contrasting colors. Street Name signs should have a white legend on a green background. A border, if used, should be the same color as the legend (Section 2D.38 MMUTCD).

2. SIGN HEIGHT

In business districts Street Name signs should provide a minimum of seven (7) feet of clearance between the top of the curb and the bottom of the sign. In rural areas signs should provide a minimum of five (5) feet of clearance between the bottom of the sign and the traveled roadway (Section 2A.18 MMUTCD). It is recommended rural street signs have a clearance of nine (9) feet to prevent vandalism.

3. SIGN LETTERING

Lettering on ground-mounted Street Name signs should be at least six inches in capital letters, or six inches (6 in) upper case letters with four-and-a-half inch (4.5 in) lower-case letters (Section 2D.38 MMUTCD).

On multi-lane streets with speed limits greater than 40 mph, the lettering on ground-mounted Street Name signs should be at least eight inches (8 in) high in capital letters or eight inches (8 in) upper case letters with sixinch (6 in) lower-case letters (Section 2D.38 MMUTCD).

For local roads with speed limits of 25 mph or less, the lettering height may be a minimum of four inches (4 in) (Section 2D.38 MMUTCD).

Page 100: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

22

Supplementary lettering to indicate type of street (e.g., Street, Avenue, Road, etc.) or the section of the City (such as NW) may be in smaller lettering, at least three (3) inches high. Conventional abbreviations (see Section 1A.14 MMUTCD) may be used except for the street name itself (Section 2D.38 MMUTCD).

4. SIGN PLACEMENT

In business districts and on principal arterials, Street Name signs should be placed at least on diagonally opposite corners. In residential areas, at leastone Street Name sign should be mounted at each intersection. Signs naming both streets should be erected at each intersection. They should be mounted with their faces parallel to the streets they name (Section 2D.38MMUTCD).

C. STREET SIGN INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE

1. PUBLIC ROADS

The applicable public agency is responsible for all street signs on streets/roads designated as public.

2. PRIVATE ROADS

The property owners along private roads are responsible for installing street signs at the intersections of all private and public streets in compliance with this policy.

Page 101: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

23

SECTION 8

DEFINITIONS

APARTMENT BUILDING

A single building comprised of three or more dwelling units used as rental property.

CONDOMINIUM

A building in which each individual unit is held in separate private ownership and all floor space, facilities and outdoor areas used in common by all tenants are owned, administered and maintained by a corporation created pursuant to the provisions of the appropriate statute.

An individual dwelling unit under individual ownership in a multiple unit development with common elements in which are owned by the owners on a proportional, undivided basis.

DUPLEX RESIDENCE

A building divided into two dwelling units each of which has an independent entrance either directly or through a common vestibule.

MANUFACTURED HOMES

A detached residential dwelling unit designed, after fabrication, for transportation on streets or highways on its own wheels or on flatbed or other trailers, and arriving at the site where it is to be occupied as a dwelling, complete and ready for occupancy except for minor and incidental unpacking and assembly operations, location on jacks or other temporary or permanent foundations.

SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE

A dwelling meant for occupation by a single family.

STRIP COMMERCIAL BUILDING

A single building with multiple accesses leased by square footage and allows interior business to vary in size.

TOWNHOUSES

A building comprised of more than one narrow, multi-story unit. Each unit has its own entrance. A townhouse may be part of an apartment building or a condominium.

Page 102: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

24

APPENDIX A

Page 103: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

25

Page 104: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

MemorandumTo:

Public Safety CommitteeFinance CommitteeLivingston County Board of Commissioners

cc:

From: Paul McNamara, IT Director

Donald Arbic, Central Dispatch Director

Date: January 5, 2012

Re: Approval of Amendments to Street Naming and Addressing Policy

In April 2002 the Board of Commissioners approved the first Livingston County Street Naming and Addressing Policy to promote the standardization of procedures for street naming and address issuance throughout the County. The policy was last reviewed and updated in 2005. In order to keep the Policy up-to-date and actively used, the need to review and make appropriate changes is evident. Therefore, the Address Policy Committee, consisting of representatives from GIS, Central Dispatch, the Road Commission and local units that assign their own addresses, has reviewed the existing policy and proposed changes.

Highlights of the changes included in the newly revised policy include:

Indicated Unadilla Township issues their own addresses

Added the address grid for each village

Require developers to name access streets that may not have any addresses assigned

Prevent business names from being used as street names (i.e. Thermofil Way was changed after the business changed ownership)

Expanded section to describe changing a street name (subdivision/condo vs. unplatted private road vs. public road)

Extended address & street name corrections to 60 days

Removed appeal section

Added a Suspension of Process section to give residents additional time to comply with an address correction

LIVINGSTON COUNTY, MICHIGAN911 CENTRAL DISPATCH/

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT

300 S. Highlander Way, Howell, Michigan 48843Phone 517.546.4620 Fax 517.546.5008

Web Site: co.livingston.mi.us

Page 105: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

RESOLUTION NO:

LIVINGSTON COUNTY DATE:

RESOLUTION TO ESTABLISH A LIVINGSTON COUNTY ADDRESSING

ORDINANCE – PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE, FINANCE COMMITTEE, BOARD

OF COMMISSIONERS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 9-1-1 CENTRAL

DISPATCH

WHEREAS, the Livingston County Board of Commissioners approved the Livingston County Street Naming and Addressing Policy in 2002 and amended the policy in 2005 and 2011; and,

WHEREAS, the Information Technology and Central Dispatch/Emergency Management Departments recognize the need to incorporate said policy as an enforceable ordinance to protect public health and safety, provide more efficient delivery of County services, ensure uniform application and facilitate U.S. mail and parcel delivery in Livingston County; and,

WHEREAS, the Address Policy Committee, made up of representatives from IT/GIS, Central Dispatch and the Road Commission, with input from local units of government and consultation with County Civil Counsel, developed the Livingston County Addressing Ordinance; and,

WHEREAS, the ordinance will standardize County-wide addressing and street naming procedures, designate officials to administer the ordinance, designate violations to be municipal civil infractions, and eliminate addressing confusion amongst all communities within Livingston County.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED the Livingston County Board of Commissioners

hereby adopts the attached Addressing Ordinance.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Clerk be authorized to sign said ordinance

after final review and approval of civil counsel.

# # #

MOVED:SECONDED:CARRIED:

Page 106: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

LIVINGSTON COUNTY, MICHIGAN

Ordinance No. ____

LIVINGSTON COUNTYADDRESSING ORDINANCE

AN ORDINANCE TO PROVIDE FOR THE NAMING OF STREETS AND NUMERIC ADDRESSING OF BUILDINGS, POSTING OF STREET SIGNS, AND DISPLAY OF

ADDRESS NUMBERS; TO DESIGNATE AUTHORIZED LOCAL OFFICIALS RESPONSIBLE TO ADMINISTER THE ADDRESSING ORDINANCE AND

REGULATIONS AND TO ENFORCE VIOLATIONS; TO DESIGNATE VIOLATIONS TO BE MUNICIPAL CIVIL INFRACTIONS; TO ADOPT A SCHEDULE OF FINES; TO

PLACE THE MUNICIPAL CIVIL INFRACTIONS VIOLATIONS BUREAU AT THE GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT; TO

ADOPT A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND TO PROVIDE AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

THE COUNTY OF LIVINGSTON ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. PURPOSE, SCOPE, DEFINITIONS AND ADMINISTRATION

A. Purpose

The purpose of this Ordinance is to establish a system of assigning and correcting addresses in Livingston County to facilitate the locating of structures in order to protect the public health and safety by prompting reduced response times by police, fire, ambulance, and other emergency services; to provide for more efficient delivery of County services, such as building inspections, soil evaluations, health inspections, property tax administration, property mapping, and other county affairs; and to provide for efficient U.S. mail and parcel delivery in Livingston County.

B. Scope

This Ordinance shall be effective and enforceable throughout Livingston County,except in the jurisdiction of those cities, villages, or townships that have previously enacted or subsequently enact an ordinance that addresses the general subject matter of this ordinance.

C. Definitions

1. “Address” means the combination of a set of numbers, a street prefix (i.e., N., S., E., or W., if applicable), a street name, a street suffix (e.g., Ave., Rd., St., Dr., Cir., or Ct.), a street post-directional (i.e., N., S., E., or W., if applicable), an apartment or suite designation if applicable, and an apartment or suite number if applicable.

Page 107: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

2. “Address number” means a set of numbers based upon the formula that begins at 0 base points along the East-West baseline and North-South meridian as assigned by the Addressing Official as part of an address. Numbering systems currently in effect in incorporated and unincorporated villages would be changed or modified only at the request of local units of government or to the extent necessary to correct numbering errors found during the process of mapping Livingston County.

3. “Street” or “road” means any vehicular way which is a state, county, or municipal roadway, or is shown on an approved and recorded subdivision plat or site plan, or is a private road that serves more than two existing lots.

4. “Principal structure” shall include but not be limited to: residential buildings, office buildings, commercial buildings, industrial buildings, public buildings, utility structures, and buildings used for storage, including, but not limited to garages, pole barns, utility meters andother accessory structures.

D. Administration

The Director of the Livingston County Information Technology Department shall appoint a person from that department to be the County Addressing Official. The Addressing Official shall have overall responsibility for administration and coordination of this Ordinance and the Livingston County Street Naming and Addressing Policy, including enforcement.

SECTION 2. STREET NAMES AND ADDRESSING

A. Incorporation of Policy

The County Addressing Official shall coordinate all numeric addressing, including the assignment of numeric address corrections that require naming of easements and renaming of private roads. and The Livingston County Road Commission shall be responsible for coordinating new road names with developers and property ownersnaming, renaming, and sign identification of all county roads streets within the County, pursuant to the Livingston County Street Naming and Addressing Policy as adopted and from time to time amended by Resolution of the County Board of Commissioners, which Policy is incorporated by reference.

B. Display of Address

The property owners or residents of all principal structures on each parcel of land are required to display an address number in the manner prescribed in the Livingston County Street Naming and Addressing Policy, incorporated by reference. In the event an address number has been corrected by administrative action of the Addressing

Page 108: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

Official, the property owner or resident shall so notify the U.S. Postal Service, and display the new correct address, within 60 days of receipt of a Notice of Address Correction.

C. Road Names

The provisions of this Ordinance shall apply to both public and private roads. Every road, public or private, that exists in Livingston County on or after the effective date of this ordinance shall be posted or signed with, a name that shall be registered with and approved by the Livingston County Road Commission in the manner prescribed in the Livingston County Street Naming and Addressing Policy, incorporated by reference. The Livingston County Road Commission Addressing Official shall be the sole final authority for street or road naming. The Livingston County Road Commission shall maintain the county-wide repository of street names.

D. Posting of Street Signs

The property owners or residents with addresses on a private road shall erect and maintain a suitable sign identifying the private road at the intersection of the private road and the adjoining public road in the manner prescribed in the Livingston County Street Naming and Addressing Policy, incorporated by reference.

E. Assigned Number and Address Corrections

Existing, or previously assigned or displayed address numbers, public road and private road names that do not comply with this Ordinance and the Livingston County Street Naming and Addressing Policy, incorporated by reference, may be correctedeither (1) at the request of the property owner(s) or his/her agent(s), but only upon approval of the Addressing Official, or (2) such change may be initiated by the County Addressing Official. When a correction is initiated by the Addressing Official, the property owner(s) shall be notified, in writing, that a new number has been assigned. Address corrections become effective upon receipt of Notice of Address Correction. A resident who does not put a change of address in with the United States Postal Serviceand who does not display the new correct address within 60 days after receiving the Notice of Address Correction will be in violation of this ordinance and subject to penalty as provided by Ordinance.

SECTION 3. DESIGNATION OF VIOLATIONS OF THIS ORDINANCE AS MUNICIPAL CIVIL INFRACTIONS.

A. Pursuant to the authority set forth in 1851 PA 156, as amended, being MCL 46.11(j), and Chapter 87 of 1961 PA 236, as amended, being MCL 600.8701 et seq., a violation of any provision of this Ordinance shall be a municipal civil infraction.

Page 109: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

B. The sanction for any violation of this Ordinance, which is a municipal civil infraction, shall be a civil fine as provided herein, plus any cost, damages, expenses and other sanctions, as authorized under Chapter 87 of 1961 PA 236, as amended, and other applicable laws.

C. The County Addressing Official, deputies of the Livingston County Sheriff, and other persons specifically designated by the Director of the Livingston County Information Technology Department, are the County officials authorized to issue municipal civil infraction citations and municipal civil infraction violation notices for violations of this Ordinance

D. In addition to enforcement of violations of this Ordinance as municipal civil infractions, enforcement of violations of this Ordinance may be accomplished by civil action, along with any other remedies provided by law. Violation of this Ordinance is hereby declared a nuisance, per se, and adjudication of responsibility for a municipal civil infraction violation of this Ordinance shall not preclude other civil proceedings to abate such nuisance.

E. Each day a violation exists constitutes a separate infraction.

SECTION 4. SCHEDULE OF FINES FOR VIOLATIONS

A. Fines to be established by County Board Resolution

The County Board of Commissioners shall by Resolution adopt a schedule of fines for violations of this Ordinance, which may be amended by subsequent Resolution. For purposes of establishing an initial schedule of fines, the following schedule is adopted.

B. Fines for Municipal Civil Infraction Citations

1. A person, corporation or firm who violates any provision of this Ordinance and is found responsible at the district court for a municipal civil infraction citation, shall pay a civil fine of not less that $75.00 nor more than $500.00, plus costs and other sanctions, for each infraction.

2. Repeat offenses shall be subject to increased fines as set forth below. As used in this subsection, “repeat offense,” means a second (or any subsequent) municipal civil infraction violation of the same requirement or provision of this Ordinance, committed by a corporation, person or firm within any 24-month period and (b) for which the person admits responsibility or is determined to be responsible. The increased fine for a repeat offense shall be as

Page 110: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

follows:

(i) The fine for any offense that is a repeat offense shall be no less than $200.00 plus costs and other sanctions.

(ii) The fine for any offense that is a second repeat offense shall be no less than $300.00 plus costs and other sanctions.

(iii) The fine for any offense that is a third or subsequent repeat offense shall be no less than $500.00 plus costs and other sanctions.

C. Fines for Violation Notices

A person, corporation or firm who, as a result of violating any provision of this Ordinance receives a municipal civil infraction violation notice, upon a determination of responsibility thereon, shall pay an initial civil fine at the Livingston County Municipal Civil Infractions Violations Bureau of $50.00.

1. In the case of another offense within one year of the date of the initial infraction, the civil fine shall be $75.00. (This shall be known as the second offense.)

2. In the case of another offense within one year of the date of the second offense, the civil fine shall be $150.00. (This shall be known as the third offense.)

3. In the case of another offense within one year of the date of the third offense, the civil fine shall be $500.00. (This shall be known as the fourth offense.) All subsequent offenses shall be subject to a civil fine of $500.00.

SECTION 5. ESTABLISHMENT OF MUNICIPAL CIVIL INFRACTIONS VIOLATIONS BUREAU

The Municipal Civil Infraction Violations Bureau, for disposition of violation notices issued under this Ordinance, shall be located at the Livingston County Geographic Information Systems Management Division, 304 E. Grand River Avenue, Suite 101, Howell, MI 48843.

SECTION 6. REPEALER.

All ordinances in conflict are repealed only to the extent necessary to give this ordinance full force and effect.

SECTION 7. SEVERABILITY.

Page 111: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

The various parts, sections and clauses of this ordinance, inclusive of the Policy incorporated by reference, are hereby declared to be severable. Should any part, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance be found invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by any court of competent jurisdiction, any such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance.

SECTION 8. SAVINGS CLAUSE.

All proceedings pending and all rights and liabilities existing, acquired or incurred at the time this ordinance takes effect are saved and may be consummated according to the law in force when they were commenced.

SECTION 9. EFFECTIVE DATE.

The provisions of this ordinance are ordered to take effect after publication.

I, Margaret Dunleavy, Livingston County Clerk, certify that this ordinance was adopted by the Livingston County Board of Commissioners and published on _____________________________.

_______________________________Margaret DunleavyLivingston County Clerk

Approved as to form:COHL, STOKER & TOSKEY, P.C.

_____________________________Timothy M. Perrone

N:\Client\Livingston\ordinances\addressing ordinance.wpd

Page 112: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

MemorandumTo:

Public Safety CommitteeFinance CommitteeLivingston County Board of Commissioners

cc:

From:Paul McNamara, IT DirectorDonald Arbic, Central Dispatch Director

Date: January 10, 2012

Re: Establish Addressing Ordinance

Addresses issued by IT/GIS, either as a new address or a correction, include a house number and street name. The process for determining an address was standardized in April 2002 when the Board of Commissioners first approved the Livingston County Street Naming and Addressing Policy. The policy was amended in 2005 and additional changes have been proposed in a separate resolution submitted along with the Addressing Ordinance.

It is apparent after working within the guidelines established in the Street Naming and Addressing Policy for almost 10 years the policy must be incorporated as a county ordinance to ensure consistent application. While the policy has been very useful in providing a standard set of procedures, it has no enforcement provision, making it impossible to ensure county residents use the address issued by the Information Technology Department/GIS Division. Correct and uniform addressing is vital for efficient delivery of county services including, but not limited to, public safety, building inspections, soil evaluations, and health inspections.

LIVINGSTON COUNTY, MICHIGAN911 CENTRAL DISPATCH/

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT

300 S. Highlander Way, Howell, Michigan 48843Phone 517.546.4620 Fax 517.546.5008

Web Site: co.livingston.mi.us

Page 113: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

RESOLUTION NO:

LIVINGSTON COUNTY DATE:

RESOLUTION TO APPROVE AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT

BETWEEN LIVINGSTON COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE LIVINGSTON COUNTY

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT AND THE VILLAGE OF

PINCKNEY – Information Technology

WHEREAS, the Village of Pinckney has been added to the fiber optic network owned by the County; and

WHEREAS, the Village established the connection for the purpose of obtaining services of the Livingston County IT Department; and

WHEREAS, it has been determined that the County’s existing computer infrastructure and IT Department’s staffing can add the Village to the County’s system without need for additional hardware or software, or increase in staff; and

WHEREAS, the Village will pay for all engineering and technical services to connect their internal network to the County’s system; and

WHEREAS, the Village has agreed to sign a two year agreement for IT WAN and Internet connectivity for the monthly rate of $50.00.

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Livingston County Board of Commissioners

hereby approved entering into an Intergovernmental Agreement between the

Livingston County Information Technology Department and the Village of

Pinckney for IT services and Internet connectivity for a two year period at the rate

of $50.00 per month.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairman of the Livingston County Board of

Commissioners be authorized to sign any necessary documents pertinent to this

agreement upon review of Civil Counsel.

# # #

MOVED:SECONDED:CARRIED:

Page 114: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

Memorandum

To: Livingston County Board of Commissioners

From: Paul McNamara

Date: 1/24/2012

Re: Resolution for an Inter-government Agreement with the

Village of Pinckney

Attached for your consideration is an Intergovernmental Agreement between Livingston County Information Technology Department and the Village of Pinckney.

The village offices and the Pinckney Police department are located in the same building in the village. The Pinckney Police department was connected to the Livingston County Public Safety System through the recently completed fiber optic project. Recently the village president asked if it would be possible for the village to use the same fiber connection for the purpose of obtaining technology services from Livingston County IT.

After reviewing the connection and the fiber strands available it was determined that the requested connection could be made without requiring any additional equipment or software. The changes to the infrastructure can be completed by technical staff in less than four hours. The village has agreed to pay for the technician’s time to accomplish the transition.

The village will be using the system for access to the Wide Area Network and Internet connectivity. They have also agreed to a two year contract at a rate of $50 per month.

If you have any questions concerning the agreement please contact me.

LIVINGSTON COUNTY, MICHIGANDEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

304 E. Grand River Ave., Howell, MI 48843Phone 517 548-3230 Fax 517 545-9608

Web Site: co.livingston.mi.us

Page 115: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

RESOLUTION NO:

LIVINGSTON COUNTY DATE:

RESOLUTION TO APPROVE AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT

BETWEEN LIVINGSTON COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE LIVINGSTON COUNTY

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT AND THE CITY OF BRIGHTON

AND THE CITY OF HOWELL – Information Technology

WHEREAS, the City of Brighton and the City of Howell have been added to the fiber optic network owned by the County; and

WHEREAS, the Cities have requested that the County IT build a VPN connection for the purpose of sharing IT services; and

WHEREAS, it has been determined that the County’s existing computer infrastructure and IT Department’s staffing can build and maintain the connection for the Cities without need for additional hardware or software, or increase in staff; and

WHEREAS, the Cities will pay for all engineering and technical services to connect their internal networks to the County’s system; and

WHEREAS, the Cities have agreed to an annual rate of $3,000.00 for the maintenance of the VPN connection and infrastructure connectivity.

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Livingston County Board of Commissioners

hereby approved entering into an Intergovernmental Agreement between the Livingston

County Information Technology Department and the City of Brighton and the City of

Howell for a VPN and infrastructure connection at the rate of $3,000.00 annually.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairman of the Livingston County Board of

Commissioners be authorized to sign any necessary documents pertinent to this

agreement upon review of Civil Counsel.

# # #

MOVED:

SECONDED:

CARRIED:

Page 116: 1-25-12 Finance WEB · innovations grant/finance/full board 20 ... and addressing policy – public safety committee, finance committee, board of commissioners, information technology

MEMORANDUM

TO: Livingston County Board of Commissioners

FROM: Paul McNamara, IT Director

DATE: January 24, 2012

SUBJECT: Intergovernmental Agreement with City of Howell and the City of Brighton

Attached for your consideration is an Intergovernmental Agreement between Livingston County Information Technology Department and the City of Howell and the City of Brighton.

The City of Brighton was connected to the Livingston County fiber network through the recently completed phase of the fiber optic project and the City of Howell was connected to the County fiber network during the initial fiber project. Both cities approached County IT and requested that they be linked together through a Virtual Private Network (VPN) utilizing the fiber network to facilitate the consolidation of their IT resources and applications.

After reviewing the connection and the fiber strands available it was determined that the requested connection could be made without requiring any additional equipment or software. The changes to the infrastructure can be completed by technical staff in less than 16 hours. The cities have agreed to pay for the technician’s time to accomplish the transition. The cities have also agreed to pay a month fee to the County for the maintenance and continued use of the network.

If you have any questions concerning the agreement please contact me.